IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY
|
|
- Donald Park
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY DAVID J. BUCHANAN, : C.A. No. S08C THG Plaintiff, : v. : WILLIAM WALLACE, : DELAWARE STATE POLICE, DAVID J. RICHARDS, : BARBARA H. RICHARDS, : Defendants. : ORDERS DENYING MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS DATE SUBMITTED: August 13, 2008 DATE DECIDED: September 18, 2008 David J. Buchanan, SBI#, Sussex Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 500, Georgetown, DE Graves, J.
2 David J. Buchanan ( Buchanan ) is the plaintiff in this pending case which originated in the Court of Chancery. The Court of Chancery dismissed the case without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction, ruling that Buchanan had stated legal, not equitable, claims for relief. Buchanan has transferred this action pursuant to10 Del. C Buchanan has filed additional pleadings with this Court which appear to amend the complaint filed in the Court of Chancery. In connection with the original complaint in Chancery, Buchanan filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court of Chancery granted this motion. Now that the matter has been transferred here, Buchanan has filed another motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dated July 30, In two orders, both dated July 29, 2008, issued in two separate appeals, the Delaware Supreme Court denied Buchanan s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Supreme Court precedent requires this Court to deny Buchanan s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Before this matter proceeds, Buchanan must pay the following fees and costs: a filing fee of $ to the Superior Court; a $60.00 fee to the Sheriff of Sussex County for service on 1 In 10 Del. C. 1902, it is provided as follows: No civil action, suit or other proceeding brought in any court of this State shall be dismissed solely on the ground that such court is without jurisdiction of the subject matter, either in the original proceeding or on appeal. Such proceeding may be transferred to an appropriate court for hearing and determination, provided that the party otherwise adversely affected, within 60 days after the order denying the jurisdiction of the first court has become final, files in that court a written election of transfer, discharges all costs accrued in the first court, and makes the usual deposit for costs in the second court. All or part of the papers filed, or copies thereof, and a transcript of the entries, in the court where the proceeding was originally instituted shall be delivered in accordance with the rules or special orders of such court, by the Prothonotary, clerk, or register of that court to the Prothonotary, clerk or register of the court to which the proceeding is transferred. The latter court shall thereupon entertain such applications in the proceeding as conform to law and to the rules and practice of such court, and may by rule or special order provide for amendments in pleadings and for all other matters concerning the course of procedure for hearing and determining the cause as justice may require. For the purpose of laches or of any statute of limitations, the time of bringing the proceeding shall be deemed to be the time when it was brought in the first court. This section shall be liberally construed to permit and facilitate transfers of proceedings between the courts of this State in the interests of justice. 2
3 William Wallace and the Delaware State Police; a $35.00 fee to the Sheriff of Kent County for service on the Richards by way of serving the Secretary of State (this must be by money order because the Kent County Sheriff does not take personal checks); and a $4.00 money order payable to the Secretary of State for the long-arm service on the Richards. 2 While reviewing the motion to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court reviewed the complaint pursuant to 10 Del. C. 8803(b). 3 This review has led this Court to conclude that a stay must be entered until pending criminal proceedings against Buchanan finally are resolved. Buchanan has a history of filing frivolous and malicious litigation against parties who have been involved in his divorce proceedings and the proceedings ancillary thereto. Buchanan v. Gay, Del. Super., C.A. No. 06C , Johnson, J. (Sept. 21, 2006), rearg. den. (Oct. 13, 2006), aff d, Del. Supr., No. 562, 2006, Berger, J. (May 17, 2007); Buchanan v. Gay, Del. Super., C.A. No. 08M-02-12, Stokes, J. (March 10, 2008). In the latter case, he also filed frivolous claims against his bankruptcy attorney and his ex-wife s attorney. Additionally, he sought to obtain relief from the Family Court decisions by filing legally meritless actions in the Supreme Court, In re Buchanan, Del. Supr., No. 530, 2007, Ridgely, J. (Nov. 14, 2007); Chancery Court, Buchanan 2 Buchanan repeatedly has asserted in this civil action and in a criminal action pending in this Court that he has obtained service over the defendants in this matter. He never has obtained service in accordance with the law. Serving an attorney is not personal service over the defendants. Buchanan must obtain legal service over each defendant in this case. 3 In 10 Del. C. 8803(b), it is provided as follows: b) Upon establishing the amount of fees and costs to be paid, the court shall review the complaint. Upon such review, the complaint shall be dismissed if the court finds the action is factually frivolous, malicious or, upon a court's finding that the action is legally frivolous and that even a pro se litigant, acting with due diligence, should have found well settled law disposing of the issue(s) raised. Any order of dismissal shall specifically identify whether the complaint was factually frivolous, legally frivolous and/or malicious. Service of process shall not issue unless and until the court grants leave following its review. 3
4 v. Buchanan, Del. Ch., No. 2190, Chandler, C. (May 31, 2006); and Superior Court, Buchanan v. Buchanan, Del. Super., C.A. No. 06C , Bradley, J. (July 7, 2006).The Supreme Court recently noted in an order denying Buchanan s request for a writ of mandamus that Buchanan has filed at least eight separate actions in the Supreme Court over the past several months, all of which stem from his dissatisfaction with the Family Court s disposition of his and his former wife s marital property. In re Buchanan, Del. Supr., No. 368, 2008, Ridgely, J. (Sept. 2, 2008) at 2. 4 Buchanan also has a history of misrepresenting the facts and making claims based upon those misrepresentations. Buchanan v. Gay, Del. Super., C.A. No. 06C , Johnson, J. (Sept. 21, 2006) at 4; Buchanan v. Gay, Del Super., C.A. No. 08M-02-12, Stokes, J. (March 10, 2008) at 3. The complaint filed in this matter is no different. It contains allegations which are not true and bases claims on those untrue allegations. Thus, in setting forth facts below, I set forth facts which appear in previous decisions of various courts which have dealt with Buchanan. I also obtain undisputed facts from the documents which have been filed in this matter as well as in the pending criminal case of State v. Buchanan, Def. ID# The facts indisputably show as follows. First, and most important, Buchanan has been evicted, by a final order of the Family Court, from the property at Hudson Road, Laurel, Delaware ( the property ). Bennett v. Bennett, Del. Supr., No. 73, 2007, Ridgely, J. (Aug. 6, 2007); Bell v. Bell, Del. Supr., No. 60, 2008 (May 4 The Supreme Court ruled at page 3: Because we conclude that Buchanan s repetitive and excessive filings constitute an abuse of the processes of this Court, we hereby direct the Clerk that no future filings by Buchanan in connection with Family Court File... shall be docketed unless first reviewed and approved for filing by a Justice of this Court. 4
5 23, 2008). 5 As of January 3, 2008, he was ordered to be off of the property. He was excluded from the home in order to allow his ex-wife the opportunity to safely prepare the home for sale. As of January 3, 2008, a Court in the District of Columbia wanted Buchanan for criminal charges where Barbara Richards, a defendant in this case, was an alleged victim. Corporal William Wallace of the Delaware State Police ( Corporal Wallace ), also a defendant in this action, arrested Buchanan on the fugitive warrant on January 3, Buchanan posted bond on those charges. On January 10, 2008, Buchanan went onto the property, accompanied by the Delaware State Police, to retrieve his personal property. On January 26, 2008, Buchanan was arrested at the property. State v. Buchanan, Def. ID# The charges lodged at this time were burglary in the second degree; criminal 5 Bankruptcy proceedings had delayed Family Court orders regarding the sale of the property. When these proceedings were dismissed, the Family Court, in an order dated February 5, 2007, entered an order evicting Buchanan from two parcels of marital real estate. Bennett v. Bennett, Del. Supr., No. 73, 2007, Ridgely, J. (Aug. 6, 2007) at 1-2. The Supreme Court affirmed the Family Court order. Id. at 3. The Family Court entered another order dated October 24, 2007, barring Buchanan from the property. State v. Buchanan, Def. ID# , Docket Entry 3. Family Court orders were stayed pending further bankruptcy proceedings. Id. Upon receiving notice from the Bankruptcy Court that Buchanan s bankruptcy proceedings had been dismissed, the Family Court ordered, on January 3, 2008, that stays of its October 24, 2007, orders were lifted and those orders could be carried out with full force and effect. Id. Those October 24, 2007, orders compelled the execution of a contract of sale by directing a clerk of the Family Court to execute an enclosed contract of sale and directed all appropriate law enforcement agencies to physically remove David J. Buchanan from the former marital property in order that the Court s Order of Sale of the Property could be carried out. Id. This January 3, 2008, order became final when the Supreme Court dismissed Buchanan s appeal. Bell v. Bell, Del. Supr., No. 60, 2008, Holland, J. (May 23, 2008). 6 The affidavit of probable cause alleges in pertinent part as follows: On at approx hours I responded to [34806] Hudson Rd., Laurel to assist undercover units with an ongoing domestic situation. Prior to arrival Cpl. Wallace conducted a briefing with all officers involved and stated that D (Buchanan, David J. WM) was evicted from the above residence in compliance with the Sussex Family court order, after being arrested at this residence as an out of state fugitive on D-Buchanan was provided assistance with retrieving his property from the residence and was advised that he was no longer allowed on the property at Hudson Rd., Laurel and was advised that if he returned to said property he would be in violation of the Family Court Order and would face criminal charges being filed against him. Since his arrest Cpl. Wallace has been in contact with D-Buchanan on numerous occasions (as recently as ) advising him that he was not allowed at the residence and that if he were found there he would be arrested on criminal charges. On todays [sic] date units responded 5
6 mischief under $1000; resisting arrest; and criminal contempt by disobedience or resistance to a mandate of a court. 7 Immediately thereafter, on January 29, 2008, Buchanan filed with the Family Court a Protection from Abuse petition, labeled Petition for Protection from Abuse and Emergency Petition for Writ of De Ejectione Firmae Providing Assignment of Property Pursuant to 10 Del. C. 921(4). He sought relief from Corporal Wallace. By order dated February 1, 2008, the Family Court dismissed this petition, ruling it had no jurisdiction over Corporal Wallace. On February 6, 2008, Buchanan sought to subpoena Corporal Wallace in a Family Court proceeding. Thereby, Buchanan sought information pertaining to his arrests on January 3, 2008, and January 26, On February 15, 2008, Buchanan commenced this pending civil litigation by filing in the to the residence in order to assist V... with making sure the residence was vacant and that D- Buchanan was not on the property. Upon arrival of the first unit (Tpr. Gallagher) found the white Ford F-250 in the driveway and smoke coming from the chimney, indicating that someone was inside the residence. The white Ford pickup is registered to D-Buchanan. D-Buchanan has made threats in the past and on Troop 5 units (Cpl. Allen) received third party information from a neighbor that D-Buchanan stated he would blow it all up if someone attempted to remove him from the property. Upon arrival Cpl. Wallace made contact via cell phone with D-Buchanan, advising that he was in the area and observed his truck in the driveway and requested that he come to the end of theb [sic] driveway and talk to him. D-Buchanan denied being on the property and stated that he was in Lincoln in a separate vehicle also owned by him... Several minutes later Tpr. Gallagher observed D-Buchanan exit the residence and walk toward the wooded area. Troopers responded into the driveway and commanded D-Buchanan to stop and return to the residence, at which point he turned and looked back, seeing the Troopers and began to run in the same direction, away from the Troopers entering the wooded area. Troopers and K9-50 with Partner (Aron) gave chase and were able to apprehend D-Buchanan without incident in an adjacent field. A second interview conducted with the owners of the property revealed a fully loaded 20 gauge shot gun hidden behind a full sheet of drywall next to the basement entry door. A jacket was also found hanging on the sheet of drywall with all of the pockets loaded with ammunition for the shot gun. Tpr. Gallagher also that he was advised by V... that D-Buchanan broke the door knob off the basement door and replaced it with a new door knob, thus giving him a key to get into the residence. 7 The Grand Jury indicted Buchanan on March 24, 2008, and the indictment amended the burglary in the second degree charge to a burglary in the third degree charge, added a charge of possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and included the charges of criminal mischief, resisting arrest, and criminal contempt. 6
7 Court of Chancery a Petition for Writ of De Ejectione Firmae and Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief. The parties named were William A. Wallace, the Delaware State Police and David J. Richards. The complaint alleges that David J. Richards ( Richards ) is the husband of Buchanan s ex-wife. It further alleges that on January 4, 2008, Richards, with the assistance of Corporal Wallace gained unauthorized access to the office of Buchanan Farms, Inc. located on the property owned and deeded to David J. Buchanan, at Hudson Road, Laurel, Delaware... ; Richards removed items of Buchanan s personal property from the premises; and the defendants entered Buchanan s locked personal vehicle and removed items of Buchanan s personal property. The complaint further alleges that on January 26, 2008, the date of plaintiff s arrest in the pending criminal matter, Richards, with the assistance of the Delaware State Police, removed firearms, property, and valuable livestock from the property. He asserts Richards conspired with Corporal Wallace to unlawfully ouster Buchanan from the property. Buchanan seeks injunctive relief preventing further trespass on the property, declaratory relief, and the return of his property. Meanwhile, litigation involving Buchanan continued in Family Court, with a protection from abuse order being entered on March 13, That order prevented Buchanan from possessing any firearms. On March 13, 2008, Buchanan again was arrested, this time for charges of possession of a firearm or ammunition by a person prohibited (three counts); carrying a concealed deadly weapon (2 counts); criminal contempt of a domestic violence protective order; and driving while license suspended or revoked. State v. Buchanan, Def. ID# , now 7
8 consolidated into State v. Buchanan, Def. ID# In a letter dated April 1, 2008, filed with the Court of Chancery, Buchanan asked the Chancery Court to issue an injunction regarding malicious prosecution by the Department of Justice. Chancery Court determined that Buchanan had not pled a case of ejectment, and to the extent he had stated a claim, it was for replevin or for the torts of trespass or conversion. It further ruled that the equitable relief Buchanan sought was not available to him. Thus, the Chancery Court dismissed the case, without prejudice, for lack of jurisdiction. In a document filed with Superior Court which appears to amend the original complaint filed with Chancery Court, Buchanan includes Barbara Richards as a defendant. In this pleading, he asserts that his arrests were beyond the authority and jurisdiction of the State Police and Mr. Richards. He alleges that Mr. Richards coordinated his arrest on January 3, He also asserts that all of the defendants, including Barbara Richards, took his personal property. He alleges the arrests and seizures of his property resulted in his wrongful ejectment from the property. He asserts his constitutional rights have been violated. He maintains he suffered malicious prosecution, tort, false arrest, deprivation of rights, and emotional harm. Buchanan has filed a multitude of motions and pleadings with this Court in the criminal case which interweave the pending civil case with the criminal case. State v. Buchanan, Def. ID# , Docket Entries 20, 21, 26, 27, 29, 33, 36, 41, 43. Buchanan attempts to obtain, in the criminal filings, discovery related to his civil case. Id., Docket Entry 20. Buchanan asserts 8 The March 24, 2008 Grand Jury indictment, which incorporated both sets of charges, charged Buchanan with possession of a deadly weapon by a person prohibited (two counts regarding firearms and one count regarding ammunition) and carrying a concealed deadly weapon (two counts). 8
9 that his bond was increased in retaliation for him filing this civil suit. Id., Docket Entry 33. He also maintains that the State, in filing these criminal charges, is attempting to evict him from his property. Id., Undocketed document which was filed with the Supreme Court and captioned Answer to `Answer and Motion to Dismiss. He argues the civil and criminal matters should be combined. Id., Docket Entry 33. Despite the fact he was arrested on the first set of charges before he filed his civil suit, he argues the State is estopped from pursuing the criminal matters because it is pursuing the criminal matters to preclude him from obtaining recovery in the civil case. Id., Docket Entries 20, 26, 29, 43. Finally, he argues that trial counsel is ineffective because he cannot represent him in the civil suit. Id., Docket Entries 27, 33, 36, 41. The Court has decided to stay this civil proceeding pending a final outcome of the criminal proceedings against Buchanan. Even though he has not obtained service over any of the defendants, Buchanan already is seeking discovery in the civil matter and in the criminal matter. He may not obtain discovery in a criminal matter through an interrelated civil proceeding. State v. Spicer, Del. Super., C.A. Nos. 98M and 98M , Stokes, J. (March 31, 1999), rearg. den. (May 11, 1999). Also, it is clear from the filings to date that Buchanan is harassing the arresting officer, his ex-wife and his ex-wife s husband. He is attempting to control the outcome of the criminal proceedings through this civil proceeding. In light of this behavior, I rule that this civil action shall be stayed until there is a final resolution of the matters in State v. Buchanan, Def. ID# Upon final resolution of the criminal matter, the Court will 9 A judgment would be final if Buchanan is acquitted. If Buchanan is found guilty or pleads guilty, then the judgment is final 30 days after the Court imposes sentence if Buchanan does not file a direct appeal; or, if he files an appeal, it is final when the Supreme Court issues a mandate or order finally determining the case on direct review, or if Buchanan files a petition for certiorari seeking review of the Supreme Court s mandate or order, when the United States Supreme Court issues a mandate or order finally disposing of the case on direct review. 9
10 reconsider the civil complaint and review it once again to determine which, if any, claims may proceed. Because the Court has ruled that this civil matter is stayed, Buchanan may not file anything in this action. Any pleadings or documents filed in this matter shall not be docketed but shall be rejected and returned to Buchanan. In conclusion, I have made the following rulings: 1) The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Before this matter proceeds, Buchanan must pay the following fees and costs: a filing fee of $ to the Superior Court; a $60.00 fee to the Sheriff of Sussex County for service on William Wallace and the Delaware State Police; a $35.00 fee to the Sheriff of Kent County for service on the Richards by way of serving the Secretary of State (this must be by money order because the Kent County Sheriff does not take personal checks); and a $4.00 money order payable to the Secretary of State for the longarm service on the Richards. 2) This matter is stayed pending the final outcome of the criminal proceedings in State v. Buchanan, Def. ID# ) Should Buchanan attempt to file any pleading or document in this proceeding before final resolution of the criminal matter, the Prothonotary s Office is to return the pleading or document to Buchanan without docketing such. IT IS SO ORDERED. 10
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY DAVID J. BUCHANAN, : C.A. No. 08M-02-012 RFS Petitioner/Respondent 1 : v. : THOMAS E. GAY JAMES B. TYLER : GLYNIS GIBSON Respondents/Defendants.
More informationCHAPTER 200. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION; GENERAL PROVISIONS
RULES OF CONSTRUCTION 246 Rule 201 CHAPTER 200. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION; GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 201. Citation of Rules. 202. Definitions. 203. Computation of Time. 204. Purpose and Intent of Rules. 205.
More informationNEW HAMPSHIRE. (a) Commission or attempted commission of harassment as defined in RSA 644:4;
173-B:1 Definitions. As used in this chapter: NEW HAMPSHIRE I. "Abuse" means the occurrence of one or more of the following acts between family or household members or current or former sexual or intimate
More information704 N. King St., Suite 600 White and Williams, LLP Wilmington, DE N. Market Street, Suite 902 Wilmington, DE 19801
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE E. SCOTT BRADLEY 1 The Circle, Suite 2 JUDGE GEORGETOWN, DE 19947 September 28, 2016 Brian T.N. Jordan, Esquire Marc S. Casarino, Esquire Jordan Law Firm, LLC Nicholas
More informationBRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES. 1. Upon the filing of a divorce or custody action pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of
BRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES Local Rule 51 These rules shall be known as the Bradford County Rules of Civil Procedure and may be cited as Brad.Co.R.C.P. Local Rule 205.2(b) 1. Upon the filing of a
More informationINMATE FORM FOR CIVIL ACTIONS FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA
INMATE FORM FOR CIVIL ACTIONS FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF GEORGIA INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY (NOTE: O.C.G.A. 9-10-14(a) requires the proper use of this form, and failure to use this form as required
More informationPART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS
PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS What this Part is about: This Part is designed to resolve issues and questions arising in the course of a Court action. It includes rules describing how applications
More informationRhode Island False Claims Act
Rhode Island False Claims Act 9-1.1-1. Name of act. [Effective until February 15, 2008.] This chapter may be cited as the State False Claims Act. 9-1.1-2. Definitions. [Effective until February 15, 2008.]
More informationBedford County Local Rules
UPDATED 12/28/16 Bedford County Local Rules Table of Rules Rules of Civil Procedure 206.4(c) Issuance of Rule to Show Cause 208.3(a) Motions Procedure 208.3(b) Motions, Briefs, and Responses 211.1 Non-Appearance
More informationTEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED
TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE FORMS ANNOTATED 1.1 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL Order By Daniel L. Young PART ONE STATE PROCEEDINGS CHAPTER 1. BAIL 1.2 SURETY S AFFIDAVIT TO SURRENDER PRINCIPAL CURRENTLY
More informationCHAPTER 33. BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME COURT IN GENERAL ORIGINAL MATTERS Applications for Leave to File Original Process. KING S BENCH MATTERS
SUPREME COURT BUSINESS 210 Rule 3301 CHAPTER 33. BUSINESS OF THE SUPREME COURT IN GENERAL Rule 3301. Office of the Prothonotary. 3302. Seal of the Supreme Court. 3303. [Rescinded]. 3304. Hybrid Representation.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
In re: Martin Tarin Franco Doc. 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION IN RE A-09-MC-508-SS MARTIN TARIN FRANCO ORDER AND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 50B 1
Chapter 50B. Domestic Violence. 50B-1. Domestic violence; definition. (a) Domestic violence means the commission of one or more of the following acts upon an aggrieved party or upon a minor child residing
More informationAmended by Order dated June 21, 2013; effective July 1, RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART FIVE THE SUPREME COURT B. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
Amended by Order dated June 21, 2013; effective July 1, 2013. RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART FIVE THE SUPREME COURT B. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Rule 5:7B. Petition for a Writ of Actual Innocence.
More informationPowers and Duties of Court Commissioners
Marquette Law Review Volume 1 Issue 4 Volume 1, Issue 4 (1917) Article 4 Powers and Duties of Court Commissioners Max W. Nohl Milwaukee Bar Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr
More informationCHAPTER 15. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENTAL DETERMINATIONS IN GENERAL
JUDICIAL REVIEW 210 Rule 1501 CHAPTER 15. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF GOVERNMENTAL DETERMINATIONS IN GENERAL Rule 1501. Scope of Chapter. 1502. Exclusive Procedure. 1503. Improvident Appeals or Original Jurisdiction
More informationPacket Two: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 1: Background
Packet Two: Criminal Law and Procedure Chapter 1: Background Review from Introduction to Law The United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land. The United States Supreme Court is the final
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERKS COUNTY TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PART I COURT OF COMMON PLEAS. EFFECTIVE September 23, 2013
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF BERKS COUNTY TWENTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PART I COURT OF COMMON PLEAS EFFECTIVE September 23, 2013 PART II ORPHANS COURT DIVISION THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK
More information3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments Page 1
3RD CIRCUIT LOCAL APPELLATE RULES Proposed amendments 2008 - Page 1 1 L.A.R. 1.0 SCOPE AND TITLE OF RULES 2 1.1 Scope and Organization of Rules 3 The following Local Appellate Rules (L.A.R.) are adopted
More informationChicago False Claims Act
Chicago False Claims Act Chapter 1-21 False Statements 1-21-010 False Statements. Any person who knowingly makes a false statement of material fact to the city in violation of any statute, ordinance or
More informationDate Submitted: August 11, 2009 Date Decided: August 13, 2009
COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEO E. STRINE, JR. VICE CHANCELLOR New Castle County Courthouse Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Kenneth Abraham SBI# 00173040 James T. Vaughn Correctional Center 1181
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN THE MATTER OF THE ) PURPORTED LAST WILL AND ) TESTAMENT OF PAUL F. ZILL, ) DATED MARCH 26, 2006, AND ) C.A. No. 2593-MA STATUS OF BARBARA ZILL, ) EXECUTRIX
More informationCourt Records Glossary
Court Records Glossary Documents Affidavit Answer Appeal Brief Case File Complaint Deposition Docket Indictment Interrogatories Injunction Judgment Opinion Pleadings Praecipe A written or printed statement
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 75D 1
Chapter 75D. Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations. 75D-1. Short title. This Chapter shall be known and may be cited as the North Carolina Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE TITLE 16. PARTICULAR ACTIONS, PROCEEDINGS AND MATTERS. CHAPTER 11. EJECTMENT AND OTHER REAL PROPERTY ACTIONS. 2001 Edition DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA OFFICIAL CODE CHAPTER
More informationRULES AND STATUTES ON HABEAS CORPUS with Amendments and Additions in the ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996
RULES AND STATUTES ON HABEAS CORPUS with Amendments and Additions in the ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT OF 1996 CRIMINAL JUSTICE LEGAL FOUNDATION INTRODUCTION On April 24, 1996, Senate Bill
More informationTHE FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT 31 U.S.C
THE FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT 31 U.S.C. 3729-3733 Reflecting proposed amendments in S. 386, the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009, as passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on May 6, 2009
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. HAROLD KUPERSMIT Appellant No. 1475 EDA 2014 Appeal from the Order Entered
More informationAdministrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents
Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, 2003 Table of Contents PART I Administrative Rules for Procedures for Preliminary Sunrise Review Assessments Part
More informationDistrict of Columbia False Claims Act
District of Columbia False Claims Act 2-308.03. Claims by District government against contractor (a) (1) All claims by the District government against a contractor arising under or relating to a contract
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY JENNIFER AUGUST, : C.A. NO. SS06J
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY JENNIFER AUGUST, : C.A. NO. SS06J-09-168 Plaintiff, : v. : DAVID AUGUST, : Defendant. : JENNIFER AUGUST, : C.A. NO. SS07J-09-096
More informationINMATE FORM FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY
INMATE FORM FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS INSTRUCTIONS READ CAREFULLY (NOTE: O.C.G.A. 9-10-14(a) requires the proper use of this form, and failure to use this form as required will result in the clerk of any
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR PRISONERS FILING A COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PRISONERS FILING A COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 This packet includes one copy each of a complaint form and in forma pauperis affidavit. To initiate a lawsuit, you must submit both. Any
More informationNEW MEXICO. New Mexico 1
NEW MEXICO 40-13-1. Short title. This act [40-13-1 to 40-13-7 NMSA 1978] may be cited as the "Family Violence Protection Act". History: Laws 1987, ch. 286, 1. 40-13-2. Definitions. As used in the Family
More informationDe Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144 (C.A.9 (Cal.), 1990)
Page 1144 912 F.2d 1144 Steven M. De LONG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Michael HENNESSEY, Respondent-Appellee. Steven M. De LONG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dr. Ruth MANSFIELD; Gloria Gonzales; Patricia Denning;
More informationCHAPTER ACTIONS
ACTIONS AT LAW 231 CHAPTER 1000. ACTIONS Subchapter Rule A. CIVIL ACTION... 1001 B. ACTION IN TRESPASS... 1041 C. ACTION IN EJECTMENT... 1051 D. ACTION TO QUIET TITLE... 1061 E. ACTION IN REPLEVIN... 1071
More informationPETITION TO MODIFY PROTECTION FROM ABUSE ORDER INSTRUCTION SHEET
PETITION TO MODIFY PROTECTION FROM ABUSE ORDER INSTRUCTION SHEET USE THIS FORM IF YOU NEED TO CHANGE YOUR FINAL OR TEMPORARY PROTECTION FROM ABUSE ORDER. These instructions are meant to give you general
More informationRULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 6:7. PROCESS TO ENFORCE JUDGMENTS
RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 6:7. PROCESS TO ENFORCE JUDGMENTS 6:7-1. Requests for Issuance of Writs of Execution; Contents of Writs of Execution and Other Process for the
More informationLOCAL RULES. Tenth Judicial District - Osage County Oklahoma. Effective July 1, 2012
LOCAL RULES Effective July 1, 2012 Tenth Judicial District - Osage County Oklahoma Hon. Stuart L. Tate- Special Judge Hon. B. David Gambill- Associate District Judge Hon. M. John Kane IV- District Judge
More informationCHAPTER ARBITRATION
ARBITRATION 231 Rule 1301 CHAPTER 1300. ARBITRATION Subchap. Rule A. COMPULSORY ARBITRATION... 1301 B. PROCEEDING TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND CONFIRM AN ARBITRATION AWARD IN A CONSUMER CREDIT TRANSACTION...
More information25 8/15/05 2 7/ /17/06 3 4/ /24/06 4 4/ /21/06 5 8/ /1/07 6 1/22/ /21/08 7 1/22/ /18/09 8 1/26/98
WESTMORELAND COUNTY LOCAL RULES OF COURT SUPPLEMENTS RECORD Use the filing record below to ensure that your local rules of court are current. When each additional supplement is received, record the date
More informationReferred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Provides for the issuance of orders of protection relating to high-risk behavior.
S.B. 0 SENATE BILL NO. 0 SENATORS RATTI AND CANNIZZARO PREFILED JANUARY, 0 Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY Provides for the issuance of orders of protection relating to high-risk behavior. (BDR
More informationRULE TITLE AND SCOPE
RULE 7.010. TITLE AND SCOPE (a) Title. These rules shall be cited as Florida Small Claims Rules and may be abbreviated Fla. Sm. Cl. R. These rules shall be construed to implement the simple, speedy, and
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION. Plaintiff, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION
Cummings v. Moore et al Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION BERTHA L. CUMMINGS, Plaintiff, v. Action No. 3:08 CV 579 EDDIE N. MOORE, JR., JANET DUGGER, RANDY
More informationADAMS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE BUSINESS OF COURTS
ADAMS COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Rule 51. Title and Citation of Rules. Scope. All civil procedural rules adopted by the Adams County Court of Common Pleas shall be known as the
More informationRULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 1:43. FILING AND OTHER FEES ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 2B:1-7
RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 1:43. FILING AND OTHER FEES ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO N.J.S.A. 2B:1-7 1:43. Filing and Other Fees Established Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2B:1-7 The following
More informationPLAN OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. In Implementation of. The Criminal Justice Act
PLAN OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT In Implementation of The Criminal Justice Act The Judicial Council of the Fourth Circuit adopts the following plan, in implementation of
More informationGeneral Sessions Court
CTAS Private Acts - Madison June 28, 2018 General Sessions Court Published on CTAS Private Acts (http://privateacts.ctas.tennessee.edu) 2018-06-28 Page 1 of 6 Table of Contents General Sessions Court...
More informationPart 36 Extraordinary Remedies
Alberta Rules of Court 390/68 R427-430 Part 36 Extraordinary Remedies Replevin Recovery of personal property 427 In any action brought for the recovery of any personal property and claiming that the property
More informationWASHINGTON STATE MEDICAID FRAUD FALSE CLAIMS ACT. This chapter may be known and cited as the medicaid fraud false claims act.
Added by Chapter 241, Laws 2012. Effective date June 7, 2012. RCW 74.66.005 Short title. WASHINGTON STATE MEDICAID FRAUD FALSE CLAIMS ACT This chapter may be known and cited as the medicaid fraud false
More informationacquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
GlosaryofLegalTerms acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. affidavit: A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making
More informationBEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. : Respondent : (Delaware County)
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL : No. 292, Disciplinary Docket No. 2 Petitioner : Supreme Court : : Nos. 3 DB 1997 and 72 DB 2003 v. :
More informationCriminal Litigation: Step-By-Step
Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step Path of Criminal Cases in Queens Commencement Arraignment Pre-Trial Trial Getting The Defendant Before The Court! There are four
More informationARTICLE II. APPELLATE PROCEDURE
APPEALS FROM LOWER COURTS 210 Rule 901 ARTICLE II. APPELLATE PROCEDURE Chap. Rule 9. APPEALS FROM LOWER COURTS... 901 11. APPEALS FROM COMMONWEALTH COURT AND SUPERIOR COURT... 1101 13. INTERLOCUTORY APPEALS
More informationNew Jersey False Claims Act
New Jersey False Claims Act (N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:32C-1 to 18) i 2A:32C-1. Short title Sections 1 through 15 and sections 17 and 18 [C.2A:32C-1 through C.2A:32C-17] of this act shall be known and may be
More informationRule 900. Scope; Notice In Death Penalty Cases.
POST-CONVICTION COLLATERAL PROCEEDINGS 234 Rule 900 CHAPTER 9. POST-CONVICTION COLLATERAL PROCEEDINGS 900. Scope; Notice In Death Penalty Cases. 901. Initiation of Post-Conviction Collateral Proceedings.
More informationVideo Course Evaluation Form. Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of Course You Just Watched
Garden State CLE 21 Winthrop Road Lawrenceville, New Jersey 08648 (609) 895-0046 fax- 609-895-1899 Atty2starz@aol.com! Video Course Evaluation Form Attorney Name Atty ID number for Pennsylvania: Name of
More informationH 7688 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
======== LC000 ======== 01 -- H S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T RELATING TO COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE--COURTS -- EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDERS
More informationCase 3:10-cr JAH Document 19 Filed 06/14/10 Page 1 of 6
Case :-cr-00-jah Document Filed 0// Page of LAURA E. DUFFY United States Attorney CAROLINE P. HAN Assistant U.S. Attorney California State Bar No. 00 United States Attorney's Office 0 Front Street, Room
More informationMOBar CLE Residential Landlord/Tenant Law Part 2 Page 1
Prepared by Michael T. Carney, Mid-Missouri Legal Services, Corp. I. The Eviction Process a. Rent and Possession i. What is Rent and Possession 1. RSMO 535.010 a. Tenant fails to make a payment of rent
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA James D. Schneller, : Appellant : : v. : No. 352 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: August 5, 2016 Clerk of Courts of the First Judicial : District of Pennsylvania; Prothonotary
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY TERRY MALIN, ) Defendant, ) ) v. ) I.D. # 0608022475B ) ) STATE OF DELAWARE. ) Date Submitted: Motion for Postconviction Relief:
More informationPA Huntingdon Cty. Civ. LR 205 This document is current with amendments received through June 1, 2016
PA Huntingdon Cty. Civ. LR 205 Pennsylvania Local Rules of Court > HUNTINGDON COUNTY > RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Rule 205. Civil Case Management 1. The Huntingdon County Civil Case Management Plan. (a)
More informationRule Change #2001(16) The Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure Chapter 26. Colorado Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Courts Appendix to Chapter 26
Rule Change #2001(16) The Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure Chapter 26. Colorado Rules of Procedure for Small Claims Courts Appendix to Chapter 26 The following rules are Amended and Adopted as of September
More informationSuperior Courts Common Records Retention Schedules Schedules relating to Case Records
Superior Courts Common Records Retention Schedules Schedules relating to Case Records SERIES TITLE: FELONY CASE FILES Schedule: 86-21 Approved April 8, 1986 Documents relating to trying felony cases in
More informationDIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT
DIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT [If the default judgment comes from Small Claims Court, go to that court and ask the small claims clerk for information
More informationALABAMA SURFACE MINING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
ALABAMA SURFACE MINING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 880-X-5A SPECIAL RULES FOR HEARINGS AND APPEALS SPECIAL RULES APPLICABLE TO SURFACE COAL MINING HEARINGS AND APPEALS TABLE OF CONTENTS 880-X-5A-.01
More informationTHE COURTS. Title 246 MINOR CIVIL COURT RULES
Title 246 MINOR CIVIL COURT RULES PART I. GENERAL [246 PA. CODE CH. 100] Order Amending Rule 113 of the Rules of Conduct, Office Standards and Civil Procedure for District Justices; No. 128; Magisterial
More informationNew Mexico Medicaid False Claims Act
New Mexico Medicaid False Claims Act (N.M. Stat. Ann. 27-14-1 to 15) i 27-14-1. Short title This [act] [27-14-1 to 27-14-15 NMSA 1978] may be cited as the "Medicaid False Claims Act". 27-14-2. Purpose
More informationO.C.G.A. TITLE 23 Chapter 3 Article 6. GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved.
O.C.G.A. TITLE 23 Chapter 3 Article 6 GEORGIA CODE Copyright 2015 by The State of Georgia All rights reserved. *** Current Through the 2015 Regular Session *** TITLE 23. EQUITY CHAPTER 3. EQUITABLE REMEDIES
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY ORDER
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY MICHELE A. RODGERS RUSSO, Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 01C-08-005 JOSEPH W. NELSON, Defendant. ORDER Michele Rodgers Russo ( Plaintiff
More informationTitle 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL
Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL Chapter 517: ASSET FORFEITURE Table of Contents Part 7. ASSET FORFEITURE... Section 5821. SUBJECT PROPERTY... 3 Section 5821-A. PROPERTY NOT SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE
More informationJUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS
SUPREME COURT RULES FORMS RULES RELATING TO DISTRICT COURT AND RULES RELATING TO SUPREME COURT, COURT OF APPEALS, AND APPELLATE PRACTICE JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationL 1901 Prompt Disposition of Matters; Termination of Inactive Cases
L 1901 Prompt Disposition of Matters; Termination of Inactive Cases (a) The Court Administrator, no less than once per year, shall prepare, or cause the Prothonotary to prepare, a list of civil cases for
More informationELY SHOSHONE RULES OFAPPELLATE PROCEDURE
[Rev. 10/10/2007 2:43:59 PM] ELY SHOSHONE RULES OFAPPELLATE PROCEDURE I. APPLICABILITY OF RULES RULE 1. SCOPE, CONSTRUCTION OF RULES (a) Scope of Rules. These rules govern procedure in appeals to the Appellate
More informationDodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)
Dodge County (Sixth Judicial District) 1. Rules of Decorum 2. Civil Practice 3. Rules of Criminal Procedure 4. Rules of Family Court Procedure 5. Filing of Papers by Electronic Filing and Facsimile Transmission
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A113296
Filed 4/25/08 P. v. Canada CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ORDER OF THE COURT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS IN RE: ) ) ADOPTION OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS ) SMALL CLAIMS RULES. ) ) PROMULGATION No. 2017-009 ORDER OF THE COURT Pursuant to its inherent authority and the authority
More informationReferred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Provides for the issuance of certain orders for protection. (BDR 3-839)
REQUIRES TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY VOTE ( 0) S.B. SENATE BILL NO. SENATORS RATTI, FORD, MANENDO, SPEARMAN, FARLEY; ATKINSON, CANCELA, CANNIZZARO, DENIS, PARKS, SEGERBLOM AND WOODHOUSE MARCH 0, 0 Referred to
More informationTitle 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL
Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL Chapter 105-A: MAINE BAIL CODE Table of Contents Part 2. PROCEEDINGS BEFORE TRIAL... Subchapter 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 3 Section 1001. TITLE... 3 Section 1002. LEGISLATIVE
More informationChapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS
Chapter II BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS 201. CREATION OF THE BAY MILLS COURT OF APPEALS. There shall be a Bay Mills Court of Appeals consisting of the three appeals judges. Any number of judges may be appointed
More informationCALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT
CALIFORNIA FALSE CLAIMS ACT The people of the State of California do enact as follows: SECTION 1. Section 12650 of the Government Code is amended to read: 12650. (a) This article shall be known and may
More informationEleventh Judicial District Local Rules
Eleventh Judicial District Local Rules Table of Contents Standardized Practice for District Court Criminal Sessions... 11.3 Order for Non-Appearing Defendants/ Respondents and Non-Complying Defendant/
More informationSUMMARY OF CONTENTS SC-1.
SUMMARY OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 SUMMARY OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Chapter 1. Preliminary Matters............................ 1-1 Chapter 2. Parties...................................... 2-1 Chapter 3. Service......................................
More informationMagisterial District Judge
Magisterial District Judge Questions and Answers Defending An Action in Magisterial District Judge Court A landlord who wants to evict a tenant, who has not moved in response to the landlord s eviction
More informationJUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JUDICIAL COUNCIL FORMS TABLE OF CONTENTS DISTRICT COURT RULES... 1-39 Rule 109 Supervision and Reporting in Probate Cases Annual/Final Report on the Condition of the Guardian s Ward...1 Annual/Final Accounting...3
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 8 1
Article 8. Miscellaneous. Rule 64. Seizure of person or property. At the commencement of and during the course of an action, all remedies providing for seizure of person or property for the purpose of
More informationLAWS OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO MARRIED PERSONS ACT CHAPTER 45:50. Act 52 of 1976
MARRIED PERSONS ACT CHAPTER 45:50 Act 52 of 1976 Current Authorised Pages Pages Authorised (inclusive) by L.R.O. 1 20.. 1/2006 L.R.O. 1/2006 2 Chap. 45:50 Married Persons Note on Subsidiary Legislation
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION SARAH COFFEY, KRIS HERMES, and ) COMPLAINT ERIN STALNAKER, ) ) DEMAND FOR JURY Plaintiffs, ) TRIAL v. ) ) DAVID LANGFELLOW, in his individual
More informationGlossary. FY Statistical Reference Guide 11-1
Glossary Florida Office of the State Courts Administrator The glossary contains definitions of terms most frequently encountered in the collection and reporting of Summary Reporting System data. Generally,
More informationTOWNSHIP OF ACME GRAND TRAVERSE COUTNY, MICHIGAN ACME TOWNSHIP MEDICAL MARIHUANA LICENSING ORDINANCE
TOWNSHIP OF ACME GRAND TRAVERSE COUTNY, MICHIGAN ACME TOWNSHIP MEDICAL MARIHUANA LICENSING ORDINANCE 2017-02 (Approved October 3, 2017; Amended November 14, 2017; Effective December 16, 2017) 1. Title
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS EASTERN SAVINGS BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED November 4, 2003 v No. 240779 Lenawee Circuit Court CITIZENS BANK, FRANK J. DISANTO, LC No. 01-000364-CH
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR SUSSEX COUNTY THEODORE J. MARCUCILLI and C.A. No. 99C-02-007 JUDY G. MARCUCILLI, PLAINTIFFS, v. BOARDWALK BUILDERS, INC., DEFENDANT and THIRD-
More informationThese rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.
BUSINESS OF THE COURT L.R. No. 51 TITLE AND CITATION OF RULES These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.
More informationH 5510 SUBSTITUTE B AS AMENDED ======== LC001499/SUB B ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D
01 -- H SUBSTITUTE B AS AMENDED ======== LC001/SUB B ======== S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D IN GENERAL ASSEMBLY JANUARY SESSION, A.D. 01 A N A C T AN ACT RELATING TO COURTS AND CIVIL PROCEDURE--COURTS
More informationCLINTON COUNTY RULES OF COURT. Contents LOCAL CRIMINAL RULES... 4 Local Administrative Order: Concerning Magisterial Judicial District Coverage...
CLINTON COUNTY RULES OF COURT Contents LOCAL CRIMINAL RULES... 4 Local Administrative Order: Concerning Magisterial Judicial District Coverage... 4 Rule 202. Approval of Search Warrant Applications by
More information: : : : : : : : : : :
B-25 In the Matter of Neil Raciti, Middlesex County CSC Docket No. 2018-3711 STATE OF NEW JERSEY DECISION OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Request for Interim Relief ISSUED AUGUST 17, 2018 (SLK) Neil Raciti,
More information109 East Main Street SCHNITTKE & SMITH McConnelsville, Ohio South High Street, P. O. Box 542 New Lexington, Ohio 43764
[Cite as State v. Biggers, 2005-Ohio-5956.] COURT OF APPEALS MORGAN COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- KENNETH BIGGERS Defendant-Appellant JUDGES: Hon. John F.
More informationJanuary 17, Karl Haller, Esquire Office of the Public Defender Mellon Bank Building The Circle Georgetown, DE 19947
Elizabeth R. McFarland, Esquire Deputy Attorney General Department of Justice Carvel State Office Building 820 N. French Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Karl Haller, Esquire Office of the Public Defender Mellon
More informationACME TOWNSHIP MEDICAL MARIHUANA LICENSING ORDINANCE
ACME TOWNSHIP MEDICAL MARIHUANA LICENSING ORDINANCE 1. Title This ordinance shall be known and cited as the Acme Township Medical Marihuana Licensing Ordinance. 2. Purpose The purpose of this ordinance
More information