Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 12/08/16 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 932 as Exhibit A. The chart in Exhibit A identifies the intrinsic and ext
|
|
- Polly Randall
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 931 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD., Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE US, INC. and T-MOBILE USA, INC., Defendants, Civil Action No. 2:16-cv JRG-RSP JURY TRIAL DEMANDED NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS US LLC, NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON, and ERICSSON INC., Intervenors. JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PREHEARING STATEMENT Plaintiff Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd., Defendants T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Intervenors Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC, Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy, Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, and Ericsson Inc. hereby submit this Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement in the above-styled consolidated cases pursuant to P.R. 4-3 and this Court s Docket Control Order regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,537,779; 8,638,750; and 8,031,677. I. P.R. 4-3(a): The Construction of Claim Terms, Phrases, or Clauses on Which the Parties Agree. None. II. P.R. 4-3(b): Each Party s Proposed Constructions. The parties proposed constructions, intrinsic, and extrinsic evidence are attached hereto 1 NSN , Page 1
2 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 12/08/16 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 932 as Exhibit A. The chart in Exhibit A identifies the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence that the respective parties presently intend to rely upon in support of their proposed constructions or to oppose any other party s proposed constructions. Each party also reserves the right to cite to intrinsic and/or extrinsic evidence cited by another party. III. P.R. 4-3(c): The Anticipated Length of Time Necessary for the Claim Construction Hearing. hearing. The parties respectfully request that the Court allot 3 hours for the claim construction IV. P.R. 4-3(d): Whether Any Party Proposes to Call One or More Witnesses. At the present time, no party proposes to call witnesses for live testimony at the claim construction hearing. NSN, T-Mobile & Ericsson have provided a brief summary of their experts opinions in Exhibit A below. Huawei has provided a brief summary of its expert s opinions in Exhibit B. The parties agree to submit expert testimony via declarations. The party submitting expert testimony need not disclose it prior to attaching the declaration as an exhibit to its claim construction brief. The parties agree to forego depositions of the claim construction experts for use at the Markman hearing. V. P.R. 4-3(e): A List of Any other Issues That Might Appropriately Be Taken Up at a Prehearing Conference. conference. The parties are not presently aware of any issues which might be taken up at a prehearing Dated: December 8, 2016 Respectfully submitted, By: /s/ Neil Warren Ruffin Cordell Texas Bar No cordell@fr.com Linda Kordziel DC Bar No kordziel@fr.com 2 NSN , Page 2
3 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 12/08/16 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 933 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C K Street, N.W., 11th Floor Washington, D.C Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) Thomas H. Reger II Texas Bar No reger@fr.com Carl E. Bruce Texas Bar No bruce@fr.com David B. Conrad Texas Bar No conrad@fr.com Jane Du Texas Bar No du@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C Main Street, Suite 5000 Dallas, TX Telephone: (214) Facsimile: (214) David Barkan California Bar No barkan@fr.com Neil Warren California Bar No warren@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, CA Telephone: (650) Facsimile: (650) Kevin Su Massachusetts Bar No su@fr.com FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. One Marina Park Drive Boston, MA Telephone: (617) Facsimile: (617) COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. 3 NSN , Page 3
4 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 12/08/16 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 934 /s/ Mark D. Selwyn Mark D. Selwyn (California Bar No ) Kathryn D. Zalewski (California Bar No ) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California (650) Joseph J. Mueller (Massachusetts Bar No ) Cynthia Vreeland (Texas Bar No Massachusetts Bar No ) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA (627) Michael E. Jones SBN: POTTER MINTON, PC 110 North College, Suite 500 Tyler, Texas Tel Fax mikejones@potterminton.com ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS T- MOBILE US, INC. AND T-MOBILE USA, INC. /s/ John Haynes John Haynes (GA Bar No ) Patrick Flinn (GA Bar No ) Michael C. Deane (GA Bar No ) Nicholas Tsui (GA Bar No ) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 1201 W. Peachtree St. Atlanta, GA Telephone: (404) Facsimile: (404) Patrick.Flinn@alston.com 4 NSN , Page 4
5 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 12/08/16 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: John.Haynes@alston.com Michael.Deane@alston.com Nick.Tsui@alston.com Michael J. Newton (TX Bar No ) Derek Neilson (TX Bar No ) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 2800 N. Harwood St., Suite 1800 Dallas, Texas Telephone: (214) Facsimile: (214) Mike.Newton@alston.com Derek.Neilson@alston.com M. Scott Stevens (NC Bar No ) Ross R. Barton (NC Bar No ) Linda Chang (NC Bar No ) Robert Caison (NC Bar No ) Samuel Merritt (NC Bar No ) M. Joseph Fernando (NC Bar No ) ALSTON & BIRD LLP Bank of America Plaza 101 South Tryon Street, Suite 4000 Charlotte, NC Telephone: (704) Facsimile: (704) Scott.Stevens@alston.com Ross.Barton@alston.com Linda.Chang@alston.com Robert.Caison@alston.com Sam.Merritt@alston.com Ravi.Fernando@alston.com Marsha E. Diedrich (CA Bar No ) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 333 South Hope Street 16th Floor Los Angeles, CA Telephone: (213) Facsimile: (213) Marsha.Diedrich@alston.com Thomas Davison (FL Bar No ) ALSTON & BIRD LLP The Atlantic Building 950 F Street, NW 5 NSN , Page 5
6 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 12/08/16 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 936 Washington, DC Telephone: (202) Facsimile: (202) Tom.Davison@alston.com Deron R. Dacus Texas State Bar No THE DACUS FIRM, P.C. 821 ESE Loop 323, Suite 430 Tyler, TX Telephone: (903) Facsimile: (903) ddacus@dacusfirm.com COUNSEL FOR INTERVENORS NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS US LLC AND NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY. By: /s/ Phillip B. Philbin Phillip B. Philbin State Bar No Jamie H. McDole State Bar No Charles M. Jones II State Bar No Michael D. Karson State Bar No Hamilton C. Simpson State Bar No HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP 2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700 Dallas, Texas Tel.: (214) Fax: (214) phillip.philbin@haynesboone.com jamie.mcdole@haynesboone.com charlie.jones@haynesboone.com michael.karson@haynesboone.com hamilton.simpson@haynesboone.com ATTORNEYS FOR INTERVENORS TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON AND ERICSSON INC. 6 NSN , Page 6
7 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 110 Filed 12/08/16 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 937 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on December 8, 2016 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court s CM/ECF system per Local Rule CV-5(a)(3). /s/ Neil Warren Neil Warren 7 NSN , Page 7
8 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 1 of 41 PageID #: 938 EXHIBIT A 1 NSN , Page 8
9 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 2 of 41 PageID #: 939 NSN , Page 9
10 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 3 of 41 PageID #: 940 NSN , Page 10
11 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 4 of 41 PageID #: 941 NSN , Page 11
12 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 5 of 41 PageID #: 942 NSN , Page 12
13 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 6 of 41 PageID #: 943 NSN , Page 13
14 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 7 of 41 PageID #: 944 NSN , Page 14
15 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 8 of 41 PageID #: 945 NSN , Page 15
16 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 9 of 41 PageID #: 946 NSN , Page 16
17 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 10 of 41 PageID #: 947 NSN , Page 17
18 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 11 of 41 PageID #: 948 NSN , Page 18
19 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 12 of 41 PageID #: 949 NSN , Page 19
20 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 13 of 41 PageID #: 950 NSN , Page 20
21 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 14 of 41 PageID #: 951 NSN , Page 21
22 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 15 of 41 PageID #: 952 NSN , Page 22
23 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 16 of 41 PageID #: 953 NSN , Page 23
24 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 17 of 41 PageID #: 954 NSN , Page 24
25 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 18 of 41 PageID #: 955 NSN , Page 25
26 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 19 of 41 PageID #: 956 NSN , Page 26
27 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 20 of 41 PageID #: 957 NSN , Page 27
28 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 21 of 41 PageID #: 958 NSN , Page 28
29 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 22 of 41 PageID #: 959 NSN , Page 29
30 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 23 of 41 PageID #: 960 NSN , Page 30
31 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 24 of 41 PageID #: 961 NSN , Page 31
32 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 25 of 41 PageID #: 962 NSN , Page 32
33 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 26 of 41 PageID #: 963 NSN , Page 33
34 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 27 of 41 PageID #: 964 NSN , Page 34
35 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 28 of 41 PageID #: 965 NSN , Page 35
36 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 29 of 41 PageID #: 966 NSN , Page 36
37 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 30 of 41 PageID #: 967 NSN , Page 37
38 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 31 of 41 PageID #: 968 NSN , Page 38
39 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 32 of 41 PageID #: 969 NSN , Page 39
40 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 33 of 41 PageID #: 970 NSN , Page 40
41 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 34 of 41 PageID #: 971 NSN , Page 41
42 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 35 of 41 PageID #: 972 NSN , Page 42
43 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 36 of 41 PageID #: 973 EXHIBIT B 36 NSN , Page 43
44 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 37 of 41 PageID #: 974 Summary of Opinions by Huawei s Claim Construction Expert, Dr. Jonathan Wells If T-Mobile or NSN submits expert testimony as identified in its P.R. 4-2 and 4-3 disclosures, Huawei intends to submit a declaration from its claim construction expert, Dr. Jonathan Wells, with its reply claim construction brief. Huawei will rely on Dr. Wells opinions in opposing Defendants proposed constructions and rebutting Defendants expert s opinions. Huawei provides herein a brief description of the substance of Dr. Wells proposed testimony. Dr. Wells has been asked to consider the following topics with respect to the Patents-in-Suit: a) The level of ordinary skill in the art with respect to U.S. Patent No. 8,638,750 (the 750 Patent ), U.S. Patent No. 8,537,779 (the 779 Patent ); and U.S. Patent No. 8,031,677 (the 677 Patent ); as well as b) How the claim terms listed in Exhibit A would have been understood by one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the respective inventions, in light of the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence. I. Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art 1. Dr. Wells will address the level of ordinary skill in the art with respect to the 750, 779, and 677 Patents. II. Patent Terms a. Create Bearer Request message ( 779 Patent, Claim 4) 2. To the extent Defendants offer expert testimony in support of their construction of this term, Dr. Wells will respond to Defendants assertion that Create Bearer Request means a message titled Create Bearer Request and will opine that a 37 NSN , Page 44
45 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 38 of 41 PageID #: 975 person of ordinary skill in the art would not have understood the term in this manner with reference to the claims, figures, specification, prosecution history or prior art of the 779 Patent. Dr. Wells will opine that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have understood consistent with its plain meaning. Dr. Wells may rely on the representative support as identified by Huawei in Exhibit A and any other materials identified by Defendants or Intervenors. b. attach request ( 750 Patent, Claims 2, 3, 8, 9, 14, & 15) 3. To the extent Defendants offer expert testimony in support of their construction of this term, Dr. Wells will respond to Defendants assertion that attach request is indefinite or lacks written description and will opine that a person of ordinary skill in the art would not have considered this term to lack a written description with reference to the claims, figures, specification, and prosecution history of the 779 Patent. Dr. Wells will opine that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have understood this term consistent with its plain meaning. Dr. Wells may rely on the representative support as identified by Huawei in Exhibit A and any other materials identified by Defendants or Intervenors. c. Create Default Bearer Request Message ( 750 Patent, Claims 4, 10, 17) 4. To the extent Defendants offer expert testimony in support of their construction of this term, Dr. Wells will respond to Defendants assertion that Create Default Bearer Request means a message titled Create Default Bearer Request and will opine that a person of ordinary skill in the art would not have understood the term in this manner with reference to the claims, figures, specification, prosecution history or prior art of the 750 Patent. Dr. Wells will opine that a person of ordinary skill in the art 38 NSN , Page 45
46 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 39 of 41 PageID #: 976 would have understood consistent with its plain meaning. Dr. Wells may rely on the representative support as identified by Huawei in Exhibit A and any other materials identified by Defendants or Intervenors. d. A method for detaching a user equipment (UE) when a handover from a 3 rd generation partnership project (3GPP) network to a non-3gpp network occurs, comprising ( 677 patent, Claim 1) 5. To the extent Defendants offer expert testimony in support of their construction of this term, Dr. Wells will respond to Defendants assertion that the preamble is limiting and will opine that a person of ordinary skill in the art would not have understood the term this manner with reference to the claims, figures, specification, and prosecution history of the 677 Patent. Dr. Wells may rely on the representative support as identified by Huawei in Exhibit A and any other materials identified by Defendants or Intervenors. e. detaching, by the MME, the UE from the 3GPP network / detach the UE from the 3GPP network ( 677 patent, Claims 1, 8) 6. To the extent Defendants offer expert testimony in support of their construction of this term, Dr. Wells will respond to Defendants assertion that it means deleting the MM context of the UE by the MME / delete the MM context of the UE, by the MME, and will opine that a person of ordinary skill in the art would not have understood the term in this manner with reference to the claims, figures, specification, and prosecution history of the 677 Patent. Dr. Wells will opine that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have understood this term to mean deleting an MM context of the 39 NSN , Page 46
47 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 40 of 41 PageID #: 977 UE by the MME / delete an MM context of the UE, by the MME. Dr. Wells may rely on the representative support as identified by Huawei in Exhibit A and any other materials identified by Defendants or Intervenors. III. Alleged Means-Plus-Function Terms 7. Dr. Wells will respond to Defendants assertion that the purported meansplus-function claim terms proposed for construction by Defendants 1 lack any 1 a receiver... the receiver is configured to receive, from a user equipment (UE), an access request message for access the 3GPP access system;... wherein the access request message includes the first handover indication information indicating that the access is a handover access ( 750 Patent, Claim 1); a transmitter configured to communicatively connect with the receiver,...the transmitter is configured to send a resource request message to a packet data network gateway (PDN GW) to create resources for the UE to be used in the 3GPP access system,... wherein, in response to the first handover indication information being included in the access request message, the resource request message is configured to include second handover indication information, which indicates that the resource request message is caused by a handover access; and wherein the second handover indication information is configured to be carried by an indication flag of the resource request message, the indication flag including one of a handover indication flag, a create type flag which is set to be handover create, and cause flag which is set to be handover cause ( 750 Patent, Claim 1); a mobility management network device configured to be responsible for mobility management, wherein, during a handover of a user equipment (UE) from a non-3rd Generation Partnership Project (non-3gpp) access system to a 3GPP access system, the mobility management network device is configured to: receive, from the UE, an access request message for access the 3GPP access system; and send a resource request message to a packet data network gateway (PDN GW) to request the PDG GW to create resources for the UE to be used in the 3GPP access system, wherein the access request message includes first handover indication information indicating that the access is a handover access; and wherein, in response to the first handover indication information being included in the access request message, the mobility management network device is configured to include second handover indication information indicating that the resource request message is caused by a handover access into the resource request message; and, wherein the mobility management network device is configured to carry the second handover indication information by an indication flag of the resource request message, the indication flag including one of a handover indication flag, a create type flag which is set to be handover create, and cause flag which is set to be handover cause ( 750 Patent, Claim 13); an obtaining unit, configured to receive an attach request message sent by a User Equipment (UE) during a handover from a non 3rd Generation Partnership Project (non-3gpp) network to a 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) network, wherein the attach request message comprises an information element indicating handover ( 779 Patent, Claim 11); 40 NSN , Page 47
48 Case 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document Filed 12/08/16 Page 41 of 41 PageID #: 978 corresponding structure and will opine that a person of ordinary skill in the art would have understood these terms within the context of the 779 and 750 Patents in the first instance, but in any event would have understood their corresponding structures with reference to the claims, figures, specification, and prosecution history of the 779 and 750 Patents. Dr. Wells may rely on the representative support as identified by Huawei in Exhibit A and any other materials identified by Defendants or Intervenors. an identifying unit, configured to identify that the attach request message is due to the handover according to the IE indicating handover ( 779 Patent, Claim 11); a processing unit, configured to identify a Packet Data Network Gateway (PDN GW) whose address is used by the UE in the non-3gpp network by communicating with a Home Subscriber Server (HSS), and request the PDN GW to initiate a bearer creation procedure ( 779 Patent, Claim 11). 41 NSN , Page 48
Case5:11-cv LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1777 Filed08/15/12 Page1 of 19 1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22 nd
More informationCase 5:15-cv NC Document 372 Filed 11/23/16 Page 1 of 10
Case :-cv-000-nc Document Filed // Page of 0 0 Marc A. Fenster (CA SBN 0) Email: mfenster@raklaw.com Benjamin T. Wang (CA SBN ) Email: bwang@raklaw.com Reza Mirzaie (CA SBN ) Email: rmirzaie@raklaw.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 28 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC v. Civil Case No. 2:07-cv-511 (CE)
More informationCase 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842
Case 2:16-cv-00525-JRG-RSP Document 123 Filed 03/09/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 842 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MARINER IC INC., Plaintiff, v. FUNAI
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. MDL No
In Re: Webloyalty.com, Inc., Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation Doc. 77 Case 1:07-md-01820-JLT Document 77 Filed 11/01/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
More informationCase 1:15-cv LMB-JFA Document 37 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 374
Case 1:15-cv-00014-LMB-JFA Document 37 Filed 04/03/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID# 374 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION AFILIAS PLC Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:15-CV-00014-LMB-JFA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case:-cv-0-LHK Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN ) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN ) mjacobs@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN ) rhung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER
More informationCase 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104
Case 2:13-cv-00014-JRG-RSP Document 12 Filed 07/10/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 104 PERSONAL AUDIO, LLC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION v. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
MANTIS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION v. Plaintiff, CULVER FRANCHISING SYSTEM, INC., CASE NO. 2:17-cv-324 PATENT CASE JURY
More informationCase 5:11-cv LHK Document 3322 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0-lhk Document Filed /0/ Page of [COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGE] 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION APPLE INC., a California corporation, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227
Case 2:14-cv-00799-JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227 ECLIPSE IP LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff, v. LUXI
More informationCase 2:08-cv DF-CE Document 1 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:08-cv-00093-DF-CE Document 1 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION e.digital CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AVID TECHNOLOGY,
More informationCase 2:13-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 2:13-cv-01066-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 12/10/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION HOPEWELL CULTURE & DESIGN LLC, V. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT
Case 6:15-cv-00042 Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADAPTIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. ERICSSON, INC., TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET
More informationIntellectual Property/Legislative ADVISORY
Intellectual Property/Legislative ADVISORY March 18, 2011 Patent Reform Legislation Passes the Senate; House to Introduce Similar Bill this Month On March 8, 2011, the U.S. Senate passed S. 23, the America
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS [MARSHALL / TYLER / TEXARKANA] DIVISION [PLAINTIFF][, et al.,] v. [DEFENDANT][, et al.] Case No. [2 / 6 / 5]:00-CV-000-[JRG / RSP /
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION HIGH QUALITY PRINTING ) INVENTIONS, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PRINTOGRAPH,
More informationCase 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457
Case 2:16-cv-01096-JRG-RSP Document 44 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 457 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION JOE ANDREW SALAZAR, Plaintiff, vs.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ESN LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al Doc. 140 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ESN, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., and CISCO-LINKSYS, LLC,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CREE, INC., Plaintiff, v. SEMILEDS OPTOELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-00292 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
In Re: Webloyalty.com, Inc., Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation Doc. 73 Case 1:07-md-01820-JLT Document 73 Filed 10/11/2007 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS In re
More informationCase 2:13-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/15/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 2:13-cv-00213-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/15/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION REMBRANDT WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES, LP, v.
More informationCase 2:15-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1
Case 2:15-cv-01240-JRG Document 1 Filed 07/08/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 TURN IP LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Civil Action
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NORTHWEST AUSTIN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE, v. Plaintiff, ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants.
More informationAttorneys for Defendants TerraForm Global, Inc. and Peter Blackmore UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement System v. SunEdison, Inc. et al Doc. 0 1 1 Michael Bongiorno (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Timothy Perla (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Case 2:13-cv-00014-JRG-RSP Document 5 Filed 05/10/13 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 48 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PERSONAL AUDIO, LLC, Plaintiff, v.
More informationCase 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 2:16-cv-01186-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SPIN MASTER, LTD., Plaintiff, v. HELLODISCOUNTSTORE.COM,
More informationCase4:12-cv JSW Document34 Filed09/19/14 Page1 of 11
Case:-cv-0-JSW Document Filed0// Page of 0 JAMES C. OTTESON, State Bar No. jim@agilityiplaw.com THOMAS T. CARMACK, State Bar No. tom@agilityiplaw.com PHILIP W. MARSH, State Bar No. phil@agilityiplaw.com
More informationNOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
Case :-cv-00-ag-rnb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #:0 South Grand Avenue, th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00-0 0 Peter J. Chassman (pro hac vice pchassman@winston.com Dustin J. Edwards (pro hac vice dedwards@winston.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Case No. COMPLAINT FOR DECARATORY RELIEF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC. Plaintiff, v. OPTOVUE, INC. and MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Defendants. Case No. JURY TRIAL REQUESTED
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO. Wi-LAN USA, INC. and Wi-LAN, INC., v. Plaintiffs, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON, and ERICSSON INC. Defendants. COMPLAINT This
More informationCase 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1
Case 2:17-cv-00182-JRG Document 1 Filed 03/08/17 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FIGUREFUN LLC ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil
More informationUNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD. MUNCHKIN, INC. AND TOYS R US, INC. Petitioners
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD MUNCHKIN, INC. AND TOYS R US, INC. Petitioners v. LUV N CARE, LTD. Patent Owner CASE IPR2013-00072 Patent Before SALLY
More informationCase 3:16-cv M Document 44 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID 257 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 3:16-cv-01476-M Document 44 Filed 06/24/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID 257 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FINANCIAL
More informationCase 6:10-cv LED Document 1 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION
Case 6:10-cv-00379-LED Document 1 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. T-MOBILE
More informationCase 2:15-cv JRG-RSP Document 41 Filed 10/19/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 338
Case 2:15-cv-00961-JRG-RSP Document 41 Filed 10/19/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 338 NEXUSCARD INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION v. Plaintiff, BROOKSHIRE
More informationCase 1:06-cv PLF-EGS-DST Document 136 Filed 06/13/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:06-cv-01384-PLF-EGS-DST Document 136 Filed 06/13/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NORTHWEST AUSTIN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:16-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 03/14/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 42
Case 2:16-cv-01333-JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 03/14/17 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 42 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION INNOVATIONS LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff,
More informationCase 2:14-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT
Case 2:14-cv-00892-JRG Document 1 Filed 09/12/14 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION INDUSTRIAL PRINT TECHNOLOGIES LLC, a Texas
More informationCase 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105
Case 2:13-cv-00750-JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105 Babbage Holdings, LLC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISON Plaintiff, v. Activision
More informationCase 3:17-cv L Document 25 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 171
Case 3:17-cv-03300-L Document 25 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 6 PageID 171 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MBA ENGINEERING, INC., as Sponsor and Administrator
More informationCase 2:17-cv JRG Document 15 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 77
Case 2:17-cv-00684-JRG Document 15 Filed 12/19/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 77 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION SCA VENTURES, LLC ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil
More informationU.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv JDB
USCA Case #15-5190 Document #1561501 Filed: 07/08/2015 APPEAL,CLOSED,TYPE C Page 1 of 16 U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:14 cv 01870 JDB ASSOCIATION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION CHARLES C. FREENY III, BRYAN E. FREENY, and JAMES P. FREENY, Plaintiffs, Case No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. HTC AMERICA,
More informationrbk Doc#199 Filed 03/13/18 Entered 03/13/18 13:22:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 11
18-50049-rbk Doc#199 Filed 03/13/18 Entered 03/13/18 13:22:41 Main Document Pg 1 of The relief described hereinbelow is SO ORDERED. Signed March 13, 2018. Ronald B. King Chief United States Bankruptcy
More informationCase 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1
Case 6:15-cv-00850 Document 1 Filed 09/11/15 Page 1 of 19 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION TRANSDATA, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.
More informationCase5:11-cv LHK Document Filed12/02/13 Page1 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document2838-2 Filed12/02/13 Page1 of 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com RACHEL KREVANS (SBN
More informationCase 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-00195-TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DIGITAL CHOICE OF TEXAS, LLC V. CIVIL NO. 2:05-CV-195(TJW)
More informationCase 1:14-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:14-cv-00721-UNA Document 1 Filed 06/06/14 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TSMC TECHNOLOGY, INC., TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY,
More informationCase hdh11 Doc 639 Filed 11/21/17 Entered 11/21/17 13:18:18 Page 1 of 14
Case 16-33437-hdh11 Doc 639 Filed 11/21/17 Entered 11/21/17 13:18:18 Page 1 of 14 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Samuel A. Newman (admitted pro hac vice) snewman@gibsondunn.com Olivia Adendorff (TX SBN: 24069994)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
EYETALK365, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION v. Plaintiff, BIRD HOME AUTOMATION, LLC. Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-00858 JURY
More informationCase 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1
Case 2:15-cv-00898 Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION AUTOMATION MIDDLEWARE SOLUTIONS, INC., v. Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Cobb v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION JONATHAN COBB Plaintiff, v. Case No. 1:08-CV-0483 (MHS) GOOGLE INC. and WORKFORCELOGIC USA,
More informationrbk Doc#260 Filed 03/29/18 Entered 03/29/18 16:25:01 Main Document Pg 1 of 9
18-5004-rbk Doc#260 Filed 03/2/18 Entered 03/2/18 16:25:01 Main Document Pg 1 of A status hearing on this motion will be held on May 8, 2018, at 2:00 p.m. The relief described hereinbelow is SO ORDERED.
More informationCase 9:15-cv KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 7
Case 9:15-cv-80098-KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/03/2015 Page 1 of 7 ARRIVALSTAR S.A. and MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, v. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationCase M:06-cv VRW Document 374 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case M:0-cv-0-VRW Document Filed 0//0 Page of 0 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION CINDY COHN ( cindy@eff.org LEE TIEN ( tien@eff.org KURT OPSAHL (0 kurt@eff.org KEVIN S. BANKSTON (0 bankston@eff.org CORYNNE
More informationCase 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:17-cv-00422-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. Plaintiff, AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS
More informationCase 3:05-cv B-BLM Document 783 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 1 of 9
Case :0-cv-0-B-BLM Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 ROBERT S. BREWER, JR. (SBN ) JAMES S. MCNEILL (SBN 0) 0 B Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () -0 WILLIAM F. LEE (admitted
More informationU.S. District Court [LIVE] Eastern District of TEXAS (Marshall) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:14-cv JRG-RSP
US District Court Civil Docket as of November 10, 2015 Retrieved from the court on April 4, 2016 U.S. District Court [LIVE] Eastern District of TEXAS (Marshall) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:14-cv-00894-JRG-RSP
More informationCase 2:08-cv JLL-CCC Document 1 Filed 06/11/2008 Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:08-cv-02877-JLL-CCC Document 1 Filed 06/11/2008 Page 1 of 29 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY William J. Heller Jonathan M.H. Short McCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP Four
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-B-BLM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 ROBERT S. BREWER, JR. (SBN ) JAMES S. MCNEILL (SBN ) MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP 0 B Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone:() -00 Facsimile: () -0
More informationCase 1:10-cv PAB-KLM Document 116 Filed 04/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:10-cv-03013-PAB-KLM Document 116 Filed 04/29/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 Civil Action No. 10-cv-03013-PAB-KLM BIAX CORPORATION, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION
ESN LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. et al Doc. 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION ESN, LLC, v. Plaintiff, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. and CISCO-LINKSYS, LLC, CIVIL ACTION NO.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-1294 v.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TH EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION CRYPTOPEAK SOLUTIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:15-cv-1294 v. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. IRON OAK TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Defendant. Civil Action No. Jury Trial Requested
More informationCase 1:15-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Case 1:15-cv-01157-RWS Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION EMMANUEL C. GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:14-cv-651
More informationCase 2:16-cv RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01162-RWS Document 1 Filed 10/14/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROTHSCHILD PATENT IMAGING LLC, Plaintiff,
More informationCase hdh11 Doc 1445 Filed 04/11/19 Entered 04/11/19 16:41:38 Page 1 of 5
Case 18-30777-hdh11 Doc 1445 Filed 04/11/19 Entered 04/11/19 16:41:38 Page 1 of 5 Michael A. McConnell Texas Bar I.D. 13447300 Nancy Ribaudo Texas Bar I.D. 24026066 KELLY HART & HALLMAN LLP 201 Main Street,
More informationCase 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:10-cv-00544-GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE APPLE INC., vs. Plaintiff, High Tech Computer Corp., a/k/a
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MICOBA LLC Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY
More informationUnited States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv RGS
US District Court Civil Docket as of 10/15/2002 Retrieved from the court on Wednesday, August 03, 2005 United States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:00-cv-10861-RGS
More informationCase 5:08-cv JW Document 49 Filed 02/05/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case :0-cv-0-JW Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of MCKOOL SMITH, P.C. Gayle Rosenstein Klein (State Bar No. ) Park Avenue, Suite 00 New York, NY 00 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () 0- Email: gklein@mckoolsmith.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ACCASVEK, LLC, a Texas Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-cv-636 v. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
MITCHELL + COMPANY Brian E. Mitchell (SBN 0) brian.mitchell@mcolawoffices.com Marcel F. De Armas (SBN ) mdearmas@mcolawoffices.com Embarcadero Center, Suite 00 San Francisco, California 1 Tel: -- Fax:
More informationrbk Doc#237 Filed 03/22/18 Entered 03/22/18 15:08:39 Main Document Pg 1 of 4
18-50049-rbk Doc#237 Filed 03/22/18 Entered 03/22/18 15:08:39 Main Document Pg 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION In Re: BANKRUPTCY CASE NO. A'GACI, L.L.C.
More informationUnited States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv GAO
US District Court Civil Docket as of August 3, 2016 Retrieved from the court on August 3, 2016 United States District Court District of Massachusetts (Boston) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:15-cv-13295-GAO
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NORTHWEST AUSTIN MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER ONE, v. Plaintiff, ALBERTO GONZALES, Attorney General of the United States, et al., Defendants.
More informationCase3:12-cv VC Document70 Filed06/23/15 Page1 of 3
Case:-cv-0-VC Document0 Filed0// Page of 0 MARK D. FOWLER, Bar No. mark.fowler@dlapiper.com AARON WAINSCOAT, Bar No. aaron.wainscoat@dlapiper.com ERIK R. FUEHRER, Bar No. erik.fuehrer@dlapiper.com 000
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ENDEAVOR MESHTECH, INC., Plaintiff, v. TANTALUS SYSTEMS, INC. Civil Action No. ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT JURY TRIAL
More informationCase 3:13-cv SC Document 39 Filed 01/09/14 Page 1 of 5
Case :-cv-0-sc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Ben F. Pierce Gore (SBN ) PRATT & ASSOCIATES The Alameda, Suite San Jose, CA Telephone: (0) -0 Fax: (0) -0 pgore@prattattorneys.com David P. Wilson (admitted
More informationCase 2:17-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1
Case 2:17-cv-00308-JRG Document 1 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DOCUMENT SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC., v. Plaintiff,
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. Georgia Northern District Court Case No. 1:10-cv D. H. Pace Company, Inc. v. Stephens et al.
PlainSite Legal Document Georgia Northern District Court Case No. 1:10-cv-01524 D. H. Pace Company, Inc. v. Stephens et al Document 27 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation
More informationCase 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/07/16 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 MARK W. GOOD (Bar No. 0) TERRA LAW LLP 0 W. San Fernando St., # San Jose, California Telephone: 0--00 Facsimile: 0-- Email: mgood@terra-law.com JONATHAN T. SUDER
More information1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure.
Information or instructions: Request for disclosure 1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure. 2. Either party may file a request upon the other in order to obtain basic
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S REPLY TO THE COUNTERCLAIMS OF GOOGLE INC.
Polaris IP, LLC v. Google Inc. et al Doc. 145 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC F/K/A POLARIS IP, LLC, v. GOOGLE, INC., et al
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 2:07-cv-02784-SHM-dkv Document 439 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID 22005 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION IN RE REGIONS MORGAN KEEGAN SECURITIES,
More informationCase 2:15-cv JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION
Case 2:15-cv-01267-JRG-RSP Document 1 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION TRAXXAS LP, v. Plaintiff, HOBBY PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL,
More informationMEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The court issues this order to resolve the areas of disagreement between the parties relating to claim construction.
United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division. BROOKTROUT, INC, v. EICON NETWORKS CORPORATION. Civil Action No. 2:03-CV-59 July 28, 2004. Samuel Franklin Baxter, Emily A. Berger, McKool,
More informationCase Doc 65 Filed 11/08/17 Entered 11/08/17 14:21:15 Desc Main Document Page 6 of 24
Document Page 6 of 24 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION In re BESTWALL LLC, 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 17-31795 Debtor. NOTICE, CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationCase 2:11-cv JEM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2011 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 2:11-cv-14052-JEM Document 38 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/18/2011 Page 1 of 4 JOHN ZUCCARINI, Plaintiff, v. NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC, et al. Defendants. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationCase 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case 2:16-cv-01392 Document 1 Filed 12/09/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MICOBA LLC Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
Case 2:10-cv-00272-TJW Document 1 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION GEOTAG INC., Plaintiff vs. YELLOWPAGES.COM, LLC, Defendant.
More informationCase5:11-cv LHK Document902 Filed05/07/12 Page1 of 7
Case:-cv-0-LHK Document0 Filed0/0/ Page of [COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES] 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 0 APPLE INC., a California corporation, v.
More informationv. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
Case 3:16-cv-00094-VLB Document 36 Filed 05/09/17 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC and International Refills Company Ltd., Civil
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case: 16-1562 Document: 42-2 Page: 1 Filed: 03/21/2017 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit TVIIM, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. MCAFEE, INC., Defendant-Appellee 2016-1562 Appeal from the
More informationCase4:07-cv PJH Document728-1 Filed08/05/10 Page1 of 5
Case:0-cv-0-PJH Document- Filed0/0/0 Page of 0 Robert A. Mittelstaedt (SBN 00) Jason McDonell (SBN 0) Elaine Wallace (SBN ) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile: ()
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:15-cv-02594-MHC Document 12 Filed 10/14/15 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CODE REVISION COMMISION on behalf of and for the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION WETRO LAN LLC, v. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:15-cv-50 D-LINK SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, Defendant. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
More informationCase 2:18-cv JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1
Case 2:18-cv-00167-JRG Document 1 Filed 04/24/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION MARINER IC INC., v. Plaintiff, HUAWEI DEVICE
More informationCase 3:12-cv VC Document 119 Filed 05/09/17 Page 1 of 13 (Counsel listed on signature page)
Case :-cv-0-vc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of (Counsel listed on signature page) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 0 0 TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC, et al,
More information