OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
|
|
- Lynette Arnold
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 26/05/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY OF A REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN FILE NUMBER ICD 9049 COMMUNITY DESIGN LANGUAGE OF PROCEEDINGS English APPLICANT collectingsystems GmbH Am Steinhaus Stammhamm Germany REPRESENTATIVE OF THE APPLICANT WINTER, BRANDL, FÜRNISS, HÜBNER, RÖSS, KAISER, POLTE PARTNERSCHAFT PATENT- UND RECHTSANWALTSKANZLEI Bavariaring 10 D München Germany HOLDER TEXLAND Marek Brocławski Narutowicza Otwock Poland REPRESENTATIVE OF THE HOLDER Łukasz Sommer ul. Grochowska 172 lok Warszawa Poland Avenida de Europa, 4 E Alicante Spain Tel Fax
2 The Invalidity Division, composed of Ludmila Čelišová (rapporteur), Jakub Pinkowski (member) and Martin Schlötelburg (member), takes the following decision on 26/05/2014: 1. The registered Community design No is declared invalid. 2. The Holder shall bear the costs of the Applicant. I. FACTS, EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENTS (1) Community design No (hereinafter the RCD ) was registered in the name of the Holder with the filing date of 11/06/2012. The RCD s indication of products reads containers, deep collection containers, recycling containers, and the design is depicted by the following views: ( 2
3 (2) On 08/03/2013, the Applicant filed a request for a declaration of invalidity (hereinafter the application ) contesting the validity of the RCD. The application fee was paid by current account with OHIM. (3) Using the Office application form, the Applicant requests a declaration of invalidity of the RCD on the grounds that the RCD does not fulfil the requirements of Articles 4 to 9 of the Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs (hereinafter CDR ). (4) As evidence, the Applicant provides, inter alia, an extract from the Register of the German Patent and Trade Mark Office concerning German design No , filed on 07/03/2011, registered for drop-off boxes for used clothes and published on 21/10/2011 in the following views (hereinafter the prior design ): (5) In the reasoned statement, the Applicant claims that the RCD lacks novelty and individual character with respect to the prior design and it should be declared invalid. The contested RCD and the prior design share all substantial features, and if there are any differences between them, they are insignificant details. (6) In its response, the Holder submits that the RCD is not identical to the prior design and does not produce the same overall impression on the informed user. The similarities indicated by the Applicant are determined by the technical function of the containers. The designs differ in the lock holder, the angle of the rain-drip rails, the opening hatch and guiding path, the slide mechanism, handles, the feet and the colour. As regards the designer s degree of freedom, the boxes for used clothes comprising a slide mechanism and guiding path usually have a shape close to a cube and a certain layout of components. The components such 1.5 3
4 as the slide mechanism with handle, guiding path, rain-drip rails, door or feet must be located in certain places, due to their functions. There are a lot of technical constraints applied to the products and therefore the designer s freedom is limited. The informed user is familiar with boxes for used clothes, their aspects and working methods. They are aware that the shape of parts such as the slide mechanism is dictated by technical function rather than by aesthetic reasons and this mechanism has been known for years. (7) In its response, the Applicant reiterates that the RCD satisfies neither the requirement of novelty nor the requirement of individual character. The technical function of the design does not limit the designer s choice of design and the placement of various elements. In designing a container for used clothes, the designer s freedom is restricted insofar as the container has to have a receptacle for receiving the objects via an opening. The opening can be actuated by means of an appropriate mechanism. The design colour has no effect on the individual character either, because it does not constitute a characterising feature. (8) The Holder did not send a rejoinder. (9) For further details of the facts, evidence and arguments submitted by the parties, reference is made to the documents on file. II. GROUNDS OF THE DECISION A. Admissibility (10) The indication of the grounds for invalidity in the application is a statement of the grounds on which the application is based within the meaning of Article 28(1)(b)(i) Commission Regulation (EC) No 2245/2002 of 21 October 2002 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs (hereinafter CDIR ). Furthermore, the application complies with Article 28(1)(b)(vi) CDIR, since it contains an indication of the facts, evidence and arguments submitted in support of these grounds. The other requirements of Article 28(1) CDIR are also met. The application is thus admissible. B. Substantiation B.1 Evidence (11) The prior design was published by the German Patent and Trade Mark Office prior to the contested RCD s filing date, and hence was made available to the public within the meaning of Article 7(1) CDR. B.2 Novelty (12) According to Article 5 CDR, an RCD lacks novelty when an identical design has been made available to the public prior to the RCD s filing date. Designs shall be deemed to be identical if their features differ only in immaterial details. (13) The RCD and the prior design both relate to collection containers. They have at least the following features in common: 4
5 - the shape and contours of the body of the container; - the door in the front lower part of the container; - the slide mechanism to deposit items in the container; - drip rails leading rain water away from the container entrance. (14) The RCD differs from the prior design in the following features: - the shape of the handle to operate the slide mechanism; - the latch of the container door; - the angle of the drip rail; - the angle at which the slide mechanism recesses into the container; - the feet of the container; - the boltless door of the container; - the colour of the container. (15) The differences between the compared designs are not completely immaterial. The prior design therefore does not constitute an obstacle to the novelty of the RCD. B.3 Individual character (16) According to Article 6 CDR, an RCD lacks individual character if the overall impression produced on the informed user is the same as that produced on such a user by any design which has been made available to the public prior to the RCD s filing date or the priority date claimed. In assessing individual character of an RCD, the designer s degree of freedom in developing the design shall be taken into consideration. (17) The informed user, from whose perspective the test is performed, according to established case-law, is particularly observant, is aware of the state of the art in the sector concerned and uses the product related to the RCD in accordance with the purpose for which it is intended (see judgment of 09/09/2011, T-10/08, Internal combustion engine, paragraphs 23 to 25). (18) In the present case, the informed user is aware of designs of collection containers available on the market before the filing date of the contested RCD. The informed user is familiar with the basic features of the products concerned: the container must have a body to store the collected items, it must have an opening to receive the content and another to remove it. The designer s freedom in developing a design of a collection container is limited as regards the volume appropriate to the content the container and the nature of it (the material, size, etc.). However, the designer s freedom is not substantially limited as regards the shape and other components the container can have. Concerning the depositing and removal mechanisms, some security and safety precautions may be necessary to make sure that items can be deposited safely but not removed by unauthorised persons. However, the Holder did not submit any evidence of such normative or technical requirements. The choice of the depositing and removal mechanisms can also depend on the nature of the items to be collected, but this does not limit the choice to only one depositing and removal mechanism either. (19) The Office does not agree with the Holder that severe technical constraints prevent the designer from departing substantially from the prior design. 5
6 (20) Comparing the contours, shape and main components present in both the RCD and the prior design, they are deemed to be identical or almost identical. This concerns mainly the characteristic shape of the rectangle and the top, which slants downwards toward the back. The RCD and the prior design differ in the following details: the handle element attached to the hatch and the bolts on the front door in the prior design (and omitted in the RCD); the shape of the handle of the slide mechanism, which is trapezoidal in the prior design but rectangular in the RCD; the feet, which are different in both designs but which are almost invisible under the body of the containers; and the angle at which the rain-drip rails are bevelled, although this difference is almost unnoticeable. The designs also differ in the angle at which the slide mechanism recesses into the container, but they do not differ in the design of the slide opening. The colours of the containers, though different, are basic and very common ones. The identified changes do not substantially alter the appearance of the product related to the RCD. The similarities with the prior design undisputedly prevail. The designer of the RCD did not necessarily have to copy the design s characteristic features, such as the shape and composition of the components. From the informed user s perspective, both designs produce the same overall impression. C. Conclusion (21) The RCD is declared invalid on the grounds of Article 25(1)(b) CDR in conjunction with Article 6 CDR, due to the lack of individual character. III. COSTS (22) Pursuant to Article 70(1) CDR and Article 79(1) CDIR, the Holder bears the fees and costs of the Applicant. (23) The costs to be reimbursed by the Holder to the Applicant are fixed at EUR 750, of which EUR 400 for the costs of representation and EUR 350 for the reimbursement of the invalidity fee. IV. RIGHT TO APPEAL (24) According to Article 57 CDR, notice of appeal must be filed in writing at the Office within two months of the date of notification of this decision. Furthermore, a written statement of the grounds of appeal must be filed within four months of the same date. The notice of appeal will be deemed to be filed only when the appeal fee of EUR 800 has been paid. THE INVALIDITY DIVISION Ludmila Čelišová Jakub Pinkowski Martin Schlötelburg 6
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 02/06/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 23/04/2014.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 23/04/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 04/10/2012
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 04/10/2012 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 23/04/2014.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 23/04/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 05/03/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 18/09/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/02/2014.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/02/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English. P.H.U. MISTAL Słotwina Świdnica Poland
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 11/10/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 14/05/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 14/05/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 19/06/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 03/09/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 25/08/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/01/2013.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/01/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 18/09/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 08/08/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT - DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 12/04/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 12/08/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationDECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT- DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/11/2012 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 05/11/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 25/03/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 08/10/2013.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 08/10/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English. Red Bull GmbH Am Brunnen Fusch am See Austria
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 12/11/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 27/08/14 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/11/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 26/11/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/11/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/03/2013.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/03/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 16/04/2014
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 16/04/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 18/08/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 12/08/14 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 27/08/14 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 29/09/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 17/10/2013.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 17/10/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 02/09/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 10/07/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/11/2012
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/11/2012 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 29/11/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 24/07/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 29/10/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 12/11/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 09/12/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 03/10/2012 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English. August Storck KG Waldstraße Berlin Germany
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 18/10/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DEPARTMENT FOR DESIGNS AND REGISTER - INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 10/06/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/11/2012 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DEPARTMENT FOR DESIGNS AND REGISTER - INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 06/06/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/06/2014.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/06/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English. INTER LINK SAS Z.A. du Niederwald Seltz France
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/10/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/02/2014.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/02/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English. Red Bull GmbH Am Brunnen Fuschl am See Austria
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 26/06/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/01/2013.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 21/01/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION. German
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DESIGNS DEPARTMENT INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/01/06 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 10/07/14 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 19/02/2013.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 19/02/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 24/10/2012 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 24/07/07. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DESIGNS DEPARTMENT- INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 24/07/07 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 24/08/06. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DESIGNS DEPARTMENT- INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 24/08/06 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 14/06/04. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DESIGNS DEPARTMENT- INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 14/06/04 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT - Designs Service DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 17/06/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 01/07/2014 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 14/06/04. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DESIGNS DEPARTMENT- INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 14/06/04 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/06/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 06/02/06. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DESIGNS DEPARTMENT- INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 06/02/06 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 31/01/2013.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 31/01/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DESIGNS DEPARTMENT INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/12/06 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/08/2013.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT DESIGNS SERVICE DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 20/08/2013 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 26/07/07. English
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DESIGNS DEPARTMENT INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 26/07/07 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS)
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DESIGNS DEPARTMENT INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 26/02/08 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 19 SEPTEMBER 2006.
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DESIGNS DEPARTMENT INVALIDITY DIVISION DECISION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION OF 19 SEPTEMBER 2006 IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION
More informationDECISION of the Third Board of Appeal of 6 June 2016
THE BOARDS OF APPEAL DECISION of the Third Board of Appeal of 6 June 2016 In Case R 1186/2015-3 Magmatic Limited Shaftesbury Chapel Union Road Bristol BS2 0LP United Kingdom Invalidity Applicant / Appellant
More informationThe Community Design System The Latest Developments in Examination and Invalidity Procedure. By Eva Vyoralová
The Community Design System The Latest Developments in Examination and Invalidity Procedure By Eva Vyoralová 1. Introduction The aim of this article, based on the presentation given at the ECTA Round Table
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION of the Third Board of Appeal of 30 June 2009
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) The Boards of Appeal In Case R 1524/2007-3 DECISION of the Third Board of Appeal of 30 June 2009 SIACO - Soc. Ind. Com.de Art P/CALÇADO,
More informationNOTIFICATION OF A DEelSION OF THE INVALIDITY DIVISION COMMUNICATION TO THE APPLICANT
Date: 10-11-201410:16:57 Th is fax was received b GFI FAXmaker fax server For more information, visit: http://www fi.com ***** ** ** (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) * OPt=RATIONS DEPARTMENT-Designs Service *
More informationNotes on the Application Form for a Declaration of Invalidity of a Registered Community Design
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (OHIM) Trade Marks and Designs Notes on the Application Form for a Declaration of Invalidity 1. General remarks 1.1 Use of the form This form is made available
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EXAMINATION OF DESIGN INVALIDITY APPLICATIONS Guidelines for
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ON REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ON REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EXAMINATION OF DESIGN INVALIDITY APPLICATIONS Guidelines for Examination
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY OF A REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN
GUIDELINES FOR THE PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY OF A REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN 1) INTRODUCTION 2) GENERAL PRINCIPLES 3) FILING OF THE APPLICATION 4) ADMISSIBILITY 5) EXCHANGE OF
More informationEUIPO. Alicante, 15/09/ PAlses 8AJ6S Notification to the holder of a decision
34965137707 EUIPO 10:22 :31 15-09-2017 1/18.: ~ ~. EUIPO -11 6- F.UROPEA«UNION '$< r. ~ :r ttell.ecl'l.ial PROPERTY Cl'=f.!Cl': OPERATIONS DEPARTM ENT 14068 Alicante, 15/09/2017 Visser Schaap & Kreijger
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ON REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS RENEWAL OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ON REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS RENEWAL OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS Guidelines for Examination in the Office Page 1 Table
More informationNotes on the Conversion Form
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (OHIM) Trade Marks and Designs Notes on the Conversion Form General Remarks The conversion form is made available by the Office for Harmonization in the
More informationDesign Protection in Europe
Design Protection in Europe www.bardehle.com 2 Content 5 1. Requirements for design protection in Europe 5 2. Overlap of design law and other IP rights 6 3. Design law in Germany and international design
More informationDesigns. Germany Henning Hartwig BARDEHLE PAGENBERG Partnerschaft mbb. A Global Guide
Designs 2015 Henning Hartwig A Global Guide ... IP only. BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. Selected teams of legally and technically qualified professionals
More informationDESIGN PROTECTION AND EXAMINATION EUROPEAN APPROACH FRANCK FOUGERE ANANDA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED
DESIGN PROTECTION AND EXAMINATION EUROPEAN APPROACH FRANCK FOUGERE ANANDA INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LIMITED ASEAN- USPTO WORKSHOP ON DESIGN EXAMINATION THAILAND, 10-12 MAY 2011 DESIGNS ARE LANGUAGE OF COMMUNICATION
More informationContributing firm. Author Henning Hartwig
Germany Contributing firm Author Henning Hartwig Legal framework Design law in Germany consists of the Designs Act, harmonised to a substantial degree with the EU Designs Directive (98/71/EC) and the EU
More informationPage 1 of 7 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber) 13 September 2005 (*) (Community
More informationGUIDELINES CONCERNING PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARK AND DESIGNS) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN
GUIDELINES CONCERNING PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARK AND DESIGNS) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN RENEWAL Draft, DIPP Status: October 2007 Renewal Guidelines
More informationDIRECTIVE 98/71/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
DIRECTIVE 98/71/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION; Having regard to the
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART E
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART E REGISTER OPERATIONS SECTION 3 CTMs AS OBJECTS OF PROPERTY CHAPTER
More informationMadrid Easy. A rough and easy guide how international registrations designating the European Community will be processed by the OHIM
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) Trade Marks Department IP Matters Alicante, 14 September 2004 DS/ab -TMD/04 Madrid Easy Or: A rough and easy guide how international
More informationOFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) DECISION of the Cancellation Division of 28/10/2011:
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) Cancellation Division DECISION of the Cancellation Division of 28/10/2011: IN THE PROCEEDINGS FOR A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY OHIM
More informationChapter 3 Amendment Changing Special Technical Feature of Invention (Patent Act Article 17bis(4))
Note: When any ambiguity of interpretation is found in this provisional translation, the Japanese text shall prevail. Part IV Chapter 3 Amendment Changing Special Technical Feature of Invention Chapter
More informationSearch by keywords. Below is a full list of keywords and explanations. Keyword. Explanations
Search by keywords Many cases or documents in esearch Case Law are tagged with one or more pre-defined keywords categorising their content. This allows the user to identify relevant cases through a combination
More informationEU-CHINA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TRADEMARK LAW. João Miranda de Sousa Head of IP
EU-CHINA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TRADEMARK LAW Head of IP Beijing, 27-28 October 2010 EU-CHINA INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON TRADEMARK LAW ACQUISITION OF TRADEMARK RIGHTS 1. Whether trademark rights are acquired
More informationNotification of a decision to the EUTM proprietor/ir holder. Alicante, 11/01/2019
Notification of a decision to the EUTM proprietor/ir holder OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT Cancellation Division C306B Alicante, 11/01/2019 BARDEHLE PAGENBERG PARTNERSCHAFT MBB PATENTANWÄLTE, RECHTSANWÄLTE Postfach
More informationTrade Marks Act, 1996 (Community Trade Mark) Regulations (S.I. No. 229 of 2000) The Irish Patent Office
Title Source Trade Marks Act, 1996 (Community Trade Mark) Regulations (S.I. No. 229 of 2000) The Irish Patent Office S.I. No. 229 of 2000. Trade Marks Act, 1996 (Community Trade Mark) Regulations, 2000
More informationNotes on the Application Form for a Declaration of Invalidity of a European Union Trade Mark
Notes on the Application Form for a Declaration of Invalidity of a European Union 1 General Remarks 1.1 Use of the form The form may be obtained free of charge from the EUIPO and downloaded from its website
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART A
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 1 MEANS OF COMMUNICATION, TIME LIMITS Guidelines
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS PART E
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS PART E REGISTER OPERATIONS SECTION 3 EUTMs AS OBJECTS OF PROPERTY CHAPTER
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 8
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 8 RESTITUTIO IN INTEGRUM Guidelines for Examination in the Office,
More information