Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. 8 Defendants 72 Additional Count(s)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. 8 Defendants 72 Additional Count(s)"

Transcription

1 Criminal Court Division State of Ohio, VS. Plaintiff For Engaging In A Pattern Of Corrupt Activity - F (A)(1) 8 72 Additional Count(s) Gregory R. Cochran, Justin B. Taylor, David A. Quinones, Antonio Caraballo, Abel Guzman, Joseph A. Sabo, Robert E. Schepis, Anthony Alvarez Dates of Offense (on or about) The Term Of Case Number 11/01/2012 to 05/01/2014 September of CR The State of Ohio, Cuyahoga County } SS. Count 1 Engaging In A Pattern Of Corrupt Activity - F (A)(1) Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones, Antonio Caraballo, Abel Guzman, Joseph A. Sabo, Robert E. Schepis, Jason B. Taylor Date of Offense On or about November 1, 2012 through May 1, 2014 The Jurors of the Grand Jury of the State of Ohio, within and for the body of the County aforesaid, on their oaths, IN THE NAME AND BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF OHIO, do find and present, that the above named Defendant(s), on or about the date of the offense set forth above, in the County of Cuyahoga, unlawfully while employed by, or associated with, any enterprise did conduct or participate in, directly or indirectly, the affairs of the enterprise through a pattern of corrupt activity or the collection of an unlawful debt and at least one of the incidents of corrupt activity was a felony of the first, second, or third degree, aggravated murder, or murder, or at least one of the incidents was a felony under the law of this state that was committed prior to July 1, 1996, and constituted a felony of the first, second, or third degree, aggravated murder, or murder or was committed on or after July 1, 1996, or one of the incidents of corrupt activity was a felony under the law of the United States or of another state that, if committed in this state on or after July 1, 1996, would have constituted a felony of the first, second, or third degree, aggravated murder, or murder under the law of this state. On or between November 1, 2012 through May, , in the County of Cuyahoga, as well as the Counties of Huron, Lake, Lorain, Medina, Portage, Stark, Summit, and Wood, State of Ohio, or by some manner enumerated in Section of the Revised Code, whereby proper venue is placed in Cuyahoga County, DEFENDANTS, as part of a continuing course of conduct were associated with an Enterprise, as defined in Section (C) of the Revised Code. Page 1 of 38

2 The Enterprise existed separate and apart from the pattern of corrupt activity in which it engaged. In the alternative, this Enterprise is an illicit enterprise under O.R.C , whether or not this Enterprise existed separate and apart from the pattern of corrupt activity described in this Indictment. This Enterprise functioned as a continuing unit by engaging in the diverse forms of illegal activities, as stated in this Indictment. In so doing, the DEFENDANTS NAMED BELOW are persons associated with the Enterprise who participated in and/or managed the affairs of the Enterprise who participated in and/or managed the affairs of the Enterprise, as explained in the Indictment. As such, these persons provided continuity and structure to the Enterprise in order to accomplish its illegal purposes-the pattern of corrupt activity, to wit: an organized Burglary ring whose purpose was to unlawfully enter residential homes to steal various items and personal property of innocent victims and to sell such illegal gotten goods to a fence in order to enrich themselves monetarily. This Enterprise and the Persons associated with the Enterprise were joined in purpose over a period of time, although their various roles were different in order to accomplish the main purposes of the Enterprise. These activities occurred with the knowledge and/or support of and/or were aided and abetted by each of the persons associated with the Enterprise. An association-in-fact enterprise must have a structure, but it does not need to have an ascertainable structure beyond that inherent in the pattern of racketeering activity in which it engaged. To constitute an associationin-fact enterprise under O.R.C , a group need not have a hierarchal structure, chain of command, or other business-like attributes; decisions may be made on and ad hoc basis and by any number of methods. Members of the group need not have fixed roles; different members may perform different roles at different times. An enterprise is proven by evidence that the various associates function as a continuing unit. Proof of a pattern of corrupt activity may be sufficient under O.R.C to create an inference that an association-in-fact enterprise does exist. The Enterprise is an association and/or organization and/or a group of persons associated-in-fact although not a legal entity, including but not limited to David Quinones, Gregory Cochran, Antonio Caraballo, Abel Guzman, Robert Schepis, Justin Taylor, and Joseph Sabo and others yet unknown, each of whom did conduct and/or participate in, directly in the affairs of said enterprise, to wit a group of persons associated in fact for the purpose of burglarizing residential homes, stealing property from those homes, then selling the property to a fence who receives the stolen property and resells the property for profit. With regard to the diverse forms of illegal activities as described in this Indictment, this Enterprise had an ascertainable structure inherent in the pattern of corrupt activity in which it was engaged. As such, this Enterprise had at least three structural features: (1) a purpose, (2) relationships among those Persons Associated with the Enterprise, and (3) longevity sufficient to permit those Persons to pursue the Enterprise s purpose, which is sometimes referred to as a continuing unit. The Enterprise The Enterprise consists of all of the above named and unnamed individuals who are involved in an organized Burglary ring managed and directed by David Quinones, who learned the methods and means of residential burglary from his deceased father, Jose Quinones. Jose Quinones, the father of David Quinones, taught his son and his friend, Gregory Cochran, the art of residential burglary. David Quinones also was introduced by his father to the fence he utilized which was/is Joseph Sabo. A Page 2 of 38

3 fence is a person who knowingly procures, buys stolen goods and then resells them for profit. Gregory Cochran is a close associate of David Quinones and also learned the art of residential Burglary from Jose Quinones as well as David Quinones. Antonio Caraballo and Abel Guzman met David Quinones in prison and was recruited by David Quinones to join his criminal enterprise when they got out of prison. Robert Schepis and Justin Taylor also were recruited by David Quinones and Gregory Cochran to facilitate the organization s purpose of residential burglaries. As indicated previously, Joseph Sabo was the fence of the organization in that he purchased the stolen property and then resold the property for his own personal gain. This burglary ring was managed and directed by David Quinones and Gregory Cochran, who developed the organization s methods, plans, and execution of the burglaries. This ring operated in the following nine counties, Cuyahoga, Huron, Lake, Lorain, Medina, Portage, Stark, Summit, and Wood over at least an 18 month period. David Quinones and Gregory Cochran directed and taught Antonio Caraballo, Abel Guzman, Robert Schepis, and Justin Taylor how to burglarize residential homes, the best time, the proper method of entry to the homes, what to steal and how to dispose of the ill-gotten goods. All the members roles were interchangeable after they learned the ropes of burglarizing residential homes. That is why they all participated in selecting which homes to burglarize, the forced entry into homes, the actual taking of which property and acting as lookouts. Whoever went to work (a term used by the ring to burglarize homes) would share the proceeds when the stolen goods were sold to Joseph Sabo, the fence. The following is a description of how the ring operated. David Quinones and Gregory Cochran would focus on larger homes in high-end neighborhoods with a preference for homes located in cul-de-sacs or on streets leading to cul-de-sacs. Often one or more homes would be targeted on the same street or in the same areas. Google maps would be utilized to search which location to hit and the preference of the ring was to break into the homes during standard time as darkness would come earlier. Once the areas was picked, the ring would case the neighborhood during the daytime to plan which houses to break into, where to park the getaway car, and where the lookout would be and how to plan their exit from the neighborhood. When selecting the houses to burglarize, it usually came down to how comfortable the members would be with the area, especially David Quinones and Gregory Cochran, based upon their knowledge of how to be most efficient when breaking into residential homes. Once satisfied, they would park usually in an adjacent street and would come through the back of the property because there would be less light. The ring would like to have a wooden area to approach the targeted homes for cover and sometimes, the ring would not case the area and just pick the targets on scene and execute the burglaries. The decisions regarding these issues were heavily influenced by David Quinones and Gregory Cochran. Friday and Saturday nights were preferable since that is the night most people would go out. The members would gain entry by forcing open a door leading into the garage, rear doors or windows. Later Page 3 of 38

4 on, the ring members would be so bold as to break in through the front door. The preferred method to gain entry was a pry bar which they usually kept at Gregory Cochran s house. Most of the time, David Quinones would break into the houses and let Gregory Cochran in and they (David Quinones and Gregory Cochran) would direct the location of the lookout. As part of their modus operandi, the members of the ring would usually purchase mechanic brand gloves with dimpled palms and fingers from local auto parts stores in the area of the targeted homes or purchase them before they went into the targeted area. Once in the house a pillow case from the home itself was usually used to haul the stolen property away. The master bedroom was always targeted first before the rest of the house was ransacked. Initially preference was shown for just jewelry, cash, and prescription drugs but as the ring matured, they targeted electronic games, computers, IPads, and other portable electronic items. The targeted houses were ransacked by the time the members of the ring were done. Usual time in the targeted homes was between 15 to 30 minutes. After the burglaries, Gregory Cochran would separate the jewelry by carat weight and remove the stones. Also, Gregory Cochran had a test kit to distinguish between the fake diamonds and real ones and once this vetting process was complete, they would then take the stolen property to Joseph Sabo, their fence. Joseph Sabo was the fence for David Quinones father and owned a flea market booth inside the Streetsboro Flea Market where he would sell the stolen items he bought from the ring members. Over 1,500 items were seized with the search warrant from Joseph Sabo s booth and to date, nearly a dozen victims have identified their property. Also a search of Joseph Sabo s house located on Spring Road in Cleveland contained items identified as stolen from the homes burglarized by this ring. Multiple police agencies from all nine counties were coordinated by the Cuyahoga County organized crime task force. Key evidence of this burlary ring came from GPS mapping devices recovered from members of the burglary ring, as well as GPS location data recovered from burglary ring members mobile phones. Analysis of the burglary ring members mobile phone location data in comparison to the GPS device location data established the practice, pattern, and methods of the burglary ring. This extensive burglary ring was responsible for 39 burglaries over an eighteen month period with a total of $221, of property stolen. AFFAIRS OF THE ENTERPRISE 1. Did knowingly by force, stealth or deception trespassed in an occupied structure when another person, other than the accomplice of the offender is present, with purpose to commit in the structure any criminal offense, to wit theft. 2. Did with purpose to deprive the owner of property, shall knowingly obtain or exert control over said property by deception. 3. Did receive, retain, or disposed of property of another knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the property has been obtained through the commission of a theft offense. THE PATTERN OF CORRUPT ACTIVITY- from November 1, 2012 to May 1, BURGLARY; TRESPASS IN A HABITATION WHEN A PERSON IS PRESENT OR LIKELY TO BE PRESENT R.C (A)(1) No person, by force, stealth, or deception, shall do any of the following: Page 4 of 38

5 Trespass in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when another person other than an accomplice of the offender is present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense; 2. THEFT; AGGRAVATED THEFT R.C (A)(1)-(5) No person, with purpose to deprive the owner of property or services, shall knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services in any of the following ways: by deception. 3. RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY R.C No person shall receive, retain, or dispose of property of another knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the property has been obtained through commission of a theft offense. INCIDENTS OF CORRUPT ACTIVITY 1. On or about November 9, 2012, Gregory R. Cochran and David A. Quinones did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when David and Alisa Jeras, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about November 9, 2012, Gregory R. Cochran and David A. Quinones did with purpose to deprive the owner, David and Alisa Jeras, of jewelry and commemorative coins or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $7,500 or more and less than $150, On or about November 9, 2012, David A. Quinones did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Rebecca Faulk, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about November 9, 2012, David A. Quinones did with purpose to deprive the owner, Rebecca Faulk, of jewelry or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7, On or about December 28, 2012, Gregory R. Cochran and David A. Quinones did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Loren Marinin and Carla Horoszko, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about December 28, 2012, Gregory R. Cochran, Justin B. Taylor, and David A. Quinones did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Kevin and Letitia Kwiatkowski, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about December 28, 2012, Gregory R. Cochran, Justin B. Taylor, and David A. Quinones did with purpose to deprive the owner, Kevin and Letitia Kwiatkowski, of cash and jewelry or services, knowingly Page 5 of 38

6 obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $7,500 or more and less than $150, On or about January 18, 2013, David A. Quinones and Abel Guzman did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Steven and Mary Ruhe, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about January 18, 2013, David A. Quinones and Abel Guzman did with purpose to deprive the owner, Steven and Mary Ruhe, of jewelry or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7, On or about January 18, 2013, David A. Quinones and Abel Guzman did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Linda Yonkof, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about January 18, 2013, David A. Quinones and Abel Guzman did with purpose to deprive the owner, Linda Yonkof, of jewelry or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $7,500 or more and less than $150, On or about February 5, 2013, Abel Guzman did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Soheir and Adile Botros, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about February 5, 2013, Abel Guzman did with purpose to deprive the owner, Soheir and Adile Botros, of jewelry and cash or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7, On or about February 9, 2013, David A. Quinones and Abel Guzman did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Rafael and Patti Dominguez, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about February 9, 2013, David A. Quinones and Abel Guzman did with purpose to deprive the owner, David Gido, of cash, jewelry, and electronics or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7, On or about February 9, 2013, David A. Quinones and Abel Guzman did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when David Gido, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about March 3, 2013, Abel Guzman did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in Page 6 of 38

7 section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Scott and Nancy Willard, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about February 18, 2013, Justin B. Taylor and David A. Quinones did by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Anthony Dimarco, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about April 3, 2013, Gregory R. Cochran, Antonio Caraballo, and Abel Guzman did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Christopher and Julie Mead, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about April 3, 2013, Gregory R. Cochran, Antonio Caraballo, and Abel Guzman did with purpose to deprive the owner, Christopher and Julie Mead, of jewlery and cash or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7, On or about November 23, 2013, Gregory R. Cochran and David A. Quinones did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when John and Jean Lawrie, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about November 29, 2013, Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones, and Robert E. Schepis did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Karl and Angela Miller, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about November 29, 2013, Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones, and Robert E. Schepis did with purpose to deprive the owner, Karl and Angela Miller, of jewelry or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7, On or about November 29, 2013, Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones, and Robert E. Schepis did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when James and Diane Strong, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about November 29, 2013, Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones, and Robert Schepis did with purpose to deprive the owner, James and Diane Strong, of jewelry and cash or services, knowingly obtain or Page 7 of 38

8 exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7, On or about December 7, 2013, Gregory R. Cochran and David A. Quinones did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Kevin Gottschalk and Judith Lasits, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C The offender had a firearm on or about his person or under his control while committing the offense. 27. On or about December 7, 2013, Gregory R. Cochran and David A. Quinones did with purpose to deprive the owner, Kevin Gottschalk and Judith Lasits, of a gun or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property stolen is a firearm or dangerous ordnance. 28. On or about December 7, 2013, Gregory R. Cochran and David A. Quinones did with purpose to deprive the owner, Kevin Gottschalk and Judith Lasits, of jewelry and cash or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7, On or about January 4, 2014, Gregory R. Cochran and Antonio Caraballo did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Robert Nord, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about January 4, 2014, Gregory R. Cochran and Antonio Caraballo did with purpose to deprive the owner, Robert Nord, of jewelry, cash, and electronics or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7, On or about January 11, 2012, Gregory R. Cochran and Antonio Caraballo did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Michael and Mary Manos, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about January 11, 2014, Gregory R. Cochran and Antonio Caraballo did with purpose to deprive the owner, Michael and Mary Manos, of jewelry and electronics or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $7,500 or more and less than $150, On or about January 18, 2014, Gregory R. Cochran and Antonio Caraballo did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Angelo and Laura Coreno, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about January 18, 2014, Gregory R. Cochran and Antonio Caraballo did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when David and Lynn Ernes, not Page 8 of 38

9 the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about January 18, 2014, Gregory R. Cochran and Antonio Caraballo did with purpose to deprive the owner, David and Lynn Ernes, of jewelry or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7, On or about January 31, 2014, Gregory R. Cochran and Antonio Caraballo did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Michael Zifer, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about April 23, 2014, Antonio Caraballo and Robert E. Schepis did, by force, stealth, or deception, attempt to trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when David Smith, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C On or about April 23, 2014, Antonio Caraballo and Robert E. Schepis did, by force, stealth, or deception, trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Richard and Veronica Martinez- Bennett, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 2 Conspiracy - F (A)(1) Gregory R. Cochran, Justin B. Taylor, David A. Quinones, Antonio Caraballo, Abel Guzman, Joseph A. Sabo, Robert E. Schepis, Date of Offense On or about November 1, 2012 to May 1, 2014 did with purpose to commit or promote or facilitate the commission of Engaging in an Pattern of Corrupt Activity, O.R.C (A)(1), plan or aid in planning the commission of the specified offense with another person or persons, including but not limited to: Burglarized residential homes in a nine county area, stealing property within those homes and then dispose of the stolen property to a fence who then sells said property to innocent purchasers, all in furtherance of the above activity. Page 9 of 38

10 The Enterprise in the matter consisted of David Quinones, Gregory Cochran, Antonio Caraballo, Abel Guzman, Robert Schepis, Justin Taylor, Joseph Sabo, and numerous other yet to be named parties, each of whom did conduct or participate in, directly or indirectly, the affairs of said enterprise, to wit: a group of persons associates in fact for the purposes of engaging in Burglary and Theft (by deception), through a pattern of corrupt activity as defined in Sections (I)(2)(a) or (I)(2)(c) of the Ohio Revised Code. The predicate acts that constitute the pattern of corrupt activity as defined in O.R.C (E) of said enterprise, which include criminal violations of the Revised Code Title 29 as alleged in the following counts three through seventy-two. FURTHERMORE, and the object of the conspiracy was a felony of the second degree. Count 3 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about November 9, 2012 occupied structure, when David and Alisa Jeras, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, Count 4 Grand Theft - F4 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about November 9, 2012 did with purpose to deprive the owner, David and Alisa Jeras, of jewelry and commemorative coins or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $7,500 or more and less than $150,000. Page 10 of 38

11 Count 5 David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about November 9, 2012 occupied structure, when Rebecca Faulk, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 6 Theft - F5 David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about November 9, 2012 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Rebecca Faulk, of jewelry or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7,500. Page 11 of 38

12 Count 7 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about December 28, 2012 occupied structure, when Carla Horoszko, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 8 Gregory R. Cochran, Justin B. Taylor, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about December 28, 2012 occupied structure, when Kevin and Letitia Kwiatkowski, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 9 Grand Theft - F4 Gregory R. Cochran, Justin B. Taylor, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about December 28, 2012 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Kevin and Letitia Kwiatkowski, of cash and jewelry or Page 12 of 38

13 services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $7,500 or more and less than $150,000. Count 10 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about January 18, 2013 occupied structure, when Steven and Mary Ruhe, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 11 Theft - F5 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about January 18, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Steven and Mary Ruhe, of jewelry or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7,500. Page 13 of 38

14 Count 12 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about January 18, 2013 occupied structure, when Linda Yonkof, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, Count 13 Grand Theft - F4 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about January 18, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Linda Yonkof, of jewelry or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $7,500 or more and less than $150,000. Count 14 Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about February 5, 2013 occupied structure, when Soheir and Adel Botros, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, Page 14 of 38

15 with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 15 Theft - F5 Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about February 5, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Soheir and Adel Botros, of jewelry and cash or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7,500. Count 16 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about February 9, 2013 occupied structure, when Rafael and Patti Dominguez, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Page 15 of 38

16 Count 17 Theft - F5 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about February 9, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, David Gido, of cash, jewelry, and electronics or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7,500. Count 18 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about February 9, 2013 occupied structure, when David Gido, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 19 Justin B. Taylor, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about February 18, 2013 occupied structure, when Anthony Dimarco, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with Page 16 of 38

17 purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 20 Attempted Burglary - F / (A)(1) Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 2, 2013 did, by force, stealth, or deception, attempt to trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when Carl and Linda Orringer, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, Count 21 Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 3, 2013 occupied structure, when Scott and Nancy Willard, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Page 17 of 38

18 Count 22 Grand Theft - F4 Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 3, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Scott and Nancy Willard, of jewelery and electronics or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $7,500 or more and less than $150,000. Count 23 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 7, 2013 occupied structure, when Steven and Sara Reger, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 24 Grand Theft - F4 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 7, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Steven and Sara Reger, of jewelry or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $7,500 or more and less than $150,000. Page 18 of 38

19 Count 25 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 7, 2013 occupied structure, when Robin Joseph, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 26 Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 10, 2013 occupied structure, when Kameshwari Deverakonda, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Page 19 of 38

20 Count 27 Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 16, 2013 occupied structure, when Michael and Catherine Cunningham, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 28 Grand Theft - F4 Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 16, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Michael and Catherine Cunningham, of jewelry and cash or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $7,500 or more and less than $150,000. Count 29 Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 16, 2013 occupied structure, when Jonathan Waler and Jennifer Agoston, not the accomplice of the offender, Page 20 of 38

21 was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 30 Petty Theft - M1 Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 16, 2014 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Jonathan Waler and Jennifer Agoston, of jewelry or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at less than $1,000. Count 31 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 23, 2013 occupied structure, when Annette Fuller and Stephen James, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, Firearm Specification - 1 year (A) The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or about his person or under his control while committing the offense. Page 21 of 38

22 Count 32 Grand Theft - F3 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 23, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Annette Fuller and Stephen James, of a gun or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property stolen is a firearm or dangerous ordnance. Count 33 Theft - F5 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 23, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Annette Fuller and Stephen James, of jewelry and cash or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7,500. Count 34 David A. Quinones, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about March 23, 2013 occupied structure, when Gary and Vicki Timple, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Page 22 of 38

23 Count 35 Gregory R. Cochran, Antonio Caraballo, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about April 3, 2013 occupied structure, when Christopher and Julie Mead, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 36 Theft - F5 Gregory R. Cochran, Antonio Caraballo, Abel Guzman Date of Offense On or about April 3, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Christopher and Julie Mead, of jewlery and cash or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7,500. Page 23 of 38

24 Count 37 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about November 23, 2013 occupied structure, when John and Jean Lawrie, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 38 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones, Robert E. Schepis Date of Offense On or about November 29, 2013 occupied structure, when Karl and Angela Miller, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 39 Theft - F5 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones, Robert E. Schepis Date of Offense On or about November 29, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Karl and Angela Miller, of jewelry or services, knowingly Page 24 of 38

25 obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7,500. Count 40 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones, Robert E. Schepis Date of Offense On or about November 29, 2013 occupied structure, when James and Diane Strong, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 41 Theft - F5 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones, Robert E. Schepis Date of Offense On or about November 29, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, James and Diane Strong, of jewelry and cash or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7,500. Page 25 of 38

26 Count 42 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about December 7, 2013 occupied structure, when Kevin Gottschalk and Judith Lasits, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Firearm Specification - 1 year (A) The Grand Jurors further find and specify that the offender had a firearm on or about his person or under his control while committing the offense. Count 43 Grand Theft - F3 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about December 7, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Kevin Gottschalk and Judith Lasits, of a gun or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property stolen is a firearm or dangerous ordnance. Count 44 Theft - F5 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about December 7, 2013 Page 26 of 38

27 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Kevin Gottschalk and Judith Lasits, of jewelry and cash or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7,500. Count 45 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about December 15, 2013 occupied structure, when Jane Semple, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 46 Theft - F5 Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about December 15, 2013 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Jane Semple, of jewelry and cash or services, knowingly obtain or exert control over either the property or services by deception and the property or services stolen is valued at $1,000 or more and less than $7,500. Page 27 of 38

28 Count 47 Attempted Burglary - F / (A)(1) Gregory R. Cochran, David A. Quinones Date of Offense On or about December 15, 2013 did, by force, stealth, or deception, attempt to trespass, as defined in section (A)(1) of the Revised Code, in an occupied structure or in a separately secured or separately occupied portion of an occupied structure, when David Dunnington, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 48 Gregory R. Cochran, Antonio Caraballo Date of Offense On or about January 4, 2014 occupied structure, when Robert and Margaret Nord, not the accomplice of the offender, was present, with purpose to commit in the structure or in the separately secured or separately occupied portion of the structure any criminal offense, to wit: Theft, R.C Count 49 Theft - F5 Gregory R. Cochran, Antonio Caraballo Date of Offense On or about January 4, 2014 did with purpose to deprive the owner, Robert and Margaret Nord, of jewelry, cash, and electronics Page 28 of 38

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio,

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio, , Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division State of Ohio, VS. Plaintiff Defendant Aggravated Murder - UF 2903.01(A) 10 Additional Count(s) For Dates of Offense (on or about) The Term

More information

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff : CASE NO CR 722

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff : CASE NO CR 722 COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff : CASE NO. 2011 CR 722 vs. : Judge McBride DAVID ANDREW HIGGINS : DECISION/ENTRY Defendant : Lara A. Molnar, assistant prosecuting

More information

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio, (A)

} SS. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. The State of Ohio, (A) Dontavius D. Williams Criminal Court Division State of Ohio, VS. Plaintiff Marlon A. Hackett Jr., Defendants Aggravated Murder - UF 2903.01(A) 7 Additional Count(s) For Dates of Offense (on or about) The

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Knuckles, 2011-Ohio-4242.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96078 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. KIMMY D. KNUCKLES

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Goldsmith, 2008-Ohio-5990.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90617 STATE OF OHIO vs. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE ANTONIO GOLDSMITH

More information

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. Plaintiff CR A I

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division. Plaintiff CR A I Amin Walker Kenitra Robinson, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division State of Ohio, vs. Plaintiff Jaylen Miller Defendants Attempted Murder - FI 2923.02/2903.02(A) 7 Additional Count(s)

More information

v. No. 29,690 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Kenneth H. Martinez, District Judge

v. No. 29,690 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY Kenneth H. Martinez, District Judge 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 1-0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please

More information

INTRODUCTION AND COURSE OF CONDUCT FINDINGS. The Jurors of the Grand Jury of the State of Ohio, duly selected, impaneled, sworn and charged to

INTRODUCTION AND COURSE OF CONDUCT FINDINGS. The Jurors of the Grand Jury of the State of Ohio, duly selected, impaneled, sworn and charged to The State of Ohio, Franklin County Grand Jury Term Beginning May 13, 2016 } SS. INDICTMENT FOR: Aggravated Murder with Specification (ORC 2903.01) (UF) (2 Counts); Murder with Specification (ORC 2903.02)

More information

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NUMBER

COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NUMBER COURT OF APPEALS THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT ALLEN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE CASE NUMBER 1-99-44 v. KEVIN FREEMAN, SR. O P I N I O N DEFENDANT-APPELLANT CHARACTER OF PROCEEDINGS: Criminal Appeal

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY [Cite as State v. Ramsey, 2008-Ohio-1052.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C. A. No. 23885 Appellee v. DWAYNE CHRISTOPHER RAMSEY Appellant

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY [Cite as State v. Snow, 2009-Ohio-1336.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 24298 Appellant v. DALTON J. SNOW Appellee APPEAL

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Criminal Procedure/Criminal Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Vicky operates

More information

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 11 CR 489

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff, : Case No. 11 CR 489 IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff, : Case No. 11 CR 489 v. : Judge Berens CLARENCE MULLINS, : ENTRY Overruling Defendant s Motion to Dismiss Defendant. : This

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Wright State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, SAMARA LEIGH JUHL DOB: 01/27/1994 7734 Lancaster Avenue NE Otsego, MN 55301 Defendant. Prosecutor File No. Court File No. District

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D, this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) )

THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff vs EDWARD WALKER Defendant CASE NO. CR 429590 MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER FRIEDMAN, J.: 1. The Court has before it a proposed

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 556 U. S. (2009) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of

More information

ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Rel\08\29\2008 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate

More information

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division

Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Criminal Court Division Criminal Court Division Martell Taylor Jonte Ervin State of Ohio, VS. Plaintiff Martez M. Powell Deonte D. Driskell, For Participating In A Criminal Gang - F2 2923.42(A) 18 Additional Count(s) Dates of

More information

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:

AN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio: (132nd General Assembly) (Amended House Bill Number 405) AN ACT To amend section 2923.31 and to enact section 2913.30 of the Revised Code to create the offense of counterfeiting and to include counterfeiting

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO CRIMINAL DIVISION. Now comes Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, Timothy J.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO CRIMINAL DIVISION. Now comes Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, Timothy J. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO CRIMINAL DIVISION STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff, vs. JOHN MCNALLY, et al.. Case No. CR-585428 Judge Janet Burnside STATE S MOTION TO AMEND THE INDICTMENT Now

More information

As Reported by the House Criminal Justice Committee. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session Am. H. B. No

As Reported by the House Criminal Justice Committee. 132nd General Assembly Regular Session Am. H. B. No 132nd General Assembly Regular Session Am. H. B. No. 405 2017-2018 Representative Perales Cosponsors: Representatives Butler, Boccieri, Dever, Fedor, Miller, Schaffer, Sheehy, Slaby, Smith, K., Sweeney,

More information

Case 1:07-cr JR Document 2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term

Case 1:07-cr JR Document 2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Holding a Criminal Term Case 1:07-cr-00046-JR Document 2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Holding a Criminal Term Grand Jury Sworn in on May 11, 2006 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO [Cite as State v. Harrington, 2009-Ohio-5576.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. BYRON HARRINGTON, Defendant-Appellant.

More information

Kidnapping. Joseph & His Brothers - Charges

Kidnapping. Joseph & His Brothers - Charges Joseph & His Brothers - Charges 2905.01 Kidnapping No person, by force, threat, or deception, or, in the case of a victim under the age of thirteen or mentally incompetent, by any means, shall remove another

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR GREENE COUNTY, OHIO. BRIAN R. HOUS : (Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court) Defendant-Appellant :... O P I N I O N...

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR GREENE COUNTY, OHIO. BRIAN R. HOUS : (Criminal Appeal from Common Pleas Court) Defendant-Appellant :... O P I N I O N... [Cite as State v. Hous, 2004-Ohio-666.] STATE OF OHIO : IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR GREENE COUNTY, OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 02CA116 vs. : T.C. CASE NO. 02CR104 BRIAN R. HOUS : (Criminal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 28, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Mary E.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed July 28, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott County, Mary E. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 0-453 / 09-1085 Filed July 28, 2010 LATRON Q. GANT, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. Judge. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Scott

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2002 JERAIL L. LAW, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D01-3202 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed September 6, 2002 Appeal

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For plaintiff-appellee: : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS : For defendant-appellant:

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For plaintiff-appellee: : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS : For defendant-appellant: [Cite as State v. Ricks, 2004-Ohio-6913.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 84500 STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-appellee : : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS :

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Cooper, 2012-Ohio-355.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96635 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. BRANDON COOPER DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

Chapter 8. Criminal Wrongs. Civil and Criminal Law. Classification of Crimes

Chapter 8. Criminal Wrongs. Civil and Criminal Law. Classification of Crimes Chapter 8 Criminal Wrongs Civil and Criminal Law Civil (Tort) Law Spells our the duties that exist between persons or between citizens and their governments, excluding the duty not to commit crimes. In

More information

COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State v.brister, 2005-Ohio-2061.] COURT OF APPEALS GUERNSEY COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee vs. DARRELL BRISTER Defendant-Appellant Guernsey County, App.

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) CASE NO: CR B ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs ) ) M. D. ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendant. )

STATE OF OHIO ) CASE NO: CR B ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs ) ) M. D. ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendant. ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO CASE NO: CR 98 360551-B Plaintiff, vs M. D. JOURNAL ENTRY Defendant. On July 2, 2008, defendant M.D. filed a motion to seal the record of

More information

Scenario 1: domestic burglary (Theft Act 1968 (section 9))

Scenario 1: domestic burglary (Theft Act 1968 (section 9)) Sentencing scenarios Use the sentencing guideline to decide what sentence each of these offenders should get. Scenario 1: domestic burglary (Theft Act 1968 (section 9)) Rachel is a second year university

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Tokar, 2009-Ohio-4369.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91941 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JEFFREY TOKAR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT [Cite as State v. Gaither, 2005-Ohio-2619.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 85023 STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-appellee : : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION LeDON GAITHER

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 21, 2010

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 21, 2010 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 21, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JASON MICHAEL FINT Appeal from the Criminal Court for Bradley County No. M-09-016 Amy

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 21, 2005

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 21, 2005 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 21, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LAJUN M. COLE, SR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 40400207

More information

BY: KIRSTEN PSCHOLKA-GARTNER Suite South Park Street Mansfield, OH Mansfield, OH 44902

BY: KIRSTEN PSCHOLKA-GARTNER Suite South Park Street Mansfield, OH Mansfield, OH 44902 [Cite as State v. Williams, 2011-Ohio-1979.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- STEVEN WILLIAMS Defendant-Appellant JUDGES Hon. W. Scott

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 556 U. S. (2009) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 07 1309 EDMUND BOYLE, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT [June

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Calderwood, 194 Ohio App.3d 438, 2011-Ohio-2913.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95269 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO [Cite as State v. Stroub, 2011-Ohio-169.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT WYANDOT COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 16-10-02 v. EDWARD D. STROUB, O P I N I O N

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Worley, 2011-Ohio-2779.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 94590 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. PEREZ WORLEY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION

VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY SESSION VIRGINIA ACTS OF ASSEMBLY -- 2015 SESSION CHAPTER 691 An Act to amend and reenact 9.1-902, 17.1-805, 18.2-46.1, 18.2-356, 18.2-357, 18.2-513, 19.2-215.1, and 19.2-386.35 of the Code of Virginia and to

More information

Criminal Appeal From: Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas. Judgment Appealed From Is: Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part, and Cause Remanded

Criminal Appeal From: Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas. Judgment Appealed From Is: Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part, and Cause Remanded [Cite as State v. Germany, 2014-Ohio-3202.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. BYRON GERMANY, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY [Cite as State v. Laughlin, 2014-Ohio-5417.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 27185 Appellee v. THOMAS H. LAUGHLIN Appellant

More information

Media Release Cases. Case Number Judge - Court Room Unit Agency

Media Release Cases. Case Number Judge - Court Room Unit Agency Case Number Judge - Court Room Unit Agency Defendants Primary Charges 608500-16-CR Gallagher, Hollie L.16-A General Felony Cleveland Division of Police Doss, Louis M. On August 1, 2016, the defendant,

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Spoon, 2012-Ohio-4052.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97742 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. LEROY SPOON DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

Conversion of National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) Data to Summary Reporting System (SRS) Data

Conversion of National Incident Based Reporting System (NIBRS) Data to Summary Reporting System (SRS) Data U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Criminal Justice Information Services Division Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program Conversion

More information

STATE OF OHIO ANTHONY SCIMONE

STATE OF OHIO ANTHONY SCIMONE [Cite as State v. Scimone, 2011-Ohio-75.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 94339 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ANTHONY SCIMONE

More information

STATE OF OHIO KIRKLAND FARMER

STATE OF OHIO KIRKLAND FARMER [Cite as State v. Farmer, 2010-Ohio-3406.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 93246 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. KIRKLAND FARMER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE I. THE ENTERPRISE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COUNT ONE I. THE ENTERPRISE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK POLCHAN, SAMUEL VOLPENDESTO, MICHAEL SARNO, also known as, Big Mike, Mikey, Large, and the Large

More information

PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Post Office Box 40 BRIAN T. WALTZ West Jefferson, Ohio ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR 20 South Second Street Newark, Ohio 43055

PROSECUTING ATTORNEY Post Office Box 40 BRIAN T. WALTZ West Jefferson, Ohio ASSISTANT PROSECUTOR 20 South Second Street Newark, Ohio 43055 [Cite as State v. Molla, 2008-Ohio-5331.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- ACHENAFI T. MOLLA Defendant-Appellant JUDGES: Hon. John W.

More information

RACKETEERING 1 (N.J.S.A. 2C:41-2c)

RACKETEERING 1 (N.J.S.A. 2C:41-2c) Approved 2/14/11 RACKETEERING 1 Count of the indictment charges defendant with racketeering. [READ COUNT OF INDICTMENT] That section of our statutes provides in pertinent part: It is unlawful for any person

More information

Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law:

Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law: Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law: Crime a wrong against society proclaimed in a statute and, if committed, punishable

More information

BUSINESS LAW. Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes

BUSINESS LAW. Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes BUSINESS LAW Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes Learning Objectives List and describe the essential elements of a crime. Describe criminal procedure, including arrest, indictment, arraignment, and

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Whitsett, 2014-Ohio-4933.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101182 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ERNEST M. WHITSETT

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION -GR-102-Guilty Plea IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ) NO. Criminal Sessions, VS. ) Charge: ) ) Defendant. ) BEFORE THE

More information

STATE OF OHIO, ) ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, ) CASE NO. 98 C.A. 89 ) - VS - ) OPINION ) WILLIAM PAIGE, ) ) DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. )

STATE OF OHIO, ) ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, ) CASE NO. 98 C.A. 89 ) - VS - ) OPINION ) WILLIAM PAIGE, ) ) DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ) [Cite as State v. Paige, 2000-Ohio-2673.] STATE OF OHIO, MAHONING COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, ) ) PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, ) CASE NO. 98 C.A. 89 ) - VS - ) OPINION ) WILLIAM

More information

Question 3. What crimes, if any, can Deanna and Alma reasonably be charged with, and what defenses might each assert? Discuss.

Question 3. What crimes, if any, can Deanna and Alma reasonably be charged with, and what defenses might each assert? Discuss. Question 3 Deanna, a single mother of ten-year old Vickie, worked as a cashier at the local grocery store. Deanna had recently broken off her relationship with Randy, a drug addict who had been violent

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 3, 2005

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 3, 2005 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 3, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEITH DOTSON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 03-07367 Chris Craft, Judge

More information

Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C

Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C Families Against Mandatory Minimums 1612 K Street, N.W., Suite 700 Washington, D.C. 20006 202-822-6700 www.famm.org Summary of The Gang Deterrence and Community Protection Act of 2005 Title I Criminal

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Duncan, 2011-Ohio-2787.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95491 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. BRIAN K. DUNCAN

More information

THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO. Criminal Appeal from the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 03 CR

THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO. Criminal Appeal from the Lake County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 03 CR [Cite as State v. Ervin, 2005-Ohio-687.] THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : O P I N I O N Plaintiff-Appellee, : - vs - : CASE NO. 2003-L-207 JAMES D. ERVIN,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO [Cite as State v. Lightner, 2009-Ohio-2307.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HARDIN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 6-08-15 v. STEVEN LIGHTNER, JR., O P I N

More information

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Nos & September Term, 2014 ANTHONY NYREKI EDWARDS STATE OF MARYLAND

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. Nos & September Term, 2014 ANTHONY NYREKI EDWARDS STATE OF MARYLAND UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND Nos. 2561 & 2562 September Term, 2014 ANTHONY NYREKI EDWARDS v. STATE OF MARYLAND Eyler, Deborah S., Wright, Friedman, JJ. CONSOLIDATED CASES Opinion

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED March 14, 2017 v No. 326634 Muskegon Circuit Court ROBERT EARL GEE, LC No. 14-065139-FC Defendant-Appellant.

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY STATE OF DELAWARE, ) ) v. ) ) ID No. 0001003655 DIONNE BROWN, ) ) Defendant. ) Submitted: March 9, 2001 Decided: April 12, 2001

More information

THERON ANTHONY FINNEY OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. January 16, 2009 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

THERON ANTHONY FINNEY OPINION BY v. Record No JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. January 16, 2009 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA Present: All the Justices THERON ANTHONY FINNEY OPINION BY v. Record No. 080440 JUSTICE LAWRENCE L. KOONTZ, JR. January 16, 2009 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Theron Anthony

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY [Cite as State v. Secession, 2008-Ohio-2531.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C. A. No. 23958 Appellee v. ANTHONY L. SECESSION Appellant

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 26, 2011

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 26, 2011 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs April 26, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSHUA W. EADS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Union County No. 2008-CR-3659

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 17, 2017, at Knoxville

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 17, 2017, at Knoxville IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs May 17, 2017, at Knoxville 06/20/2017 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. CHRISTOPHER COLLIER Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County

More information

STATE OF OHIO DEWAYNE BRAY

STATE OF OHIO DEWAYNE BRAY [Cite as State v. Bray, 2009-Ohio-6461.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92619 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DEWAYNE BRAY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Mullen [2006] QCA 317 PARTIES: R V MULLEN, Todd Kenneth (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 175 of 2006 DC No 3220 of 2005 DC No 1341 of 2006 DC No 1512 of 2006 DC No

More information

STATE OF OHIO STEVEN JOHNSON

STATE OF OHIO STEVEN JOHNSON [Cite as State v. Johnson, 2009-Ohio-3101.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91701 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. STEVEN JOHNSON

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: FUNDAMENTALS INTRODUCTION 1. CHAPTER ONE: CRIME AND PUNISHMENT 5 Overview of Crimes 5 Types of Crimes and Punishment 8

TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: FUNDAMENTALS INTRODUCTION 1. CHAPTER ONE: CRIME AND PUNISHMENT 5 Overview of Crimes 5 Types of Crimes and Punishment 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I: FUNDAMENTALS INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER ONE: CRIME AND PUNISHMENT 5 Overview of Crimes 5 Types of Crimes and Punishment 8 CHAPTER TWO: YOUR RIGHTS AS A TEENAGER: SEARCH AND SEIZURE

More information

Introduction to Criminal Law

Introduction to Criminal Law Winter 2019 Introduction to Criminal Law Recognizing Offenses Shoplifting equals Larceny Criminal possession of stolen property. Punching someone might be Assault; or Harassment; or Menacing Recognizing

More information

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TREVON SYKES, PETITIONER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TREVON SYKES, PETITIONER UNITED STATES OF AMERICA No. 16-9604 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TREVON SYKES, PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs.

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs. [Cite as State v. Ely, 2006-Ohio-459.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 86091 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant JOURNAL ENTRY vs. AND KEITH ELY, OPINION Defendant-Appellee

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 21, 2005

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 21, 2005 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 21, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TERRANCE YVES SMOTHERS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. 40300629

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. COMMONWEALTH OF : NO ,880 PENNSYLVANIA : : CRIMINAL vs. : : : Relief Act Petition

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. COMMONWEALTH OF : NO ,880 PENNSYLVANIA : : CRIMINAL vs. : : : Relief Act Petition IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF : NO. 03-10,880 PENNSYLVANIA : : CRIMINAL vs. : : MICHAEL W. McCLOSKEY, : Defemdant s Amended Post Conviction Defendant : Relief

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs.

COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs. [Cite as State v. Hooks, 2004-Ohio-1124.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 83193 STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : AND KEVIN HOOKS, : OPINION Defendant-Appellant

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):

The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s): State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, ALEC PRICE STREIT DOB: 05/01/1997 2400 ELLIOTT AVENUE SOUTH #326 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55404 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District

More information

COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: Robert Junk, Pike County Prosecutor, 108 North Market Street, Waverly, Ohio 45690

COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: Robert Junk, Pike County Prosecutor, 108 North Market Street, Waverly, Ohio 45690 [Cite as State v. Schoolcraft, 2002-Ohio-3583.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PIKE COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 01CA673 vs. : DONALD SCHOOLCRAFT, :

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Totty, 2014-Ohio-3239.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100788 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JASON TOTTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT

More information

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: July 14, 2016 106095 THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES E.

More information

Court of Appeals of Ohio

Court of Appeals of Ohio [Cite as State v. Hamilton, 2009-Ohio-3595.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91896 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ANTONIO HAMILTON

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) BRYAN SCHRODER United States Attorney JONAS M. WALKER Assistant U.S. Attorney Federal Building & U.S. Courthouse 222 West Seventh Avenue, #9, Room 253 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7567 Phone: (907 271-5071

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR CURTIS, : (Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR CURTIS, : (Criminal appeal from Common Pleas Court) Appellant. [Cite as State v. Curtis, 193 Ohio App.3d 121, 2011-Ohio-1277.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO The STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : C.A. CASE NO. 23895 v. : T.C. NO. 08 CR 1518 CURTIS,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: KIMBERLY A. JACKSON Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana MATTHEW D. FISHER Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO [Cite as State v. Carey, 2011-Ohio-1998.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT UNION COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 14-10-25 v. SHONTA CAREY, O P I N I O N DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

More information

Ken Cox Assets Protection Business Partner Target Stores New Mexico / Arizona

Ken Cox Assets Protection Business Partner Target Stores New Mexico / Arizona Ken Cox Assets Protection Business Partner Target Stores New Mexico / Arizona While retail crime comes in many forms such as shoplifting, credit card fraud, and internal theft, ORC is a different beast.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D, this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 14 2017 16:56:06 2016-KA-01711-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL MCKEITHAN APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01711-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 5, 2007

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 5, 2007 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs June 5, 2007 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ANDRECO BOONE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 05-06682 Chris Craft,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO [Cite as State v. Klein, 2005-Ohio-1761.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. THOMAS KLEIN, Defendant-Appellant. : : :

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY [Cite as State v. Jarvis, 2015-Ohio-4219.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) STATE OF OHIO Appellee C.A. No. 14CA010667 v. KRISTOPHER L. JARVIS Appellant

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COBB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA. Defendant. STATE S REQUESTS TO CHARGE

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COBB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA. Defendant. STATE S REQUESTS TO CHARGE IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF COBB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA STATE OF GEORGIA vs. Case No.: Defendant. STATE S REQUESTS TO CHARGE COMES NOW THE STATE OF GEORGIA at the commencement of trial in the above styled

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA OPINION AND ORDER. which seeks habeas corpus relief. The relevant facts follow.

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA OPINION AND ORDER. which seeks habeas corpus relief. The relevant facts follow. IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH No. CR-1244-2014 vs. BETHANY SHIRK, Defendant OPINION AND ORDER This matter came before the court on Defendant s omnibus pretrial

More information