The Honourable Madam Justice Linda K. Webber
|
|
- Jordan Abner Richard
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Date: Docket: CSC Registy: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION GRAHAM TUPLIN AND: APPLICANT (APPELLANT) REGISTRAR, INDIAN & NORTHERN AFFAIRS CANADA RESPONDENT BEFORE: The Honourable Madam Justice Linda K. Webber D. Bruce Clarke David R. Sanderson Solicitor for the Appellant Solicitor for the Respondent Place and Date of Hearing Place and Date of Decision Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island (In Chambers) January 13, 1998 Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island October 9, 1998
2 BETWEEN: GRAHAM TUPLIN AND: APPLICANT (APPELLANT) REGISTRAR, INDIAN & NORTHERN AFFAIRS CANADA RESPONDENT Prince Edward Island Supreme Court - Trial Division Before: Webber J. (In Chambers) Date Heard: January 13, 1998 Date of Decision: October STANDARD OF REVIEW - trial de novo - oral evidence. CASES CONSIDERED: Provincial Tar Commissioner v. Maritime Dredging Limited and Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (1 9971, 2 P.E.I.R. 78; Simmonds v. Law Society of Prince Edward Island (1995), 131 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 328 (P.E.1.S.C.- T.D.); Re McArthur et a/. v. Registrar, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (19921, 91 D.L.R. (4th) 666 Sask. Q.8.) ; Delgamuuk v. British Columbia, ( S.C.J. No. 108 (Q.L.). STATUTES CONSIDERED: Indian Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. 1-5, 5s. 2, 5, 8 and 9, and 1 4.3; Prince Edward Island Supreme Court Rules of Court, Civil Procedure Rule 37.02(1); Constitution An, TEXTS CONSIDERED: Blake, Administrative Law in Canada, (2nd) D. Bruce Clarke, solicitor for the applicant David R. Sanderson, solici~or for the respondent
3 [I] On August 6, 1996 Graham Tuplin ("applicant') filed a notice of appeal of the decision rendered by the Registrar, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, on a protest filed by Graham Tuplin. In that decision, the Regisbar affirmed the original decision to deny Mr. Tuplin's request to be registered In accordance with paragraph 6(l)(aJ of the indh A 4 R.S.C. 1985, c An amended notice of appeal, not relevant to thls application, was filed April 3, [2] On December 2, 1997 an application was made on behalf of the applicant for 'direction of the Court as to how the appeal should proceed" pursuant to Civil Procedure Rule 14.05(21. That Ruie deals with the originating process for the commencement of an application and so would not appear to be relevant. The application before me is in the nature of a motion for directions within the context of an existing appeal pursuant to s of the 1ndiutAc-t to the Supreme Court of Prince Edward Island, Trial Division. [31 kr there war; no objection raised by the iuspondent to the form of the motion, I will consider it before the Coun pursuant to Rule 37.02(1) (a judge of the court has jurisdiction to hear any motion in the proceeding) and deal with it as such. 141 The pre-hearing brief filed on behalf of the applicant Indicates that the applicant seeks:.to adduce evidence and legal argumenl to show thu custom adoption Is a constitutionally guaranteed &ori&al right that is not dependant on 9tahrte. reuulation or the interpretation of government bureaucrats for ib continued existence, importance and cifccct. (p. 5) 151 The Registrar refused to grant the applicant an oral hearing at which oral history evidence of custom adoption could be ptesenred. Thus, argues the applicant, this Coun should hear the appeal by way of trial de novo. In the alternat~ve, the applicant seeks to be allowed to adduce oral evidence on the appeal, so that oral history evidence of custom adoption will be heard. STANDARD OF REVIEW [6] In determining the standard of review required by a statutory appeal of a decision rendered by an administrative tribunal, the Prince Edward Island Court of Appeal in Provincial Tax Commissioner v. Multimt Dredging Limited and ldd Regulatory and Appeals Commission, (1997). 2 P.E.I.R. 78 stated that the legislative intent in conferring jurisdiction on the tribunal can be determined by considering
4 Page: 2 the nature of the statutew conferring jurisdiction; the tribunal's role or function; the presence or absence of a privative clause; whether or not there is a statutory right of appeal; the expertise of the tribunal; whether the question goes to the jurisdiction of the tribunal; the role of the tribunal in policy development; and the nature of the problem before the tribunal. [;rl In the instant case, the Registrar of lndian Affairs is the 'tribunal' whose decision is appealed. [Bl In the Indian A d "Registrar" is defined in s. 2: s. 2 'Registrar' means theofficer in the Department who is in charge of the lndian Register and the Band Lists maintamed in the Oepment. [9 Section 5 of the Indian Act establishes an lndian Register and gives the Registrar the authority to add or delete from that Register:... the name of any penon who, in accordance with this Act, is entitled or not entitled, as the case may be, to have his name included in the lndian Register. [I 01 Seaion 8 provides for the maintenance of a Band List. Section 9 states that such list shall be maintained in the Department by the Registrar until a band assumes control of its Band List, and gives the Registrar the authority to add to or delete from that list:... the name of any person who, in accordance with this Act, is entitled or not entitled, as the case may be, to have his name included in that List. [I 11 Anyone who disagrees with a decision made by the Registrar in connection with such lists may file a protest with the Registrar: A protest may be made in respect of the inclusion or addition of the name of a person in, or the omission or deletion of the name of a person from, the lndian Reginer, or a Band List maintained in the Department, within three years after the inclusion or addition, or omission or deletion, as the case may be, by notice in writing to the Registrar, containing a brief sutement nf the ground, therefor. 12) A protest may be made under this section in respect of the Band List of a band by the councll of the band, any member of the band or the penon in respect d whore name the proter IS made or that person's representative.
5 Page: 3 (3) A protest may be made under this section In respect of the Indian Register by the person in respect of whose name the protest is made or that person's representative. (4) The onus of establishing the grounds of a protest under this section lies on the person making the protest. (5) Where a protest 1s made to the Registrar under this seaion, the Registrar shall cause an investigation to be made into the matter and render a decsron. (6) For the purposes of this section, the Registrar may receive such evidence on oath, on affidavit or in any other manner, whether or not admissible in a court of law, as the Registrar, in his direction, sees fit or deems just. (7) Subject to smion 14.3, the decision oi the Registrar under subsection (5) is final and conclusive. [I 21 The decision appealed from is the decision made by the Registrar after Graham Tuplin filed his protest in accordance with s of the Indian Act. [I 3) It is noteworthy that the Registrar has responsibility for both determining whose name is on the lndian Register and for investigating the decision on who is registered, if the decision is protested. While there is a privative clause, that clause is subsumed to the right of appeal; "Subject to section 14.3 [the appeal section] the decision... is final and conclusive". This would suggest it is not a true privative clause. [I 41 The dual role of the Registrar - as decision-maker and the person who investigates and rules on the decision - is most significant. In this context, the person affected is one who has not yet had an opportunity to be heard on appeavprotest of the decision by any independent person or tribunal. The following comments of the Court of Appeal in Provincial Tax Commissioner v. Maritime Dredging, eta/. are therefore relevant:... Although vested with the jurisdiction to consider a Notice of Objection pursuant to s. 9, the Provincial Tax Commissioner is under no obligation to hold a hearing, and he could hardly be said to be at arms length from the Provincial Treasurer, the person from whom he takes his direction and the person responsible for the assessment of the tax in the first instance. In substance, when the Provincial Tax Commissioner a N on a Notice of Objection, he is conducting a reconsideration of the assessment, a process which is not in the nature of an appeal.... (p. 86, per McQuaid, J.A.) These latter comments regarding the reconsideration of a decision after a notice of
6 Page: 4 objection has been filed appear very applicable to the Registrar's investigation of a protest of his own decision. [15] In the instant case, the person rendering the initial decision was not the same person rendering the decision on the protest. However, this was because the person holding the position of Registrar happened to change during the coune of time this matter was being dealt with: I have accepted your letter as a protest of my predecessor's decision... (letter, Tab 22, Record) [16] 1 do not consider that this fortuitous change of persons removes the protest process from the comments cited above in Maritime Dredging. [17] The role of the Registrar, the one who makes the initial decision and the one who reviews that decision, is problematic from the perspective of the fairness of the hearing at the level of the protest. While there is a privative clause, it is subject to a right of appeal. The Registrar would not appear to be any more expert than the court in interpreting the sections of the hdian Ad regarding registration and applying them to the faas of the case The type of hearing contemplated on appeal is not specified in the Indian Ad. Section 14.3 provides for a right of appeal within six months after the Registrar renders a decision on a protest under The only directions given are: 14.3(3) On receipt of a copy of a notlce of appeal under subsection (Z), the Registrar shall forthwith file with the court a copy of the decision being appealed together with all documentary evidence considered in arriving at that dec~sion and any recording or transcript of any oral proceedings related thereto that were held before the Registrar. (4) The court may, after hearing an appeal under this section, la1 affirm, vary or reverse the decision oi the Registrar; or + (bl refer the subject-matter of the appeal back to the Registrar for reconsideration or further invest~gat~on. [I 91 The fact that the Registrar is required to forward the record to the court, and the fad that the court may send matters back to the Registrar 'for reconsideration or further investigation' does not overcome the problem with the procedure set out in the lndian Ad, insofar as providing the applicant with a fair hearing. [201 This is not to say that the hearing needed to have been in any special form. I
7 Page: 5 find no merit in the argument of the applicant that the Registrar's refusal to allow an oral hearing supports the argument for a trial de novo. As stated in Simmonds v. Law Society of Prince Edward Island (1 999, 134 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 328 (P.E.I.S.C.-T.D.), the rules of natural justice do not require an oral hearing for there to be a fair hearing. [21] Counsel for the respondent cited Re Mdrthur et a1 v. Registrar, Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (1992), 91 D.L.R. (4th) 666 (Sask. Q.B.) in support of its argument that an appeal pursuant to s of the Ad is a review of the record only, not a trial de novo. Matheson J. states in that case: The foregoing provision 114.3(31 and (4)] would not seem to contemplate that additional evidence might be adduced in the appellate courr. (p. 671) However, Matheson 1. goes on to point out that additional evidence was put forward in that case by way of affidavit and no objection was made to this additional evidence. Clearly in that case, the nature of the hearing contemplated by s was not raised as an issue and so was not dealt with at any length by Matheson j. AS this appeal will be the first opportunity for the applicant to be heard by an independent tribunal, I conclude that the hearing of this appeal should be by way of trial de novo. ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE [221 However, this is not to say that any particular type of evidence may be put before the trial judge. As stated in the text Administrative Law in Canada (2nd) by Sara Blake, at p 136: If the appeal is by way of a new hearing, when and to what extent may reference be made to [he record of the proceedings below7 The appellate body i s not expected to stan from scratch. The evidence before and the reasons for decision of the inferior tribunal are admissible before the appellate tribunal and may be accorded considerable weight especially it the inferior tribunal war expert in the field, heard the parties' evidence and made detailed findings of fact, and rendered extensive, well-thoughtsut reasons. New evidence that was not available at the timeof the hearing before the lower tribunal should be admitted. Evidence not presented to the tribunal of first instance may be admitted before the appellate tribunal. However, if it was deliberately withheld from the first tribunal, it should be approached with caution. The appellate tribunal should not require the appellant to show that the subordinate tribunal's decision was patently unrea5onable before interfering. It should assess the evidence it has heard and come to its own decision, but may give weight to the decision under appeal. [23] The thrust of the applicant's motion in the instant case, although framed broadly in the nature of an order determining that the appeal hearing be by way of
8 SUWtMt COURT PEI PAGE 07 Page: 6 trial de novo, has in faa been to seek an order approving the tendering at trial of oral history evidence regarding custom adoption for the Lennox Island Band. [24] Such an order will depend upon the relevance of that evidence as determined by the trial judge. The relevance of such evidence is an issue upon which the applicant and respondent disagree. [25] In a letter to the applicant dated August 26, 1994 (tab 20, record) the Registrar's view of the issue regarding custom adoption was stated as follows on p. 3: The decision that Joseph Tuplin is not entitled to be registered in accordance with paragraph 6(lKa) does not at all imply a finding that no parentchild relationship was created by the custom adoption. It is based solely on the fact that at no time prior to April 17, 1985 did adoption of any kind constitute a basis for registration as an Indian In a letter dated November 14, 1995 (tab 19, record), the Registrar dealt with the same issue when deciding upon the applicant's request for an oral hearing as follows: The fact that your client's father was adopted by a member of the Lennox Island Band in accordance with the customs of that communiry is nor in dispute.... Lp.11 I beiieve the larger question raised by Mr. Tuplin's protest is whether or not a non-indian person could have gained Indian Status by virtue of being adopted in accordance with the laws of the state or province in which the adoption took place or in accordance with the customary practices of the lndian community to which his adoptive parenb belonged prior to April 17, As I stated in my letter to Mr. Tuplin, I do not believe that any form of adoption would have created a situation by which a non-indian child could become registered under the Act prior to the 1985 amendments. In light of the above, your request for a hearing is denied. [p.2] I271 While the applicant argues on appeal that the Registrar breached the principles of natural justice by denying the applicant an oral hearing to prove that custom adoption has been practised for hundreds of years, the basis for the denial is that proving that point would be irrelevant and have no bearing upon registration rights under the lndian Ad. As stated by the respondent in her facturn (tab 3, p. 5, para. 15): The determining issue is not the validity of the practice of custom adoption but the interpretation of section 6UJ of the Indian Act, relating to registrat~on of adopted individuals....
9 Page: 7 [28] In response, the applicant's argument appears to be: we need to put forward evidence of custom adoption so that we can prove it is an entrenched aboriginal right and that, in turn, will show an entitlement to registration under the Indian Ad. [29] However, the trial judge must be the one to decide on the relevance of such evidence, since even if custom adoption is an aboriginal right proteded by s. 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 the evidence the applicant seeks to adduce may in fact be unnecessary. The Registrar's comments suggest there may be no dispute about Joseph Tuplin having been adopted in accordance with such custom. The Registrar appears to have accepted that a parentlchild relationship was established by custom adoption. What is at issue is the right to be registered under the lndian Ad as a result of that custom adoption. [30] What the applicant must do is connect custom adoption with registration rights under the Indian Ad. Registration rights are granted based upon the characteristics of the registrant. The applicant disputes the characterization of Joseph Tuplin and, subsequently, his son Graham Tuplin. The reason for the dispute is the Registrar's position that custom adoption did not grant full registration rights under the Indian Act until after April 17, The applicant's position appears to be that these rights are inherent and can't be so limited by statute. This is a legal question to be answered by the trial judge. [31] 1 also note that the applicant appears to confuse oral history with oral evidence. Oral history, as referred to in Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, [I 99n S.C.J. No. 108 [Q.L.) is a type of evidence arid the Court's comments refer to the way in which this evidence must be dealt with, not the way in which it must be received. "Oral history" could be taped and transcribed and in that way produced in documentary form for consideration. There is nothing in Delgamuukw, supra, to suggest this would be inappropriate. [32] Regarding the merits of the applicant's constitutional argument that custom adoption is an aboriginal right, that is a matter for the trial judge to decide. It follows, then, that a decision about whether or not evidence of custom adoption is relevant to this proceeding cannot be made by anyone other than the trial judge. CONCLUSION [33] The hearing of this matter shall be by way of trial de novo.
10 Page: 8 [34] The trial judge must dqide whether or not oral history evidence of custom adoption is relevant and, if relevant, in what form it may be adduced. October 9, 1998
CHECKLIST FOR RULE 61 APPEALS TO AN APPEAL DIVISION I N D E X Certificate or Agreement Respecting Evidence
CHECKLIST FOR RULE 61 APPEALS TO AN APPEAL DIVISION I N D E X 61.02 Leave to Appeal 61.03 Commencement of Appeals 61.04 Certificate or Agreement Respecting Evidence 61.05 Cross-Appeals 61.06 Amendment
More informationCitation: Duffy Const. v. Dennis Const Date: PESCTD 95 Docket: GSC Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: Duffy Const. v. Dennis Const Date: 20001205 2000 PESCTD 95 Docket: GSC-17689 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN: AND: DUFFY
More informationCitation: Gallant v. Piccott Date: PESCAD 17 Docket: AD-0859 Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: Gallant v. Piccott Date: 20000518 2000 PESCAD 17 Docket: AD-0859 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION BETWEEN: STEPHEN ARTHUR PICCOTT,
More informationCitation: Polar Foods v. Jensen Date: PESCTD 63 Docket: S-1-GS Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: Polar Foods v. Jensen Date: 20020924 2002 PESCTD 63 Docket: S-1-GS-18910 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN: POLAR FOODS INTERNATIONAL
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION LAW SOCIETY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
Date: 19980514 Docket: GSC-16464 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN: LAW SOCIETY OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND APPLICANT AND: PAULA M. MacKINNON
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION LOUISE PARKER
Date: 19971222 Docket: GSC-15236 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN: LOUISE PARKER PLAINTIFF AND: LEDWELL, LARTER and DRISCOLL and DAVID
More informationTRIALS RULE 52 TRIAL PROCEDURE
TRIALS RULE 52 TRIAL PROCEDURE FAILURE TO ATTEND AT TRIAL 52.01 (1) Where an action is called for trial and all parties fail to attend, the trial judge may strike the action off the trial list. (2) Where
More informationRULE 71 FAMILY LAW PROCEEDINGS
RULE 71 FAMILY LAW PROCEEDINGS APPLICATION OF THE RULE 71.01 Rules 71.02 to 71.12 apply to proceedings under the Family Law Act and the Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. DEFINITIONS 71.02 In Rules
More informationSASKATCHEWAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW UPDATE
SASKATCHEWAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW UPDATE Larry Seiferling, Q.C., Partner, McDougall Gauley LLP Angela Giroux, Associate, McDougall Gauley LLP (a) Introduction There are few, if any, issues that have arisen
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
Page: 1 SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: IRAC v. Privacy Commissioner & D.B.S. 2012 PESC 25 Date: 20120831 Docket: S1-GS-23775 Registry: Charlottetown Between: Island Regulatory and Appeal
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA
COURT OF APPEAL FOR BRITISH COLUMBIA Between: Date: 20120215 Docket: CA039639 Ingrid Andrea Franzke And Appellant (Petitioner) Workers' Compensation Appeal Tribunal Respondent (Defendant) Before: The Honourable
More informationSASKATCHEWAN COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH RULES RESPECTING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES
CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS 501 SASKATCHEWAN COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH RULES RESPECTING PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCES (SI/86-158, Canada Gazette (Part II), September 3, 1986.) 1 When an accused is to be tried with a jury,
More informationRULE 21 DETERMINATION OF AN ISSUE BEFORE TRIAL WHERE AVAILABLE To any Party on a Question of Law (1) A party may move before a judge, (a) for
RULE 21 DETERMINATION OF AN ISSUE BEFORE TRIAL WHERE AVAILABLE To any Party on a Question of Law 21.01 (1) A party may move before a judge, (a) for the determination, before trial, of a question of law
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Citation: Lank v. Government of PEI 2010 PESC 09 Date: Docket: S1-GS Registry: Charlottetown
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: Lank v. Government of PEI 2010 PESC 09 Date: 20100218 Docket: S1-GS-16828 Registry: Charlottetown Between: Stephen Lank and Stephen Lank Enterprises Inc.
More informationCitation: R. v. R.C. (P.) Date: PESCTD 22 Docket: GSC Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: R. v. R.C. (P.) Date: 2000308 2000 PESCTD 22 Docket: GSC-17475 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: AND: PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
More informationFARM PRACTICES ACT REGULATIONS
c t FARM PRACTICES ACT REGULATIONS PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this regulation, current to February 1, 2004. It is intended for
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (Manitoba Court of Appeal) APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL (Supreme Court Act section 40 R.S., c.5-19, s.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (Manitoba Court of Appeal) File No. BETWEEN: ERNEST LIONEL JOSEPH BLAIS, - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN, - and - MÉTIS NATIONAL COUNCIL, Applicant (Accused), Respondent (Informant),
More informationPLEASE NOTE. Legislative Counsel Office Tel: (902)
c t AFFIDAVITS ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to January 1, 2009. It is intended for information and reference
More informationFinancial Services Tribunal. Practice Directives and Guidelines
Financial Services Tribunal Practice Directives and Guidelines Revised October 2012 Financial Services Tribunal Practice Directives and Guidelines 1.0 Introduction The purpose of these Practice Directives
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN LESLIE CAMERON KING
PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION Citation: R. v. King 2008 PESCTD 18 Date: 20080325 Docket: S1-GC-572 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: AND: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN LESLIE
More informationPage: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION
Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION Citation: Attorney General (PEI) v. Thompson et al. 2003 PESCAD 18 Date: 20030623 Docket: S1-AD-0957 Registry: Charlottetown
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Citation: Widelitz v. Cox & Palmer 2010 PESC 43 Date: Docket: S1-GS Registry: Charlottetown
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: Widelitz v. Cox & Palmer 2010 PESC 43 Date: 20101022 Docket: S1-GS-23705 Registry: Charlottetown Between: Kenneth Widelitz Plaintiff And: Cox & Palmer Defendant
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Walcott v. Walcott, 2017 NSSC 327 LIBRARY HEADING
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: Walcott v. Walcott, 2017 NSSC 327 Date: 20170926 Docket: File No. 460559 Registry: Sydney Between: Rita Walcott and Gerald Walcott v. Georgina Walcott and Joseph
More informationRULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS
RULE 82 CRIMINAL APPEAL RULE INTERPRETATION AND DEFINITIONS 82.01 (1) In this rule, unless the context requires otherwise: "appeal" includes an application for leave to appeal and a crossappeal; (appel)
More informationCitation: Jenkins v. HRC & ors. Date: PESCTD 34 Docket: S-1-GS Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: Jenkins v. HRC & ors. Date: 20030404 2003 PESCTD 34 Docket: S-1-GS-19359 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISL IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN Ronald Jenkins The
More informationBoundaries Act. Client Guide December 2003 Ministry of Consumer and Business Services Registration Division Title and Survey Services Office
Boundaries Act Client Guide December 2003 Ministry of Consumer and Business Services Registration Division Title and Survey Services Office TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction... 1 2. Application and Accompanying
More information2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004
This is a version of The General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules which incorporates the 2004 Rules and amendments made to those rules in 2009, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2017 2004 No 2608 HEALTH
More informationAffidavit Filing of Application Service Delivery of Application Determination 79.10
RULE 79 PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND RULE OF PRACTISE RESPECTING APPLICATIONS AND HEARINGS CONCERNING A REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF YEARS OF IMPRISONMENT WITHOUT ELIGIBILITY FOR PAROLE Short Title 79.01 This Rule
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Cariboo Gur Sikh Temple Society (1979) v. British Columbia (Employment Standards Tribunal), 2016 BCSC 1622 Between: Cariboo Gur Sikh Temple Society (1979)
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION
Citation: Society of Lloyd s v. McNeill Date: 20030924 2003 PESCTD 76 Docket: S-1-GS-19948 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION In the Matter of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Between: R. v. Plummer, 2017 BCSC 1579 Date: 20170906 Docket: 27081 Registry: Vancouver Regina v. Scott Plummer Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Bowden
More informationIndian Act I-5 SHORT TITLE INTERPRETATION
Indian Act ( R.S., 1985, c. I-5 ) Disclaimer: These documents are not the official versions (more). Attention: See coming into force provision and notes, where applicable. An Act respecting Indians Short
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: The Law Society of British Columbia v. Parsons, 2015 BCSC 742 Date: 20150506 Docket: S151214 Registry: Vancouver Between: The Law Society of British Columbia
More informationVICTIMS OF FAMILY VIOLENCE ACT REGULATIONS
c t VICTIMS OF FAMILY VIOLENCE ACT REGULATIONS PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this regulation, current to January 1, 2009. It is intended
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION. Against. Gerard Joseph MacDonald
PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION Citation: R v. MacDonald 2007 PESCTD 29 Date: 20070820 Docket: S1 GC-556 Registry: Charlottetown Between Her Majesty the Queen Against
More informationc t LABOUR MOBILITY ACT
c t LABOUR MOBILITY ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to June 30, 2010. It is intended for information and reference
More informationEXAMINATION OUT OF COURT RULE 34 PROCEDURE ON ORAL EXAMINATIONS
EXAMINATION OUT OF COURT RULE 34 PROCEDURE ON ORAL EXAMINATIONS APPLICATION OF THE RULE 34.01 Rules 34.02 to 34.19 apply to, (a) an oral examination for discovery under Rule 31; (b) the taking of evidence
More informationArsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward Island, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 3
Arsenault-Cameron v. Prince Edward Island, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 3 Noëlla Arsenault-Cameron, Madeleine Costa-Petitpas and the Fédération des Parents de l Île-du-Prince-Édouard Inc. Appellants v. The Government
More informationNEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER
March 20, 2009 A-2009-004 NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONER REPORT A-2009-004 Eastern Regional Integrated Health Authority Summary: The Applicant applied under
More informationand THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA AND CLIFFS NATURAL RESOURCES INC ORDER
Federal Court Cour fédérale Date: 20130315 Docket: T-1820-11 Ottawa, Ontario, March 15, 2013 PRESENT: Madam Prothonotary Aronovitch BETWEEN: MARTEN FALLS FIRST NATION, WEBEQUIE FIRST NATION, NIBINAMIK
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION. Patrick Jay
Citation: Jay v. DHL Express Date: 20060103 2006 PESCTD 01 Docket: S1 GS-18505 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION Between: And: Patrick Jay DHL
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT, R.S.O. 1990, c. S.5, AS AMENDED - AND -
Ontario Commission des P.O. Box 55, 19 th Floor CP 55, 19e étage Securities valeurs mobilières 20 Queen Street West 20, rue queen ouest Commission de l Ontario Toronto ON M5H 3S8 Toronto ON M5H 3S8 IN
More informationHEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS. General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004
2004 No 2608 HEALTH CARE AND ASSOCIATED PROFESSIONS DOCTORS General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004 Made 4th October 2004 Laid before Parliament 7th October 2004 Coming
More informationCitation: Action Press v. PEITF Date: PESCTD 02 Docket: GSC Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: Action Press v. PEITF Date: 20020114 2002 PESCTD 02 Docket: GSC-18145 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN: AND: CARRUTHERS ENTERPRISES
More informationCONSUMER REPORTING ACT
c t CONSUMER REPORTING ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to January 1, 2009. It is intended for information and
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION
Date: 19980707 Docket: GSC-16600 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN: ADMINISTRATOR OF THE PRIVATE TRAINING SCHOOLS ACT, R.S.P.E.I. 1988,
More informationCHILD PROTECTION ACT REGULATIONS
c t CHILD PROTECTION ACT REGULATIONS PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this regulation, current to June 1, 2010. It is intended for information
More informationRULE 53 EVIDENCE AT TRIAL
RULE 53 EVIDENCE AT TRIAL EVIDENCE BY WITNESSES Oral Evidence as General Rule 53.01 (1) Unless these rules provide otherwise, witnesses at the trial of an action shall be examined orally in court and the
More informationPart 44 Alberta Divorce Rules
R561.1-562.1 Part 44 Alberta Divorce Rules Forms will be found in Schedule B Definitions 561.1 In this Part, (a) Act means the Divorce Act (Canada) (RSC 1985, c3 (2nd) Supp.); (b) divorce proceeding means
More informationBILL NO. 42. Health Information Act
HOUSE USE ONLY CHAIR: WITH / WITHOUT 4th SESSION, 64th GENERAL ASSEMBLY Province of Prince Edward Island 63 ELIZABETH II, 2014 BILL NO. 42 Health Information Act Honourable Doug W. Currie Minister of Health
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION
Citation: Society of Lloyd s v. McNeill Date: 20031107 2003 PESCTD 88 Docket: S-1-GS-19948 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION In the Matter of
More informationImpact of Class Action Rules on Lawsuits by Aboriginal Nations in Federal Court
August 10, 2004 Ms. Éloïse Arbour Secretary to the Rules Committee Federal Court of Appeal Ottawa ON K1A 0H9 Dear Ms. Arbour: Re: Impact of Class Action Rules on Lawsuits by Aboriginal Nations in Federal
More informationPLEASE NOTE. authority of the Queen s Printer for the province should be consulted to determine the authoritative statement of the law.
c t JUDICATURE ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to May 12, 2017. It is intended for information and reference purposes
More informationThis Act will be repealed by the Industrial Property Act 1 of 2012 (GG 4907), which has not yet been brought into force. ACT
Trade Marks in South West Africa Act 48 of 1973 (RSA) (RSA GG 3913) came into force in South Africa and South West Africa on 1 January 1974 (see section 82 of Act) APPLICABILITY TO SOUTH WEST AFRICA: The
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: The Law Society of British Columbia v. Boyer, 2016 BCSC 342 Date: 20160210 Docket: S1510783 Registry: Vancouver Between: The Law Society of British Columbia
More informationRules of the High Court (Family Proceedings) 2009 PART 2 ORDERS WITH RESPECT TO CHILDREN
6. Application of Part 2 PART 2 ORDERS WITH RESPECT TO CHILDREN This Part applies to family proceedings in the Court so far as they relate to any matter under Part 1 or 2 of the 2001 Act with respect to
More informationPage: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND COURT OF APPEAL. JOHN McGOWAN and CAROLYN McGOWAN THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA
Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND COURT OF APPEAL Citation: McGowan v. Bank of Nova Scotia 2011 PECA 20 Date: 20111214 Docket: S1-CA-1202 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: AND:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: Simpson v. Carewco et ors. 2010 PESC 07 Date: 20100202 Docket: S1-GS-22899 Registry: Charlottetown Between: Timothy G. Simpson And: Plaintiff Carewco Holdings
More informationPLEADINGS RULE 25 PLEADINGS IN AN ACTION
PLEADINGS RULE 25 PLEADINGS IN AN ACTION PLEADINGS REQUIRED OR PERMITTED Action Commenced by Statement of Claim or Notice of Action 25.01 (1) In an action commenced by statement of claim or notice of action,
More informationGeneral Comments. 1. Several commenters noted the importance of maintaining consistency in drafting with current securities legislation.
Cooperative Capital Markets Regulatory System Provincial-Territorial Capital Markets Act September 2014 Consultation Draft: Summary of Comments Received and Ministerial/Regulatory Responses The following
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 16, 2004. It is intended for information and reference purposes only.
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Case CCT 11/01 IN RE: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE MPUMALANGA PETITIONS BILL, 2000 Heard on : 16 August 2001 Decided on : 5 October 2001 JUDGMENT LANGA DP: Introduction
More informationBill S-8 Bill S-11. An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on First Nation lands
Clause by Clause Comparison: Bill S-8, An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on First Nation lands (February 29, 2012) and Bill S-11, An Act respecting the safety of drinking water on first nation
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of these regulations, please see the Table of Regulations.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this regulation, current to February 1, 2004. It is intended for information and reference purposes
More informationLEGAL REVIEW OF FIRST NATIONS RIGHTS TO CARBON CREDITS
REPORT 6: LEGAL REVIEW OF FIRST NATIONS RIGHTS TO CARBON CREDITS Prepared For: The Assembly of First Nations Prepared By: March 2006 The views expressed herein are those of the author and not necessarily
More informationNATURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING ACT POULTRY MEAT COMMODITY MARKETING REGULATIONS
c t NATURAL PRODUCTS MARKETING ACT POULTRY MEAT COMMODITY MARKETING REGULATIONS PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this regulation, current
More informationISLAND REGULATORY AND APPEALS COMMISSION ACT
c t ISLAND REGULATORY AND APPEALS COMMISSION ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 15, 2016. It is intended
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: British Columbia (Ministry of Justice) v. Maddock, 2015 BCSC 746 Date: 20150423 Docket: 14-3365 Registry: Victoria In the matter of the decisions of the
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN S BENCH CRIMINAL RULES
Court of Queen s Bench Rules COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH CRIMINAL RULES Table of Contents 9.1.2 Rules Pursuant to Section 424 of the Criminal Code with Respect to Mandamus, Certiorari, Habeas Corpus and Prohibition
More informationPage: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION
Page: 1 PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION Citation: J.J.C. (a young offender) v. R. 2003 PESCAD 26 Date: 20031020 Docket: S1-AD-0987 Registry: Charlottetown Publication
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
More informationOrder COLLEGE OF OPTICIANS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Order 02-35 COLLEGE OF OPTICIANS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA David Loukidelis, Information and Privacy Commissioner July 16, 2002 Quicklaw Cite: [2002] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 35 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/order02-35.pdf
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Cal-terra Developments Ltd. v. Hunter, 2017 BCSC 1320 Date: 20170728 Docket: 15-4976 Registry: Victoria Re: Judicial Review Procedure Act, R.S.B.C. 1996,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Citation: Cairns v Bd. of School Trustees & Ors 2009 PESC 03 GORDON CAIRNS
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: Cairns v Bd. of School Trustees & Ors 2009 PESC 03 Court File No. S2-GS-5182 Date: 20090128 Registry: Summerside BETWEEN: GORDON CAIRNS PLAINTIFF (RESPONDENT)
More informationRULES OF COURT (1978) ADOPTED ON 14 APRIL 1978 AND ENTERED INTO FORCE ON 1 JULY
Rules of Court Article 30 of the Statute of the International Court of Justice provides that "the Court shall frame rules for carrying out its functions". These Rules are intended to supplement the general
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS
Court of Appeal Rules COURT OF APPEAL RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS APPEALS TO THE COURT OF APPEAL...11.1.3 Definitions, 501...11.1.3 Sittings, 502...11.1.3 Chief Justice to preside, 503...11.1.3 Adjournment
More informationOFFICE OF THE INFORMATION & PRIVACY COMMISSIONER for Prince Edward Island. Order No. FI Re: Department of Communities, Land, and Environment
OFFICE OF THE INFORMATION & PRIVACY COMMISSIONER for Prince Edward Island Order No. FI-16-004 Re: Department of Communities, Land, and Environment Prince Edward Island Information and Privacy Commissioner
More informationRULE 58 ASSESSMENT OF COSTS
RULE 58 ASSESSMENT OF COSTS GENERAL 58.01 Where a rule or order provides that a party is entitled to the costs of all or part of a proceeding and the costs have not been fixed by the court, they shall
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: PEI Protestant Children s Trust and Province of PEI and S. Marshall 2014 PESC 6 Date:20140225 Docket: S1-GS-20889 Registry: Charlottetown Between: And: And:
More informationCANADA-BRITISH COLUMBIA ENVIRONMENTAL OCCURRENCES NOTIFICATION AGREEMENT (the Agreement )
CANADA-BRITISH COLUMBIA ENVIRONMENTAL OCCURRENCES NOTIFICATION AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) BETWEEN Her Majesty the Queen in right of CANADA as represented by the Minister of the Environment for Canada (
More informationTrade Marks Act (2) If this Act does not commence under subsection (1) before 1 January. No. 156 of An Act relating to trade marks
Trade Marks Act 1994 No. 156 of 1994 An Act relating to trade marks The Parliament of Australia enacts: [Assented to 13 December 1994] PART 1--PRELIMINARY Short title L This Act may be cited as the Trade
More informationThe Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board. Disciplinary Procedure Rules
The Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board Disciplinary Procedure Rules The Patent Regulation Board of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and the Trade Mark Regulation Board
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013)
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) 1. Scope of Application and Interpretation 1.1 Where parties have agreed to refer their disputes
More informationSocial Workers Act CHAPTER 12 OF THE ACTS OF as amended by. 2001, c. 19; 2005, c. 60; 2012, c. 48, s. 40; 2015, c. 52
Social Workers Act CHAPTER 12 OF THE ACTS OF 1993 as amended by 2001, c. 19; 2005, c. 60; 2012, c. 48, s. 40; 2015, c. 52 2016 Her Majesty the Queen in right of the Province of Nova Scotia Published by
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION. Her Majesty the Queen. against. Corey Blair Clarke
Citation: R v Clarke Date:20050216 2005 PCSCTD 10 Docket:S 1 GC 384 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION Her Majesty the Queen against Corey Blair
More informationThe Crown Minerals Act
1 The Crown Minerals Act being Chapter C-50.2 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1984-85- 86 (effective July 1, 1985) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1988-89, c.42; 1989-90, c.54; 1990-91, c.13;
More informationCONTROVERTED ELECTIONS (PROVINCIAL) ACT
c t CONTROVERTED ELECTIONS (PROVINCIAL) ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 2, 2015. It is intended for
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR COURT OF APPEAL Citation: Weir s Construction Limited v. Warford (Estate), 2018 NLCA 5 Date: January 22, 2018 Docket: 201601H0092 BETWEEN: WEIR S CONSTRUCTION
More informationRULE 60 ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS
RULE 60 ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS DEFINITIONS 60.01 In Rules 60.02 to 60.19, (a) "creditor" means a person who is entitled to enforce an order for the payment or recovery of money; (b) "debtor" means a person
More informationRULES OF COURT (1978) ADOPTED ON 14 APRIL 1978 AND ENTERED INTO FORCE ON 1 JULY PREAMBLE *
RULES OF COURT (1978) ADOPTED ON 14 APRIL 1978 AND ENTERED INTO FORCE ON 1 JULY 1978 1 PREAMBLE * The Court, Having regard to Chapter XIV of the Charter of the United Nations; Having regard to the Statute
More informationDr. Nael Bunni, Chairman, Dispute Resolution Panel, Engineers Ireland, 22 Clyde Road, Ballsbridge, Dublin 4. December 2000.
Preamble This Arbitration Procedure has been prepared by Engineers Ireland principally for use with the Engineers Ireland Conditions of Contract for arbitrations conducted under the Arbitration Acts 1954
More informationRule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL Introduction Definitions General Principles
Rule 8400 Rules of Practice and Procedure GENERAL 8401. Introduction (1) The Rules of Practice and Procedure (the Rules of Procedure ) set out the rules that govern the conduct of IIROC s enforcement proceedings
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF MANITOBA
Origin: Appeal from a decision of the Master of the Court of Queen's Bench, dated June 5, 2013 Date: 20131213 Docket: CI 13-01-81367 (Winnipeg Centre) Indexed as: Jewish Community Campus of Winnipeg Inc.
More informationP R O T O C O L INTER-JURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE
INTER-JURISDICTIONAL PRACTICE P R O T O C O L AGREEMENT SIGNED ON FEBRUARY 18, 1994 IN JASPER, ALBERTA. Amended: February 24, 1995, March 2, 1996 and August 28, 1998 This copy includes the amendments,
More informationIntroductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario
Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario Table of Contents INTRODUCTION This guide contains an overview of the Canadian legal system and court structure as well as key procedural and substantive
More informationThe Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning. Robert John Douglas McRoberts
2010 LSBC 19 Report issued: August 03, 2010 The Law Society of British Columbia In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c.9 and a hearing concerning Robert John Douglas McRoberts Applicant
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA
PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA November 4, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE TO PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: Law Society of B.C. v. Bryfogle, 2006 BCSC 1092 Between: And: The Law Society of British Columbia Date: 20060609 Docket: L052318 Registry: Vancouver Petitioner
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT FERRIER, SWINTON & LEDERER JJ. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Applicant.
CITATION: St. Catharines (City v. IPCO, 2011 ONSC 346 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 351/09 DATE: 20110316 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT FERRIER, SWINTON & LEDERER JJ. B E T W E E N: THE
More informationOFFICE OF THE ETHICS COMMISSIONER PROVINCE OF ALBERTA. Report of an Investigation under the Lobbyists Act. Re: Mr. Joseph Lougheed
OFFICE OF THE ETHICS COMMISSIONER PROVINCE OF ALBERTA Report of an Investigation under the Lobbyists Act Re: Mr. Joseph Lougheed May 6, 2013 May 6, 2013 Hon. Gene Zwozdesky Speaker Office of the Speaker
More information