Published in cooperation with the University of Pittsburgh s Tri-State Area School Study Council 2017
|
|
- Marshall Flynn
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 EDUCATION LAW REPORT Publishe in cooperation with the University of Pittsburgh s Tri-State Area School Stuy Council Volume XXVIII Number In This Issue Office of Open Recors Hols That School Vieos Depicting Stuent in an Altercation is not an Eucational Recor of the Stuent Uner FERPA Mile School GayStraight Alliance Allowe to Pursue Equal Access Claims Commonwealth Court Orers Teacher Reinstate When the School Boar Fails to Strictly Comply with Statutory Proceures for Dismissing the Tenure Teacher Latest Legal Developments on Stuent Searches Feeral Juge in Pittsburgh Rules That Employers Cannot Discriminate Against Employees Base on Sexual Orientation Tucker Arensberg PC 1500 One PPG Place Pittsburgh, PA Lemoyne Drive Lemoyne, PA tuckerlaw.com Copyright All rights reserve. OFFICE OF OPEN RECORDS HOLDS THAT SCHOOL VIDEOS DEPICTING STUDENT IN AN ALTERCATION IS NOT AN EDUCATIONAL RECORD OF THE STUDENT UNDER FERPA Hawkins v. Central Dauphin School District, AP , 2016 PA O.O.R.D. LEXIS 760. The Office of Open Recors reverses its earlier ecision an hols that a vieo from a school bus vieo system showing an altercation between an ault an a 17-year-ol stuent is not an eucational recor of the stuent uner the Family Eucational Rights an Privacy Act ( FERPA ), 20 U.S.C. 1232g. from isclosure an financially penalizes school istricts which [have] a policy or practice of permitting the release of eucation recors of stuents without the written consent of their parents. 20 U.S.C. 1232g(b) (1). FERPA an its implementing regulations efine eucation recors as those recors that are []irectly relate to a stuent an [m]aintaine by an eucational agency or institution or by a party acting for the agency or institution. 20 U.S.C. 1232g(a)(4)(A); 34 C.F.R SUMMARY AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND A request ( Request ) was submitte to the Central Dauphin School District ( District ) pursuant to the Right-to-Know Law ( RTKL ), 65 P.S et seq., seeking a vieo from a District school bus. The requeste vieo showe an ault grabbing a 17-year-ol stuent by the wrist. The District enie the Request, stating that isclosure of the vieo woul violate FERPA an woul result in the loss of feeral funing. 65 P.S (b)(1)(i). The OOR acknowlege that the efinition of eucational recors is broa an that, by its terms appears to encompass all recors hel by an eucational institution an which relate to a stuent. Nevertheless, the OOR state that the courts interpreting FERPA have mae clear that only those recors relating to stuent acaemics are eucation recors protecte by FERPA an hel that the vieo was not an eucational recor. On appeal, the Office of Open Recors ( OOR ) grante the appeal an hel that the vieo was a public recor. In the OOR s view, only recors relating to a stuent s acaemics are eucational recors uner FERPA. In making this etermination, the OOR reverse its earlier ecision in Remling v. Bangor Area Sch. Dist., OOR Dkt. AP , 2011 PA O.O.R.D. LEXIS 74 which hel that such vieos are eucational recors uner FERPA an exempt from isclosure uner the RTKL. Though the language use by the OOR in the Hawkins ecision suggests that all courts agree with this narrow interpretation, the reality is that the OOR was relying on state an feeral ecisions from other jurisictions that have been rejecte by other courts for being inconsistent with the plain language of FERPA protects personally ientifiable information containe in eucation recors 1 continue
2 EDUCATION LAW REPORT FERPA. Moreover, the OOR s new position is inconsistent with guiance issue by the Feeral Department of Eucation s Family Compliance Office ( FCO ) which oversees compliance with FERPA. Contrary to the OOR s position on Hawkins, there is a significant boy of case law holing that the term eucational recors must be interprete broaly an inclue school surveillance vieos. In Unite States v. Miami University, 91 F. Supp (S.D. Ohio 2000), for example, the court reviewe an rejecte many of the cases relie upon by the OOR in Hawkins: With all ue respect to these courts, this Court refuses to aopt such a narrow interpretation of FERPA s efinition of eucation recors. None of the above-cite ecisions provie any reasoning for their narrow interpretation of FERPA, an this Court fails to see how such a limite meaning of eucation recors can be iscerne from the plain language. I., at 1149 n. 17. See also Bryner v. Canyons School District, 351 P.3 852, 858 (Utah Ct. App. 2015) (vieo from a school surveillance camera that showe an altercation between the requester s chil an other stuents outsie of a classroom is an eucational recor); Meley v. B. of Euc., 168 S.W.3 398, 404 (Ky. Ct. App. 2004) (vieotapes of teacher s classroom were eucation recors within meaning of FERPA). Moreover, the OOR s holing in Hawkins is inconsistent with guiance issue by the Feeral FCO. The FCO, which implements an oversees institutional compliance with FERPA, has issue guiance to school istricts stating that school vieos of stuents are eucational recors of the stuents. Initially, the FCO avise that a parent may only inspect a school vieotape showing his or her own chil engage in misbehavior if no other stuents are picture : Letter re: Berkeley County Sch. Dist., 7 FAB 40 (FCO 2004) (quote in Bryner, 351 P.3 at 858). In other wors, any school vieo epicting a stuent is an eucational recor of that stuent. The FCO subsequently issue informal guiance that suggests that vieo recorings may constitute eucation recors only for those stuents who are irectly relate to the focus or subject of the vieo. See, e.g., Opinion of the Texas Attorney General, OR , 2006 Tex. AG Ltr. Rul. LEXIS 7439 (July 18, 2006) ( The [PCO] has, however, etermine that the images of the stuents involve in the altercation o constitute the eucation recors of those stuents. Thus, FERPA oes apply to the stuents involve in the altercation. ) (quote in Bryner., 351 P.3 at 858). At the very least, guiance issue by the FCO, which has been relie upon by courts, inicates that vieos epicting altercations are eucational recors uner FERPA of the stuents involve in the altercation. Accoringly, contrary to the OOR s assertion in Hawkins, only a small line of cases has interprete the term eucational recor narrowly. The stronger argument, base on the text of the statute an regulations an the guiance issue by the feeral government, may be that the term shoul be interprete broaly an inclue surveillance vieos. There are no Pennsylvania ecisions irectly on point, but Pennsylvania courts appear to have aopte the broa efinition of eucational recors. In Sherry v. Ranor Twp. Sch. Dist., 20 A.3 515, 525 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011), the Commonwealth Court hel that stuent isciplinary recors are inclue uner FERPA s efinition of eucation recors. In oing so, the court relie on the Sixth Circuits ecision which affirme the above-quote Miami University case, Unite States v. Miami University, 294 F (6th Cir. 2002). Accoringly, Pennsylvania courts may very well hol that school surveillance vieos are eucational recors. The Hawkins ecision was appeale to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County where it is pening. In the meantime, the OOR continues to apply its narrow interpretation of eucational recors an orer the release of vieos featuring stuents. See Aams v. Parklan School District, AP Because there is uncertainty whether school surveillance vieos are eucational recors uner FERPA, school istricts shoul work with their solicitor before relying on the recent OOR ecisions an creating a policy or practice of granting RTKL request that seeks school vieos epicting stuents. 2
3 Volume XXVIII Number 1, 2017 MIDDLE SCHOOL GAY-STRAIGHT ALLIANCE ALLOWED TO PURSUE EQUAL ACCESS CLAIMS Carver Mile Sch. Gay-Straight Alliance v. Sch. B. of Lake Cnty. Fla., 842 F (11 Cir., Dec. 6, 2016): A Feeral Appellate Court hel that a Floria mile school met the efinition of a seconary school uner the Equal Access Act, an therefore claims against the school by an extracurricular club, the Gay-Straight Alliance, coul go forwar. SUMMARY AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND Stuents at Carver Mile School ( Carver ) applie for approval of the Carver Mile School Gay-Straight Alliance, an extracurricular stuent club. The application escribe the following purposes an goals of the club: 1) to create a safe, supportive environment at school for stuents to iscuss experiences, challenges an successes of LGBT stuents an their allies 2) to create an execute strategies to confront an work to en bullying, iscrimination, an harassment against all stuents, incluing LGBT stuents 3) to promote critical thinking by iscussing how to aress bullying an other issues confronting stuents at Carver Mile School. School District aministrators enie the application an in response the Alliance an a stuent, H.F., file a complaint against the School Boar of Lake County, Floria ( Boar ) alleging, among other claims, that the Boar violate the Feeral Equal Access Act. After a bench trial, the Unite States District Court for the Mile District of Floria ismisse the Equal Access Act Claim as not ripe, moot an, in the alternative, rule that the Act i not apply to Carver Mile School because the mile school i not meet the efinition of a seconary school uner the Act. The District Court rule that, in Floria, a seconary school means a high school. The Alliance an H.F. appeale this ismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit. The Equal Access Act requires any public seconary school which receives feeral financial assistance to give extracurricular clubs equal access to school resources. The Act efines a seconary school as a public school which provies seconary eucation as etermine by state law. (emphasis ae). The appeals court explaine that the Act applie to any school that provie seconary eucation an was not exclusive to high schools. Carver offere an Algebra I class through which stuents at the mile school receive high school creit. Because it offere a high school-level course, the Court hel that Carver Mile School provie seconary eucation uner Floria law. Consequently, the mile school was subject to the Equal Access Act an the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit remane the case back to the District Court to apply the Act. Because the case epene on the analysis of Floria law, it is unclear whether a similar result woul be obtaine in other states. It is also unclear whether a mile school can be consiere a seconary school uner the Equal Access Act, regarless of whether it offers high school creit. However, school istricts shoul be aware that the Equal Access Act potentially applies to mile schools as well as high schools, requiring equal access for clubs such as the Carver Mile School Gay-Straight Alliance. COMMONWEALTH COURT ORDERS TEACHER REINSTATED WHEN THE SCHOOL BOARD FAILS TO STRICTLY COMPLY WITH STATUTORY PROCEDURES FOR DISMISSING THE TENURED TEACHER. Vlaimirsky v. School District of Philaelphia, 144 A (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). The Commonwealth Court hel that a tenure teacher has a constitutionally protecte interest in his (or her) employment an can only be terminate in strict accorance with the proceural requirements for ismissal in the School Coe. Failure to strictly comply with the termination proceures may result in a violation of the teacher s ue process rights an lea to the teacher s reinstatement. SUMMARY AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND On September 1, 1997, the School District of Philaelphia ( District ) hire Serge Vlaimirsky ( Vlaimirsky ) as a social stuies teacher at Overbrook High School 3 continue
4 EDUCATION LAW REPORT ( Overbrook ). In 2011, the District attempte to terminate Vlaimirsky s employment base on two incients that occurre that year. The first incient involve Vlaimirsky yelling at Overbrook s principal. The other involve Vlaimirsky shouting obscenities at stuents in his classroom an grabbing another stuent s arm in an attempt to take his phone. After an investigatory conference, Vlaimirsky receive an unsatisfactory rating base on these incients. After another, secon-level conference, the District s Talent Acquisition Office Deputy Chief recommene that Vlaimirsky s employment be terminate. On July 20, 2011, the District maile Vlaimirsky a letter signe by the School Boar Chairman an the District Superintenent stating that: 1) they recommen the Boar terminate his employment immeiately, 2) the District payroll epartment woul make the necessary salary ajustments, an 3) the charges against him constitute just cause uner the collective bargaining agreement an violation of the School Laws of the Commonwealth. The letter further informe Vlaimirsky that he ha a right to a hearing before the Boar. Vlaimirsky requeste a hearing before the Boar. After the hearing, the Hearing Officer recommene that Vlaimirsky s employment be terminate for intemperance an willful violation of the School Laws. On March 15, 2012, the Boar resolve to aopt the Hearing Officer s recommenations, terminate Vlaimirsky an eclare that the termination was effective July 20, 2011 the ate of the Boar Chairman an the District Superintenent s letter. Vlaimirsky appeale the Boar s ecision to the Acting Secretary of the Department of Eucation ( Acting Secretary ), who after a hearing orere that Vlaimirsky be reinstate to his position as a teacher as of July 20, 2011, but uphel the Boar s ecision to terminate Vlaimirsky on March 15, Vlaimirsky an the District appeale the Acting Secretary s ecision to the Commonwealth Court. Section 1127 of the School Coe requires that before a tenure teacher is ismisse the School Boar not a 4 school aministrator must provie a tenure teacher with a written statement of the charges for his (or her) ismissal an conuct a hearing. The Court interprete Section 1127 as requiring the Boar to etermine that evience exists that, if true, justifies employment termination, before issuing a written statement of charges. Further, the Court state that Section 1127 of the School Coe requires that a written statement of charges: 1) be signe by the Boar Presient an atteste by the Boar Secretary; 2) be maile to the teacher on behalf of the Boar by registere mail; an 3) set a time, place an location for a hearing before the Boar no later than fifteen ays from the ate of the written notice. The Court conclue that the Boar Chairman an the District Superintenent s July 20, 2011 letter was not sent on behalf of the Boar; therefore, it violate the requirements of Section 1127 of the School Coe. Moreover, since Vlaimirsky was not pai after the ate of the letter, he was essentially terminate without any Boar action an prior to a hearing. Therefore, the Court conclue that Vlaimirsky s termination by the July 20, 2011 letter was a ismissal by aministrative action in violation of the School Coe. Dismissals by aministrative actions are not permitte uner the School Coe. Instea, Section 1129 of the School Coe requires that for a teacher s ismissal to be effective, the Boar must vote by roll-call, an there must be a two-thirs vote in favor of the ismissal. In this case, the Boar faile to comply with Section 1129 of the School Coe because the Boar s March 15, 2012 resolution occurre after Vlaimirsky was effectively terminate on July 20, 2011 an because the resolution mae Vlaimirsky s termination retroactive to July 20, The Court note that in no case can the effective ate of the ismissal be earlier than the ate of the school boar s resolution a eviation from these proceures constitutes a enial of ue process. The District s failure to strictly comply with Sections 1127 an 1129 of the School Coe was a violation of Vlaimirsky s ue process rights. A tenure teacher has a constitutionally protecte interest in his (or her) employment an the proceures set forth in the School Coe must be followe. The Court note that eviations from the statutory proceures constitute fatal efects
5 Volume XXVIII Number 1, 2017 making the school boar s ismissal an illegal act. The Court rejecte the District s request that the case be remane, noting that a reman cannot cure the egregious failure of the District to comply with [the proceural safeguars] in the School Coe. The Court orere the Boar to reinstate Vlaimirsky to his position an remane the case to the Acting Secretary to etermine what compensation, if any, the District owe Vlaimirsky. Because tenure teachers have a constitutionally protecte interest in their employment, School Aministrators who plan to terminate a tenure teacher shoul work with their solicitors to ensure that they strictly comply with all the proceures for ismissals, charges, notices, an hearings in Section 1127 of the School Coe to avoi violating the teacher s constitutional rights. As this case illustrates, efforts to fix a efect in a ismissal proceeing may be ineffective because once a proceural requirement for ismissal is misse or ignore, such action (or inaction) is consiere a fatal efect. LATEST LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS ON STUDENT SEARCHES Highhouse v. Wayne Highlans School District, F. Supp WL (M.D. Pa. Sept. 7, 2016): claims relating to unlawful strip search of a stuent accuse of stealing money against iniviual employees an a school istrict survive a motion to ismiss; Sayler v. Holiaysburg Area School District, 3:16-57 (W.D. Pa. September 26, 2016): claims relating to an unlawful search an seizure of an autistic stuent accuse of possessing a knife against iniviual employees an a school istrict survive a motion to ismiss. Highhouse v. Wayne Highlans School District In Highhouse v. Wayne Highlans School District, F.Supp WL (M.D. Pa. Sept. 7, 2016), a male high school stuent ( Plaintiff ) was strip searche by two school istrict employees ( Employees ) who believe that the Plaintiff stole $250 from another stuent uring gym class. The Employees orere the Plaintiff to strip own to his unerwear an then pulle on the elastic waistban of the unerwear, exposing Plaintiff s private areas. The Plaintiff file a complaint against the Employees an the school istrict ( District ) asserting, among other things, that the strip search violate his Fourth Amenment rights against unreasonable searches an seizures. Generally, a court will apply a stanar of reasonable suspicion to etermine the legality of a school aministrator s search of a stuent. However, in Saffor Unifie School District #1 v. Reing, 557 U.S. 364 (2009) ( Saffor ), the Supreme Court of the Unite States note the categorically extreme intrusiveness of stuent strip searches an create a new rule regaring the reasonableness of such searches. To justify this kin of intrusion, school officials must: 1) have some evience that the item they suspect is being hien by the stuent is angerous in terms of its power or quantity ; or 2) have some specific reason to suppose that the forbien item is hien in a stuent s unerwear. In Highhouse, the court foun that, base on the allegations in the complaint, the Employees i not have a vali basis to conuct a strip search. Unlike a weapon or rugs, money is not inherently angerous. Moreover, the Employees ha no reason to believe that the Stuent hi the money in his unerwear. Accoringly, the court foun that the Plaintiff aequately state a claim that the Employees violate his Fourth Amenment rights when they strip searche him. The Court also foun that the District may be liable for the strip search. Generally, school istricts can only be liable for the actions of their employees if the school istrict has an official policy or custom that cause the asserte constitutional eprivation. However, a policy may be establishe several ifferent ways, incluing a school istrict s failure to train its employees. A plaintiff relying on a failure to train theory must show that the failure cause a pattern of violations or that a violation of rights is a highly preictable consequence of the failure to train employees how to hanle recurring situations. 5 continue
6 EDUCATION LAW REPORT The Court foun that the Plaintiff mae sufficient allegations that the District faile to property train its employees regaring proper etentions an searches of stuents an enie the District s motion to ismiss. Sayler v. Holiaysburg Area School District In Sayler v. Holiaysburg Area School District, 3:16-57 (W.D. Pa. September 26, 2016), an autistic stuent ( Plaintiff ) was injure when employees ( Employees ) of the school istrict ( District ) were investigating an allegation that the stuent was in possession of a knife. The complaint allege that the staff an employees of the District knew that the Plaintiff was autistic an that he experience extreme fear an agitation when touche by or confine with others. The Plaintiff was pulle out of class an tol that there was a rumor that he was going to bring a knife to school an stab another stuent. The Plaintiff enie the rumor an Employees sai that they believe him, but that they were going to continue the investigation. The Employees searche the Plaintiff s locker an biner, but i not fin a knife or other contraban. While searching, the Employees left the Plaintiff unsupervise, inicating that they i not consier him to be a threat. The Plaintiff also emptie his pockets an lifte his shirt in front of the Employees to show that he i not possess a knife. The Plaintiff aske to call his mother, but the Employees refuse. One of the Employees then searche the Plaintiff by touching an grabbing him an eventually slamming him to the groun, fracturing Plaintiff s kneecap an causing other physical an emotional injuries. The Plaintiff brought claims against the District an the Employees for conucting an illegal search an seizure in violation of his Fourth Amenment rights. As set forth above, searches conucte in public schools that o not involve strip searches are governe by the reasonableness stanar. The measures aopte must be reasonably relate to the objectives of the search an not excessively intrusive in light of the characteristics of the stuent an the nature of the infraction. The court foun that the Plaintiff state a vali claim against the District an the Employees because Plaintiff allege that the Employees i not believe he ha a knife, ha alreay searche Plaintiff s belongings an pockets, knew that Plaintiff was autistic an became istresse when touche an still proceee to perform a rough physical search that resulte in a broken kneecap. Accoringly, base on Plaintiff s allegations, the search was not reasonable. These cases shoul remin school istricts that they must work with their solicitors to ensure that istrict officials an employees are properly eucate an traine with respect to the proper exercise of isciplinary an investigatory power, incluing etentions an searches of stuents, because the failure to o so can result in liability for the employees an the school istrict. In orer for a stuent search to be permissible, the school istrict must have reasonable suspicion of wrongoing an the resulting search must be reasonably relate to the objectives of the search. As inicate in the Sayler case, reasonableness will be juge in light of the characteristics of the stuent an the nature of the infraction. School istricts shoul be reluctant to have its employees conuct strip searches. As note by the court in Highhouse, stuent strip searches are embarrassing, frightening, an humiliating, an constitute categorically extreme intrusiveness which suggests that a strip search of a stuent will almost never be justifie. In all but the most extreme circumstances, if there is a suspicion of a serious threat or a violation of the law, a school istrict shoul contact the local police epartment rather than perform an improper search. 6
7 Volume XXVIII Number 1, 2017 FEDERAL JUDGE IN PITTSBURGH RULES THAT EMPLOYERS CANNOT DISCRIMINATE AGAINST EMPLOYEES BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION of the first feeral juges to fin that Title VII prohibits sexual orientation iscrimination. EEOC v. Scott Meical Center, 2016 WL (W.D. Pa. Nov. 4, 2016). Juge Cathy Bissoon of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania recently hel that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from iscriminating against employees base on their sexual orientation. SUMMARY AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND On March 1, 2016, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) file a feeral lawsuit in the Western District of Pennsylvania against Scott Meical Health Center, P.C. ( Scott Meical ). The EEOC allege that Robert McClenon, a supervisor at Scott Meical, repeately harasse Dale Baxley, a male employee, because he is gay. Baxley reporte Supervisor McClenon s behavior to Scott Meical s Presient, but the company took no action. Baxley eventually resigne. In its complaint, the EEOC allege that Scott Meical violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ( Title VII ). This law prohibits iscrimination by an employer against an employee because of sex. The EEOC claime that Scott Meical iscriminate against Baxley because of sex by mistreating him base on his sexual orientation. Accoring to the EEOC, if Baxley ha been a woman rather than a man Supervisor McClenon woul not have harasse him about his relationship with another man. On May 9, 2016, Scott Meical sought to ismiss the EEOC s complaint. It asserte that Title VII s ban on iscrimination because of sex oes not cover iscrimination base on sexual orientation. On November 4, 2016, Juge Cathy Bissoon enie Scott Meical s motion to ismiss. She foun that Title VII s ban on iscrimination because of sex also prohibits employers from iscriminating against employees base on sexual orientation. She foun no meaningful ifference between sexual orientation iscrimination an iscrimination because of sex. In her view, sexual orientation iscrimination always involves jugments or stereotypes about how a person shoul behave base on their sex. Juge Bissoon thus conclue that sexual orientation iscrimination inevitably is iscrimination because of sex. She is one 7 Title VII has transforme many facets of the employeremployee relationship since Presient Lynon Johnson signe it into law on July 2, Since its enactment, however, feeral courts repeately have hel that Title VII s ban on iscrimination because of sex oes not inclue sexual orientation iscrimination. Some members of Congress repeately trie to enact legislation to protect gay an lesbian employees in the workplace, but these bills never became law. This means that no feeral law prevents employers from iscriminating against employees base on their sexual orientation. Many states incluing Pennsylvania also o not prohibit workplace sexual orientation iscrimination, so aggrieve employees often have no legal remey. Given that new feeral legislation was not forthcoming, the EEOC aopte a unique legal strategy in Rather than wait for a new law, the agency ecie to argue that Title VII alreay bars sexual orientation iscrimination by employers. Scott Meical was one of the first cases where the EEOC mae this argument. Juge Bissoon s ruling that Title VII prohibits iscrimination by employers base on sexual orientation probably is just an early skirmish in a long legal battle. Her ruling is not bining on other feeral courts in Pennsylvania, but it sets up a potential appeal to the Thir Circuit. If the Thir Circuit eventually affirms her ecision, Title VII now woul prohibit Pennsylvania employers from iscriminating against employees base on their sexual orientation. Other feeral courts now are hearing similar cases too. Many observers preict that the U.S. Supreme Court may eventually resolve the issue. School istricts shoul watch how this issue continues to evelop. Although Juge Bissoon s ecision is important, it oes not resolve whether Title VII prohibits sexual orientation iscrimination once an for all. Future ecisions by the Thir Circuit or even the U.S. Supreme Court shoul provie greater clarity. School istricts thus shoul follow these evelopments to ensure continue compliance with feeral law.
8 Matthew M. Hoffman Co-chair MUNICIPAL AND SCHOOL LAW GROUP John T. Vogel Co-chair Freerick J. Wolfe Robert L. McTiernan William Campbell Ries Kenneth G. Scholtz Irving S. Firman Gavin A. Robb Ewar R. Lawrence, Jr Christopher Voltz Thomas P. Peterson Richar B. Tucker, III Steve R. Bovan Davi Mongillo Daniel C. Conlon MUNICIPAL AND SCHOOL LAW GROUP Tucker Arensberg, P.C One PPG Place Pittsburgh, PA tuckerlaw.com Tucker Arensberg s Municipal an School Law Group represents local school istricts an municipalities in a variety of legal matters. Our attorneys are solicitors or special counsel for several school istricts/jointures an municipalities in Western Pennsylvania. In aition, our attorneys serve as special labor counsel to numerous school istricts an municipalities in Western Pennsylvania an have hel appointments as special counsel to school boars, zoning boars, civil service commissions an other municipal sub-entities. The range of services calle for in our representation of public boies is quite broa. Inclue in that range are: public an school financing, incluing the issuance of bone inebteness; labor, employment an personnel issues; public biing an contracting; school construction an renovation; taxation, incluing real estate, earne income an Act 511; pupil services an iscipline; zoning an lan use an litigation an appellate court work. The Tri-State Area School Stuy Council at the University of Pittsburgh was establishe in 1948 as a continuing partnership between school istricts an the University. We are the thir olest an secon largest Stuy Council in the country. We seek to work with you to aress the issues of practice we all face as we lea eucational organizations to improve focus an buil organizational capacity. Priorities establishe by the membership inclue: 1) timely information issemination on current research an exemplary practices; 2) research an evelopment technical assistance on projects to meet istrict nees; 3) professional evelopment programs an workshops on current topics; 4) participation in District clinical experiences to prepare future school leaers an; 5) practitioner participation in acaemic preparation programs. For more information, please contact Dr. Diane Kirk, Director, The information containe in Tucker Arensberg s EDUCATION LAW REPORT is for the general knowlege of our reaers. The REPORT is not esigne to be an shoul not be use as the sole source of resolving or analyzing any type of problem. The law in this area of practice is constantly changing an each fact situation is ifferent. Shoul you have any specific questions regaring a fact situation, we urge you to consult with legal council. 8
Published in cooperation with the University of Pittsburgh s Tri-State Area School Study Council 2017
EDUCATION LAW REPORT Publishe in cooperation with the University of Pittsburgh s Tri-State Area School Stuy Council Volume XXVIII Number 2 2017 In This Issue Feeral Court Allows Title IX Claim to Procee
More informationThe Equality Act 2010 What Employers Need to Know Now
October 2010 / Special Alert A legal upate from Dechert s Employment Law Group The Equality Act 2010 What Employers Nee to Know Now Introuction The Equality Act (the Act ) receive Royal Assent in early
More informationCAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE
VIRGINIA CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE These resources are current as of 11/5/2014: We o our best to perioically upate these resources an welcome any comments or questions regaring new evelopments
More informationLESER Global Form Global Commodity Management General Conditions Purchasing
Global Commoity Management General Conitions Page 1/7 I. General / scope of application 1. These General Conitions of Purchase apply to all contracts entere into by LESER an a supplier or subcontractor
More informationPublished in cooperation with the University of Pittsburgh s Tri-State Area School Study Council 2017
EDUCATION LAW REPORT Published in cooperation with the University of Pittsburgh s Tri-State Area School Study Council Volume XXVIII Number 3 2017 In This Issue Federal Court Holds that Banning a Commenter
More informationConvention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
Unite Nations CEDAW/C/2006/II/4 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Distr.: General 19 April 2006 Original: English Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination
More informationThe United States Supreme Court Upholds the Gartenberg Standard for Claims Alleging Excessive Advisory Fees
March 2010 / Issue 8 A legal upate from Dechert s Financial Services Group The Unite States Supreme Court Uphols the Gartenberg Stanar for Claims Alleging Excessive Avisory Fees Introuction On March 30,
More informationThe Doctor Is Out, But Is Resale Price Maintenance In?
July 2007 / Issue 20 A legal upate from Dechert s Antitrust Group The Doctor Is Out, But Is Resale Price Maintenance In? Key Questions for Clients Consiering Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) after Leegin
More informationCRIMINALIZATION OF MARITIME ACTIVITIES
CRIMINALIZATION OF MARITIME ACTIVITIES Charles M. Davis 2008 Vessel operators, incluing shoresie corporate officers an supervisors, an shipboar officers an crews, potentially are subject to criminal prosecution
More informationSec Findings on the public health, safety, and welfare rationales of sign regulations.
Forsyth County Sign Orinance Chapter 66 - SIGNS FOOTNOTE(S): --- (1) --- Cross reference Builings an builing regulations, ch. 18; planning, ch. 58; unifie evelopment coe, app. A. (Back) State Law reference
More informationGREENWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT US Government Pacing Guide st Semester THIRD NINE WEEKS
Instructional Perio Pacing Guie 2017 2018 1 st Semester THIRD NINE WEEKS Acaemic Framework/ 1 Aug. 06 5, b, c 6a, b, c INTRODUCTION to COURSE Chapter 1: Government an the State Define Government an its
More informationCan international human rights treaties (IHRTs)
Treaties, Tenure, an Torture: The Conflicting Domestic Effects of International Law Courtenay R. Conra Emily Hencken Ritter University of California, Merce University of California, Merce International
More information.Jl 76 April Haskell, with whom was Joanne T. Belisle, Glastonbury, for appellant (intervening
DURNIAK v AUGUST WINTER AND SONS, INC Conn 1277 Cite as 610 A2 1277 (Conn 1992) of employee's eath Employer intervene been no formal eman mae upon the responent for support prior to this petition We agree
More informationNominations to Article III Lower Courts by President George W. Bush During the 110 th Congress
Orer Coe RL33953 Nominations to Article III Lower Courts by Presient George W. Bush During the 110 th Congress Upate May 30, 2008 Denis Steven Rutkus Specialist on the Feeral Juiciary Government an Finance
More informationEFFECTS OF APPRENTICESHIP AND SOCIAL CAPITAL ON NEW BUSINESS CREATION PROCESS OF IMMIGRANT ENTREPRENEURS
Review of Public Aministration an Management Vol., No. 3, July 3 ISSN: 3-44 Website: www.arabianjbmr.com/rpam_inex.php Publisher: Department of Public Aministration Nnami Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
More informationPrinceton University. Honors Faculty Members Receiving Emeritus Status d
Princeton University Honors Faculty Members Receiving Emeritus Status June 2007 The biographical sketches were written by colleagues in the epartments of those honore. Contents Paul Benacerraf Page 5 Nancy
More informationStudy Questions (with Answers) Lecture 10. Migration
Stuy Questions (with Answers) Page 1 of 4 (5) Stuy Questions (with Answers) Lecture 10 Part 1: Multiple Choice Select the best answer of those given. 1. Which of the following reasons for people migrating
More informationFOUNDING DOCUMENTS TREASURE HUNT
LESSON 1 FOUNDING DOCUMENTS TREASURE HUNT OVERVIEW Stuents will trace the origins of some of the funamental principles an ieals foun in the Declaration of Inepenence an the Constitution of the Unite States.
More informationDemocracy and the Threat of Kingmaking 1
Democracy an the Threat of Kingmaking 1 Thorsten Janus University of Wyoming Abstract This paper suggests a way to achieve emocratic reforms at no cost espite resistance from incumbent power holers. The
More informationFINAL DETERMINATION. IN THE MATTER OF : : JOSHUA PRINCE, ESQ. : Requester : : v. : Docket No.: AP : CITY OF HARRISBURG, : Respondent :
FINAL DETERMINATION IN THE MATTER OF : : JOSHUA PRINCE, ESQ. : Requester : : v. : Docket No.: AP 2015-0350 : CITY OF HARRISBURG, : Respondent : INTRODUCTION Joshua Prince, Esq. ( Requester ) submitted
More informationIS INDIVIDUALIZED SUSPICION NEEDED FOR STRIP SEARCHES IN SCHOOLS?
IS INDIVIDUALIZED SUSPICION NEEDED FOR STRIP SEARCHES IN SCHOOLS? Knisley v. Pike Co. Joint Vocational School District June 2010 For duplication & redistribution of this article, please contact the Public
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) NATURE OF THE ACTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, SCOTT MEDICAL HEALTH CENTER, P.C., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. NATURE
More informationB.C. V. STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC.: SHAKING UP TEXAS S INTERPRETATION OF THE TCHRA
B.C. V. STEAK N SHAKE OPERATIONS, INC.: SHAKING UP TEXAS S INTERPRETATION OF THE TCHRA I. INTRODUCTION... 1 II. BACKGROUND... 2 A. The Texas Commission on Human Rights Act... 2 B. Common Law Claims Under
More informationLOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS PERFOMANCE AND THE QUALITY OF SERVICE DELIVERY IN UGANDA
LOCAL GOVERNMENT COUNCILS PERFOMANCE AND THE QUALITY OF SERVICE DELIVERY IN UGANDA Amuria District Council Score-car 2008/2009 Ssemakula Eugene Geral Lillian Muyoma-Tamale Benson Ekwee Ocen Joseph Aolu
More informationFINAL DETERMINATION : : : : : : : : : : INTRODUCTION. Amanda St. Hilaire, a reporter for ABC27 News (collectively, the Requester ), submitted
FINAL DETERMINATION IN THE MATTER OF AMANDA ST. HILAIRE and ABC27 NEWS, Requester v. WEST SHORE REGIONAL POLICE DEPARTMENT, Respondent Docket No AP 2017-0439 INTRODUCTION Amanda St. Hilaire, a reporter
More informationCOMPARATIVE VERSUS CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE: A COMPARISON OF THE LITIGATION EXPENDITURES
COMARATIVE VERSUS CONTRIBUTOR NEGLIGENCE: A COMARISON O THE LITIGATION EENDITURES Jef De Mot ost-octoral Researcher WO University of Ghent Center for Avance Stuies in Law an Economics Visiting scholar
More informationCase 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00498-RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 LISA COLE, Plaintiff, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY DEPARTMENT
More informationWin One, Lose One: A New Defense for California
Win One, Lose One: A New Defense for California 9/15/2001 Employment + Labor and Litigation Client Alert This Commentary highlights two recent developments in California employment law: (1) the recent
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION. Defendants. ) ORDER
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION MONICA DANIEL HUTCHISON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 09-3018-CV-S-RED ) TEXAS COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al, )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION V. CIVIL ACTION NO. PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WES LITTLE, Individually, a/n/f OF MINOR PLAINTIFF, E.L. V. CIVIL ACTION NO. WEST SABINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT,
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT IN THE WORKPLACE I. AGE DISCRIMINATION By Edward T. Ellis 1 A. Disparate Impact Claims Under the ADEA After Smith v. City of Jackson 1. The Supreme
More informationFINAL DETERMINATION INTRODUCTION. Amanda St. Hilaire, a reporter for ABC27 NEWS (collectively, the Requester ),
FINAL DETERMINATION IN THE MATTER OF : : AMANDA ST. HILAIRE AND : ABC27 NEWS, : Requester : : v. : Docket No.: AP 2017-0416 : CAMP HILL BOROUGH, : Respondent : INTRODUCTION Amanda St. Hilaire, a reporter
More informationCase 1:14-cv MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:14-cv-00215-MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TINA DEETER, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 14-215E
More informationBurrows v. The College of Central Florida Doc. 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION
Burrows v. The College of Central Florida Doc. 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION BARBARA BURROWS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 5:14-cv-197-Oc-30PRL THE COLLEGE OF CENTRAL
More informationCase 2:13-cv JFC Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:13-cv-00909-JFC Document 1 Filed 06/27/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JENNIFER FINLEY, v. Plaintiff, WESTERN PENN WAXING, LLC; EUROPEAN
More informationW urban, national, or continental entities; of the bourgeoisie, the working
The Inirect Social Structure of Eurobean Village Communities' ROBERT T. ANDERSON Mills College AND GALLATIN ANDERSON bngley Porter Neuropsychirk Instile HEN one thinks of European classes, one tens to
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ROBERT B. SYKES (#3180 bob@sykesinjurylaw.com ALYSON E. CARTER (#9886 alyson@sykesinjurylaw.com ROBERT B. SYKES & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 311 South State Street, Suite 240 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone
More informationJ. SCOTT DYER, FAGIE HARTMAN, JULIE LEVY AND KATE WHITE
SUPREME COURT ELIMINATES THE CONTINUING VIOLATION THEORY IN EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CASES, FOR ALL BUT HOSTILE ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS J. SCOTT DYER, FAGIE HARTMAN, JULIE LEVY AND KATE WHITE JULY 8, 2002
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Daniel Borden, : Appellant : : v. : : No. 77 C.D. 2014 Bangor Area School District : Argued: September 8, 2014 BEFORE: HONORABLE DAN PELLEGRINI, President Judge
More informationMitigation of Damages Defense Against Title VII Wrongful Termination Claim and the Effect of Claimant s Termination from Interim Employer
ATTORNEYS Joseph Borchelt Ian Mitchell PRACTICE AREAS Employment Practices Defense Mitigation of Damages Defense Against Title VII Wrongful Termination Claim and the Effect of Claimant s Termination from
More informationThe Decoupling of Median Wages from Productivity in OECD Countries
The Decoupling of Meian Wages from Prouctivity in OECD Countries Cyrille Schwellnus, Anreas Kappeler an Pierre-Alain Pionnier OECD 1 ABSTRACT Over the past two ecaes, aggregate labour prouctivity growth
More informationRejecting Sexual Advances as Protected Activity: A District Court Split 1
Rejecting Sexual Advances as Protected Activity: A District Court Split 1 March 5-7, 2009 Litigating Employment Discrimination and Employment-Related Claims And Defenses in Federal and State Courts Scottsdale,
More informationCase 5:18-cv TES Document 204 Filed 04/15/19 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Case 5:18-cv-00388-TES Document 204 Filed 04/15/19 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION VC MACON GA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 5:18-cv-00388-TES
More informationWOMEN STRUGGLING TO ACHIEVE HIGHER EDUCATION AND CULTURAL COMPARISON OF PAKISTANI GIRLS STUDYING IN BRAZIL
WOMEN STRUGGLING TO ACHIEVE HIGHER EDUCATION AND CULTURAL COMPARISON OF PAKISTANI GIRLS STUDYING IN BRAZIL MULHERES QUE ALCANÇAM A EDUCAÇÃO SUPERIOR E A COMPARAÇÃO CULTURAL COM MENINAS PAKISTANESAS ESTUDANDO
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE ORDER
0 0 MARY MATSON, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant. HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES CASE NO. C0- RAJ ORDER On November,
More information6:13-cv MGL Date Filed 02/21/14 Entry Number 32 Page 1 of 10
6:13-cv-00257-MGL Date Filed 02/21/14 Entry Number 32 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Gregory Somers, ) Case No. 6:13-cv-00257-MGL-JDA
More informationFINAL DETERMINATION. Docket No.: AP INTRODUCTION. Michael Buffer and The Citizens Voice (collectively Requester ) submitted a request
FINAL DETERMINATION IN THE MATTER OF : : MICHAEL BUFFER AND THE : CITIZENS VOICE, : Complainant : : v. : : WEST SIDE CAREER AND : Docket No.: AP 2014-0423 TECHNOLOGY CENTER, : Respondent : INTRODUCTION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SANDRA DILAURA and : Civil Action No. 03-2200 JEFFREY DILAURA, w/h, and : THE UNITED STATES EQUAL : EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY : COMMISSION,
More informationMemorandum. Florida County Court Clerks. National Center for Lesbian Rights and Equality Florida. Date: December 23, 2014
Memorandum To: From: Florida County Court Clerks National Center for Lesbian Rights and Equality Florida Date: December 23, 2014 Re: Duties of Florida County Court Clerks Regarding Issuance of Marriage
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ORDER I. BACKGROUND
Case: 1:10-cv-00568 Document #: 31 Filed: 03/07/11 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationWilliam Peake v. Pennsylvania State Police
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 3-15-2016 William Peake v. Pennsylvania State Police Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationNew Mexico Lobo, Volume 073, No 106, 3/24/ 1970
University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository 970 The Daily Lobo 96-970 3-24-970 New Mexico Lobo, Volume 073, No 06, 3/24/ 970 University of New Mexico Follow this an aitional works at: http://igitalrepository.unm.eu/aily_lobo_970
More informationSaunders ("Saunders") searched W.S.G.,1 a student at Hermitage High School, for drugs.
Gallimore et al v. Henrico County School Board et al Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division DANIEL AND MANUELA GALLIMORE, PARENTS AND NEXT FRIENDS
More informationCase 5:09-cv JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:09-cv-00349-JMH Document 1 Filed 10/26/2009 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION at LEXINGTON CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:09-CV- REBECCA LEACH, ) ) Complaint
More informationCase 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-0-jsc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of WILLIAM C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) BENNETT & JOHNSON, LLP 0 Harrison Street, Suite 00 Oakland, California Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 william@bennettjohnsonlaw.com
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Right to Know Law Request : Served on Venango County's Tourism : Promotion Agency and Lead Economic : No. 2286 C.D. 2012 Development Agency : Argued: November
More informationStudents Freedom From Unreasonable Searches and Seizures. I. Introduction & Brief Background on Searches and Seizures
Makenzi Travis Education Law & Policy Seminar Spring 2011 Published Paper Students Freedom From Unreasonable Searches and Seizures I. Introduction & Brief Background on Searches and Seizures The Fourth
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, Defendant. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND NATURE OF ACTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA Civil Action No: 8:03CV165 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, WOODMEN OF THE WORLD LIFE INSURANCE SOCIETY and/or OMAHA
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No Filed June 24, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County, Kellyann M.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 14-0773 Filed June 24, 2015 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. MAR YO D. LINDSEY JR., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Black Hawk County,
More informationA. Privilege Against Self-Incrimination Issue
In the wake of the passage of the state law pertaining to so-called red light traffic cameras, [See Acts 2008, Public Chapter 962, effective July 1, 2008, codified at Tenn. Code Ann. 55-8-198 (Supp. 2009)],
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 No. 14-3610 United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604 Argued October 6, 2015 Decided
More informationI. Introduction. fact that most people carry a cell phone, there has been relatively little litigation deciding
CELL PHONE SEARCHES IN SCHOOLS: THE NEW FRONTIER ANDREA KLIKA I. Introduction In the age of smart phones, what once was a simple device to make phone calls has become a personal computer that stores a
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Geoffrey Johnson, : Petitioner : : v. : : Pennsylvania Convention : Center Authority, : No. 1844 C.D. 2011 Respondent : Argued: May 14, 2012 BEFORE: HONORABLE
More informationCase 2:15-cv LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:15-cv-06077-LFR Document 1 Filed 11/11/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SAM MELRATH, 50 Jarrett Avenue Rockledge, PA 19046 v. Plaintiff
More informationFINAL DETERMINATION INTRODUCTION. Robert Kalinowski and The Citizens Voice (collectively Requester ) submitted a
FINAL DETERMINATION IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT KALINOWSKI AND THE CITIZENS VOICE, Complainant v. Docket No. AP 2014-0272 LUZERNE COUNTY, Respondent INTRODUCTION Robert Kalinowski and The Citizens Voice (collectively
More informationJody Feder Legislative Attorney American Law Division
Order Code RS22686 June 28, 2007 Pay Discrimination Claims Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act: A Legal Analysis of the Supreme Court s Decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. Summary
More information1998 WL Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois.
1998 WL 748328 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois. Rosalind WARNELL and Suzette Wright, each individually and on behalf of other similarly situated
More informationCourthouse News Service
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION AT LEXINGTON JERRY SANDER Case No. 3514 Kedgewick Court Lexington, KY 40503 Judge Plaintiff, v. GRAY TELEVISION GROUP, INC. d/b/a
More informationHuman Rights Defense Center
Human Rights Defense Center DEDICATED TO PROTECTING HUMAN RIGHTS SENT VIA MAIL AND ELECTRONICALLY Robert Hinchman, Senior Counsel Office of Legal Policy U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue,
More informationRawls, Phelps, Nash: eciency curve and economic justice
Rawls, Phelps, Nash: eciency curve an economic justice Louis e Mesnar June 14, 2011 University of Burguny an CNRS, Laboratoire 'Economie et e Gestion (UMR CNRS 5118); 2 B Gabriel, B.P. 26611, F-21066 DIJON
More information2018 MARE/MO K-8 Fall Conference
2018 MARE/MO K-8 Fall Conference Search & Seizure and Effectively Partnering with Law Enforcement October 18, 2018 Ryan Fry (833)-GMEDLAW www.gmschoollaw.com @GuinMundorfKC Students Legitimate Expectation
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, Defendant. CONSENT DECREE
Page 1 of 8 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, LUMBERTON MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT, CIVIL ACTION NO. Defendant. CONSENT DECREE This
More informationCase 1:12-cv S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT
Case 1:12-cv-00574-S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND GENERAL JONES, Plaintiff vs. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, by and through
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Introduction
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERITES UNION OF HAWAII FOUNDATION BRENT T. WHITE 7391 P.O. Box 3410 Honolulu, HI 96801 Telephone: (808 522-5907 Facsimile: (808 522-5909 Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationSocial Sciences in Asia
o. 35 Social Sciences in Asia Bura, Mongolia, ew Zealan, The Philippines, Singapore P a U REPORTS AD PAPERS I THE SOCIAL SCIECES The Reports an Papers are intene to present to a restricte public of specialists
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 96-CV-381. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections
More informationPINE TREE ISD. Discipline Manual. Discipline Manual Page 1
PINE TREE IS iscipline anual 2018 2019 iscipline anual Page 1 Pine Tree Local Action iscipline s Short escription Long escription B/P BUS PROBATION BUS PROBATION B/Y BUS PROB. - YEA BUS PROBATION
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A16-1885 Sarah B. Janecek, petitioner, Appellant,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RICHARD RAYMEN, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 05-486 (RBW) ) UNITED SENIOR ASSOCIATION, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. )
More informationCase 2:10-cv GCS -VMM Document 1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:10-cv-14942-GCS -VMM Document 1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CHARLES JONES as ) Personal Representative of the ) Estate
More informationRight to Know Law Legal Update
Erik Arneson, Executive Director Right to Know Law Legal Update PA State Association of Boroughs Presented by Nathanial Byerly and George Spiess OOR Update Numbers Appeals 1,400 appeals through end of
More informationUNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS LEGISLATION: STATE COMPARISON CHART
STATE BILL # STATUS OF BILL Florida FSA 934.50 effective as of July 1, 2013 Idaho I.C. 21-213 effective as of July 1, 2013. Illinois 725 Ill. Comp. Stat. 167/1 et seq. effective as of January 1, 2014.
More informationCase 0:16-cv WPD Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:16-cv-61856-WPD Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2017 Page 1 of 11 JENNIFER SANDOVAL, vs. Plaintiff, RONALD R. WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, P.L., SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE,
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 17-370 In The Supreme Court of the United States JAMEKA K. EVANS, v. Petitioner, GEORGIA REGIONAL HOSPITAL, et al., Respondents. On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals
More informationCase 7:16-cv O Document 100 Filed 11/20/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1792
Case 7:16-cv-00054-O Document 100 Filed 11/20/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1792 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION STATE OF TEXAS et al., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 3:17-cv UN4 Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT
Case 3:17-cv-01518-UN4 Document 1 Filed 08/24/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAUREN FIZZ : : -vs- : NO. : ROBERT ALLEN, Individually and : in
More informationPROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION, INCLUDING SEXUAL AND OTHER FORMS OF HARASSMENT 2.70*
PROHIBITING DISCRIMINATION, INCLUDING SEXUAL AND OTHER FORMS OF HARASSMENT 2.70* I. Policy Against Discrimination A. No person shall, on the basis of race, color, religion, gender, age, marital status,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO RWZ. NANCY K. GARRITY, JOANNE CLARK and ARTHUR GARRITY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-12143-RWZ NANCY K. GARRITY, JOANNE CLARK and ARTHUR GARRITY v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sherfey et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CHAD SHERFEY, ET AL., ) CASE NO.1:16CV776 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE CHRISTOPHER
More informationCase 1:07-cv AA Document 25 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:07-cv-00829-AA Document 25 Filed 08/14/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION NICOLE WILLIAMS, Case No. 1:07-CV-829 on behalf of herself and all
More informationcase 2:14-cv PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
case 2:14-cv-00234-PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION NICHOLAS KINCADE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO: 2:14-CV-234-PPS-JEM
More informationCase 0:12-cv RNS Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2013 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:12-cv-61959-RNS Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/23/2013 Page 1 of 9 ZENOVIDA LOVE, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 12-61959-Civ-SCOLA vs. Plaintiffs,
More informationDavid Jankowski v. Robert Lellock
2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-20-2016 David Jankowski v. Robert Lellock Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016
More informationCase 3:19-cv DJH Document 21 Filed 03/20/19 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 254
Case 3:19-cv-00178-DJH Document 21 Filed 03/20/19 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 254 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION EMW WOMEN S SURGICAL CENTER, P.S.C. and ERNEST
More informationPaul Kengor. SEPTEMBER (cloth) $ pages 6 x 9 Illustrated U.S. HISTORY / POLITICS
New Release DUPES How America s Aversaries Have Manipulate Progressives for a Century Paul Kengor SEPTEMBER 9781935191759 (cloth) $29.95 496 pages 6 x 9 Illustrate U.S. HISTORY / POLITICS BESTSELLING AUTHOR
More informationCase 1:14-cv RJS-DBP Document 47 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 1:14-cv-00134-RJS-DBP Document 47 Filed 11/22/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH NORTHERN DIVISION HOPE ZISUMBO, Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
More informationCriminal Intelligence Unit Guidelines for First Amendment Demonstrations
Association of LAW ENFORCEMENT INTELLIGENCE UNITS Founded in 1956 Your Voice at the National Level! Criminal Intelligence Unit Guidelines for First Amendment Demonstrations Revised: July 29, 2009 Copyright
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA JONES COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT APPELLEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-00857-COA TASHA DAVIS, INDIVIDUALLY, AND TASHA DAVIS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH HEIRS OF CALLIE ALLYN DAVIS, DECEASED APPELLANT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 3:12-cv-00626-JMM Document 10 Filed 09/24/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA FRED J. ROBBINS, JR. and : No. 3:12cv626 MARY ROBBINS, : Plaintiffs
More informationCase: 3:17-cv jdp Document #: 35 Filed: 06/01/18 Page 1 of 15
Case: 3:17-cv-00896-jdp Document #: 35 Filed: 06/01/18 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JOHN SATRAN, v. Plaintiff, OPINION & ORDER LVNV FUNDING, LLC,
More information