CANADIAN TOY RECALL CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of February 9, Between

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CANADIAN TOY RECALL CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of February 9, Between"

Transcription

1 CANADIAN TOY RECALL CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of February 9, 2011 Between ROSEMARY TRAINOR, NANCY CAIRNS, RENAE SHARP, SEAN CLOSE, LISA WIGGINS, GILLES ROBINEAU, PAULA PRICE AND KEVIN TRAVIS (the Plaintiffs ) and MATTEL, INC., MATTEL CANADA INC. AND FISHER-PRICE, INC. ( Mattel )

2 CANADIAN TOY RECALL CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS WHEREAS, in 2006 and 2007, Mattel voluntarily recalled and/or acted to accept returns by consumers of Recalled Toys; WHEREAS, following the announcement of the Recalls in August 2007, the Plaintiffs commenced the Proceedings against Mattel in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and New Brunswick, arising out of the Defendants sale, manufacture, distribution, or marketing of the Recalled Toys and alleging claims for damages; WHEREAS, Mattel has denied and continues to deny the Plaintiffs allegations and claims in the Proceedings, and has denied any wrongdoing or liability to the Plaintiffs; WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs and Class Counsel have reviewed and fully understand the terms of this Settlement Agreement and, based on their analyses of the facts and law applicable to the Plaintiffs' claims, and having regard to the burdens and expense in prosecuting the Proceedings, including the risks and uncertainties associated with trials and appeals, the Plaintiffs and Class Counsel have concluded that this Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable and in the best interests of the Plaintiffs and the classes they seek to represent; WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs, Class Counsel and Mattel agree that neither this Settlement Agreement nor any statement made in the negotiation thereof shall be deemed or construed to be an admission by or evidence against Mattel or evidence of the truth of any of the Plaintiffs allegations against Mattel, which Mattel expressly denies; WHEREAS, although Mattel denies the Plaintiffs allegations in the Proceedings, denies any wrongdoing of any kind, and believes that the Proceedings are without merit, Mattel also has taken into account the uncertainty, risk, and delay inherent in litigation and agreed to enter into the Agreement in order to achieve a final and nation-wide resolution of all claims that were or could have been asserted against it by the Plaintiffs in the Proceedings and to avoid further litigation expense and inconvenience, and to remove the distraction of burdensome and protracted litigation; WHEREAS, the Plaintiffs and Mattel intend and desire to compromise, resolve, dismiss and release all allegations and claims for damages or other relief relating to the Recalled Toys that are set forth in the Proceedings and that have been or could have been brought against any Defendants in the Proceedings and in any action filed, litigation pending or claim pursued by any person or entity who is a member of a Settlement Class, except for individual claims of personal injury; WHEREAS, the Parties therefore wish to, and hereby do, finally resolve on a national basis, without admission of liability, all of the Proceedings as against the Defendants;

3 - 2 - WHEREAS, for the purposes of settlement only and contingent on approvals by the Settlement Courts as provided for in this Settlement Agreement, the Parties have consented to certification or authorization of the Settlement Proceedings as class proceedings and have consented to a Settlement Class and a Common Issue in each of the Settlement Proceedings; and WHEREAS, the Representative Plaintiffs assert that they are adequate class representatives for the Settlement Classes and will seek to be appointed representative plaintiffs in their respective Settlement Proceedings. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, agreements and releases set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, it is agreed by the Parties that the Proceedings be settled and/or dismissed on the merits with prejudice and without costs as to the Plaintiffs, the classes they seek to represent and Mattel, subject to the approval of the Settlement Courts, on the following terms and conditions: A. DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this Settlement Agreement only, including the Recitals and Exhibits hereto: (1) Agreement or Settlement Agreement means this Settlement Agreement, including the recitals and all Exhibits attached hereto. (2) Alberta Proceeding means the proceeding commenced by the Plaintiff, Nancy Cairns, in the Court of Queen s Bench of Alberta, Court File no , in Calgary. (3) Approval Motion shall mean the motion or application brought in each Settlement Proceeding before the Settlement Court seeking court approval of the Settlement and certification or authorization of the Settlement Proceeding as a class proceeding for settlement purposes as provided for in Section C. (4) BC Proceeding means the proceeding commenced by the Plaintiff, Rosemary Trainor, in the BC Court, Court File no /4, in Victoria. (5) BC Court means the Supreme Court of British Columbia. (6) BC Settlement Class means all Persons in British Columbia, except Excluded Persons, who: (i) purchased or acquired (including by gift) a new Recalled Toy for or on behalf of themselves or a minor child over whom they have custody and control as a parent or guardian, or to be given as a gift to another Person; or (ii) are the parent or guardian of a minor child who purchased or acquired (including by gift) a new Recalled Toy.

4 - 3 - (7) Claim means a request for relief pursuant to Sections D.1. and/or D.2. of this Agreement submitted by a Settlement Class Member on a Claim Form filed with the Claims Administrator in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. (8) Claim Form means the paper, electronic or online form to be used by Settlement Class Members for filing Claims with the Claims Administrator. The proposed Claim Form is subject to Settlement Court approval and attached hereto as Exhibit G. (9) Claims Administration Expenses means the expenses incurred by the Claims Administrator in administering the Notice Program and processing all Claims by Settlement Class Members. (10) Claims Administrator means Gilardi & Co., LLC, who the Parties have agreed will administer the Notice Program and Claims process, and oversee the distribution of Settlement Benefits to Settlement Class Members in accordance with the terms of this Settlement Agreement, subject to the approval of the Settlement Courts. (11) Claims Deadline means the date by which all Claim Forms must be postmarked or received by the Claims Administrator to be considered timely. The Claims Deadline shall be clearly set forth in the Final Orders, on the Claims Administrator s dedicated website, and the front page of the Claim Form. (12) Class Counsel means the law firm of Merchant Law Group LLP. (13) Class Counsel Fees means such funds as may be awarded by the Settlement Courts to Class Counsel to compensate them in the Proceedings for their fees and expenses in connection therewith, including the fees, disbursements, costs, interest, GST, HST, PST and other applicable taxes or charges of Class Counsel, as described more particularly in Section H.1. of this Agreement. (14) Common Issue in each Settlement Proceeding means: Were the Defendants, or any of them, negligent in the manufacture, distribution, sale and/or recall of the Recalled Toys? (15) Defendants means Mattel and other entities named as defendants in the Proceedings. (16) Effective Date means the date five (5) business days after the earliest date on which there are Final Orders from all three Settlement Courts approving this Settlement Agreement.

5 - 4 - (17) Excluded Persons means: (a) all Persons who purchased or acquired Recalled Toy(s) for resale; (b) all Defendants and their affiliated entities, legal representatives, successors and assigns; and (c) with respect to the Quebec Settlement Class only, any legal person established for a private interest, partnership or association which has had under its control more than 50 persons bound to it by a contract of employment at any time after October 8, (18) Exhibits means the exhibits attached to this Settlement Agreement. (19) FARC means Le fonds d'aide aux recours collectives administered by the province of Quebec. (20) Final Order means a final judgment or final approval order entered by a Settlement Court on an Approval Motion, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit H hereto, certifying or authorizing a Settlement Proceeding as a class proceeding for settlement purposes and approving this Settlement Agreement, once the time to appeal such judgment or order (or the time to seek leave to appeal such judgment or order) has expired without any appeal or motion seeking leave to appeal being taken, or if an appeal or motion for leave to appeal from the judgment or order is taken, once there has been affirmation of such final judgment or approval order in its entirety, without modification, upon a final disposition of all appeals. Notwithstanding the forgoing, the Parties agree that if an Approval Motion is not opposed by any person and no appeal or motion for leave to appeal is taken in respect of such Approval Motion, the final judgment or final approval order entered by a Settlement Court on such Approval Motion shall become a Final Order after the expiry of thirty (30) days from the date such order or judgement is entered. (21) Hearing Notice means the notice to the proposed Settlement Classes providing notice of the Approval Motions as provided in Section G.1. herein, substantially in the form attached as Exhibit B hereto. (22) Incentive Award means the payment approved by the Settlement Courts and paid by Mattel to the Plaintiffs for efforts undertaken by them on behalf of the Settlement Class Members, as provided in Section H.2. herein. (23) Manitoba Proceeding means the proceeding commenced by the Plaintiff, Sean Close, in the Court of Queen s Bench of Manitoba, Court File no. CI , in Winnipeg. (24) Mattel means Mattel, Inc., Mattel Canada Inc. and Fisher-Price, Inc. and all of their direct and indirect Canadian and foreign subsidiaries, predecessors, successors, parents, affiliates and assigns, that manufactured, contracted with

6 - 5 - Vendors to manufacture, distributed, marketed, offered for sale, donated and/or sold Recalled Toys. (25) Mattel s Counsel means the law firm of Ogilvy Renault LLP. (26) NACHRI means the National Association of Children s Hospitals and Related Institutions. (27) New Brunswick Proceeding means the proceeding commenced by the Plaintiff, Kevin Travis, in the Court of Queen s Bench of New Brunswick, Court File no. MC063507, in Moncton. (28) Notice Date means the date upon which the Settlement Notice is first published or disseminated to the Settlement Classes. (29) Notice Expenses means the reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with preparing, printing, mailing, disseminating, posting, ing, internet hosting and publishing the Hearing Notice and Settlement Notice, and all other aspects of administering the Notice Program. (30) Notice Program means the plan approved by the Settlement Courts for disseminating the Hearing Notice and Settlement Notice directly and by publication to the members of the Settlement Class, substantially in the manner provided for in the Dissemination Plans attached as Exhibits C and F hereto. (31) Ontario Proceeding means the proceeding brought by the Plaintiffs, Lisa Wiggins and Gilles Robineau, in the Ontario Court, Court File no. CV CP, in Brampton. (32) Ontario Court means the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. (33) Ontario Settlement Class means all Persons in Canada, except Excluded Persons and Persons who are members of the Quebec Settlement Class or the BC Settlement Class, who: (i) purchased or acquired (including by gift) a new Recalled Toy for or on behalf of themselves or a minor child over whom they have custody and control as a parent or guardian, or to be given as a gift to another Person; or (ii) are the parent or guardian of a minor child who purchased or acquired (including by gift) a new Recalled Toy. (34) Opt-Out Deadline means the date which is ninety (90) days after the Notice Date, or such other date as approved by Settlement Courts.

7 - 6 - (35) Other Actions means actions or proceedings, other than the Proceedings, relating to Released Claims commenced by a Settlement Class Member either before or after the Effective Date. (36) Other Proceedings means the Alberta Proceeding, the Saskatchewan Proceeding, the Manitoba Proceeding and the New Brunswick Proceeding. (37) Party or Parties means the parties to this Agreement, i.e., the Plaintiffs and/or Mattel. (38) Person means any adult individual or minor child or any corporation, trust, partnership, limited liability company or other legal entity, and their respective successors or assigns. (39) Plaintiffs means the individuals named as plaintiffs in the Proceedings: Rosemary Trainor, Nancy Cairns, Renae Sharp, Sean Close, Lisa Wiggins, Gilles Robineau, Paula Price and Kevin Travis. (40) Proceedings means the BC Proceeding, the Alberta Proceeding, the Saskatchewan Proceeding, the Manitoba Proceeding, the Ontario Proceeding, the Quebec Proceeding and the New Brunswick Proceeding. (41) Proof of Purchase means documentation from a third-party commercial source reasonably establishing the fact of purchase of a Recalled Toy(s). (42) Quebec Court means the Superior Court of Quebec. (43) Quebec Proceeding means the proceeding commenced by the Plaintiff, Paula Price, in the Quebec Court, Court File no , in Montreal. (44) Quebec Settlement Class means all Persons in Quebec, except Excluded Persons, who: (i) purchased or acquired (including by gift) a new Recalled Toy for or on behalf of themselves or a minor child over whom they have custody and control as a parent or guardian, or to be given as a gift to another Person; or (ii) are the parent or guardian of a minor child who purchased or acquired (including by gift) a new Recalled Toy. (45) Recalls means the recall of Mattel toy products on November 21, 2006, August 2, 2007, August 14, 2007, September 4, 2007, and October 25, 2007, as well as the withdrawal of certain products from the market in December (46) Recall Price(s) means the price(s) for Recalled Toys set forth in the notices of the Recalls identified in Exhibit A, which prices include an estimated amount intended to compensate Settlement Class Members for taxes (including

8 - 7 - PST, GST and/or HST) paid at the time of the original purchase of a Recalled Toy. (47) Recall Voucher means a voucher received by a consumer in accordance with the terms of one of the Recalls. (48) Recalled Toy(s) means those toy products made by Mattel or for Mattel by a Vendor, sold in Canada, and subject to the Recalls as identified more particularly in the attached Exhibit A. (49) Released Claims means any and all manner of claims, demands, actions, suits, causes of action, whether class, individual or otherwise in nature, whether personal or subrogated, damages whenever incurred, liabilities of any nature whatsoever, including interest, costs, expenses, penalties, and lawyers' fees, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, in law, under statute or in equity, that the Releasors, or any of them, whether directly, indirectly, derivatively, or in any other capacity, ever had, now have, or hereafter can, shall, or may have, relating in any way to any conduct anywhere, from the beginning of time to the date hereof, in respect of the design, sale, marketing, advertising, manufacture, distribution, donation, purchase, recall, withdrawal from sale, possession, handling, ingestion, exposure, touching or contact of any kind, or use of a Recalled Toy or relating to any conduct alleged (or which could have been alleged) in the Proceedings including, without limitation, any such claims that have been asserted or could have been asserted, whether in Canada or elsewhere, as a result of the purchase of Recalled Toys. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the term Released Claims does not include an individual claim for personal injury of a Releasor claimed to have been caused by, or related to, the Recalled Toys (including, without limitation, individual claims for testing, medical monitoring, or medical treatment, whether asserted as a claim for damages or a remedy for a claim); provided, however, that the cost of any lead testing of a minor child that is reimbursed by Mattel to a Settlement Class Member pursuant to a Claim submitted under Section D.2. of this Agreement shall be included in the term Released Claims. (50) Releasees means the Defendants, including Mattel, and any entity that manufactured, tested, inspected, audited, certified, purchased, distributed, licensed, transported, marketed, advertised, donated, promoted, sold or offered for sale at wholesale or retail any Recalled Toy, or any part thereof, including all of their respective predecessors, successors, assigns, parents, subsidiaries, divisions, departments, and affiliates, and any and all of their past, present and future officers, directors, employees, stockholders, partners, agents, servants, successors, attorneys, insurers, representatives, licensees, licensors, customers, subrogees and assigns. It is expressly understood that, to the extent a Releasee is not a Party to the Agreement, all such Releasees are intended third party beneficiaries of the Agreement.

9 - 8 - (51) Releasors means, jointly and severally, individually and collectively, the Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class Members and their respective parents, minor children, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors, successors, heirs, executors, administrators, insurers and assigns. (52) Representative Plaintiffs means the Plaintiffs in the Settlement Proceedings: Rosemary Trainor, Lisa Wiggins, Gilles Robineau and Paula Price. (53) Saskatchewan Proceeding means the proceeding commenced by the Plaintiff, Renae Sharp, in the Saskatchewan Court of Queen s Bench, Court File no of 2007, in Regina. (54) Settlement means the terms and conditions of this Agreement. (55) Settlement Benefits means the monetary or other relief available to, or obtained by, Settlement Class Members pursuant to Sections D.1. and D.2. of this Agreement. (56) Settlement Class means the Ontario Settlement Class, the Quebec Settlement Class or the BC Settlement Class. (57) Settlement Class Member means a member of a Settlement Class who does not validly opt out of that Settlement Class in accordance with orders of the Settlement Courts. (58) Settlement Consideration means the consideration exchanged by and between Mattel and the Settlement Class, as set forth in this Agreement, including, without limitation, the Settlement Benefits provided for in Section D. herein. (59) Settlement Court means the Ontario Court, the Quebec Court or the BC Court. (60) Settlement Notice means the notice to the Settlement Classes advising of the approval of the Settlement by the Settlement Courts as provided in Section G.2. herein and includes the Short-Form Settlement Notice (substantially in the form attached as Exhibit D hereto), the Long-Form Settlement Notice (substantially in the form attached as Exhibit E hereto), and the Postcard Notice (substantially in the form attached as Exhibit I hereto). (61) Settlement Proceeding means the Ontario Proceeding, the Quebec Proceeding or the BC Proceeding. (62) SKU means Stock-Keeping Unit. (63) Vendor means a third party that manufactured for Mattel Recalled Toys sold at wholesale by Mattel.

10 - 9 - (64) Voucher means the document that Settlement Class Members may receive for relief under Sections D.1.(b)-D.1.(d) herein and that will entitle the Person presenting such Voucher to a participating retailer to purchase products manufactured by or for Mattel. B. FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES ONLY 1. No Admission of Liability Whether or not this Settlement Agreement is terminated, this Settlement Agreement and anything contained herein, and any and all negotiations, documents, discussions and proceedings associated with this Settlement Agreement, and any action taken to carry out this Settlement Agreement, shall not be deemed, construed or interpreted to be an admission of any violation of any statute or law, or of any wrongdoing or liability by Mattel, or of the truth of any of the claims or allegations contained in the Proceedings or any other pleading filed by the Plaintiffs. 2. Agreement Not Evidence The Parties agree that, whether or not it is terminated, this Settlement Agreement and anything contained herein, and any and all negotiations, documents, discussions and proceedings associated with this Settlement Agreement, and any action taken to carry out this Settlement Agreement, shall not be referred to, offered as evidence or received in evidence in any pending or future civil, criminal or administrative action or proceeding, except in a proceeding to approve and/or enforce this Settlement Agreement, or to defend against the assertion of Released Claims, or as otherwise required by law. 3. Agreement Without Prejudice The Agreement is without prejudice to the rights of each Releasee and each Releasor to: (a) (b) (c) seek or oppose the certification of any of the Proceedings as class proceedings should the Settlement Agreement not be finally approved or implemented for any reason; seek or oppose certification in any other action (except to the extent barred by the Releases and/or other provisions of Section J of this Agreement); or use the certification of the Settlement Proceedings to oppose certification of any other proposed or existing class proceeding arising out of the Released Claims.

11 C. COOPERATION BY THE PARTIES AND COURT APPROVAL OF THE SETTLEMENT 1. Best Efforts The Parties shall use their best efforts to effectuate this Settlement and to obtain prompt approval of the Settlement by the Settlement Courts. 2. Motions for Approval (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) The Representative Plaintiffs in the Settlement Proceedings shall bring Approval Motions before the Settlement Courts for orders approving the Notices described in Section G. herein, certifying or authorizing each of the Settlement Proceedings commenced in their respective jurisdictions as a class proceeding (for settlement purposes) and approving this Settlement Agreement. The Parties agree that the Settlement Proceedings shall be certified or authorized as class proceedings solely for purposes of settlement of the Proceedings and the approval of this Settlement Agreement by the Settlement Courts. The Plaintiffs agree that, in the motions for certification or authorization of the Settlement Proceedings as class proceedings and for the approval of this Settlement Agreement, the only common issue that they will seek to define is the Common Issue and the only classes that they will assert are the Settlement Classes. The Representative Plaintiffs in the Quebec Proceeding and the BC Proceeding shall not proceed with a motion for certification or authorization of such Proceeding as a class proceeding (for settlement purposes) or for approval of the Settlement Agreement unless and until the Ontario Court has rendered a decision approving the Settlement Agreement in the Ontario Proceeding. The condition in this Subsection (C.2.(d)) may be waived or modified by agreement of Mattel s Counsel and Class Counsel. The Ontario Court s order certifying the Ontario Proceeding and approving the Settlement Agreement referred to in Section C.2.(a) shall be substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit H. The Quebec and BC Courts orders authorizing or certifying the Settlement Proceedings and approving the Settlement Agreement referred to in Section C.2.(a) shall be agreed upon by the Parties and shall mirror the substance and, where possible, the form of the Ontario order. This Settlement Agreement shall only become final on the Effective Date. 3. Pre-Motion Confidentiality Until the first of the Approval Motions required by Section C.2. is filed, the Parties shall keep all of the terms of the Settlement Agreement confidential and shall not disclose them without the

12 prior written consent of Mattel s Counsel and Class Counsel, as the case may be, except as required for the purposes of financial reporting or the preparation of financial records (including tax returns and financial statements) or as otherwise required by law. 4. Jurisdiction of the Settlement Courts The Parties agree that each of the Settlement Courts shall retain exclusive and continuing jurisdiction over the Settlement Proceeding commenced in its jurisdiction, the Parties thereto, the Settlement Class for that jurisdiction as defined herein, and the Claims Administrator, to interpret and enforce the terms, conditions, and obligations under this Settlement Agreement. D. SETTLEMENT CONSIDERATION 1. Monetary and Other Relief for Settlement Class Members In addition to all other Settlement Consideration set forth in the Agreement, Settlement Class Members who file Claims by the Claims Deadline and provide all required proof or documentation and comply with all other conditions and requirements specified herein, all as approved and validated by the Claims Administrator, shall have the right to obtain relief, as detailed herein. (a) For Settlement Class Members Who Returned Recalled Toys Pursuant To A Recall Settlement Class Members who returned Recalled Toy(s) to Mattel pursuant to a Recall prior to the Notice Date shall be entitled to receive a cheque from Mattel in an amount equal to the greater of: (i) 50% of the total amount of the Recall Voucher(s) previously sent to the Settlement Class Member in connection with the prior return of Recalled Toy(s); or (ii) $ The amount of any cheques under this Subsection (D.1.(a)) that cannot be delivered to Settlement Class Members because of inability to locate those Settlement Class Members after a good faith effort to locate them, which shall in no case exceed six months following the initial mailing of the cheques, will cease to be the property of those Settlement Class Members, and the amount of such cheques, if any, shall be contributed to NACHRI for the benefit of the Canadian member hospitals identified in Section D.3. herein. (b) For Settlement Class Members In Possession Of Recalled Toys Settlement Class Members who have retained possession of any Recalled Toy(s), other than those specified in Section D.1.(e) herein, upon submitting a timely, valid Claim Form, together with the return of all, or substantially all, of the Recalled Toy(s), shall be

13 entitled to elect to receive either a cheque or a Voucher in the amount of the total Recall Price(s) of such returned Recalled Toy(s). The Claims Administrator shall make available by mail and online to Settlement Class Members who wish to submit Claims a preaddressed, pre-paid shipping label(s) for Settlement Class Members to return the Recalled Toy(s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, Settlement Class Members may return Recalled Toy(s), at their own cost, along with a completed Claim Form. In such event, Mattel shall not be responsible for reimbursement of such Settlement Class Members cost of shipping. (c) For Settlement Class Members Who Have Documentation Demonstrating Purchase Of Recalled Toys But Who Destroyed Or Discarded Them Settlement Class Members who no longer have possession of a Recalled Toy(s) because such Settlement Class Member destroyed or discarded the Recalled Toy(s) as a result of the announcements of the Recalls, but submit: (1) a timely, valid Claim Form certifying that the Recalled Toy(s) was destroyed or discarded as a result of the Recall announcements; (2) the date on which the Recalled Toy(s) was destroyed or discarded; and (3) Proof of Purchase, shall be entitled to elect to receive either a cheque or a Voucher in the amount of the total of the actual price(s) paid for the Recalled Toy(s). In order to claim relief under this Subsection (D.1.(c)), the Settlement Class Member must have destroyed or discarded the Recalled Toy as a result of the Recall announcements, and not simply transferred ownership to another Person. (d) For Settlement Class Members Who Have No Proof Of Purchase And Who Destroyed Or Discarded Those Recalled Toys Subject to the limitations set forth in Section D.1.(f) herein, Settlement Class Members who do not possess Proof(s) of Purchase and no longer have possession of the Recalled Toy(s) because such Settlement Class Member destroyed or discarded the Recalled Toy(s) as a result of the announcements of the Recalls, upon submitting a timely, valid Claim Form declaring that the Settlement Class Member purchased or acquired any Recalled Toy(s), other than those specified in Section D.1.(e) herein, within the applicable date range set forth in Exhibit A, and that the Recalled Toy(s) was destroyed or discarded as a result of the Recall announcements, shall receive a Voucher in the amount of the Recall Price for not more than three (3) Recalled Toy(s) per Person and/or address. The total value of all Vouchers issued under this Subsection (D.1.(d)) to all Settlement Class Members shall not exceed one million dollars ($1,000,000.00). In the event that Settlement Class Members file valid Claims seeking relief in an amount exceeding $1,000, under this Subsection (D.1.(d)), the face value of all Vouchers issued to Settlement Class Members hereunder shall be reduced pro rata to a total of $1,000,

14 (e) For Settlement Class Members Who Purchased One Of The Following Recalled Toys For Which Mattel Offers A Replacement Remedy Subject to the limitations in Section D.1.(f) herein, Settlement Class Members who purchased or acquired any of the following Recalled Toys: (1) H5705 GeoTrax Rail & Road System Freightway Transport, date coded (2) K8606 Barbie Table & Chairs, date coded (3) K8608 Barbie Futon & Table Living Room Playset, date coded (4) K8609 Barbie Desk & Chair Bedroom Playset, date coded (5) J9485 Barbie Dream Puppy House Playset, date coded (6) J9486 Barbie Dream Kitty Condo Playset, date coded (7) K8607 Barbie Bathtub & Toilet Bathroom Playset, date coded (8) K8613 Barbie Couch & Table Living Room Playset, date coded (9) K3013 GeoTrax Rail & Road System Special Track Pack, date coded (10) J9472 Barbie Doll & Tanner, containing a silver-tipped, blue pooper scooper (11) J9560 Barbie Doll & Tanner, containing a silver-tipped, blue pooper scooper (12) J2526 Fisher-Price Medical Kit, containing a red blood pressure monitor cuff shall, upon submitting a timely, valid Claim Form be entitled to receive a cheque from Mattel in the amount of $4.00 per Recalled Toy, with a limit of three (3) Recalled Toys ($12.00 total) per Person and/or address. Settlement Class Members who return the affected parts specified on Exhibit A from one or more of the Recalled Toys enumerated in this Subsection (D.1.(e)), along with the Claim Form, will also be entitled to receive replacement parts to the extent available in Mattel s inventory. If the Settlement Class Member neither possesses the affected parts of the Recalled Toys specified on Exhibit A, nor Proof of Purchase, he/she must submit a timely, valid Claim Form declaring that the Settlement Class Member purchased or acquired one of the enumerated Recalled Toys during the applicable period specified in Exhibit A. (f) Claims Limitation and Validation (1) One Claim Per Recalled Toy Per Address For Claims under any of Sections D.1.(b)-D.1.(e), only one Claim per Recalled Toy per address will be permitted.

15 (2) Limitations on Claims by Declaration Only For purposes of this Subsection (D.1.(f)), Settlement Class Members who file Claims without returning the Recalled Toy(s) or Proof(s) of Purchase of the Recalled Toy(s) are referred to as filing Claims by Declaration Only. (A) (B) Except as provided in the next Subsection (D.1.(f)(2)(B)), Settlement Class Members may file Claims under any of Section D.1.(b), (c), (d) and/or (e) for which they qualify. Settlement Class Members may not file Claims by Declaration Only under both Sections D.1(d) and Section D.1(e). Settlement Class Members who have Proof of Purchase or return the affected parts of the Recalled Toys specified in Section D.1(e) will be permitted to file Claims under Section D.1(d) if they also qualify for Settlement Benefits under Section D.1.(d). However, Settlement Class Members who file Claims by Declaration Only under Section D.1.(e), i.e., without Proof of Purchase or returning the affected parts of the Recalled Toys specified in Section D.1.(e), will not be permitted also to file Claims by Declaration Only under Section D.1.(d), and Settlement Class Members who file Claims by Declaration Only under Section D.1.(d) will not be permitted also to file Claims by Declaration Only under Section D.1.(e). (3) Validation by Purchase Date For the sole purpose of validating Claims: (A) (B) under Section D.1.(c) and (d) and all Claims by Declaration Only under Section D.1.(e); or based on Recalled Toys or parts thereof that do not contain a date code and are returned under Sections D.1(b) and/or D.1.(e), the Claims Administrator will validate Claims if the Class Member affirms that the Recalled Toy(s) were purchased or received as a gift during the date ranges specified on Exhibit A. The Claims Administrator shall have the discretion to validate Claims based upon gifts received outside the date ranges specified on Exhibit A where the totality of circumstances indicates that the gift was purchased during the applicable date range. (g) Voucher Terms Vouchers issued under Sections D.1.(b)-D.1(d) may be used only for the purchase of products manufactured by or for Mattel. Only one Voucher may be used in any retail transaction. All Vouchers will expire one year after issuance. Vouchers will be issued in the name of the Settlement Class Member filing the Claim but may be used by another Person without endorsement. Lost or stolen Vouchers are the responsibility of the Settlement Class Member, and will not be replaced or reissued.

16 (h) Mattel s Right To Dispose Of Recalled Toys Returned By Settlement Class Members (1) Mattel will file a motion in each of the Settlement Proceedings, to be heard concurrently with, or immediately following, the Approval Motions, seeking leave to dispose of all toys withheld from sale by Mattel and all toys returned by retailers in the Recalls. The Plaintiffs agree not to oppose these motions. (2) Any toy returned to Mattel by Settlement Class Members pursuant to the Settlement becomes the property of Mattel. Mattel will retain all products returned by consumers in the Recalls or by Settlement Class Members pursuant to the Settlement until the Effective Date. Mattel shall have no obligation to preserve or maintain, and may dispose of or destroy, any returned Recalled Toys after the Effective Date. Settlement Class Members expressly waive any claims for spoliation arising from or related to the disposal of any Recalled Toy(s) withheld from sale by Mattel and all toys returned to Mattel by retailers pursuant to the Recalls, or the destruction or disposal after the Effective Date of Recalled Toy(s) returned by consumers or Settlement Class Members pursuant to the Recalls or the Settlement. 2. Lead Testing of Minor Children Settlement Class Members who incurred out-of-pocket costs for testing the lead level of a minor child of whom the Settlement Class Member is the parent or guardian as the result of the child s exposure to a Recalled Toy(s), which testing occurred within six (6) weeks after the announcement of the Recall of the Recalled Toy(s) to which the child was exposed and which was done as a result of the child s exposure to such Recalled Toys, may seek reimbursement for such costs under the terms set forth in this Section (D.2.). Each such Settlement Class Member, upon submitting a timely, valid Claim Form containing the information and affirmations set forth herein shall receive reimbursement for the actual out-of-pocket and unreimbursed costs of testing for not more than one (1) test per child. Mattel shall not be obligated to pay more than $60,000 in total for such reimbursements, and, in the event that Settlement Class Members file valid Claims seeking relief under this Section in an amount exceeding $60,000, the amount of the reimbursements paid to Settlement Class Members hereunder shall be reduced pro rata to a total of $60,000. In order to qualify for relief under this Section, a Settlement Class Member must submit a valid Claim Form containing the following information: (a) (b) (c) (d) Name, address, telephone number, , and any other pertinent contact information for use in validating the Claim; Name, gender, age, and address of each child tested; Affirmation that the Settlement Class Member is the parent or guardian of each child who was tested; The Recalled Toy(s) to which each child was exposed and, as to each: (1) The date on which it was purchased or acquired; and

17 (2) The date(s) during which the child was exposed; (e) (f) (g) (h) The date on which the test was performed; The name of the medical service provider who performed the test; The total out of pocket cost of the test paid by the Settlement Class Member and not covered by provincial health insurance; and, The amount of reimbursement from private health insurance or any other source that the Settlement Class Member received. Settlement Class Members must submit with the Claim Form documentary evidence reasonably establishing the out-of-pocket expenses incurred and all other elements of the Claim. All information submitted by Settlement Class Members under this Section (D.2.) shall be kept confidential by the Claims Administrator and will be used solely for the purpose of validating the Claims made. Claim Forms submitted under this Section shall be destroyed within one week after all Claims have been paid out under this Section. 3. Cy Pres Fund Mattel will make a total cy pres contribution in the amount of $25,000 as follows: (a) a contribution of $20,000 to NACHRI for the benefit of the following NACHRI Canadian member hospitals: (1) Children s & Women s Health Centre of British Columbia in Vancouver, British Columbia; (2) The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Ontario; (3) Children s Hospital of Eastern Ontario in Ottawa, Ontario; (4) Montreal Children s Hospital in Montreal, Quebec; (5) Maisonneuve Rosemont Hospital in St. Hubert, Quebec; and (b) a contribution of $5,000 to the Children s Hospital Foundation of Saskatchewan. 4. Costs of Notice, Administration, and Other Costs and Expenses Mattel shall be responsible to pay all Claims Administration Expenses and all Notice Expenses. 5. FARC Deduction for Cheques to Quebec Settlement Class Members In accordance with the laws of the province of Quebec, Settlement Benefits paid by cheque to Quebec Settlement Class Members under Section D.1. or D.2. of this Settlement Agreement shall be subject to a deduction of two percent (2%) for remittance to FARC. Each Quebec Settlement Class Member who is entitled to receive Settlement Benefits under Section D.1.(a), (e) or D.2. herein, or who is entitled to receive Settlement Benefits under Section D.1.(b) or (c) herein and

18 elects to receive payment by cheque, shall receive a cheque for an amount that is two percent (2%) less than the amount such Quebec Settlement Class Member would otherwise be entitled to receive under this Settlement Agreement. Settlement Benefits paid by Voucher to Quebec Settlement Class Members under Sections D.1.(b), (c) or (d) herein shall not be subject to the two percent (2%) FARC deduction. The Claims Administrator shall maintain a record of all amounts deducted from the cheques delivered to Quebec Settlement Class Members in accordance with this Section (D.5.). Within 120 days of the later of the Claims Deadline or the final resolution of all Claims, the Claims Administrator shall remit to FARC an amount equal to the total amount deducted from all of the Claims of Quebec Settlement Class Members under this Section (D.5.). E. CLAIMS DEADLINES, CLAIM FORMS, AND ADMINISTRATION 1. All Claims must be submitted with a Claim Form and received by the Claims Administrator or postmarked by the Claims Deadline. The Claims Deadline shall be clearly set forth in the Settlement Notice, the websites of the Claims Administrator and of Class Counsel, and the Claim Form. Settlement Class Members who do not timely submit a completed Claim Form shall not be eligible for Settlement Benefits except as provided under Section D.1.(a). However, the Claims Administrator may, in its discretion, permit a Settlement Class Member who makes a timely Claim to remedy deficiencies in such Settlement Class Member s Claim Form or related documentation. 2. Those Settlement Class Members submitting Claims under any of Sections D.1.(b)- D.1.(e) and D.2. herein must submit to the Claims Administrator a timely Claim Form. Claim Forms must be signed by hand or electronically by the Settlement Class Member who must attest to the truth and accuracy of the information provided by the Settlement Class Member in the Claim Form and acknowledge that knowingly submitting a false Claim could constitute fraud or contempt of the Final Order of a Settlement Court. 3. Claim Forms will be made available by mail and for downloading from the Settlement Website maintained by the Claims Administrator and may be made available on the website of Class Counsel. Such Claim Form must include the following information and/or affirmations: (a) (b) Telephone number or contact information for use, if necessary, in validating Claims; and The following information relating to purchase and Recalled Toy: (1) Settlement Class Member name and address; (2) Identification of the Recalled Toy(s) for which the Claim is made, sufficient to show that the Claim relates to a Recalled Toy(s); (3) Date(s) of purchase or, if received as a gift, the date(s) of acquisition; (4) Price(s) paid;

19 (5) Name(s) and location(s) of retailer(s); (6) Gender(s) and age(s) of child(ren) for whom the Recalled Toy(s) was purchased; and (7) The date(s) on which the Recalled Toy(s) was destroyed or discarded as a result of a Mattel Recall announcement. Class Members may submit completed and signed (either by hand or electronically) Claim Forms to the Claims Administrator by mail, private courier, facsimile, online or as an attachment to an . Mattel agrees that information provided by Settlement Class Members on Claim Forms shall be kept confidential, shall be used only for purposes of administering the Settlement, and shall not be used for marketing or any other commercial purposes. 4. The Parties agree that the Claims Administrator shall be Gilardi & Co., LLC, subject to the approval of the Settlement Courts. The Claims Administrator will be an agent of the Settlement Courts, and will be subject to the Settlement Courts supervision and direction as circumstances may require. The Claims Administrator will administer the Notice Program and Claims process, and oversee the distribution of Settlement Benefits to Settlement Class Members in accordance with the terms of the Settlement and the Final Orders of the Settlement Courts. 5. The Claims Administrator shall administer the Settlement Benefits for Settlement Class Members provided by the Agreement by resolving Claims in a cost effective and timely manner. The Claims Administrator may utilize the resources of Mattel to identify Settlement Class Members; to train the Claims Administrator s personnel on toy identification; to facilitate providing notice directly or by publication; to assist with establishing the Settlement website; to store and/or dispose of toys returned by Settlement Class Members; and to accomplish such other purposes as may be approved by Mattel and Class Counsel; provided, however, that the determination of the validity of Claims shall be made by the Claims Administrator. The Claims Administrator shall maintain records of all Claims submitted. The Claims Administrator shall maintain all such records until the later of 180 days after either the Claims Deadline or all Claims have been finally resolved, and such records will be made available upon request to Class Counsel and Mattel s Counsel. Claim Forms and supporting documentation will be kept confidential by the Claims Administrator and will be provided only to a Settlement Court upon request and to Class Counsel and Mattel s Counsel to the extent necessary to resolve issues pursuant to Section E.7. The Claims Administrator also shall provide such reports and such other information to the Settlement Courts as they may require. 6. The Claims Administrator will review and validate all Claims submitted by Settlement Class Members. With respect to Claims under Section D.1.(b), the Parties agree that one objective of the Settlement is to secure the return of substantially the entire Recalled Toy. 7. The determination of the validity of Claims submitted by members of the Settlement Class (or by Persons who purport to be members of the Settlement Class) shall be made by the Claims Administrator. The Claims Administrator shall have the discretion to review Claims with the objectives of efficiency and effecting substantial justice to the

20 Parties and the Settlement Class Members. The Claims Administrator shall have the right to contact Settlement Class Members to validate Claims. The validity of a Claim will be assessed based on the totality of the Claim. The inability of a Settlement Class Member to provide precise dates of purchase, price paid, or the identity of the selling retailer will not per se invalidate a Claim, but will be assessed with other factors for purposes of validation. Issues regarding the validity of Claims that cannot be resolved by the Claims Administrator shall be submitted to Mattel s Counsel and Class Counsel for resolution and, if no resolution is reached, to the applicable Settlement Court. 8. The Claims Administrator shall cause a website to be created in both English and French containing Claims information and relevant documents, including but not limited to, all applicable deadlines; the Long-Form Settlement Notice, in both English and French; a downloadable Claim Form, in both English and French, that may be submitted online or by mail; FAQs and answers in both English and French; copies of the orders of the Settlement Courts Court pertaining to the Settlement; a copy of this Agreement; a tollfree telephone number and addresses to contact the Claims Administrator by and mail; means to identify Recalled Toys, including purchase date ranges; the dates of the Recalls; and the Recalled Toys affected by the Recalls. Mattel shall pay the cost of creating and maintaining this website. The website may be rendered inactive at Mattel s sole discretion after the Claims Deadline. F. OPTING OUT 1. Procedure (a) (b) (c) A Person who is a member of a Settlement Class may opt-out of the Settlement Proceedings by sending a written election to opt-out, signed by the Person, by pre-paid mail, courier or facsimile to the Claims Administrator. An election to opt-out will only be effective if it is actually sent to the Claims Administrator and received or post-marked on or before the Opt-Out Deadline. In addition to a written election to opt-out, a person who wishes to opt-out must provide to the Claims Administrator, on or before the Opt-Out Deadline: (1) the Person's full name, current address and telephone number; (2) the Settlement Class the Person is a member of; and (3) the information in the Person s possession identifying the Recalled Toys the Person purchased or acquired. (d) An election to opt out will only be effective if it is on behalf of a single Person or on behalf of one or more Persons residing at the same address. So-called mass or class opt-outs shall not be allowed.

21 (e) Quebec Class Members who have commenced Other Actions or commence Other Actions and fail to discontinue such Other Actions by the Opt-Out Deadline shall be deemed to have opted out. 2. Opt-Out Report (a) Within thirty (30) days of the Opt-Out Deadline, the Claims Administrator shall provide to Mattel and Class Counsel, to the extent that such information is known by the Claims Administrator, the following information in respect of each Person, if any, who has opted out of the Proceedings: (1) the Person's full name, current address and telephone number; (2) the Settlement Proceeding from which the Person is opting out; (3) the reasons for opting out; (4) the identity of the Recalled Toys the Person purchased or acquired; and (5) a copy of all information provided by that Person in the opting-out process. G. NOTICES TO SETTLEMENT CLASSES 1. Hearing Notice The proposed Settlement Classes shall be notified of hearings at which the Settlement Courts will be asked to approve the Settlement Agreement by a Hearing Notice substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B. Subject to approval of the Settlement Courts, the Claims Administrator shall cause the Hearing Notice to be published and distributed in the manner described in the Hearing Notice Dissemination Plan attached as Exhibit C by a date to be set by the Settlement Courts. 2. Settlement Notice The Settlement Classes shall be notified of the certification of each of the Settlement Proceedings as a class proceeding and the approval of this Settlement Agreement by the Short- Form Settlement Notice substantially in the form attached as Exhibit D, the Long-Form Settlement Notice substantially in the form attached as Exhibit E, and the Postcard Notice substantially in the form attached as Exhibit I. Subject to approval of the Settlement Courts, the Claims Administrator shall cause the Settlement Notices to be published and distributed in the manner described in the Settlement Notice Dissemination Plan attached as Exhibit F. The publication and distribution of the Settlement Notices shall commence on the Notice Date, which date shall occur within the thirty (30) day period commencing on the Effective Date, or within such later period as agreed by the Parties and approved by the Settlement Courts.

2010 RECALL CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of January 19, Between ANTHONY SNYDER, ANDREW WINKLER AND LAURA VELL

2010 RECALL CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of January 19, Between ANTHONY SNYDER, ANDREW WINKLER AND LAURA VELL 2010 RECALL CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of January 19, 2015 Between ANTHONY SNYDER, ANDREW WINKLER AND LAURA VELL (the Plaintiffs ) and MATTEL, INC., MATTEL CANADA INC. AND FISHER-PRICE,

More information

ONTARIO GASOLINE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made on June 4, Between JAMES LORIMER. (the "Plaintiff. and

ONTARIO GASOLINE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made on June 4, Between JAMES LORIMER. (the Plaintiff. and ONTARIO GASOLINE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made on June 4, 2013 Between JAMES LORIMER (the "Plaintiff 1 ) and CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED (the "Settling Defendant") TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION

More information

Plaintiffs. Defendants. Petitioner. Designated Person. Respondents. Plaintiffs. Defendants. Plaintiffs. Defendants. Plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs. Defendants. Petitioner. Designated Person. Respondents. Plaintiffs. Defendants. Plaintiffs. Defendants. Plaintiffs. Execution Version CLASS ACTION CANADA WIDE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of April 10, 2015 Peters et al. v. Merck Frosst Canada Ltd. et al. Option consommateurs Nicole Brousseau Merck Frosst Canada Limitée

More information

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 In The Case Of Kevin Burkhammer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Allied Interstate LLC; and, Does 1-20, Inclusive, 15CV0567 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

More information

CANADIAN SRAM CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of April 1, Between

CANADIAN SRAM CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of April 1, Between CANADIAN SRAM CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of April 1, 2015 Between JEREMY SCHIMPF, DAVID BRATTON and COMMUNICATION MEGA-SAT INC. (the "Plaintiffs" and ETRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., and

More information

CANADIAN SRAM CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of March / f, Between

CANADIAN SRAM CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of March / f, Between CANADIAN SRAM CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of March / f, 2015 Between JEREMY SCHIMPF, DAVID BRATTON and COMMUNICATION MEGA-SAT INC. (the "Plaintiffs") and TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA

More information

Between. (the "Plaintiffs") and

Between. (the Plaintiffs) and CANADIAN INVERTERS CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of December 2, 2016 Between SHERIDAN CHEVROLET CADILLAC LTD., THE PICKERING AUTO MALL LTD. and SERGE ASSELIN (the "Plaintiffs") and

More information

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD.

HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD. HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of June 22, 2017 BETWEEN CLAIRE R. MCDONALD ( Plaintiff ) and HOME CAPITAL GROUP INC. GERALD M. SOLOWAY ROBERT MORTON ROBERT J.

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Settlement Agreement") is entered into between Petitioner ROBERT ANDRE ROBITAI LLE ("Petitioner"), individually and on behalf of

More information

CANADIAN AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS SYSTEMS CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of November 11, Between

CANADIAN AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS SYSTEMS CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of November 11, Between CANADIAN AUTOMOTIVE WIRE HARNESS SYSTEMS CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of November 11, 2014 Between SHERIDAN CHEVROLET CADILLAC LTD., PICKERING AUTO MALL LTD., FADY SAMAHA, DARREN

More information

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-cv SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 1 of 9 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-cv-10087-SAS Document 59-1 Filed 06/28/11 Page 2 of 9 BETWEEN EXHIBIT "A" CANADIAN PRE-APPROVAL ORDER ONTARIO SUPERIOR

More information

STUDENT LOANS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

STUDENT LOANS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT STUDENT LOANS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as at December 5, 2017 Court File No: T-132-13 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: GAELEN PATRICK CONDON, REBECCA WALKER ANGELA PIGGOTT and Plaintiffs

More information

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS Case 8:15-cv-01936-JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made and entered into as of July 24, 2017, between (a) Plaintiff Jordan

More information

CANADIAN LCD PANELS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of February 7, Between

CANADIAN LCD PANELS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of February 7, Between CANADIAN LCD PANELS CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of February 7, 2017 Between THE FANSHAWE COLLEGE OF APPLIED ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY, MASS ENGINEERED DESIGN INC., COMMUNICATION MEGA-SAT

More information

-AND- TRANSACTION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

-AND- TRANSACTION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL No.: 500-06-000476-099 SUPERIOR COURT (Class action) NOELLA NEALE, v. GROUPE AEROPLAN INC., Plaintiff -and- AEROPLAN CANADA INC. Defendants -AND- COURT FILE

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PHELPS COUNTY, MISSOURI

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PHELPS COUNTY, MISSOURI IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PHELPS COUNTY, MISSOURI SHERHONDA GOLDEN, DENISE VALENCIA, ) Individually and on behalf of similarly situated ) persons, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) No. 17PH-CV01741 ) v. ) Hon. William Earle

More information

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of

STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT. into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself and a class of STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement ( Agreement or Settlement ) is entered into between Plaintiff ARcare, Inc. ( Plaintiff or ARcare ), on behalf of itself

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ) is made and

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ) is made and SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ) is made and entered into as of this 30 th day of January, 2014, by and among: (1) (a) Stephanie Grieve, individually

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garo Madenlian, et al. v. Flax USA, Inc. Civil Litigation No. SACV13-01748 JVS (JPRx) If you purchased flax milk sold in the United States by Flax USA, Inc.,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement ), effective as of the date of the last signature below, is made by and between Plaintiff Jonathan Weisberg

More information

Equity Investment Agreement

Equity Investment Agreement Equity Investment Agreement THIS EQUITY INVESTMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is dated as of DATE (the "Effective Date") by and between, a Delaware business corporation, having an address at ("Company")

More information

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161

Case 2:16-cv ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 Case 2:16-cv-05218-ADS-AKT Document 24 Filed 06/23/17 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 161 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RICHARD SCALFANI, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION HENRY LACE on behalf of himself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No. 3:12-CV-00363-JD-CAN ) v. )

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 'l day of January 2018,

More information

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 0:13-cv MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 0:13-cv-61747-MGC Document 77-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2015 Page 1 of 55 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Agreement or Settlement ) is made by and

More information

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT ) SS: CIVIL DIVISION, ROOM 12 COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO. 49D PL

STATE OF INDIANA ) IN THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT ) SS: CIVIL DIVISION, ROOM 12 COUNTY OF MARION ) CAUSE NO. 49D PL STATE OF INDIANA IN THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT SS: CIVIL DIVISION, ROOM 12 COUNTY OF MARION CAUSE NO. 49D12-1303-PL-008769 TAMMY RAAB, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you are an individual who while residing in the United States between January 21, 2007 and October 15, 2009 owned a Harmony 1000

More information

Case 3:16-cv GPC-JMA Document 36-2 Filed 11/22/17 PageID.307 Page 6 of 63 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 3:16-cv GPC-JMA Document 36-2 Filed 11/22/17 PageID.307 Page 6 of 63 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 3:16-cv-00370-GPC-JMA Document 36-2 Filed 11/22/17 PageID.307 Page 6 of 63 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ) is entered into

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Robert Ward, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 2:17-cv-02069-MMB v. Flagship Credit Acceptance

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TAX CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) TAX CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Clint Rasschaert, Ed Risch, Pamela Schiller, Verna Schuna, Eric Gedrose, and Justin Short, v. Plaintiffs, Frontier Communications Corporation,

More information

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14

Case 1:15-cv WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 Case 1:15-cv-01249-WHP Document 148 Filed 06/28/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 15-cv-1249

More information

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement

AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement AMENDED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Amended Class Action Settlement Agreement and General Release ( Settlement Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Defendants

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE (the "Agreement") is entered into, effective August 24, 2015 (the "Effective Date"), by Dr. Arthur Hall, Ph.D. ("Dr. Hall"),

More information

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE

ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No. 29762 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE THE HONOURABLE ) MR. JUSTICE WARREN K. WINKLER ) ) FRIDAY, THE 15 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2006 BETWEEN: MARLENE C. CLOUD, GERALDINE ROBERTSON, RON DELEARY,

More information

Case 1:14-cv KBM-GJF Document 118 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Case 1:14-cv KBM-GJF Document 118 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Case 1:14-cv-00670-KBM-GJF Document 118 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO CAROLINE TULLIE, on her own behalf, as administrator of the estate

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE MICHAEL E. TAYLOR, et al., v. Plaintiffs, DYNAMIC PET PRODUCTS, LLC, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1616-CV11531 Division

More information

Case 3:10-md RS Document Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO

Case 3:10-md RS Document Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO Case 3:10-md-02143-RS Document 2260-3 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS This Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims ( Agreement ) is entered into as of the last date of any signature below by and among: (a) (b) Swedish Health

More information

This Agreement is made effective the day of, 2 BETWEEN:

This Agreement is made effective the day of, 2 BETWEEN: Note: The following form of agreement has been negotiated between the University of Saskatchewan and the University of Saskatchewan Faculty Association ( USFA ) for execution by the University and USFA

More information

METER DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY AND

METER DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY AND METER DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY AND THIS METER DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is entered into this day of, (the Effective Date ), by and between,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NICHOLAS CHALUPA, ) Individually and on Behalf of All Other ) No. 1:12-cv-10868-JCB Persons Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED PARCEL

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND LIMITED RELEASE OF CLAIMS AMANDA OTT, ET AL. AND PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC. Case 3:12-cv-00486 Document 247-1 Filed 02/03/15 Page 1 of 28 PageID #: 7164 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND

More information

NOBLE MIDSTREAM GP LLC FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT. Dated Effective as of September 20, 2016

NOBLE MIDSTREAM GP LLC FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT. Dated Effective as of September 20, 2016 Exhibit 3.2 Execution Version NOBLE MIDSTREAM GP LLC FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT Dated Effective as of September 20, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Article I DEFINITIONS 1 Section

More information

THE FIBRE BOX ASSOCIATION. AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS April 2014

THE FIBRE BOX ASSOCIATION. AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS April 2014 THE FIBRE BOX ASSOCIATION AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS April 2014 ARTICLE 1. OFFICES 1.1 Principal Office - Illinois: The principal office of the Association shall be in the State of Illinois or in such

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE Case: 1:12-cv-00276 Document #: 113 Filed: 11/06/13 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:2694 2c THURMAN ROSS, by and on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

usdrp DISPUTE PROVIDER AGREEMENT (Approved by the U. S. Dept. of Commerce on February 21, 2002)

usdrp DISPUTE PROVIDER AGREEMENT (Approved by the U. S. Dept. of Commerce on February 21, 2002) usdrp DISPUTE PROVIDER AGREEMENT (Approved by the U. S. Dept. of Commerce on February 21, 2002) This Contract to provide dispute resolution services for.us domain space ( Contract ) sets forth the basic

More information

DRAFT. OCE Funding Agreement

DRAFT. OCE Funding Agreement (Trilateral) MIS#: This Agreement is made between ( Client ), ( Research Partner ), (Client and Research Partner collectively referred to as the Participants ), and Ontario Centres of Excellence Inc. (

More information

CANADIAN FOREX CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of May 29, Between

CANADIAN FOREX CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made as of May 29, Between CANADIAN FOREX CLASS ACTION NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of May 29, 2017 Between JOSEPH S. MANCINELLI, CARMEN PRINCIPATO, DOUGLAS SERROUL, LUIGI CARROZZI, MANUEL BASTOS, AND JACK OLIVEIRA IN THEIR

More information

HDCP RESELLER ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT W I T N E S S E T H

HDCP RESELLER ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT W I T N E S S E T H Last Revised: 8/10/2008 HDCP RESELLER ASSOCIATE AGREEMENT This HDCP Reseller Associate Agreement (the Agreement ) is effective as of latest date set out on the signature page hereof (the Effective Date

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H. D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ]' STUART ROSENBERG Plaintiff 93723077 93723077 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLfEAS p H D H lit ui Item 4u.i CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO Case No: CV-l$fetffift) I U P 2: 0 I lllll it CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC ET

More information

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the. Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE THIS STIPULATION AND AGREEMENT OF SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE (the Settlement Agreement ) is made by and between the named Claimants proposed as Class and

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2008 CA 000199 IMERGENT. INC., and STORESONLINE,

More information

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12 Case :-md-0-dms-rbb Document 0 Filed // Page of 0 0 In re GROUPON MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. :-md-0-dms-rbb ORDER APPROVING

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS WILLIAM TENNISON, individually, et al. and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MADISON COUNTY, ILLINOIS v. Case No. 01-L-000457 MARION BASS

More information

ARTIST MANAGEMENT CONTRACT

ARTIST MANAGEMENT CONTRACT ARTIST MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the. BY AND BETWEEN: JENNIFER ELIZABETH SCHRODER (herein referred to as the "Artist") [Address] [Address] - and - TRACY WESLOSKY

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DAREN LEVIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:15-cv-07081-LLS Hon. Louis L. Stanton v. RESOURCE

More information

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

SANTANDER CONSUMER USA HOLDINGS INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event

More information

CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT. by and among CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE. as Seller, Servicer and Cash Manager. and

CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT. by and among CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE. as Seller, Servicer and Cash Manager. and Execution Copy CUSTODIAL AGREEMENT by and among CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE as Seller, Servicer and Cash Manager and CIBC COVERED BOND (LEGISLATIVE) GUARANTOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as Guarantor and

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release (the Settlement Agreement ) is entered into between each of William Richert, Maude Retchin Feil, and Ann Jamison (individually and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No. MUST BE POSTMARKED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 8, 2017 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA In re Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation Case No.: 1:07-cv-1757-RC For Official

More information

CBI KEYSTONE INVESTMENT CLASS ACTION PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT MAY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS

CBI KEYSTONE INVESTMENT CLASS ACTION PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT MAY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS CBI KEYSTONE INVESTMENT CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT APPROVAL PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT MAY AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS TO CLASS MEMBERS: If you are a Canadian resident, and you purchased

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXA S SHERMAN DIVISION FILE D U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MAR 21200 7 DAVID J. MALANu, t;lerk BY DEPUTY PLA, LLC, individually and on

More information

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Case 1:08-cv BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Case 1:08-cv-03653-BSJ-MHD Document 93 Filed 12/05/11 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES J HAYES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY LEONARD BUSTOS and MARY WATTS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 06 Civ. 2308 (HAA)(ES) VONAGE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION In Re: Wire Harness THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Truck and Equipment Dealer Cases :

More information

AHEAD Program Agreement

AHEAD Program Agreement AHEAD Program Agreement This Access to Housing and Economic Assistance for Development (AHEAD) Program Agreement (this Agreement ) is entered into this day of among the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco

More information

CANADIAN COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT INC. (CCME)

CANADIAN COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT INC. (CCME) CANADIAN COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF THE ENVIRONMENT INC. (CCME) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT THIS AGREEMENT made in duplicate as of the xx th day of Month, 2016; BETWEEN: Name of Contractor Address City,

More information

BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION. Rules for Gas Marketers

BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION. Rules for Gas Marketers APPENDIX A To Order A-12-13 Page 1 of 3 BRITISH COLUMBIA UTILITIES COMMISSION Rules for Gas Marketers Section 71.1(1) of the Utilities Commission Act (Act) requires a person who is not a public utility

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARENGO COUNTY, ALABAMA CHARLES GLASS, and ) RONNIE JENNINGS, ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) CV 2014-900163 BLACK WARRIOR ELECTRIC ) MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION, Defendant. ) SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WILLIAM JACKSON ET AL. v. LANG PHARMA NUTRITION, INC. ET AL. Superior Court of California for the County of San Diego Case No. 37-2017-00028196-CU-BC-CTL The Superior

More information

SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ), by

SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ), by SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT THIS SETTLEMENT AND MUTUAL RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ), by and between ARBOR E&T, LLC ( Arbor ) and THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ( PBC School

More information

Case 2:13-cv WJM-MF Document 66-2 Filed 11/14/16 Page 7 of 75 PageID: 729 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 2:13-cv WJM-MF Document 66-2 Filed 11/14/16 Page 7 of 75 PageID: 729 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case 2:13-cv-03417-WJM-MF Document 66-2 Filed 11/14/16 Page 7 of 75 PageID: 729 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Plaintiffs and Class Representatives Robert Gray and Makrum George ( Plaintiffs or Class

More information

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made as of August 20, 2007 by and between MOST V AMERIKU (hereinafter MVA ) on the one hand and OLEG KAPANETS (hereinafter

More information

AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT RICE MIDSTREAM MANAGEMENT LLC

AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT RICE MIDSTREAM MANAGEMENT LLC Exhibit 3.2 Execution Version AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT OF RICE MIDSTREAM MANAGEMENT LLC TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.1 Definitions 1 Section 1.2 Construction

More information

THE FIBRE BOX ASSOCIATION AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS NOVEMBER 2004

THE FIBRE BOX ASSOCIATION AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS NOVEMBER 2004 THE FIBRE BOX ASSOCIATION AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS NOVEMBER 2004 ARTICLE 1. OFFICES 1.1 Principal Office - Delaware: The principal office of the Association in the State of Delaware shall be in the

More information

CASH MANAGEMENT SERVICES MASTER AGREEMENT

CASH MANAGEMENT SERVICES MASTER AGREEMENT This Cash Management Services Master Agreement (the Master Agreement ) and any applicable Schedules (the Master Agreement and any applicable Schedules are together referred to as the Agreement ) sets out

More information

AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS of W. R. GRACE & CO. Incorporated under the Laws of the State of Delaware ARTICLE I OFFICES AND RECORDS

AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS of W. R. GRACE & CO. Incorporated under the Laws of the State of Delaware ARTICLE I OFFICES AND RECORDS AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS of W. R. GRACE & CO. Adopted on January 22, 2015 Incorporated under the Laws of the State of Delaware ARTICLE I OFFICES AND RECORDS Section 1.1. Delaware Office. The principal

More information

U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center

U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center SAMPLE (Actual agreements may vary) U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center PATENT LICENSE AGREEMENT between the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

Case 3:15-cv BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 80 PageID: 1050 EXHIBIT A

Case 3:15-cv BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 80 PageID: 1050 EXHIBIT A Case 3:15-cv-05089-BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 1 of 80 PageID: 1050 EXHIBIT A Case 3:15-cv-05089-BRM-LHG Document 82-1 Filed 09/27/17 Page 2 of 80 PageID: 1051 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

More information

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283

Case 3:14-cv PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 Case 3:14-cv-05628-PGS-LHG Document 130 Filed 05/14/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID: 4283 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY fl RE COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, inc. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No.

More information

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, CERTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT CLASS, AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II) SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING; AND (III) MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF

More information

AGREEMENT WHEREAS WHEREAS, WHEREAS, NOW, THEREFORE, Grant of License.

AGREEMENT WHEREAS WHEREAS, WHEREAS, NOW, THEREFORE, Grant of License. AGREEMENT THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is entered into and is effective as of the date the last signatory signs and is by and between Delta Sigma Theta Sorority, Incorporated ( Delta or Licensor

More information

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case 1:13-cv-01052-GJQ Doc #12 Filed 04/16/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Dorothy R. Konicki, for herself and class members, v. Plaintiff,

More information

INTERNET ADVERTISING AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT made as of this day of, 2004.

INTERNET ADVERTISING AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT made as of this day of, 2004. INTERNET ADVERTISING AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made as of this day of, 2004. BETWEEN: THOMSON ASSOCIATES INC., a corporation incorporated under the laws of the Province of Ontario; (hereinafter referred

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re VELTI PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. 3:13-cv-03889-WHO (Consolidated

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION. Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION In re GEMSTAR-TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 02-CV-2775-MRP (PLAx) CLASS ACTION This Document

More information

Case No. 08-cv Hon. James B. Zagel

Case No. 08-cv Hon. James B. Zagel IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: STEEL ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No. 08-cv-5214 THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL DIRECT PURCHASER ACTIONS: Hon.

More information

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

Case 4:16-cv HSG Document 33-1 Filed 11/16/16 Page 16 of 66 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE Case :-cv-00-hsg Document - Filed // Page of 0 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release and its attached exhibits ( Settlement Agreement or Agreement ), is entered into by

More information

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9

Case Case 1:10-cv AKH Document Document Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9 Case Case 1:10-cv-03864-AKH Document Document 476-1 479 Filed 03/16/15 03/13/15 Page 11of9 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~X MARY K. JONES, Individually and

More information

NOBLE ENERGY, INC. Pursuant to the Offer to Purchase dated August 8, 2017

NOBLE ENERGY, INC. Pursuant to the Offer to Purchase dated August 8, 2017 NOBLE ENERGY, INC. LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To Tender in Respect of Any and All Outstanding 8.25% Senior Notes Due 2019 (CUSIP No. 655044AD7; ISIN US655044AD79) Pursuant to the Offer to Purchase dated August

More information

ENT CREDIT UNION ELECTRONIC DEPOSIT AGREEMENT

ENT CREDIT UNION ELECTRONIC DEPOSIT AGREEMENT ENT CREDIT UNION ELECTRONIC DEPOSIT AGREEMENT This (as amended and/or supplemented, this Agreement ) governs Member s use of Ent Credit Union s ( Ent ) Remote Deposit Services ( Services ). Ent offers

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHARP COUNTY, ARKANSAS POSITION 1. PLAINTIFF Case No. CV SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHARP COUNTY, ARKANSAS POSITION 1. PLAINTIFF Case No. CV SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF SHARP COUNTY, ARKANSAS POSITION 1 DARRELL E. BEASON, JR., an Arkansas Resident on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. PLAINTIFF Case No. CV-2011-137 LIBERTY

More information

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16-2 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 159 PageID #: 87

Case 2:17-cv JFB-SIL Document 16-2 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 159 PageID #: 87 Case 2:17-cv-02264-JFB-SIL Document 16-2 Filed 07/14/17 Page 1 of 159 PageID #: 87 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LOGAN LANDES and JAMES GODDARD, individually

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE OF CLAIMS WHEREAS, on or about May 3, 2016, Plaintiff Joe Rogers filed a class action complaint ("Complaint"), against Farrelli's Management Services, LLC, Farrelli's Canyon,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly

More information

Case 4:14-md CW Document Filed 02/03/17 Page 2 of 67

Case 4:14-md CW Document Filed 02/03/17 Page 2 of 67 Case :-md-0-cw Document 0- Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice) Craig R. Spiegel (00) Ashley A. Bede (Pro Hac Vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP Eighth Avenue, Suite 00 Seattle, WA 0

More information

Premium Account Terms of Service Agreement. Statista, Inc.

Premium Account Terms of Service Agreement. Statista, Inc. Premium Account Terms of Service Agreement Statista, Inc. Last updated: October 2016 Premium Account Terms of Service Agreement www.statista.com 02 This Terms of Service Agreement (this "Agreement") is

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE. Gentiva Securities Litigation PO Box 3058 Portland, OR Gentiva Securities Litigation Website: www.gentivasecuritieslitigation.com Claims Administrator Email: info@gentivasecuritieslitigation.com P.O. Box 3058 Toll Free: 888-593-7570 Portland, OR 97208-3058

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Master File No. 05-CV H(RBB) CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re PETCO CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Master File No. 05-CV-0823- H(RBB) CLASS ACTION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. NOTICE

More information