SAFEGUARDING VULNERABLE GROUPS ACT 2006

Transcription

1 SAFEGUARDING VULNERABLE GROUPS ACT 2006 EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These explanatory notes relate to the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act which received Royal Assent on 8 th November They have been prepared by the Department for Education and Skills in order to assist the reader in understanding the Act. They do not form part of the Act and have not been endorsed by Parliament. 2. The notes need to be read in conjunction with the Act. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Act. So where a section or part of a section does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND 3. The current system for vetting people who wish to work with children or vulnerable adults operates through employers obtaining criminal record certificates issued by the Criminal Records Bureau ( CRB disclosures ) for new job applicants. CRB disclosures give employers information about an individual s criminal records history, which informs their assessments about the individual s suitability to work with children or vulnerable adults. 4. There are also three separate lists of persons who are barred from working with children or, as the case may be, vulnerable adults. These lists operate under different legislation and with different criteria and procedures: List 99 (a list of those in respect of whom directions under section 142 of the Education Act 2002 have been made), the Protection of Children Act (POCA) List (maintained under the Protection of Children Act 1999) and the Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) List (maintained under Part 7 of the Care Standards Act 2000). Disqualification orders made by a court (under Part 2 of the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000) also bar individuals from working with children. 5. The Bichard Inquiry Report (June 2004), available from identified systemic failures in current vetting and barring systems. These included the following factors: inconsistent decisions were being made by employers on the basis of CRB disclosure information CRB disclosure information is only certain to be accurate on the day of issue there are inconsistencies between List 99, the POCA list and POVA list the current barring system is reactive to harmful behaviour rather than preventative there are inconsistencies between police authorities in the disclosure of police information 6. This Act provides the legislative framework for a new vetting and barring scheme for people who work with children and vulnerable adults. A public consultation for the new scheme, Making Safeguarding Everybody s Business: A Post-Bichard Vetting Scheme 1

2 (Ref: DOC-EN), ran from 5 April 5 July This consultation paper and a summary of the responses to it can be found at 7. The purpose of the new scheme is to minimise the risk of harm posed to children and vulnerable adults by those that might seek to harm them through their work (paid or unpaid) (whether they fall into the category of regulated activity, see paragraphs 41 to 47, or controlled activity, see paragraphs 98 to 103; see also the glossary in Annex A for further explanation). It seeks to do this by barring unsuitable individuals not just on the basis of referrals but also at the earliest possible opportunity as part of a centralised vetting process that all those working closely with children and/or vulnerable adults will need to go through. Overview 8. The Act provides that: There will be two barred lists one for those who are barred from engaging in regulated activity with children (the children s barred list ), and one for those who are barred from engaging in regulated activity with vulnerable adults (the adults barred list ). There will be an Independent Barring Board ( IBB ). The IBB will maintain the children s barred list and adults barred list and will make decisions about whether an individual should be included in one or both barred lists. There will be a right of appeal to the Care Standards Tribunal, with the permission of the Tribunal, against inclusion in a barred list on a point of law or on a finding of fact made by the IBB. There will be four routes to inclusion on one or both of the barred lists (see diagram at Annex D). Automatic inclusion on one or both of the barred lists as a result of receiving a caution or conviction for specified offences, or other criteria which may be specified (such as orders, foreign orders or directions, and inclusion on a foreign barred list). There will be no right for the individual to make representations nor a right of appeal in these cases. Automatic inclusion on one or both of the barred lists as a result of receiving a caution or conviction for certain other specified offences or as a result of having met some certain other specified criteria. There will be a right to make representations and a right of appeal following inclusion. Specified behaviour (the term relevant conduct is used in the Act) that leads to consideration for inclusion on one or both of the barred lists. This includes, for example, conduct which harms a child in the case of the children s barred list, or conduct which harms a vulnerable adult in the case of the adults barred list, or conduct involving child pornography for both lists. Risk of harm: where evidence suggests that an individual may present a risk of harm to children or vulnerable adults, this will lead to consideration for inclusion on the appropriate list. An individual who is included in the children s barred list must not engage in regulated activity in relation to children. An individual who is included in the adults barred list must not engage in regulated activity in relation to vulnerable 2

3 These notes refer to the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 (c.47) adults. Broadly, regulated activity will cover a range of specified activities that provide an opportunity for close contact with children or vulnerable adults, other activities in key settings such as schools and care homes which provide an opportunity for contact and key positions of responsibility such as the Children s Commissioner and the Director of Adult Social Services. There are a series of criminal offences to: a. prevent barred individuals from engaging in regulated activity in relation to children or vulnerable adults b. ensure that people permitted to engage in regulated activity in relation to children or vulnerable adults with the permission of a regulated activity provider are subject to monitoring c. ensure that relevant employers check an individual s status in the scheme before permitting an individual to engage in regulated activity in relation to children or vulnerable adults To become subject to monitoring individuals will need to make an application to the Secretary of State, in the guise of the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB). The Act also confers power on the Secretary of State to make regulations about controlled activity. This covers certain activity other than regulated activity. There is no current intention to prevent a barred individual from engaging in controlled activity. But in part the regulations will be used so as to require employers (and others with responsibility for managing controlled activity) to put in place appropriate safeguards to manage the risks posed by barred individuals. Broadly, controlled activity covers support work in general health settings, further education settings and adult social care settings. It also covers work which gives a person the opportunity for access to sensitive records about children and vulnerable adults, including education and social services records. How will the new scheme work? 9. These paragraphs provide a very brief overview of how the new scheme will work and will help to put into context the overview of the legislation given above. They need to be read in conjunction with the diagram at annex B. 10. Those who are closely working, or applying to work, with children or vulnerable adults will be required to make an application to the Secretary of State to be subject to monitoring (see the glossary at Annex A). This will cover everyone engaging in what the Act refers to as regulated activity with the permission of a regulated activity provider. (The intention is that employers engaging individuals in controlled activity will also in most cases need to ensure that they are subject to monitoring, although this requirement will be placed on employers through regulations). The Act allows for the phasing in of applications from existing members of the workforce. 11. The Secretary of State, using the Criminal Records Bureau (CRB), will then search the Police National Computer for cautions and convictions and make enquiries of local police forces to obtain other relevant information. 12. Where the Secretary of State s enquiries reveal that a person satisfies one of the criteria 3

4 that lead to automatic inclusion in a barred list, he will refer the matter to the IBB so that the person can be included in the relevant barred list. The Secretary of State will also pass details of relevant cautions and convictions together with all information received from local police forces to the IBB, which the IBB can then consider in relation to inclusion in a barred list. Where a person is included in a barred list, he ceases to be subject to monitoring (if he was previously) and is not able to engage in regulated activity. Except in the most serious cases, individuals will have the opportunity to make representations about why they should not be barred on the basis of this information. 13. At appropriate intervals, the Secretary of State must repeat the searches and enquiries referred to above. If new information comes to light about a person who is subject to monitoring, the Secretary of State will give the information to the IBB as outlined above. The IBB may also have cause to consider including a person in a barred list on the basis of referrals from employers, local authorities, professional bodies and supervisory authorities (see diagram at annex C). An employer may register to be notified if an employee ceases to be subject to monitoring. Where this is the case the employer will then be informed of this by the Secretary of State, in the guise of the CRB. TERRITORIAL EXTENT 14. The Act extends to England and Wales. This reflects the current position in relation to POCA, POVA and List The following provisions in the Act extend to Northern Ireland: the establishment of the IBB; provisions relating to the information monitor for the purposes of this Act and the Police Act 1997; provisions amending the Police Act 1997; and, so far as relevant to these provisions, general provisions relating to interpretation and secondary legislation. The intention is that the remainder of the provisions in the Act will be mirrored by separate Northern Ireland legislation. This will enable provisions specific to Northern Ireland to be made. 16. The Act does not extend to Scotland. However it does provide for appropriate information sharing to be established with the parallel scheme that is to be set up in Scotland. 17. The Act may by Order in Council be extended to the Isle of Man or the Channel Islands. 18. These arrangements are intended to enable vetting and barring processes to operate coherently across the UK. TERRITORIAL APPLICATION: WALES 19. The Act confers various powers to make subordinate legislation. In general, these are exercisable by the Secretary of State. Section 56 alters this general position. In certain cases, power to make subordinate legislation in relation to Wales is exercisable by the Welsh Ministers (instead of by the Secretary of State). In other cases, the power remains exercisable by the Secretary of State but only with the consent of the Welsh Ministers. And in yet other cases, the power remains exercisable by the Secretary of State but he is required to consult the Welsh Ministers before exercising it. Section 56 of the Act sets out which sections of the Act fall into each of these categories. 4

5 20. In addition, paragraph 2 (3) (d) of Schedule 8 enables the Welsh Ministers to set the procedure under which certain applications may be made to the General Teaching Council for Wales for registration under the Teaching and Higher Education Act Finally, there is also provision in paragraph 23 of Schedule 3 for the IBB to provide the Welsh Ministers with information. COMMENTARY ON SECTIONS AND SCHEDULES BARRING Section 1: Independent Barring Board 21. Section 1 establishes a statutory body to be known as the Independent Barring Board ( IBB ). The creation of the IBB meets the Ministerial commitment to transfer the responsibility for barring decisions from Ministers to a new independent board of experts. Schedule 1: Independent Barring Board 22. This Schedule makes provision regarding the IBB. The IBB has core functions of determining whether to include an individual in a barred list, determining whether to remove an individual from a barred list and considering representations made under Schedule 3. These functions cannot be delegated outside the IBB, but can be delegated internally to allow the IBB s workload to be managed effectively. The IBB can delegate its non-core functions, such as administrative functions, to persons outside the IBB, for example to the CRB. 23. Schedule 1 provides for the IBB s membership and staffing arrangements. The Secretary of State will appoint the chairman and members, and the IBB will recruit its own staff. The IBB must publish an annual report on the exercise of its functions, and the Secretary of State can also direct the IBB to submit a report to him on the exercise of any of its functions. The IBB s annual accounts are to be audited by the Comptroller and Auditor General and laid before Parliament. 24. Schedule 1 also provides for the IBB to be funded by the Secretary of State. Income from those applying to be monitored will be received by the Secretary of State (see sections 24) and a mechanism for funding the IBB on the basis of this income will be put in place. Section 2: Barred lists 25. This section provides that the IBB must establish and maintain two barred lists a children s barred list and an adults barred list. Schedule 3 makes provision regarding inclusion in the barred lists. Schedule 3: Barred lists 26. Part 1 sets out how someone may be included in the children s barred list. Part 2 covers the equivalent rules in relation to the adults barred list. For each list there will be four types of cases: a. Paragraphs 1 and 7 of the Schedule require the IBB to include individuals in the barred list automatically (with no right to make representations). This applies where an individual s case is referred to the IBB by the Secretary of State and criteria set out in regulations are met. The criteria which may be specified as requiring an individual s inclusion in a list automatically are set out in paragraph 5

6 24 of the Schedule. For the purposes of paragraphs 1 and 7 the criteria are likely to include being cautioned for, or convicted of, the most serious offences against vulnerable individuals. b. Paragraphs 2 and 8 of the Schedule require the IBB to include individuals in the relevant barred list, but allow listed individuals then to make representations as to why they should be removed. Once again, this applies where an individual s case is referred to the IBB by the Secretary of State and criteria set out in regulations are met. The criteria which may be specified as requiring an individual s inclusion in a list automatically are set out in paragraph 24 of the Schedule. For the purposes of paragraph 2 and 8 the criteria are likely to include being cautioned for, or convicted of, serious offences against vulnerable individuals. c. Paragraphs 3 and 9 are concerned with the inclusion of individuals in a barred list because of concerns regarding their behaviour. This includes cases where the IBB has information that an individual has engaged in behaviour which: harms, attempts to harm, puts at risk of harm or incites another to harm a child or vulnerable adult; involves child pornography or inappropriate conduct involving violent pornography; or is of an inappropriate sexual nature involving a child or vulnerable adult The IBB, if minded to bar, will allow the individual to make representations and, having considered any such representations, decide whether the individual should be included in one or both barred lists. d. Paragraphs 5 and 11 are concerned with an individual s inclusion in a barred list because of a perceived risk that they might cause harm to children or vulnerable adults. Where the IBB has information that an individual may be at risk of harming, attempting to harm, putting at risk of harm or inciting another to harm a child or vulnerable adult (but has yet to engage in such behaviour), IBB will, if minded to bar, allow the individual to make representations, and having considered any such representations decide whether the individual should be included in one or both barred lists. e. Paragraphs 6 and 12 provide that the IBB must not include a person in the children s or adults barred list where: Scottish Ministers have already made a decision to include or not to include the person in their equivalent barred list and the IBB has no new evidence. Prescribed conditions are met such that it is more appropriate for a person's case to be considered by Scottish Ministers. An example of a condition that may be prescribed is that the person lives and works in Scotland. Any regulations setting such conditions will be subject to the affirmative resolution procedure. 27. (Note: a person who is included in a corresponding list in Scotland (or Northern Ireland) will be barred from regulated activity in England and Wales by virtue of section 3(2) and (3)). 28. Part 3 sets out general provisions relating to the barred lists. Paragraph 13 places a duty on the IBB to consider all the information it receives and to decide whether 6

7 it suggests that a person should be included in the lists. Where this information indicates a risk, then the IBB may consider the individual for inclusion in either or both lists. 29. Paragraph 14 ensures that the IBB must take all reasonable steps to notify an individual when he has been included in a barred list. 30. Paragraph 15 allows for regulations to be made governing the procedure which the IBB must follow in making its barring decisions. This also enables time limits to be specified within which decisions must be taken, along with time limits within which IBB must carry out reviews and representations. 31. Paragraph 16 deals with representations. Any information which the IBB proposes to use to make a barring decision is to be made available to the relevant individual to give them a fair opportunity to make representations as to why they should not be barred. 32. Paragraph 17 allows for late representations to be made. This is designed for exceptional cases where, for example, the IBB is unable to locate the person under consideration and has therefore not been able to inform them that they are at risk of being barred. In this case late representations are allowed as of right. Alternatively, an individual may have been unwell, or unable to understand or respond to letters from the IBB, in which case the right to make representations will be dependent on the IBB granting permission. 33. Paragraph 18 makes provision for barred individuals to be able to apply to the IBB to have their case reviewed after the minimum prescribed period has elapsed. An application for a review can only happen with the IBB s permission. An application for permission may be allowed only if the individual s circumstances have changed since he was included in the list or last applied for permission. 34. Paragraph 19 provides the IBB with the power to obtain relevant police information in relation to individuals whose cases it is considering. The IBB is required to pay the police a fee determined by the Secretary of State for providing this information. 35. Paragraph 20(1) provides for information to flow from the Secretary of State to the IBB about particular individuals in connection with the current barring schemes. Paragraph 20(2) is the basis on which the information which the Secretary of State gathers in relation to a person who is subject to monitoring must be transferred to the IBB. 36. Paragraph 21 places a duty on the IBB to provide prescribed information to the Secretary of State about an individual who has been barred or that the Board is considering for barring. The Secretary of State, in the guise of the CRB, will perform the administrative function of actually adding the individual s name to the barred list. There is also the requirement in paragraph 21(c) for the IBB to refer cases to the Secretary of State which come to its attention through the referral process and meet the prescribed criteria for automatic barring. 37. Paragraph 24 sets out the criteria that may be prescribed for automatic barring. This provision also ensures that individuals will not be barred automatically on the basis of any offences they have committed, or orders or directions that have been made in relation to them, before they reached the age of Paragraph 25 places a duty on the courts, when convicting an individual for an automatic barring offence or making a specified order against him, to inform the individual that a consequence of his conviction or order is that IBB will include him in 7

8 the relevant barred list. Section 3: Barred persons 39. This section provides that an individual is barred from regulated activity if he is included in either of the lists set up by section 2, or in an equivalent list held in Northern Ireland or Scotland. Section 4: Appeals 40. This section provides for an appeal to the Care Standards Tribunal on a point of law or on a finding of fact made by the IBB against a decision of the IBB to include or keep someone in the children s or adults barred list. It gives the Secretary of State the power to make regulations specifying Tribunal procedure. The Court of Appeal will hear appeals on points of law against a Tribunal decision. REGULATED ACTIVITY Section 5: Regulated activity 41. Section 5 provides that regulated activity relating to children and vulnerable adults is as set out in Schedule 4 to the Act. Broadly speaking, regulated activity includes work (paid and unpaid) which involves certain close contact with children or vulnerable adults. Subsequent sections create a series of offences in relation to regulated activity. So, for example, an individual commits an offence if he engages in regulated activity whilst barred. Other offences relate to the person who permits an individual to engage in regulated activity. For example, an employer may be guilty of an offence if he fails to carry out appropriate checks before permitting an employee to engage in regulated activity. 42. The section allows the Secretary of State to amend the definition of regulated activity by order under the affirmative resolution procedure. Elsewhere in the Act the definition of regulated activity is modified for the purposes of particular provisions so that the frequency of an activity is irrelevant. The power to amend the definition of regulated activity includes the power to amend these modifications. Schedule 4: Regulated activity Part 1: Regulated activity relating to children 43. This Part defines regulated activity relating to children. Broadly speaking, the principal activities are - a. Certain types of close contact activity (specified in paragraph 2(1)) carried out frequently, on three or more days in a 30-day period, or overnight. Examples include, teaching, supervising, advising, or caring for children. This also includes the moderation of internet chatrooms likely to be used wholly or mainly by children (paragraph 2(1)(e)). b. Any activity carried out frequently or on three or more days in a 30-day period in an establishment specified in paragraph 3(1) which gives a person the opportunity to have contact with children in pursuance of his duties there (e.g. a school secretary). c. The provision of childminding where there is a requirement to be registered under the provisions of the Childcare Act 2006 or there would be a requirement to be registered but for the fact that the individual does not provide childcare for a 8

9 child below the age of eight (paragraph 1(3)). Similarly childminders in Wales are also covered, but here the requirement to register arises from the Children Act 1989 (Paragraph 1(6)). d. Fostering a child (see below section 53). e. The exercise of functions of the Children and Family Courts Advisory and Support Services (CAFCASS) support officers and their Welsh equivalent. f. The inspection of establishments specified in paragraph 3(1) (e.g. a school) on behalf of the organisations specified in paragraph 1(10) (e.g. OFSTED; Healthcare Commission) and the inspection of generalist health establishments specified in paragraph 1(12) and 1(13) on behalf of the organisations specified in paragraph 1(11). g. The day-to-day management or supervision on a regular basis of any person carrying out the activities mentioned in a, b, e and f above. h. The exercise of a function of the positions specified in paragraph 4(1) (e.g. school governor, Children s Commissioner, trustee of a children s charity, operator of the Information Sharing Index set up under the Children Act 2004). 44. Paragraph 2(2) of Schedule 4 provides that teaching, training, supervising etc. a child in the course of his employment will not be regulated activity. However this will not be the case where the child is under 16 and it is a person s principal responsibility to be engaged in that particular activity in relation to the child. Part 2: Regulated Activity Relating to Vulnerable Adults 45. This Part defines regulated activity relating vulnerable adults. Broadly speaking, the principal activities are - a. Certain types of activity (specified in paragraph 7(1)) carried out frequently, on three or more days in a 30-day period, or overnight. This includes teaching, training, advising, and caring for vulnerable adults. b. Any activity carried out frequently, or on three or more days in a 30-day period in a care home which gives a person the opportunity to have contact with vulnerable adults as a result of his duties or anything he is allowed to do there. c. The day-to-day management or supervision or a regular basis of any person carrying out the activities mentioned in a and b above. d. The inspection of establishments specified in paragraph 7(7) (e.g. a care home) by an organisation specified in paragraph 7(6) (e.g. the Healthcare Commission). e. The exercise of a function of the positions specified in paragraph 7(9) (e.g. the director of adult social services or a trustee of vulnerable adults charity). Part 3: The period condition 46. This Part defines the period condition for the purposes of regulated activity. The requirements to check and be subject to monitoring kick in primarily when an activity is carried out frequently or the period condition is satisfied. Paragraph 10(1) defines this as activity which takes place on more than two days in a 30-day period. For certain activities, such as caring for children or providing treatment for a vulnerable adult, the requirements to check and be subject to monitoring apply also when the activity takes 9

10 place overnight and the individual has the opportunity for face to face contact with children or vulnerable adults. 47. It is important to note that section 58 of the Act prevents any activity within the context of a familial relationship and certain types of activity within the context of a friendship from being a regulated activity relating to children or vulnerable adults for the purpose of the Act. REGULATED ACTIVITY PROVIDERS Section 6: Regulated activity providers 48. This section defines regulated activity provider for the purpose of the Act, on whom a number of obligations are imposed by its other provisions. A regulated activity provider is an individual or organisation responsible for the management or control of regulated activity, who makes arrangements for a person to engage in that activity. The effect of subsection (2)(b) is that regulated activity providers will be those with the ultimate responsibility for the regulated activity: not every individual in the management chain will be responsible for making the check of a person s status. There is no need for a contract to be in place for an individual or body to be a regulated activity provider, and the definition applies to both paid and unpaid work. A person who simply uses services provided by another (for example, a nanny who places a child in the care of a supermarket crèche) will not be a regulated activity provider because he will have no responsibility for the management or control of the regulated activity. But the supermarket in this case will be a regulated activity provider. 49. Subsection (3) provides that a person is a regulated activity provider if section 53(4) so provides. Section 53(4) applies where a person arranges for another to foster a child as a private foster parent and has power to terminate the arrangements. The arranger in this case is a regulated activity provider even if he would not otherwise be (i.e. because he does not have control or management of the activity). Subsection (4) states that those with responsibility for adult placement schemes will also be regulated activity providers. 50. Subsection (5) provides that a person who makes arrangements for another to engage in regulated activity for his own benefit, or for a child or vulnerable adult who is a member of his family or is a friend of his (construed in accordance with section 58), is not a regulated activity provider. So, for example, a parent who employs a nanny to look after his child will not be a regulated activity provider for the purposes of the Act. This means that certain provisions of the Act will not apply to the parent. For example, although parents will be able to apply for vetting information about potential nannies they will not commit a criminal offence by failing to check a nanny s status or by failing to ensure that a nanny is subject to monitoring. 51. Subsection (8) provides that a person who appoints, or participates in the appointment of, a person to a position referred to in that subsection is not a regulated activity provider merely by reason of that fact. So, for example, those who elect the trustees of a children s charity will not be regulated activity providers for the purpose of the Act or subject to the obligations imposed on regulated activity providers. 52. Subsection (10) provides that if a regulated activity provider is an unincorporated association any requirement or liability under the Act will be the liability of the person responsible for the management and control of the association or, if there is more than 10

11 one such person, all of them jointly and severally. RESTRICTIONS ON PARTICIPATING IN REGULATED ACTIVITY Section 7: Barred person not to engage in regulated activity 53. This section makes it an offence for a barred person to engage in regulated activity, or seek or offer to engage in regulated activity. 54. Subsection (3) provides a defence if the person can prove that he did not know, and could not reasonably be expected to know, that he was barred. A person who, for example, could not be contacted by IBB either when it was considering whether to include him in the list (so as to give him an opportunity to make representations) or when it made known its barring decision might benefit from this defence. 55. Subsection (4) does specify one type of exceptional situation where a person who knows he is barred is able to engage in regulated activity. This is where he reasonably thinks that it is necessary to do so in order to prevent harm coming to a child or vulnerable adult, where he reasonably thinks that there was no-one else around who could engage in the activity for that purpose and he engages in the activity for the shortest amount of time necessary. This would cover a barred doctor providing first aid to a child who had an accident in the street. 56. Subsection (5) modifies the definition of regulated activity for the purposes of section 7. It disapplies the requirements about frequency and the period condition. This means that for the purposes of this section a relevant activity will be regulated activity even if it is carried out once only. So, for example, a person who is barred from regulated activity relating to children will commit an offence if he supervises children on a single occasion. Section 8: Person not to engage in regulated activity unless subject to monitoring 57. Subsection (1) makes it an offence for a person to engage in regulated activity with the permission of a regulated activity provider unless he is subject to monitoring. (A person may apply to become subject to monitoring under section 24.) 58. Subsection (2) ensures that childminders who are required to be registered under the provisions of the Childcare Act 2006 or who would be required to be registered but for the fact that they do not provide childcare for a child below the age of eight will be required to be subject to monitoring. This applies even where the childminder is engaged in providing services to a person who is not a regulated activity provider (see note on section 6 for definition of regulated activity provider). This requirement also applies to childminders in Wales in similar circumstances. 59. Subsection (3) makes it an offence for a person to act as a member of a governing body of an educational establishment whilst not subject to monitoring. A member of a governing body can include not only a person traditionally described as a governor but also one who is a member of a body which governs an educational establishment, for example, a director or trustee if the board of directors or trustees is the governing body of the relevant educational institution. 60. Subsection (6) ensures that this offence does not apply if the individual who engages in the activity is under 16 years old. This will ensure that young people can, for example, undertake work experience in a nursery without being subject to monitoring. 11

12 61. Subsections (7) and (11) ensure that those already in post before it becomes an offence for an individual not to be subject to monitoring will not initially be criminalised if they are not subject to monitoring. The implementation of the scheme will be phased and the intention is that, to start with, only new appointments will be subject to its requirements. After a prescribed date however (subsections (9) and (12)) those already in post at the commencement of section 8 will need also to be subject to monitoring. 62. Subsection (8) extends the scope of subsection (7) in certain cases involving NHS employment. It deals with the situation where a person is engaged in relevant NHS employment when the section comes into force and he then engages in another form of relevant NHS employment. In this case, the first NHS employment is caught by subsection (7). The second NHS employment is not caught by subsection (7) as the permission to engage in that activity does not pre-date commencement of the section. Subsection (8) ensures that in this situation the person does not need to apply to be subject to monitoring in respect of the second NHS employment until he needs to apply to be subject to monitoring in respect of the first NHS employment. 63. Subsection (10) ensures that a person does not commit an offence if he engages in regulated activity mentioned in section 16 and that activity is regulated activity relating to vulnerable adults. Section 16 contains miscellaneous exceptions for persons such as prison officers. 64. Subsection (14) will require courts to consider the extent to which guidance issued by the Secretary of State on the definition of frequently has been followed when setting the penalty for the commission of the offence in the section. This is intended to protect those individuals who have followed the Secretary of State s guidance in the event that a court takes a different view to the Secretary of State on the interpretation of frequently. Section 9: Use of barred person for regulated activity 65. This section makes it an offence for any person to permit an individual to engage in regulated activity if he knows or has reason to believe that the individual is barred from that activity and the person engages in the activity. Subsection (5) makes similar modifications to the definition of regulated activity as are made by section 7(5). So even where the regulated activity is taking place occasionally or for a short period of time, the person giving permission would commit an offence. There is a similar offence in respect of a personnel supplier (defined in section 60) who supplies an individual for regulated activity. 66. Subsection (4) provides a defence where it is necessary for an employer to permit a barred individual to engage in regulated activity to prevent harm. This will only be in rare circumstances where there was no-one else who could engage in the specific activity e.g. a school giving a barred parent who had come to pick up their child consent by phone to look after a stricken child at the school campsite where the sole teacher in charge had been taken ill. Section 10: Use of person not subject to monitoring for regulated activity 67. This section makes it an offence for a regulated activity provider to permit an individual whom he knows or has reason to believe is not subject to monitoring in relation to regulated activity to engage in that activity. A similar offence is created in relation to a personnel supplier who supplies an individual in these circumstances, though the regulated activity provider will commit the offence only if the individual 12

13 actually engages in the activity. 68. Subsection (3) redefines regulated activity, for the purposes of subsection (2), so that it is an offence for a personnel supplier to supply an individual to engage in regulated activity without them being subject to monitoring, even where this activity takes place only briefly or for a short period of time. Again the modifications mirror those made by section 7(5), which are explained more extensively above. 69. Subsection (5) ensures that this offence does not apply if the individual who engages in the activity is under 16 years old. This will ensure that a person will be able to use, for example, young people who are not subject to monitoring for work experience in a nursery. 70. Subsections (6), (8), (11) and (12) have a similar purpose to section 8(7), (9), (11) and (12) (see above). 71. Again, similarly to section 8 for employees and volunteers, subsections (7) and (9) exempt certain providers of regulated activity mentioned in sections 16 and 17 (where certain conditions are met), from the offence of employing someone whom he knows or has reason to believe is not subject to monitoring. 72. Subsection (10) will require courts to consider the extent to which guidance issued by the Secretary of State on the definition of frequently has been followed when setting the penalty for the commission of the offence in the section. This is intended to protect employers who have followed the Secretary of State s guidance in the event that a court takes a different view to the Secretary of State on the interpretation of frequently. Section 11: Regulated activity provider: failure to check 73. This section makes it an offence for a regulated activity provider to permit an individual to engage in regulated activity without first ascertaining that they are subject to monitoring in relation to the activity (the offence only applies if the individual actually engages in the activity). The regulated activity provider must ascertain whether the individual is subject to monitoring in accordance with the relevant Part of Schedule 5 (see below). It is also an offence to knowingly or recklessly provide false written confirmation that is required by Schedule 5 (subsection (8)). 74. Subsection (2) defines what it means to check whether a person is subject to monitoring. The various methods of checking whether a person is subject to monitoring are set out in Schedule This section lists defences which apply in specific circumstances. Subsections (3) and (4) exempt certain providers of regulated activity mentioned in sections 16 and 17 (where certain conditions are met), from the requirement to check that an individual is subject to monitoring. 76. Subsection (5) ensures that this offence does not apply if the individual is under 16 years old. This will ensure that, for example, a care home could give work experience to young people without having to check that they are subject to monitoring. 77. Provision equivalent to that in section 8(7) (see above) is made in subsection (6) for regulated activity providers and covers permission to carry out an activity that was given before commencement of section Subsection (10) will require courts to consider the extent to which guidance issued by the Secretary of State on the definition of frequently has been followed when setting 13

14 the penalty for the commission of the offence in the section. This is intended to protect employers who have followed the Secretary of State s guidance in the event that a court takes a different view to the Secretary of State on the interpretation of frequently. Schedule 5 Appropriate verification 79. Schedule 5 sets out how a regulated activity provider fulfils the duty to check that a person is subject to monitoring. 80. The default position is that a regulated activity provider must obtain an appropriate verification in accordance with one of the methods set out in Part 1 of the Schedule. In summary the methods are: a. making a check through an application under section 30 (see paragraph 1(1)(a)) that the person is subject to monitoring, and whether he is undergoing assessment (as defined in section 31(4)); b. obtaining an enhanced criminal record certificate under the Police Act 1997 in relation to the person (see paragraph 1(1)(b)) containing suitability information including whether the person is subject to monitoring, and whether he is being considered for barring (other than automatic barring) (see paragraph 11 of Schedule 5 and paragraph 14 of Schedule 9), or obtaining information derived from such a certificate (see paragraph 2); c. obtaining written confirmation from another regulated activity provider who is also permitting the person to engage in the activity concerned that the other regulated activity provider: i. has no reason to believe that the person is barred or not subject to monitoring in relation to the activity; and ii. is registered to be notified by the Secretary of State if the person ceases to be subject to monitoring in relation to the activity. d. obtaining written confirmation from a personnel supplier who is supplying the person to engage in the activity concerned that the personnel supplier: i. has no reason to believe that the person is barred or not subject to monitoring in relation to the activity; and ii. is registered to be notified by the Secretary of State if the person ceases to be subject to monitoring in relation to the activity. 81. For example where a school hires a building contractor to carry out maintenance work on the school, the school may rely on written confirmation from the contractor. And where an employment agency supplies carers for a care home, the care home may rely on written confirmation from the employment agency. 82. Section 11(8) makes it an offence to provide written confirmation that is false. 83. Part 2 of the Schedule applies only in prescribed cases (see section 11(2)). To make a check under part 2 a regulated activity provider must both check a person is subject to monitoring and have taken prescribed steps to obtain an enhanced criminal record certificate. A regulated activity provider may rely on a check carried out by another regulated activity provider or by a personnel supplier in the same circumstances set out for part 1. But under part 2 the regulated activity provider must obtain from the other regulated activity provider or personnel supplier a copy of an enhanced criminal record 14

15 certificate in addition to written confirmation. The written confirmation must include that the regulated activity provider or personnel supplier: a. has no reason to believe that the person is barred or not subject to monitoring in relation to the activity; b. is registered to be notified by the Secretary of State if the person ceases to be subject to monitoring in relation to the activity; and c. has not had disclosed to him, in connection with the criminal record certificate, information from the Secretary of State in pursuance of section 113B(6)(b) of the Police Act This is information which, in the interests of the prevention or detection of crime, the chief officer of a relevant police force did not consider could be included on the criminal record certificate, but could nonetheless be provided to the registered person who countersigned the application for the criminal record certificate. 84. Part 3 of the Schedule also applies only in prescribed cases (see section 11(2)). To make a check under part 3 a regulated activity provider must obtain a copy of an enhanced criminal record certificate. As throughout Schedule 5, the certificate must provide the suitability information referred to in paragraph 11 including, amongst other things, information as to whether the person is barred, being considered for barring (other than automatic barring) and/or is subject to monitoring in relation to the activity. The regulated activity provider may also rely on written confirmation and an enhanced criminal record certificate from another regulated activity provider or a personnel supplier as set out, above, for part 2. Section 12: Personnel suppliers: failure to check 85. This section refers to Schedule 6 see below. 86. Subsection (2) enables the Secretary of State to extend the requirement on employment businesses to check an individual s status to other types of personnel supplier (as defined in the Act) by order (subject to the negative resolution procedure). Schedule 6 Employment businesses: failure to check 87. This Schedule provides that an employment business will commit an offence if they fail to register an interest in an individual (see section 32) prior to supplying the individual to engage in regulated activity. Registering an interest will ensure that the employment business is informed if the individual ceases to be subject to monitoring. The Schedule also allows the Secretary of State to prescribe circumstances in which it will be an offence for such a business to supply an individual without having obtained an enhanced criminal record certificate in relation to that individual. Moreover, Paragraph 4 has the effect that employment businesses are placed under the requirements of this Schedule even if an individual will only be engaged in regulated activity infrequently, or on fewer that three days in a 30 day period. Section 13: Educational establishments: checks on members of governing body 88. This section provides that an appropriate officer commits an offence if he fails within a prescribed period to make a check in accordance with section 15 in relation to a person who is appointed to the governing body of an educational establishment mentioned in section 8(5). The appropriate officer for each type of educational establishment, e.g. maintained schools, academies, etc. will be prescribed in regulations. 15

16 89. Provision is made in subsection (3) not to apply the requirements to appointments made before commencement of section 13. Subsection (4) enables this exemption to be switched off. Section 14 Office holders: offences 90. Subsection (1) enables the Secretary of State by regulations to provide that a person commits an offence if he engages in regulated activity by holding a specified office and he is not subject to monitoring. 91. Subsection (2) enables the Secretary of State by regulations to provide that a specified person commits an offence if he fails to carry out a check under section 15 in relation to a person appointed to such an office. Section 15 sections 13 and 14: checks 92. This section sets out how checks of governors of educational institutions and other officers prescribed by section 14 are to be made. Any of the methods mentioned in subsections (2) and (3) may be used. EXCEPTIONS Section 16: Exception to requirement to make monitoring check 93. This section lists regulated activity (in relation to vulnerable adults) in relation to which regulated activity providers are exempted from the obligation to make an appropriate check under section 11, and from the offence under section 10 of employing an individual who is known or suspected not to be subject to monitoring. Subsection (1) sets out the activities in respect of which the exemption applies. These include activities carried out for the purposes of prisons and certain activities targeted at individuals because of their age, health or disability. In cases where the exemptions apply checks may still be made but are not mandatory. The section contains a provision which allows for this list to be amended in the future. A sun-setting subsection provides that the exemptions in relation to recreational, social, sporting or educational activity, housing and prescribed welfare services will only apply for three years after commencement of any provision of the section, or at such later date as the Secretary of State may specify by order. Section 17: NHS employment 94. This section relates specifically to those regulated activity providers who employ people in relevant NHS employment which is defined as employment with one of the NHS bodies listed in subsection (3). Where a person is employed in relevant NHS employment, and provided that employment continues, he can undertake other such employment without the need for a monitoring check to be made in relation to that other employment. This provision is aimed, for example, at the situation where a person who is employed with the NHS as his main employment, is then supplied by NHS Professionals (the NHS s in-house supplier of staff) or by another agency to work for the NHS on a temporary basis to cover staff absences and holiday etc. The main NHS employment acts as an umbrella for any other NHS employment undertaken whilst the main NHS employment continues. This modification of the normal requirements applies to employment (which is relevant NHS employment) with an NHS body, or with a person who provides healthcare for an NHS body. 16