Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 1 of 11. PageID #: 503 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
|
|
- Laura Ryan
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 1 of 11. PageID #: 503 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO STERLING JEWELERS INC., Civil Action No. 5:12-cv Plaintiff, vs. ZALE CORPORATION, Defendant. PLAINTIFF STERLING JEWELERS INC. S POST-HEARING BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Plaintiff Sterling Jewelers Inc. ( Sterling ) submits this Post-Hearing Brief in Support of its Motion for a Preliminary Injunction under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), and the Ohio Deceptive Trade Practices Act, Ohio Rev. Code 4165 et. seq. Defendant Zale Corporation s ( Zales ) advertising claims concerning the Celebration Fire diamonds are false, deceptive, and substantiated only by Zales s personal conviction that they are the most brilliant diamonds in the world. 1 Injunctive relief is warranted for the reasons that follow. I. THERE IS NO INDUSTRY STANDARD OR GENERALLY ACCEPTED DEFINITION OR MEASUREMENT OF A DIAMOND S BRILLIANCE All evidence and testimony agreed that there is no industry standard for measuring brilliance, although each entity that claims to measure brilliance is able to measure what it defines as brilliance within a range of repeatability. Sterling s diamond brilliance expert, 1 All evidentiary references in this brief are to Plaintiff s Exhibits ( Pl. Ex. ) or Defendant s Exhibits ( Def. Ex. ) admitted into evidence following the December 17-18, 2012, preliminary injunction hearing, or to witness testimony given at that hearing to the best of Sterling s recollection, as Sterling does not yet have a hearing transcript. NY01\HorvA\
2 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 2 of 11. PageID #: 504 Randall Wagner, and Zales diamond brilliance expert, Dr. Jose Sasian, both testified that no governing body exists in the jewelry industry to set a standard for defining or measuring brilliance. Def. Ex. 8 [Wagner deposition transcript] at 26; Sasian testimony, Dec. 18, Dr. Lalit Aggarwal, President of ImaGem, agrees. Pl. Ex at 5 Mr. Wagner also testified that none of his competitors measures brilliance as he defines it. Def. Ex. 8 [Wagner deposition transcript] at 131; Wagner testimony, Dec. 17, Professor Sasian conceded that there is no single standard or methodology widely accepted in the jewelry industry to measure brilliance. Pl. Ex at 20. Dr. Sasian concluded his hearing testimony by stating that neither the GemEx system, despite being the industry s most widely used, nor the ImaGem system met his criteria for being generally accepted across the entire diamond industry. Sasian testimony (redirect exam), Dec. 18, The measurements of brilliance produced by industry participants GemEx, ImaGem/PGGL, and other firms that test and certify diamond brilliance for the industry are incompatible and embody differing definitions of brilliance, so results of tests run at different laboratories are apples and oranges. Not only do their inventors insist that they do not measure the same concept, but there is no way to translate a brilliance score from one of these laboratories (e.g., ImagGem s 0-to-255 scale) to the other (e.g., GemEx s 0-to-100 scale). Zales expert witness, Dr. Sasian, wrote and testified that the measurements of these and all other laboratories in the industry do not necessarily correlate. Pl. Ex at 21. II. ZALES FALSELY ADVERTISES THAT ITS CLAIM OF MOST BRILLIANT DIAMOND IN THE WORLD CAN BE AND HAS BEEN PROVEN The absence of an industry standard or general definition of a term, however, does not mean that a claim centered on that term need not be proven especially when it is deceptively advertised as if it were provable and proven under an industry standard or generally accepted NY01\HorvA\
3 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 3 of 11. PageID #: 505 definition. If a claim is communicated to consumers as provable and indeed as proven, it subjects the advertiser to liability even if the lack of a generally accepted definition of testing method makes proof of the claim problematic. In W.L Gore & Assocs., Inc. v. Totes Inc., 788 F. Supp. 800 (D. Del. 1992), the court held that the defendant s use of the term waterproof in advertising the protective characteristics of its golf suit was false on its face even though there was no industry standard definition of waterproof, where testing demonstrated that the suits were only partially waterproof. 788 F. Supp. at The defendant countered by arguing that there was no accepted test for measuring waterproofness, and that there is not a commonly accepted industry definition of waterproofness from which to judge whether its claims are true or false. Id. at 807 ( from the lack of an industry standard, [defendant] argues that waterproof means different things to different people ). The court, issuing a preliminary injunction, explained that technical industry standards are often irrelevant to consumer expectations and, at the very least, golfing consumers will expect that they will not get wet. The lack of an industry standard makes the claim no less false. Id. at 807. Similarly, in X-IT Prods., LLC v. Walter Kidde Portable Equip., Inc., 155 F. Supp. 2d 577, 628 (E.D. Va. 2001), the court found that the defendant s claim that its emergency escape ladder was flame resistant was false even though no established industry testing standard existed. 155 F. Supp. 2d at 628 (also rejecting argument that flame resistant was puffery). See also J. D Addario & Co. v. Dronge & Rapoport Assocs., No. 95 Civ. 8089, 1997 WL , at *2-3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 7, 1997) (enjoining defendant from advertising that its metal strings for musical instruments are hand-made where there was no industry standard for the designation of hand-made strings). NY01\HorvA\
4 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 4 of 11. PageID #: 506 The ultimate authority on whether an advertising claim has meaning and requires substantiation is consumers. Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act applies with equal force to (1) statements which are literally false and (2) statements which, while literally true or ambiguous, convey a false impression or are misleading in context, as demonstrated by actual consumer confusion. Abbott Labs. v. Mead Johnson & Co., 971 F.2d 6 (7th Cir. 1992) (overturning denial of preliminary injunction of implied claim). Sterling has produced evidence that, regardless of what Zales now asserts it intended its claim to mean, a huge segment of consumers 25 percent believes the claim to mean that the Celebration Fire diamonds are more brilliant than any other diamond in the world. Consumer perception expert Dr. Michael Rappeport found that a substantial number of consumers understand Zales claim to mean that their Celebration Fire diamonds are more brilliant than all other diamonds that are available, not that they are just among the more brilliant diamonds. Pl. Ex. 1-11; Rappeport testimony, Dec. 17, Zales has not provided any consumer perception evidence in support of any alternative interpretation, e.g., that the claim refers to the most brilliant cut diamond in the world or that it is based on the average brilliance of Celebration Fire diamonds. III. ZALES TOOK ON THE BURDEN OF PROVING ITS MOST BRILLIANT DIAMOND IN THE WORLD CLAIM Zales claim that its Celebration Fire diamonds are the most brilliant in the world communicates to consumers that the brilliance of diamonds is a substantive, objectively measurable property of diamonds and that Zales has a basis for claiming each individual Celebration Fire diamond to be more brilliant than any diamond from a competitor. Moreover, Zales claim is accompanied by an assertion that it is proven by independent laboratory testing. Pl. Ex at This converts the most-brilliant claim into what courts call an establishment claim, which alters the burdens of proof among the parties. NY01\HorvA\
5 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 5 of 11. PageID #: 507 A plaintiff s burden in proving literal falsity thus varies depending on the nature of the challenged advertisement. Where the defendant s advertisement claims that its product is superior, plaintiff must affirmatively prove defendant s product equal or inferior. Where, as in the current case, defendant s ad explicitly or implicitly represents that tests or studies prove its product superior, plaintiff satisfies its burden by showing that the tests did not establish the proposition for which they were cited. We have held that a plaintiff can meet this burden by demonstrating that the tests were not sufficiently reliable to permit a conclusion that the product is superior. Castrol, Inc. v. Quaker State Corp., 977 F.2d 57, 63 (2d Cir. 1992) (citations omitted); Procter & Gamble Co. v. Chesebrough-Pond's, Inc., 747 F.2d 114, 119 (2d Cir. 1984); Fed. Express Corp. v. Utd. Parcel Serv., Inc., 765 F. Supp. 2d 1011, 1018 (W.D. Tenn. 2010) (citing cases); Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co., 720 F. Supp. 194, 213 (D.D.C. 1989), aff d in part and rev d in part on other grounds, 913 F.2d 958 (D.C. Cir. 1990); Am. Home Prods. Corp. v. Johnson & Johnson, 654 F. Supp. 568, 590 (S.D.N.Y. 1987); Thompson Med. Co. v. Ciba-Geigy Corp., 643 F. Supp. 1190, (S.D.N.Y. 1986). The issue in the case, thus, because whether Zales has proof that it can show proof that its Celebration Fire diamonds are the most brilliant in the world. Zales counsel promised this proof to the Court in his opening statement. During the hearing, however, no credible evidence to this effect was introduced (see infra Part IV.C). IV. ZALES CANNOT PROVE ITS CLAIM A. To Substantiate Zales Claim, Every One of Its Own and Competing Diamonds Must be Tested It is necessary for Zales to test each individual Celebration Fire diamond to substantiate its claim because of the meaning of its claim and the way its diamonds are marketed. Zales claims that each diamond is the most brilliant available, not that the average brilliance of the Celebration Fire line is the highest (which has not been established either). The consumer who NY01\HorvA\
6 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 6 of 11. PageID #: 508 buys each Celebration Fire diamond gets an individual brilliance score for that stone, not an average score for the Celebration Fire line. E.g. Pl. Ex To substantiate the most-brilliant claim, Zales would have to test every individual Celebration Fire against every competing diamond in the market. At the injunction hearing, Dr. Aggarwal noted with approval that Zales/PGGL grades each and every Celebration Fire for brilliance prior to purchase, stating that no claim can be made for the brilliance of a group of diamonds without testing every one. Aggarwal testimony, Dec. 18, With respect to the Shrenuj/Zales 51 competitor diamond study, Dr. Aggarwal could confirm the accuracy of the brilliance scores only as to the individual Celebration Fire diamonds that were tested by ImaGem. Pl. Ex Diamond brilliance testing expert Randall Wagner agreed. Def. Ex. 8 [Wagner deposition transcript] at 190 ( [W]e measure one diamond and we report on that one diamond. ). Because each diamond is unique, brilliance cannot be generalized there is no such thing as one brilliance for a line of diamonds, a cut of diamonds, or any other group of diamonds and Zales s assertion that its most-brilliant claim applies to every Celebration Fire is false. B. The Evidence Proffered by Zales Falls Far Short Zales only substantiation for its extraordinarily strong and broad supremacy claim turned out to be a study of 51 individual diamonds (or 57 or 46, depending on which evidence Zales cited) designed and conducted by Zales and the Celebration Fire diamond s manufacturer, a company called Shrenuj. Aggarwal testimony, Dec. 18, 2012; Pl. Ex. 35. Despite the absence of any documentation or non-hearsay testimony as to how the study was conducted, and without belaboring the record already before the Court, numerous deficiencies were shown by the evidence admitted at the hearing. NY01\HorvA\
7 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 7 of 11. PageID #: 509 First, the study tested only 2 to 3 diamonds from each competing line in an implicit attempt to compare average ratings (Pl. Ex to 13-8), when what was necessary to substantiate Zales claim was to prove Zales claim as to each Celebration Fire diamond. See supra Part IV.A. Thus, even had it been reliable, the Shrenuj/Zales diamond comparison tested the wrong hypothesis. See Castrol, 977 F.2d at 63 ( If the plaintiff can show that the tests, even if reliable, do not establish the proposition asserted by the defendant, the plaintiff has obviously met its burden [of proof in challenging an establishment claim]. In such a case, tests which may or may not be sufficiently reliable, are simply irrelevant. ). Second, the study s sample of 2 to 3 diamonds from each line are completely inadequate even to estimate an average for each line. This would require an adequate sample size for statistical significance. See Callaway Golf Co. v. Slazenger, 384 F. Supp. 2d 735, 742 (D. Del. 2005) (study supporting advertising claim was inadequate where, inter alia, low statistical significance due to small sample size invalidated the [results of the study] ). Accordingly, Dr. Sasian testified that the study could not support any generalization beyond the 51 individual stones tested, even if it were properly conducted. See Sasian testimony, Dec. 18, 2012; RyMed Techs., Inc. v. ICU Med., Inc., 2012 WL , at *12 (W.D. Tenn. Sept. 28, 2012) (for a study or survey to be sufficiently reliable to support an establishment claim, it must be based on, among other things, an appropriate sample size); Doctor s Assocs., Inc. v. QIP Holder LLC, No. 3:06-cv-1710, 2010 WL , at *17 (D. Conn. Feb. 19, 2010) (finding fault with study proffered in support of claim comparing amount of meat in sandwiches where the advertiser tested sandwiches from only 35 out of approximately 25,000 of competitor s stores and failed to use a geographically diverse sample). NY01\HorvA\
8 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 8 of 11. PageID #: 510 Third, the study tested the Celebration Fire against only a few competing lines, and it is not legitimate under advertising law to test only some of the competitors that one claims superiority against. See Callaway Golf, 384 F. Supp. 2d at 742 (upholding jury verdict that defendant s claim of the Longest Ball on Tour was literally false because, inter alia, study to validate claim tested advertiser s golf ball against less than 50% of the other golf balls on the PGA tour). Fourth, there were irregularities in the sampling, blinding, chain of custody, and data integrity that no witness could defend or explain. See Pl. Exs. 35, 36; Aggarwal testimony, Dec. 18, 2012; Hollander testimony, Dec. 18, Even the conclusion that three Celebration Fire diamonds were brighter than 40-something other diamonds, thus, was not established by the Zales/Shrenuj comparison. CONCLUSION Zales promises consumers that it has proven its diamonds to be the most brilliant in the world. Its counsel promised the same thing at the start of the preliminary injunction hearing. Yet, at the hearing, Zales could not even prove what the concept of brilliance of a diamond means. The testing with which it purported to prove its claims was invalid, and no witness could claim first-hand knowledge of the test, let alone defend its methodology and results. Zales cannot even produce a credible method for proving its extravagant yet powerful claim that each Celebration Fire diamond is more brilliant than any others that consumers can buy. In determining whether to grant a motion for preliminary injunction, a trial court must consider: (1) whether the movant has a strong or substantial likelihood of success on the merits of his underlying claim, (2) whether the movant will be irreparably harmed if the order is not granted, (3) what injury to others will be caused by the granting of the motion, and (4) whether NY01\HorvA\
9 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 9 of 11. PageID #: 511 the public interest will be served by the granting of the motion. See Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons v. Fisher, 70 F.3d 1474, 1480 (6th Cir. 1995). These four considerations are factors to be balanced, not prerequisites that must be met. Id. Accordingly, the degree of likelihood of success required may depend on the strength of the other factors. Id.; see also Utd. Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. Southwest Ohio Reg l Transit Auth., 163 F.3d 341, 347 (6th Cir. 1998). At the conclusion of the December preliminary injunction hearing, all four factors weigh even more strongly for Sterling than they did at the outset of Sterling s motion. Absent injunctive relief, consumers will continue to be deceived by Zales false advertising and Sterling will continue to be harmed. All equities weigh in favor of injunctive relief, and Sterling requests that the Court grant its Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Dated: December 19, 2012 Respectfully submitted, NY01\HorvA\ THOMPSON HINE LLP By: /s/ Robert F. Ware Robert F. Ware THOMPSON HINE LLP 3900 Key Center 127 Public Square Cleveland, OH Rob.Ware@ThompsonHine.com August T. Horvath (admitted pro hac vice) KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 101 Park Ave. New York, NY AHorvath@KelleyDrye.com Daniel S. Blynn (admitted pro hac vice) KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 3050 K Street, N.W., Suite 400 Washington, DC 20007
10 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 10 of 11. PageID #: Attorneys for Plaintiff Sterling Jewelers Inc. NY01\HorvA\
11 Case: 5:12-cv JRA Doc #: 33 Filed: 12/19/12 11 of 11. PageID #: 513 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on December 19, 2012, a copy of the foregoing was filed electronically. Notice of its filing will be sent by operation of the Court's electronic filing system to all parties indicated on the electronic filing receipt. Parties may access its filing through the Court's system. /s/ Robert F. Ware, Esq. Attorney for Plaintiff Sterling Jewelers Inc. NY01\HorvA\
Case 1:04-cv RJS Document 90 Filed 09/13/10 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:04-cv-04607-RJS Document 90 Filed 09/13/10 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TIFFANY (NJ) INC. & TIFFANY AND CO., Plaintiffs, No. 04 Civ. 4607 (RJS) -v- EBAY,
More informationCase 1:14-cv CMA Document 14 Filed 05/02/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9
Case 1:14-cv-01178-CMA Document 14 Filed 05/02/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9 Civil Action No. 14-cv-01178-CMA-MEH IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello
More informationInjunctions, Compulsory Licenses, and Other Prospective Relief What the Future Holds for Litigants
Injunctions, Compulsory Licenses, and Other Prospective Relief What the Future Holds for Litigants AIPLA 2014 Spring Meeting Colin G. Sandercock* * These slides have been prepared for the AIPLA 2014 Spring
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. Missouri Western District Court Case No. 4:14-cv BCW Federal Trade Commission v. BF Labs, Inc. et al.
PlainSite Legal Document Missouri Western District Court Case No. 4:14-cv-00815-BCW Federal Trade Commission v. BF Labs, Inc. et al Document 214 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer
More informationCase: 5:16-cv JRA Doc #: 8 Filed: 11/30/16 1 of 8. PageID #: 111 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 5:16-cv-02889-JRA Doc #: 8 Filed: 11/30/16 1 of 8. PageID #: 111 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL PENNEL, JR.,, vs. Plaintiff/Movant, NATIONAL
More informationCase 1:11-cv BAH Document 16-1 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:11-cv-02074-BAH Document 16-1 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHARIF MOBLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02074 (BAH) DEPARTMENT
More informationCase: 1:11-cv DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1
Case: 1:11-cv-00123-DAP Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/19/11 1 of 9. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MT INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, -vs- ALLURE INSTITUTE,
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 22 Filed: 09/25/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:619
Case: 1:12-cv-07163 Document #: 22 Filed: 09/25/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:619 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION TORY BURCH LLC; RIVER LIGHT V, L.P.,
More information* FEB * FI LED ~ ){ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 2:13-cv-06329-LDW-AKT Document 181 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 7003 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------~--------------------){
More informationCase 1:14-cv VM-RLE Document 50 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:14-cv-00649-VM-RLE Document 50 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, ~I - against - HELLO PRODUCTS, LLC, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 8:11-cv JST-JPR Document Filed 08/16/13 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:5240
Case :-cv-0-jst-jpr Document 0- Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 0 0 AYTAN Y. BELLIN (admitted pro hac vice AYTAN.BELLIN@BELLINLAW.COM BELLIN & ASSOCIATES LLC Miles Avenue White Plains, New York 00 Telephone:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff,
Case :-cv-0-mma-dhb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 SUZANNE ALAEI, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, KRAFT HEINZ FOOD COMPANY, Defendant. Case No.: cv-mma (DHB)
More informationCase 1:13-cv JSR Document 252 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 18
--------------------- ----- Case 1:13-cv-02027-JSR Document 252 Filed 06/30/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------- x COGNEX CORPORATION;
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION KING S HAWAIIAN BAKERY SOUTHEAST, INC., a Georgia corporation; KING S HAWAIIAN HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a California corporation;
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 16-06084-CV-SJ-ODS JET MIDWEST TECHNIK,
More informationHONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. Michelle Urie
#:4308 Filed 01/19/10 Page 1 of 7 Page ID Title: YOKOHAMA RUBBER COMPANY LTD ET AL. v. STAMFORD TYRES INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD ET AL. PRESENT: HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Michelle
More informationCase: 5:14-cv JRA Doc #: 12 Filed: 10/24/14 1 of 7. PageID #: 162
Case: 5:14-cv-02331-JRA Doc #: 12 Filed: 10/24/14 1 of 7. PageID #: 162 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Ellora s Cave Publishing, Inc., et al. Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION VOILÉ MANUFACTURING CORP., Plaintiff, ORDER and MEMORANDUM DECISION vs. LOUIS DANDURAND and BURNT MOUNTAIN DESIGNS, LLC, Case
More informationCase: 3:18-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1
Case: 3:18-cv-00375-TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/16/18 Page: 1 of 4 PAGEID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION BARBARA BECKLEY 1414 Cory Drive Dayton,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM. DALE S. FISCHER, United States District Judge
Case 2:11-cv-01565-DSF -VBK Document 19 Filed 03/03/11 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:690 Case No. CV 11-1565 DSF (VBKx) Date 3/3/11 Title Tacori Enterprises v. Scott Kay, Inc. Present: The Honorable DALE S. FISCHER,
More informationCase 8:15-cv SDM-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Case 8:15-cv-01484-SDM-TGW Document 1 Filed 06/23/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION NATIONWIDE INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida corporation, v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, GSI TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-jst ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY Re: ECF
More informationCase 1:16-cv NLH-KMW Document 22 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 499 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:16-cv-01188-NLH-KMW Document 22 Filed 08/30/17 Page 1 of 11 PageID: 499 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CHRISTINE RIDGEWAY, v. AR RESOURCES, INC., Plaintiff, Civil No. 16-1188
More informationCase: 3:13-cv bbc Document #: 48 Filed: 11/14/13 Page 1 of 9
Case: 3:13-cv-00346-bbc Document #: 48 Filed: 11/14/13 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 03/27/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:84
Case: 1:16-cv-04522 Document #: 21 Filed: 03/27/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:84 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LISA SKINNER, Plaintiff, v. Case No.
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #19-5042 Document #1779028 Filed: 03/24/2019 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT : DAMIEN GUEDUES, et al., : : No. 19-5042 Appellants : : Consolidated
More informationNOTE: CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE TO THIS DOCUMENT
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Sundesa, LLC, a Utah Limited Liability Company, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, Harrison-Daniels, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. NOTE:
More informationCase 2:04-cv TJW Document 424 Filed 03/21/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case :04-cv-000-TJW Document 44 Filed 0/1/007 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION O MICRO INTERNATIONAL LTD., Plaintiff, v. BEYOND INNOVATION
More informationCase 3:15-cv AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17
Case 3:15-cv-00058-AA Document 1 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 17 THOMAS J. ROMANO, OSB No. 053661 E-mail: tromano@khpatent.com SHAWN J. KOLITCH, OSB No. 063980 E-mail: shawn@khpatent.com KIMBERLY N. FISHER,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DISTRICT
Case: 1:09-cv-03039 Document #: 94 Filed: 04/01/11 Page 1 of 12 PageID #:953 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DISTRICT SARA LEE CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationPost-EBay: Permanent Injunctions, Future Damages
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com Post-EBay: Permanent Injunctions, Future Damages
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-02212 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SIOUX STEEL COMPANY A South Dakota Corporation
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CITIZENS ALLIANCE FOR JUDGE PAUL R. MATIA SECURE ELECTIONS, et al. CASE NO. 1:04CV2147 Plaintiffs -vs- O R D E R MICHAEL VU, etc.,
More informationDefendant. SUMMARY ORDER. Plaintiff PPC Broadband, Inc., d/b/a PPC commenced this action
Case 5:11-cv-00761-GLS-DEP Document 228 Filed 05/20/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PPC BROADBAND, INC., d/b/a PPC, v. Plaintiff, 5:11-cv-761 (GLS/DEP) CORNING
More informationCase 3:14-cv K Document 1117 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID 61373
Case 3:14-cv-01849-K Document 1117 Filed 06/27/18 Page 1 of 15 PageID 61373 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ZENIMAX MEDIA INC. and ID SOFTWARE, LLC, Plaintiffs,
More informationCase: 2:16-cv CDP Doc. #: 162 Filed: 12/03/18 Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 8273
Case: 2:16-cv-00039-CDP Doc. #: 162 Filed: 12/03/18 Page: 1 of 5 PageID #: 8273 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION COOPER INDUSTRIES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
Diskriter, Inc. v. Alecto Healthcare Services Ohio Valley LLC et al Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA DISKRITER, INC., a Pennsylvania corporation, Plaintiff,
More information"'031 Patent"), and alleging claims of copyright infringement. (Compl. at 5).^ Plaintiff filed its
Case 1:17-cv-03653-FB-CLP Document 83 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1617 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK POPSOCKETS LLC, -X -against- Plaintiff, QUEST USA CORP. and ISAAC
More informationCase 3:10-cv FLW-DEA Document 48 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1147 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:10-cv-05695-FLW-DEA Document 48 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID: 1147 Edward R. Mackiewicz STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP 1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20036 Telephone: 202-429-6412 Facsimile:
More informationCase: 5:09-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/14/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case: 5:09-cv-01604-SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/14/09 1 of 5. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO HORTON ARCHERY, LLC Plaintiff, Case No. Judge v. AMERICAN HUNTING
More informationCase 4:08-cv RP-RAW Document 34 Filed 01/26/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 4:08-cv-00370-RP-RAW Document 34 Filed 01/26/2009 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION CARL OLSEN, ) ) Civil No. 4:08-cv-00370 (RWP/RAW) Plaintiff, )
More informationCase3:12-cv SI Document11 Filed07/13/12 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case:-cv-0-SI Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 SHUTTERFLY, INC., v. Plaintiff, FOREVERARTS, INC. and HENRY ZHENG, Defendants. / No. CR - SI ORDER
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:16-cv-00815-TSB Doc #: 54 Filed: 03/15/18 Page: 1 of 15 PAGEID #: 1438 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION DELORES REID, on behalf of herself and all others
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RIDDELL, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 16 C 4496 ) KRANOS CORPORATION d/b/a SCHUTT ) SPORTS, ) ) Defendant.
More informationmg Doc Filed 09/13/16 Entered 09/13/16 12:39:53 Main Document Pg 1 of 14
Pg 1 of 14 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 250 West 55 th Street New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212 468-8000 Facsimile: (212 468-7900 Norman S. Rosenbaum Jordan A. Wishnew Counsel for the ResCap Borrower
More informationCase 1:08-cv RMU Document 53 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:08-cv-00380-RMU Document 53 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPALACHIAN VOICES, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 08-0380 (RMU) : v.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SANDISK CORP., v. Plaintiff, OPINION
More informationCase 1:14-cv TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-00857-TSC Document 113 Filed 03/31/16 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION,
More informationCase 1:18-cv CRC Document 12 Filed 11/08/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-02047-CRC Document 12 Filed 11/08/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEVIN FAHEY, On behalf of the general public of the District of Columbia, Plaintiff,
More informationWinning at the Outset: Improving Chances of Success on a Preliminary Injunction Motion. AIPLA Presentation October 2010 Lynda Zadra-Symes
Winning at the Outset: Improving Chances of Success on a Preliminary Injunction Motion AIPLA Presentation October 2010 Lynda Zadra-Symes TRO/Preliminary Injunction Powerful, often case-ending if successful
More informationCase: 4:16-cv DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1
Case: 4:16-cv-01163-DDN Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/15/16 Page: 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION FERMENTED PROJECTS, LLC d/b/a SIDE PROJECT,
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1
Case: 1:17-cv-02403 Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ETi SOLID STATE LIGHTING, INC., ) CASE NO. 1:17-cv-2403
More informationCase: 1:18-cv TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 64 Filed: 08/16/18 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 675
Case: 1:18-cv-00357-TSB-KNM-MHW Doc #: 64 Filed: 08/16/18 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 675 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION OHIO A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, et
More informationCase 2:13-cv RSP Document 143 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 6760
Case 2:13-cv-00791-RSP Document 143 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 6760 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION FREENY, ET AL. v. MURPHY OIL CORPORATION,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. and PHILIPS LIGHTING NORTH AMERICA CORP., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 14-12298-DJC WANGS ALLIANCE CORP., d/b/a WAC LIGHTING
More informationQVC Inc v. Your Vitamins Inc
2011 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-26-2011 QVC Inc v. Your Vitamins Inc Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-4587 Follow this
More informationFed. Circ. Should Clarify Irreparable Harm In Patent Cases
Fed Circ Should Clarify Irreparable Harm In Patent Cases Law360, New York (December 02, 2013, 1:23 PM ET) -- As in other cases, to obtain an injunction in a patent case, the plaintiff is required to demonstrate,
More informationCase 1:08-cv JEB Document 50 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:08-cv-01289-JEB Document 50 Filed 03/11/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DICK ANTHONY HELLER, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 08-01289 (JEB v. DISTRICT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. v. Case No. 2:09-CV-271 OPINION
Pioneer Surgical Technology, Inc. v. Vikingcraft Spine, Inc. et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION PIONEER SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ARMACELL LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:13cv896 ) AEROFLEX USA, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BEATY,
More informationThe Role of Experts in Class Certification in U.S. Antitrust Cases. Stacey Anne Mahoney Bingham McCutchen LLP
The Role of Experts in Class Certification in U.S. Antitrust Cases Stacey Anne Mahoney Bingham McCutchen LLP In the United States, whether you represent Plaintiffs or Defendants in antitrust class actions,
More informationCase 1:18-cv DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2018 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:18-cv-20971-DPG Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/14/2018 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA SUNSCREEN MIST HOLDINGS, LLC, a Michigan limited
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.
Case :-cv-00-ben-ksc Document 0 Filed 0// PageID.0 Page of 0 0 ANDREA NATHAN, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, v. VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationCase: 4:11-cv CDP Doc. #: 51 Filed: 06/06/11 Page: 1 of 11 PageID #: 790
Case: 4:11-cv-00752-CDP Doc. #: 51 Filed: 06/06/11 Page: 1 of 11 PageID #: 790 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION S. VICTOR WHITMILL, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.
More information(Argued: February 19, 2014 Decided: May 13, 2015)
--cv(l) U.S. Polo Ass n, Inc. v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 01 (Argued: February 1, 0 Decided: May 1, 0) Docket Nos.
More informationCase4:09-cv SBA Document42 Document48 Filed12/17/09 Filed02/01/10 Page1 of 7
Case:0-cv-00-SBA Document Document Filed//0 Filed0/0/0 Page of 0 0 BAY AREA LEGAL AID LISA GREIF, State Bar No. NAOMI YOUNG, State Bar No. 00 ROBERT P. CAPISTRANO, State Bar No. 0 Telegraph Avenue Oakland,
More informationCase 2:06-cv JCC Document 51 Filed 12/08/2006 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :0-cv-00-JCC Document Filed /0/0 Page of 0 0 JAMES S. GORDON, Jr., a married individual, d/b/a GORDONWORKS.COM ; OMNI INNOVATIONS, LLC., a Washington limited liability company, v. Plaintiffs, VIRTUMUNDO,
More informationCase 0:09-cv JIC Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2009 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:09-cv-60812-JIC Document 51 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/31/2009 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA STAR-BRITE DISTRIBUTING, INC., Case No. 09-60812-CIV-COHN/SELTZER
More information8:13-cv JFB-TDT Doc # 7 Filed: 08/19/13 Page 1 of 33 - Page ID # 91 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
8:13-cv-00215-JFB-TDT Doc # 7 Filed: 08/19/13 Page 1 of 33 - Page ID # 91 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA ACTIVISION TV, INC., Plaintiff, v. PINNACLE BANCORP, INC., and
More informationCase 1:14-cv CMH-MSN Document 232 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID# 3362
Case 1:14-cv-01749-CMH-MSN Document 232 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 17 PageID# 3362 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION Verisign, Inc., Plaintiff,
More informationmoves this Court for an order for the Disclosure of the Grand Jury Transcripts. This
Case: 1:16-cr-00265-JRA Doc #: 42 Filed: 07/28/17 1 of 8. PageID #: 214 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CASE NO. 1:16-CR-265
More informationPeterson v. Bernardi. District of New Jersey Civil No RMB-JS (July 24, 2009)
Peterson v. Bernardi District of New Jersey Civil No. 07-2723-RMB-JS (July 24, 2009) Opinion And Order Joel Schneider, United States Magistrate Judge This matter is before the Court on plaintiff's Motion
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. v. No Appellee-Intervenor-Defendant.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, KEVIN KNEDLER, CHARLES EARL, AARON HARRIS, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. No. 14-3230 JON HUSTED, in his Official Capacity as
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Case 1:11-cv-00760-BMK Document 47 Filed 08/23/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #: 722 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII STEVEN D. WARD, vs. Plaintiff, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:16-CV-165 EAGLES NEST OUTFITTERS, INC., Plaintiff DYLAN HEWLETT, D/B/A BEAR BUTT, Defendant.
More informationCase 3:01-cv AWT Document 143 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : : : : : :
Case 301-cv-02402-AWT Document 143 Filed 03/26/2008 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PETER D. MAINS and LORI M. MAINS Plaintiffs, v. SEA RAY BOATS, INC. Defendant. CASE
More informationTHE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GEORGIA-PACIFIC CONSUMER PRODUCTS LP, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ALDI INC., Defendant. COMPLAINT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ORDER
Case 2:07-cv-00642-JPS Filed 02/29/2008 Page 1 of 17 Document 96 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN SCHERING-PLOUGH HEALTHCARE PRODUCTS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 07-CV-642 SCHWARZ
More information;~~i~i~s~o~-;~-~~~-~~,-~~~~-;;~~ ~ ji DATE FILE!:):
Case 1:10-cv-02705-SAS Document 70 Filed 12/27/11 DOCUMENT Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. BLBCrRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK,DOC Ir....,. ~ ;~~i~i~s~o~-;~-~~~-~~,-~~~~-;;~~-------~
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, : Case No. 1:12-cv-552 : Plaintiff, : Judge Timothy S. Black : : vs. : : TEAM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et
More informationCase 1:14-cv CMH-MSN Document 234 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID# 3398
Case 1:14-cv-01749-CMH-MSN Document 234 Filed 08/28/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID# 3398 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION Verisign, Inc., Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1
Case 1:18-cv-01866 Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------X AURORA LED TECHNOLOGY,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division 04/20/2018 ELIZABETH SINES et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) Civil Action No. 3:17cv00072 ) v. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DOUGLAS DODSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CORECIVIC, et al., Defendants. NO. 3:17-cv-00048 JUDGE CAMPBELL MAGISTRATE
More informationJ S - 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE NO. CV JST (FMOx) GLOBAL DÉCOR, INC. and THOMAS H. WOLF.
Case :-cv-00-jls-fmo Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 0 GLOBAL DÉCOR, INC. and THOMAS H. WOLF vs. Plaintiffs, THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL
More informationCase3:15-cv DMR Document1 Filed09/16/15 Page1 of 11
Case:-cv-0-DMR Document Filed0// Page of MICHAEL G. RHODES () (rhodesmg@cooley.com) California Street, th Floor San Francisco, CA Telephone: Facsimile: BRENDAN J. HUGHES (pro hac vice to be filed) (bhughes@cooley.com)
More informationCase: 2:12-cv PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858
Case: 2:12-cv-00636-PCE-NMK Doc #: 89 Filed: 06/11/14 Page: 1 of 8 PAGEID #: 1858 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION OBAMA FOR AMERICA, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationCase: 4:15-cv JAR Doc. #: 21 Filed: 08/05/16 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 302
Case: 4:15-cv-01361-JAR Doc. #: 21 Filed: 08/05/16 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 302 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TIMOTHY H. JONES, Plaintiff, v. No. 4:15-cv-01361-JAR
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Page 1 of 7 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 02-1361 DONALD W. NUTTING, an individual doing business as Foothills Distributing Co., v. RAM SOUTHWEST, INC., doing business as Violets,
More informationCase 3:08-cv DAK Document 56 Filed 09/23/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Case 3:08-cv-01434-DAK Document 56 Filed 09/23/09 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, -vs- ANDREA L. BRENT, Plaintiff,
More informationPlainSite. Legal Document. Missouri Eastern District Court Case No. 4:09-cv Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v.
PlainSite Legal Document Missouri Eastern District Court Case No. 4:09-cv-01252 Jo Ann Howard and Associates, P.C. et al v. Cassity et al Document 2163 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think
More informationCase: 2:13-cv MHW-TPK Doc #: 91 Filed: 03/25/14 Page: 1 of 26 PAGEID #: 2237
Case 213-cv-00953-MHW-TPK Doc # 91 Filed 03/25/14 Page 1 of 26 PAGEID # 2237 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al, -vs- Plaintiffs, JON
More informationPlaintiff, Defendants. argument on the motions, the Court DENIES both motions. Background
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 1 BADEN SPORTS, INC. v. Plaintiff, KABUSHIKI KAISHA MOLTEN (DBA MOLTEN CORPORATION) and MOLTEN U.S.A., INC., Defendants. No. C0-0MJP
More informationCase 1:15-mc JGK Document 26 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 10
Case 1:15-mc-00056-JGK Document 26 Filed 05/11/15 Page 1 of 10 United States District Court Southern District of New York SUSANNE STONE MARSHALL, ET AL., Petitioners, -against- BERNARD L. MADOFF, ET AL.,
More informationCase 1:07-cv PLF Document 212 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:07-cv-01144-PLF Document 212 Filed 03/31/17 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel., AARON J. WESTRICK, Ph.D., Civil Action No. 04-0280
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS JOHN DOE, ) Plaintiff ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:16cv-30184-MAP v. ) ) WILLIAMS COLLEGE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE EX
More informationCase 3:16-cv JCH Document 20 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:16-cv-01944-JCH Document 20 Filed 04/13/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT DOCTOR S ASSOCIATES INC., : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION NO. : 3:16-CV-1944 (JCH) v. : :
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
12-761 din THE Supreme Court of the United States POM WONDERFUL LLC, v. Petitioner, THE COCA-COLA COMPANY, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH
More informationCase 1:10-cv AKH Document 68 Filed 03/25/11 Page 1 of 12. Plaintiff, Defendant.
Case 1:10-cv-03864-AKH Document 68 Filed 03/25/11 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARY K. JONES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, ECF
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:18-cv-09902-DSF-AGR Document 23 Filed 04/08/19 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:299 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JAMES TODD SMITH, Plaintiff, v. GUERILLA UNION, INC., et al.,
More information