Case ILN/1:17-cv Document 9 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
|
|
- Gerald O’Brien’
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case ILN/1:17-cv Document 9 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: ) ) SORIN 3T HEATER-COOLER ) LITIGATION, ) ) MDL No This Document Relates To: ) ) Kmak v. LivaNova Deutschland ) GMBH, et. al. 1:17-cv ) INTERESTED PARTIES' OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR TRANSFER AND COORDINATION OR CONSOLIDATION UNDER 28 U.S.C Pursuant to Rule 6.2(e) of the Rules of Civil Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("the Panel"), Plaintiff, Susan Kmak, as independent administrator of the estate of Michael Kmak, deceased (herein after referred to as "Plaintiff"), opposes transfer and consolidation under 28 U.S.C Further, the Plaintiff herein joins the other Oppositions filed before this panel on behalf of the additional plaintiffs who had filed causes of action against the named Defendants. The Plaintiff notes that the instant cause of action was filed on June 26, 2017 in the United States District Court of the Northern District of Illinois. Since its filing, the parties have engaged in some exchange of discovery and are currently engaged in motion practice as a pending motion to dismiss is before the Honorable Judge Bucklo of the Northern District of Illinois. At this time, Plaintiff is unaware of any other causes of action that have been filed in the state of Illinois. Transfer and consolidation will not serve the convenience of the collective parties and witnesses, particularly in Plaintiff's Action and would frustrate the just and efficient conduct of this litigation because: 1) a significant disparity exists among the subject actions, particularly the instant action as compared to many others as this cause of action involves the death of Michael 1
2 Case ILN/1:17-cv Document 9 Filed 11/27/17 Page 2 of 7 Kmak while many of the other actions were recently filed as medical monitoring cases; 2) on information and belief the other subject actions are filed outside of the state of Illinois and have already benefitted from shared discovery and informal consolidation in geographic regions while the instant cause shares no medical treatment or shared geography with any other causes of action; and 3) the subject actions allege different theories of liability and thus require different discovery regarding the origin of the NTM contamination in Defendants' heater coolers and additionally Plaintiff's causes of action contains counts of wrongful death and survival actions under Illinois state statutes. For the reasons set forth more fully below, this Panel should deny transfer and centralization outright or, in the alternative, exclude the Kmak action from its consolidation order. I. STANDARD OF REVIEW Under 28 U.S.C. 1407, the Panel has discretion to transfer and consolidate similar actions pending in different districts to maximize the convenience of the parties and witnesses and promote the just and efficient conduct of the actions. 28 U.S.C. 1407(a). While appropriate under certain circumstances, "centralization under Section 1407 should be the last solution after considered review of all other options." In re Best Buy So., Inc., Cal. Song-Beverly Credit Card Act Litig., 804 F. Supp. 2d 1376, 1378 (J.P.M.L. 2011); In re: Gerber Probiotic Prods. Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig., 8999 F. Supp. 2d 1378, 1379 (J.P.M.L. 2012). The Panel acknowledges three broad circumstances, all present here, that make the case for centralization less compelling: (1) when the actions entail significant localized discovery, (2) the defendants and/or some of the plaintiff oppose centralizations, where (3) only a few actions or procedurally dissimilar actions are involved in the litigation. In re: CVS Caremark Corp. Wage and Hour Emp't Practices Litig. 684 F. Supp. 2d 1377, 1379 (J.P.M.L. 2010). 2
3 Case ILN/1:17-cv Document 9 Filed 11/27/17 Page 3 of 7 Centralization is frequently denied where cooperation among the parties and deference among the courts can minimize the possibilities of duplicative discover or inconsistent pretrial rulings. In re Eli Lilly and Co. (Cephalexin Monohydrate) Patent Litig., 446 F. Supp. 242, 244 (J.P.M.L. 1978); In re Adderall XR (Amphetamine/Dextroamphetamine) Mktg., Sales Practices & Antitrust, 968 F. Supp. 2d 1343, 1345 (J.P.M.L. 2013); In re OSF Healthcare Sys. Emple. Ret. Income Sec. Act Erisa Litig., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS * (J.P.M.L. Dec. 7, 2016); see also Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth (2004). In considering centralization, the Panel must also consider whether the disruption of plaintiff's choice of forum is necessary to achieve efficiencies and promote justice. Evans v. Equinox Holdings, Inc. (In re Equinox Fitness Wage & Hour Empl. Practices Litig.), 764 F. Supp. 2d 1347, 1348 (J.P.M.L. 2011). II. ARGUMENT When there is a significant procedural disparity among the actions, the Panel must take a closer look at whether the movant has met its burden of demonstrating that centralization will still serve the purposes of 28 U.S.C In re Brandywine Communs. Techs., LLC, 959 F. Supp. 2d 1377 (J.P.M.L. 2013)(citing In re La.-Pacific Corp., 867 F. Supp. 2d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2012). Here, centralization is inappropriate because significant procedural disparity exists among the subject actions. Firstly, you have a disparity in the time frames for filing. Many of these cases have just been filed this month, some have been pending for over a year, and the instant case was filed over five months ago. Secondly, the majority of cases are medical monitoring cases. However, in the instant Kmak action, Michael Kmak is deceased from the infection causes by the medical device. Thus, with respect to the Kmak action, discovery and pretrial preparation will likely be highly localized and consolidation to the northern region of 3
4 Case ILN/1:17-cv Document 9 Filed 11/27/17 Page 4 of 7 Illinois and the northwest region of Indiana, which encompasses the areas that the decedent received surgery with the Sorin 3T device and where his post-surgical treatment occurred, as well as where he died. Plaintiff is also aware that significant discovery has already taken place in the Anapol Weiss actions, which could streamline the process for any overlapping witnesses. However, the vast majority of witnesses in the Kmak action, both medical and lay, reside in Chicagoland area of Illinois and the northwest region of Indiana. Upon information and belief, a protective order could be entered into by the parties, as other subject actions have done, which could permit sharing of discovery and this would greatly reduce the possibility of duplicative document discovery. The Kmak plaintiff are amendable to entering into a similar protective order. B. Many of the Subject Actions are Already Informally Consolidated As indicated in the oppositions filed by counsel for the Anapol Weiss plaintiffs and again by counsel for the Reed plaintiff, in addition to protective orders that can be entered into that contemplate sharing amongst the subject actions, roughly half of the subject actions are already informally "consolidated" for pre-trial purposes in geographical regions. Specifically, all nine cases in the state of Iowa, all ten cases in the state of South Carolina, and the three federal cases in the state of Pennsylvania. Importantly, the Kmak Action is the one and only case currently filed in the state of Illinois and therefore aside from possible sharing of certain discovery completed by the corporate entities, there is no other duplicative discovery to be completed in the Kmak Action that would affect any of the other filed cases. C. The Subject Actions Allege Different Theories of Liability As previously argued before this Panel in February 2017, the subject actions still concern different bacteria and different theories of liability with respect to product defect, causation, and 4
5 Case ILN/1:17-cv Document 9 Filed 11/27/17 Page 5 of 7 damage still exists today. Additionally, as the Kmak action involves a decedent, who died in Indiana, there will be significant localized discovery and centralization should be denied in cases where actions entail significant localized discovery. In re: CVS Caremark Corp. Wage and Hour Emp't Practices Litig. 684 F. Supp. 2d at Moreover, centralization should be denied because unlike a majority of the subject actions, Kmak asserts Illinois wrongful death and survival causes of action as Kmak involves an individual who died as a result of infection caused by the Sorin 3T device. Therefore, unlike a majority of the other subject actions, that are mainly medical monitoring cases, the instant case contains different causes of action as it involves a death. In re Electrolux Dryer Prods. Liab. Litig., 978 F. Supp. 2d 1376, 1377 (J.P.M.L. 2013) (denying centralization, in part, because differing theories of liability predominated over common ones). D. The Kmak Action Should Not Be Considered For Centralization In the event that the Panel is inclined to grant centralization, the Kmak Plaintiff requests that the Kmak action be excluded from such consolidation. As stated, the Kmak action involves a death, is the only cause of action filed in the state of Illinois, and involves witnesses, including doctors, who all reside in the Chicagoland area of Illinois and in the northwest region of Indiana. Therefore, centralizing the Kmak action for discovery and pretrial purposes would have minimal effect at streamlining the discovery process as most of the discovery in the Kmak action would not be duplicative and could not be shared among the other cases. However, any discovery done that may duplicative among the other cases could easily be shared to the Kmak action without needing to unnecessarily centralize the entire case. 5
6 Case ILN/1:17-cv Document 9 Filed 11/27/17 Page 6 of 7 III. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, transfer and consolidation will not serve the convenience of the collective parties and witness or promote the just and efficient conduct of this litigation. Kmak respectfully requests that the Panel deny centralization or, in the alternative, exclude the Kmak Action from any consolidation order. Respectfully Submitted, Dated: November 27, 2017 Dean J. Caras Attorney for Plaintiff CARAS LAW GROUP 320 W. Illinois Street, Suite 2112 Chicago, IL Phone: dean.caras@deancaras.com Dean J. Caras 6
7 Case ILN/1:17-cv Document 9 Filed 11/27/17 Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Opposition to Motion for Transfer and Coordination or Consolidation Under 28 U.S.C was served electronically via CM/ECF system, which will automatically serve and send notification of such filing to all registered attorneys of record. This 27th day of November, Dean J. Caras 7
Case MDL No Document 255 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2388 Document 255 Filed 09/04/12 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: MORTGAGE LENDER FORCE- PLACED INSURANCE LITIGATION MDL No. 2388 FEDERAL
More informationCase CO/1:15-cv Document 9 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case CO/1:15-cv-01169 Document 9 Filed 07/14/15 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re: Fluoroquinolone Products MDL - 2642 Liability Litigation INTERESTED
More informationCase MDL No Document 1-1 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2772 Document 1-1 Filed 01/26/17 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re: ) ) Sorin 3T Heater-Cooler Litigation ) MDL DOCKET NO. ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
More informationCase MDL No Document 1-1 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE JUDICAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2381 Document 1-1 Filed 05/09/12 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE JUDICAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In Re: INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC. ROBOTIC SURGERY PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION: MDL DOCKET
More informationCase MDL No Document 1-1 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2776 Document 1-1 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: FARXIGA (DAPAGLIFLOZIN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL Docket No.
More informationUNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER
Jordie Bornstein et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated Doc. 29 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: QUALCOMM ANTITRUST LITIGATION MDL No. 2773 TRANSFER ORDER * Before the Panel: Plaintiffs
More informationCase VAE/2:13-cv Document 10 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case VAE/2:13-cv-00178 Document 10 Filed 05/20/13 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re: Lipitor (Atorvastatin Calcium) Marketing, Sales Practices and Products
More informationBEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION. ) IN RE: QUALITEST BIRTH ) MDL Docket No.: 1:14-P-51 CONTROL LITIGATION ) )
Case MDL No. 2552 Document 2-1 Filed 04/30/14 Page 1 of 17 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ) IN RE: QUALITEST BIRTH ) MDL Docket No.: 1:14-P-51 CONTROL LITIGATION ) ) PETITIONERS
More informationCase MDL No Document 1-1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2619 Document 1-1 Filed 02/12/15 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re: WALGREENS HERBAL ) SUPPLEMENTS LITIGATION ) MDL Docket No. ) ) PLAINTIFF
More informationCase NYE/1:11-cv Document 3 Filed 10/05/11 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case NYE/1:11-cv-04502 Document 3 Filed 10/05/11 Page 1 of 7 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: ACTOS PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION ) MDL Docket No. 2299 ) ) REPLY
More informationCase KS/2:14-cv Document 8 Filed 10/29/14 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case KS/2:14-cv-02497 Document 8 Filed 10/29/14 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE SYNGENTA MIR 162 CORN LITIGATION MDL DOCKET NO. 2591 U.S. SYNGENTA
More informationCase MDL No Document 52 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2657 Document 52 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 3 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: Zofran (Ondansetron) Products Liability Litigation MDL No. 2657 INTERESTED
More informationCase Pending No. 73 Document 1-1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 23 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case Pending No. 73 Document 1-1 Filed 11/06/17 Page 1 of 23 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: MDL No. Sorin 3T Heater-Cooler Litigation ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
More informationUNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER
NICHOLSON v. JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC et al Doc. 32 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: XARELTO (RIVAROXABAN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2592 TRANSFER ORDER
More informationCase MDL No Document 84 Filed 04/04/18 Page 1 of 5. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER
Case MDL No. 2826 Document 84 Filed 04/04/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION MDL No. 2826 TRANSFER ORDER
More informationCase MDL No Document 4-1 Filed 09/27/18 Page 1 of 10 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2873 Document 4-1 Filed 09/27/18 Page 1 of 10 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: PFAS Products Liability and Environmental Liability Litigation MDL
More informationCase ILN/1:12-cv Document 14 Filed 05/21/13 Page 1 of 6 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case ILN/1:12-cv-08326 Document 14 Filed 05/21/13 Page 1 of 6 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re: Effexor (Venlafaxine Hydrochloride) Products Liability Litigation
More informationCase MDL No Document 402 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 9. BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTlDlSTRlCT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2672 Document 402 Filed 10/20/15 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTlDlSTRlCT LITIGATION IN RE VOLKSWAGEN CLEAN DIESEL MARKETING, SALES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION
More informationCase MDL No Document 142 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2705 Document 142 Filed 06/02/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: 100% GRATED PARMESAN CHEESE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION MDL No. 2705
More informationCase MDL No Document 189 Filed 09/27/12 Page 1 of 6. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ORDER DENYING TRANSFER
Case MDL No. 2393 Document 189 Filed 09/27/12 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: UPONOR, INC., F1960 PLUMBING FITTINGS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2393
More informationCase MDL No Document 2-1 Filed 01/02/18 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2827 Document 2-1 Filed 01/02/18 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTI-DISTRICT LITIGATION In re: APPLE, INC. DEVICE PERFORMANCE LITIGATION MDL DKT. NO.: CORRECTED MEMORANDUM
More informationCase WVS/2:12-cv Document 12 Filed 03/13/13 Page 1 of 21 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ) )
Case WVS/2:12-cv-03155 Document 12 Filed 03/13/13 Page 1 of 21 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re: Cook Medical Pelvic Repair Products Liability Litigation ) ) MDL
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901
Case: 1:13-cv-01569 Document #: 19 Filed: 06/13/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:901 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAUL DUFFY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case
More informationCase CAC/2:12-cv Document 12 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 8 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case CAC/2:12-cv-11008 Document 12 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 8 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS MDL No. 2462 TECHNOLOGIES, LLC PATENT LITIGATION
More informationCase ILS/3:14-cv Document 5 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 11 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ) ) ) )
Case ILS/3:14-cv-01254 Document 5 Filed 11/24/14 Page 1 of 11 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re: Xarelto Products Liability Litigation ) ) ) ) MDL No. 2592 BAYER
More informationCase MDL No Document 29 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 25 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2826 Document 29 Filed 01/17/18 Page 1 of 25 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION MDL No. 2826
More informationCase MDL No Document 46 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 11 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2738 Document 46 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 11 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES
More informationCase Pending No. 55 Document 1-1 Filed 04/26/13 Page 1 of 6 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case Pending No. 55 Document 1-1 Filed 04/26/13 Page 1 of 6 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re Lipitor (Atorvastatin) Litigation MDL- BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS
More informationCase MDL No Document 1-1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2627 Document 1-1 Filed 03/09/15 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re: Lumber Liquidators Flooring Products Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORTH WORTH DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORTH WORTH DIVISION American Airlines, Inc, Plaintiffs, vs. Travelport Limited, Travelport, LP, Orbitz Worldwide, LLC, Civil Action No.: 4:11-CV-00244Y
More informationSpratt v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, No. 2:16-cv (D.N.J.)
Case MDL No. 2757 Document 61 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 6 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Spratt v. AstraZeneca
More informationCase MDL No Document 76 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 5 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2666 Document 76 Filed 11/18/15 Page 1 of 5 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: BAIR HUGGER FORCED AIR MDL No. 2666 WARMING PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
More informationCase NYW/1:11-cv Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 13 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case NYW/1:11-cv-00643 Document 12 Filed 09/29/11 Page 1 of 13 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION : : In re Actos Products Liability Litigation : MDL DOCKET NO. 2299 : : DEFENDANTS RESPONSE
More informationCase MDL No Document 1-1 Filed 12/12/12 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2428 Document 1-1 Filed 12/12/12 Page 1 of 9 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: Fresenius GranuFlo/Naturalyte Dialysate Litigation MDL No. BRIEF IN
More informationCase 1:15-cv IMK Document 8 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 137
Case 1:15-cv-00110-IMK Document 8 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 137 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CLARKSBURG DIVISION MURRAY ENERGY CORPORATION,
More informationCase Pending No. 88 Document 1-1 Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 13 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ) ) ) )
Case Pending No. 88 Document 1-1 Filed 10/22/18 Page 1 of 13 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re: Valsartan NDMA Contamination Litigation ) ) ) ) MDL No. 88 PLAINTIFF
More informationCase 2:05-cv SRC-CLW Document 992 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 65902
Case 2:05-cv-02367-SRC-CLW Document 992 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 2 PageID: 65902 James E. Cecchi CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO 5 Becker Farm Road Roseland, NJ 07068 (973) 994-1700 Liaison
More informationCase 1:16-cv RNS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2016 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:16-cv-21221-RNS Document 13 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2016 Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION Civil Action No: 1:16-cv-21221-Scola MASTER SGT.
More informationCase CAC/2:12-cv Document 11 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 8 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case CAC/2:12-cv-11017 Document 11 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 8 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re BRANDYWINE COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC PATENT LITIGATION MDL
More informationCase: 1:11-cv Document #: 1056 Filed: 02/28/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:26978
Case: 1:11-cv-05468 Document #: 1056 Filed: 02/28/14 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:26978 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN RE: ZIMMER NEXGEN KNEE ) IMPLANT
More informationCase 2:11-ml MRP-MAN Document 1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1 Case MDL No Document 143 Filed 08/15/11 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:11-ml-02265-MRP-MAN Document 1 Filed 08/30/11 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:1 Case MDL No. 2265 Document 143 Filed 08/15/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTHMSTRICT LITIGATION r IN RE: COUNTRYWIDE
More informationNotice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against
Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against Sagent Technology, Inc. for Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof
More informationUNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION. IN RE: GADOLINIUM CONTRAST DYES PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No TRANSFER ORDER
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: GADOLINIUM CONTRAST DYES PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 1909 TRANSFER ORDER Before the entire Panel * : Plaintiffs in twelve actions
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 13-55881 06/25/2013 ID: 8680068 DktEntry: 14 Page: 1 of 10 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INGENUITY 13 LLC Plaintiff and PRENDA LAW, INC., Ninth Circuit Case No. 13-55881 [Related
More informationMichael B. Wigmore Direct Phone: Direct Fax: January 14, 2009 VIA HAND DELIVERY
Michael B. Wigmore Direct Phone: 202.373.6792 Direct Fax: 202.373.6001 michael.wigmore@bingham.com VIA HAND DELIVERY Jeffrey N. Lüthi, Clerk of the Panel Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Thurgood
More informationCase MDL No Document 54 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 5. UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER
Case MDL No. 2243 Document 54 Filed 05/23/11 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: FOSAMAX (ALENDRONATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. II) MDL No. 2243
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 85 Filed: 06/12/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1268
Case: 1:14-cv-01748 Document #: 85 Filed: 06/12/14 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1268 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION In re: TESTOSTERONE ) REPLACEMENT
More informationCase ARE/4:13-cv Document 33 Filed 07/18/13 Page 1 of 10 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case ARE/4:13-cv-00250 Document 33 Filed 07/18/13 Page 1 of 10 BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE : PILOT FLYING J FUEL REBATE CONTRACT LITIGATION MDL Docket No. 2468 JOINT AGREED
More informationCase MDL No Document 1-1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 15 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2754 Document 1-1 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 15 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: ELIQUIS (APIXABAN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. BRISTOL-MYERS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity ) as Governor of the State of North Carolina, ) and FRANK PERRY, in his official
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Case 1:16-cv-00260-JEJ Document 49 Filed 10/25/16 Page 1 of 30 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EDWARD BAKER and JACK MILLER, on behalf of themselves and all
More informationBEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re ) ) Clean Water Rule: ) MDL No. Definition of Waters of the United States ) ) ) MOTION OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TRANSFER OF ACTIONS
More informationCase 3:13-cv K Document 36 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID 492 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:13-cv-02760-K Document 36 Filed 11/14/13 Page 1 of 6 PageID 492 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION VICTAULIC COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. ROMAR SUPPLY, INCORPORATED,
More informationCase 1:15-cv JMF Document 9 Filed 08/27/15 Page 1 of 14
Case 1:15-cv-04685-JMF Document 9 Filed 08/27/15 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : IN RE:
More informationCase Pending No. 20 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 18 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case Pending No. 20 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 18 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: STRYKER REJUVENATE AND ABG II HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
More informationCase 4:15-cv CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 4:15-cv-00386-CVE-PJC Document 32 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 07/31/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STATE OF OKLAHOMA ex rel. E. Scott Pruitt, in his official
More informationCase MN/0:13-cv Document 30 Filed 03/25/13 Page 1 of 10 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MN/0:13-cv-00235 Document 30 Filed 03/25/13 Page 1 of 10 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: STRYKER REJUVENATE AND MDL No. 2441 ABG II HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. HID Global Corp., et al. v. Farpointe Data, Inc., et al.
Present: The Honorable James V. Selna Karla J. Tunis Deputy Clerk Not Present Court Reporter Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present Attorneys Present for Defendants: Not Present Proceedings: (IN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. Plaintiffs, Defendants.
Nance v. May Trucking Company et al Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 SCOTT NANCE and FREDERICK FREEDMAN, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and
More informationIt appearing that the civil actions listed on Schedule A, attached hereto -- which were
Case 7:13-cv-01748-CS Document 5 Filed 04/12/13 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------x IN RE: MIRENA
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Johnson v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Karen P. Johnson, C/A No.: 3:12-cv-2274-JFA Plaintiff, vs. ORDER
More informationCase LMI Doc 490 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 5. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION
Case 15-16885-LMI Doc 490 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION www.flsb.uscourts.gov IN RE: ADINATH CORP. and SIMPLY FASHION STORES LTD.,
More informationCase 1:17-cv LPS Document 15 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 434
Case 1:17-cv-00610-LPS Document 15 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 434 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE., MARGARET KAY YOUNG, et al. Plaintiffs, v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
More informationCase MDL No Document 41 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 12 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2652 Document 41 Filed 07/10/15 Page 1 of 12 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: POWER MORCELLATOR ) LITIGATION ) MDL No. 2652 ) GYRUS ACMI, LP AND GYRUS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Smith v. OSF Healthcare System et al Doc. 55 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SHEILAR SMITH and KASANDRA ANTON, on Behalf of Themselves, Individually, and on behalf
More informationDAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
Case :-cv-00-sba Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 Thomas R. Burke (State Bar No. 0) thomasburke@dwt.com 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA Telephone: () -00 Facsimile: () - Linda Lye (State
More informationCase 3:16-md FLW-LHG Document 115 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1596 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY MDL 2738
Case 3:16-md-02738-FLW-LHG Document 115 Filed 02/17/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID: 1596 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES
More informationCase MDL No Document 2 Filed 08/02/17 Page 1 of 11 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2797 Document 2 Filed 08/02/17 Page 1 of 11 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: WELLS FARGO AUTO INSURANCE LITIGATION MDL NO. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case: 17-107 Document: 16 Page: 1 Filed: 02/23/2017 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit In re: GOOGLE INC., Petitioner 2017-107 On Petition for Writ
More informationAn Overview of Civil Litigation in the U.S. presented by Martijn Steger May 24, 2014
presented by Martijn Steger May 24, 2014 General Explanation of Civil Litigation in the U.S. U.S. litigation is governed by + + Rules of Civil Procedure; and + + Rules of Evidence. Rules of Civil Procedure:
More informationCASE 0:15-cv JRT Document 17 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA INTRODUCTION
CASE 0:15-cv-03773-JRT Document 17 Filed 02/12/16 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: FLUOROQUINOLONE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 15-2642 (JRT) This Document
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Boateng v. OneMain Financial, Inc. Doc. 22 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION GLORIA BOATENG, Plaintiff, v. ONEMAIN FINANCIAL, INC., Defendant. Case
More informationCase 1:14-md JMF Document 875 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:14-md-02543-JMF Document 875 Filed 04/24/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-jst ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY Re: ECF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: FLUOROQUINOLONE PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 15-2642 (JRT) This Document Relates to: Civil No. 16-388 (JRT) Buries v. Johnson & Johnson
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-jm-jlb Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re BRIDGEPOINT EDUCATION, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil No. cv JM (JLB) ORDER REGARDING
More informationCase MDL No Document 21 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 22 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) )
Case MDL No. 2713 Document 21 Filed 04/06/16 Page 1 of 22 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, ET AL., PREFERRED STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENTS
More informationCase: 7:15-cv ART-EBA Doc #: 40 Filed: 04/08/16 Page: 1 of 2 - Page ID#: 1167
Case: 7:15-cv-00109-ART-EBA Doc #: 40 Filed: 04/08/16 Page: 1 of 2 - Page ID#: 1167 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION AT PIKEVILLE ARNETIA JOYCE ROBINSON,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:16-cv-00452-TCB Document 29 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMMON CAUSE, et al., * * Civil Action No. Plaintiffs,
More informationCase: 1:10-cv Document #: 92 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1591
Case: 1:10-cv-05135 Document #: 92 Filed: 12/06/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1591 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RHONDA EZELL, JOSEPH I. BROWN, )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION IN RE CELEXA AND LEXAPRO ) MDL DOCKET NO. 1736 PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) ALL CASES MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before me now is
More informationUNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION TRANSFER ORDER
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: BP p.l.c. SECURITIES LITIGATION MDL No. 2185 TRANSFER ORDER Before the entire Panel : Plaintiff in an action (Ludlow) pending in the Western
More informationIn re: Asbestos Prod Liability
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-17-2014 In re: Asbestos Prod Liability Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 13-4423 Follow
More informationCase MDL No Document 1-1 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 19 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Case MDL No. 2666 Document 1-1 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 19 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION IN RE: BAIR HUGGER FORCED AIR WARMING PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No.
More informationCase 0:12-cv WJZ Document 215 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2013 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:12-cv-60460-WJZ Document 215 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/06/2013 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 12-60460-CIV-ROSENBAUM A.R., by and through her next
More informationBEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION. In re Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION In re Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation MDL-17-22 BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR TRANSFER
More informationCase3:12-cv CRB Document52 Filed04/05/13 Page1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case:-cv-0-CRB Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 Paul Duffy (Bar No. N. Clark St., Suite 00 Chicago, IL 00 Phone: (00 0-00 E-mail: paduffy@wefightpiracy.com Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase 1:12-cv GMS Document 34 Filed 07/02/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1399
Case 1:12-cv-01744-GMS Document 34 Filed 07/02/13 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1399 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE NESTE OIL OYJ, v. Plaintiff, DYNAMIC FUELS, LLC, SYNTROLEUM
More informationUnited States District Court
Case:-cv-000-RS Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JESSICA LEE, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals,
More informationCase 2:12-md Document 1596 Filed 06/12/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 19539
Case 2:12-md-02327 Document 1596 Filed 06/12/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 19539 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON IN RE: ETHICON, INC., PELVIC REPAIR SYSTEM PRODUCTS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel
Case 1:11-cv-02971-WYD-KMT Document 125 Filed 07/16/12 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 Civil Action No. 11-cv-02971-WYD-KMT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Chief Judge Wiley
More informationCase5:13-md LHK Document129 Filed01/27/14 Page1 of 7
Case:-md-00-LHK Document Filed0// Page of 0 0 IN RE: GOOGLE INC. GMAIL LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Case :-cv-000-jls-nls Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 PATRICK A. GRIGGS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. VITAL THERAPIES, INC.; TERRY WINTERS; and MICHAEL V. SWANSON, UNITED
More informationCase 3:07-cv JST Document 5169 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-JST Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 IN RE: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Order Relates To: ALL DIRECT PURCHASER
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
0 INTEGRATED GLOBAL CONCEPTS, INC., v. Plaintiff, j GLOBAL, INC. and ADVANCED MESSAGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case
More information#25902 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 309-md-02100-DRH-PMF Document 2630 #25902 Filed 01/02/13 Page 1 of 9 Page ID UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ------------------------------------------------------------
More informationCase 5:15-md LHK Document 417 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 9
Case :-md-0-lhk Document Filed // Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 0 IN RE ANTHEM, INC. DATA BREACH LITIGATION Y. MICHAEL SMILOW and JESSICA KATZ,
More informationCase 2:14-cv SPL Document 25 Filed 09/11/14 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-000-spl Document Filed 0// Page of William R. Mettler, Esq. S. Price Road Chandler, Arizona Arizona State Bar No. 00 (0 0-0 wrmettler@wrmettlerlaw.com Attorney for Defendant Zenith Financial
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Levitte v. Google Inc. Doc. Dockets.Justia.com 0 MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) LEO P. NORTON () (lnorton@cooley.com) 0 Eastgate Mall San Diego, CA Telephone: () 0-000 Facsimile: () 0-0 PETER
More informationCase 1:16-cv JPO Document 75 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 11 X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : X. Plaintiffs,
Case 116-cv-03852-JPO Document 75 Filed 09/16/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------- COMCAST CORPORATION,
More information