Isobel Kennedy, SC Law Library
|
|
- Spencer Spencer
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 8 th ANNUAL NATIONAL PROSECUTORS CONFERENCE SATURDAY, 19 MAY 2007 DUBLIN CASTLE CONFERENCE CENTRE Isobel Kennedy, SC Law Library ~ Defence of Diminished Responsibility
2 1.GENERAL 8 th Annual National Prosecutors Conference 19 May Dublin Castle DIMINISHED RESPONSIBILITY Isobel Kennedy, SC The defence of diminished responsibility is a statutory defence. It was introduced into our law by virtue of the Section 6 of the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act The defence is a partial defence and is in the form of a statutory concession to the offence of Murder. If successful the defence operates to reduce the offence of Murder to one of Manslaughter rather than leading to an acquittal. Sections 5(4), 6 and 19 of the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006 are the relevant sections in relation to diminished responsibility and provide respectively as follows:- 5(4) - Where on a trial for murder the accused contends (a) - that at the time of the alleged offence he or she was suffering from a mental disorder such that he or she ought to be found not guilty by reason of insanity, or (b) - that at that time he or she was suffering from a mental disorder specified in Section 6(1)(c), the court shall allow the prosecution to adduce evidence tending to 1 Number
3 prove the other of those contentions, and may give directions as to the stage of the proceedings at which the prosecution may adduce such evidence. 6. (1) Where a person is tried for murder and the jury or, as the case may be, the Special Criminal Court finds that the person (a) did the act alleged, (b) was at the time suffering from a mental disorder, and (c) - the mental disorder was not such as to justify finding him or her not guilty by reason of insanity, but was such as to diminish substantially his or her responsibility for the act, the jury or court, as the case may be, shall find the person not guilty of that offence but guilty of manslaughter on the ground of diminished responsibility. (2) Subject to Section 5(4), where a person is tried for the offence specified in subsection (1), it shall be for the defence to establish that the person is, by virtue of this section, not liable to be convicted of that offence. 2
4 (3) A woman found guilty of infanticide may be dealt with in accordance with subsection (1). 19. (1) Where in any proceedings for an offence the defence intends to adduce evidence as to the mental condition of the accused, notice of the intention shall be given to the prosecution within 10 days of the accused being asked how he or she wishes to plead to the charge. (2) Where the notice referred to in subsection (1) is not given within the period specified in that subsection, then, without prejudice to any other provision of this Act, evidence shall not, without leave of the court, be adduced by the defence during the course of the trial for the offence concerned as to the mental condition of the accused. (3) A notice referred to in subsection (1) shall be in such form as rules of court provide. It does not seem that manslaughter on the ground of diminished responsibility can be charged on the indictment and therefore the accused must be indicted for murder regardless of any view that the defence. However, I do not see any reason as to why a plea to manslaughter if offered, could not be accepted where it is absolutely clear on the proposed medical evidence that the accused was at the 3
5 time of the killing suffering from a mental disorder which caused a substantial diminution of responsibility. In the English decision of Cox, Winn LJ said (at p. 310): that there are cases where, on an indictment for murder, it is perfectly proper, where the medical evidence is plainly to this effect, to treat the case as one of substantially diminished responsibility and accept, if it be tendered, a plea to manslaughter on that ground, and avoid a trial for murder. 2 Any acceptance of a plea to manslaughter would need to be based on very clear cut medical evidence and it would of course be essential that the requirements under section 6 (1) (a), (b) and (c) of the Act be present. 2. REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE ACT In order for the defence to lie there must be evidence from which the jury or the Special Criminal Court can find that the accused killed the deceased and at the time of the killing was suffering from a mental disorder insufficient to justify a finding of not guilty by reason of insanity, but which disorder substantially diminished his responsibility for the act. 3 2 [1968] 1 WLR Section 6(1) (a), (b) and (c) of the 2006 Act. 4
6 A mental disorder is defined under section 1 of the Act of 2006 as follows: mental disorder includes mental illness, mental disability, dementia or any disease of the mind but does not include intoxication. Intoxication is defined under the same section as: intoxication means being under the intoxicating influence of any alcoholic drink, drug, solvent or any other substance or combination of substances; 4 The definition of a mental disorder under the 2006 Act is quite limited and this can be seen when contrasted with the definition of a mental disorder under the Mental Health Act 2001which defines a mental disorder in section 3 as a mental illness, severe dementia or significant intellectual disability and further defines each of the three above categories. 5 4 Section 1 of the 2006 Act (1) In this Act mental disorder means mental illness, severe dementia or significant intellectual disability where (a) because of the illness, disability or dementia, there is a serious likelihood of the person concerned causing immediate and serious harm to himself or herself or to other persons, or (b) (i) because of the severity of the illness, disability or dementia, the judgment of the person concerned is so impaired that failure to 5
7 The definition of a mental disorder under the Mental Health Act 2001 is relevant to the issue of treatment once a person is found not guilty by reason of insanity or is not fit to be tried but does not apply to diminished responsibility. At this time it is difficult to say what type of mental disorder will be covered by the definition under the act. The definition section is as stated above quite limited and does not further define or expand on what is meant by mental disorder. Therefore it will be very much for the psychiatrists to opine as to whether somebody will come within the definition and then of course for the jury to take that evidence into consideration along with all the evidence in coming to a decision as to whether the accused was suffering from a mental disorder at the time and as to whether that disorder substantially diminished the accused s mental responsibility. Disease of the mind has been retained in the definition of mental disorder which is of course different to abnormality of the mind as included under section 2 of the Homicide Act Abnormality of the mind has been defined as as admit the person to an approved centre would be likely to lead to a serious deterioration in his or her condition or would prevent the administration of appropriate treatment that could be given only by such admission, and(ii) the reception, detention and treatment of the person concerned in an approved centre would be likely to benefit or alleviate the condition of that person to a material extent.(2) In subsection (1) mental illness means a state of mind of a person which affects the person s thinking, perceiving, emotion or judgment and which seriously impairs the mental function of the person to the extent that he or she requires care or medical treatment in his or her own interest or in the interest of other persons; severe dementia means a deterioration of the brain of a person which significantly impairs the intellectual function of the person thereby affecting thought, comprehension and memory and which includes severe psychiatric or behavioural symptoms such as physical aggression; significant intellectual disability means a state of arrested or incomplete development of mind of a person which includes significant impairment of intelligence and social functioning and abnormally aggressive or seriously irresponsible conduct on the part of the person. 6 Section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 which introduced the defence of diminished responsibility into English law and provides: 2(1) - Where a person kills or is party to the killing of another, he shall not be convicted of murder if he was suffering from such abnormality of mind (whether arising from a condition of arrested or retarded development of mind or any inherent caused or induced by disease or injury) as substantially impaired his mental responsibility for his acts or omissions in doing or being a party to the killing.(2) - On a charge of murder, it shall be for the defence to prove that the person charged is by virtue of this section not liable to be convicted of 6
8 state of mind so different from that of ordinary human beings that the reasonable man would term it abnormal. R v. Byrne INTOXICATION The definition of mental disorder specifically excludes intoxication. Intoxication itself is given a wide definition and includes the effects of drugs as well as alcohol. It can be anticipated that intoxication may feature in cases where diminished responsibility is raised. In the Tandy case 8 the accused strangled her child after consuming alcohol. She was an alcoholic and was clearly suffering from an abnormality of the mind at the time of the killing. The Court of Appeal upheld the murder conviction on the Trial Judge s direction the abnormality had to be caused by the disease, namely alcoholism for the defence to succeed and not the voluntary ingestion of alcohol. If the alcoholism has reached the level at which her brain had been injured by the repeated insult from intoxicants so that there was gross impairment of her judgment and emotional responses per Watkins LJ at page 356. Alcoholism might still have provided a defence if the jury had found that the intoxication was not voluntary. The case raised the issue of the first drink of the day and as to whether it was not involuntary and if so then the entire day s drinking was not involuntary. The relevance of this decision is that the abnormality of the mind must be caused by the disease; i.e.; alcoholism. Watkins LJ stated succinctly as follows; if her drinking was involuntary then her abnormality of mind at the time of the act of strangulation was induced by her condition of alcoholism. No doubt this issue will raise its head in this jurisdiction also. murder. 7 [1960] 2 Q.B. 396 at [1989] 1 WLR
9 4. PROCEDURE and TRIAL The first step for the Defence legal team must be to notify the prosecution of an intention to adduce evidence as to the mental condition of the accused; i.e.; indicating an intention to adduce evidence in support of the defence of diminished responsibility. Section 19(1) of the Act states that such notice shall be given to the prosecution within 10 days of the accused being asked how he or she wishes to plead to the charge and that if such notice is not given, evidence shall not, without leave of the court be adduced by the defence as regards the mental condition of the accused. Such notice shall be in such form as rules of court provide, however, at the time of this paper no such rules were in force. In the meantime the practice has been for the Defence Solicitors to notify the Prosecution by letter 10 days in advance of trial of the intention to call such evidence. It should be noted that on a practical level, it would be preferable if such notice were served far in advance of the 10day period to enable the Prosecution to have the accused psychiatrically assessed and to consider any issues such as organic brain injury which may be relevant in any given case. However, it should be noted that the Act is silent in respect of diminished responsibility as to any requirement for a Consultant Psychiatrist to give evidence (as is required for issues of insanity) or indeed any medical or expert evidence, but it would be difficult to succeed in the defence without such evidence. There does not seem to be any requirement under the Act for the Defence to furnish the prosecution with their psychiatric reports or in 8
10 fact to make an accused person available for psychiatric examination. This raises practical issues regarding disclosure on the part of the Defence and the ability of the Prosecution to adduce evidence to rebut any Defence contention of diminished responsibility. On a practical note it may be necessary for the prosecution in instances of late notification or where the Defence have failed to provide their expert s report to apply to the Court to have the trial adjourned. As the onus is on the Defence in relation to the proof of diminished responsibility (set out hereunder), an argument could be made that the Defence should disclose the report/s. The Prosecution would of course have to disclose in accordance with the usual guidelines. A Defence at trial should establish the facts on which the medical evidence is based and the prosecution should investigate the basis of any such defence which would include careful examination of any medical reports. Since a jury or the Special Criminal Court must find that the accused did the alleged act, much of the evidence will either run as a matter of course or will be admitted by the Defence. Any expert whom it is proposed to call should be present for all the evidence. At the conclusion of the Prosecution case, the Defence will then call evidence on the issue. It should be noted that Psychiatrists are sometimes permitted to base their opinion on hearsay, ie; matters they have been told by the accused without proof by admissible evidence. However, the strict view is that as expressed in Cross on 9
11 Evidence, 5 th edition at page 446: A doctor may not state what a patient told him about past symptoms as evidence of the existence of those symptoms because that would infringe the rule against hearsay, but he may give evidence of what the patient told him in order to explain the grounds on which he came to a conclusion with regard to the patient s condition. The Prosecution may then call evidence in rebuttal. 5. ONUS OF PROOF Section 6(2) clearly places the onus of proof on the Defence where the accused contends for diminished responsibility. The section provides as follows: Subject to section 5(4), where a person is tried for the offence specified in subsection (1), it shall be for the defence to establish that the person is, by virtue of this section, not liable to be convicted of that offence. 10
12 It is clear therefore that the onus of proof rests on the Defence and the standard of proof accordingly is on the balance of probabilities. The same position applies in England under section 2 of the Homicide Act, R. v. Dunbar. 9 Statute may expressly place the burden of proof on the Defence to prove a particular issue. Section 5(4) of the Act is very similar to section 6 of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act, Under section 6 where an accused person is charged with murder and raises diminished responsibility or insanity, the court shall allow the prosecution to call evidence tending to prove the other of those issues. In that instance the burden of proof rests with the prosecution to prove the other contention beyond reasonable doubt. Section 5(4) provides for this type of situation. 6. WILL IT ALWAYS BE NECESSARY FOR THE PROSECUTION TO CALL EVIDENCE IN REBUTTAL? The trial should proceed in the ordinary way notwithstanding notification of an intention to raise diminished responsibility. The 9 [1998] 1 Q.B Section 6 provides: Where on a trial for murder the accused contends (a) that at the time of the alleged offence he was insane so as not to be responsible according to (b) law for his actions; or that at the time he was suffering from such abnormality of mind as is specified in subsection (1) of section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 (diminished responsibility), the court shall allow the prosecution to adduce or elicit evidence tending to prove the other of those contentions, and may give directions as to the stage of the proceedings at which the prosecution may adduce such evidence. 11
13 onus remains on the prosecution to proof all issues beyond reasonable doubt. At the close of the prosecution case, the defence, if continuing to rely on diminished responsibility will usually call medical evidence. Should it transpire that such medical evidence is very weak and does not raise the issue, it is arguable that the prosecution could make an application to the trial Judge that the issue should not be permitted for the jury s consideration. Should the prosecution call evidence in this type of instance in rebuttal, it will have the effect of conceding that there is a case to answer. This would be more likely to apply in cases where there is no evidence of a mental disorder. It must be anticipated however, that the threshold for the defence will be very low indeed. 7. A JURY QUESTION For the Defence to succeed the jury or the Special Criminal Court must be satisfied that at the time of the killing, the accused was suffering from a mental disorder which diminished substantially his responsibility for the act. Where medical experts differ it is for the jury to resolve the issue. The jury must assess all the evidence in the trial. A mental disorder alone is insufficient, it must, as stated above be such as causes a substantial diminution in the accused s responsibility for the act. Whether it does so is a question for the 12
14 jury. On this issue in the decision of Byrne 11 Lord Parker at page 404 said: is a question of degree and essentially one for the jury. Medical evidence is, of course, relevant, but the question involves a decision not merely as to whether there was some impairment of the mental responsibility of the accused for his acts but whether such impairment can properly be called substantial, a matter upon which juries may quite legitimately differ from doctors. What is the meaning of substantially? In R v. Lloyd 12 at pp. 181, 66 the court approved the following direction on the words substantially impaired which was given by the trial Judge: your own common sense will tell you what it means. This far I will go. Substantial does not mean total, that is to say the mental responsibility need not be totally impaired, so to speak, destroyed altogether. At the other end of the scale substantial does not mean trivial or minimal. It is something in between and Parliament has left it to you to say on the evidence: was the mental responsibility impaired, and, if so, was it substantially impaired? 11 See note 7 12 [1967] 1 Q.B. 175, Cr.App.R. 61, CCA. 13
15 The courts in England have said that guidance should be given to the jury as to the meaning of substantial and that it should be done by giving one of the two meanings approved in Lloyd; (a) that the jury should approach the word in a broad common sense way or (b) that the word meant more than some trivial degree of impairment but less than total impairment. In a recent case before Carney J., a direction was given in terms of (b) above. Medical evidence is desirable from a defence point of view and will certainly be required to deal with the issue of a mental disorder. Should expert witnesses be permitted to give evidence as to whether such disorder existing at the time of the offence substantially diminished the accused s responsibility? In England it seems that medical witnesses are allowed by the court to do so. In Campbell 13 it was held that the judge rightly did not put the defence to the jury where the medical evidence showed an abnormality of the mind but did not deal with the issue of substantial impairment. However, in giving this evidence does the expert usurp the jury function? To make the defence work however, it may be that medical experts will give evidence of the existence of a mental disorder at the relevant time which diminished the responsibility of the accused and it will be for the jury to assess all the evidence and consider whether they are 13 (1986) 84 Cr App R
16 satisfied as to the existence of a mental disorder which substantially diminished the accused s criminal responsibility. The terms of section 6 do suggest that the jury (or the Special Criminal Court) is the fact finder on all issues; i.e.; that the accused did the act alleged, and was suffering from a mental disorder at the time and that this disorder diminished substantially his responsibility for the act. Therefore it may be that the medical experts will give the evidence but that the jury will be advised to assess the evidence and to reject or accept same before returning a verdict. 9. VERDICTS Section 6 seems clear that should the jury return a verdict of not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter that the verdict should be recorded as one of not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter on the ground of diminished responsibility. This verdict will of course be relevant to the issue of sentence and will be particularly relevant in circumstances where other defences are also in issue. This brings us back to the issue as to whether, if the prosecution were to accept a plea of guilty to manslaughter, should that plea be entered on the aforementioned basis? Again the act seems clear on this and it seems that the correct plea would be on the ground of diminished responsibility. Finally, it also appears that an accused could reply to the charge at trial, as above and should the plea be unacceptable to the prosecution proceed to trial in the usual way. 15
Number 11 of 2006 CRIMINAL LAW (INSANITY) ACT 2006 REVISED. Updated to 3 November 2014
Number 11 of CRIMINAL LAW (INSANITY) ACT REVISED Updated to 3 November 2014 This Revised Act is an administrative consolidation of the. It is prepared by the Law Reform Commission in accordance with its
More informationIntroduction 3. The Meaning of Mental Illness 3. The Mental Health Act 4. Mental Illness and the Criminal Law 6. The Mental Health Court 7
Mental Health Laws Chapter Contents Introduction 3 The Meaning of Mental Illness 3 The Mental Health Act 4 Mental Illness and the Criminal Law 6 The Mental Health Court 7 The Mental Health Review Tribunal
More informationTo begin, the behaviour and the defendant in question have to be identified as well as the offence they ve committed. This may be:
Homicide Offences To begin, the behaviour and the defendant in question have to be identified as well as the offence they ve committed. This may be: Murder or voluntary manslaughter if partial defences
More informationNumber 25 of 2001 MENTAL HEALTH ACT 2001 REVISED. Updated to 1 January 2019
Number 25 of 2001 MENTAL HEALTH ACT 2001 REVISED Updated to 1 January 2019 This Revised Act is an administrative consolidation of the. It is prepared by the Law Reform Commission in accordance with its
More informationDomestic Violence, Crime and Victims Bill [HL]
[AS AMENDED IN STANDING COMMITTEE E] CONTENTS PART 1 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ETC Amendments to Part 4 of the Family Law Act 1996 1 Breach of non-molestation order to be a criminal offence 2 Additional considerations
More informationBERMUDA CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE (DISCLOSURE AND CRIMINAL REFORM ACT 2015) REGULATIONS 2015 BR 89 / 2015
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA CRIMINAL JURISDICTION AND PROCEDURE (DISCLOSURE AND CRIMINAL BR 89 / 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Citation Amends section 3 Amends section 5 Amends section 7 Amends
More informationMENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT 1998 BERMUDA 1998 : 32 MENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT 1998
BERMUDA 1998 : 32 MENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT 1998 [Date of Assent 13 July 1998] [Operative Date 13 July 1998] WHEREAS it is expedient to amend the Mental Health Act 1968: Be it enacted by The Queen's
More informationPsychiatric Defences MRCPsych Lecture
Psychiatric Defences MRCPsych Lecture Dr Abebe Ejara Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist 8 November 2016 Crime Crime is an act or omission that contravenes the law Criminal Law A behaviour that should be
More informationJUDGMENT. R v Golds (Appellant)
Michaelmas Term [2016] UKSC 61 On appeal from: [2014] EWCA Crim 748 JUDGMENT R v Golds (Appellant) before Lord Neuberger, President Lady Hale, Deputy President Lord Kerr Lord Reed Lord Hughes Lord Toulson
More informationTitle 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 2: CRIMINAL LIABILITY; ELEMENTS OF CRIMES Table of Contents Part 1. GENERAL PRINCIPLES... Section 31. VOLUNTARY CONDUCT (REPEALED)... 3 Section 32. ELEMENTS OF CRIMES
More informationEdinburgh Research Explorer
Edinburgh Research Explorer The New Mental Disorder Defences Citation for published version: Maher, G 2013, 'The New Mental Disorder Defences: Some Comments' Scots Law Times, pp. 1-4. Link: Link to publication
More informationMENTAL HEALTH (JERSEY) LAW 2016
Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016 Arrangement MENTAL HEALTH (JERSEY) LAW 2016 Arrangement Article PART 1 5 INTERPRETATION, APPLICATION AND OTHER GENERAL PROVISIONS 5 1 Interpretation... 5 2 Minister s primary
More informationPARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA. Magistrates' Court Amendment (Mental Health List) Bill 2009
PARLIAMENT OF VICTORIA Magistrates' Court Amendment (Mental Health List) Bill 09 TABLE OF PROVISIONS Clause Page 1 Purpose 1 2 Commencement 1 3 Principal Act 2 4 Definitions 2 New sections 4S to 4Y inserted
More informationCRIM EXAM NOTES. Table of Contents. Weeks 1-4
CRIM EXAM NOTES Weeks 1-4 Table of Contents Setup (jurisdiction, BOP, onus)... 2 Elements, AR, Voluntariness... 3 Voluntariness, Automatism... 4 MR (intention, reckless, knowledge, negligence)... 5 Concurrence...
More informationA Bill Regular Session, 2017 SENATE BILL 42
Stricken language would be deleted from and underlined language would be added to present law. Act of the Regular Session 0 State of Arkansas As Engrossed: S// S// H// H// st General Assembly A Bill Regular
More informationIntroduction to Criminal Law
Introduction to Criminal Law CHAPTER CONTENTS Introduction 2 Crimes versus Civil Wrongs 2 Types of Criminal Offences 3 General Principles of Criminal Law 4 Accessories and Parties to Crimes 5 Attempted
More informationGovernment Response to the Bail Review (Advice provided by the Hon Paul Coghlan QC on 3 April 2017)
Government Response to the Bail Review (Advice provided by the Hon Paul Coghlan QC on 3 April 2017) No. Recommendation Government Response Additional comments Chapter 3: Purpose of the Bail Act 1. That
More informationNumber 27 of 2010 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART 1 Preliminary and General. PART 2 Impact of Crime on Victim
Click here for Explanatory Memorandum Section Number 27 of 2010 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Preliminary and General 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3.
More informationCRIME ARTICLE: FIT FOR TRIAL?
CRIME ARTICLE: FIT FOR TRIAL? Parliament and the courts have developed a process of identifying when defendants are unfit to stand trial in the Crown Court to allow accommodations to be made to the court
More informationCriminal Law II Overview Jan June 2006
Inchoate Liability Incitement Incitement is the common law offence (see Whitehouse [1977]) of influencing the mind of another whilst intending him to commit a crime. Its actus reus is the actual communication
More informationM.A. SANUSI V THE STATE (1984) LPELR-3007(SC)
insanity M.A. SANUSI V THE STATE (1984) LPELR-3007(SC) OPUTA JSC - Proof of insanity provides a complete answer to the charge as the accused will not be "criminally responsible for the act". That is one
More informationCriminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court
Criminal Litigation Accreditation Scheme Standards of competence for the accreditation of solicitors representing clients in the magistrates court Contents Part 1 Underpinning knowledge...3 1.1 An understanding
More informationReferred to Committee on Health and Human Services. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing mental health. (BDR )
A.B. ASSEMBLY BILL NO. COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (ON BEHALF OF THE NORTHERN REGIONAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH POLICY BOARD) PREFILED NOVEMBER, 0 Referred to Committee on Health and Human Services
More informationTable of Contents. CON-1 (Mental Disorder) (2013-3)
Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 1-1 1.1 HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE... 1-1 (a) Pre-1992 Amendments... 1-1 (b) The Reform Movement... 1-4 (c) The Swain Decision... 1-6 (d) The 1992 Amendments: Part XX.1
More informationCriminal Appeal Act 1968
Criminal Appeal Act 1968 CHAPTER 19 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I APPEAL TO COURT OF APPEAL IN CRIMINAL CASES Appeal against conviction on indictment Section 1. Right of appeal. 2. Grounds for allowing
More informationTHE MENTAL HEALTH COURT. Joanne Capozzi Assistant Crown Attorney
THE MENTAL HEALTH COURT Joanne Capozzi Assistant Crown Attorney 1 What is Mental Health Court? A problem-solving court established to address the special needs of mentally ill offenders Deals with legal
More informationc t MENTAL HEALTH ACT
c t MENTAL HEALTH ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to December 6, 2013. It is intended for information and reference
More informationLaw School for Journalists
Law School for Journalists Tuesday, August 7, 2012 8:30 to 10:00 a.m. 1900 Grant Street 3rd Floor - Denver, CO 80203 Incompetent to Proceed C.R.S. 16-8.5-101 Definition As a result of a mental disability
More informationCitation: Storey, Tony (2014) Self-defence: Insane Delusions and Reasonable Force. Journal of Criminal Law, 78. pp
Citation: Storey, Tony (2014) Self-defence: Insane Delusions and Reasonable Force. Journal of Criminal Law, 78. pp. 12-15. ISSN 0022-0183 Published by: Vathek Publishing URL: http://www.vathek.com/jcl/home.php
More informationSOC 3395: Criminal Justice & Corrections Lecture 4&5: Criminal Law & Criminal Justice in Canada II:
SOC 3395: Criminal Justice & Corrections Lecture 4&5: Criminal Law & Criminal Justice in Canada II: In the next 2 classes we will consider: (i) Canadian constitutional mechanics; (ii) Types of law; (iii)
More informationDouble Jeopardy (Scotland) Bill
Double Jeopardy (Scotland) Bill Groupings of Amendments for Stage 2 This document provides procedural information which will assist in preparing for and following proceedings on the above Bill. The information
More informationMENTAL HEALTH (JERSEY) LAW Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2017 This is a revised edition of the law
MENTAL HEALTH (JERSEY) LAW 1969 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2017 This is a revised edition of the law Mental Health (Jersey) Law 1969 Arrangement MENTAL HEALTH (JERSEY) LAW 1969 Arrangement
More informationAct No. 10 of 2017 BILL
Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 72, 13th July, 2017 Second Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No. 10
More informationJames Hamilton, Director of Public Prosecutions, Ireland International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Conference 15 July 2008, Dublin
A SINGLE OFFENCE OF UNLAWFUL KILLING? Ever since the abolition of the death penalty as a punishment for murder, arguments have arisen in favour of merging the offences of murder and manslaughter into a
More informationCoroners and Justice Bill Part 2
Coroners and Justice Bill Part 2 Suggested amendments for Committee Stage House of Commons February 2009 For further information contact Sally Ireland, Senior Legal Officer (Criminal Justice) E-mail: sireland@justice.org.uk
More informationISSUES. Saskatoon Criminal Defence Lawyers Association December 1, Fall Seminar, 1998: Bail Hearings and Sentencing. Prepared by: Andrew Mason
SENTENCING ISSUES Saskatoon Criminal Defence Lawyers Association December 1, 1998 Fall Seminar, 1998: Bail Hearings and Sentencing Prepared by: Andrew Mason Also available to members at the SCDLA Web site:
More informationYouth Crime briefing
YOUTH CRIME BRIEFING SEPTEMBER 2005 Youth Crime briefing Mental health legislation and the youth justice system Contents Introduction Page 1 The definition of mental disorder Page 2 Underlying principles
More informationSlide 1. Slide 2 Basic denial defence which is used when the accused claims that he or she was not present at the time of the offence.
Slide 1 (including Excuses and Justifications) Slide 2 Basic denial defence which is used when the accused claims that he or she was not present at the time of the offence. Independent evidence supporting
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2007 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 8 OF 2005 BETWEEN: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS Appellant AND ISRAEL HERNANDEZ ORELLANO Respondent BEFORE: The Hon. Mr. Justice Mottley
More informationBERMUDA MENTAL HEALTH ACT : 295
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA MENTAL HEALTH ACT 1968 1968 : 295 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 16A 17 18 19 20 21 PART I PRELIMINARY Interpretation Facilities for persons suffering
More informationOffences 3. S300 Unlawful homicide 3. S302(1)(a) Intentional Murder 4. S303 Manslaughter 7. S335 Common Assault 9
4032LAW Exam Notes Offences 3 S300 Unlawful homicide 3 S302(1)(a) Intentional Murder 4 S303 Manslaughter 7 S335 Common Assault 9 S339 Assault occasioning bodily harm 10 S340 Serious assaults 11 S317 Acts
More informationCriminal Law. Text, Cases, and Materials. Janet Loveless. Third Edition UNIVERSITY PRESS
Criminal Law Text, Cases, and Materials Third Edition Janet Loveless UNIVERSITY PRESS Contents Guide to using the book Guide to the Online Resource Centre this edition Preface Acknowledgements Table cases
More informationExaminable excerpts of. Bail Act as at 30 September 2018 PART 1 PRELIMINARY
Examinable excerpts of Bail Act 1977 as at 30 September 2018 1A Purpose PART 1 PRELIMINARY The purpose of this Act is to provide a legislative framework for the making of decisions as to whether a person
More informationIntroduction Crime, Law and Morality. Key Principles: actus reus, mens rea, legal personhood, doli incapax.
Introduction Crime, Law and Morality Key Principles: actus reus, mens rea, legal personhood, doli incapax. Objective Principles: * Constructive-murder rule: a person may be guilty of murder, if while in
More informationMental Health Bill [HL]
EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Department of Health and the Home Office, in consultation with the Welsh Assembly Government, are published separately as HL Bill 1 EN.
More information692 Part VI.b Excuse Defenses
692 Part VI.b Excuse Defenses THE LAW New York Penal Code (1999) Part 3. Specific Offenses Title H. Offenses Against the Person Involving Physical Injury, Sexual Conduct, Restraint and Intimidation Article
More informationChildren Law - Barbados Abortion; Child stealing; Concealment of birth; Endangering life of children; Infanticide
Country Code: BB 1994 ACT 18 Title: Country: OFFENCES AGAINST THE PERSON ACT BARBADOS Reference: 18/1994 Date of entry into force: September 1, 1994 Date of Amendment: Subject: Key words: Children Law
More informationAGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY (SCOTLAND) BILL
AGE OF CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY (SCOTLAND) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. As required under Rule 9.3.2A of the Parliament s Standing Orders, these Explanatory Notes are published to accompany the
More informationCrimes (Mental ImpaIrment and Unfitness to be TrIed) Bill
ARr.dUR ROBINSON & HEDDERWlCD I library Crimes (Mental ImpaIrment and Unfitness to be TrIed) Bill EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM PART I-PRELIMINARY Clause 1 Clause 2 Clause 3 sets out the three main purposes of
More informationContents PART 1: CRIMINAL LIABILITY. Table of Statutes. Table of Secondary Legislation. Table of Cases
Contents Table of Statutes Table of Secondary Legislation Table of Cases PART 1: CRIMINAL LIABILITY Chapter 1: Fundamental Principles of Criminal Liability 1: Actus Reus 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Conduct as
More informationdetention and duty of care
Mental Health Act detention and duty of care Prepared by Rebecca Vink and Melanie Shea Legal Branch NSW Ministry of Health March 2016 Background - Involuntary Detention General Principle = Competent adults
More informationNumber 24 of 2012 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (WITHHOLDING OF INFORMATION ON OFFENCES AGAINST CHILDREN AND VULNERABLE PERSONS) ACT 2012 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
Number 24 of 2012 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (WITHHOLDING OF INFORMATION ON OFFENCES AGAINST CHILDREN AND VULNERABLE PERSONS) ACT 2012 Section 1. Interpretation. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 2. Offence of withholding
More informationMENTAL HEALTH AND THE CRIMINAL LAW A BRIEF INTRODUCTION
MENTAL HEALTH AND THE CRIMINAL LAW A BRIEF INTRODUCTION The Mental Health Act Mental Disorder is defined in s1(2) of the Mental Health Act (MHA), as amended by the Mental Health Act 2007, as being any
More informationNumber 10 of 1999 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT, 1999 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I. Preliminary and General. Section 1. Interpretation.
Section 1. Interpretation. Number 10 of 1999 CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACT, 1999 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I Preliminary and General 2. Citation and commencement. 3. Expenses. PART II Amendments to Provide for
More informationCriminal Code CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDMENT) (NO. 2) BILL, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES
BELIZE: CRIMINAL CODE (AMENDMENT) (NO. 2) BILL, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES 1. Short title. 2. Amendment of section 12. 3. Repeal and substitution of section 25. 4. Amendment of section 45. 5. Repeal and
More informationTo be opened on receipt
To be opened on receipt A2 GCE LAW G4/01/RM Criminal Law Special Study PRE-RELEASE SPECIAL STUDY MATERIAL *G131940113* JANUARY AND JUNE 13 INSTRUCTIONS TO TEACHERS This Resource Material must be opened
More informationMENTAL HEALTH ACT. Act No. 45,1958.
MENTAL HEALTH ACT. Act No. 45,1958. An Act to make provision with respect to the care, treatment and control of persons who are mentally ill and the management of their estates; to repeal the Lunacy Act
More informationIN THE MUNICIPAL COURT CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) CASE NO. Defendant hereby ordered to have psychiatric evaluation with Dr. on at as follows (check one):
CASE NO. STATE/MUNICIPALITY vs. JOURNAL ENTRY DEFENDANT Order for Evaluation trial. It has come to this court s attention that the defendant may not be competent to stand Defendant hereby ordered to have
More informationThe Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act Update. Geoffrey Shannon INTRODUCTION. Solicitor.
Art6 1/16/06 6:56 PM Page 23 The Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005 Update Geoffrey Shannon Solicitor. T he Safety, Health and Welfare at Work Act 2005 was enacted in September 2005 and will have
More informationLegal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 106, 5th October, 2017
Legal Supplement Part A to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 106, 5th October, 2017 Second Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Act No.
More informationPCLL Conversion Examination January 2012 Examiner s Comments Evidence
PCLL Conversion Examination January 2012 Examiner s Comments Evidence Question 1 This question was approached badly by too many students who appear not to have understood the question to advise A, S and
More informationModern Slavery Bill [AS AMENDED ON REPORT] CONTENTS PART 1 OFFENCES
[AS AMENDED ON REPORT] CONTENTS PART 1 OFFENCES Offences 1 Slavery, servitude and forced or compulsory labour 2 Human trafficking 3 Meaning of exploitation 4 Committing offence with intent to commit offence
More informationHSC Legal Studies. Year 2016 Mark Pages 33 Published Feb 7, Legal- Crime Notes. By Annabelle (97.35 ATAR)
HSC Legal Studies Year 2016 Mark 94.00 Pages 33 Published Feb 7, 2017 Legal- Crime Notes By Annabelle (97.35 ATAR) Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Your notes author, Annabelle. Annabelle achieved an ATAR
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL INTRODUCED BY LEACH, HAYWOOD, HUGHES AND BLAKE, MAY 8, 2017 AN ACT
PRINTER'S NO. 0 THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL No. 0 Session of 0 INTRODUCED BY LEACH, HAYWOOD, HUGHES AND BLAKE, MAY, 0 REFERRED TO JUDICIARY, MAY, 0 AN ACT 0 Amending Titles (Crimes
More informationDRUNKENNESS AS A DEFENCE TO MURDER
Page 1 DRUNKENNESS AS A DEFENCE TO MURDER Criminal Law Conference 2005 Halifax, Nova Scotia Prepared by: Joel E. Pink, Q.C. Joel E. Pink, Q.C. & Associates 1583 Hollis Street, Ste 300 Halifax, NS B3J 2P8
More informationCRIMINAL LAW. Sweet &. Maxwell's Textbook Series. 4th edition
CRIMINAL LAW Sweet &. Maxwell's Textbook Series 4th edition Alan Reed, M.A., LL.M., Solicitor Professor of Criminal and Private International Law, University of Sunderland and Ben Fitzpatrick, B.A., P.G.C.L.T.H.E.
More informationLAW550 Litigation Final Exam Notes
LAW550 Litigation Final Exam Notes Important Provisions to Keep in Mind... 2 Voir Dire... 2 Adducing of Evidence Ch 2 Evidence Act... 4 Calling Witnesses... 8 Examination of witnesses... 11 Cross-Examination...
More informationLAWS1206 Criminal Law 1 st Semester 2011
LAWS1206 Criminal Law 1 st Semester 2011 How to Use this Script: These sample exam answers are based on problems done in past years. Since these answers were written, the law has changed and the subject
More informationCriminal Procedure Amendment (Mandatory Pre-trial Defence Disclosure) Act 2013 No 10
New South Wales Criminal Procedure Amendment (Mandatory Pre-trial Defence Disclosure) Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 Schedule 1 Amendment of Criminal Procedure Act 1986 No 209 3 New South
More informationTHE EVIDENCE (AMENDMENT) ACT, Arrangement of Sections
THE EVIDENCE (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2009 Arrangement of Sections Section 1. Short title 2. Commencement 3. Act inconsistent with Constitution 4. Interpretation 5. Section 13 amended 6. Section 15C amended 7.
More informationIndex. All references are to page numbers. assault de minimis non curat lex defence, 32 police officer, on a, 7
Index All references are to page numbers. A Aboriginal sentencing principles Aboriginal women, 291 basic principles, 282 generally, 282 manslaughter, 291, 293 practical framework, 286 street gangs, 293
More informationCERTIFICATION PROCEEDING
CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING PURPOSE: TO ALLOW A JUVENILE COURT TO WAIVE ITS EXCLUSIVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND TRANSFER A JUVENILE TO ADULT CRIMINAL COURT BECAUSE OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE ALLEGED
More informationThis Bill would amend the Magistrate s Courts Act, Cap. 116A to (a)
Explanatory Memorandum After Page 26 2016-03-16 OBJECTS AND REASONS This Bill would amend the Magistrate s Courts Act, Cap. 116A to make better provision for committal proceedings under the Act by requiring
More informationMLL214 CRIMINAL LAW NOTES
MLL214 CRIMINAL LAW NOTES Contents Topic 1: Course Overview... 3 Sources of Criminal Law... 4 Requirements for Criminal Liability... 4 Topic 2: Homicide and Actus Reus... Error! Bookmark not defined. Unlawful
More informationINDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT
INDICTABLE OFFENCES (PRELIMINARY ENQUIRY) ACT CHAPTER 12:01 48 of 1920 5 of 1923 21 of 1936 14 of 1939 25 of 1948 1 of 1955 10 of 1961 11 of 1961 29 of 1977 45 of 1979 Act 12 of 1917 Amended by *See Note
More informationCriminal Law Guidebook
The following is a suggested solution to the problem on page 285. It represents an answer of an above average standard. The ILAC approach to problem-solving as set out in the How to Answer Questions section
More informationCriminal Procedure Act 2009
Examinable excerpts of Criminal Procedure Act 2009 as at 2 October 2017 CHAPTER 2 COMMENCING A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING PART 2.1 WAYS IN WHICH A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IS COMMENCED 5 How a criminal proceeding
More informationQUEENSLAND S MENTAL HEALTH COURT. The Hon Justice Catherine Holmes. October 2014
QUEENSLAND S MENTAL HEALTH COURT The Hon Justice Catherine Holmes October 2014 My role in this session is to talk about Queensland s Mental Health Court. I do so in two capacities, as a past presiding
More informationLewisham Youth Offending Service
Lewisham Youth Offending Service A brief guide to the Youth Justice System (YJS) and the Youth Offending Service (YOS) In dealing with any offence committed by a young person under the age of 18, the police
More informationALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1
ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 Constitution Art. I, 6.01 Basic rights for crime victims. (a) Crime victims, as defined by law or their lawful representatives, including the next of kin of homicide victims,
More informationCriminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition
Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction Twelfth Edition Chapter 3 Criminal Law The Nature and Purpose of Law (1 of 2) Law A rule of conduct, generally found enacted in the form of a statute, that proscribes
More informationDefenses for the Accused. Chapter 10
Defenses for the Accused Chapter 10 Denial A defense is the denial of committing the act or giving justification of what otherwise would be considered a criminal act. The most common defense for an accused
More informationCHILDREN COURT RULES, 2018
CHILDREN COURT RULES, 2018 CONTENTS Rule Page PART 1 CITATION, COMMENCEMENT AND POWERS Citation and Commencement Rule 1.1 Definitions Rule 1.2 Application of the Rules Rule 1.3 Effect of non-compliance
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR. PRACTICE DIRECTIVE P.D. (Crim.) No
SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR PRACTICE DIRECTIVE P.D. (Crim.) No. 2018-01 RULES AFFECTED: Criminal Proceedings Rules of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, r. 6, and 9-15 EFFECTIVE
More informationCrimes (Sexual Offences) Act 1991
No. 8/1991 TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY Section 1. Purposes 2. Commencement PART 2 AMENDMENT OF THE CRIMES ACT 1958 3. New Subdivisions (8) to (8F) inserted in Division 1 of Part I (8) Sexual
More informationCHAPTER 113A CRIMINAL APPEAL
1 L.R.O. 2002 Criminal Appeal CAP. 113A CHAPTER 113A CRIMINAL APPEAL ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION CITATION 1. Short title. INTERPRETATION 2. Definitions. PART I CRIMINAL APPEALS FROM HIGH COURT 3. Right
More informationMENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT, 2007
MENTAL HEALTH AMENDMENT ACT, 2007 (Assented to December 7, 2007) HER MAJESTY, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of Alberta, enacts as follows: Amends RSA 2000 cm-13 1 The Mental
More informationClick here for Explanatory Memorandum
Click here for Explanatory Memorandum AN BILLE UM CHEARTAS COIRIÚIL (FAISNÉIS FAOI CHIONTA IN AGHAIDH LEANAÍ AGUS AOSAIGH SHOGHONTA A CHOIMEÁD SIAR), 2012 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (WITHHOLDING OF INFORMATION ON
More informationCriminal Procedure Act, 1993
Criminal Procedure Act, 1993 Number 40 of 1993 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT, 1993 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section 1. Interpretation. 2. Review by Court of Criminal Appeal of alleged miscarriage of justice or
More informationIndex. Current to Release accused subject to a hospital detention
Index Current to Release 2013-3 ABORIGINAL OFFENDERS. consideration of under s. 672.54, 7.4(e), 8.3(d), 9.3(b)(iii), 11.5(a)(iii) ABSOLUTE DISCHARGES. s. 672.54 disposition, 9.1(b) APPEALS. common issues
More informationThe Criminal Justice System: From Charges to Sentencing
The Criminal Justice System: From Charges to Sentencing The Key Principles The aim the system is to protect and to regulate society, to punish offenders and to offer rehabilitation; The Government, through
More informationModern Slavery Bill [AS AMENDED IN PUBLIC BILL COMMITTEE] CONTENTS PART 1 OFFENCES
Modern Slavery Bill [AS AMENDED IN PUBLIC BILL COMMITTEE] CONTENTS PART 1 OFFENCES Offences 1 Slavery, servitude and forced or compulsory labour 2 Human trafficking 3 Meaning of exploitation 4 Committing
More informationSentencing Act Examinable excerpts of PART 1 PRELIMINARY. 1 Purposes
Examinable excerpts of Sentencing Act 1991 as at 10 April 2018 1 Purposes PART 1 PRELIMINARY The purposes of this Act are (a) to promote consistency of approach in the sentencing of offenders; (b) to have
More informationS G C. Dangerous Offenders. Sentencing Guidelines Council. Guide for Sentencers and Practitioners
S G C Sentencing Guidelines Council Dangerous Offenders Guide for Sentencers and Practitioners CONTENTS PART ONE Introduction 5 PART TWO PART THREE Criteria for imposing sentences under the dangerous
More informationTable of Contents. Dedication... iii Preface... v Table of Cases... xv. A. General Principles... 1
Table of Contents Dedication... iii Preface... v Table of Cases... xv Chapter 1 Substantive Criminal Law A. General Principles... 1 1. Causation... 1 (a) Causation for Impaired Driving Causing Bodily Harm/Death...
More informationAs Introduced. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No
132nd General Assembly Regular Session H. B. No. 778 2017-2018 Representative Gavarone A B I L L To amend sections 2945.37 and 2945.371 of the Revised Code to prohibit a court from ordering certain offenders
More informationBail Act 1977 Stage Two - to commence 1 July 2018
Stage Two - to commence 1 July 2018 Section TABLE OF PROVISIONS Page Part 1 Preliminary 4 1 Short title and commencement 4 1A Purpose 1B Guiding Principles 2 Repeals and savings 5 3 Definitions 5 3AAAA
More informationDangerous Dog. Offences Definitive Guideline
Dangerous Dog DEFINITIVE GUIDELINE Offences Definitive Guideline Revised - Contents Applicability of Guidelines 2 Dog dangerously out of control in any place where death is caused Dangerous Dogs Act 1991
More informationThis overview was originally prepared by the Department of Justice and Regulation and is reprinted here with its kind permission.
(Stage One) Act 2017 Overview of changes commencing 21 May 2018 All section references are to the Act 1977, unless otherwise indicated. This overview was originally prepared by the Department of Justice
More informationLEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2013
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 3 - UNIT 3 CRIMINAL LAW SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2013 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More information