IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
|
|
- Shannon Gardner
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION CHASE BARFIELD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:11-cv-4321NKL ) SHO-ME POWER ELECTRIC ) COOPERATIVE, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) THE SHO-ME DEFENDANTS JOINT ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT COME NOW Defendants, Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative and Sho-Me Technologies, LLC (collectively the Sho-Me Defendants ), and file this Joint Answer to the Plaintiffs First Amended Class Action For ease of reference, this Answer uses the same subject matter headings and paragraph numbers as the First Amended Class Action Complaint (the Complaint ). Shorthand names and terms as defined in the Complaint are used in this Joint Answer. PARTIES The Sho-Me Defendants specifically deny the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 3 of the Complaint that they and KAMO are operating commercial fiber-opticcommunication networks independent of the transmission or distribution of electricity. The Sho-Me Defendants do not have sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the remaining allegations in paragraphs 1 through 3 of the The Sho-Me Defendants admit the allegations of paragraphs 4 through 7 of the Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 1 of 12
2 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 8. & 9. The Sho-Me Defendants admit that so long as KAMO Electric and K-Power Net are joined as defendants in this action, this Court has subject matter jurisdiction. Otherwise, the Sho-Me Defendants have insufficient knowledge to admit or deny the factual allegations in paragraphs 8 and 9 of the CLASS-ACTION ALLEGATIONS 10. No response is required to paragraph 10 of the Complaint which is a legal conclusion The Sho-Me Defendants deny the allegations of paragraphs 11 through 19 of the Complaint including the allegations in each of the lettered subparagraphs in paragraphs 13, 15, 16 and 19 of the FACTS 20. The Sho-Me Defendants deny that Plaintiff Robertson owns tax parcel consisting of 97 acres of land in Miller County, Missouri. The Sho-Me Defendants do not have sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations in paragraph 20 with respect to Plaintiff Barfield. The Sho-Me Defendants admit the remaining allegations in paragraph 20 of the 21. The Sho-Me Defendants admit that Sho-Me Power owns duly recorded easements to use portions of Robertson s and the Biffles land, and deny the remaining allegations in paragraph 21 of the 22. The Sho-Me Defendants admit that Sho-Me Power installed fiber-optic cable on the electric transmission poles on its easements over the Biffles and Robertson s property, and deny the remaining allegations of paragraph 22 of the 23. The Sho-Me Defendants admit that the words in quotation marks in paragraph Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 2 of 12
3 of the Complaint are accurate but taken out of context from Sho-Me Tech s website, and deny the remaining allegations in paragraph 23 of the 24. The Sho-Me Defendants do not have sufficient knowledge to admit or deny the allegations contained in paragraph 24 of the 25. The Sho-Me Defendants admit that Sho-Me Power helped an ad hoc group of rural electric distribution cooperatives called CBN to advertise and promote the expansion of high-speed data services in rural Missouri, maintain a website, hold educational meetings, train employees and assist local schools and medical facilities to participate in the federal E-Rate program to reduce their costs. The name CBN or Cooperatives Broadband Network was only a name, was never incorporated, had no legal memberships and did not share any profits or losses between the rural electric cooperatives or their telecommunications subsidiaries. The CBN website was closed in The Sho-Me Defendants deny that the KAMO Defendants were members of CBN or that they ever financially assisted CBN. The Sho-Me Defendants deny the remaining allegations in paragraph 25 of the 26. The Sho-Me Defendants deny the allegations contained in paragraph 26 of the 27. The Sho-Me Defendants admit that Sho-Me Tech has entered into at least 30 interconnection agreements with companies that own or operate fiber-optic lines to enable its customers to access the internet or telecommunication networks. One of those interconnection agreements is with K-Power Net. The terms of its interconnection agreement with K-Power Net are similar to the terms of Sho-Me Tech s other interconnection agreements and do not give K- Power Net any more favorable terms or prices. 28. The Sho-Me Defendants admit that Sho-Me Power has installed many miles of Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 3 of 12
4 fiber-optic cable, which is an integral part of its electric transmission system, on poles located on easements it owns. The Sho-Me Defendants deny the remaining allegations in paragraph 28 of the The Sho-Me Defendants deny the allegations in paragraphs 29 through 33 of the COUNT I (Declaratory Judgment) 34. Paragraph 34 of the Complaint does not call for a response The Sho-Me Defendants deny the allegations in paragraphs 35 through 37 of the COUNT II (Trespass) 38. Paragraph 38 of the Complaint does not call for a response The Sho-Me Defendants deny the allegations in paragraphs 39 through 42 of the COUNT III (Unjust Enrichment) 43. Paragraph 43 of the Complaint does not call for a response The Sho-Me Defendants deny the allegations in paragraphs 44 and 45 of the COUNT IV (Injunctive Relieve) 46. Paragraph 46 of the Complaint does not call for a response The Sho-Me Defendants deny the allegations in paragraphs 47 through 49 of the Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 4 of 12
5 PUNITIVE DAMAGES 50. Paragraph 50 of the Complaint does not call for a response. 51. The Sho-Me Defendants deny the allegations in paragraph 51 of the AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Each and every allegation of the Complaint not expressly admitted is hereby denied. Additionally, for their defenses to the Complaint, the Sho-Me Defendants state as follows: FIRST DEFENSE The Complaint fails to state a claim for which relief may be granted for the reasons set forth in the Sho-Me Defendants Joint Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Motion for More Definite Statement. SECOND DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail because, as to the Sho-Me Defendants alone, federal subject matter jurisdiction is lacking. THIRD DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail because any installation and/or use of fiber optics on their property by a Sho-Me Defendant is authorized by the terms of a valid express easement. FOURTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail pursuant to the doctrines of actual and/or implied consent and/or ratification. FIFTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail for lack of standing. SIXTH DEFENSE The Sho-Me Defendants are not potentially liable for any act or omission by either of the Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 5 of 12
6 KAMO Defendants. SEVENTH DEFENSE The Sho-Me Defendants are not proper parties to this action for any fiber optic line or act or omission of or by either KAMO Defendant. EIGHTH DEFENSE No joint venture exists between the Sho-Me Defendants and the KAMO Defendants. NINTH DEFENSE There is no alleged or legitimate basis for the suggestion in the Complaint that joint liability may be appropriate in this case. TENTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail because Sho-Me s use of fiber optics is intangible and results in no physical interference with the Plaintiffs property. ELEVENTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail because Sho-Me s use of fiber optics is intangible and imposes no additional burden to the easement. TWELFTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail because Sho-Me s use of fiber optics affects, at most, only the degree of use and not the character of use. THIRTEENTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail because the main object of Sho-Me s fiber optic system is for electrical transmission purposes that used to be served by old technology that is no longer available; e.g., communications between unmanned stations and communications between the dispatch center and substations Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 6 of 12
7 FOURTEENTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail because Mo. Rev. St does not trump (either textually or by legal effect) pre-existing case law. FIFTEENTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail because they seek to thwart the strong public policy in favor of expanding access to new communications technologies. SIXTEENTH DEFENSE The placement of fiber optics inures to the benefit of cooperative members, which include Plaintiffs and putative class members. SEVENTEENTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members may fail because of the doctrine of adverse possession. EIGHTEENTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members may fail because of the doctrine of prescriptive and/or implied easements. NINTEENTH DEFENSE The declaratory and/or injunctive relief claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail because they have an adequate remedy at law. TWENTIETH DEFENSE Each Plaintiff and/or putative class member whose property is subject to an express easement with a Sho-Me Defendant lacks a cognizable claim for quasi-contractual relief (i.e., unjust enrichment). TWENTY-FIRST DEFENSE Plaintiffs claims and/or those of the putative class may be barred in whole or in part by Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 7 of 12
8 the doctrines of accord and satisfaction, payment and release. TWENTY-SECOND DEFENSE Plaintiffs claims and/or those of the putative class may be barred by applicable statutes of limitations or repose and/or the doctrine of laches. TWENTY-THIRD DEFENSE Plaintiffs and/or putative class members have failed to mitigate their damages, if any. TWENTY-FOURTH DEFENSE Plaintiffs and/or putative class members, by their actions or omissions, including but not limited to their own personal use of fiber optic communications reliant upon Sho-Me s fiber optic system, have waived the right to recover and/or are estopped from recovering against the Sho-Me Defendants. TWENTY-FIFTH DEFENSE Plaintiffs claims and/or those of the putative class are barred in whole or in part on the grounds Plaintiffs and class members would be unjustly enriched if they were allowed to recover from the Sho-Me Defendants. TWENTY-SIXTH DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members fail in whole or in part because of the lack of any ascertainable loss of money or property. TWENTY-SEVENTH DEFENSE The Sho-Me Defendants are entitled to a setoff to the extent that Plaintiffs or any putative class member owes money to a Sho-Me Defendant. TWENTY-EIGHTH DEFENSE The claims of some putative class members require contractual arbitration Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 8 of 12
9 TWENTY-NINTH DEFENSE This action may not be maintained as a class action because the many requirements incorporated into Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are not met in this case. THIRTIETH DEFENSE All of the easements are exclusive and apportionable. THIRTY-FIRST DEFENSE The claims of Plaintiffs and/or putative class members may fail due to their failure to join necessary and/or indispensable parties. THIRTY-SECOND DEFENSE There is no legal, contractual or factual basis for any award of attorney fees in favor of Plaintiffs and/or members of the class they seek to represent. THIRTY-THIRD DEFENSE There is no legal, contractual or factual basis for any award of exemplary or punitive damages in favor of Plaintiffs and/or members of the class they seek to represent. THIRTY-FOURTH DEFENSE Plaintiffs claim for punitive damages cannot be sustained because an award of punitive damages under Missouri law would violate the Sho-Me Defendants procedural and substantive Due Process and Equal Protection rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the Sho-Me Defendants Due Process and Equal Protection rights under corresponding provisions of the Missouri Constitution, and would be improper under the common law and public policies of the United States and Missouri. Moreover, the foregoing considerations, and considerations of Due Process, comity, and state sovereignty, bar any attempts to punish the Sho-Me Defendants except to the extent the alleged conduct had a direct impact in this state and a direct nexus to the specific harm alleged by Plaintiffs in this case Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 9 of 12
10 THIRTY-FIFTH DEFENSE No punishment may be imposed for conduct that cannot form the basis for an underlying claim for liability, including, but not limited to, conduct that occurred outside the applicable statute of limitations. Imposition of punitive damages under such circumstances would violate the Sho-Me Defendants procedural and substantive Due Process and Equal Protection rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and the Sho-Me Defendants Due Process and Equal Protection rights under corresponding provisions of the Missouri Constitution. Furthermore, Plaintiffs claim for punitive damages cannot be sustained under these same principles because Missouri does not provide constitutionally adequate standards and instructions for determining the imposition and amount of punitive damages. THIRTY-SIXTH DEFENSE The Sho-Me Defendants reserve the right to raise additional affirmative defenses as may be established during discovery and by the evidence in this case Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 10 of 12
11 Respectfully submitted, THOMPSON COBURN LLP By:/s/ Robert J. Wagner W. Stanley Walch, #17166 Christopher Hohn, #44124 Robert J. Wagner, #46391 Stephen A. D Aunoy, #54961 One US Bank Plaza St. Louis, MO (fax) swalch@thompsoncoburn.com chohn@thompsoncoburn.com rwagner@thompsoncoburn.com sdaunoy@thompsoncobur.com Dana L. Kollar, #43147 ANDERECK, EVANS, WIDGER, JOHNSON & LEWIS, LLC 700 East Capitol Ave. Jefferson City, MO (fax) dlkollar@aempb.com Terry M. Evans ANDERECK, EVANS, WIDGER, JOHNSON & LEWIS, LLC 119 East Main Street P.O. Box 654 Smithville, MO (fax) tevans@lawofficemo.com Attorneys for Defendants Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative and Sho-Me Technologies, LLC Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 11 of 12
12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing has been served electronically by means of the Court s CM/ECF electronic filing system on July 19, 2012, on all counsel of record. /s/ Robert J. Wagner Case 2:11-cv NKL Document 85 Filed 07/19/12 Page 12 of 12
Case 3:15-cv RGJ-KLH Document 38 Filed 11/25/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 257 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 3:15-cv-02907-RGJ-KLH Document 38 Filed 11/25/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 257 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JOSEPH HENDERSON, SR. * CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:15CV02907 * VERSUS
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ELECTRONICALLY FILED 12/17/2012 2:06 PM CV-2012-901531.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA FLORENCE CAUTHEN, CLERK INNOVATION SPORTS & ) ENTERTAINMENT,
More informationCase 1:12-cv DJC Document 36 Filed 09/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:12-cv-11280-DJC Document 36 Filed 09/10/13 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x KAREN L. BACCHI,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION CHASE BARFIELD, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2:11-cv-4321-NKL ) Sho-Me POWER ELECTRIC ) COOPERATIVE, et al., ) )
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/09/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X 115 KINGSTON AVENUE LLC, and 113 KINGSTON LLC, Plaintiffs, VERIFIED ANSWER -against- Index No.: 654456/16 MT. HAWLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/2015 01:47 PM INDEX NO. 190350/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2015 03:49 PM INDEX NO. 190202/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS
More informationCase 2:17-cv EEF-MBN Document 66 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 2:17-cv-06197-EEF-MBN Document 66 Filed 11/07/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ADRIAN CALISTE AND BRIAN GISCLAIR, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS
More informationFILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/ :02 PM
FILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/23/2017 12:02 PM INDEX NO. EFCA2016-002373 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/23/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONEIDA FRANK JAKUBOWKI AND GLORIA
More informationR. BRIAN DIXON, Bar No LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Case :-cv-000-jgb-rao Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 R. BRIAN DIXON, Bar No. 0 bdixon@littler.com Bush Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone:..0 Facsimile:..0 DOUGLAS A. WICKHAM, Bar
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 02/24/ /31/ :26 08:31 PM AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 637 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/24/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X MARIA C. CORSO, FRANK J. IANNO -against- Plaintiff, ANSWER WITH COUNTERCLAIMS
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/31/ :46 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 112 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/31/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO Assunte Catazano a/k/a Sue Catazano, as Personal INDEX NO. 190298-16 Representative
More informationConsolidated Class Action Complaint ( Complaint ) filed by Plaintiffs JAMES E. ELIAS and GENERAL DENIAL
0 0 Defendant SYNCRHONY BANK ( Defendant ) hereby answers the Third Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint ( Complaint ) filed by Plaintiffs JAMES E. ELIAS and JAMES P. KOZIK ( Plaintiffs ) as follows:
More informationDefendant, Prevost Car (US) Inc., Individually and as. Successor to Nova Bus, by its attorneys, MAIMONE & ASSOCIATES,
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/08/2016 11:03 PM INDEX NO. 190300/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/08/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
David L. Kagel (Calif. Bar No. 1 John Torbett (Calif. State Bar No. Law Offices of David Kagel, PLC 01 Century Park East, th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: ( -00 Fax: ( - Attorneys Admitted Pro Hac
More informationCase 8:13-cv JSM-AEP Document 17 Filed 01/14/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 64 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:13-cv-03084-JSM-AEP Document 17 Filed 01/14/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 64 SHELENE JEAN-LOUIS, JUDES PETIT-FRERE, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/2016 0433 PM INDEX NO. 190115/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF 06/07/2016 LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP 137 West 25th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10001 (212) 302-2400
More informationINDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION
FORM E.C. 4B (v) 2015 INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION NOMINATION FORM FOR MEMBER HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NAME OF CANDIDATE:.. CONSTITUENCY:.. STATE:. Affix passport photograph INDEPENDENT NATIONAL
More informationCase 1:16-cv LGS Document 21 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:16-cv-00934-LGS Document 21 Filed 04/11/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Laspata DeCaro Studio Corporation, Case No: 1:16-cv-00934-LGS - against - Plaintiff,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/28/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/28/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------- x IN RE NEW YORK CITY ASBESTOS LITIGATION NYCAL --------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/2016 11:24 AM INDEX NO. 190043/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X JOHN D. FIEDERLEIN AND
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/02/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/02/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------x Index No.: 221 WEST 17 TH STREET, LLC, -against- Plaintiff, COMPLAINT ALLIED WORLD SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 60 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------x LEROY BAKER, Index No.: 190058/2017 Plaintiff, -against- AF SUPPLY USA INC.,
More informationCase 1:16-cv FAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:16-cv-20683-FAM Document 50 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION HERON DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2015 01:23 PM INDEX NO. 190245/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendant.
2:10-cv-03075-RMG Date Filed 02/25/11 Entry Number 22 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Righthaven LLC, Dana Eiser, v. Plaintiff, Defendant. Civil
More informationCase3:13-cv SI Document11 Filed03/26/13 Page1 of 17
Case:-cv-000-SI Document Filed0// Page of CHRISTOPHER J. BORDERS (SBN: 0 cborders@hinshawlaw.com AMY K. JENSEN (SBN: ajensen@hinshawlaw.com HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP One California Street, th Floor San
More informationCase 2:13-cv CG-WPL Document 17 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 2:13-cv-00727-CG-WPL Document 17 Filed 09/18/13 Page 1 of 10 DAVID ECKERT Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO vs. No. 2:13-cv-00727-CG/WPL THE CITY OF DEMING. DEMING
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/28/2016 05:04 PM INDEX NO. 190293/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 55 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X VINCENT ASCIONE, v. ALCOA,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/10/2016 02:54 PM INDEX NO. 190047/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/10/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X NORMAN DOIRON AND ELAINE
More information3:13-cv JFA Date Filed 04/04/13 Entry Number 4 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
3:13-cv-00882-JFA Date Filed 04/04/13 Entry Number 4 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Charles Smith, individually and as Parent of Minor
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/25/ :15 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 73 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/25/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK EVA SCRIVO FIFTH AVENUE, INC., vs. Plaintiff, ANNIE RUSH and COSETTE FIFTH AVENUE, LLC, Defendants. Index No. 656723/2016 VERIFIED ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS
More informationCase 3:08-cv VRW Document 11 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case :0-cv-0-VRW Document Filed 0//0 Page of BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & BIRKHAEUSER, LLP Alan R. Plutzik (State Bar No. ) Michael S. Strimling (State Bar No. ) Oak Grove Road, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, California
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:15-cv-00405-CCE-JEP Document 7 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) LIMECCA CORBIN, on behalf of herself and ) similarly situated
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/07/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/07/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/07/2015 03:53 PM INDEX NO. 158552/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 64 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/07/2015 SUPREME COURT: STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF 11-15 EAST
More informationthe unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 1 1 1 Defendant FRHI HOTELS & RESORTS (CANADA) INC. ( Defendant ) hereby answers the unverified First Amended Complaint (the Complaint ) of plaintiffs MIKE SPITZER and MICHELLE MACOMBER
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/08/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 223 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/08/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/08/2014 12:36 PM INDEX NO. 155113/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 223 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/08/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (hereinafter FedEx Ground ), by and
THE HONORABLE BRUCE HELLER SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY MITCH SPENCER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. --00- SEA v. Plaintiff, ACTION COMPLAINT FEDEX GROUND
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/22/ :49 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/22/2016. Exhibit D {N
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 09/22/2016 12:49 PM INDEX NO. 504403/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/22/2016 Exhibit D {N0194821.1 } SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS x THE BOARD
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 135 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/19/2012
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/2012 INDEX NO. 100061/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 135 RECEIVED NYSCEF 07/19/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK VERIFIED REPLY TO 89 BOWERY AND HUA YANG'S COUNTERCLAIMS IN VERIFIED AMENDED ANSWER Index No. 150738/2017 Plaintiff, 93 BOWERY HOLDINGS LLC ("93
More informationCase 4:10-cv TSH Document 4 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 4:10-cv-40257-TSH Document 4 Filed 02/24/11 Page 1 of 9 WAKEELAH A. COCROFT, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) JEREMY SMITH, ) Defendant ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS C.A. No. 10-40257-FDS
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :55 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY a/s/o Index No.: 152491/2017 ROCKROSE DEVELOPMENT CORP., Plaintiff, VERIFIED ANSWER TO CROSS-CLAIMS OF -against- THIRD-PARTY
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/05/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/05/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/05/2014 12:37 PM INDEX NO. 156171/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/05/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: ONEIDA COUNTY CLERK 01/27/ :26 PM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ONEIDA -----------------------------------------------------------------------x FRANK JAKUBOWSKI and GLORIA JAKUBOWSKI, -against- Plaintiffs, A.O. SMITH
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2006 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2016. Exhibit 21
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/2016 06:18 PM INDEX NO. 111768/2006 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2016 Exhibit 21 SCAf.r.EllONWIOl11l1,---------------------- SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF
More informationCase5:09-cv JW Document106 Filed04/22/10 Page1 of 9
Case:0-cv-0-JW Document0 Filed0//0 Page of 0 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 0) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com Melissa J. Baily (Bar No. ) melissabaily@quinnemanuel.com
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/ :24 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/01/2015 04:24 PM INDEX NO. 190079/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationCase 3:17-cv DPJ-FKB Document 5 Filed 05/19/17 Page 1 of 15
Case 3:17-cv-00270-DPJ-FKB Document 5 Filed 05/19/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION TINA L. WALLACE PLAINTIFF VS. CITY OF JACKSON,
More informationCase 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11
Case 3:16-cv-00657-DPJ-FKB Document 9 Filed 10/24/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION KIMBERLY V. BRACEY VS. PLAINTIFF CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase5:02-cv JF Document3 Filed11/06/02 Page1 of 14
Case:0-cv-0-JF Document Filed/0/0 Page of JAMES R. HAWLEY -- BAR NO. 0 KATHRYN CHOW BAR NO. 0 HOGE, FENTON, JONES & APPEL, INC. Sixty South Market Street, Suite 00 San Jose, California - Phone: (0) -0
More informationCase 2:15-cv DBP Document 26 Filed 03/24/15 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:15-cv-00102-DBP Document 26 Filed 03/24/15 Page 1 of 20 John A. Anderson (#4464) jaanderson@stoel.com Timothy K. Conde (#10118) tkconde@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 201 South Main Street, Suite 1100
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP PAUL S. COWIE, Cal. Bar No. 01 pcowie@sheppardmuilin.com MICHAEL H. GIACINTI, Cal. Bar No. mgiacinti@sheppardmullin.com Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, California 01-1
More informationCase: 25CH1:15-cv Document #: 7 Filed: 10/05/2015 Page 1 of 16
Case: 25CH1:15-cv-001479 Document #: 7 Filed: 10/05/2015 Page 1 of 16 IN THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI FAIR COMMISSION PLAINTIFF VS. CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 03/05/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case: 1:12-cv-00640 Document #: 21 Filed: 03/05/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #:30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS RUDE MUSIC, INC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO.: 1:12-cv-00640
More informationCase 1:14-cv CMH-TRJ Document 14 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 83
Case 1:14-cv-01749-CMH-TRJ Document 14 Filed 01/23/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID# 83 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION VERISIGN, INC., v. XYZ.COM, LLC
More informationKanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts Doc. 10 Case 3:07-cv MJJ Document 10 Filed 07/02/2007 Page 1 of 13
Kanter v. California Administrative Office of the Courts Doc. Case :0-cv-0-MJJ Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 PATRICIA K. GILLETTE (Bar No. ) GREG J. RICHARDSON (Bar No. 0) BROOKE D. ANDRICH (Bar No.
More informationTopic 4: The Constitution
Name: Date: Period: Topic 4: The Constitution Notes Chp 4: The Constitution 1 Objectives about The Constitution The student will demonstrate knowledge of the Constitution of the United States by a) identifying
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/10/ :35 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/10/2018 EXHIBIT 4
EXHIBIT 4 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/08/2018 04;47 PM WATER STREET REALTY GROUP LLC and YARON HERSHCO, Defendants,....----X -- â â ----- â WATER STREET REALTY GROUP LLC and YARON HERSHCO, Third-Party
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION ZUCKER FEATHER PRODUCTS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 2:14-CV-4298 ) HOLIDAY IMAGE, LLC, ) ) Serve: ) Corporate Service Bureau
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO RESPONDENT ETNA TOWNSHIP'S ANSWER TO RELATORS' COMPLAINT FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS
Ls! IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO /n, w" State of Ohio, ex rel. Ascena Retail group, Inc., et al., Relators, Case No.: 14-1013 V. Original action in mandamus City of Reynoldsburg, et al., Respondents. RESPONDENT
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/30/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/30/2016 03:41 PM INDEX NO. 651348/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/30/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MARK D ANDREA, Plaintiff,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/11/ :17 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 85 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/11/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x Index No.: 655023/2016 DAWN JONES, DDS and EXCLUSIVE DENTAL STUDIOS, PLLC. d/b/a
More informationCase 4:17-cv PJH Document 61 Filed 02/28/18 Page 1 of 33
Case :-cv-0-pjh Document Filed 0// Page of Brenda A. Prackup Law Office of Brenda A. Prackup 000 MacArthur Blvd. East Tower, th Floor Newport Beach, CA 0 Tel:.. Email: brenda@baplawoffice.com Attorney
More informationDEFENDANTS' VERIFIED ANSWER
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/15/2016 11:34 AM INDEX NO. 154310/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x KRISHNA DEBYSINGH, -against-
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION. DAVID ESRATI : Case No CV Plaintiff, : Judge Richard Skelton
ELECTRONICALLY FILED COURT OF COMMON PLEAS Wednesday, March 7, 2018 11:47:51 AM CASE NUMBER: 2018 CV 00593 Docket ID: 31942993 RUSSELL M JOSEPH CLERK OF COURTS MONTGOMERY COUNTY OHIO IN THE COMMON PLEAS
More informationCase 1:14-cv JCC-IDD Document 7 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 39
Case 1:14-cv-01326-JCC-IDD Document 7 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION Jeremy L. Baum, Plaintiff, v. JPMorgan
More information)(
FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/15/2016 05:35 PM INDEX NO. 57971/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER --------------------------------------------------------------------------)(
More informationCase 1:07-cv GMS Document 25 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:07-cv-00228-GMS Document 25 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE JEFFREY D. HILL, : : Plaintiff, : : C.A. No. 07-228 (GMS) v. : : JURY TRIAL
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/ /30/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2014 10/30/2014 12:42 PM INDEX NO. 190087/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2014 10/30/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK
More informationCase 1:17-cv PBS Document 24 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:17-cv-10356-PBS Document 24 Filed 05/26/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS JONATHAN MONSARRAT, v. Plaintiff, GOTPER6067-00001and DOES 1-5, dba ENCYCLOPEDIADRAMATICA.SE,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Electronically FILED by Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles on 0//0 0: PM Sherri R. Carter, Executive Officer/Clerk of Court, by F. Caldera,Deputy Clerk 0 0 MICHAEL J. KUMP (SBN 00) mkump@kwikalaw.com
More informationCase 1:14-cv CMA-KMT Document 1081 Filed 05/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-074-CMA-KMT Document 1081 Filed 05/16/18 USDC Colorado Page 1 of Civil Action No. 14-cv-074-CMA-KMT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JOHANA PAOLA BELTRAN; LUSAPHO
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/21/ :37 PM INDEX NO /2016
INDEX NO. 521852/2016 FILED : KINGS COUNTY CLERK 11:22 AM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS RAHIM ALI, Index No.: 521852/2016 Plaintiff, - against - GIBRAN KHAN, 1886 SCHENECTADY AVE.,
More informationCase 4:18-cv JSW Document 14 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 13. Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF VALLEJO, JARRETT TONN, KEVIN BARRETO, and SEAN KENNEY
Case :-cv-00-jsw Document Filed 0// Page of CLAUDIA M. QUINTANA City Attorney, SBN BY: KATELYN M. KNIGHT Deputy City Attorney, SBN CITY OF VALLEJO, City Hall Santa Clara Street, P.O. Box 0 Vallejo, CA
More informationFILED: NYS COURT OF CLAIMS 07/13/ :49 AM CLAIM NO NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/13/2016
FILED: NYS COURT OF CLAIMS 07/13/2016 11:49 AM CLAIM NO. 127947 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/13/2016 STATEOFNEWYORK: COURTOFCLAIMS MATTHEW NAPOLEON!, - against - THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Claimant,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/12/ :04 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/12/2015 11:04 AM INDEX NO. 190275/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/12/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationFILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2013
FILED: NASSAU COUNTY CLERK 08/14/2013 INDEX NO. 601355/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/14/2013 MP-1172-B ADS/dp SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NASSAU ---------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/01/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 24 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/01/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/01/2014 INDEX NO. 190033/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 24 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/01/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK RICHARD R. LEFRAK, -against- Plaintiffs,
More informationFILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/28/ :53 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/28/2016
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/28/2016 06:53 PM INDEX NO. 712841/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS -----------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/08/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/08/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/08/2013 INDEX NO. 151360/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/08/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK STEPHEN MOLINARI, Index No.: 151360/12
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Case:-cv-0-JSW Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 J. Rick Taché (#00) rtache@swlaw.com Deborah S. Mallgrave (#0) dmallgrave@swlaw.com Harsh P. Parikh (#0) hparikh@swlaw.com SNELL & WILMER Costa Mesa, CA - Telephone:
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY RUBIE ELLIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1316-CV04606 ) Division 14 KANSAS CITY 33 SCHOOL ) DISTRICT, et al. ) ) Defendants. ) ANSWER
More informationPlaintiff, Yonkers Contracting Company, Inc. ("Yonkers"), and Zurich American Insurance Company
FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 05/20/2013 INDEX NO. 54272/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ---------------------------------------------------------------------)(
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA * * *
BRETT L. MCKAGUE, ESQ. SBN 0 JEREMY J. SCHROEDER, ESQ. SBN FLESHER MCKAGUE LLP 0 Plaza Drive Rocklin, CA Telephone: ().0 Facsimile: (). Attorneys for defendant and cross-defendant, GENTRY ASSOCIATES CONSTRUCTION
More informationGENERAL APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT OF INDEMNITY CONTRACTORS FORM
MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING INC. P.O. Box 14498 Des Moines iowa 50306-3498 Phone (800) 678-8171 FAX (515) 243-3854 GENERAL APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT OF INDEMNITY CONTRACTORS
More informationEAKIN V. ST. LOUIS, K. C. & N. R. CO. [3 Cent. Law J. 655.] 1 Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri. Sept. Term, 1876.
YesWeScan: The FEDERAL CASES EAKIN V. ST. LOUIS, K. C. & N. R. CO. Case No. 4,236. [3 Cent. Law J. 655.] 1 Circuit Court, E. D. Missouri. Sept. Term, 1876. LEASE BY RAILROAD COMPANY RATIFICATION BY ACQUIESCENCE
More informationGENERAL APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT OF INDEMNITY CONTRACTORS FORM
MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY (MUTUAL) MERCHANTS NATIONAL BONDING, INC. P.O. Box 14498, Des Moines, iowa 50306-3498 Phone (800) 678-8171 FAX (515) 243-3854 GENERAL APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT OF INDEMNITY CONTRACTORS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION. Case No. 3:18-CV FDW-DSC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION JAMES SEITZ, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF LAUREN E. SEITZ, DECEASED, Case No. 3:18-CV-00044-FDW-DSC v.
More informationCase 2:12-cv MSD-TEM Document 4 Filed 12/26/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 25
Case 2:12-cv-00642-MSD-TEM Document 4 Filed 12/26/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID# 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division LAUREN GREY-IGEL, on behalf of : Herself and all
More informationFILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 10/13/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ----------------------------------------x MONSOUR MARDJANI, as Administrator of the Estate of WILMA MARDJANI and MONSOUR MARDJANI, Individually,
More informationPLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS GORDON RAMSAY'S AND G.R. US LICENSING'S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2016 11:55 AM INDEX NO. 651046/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 66 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------)(
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA
JAY L. POMERANTZ (CSB No. ) jpomerantz@fenwick.com ILANA RUBEL (CSB No. ) irubel@fenwick.com MATTHEW MEYERHOFER (CSB NO. ) mmeyerhofer@fenwick.com Silicon Valley Center 0 California Street Mountain View,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/12/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/12/2014
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/12/2014 INDEX NO. 190087/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/12/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ALL COUNTIES WITHIN NEW YORK CITY ------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 74 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK TYREL HEMPSTEAD, Index No. 156963/2017 Plaintif, -against- HAMMER & STEEL, INC., STS-SCHELTZKE GMBH & CO. KG., 9501 DITMARS BOULEVARD, LLC, ICS
More informationFILED: ALBANY COUNTY CLERK 01/05/ :51 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/05/2016
FILED ALBANY COUNTY CLERK 01/05/2016 0951 AM INDEX NO. 901530/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF 01/05/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ALBANY LYNN M. LOCKWOOD, as Executrix for
More informationCase 1:13-cv NMG Document 25 Filed 01/27/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUETTS
Case 1:13-cv-12631-NMG Document 25 Filed 01/27/14 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUETTS FRED MCCLURE, Derivatively on Behalf of RUSSELL COMMODITY STRATEGIES FUND, RUSSELL EMERGING
More informationFILED: ALBANY COUNTY CLERK 03/08/ :09 PM INDEX NO NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/08/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ALBANY ---------------------------------------------------------------------x DAVID BROWN and MARIA BROWN, -against- 3M COMPANY and RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC.,
More informationDOCKET NO. the City of Millville, County of Cumberland and State of New Jersey, by way of FIRST COUNT
Fj Law Offices NED P. ROGOVOY, ESQUIRE, L.L.C. Attorney ID #008141073 782 South Brewster Road, Unit A-6 Vineland, New Jersey 08362 (856) 205-9701 Attorney for Plaintiff ROBERT R. HULITT, SR. Plaintiff
More information6 Mofty Shulman (Pro Hac Vice to be filed)
I BOlES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP Alan B. Vickery (Pro Mac Vice to be Filed) 2 avickery@bsfl1p.com John F. LaSalle (Pro Hac Vice to be Filed) 3 j1asa11ebsfllp.com 575 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor 4 New York,
More information