Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 1 of 3
|
|
- April Cummings
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO CIV-MGC TAYLOR CASE, AUDRA AWAI, CLIFFORD KLEIN, JOYCELYN STINSON, MELISSA SHIPMAN, and AMY KISZ, on Behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, FLORIDA COASTAL SCHOOL OF LAW, INC. and DOES 1-20, Defendants. / NOTICE OF FILING SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS TAYLOR CASEY, AUDRA AWAI, CLIFFORD KLEIN, JOYCELYN STINSON, MELISSA SHIPMAN, and AMY KISZ ( Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, hereby give notice of filing Supplemental Authority in Support of Plaintiff's Response in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (ECF # 22). 1 See attached Composite Exhibit A. Respectfully submitted, s/ Elio F. Martinez, Jr. ELIO F. MARTINEZ, JR. Florida Bar No.: MARIAN KENNADY Florida Bar No LESLIE V. MARENCO Florida Bar No Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (ECF #22) addressed primarily the issue of transfer and included a reservation of right to file further response to the Motion to Dismiss upon a determination of the Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (ECF # 20) which remains pending.
2 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 2 of 3 CASE NO CIV-MGC CONCEPCION MARTINEZ & BELLIDO 255 Aragon Ave. 2nd Floor Coral Gables, FL Tel: / Fax: emartinez@cfclaw.com mkennady@cfclaw.com lmarenco@cfclaw.com -and- David Anziska, Esq. The Law Offices of David Anziska 305 Broadway, 9 th Fl. New York, NY Phone (212) ; Fax: (212) Jesse Strauss, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Strauss Law, PLLC 305 Broadway, 9 th Fl. New York, NY Phone (212) ; Fax (212) Counsel for Plaintiffs, individually and for all others similarly situated CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was served via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF on July 26, 2012, on all counsel or parties of record on the Service List below. By: s/ Elio F. Martinez, Jr. ELIO F. MARTINEZ, JR. Florida Bar No.:
3 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 3 of 3 CASE NO CIV-MGC SERVICE LIST Taylor Casey, et al. v. Florida Coastal School of Law United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Case No CIV-MGC Herman J. Russomanno, Esq. Herman J. Russomanno, III, Esq. RUSSOMANNO & BORRELLO, P.A. Museum Tower, Penthouse West Flagler Street Miami, Florida and- Michael J. Volpe, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Edmund M. O'Toole, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Venable LLP 1270 Avenue of the Americas, 24th Floor New York, NY Counsel for Defendant Florida Coastal School of Law 3
4 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 1 of 11 Composite Exhibit "A"
5 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 2 of 11 1 Prepared by the Court FILED San Francisco County Superlor Court JUL CLE K or THE COURT BY: Deputy Clark SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA County Of San Francisco Department No CAIONLEAN AIMING, et al, Plaintiffs, V. GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY, et al, Defendants. No. CGC ORDER OVERRULING DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT On June 13, 2012 a hearing was held on defendant Golden Gate University's demurrer to the first amended complaint. The demurrer asserted three grounds why the claims alleged by the plaintiffs were deficient: 1) all three claims fail because they did not allege that defendant's statements were likely to deceive reasonable prospective and current law students; 2) the claim under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) fails because education is neither a good nor a service as those terms are defined in the CLRA; and 3) the Unfair Competition Law (UCL) claim 25 Page 1
6 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 3 of is time-barred. At the hearing I orally rejected the third ground. At the conclusion of the hearing I took the first and second grounds under submission so that I could more fully consider the parties' oral and written arguments as to those grounds. Having completed my further review, I reject the first and second grounds asserted by defendant and thus overrule the demurrer in its entirety. California case law establishes that ordinarily the issue of whether a statement is likely to deceive a reasonable consumer is a question of fact, Relying heavily on the reasoning of a New York trial court decision, defendant argues that a reasonable prospective or current law student would surely understand that the statements attributed to the defendant did not pertain only to jobs requiring or preferring a law school degree. Accepting the truth of plaintiffs' well-pleaded allegations, as I am required to do at this stage of the case, I disagree. Each of the plaintiffs allege that they were in fact deceived by the statements they attribute to the defendant, and there is nothing before me to suggest that any of the plaintiffs were not reasonable consumers of a law school education. Moreover, the statements attributed to defendant were allegedly made in a context (i,e. in materials designed to attract and retain law students to defendant's law school) where a reasonable prospective or current law student could reasonably believe that the statements pertained only to jobs for which a law school education is a requirement or preference and did not include jobs for which a law school education is irrelevant or of minimal utility. This issue is simply not amenable to resolution on a demurrer and must await factual development by the parties. The New York trial court decision is distinguishable to the extent that there are different rules for deciding motions to dismiss in New York than there are for deciding demurrers, different rules as to the scope of judicial notice, and differences in the governing substantive law. To the extent, if any, the New York trial court decision rests on the same procedural and 25 Page 2
7 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 4 of 11 substantive law that apply to deciding the cognizability of plaintiffs' claims, the New York decision is not in accord with California procedural and substantive law and thus I decline to follow it. The provision of education, and specifically a law school education, falls well within CLRA's broad definition of "services." Therefore, per Fairbanks v. Superior Court p009) 46 Cal, 4 th 56, which teaches that no further inquiry is needed when the statutory language resolves the issue, defendant's second ground lacks merit. Defendant places much emphasis on a single paragraph in Fairbanks, which states that the legislative history of the CLRA showing that the statute had been adapted from a model law that included the word "insurance" within the definition of services confirms that insurance, which is not explicitly included in the CLRA's definition of services, is outside of CLRA"s definition of services. There are several problems with this argument as pertains to the issue of whether education is within CLRA"s definition of "services." First, the word "education" appears in the model act not by itself but as an object to the antecedent phrase of "privileges with respect to." This strongly suggests that the drafters of the model act had something in mind other that just the provision of education when the word education was included in the model act's definition of services. This is, in marked contrast, to the unqualified word "insurance" used in the model act. Second, defendant's argument does not account for the fact that none of the activities specifically identified in the model act as services that appear in the same subsection of the model act as the word "education" ("transportation, hotel and restaurant accommodations...entertainment, recreation, physical culture, hospital accommodations, funerals, cemetery accommodations") appear in CLRA"s definition of services. Yet many, if not all, of those Page 3
8 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 5 of 11 activities unquestionably fall within CLRA"s defmition of services and the CLRA has been applied to many of them. Third, defendant's argument fails to take into account that Fairbanks also looked to the Unruh Act for confirmation of its holding that life insurance is not within the CLRA's defmition of services because the word insurance does appear in the Unnih Act's definition of services. In contrast, the word education is not expressly included in the Unruh Act's definition of services, yet there are cases that have applied that statute to educational instituitons. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above and at the hearing, defendant's demurrer is overruled in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 19, 2012 Harold alm Superior Court Judge Page 4
9 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 6 of 11 Superior Court of California County of San Francisco CAIONLEAN ARRING, et al, VS. GOLDEN GATE UNIVERSITY, et al, Plaintiff(s) Defendant(s) Case Number: CGC CERTIFICA I OF MAILIN6 (CCP 1013a (4) ) I, Gina Gonzales, a Deputy Clerk of the Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, certify that I am not a party to the within action. On July 19, 2012, I served the attached Order Overruling Demurrer To First Amended Complaint by placing a copy thereof in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows: ROSEMARY M. RIVAS, ESQ. DANIELLE A. STOUMBOS, ESQ. FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP 100 Bush Street, Ste San Francisco, CA Si EPHAN1E A. SHERIDAN, ESQ. KELLY SAVAGE DAY, ESQ. ' SEDGWICK, LLP 333 Bush Street, 30 TH Fl San Francisco, CA JOHN PARKER, ESQ, KERSHAW CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, CA and, I then placed the sealed envelopes in the outgoing mail at 400 McAllister Street, San Francisco, CA on the date indicated above for collection, attachment of required prepaid postage, and mailing on that date following standard court practices. Dated: July 19, 2012 MICHAEL YUEN, Clerk B :
10 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 7 of 11 1 Prepared by the Court FILED San Francisco County Superior Court BY: JUL CLE*K OF THE COURT / /, /de../ Deputy Clerk SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA County Of San Francisco Department No ELIZABETH HALLOCK, et al, No, CGC V. Plaintiffs, ORDER OVERRULING DEMURRER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al, Defendants On June 13, 2012 a hearing was held on defendant University of San Francisco's demurrer to the first amended complaint. The demurrer asserted three grounds why the claims alleged by the plaintiffs were:deficient: 1) all three claims fail because they did not allege that defendant's statements were likely to deceive reasonable prospective and current law students; 2) the claim under the Consumer Legal Rernedies Act (CLRA) fails because education is neither a good nor a service as those terms are defined in the CLRA; and 3) the Unfair Competition Law 25 Page 1
11 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 8 of (1./CL) claim is time-barred. At the hearing I orally rejected the third ground. At the conclusion of the hearing I took the first and second grounds under submission so that I could more fully consider the parties' oral and written arguments as to those grounds. Having completed my further review, I reject the first and second grounds asserted by defendant and thus overrule the demurrer in its entirety. California case law establishes that ordinarily the issue of whether a statement is likely to deceive a reasonable consumer is a question of fact. Relying heavily on the reasoning of a New York trial court decision, defendant argues that a reasonable prospective or current law student would surely understand that the statements attributed to the defendant did not pertain only to jobs requiring or preferring a law school degree. Accepting the truth of plaintiffs' well-pleaded allegations, as I am required to do at this stage of the case, I disagree. Each of the plaintiffs allege that they were in fact deceived by the statements they attribute to the defendant, and there is nothing before me to suggest that any of the plaintiffs were not reasonable consumers of a law school education. Moreover, the statements attributed to defendant were allegedly made in a context (i.e. in materials designed to attract and retain law students to defendant's law school) where a reasonable prospective or current law student could reasonably believe that the statements pertained only to jobs for which a law school education is a requirement or preference and did not include jobs for which a law school education is irrelevant or of minimal utility. This issue is simply not amenable to resolution on a demurrer and must await factual development by the parties. The New York trial court decision is distinguishable to the extent that there are different rules for deciding motions to dismiss in New York than there are for deciding demurrers, different rules as to the scope of judicial notice, and differences in the governing substantive law. To the extent, if any, the New York trial court decision rests on the same procedural and 25 Page 2
12 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 9 of 11 1 substantive law that apply to deciding the cognizability of plaintiffs' claims, the New York decision is not in accord with California procedural and substantive law and thus I decline to follow it. The provision of education, and specifically a law school education, falls well within CLRA's broad definition of "services." Therefore, per Fairbanks v. Superior Court (2009) 46 Cal. 4 1h 56, which teaches that no further inquiry is needed when the statutory language resolves the issue, defendant's second ground lacks merit. Defendant places much emphasis on a single paragraph in Fairbanks, which states that the legislative history of the CLRA showing that the statute had been adapted from a model law that included the word "insurance" within the defmition of services confirms that insurance, which is not explicitly included in the CLRA's definition of services, is outside of CLRA"s definition of services. There are several problems with this argument as pertains to the issue of whether education is within CLRA"s definition of "services." First, the word "education" appears in the model act not by itself but as an object to the antecedent phrase of "privileges with respect to." This strongly suggests that the drafters of the model act had something in mind other that just the provision of education when the word education was included in the model act's definition of services. This is, in marked contrast, to the unqualified word "insurance" used in the model act. Second, defendant's argument does not account for the fact that none of the activities specifically identified in the model act as services that appear in the same subsection of the model act as the word "education" ("transportation, hotel and restaurant accommodations...entertainment, recreation, physical culture, hospital accommodations, funerals, cemetery accommodations") appear in CLRA"s defmition of services. Yet many, if not all, of those Page 3
13 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 10 of activities unquestionably fall within CLRA"s definition of services and the CLRA has been applied to many of them. Third, defendant's argument fails to take into account that Fairbanks also looked to the Unruh Act for confirmation of its holding that life insurance is not within the CLRA's definition of services because the word insurance does appear in the Unruh Act's definition of services. In contrast, the word education is not expressly included in the Unruh Act's definition of services, yet there are cases that have applied that statute to educational instituitons. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above and at the hearing, defendant's demurrer is overruled in its entirety. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 19, Harold Kahn Superior Court Judge Page 4
14 Case 1:12-cv MGC Document 35-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/26/2012 Page 11 of 11 Superior Court of California County of San Francisco ELIZABETH HALLOCK, et al, vs. Plaintiff(s) Case Number: CGC CERTIFICATE OF MAILING (CCP 1013a (4) ) UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al, Defendant(s) I, Gina Gonzales, a Deputy Clerk of the Superior Court of the County of San Francisco, certify that I am not a party to the within action.. On July 19, 2012,1 served the attached Order Overruling Demurrer To First Amended Complaint by placing a copy thereof in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows: ROSEMARY M. RIVAS, ESQ. DANIELLE A. STOUMBOS, ESQ. FINKELSTEIN THOMPSON LLP 100 Bush Street, Ste San Francisco, CA SIEPHANIE A. SHERIDAN, ESQ. KELLY SAVAGE DAY, ESQ. SEDGWICK, LLP 333 Bush Street, 30 TH Fl San Francisco, CA JOHN PARKER, ESQ. KERSHAW CUTTER & RATINOFF, LLP 401 Watt Avenue Sacramento, CA and, I then. placed the sealed envelopes in the outgoing mail at 400 McAllister Street, *San Francisco, CA on the date indicated above for collection, attachment of required prepaid postage, and mailing on that date following standard court practices. Dated: July 19, 2012 MICHAEL YUEN, Clerk ' By: 4/Ig ina Gonz es, D9 uty Clerk
Case 9:15-cv KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 7
Case 9:15-cv-80098-KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 7 ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, v. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationCase 1:11-cv MGC Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2011 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:11-cv-22026-MGC Document 81 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/21/2011 Page 1 of 6 BERND WOLLSCHLAEGER, et al., v. Plaintiffs, FRANK FARMER, et al., Defendants. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationCase 1:16-cv DPG Document 509 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2018 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:16-cv-21301-DPG Document 509 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2018 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 16-cv-21301-GAYLES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More informationCase 0:16-cv WPD Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2017 Page 1 of 4
Case 0:16-cv-62603-WPD Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/07/2017 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO. 16-CV-62603-WPD GRISEL ALONSO,
More informationCase 1:13-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:13-cv-21570-BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/18/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Plaintiff, MIAMI-DADE COUNTY; MIAMI-DADE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; MIAMI- DADE COUNTY
More informationCase 1:12-cv MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:12-cv-22439-MGC Document 155 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2013 Page 1 of 8 MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a sovereign nation and Federally recognized Indian tribe, vs. Plaintiff, IN THE
More informationCase 0:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2018 Page 1 of 5
Case 0:18-cv-60589-FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO.: FREDNER BOURSIQUOT,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CARLOS PEREZ, ERIC ZIMELMAN, ANGELA D. RIEKE and DOROTHY HAYS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case
More informationCase 0:17-cv BB Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2018 Page 1 of 4
Case 017-cv-62013-BB Document 89 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/19/2018 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION Hard Rock Café International (USA), Inc.,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT 501. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment came on regularly for hearing on June 18,
F I LED Supenor Court of California County of San Francisco JUN ft~r~#fiie COURT b!1p~1y Clerk 1 McCormack Baron Ragan Management Services, Inc. v. Plaintiff, Margarita Herrera, et ai., SUPERIOR COURT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Petitioners, Real Parties in Interest.
Case: 10-72977 09/29/2010 Page: 1 of 7 ID: 7491582 DktEntry: 6 10-72977 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and
More informationCase 1:16-cv RNS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2016 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:16-cv-21221-RNS Document 24 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2016 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ANTHONY R. EDWARDS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez
Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow Doc. 34 Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MARK J. GAINOR, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:18-cv R-AGR Document 7 Filed 02/05/18 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:26
Case :-cv-00-r-agr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Ryan J. Clarkson (SBN 0 rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Shireen M. Clarkson (SBN sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Bahar Sodaify (SBN 0 bsodaify@clarksonlawfirm.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 1 1 0 Richard G. McCracken, SBN 00 Andrew J. Kahn, SBN Paul L. More, SBN Yuval M. Miller, SBN DAVIS, COWELL & BOWE, LLP Market Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Tel: () -00 Fax: () -01 Attorneys for
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:
Case 9:18-cv-81345-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2018 Page 1 of 4 JOHN DOE, vs. Plaintiff, RICHARD L. SWEARINGEN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Florida Department of Law
More informationCase 1:17-cv DPG Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:17-cv-22952-DPG Document 3 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 8 LIZA PRAMAN, v. Plaintiff(s), ASTOR EB-5 LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, and DAVID J. HART, Individually, Defendants.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 4/29/2016 2:19 PM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal JOHN TAGLIERI, vs. Appellant, DONALD J. TRUMP, THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION,
More informationCase 1:16-cv DPG Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cv-21301-DPG Document 145 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/26/2016 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-CV-21301-GAYLES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. Florida Southern District Court Case No. 1:13-cv Lardner v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. Document 42.
PlainSite Legal Document Florida Southern District Court Case No. 1:13-cv-22751 Lardner v. Diversified Consultants, Inc. Document 42 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation
More informationCase 1:16-cv RNS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2016 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:16-cv-21221-RNS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2016 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Civil Action No: 1:16-cv-21221-Scola MASTER SGT.
More informationCase 0:12-cv WJZ Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/13/2012 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:1-cv-61735-WJZ Document 7 Entered on FLSD Docket 1/13/01 Page 1 of 5 BROWARD BULLDOG, INC., a Florida corporation not for profit, and DAN CHRISTENSEN, founder, operator and editor of the BrowardBulldog.com
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :0-cv-0-GAF -CT Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 S. FIGUEROA ST., SUITE 00 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 00- TELEPHONE ( -00 FAX ( - Andrew R. Hall (CA SBN andyhall@dwt.com Catherine E. Maxson (CA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No GOLD/MCALILEY (and consolidated cases)
Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 458 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/03/2010 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION No. 04-21448-GOLD/MCALILEY (and consolidated
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT APPELLANT S SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL OPENING BRIEF
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERNEST LANDRY, Defendant and Appellant. H040337 (Santa Clara County
More informationCase 1:17-cv MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21
Case 1:17-cv-23307-MGC Document 107 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/28/2018 Page 1 of 21 AUSTIN BELANGER, v. Plaintiff, ROUNDPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase 1:11-cv MGC Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2011 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:11-cv-22026-MGC Document 78 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/15/2011 Page 1 of 8 BERND WOLLSCHLAEGER, et al., v. Plaintiffs, FRANK FARMER, et al., Defendants. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Case 4:17-cv-00577-MW-CAS Document 1 Filed 12/18/17 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA, TALLAHASSEE DIVISION VENITA WOODFAULK, Plaintiff, Case No. v. DOCTORS
More informationCase 1:16-cv FAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2016 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cv-21224-FAM Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2016 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 16-21224-CIV-MORENO MASTER SGT. ANTHONY
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,. COUNTY OF.PLUMAS
ENDORSED Plumas Superior Court SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,. COUNTY OF.PLUMAS DEBORAH NORRIE, Clerk of the Court By T.Ph=e=lp~s _ Deputy Clerk CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORES1RY AND FIRE PROTECTION, PLAINTIFF
More informationF 1 CLEFIA OF THE- COURT O SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT 305. Case No. CGC
F 1 upotior Court of California County of San Frncioo O 4.2017 CLEFIA OF THE- COURT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Deputy Mark COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO DEPARTMENT 305 KELLY ELLIS, HOLLY PEASE, and KELLI WISURI,
More informationNOTICE OF FILING REVISED PROPOSED ORDER ON MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT (DE61)
Case 1:17-cv-22568-MGC Document 62 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/09/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 17-22568-CIV-COOKE/Goodman ARTHENIA JOYNER, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:18-cv JLK Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2018 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:18-cv-20691-JLK Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/22/2018 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA LEONARDO BONOMI, and other similarly situated individually,
More informationCASE NO.: 4D JOHN TAGLIERI, an individual, Appellant, Appellees. REPLY BRIEF
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT CASE NO.: 4D14-1983 JOHN TAGLIERI, an individual, RECEIVED, 9/8/2015 1:38 PM, Clerk, Fourth District Court of Appeal Appellant, V. DONALD J. TRUMP, THE
More informationB CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE. LINDA DE ROGATIS, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
B254024 CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION FIVE LINDA DE ROGATIS, et al., v. Plaintiffs and Appellants, KAREN MICHELLE SHAINSKY, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL FROM SUPERIOR
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
MARC G. HYNES, ESQ., CA STATE BAR #049048 ATKINSON FARASYN, LLP 660 WEST DANA STREET P. O. BOX 279 MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94042 Tel.: (650) 967-6941 FAX: (650) 967-1395 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Petitioners
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 3:11-cv County of Marin v. Deloitte Consulting LLP et al.
PlainSite Legal Document California Northern District Court Case No. :-cv-00 County of Marin v. Deloitte Consulting LLP et al Document View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 1:10-CV ANSWER TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case 1:10-cv-24337-WMH Document 18 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/08/2011 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION CASE NO. 1:10-CV-24337 JOSE RABEIRO Plaintiff,
More informationCase 3:16-md VC Document 1461 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 1461 Filed 05/18/18 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 WEITZ & LUXENBERG, PC Robin L. Greenwald (pro hac vice) 700 Broadway New York, NY
More informationCase 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
Case 9:18-cv-80674-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 Google LLC, a limited liability company vs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Plaintiff, CASE NO.
More informationCase 1:16-cv CMA Document 126 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cv-21199-CMA Document 126 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/30/2017 Page 1 of 6 ANDREA ROSSI and LEONARDO CORPORATION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 1:16-cv-21199-CMA
More informationCase M:06-cv VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5
Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW Document 424 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 5 Jon B. Eisenberg, California Bar No. 88278 (jon@eandhlaw.com William N. Hancock, California Bar No. 104501 (bill@eandhlaw.com Eisenberg
More informationCase 9:07-cv DTKH Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2010 Page 1 of 5. E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \e* SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:07-cv-81038-DTKH Document 87 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2010 Page 1 of 5 F\ PPS cry VOW E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ^J 'e, le \e* SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA NO. 07-81038-CIV-HURLEY/HOPKINS
More informationCase 1:15-mc ESH Document 17 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-mc-00410-ESH Document 17 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CBS BROADCASTING INC., Misc.
More informationCase 1:11-mc MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2011 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:11-mc-22432-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2011 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL SHREDDING OF WISCONSIN, INC., a Wisconsin corporation,
More informationCase 5:08-cv RMW Document 7 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 7
Case 5:08-cv-00296-RMW Document 7 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 RDMTIND G. BROWN TR. Attorney General of the State of California DANE R. GILLETTE Chief Assistant Attorney General HUE L.
More informationCase 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 8
Case 9:18-cv-80633-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/14/2018 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION MARGARET SCHULTZ, Individually
More informationCase 9:17-cv KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6
Case 9:17-cv-80495-KAM Document 10 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/25/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION CASE NO. 9:17-CV-80495-MARRA-MATTHEWMAN
More informationCase 2:14-cv WBS-EFB Document 14 Filed 08/07/14 Page 1 of 5
Case :-cv-0-wbs-efb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP T. Robert Finlay, Esq., SBN 0 Lukasz I. Wozniak, Esq., SBN MacArthur Court, Suite 0 Newport Beach, CA 0 Tel. () -00; Fax () 0-
More informationCase 9:03-cv KAM Document 2795 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/17/2014 Page 1 of 8
Case 9:03-cv-80612-KAM Document 2795 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/17/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 03-80612-CIV-MARRA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
More informationWoods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058) 29229 Canwood
More informationCase 1:11-cv JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:11-cv-21757-JEM Document 60 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/22/2011 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Case Number: 11-21757-CIV-MARTINEZ-MCALILEY
More informationCase 0:09-cv WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:09-cv-60016-WPD Document 53 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/01/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA HOLLYWOOD MOBILE ESTATES LIMITED, a Florida Limited Partnership,
More informationCase 9:03-cv KAM Document 2926 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/19/2014 Page 1 of 2
Case 9:03-cv-80612-KAM Document 2926 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/19/2014 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 03-80612-CIV-MARRA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
More informationCase 1:11-cv MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:11-cv-22026-MGC Document 14 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/17/2011 Page 1 of 9 BERND WOLLSCHLAEGER, et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 11-22026-Civ-COOKE/TURNOFF
More informationI will continue to provide updates to creditors as relevant matters arise.
April 0 TO CREDITORS AS ADDRESSED Dear Sir/Madam Forge Group Power Pty Ltd ACN (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (the Company) I refer to my circular to creditors dated 0 January 01 that
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/15/2014 INDEX NO. 653695/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ROYAL PARK INVESTMENTS SA/NV, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:16-cv CMA Document 257 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cv-21199-CMA Document 257 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/13/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ANDREA ROSSI, et al., CASE NO. 1:16-CV-21199-CMA Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 4:17-cv JLK Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2018 Page 1 of 5
Case 4:17-cv-10092-JLK Document 29 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/13/2018 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA KEY WEST DIVISION CHABAD OF KEY WEST, INC., and
More informationCase 1:04-cv ASG Document 656 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2012 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:04-cv-21448-ASG Document 656 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/09/2012 Page 1 of 12 MICCOSUKEE TRIBE OF INDIANS OF FLORIDA, a federally-recognized Indian Tribe, and FRIENDS OF THE EVERGLADES, vs. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:16-cv FAM Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2016 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cv-20001-FAM Document 36 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/29/2016 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 16-CV-20001-FAM WARREN REDLICH, pro se, vs. Plaintiff, THE CITY
More informationCase 1:16-cv DPG Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cv-21301-DPG Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/20/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-CV-21301-GAYLES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:07-cv-01235-MCA-LFG Document 7 Filed 01/21/2008 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO US AIRWAYS, INC., vs. Plaintiff, No. 07 CV 1235 MCA/LFG EDWARD J.
More informationCase 0:13-cv JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:13-cv-60066-JIC Document 318 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2016 Page 1 of 11 ABRAHAM INETIANBOR, JOHNNY FRETWELL, LAUREN BROWN, THOMAS PETERSON, VIRGINIA FRY, AND NELS PATE, JR., on behalf of themselves
More informationCLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL (Minute Order)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO Gordon D Schaber Courthouse 720 Ninth STREET Sacramento, CA 95814-1311 SHORT TITLE: Bohannan vs. Professional Cycle Parts CLERK'S CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. JOSHUA MARTIN MIRACLE, Defendant and Appellant. CAPITAL CASE No. S140894 Santa Barbara County
More informationCase 9:15-cv JIC Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:15-cv-81783-JIC Document 75 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/07/2016 Page 1 of 8 DAVID M. LEVINE, not individually, but solely in his capacity as Receiver for ECAREER HOLDINGS, INC. and ECAREER, INC.,
More informationATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Simon v. Adzilla, Inc [New Media] et al Doc. 0 Case:0-cv-00-MMC Document0 Filed0//0 Page of 0 David C. Parisi, Esq. - SBN Suzanne Havens Bechman, Esq. SBN dcparisi@parisihavens.com shavens@parisihavens.com
More informationJudicial Assistant s > ALWAYS copy opposing counsel(s) on correspondence to the Court
Honorable Judge Amy M. Williams 545 First Avenue North, Room 417 St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11 2019 JURY TRIAL WEEKS *ALL ONE WEEK DOCKETS* JANUARY 7 FEBRUARY
More informationHAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and
S190318 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HAROLD P. STURGEON, Plaintiff and Petitioner, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., Defendants and Respondents, and SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT YAKIMA
Case :-cv-000-smj ECF No. filed // PageID.00 Page of Brendan V. Sullivan, Jr. Steven M. Cady WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP Twelfth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 000 Tel.: 0-- scady@wc.com Maren R. Norton 00
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS
ELECTRONICALLY FILED Pulaski County Circuit Court Larry Crane, Circuit/County Clerk 2018-Jul-25 11:46:28 60CV-18-4857 C06D17 : 8 Pages IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF PULASKI COUNTY, ARKANSAS MARION HUMPHREY,
More informationCase 3:14-cv REP-AWA-BMK Document 157 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 5908
Case 3:14-cv-00852-REP-AWA-BMK Document 157 Filed 05/16/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 5908 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION Golden Bethune-Hill, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationJudicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11
Honorable Judge Amy M. Williams 545 First Avenue North, Room 417 St. Petersburg, FL 33701 Judicial Practice Preferences Circuit Civil/Section 11 2018 JURY TRIAL WEEKS December 3 2019 JURY TRIAL WEEKS JANUARY
More informationU.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv PAE
US District Court Civil Docket as of July 15, 2016 Retrieved from the court on July 15, 2016 U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (Foley Square) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv-04868-PAE
More informationCase 1:04-cv JLK Document 213 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:04-cv-22572-JLK Document 213 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/04/2007 Page 1 of 5 EMMA YAIZA DIAZ et al., v. Plaintiffs, KURT BROWNING, Secretary of State of Florida, et al., Defendants. / UNITED STATES
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Case: 14-80121 09/11/2014 ID: 9236871 DktEntry: 4 Page: 1 of 13 Docket No. 14-80121 United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit MICHAEL A. COBB, v. CITY OF STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA, IN RE: CITY OF
More informationCase 1:16-cv CMA Document 296 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cv-21199-CMA Document 296 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/09/2017 Page 1 of 6 ANDREA ROSSI and LEONARDO CORPORATION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 1:16-cv-21199-CIV-ALTONAGA/O
More informationCase 0:17-cv BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2017 Page 1 of 6. Case No. 0:17-cv BB RICHARD WIGGINS,
Case 0:17-cv-60468-BB Document 42 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/05/2017 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION ASKER B. ASKER, BASSAM ASKAR,
More informationU.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv RDM
USCA Case #16-7081 Document #1622123 Filed: 06/28/2016 APPEAL,CLOSED,JURY,TYPE E Page 1 of 10 U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv 00372 RDM DOE v.
More information) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Sterling E. Norris, Esq. (SBN 00 Paul J. Orfanedes (Appearing Pro Hac Vice JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. 0 Huntington Drive, Suite 1 San Marino, CA 0 Tel.: ( -0 Fax: ( -0 Attorneys for Plaintiff HAROLD P. STURGEON,
More information':.Ji.. zo1'i/p. I?. By S' ANT Ell EWBERRY FILED. v. ' ALAMEDA COUNTY. STEPHANIE STIA VETTI, et al, Case No. RG Plaintiffs,
FILED ALAMEDA COUNTY ':.Ji.. zo1'i/p I?. By S' ANT Ell EWBERRY l SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA I \ 1\\\l\ \\1\l \\\\\\\\\\ lllllll\llllllllllllllllllll - --
More informationCase3:09-cv RS Document78 Filed05/03/11 Page1 of 7
Case:0-cv-0-RS Document Filed0/0/ Page of C. D. Michel - S.B.N. Glenn S. McRoberts - S.B.N. Clinton B. Monfort - S.B.N. 0 MICHEL & ASSOCIATES, PC 0 E. Ocean Boulevard, Suite 00 Long Beach, CA 00 Telephone:
More informationCase 9:16-cr RLR Document 91 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:16-cr-80107-RLR Document 91 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/03/2017 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, vs. Plaintiff, GREGORY HUBBARD, Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationCase 0:12-cv WJZ Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/27/2017 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:12-cv-61735-WJZ Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/27/2017 Page 1 of 7 BROWARD BULLDOG, INC., a Florida corporation not for profit; and DAN CHRISTENSEN, founder, operator and editor of the BrowardBulldog.com
More informationPARKER, et al., THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., STIPULATION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF PURSUANT TO RULES OF COURT, RULE 8.
- J IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PARKER, et al., v Plaintiffs and Respondents, Case No. F06249Q HFTH/AL ST0Cr THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants and
More informationCase LMI Doc 23 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 10. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division
Case 15-01540-LMI Doc 23 Filed 09/04/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division www.flsb.uscourts.gov In re: ADINATH CORP. and SIMPLY FASHION STORES, LTD.,
More informationCase 1:14-cv Document 430 Filed in TXSD on 11/18/16 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:14-cv-00254 Document 430 Filed in TXSD on 11/18/16 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION STATE OF TEXAS, et al. Plaintiffs, No. 1:14-cv-254
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-KING/O SULLIVAN
Case 1:04-cv-22572-JLK Document 237 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 04-22572-CIV-KING/O SULLIVAN EMMA YAIZA DIAZ; AMERICAN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-SEITZ/MCALILEY
Stockwire Research Group, Inc. et al v. Lebed et al Doc. 32 STOCKWIRE RESEARCH GROUP, INC. a Florida corporation, and ADRIAN JAMES, a Texas Resident, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationCase 9:14-cv DMM Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:14-cv-80468-DMM Document 118 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 14-CV-80468-MIDDLEBROOKS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
More informationCase 2:14-cv R-RZ Document 52 Filed 08/27/14 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:611
Case :-cv-0-r-rz Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 ANDY DOGALI Pro Hac Vice adogali@dogalilaw.com Dogali Law Group, P.A. 0 E. Kennedy Blvd., Suite 00 Tampa, Florida 0 Tel: () 000 Fax: () EUGENE FELDMAN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOSEPH CASIAS, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES, INC., et al. Defendants. Case No.:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
Young v. Reed Elsevier, Inc. et al Doc. 4 Case 9:07-cv-80031-DMM Document 4 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/17/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WEST PALM BEACH DIVISION
More informationCase 1:16-cv FAM Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2016 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:16-cv-21224-FAM Document 44 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/30/2016 Page 1 of 6 ANTHONY R. EDWARDS, et al., v. Plaintiffs, PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP, Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff
F & G Research, Inc. v. Google, Inc. Doc. 39 Case 0:06-cv-60905-CMA Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/29/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 06-60905-CIV-ALTONAGA/Turnoff
More informationCase 6:11-ap SC Doc 14 Filed 12/08/11 Entered 12/08/11 15:28:33 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5
Case :-ap-0-sc Doc Filed /0/ Entered /0/ :: Desc Main Document Page of Law Offices of Ziad Rawa, CPA, APC Ziad Elrawashdeh, Esq. State Bar No. Baktash Zameer, Esq. State Bar No. Pine Avenue, Suite A Chino
More informationCase 0:16-cv WPD Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/22/2017 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:16-cv-61975-WPD Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/22/2017 Page 1 of 10 MIAMI WATERKEEPER, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FLORIDA WILDLIFE FEDERATION, INC., and DIVING EQUIPMENT AND MARKETING
More information[QIJ$&J ORDER PRELIMINARILY APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND
Case 1:14-cv-01343-RGA Document 57 Filed 12/22/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 873 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE VAMSI ANDAVARAPU, Individually And On Behalf Of All Others Similarly Situated,
More informationCase 2:11-cv JEM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2011 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 2:11-cv-14052-JEM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2011 Page 1 of 4 JOHN ZUCCARINI, Plaintiff, v. NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC, et al. Defendants. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More information