3 IN THE GENERAL DISTRICT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY
|
|
- Justina Hall
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Page 1 2 V I R G I N I A 3 IN THE GENERAL DISTRICT COURT OF PRINCE WILLIAM COUNTY 4 5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 6 THIDA WIN, : 7 Plaintiff, : 8 versus, : GV NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, : 10 Defendant. : 11 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 12 Manassas, Virginia 13 Wednesday, April 7, The above-entitled action came on to be heard before the 16 Honorable Peter W. Steketee, a Judge for the General District Court of 17 Prince William County, in Courtroom 1, 9311 Lee Avenue, Manassas, 18 Virginia beginning at 12:30 o'clock p.m
2 1 APPEARANCES: Page 2 2 For the Plaintiff: 3 4 JOELLE E. GOTWALS, ESQUIRE 5 Law Offices of Robert R. Weed Sudley Road, Suite Manassas, VA For the Defendant: AMY SANBORN OWEN, ESQUIRE 13 Cochran & Owen Towers Crescent Drive, Suite Vienna, VA
3 1 P R O C E E D I N G S : Page 3 2 THE COURT: All right, this is what, a demurrer? 3 MS. OWENS: This is our demurrer, Your Honor. 4 THE COURT: Let's see what we have first of all. This is a 5 negligence claim, is that correct? 6 MS. GOTWALS: Yes, Your Honor. 7 THE COURT: Failure to prevent employees from committing 8 harassment, violation of Code. 9 And so Navy Federal Credit Union is alleged, has been, at 10 least turned its head from employees who are committing acts of 11 harassment, is that it? All right. So the demurrer is Navy 12 Federal's; I guess I should hear it. 13 MS. OWEN: Thank you, Your Honor. Amy Owen on behalf of 14 Navy Federal Credit Union. This case that was filed I believe is a 15 somewhat of a case of first impression; I certainly have never seen 16 someone allege that the creditor could be liable under criminal 17 statute for its employees who are attempting to collect a debt. 18 This is an interesting argument; however, I think the 19 Court can rule on it pretty easily under the Fair Debt Collection 20 Practices Act, which is a federal act that preempts common law causes 21 of action for activity that is covered under the act and the act as 22 the Court may know covers when you can call someone, how often you can
4 1 call someone, the substance of what you can say, et cetera. Page 4 2 And for that reason, Your Honor, just from the outset I 3 think the Court needs to grant, sustain the demurrer. 4 But looking at it a little bit further, I think the Court 5 can hear the full case and that the Court will never allow a debtor to 6 come back and start claiming negligence on the creditor for allowing 7 its employees to try to collect a debt. It just doesn't make sense. 8 I don't know how there will be ability to prove beyond a reasonable 9 doubt that this statute was in fact violated. 10 I'm not aware of any police report that was filed, that 11 people were charged, convicted. I could go on and on, Your Honor, but 12 it's simply, it is an interesting argument. It's certainly novel and 13 clever, but the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is in place already 14 on this very issue about THE COURT: But they narrowed this in their warrant in 16 debt, because what they said was that they had violated specifically 17 the provisions of Virginia Code , which is captioned, causing 18 the telephone to ring with the intent to annoy. I must tell you there 19 are times during the evening when the phone rings and whether it's my 20 children or my wife who happens to be at a meeting or something like 21 that, I'm annoyed, not until I pick it up, of course, but I'm annoyed 22 I say, when I pick it up, I'm no longer annoyed, but I've had plenty
5 Page 5 1 of times the phone rings, I'm into something, if I'm reading and I 2 don't want to interrupt, I'm annoyed. 3 MS. OWEN: I understand. I think you've just -- 4 THE COURT: I'm not sure what that means. 5 MS. OWEN: I don't think that debt collectors will be 6 coming after Your Honor but now that you've said that, there may be 7 causes of action when people call to solicit for political 8 contributions or for charities or to change your phone plan. I mean, 9 where does it end. 10 THE COURT: I guess my point there is that there are times 11 when just the ringing of a telephone is an annoying event because 12 you're tied up in something else and I guess we can always turn it 13 off. 14 But having heard what she has said, what is your position 15 with respect to this? Is it your position that just calling 16 constitutes the annoyance? 17 MS. GOTWALS: Well, let me answer that question first. 18 THE COURT: Okay. 19 MS. GOTWALS: And then I'll go directly to what counsel 20 said here. 21 THE COURT: Because I don't know. 22 MS. GOTWALS: Certainly. Our argument is not just the
6 Page 6 1 ringing of the telephone. But if you'll take a look at the bill of 2 particulars -- 3 THE COURT: I haven't. 4 MS. GOTWALS: Two things, one, we have and are able to 5 successfully document if we go to trial, over a period of two weeks, phone calls from the defendants, sometimes 20 to 30 times a day 7 from three to four different individuals identifying themselves as 8 being employed by Navy Federal Credit Union. 9 THE COURT: These are all answered phone calls? 10 MS. GOTWALS: They are not all answered, no, but the phone 11 numbers that are identified, and we have provided by Ms. Win, her 12 phone records that can demonstrate the times that they have called, 13 the numbers that we can associate with Navy Federal should we need to 14 prove that at the trial. 15 So to Your Honor's point of whether or not just the phone 16 ringing is harassment, maybe, maybe not, but in this case it's almost THE COURT: Well, I was being somewhat facetious about 19 that. 20 MS. GOTWALS: Certainly, Your Honor. 21 THE COURT: The harassment, as far as I'm concerned, 22 doesn't begin really until I pick up the phone and find that there's
7 1 someone on the other end that's giving me fits in some fashion or Page 7 2 another and who's been told not to call or who otherwise should know 3 better. 4 MS. GOTWALS: That's correct. I think Your Honor -- 5 THE COURT: But the mere ringing of the phone sometimes, I 6 was saying facetiously was the annoyance. 7 MS. GOTWALS: Right, and, well, Your Honor, in this case we 8 also have, and would be able to prove by Ms. Win's testimony that they 9 were told dozens of times that she was unable to pay the debt and 10 would not be paying the debt, was filing for bankruptcy. In fact, to 11 note, that she had in fact already filed for bankruptcy and to call 12 her bankruptcy counsel, my boss, Bob Weed. 13 THE COURT: Let me ask you MS. GOTWALS: Okay. 15 THE COURT: - is your position going to be that she had 16 initiated a bankruptcy and this was an act that followed that 17 bankruptcy initiation? 18 MS. GOTWALS: No, no, Your Honor, my point is solely that 19 once being informed a dozen or two dozen times by my client that she 20 couldn't pay, wouldn't be paying and would in the near future be 21 filing bankruptcy, the only point of calling her beyond that, after 22 knowledge of that, would be to harass her and annoy her because she
8 Page 8 1 could and would not, was unable to pay and calling her 30 times a day 2 was not going to change that. 3 THE COURT: But if they wanted to make some arrangements 4 for her 5 MS. GOTWALS: Well -- 6 THE COURT: - some compromise 7 MS. GOTWALS: If they called, you know, occasionally, allow 8 enough time for her circumstances to change, to make payment 9 arrangements, that would be sensible to me, but to call 30 times a 10 day, nothing has changed between 12:01 and 12:07 p.m. 11 THE COURT: Do we know what they were intending to say? Do 12 we know what, in other words, is it your position that it's simply the 13 call that constitutes the annoyance and not the message? 14 MS. GOTWALS: Yes, to the extent that the volume of calls 15 and the calls subsequent to knowledge that she was unable and 16 unwilling to pay constituted annoyance and harassment, yes. I meant 17 that's THE COURT: Which is MS. GOTWALS: It's not what they said or what they've not 20 said. It's certainly part of her testimony, the things that they said 21 to her. 22 THE COURT: Then again, they may have been hopeful that
9 Page 9 1 she's gone out and bought a lottery ticket and - her position is that 2 it's the volume of these calls at a time when they knew that things 3 weren't going to get any better. That the message had been 4 communicated. 5 MS. OWEN: Fair Debt Collection Practices Act addresses all 6 these things. But I also want to go back to the statement, which I 7 think is important. I failed to mention in the beginning, Your Honor, 8 Ms. Win just filed bankruptcy a week ago, so I'm not even sure the 9 Court has jurisdiction over this any more, but the plaintiff's counsel 10 insists that the Court does. 11 THE COURT: Is it sanctioned by the trustee? 12 MS. GOTWALS: It hasn't; she hasn't yet had a 341 hearing, 13 Your Honor. She is in the process THE COURT: Does this not constitute an asset of the 15 bankruptcy estate? 16 MS. GOTWALS: It is listed as an asset of the bankruptcy 17 estate. 18 THE COURT: And should not the bankruptcy trustee have some 19 say in this either by saying, gee, I want to command this performance 20 or I'm going to simply wash my hands of it and let you handle it. 21 MS. GOTWALS: Well, and in past circumstances such as 22 these, Your Honor, we've exempted any possible judgment as part of a
10 Page 10 1 personal injury, any of these types of debt cases so we've never had a 2 trustee seeking to go after the interest in any of these lawsuits 3 because we've listed them in the, as an asset, but also, 4 simultaneously listed them as exempt. We've never had a trustee go 5 after it. 6 THE COURT: You brought this under , which is a 7 criminal code section. 8 MS. GOTWALS: Well, we filed it as a negligence action, 9 negligent training and hiring, but it is negligent to allow an 10 employee to break criminal law. 11 THE COURT: So what are the damages that you are going to 12 be seeking? What are the damages that you're seeking? How is that 13 going to be calculated, just the nuisance? 14 MS. GOTWALS: Yes, and the humiliation harassment 15 THE COURT: What's the basis I have for that? 16 MS. GOTWALS: Well, the testimony of Ms. Win, who isn't 17 here today. 18 THE COURT: I mean, what's the basis I have for that? 19 Where are the Bill of Particulars? Is it your position that if you 20 ask that those phone calls cease and they have persisted, your office? 21 MS. GOTWALS: I'm sorry? 22 THE COURT: Did your office ask that those phone calls
11 1 cease yet they persisted after that? Page 11 2 MS. GOTWALS: I can't speak to that today, Your Honor. 3 It's entirely possible, but I certainly just don't know whether or not 4 anyone at my firm spoke to anyone at the defendant's office. 5 THE COURT: So that's not going to be part of your case 6 then I gather? 7 MS. GOTWALS: Not at this time, Your Honor. Though, if I 8 may briefly just address defense counsel's point? 9 THE COURT: So this is set for trial today? 10 MS. GOTWALS: No, no, Your Honor. In fact, we moved the 11 trial to, I believe, May 5th pending the results of the demurrer here 12 today. 13 THE COURT: It looks like it's still on the docket for 14 today. 15 MS. OWEN: It does, Your Honor. Apparently the Court would 16 enter the order today; it came THE COURT: All right. 18 MS. GOTWALS: I believe there was a joint consent order 19 submitted to move the trial. I guess that didn't get removed from 20 today's docket. But if I can briefly respond, Your Honor, to defense 21 counsel's comments regarding the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. 22 THE COURT: That's what their hat is hanging on right now.
12 1 MS. GOTWALS: I'm sorry? Page 12 2 THE COURT: That is what their hat is hanging on. 3 MS. GOTWALS: Yes, Your Honor. And I guess I would ask the 4 question of defense counsel whether or not they, it's their position 5 that their client is a debt collector within the definition of the 6 statute and therefore their actions are covered by the statute. 7 Because the statute pertains only to the actions of a very 8 limited number of groups, specifically debt collectors who are defined 9 by the statute as those whose principle purpose of which is collecting 10 debts for another person or entity. 11 MS. OWEN: It's not my understanding that they were 12 employees that called. 13 THE COURT: It was not an employee? 14 MS. GOTWALS: Your Honor, it's the plaintiff's position 15 that these were people directly employed by Navy Federal Credit Union. 16 THE COURT: How many witnesses do you anticipate calling? 17 MS. GOTWALS: Myself, probably just Thida Win. 18 THE COURT: And how many do you anticipate? 19 MS. OWEN: Your Honor, this again, when you take the 20 position, I said I was going to file for bankruptcy and then I waited 21 six months to file, somehow that opens the door for this. We could 22 have, do I have to bring every person that ever dialed it?
13 1 THE COURT: I don't know. Page 13 2 MS. OWEN: We would certainly have to get a -- 3 MS. GOTWALS: Your Honor, if I may -- 4 THE COURT: I have some great difficulty with the claim 5 that you have brought personally. At the same time I am not going to 6 the grant the demurrer unless it is so clear cut, certainly at this 7 level, to give you the chance to have your day in court. 8 But I must tell you, this sounds a bit of a reach, not 9 only with respect to the harassment -- if you really felt it was 10 harassment under 429, bring it back as a criminal offense. You know, 11 find out who is doing it and bring that person in, or if you think you 12 can bring in Navy Federal on that basis, bring them in. 13 But if you're going to try to show that there's some 14 damages, at least for my part, I think you've got an extraordinarily 15 difficult task. I'm not going to grant the demurrer. I do so knowing 16 that there's difficulties for the defendant in terms of witnesses. 17 But I am telling the plaintiff right now that I think 18 you've got a terribly rough row to hoe here; I really do. And I'm at 19 this point struggling to find a way of how you're going to accomplish 20 it. 21 I'm not going to grant the demurrer at this point. But at 22 the same time you may want to rethink this because at some point they
14 Page 14 1 may come back with a motion of their own with respect to an action 2 such as this. 3 If they are exempt of the federal law, if you're choosing 4 this just on harassment and she wasn't so harassed, she sought relief 5 under the code section to which you've made reference here, someone 6 may ask, well, why didn't you and then beyond that, somebody may say, 7 well, gee, you know, why are you going after the creditor at this 8 point because I'm assuming those calls have ceased. 9 And I'm not so sure you're not opening the door for your 10 client to some other issue being brought up by the defendant. I don't 11 know. I don't really know. Not today. We'll find out. 12 MS. OWEN: Are you making a finding for a cause of action 13 for a 14 THE COURT: I'm not making any finding. I'm putting this 15 over to May 5 at 1:30 for trial. That may very well be my week. You 16 may be stuck with me. Those are headaches that I think about. They 17 require a bottle of Exedrin in the briefcase just in case. 18 MS. GOTWALS: Thank you, Your Honor. 19 THE COURT: All right. 20 (Whereupon, 12:54 o'clock p.m., the hearing in the 21 above-captioned matter was concluded.) 22
15 1 I, CAROLYN J. TIMKO, a Verbatim Reporter, do hereby Page 15 2 certify that I took the notes of the foregoing hearing by Stenomask 3 and thereafter reduced to typewriting under my direction; that the 4 foregoing is a true record of said hearing to the best of my knowledge 5 and ability; that I am neither related to nor employed by any attorney 6 or counsel employed by the parties thereto; nor financially or 7 otherwise interested in the action CAROLYN J. TIMKO 13 Court Reporter
The Florida Bar v. Bruce Edward Committe
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCase 2:12-cv WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25. Exhibit C
Case 2:12-cv-00262-WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 1 of 25 Exhibit C Case 2:12-cv-00262-WCO Document 16-3 Filed 04/06/13 Page 2 of 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CI-19 UCN: CA015815XXCICI
1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-015815-CI-19 UCN: 522008CA015815XXCICI INDYMAC FEDERAL BANK, FSB, Successor in Interest to INDYMAC BANK,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE:. Case No. 0-.. SHARON DIANE HILL,.. USX Tower - th Floor. 00 Grant Street. Pittsburgh, PA Debtor,.. December 0, 00................
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH. Petitioner, ) vs. ) Cause No Defendant.
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH MICHAEL RAETHER AND SAVANNA ) RAETHER, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) Cause No. --0-0 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST ) COMPANY;
More informationSTATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF DONA ANA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT CV WILLIAM TURNER, Plaintiff, vs.
0 0 STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF DONA ANA THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT WILLIAM TURNER, vs. Plaintiff, CV-0- ROZELLA BRANSFORD, et al., Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS On the th day of November 0, at
More information21 Proceedings reported by Certified Shorthand. 22 Reporter and Machine Shorthand/Computer-Aided
1 1 CAUSE NUMBER 2011-47860 2 IN RE : VU T RAN, IN THE DISTRICT COURT 3 HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 4 PETITIONER 164th JUDICIAL DISTRICT 5 6 7 8 9 ******************************************* * ***** 10 SEPTEMBER
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY Branch 9
STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY Branch FILED 0-0-1 CIRCUIT COURT DANE COUNTY, WI 1CV000 AMY LYNN PHOTOGRAPHY STUDIO, LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 1 CV CITY OF MADISON, et al., Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. The above-entitled matter came on for oral
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT 0 AMADOR COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, v. Appellant, KENNETH LEE SALAZAR, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, ET AL., Appellees.
More information5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 2 IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 10 CA 002652 (AW) 3 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 4 AS TRUSTEE FOR RALI 06QS2 5 Plaintiff,
More information5 Plaintiff, 6 Vs. 7 WILLIAM DAVISON, 8 Defendant. 9 / 13 * * * * * * * * 14 DEPOSITION OF MARLIN KNAPP 15 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT 2 IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2010 CA 002652 (AW) 3 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION 4 AS TRUSTEE FOR RALI 2006QS2 5 Plaintiff,
More information1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, )
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA 3 DEPARTMENT 9 HON. DENISE MOTTER, COMMISSIONER 4 5 CHRISTINE SONTAG, ) ) 6 PLAINTIFF, ) ) 7 VS. ) NO. 1381216 ) 8 WILLIAM
More informationPage 5 1 P R O C E E D I N G S 2 THE COURT: All we have left is Number 5 and 3 then Mr. Stopa's. Are you ready to proceed? 4 MR. SPANOLIOS: Your Honor
Page 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 3 4 5 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, 6 Plaintiff, 7 vs CASE NO: 2009-CA-002668 8 TONY ROBINSON and DEBRA ROBINSON,
More information1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 HONORABLE RICHARD A. KRAMER, JUDGE PRESIDING 4 DEPARTMENT NO.
1 1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 HONORABLE RICHARD A. KRAMER, JUDGE PRESIDING 4 DEPARTMENT NO. 304 5 ---ooo--- 6 COORDINATION PROCEEDING ) SPECIAL TITLE [Rule 1550(b)] ) 7 )
More informationGLOBAL HUB LOGISTICS, et al., ) VS. ) February 2, ) ) Defendants. ) ) TAMERLANE GLOBAL SERVICES, et al.,) MOTIONS HEARING
Case :-cv-0-gbl-idd Document Filed 0// Page of PageID# IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division GLOBAL HUB LOGISTICS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil
More informationKYLEEN CANE - 12/18/06 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 DAVID KAGEL, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) 5 ) vs. ) 6 ) JAN WALLACE, ) CASE NO.: 7 ) CV 06-3357 R (SSx) Defendant. ) 8 ) ) 9 AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM.
More information1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 * * * 4 NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION. 5 FOR THE HOMELESS, et al.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Page 1 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 * * * 4 NORTHEAST OHIO COALITION 5 FOR THE HOMELESS, et al., 6 Plaintiffs, 7 vs. CASE NO. C2-06-896 8 JENNIFER BRUNNER,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF YAVAPAI 0 PRESCOTT SPORTSMANS CLUB, by and) through Board of Directors, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MARK SMITH; TIM MASON; WILLIAM
More information>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS THE CASE OF CLARKE V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. WHAT DID I SAY, CLARKE V. UNITED STATES? >> YEAH.
>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS THE CASE OF CLARKE V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. WHAT DID I SAY, CLARKE V. UNITED STATES? >> YEAH. >> YOU MAY PROCEED WHEN YOU'RE READY, COUNSEL. >> THANK YOU, MR. CHIEF
More information2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. )
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI 2 JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 3 Respondents, ) ) 4 vs. ) No. SC 88038 ) 5 STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., ) ) 6 Appellants. ) 7 8 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COLE COUNTY,
More informationB e f o r e: LORD JUSTICE DAVIS MR JUSTICE CRANSTON. Between:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION DIVISIONAL COURT CO/3452/2007 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Thursday, 31 July 2014 B e f o r e: LORD JUSTICE DAVIS MR JUSTICE CRANSTON
More informationCase 2:13-cv RFB-NJK Document 335 Filed 08/14/15 Page 1 of 68
Case :-cv-00-rfb-njk Document Filed 0// Page of Case :-cv-00-rfb-njk Document Filed 0// Page of. I have reviewed the Affidavit of John P. Rohner (the Rohner Affidavit ), filed with the Court on August,
More information0001 1 THE CIRCUIT COURT, FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND 2 FOR DUVAL COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 CASE NO.: 16-2008-CA-012971 DIVISION: CV:G 4 5 GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC, ) ) 6 Plaintiff, ) ) 7 vs. ) ) 8 CARRIE GASQUE,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) Vs. Defendant.
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HONORABLE PERCY ANDERSON, JUDGE PRESIDING 0 TODD KIMSEY, Plaintiff, Vs. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF TEXAS, Defendant. No. CV - PA REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF STATUS CONFERENCE
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * No
r' --5j- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF DELAWARE COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * No. 06-53273 COMMONWEALTH
More informationKRESSE & ASSOCIATES, LLC
1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 GENERAL JURISDICTION DIVISION 3 CASE NO. 09-49079CA22 4 5 WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, F.S.D. F/K/A WORLD SAVINGS BANK,
More informationCASE NO.: CV Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction -February 5, 2013
CASE NO.: 0--00-CV Defendant's Plea to the Jurisdiction -February, 0 0 0 REPORTER'S RECORD VOLUME OF VOLUMES TRIAL COURT CAUSE NO. DC--0-A DALLAS, TEXAS CONSUMER SERVICE ALLIANCE ) IN THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationThe Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, et al. v. Brunner, Jennifer, etc.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 THE NORTHEAST OHIO ) 4 COALITION FOR THE ) HOMELESS, ET AL., ) 5 ) Plaintiffs, ) 6 ) vs. ) Case No. C2-06-896 7 ) JENNIFER BRUNNER,
More information18 TAKEN AT THE INSTANCE OF THE DEFENDANT
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT 2 OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 3 CASE NO.: 2009 CA 033952 4 DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS 5 TRUSTEE UNDER POOLING AND
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL DIV. : PART X RELIABLE ABSTRACT CO.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/09/2016 03:20 PM INDEX NO. 653850/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 211 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: CIVIL DIV. : PART 61 ----------------------------
More informationKenneth Friedman, M.D. v. Heart Institute of Port St. Lucie, Inc.
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationONTARIO, INC., Appellant, Respondent
0 COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------- ONTARIO, INC., -against- Appellant, SAMSUNG C&T CORPORATION, Respondent. ---------------------------------------- Before: No.
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO CA XXXX MB
9708 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15TH CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 50 2008 CA 040969XXXX MB THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS TRUSTEE FOR CHASEFLEX TRUST SERIES 2007-3,
More informationHAHN & BOWERSOCK FAX KALMUS DRIVE, SUITE L1 COSTA MESA, CA 92626
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPT 24 HON. ROBERT L. HESS, JUDGE BAT WORLD SANCTUARY, ET AL, PLAINTIFF, VS MARY CUMMINS, DEFENDANT. CASE NO.: BS140207 REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT
More informationWhat were the final scores in your scenario for prosecution and defense? What side were you on? What primarily helped your win or lose?
Quiz name: Make Your Case Debrief Activity (1-27-2016) Date: 01/27/2016 Question with Most Correct Answers: #0 Total Questions: 8 Question with Fewest Correct Answers: #0 1. What were the final scores
More informationAmendments To Uniform Guidelines For Taxation of Costs
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationCase 3:11-cv REP Document 132 Filed 01/28/12 Page 1 of 153 PageID# 2426 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Case :-cv-00-rep Document Filed 0// Page of PageID# IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION 0 -------------------------------------- : GILBERT JAMES :
More information>> THE NEXT AND FINAL CASE ON TODAY'S DOCKET IS CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION V. SAN PERDIDO ASSOCIATION, INC. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT,
>> THE NEXT AND FINAL CASE ON TODAY'S DOCKET IS CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE CORPORATION V. SAN PERDIDO ASSOCIATION, INC. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, I'M BARRY RICHARDS, AND I REPRESENT THE CITIZENS. I
More informationTRANSCRIPT OF MOTION HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE LEONIE M. BRINKEMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. (Pages 1-15)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION SUHAIL NAJIM ABDULLAH Civil Action No :0cv AL SHIMARI, et al, Plaintiffs, vs Alexandria, Virginia June, 0 CACI PREMIER
More informationAGREN BLANDO COURT REPORTING & VIDEO INC 1
1 BEFORE SPECIAL MASTER BARTON H. THOMPSON, JR. HEARING RE: MONTANA'S RIGHT TO V(B) CLAIMS September 30, 2011 IN THE MATTER OF MONTANA VS. WYOMING AND NORTH DAKOTA NO. 220137 ORG The above-entitled matter
More information5 v. 11 Cv (JSR) 6 SONAR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, et al., 7 Defendants x 9 February 17, :00 p.m.
Case 1:11-cv-09665-JSR Document 20 Filed 03/02/12 Page 1 of 20 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2 ------------------------------x 3 SIDNEY GORDON, 4 Plaintiff, 5 v. 11 Cv.
More informationCase 3:15-cv HEH-RCY Document Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# Exhibit D
Case 3:15-cv-00357-HEH-RCY Document 139-4 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 1828 Exhibit D Case 3:15-cv-00357-HEH-RCY Document 139-4 Filed 02/05/16 Page 2 of 6 PageID# 1829 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More information1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 CASE NO. 12-CV MGC. Plaintiff, June 11, vs.
Case 1:12-cv-21799-MGC Document 115 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/01/2013 Page 1 of 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 2 CASE NO. 12-CV-21799-MGC 3 4 JERRY ROBIN REYES, 5 vs. Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 9 Monday, November 6, The above-entitled matter came on for oral
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 3 CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., : 4 Petitioner : 5 v. : No. 99-379 6 SAINT CLAIR ADAMS : 7 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X 8 Washington,
More informationLARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION, ) ) DEFENDANT. ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT PAGES 1-14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BEFORE THE HONORABLE CHARLES A. LEGGE, JUDGE LARRY BOWOTO, ) ET AL., ) ) PLAINTIFFS, ) ) VS. ) NO. C 99-2506 CAL ) CHEVRON CORPORATION,
More informationRuth Wasem on Immigration: Part 2
Ruth Wasem on Immigration: Part 2 Angela Evans: Welcome to Policy on Purpose. My name is Angela Evans, and I'm the Dean of the LBJ School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas, Austin. My guest
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CLARA COUNTY HONORABLE AARON PERSKY, JUDGE DEPARTMENT o0o--- PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CLARA COUNTY HONORABLE AARON PERSKY, JUDGE DEPARTMENT ---o0o--- PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, vs. Plaintiff, BROCK ALLEN TURNER, Defendant. CASE NO. B ---o0o---
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) VS. ) June 15, ISHMAEL JONES, ) A pen name ) ) Defendant. ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. - ) VS. ) June, ) ISHMAEL JONES, ) A pen name ) ) ) Defendant.
More informationCase 2:08-cv AHM-PJW Document 93 Filed 12/28/09 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1024 1
Case 2:08-cv-05341-AHM-PJW Document 93 Filed 12/28/09 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1024 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION 3 HONORABLE A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT COURT FOR THE 15TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. : Case No. : CA018991XXXX MB. v. :Case No.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT COURT FOR THE 15TH JUDICIAL Page 1 CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA ----------------------------x WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, : Plaintiff, : v. : Case No. et al. :50 2010 CA018991XXXX
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT NO.
THIS TRANSCRIPT IS PROTECTED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (d) 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT
More information>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS GARRETT VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS MEGAN LONG WITH
>> THE NEXT CASE ON THE DOCKET IS GARRETT VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> WHENEVER YOU'RE READY. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, MY NAME IS MEGAN LONG WITH THE PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT.
More informationCase 2:11-cr KJM Document 142 Filed 06/19/12 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. --o0o-- Plaintiff,
Case :-cr-00-kjm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA --o0o-- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, ) Case No. :-cr-00-kjm ) formerly :-mj-00-kjn ) )
More informationNOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND POSSIBLE EXECUTIVE SESSION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION
NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING AND POSSIBLE EXECUTIVE SESSION OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA CITIZENS CLEAN ELECTIONS COMMISSION Location: 1616 West Adams, Suite 110 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Date: Friday, June 29, 2018
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ISADORE ROSENBERG, REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS THURSDAY, MAY 5, 2011
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT CE-ll HON. MICHAEL I. LEVANAS, JUDGE IN RE THE ESTATE OF: ISADORE ROSENBERG, NO. BP109162 DECEASED. REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS TRANSCRIPT OF SENTENCING HEARING BEFORE THE HONORABLE CARLOS MURGUIA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.
0 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANTHONY RENFROW, Defendant.... APPEARANCES: For the Plaintiff: For the Defendant: Court Reporter: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS Docket No. -0-CM
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY X. PENELOPE PARASIDIS, et al., : Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, :
V I R G I N I A: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X PENELOPE PARASIDIS, et al., : Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants, : vs. : CL 2009-18447 HELEN ZISSIOS, et
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION BASHE ABDI YOUSUF, et al.,. Civil Action No. :0cv0. Plaintiffs,.. vs.. Alexandria, Virginia. April, 00 MOHAMED ALI
More information>> ALL RISE. HEAR YE, HEAR YE, HEAR YE, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. ALL WHO HAVE CAUSE TO PLEA, DRAW NEAR, YOU SHALL BE HEARD.
>> ALL RISE. HEAR YE, HEAR YE, HEAR YE, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IS NOW IN SESSION. ALL WHO HAVE CAUSE TO PLEA, DRAW NEAR, YOU SHALL BE HEARD. GOD SAVE THESE UNITED STATES, THE GREAT STATE OF FLORIDA,
More informationPage 1. 10:10 a.m. Veritext Legal Solutions
1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO 2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 3 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., etc. 4 Plaintiff, 5 vs. Case No. CV-12-789401 6 EDGEWATER REALTY, LLC, et al. 7 Defendant. 8 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More information1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 2 x 3 SPOKEO, INC., : 4 Petitioner : No v. : 6 THOMAS ROBINS. : 7 x. 8 Washington, D.C.
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 2 x 3 SPOKEO, INC., : 4 Petitioner : No. 13 1339 5 v. : 6 THOMAS ROBINS. : 7 x 8 Washington, D.C. 9 Monday, November 2, 2015 10 11 The above entitled matter
More informationCase 2:11-cr KJM Document 258 Filed 03/20/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.
Case :-cr-00-kjm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ---ooo--- BEFORE THE HONORABLE KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, JUDGE ---ooo--- UNITED STATES
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/17/2018 INDEX NO / :15 PM NYSCEF DOC. NO. 246 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/17/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - CIVIL TERM - PART: 23 -------------------------------------------------------X YOUSSOUF DEMBELE a/k/a MALAHA SALIK, -against- Plaintiff, ACTION
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT 61 BEFORE HON. JOHN S. MEYER, JUDGE
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DEPARTMENT BEFORE HON. JOHN S. MEYER, JUDGE 0 DAVID RADEL, ) ) Plaintiff, )No. -0-000-CU-FR-CTL ) vs. ) ) RANCHO CIELO
More informationLilliana Cahuasqui v. U.S. Security Insurance Co.
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationRONALD FEDERICI ) VS. ) March 4, ) ) Defendants. ) ) MONICA PIGNOTTI, et al., ) THE HONORABLE GERALD BRUCE LEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case :-cv-0-gbl -TRJ Document Filed 0// Page of PageID# IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division RONALD FEDERICI ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil No. - ) VS. )
More informationCase4:10-cv SBA Document81 Filed05/31/11 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-SBA Document Filed0// Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION RITZ CAMERA & IMAGE, LLC, VS. PLAINTIFF, SANDISK CORPORATION, ET AL,
More informationARROWHEAD CAPITAL FINANCE, LTD., CHEYNE SPECIALTY FINANCE FUND L.P., et al.
0 0 COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------- ARROWHEAD CAPITAL FINANCE, LTD., -against- Appellant, CHEYNE SPECIALTY FINANCE FUND L.P., et al. Respondents. ----------------------------------------
More informationCITY OF TOLLESON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ACTION MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 22, :00 P.M.
CITY OF TOLLESON PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING ACTION MINUTES CALL TO ORDER TUESDAY, MAY 22, 2018 5:00 P.M. Chair Camacho called the Tolleson Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting to order at 5:00
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION 6. MARVIN L. BROWN, et al., ) Plaintiff,) )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS DIVISION MARVIN L. BROWN, et al., ) Plaintiff,) ) vs. KRIS KOBACK, KANSAS SECRETARY ) OF STATE, ) Defendant.) ) Case No. CV0 ) TRANSCRIPT OF JUDGE'S DECISIONS
More informationFLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PROPERTY TAX OVERSIGHT PUBLIC WORKSHOP
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PROPERTY TAX OVERSIGHT PUBLIC WORKSHOP Rule D-.0, Exchange of Evidence Rule D-.00, Index to Forms DR- and DR-PORT November, :00 p.m. - : p.m. Building, Room 0 Shumard Oak
More informationKelly Tormey v. Michael Moore
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.. IN RE:. Chapter 11. The SCO Group, Inc.,. et al.,.. Debtor(s).. Bankruptcy # (KG)...
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. IN RE:. Chapter 11. The SCO Group, Inc.,. et al.,.. Debtor(s).. Bankruptcy #07-11337 (KG)... Wilmington, DE December 5, 2007 10:00 a.m. TRANSCRIPT OF
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/22/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/22/2016 12:04 PM INDEX NO. 159878/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2016 1 Page 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------X
More information40609Nicoletti.txt. 7 MR. BRUTOCAO: Nicholas Brutocao appearing. 12 Honor. I'm counsel associated with Steve Krause and
1 1 VENTURA, CALIFORNIA; MONDAY, APRIL 6, 2009 2 --o0o-- 3 4 5 THE COURT: Nicoletti versus Metrocities 6 Mortgage. 7 MR. BRUTOCAO: Nicholas Brutocao appearing 8 for the defendant Taylor, Bean and Whitaker.
More information1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH PLAINTIFF, MOTION HEARING. 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381
1 STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : MANITOWOC COUNTY BRANCH 1 2 3 STATE OF WISCONSIN, 4 PLAINTIFF, MOTION HEARING 5 vs. Case No. 05 CF 381 6 STEVEN A. AVERY, 7 DEFENDANT. 8 DATE: DECEMBER 20, 2006 9
More informationJames M. Maloney. Attorney at Law Proctor in Admiralty. P.O. Box Bayview Avenue Port Washington, NY April 7, 2014
admitted to practice in New York; New Jersey; United States Supreme Court; U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and Third Circuits; U.S. District Courts for the District of Connecticut, Northern District
More information1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: CACE
Page: 1 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: CACE090039 3 4 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AS TRUSTEE FOR SASCO 05-WF4, 5 Plaintiff(s), 6 vs.
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document Filed in TXSD on 11/11/14 Page 1 of 77
: Case Case 1 12-cv-00128 2:13-cv-00193 - RMC-DST Document - RLW660-12 Document Filed 207-1 in TXSD Filed on 11/11/14 06 /20/12 Page 131of of77 5 the fact that this number comes from LBB. I believe 6 they
More information1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 3 DEPARTMENT CJC 48 HON. CHRISTOPHER K. LUI, JUDGE
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES 3 DEPARTMENT CJC 48 HON. CHRISTOPHER K. LUI, JUDGE 4 5 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,) ) 6 PLAINTIFF,) VS. ) CASE NO.
More informationPage 1. VICTOR and ENOABASI UKPE. Defendant(s). VICTOR and ENOABASI UKPE Counterclaimants and Third Party Plaintiffs, vs.
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION - ATLANTIC COUNTY DOCKET NO. F-10209-08 BANK OF NEW YORK AS TRUSTEE FOR THE CERTIFICATE HOLDERS CWABS, INC. ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-AB3 Plaintiff(s),
More information>>> THE SECOND CASE IS GRIDINE V. THE STATE OF FLORIDA. YOU MAY PROCEED. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, I'M GAIL ANDERSON REPRESENTING MR.
>>> THE SECOND CASE IS GRIDINE V. THE STATE OF FLORIDA. YOU MAY PROCEED. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT, I'M GAIL ANDERSON REPRESENTING MR. SHIMEEKA GRIDINE. HE WAS 14 YEARS OLD WHEN HE COMMITTED ATTEMPTED
More informationThe Due Process Advocate
The Due Process Advocate No Person shall be... deprived of life, liberty, or property without the due process of law - Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution Vol. 15 No. 2 www.dueprocessadvocate.com
More informationThis is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of
This is one of the Lawyers in Brian Korte`s office, SUSANNA LEHMAN, ESQ. She makes the Plaintiff very confused and argued a very different angle of the Pooling and Servicing agreement and the use of the
More informationCase 1:08-cv MLW Document 70 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of No. 1:08-cv MLW
Case :08-cv-696-MLW Document 70 Filed 03/0/0 Page of 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS 3 No. :08-cv-696-MLW 4 5 ERICK JOSEPH FLORES-POWELL, 6 Petitioner, 7 8 vs. 9 BRUCE CHADBOURNE,
More informationCase 2:06-cv GLL Document 48 Filed 04/24/2006 Page 1 of 66. A Yes. We hold 14 training classes prior to each
Case :0-cv-00-GLL Document Filed 0//00 Page of 0 I 0 well as new people that come on the scene? A Yes. We hold training classes prior to each primary and general election. We hold them in the regional
More informationState of Florida v. Bennie Demps
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationThe Florida Bar v. Richard Phillip Greene
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More informationSUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
SUPERIOR COURT - STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DR. SANG-HOON AHN, DR. LAURENCE ) BOGGELN, DR. GEORGE DELGADO, ) DR. PHIL DREISBACH, DR. VINCENT ) FORTANASCE, DR. VINCENT NGUYEN, ) and AMERICAN
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII. Plaintiff, vs. CIVIL NO Defendant.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Plaintiff, vs. CIVIL NO. -- ELAINE E. KAWASAKI, et al., Defendant. TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS before the HONORABLE, GLENN
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN RE:. Case No. 0-(KG).. The SCO GROUP, INC., et al... Market Street. Wilmington, Delaware Debtor... November, 00................ :00 a.m. APPEARANCES:
More informationCourt Reporter: Felicia Rene Zabin, RPR, CCR 478 Federal Certified Realtime Reporter (702)
0 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA THE HON. KENT J. DAWSON, JUDGE PRESIDING UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. CR-S-0--KJD(LRL) ) vs. ) ) IRWIN SCHIFF, CYNTHIA NEUN,
More informationHarry Ridgewell: So how have islands in the South Pacific been affected by rising sea levels in the last 10 years?
So how have islands in the South Pacific been affected by rising sea levels in the last 10 years? Well, in most places the maximum sea level rise has been about 0.7 millimetres a year. So most places that's
More information>> OUR NEXT CASE OF THE DAY IS DEBRA LAFAVE VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> YOU MAY PROCEED. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. I'M JULIUS AULISIO.
>> OUR NEXT CASE OF THE DAY IS DEBRA LAFAVE VERSUS STATE OF FLORIDA. >> YOU MAY PROCEED. >> MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT. I'M JULIUS AULISIO. I REPRESENT DEBRA LAFAVE THE PETITIONER IN THIS CASE. WE'RE HERE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ----------------------------------------------------------- ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. PETTERS COMPANY, INC., () and PETTERS GROUP WORLDWIDE,
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, C. S. 5, AS AMENDED AND THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT CASSELS
IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT R.S.O. 1990, C. S. 5, AS AMENDED AND THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH ROBERT CASSELS REASONS FOR THE DECISION OF THE ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION Hearing: Wednesday, November
More informationTranscript of Bryan Michael Pagliano
Transcript of Bryan Michael Pagliano Date: June 22, 2016 Case: Judicial Watch, Inc. -v- U.S. Department of State Planet Depos, LLC Phone: 888-433-3767 Fax: 888-503-3767 Email: transcripts@planetdepos.com
More informationIN THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CADDO STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE FIRST JUDICIL DISTRICT COURT PRISH OF CDDO STTE OF LOUISIN * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * SHREVEPORT POLICE OFFICER SSOC., et al VERSUS DOCKET NO., DLE G. COX, JR., et al
More information1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 CASE NO.: 3 4 Plaintiff, 5 -vs- 6 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY a municipal corporation 7 and political subdivision of the State
More informationGerald Lynn Bates v. State of Florida
The following is a real-time transcript taken as closed captioning during the oral argument proceedings, and as such, may contain errors. This service is provided solely for the purpose of assisting those
More information