IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, CASE NO.: MM10A. vs. JUDGE: ZACK
|
|
- Meghan Roberts
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE COUNTY COURT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, CASE NO.: MM10A vs. JUDGE: ZACK ALLEN ADILI, Defendant / RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT S WRITTEN ARGUMENT ON DEFENDANT S MOTION TO SUPPRESS The State of Florida, by and through the undersigned attorney, hereby submits its response to Defendant s Written Argument on Defendant s Motion to Suppress that was heard before the Honorable Court on July 28, 2005, and continued on August 18, In support of its Response, the State submits the following argument: PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Defendant asserts that his rights under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution were violated when agents of the State, having detected the odor of a potentially illegal and explosive substance emanating from an airport hangar, entered Defendant s leased commercial property at the Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport. Defendant believes that the agents failure to obtain either (1) a warrant or (2) Defendant s consent renders the State s entry into Defendant s place of business an illegal search. In this Response, the State will show that (1) the exigent circumstances under the facts of this case justified warrantless entry into Defendant s leased airport hangar, (2) the lessee of a commercial property used in a closely-regulated industry has a reduced expectation of privacy that justifies warrantless entry under exigent circumstances, and (3) the State agents here were properly acting on a tip corroborated by suspicious details revealed by an independent investigation conducted under the authority granted to them by the Florida Legislature.
2 BRIEF STATEMENT OF THE FACTS Defendant is the owner of a commercial airline business, Air Sunshine, which transports both people and freight between Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport and various foreign points. Defendant leases space in an airport hanger that houses several airplanes. On October 6, 2003, Lieutenant Richard Sierra, an experienced fire safety inspector with the Broward Sheriff s Office, learned from an individual wearing a pilot s uniform that indoor spray painting, which is an illegal activity under the Florida Fire Prevention Code, would be taking place at Defendant s place of business that evening. Shortly thereafter, Lt. Sierra and his supervisor, Captain John Nance, who is also an experienced fire prevention expert, detected what they believed to be the odor of a flammable substance emanating from the [Defendant's] hangar. An unusual number of cars were parked outside the hangar (Transcript of July 28 Hearing, attached hereto as Exhibit 1, at 18), and the lights inside were on (id. at 9), which strongly suggested the presence of people inside the hangar. Fearing for the safety of anyone inside the hangar, and also fearing a potential explosion or fire at the airport, Capt. Nance called the Hazardous Materials (Hazmat) Team to investigate. The Hazmat Team tested the air outside and around the hanger for hazardous substances before entering Defendant s commercial property for further testing. While no airborne hazardous materials were ultimately found, clear evidence of very recent indoor spray painting of aircraft was abundant (Exhibit 1 at 13, 14, 34, 35). ARGUMENT I. The potential for an explosion at the Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport constitutes an exigent circumstance that justified warrantless entry into Defendant s leased airport hangar [I]f truly exigent circumstances exist, no warrant is required under general Fourth Amendment principles. U.S. v. Karo, 468 U.S. 705, 718 (1984). The central requirement of the Fourth Amendment is one of reasonableness. Illinois v. McArthur, 531 U.S. 326, 330 (2001). 2
3 When faced with special law enforcement needs, diminished expectations of privacy, minimal intrusions, or the like, the Court has found that certain general, or individual, circumstances may render a warrantless search or seizure reasonable. Id. Spray paint, in its concentrated form, is automatically flammable, which means it has a flash point under 100 degrees Fahrenheit. Exhibit 1 at 37. As explained by Capt. Nance, a seasoned fire prevention expert who is familiar with both structure fires and hazardous materials, [t]he flash point is the temperature at which a product can produce vapors sufficient for ignition as long as there s an ignition source available, such as a spark, light switch, a box band. Something that would produce a spark. Id. Spray paint is so easily flammable because [o]nce the paint products are atomized or aerated, broken down into smaller particles, [ ] the flash point drops significantly and can ignite much more readily. Id. Both Lt. Sierra and Capt. Nance testified that the electric lights in the Air Sunshine hangar were turned on that evening. Exhibit 1 at 21, 38. Light switches are a potential ignition source for aerated paint fumes (Exhibit 1 at 21, 37), which is precisely why indoor spray painting is illegal under the Florida Fire Prevention Code. Thus, based on the distinctive paint odor recognized by Lt. Sierra and Capt. Nance on October 6, 2003, there was a real possibility that a spark from an active light switch inside a paint-fume-filled airport hanger could have ignited an explosion at the airport that evening. In the present climate of concern over public safety at airports, there are few circumstances more exigent than the real possibility of an airport hangar explosion. Additionally, Lt. Sierra testified that he was concerned that someone inside the hangar could have been suffocating from the hazardous fumes. Exhibit 1 at 19. Capt. Nance could not see more than half of the interior of the hanger from his vantage point. Id. at 40. The United States Supreme Court has long distinguished between the general interest in crime control and more immediate threats to public safety. Illinois v. Caballes, 125 S.Ct. 834, 847 (2005). [W]here the risk to 3
4 public safety is substantial and real, blanket suspicionless searches calibrated to the risk may rank as reasonable -- for example, searches now routine at airports. Chandler v. Miller, 520 U.S. 305, 323 (1997) (emphasis added). The real potential of an explosion of a structure or the asphyxiation of a person at the airport presented a reasonable possibility of immediate danger to public safety, and thus constituted exigent circumstances in this case. II. Defendant has a reduced expectation of privacy in a leased commercial property that is used in the closely-regulated airline industry. A. Privacy expectations in a commercial property and in a home cannot be conflated Defendant has attempted to conflate the search of a home with the search of a commercial property, two circumstances governed by distinctly different standards under Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. While the Fourth Amendment s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is applicable to commercial premises, the expectation of privacy in commercial premises [ ] is different from, and indeed less than, a similar expectation in an individual s home. New York v. Burger, 482 U.S. 691, 699, 700 (1987). In support of his argument, Defendant refers to a string of cases involving searches of private homes for narcotics. Defendant s Written Argument at 6, 7. These cases are inapposite to the instant case, which involves neither the Defendant s home nor narcotics, but rather a potentially explosive and toxic substance at a commercial airplane hanger that Defendant leases from a public airport. Here, unlike any of the private home searches at issue in the cases referred to by Defendant, a team of experienced fire safety professionals investigated whether the potentially explosive or toxic paint fumes that persist for hours after indoor spray painting posed an imminent threat to public safety. B. Commercial properties used in closely-regulated industries have an even further reduced privacy interest The privacy expectation is particularly attenuated in commercial property employed in closely regulated industries that historically have been the subject of government oversight. 4
5 Burger, 482 U.S. at 700. Because of the reduced expectation of privacy in a closely-regulated industry, the traditional warrant and probable cause prerequisites for a reasonable government search under the Fourth Amendment have lessened application to the owner or operator of such commercial premises. Id. at 702. Very few industries are as closely regulated as the commercial airline industry: Defendant s business is subject to regulation by the Federal Aviation Administration, the Transportation Security Administration, the Department of Transportation, the Interstate Commerce Commission, and numerous other federal and state agencies. Defendant s legitimate expectation of privacy in his leased airport hanger was accordingly reduced. Further still, Defendant was a lessee, not the owner, of the commercial airport property at issue here, reducing his expectation of privacy vis-à-vis his lessor, the airport and its security personnel, even further. [W]here the privacy interests of the owner are weakened and the government interests in regulating particular businesses are concomitantly heightened, a warrantless inspection of commercial premises may well be reasonable within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Burger, 482 U.S. at 702. In the present day and age, no one can seriously argue that the government s interest in airport safety is not heightened. In the instant case, when the State s entry into Defendant s closely-regulated commercial airline property is coupled with the exigent circumstances outlined in Section I above, the United States Supreme Court s standard for warrantless entry is easily met. C. Consent and exigent circumstances are two separate and distinct legal standards for warrantless entry, thus Defendant s consent arguments are irrelevant on these facts Defendant ignores that the United States Supreme Court has recognized several wellestablished and distinct exceptions to the warrant requirement. Consent of the property owner is one such exception; the existence of exigent circumstances is another. See Soldal v. Cook 5
6 County, Ill., 506 U.S. 56, 66 (1992); Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 743, n1 (1984). 1 Thus, Defendant s arguments that Defendant s consent was never obtained become irrelevant and misleading once sufficiently exigent circumstances are demonstrated, as State has done in Section I, above. D. An anonymous tip corroborated by suspicious circumstances revealed by an independent investigation meets the Florida Supreme Court s reliability standard. The Defendant also mischaracterizes the Florida Supreme Court s position on the reliability of anonymous tips. In J.L. v. State, 727 So.2d 204, 207 (Fla. 1998), which Defendant refers to but fails to quote, the anonymous tip concerned innocent details about an arrestee s clothing. The suspect in J.L. had been subject to a Terry stop based on an anonymous tip that he had a gun. Id. at 205. However, the officers independent investigation added nothing to the reliability of the tip - - the officers merely verified that the defendant was in fact standing by the bus stop and wearing a plaid shirt, neither of which is suspicious. Id. at 207 (citing Butts v. State, 644 So.2d 605 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)). Unlike J.L., which concerned a weapon on a suspect s person, the instant case involved a matter of public safety at a leased commercial airplane hangar. More importantly, the State agents here did independently observe suspicious details that corroborated the information given to Lt. Sierra by the individual wearing the pilot s uniform. Lt. Sierra and Capt. Nance were able to pinpoint the odor of a potentially hazardous material as emanating from the Air Sunshine structure. Exhibit 1 at 11. Moreover, it was precisely the suspicious detail itself, not an innocent detail, that Lt. Sierra and Capt. Nance independently observed, i.e., the odor of a potentially explosive or toxic substance emanating from an airport hanger, that presented a potential immediate danger to public safety here. 1 The state trial court never decided whether there was consent to the entry because it deemed decision of that issue unnecessary in light of its finding that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless arrest. Welsh, 466 U.S. 740, 743, n1. 6
7 III. The State agents were operating within the authority properly granted to them by the Florida Legislature The Florida Legislature, in enacting Florida Statute , has invested the State Fire Marshall with the authority to adopt the Florida Fire Prevention Code, which shall contain or incorporate by reference all firesafety laws and rules that pertain to and govern the enforcement of such firesafety rules. Fla. Stat (1). Under the legislative directive in the same statute, the State Fire Marshal has adopted, as the law of the State of Florida, the National Fire Protection Association s Standard 1, Fire Prevention Code, which reads in relevant part: To the full extent permitted by law, any authority having jurisdiction engaged in fire prevention and inspection work shall be authorized at all reasonable times to enter and examine any building, structure, marine vessel, vehicle, or premises for the purpose of making fire safety inspections. Before entering a private dwelling, the authority having jurisdiction shall obtain the consent of the occupant thereof or obtain a court warrant authorizing entry for the purpose of inspection except in those instances where an emergency exists. As used in this section, emergency means circumstances that the authority having jurisdiction knows, or has reason to believe, exist and that reasonably can constitute immediate danger to life and property. NFPA Fire Prevention Code (2000). These three sentences speak directly to the facts of this case. First, Lt. Sierra, Capt. Nance, and the Hazmat Team all work for authorities having jurisdiction to engage in fire prevention work at Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood International Airport. Exhibit 1 at 4, 23, 27. Second, the statute specifically contemplates the difference between a private dwelling and other structures, and no private dwelling was involved in this case, but rather a leased commercial property used in a closely-regulated industry at an airport. Third, an emergency existed here because Lt. Sierra and Capt. Nance had reason to believe that the odor they detected reasonably could constitute immediate danger to life and property at the airport. Id. at 9, 14, 19, 24, 32, 34. Further, the Florida Fire Prevention Code also states that [t]he incident commander conducting operations in connection with the extinguishment and control of any [ ] hazardous materials incident [ ] shall have 7
8 authority to direct all operations of [ ] mitigation of a hazardous materials incident [ ] and to take necessary precautions to save life, protect property, and prevent further injury or damage. NFPA Fire Prevention Code (2000). Thus, although private home searches generally must be conducted pursuant to a warrant in order to be reasonable under the Fourth Amendment, legislative schemes authorizing warrantless administrative searches of commercial property do not necessarily violate the Fourth Amendment because adequate privacy protection may be provided by regulatory schemes authorizing warrantless inspections. Donovan v. Dewey, 452 U.S. 594, 598, 599 (1981). The Florida Legislature has seen fit to develop just such an administrative scheme through adoption of the Florida Fire Prevention Code, under the authority of which all of the State agents in this case acted. CONCLUSION The facts of this case squarely meet the reasonableness requirement of the Fourth Amendment for warrantless entry: (1) the exigent circumstance of a possible airport hangar explosion or the asphyxiation of a person; (2) the reduced expectation of privacy for a leased commercial property that is used in a closely-regulated industry; (3) a sufficiently reliable tip, independently corroborated by an independent investigation that revealed suspicious circumstances that posed a potential immediate threat to human life and safety; and (4) State agents properly acting under authority granted to them by the Florida Legislature. For all of these reasons, the Defendant s Motion to Suppress should be denied. 8
Judicial Decision-Making and the Constitution
Judicial Decision-Making and the Constitution Florida v. J.L. Overview: The goal of this activity is to understand how judges make decisions through the interpretation and application of law. In this lesson,
More informationFLORIDA v. J.L. 529 U.S. 266 (2000)
529 U.S. 266 (2000) Juvenile being tried on weapons charge moved to suppress evidence. The Circuit Court of Dade County, Steve Levine, J., granted motion, and state appealed. The District Court of Appeal,
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY. vs. Case No. 12 CF BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 12 CF 000000 JOHN DOE, Defendant. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE THE DEFENDANT, John Doe,
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010 Opinion filed June 30, 2010. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D09-1346 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. Case No. 95,782 DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND DISTRICT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. Case No. 95,782 GREGORY MAYNARD, Respondent. / DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, SECOND DISTRICT Amicus
More informationHot Work Procedures. Competent means possessing knowledge, experience and training to perform a specific duty.
Hot Work Procedures Purpose This procedure will provide the knowledge and equipment required to minimize the identified workplace hazards associated with Hot Work. These procedures will provide: information
More informationThe State of South Carolina OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. April 21, 1998
The State of South Carolina OFFCE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CHARLES M OL ONY C ONDON ATTORN EY GENERAL Sheriff, Newberry County Post Office Box 247 Newberry, South Carolina 29108 Re: nformal Opinion Dear
More informationThe Dog Sniff Case Fourth Amendment United States Constitution
Fourth Amendment United States Constitution The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no
More informationTHE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND
10 THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR JUSTICE AND THE RULE OF LAW AND THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE SEARCHES WITHOUT WARRANTS DIVIDER 10 Honorable Mark J. McGinnis OBJECTIVES: After this session, you will be able
More informationORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to define legal implications and procedures involved when a search is performed.
Page 1 of 5 YALE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS Serving with Integrity, Trust, Commitment and Courage Since 1894 ORDER TYPE: NEED TO KNOW 312 EFFECTIVE DATE: REVIEW DATE: 19 MAR 2012 ANNUAL
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed March 14, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D10-2415 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationNovember 6, Re: Livestock and Domestic Animals -- Animal Dealers -- Inspections and Investigations; Authority of Livestock Commissioner
ROBERT T. STEPHAN ATTORNEY GENERAL November 6, 1990 ATTORNEY GENERAL OPINION NO. 90-123 Dr. Wilbur Jay, D.V.M. Acting Livestock Commissioner Animal Health Department 712 Kansas Avenue, Suite B Topeka,
More informationIn the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. BENJAMIN CAMARGO, JR., Petitioner, THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.
No. In the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES BENJAMIN CAMARGO, JR., Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeal of the State of California,
More informationHot Work Safety and the Permitting Process. Leaders Guide and Quiz
! Hot Work Safety and the Permitting Process Leaders Guide and Quiz 4879 INTRODUCTION TO THE PROGRAM Structure and Organization Information in this program is presented in a definite order so that employees
More informationBill McCollum, Attorney General, and Bryan Jordan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, v. Appellant, DEMETRIUS ANTHONY WILLIAMS, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationJudicial Decision-Making and the Constitution
Judicial Decision-Making and the Constitution OVERVIEW: The goal of this activity is to understand how judges make decisions through the interpretation and application of law. In this lesson, students
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN: CIRCUIT COURT: RACINE COUNTY: Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
STATE OF WISCONSIN: CIRCUIT COURT: RACINE COUNTY: STATE OF WISCONSIN, v. DAMIEN BELL, Plaintiff, Case No. 2007CF000744 Defendant. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE NOW COMES the above-named defendant,
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No.
More informationChapter 7 FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION*
Adopted by City Council 5/5/08 Chapter 7 FIRE PREVENTION AND PROTECTION* Article I - In General (Reserved) Sect. 7-1 to 15 Reserved Article II Fire Prevention and Life Safety Sec. 7-16. NFPA 1 Uniform
More information"HOT WORK SAFETY AND THE PERMITTING PROCESS"
PRESENTER'S GUIDE "HOT WORK SAFETY AND THE PERMITTING PROCESS" Part of the "SAFETY MEETING KIT" Series Quality Safety and Health Products, for Today...and Tomorrow OUTLINE OF MAJOR PROGRAM POINTS OUTLINE
More informationGENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: STRIP SEARCHES NUMBER: 1.7.5 ISSUED: 5/5/09 SCOPE: All Sworn Personnel EFFECTIVE: 5/5/09 DISTRIBUTION: General Orders Manual RESCINDS 1.8 AMENDS
More informationCan officers lawfully pat search a person based solely on an anonymous telephone tip that the person is carrying a concealed weapon?
Florida v. J.L. (March 28, 2000) US ISSUE Can officers lawfully pat search a person based solely on an anonymous telephone tip that the person is carrying a concealed weapon? FACTS Miami-Dade police received
More informationUNITED STATES v. DORAIS 241 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2001)
241 F.3d 1124 (9th Cir. 2001) Defendants were convicted of possessing methamphetamine with intent to distribute, following entry of conditional guilty pleas in the United States District Court for the
More informationa) The entry is limited in purpose and scope to discovery of a number as to which there is no reasonable expectation of privacy;
Crestwood Police General Order Warrantless Vehicle Searches Purpose: The purpose of this directive is to provide general guidelines and procedures for commissioned personnel to follow in conducting vehicle
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2001 CHRISTOPHER HARRIS, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D00-2505 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed August 10, 2001 Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : : CP-41-CR-0001136-2017 v. : : EARL GERALD FINZEL, : SUPPRESSION Defendant : OPINION AND ORDER On August 23,
More informationHot Work Program. Program Origination: October, 2017
Hot Work Program Program Origination: October, 2017 Contact Personnel: Jason Kayser, Fire & Safety Specialist Jason.kayser@uni.edu 319-273-2004 Hot Work Program UNI Employees & Contractors October, 2017
More informationState of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County: v. Case No. 2008CF000567
State of Wisconsin: Circuit Court: Milwaukee County: State of Wisconsin, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2008CF000567 Miguel Ayala, and Carlos Gonzales, Defendant. Motion to Suppress Evidence Seized as a Result
More informationTEXARKANA, TEXAS POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDERS MANUAL. TPCA Best Practices Recognition Program Reference Searches Without a Warrant
Effective Date February 1, 2008 Reference Amended Date Distribution All Personnel City Manager City Attorney TPCA Best Practices Recognition Program Reference Review Date January 1, 2012 Pages 5 This Operations
More informationFire SCO Group C Level 2 Skill 1: Scene Examination
Candidate Name STANDARD: NFPA 1033, 2014 Edition, 4.2 Scene Examination: 4.2.1 to 4.2.9 Also see NFPA 921 Appendix A for forms, logs and notes templates to be used during investigation. Local department
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : vs. : No. 966-CR-2014 : CATHRYN J. PORAMBO, : : Defendant : Cynthia Dydra-Hatton, Esquire
More informationThe Fourth Amendment places certain restrictions on when and how searches and seizures
Handout 1.4: Search Me in Public General Fourth Amendment Information The Fourth Amendment places certain restrictions on when and how searches and seizures can be conducted. The Fourth Amendment only
More informationCHAPTER 30 POLICE DEPARTMENT
CHAPTER 30 POLICE DEPARTMENT 30.01 Department Established 30.07 Police Chief: Duties 30.02 Organization 30.08 Departmental Rules 30.03 Peace Officer Qualifications 30.09 Summoning Aid 30.04 Required Training
More informationPOCOLA POLICE DEPARTMENT
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SUBJECT SEARCH AND SEIZURE NUMBER: 8.000 EFFECTIVE DATE: 12/24/2015 SCHEDULED REVIEW DATE: DATE REVIEWED: APPROVED BY: 06/14/2016 ISSUE DATE: 12/14/2015 REVISION DATE: Chief Steve
More informationWarrantless Searches. Objectives. Two Types of Warrantless Searches. Review the legal rules Discuss emerging issues Evaluate fact patterns
Warrantless Searches Jeff Welty UNC School of Government welty@sog.unc.edu (919) 843-8474 Objectives Review the legal rules Discuss emerging issues Evaluate fact patterns Two Types of Warrantless Searches
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed July 25, 2012. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D09-3070 Lower Tribunal No. 09-16900
More informationJANUARY 11, 2017 STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF R.M. NO CA-0972 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF R.M. * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2016-CA-0972 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM JUVENILE COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2016-028-03-DQ-E/F, SECTION
More informationChief of Police: Review Date: July 1
Directive Type: General Order Effective Date 05-17-2016 General Order Number: 05.09 Subject: Legal Process and Court Appearances Amends/Supersedes: Section 05, Chapter 09, Legal Process, revised 2008 Distribution:
More information[Cite as State v. Mercier, 117 Ohio St.3d 1253, 2008-Ohio-1429.]
[Cite as State v. Mercier, 117 Ohio St.3d 1253, 2008-Ohio-1429.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MERCIER, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Mercier, 117 Ohio St.3d 1253, 2008-Ohio-1429.] Court of appeals judgment
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2013 WILLIAM ANDREW PRICE, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant,
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS PD-1320-10 DENNIS WAYNE LIMON, JR., Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Discretionary Review from the Thirteenth Court of Appeals, San Patricio County Womack, J.,
More informationTITLE 7 FIRE PROTECTION AND FIREWORKS 1 CHAPTER 1 FIRE LIMITS 2
Change 3, January 14, 2013 7-1 TITLE 7 FIRE PROTECTION AND FIREWORKS 1 CHAPTER 1. FIRE LIMITS. 2. FIRE CODES. 3. FIRE DEPARTMENT. 4. SERVICE OUTSIDE CITY LIMITS. 5. FIREWORKS. SECTION 7-101. Fire limits
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR PUBLICATION January 17, 2008 9:00 a.m. v No. 269250 Washtenaw Circuit Court MICHAEL WILLIAM MUNGO, LC No. 05-001221-FH
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1999) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 98 223 FLORIDA, PETITIONER v. TYVESSEL TYVORUS WHITE ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA [May 17, 1999] JUSTICE STEVENS,
More informationDELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT
DELMAR POLICE DEPARTMENT Policy 7.4 Searches Without a Warrant Effective Date: 05/01/15 Replaces: 2-5 Approved: Ivan Barkley Chief of Police Reference: DPAC: 1.2.3 I. POLICY In order to ensure that constitutional
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC STATE OF FLORIDA, DCA case no.: 5D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LORENZO GOLPHIN, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: SC03-554 STATE OF FLORIDA, DCA case no.: 5D02-1848 Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
More informationCHAPTER 1 GENERAL. 1
MINISTERIAL REGULATION ON THE PRESCRIBING OF STANDARD FOR ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, HEALTH AND WORK ENVIRONMENT IN CONFINED SPACE B.E. 2547 -------------------------------------
More informationHOT WORK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
HOT WORK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Table of Contents SECTION 1.0 Purpose 2.0 Regulatory Reference 3.0 Scope 4.0 Elements of the Program 5.0 Responsibility 6.0 Training and
More informationFINAL ORDER REVERSING TRIAL COURT. The State appeals from an order granting Appellee Razzano s pretrial motion to suppress.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2010-AP-46 Lower Court Case No: 2010-MM-7650 STATE OF FLORIDA, vs. Appellant, ANTHONY J. RAZZANO, III, Appellee.
More information('I 1 FOR PUBLICATION. 2 TIS..,' -'j rii 1 : qg 3 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE 4 COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS-
('I 1 FOR PUBLICATION 2 TIS..,' -'j rii 1 : qg 3 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE 4 COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS- 5 COMMONWEALTH OF THE ) CRIM. CASE NO. 14-0136-C NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS,
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT J.H., a child, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D17-2466 [October 31, 2018] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth
More informationMEMORANDUM. September 22, 1999
Douglas M. Duncan County Executive OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY Charles W. Thompson, Jr Cotmty Attorney MEMORANDUM TO: VIA: FROM: RE: Ellen Scavia Department of Environmental Protection Marc P. Hansen,
More informationPOLICE, FIRE AND EMERGENCIES
POLICE, FIRE AND EMERGENCIES TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 30 - POLICE DEPARTMENT... 125 CHAPTER 35 - FIRE DEPARTMENT... 135 CHAPTER 36 - HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SPILLS... 139 CHAPTER 30 POLICE DEPARTMENT 30.01
More informationCASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DAVID L. McKIBBEN, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D10-1011
More informationMarquette University Police Department
Marquette University Police Department Policy and Procedure Manual Policy: 4.2 Issued: May 1, 2015 Date Revised: N/A WILEAG Standards: 1.6.1, 1.7.4, 1.7.5, 1.7.6 IACLEA Standards: 2.2.2, 2.2.3 4.2.00 Purpose
More informationATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT. Policy and Procedure General Order: 1.06 Order Title: Strip and Body Cavity Searches
ATHENS-CLARKE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT Policy and Procedure General Order: 1.06 Order Title: Strip and Body Cavity Searches Original Issue Date 10/02/17 Reissue / Effective Date 10/09/17 Compliance Standards:
More informationENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NOS & JUNE TERM, 2015
Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal. ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NOS. 2014-332 & 2014-357 JUNE TERM, 2015 State of Vermont APPEALED FROM:
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 7, 2012
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 7, 2012 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BRADLEY HAWKS Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Crockett County No. 3916 Clayburn
More informationUS SUPREME COURT ACKNOWLEDGES THAT LAW REGARDING ENTRY ONTO PROPERTY IS NOT CLEARLY ESTABLISHED FOR PURPOSES OF DENYING AN OFFICER QUALIFIED IMMUNITY
November 2013 Texas Law Enforcement Handbook Monthly Update is published monthly. Copyright 2013. P.O. Box 1261, Euless, TX 76039. No claim is made regarding the accuracy of official government works or
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D., 2007
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D., 2007 Opinion filed July 5, 2007. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D06-2532 Lower Tribunal No.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CHRISTOPHER D. VAUGHAN, Appellant, CASE NO. SC06-725 L.T. Nos. 4D04-1109 4D04-2136 vs. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, et al., Appellees. / APPELLEES ANSWER BRIEF ON
More informationUniversity of Central Missouri Hot Work Permit Program
1. Introduction University of Central Missouri Hot Work Permit Program The University of Central Missouri's (UCM) Hot Work Program is designed to minimize risks to our campus community, which includes
More informationAugusta Municipal Airport
Augusta Municipal Airport HANGAR LEASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into on this day of, 2009, BY AND BETWEEN AND THE CITY OF AUGUSTA, KANSAS, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred
More informationBALTIMORE CITY SCHOOLS Baltimore School Police Force DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE This Directive contains the following numbered sections: I. Directive II. Purpose III. Policy IV. Definitions V. General Responsibilities VI. Required Action VII. Reporting VIII. Protective
More informationDECLARATORY STATEMENT. THIS CAUSE came on for consideration upon the Petition for Declaratory Statement
TOM GALLAGHER CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER STATE FIRE MARSHAL STATE OF FLORIDA In The Matter Of: CORAL GABLES FIRE DEPARTMENT FIRE PREVENTION DIVISION. Case No.: 86193-06-FM Petition for Declaratory Statement
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 9, 2014
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 9, 2014 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTIAN PHILIP VAN CAMP Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cocke County No. 4095 Rex
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO. : O P I N I O N - vs - 11/9/2009 :
[Cite as State v. Moore, 2009-Ohio-5927.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO PREBLE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2009-02-005 : O P I N I O N - vs - 11/9/2009
More informationCASE NO. 1D James T. Miller, and Laura Nezami, Jacksonville, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JEFFREY SCOTT FAWDRY, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.
More information23 Motions To Suppress Tangible Evidence
23 Motions To Suppress Tangible Evidence Part A. Introduction: Tools and Techniques for Litigating Search and Seizure Claims 23.01 OVERVIEW OF THE CHAPTER AND BIBLIOGRAPHICAL NOTE The Fourth Amendment
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1605 ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Seeking Discretionary Review from the District Court of
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida LEWIS, J. No. SC12-573 ANTHONY MACKEY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [October 17, 2013] This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Third District
More informationCASE NO. 1D The evidence at the suppression hearing showed that asset-protection
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-577
More informationCITY OF ONALASKA POLICE DEPARTMENT
CITY OF ONALASKA POLICE DEPARTMENT Policy: Arrest Procedures Policy # 17 Pages: 13 Approved by F & P Committee: 04/02/11 Approved by Common Council: 04/08/11 Initial Issue Date: 01/31/98 Revised dates:
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. LEWIS STOUFFER, CLARK JEFFREY THOMPSON, and CRAIG TURTURO, Appellees. No. 4D17-2502 [May 23, 2018] Appeal
More informationIN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2016 ANTONIO JOHNSON STATE OF MARYLAND
Circuit Court for Baltimore City Case No. 117107009 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 1654 September Term, 2016 ANTONIO JOHNSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND Eyler, Deborah S., Wright,
More information- WHAT CAN THE POLICE SEARCH YOUR HOME?
SEARCH AND SEIZURE BASICS - WHAT CAN THE POLICE SEARCH YOUR HOME? Here, in Part I of this series we discuss the warrant requirement as well as exceptions to the warrant requirement. Please be sure to read
More information7 of 63 DOCUMENTS COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, APPELLANT V. JONATHON SHANE MCMANUS AND ADAM LEVI KEISTER, APPELLEES 2001-SC-0312-DG
Page 1 7 of 63 DOCUMENTS COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, APPELLANT V. JONATHON SHANE MCMANUS AND ADAM LEVI KEISTER, APPELLEES 2001-SC-0312-DG SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY 107 S.W.3d 175; 2003 Ky. LEXIS 146 June
More informationSupreme Court of Louisiana
Supreme Court of Louisiana FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 3 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 21st day of January, 2009, are as follows: PER CURIAM: 2008-KK-1002
More informationMOTION TO SUPPRESS AND ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OF LAW. COMES NOW, Defendant, TJB, by and through his undersigned counsel and pursuant to
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF WAKE IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION FILE NO. XXCRSXXXXX STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA vs. TJB MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OF LAW
More informationCHAPTER 4 BUILDINGS PART 1 DANGEROUS STRUCTURES PART 2 NUMBERING OF BUILDINGS PART 3 OCCUPANCY OF BUILDINGS
CHAPTER 4 BUILDINGS PART 1 DANGEROUS STRUCTURES 4-101. Definitions - Dangerous Buildings 4-102. Standards for Repair, Vacation or Demolition 4-103. Dangerous Buildings - Nuisances 4-104. Duties of Building
More informationRule 318D - STRIP SEARCH, VISUAL BODY CAVITY SEARCH, AND BODY CAVITY SEARCH PROCEDURES
Rules and Procedures Rule 318D December 13, 2005 Rule 318D - STRIP SEARCH, VISUAL BODY CAVITY SEARCH, AND BODY CAVITY SEARCH PROCEDURES This rule is issued to establish guidelines, regulations and procedures
More informationFollow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-16-2006 Department of Safety,
More informationInterests Protected by the Fourth Amendment
Interests Protected by the Fourth Amendment National Center for Justice and the Rule of Law The University of Mississippi School of Law Presented By Joe Troy Textual Basis for Protected Interest Fourth
More informationmales allegedly involved in narcotics activities on the timeliness of Defendant s motion.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH : : vs. : No. CR-563-2017 : RASHEEN STURGIS, : Defendant : OPINION AND ORDER Defendant is charged with possession with intent
More informationS17G1691. CAFFEE v. THE STATE. We granted certiorari to consider whether the warrantless search of
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: May 7, 2018 S17G1691. CAFFEE v. THE STATE. PETERSON, Justice. We granted certiorari to consider whether the warrantless search of Richard Caffee resulting in the
More informationCOOK ISLANDS AVIATION OFFENCES ACT 1973 ANALYSIS. Offences Relating to Aircraft. Taking firearms, explosives, etc., on to aircraft
COOK ISLANDS AVIATION OFFENCES ACT 1973 ANALYSIS Title 1. Short Title 2. Interpretation Offences Relating to Aircraft 3. Hijacking 4. Offences in connection with hijacking 5. Other offences relating to
More informationGENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL ORDER PORT WASHINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: SEARCH AND SEIZURE NUMBER: 1.7.2 ISSUED: 5/5/09 SCOPE: All Sworn Police Personnel EFFECTIVE: 5/5/09 DISTRIBUTION: General Orders Manual RESCINDS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 4:10-cr-00194-JHP Document 40 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 03/16/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO: 10-XXXXXXXX v. CM DIVISION: HON. XXXX XXXXX MOTION TO SUPPRESS COMES NOW, Defendant
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Maddox, 2013-Ohio-1544.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98484 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ADRIAN D. MADDOX
More informationPolice Ride Alongs. In This Issue: Photograph Lineup. Pedestrian Infraction. Marijuana Odor on a Person
A Newsletter for the Criminal Justice Community Police Ride Alongs In This Issue: Photograph Lineup Pedestrian Infraction Marijuana Odor on a Person Legal Eagle Published by: Legal Eagle Services West
More informationFIRE PREVENTION ORDINANCE OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY
FIRE PREVENTION ORDINANCE OF MECKLENBURG COUNTY SECTION 1. TITLE Page 2 SECTION 2. INTENT OF THE ORDINANCE Page 2 SECTION 3. FIRE MARSHAL TO ENFORCE ORDINANCE Page 2 SECTION 4. ADOPTION OF TECHNICAL CODES
More informationEnvironmental, Health and Safety. UNC Charlotte Hot Work Program (Welding, Cutting, and Brazing)
Environmental, Health and Safety UNC Charlotte Hot Work Program (Welding, Cutting, and Brazing) January 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE:... 2 SCOPE:... 2 HOT WORK RESPONSIBILITIES... 2 SPECIFIC DEPARTMENTAL
More informationIN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, CR DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, JOANNE SEKULA,
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. No D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr WJZ-1. versus
Case: 12-12235 Date Filed: 06/20/2013 Page: 1 of 10 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 12-12235 D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr-60221-WJZ-1 versus
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. : Case No. DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BENNY ALBRITTON, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. : : : Case No. : : : SC11-675 DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
More informationSEARCH AND SEIZURE: CAN THEY DO THAT?
SEARCH AND SEIZURE: CAN THEY DO THAT? ANSWERING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT QUESTION Craig Mastantuono Mastantuono Law Office, SC Author s Note: This outline was distributed at a presentation by Attorney Craig
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR CURTIS, : (Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant.
[Cite as State v. Curtis, 193 Ohio App.3d 121, 2011-Ohio-1277.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO The STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : C.A. CASE NO. 23895 v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR 1518 CURTIS,
More informationThe GPS Tracking Case Fourth Amendment United States Constitution
Fourth Amendment United States Constitution The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMIE LEE ANDERSON APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-KA-0601-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM
More information