Judgment Enforcement Against Foreign Debtors
|
|
- Justina Dalton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 International Litigation Judgment Enforcement Against Foreign Debtors Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky, New York Law Journal January 29, 2015 Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky In most cases, the object of the litigation exercise for plaintiffs is to obtain a judgment that can be enforced. This is usually not a problem when the debtor is operating an ongoing business, using bank accounts and engaging with customers who owe it money. When, however, the judgment debtor is foreign and has no ongoing business operations and no visible assets, the usual approach of enforcing a judgment against it by identifying the debtor's assets and levying on them becomes more challenging. Two recent, related New York decisions illustrate the difficulties in pursuing certain foreign debtors. The cases concern a lawsuit brought by Motorola in the Southern District of New York based on claims of fraud and misapplication of funds, in which it was awarded, in 2003, a substantial judgment for over $2 billion against members of the Turkish Uzan family, who failed to defend the lawsuit on the merits. In 2006, these damages were supplemented by an award of $1 billion in punitive damages. 1
2 Over the ensuing years, the U.S. courts have not minced words in describing the defendants and their responses to the judgments. Already under indictment in their home country of Turkey for a separate fraud, they have evaded payment, in the words of Judge Jed Rakoff, " by utilizing an international web of proxies and stealth to hide their assets and evade payment" pursuant to " diverse, complex, and concerted efforts to conceal their assets from their creditors." 1 Earlier, the New York Court of Appeals described the Uzan defendants as having " gone to great lengths to avoid satisfying the judgments and [remaining] in contempt for failure to comply with the District Court's orders, subjecting them to arrest if they enter the United States." 2 In the face of this conduct, Motorola turned to actions against third parties that might have assets of the defendants or have information about them. Motorola engaged in certain of these postjudgment discovery proceedings ex parte and under seal. 3 Thereafter, based on the discovery obtained, the district court issued an order enjoining the defendants and anyone receiving notice of the order from transferring or dissipating any of the defendants' assets and to freeze any one of the defendants' property in their possession. Separate Entity Rule The debtors defended by invoking the "separate entity" rule, a judge-made doctrine that has been followed for almost a century, under which the bank account of a debtor may be attached only at the branch where the debtor's account is located. In this case, the deposits were located in foreign banks outside the United States. Motorola argued that a 2009 decision of the New York State Court of Appeals, Koehler v. Bank of Bermuda, 12 N.Y. 3d 538 (2009), was authority for a right to compel foreign banks to comply with the judgment-enforcement procedures under the CPLR 4 by bringing into New York bank deposits held in branches outside New York. In the Koehler case, corporate securities owned by the judgment debtor were located at the Bank of Bermuda outside the United States, where they had been pledged as collateral for a loan. The New York Court of Appeals ruled that, since the Bank of Bermuda had conceded in the litigation that it was subject to the jurisdiction of the New York State courts through its New York subsidiary, it could be compelled to bring the debtor's shares ("or monies sufficient to pay the judgment") into New York, where they could be collected by "a designated sheriff" 5 for the judgment creditor, Mr. Koehler. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that the Koehler case was distinguishable because the Bank of Bermuda had conceded that it was subject to the jurisdiction of the New York courts, whereas, in the case of Motorola against the Uzans, none of the foreign banks had made such a concession. On appeal by Motorola, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit referred the question of the applicability of the separate entity rule to the New York Court of Appeals, which responded by upholding the longstanding judicially created rule. The Court of Appeals described the separate entity rule as being "a limiting principle" based on a "long-standing common-law doctrine" on the exercise of jurisdiction over garnishees under CPLR 5225(b). The "limiting principle," it said, functions "in the context of international banking, particularly in situations involving attempts to restrain assets held in garnishee bank's foreign branches." Moreover, the court declined Motorola's invitation to "cast aside" the separate 2
3 entity rule. It has been, the court said, part of New York common law for nearly a century and used repeatedly by New York courts to "prevent post judgment restraint of assets situated in foreign branch accounts based solely on the service of a foreign bank's New York branch." The court pointed to the possibility of garnishee banks' suffering "double liability" in separate jurisdictions in the absence of the rule, which, it said, promotes international comity. 6 Regarding Motorola's contention that the court's earlier Koehler decision abrogated the separate entity rule, the court admitted that it did not discuss the separate entity rule in that case, saying that it could "discern two reasons for [its] silence on the subject." First, the foreign bank did not raise the issue, and, second, the separate entity rule would not have applied in Koehler because it did not involve bank branches or assets in New York bank accounts. 7 The court stated, in the conclusion of its opinion, " we believe that abolishing the separate entity rule would result in serious consequences in the realm of international banking to the detriment of New York's preeminence in global financial affairs." 8 The Second Circuit followed up on this decision by ordering the restraining order on the defendants' assets to be vacated. 9 Motorola was thus left out of luck with respect to obtaining relief through the judgment debtors' bank accounts outside the United States at least through actions that might be taken by New York courts. But Motorola still had the extensive rights afforded to judgment creditors under the CPLR to engage in discovery concerning the nature and extent of the debtors' assets, both within and outside the United States. 10 On that front, in many of the countries in which Motorola sought discovery of information concerning the debtors' bank accounts, there were laws that blocked or otherwise prevented the disclosure of such information. France, Jordan, Switzerland and the United Arab Emirates, among other nations, had laws invoked by the banks that purported to prevent disclosure of information of the kind sought by Motorola. Discovery Judge Rakoff first ruled that the discovery could be obtained pursuant to orders of the court, rather than exclusively under the Hague Convention on the Taking of Evidence in Civil or Commercial Matters (the Hague Convention), 11 inasmuch as both are permitted under the Supreme Court's decision in the Aerospatiale case. 12 In Aerospatiale, the Supreme Court rejected the argument that the Hague Convention is either the exclusive means of obtaining evidence abroad or the "first resort" for such discovery, holding that "direct use of the Federal Rules" of discovery may be ordered by a district court providing that it protects against discovery abuse and demonstrates "due respect for any special problem confronted by the foreign litigant on account of its nationality or the location of its operations, and for any sovereign interest expressed by the foreign state." 13 Rakoff then undertook a country-by-country analysis of these foreign laws, applying the test of "consideration of international comity" of the Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States as applied by the Supreme Court in the Aerospatiale case. This five-part test essentially involves a balancing exercise with respect to comity concerning the depth and the seriousness of the concerns of the foreign countries in question in comparison with the concerns 3
4 of the party seeking relief in the U.S. courts. Rakoff determined, with the assistance of expert witnesses presented by the parties, that France, although it had its blocking law on its books since 1980, had not undertaken any serious enforcement of it. Consequently, the judge ruled, the balance tipped in favor of granting the discovery requested with respect to information from France. 14 With respect to Jordan and the UAE, Rakoff stated that the policy of bank secrecy is " not merely protective of private interests but expressive of a public interest" that is enforced through criminal prosecutions, but noted that there was nonetheless a "total paucity of published prosecutions of banks in Jordan and the UAE for complying with discovery ordered by a foreign court." On this basis, he ordered compliance with the requests for "bank information located in Jordan and the UAE." 15 As for the discovery that Motorola sought in Switzerland, Judge Rakoff reached a different conclusion. This country, he found, has been serious in enforcing the laws under its bank secrecy regime, which, he observed, is " almost an element of that nation's national identity" and its interests should be deferred to as a matter of comity. He therefore quashed the subpoenas seeking bank documents in Switzerland. 16 Struggle to Obtain Payment As can be seen from the time that has passed since the delivery of the judgment against the Uzans in 2003, actually obtaining payment by a judgment debtor can be a protracted struggle. It has been reported that Motorola has obtained some satisfaction of its judgment, 17 but only a fraction of the amount owed. If the judgment debtors operated an ongoing business with funds flowing into it, obtaining satisfaction of the judgment would have been easier, the principal challenges being bankruptcy of the debtor, having to pierce the corporate veil and fraudulent conveyances. But when the judgment debtors are individuals whose principal occupation may be the hiding of their assets, the enforcement challenges can become huge. Evasive electronic transfers can be made swiftly from bank to bank and, perhaps more important, nominees or, in a word used in this case, "proxies," in the form of trusts, foundations, corporations and individuals, can be utilized for holding and secreting funds. It has been said that the most difficult type of assignment for private (and perhaps also public) investigators is asset tracing, and it has also been said by investigators that it is often more fruitful to obtain information about and pursue individuals rather than bank accounts and other assets. Individuals such as discontented or former employees, divorced spouses or even the subjects themselves may reveal far more than documents so arduously pursued. Therefore, the struggles engaged in by Motorola and by other judgment creditors in similar situations can be hard and frustrating, with time and effort expended in obtaining information that may be stale and useless by the time it is obtained. Court proceedings are an important part of judgment enforcement, but so are inside information and luck. Endnotes: 4
5 1. Motorola Credit Corporation v. Uzan, SDNY Case 1:02-cv JSR-FM, pp. 2 and 9 (December 22, 2014) ("Rakoff Dec. 22, 2014 opinion"). 2. Motorola Credit Corporation v. Standard Chartered Bank, 2014 NY Slip Op 07199, p. 1 (Oct. 23, 2014). 3. Id. 4. CPLR, Article CPLR 5225(b). 6. Motorola Credit Corporation v. Standard Chartered Bank, 2014 NY Slip Op 07199, p. 3 of 9 (Oct. 23, 2014). 7. Id., p. 3 of Id., p. 4 of Motorola Credit Corporation v. Standard Chartered Bank, Case 1:02-cv JSR-FM (2d Cir., Dec. 5, 2014). 10. CPLR Article U.S.T. 2555, T.I.A.S. 7444, 847 U.N.T.S. 231, reprinted in 8 I.L.M. 37 (1969); U.S. Code Annotated (West), following 28 U.S.C.A Rakoff Opinion and Order of Dec. 22, 2014, p. 9, referring to Societe Industrielle Aerospatiale v. the United States District for the Southern District of Iowa, 482 U.S. at (1987). 13. Id. at Rakoff Opinion and Order of Dec. 22, 2014, pp Id. 16. Id. at p "[Motorola and Nokia] say they have searched and seized Uzan assets in 11 countries, including homes in New York and London, bank accounts, two airplanes and a yacht worth about $125 million. They also collected $1.25 billion in a settlement with Turkey following the government's seizure of Telsim assets." 5
6 Lawrence W. Newman is of counsel and David Zaslowsky is a partner in the New York office of Baker & McKenzie. They are authors of "Litigating International Commercial Disputes" (West) and can be reached at lawrence.newman@ bakermckenzie.com and david.zaslowsky@bakermckenzie.com. 6
New York Court of Appeals Permits Extraterritorial Seizure of Assets in Aid of Judgments
June 2009 New York Court of Appeals Permits Extraterritorial Seizure of Assets in Aid of Judgments BY JAMES E. BERGER Introduction On June 4, 2009, the New York Court of Appeals issued its ruling in Koehler
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/22/ :43 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/22/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -----------------------------------------------------------X FAYE T MADIGAN, Independent administrator Of Estate of KENNETH M. THOMPSON, deceased.,
More informationEnforcing Judgments: Tools at Your Disposal
Enforcing Judgments: Tools at Your Disposal Factors and other commercial lenders frequently face the situation where their borrowers default, judgment is entered against the defaulting borrower, and assets
More informationPage 1. No. 58 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK N.Y. LEXIS 839; 2013 NY Slip Op April 30, 2013, Decided NOTICE: RIVERA, J.
Page 1 [**1] Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Appellant, v Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Respondent, William H. Millard, Defendant, The Millard Foundation, Intervenor. No. 58 COURT OF
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/14/ :57 PM INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 210 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/14/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X HOLDRUM INVESTMENTS, individually and Index No. 650950-2011 derivatively on
More informationIn this civil forfeiture action, we are asked to. determine whether service of process pursuant to CPLR 313 on
================================================================= This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationCase 1:06-cv TPG Document 45 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 11. : : Defendant. :
Case 106-cv-03276-TPG Document 45 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x MOHAMMAD LADJEVARDIAN, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, Defendant.
More informationZachary G. Newman Anthony Ellis JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT: HOW TO REALLY WIN YOUR CASE
Zachary G. Newman Anthony Ellis JUDGMENT ENFORCEMENT: HOW TO REALLY WIN YOUR CASE Part I: Preliminary Asset Searches and Pre- Judgment Litigation Strategy: Using Asset Investigation To Guide Litigation
More informationRenasant Bank v GOM Bldrs., LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 32229(U) October 27, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: Nancy M.
Renasant Bank v GOM Bldrs., LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 32229(U) October 27, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 157024/2016 Judge: Nancy M. Bannon Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationPetitioners, 10 Civ (KMW) (DCF) -against- OPINION and ORDER GOVERNMENT OF THE LAO PEOPLE S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC, Respondent.
Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. Ltd. et al v. Government of the LAO People...9;s Democratic Republic Doc. 262 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/10/ :31 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/10/2017. Exhibit I
Exhibit I 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2 ------------------------------x 3 SERGEY LEONTIEV, 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 16 CV 3595 (JSR) 6 ALEXANDER VARSHAVSKY, 7 Defendant. ARGUMENT
More informationGliklad v Cherney 2015 NY Slip Op 31439(U) August 3, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted
Gliklad v Cherney 2015 NY Slip Op 31439(U) August 3, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 602335/09 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationUNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION Spring 2015
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW CENTER INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION Spring 2015 INSTRUCTOR: Ben H. Sheppard, Jr. Distinguished Lecturer and Director, A.A. White Dispute Resolution Center Suite 116, TU II Office
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/29/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1
Case: 1:14-cv-07591 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/29/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL P. O DONNELL ) Petitioner, )
More informationbrl Doc 111 Filed 12/17/13 Entered 12/17/13 15:22:56 Main Document Pg 1 of 12
Pg 1 of 12 WINDELS MARX LANE & MITTENDORF, LLP 156 West 56 th Street Presentment Date: December 30, 2013 New York, New York 10019 Time: 12:00 p.m. Telephone: (212) 237-1000 Facsimile: (212) 262-1215 Objections
More information17 th Annual New York City Bankruptcy Conference: Governed by New York Law? Considering the Impact of New York State Law in Bankruptcy Matters
17 th Annual New York City Bankruptcy Conference: Governed by New York Law? Considering the Impact of New York State Law in Bankruptcy Matters Why Lawyers Need to Pay More Attention to the Distinctions
More informationB. AMCO v. Republic of Indonesia
CASES INTRODUCTORY NOTE Two decisions involving arbitration under the aegis of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) are published in this issue. The first is the April
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/23/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 107 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/23/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------- X ROBINSON BROG LEINWAND GREENE GENOVESE 8 GLUCK P.C., : Index No. 158914/13
More informationBoard of Trustees of N.Y. Dist. Council of Carpenters Health Welfare Fund v Jordan Kane Floor Covering, Inc NY Slip Op 30550(U) April 3, 2007
Board of Trustees of N.Y. Dist. Council of Carpenters Health Welfare Fund v Jordan Kane Floor Covering, Inc. 2007 NY Slip Op 30550(U) April 3, 2007 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 0600707/2007
More informationMatter of Bethpage Fed. Credit Union v John 2011 NY Slip Op 31652(U) April 19, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 20089/10 Judge:
Matter of Bethpage Fed. Credit Union v John 2011 NY Slip Op 31652(U) April 19, 2011 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 20089/10 Judge: Antonio I. Brandveen Republished from New York State Unified
More informationIndo-Med Commodities, Inc. v Wisell 2014 NY Slip Op 33918(U) September 29, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /14 Judge: F.
Indo-Med Commodities, Inc. v Wisell 2014 NY Slip Op 33918(U) September 29, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 600546/14 Judge: F. Dana Winslow Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2013 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus
More informationIn the Complaint in this case, filed August 3, 2009, the. Securities and Exchange Commission ( S.E.C. ) alleges, in stark
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------x SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : 09 Civ. 6829 (JSR) : - v - : : MEMORANDUM ORDER BANK
More informationBeware Distinctions Between Veil Piercing And Alter Ego
Published by Law360 on May 13, 2015. Beware Distinctions Between Veil Piercing And Alter Ego --By Evan C. Hollander and Dana Yankowitz Elliott, Arnold & Porter LLP Law360, New York (May 13, 2015, 10:27
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CENTER CAPITAL CORPORATION v. PRA AVIATION, LLC et al Doc. 67 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CENTER CAPITAL CORP., : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION : v. : : PRA
More information764 F.Supp.2d 587 (2011) I. JW OILFIELD EQUIPMENT, LLC, Petitioner, v. COMMERZBANK AG, Respondent. No. 18 MS 0302(PKC).
764 F.Supp.2d 587 (2011) I. JW OILFIELD EQUIPMENT, LLC, Petitioner, v. COMMERZBANK AG, Respondent. No. 18 MS 0302(PKC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 14, 2011. 590*590 Oksana G.
More informationBRIDGING THE GAP. Chapter 4. March 13, :45-1:45pm Pre- and Post- Judgment Collection Seth Chastain, Levy - von Beck & Associates
BRIDGING THE GAP March 13, 2015 Chapter 4 12:45-1:45pm Pre- and Post- Judgment Collection Seth Chastain, Levy - von Beck & Associates PowerPoint 1. Pre- and Post-Judgment Collections Handouts There is
More informationMaterials Provided by Brent D. Green. COLLECTION OF JUDGMENTS IN MISSOURI MISSOURI BAR ASSOCIATION CLE October 1, 2014
COLLECTION OF JUDGMENTS IN MISSOURI MISSOURI BAR ASSOCIATION CLE October 1, 2014 I. What You Should Do Before Litigation A. Have a fee agreement 1. Determine whether or not fee will be hourly or contingent.
More informationPart 36 Extraordinary Remedies
Alberta Rules of Court 390/68 R427-430 Part 36 Extraordinary Remedies Replevin Recovery of personal property 427 In any action brought for the recovery of any personal property and claiming that the property
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS ERMA L. MULLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED February 23, 2001 v No. 214096 Oakland Circuit Court EDUARD MULLER, LC No. 91-412634-DO Defendant-Appellant. Before: Collins,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 VITALY IVANOVICH SMAGIN, v. Petitioner, ASHOT YEGIAZARYAN, a.k.a. ASHOT EGIAZARYAN, Respondent. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION Case No. :1-cv-0-R
More informationStrategies to Obtain Information in Offshore Jurisdictions
Strategies to Obtain Information in Offshore Jurisdictions Stephen Baker, Baker & Partners (Jersey) Metta MacMillan-Hughes, LennoxPaton (Bahamas) Yves Klein, Monfrini Crettol & Associes (Switzerland) Jeff
More informationwhich shall govern any matters not specifically addressed in these rules.
INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION PART RULES -- PART 53 These International Arbitration Part Rules supplement the Part 53 Practice Rules, which shall govern any matters not specifically addressed in these rules.
More informationThis chapter is from Attachment of Assets. JurisNet, LLC France. Paul de Drée
This chapter is from Attachment of Assets. JurisNet, LLC 2017 www.arbitrationlaw.com France by Paul de Drée Avocat de DRÉE Avocat 19 rue du Vexin 95810 Grisy-les-Plâtres France Telephone: +33 (0) 1 34
More information716 West Ave Austin, TX USA
RECOVERING THE PROCEEDS OF FRAUD GLOBAL HEADQUARTERS the gregor building 716 West Ave Austin, TX 78701-2727 USA TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE: THE LAW IN A FRAUD RECOVERY CASE I. LEGAL CAUSES OF ACTION IN
More informationGuide to tracing assets around the World 2018
Guide to Tracing Assets Around the World 2018 Contents TerraLex 4 Australia Lander & Rogers 5 Bahamas Higgs & Johnson 7 Brazil Pinheiro, Mourão, Raso E Araújo Filho Advogados 9 Canada Mcmillan 10 Cayman
More informationRECOVERING THE PROCEEDS OF FRAUD
RECOVERING THE PROCEEDS OF FRAUD World Headquarters the gregor building 716 West Ave Austin, TX 78701-2727 USA TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE: THE LAW IN A FRAUD RECOVERY CASE I. LEGAL CAUSES OF ACTION IN
More informationRollex Corp. v. Associated Materials, Inc. (In re Superior Siding & Window, Inc.) 14 F.3d 240 (4th Cir. 1994)
Rollex Corp. v. Associated Materials, Inc. (In re Superior Siding & Window, Inc.) 14 F.3d 240 (4th Cir. 1994) NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge: The question presented is whether the bankruptcy court, when presented
More informationTribeca Space Mgrs., Inc. v Tribeca Mews Ltd NY Slip Op 32433(U) December 23, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13
Tribeca Space Mgrs., Inc. v Tribeca Mews Ltd. 2015 NY Slip Op 32433(U) December 23, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653292/13 Judge: Jennifer G. Schecter Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2003 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 9-25-2003 Jalal v. USA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential Docket No. 02-1839 Follow this and additional works
More informationSUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK. HON. STEPHEN A. BUCARIA Justice
SHORT FORM ORDER Present: SUPREME COURT - STATE OF NEW YORK HON. STEPHEN A. BUCARIA Justice CAPITAL ONE, N. Plaintiff TRIAL/lAS, PART 3 NASSAU COUNTY INDEX No. 012430/09 MOTION DATE: July 27 2009 Motion
More informationRefusing to Enforce Foreign Judgments
International Litigation Refusing to Enforce Foreign Judgments Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky, New York Law Journal November 24, 2014 Lawrence W. Newman and David Zaslowsky Although the United
More informationpìéêéãé=`çìêí=çñ=íüé=råáíéç=pí~íéë=
No. 12-842 IN THE pìéêéãé=`çìêí=çñ=íüé=råáíéç=pí~íéë= REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, v. NML CAPITAL, LTD., Petitioner, Respondent. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For
More informationMascis Inv. Partnership v SG Capital Corp NY Slip Op 30813(U) April 21, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge:
Mascis Inv. Partnership v SG Capital Corp. 2017 NY Slip Op 30813(U) April 21, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 654981/2016 Judge: Marcy Friedman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationRULE 60 ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS
RULE 60 ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS DEFINITIONS 60.01 In Rules 60.02 to 60.19, (a) "creditor" means a person who is entitled to enforce an order for the payment or recovery of money; (b) "debtor" means a person
More informationCase: 1:10-cv SO Doc #: 19 Filed: 10/18/10 1 of 9. PageID #: 1267 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:10-cv-02153-SO Doc #: 19 Filed: 10/18/10 1 of 9. PageID #: 1267 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ROSE CHEVROLET, INC., ) Case Nos.: 1:10 CV 2140 HALLEEN CHEVROLET,
More informationCase 1:12-cv JSR Document 22 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of x
Case 1:12-cv-05597-JSR Document 22 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --- ------- --X SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v- BERNARD
More informationThird Circuit Dismisses Crystallex s Fraudulent Transfer Claim But Potential Liability Remains for PDVSA
Third Circuit Dismisses Crystallex s Fraudulent Transfer Claim But Potential Liability Remains for PDVSA Richard J. Cooper & Boaz S. Morag 1 January 5, 2018 On January 3, 2018, the United States Court
More information[date] The Honorable. John Doe v. John Foe, Case No.: Dear Judge : Enclosed herewith please find the following:
[date] The Honorable RE: John Doe v. John Foe, Case No.: Dear Judge : Enclosed herewith please find the following: 1. Original Ex-Parte Motion for Break Order. 2. Original Affidavit in Support of Plaintiff
More informationCase 1:16-cv LPS Document 17 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:16-cv-01007-LPS Document 17 Filed 01/04/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CRYSTALLEX INTERNATIONAL CORP., Plaintiff, C.A. No. 16-1007-LPS
More informationTHE PRACTICE OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION
THE PRACTICE OF INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION Second Edition Lawrence W. Newman and Michael Burrows JURIS Questions About This Publication For assistance with shipments, billing or other customer service matters,
More informationCase reg Doc 34 Filed 09/20/13 Entered 09/20/13 14:28:16
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------x In re Case No. 812-70158-reg MILTON ABELES, LLC, Chapter 7 Debtor. -----------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationThe Common Interest Privilege in Bankruptcy: Recent Trends and Practical Guidance
The Common Interest Privilege in Bankruptcy: Recent Trends and Practical Guidance By Elliot Moskowitz* I. Introduction The common interest privilege (sometimes known as the community of interest privilege,
More informationEXECUTION FORMS COLLECTION OF THE JUDGMENT
EXECUTION FORMS COLLECTION OF THE JUDGMENT If Plaintiff wins a Judgment, either by default or by trial, Plaintiff may proceed to the actual collection of the Judgment. If the Defendant wins a Judgment,
More informationCase 1:15-cr KAM Document Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 15856
Case 1:15-cr-00637-KAM Document 539-1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 15856 SLR:LDM:CSK F.#2014R00501 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationChapter 4 Creditors Voluntary Winding Up Application of Chapter. MKD/096/AC#
[PART 11 WINDING UP Chapter 1 Preliminary and Interpretation 549. Interpretation (Part 11). 550. Restriction of this Part. 551. Modes of winding up - general statement as to position under Act. 552. Types
More informationCase 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Case 2:16-cv-00832-JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. PLAINTIFF, TRAFFIC MONSOON, LLC, a Utah
More informationFran") and Camilo John Pesa ("Camilo ) (collectively "Plaintiffs ) oppose the motion. SUPREME COURT-STATE OF NEW YORK SHORT FORM ORDER Present:
SUPREME COURT-STATE OF NEW YORK SHORT FORM ORDER Present: HON. TIMOTHY S. DRISCOLL Justice Supreme Court ------------------------------------------------------------------- J( MARO A. PESA, CHRISTOPER
More informationQuestionnaire Provisional Measures
Preliminary remarks Questionnaire Provisional Measures Swedish National Report Nicola Hesslén, Göteborg In Sweden we have regulations on provisional attachment, other security measures and interim decisions
More informationSupplementary Proceedings in Wisconsin
Marquette Law Review Volume 23 Issue 2 February 1939 Article 1 Supplementary Proceedings in Wisconsin Robert S. Moss Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part
More informationCase: , 05/18/2018, ID: , DktEntry: 55-1, Page 1 of 11 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 16-55502, 05/18/2018, ID: 10877555, DktEntry: 55-1, Page 1 of 11 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT FILED MAY 18 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
More informationEIGHTH ANNUAL SOUTHERN SURETY AND FIDELITY CLAIMS CONFERENCE APRIL 3-4, 1997 EXONERATION BASICS: ENFORCING THE SURETY'S RIGHTS
EIGHTH ANNUAL SOUTHERN SURETY AND FIDELITY CLAIMS CONFERENCE APRIL 3-4, 1997 EXONERATION BASICS: ENFORCING THE SURETY'S RIGHTS PRESENTED BY: L. GRAVES STIFF, III, ESQ. STARNES & ATCHISON Seventh Floor,
More informationCollecting a Money Judgment
New Jersey Judiciary Collecting a Money Judgment Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division Special Civil Part If money is owed you because you have been awarded a judgment in the Special Civil Part, you
More informationRecovering Assets & Enforcing Judgments in China Using Offshore Means
Recovering Assets & Enforcing Judgments in China Using Offshore Means Robert W. Seiden, Esq. Offshore Alert Conference Miami Beach, Florida May 2, 2016 US $56 billion The 144 China-based stocks with primary
More informationGARNISHMENT PROCEDURES FOR LITIGANTS NOT REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY EARNINGS GARNISHMENT
GARNISHMENT PROCEDURES FOR LITIGANTS NOT REPRESENTED BY AN ATTORNEY EARNINGS GARNISHMENT EARNINGS GARNISHMENT: You must fill out your forms before filing with the Clerk of the District Court. Information
More informationReplaced by 2018 version
RAK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE CENTRE GOVERNMENT OF RAS AL KHAIMAH UNITED ARAB EMIRATES RAK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE CENTRE REGISTERED AGENT RULES 2016 ADDOCS01/20437.4 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PRELIMINARY
More informationCase 1:06-cv KMW -DCF Document 696 Filed 04/20/11 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-cv-05936-KMW -DCF Document 696 Filed 04/20/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------x ARISTA
More informationMatter of Verizon New England, Inc. v IDT Domestic Telecom, Inc NY Slip Op 32387(U) September 1, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket
Matter of Verizon New England, Inc. v IDT Domestic Telecom, Inc. 2010 NY Slip Op 32387(U) September 1, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 104207/2010 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Republished
More informationWinding up by court 568. Application of Chapter 569. Circumstances in which company may be wound up by the court
PART 11 WINDING UP CHAPTER 1 Preliminary and interpretation 559. Interpretation (Part 11) 560. Restriction of this Part 561. Modes of winding up general statement as to position under Act 562. Types of
More informationThreadstone Advisors, LLC v Success Apparel Inc NY Slip Op 30212(U) January 31, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13
Threadstone Advisors, LLC v Success Apparel Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 30212(U) January 31, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 654320/13 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILING A GARNISHMENT (EARNINGS)
Maricopa County Justice Courts, State of Arizona FILING A GARNISHMENT (EARNINGS) The cost for issuing a Writ of Garnishment is $29.00. The garnishment packet contains the following forms. Each form comes
More information1. The definition of insider.
To: Drafting Committee, Advisors and Observers, Amendments to the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act From: Edwin E. Smith, Chair Kenneth C. Kettering, Reporter Date: August 20. 2013 Re: Developments at and
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/2016 01:39 PM INDEX NO. 155249/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2016 BAKER, LESHKO, SALINE & DRAPEAU, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiffs One North Lexington Avenue
More informationCarlyle, LLC v Quik Park 1633 Garage LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 32476(U) December 15, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge:
Carlyle, LLC v Quik Park 1633 Garage LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 32476(U) December 15, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653347/15 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationCase 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084
Case 3:18-cv-00186-M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed February 9, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Warren County, Paul R.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 1-029 / 10-1025 Filed February 9, 2011 ESTATE OF TOMMY RAY LYON and RONDA LYON, Plaintiffs-Appellees, vs. RODNEY N. HEEMSTRA, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Judge. Appeal
More informationCase 1:07-cv JSR Document 134 Filed 03/24/09 Page 1 of 6. x : : : : : : : : : : : : x
Case 107-cv-11074-JSR Document 134 Filed 03/24/09 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- JULIUS H. SCHOEPS, EDELGARD VON LAVERGNE-PEGUILHEN,
More informationNew Jersey False Claims Act
New Jersey False Claims Act (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:32C-1 to 18) i 2A:32C-1. Short title Sections 1 through 15 and sections 17 and 18 [C.2A:32C-1 through C.2A:32C-17] of this act shall be known and may be
More informationInformation & Instructions: Seizure of debtor's property prior to judgment
Information & Instructions: Seizure of debtor's property prior to judgment 1. Texas law provides for sequestration of the defendant's property. Garnishment provides for seizure of the debtor's monies held
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 04-0798 (PLF) ) ALL ASSETS HELD AT BANK JULIUS, ) Baer & Company, Ltd., Guernsey
More informationCase 1:10-cv BSJ-MHD Document 47 Filed 11/24/10 Page 1 of 11. x : : : : : : : : : : : : x
Case 1:10-cv-03229-BSJ-MHD Document 47 Filed 11/24/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO. and
More informationMatter of RBC Capital Mkts. Corp. v Bittner 2011 NY Slip Op 31231(U) May 9, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008 Judge:
Matter of RBC Capital Mkts. Corp. v Bittner 2011 NY Slip Op 31231(U) May 9, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 106651/2008 Judge: Michael D. Stallman Republished from New York State Unified
More informationCase grs Doc 31 Filed 12/27/16 Entered 12/27/16 12:53:11 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13
Document Page 1 of 13 IN RE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LEXINGTON DIVISION TROY L. VANWINKLE DEBTOR CASE NO. 16-50363 CHAPTER 7 LYLE WALKER and CARL DAVID CRAWFORD v. TROY
More informationGOVERNMENT OF RAS AL KHAIMAH
GOVERNMENT OF RAS AL KHAIMAH RAS AL KHAIMAH INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE CENTRE REGISTERED AGENT REGULATIONS 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS 1. Short title, commencement and authority 2.
More informationBank Leumi USA v GM Diamonds, Inc NY Slip Op 33276(U) December 17, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge: Andrea
Bank Leumi USA v GM Diamonds, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 33276(U) December 17, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150474/2015 Judge: Andrea Masley Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationCase 2:13-cv DAK Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:13-cv-00586-DAK Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 10 Peggy Hunt (Utah State Bar No. 6060) Chris Martinez (Utah State Bar No. 11152) Nathan S. Seim (Utah State Bar No. 12654) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
More informationDebt Collection and Judgment Enforcement
New York Lawyers Practical Skills Series Debt Collection and Judgment Enforcement William Ilecki, Esq.* 2017 2018 * This monograph was originally written by Jack Getman, Esq., and substantially revised
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA REPLY OF MOVANT R.J. ZAYED
Document Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Lynn E. Baker, BKY No. 10-44428 Chapter 7 Debtor. REPLY OF MOVANT R.J. ZAYED Debtor Lynn E. Baker ( Debtor ) opposes the
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DOUGLAS BURKE, Plaintiff/Counter Defendant/ Garnishor-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED August 5, 2010 v No. 290590 Wayne Circuit Court UNITED AMERICAN ACQUISITIONS AND LC No. 04-433025-CZ
More informationSmall Claims Handbook A citizen s guide to handling small claims complaints in Kentucky
Small Claims Handbook A citizen s guide to handling small claims complaints in Kentucky Provided by the Kentucky Administrative Office of the Courts and the Kentucky Office of Attorney General Small Claims
More informationDispute Resolution Around the World. Italy
Dispute Resolution Around the World Italy 2011 Dispute Resolution Around the World Italy Dispute Resolution Around the World Italy Table of Contents 1. Legal System... 1 2. Courts... 1 3. Legal Profession...
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/17/ :58 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/17/2016 10:58 AM INDEX NO. 654332/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/17/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW COUNTY OF NEW YORK COBY EMPIRE, LLC x - Plaintiff/Petition
More informationLegal Business. Overview Of Court Procedure. Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities
Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities Overview Of Court Procedure 1 Rajah & Tann 4 Battery Road #26-01 Bank of China Building Singapore 049908
More informationThe European, Middle Eastern and African Restructuring Review 2017
The European, Middle Eastern and African Restructuring Review 2017 1 Switzerland: Freezing Orders and Asset Tracing Gion Christian Casanova and Alexander Flink Prager Dreifuss Ltd Switzerland is home to
More informationCAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
CAAP-14-0000920 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I SHIGEZO HAWAII, INC., a Hawai'i Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOY TO THE WORLD INCORPORATED, a Hawai'i Corporation; INOC
More informationCase Doc 1 Filed 03/24/16 Entered 03/24/16 13:35:52 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Document Page 1 of 18 In Re: Paul Hansmeier, Debtor. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Chapter 7 Bankruptcy No. 15-42460 Daniel M. McDermott, United States Trustee, Plaintiff, Adv. No.
More informationMemorandum of Guidance as to Enforcement between the DIFC Courts and the Commercial Court, Queen s Bench Division, England and Wales
Memorandum of Guidance as to Enforcement between the DIFC Courts and the Commercial Court, Queen s Bench Division, England and Wales Introduction 1. The purpose of this memorandum is to set out the parties
More informationThe petitioner, Swift Splash LTD ("Swift Splash") moves, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 64 and New York
Swift Splash Ltd. v. The Rice Corporation Doc. 16 @Nセ GZucod USDSSDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELEC J1. SWIFT SPLASH LTD, Petitioner, 10 Civ. 6448 (JGK) - against - MEMORANDUM
More informationPROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION MDL DOCKET NO. 1506 (CAS) ALL CASES STONERIDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC,
More informationTRI/IAS PART: 22 NASSAU COUNTY
SUPREME COURT-STATE OF NEW YORK SHORT FORM ORDER Present: HON. TIMOTHY S. DRISCOLL Justice Supreme Court -------------------------------------------------------------------1l BETHP AGE FEDERA CREDIT UNION,
More information