SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D.
|
|
- Cody Day
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 E-Filed Document Jan :26: CA Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA MARLIN BUSINESS BANK APPELLANT V. STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D. STEVENS APPELLEES AMENDED BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED Submitted by: M. REED MARTZ, MSB NO FREELAND MARTZ, PLLC 302 Enterprise Drive, Suite A Oxford, Mississippi fax reed@freelandmartz.com
2 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA MARLIN BUSINESS BANK APPELLANT V. STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D. STEVENS APPELLEES CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the justices of the Supreme Court and judges of the Court of Appeals may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal. Marlin Business Bank, Appellant; M. Reed Martz, Counsel for the Appellant; Stevens Auction Company, Appellee; John D. Stevens, Appellee; and P. Nelson Smith, Jr., Counsel for Appellees. Attorney of Record for Appellant /s/ Reed Martz M. REED MARTZ, MSB No
3 CONTENTS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS STATEMENT ON ORAL ARGUMENT STATEMENT OF ISSUES STATEMENT OF ASSIGNMENT STATEMENT OF THE CASE SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ARGUMENT FULL FAITH AND CREDIT TO A FOREIGN JUDGMENT NO EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD FORUM SECTION CLAUSES CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
4 TABLE OF CASES AND OTHER AUTHORITIES Cases Alliance Trust Co. v. Armstrong, 186 So. 633, 635 (1939) Busching v. Griffin, 542 So.2d 860 (Miss. 1989) Cappaert Manufactured Hous., Inc. v. Thronson, 139 So.3d 100, 101 (Miss. App. 2013) Educational Placement Services v. Wilson, 487 So.2d 1316, 1320 (Miss. 1986) Galbraith & Dickens Aviation Ins. Agency v. Gulf Coast Aircraft Sales, Inc., 396 So.2d 19, 21 (Miss. 1981) Galbraith & Dickens, 396 So.2d at , Hicks v. Bridges, 580 So.2d 743, 746 (Miss. 1991) International Shoe Company v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1942) Long Beach Auto Auction, Inc. v. United Security Alliance, 936 So.2d 351, 355 (Miss. 2006) Long Beach Auto Auction, Inc. v. United Security Alliance, Inc., 936 So.2d 351 (Miss. 2006) , Long Beach, 936 So.2d at M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, (1972) Marsh v. Luther, 373 So.2d 1039 (Miss. 1979) Pulliam v. Chandler, 872 So.2d 752, (Miss. 2004) , Shelton v. Kindred, 279 So.2d 642 (Miss. 1973) Sollitt v. Robertson, 544 So.2d 1378, 1381 (Miss. 1989) Tel-Com Management, Inc. v. Waveland Resort Inns, Inc., 782 So.2d 149, 153 (Miss. 2001) Titan Indem. Co., 895 So.2d at Titan Indemnity Co. v. Hood, 895 So.2d 138, 145 (Miss. 2004) Titan Indemnity Co., 895 So.2d at , Willenbrock v. Brown, 239 So.2d 922 (Miss. 1970) Statutes MISS. CODE ANN Rules Miss. R. App. P. 34(b) Treatises 47 Am.Jur. Judgments 1236 (1969) Am.Jur.2d Judgments 1214 et seq. (1969) C.J.S. Judgments 889 (1947) Constitutional Provisions Art. IV, I, CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
5 STATEMENT ON ORAL ARGUMENT Pursuant to Miss. R. App. P. 34(b), the Appellant does not request oral argument. This issue is a straightforward application of the applicable statutes and case law. The record is closed, no evidence can be added, and the authority in support of each party s position should be reflected in their briefs. Oral argument would unnecessarily add to the expense of the litigation
6 STATEMENT OF ISSUES I. Whether the Trial Court erred in denying the Pennsylvania judgment full faith and credit. II. Whether the Trial Court erred in relying solely on the factual assertions of counsel and treating them as evidence with nothing else, no exhibits or testimony, in the record. III. Whether the Trial Court erred in denying the Enrollment of Foreign Judgment in partial reliance on Long Beach Auto Auction, Inc. v. United Security Alliance, Inc., 936 So.2d 351 (Miss. 2006). STATEMENT OF ASSIGNMENT Appellant does not request that this appeal be assigned to the Supreme Court as opposed to the Court of Appeals. STATEMENT OF THE CASE This is an appeal from the denial of an enrollment of foreign judgment based upon facts which were not introduced into evidence before the trial court. On November 14, 2013, Appellees Stevens Auction Company and John D. Stevens (hereinafter collectively referred to as Stevens ) purchased a security system from Security Depot. R. 24. On November 21, 2013, Stevens executed an Equipment Lease Contract for Leases Under $100,000 (the Contract ) with Marlin Business Bank ( Marlin ). R. 42. Based on the respective agreements with Security Depot and Marlin, Security Depot, the seller of the security system, would install the system and once installed, Marlin would finance the system. Notably, the Contract is not in the record; however, according to the trial court s - 5 -
7 opinion below, the Contract contains a forum selection clause stating that any suit relating to the Contract shall be brought in Pennsylvania. R. 42. On November 28, 2013, Security Depot installed the security system on the premises of Stevens. R. 24. Once installed, Marlin began financing the security equipment. Thereafter, Stevens ceased making payments to Marlin, and, in accord with the terms of the Contract, Marlin filed suit in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. R. 10. On August 26, 2014, the Philadelphia Municipal Court entered a Default Judgment in favor of Marlin and against Stevens for the sum of eleven thousand four hundred fifty-nine dollars and fifty cents ($11,459.50). R. 10. On January 16, 2015, pursuant to the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, MISS. CODE ANN et seq., Marlin filed a Notice of Enrolling of Foreign Judgment in the Circuit Court of Monroe County, Mississippi. R On January 30, 2015, Stevens filed a Response in Opposition to Notice of Enrolling of Foreign Judgment, wherein Stevens requested the Court to strike the foreign judgment from the judgment rolls of Monroe County, Mississippi. R Stevens argued that the forum selection clause should not be enforceable as a matter of inconvenience. R On May 12, 2016, the Court held a hearing on Stevens motion opposing enrollment of the judgment into Monroe County. R On June 28, 2016, the Court entered an Order denying the Notice of Enrollment of Foreign Judgment. R SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT Under the Full Faith and Credit clause, judgments entered by sister courts are presumptively enforceable and should be carried out by the other state unless the judgment falls into one of a few narrow exceptions. The applicability of one of these exceptions must be proven by competent evidence. That did not happen in this case
8 To avoid enrollment of a judgment in Mississippi, one must prove that either a) the issuing court did not have jurisdiction to enter the judgment or b) the judgment was obtained by extrinsic fraud. Neither of these conditions was satisfied. Pursant to the Contract executed by Stevens, Pennsylvania had jurisdiction to hear and enter default judgment against Stevens. This has not been contested by Stevens, nor have they argued that the judgment was obtained by fraud. 3 The Contract unequivocally provides that jurisdiction rests in the state of Pennsylvania, and by signing the Contract, Stevens agreed to such jurisdiction and venue. Stevens complaint that the additional expense of having to travel to and defend in Pennsylvania is not sufficient to render the provision in the Contract invalid. Allowing Stevens to admit they signed the Contract yet not binding them to its terms renders contracts entirely meaningless. More importantly, there is nothing in the record to support the Circuit Court s decision. At the hearing, there was no testimony offered or exhibits admitted. There is, in fact, no evidence on which the Court could base its decision. Rather, the Court chose to rely on the assertions of counsel as evidence of the timing of a particular payment to Security Depot. As this Court well knows, the assertions of counsel are not evidence. Stevens are bound by the record and what is absent from the record. Absent any basis in the record to support its decision, this Court should reverse the decision of the Circuit Court. 4 Additionally, the trial court erroneously determined that the forum selection clause contained in the Contract could not be binding on the parties. The Court based its decision in part on Long Beach Auto Auction, Inc. v. United Security Alliance, Inc., Nor have Stevens asserted that they are not subject to Pennsylvania s long arm statute based on the minimum contacts rule set forth in International Shoe Company v. State of Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1942). 4 See Pulliam v. Chandler, 872 So.2d 752, (Miss. 2004)
9 So.2d 351 (Miss. 2006), and determined that because the second lease payment to Security Depot was presumably after the execution of the Contract, the Court could not uphold the Pennsylvania judgment under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. However, the trial Court s analysis should never have reached this point. Venue should have been challenged before the Pennsylvania court. There is nothing in the record that supports a conclusion that the incorporation of the forum selection clause into the Contract was a result of fraud, undue influence, or overweening bargaining power. ARGUMENT Full faith and credit to a foreign judgment The Pennsylvania Default Judgment is entitled to full faith and credit in this state. Art. IV, I, CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES; Sollitt v. Robertson, 544 So.2d 1378, 1381 (Miss. 1989) ( Under the United States Constitution, full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, record and judicial proceedings of every other state. ). It is well settled that a judgment rendered by a court of competent jurisdiction in a sister state is entitled to a presumption of validity as to that court s assumption of jurisdiction, and the burden is on the party attacking the judgment to affirmatively show its invalidity. Galbraith & Dickens Aviation Ins. Agency v. Gulf Coast Aircraft Sales, Inc., 396 So.2d 19, 21 (Miss. 1981) (citing Marsh v. Luther, 373 So.2d 1039 (Miss. 1979)). It is also a general rule that judgments entered in courts of a sister state, when sought to be made the judgment of another state, may only be attacked for lack of jurisdiction, otherwise they must be given the same effect as a domestic judgment. Galbraith & Dickens, 396 So.2d at 21 (citing 50 C.J.S. Judgments 889 (1947); 47 Am.Jur.2d Judgments 1214 et seq. (1969))
10 Said differently, [T]he courts of this state may inquire into no question other than those which would be considered upon collateral attack in the state in which the judgment was rendered. Sollitt v. Robertson, 544 So.2d at 1381 (citing Educational Placement Services v. Wilson, 487 So.2d 1316, 1320 (Miss. 1986) (emphasis added). Whether the issuing court had jurisdiction is based on the law of the issuing state. As a general rule, one must look to the law of the state which rendered the judgment sought to be enforced to determine its validity. Galbraith & Dickens, 396 So.2d at 21 (citing 47 Am.Jur. Judgments 1236 (1969)). Instead of attacking the issuing court s jurisdiction, Stevens argued the Philadelphia Municipal Court was the wrong venue. Stevens did not allege that the Philadelphia Municipal Court lacked personal or subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case. Stevens Opposition filed with the trial court contained not a single citation to Pennsylvania law. Whether Mississippi would have enforced the forum selection clause is inapplicable, although it almost certainly would have. To permit a party when sued on a written contract, to admit that he signed it but to deny that it expresses the agreement he made or to allow him to admit that he signed it but did not read it or know its stipulations would absolutely destroy the value of all contracts. Tel-Com Management, Inc. v. Waveland Resort Inns, Inc., 782 So.2d 149, 153 (Miss. 2001) (citing Hicks v. Bridges, 580 So.2d 743, 746 (Miss. 1991); Alliance Trust Co. v. Armstrong, 186 So. 633, 635 (1939); see also Busching v. Griffin, 542 So.2d 860 (Miss. 1989)). Stevens should be bound by the terms of the Contract they freely executed. Mississippi will only deny full faith and credit to a foreign judgment where the originating court lacked jurisdiction or the judgment was obtained through extrinsic fraud. Cappaert Manufactured Hous., Inc. v. Thronson, 139 So.3d 100, 101 (Miss. App
11 2013). Here, as plainly set forth in the Contract, the Philadelphia Municipal Court had jurisdiction over Marlin s case against Stevens. The default judgment was not fraudulently obtained. The Court s analysis should have ended there. No Evidence in the Record The appellate court cannot consider anything on appeal that does not appear in the record. Willenbrock v. Brown, 239 So.2d 922 (Miss. 1970). This Court may not act upon or consider matters which do not appear in the record and must confine itself to what actually does appear in the record. It must be presumed that the rulings of the trial court were correct, and such presumption will prevail, unless the actual record supports the contrary view. Shelton v. Kindred, 279 So.2d 642 (Miss. 1973). Because the Full Faith and Credit clause assumes the validity of the foreign judgment, the burden was upon Stevens not Marlin to show a legitimate reason why the judgment was not entitled to enforcement. Based on the complete lack of a record, Stevens failed to meet this burden. At the hearing, there was no testimony offered or exhibits admitted. There was no evidence on which the Court could base its decision. Instead, the Court chose to rely on the assertions of counsel at the hearing, which was not evidence. Pulliam v. Chandler, 872 So.2d 752, (Miss. 2004). Because there is no basis in the record to support its decision, this Court should reverse the decision of the Circuit Court
12 Forum Section Clauses While Marlin does not believe it necessary to address Stevens improper and untimely challenge of venue in the Pennsylvania court, it does so out of an abundance of caution. Enforcement of a forum selection clause is deemed a question of law and is reviewed by this appellate court de novo. Titan Indemnity Co. v. Hood, 895 So.2d 138, 145 (Miss. 2004). Forum selection clauses are presumptively valid and enforceable, unless the resisting party can show: (1) Its incorporation into the contract was the result of fraud, undue influence or overweening bargaining power; (2) The selected forum is so gravely difficult and inconvenient that the resisting party will for all practical purposes be deprived of its day in court; or (3) The enforcement of the clause would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which the suit is brought, declared by statute or judicial decision. Long Beach Auto Auction, Inc. v. United Security Alliance, 936 So.2d 351, 355 (Miss. 2006) (citing Titan Indem. Co., 895 So.2d at 146; M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, (1972)). [T]he resisting party bears the burden of showing that the enforcement of the clause is unreasonable. Id. In Long Beach, at the time of being presented with the warranty agreement, the security system had already been installed, along with a deposit and first month s rent paid on the system. In this case, the security system had not yet been installed at the time the Contract was presented for execution, nor had Marlin received any payments from Stevens. In fact, installation did not occur until one week following the execution of the Contract. In Long Beach, the court specifically noted the following: Here, the system had been installed, the lease agreements concluded and binding, consideration passed with the deposit and first month s rent paid, all before the warranty was delivered. The window of opportunity to negotiate more favorable terms was already closed. Long
13 Beach, 936 So.2d at 356. This simply is not the case with the facts set forth in the record. The security system had not yet been installed, and consideration had not passed between Marlin and Stevens. It was not as if Stevens was forced into the Contract without other options. This was not a contract in adhesion, nor are Stevens arguing that it is. Rather, they are simply arguing that the terms of the Contract with respect to jurisdiction and venue were inconvenient. Even so, challenging venue at this point is untimely. Stevens should have properly challenged venue before the Pennsylvania court. There is nothing in the record that supports a conclusion that the incorporation of the forum selection clause into the Contract was a result of fraud, undue influence, or overweening bargaining power. Stevens freely executed the Contract that provided for Pennsylvania jurisdiction and venue. With limited exceptions, persons enjoy the freedom to contract. When they do, they are bound by the terms of their contracts. Titan Indemnity Co., 895 So.2d at 147. Simply because Stevens owns a business in a small town in Mississippi does not preclude it from traveling to defend an action against it in another state nor does it imply that Stevens is an unsophisticated business/businessman as eluded to in the Circuit Court proceedings. See Response and Opposition To Notice of Enrolling of Foreign Judgment, 6. As noted in Titan Indemnity, [f]ew are immune from the societal demands and modern commerce considerations which require compliance with the terms of pre-written contracts every day. Titan Indemnity Co., 895 So.2d at 147. Having to defend in Pennsylvania should not have deprived Stevens from their day in court. There is nothing that could have prevented Stevens from defending the case in Pennsylvania. Stevens simply chose to sit back and have a default judgment entered against them. In Titan Indemnity, the court noted that the mere reference to the expense the litigant may incur to litigate the matter in another forum does not meet the burden of
14 proof. Titan Indemnity Co., 895 So.2d at 147. Finally, Stevens has not made any showing of a contravention of public policy. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, and on the basis of the authorities cited, the decision of the Circuit Court in Monroe County to deny the enrollment of foreign judgment should be reversed. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Reed Martz M. REED MARTZ, MS BAR FREELAND MARTZ, PLLC 302 Enterprise Drive, Suite A Oxford, Mississippi fax reed@freelandmartz.com
15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 12th day of January 2017, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the MEC system which sent notification of such filing to the following: P. Nelson Smith, Jr., Esq. Hicks & Smith, PLLC 710 Main Street, 2nd Floor P.O. Box 1111 Columbus, MS nsmith@ghs-law.com By United States Mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the forgoing was sent to: Hon. Jim S. Pounds Monroe County Circuit Court P.O. Box 316 Boonville, MS This, the 12th day of January /s/ Reed Martz M. REED MARTZ
BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Dec 22 2016 15:32:53 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MARLIN BUSINESS BANK vs. STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY AND JOHN D. STEVENS APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 20I6-CA-OI 2016-CA-011085
More informationIN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO KA HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
E-Filed Document Dec 12 2016 13:11:01 2015-CT-00050-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2015-KA-00050 HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT
More informationE-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.
E-Filed Document Sep 24 2015 10:10:03 2015-CA-00526 Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00526 S&M TRUCKING, LLC APPELLANT VERSUS ROGERS OIL COMPANY OF COLUMBIA,
More informationE-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Jun 17 2015 16:00:09 2014-CC-01798 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2014-CC-01798 OVER THE RAINBOW DAYCARE vs. VS. MISSISSIPPI
More informationREPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU
E-Filed Document Oct 2 2014 21:28:49 2013-CA-00524-COA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CA-00524 CINDY WALLS APPELLANT V. FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES
E-Filed Document Feb 24 2017 16:23:57 2015-CA-00749-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA-00749-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VIVIAN BYAS, DECEASED VICTOR BYAS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Jul 22 2015 12:14:02 2015-CP-00008-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY HOLTON APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00008 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT
E-Filed Document May 6 2014 13:34:19 2013-CA-01501 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CLARENCE JONES VERSUS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT 2013-CA-01501 APPELLEE APPEALED FROM THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PHILVESTER AND JOYCE WILLIAMS VS. AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLANTS CAUSE NO: 2009-CA-01107 APPELLEE APPELLEE'S BRIEF James D. Bell, MSB #..., BELL & ASSOCIATES,
More informationIN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT
IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT ANDREW THOMPSON, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2007-EC-01989 CHARLES LEWIS JONES APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL
More informationCOMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by
E-Filed Document Feb 28 2017 15:47:26 2015-CT-00527-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI DOUGLAS MICHAEL LONG, JR. APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO.: 2015-CA-00527 DAVID J. VITKAUSKAS APPELLEE PETITION
More informationSUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040
SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040 SHEILA DANETTE WELLS APPELLANT VS. FRANK PRICE and PHIL PRICE d/b/a PRICE CONSTRUCTIOCOMPANY CANTON SHEET METAL AND ROOFING APPELLEES
More informationNO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE.
E-Filed Document May 29 2015 11:28:47 2013-KA-02000-COA Pages: 11 NO. 2013-KA-02000-COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. ON APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document Feb 12 2018 10:06:26 2016-CA-00928-COA Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2016-TS-00928 CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. APPELLANT VS. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLEES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VS. STEVE LACROIX APPELLANT 2008-CA-01744 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI
E-Filed Document Jun 1 2018 09:30:47 2016-CT-00928-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2016-TS-00928 CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. APPELLANT VS. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLEES
More informationPETITION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document Mar 6 2018 19:55:11 2016-KA-00932-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-KA-00932-COA JACARRUS ANTYONE PICKETT APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jul 29 2016 14:31:24 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CT-00615-SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Jan 8 2016 13:04:43 2014-KA-01838-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROBERT W. TRIPLETT a/k/a ROBERT WARREN TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a ROBERT TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a
More informationON APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE CHANCERY COURT OF YAZOO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI, THE HONORABLE JANACE HARVEY-GOREE
E-Filed Document Oct 15 2014 23:49:51 2013-CA-00620-COA Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI VERA M. MILLER WOOD, et. al. APPELLANTS vs. SUPREME COURT: 2013-CA-00620 AUDREY H. KEMP, et. al. APPELLEES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT
E-Filed Document Dec 16 2014 18:57:22 2014-CP-00558 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI BARRON BORDEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-00558 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 17:12:34 2014-CP-01810-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI AKIVA KAREEM CLARK APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-01810-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationIN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff
E-Filed Document May 10 2016 11:30:53 2015-CA-01496 Pages: 9 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA-01496 JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff BRIEF OF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Aug 28 2015 11:05:44 2014-KA-01230-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMMY DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01230 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP-01499 STEVEN EASON APPELLANT vs. CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, ALICIA BOX and RONALD KING APPELLEES On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document May 5 2017 13:43:04 2016-CP-01474-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LYNDON BRITAIN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CP-01474 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Apr 8 2016 16:33:38 2015-CP-01418-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01418-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationE-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17
E-Filed Document Dec 1 2017 18:19:55 2016-CA-01082 Pages: 17 IN THE MISSISSIPPI, SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2016-CA-01082 TONY L. AND LINDA SMITH APPELLANTS VS. JOHN HENDON, UNION PLANTERS BANK, NA FIRST AMERICAN
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Feb 27 2017 15:41:09 2016-CA-01033-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL ISHEE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CA-01033-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Apr 22 2014 15:58:43 2013-CP-00239-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SHELBY RAY PARHAM APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CC-002S8 c;oii-~ TERRY H. LOGAN, SR. AND BEVERLY W. LOGAN CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2013-CC-002S8 c;oii-~ TERRY H. LOGAN, SR. AND BEVERLY W. LOGAN 1PELLANTS V. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORT A TION COMMISSION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP-01387 HARRISON LEWIS, JR. APPELLANT VS. AZHARPASHA APELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Feb 17 2015 16:55:41 2014-IA-00674-SCT Pages: 21 CASE NO. 2014-IA-00674-SCT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CALHOUN HEALTH SERVICES, APPELLANT v. MARTHA GLASPIE, APPELLEE
More informationE-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006
E-Filed Document May 12 2014 14:25:52 2013-CA-01006 Pages: 18 2013-CA-01006 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 C.H. MILES APPELLANT V. BRENDA C. MILES APPELLEE APPELLEE
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ALBERT ABRAHAM, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-01759 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DESOTO COUNTY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Oral Argument Requested
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING
E-Filed Document Dec 28 2015 17:29:25 2014-KA-00664-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES JOHNSON APPELLANT V. 2014-KA-00664-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION FOR
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 14:04:25 2013-CP-02023-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURTNEY ELKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02023-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationUnited States District Court
Case:0-cv-0-RS Document Filed0/0/ Page of **E-filed //0** 0 0 LISA GALAVIZ, etc., v. Plaintiff, JEFFREY S. BERG, et al., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Defendants.
More informationv. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED
E-Filed Document May 30 2017 17:35:20 2013-CT-01296-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI VALLEY SILICA COMPANY, INC. APPELLANT v. No. 2013-CA-01296-SCT DOROTHY L.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Mar 2 2018 13:44:46 2017-KA-00853-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHN WARE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00853 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00742
E-Filed Document Jun 14 2017 15:21:03 2016-CA-00742-SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00742 CYNDY HOWARTH, Individually, wife, wrongful death beneficiary, and as Executrix
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Apr 20 2016 15:53:20 2015-CP-00893-COA Pages: 30 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ERNIE WHITE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00893-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document May 11 2017 16:34:51 2016-KA-01329-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GEROME MOORE APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01329-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1182-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Dec 1 2014 16:28:06 2013-KA-01785-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TREVOR HOSKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01785-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Jul 14 2015 11:36:28 2014-KA-01327-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAURICE TOWNSEND APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01327-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
Case: 12-1150 Document: 003111187849 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT Daniel J. Piszczatoski, et al., No. 12-1150 Appellants, v. The Hon. Rudolph
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. Cause No KA KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee
E-Filed Document May 1 2015 11:58:24 2014-KA-00697 Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Cause No. 2014-KA-00697 KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee APPEAL FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA BRIEF OF APPELLEES
/' ~ ~'. '\.. ' ' IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA FILE':';, MAY 262011 om.. af the Clerk 8up... COurt Courto'~I. MATT BROWN & HOLLI BROWN
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT
E-Filed Document Sep 16 2014 12:20:19 2013-CA-01986 Pages: 9 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RAVEL WILLIAMS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CA-01986 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Mar 22 2016 11:54:28 2015-KA-00623-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA-00623 DENNIS THOMPSON APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Jul 8 2015 13:57:01 2014-CP-00165-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL WALDEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-00165-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA TODD KUHN and ANGELA T. KUHN BRIEF OF APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jun 8 2017 11:12:57 2017-CA-00092 Pages: 20 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-00092 CHERYL L. HIGH APPELLANT v. TODD KUHN and ANGELA T. KUHN APPELLEES Appeal from the Harrison
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00121
~ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2008-CA-00121 REBUILD AMERICA, INC. APPELLANT VERSES ROBERT K. MILNER AND WIFE, PATRICIA K. MILNER AND W ACHOVIA BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FIRST
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA S. HUDSON APPELLANTS. v. Cause No CA LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC.
E-Filed Document Feb 21 2014 14:40:09 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 19 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA S. HUDSON APPELLANTS v. Cause No. 2013-CA-01004 LOWE S HOME CENTERS, INC.
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANTS
E-Filed Document May 31 2018 10:23:48 2016-CA-01057-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-01057 DAVID NEIL HARRIS, SR. AND VECIE MICHELE HARRIS APPELLANTS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI,
More informationREPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jul 10 2017 16:56:22 2016-KA-01527-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RODISE JENKINS APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01527-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE REPLY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SYLVESTER YOUNG, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-2026 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BURNETTE AVAKIAN, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF NORAIR AVAKIAN, DECEASED NO.
E-Filed Document Jul 19 2016 17:57:06 2015-CA-01520 Pages: 12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BURNETTE AVAKIAN, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF NORAIR AVAKIAN, DECEASED VS. WILMINGTON TRUST
More informationAPPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF
E-Filed Document Sep 23 2015 13:42:39 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Trial Court Nos. 2006-109; 2006-157 / No. 2015-CA-00502-C0A NEDRA PITTMAN, Petitioner
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Mar 22 2017 16:26:00 2016-CA-00637 Pages: 28 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-CA-00637 DAVID MICHAEL LYON, JR. APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CAUSE NO.:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT SCT 2013-CT SCT. MILTON TROTTER, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee
E-Filed Document Apr 4 2016 16:50:10 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT-00547-SCT 2013-CT-00547-SCT MILTON TROTTER, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee BRIEF
More informationCourt of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan ORDER Roger Groman v Nolan's Auction Service LLC Docket No. 334895 Stephen L. Borrello Presiding Judge David H. Sawyer LC No. 15-048562-A V Kathleen Jansen Judges The
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA SCT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2008-IA-01191-SCT SHANNON HOLMES AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLANTS VS. LEE MCMILLAN APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VIJAY PATEL INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF NATWAREL PATEL
E-Filed Document Aug 24 2015 15:39:23 2015-CA-00371 Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VIJAY PATEL INDIVIDUALLY PLAINTIFFS AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF NATWAREL
More informationtrl 5. Ann Wilson, Appellee; 7. P. Nelson Smith, Jr., Esq., Attorney for Appellee Ann Wilson; IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI trl CASE NO. 2007m-00969 FAYE JORDAN VERSUS ANN WILSON and NMMC - PLAINTIFF /APPELLANT DEFENDANTS /APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned
More informationREPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WOODKREST CUSTOM HOMES INC., NATIONWIDE CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION, LLC and ROBERT KRESS, SR. individually APPELLANTS VS. CAUSE NO.: 2008-TS-00846 JAMES COOPER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT HARRISON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document May 18 2016 17:53:03 2015-CA-01405 Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2015-TS-01405 FRANK BEATON APPELLANT vs. CAPSCO INDUSTRIES, INC. and CHRISTOPHER KILLION APPELLEES
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP HENRY HINTON APPELLANT BRIAN LADNER APPELLEE
E-Filed Document May 2 2017 15:48:02 2016-CP-01494 Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP-01494 HENRY HINTON APPELLANT v. BRIAN LADNER APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 14:15:34 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MILTON TROTTER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI $104, U.S. CURRENCY ET AL APPELLEE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
E-Filed Document Apr 1 2017 13:06:29 2015-CT-00710-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CITY OF MERIDIAN VERSUS APPELLANT NO.2015-CA-00710-COA $104,960.00 U.S. CURRENCY ET AL
More informationON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TUNICA COUNTY Cause No BRIEF OF APPELLEE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VS. ONE 1970 MERCURY COUGAR, YIN # OF9111545940 ONE 1992 FORD MUSTANG, YIN #FACP44E4NF173360 ONE FORD MUSTANG $355.00 U.S. CURRENCY AND WILLIE HAMPTON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants. RENASANT BANK Appellee
E-Filed Document Aug 30 2017 17:21:30 2016-CA-01448-COA Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-01448 BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants v. RENASANT BANK Appellee
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HOYT FORBES AND IDLDA FORBES V. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION APPELLANTS NO.2007-CA-00902-COA APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Apr 4 2017 16:36:59 2016-CP-01145-COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THOMAS HOLDER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CP-01145 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Apr 6 2016 16:21:36 2014-KA-01520-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI KENNY STEWART APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-01520-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationFILED MAR BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REOUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. CASE NO tlb2082 NANCYLOIT
e O"y IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2007-tlb2082 NANCYLOIT APPELLANT VERSUS HARRIS D. PURVIS AND BRJ INC. FILED MAR 3 1 2008 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURf COURT OF APPEAlS
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Feb 26 2015 11:04:08 2014-CP-00755-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROY DALE WALLACE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Aug 23 2017 16:38:55 2017-KA-00181-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI EDDIE EARL DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00181 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Jul 29 2015 16:09:56 2015-CP-00263-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00263-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
E-Filed Document Jan 13 2014 16:30:11 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA HUDSON VS. LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01004
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Mar 29 2018 15:36:58 2017-KA-01112-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY MARTIN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-TS-01112 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Sep 21 2016 16:19:34 2016-KA-00260-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMIE ROSEBUR APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-00260-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00702
E-Filed Document Jun 6 2017 16:14:50 2016-CA-00702-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-00702 RICHARD COLL APPELLANT VERSUS WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. No.2009-CA APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2009-CA-00841 GEORGE M. BOZIER VS. APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE RICHARD J. SCHILLING, JR. AND SW GAMING LLC APPELLEES/CROSS-APPELLANTS APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Mar 13 2017 09:59:29 2015-CP-01388-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DANA EASTERLING APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01388-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2007-CP JOHN HENRY ADAMS APPELLANT. vs. GLORIA GIBBS, DIRECTOR OF RECORDS APPELLEE
, - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2007-CP-00623 JOHN HENRY ADAMS APPELLANT vs. GLORIA GIBBS, DIRECTOR OF RECORDS APPELLEE On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Sunflower County, Mississippi
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Dec 15 2015 17:02:31 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NEDRA PITTMAN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CA-00502 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CA COA
E-Filed Document Jul 5 2016 19:15:35 2014-CA-01692-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2014-CA-01692-COA CRAIG W. CLEVELAND APPELLANT/CROSS- APPELLEE VS. DEUTSCHE BANK
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Aug 5 2014 01:08:18 2014-CA-00054-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DENNIS TERRY HUTCHINS APPELLANT V. CAUSE NO. 2014-CA-00054-COA
More informationE-Filed Document Jul :13: EC SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
E-Filed Document Jul 26 2016 13:13:30 2015-EC-01677-SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI TASHA DILLON APPELLANT vs. NO. 2015-CA-01677 DAVID MYERS APPELLEE On Appeal From the Circuit Court
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP ALLENGOUL APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Jul 7 2016 08:42:41 2016-CP-00167 Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP-00167 ALLENGOUL APPELLANT v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE ON APPEAL
More informationAPPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
E-Filed Document Dec 14 2015 08:52:35 2015-CA-00768 Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI HARUHIKO (HARRY) MURAKAMI APPELLANT v. SUPREME COURT# # 2015-CA-00768 JANICE M. YOUNG APPELLEE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Sep 15 2015 14:14:52 2015-CP-00265-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMOTHY BURNS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00265-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY LEWIS WASHINGTON NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE
E-Filed Document Jul 30 2014 19:56:53 2013-CP-02159-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY LEWIS WASHINGTON APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02159-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JUSTIN BANKSTON D/BI A BANKSTON FENCE VS. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE APPELLANT NO.: 2011-CA-00742 APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. NO CA COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P.
E-Filed Document Jan 13 2016 21:53:42 2015-CA-00199-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PEARLIE WRIGHT APPELLANT v. NO. 2015-CA-00199-COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P. APPELLEE
More informationCOPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TAURUS CALDWELL VS. FILED MAY 202008,,"HCE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURr ~OURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO. 2008-CP-0150 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Feb 2 2018 15:26:36 2017-KA-01455-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LADALE AIROSTEVE HOLLOWAY APPELLANT v. No. 2017-KA-01455-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. NO CA-Ol CA APPELLEE'S BRIEF
E-Filed Document Feb 2 2017 11:57:54 2016-CA-01131 Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-Ol131 2016-CA-01131 JONATHAN GRIFFITH vs. VS. MERLENE WALL APPELLANT APPELLEE
More information