STUDYING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "STUDYING THE U.S. CONSTITUTION"

Transcription

1 A. DISTINCTIVE ASPECTS OF U.S. JUDICIAL REVIEW 1. Once in office, all federal Article III judges are insulated from political pressures on continued employment or salary reduction, short of the drastic step of impeachment Politics and law are not easily separated in U.S. constitutional method Many provisions of the U.S. Constitution are law, in the sense that they are enforceable by the courts. 3 The power of the courts to enforce the constitution is often referred to as the power of judicial review. It means that judges can examine governmental actions for compliance with the U.S. Constitution and declare void and refuse to enforce those actions that they hold to violate the Constitution. 4. The U.S. judicial review power is de-centralized. Nearly all levels of state and federal courts have the power of constitutional review: it is not centralized in a constitutional court The U.S. judicial review power is substantive. The power goes beyond ensuring compliance with procedural requirements to the actual content of the government actions in question The U.S. judicial review power has universal effect: the rulings bind other organs of government The U.S. judicial review power is supreme. The U.S. Supreme Court decisions on the U.S. Constitution are supreme over the decisions of the highest court of any state. 8. The U.S. judicial review power is concrete. The courts may not rule on a question concerning whether proposed legislation would be constitutional posed by the legislature on. The power is exercised solely in the context of concrete, live cases and controversies The Constitution frequently has an impact upon ordinary law. For example, a dispute about whether a newspaper committed libel under state tort law can involve a decision about whether the first amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects libel defendants to some extent when writing about public figures. 8 Whether the local police are liable for 1 U.S. CONST. art. III, 1; art. II, 4. 2 See Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803). 3 Id. 4 Id. 5 Id. 6 Id. 7 U.S. CONST. art. III, 2. 8 New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). 1

2 shooting someone fleeing the scene of a crime (generated under state law), may be determined by the fourth amendment to the U.S. Constitution Federal court determinations under the U.S. Constitution (and laws) bind local and state courts; that is, they are supreme and in this sense limit state sovereignty Because of Core Distinctives 3-9, the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Supreme Court have had a dominating influence on the development of law in the U.S. an influence that is nearly unique among legal systems. B. HOW TO BRIEF A U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL CASE BRIEFING A U.S. CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CASE i A brief is a written breakdown or analysis of the parts of a judicial opinion or case. It helps a student or lawyer understand a case. Students use briefs for classroom discussion in U.S. law schools and for their own notes. Students, lawyers and judges use briefs to compare and contrast cases and to synthesize cases into applicable rules as they analyze a legal problem. The typical components of a Supreme Court constitutional law case brief are: A. Style of the Case: This is the case name, made up the parties before the court; the case citation; the court that decided the case; and the year in which the case was decided. The numbers under the case name are the citation: the first indicates the volume number of a book that reports court opinions in which the opinion can be found; the second indicates the page number on which the opinion begins. The reporters that publish United States Supreme Court opinions are indicated by the abbreviations: U.S., S. Ct. and L. Ed. At the trial level, the first party named is generally the plaintiff and the second is the defendant; at the court of appeals level, the first is often but not always the appellant (the party who took the appeal), and the second is the appellee; in Supreme Court cases, the first party is generally the petitioner (who seeks Supreme Court review), and the second is the respondent. B. Facts: These include narrative and procedural facts. Narrative facts are the essential background facts that describe what happened before the parties ended up in court, and explain why they ended up in court. The facts that the court employs in its resolution of the legal issues are often the essential narrative facts. The procedural facts are the procedural events that shaped the lawsuit and the way it is presented to the deciding court: Who sued whom? For what? In what court? In Supreme Court opinions, these facts also include who lost in the trial court and on appeal and why. The procedural facts that figure prominently in the court s resolution of the legal issues will be essential procedural facts to include in a brief. 9 Tennessee v. Garner, 471 U.S. 1 (1985). 10 See Martin v. Hunter s Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816). 2

3 C. Issue(s): The issue is the legal question the court must decide to resolve the dispute between the parties in a particular case. To find the issue, you have to identify the rule of law that governs a dispute and the key facts of the dispute. When you write an issue, use the language of the constitutional text as closely as possible. D. Holding(s): The holding is the court s decision on the question that is before it. It provides the answer to the question asked in the issue statement. It can be a simple yes or no. If it is a statement, it should include both the material facts and the rule of law that comes from the decision. A broader statement of the rule of law or ratio decidendi is often and confusingly also called a holding. You can include both, but do not neglect the fact + law version. If there is more than one issue, there may be more than one holding. E. Reasoning: The reasoning or rationales that explain the court s decision. For the lawcentered type of issues that the Supreme Court decides, the constitutional text will be important, as will the history of the writing of the text, the understanding of the textual language among the founding generation, and the understanding of it in judicial case precedent and the precedents of executive action and legislation. Constitutional principles and norms will be important, as will social, political and economic consequences of various holdings. For example, the Court may look at two lines of case authority on a constitutional issue and decide in favor of one as the correct reading of the Constitution, or decide the type of case before it is more like the cases in one line of authority than the other; or it may interpret the Constitution for the first time in a new context, using the text, the history of the text, case precedents, constitutional norms and policy. F. Judgment: The judgment indicates the action to be taken as a result of the court s holding(s) on the issue(s). Sometimes it is stated with the holding. In a Supreme Court opinion, because it is an appellate court opinion, the judgment usually will be affirmance, upholding the decision below; reversal, rejection of the decision below; or remand, return of the case to the lower court or agency for further findings of fact or other resolution consistent with the Supreme Court holding(s). C. USING THE PARTS OF A JUDICIAL OPINION A judicial opinion has several functions in U.S. law. First, it decides the dispute between the litigants. Second, it establishes a precedent to guide decisions in future cases with similar facts in courts of the same jurisdiction. The United States Supreme Court will generally follow its precedents under the principle of stare decisis (Latin for let the decision stand ). Lower courts must follow under the doctrine of precedent: decisions of higher courts in similar cases in the same jurisdiction are binding. Finally, a case not only decides a particular dispute and guides decisions in similar cases, but its reasoning may also establish or modify a general principle or rule of constitutional law applicable to future cases. 3

4 1. HOLDING, DICTA AND THE IMPACT OF AN OPINION Briefing cases helps an attorney not only understand each particular case and how it decided a dispute, but also to analyze the impact of the opinion on future cases. A lawyer needs to know what a particular case held or how it reasoned not only to understand the case itself, but also to understand the relationship between that case and others. A case precedent may have a direct, controlling impact on future legal cases, as is the case when a Supreme Court holding in a case is legally and factually analogous to a current problem. To carefully assess the impact of an opinion as a precedent for future cases, judges and attorneys distinguish a judicial holding from dictum. A statement in a judicial opinion that is not necessary to resolve the actual issue before the court is called dictum, or dicta in the plural. Dicta may be discussion about the outcome under facts different from those before the court or under an issue not before it. Dicta are not binding on a court in the next similar case; they do not need to be followed under the principle of stare decisis. We will see in the cases we read, however, that dicta may influence future decisions. The reason for giving greater authority to holdings than dicta is that courts are most to be trusted when they decide particular disputes. Because they are aware of the relevant facts and the possible competing legal positions that have been argued at length by lawyers, their decisions are more reliable than are their passing comments on peripherally related subjects. 2. FORMULATING A RULE FROM AN OPINION A judicial opinion may also have an indirect impact, through its effect as precedent on a group of similar cases that together make up the rule or doctrine applicable to factually analogous, current problems. Therefore, attorneys read an opinion not only to discover its particular holding on the problem before the court and compare it to a current, similar problem, but also to see if they can formulate a rule from it that is more broadly applicable to other cases, or reformulate a rule that the opinion modified. Sometimes the rule of the case will be called the holding of the case. In contrast to the holding discussed previously, which focused on the facts of the case, this sense of holding is often called a broad statement of the holding or the ratio decidendi. Judicial opinions don t make it easy to determine the rule of the case. While judges discuss the principles of law they use to resolve the dispute, they may not clearly articulate the impact of their decision on those principles. Indeed, the impact of one case on the law may have to be discerned from several later opinions that discuss and apply it, sometimes using different language. To discern the probable impact of the opinion on the rules of law it applied, the lawyer has to try to get inside the opinion author s head, determine what principles the author applied to reach the result, and predict how these principles could function in the future. To formulate a rule from a case it is helpful to distinguish three things: 1) the pre-existing rule of law a court applies in its reasoning, 2) the holding of the case, and 3) the rule a lawyer may take from the case. An opinion frequently begins its reasoning by stating a rule in this 4

5 course, the rule will usually be from the text of the Constitution and/or a general principle from a synthesis of earlier cases with similar facts. The Court then applies that rule to the material facts of the pending case to reach a holding. When a reader recognizes the holding and how the court got there, he or she knows more about the rule applied and what it means than he or she did before the court issued that opinion. The rule that a reader takes from the case is not just the preexisting rule the court initially recited or applied, but the modified rule the rule modified by the new information about it that a reader can glean from the opinion s holding and reasoning. When they read an opinion to see its effect on the legal rules, U.S. lawyers are primarily interested in formulating the modified rule: it is the rule of law that the Supreme Court and lower courts will apply to similar cases in the future. 3. REASONING BY ANALOGY TO AN OPINION 11 When the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court rationalize and justify their case decisions in written, published opinions, they use principles and norms in the text and structure of the Constitution and also principles and rules adopted by the Court to interpret the Constitutional text in earlier, similar cases. The latter principles are considered binding on the Court in a new and similar case by deference to the principle of stare decisis (Latin for let the decision stand. ). Therefore the Court, and the attorneys practicing before it, search earlier, similar cases for definitions, rules and principles that should guide a pending case. Lawyers and judges of lower courts do a similar search when they must argue or decide a pending case. Lower courts are bound by similar U.S. Supreme Court decisions by the doctrine of precedent. When the Court itself, lower court judges and lawyers read a Court opinion for its direct impact on pending problems, they reason by drawing analogies between many important facets of their problem case and the precedent case. By comparing their pending problem to decided cases, lawyers decide how the decisions in previous cases apply to the new problem. If the problem and the prior case resemble each other in important ways, such as by their relevant facts, then they are analogous -- and that means they should also resemble each other in their outcome. Cases are analogous if they are alike in ways that are important to their outcome and if the differences between them are not enough to destroy that analogy. Facts are not the only important element used to determine whether a precedent case is analogous to a problem situation. The applicable rule of law should also be similar, so that the issue the court dealt with is the same or similar in both key facts and rule of law applicable to the issue in the problem. The court=s reasoning in the precedent case should apply equally well to the problem case. 11 Adapted from Helene S. Shapo, Marilyn R. Walter & Elizabeth Fajans, Writing and Analysis in the Law (2 nd ed. 1991). 5

6 If the cases are different in important facets and the decision in the precedent case therefore should not control the outcome in the pending case, the precedent is called A distinguishable case does not control a subsequent case, or its impact is restricted. One distinguishes a precedent case by establishing that the differences in the facts require that the court apply a different rule. Or one may decide that the same rule should be applied, but that the facts require a different outcome. One must be careful not to distinguish cases too easily. Each case will have some differences from other cases. The distinguishing facts must be significant. By comparing and contrasting a pending fact situation with precedent, the Justices of the Supreme Court determine how well the rules of prior cases fit the new case they must decide. When lawyers-or you-do this, you are more able to predict the probable outcome of a pending case. The system of precedent allows for gradual change, however; therefore, no prediction can be certain. When one reasons by analogy, one can only offer probable proof for a conclusion, not certainty. The skill is to assess all the possible applications of the relevant rules and to weigh the possible outcomes in order to offer the best prediction. a. FACTS 4. APPLYING PRECEDENT In case briefing, the facts to include are those that are relevant to the issue and to the reasons given by the court for the holding. In applying a precedent, as when briefing a case, one must first determine which facts are relevant to the issue and to the reasons for the decision. However, to consider the relationship between a precedent and a problem case, one views the facts somewhat differently than in case briefing. The facts of an earlier case need not be identical to the facts of another case or a problem for the earlier case to be analogous. A case can be relevant precedent when its facts are similar to the problem case facts according to certain general classifications or factors. The factor provides a basis on which to draw an analogy between cases. An analogy could be drawn between a case in which a state official refuses to give unemployment benefits to a person who was fired because she would not work on her Sabbath and one in which a state official convicted Amish parents of middle school aged children for not having them enrolled in school when their religion specified practical, apprentice type schooling at that age. Although factually distinct, both sets of facts fit under the general classification of a religiously motivated action being burdened. And an analogy could be drawn because both involved regulations that were uniformly applicable, regardless of religion: rules on unemployment benefit eligibility and a truancy law. On the other hand, under another factor these cases could be distinguishable. An individual hearing on eligibility for government benefits is routine in the first type of case, involving unemployment compensation payments. It is not in the other, in which a state statute is simply to be universally obeyed and violators are prosecuted and fined. If the administrative ease of determining exceptions to uniform rules is the relevant factor, the cases are distinguishable. 6

7 b. ISSUES AND HOLDINGS For a case to be controlling precedent for a subsequent, pending case, the issue should be essentially the same as the one in the new case. However, sometimes the issue or the holding in the precedent case can be defined narrowly, so that no comparison is possible; or it can be phrased more broadly, in which case it may be significant for a pending problem or issue. How one formulates an issue or a holding depends on how many facts one includes as essential and how one characterizes those facts. If a lawyer describes the facts exactly as they were in the case, then the holding will be very narrow. This is sometimes called limiting a case to its facts. Its precedential effect will be slight. If one describes the facts more broadly, the holding can apply to a larger number of future cases whose varied facts nevertheless come within that broader description. For instance, the Marbury v. Madison opinion can be read narrowly in regard to the Supreme Court s power to declare legislation enlarging its constitutionally granted original jurisdiction unconstitutional; or it could be read more broadly, to establish the principle of judicial review of the constitutionality of the actions of other branches. The holding in United States v. Reynolds, which denied relief to a Mormon man charged criminally with polygamy, could also be read narrowly or broadly. In this case, the narrower reading would be consistent with expanded judicial power and the broader one would not be. The case holding could relate only to criminal laws about polygamy. Or it could give a broader rule about religion and the criminal law. Or it could be a very broad principle against judicially creating exemptions for religion from any generally applicable law. The Court that decided Sherbert v. Verner in 1963 may have read it in one of the first two ways mentioned; the Division of Employment v. Smith Court read it in the last way. In this instance, the broader formulation restricted judicial protection of religious freedom much more. The way a precedent case=s holding or issue is formulated may depend on the result the lawyer or judge wants to reach in applying that case to a problem case. If the decision in a precedent case is favorable to the client=s case or the result the judge wants to reach, a lawyer or judge may formulate the holding broadly, so as to include the facts of the pending case. If the decision in the precedent case is unfavorable, one will try to state the holding more narrowly, so that it does not include the facts of the present case. c. REASONING/POLICY The court=s reasoning in the precedent case should apply equally well to the facts in a pending case for it to be a controlling precedent. This is almost certain if the facts are very similar. An advocate might well have thought the strict scrutiny type of judicial reasoning used in Sherbert would be used in another case of denial of unemployment compensation benefits as a result of religious exercise. This would normally be good legal reasoning especially for a lower court. But the Court was ready to make a significant change in the law, so it was not successful reasoning in Smith. 7

8 The same reasoning may apply in different contexts. The Smith reasoning on the need to limit judicial interference with legislation or executive action on the basis of religion may apply not only to criminal drug laws, but also to laws barring headgear in schools. A policy type reason like the need to treat those who engage in minority religious practices so they are not disadvantaged compared to those who follow majority religious practices -- may work effectively in factually distinct cases and be the basis for predicting similar outcomes. Again, this will work with greater regularity in the lower courts than in the Supreme Court. It can cease to be persuasive in a new context; or it simply may be rejected, as the treatment of Sherbert by the Smith Court indicates. 5. USING SEVERAL JUDICIAL OPINIONS TO SYNTHESIZE THE LAW Adapted in part from Helene S. Shapo, Marilyn R. Walter & Elizabeth Fajans, Writing and Analysis in the Law (2nd ed. 1991). There is rarely only one case precedent relevant to a U.S. constitutional law problem. Often there is a line of relevant cases, which when read together create a principle or a rule or doctrine. To use several cases to resolve pending issues, lawyers and judges relate the cases to each other, or synthesize them into coherent doctrine. In this way, they thoroughly understand the area of law and they produce a synthesis of it that they can then use as the governing law for the analysis of a pending problem. Frequently, in reading opinions you will see legal propositions stated and followed by a string of citations to cases or other legal authorities. Usually these propositions have evolved as the Court has read the decisions of many related cases. The judges inductively produce these statements from analyzing each case and then combining the separate rules from each case into a coherent statement of the general principles in an area of law. These general principles are expressed at a level of abstraction that encompasses the particular holdings of all of the individual cases. The Court has synthesized governing rules or principles to apply to the pending case. An example is the Wisconsin v. Yoder opinion. The Court states: The essence of all that has been said and written on the subject is that only those interests of the highest order and those not otherwise served can overbalance legitimate claims to the free exercise of religion. We can accept it as settled, therefore, that, however strong the State's interest in universal compulsory education, it is by no means absolute to the exclusion or subordination of all other interests. 406 U.S. 205, 214 (1972). Immediately after that statement follows citation to three cases: E.g., Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963); McGowan v. Maryland, 366 U.S. 420 (1961) (separate opinion of Frankfurter, J.); Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944). The Court is telling the legally educated reader that it has drawn the proposition it stated prior to the citation, and upon which it relies to decide the pending case, from the cited cases. The two statements preceding the citations above contain the Court s synthesized rule. They include first, a general rule, that only those interests of the highest order and those not otherwise served can overbalance legitimate claims to the free exercise of religion. Yoder, 406 U.S. at 214. In the next sentence, the Court begins to apply that rule to the Yoder case facts, 8

9 calling it well settled. Id. The Court says that even if the state of Wisconsin s interest in universal compulsory education is very strong, in light of a legitimate free exercise claim, it is not absolute. For the state to prevail, its interest must overbalance the free exercise claim by being shown to be of the highest order and... not otherwise served. Id. To complete some of your research and writing assignments, you will need to synthesize cases into rules, as attorneys in practice do and as the Court did in the Yoder case. Begin by reading and briefing one case at a time. To synthesize, you need not only to have broken each opinion into parts, as for the case brief, but also to group and combine the opinions into coherent legal propositions. Take clues from the synthesis given you by the Court in the opinions, giving greatest weight to synthesized rules in the most recent opinions. Several methods of synthesis are possible: 1. Group cases by a rule they each follow; 2. Within a rule, group cases by (or create) analytical categories; 3. Within a rule, group by (or create) component factors of an evolving standard, claim or defense. The first method is the easiest, but applies more to lower courts than to a series of Supreme Court opinions. It may apply, however, if different portions of the Constitution s text are applicable to the different cases, or if a new rule, perhaps overruling an earlier one, is used in some of the cases. An attorney would organize the discussion of the cases according to the rule they use. Within the group of cases using a rule, she might organize by methods two or three. The second method is required when various applications of a legal rule to individual cases have led to different outcomes. A general descriptive category can make sense out of the decisions. For example, if you were studying Supreme Court opinions to learn when the police need a search warrant in order not to violate the 4th Amendment prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure, you would learn the general rule: the police need a warrant if their activity invades a criminal suspect s reasonable expectation of privacy. You might find several cases with varying facts and outcomes: One case held police do not violate the 4th Amendment when they use binoculars to look through windows of a suspect s home; another held no violation when police use dogs to sniff a suspect at an airport. On the other hand, a case held the fourth amendment is violated when police break down the door of a suspect s apartment and ransack her bedroom; another held police violated the 4th Amendment when they knocked on the door, were admitted to his home, and strip-searched the suspect. You will need more than the general rule to make sense of these differing outcomes and diverse facts. For instance, you might explain the outcomes on the basis of an analytical category. You might use the degree of intrusiveness into the suspect s home or person; the first two cases are highly intrusive and a warrant was required; the latter two were less intrusive and a warrant was not required. When you write your synthesis, you would offer this category as a way to explain that the precedent cases use the same rule but have different outcomes, and then you would use it to analyze a pending problem case. 9

10 The third method is putting together a general principle of law and relevant factors that have evolved over a series of cases. You compare the facts emphasized by the Court in various similar cases, to see if they fit into a category or factor that expands or elaborates on a general rule. The cases may state the factors outright, or they may be implicit, or evolve over a few opinions. When you write your synthesis, you would first identify the factors and explain how they determine the constitutional issue; then you would organize your writing around the factors. For example, when one studies First Amendment cases on religious expression, one will learn that the outright prohibition on prohibiting the free exercise of religion in the constitutional text is qualified by several factors. One will read cases that turn on whether the expression is through speech or worship practices and others that turn on whether the government regulation targeted the religious expression or only affected it more adversely than when applied to similar activities of those not of the religion. In the first instance, one may identify as factors for the rule--whether the freedom claimed is for a practice or for oral and written expression. In the second whether regulatory authority claimed by the state is for uniform application of a general regulation or a regulation of the particular religion or religious activity. To write a synthesis, one would begin discussion of the cases by identification of these factors in the cases and explanation of how they explain the case outcomes. After synthesizing a rule in this way, an attorney will apply it, including each of the factors, to the facts of a pending problem. i By Leigh Hunt Greenhaw. 10

Civil vs Criminal Cases

Civil vs Criminal Cases Chapter Objectives Describe the state court system and its politics Analyze sources and consequences of the power of the federal judiciary and compare/contrast approaches to constitutional interpretation

More information

MOOT COURT CASE PRESENTATION GUIDE (Appellate Presentation and Brief: 15 percent of final grade)

MOOT COURT CASE PRESENTATION GUIDE (Appellate Presentation and Brief: 15 percent of final grade) MOOT COURT CASE PRESENTATION GUIDE (Appellate Presentation and Brief: 15 percent of final grade) Each team has been given a landmark or an important case in First Amendment or media law jurisprudence.

More information

SIXTH EDITION Writing. and Analysis. in the Law. Helene S. Shapo l Marilyn R. Walter I Elizabe#l Fajans

SIXTH EDITION Writing. and Analysis. in the Law. Helene S. Shapo l Marilyn R. Walter I Elizabe#l Fajans SIXTH EDITION Writing and Analysis in the Law Helene S. Shapo l Marilyn R. Walter I Elizabe#l Fajans 1 Introduction to the Legal System and Legal Writing STUDENTS DECIDE TO COME TO LAW SCHOOL for many

More information

Good Morning Finance 270. Finance 270 Summer The Legal & Regulatory Environment of Business

Good Morning Finance 270. Finance 270 Summer The Legal & Regulatory Environment of Business Good Morning The Legal & Regulatory Environment of Business To understand the legal & regulatory environment of business, you must appreciate the role of law as the foundation for business practice in

More information

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY. vs. Case No. 12 CF BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY. vs. Case No. 12 CF BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE STATE OF WISCONSIN : CIRCUIT COURT : BROWN COUNTY STATE OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 12 CF 000000 JOHN DOE, Defendant. BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE THE DEFENDANT, John Doe,

More information

Bradley v. American Smelting & Refining Co.,

Bradley v. American Smelting & Refining Co., Bradley v. American Smelting & Refining Co., 709 P. 2d 782 (Wash. 1984) Case Analysis Questions CA Q. 1 What court decided this case? The Washington Supreme Court. CA Q. 2 Is this an appeal from a lower

More information

The Federal Courts. Chapter 16

The Federal Courts. Chapter 16 The Federal Courts Chapter 16 3 HISTORICAL ERAS OF INFLUENCE 1787-1865 Political Nation building (legitimacy of govt.) Slavery 1865-1937 Economic Govt. roll in economy Great Depression 1937-Present Ideological

More information

21/12/2009 A SURVEY COURSE. Agenda. 1. Topics Covered on the Exam. 2. Sample Exam Questions. 3. Questions

21/12/2009 A SURVEY COURSE. Agenda. 1. Topics Covered on the Exam. 2. Sample Exam Questions. 3. Questions A SURVEY COURSE Agenda 1. Topics Covered on the Exam 2. Sample Exam Questions 3. Questions 1 Topics Covered on the Exam Federalism (Federal Courts vs. State Courts) Common Law/Primary vs. Secondary Authorities/Stare

More information

AP Gov Chapter 15 Outline

AP Gov Chapter 15 Outline Law in the United States is based primarily on the English legal system because of our colonial heritage. Once the colonies became independent from England, they did not establish a new legal system. With

More information

Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. State: Feeling the Effects of Medical Marijuana on Montana s Rational Basis Test

Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. State: Feeling the Effects of Medical Marijuana on Montana s Rational Basis Test Montana Law Review Online Volume 76 Article 22 10-28-2015 Montana Cannabis Industry Association v. State: Feeling the Effects of Medical Marijuana on Montana s Rational Basis Test Luc Brodhead Alexander

More information

a. Exceptions: Australia, Canada, Germany, India, and a few others B. Debate is over how the Constitution should be interpreted

a. Exceptions: Australia, Canada, Germany, India, and a few others B. Debate is over how the Constitution should be interpreted I. The American Judicial System A. Only in the United States do judges play so large a role in policy-making - The policy-making potential of the federal judiciary is enormous. Woodrow Wilson once described

More information

A Guide to the Legislative Process - Acts and Regulations

A Guide to the Legislative Process - Acts and Regulations A Guide to the Legislative Process - Acts and Regulations November 2008 Table of Contents Introduction Choosing the Right Tools to Accomplish Policy Objectives What instruments are available to accomplish

More information

How to Read a Legal Opinion

How to Read a Legal Opinion How to Read a Legal Opinion What is a legal opinion? Opinion written and issued by the court on a particular issue(s) in a lawsuit. Case law Not all lawsuits will generate a published opinion. Most opinions

More information

Chapter 3. U.S. Constitution. THE US CONSTITUTION Unit overview. I. Six Basic Principles. Popular Sovereignty. Limited Government

Chapter 3. U.S. Constitution. THE US CONSTITUTION Unit overview. I. Six Basic Principles. Popular Sovereignty. Limited Government Chapter 3 U.S. Constitution THE US CONSTITUTION Unit overview I. Basic Principles II. Preamble III. Articles IV. Amendments V. Amending the Constitution " Original divided into 7 articles " 1-3 = specific

More information

Law as the. Foundation of Business. The Legal & Regulatory Environment of Business 16e. The United States is a nation of law. John Adams.

Law as the. Foundation of Business. The Legal & Regulatory Environment of Business 16e. The United States is a nation of law. John Adams. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Right Reserved The Legal & Regulatory Environment of Business 16e Law as the Chapter 1 Foundation of Business Reed Pagnattaro Cahoy

More information

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 07-1014 JIMMY EVANS, Petitioner, Appellant, v. MICHAEL A. THOMPSON, Superintendent of MCI Shirley, Respondent, Appellee, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

More information

HOW TO READ A LEGAL OPINION

HOW TO READ A LEGAL OPINION HOW TO READ A LEGAL OPINION A GUIDE FOR NEW LAW STUDENTS Orin S. Kerr Copyright 2007 Orin S. Kerr Second Series Autumn 2007 Volume 11 Number 1 Published by The Green Bag, Inc., in cooperation with the

More information

Research, Writing, and Analysis BRIEFING A CASE

Research, Writing, and Analysis BRIEFING A CASE Research, Writing, and Analysis BRIEFING A CASE A case brief is a written analysis of a judicial opinion. A judicial opinion is also commonly known as a case or a decision. There are many different methods

More information

Common law reasoning and institutions

Common law reasoning and institutions Common law reasoning and institutions England and Wales Common law reasoning and institutions I. The English legal system and the common law tradition II. Courts, tribunals and other decision-making bodies

More information

Mastering the BlueBook to Become a More Persuasive Writer

Mastering the BlueBook to Become a More Persuasive Writer Mastering the BlueBook to Become a More Persuasive Writer In addition to writing their sentences well, effective legal writers think about how they use and cite legal authority in their writing. One part

More information

Glossary of Terms for Business Law and Ethics

Glossary of Terms for Business Law and Ethics Glossary of Terms for Business Law and Ethics MBA 625, Patten University Abusive/Intimidating Behavior Physical threats, false accusations, being annoying, profanity, insults, yelling, harshness, ignoring

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 5, 2005 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 5, 2005 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE October 5, 2005 Session TOMMY D. LANIUS v. NASHVILLE ELECTRIC SERVICE Interlocutory appeal from the Chancery Court for Sumner County No. 2004C-96 Hon. Thomas

More information

Introduction. The Structure of Cases

Introduction. The Structure of Cases Appendix: Reading and Briefing Cases Introduction A unique aspect of studying criminal procedure is that you have the opportunity to read actual court decisions. Reading cases likely will be a new experience,

More information

558 March 28, 2019 No. 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

558 March 28, 2019 No. 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON 558 March 28, 2019 No. 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON John S. FOOTE, Mary Elledge, and Deborah Mapes-Stice, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Appellant. (CC 17CV49853)

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS. Judgment Rendered June

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS. Judgment Rendered June STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2007 KA 2009 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS ll n MATTHEW G L CONWAY Judgment Rendered June 6 2008 Appealed from the 18th Judicial District Court In and for

More information

Chapter 14: The Judiciary Multiple Choice

Chapter 14: The Judiciary Multiple Choice Multiple Choice 1. In the context of Supreme Court conferences, which of the following statements is true of a dissenting opinion? a. It can be written by one or more justices. b. It refers to the opinion

More information

11 Green Bag 2d 51. Green Bag Autumn, Article. HOW TO READ A LEGAL OPINION A Guide for New Law Students. Orin S. Kerr a1

11 Green Bag 2d 51. Green Bag Autumn, Article. HOW TO READ A LEGAL OPINION A Guide for New Law Students. Orin S. Kerr a1 11 Green Bag 2d 51 Green Bag Autumn, 2007 Article HOW TO READ A LEGAL OPINION A Guide for New Law Students Orin S. Kerr a1 Copyright 2007 by The Green Bag, Inc.; Orin S. Kerr This essay is designed to

More information

Law Related Education

Law Related Education Law Related Education Copyright 2006 by the Kansas Bar Association. Revised 2016. All rights reserved. No use is permitted which will infringe on the copyright w ithout the express written consent of the

More information

Aconsideration of the sources of law in a legal

Aconsideration of the sources of law in a legal 1 The Sources of American Law Aconsideration of the sources of law in a legal order must deal with a variety of different, although related, matters. Historical roots and derivations need explanation.

More information

Benchmarks Activity 3

Benchmarks Activity 3 Benchmarks Activity 3 Benchmarks Activity 3 What the Law Means Time needed: 30 minutes Topics addressed: Role of the judicial branch Introduction to judicial review Overview: You will review the role of

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Cite as: 544 U. S. (2005) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of

More information

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 97-CM Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Hon. Robert E. Morin, Trial Judge)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 97-CM Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. (Hon. Robert E. Morin, Trial Judge) Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections

More information

ARIZONA PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING BOARD HOUR BASIC CURRICULUM MODEL LESSON PLAN LESSON TITLE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 2.

ARIZONA PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING BOARD HOUR BASIC CURRICULUM MODEL LESSON PLAN LESSON TITLE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 2. ARIZONA PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING BOARD 585 - HOUR BASIC CURRICULUM MODEL LESSON PLAN LESSON TITLE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 2.10 AUGUST 2017 SUBJECT: AZ POST DESIGNATION: Constitutional Law 2.10

More information

FEDERALISM. As a consequence, rights established under deeds, wills, contracts, and the like in one state must be recognized by other states.

FEDERALISM. As a consequence, rights established under deeds, wills, contracts, and the like in one state must be recognized by other states. FEDERALISM Federal Government: A form of government where states form a union and the sovereign power is divided between the national government and the various states. The Privileges and Immunities Clause:

More information

laws created by legislative bodies.

laws created by legislative bodies. THE AP AMERICAN GOVERNMENT STUDY GUIDE CLASSIFICATION OF LEGAL ISSUES TYPE OF CASE CIVIL CASES CRIMINAL CASES covers issues of claims, suits, contracts, and licenses. covers illegal actions or wrongful

More information

6th BILETA Conference An Expert System for Improving the Pretrial Release/Detention Decision

6th BILETA Conference An Expert System for Improving the Pretrial Release/Detention Decision Page 1 of 8 6th BILETA Conference 1991 Editor: Tim Green An Expert System for Improving the Pretrial Release/Detention Decision Patricia Professor of Law Syracuse University London Centre 24 Kensington

More information

14. HEARSAY A. INTRODUCTION

14. HEARSAY A. INTRODUCTION 14. HEARSAY A. INTRODUCTION 1. What is the Hearsay Rule? Hearsay is a statement that was made outside of the courtroom, asserts facts, and is now offered in court to prove the truth of the facts asserted.

More information

Chapter 13: The Judiciary

Chapter 13: The Judiciary Learning Objectives «Understand the Role of the Judiciary in US Government and Significant Court Cases Chapter 13: The Judiciary «Apply the Principle of Judicial Review «Contrast the Doctrine of Judicial

More information

Research Guide: One L Dictionary

Research Guide: One L Dictionary Research Guide: One L Dictionary This One L Dictionary is designed to provide easy reference to vocabulary commonly used in the legal community and to assist in your introduction to a new vocabulary; or

More information

California Bar Examination

California Bar Examination California Bar Examination Essay Question: Constitutional Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question The Legislature of State

More information

New Hampshire Supreme Court October 14, 2015 Oral Argument Case Summary

New Hampshire Supreme Court October 14, 2015 Oral Argument Case Summary New Hampshire Supreme Court October 14, 2015 Oral Argument Case Summary CASE #1 State of New Hampshire v. Albert J. Boutin, III (2014-0528) Attorney Thomas Barnard, Senior Assistant Appellate Defender,

More information

v No Kent Circuit Court

v No Kent Circuit Court S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED October 17, 2017 v No. 333827 Kent Circuit Court JENNIFER MARIE HAMMERLUND, LC

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STUART T. GUTTMAN, M.D.

ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Nos & IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STUART T. GUTTMAN, M.D. Appellate Case: 10-2167 Document: 01018564699 Date Filed: 01/10/2011 Page: 1 ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Nos. 10-2167 & 10-2172 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT STUART T. GUTTMAN,

More information

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 17, 2018 Session

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 17, 2018 Session IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE April 17, 2018 Session 08/27/2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. COREY FOREST Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 24034 Robert L. Jones,

More information

Common law reasoning and institutions Civil and Criminal Procedure (England and Wales) Litigation U.S.

Common law reasoning and institutions Civil and Criminal Procedure (England and Wales) Litigation U.S. Litigation U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3 20122 Milano Comparing England and Wales and the U.S. Just Legal Services - Scuola di Formazione Legale Via Laghetto, 3

More information

Terms to Know. In the first column, answer the questions based on what you know before you study. After this lesson, complete the last column.

Terms to Know. In the first column, answer the questions based on what you know before you study. After this lesson, complete the last column. Lesson 1: Federal Courts ESSENTIAL QUESTION How can governments ensure citizens are treated fairly? GUIDING QUESTIONS 1. What is the role of the federal courts? 2. What kinds of cases are heard in federal

More information

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION WITH REFERENCE TO THE PRINCE CASE ISSN VOLUME 6 No 2

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION WITH REFERENCE TO THE PRINCE CASE ISSN VOLUME 6 No 2 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH IN CONSTITUTIONAL ADJUDICATION WITH REFERENCE TO THE PRINCE CASE ISSN 1727-3781 2003 VOLUME 6 No 2 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF A PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACH IN CONSTITUTIONAL

More information

US CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE

US CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE US CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare,

More information

United States Court of Appeals

United States Court of Appeals In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 13 2661 MARY E. SHEPARD, et al., v. Plaintiffs Appellants, LISA M. MADIGAN, Attorney General of Illinois, et al., Defendants Appellees.

More information

1. The primary objective of law is to maintain harmony, stability, and justice within a society.

1. The primary objective of law is to maintain harmony, stability, and justice within a society. Business Law with UCC Applications 14th Edition Sukys Test Bank Full Download: http://testbanklive.com/download/business-law-with-ucc-applications-14th-edition-sukys-test-bank/ Chapter 02 Sources of the

More information

The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series

The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series The Civil Action Part 1 of a 4 part series The American civil judicial system is slow, and imperfect, but many times a victim s only recourse in attempting to me made whole after suffering an injury. This

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 98,856. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, KRISTI MARIE URBAN, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 98,856. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, KRISTI MARIE URBAN, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 98,856 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. KRISTI MARIE URBAN, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Interpretation of a statute raises a question of law over which

More information

1 pt. 2pt. 3 pt. 4pt. 5 pt

1 pt. 2pt. 3 pt. 4pt. 5 pt Court Cases I Court Cases II Court Cases III Terms & Amendments I Terms & Amendments II 1pt 1 pt 1 pt 1pt 1 pt 2 pt 2 pt 2pt 2pt 2 pt 3 pt 3 pt 3 pt 3 pt 3 pt 4 pt 4 pt 4pt 4 pt 4pt 5pt 5 pt 5 pt 5 pt

More information

on your blue computer graded bubble sheet in the appropriate location.

on your blue computer graded bubble sheet in the appropriate location. as your signature PRINT your name EXAM #1 Business Law Fundamentals LAWS 3930 sections -001, -002 and -003 Chapters 1-4, 24, 6, 7, and 9 INSTRUCTIONS: 1. Affix your printed name as your signature in the

More information

The Norwegian legal system, the work of the Appeals Committee and the role of precedent in Norwegian law

The Norwegian legal system, the work of the Appeals Committee and the role of precedent in Norwegian law The Norwegian legal system, the work of the Appeals Committee and the role of precedent in Norwegian law Karin M. Bruzelius Justice, Norwegian Supreme Court I Introductory remarks I was originally asked

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. No. A-1-CA APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY Drew D. Tatum, District Judge

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO. v. No. A-1-CA APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY Drew D. Tatum, District Judge This decision was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule -0 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of non-precedential dispositions. Please also note that this

More information

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016).

This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016). This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A18-0786 State of Minnesota, Appellant, vs. Cabbott

More information

Introduction to the American Legal System

Introduction to the American Legal System 1 Introduction to the American Legal System Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D., and Terrye Conroy J.D., M.L.I.S. University of South Carolina [Laws are] rules of civil conduct prescribed by the state... commanding

More information

Chapter 8 - Judiciary. AP Government

Chapter 8 - Judiciary. AP Government Chapter 8 - Judiciary AP Government The Structure of the Judiciary A complex set of institutional courts and regular processes has been established to handle laws in the American system of government.

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED April 5, 2016 v No. 322625 Macomb Circuit Court PAUL ROBERT HARTIGAN, LC No. 2013-000669-FH Defendant-Appellant.

More information

LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying Chapter 16, you should be able to: 1. Understand the nature of the judicial system. 2. Explain how courts in the United States are organized and the nature of their jurisdiction.

More information

Big Idea 2 Objectives Explain the extent to which states are limited by the due process clause from infringing upon individual rights.

Big Idea 2 Objectives Explain the extent to which states are limited by the due process clause from infringing upon individual rights. Big Idea 2: The Courts, Civil Liberties, & Civil Rights Through the U.S. Constitution, but primarily through the Bill of Rights and the 14th Amendment, citizens and groups have attempted to restrict national

More information

CASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DAVID L. McKIBBEN, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D10-1011

More information

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CJ UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017

Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CJ UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2017 Circuit Court for Prince George s County Case No. CJ171506 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 2503 September Term, 2017 DONALD EUGENE BAILEY v. STATE OF MARYLAND Berger, Friedman,

More information

4.17: SUPREME COURT. AP U. S. Government

4.17: SUPREME COURT. AP U. S. Government 4.17: SUPREME COURT C AP U. S. Government Article III of the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court as the this co-equal branch of the US government. In its early history the Court was not so prestigious.

More information

Landmark Supreme Court Cases

Landmark Supreme Court Cases Landmark Supreme Court Cases Learning Target: JB 5.1 I can demonstrate or explain how Landmark Supreme Court Cases have been defined and interpreted rights over time. Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) Right

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2006 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes

More information

STUDY GUIDE Three Branches Test

STUDY GUIDE Three Branches Test STUDY GUIDE Three Branches Test NAME (Remember to review your notes and class materials as well as this guide.) 1 Circle, highlight, check, or underline the correct answers, or fill in the blanks. 1. The

More information

AMERICAN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Robert F. Williams. The term state constitutional law represents an important subfield of American

AMERICAN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. Robert F. Williams. The term state constitutional law represents an important subfield of American AMERICAN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Robert F. Williams The term state constitutional law represents an important subfield of American constitutional law. Most references to constitutional law by either legal

More information

Chapter 10: The Judiciary

Chapter 10: The Judiciary Chapter 10: The Judiciary Constitution and Creation of the Federal Judiciary Read Article III and answer: Discuss justices/judges: terms, appointments, remuneration What powers and jurisdiction does the

More information

CHAPTER 18:3 Supreme Court

CHAPTER 18:3 Supreme Court CHAPTER 18:3 Supreme Court Chapter 18:3 o We will examine the reasons why the Supreme Court is often called the higher court. o We will examine why judicial review is a key feature in the American System

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida No. SC13-252 THE FLORIDA HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, et al., Petitioners, vs. THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA, et al., Respondents. [July 11, 2013] PARIENTE, J. The Florida

More information

AP Government & Politics Ch. 15 The Federal Court System & SCOTUS

AP Government & Politics Ch. 15 The Federal Court System & SCOTUS AP Government & Politics Ch. 15 The Federal Court System & SCOTUS 1. A liberal judicial activist judge would probably support which of the following rulings made by the Supreme Court? A. a death penalty

More information

US Government Module 4 Study Guide

US Government Module 4 Study Guide US Government Module 4 Study Guide 4.01 The Judicial Branch Created in Article III of the Constitution and consists of a US Supreme Court and lower courts Three basic levels of courts trial appellate supreme

More information

Background Guide. Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS)

Background Guide. Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) Background Guide (SCOTUS) 1 Committee Overview Chair: Dennis Wieboldt Case Docket No. 17-1091: Timbs v. Indiana The Background The (SCOTUS) is the head of the judicial branch, and the highest federal court

More information

Case 6:13-cr EFM Document 102 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

Case 6:13-cr EFM Document 102 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS Case 6:13-cr-10176-EFM Document 102 Filed 10/30/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 13-10176-01-EFM WALTER ACKERMAN,

More information

Borland v. Sanders Lead Co. 369 So. 2d 523 (Ala. 1979) Case Analysis Questions

Borland v. Sanders Lead Co. 369 So. 2d 523 (Ala. 1979) Case Analysis Questions Borland v. Sanders Lead Co. 369 So. 2d 523 (Ala. 1979) Case Analysis Questions CA Q. 1 What court decided this case? The Supreme Court of Alabama. CA Q. 2 What are the facts in this case? The Defendant

More information

STUDENT GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY

STUDENT GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY RULES OF THE JUDICIARY OF THE STUDENT GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION OF THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ADOPTED APRIL 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I: Composition and Role of the Judiciary Section 1: Constitutional

More information

Opening Statement to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on the Eight Amendment to the Constitution

Opening Statement to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on the Eight Amendment to the Constitution Opening Statement to the Oireachtas Joint Committee on the Eight Amendment to the Constitution Dr David Kenny Assistant Professor of Law, Trinity College Dublin September 27 th, 2017 I have been asked

More information

CASE NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CASE NO UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Case: 15-35967, 02/12/2016, ID: 9864857, DktEntry: 27, Page 1 of 14 CASE NO. 15-35967 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RAVALLI COUNTY REPUBLICAN CENTRAL COMMITTEE, GALLATIN COUNTY REPUBLICAN

More information

Lecture: The First Amendment

Lecture: The First Amendment Lecture: The First Amendment "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right

More information

Appealing Temporary Injunctive Relief In Texas. By David F. Johnson

Appealing Temporary Injunctive Relief In Texas. By David F. Johnson Appealing Temporary Injunctive Relief In Texas By David F. Johnson Introduction Author has practiced civil trial and appellate law for twenty years. Author has a blog: http://www.txfiduciar ylitigator.com

More information

The Constitution in One Sentence: Understanding the Tenth Amendment

The Constitution in One Sentence: Understanding the Tenth Amendment January 10, 2011 Constitutional Guidance for Lawmakers The Constitution in One Sentence: Understanding the Tenth Amendment In a certain sense, the Tenth Amendment the last of the 10 amendments that make

More information

IN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, CR DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, JOANNE SEKULA,

IN COURT OF APPEALS. DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, CR DISTRICT II STATE OF WISCONSIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, JOANNE SEKULA, COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 12, 2001 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Appeals NOTICE This opinion is subject to further editing. If published, the official version will appear

More information

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 97-CO-276. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 97-CO-276. Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections

More information

CHAPTER 12 Federal Courts

CHAPTER 12 Federal Courts CHAPTER 12 Federal Courts OUTLINE The Role of the Courts Settling Disputes Judicial Policymaking Political History of the Supreme Court The Federal Court System District Courts Courts of Appeal Supreme

More information

The Nature of the Law

The Nature of the Law The Nature of the Law Chapter 1 1 The Types of Law Constitutions Statutes Common Law and Statutory Interpretation Equity Administrative regulations Administrative decisions Treaties Ordinances Executive

More information

Case: Document: 39-2 Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 1. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0580n.06. Case No.

Case: Document: 39-2 Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 1. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0580n.06. Case No. Case: 13-2456 Document: 39-2 Filed: 07/31/2014 Page: 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 14a0580n.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re SETTLEMENT FACILITY DOW

More information

Commercial Law Outline. 4 th Edition

Commercial Law Outline. 4 th Edition 1 Commercial Law Outline 4 th Edition 2 Commercial Law Notes (Weeks 1-12) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Business and the Law... 4 A. The Nature of law... 4 II. The Australian Legal System... 5 A. Legal Systems...

More information

Chapter Thirteen: The Courts

Chapter Thirteen: The Courts Chapter Thirteen: The Courts Learning Outcomes 1. Explain the main sources of American law, including constitutions, statutes and regulations, and the common law tradition. 2. Describe the structure of

More information

REPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS

REPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS REPORTING CATEGORY 2: ROLES, RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITIZENS SS.7.C.2.1: Define the term "citizen," and identify legal means of becoming a United States citizen. Citizen: a native or naturalized

More information

Supreme Court s Obamacare Decision Renders Federal Tort-Reform Bill Unconstitutional

Supreme Court s Obamacare Decision Renders Federal Tort-Reform Bill Unconstitutional Supreme Court s Obamacare Decision Renders Federal Tort-Reform Bill Unconstitutional by Robert G. Natelson 1 Congressional schemes to federalize state health care lawsuits always have been constitutionally

More information

coercive nature of law (i.e., not voluntary) rules of the sovereign (legitimate authority) backed by force Problem:

coercive nature of law (i.e., not voluntary) rules of the sovereign (legitimate authority) backed by force Problem: What is law? coercive nature of law (i.e., not voluntary) rules of the sovereign (legitimate authority) backed by force Problem: who is the sovereign in US? Congress, courts, executive? federal versus

More information

INTRODUCTION TO READING & BRIEFING CASES AND OUTLINING

INTRODUCTION TO READING & BRIEFING CASES AND OUTLINING INTRODUCTION TO READING & BRIEFING CASES AND OUTLINING Copyright 1992, 1996 Robert N. Clinton Introduction The legal traditions followed by the federal government, the states (with the exception of the

More information

DECISION Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, and Defendants Motion to Strike

DECISION Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment, and Defendants Motion to Strike Rock of Ages Corp. v. Bernier, No. 68-2-14 Wncv (Teachout, J., April 22, 2015) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the

More information

ARIZONA PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING BOARD HOUR BASIC CURRICULUM MODEL LESSON PLAN LESSON TITLE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 2.

ARIZONA PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING BOARD HOUR BASIC CURRICULUM MODEL LESSON PLAN LESSON TITLE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 2. ARIZONA PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING BOARD 585 - HOUR BASIC CURRICULUM MODEL LESSON PLAN LESSON TITLE: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 2.10 NOVEMBER 2011 SUBJECT: AZ POST DESIGNATION: Constitutional Law 2.10

More information

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015 MAURICE MARKELL FELDER STATE OF MARYLAND

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2015 MAURICE MARKELL FELDER STATE OF MARYLAND UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 0273 September Term, 2015 MAURICE MARKELL FELDER v. STATE OF MARYLAND Kehoe, Leahy, Davis, Arrie W. (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ. Opinion

More information

Relationship of Issuer to Owner and Transferee The subject of this chapter is the relationship between the issuer of a security and the rest of the

Relationship of Issuer to Owner and Transferee The subject of this chapter is the relationship between the issuer of a security and the rest of the Chapter Two Relationship of Issuer to Owner and Transferee The subject of this chapter is the relationship between the issuer of a security and the rest of the world. This relationship is far simpler than

More information

Chapter III ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. Administrative law concerns the authority and procedures of administrative agencies.

Chapter III ADMINISTRATIVE LAW. Administrative law concerns the authority and procedures of administrative agencies. Chapter III ADMINISTRATIVE LAW Administrative law concerns the authority and procedures of administrative agencies. Administrative agencies are governmental bodies other than the courts or the legislatures

More information

Judicial Precedent Revision

Judicial Precedent Revision Judicial Precedent Revision Stare Decisis Stare decisis means: stand by what has been decided. Points of law that have been decided in previous similar cases must be followed. This makes the system CONSISTENT,

More information