COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA"

Transcription

1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 56789In Re Complex Litigation Matters, Plaintiff(s), v., Defendant(s). CASE NO.: MSC ELECTRONIC CASE FILING STANDING ORDER as amended effective April 11, 2011 Pursuant to California Rules of Court 2.253, 2.254(b) and 3.751, the Court enters the following Standing Order, applicable to all matters designated by the court for electronic filing: I. Applicability of Other Rules and Orders. Except to the extent modified by this Order, approved stipulation or other order of the court, all California Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rules, and orders of the court shall continue to apply to cases which are subject to electronic filing. Electronic filing is subject to the provisions of California Rules of Court to 2.261, as those Rules may be amended from time to time. II. Selection of Cases. Most matters classified by the court as Complex Litigation will be designated for mandatory e-filing. However papers should not be e-filed until the Court enters a specific order, designating an Electronic Filing Service Provider. That will usually be done at the first case management conference. If any party believes e-filing should begin sooner than 1

2 the first case management conference, they should meet and confer with all other parties who have appeared and present a stipulation to the court which includes the designation of an Electronic Filing Service Provider. III. Electronic Filing Service Providers. Pursuant to Rule of Court the court has contracted with two (2) Electronic Filing Service Providers (EFSPs) to establish an electronic filing system for the court. The currently designated EFSPs for the Complex Litigation Filing Project are: LexisNexis File & Serve [ One Legal, Inc. [ Due to limitations on electronic service, only one EFSP may be used in each matter. The first appearing party may select the EFSP, subject to modification by the court. If no selection is made prior to the initial case management conference, the Court will select the EFSP to be used by the parties. IV. Registration and Access. Obligation to Register. At least one attorney of record for each party in a matter designated for electronic filing must promptly register with the EFSP assigned or selected for that matter. Upon receipt by the EFSP of a properly executed click-through user agreement, the EFSP will assign to the user a confidential login and password to the system. Additional authorized users may be added at any time. No attorney or other user shall knowingly authorize or permit his or her username or password to be utilized by anyone, even another attorney of record. Attorneys of record who fail to timely register, or to keep registration information current shall be subject to such sanctions as may be imposed by the court. Obligation to Keep Information Current. A party whose electronic notification address changes while the action or proceeding is pending must promptly file a notice of change of address with the court electronically and must serve this notice on all other parties or their

3 attorneys of record. An electronic notification address is presumed valid for a party if the party files electronic documents with the court from that address and has not filed and served notice that the address is no longer valid. V. Electronic Filing Requirements. Generally. In any case subject to electronic filing, all documents to be filed with the Clerk of Court shall be filed electronically through the designated EFSP. Except as otherwise provided in this Order, or otherwise authorized by the court, the court will not accept or file any pleadings or instrument in paper form. Format. All electronically filed and served pleadings shall, to the extent practicable, be formatted in accordance with the applicable rules governing formatting of paper pleadings. The electronic document title of each pleading or other document, shall include: (a) Party or parties filing/serving the document, (b) Nature of the document, (c) Party or parties against whom relief, if any, is sought, and (d) Nature of the relief sought (e.g., Defendant ABC Corporation s Motion for Summary Judgment") Where the filer possesses only a paper copy of a document, it should be scanned to PDF format. Completion of Filing. Electronic transmission of a document consistent with the procedures adopted by the court shall, upon the complete receipt of the same by the Clerk and together with the receipt of acceptance by the court, transmitted from the EFSP, constitute filing of the document for all purposes of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Court, and shall constitute entry of that document onto the docket maintained by the Clerk. Deadlines. Filing documents electronically does not alter any filing deadlines. All electronic transmissions of documents must be completed (i.e., received completely by the Clerk s Office) prior to 5:00 Pacific Time in order to be considered timely filed that day. Where a

4 specific time deadline is set by court order or stipulation, the electronic filing shall be completed by that time. Technical Failures. The Clerk shall deem the electronic filing system to be subject to a technical failure on a given day if the court is unable to accept filings continuously or intermittently over the course of any period of time greater than one hour after 12:00 noon that day, in which case filings due that day which were not filed due solely to such technical failures shall become due the next business day. Such delayed filings shall be accompanied by a declaration or affidavit attesting to the filing person s failed attempts to file electronically at least two times after 12:00 noon separated by at least one hour on each day of delay due to such technical failure. Docket. The record of filings and entries generated by the courts case management system for each case shall constitute the docket. VI. Electronic Summons On electronic filing of a complaint, a petition, or another document that must be served with a summons, the court will transmit a summons electronically to the filer. The summons will contain an image of the court's seal and the assigned case number. Personal service of the printed form of a summons transmitted electronically to the electronic filer has the same legal effect as personal service of a copy of an original summons. (Rule of Court 2.259(f)(3).) VII. Permissible Manual Filing (Rule 2.253(c)) Generally. Parties otherwise subject to mandatory electronic filing may be excused from filing a particular document electronically if it is not available in electronic format and it is not feasible for the filer to convert it to electronic format by scanning it to PDF. Such a document may be manually filed with the Clerk of Court and served upon the parties in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Rules of Court for filing and service of non-electronic documents. Parties manually filing a document shall file electronically a Notice of Manual Filing setting forth the reason(s) why the component cannot be filed

5 electronically. Exhibits. Exhibits whose electronic original is not available to the filer, and which must therefore be scanned to PDF, should not be filed electronically if the file size of the individual scanned document would exceed the limit specified by the EFSP and the Court [5 Mb]. Exhibits filed on paper because they are too large to scan must be identified in the electronic filing by a Notice of Manual Filing attached in place of the actual document. Original documents. In any proceeding that requires the filing of an original document, an electronic filer may file a scanned copy of a document if the original document is then filed with the court within ten (10) calendar days. [See Rule of Court 2.252(b)] Documents Lodged Conditionally. Documents lodged with the court conditionally under seal, as provided in Rule of Court 2.551, may be submitted in paper form, pending hearing on a motion to seal. Copies of Non-California authorities not required. The Complex Litigation Department has access to all non-california authorities and has, by its guidelines, waived the requirement to comply with Rule of Court (i). It is requested that parties not file such materials, manually or otherwise, or burden the Court with courtesy copies. VIII. Courtesy Copies of Pleadings. A courtesy copy of any of the following papers shall be delivered to the chambers of the Judge that will be hearing the matter: (1) all papers supporting or opposing any motion for summary judgment or summary adjudication; (2) All issue conference statements as well as issue conference statement papers such as motions in limine or oppositions thereto. (3) All motions and oppositions thereto set for hearing in the Discovery Department (60). (4) all papers supporting or opposing any other motion wherein the total number of pages of the document or group of documents being filed,

6 including exhibits, exceeds fifteen (15) pages [not including pages of proofs of service]; (5) all papers supporting or opposing any ex parte motion; (6) all case management conference statements; and (7) any papers other than those described above that the Court specifically orders to be supplemented with courtesy copies. Courtesy copies are to be delivered no later than the following court day from the date of electronic filing. For ex parte motions they should be provided as early as reasonably feasible. Courtesy copies of electronically filed documents other than those described above should not be delivered to the complex litigation department. IX. Public Access and Privacy Personal Identifiers Except as provided in Rules of Court through and through 2.506, an electronically filed document is a public document at the time it is filed unless it is sealed under rule or made confidential by law. (See Rule of Court 2.254(d).) To promote electronic access to case files while also protecting personal privacy and other legitimate interests, parties must refrain from including, or must redact where inclusion is necessary, the following personal data identifiers from all pleadings and other papers filed with the court, including exhibits thereto, whether filed electronically or in paper, unless otherwise ordered by the court: (a) Social Security numbers. If an individual s social security number must be included in a pleading or other paper, only the last four digits of that number should be used. (b) Names of minor children. If the involvement of a minor child must be mentioned, only the initials of that child should be used. (c) Dates of birth. If an individual s date of birth must be included in a pleading or

7 other paper, only the year should be used. (d) Financial account numbers. If financial account numbers are relevant, only the last four digits of these numbers should be used. Privileged or confidential information. No party shall intentionally include within pleadings, nor attach as exhibits, any other matter that the party knows to be properly subject to a claim of privilege or confidentiality. Filing of Sensitive Documents. A party wishing to file a document containing the personal data identifiers listed above, or material known to be subject to a claim of privilege, may file an unredacted document under seal as provided herein. The party must file a redacted copy for the public file. Responsibility for Redaction. The responsibility for redacting personal identifiers and privileged or confidential information rests solely with counsel and the parties. The Clerk will not review each pleading or other paper for compliance. The court may impose sanctions for violation of these requirements. X. Signatures (Rule of Court 2.257) Documents under penalty of perjury. When a document to be filed electronically provides for a signature under penalty of perjury, the document is deemed signed by the declarant if, before filing, the declarant has signed a printed form of the document. By electronically filing the document, the electronic filer certifies that he or she has complied with this requirement and that the original, signed document is available for inspection and copying at the request of the court or any other party. At any time after the document is filed, any other party may serve a demand for production of the original signed document. The terms of Rule of Court shall apply to any such demand. Documents not under penalty of perjury If a document does not require a signature under penalty of perjury, the document is deemed signed by the party submitting it if the

8 document is filed electronically. Documents requiring signatures of opposing parties When a document to be filed electronically, such as a stipulation, requires the signatures of opposing parties, the following procedure applies: (1) The party filing the document must obtain the signatures of all parties on a printed form of the document; (2) The party filing the document must maintain the original, signed document and must make it available for inspection and copying as provided in Rule of Court 2.257(c)(2); (3) By electronically filing the document, the electronic filer indicates that all parties have signed the document and that the filer has the signed original in his or her possession. XI. Proposed Orders for Court Signature. Generally. Proposed orders accompanying motions or oppositions should be e-filed with the moving or opposing papers. Such proposed orders must be clearly marked as proposed. Signature Copies. For the purpose of signing of orders, after the hearing the prevailing party must to the court at cxlit@contracosta.courts.ca.gov a signature copy, in wordprocessing format so that it can be modified, if needed, and dated, prior to signing. Other than the space for the Court to date and sign the order, all other blanks should be filled in. The e- mail transmitting the proposed order to the Court must be cc d to all other parties in the case. Format. The ed copy may be in any of the following formats: WordPerfect (.wpd); Microsoft Word (.doc); Plain Text / ACSII (.txt). Timing of Signature Copies. Excepting for orders pursuant to C.C.P (a)(2), and stipulated orders, proposed orders should not be ed until the Court has indicated that the requested relief will be granted. Orders ed prior to the ruling of the court will not be retained and replacement orders will be necessary. Orders to be held for the statutory time period provided my C.C.P (a)(2) of 20 or 25 days may be sent when the notice of settlement is filed. Orders by stipulation may be sent when the stipulation is e-filed. If the order is indicated upon the same document as the

9 stipulation, the document should be ed as one word processing document ing Requirements. (a) Subject or Heading : This must indicate the case name (at least in shortened form) and the date of hearing. For orders by stipulation By Stipulation must replace the hearing date. For C.C.P (a)(2) orders the code section and last day for objection must be indicated. (b) Accompanying message: This should include the case number, any information as to the opportunity of opposing parties to object or seek modification of the submitted order, and any other information that would be helpful to the Court. Service of the Court s Orders. Orders filed by the court in cases designated for electronic filing will be served: (a) through the EFSP; or (b) by from the court to the address(es) provided to the EFSP. No paper service will be made by the court. XII. Service of Electronically Filed Documents. Generally. The designated EFSP will provide electronic service for all documents requiring service, including those which are not filed with the court, as provided in Rule of Court Delivery of e-service documents through the EFSP to other registered users shall be considered as valid and effective service and shall have the same legal effect as an original paper document. Recipients of e-service documents shall access their documents through the EFSP. The parties are also strongly encouraged to check the docket in their case on the court s Open Access web site at regular intervals. Proof of Service Proof of service shall be made in the manner provided in Rule of Court 2.260(c). XIII. Service of this Order. A copy of this Standing Order must be served with the initiating pleading by any plaintiff, petitioner, or cross-complainant. 9

10 Dated: Barry P. Goode Judge of the Superior Court

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire adopts

More information

202.5-b. Electronic Filing in Supreme Court; Consensual Program.

202.5-b. Electronic Filing in Supreme Court; Consensual Program. 202.5-b. Electronic Filing in Supreme Court; Consensual Program. (a) Application. (1) On consent, documents may be filed and served by electronic means in Supreme Court in such civil actions and in such

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. EFFECTIVE DATE Electronic filing is mandatory,

More information

JUDICIARY OF GUAM ELECTRONIC FILING RULES 1

JUDICIARY OF GUAM ELECTRONIC FILING RULES 1 1 1 Adopted by the Supreme Court of Guam pursuant to Promulgation Order No. 15-001-01 (Oct. 2, 2015). TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION I - AUTHORITY AND SCOPE Page EFR 1.1. Electronic Document Management System.

More information

ELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENTS. Stanislaus County Superior Court Civil Division

ELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENTS. Stanislaus County Superior Court Civil Division PERMISSIVE efiling ELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENTS Stanislaus County Superior Court Civil Division Effective May 2, 2016, documents may be filed electronically in general civil cases for limited and unlimited

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO IN RE: ) MISC. NO. 325 RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF ) THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, GENERAL ) AMENDMENT DIVISION AMENDMENT OF LOCAL ) COURT RULES RULE

More information

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 39.0 ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS

Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 39.0 ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS 39.0 ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS (A) E FILING GENERALLY (1) All attorneys must use the court's e filing system. All cases, except for those listed below, are designated as e file cases. Case types

More information

Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions

Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions RUBY J. KRAJICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W W W.NYSD.USCOURTS.GOV C L E R K O F C O U R T SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 500 PEARL STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10007 300 QUARROPAS STREET, W HITE PLAINS, NY 10601

More information

HAWAI'I ELECTRONIC FILING & SERVICE RULES

HAWAI'I ELECTRONIC FILING & SERVICE RULES HAWAI'I ELECTRONIC FILING & SERVICE RULES (SCRU-12-0000409) Adopted and Promulgated by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i Effective September 27, 2010 The Judiciary State of Hawai'i Hawai'i Electronic

More information

Electronic Protest Docketing System Instructions. (Version 1.0 June 2016)

Electronic Protest Docketing System Instructions. (Version 1.0 June 2016) I. INTRODUCTION Electronic Protest Docketing System Instructions (Version 1.0 June 2016) 1. In General. These Instructions govern electronic filings for protests, requests for reconsideration, and either

More information

LOCAL RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTING AND/OR SUPERSEDING UNIFORM RULES OF LOUISIANA COURTS OF APPEAL

LOCAL RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTING AND/OR SUPERSEDING UNIFORM RULES OF LOUISIANA COURTS OF APPEAL LOCAL RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT SUPPLEMENTING AND/OR SUPERSEDING UNIFORM RULES OF LOUISIANA COURTS OF APPEAL Adopted October 1982 Including Amendments Last Revision: March 14, 2018 Table

More information

RULE 13.1 Filing and service electronic-transmission filings

RULE 13.1 Filing and service electronic-transmission filings RULE 13.1 Filing and service electronic-transmission filings (A) Facsimile filings. In conformity with App.R. 13, pleadings and other papers may be filed with the Hamilton County Clerk of Courts by facsimile

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Misc. Docket No. 15-9205 FINAL APPROVAL OF RULES GOVERNING ELECTRONIC FILING IN CRIMINAL CASES ORDERED that: 1. On June 9, 2015, the Supreme Court of Texas (Misc. Docket No.

More information

LECTRONIC FILING In New York State

LECTRONIC FILING In New York State LECTRONIC FILING In New York State The Courthouse in the 21 st Century E lectronic technology is transforming the world, including the courthouse. Electronic filing has been introduced in New York State

More information

PART IX. ENVIRONMENTAL HEARING BOARD

PART IX. ENVIRONMENTAL HEARING BOARD PART IX. ENVIRONMENTAL HEARING BOARD Chap. Sec. 1021. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE... 1021.1 CHAPTER 1021. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS GENERAL Sec. 1021.1. Scope of chapter. 1021.2. Definitions.

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire adopts

More information

Kane County Local Rule

Kane County Local Rule Article 2A: Administration of the Court E-filing 2A.01 DESIGNATION OF ELECTRONIC FILING CASE TYPES (a) This Court hereby authorizes all civil cases with the exception of WI (Wills), and sealed and impounded

More information

A Guide to Model Rules for Electronic Filing and Service. Travis Olson, Esq. Marsha Edwards Hon. Arthur M. Monty Ahalt (ret.

A Guide to Model Rules for Electronic Filing and Service. Travis Olson, Esq. Marsha Edwards Hon. Arthur M. Monty Ahalt (ret. A Guide to Model Rules for Electronic Filing and Service Travis Olson, Esq. Marsha Edwards Hon. Arthur M. Monty Ahalt (ret.) File & Serve Contents Acknowledgements..............................................

More information

NEW YORK STATE COURTS ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM

NEW YORK STATE COURTS ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM NEW YORK STATE COURTS ELECTRONIC FILING SYSTEM USER S MANUAL FOR SURROGATE S COURT PART I OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM ELECTRONIC FILING RESOURCE CENTER 646-386-3033 efile@courts.state.ny.us Jeffrey Carucci

More information

BERKS COUNTY. [43 Pa.B. 4839] [Saturday, August 24, 2013] Order. (New language is bold, and removed language is shown by brackets in bold.

BERKS COUNTY. [43 Pa.B. 4839] [Saturday, August 24, 2013] Order. (New language is bold, and removed language is shown by brackets in bold. BERKS COUNTY Administrative Order Relative to Amendments of Rules of Civil Procedure and Judicial Administration; No. 13-161 Prothonotary; No. CP-06-AD-0000013-2013 Clerk of Courts [43 Pa.B. 4839] [Saturday,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SONOMA v. Plaintiffs, Defendants. Case No. STIPULATION AND ORDER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SERVICE Date Action Filed: Assigned to: Dept: The undersigned parties and/or

More information

STIPULATION AND ORDER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS

STIPULATION AND ORDER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF 1 Plaintiffs, v. Defendants. AND ALL RELATED CROSS-ACTIONS. CASE NO. STIPULATION AND ORDER AUTHORIZING ELECTRONIC SERVICE OF DOCUMENTS Date Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 LENNELL DUNBAR, Plaintiff, v. EMW INC., Defendant. Case No.: :-CV-00- JLT SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. Pleading Amendment Deadline:

More information

PROTOCOL FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPREME COURT

PROTOCOL FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPREME COURT I. Introduction: PROTOCOL FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPREME COURT This document has been drafted after consultation with Suffolk County District Administrative Judge C. Randall Hinrichs and

More information

Superior Court of California County of Orange

Superior Court of California County of Orange Superior Court of California County of Orange PROBATE DEPARTMENT HEARING AND TRIAL GUIDELINES Welcome to Probate. The Court recommends that all counsel and self-represented parties read and familiarize

More information

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules

District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility Board Rules Adopted June 23, 1983 Effective July 1, 1983 This edition represents a complete revision of the Board Rules. All previous

More information

Wayne County Municipal & Common Pleas Courts. E-filing Local Rule. a. Original Document: the electronic document received by the Court from the filer

Wayne County Municipal & Common Pleas Courts. E-filing Local Rule. a. Original Document: the electronic document received by the Court from the filer Wayne County Municipal & Common Pleas Courts E-filing Local Rule 1. Definitions. a. Original Document: the electronic document received by the Court from the filer b. PDF: portable document format c. Source

More information

HARRIS COUNTY LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURTS. concerning the ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS

HARRIS COUNTY LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURTS. concerning the ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS HARRIS COUNTY LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURTS concerning the ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS Rule 1.1 Purpose PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS These rules govern the electronic filing and service of

More information

GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT. Amended and Effective January 1, Rule Title Page No.

GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT. Amended and Effective January 1, Rule Title Page No. GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT Amended and Effective January 1, 2017 Rule Title Page No. 1 Purpose and Scope 1 2 Mandatory Business Court Designation 3 3

More information

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Effective November 1, 2010

UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Effective November 1, 2010 UNITED STATES FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE COURT Washington, D.C. RULES OF PROCEDURE Effective November 1, 2010 Rule Page Title I. Scope of Rules; Amendment 1. Scope of Rules... I 2. Amendment...

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number] Parts in blue print are instructions to user, not to be included in filed document unless as noted. [NOTE: This sample may be helpful when documents have been sealed by the trial court, appellate counsel

More information

Business Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.

Business Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules. RRDRP Rules These Rules are in effect for all RRDRP proceedings. Administrative proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Registry Restrictions Dispute Resolution Procedure shall be governed

More information

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk

INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk July 23, 2013 INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge Chambers Courtroom Deputy Clerk United States Courthouse Ms. Gina Sicora 300 Quarropas Street (914) 390-4178

More information

- 6 - the statement will not be filed and will not be a part of the Court s file in the case.

- 6 - the statement will not be filed and will not be a part of the Court s file in the case. - 6 - the statement will not be filed and will not be a part of the Court s file in the case. Rule 27 is added as follows RULE 27. PRIVACY PROTECTION FOR FILINGS MADE WITH THE COURT (a) Redacted Filings:

More information

Los Angeles Superior Court Probate Efiling FAQs

Los Angeles Superior Court Probate Efiling FAQs Los Angeles Superior Court 1. How does efiling work? Electronic filing of court documents occurs through an electronic filing service provider (EFSP). The user creates an account and the efiling system

More information

BELL COUNTY LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURTS. concerning the ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS

BELL COUNTY LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURTS. concerning the ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS BELL COUNTY LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURTS concerning the ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS Rule 1.1 Purpose PART 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS These rules govern the electronic filing and service of court

More information

By Jeffry M. Nichols, Shareholder, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione

By Jeffry M. Nichols, Shareholder, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF ELECTRONIC FILING By Jeffry M. Nichols, Shareholder, Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione I. INTRODUCTION A. What is e-filing? 1. E-filing simply refers to the filing of a document electronically

More information

E-Filing a Document. Thursday, June 14, Dwight E. Brock Collier Clerk of Courts

E-Filing a Document. Thursday, June 14, Dwight E. Brock Collier Clerk of Courts E-Filing a Document Thursday, June 14, 2012 Dwight E. Brock Collier Clerk of Courts What is efiling? A Method to File Court Case Documents Electronically with the Clerk of Courts How: By utilizing the

More information

ELECTRONIC FILING STANDARDS AND PRACTICES CHAMPAIGN COUNTY (Effective ) GENERAL

ELECTRONIC FILING STANDARDS AND PRACTICES CHAMPAIGN COUNTY (Effective ) GENERAL ELECTRONIC FILING STANDARDS AND PRACTICES CHAMPAIGN COUNTY (Effective 1.1.18) GENERAL A. AUTHORITY These standards are implemented pursuant to M. R. 18368 issued by the Supreme Court of Illinois. B. DEFINITIONS

More information

Electronic Filing Rules of the Appellate Division

Electronic Filing Rules of the Appellate Division Electronic Filing Rules of the Appellate Division Approved by Joint Order of the Departments of the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division December 12, 2017 1245.1. Definitions. For purposes

More information

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS Rule 1:18. Pretrial Scheduling Order. A. In any civil case the parties, by counsel of record, may agree and submit for approval

More information

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN Revised: January 3, 2011 Chambers Deputy/Law Clerk United States District Court Jim Reily Southern District of New York (212) 805-0120 500 Pearl

More information

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO JUVENILE DIVISION

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO JUVENILE DIVISION IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF WAYNE COUNTY, OHIO JUVENILE DIVISION IN RE: ELECTRONIC FILING OF COURT DOCUMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER I. APPLICATION AND SCOPE OF ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER In the first quarter

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. MC JFW(SKx)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. MC JFW(SKx) Case :-mc-000-jfw-sk Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 The National Coalition of Association of -Eleven Franchisees, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, -Eleven,

More information

PART 4 ELECTRONIC COURT DOCUMENTS

PART 4 ELECTRONIC COURT DOCUMENTS PART 4 ELECTRONIC COURT DOCUMENTS ELECTRONICALLY TRANSMITTED COURT DOCUMENTS [ FAX FILING ] [ APPROVED BY THE TEXAS SUPREME COURT ON DECEMBER 11, 2002 ] Special Order 33166, as Amended 09/03/99 PART 4.

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 1 In re Los Angeles Asbestos Litigation General Orders SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES Case No. C 00000 THIRD AMENDED GENERAL ORDER NO. 0 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

More information

9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT

9:30 a.m. MOTION CALL, CASE MANAGEMENT, STATUS DATES 10:00 a.m. 2:30 p.m. MATTERS SET BY THE COURT HONORABLE FRANKLIN U. VALDERRAMA STANDING ORDER CALENDAR 3 Room 2402, Richard J. Daley Center Telephone: 312-603-5432 No Fax or Email Law Clerks: Alexandra M. Franco Samantha Grund-Wickramasekera Court

More information

E-Filing Court Documents In Escambia County

E-Filing Court Documents In Escambia County E-Filing Court Documents In Escambia County Clerk of the Circuit Court and Comptroller 1 WHY E-FILING? Per Florida Statute 28.22205, Each clerk of court shall implement an electronic filing process. The

More information

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES Rule Effective Chapter 1. Civil Cases over $25,000 300. Renumbered as Rule 359 07/01/09 301. Classification 07/01/09 302. Renumbered as Rule 361 07/01/09 303. All-Purpose Assignment

More information

Judge Krier s Civil Division Procedures Collier County

Judge Krier s Civil Division Procedures Collier County Judge Krier s Civil Division Procedures Collier County These procedures are intended to ensure that all parties and their attorneys have equal access to justice through the organized administration of

More information

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Trademark Regulations Title 37 - Code of Federal Regulations as amended on June 11, 2015, effective July 17, 2015.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Trademark Regulations Title 37 - Code of Federal Regulations as amended on June 11, 2015, effective July 17, 2015. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Trademark Regulations Title 37 - Code of Federal Regulations as amended on June 11, 2015, effective July 17, 2015. TABLE OF CONTENTS RULES APPLICABLE TO TRADEMARK CASES 2.1 [Reserved]

More information

: : Upon the motion dated as of November 8, 2010 (the Motion ), 1 of Ambac Financial

: : Upon the motion dated as of November 8, 2010 (the Motion ), 1 of Ambac Financial UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re AMBAC FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Debtor. ---------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Proposed Changes to the Rules of Practice. Federal Circuit Rule 1

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Proposed Changes to the Rules of Practice. Federal Circuit Rule 1 Rule 1. Scope of Rules; Title United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Proposed Changes to the Rules of Practice Federal Circuit Rule 1 (a) Reference to District and Trial Courts and Agencies.

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. Administrative Order Civ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA Administrative Order 2018-62-Civ ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER INSTITUTING A UNIFORM TRIAL ORDER FOR CIRCUIT CIVIL CASES

More information

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

I. GENERAL PROVISIONS I. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Authority and Applicability. The promulgation of these Rules is authorized by S.C. Code Ann. 1-23-650 (1976) (as amended). These Rules shall govern all proceedings before the Administrative

More information

ELECTRONIC FILING STANDARDS IMPLEMENTING E-FILING PROGRAM 4 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CLINTON COUNTY, IL

ELECTRONIC FILING STANDARDS IMPLEMENTING E-FILING PROGRAM 4 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CLINTON COUNTY, IL ELECTRONIC FILING STANDARDS IMPLEMENTING E-FILING PROGRAM 4 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CLINTON COUNTY, IL A. AUTHORITY GENERAL These standards are implemented pursuant to the authority granted by M.R. 18368 issued

More information

STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101

STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101 State of Illinois Circuit Court of Cook County Ronald F. Bartkowicz 2101 Richard J. Daley Center Judge Chicago, Illinois 60602 STANDING ORDER FOR CALENDAR Y * Room 2101 Phone Numbers: Case Coordinator:

More information

.VERSICHERUNG. Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) for.versicherung Domain Names

.VERSICHERUNG. Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) for.versicherung Domain Names .VERSICHERUNG Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) for.versicherung Domain Names Overview Chapter I - Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP)... 2 1. Purpose...

More information

CALENDAR Q. JUDGE PATRICK J. SHERLOCK 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS fax

CALENDAR Q. JUDGE PATRICK J. SHERLOCK 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS fax CALENDAR Q JUDGE PATRICK J. SHERLOCK 2007 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602 312-603-5902 312-603-3022 fax Case Coordinator: Melissa Robbins Melissa.Robbins@cookcountyil.gov STANDING ORDER

More information

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the following amendments to the Rules of Appellate Procedure were adopted to take effect on January 1, 2019. The amendments were approved

More information

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016

Filed & Entered: 03/14/2016 1:15-mc-01902-MKB-JO Order requiring Apple, Inc. to assist in the execution of a search warrant issued by the court et al Margo K. Brodie, presiding James Orenstein, referral Date filed: 10/08/2015 Date

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire adopts

More information

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY CASE NO: Vs. Plaintiff Defendants / FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER THIS CASE having been reviewed by the

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Case :-cv-00-ben-jlb Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 VIRGINIA DUNCAN, et al., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity

More information

Public Records Request

Public Records Request Public Records Request Scope: CITYWIDE Policy Contact Emilie Costan Citywide Records Manager Office of the City Clerk (916) 808-5908 ecostan@cityofsacramento.org Table of Contents Policy Definitions Public

More information

dotberlin GmbH & Co. KG

dotberlin GmbH & Co. KG Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) 1. This policy has been adopted by all accredited Domain Name Registrars for Domain Names ending in.berlin. 2. The policy is between the Registrar

More information

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions And Other Useful Information Carolyn Weber 2/12/2014 This document contains questions that are frequently asked by filers during training sessions and submitted to the service

More information

WHEREAS, the Appellate Division seeks to adopt various procedures which are currently in use in the Third District Court of Appeal; and

WHEREAS, the Appellate Division seeks to adopt various procedures which are currently in use in the Third District Court of Appeal; and THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 17-1 (Court Administration) ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 17-02 IN RE: ESTABLISHING CERTAIN FILING AND OTHER PROCEDURES IN THE CIRCUIT APPELLATE

More information

(C) The docket entries shall include at a minimum the following information:

(C) The docket entries shall include at a minimum the following information: RULE 113. CRIMINAL CASE FILE AND DOCKET ENTRIES. (A) The clerk of courts shall maintain the criminal case file for the court of common pleas. The criminal case file shall contain all original records,

More information

4th May, 2012 Statutory Instruments 151 GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBIA. The High Court Act (Laws, Volume 3, Cap. 27)

4th May, 2012 Statutory Instruments 151 GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBIA. The High Court Act (Laws, Volume 3, Cap. 27) 4th May, 2012 Statutory Instruments 151 GOVERNMENT OF ZAMBIA STATUTORY INSTRUMENT NO. 27 OF 2012 The High Court Act (Laws, Volume 3, Cap. 27) The High Court (Amendment) Rules, 2012 IN EXERCISE of the powers

More information

EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT SEMINOLE COUNTY COUNTY/CIVIL DIVISION S COURTROOM C ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GUIDELINES

EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT SEMINOLE COUNTY COUNTY/CIVIL DIVISION S COURTROOM C ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GUIDELINES EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT SEMINOLE COUNTY COUNTY/CIVIL DIVISION S COURTROOM C ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES GUIDELINES JUDGE DEBRA L. KRAUSE REVISED JANUARY 2018 CONTENTS HEARINGS...1 Scheduling

More information

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only)

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only) CIRCUIT CIVIL SARASOTA COUNTY PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only) I LOCAL RULES, STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONALISM & GOOD

More information

Judge Mary L. Mikva CALENDAR 6 - ROOM 2508 Telephone: 312/ Fax: 312/

Judge Mary L. Mikva CALENDAR 6 - ROOM 2508 Telephone: 312/ Fax: 312/ IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT- CHANCERY DIVISION I. Motions Judge Mary L. Mikva CALENDAR 6 - ROOM 2508 Telephone: 312/603-4890 Fax: 312/603-5796 A. Routine Motions STANDING

More information

Business Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules.

Business Day: means a working day as defined by the Provider in its Supplemental Rules. PDDRP Rule These Rules are in effect for all PDDRP proceedings. Administrative proceedings for the resolution of disputes under the Trademark Post- Delegation Dispute Resolution Procedure shall be governed

More information

CHARLOTTE PROBATE & GUARDIANSHIP BEST PRACTICES ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED ORDERS February 5, 2018

CHARLOTTE PROBATE & GUARDIANSHIP BEST PRACTICES ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED ORDERS February 5, 2018 CHARLOTTE PROBATE & GUARDIANSHIP BEST PRACTICES ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED ORDERS February 5, 2018 Beginning on February 5, 2018, proposed orders can be submitted electronically via E-mail to Judge

More information

CA State Rule Changes Civil January 18, Presented By Elaine Screechfield Firmwide Litigation Docket Manager Morrison & Foerster LLP

CA State Rule Changes Civil January 18, Presented By Elaine Screechfield Firmwide Litigation Docket Manager Morrison & Foerster LLP CA State Rule Changes Civil January 18, 2018 Presented By Elaine Screechfield Firmwide Litigation Docket Manager Morrison & Foerster LLP Summary of Changes The following slides summarize changes to rules

More information

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW Rule Effective 700. Subject Matter of the Family Law Court 07/01/2014 700.5 Attorneys and Self Represented Parties 07/01/2011 700.6 Family Law Filings 01/01/2012 701. Assignment of

More information

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES 1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 CITATION These civil rules should be cited as "Marin County Rule, Civil" or "MCR Civ" followed by the rule number (e.g., Marin County Rule, Civil 1.1 or MCR Civ 1.1).

More information

File & ServeXpress. Marion County Indiana Mass Tort Litigation Reference Manual

File & ServeXpress. Marion County Indiana Mass Tort Litigation Reference Manual File & ServeXpress Marion County Indiana Mass Tort Litigation Reference Manual Contents Overview 4 Registration and Training Information 4 Contact Information 4 Navigation to the File & ServeXpress Resource

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL DIVISION CASE NO. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) RICHARD L. DUQUETTE Attorney at Law P.O. Box 2446 Carlsbad, CA 92018 2446 SBN 108342 Telephone: (760 730 0500 Attorney for Petitioner CHRISTINA HARRIS SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF

More information

Guidance for Implementation of the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Criminal Case Files

Guidance for Implementation of the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Criminal Case Files Agenda E-6 (Appendix A) Court Admin./Case Mgmt. March 2004 Guidance for Implementation of the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Criminal Case Files In September 2001,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO PA-CIR

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO PA-CIR IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER NO. 2005-065 PA-CIR RE: PROBATE AND GUARDIANSHIP DIVISION E-FILING In order to provide parties and

More information

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Directive Concerning Statewide Electronic Filing Standards Amended, Effective May 2018 The purposes of this Chief Justice Directive (CJD) are (1) to

More information

a) to take account of the policy rules that apply to.au domain names, that do not apply to gtld domain names; and

a) to take account of the policy rules that apply to.au domain names, that do not apply to gtld domain names; and auda PUBLISHED POLICY Policy Title:.au DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY (audrp) Policy No: 2010-05 Publication Date: 13/08/2010 Status: Current 1. BACKGROUND 1.1 This document sets out the.au Dispute Resolution

More information

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY PART I. RULES OF GENERAL APPLICATION CHAPTER I. PROCEDURE RULE 1:5. SERVICE AND FILING OF PAPERS

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY PART I. RULES OF GENERAL APPLICATION CHAPTER I. PROCEDURE RULE 1:5. SERVICE AND FILING OF PAPERS RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY PART I. RULES OF GENERAL APPLICATION CHAPTER I. PROCEDURE RULE 1:5. SERVICE AND FILING OF PAPERS Rule 1:5-1. Service: When Required (a) Civil Actions.

More information

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter

More information

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Directive Concerning Statewide Electronic Filing Standards Chief Justice Directive 11-01 Amended, Effective November 2014 The purposes of this CJD

More information

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B 124 NORTH CAROLINA ROBESON COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B Rule 1. Name. These rules shall

More information

PROTOCOLS FOR NEW YORK STATE COURTS E-FILING (NYSCEF) Cases Filed in Supreme Court, Seneca County

PROTOCOLS FOR NEW YORK STATE COURTS E-FILING (NYSCEF) Cases Filed in Supreme Court, Seneca County PROTOCOLS FOR NEW YORK STATE COURTS E-FILING (NYSCEF) Cases Filed in Supreme Court, Seneca County Effective January 24, 2018 I. Introduction: In implementation of the New York State Courts E-Filing system

More information

Medina County Court of Common Pleas. Rules of the General Division

Medina County Court of Common Pleas. Rules of the General Division Medina County Court of Common Pleas Rules of the General Division Effective January 1, 2009 1 Rule 1 Rule 2 Rule 3 Rule 4 Rule 5 Rule 6 Rule 7 Rule 8 Rule 9 Rule 10 Rule 11 Rule 12 Rule 13 Rule 14 Rule

More information

Washoe District Court Rule 10 Format of Pleadings Effective 4/23/17

Washoe District Court Rule 10 Format of Pleadings Effective 4/23/17 Washoe District Court Rule 10 Format of Pleadings Effective 4/23/17 Rule 10. Form of pleadings. 1. Format. (a) General. 1. All documents presented for filing must be: (i) Signed with the filer s signature;

More information

Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.hk and. 香港 domain names Rules of Procedure

Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.hk and. 香港 domain names Rules of Procedure Hong Kong Internet Registration Corporation Limited Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy for.hk and. 香港 domain names Rules of Procedure [Effective 22 February 2011] Arbitration proceedings for the resolution

More information

[Related Statewide Rule NMRA]

[Related Statewide Rule NMRA] [Related Statewide Rule 1-016 NMRA] LR3-203. Civil case control. A. Case management scope. This case management system is to guide and control the progress of cases from filing of the complaint to the

More information

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012)

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012) COMMERCIAL CALENDAR I (Effective January 30, 2012) JUDGE THOMAS R. MULROY 2207 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602 Case Coordinator: Margaret Murphy 312-603-6058 STANDING ORDER FOR PRETRIAL

More information

LANCASTER COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

LANCASTER COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE LANCASTER COUNTY RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RULE 1. Title and Citation of Rules These rules shall be known as the Lancaster County Rules of Civil Procedure and may be cited as L.C.R.C.P. No.. RULE 10. Business

More information

Jose M. Gonzalez Associate Judge (65 th District Court) August 23 and 31, 2016

Jose M. Gonzalez Associate Judge (65 th District Court) August 23 and 31, 2016 Jose M. Gonzalez Associate Judge (65 th District Court) August 23 and 31, 2016 How does the e-file system work? The non-techie version... (EFSP) Electronic File Service Provider E-File Computer System

More information

scc Doc 51 Filed 07/16/15 Entered 07/16/15 15:54:38 Main Document Pg 1 of 23

scc Doc 51 Filed 07/16/15 Entered 07/16/15 15:54:38 Main Document Pg 1 of 23 Pg 1 of 23 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) SABINE OIL & GAS CORPORATION, et al., 1 ) Case No. 15-11835 (SCC) ) Debtors. ) (Joint Administration Requested)

More information

Amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (Effective December 1, 2007)

Amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (Effective December 1, 2007) Amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (Effective December 1, 2007) The attached amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure were approved by the Judicial Conference at its

More information

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective November 17, 2010)

COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective November 17, 2010) COMMERCIAL CALENDAR N (Effective November 17, 2010) JUDGE DANIEL J. PIERCE 2307 RICHARD J. DALEY CENTER CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602 Case Coordinator: Kate Moore 312-603-4804 STANDING ORDER FOR PRETRIAL PROCEDURE

More information

THE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO

THE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO THE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO Procedural Rules Established Pursuant to 40 ILCS 5/6-191 Governing Applications for and Administrative Hearings upon Applications

More information