BENCH TRIAL HANDBOOK
|
|
- Benedict Thompson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 BENCH TRIAL HANDBOOK
2 GETTING STARTED The hardest part of preparing any case for trial is determining where to begin. The following steps are an outline for preparing your case. The outline is merely a guideline. You may have different techniques or organization skills you may wish to use separately or in conjunction with the following steps. First Things First: 1. Find a partner someone you can meet with regularly; 2. Decide which side of the case you want to represent a. Criminal case = prosecution or defense b. Civil case = plaintiff or defense Developing your Case: 1. Read the case and instructions one time through. 2. Separate the instructions and jury instructions 3. On a piece of paper draw three columns. 4. In the first column, identify the cause of action or crime, and write the elements which make up the cause of action or crime on the lines beneath it. 5. In the second column list all of the facts that establish the elements of the cause of action or crime. 6. In the third column list all of the facts that negate the elements of the cause of action or crime. 7. Determine which facts repeatedly support your position. 8. Develop theme and theory of the case. Preparing for Trial: 1. Who is going to give the opening statement? 2. Who is going to give the closing argument? 3. Divide the task of direct examinations of witnesses equally. 4. Divide the task of cross examinations of witnesses equally. 5. Find your witnesses. Page 1
3 WITNESSES You will supply the witnesses for your case. A witness may testify only to facts stated in or reasonably inferred from his/her witness statement or the fact pattern (if he/she reasonably would have knowledge of those facts). If you need clarification, or are unsure whether your inference is reasonable or not, speak with your attorney coach, and he/she will help you to fill in any gaps in the official materials. The fact pattern is a set of indisputable facts from which witnesses and attorneys may draw reasonable inferences. If a witness is asked a question calling for an answer which cannot reasonably be inferred from the materials provided, they must reply, I don t know or I can t remember. It is up to the attorney to make the appropriate objections when witnesses are asked to testify about something which is not generally known or cannot be reasonably inferred from the fact pattern or a witness statement. A witness can be impeached if he/she contradicts the material contained in his/her witness statement. THEME/THEORY You and your partner should first develop a theme and theory for your case this will bring your entire case together in a cohesive way, even though each of you are responsible for conducting separate portions of the trial. The theme and theory is how you grab the judge s attention. A theme is important in any case because it gives the judge a sense of direction regarding how you will present your case. When your case revolves around a theme, the judge will remember testimony, case development, and your position. The theme is a short phrase that you use to grab the judge s attention. In composing a theme you should provide your most telling fact with broad encompassing statement of the law. For example in a personal injury and medical malpractice case, a plaintiff may use the theme of Failure to take the time. Notice that the theme incorporates a standard of care, time, and the breach of that standard. The theme is incorporating the elements that must be proven in order for the plaintiff to prevail. For an example in a criminal case, think back to the O.J. Simpson case, and the impossible to forget theme of, If the glove doesn t fit, you must acquit. The theory is how you prove your case, and expands upon your theme. The theory of the case is how you expect to prove your position. How did the defendant s acts demonstrate a failure to take the time? Explain your theory of the case immediately after you state your theme. While the theme is a single catchphrase, explaining your theory of the case will take a few sentences or so, if not more. Page 2
4 OPENING STATEMENT Purposes of Opening Statement An opening statement is the first chance the attorney has to tell the judge about the case and, more importantly, why the judge should find in your favor. Specific purposes of the opening statement are to: 1. Set forth your theme and theory of the case; 2. Provide the judge with a roadmap of how you expect your case to proceed/develop in trial; 3. Inform the judge, in a general way, of the nature of the case and any defense(s); 4. Advise the judge of the facts relied on by the parties to make up the right of action, crime, or defense; 5. Define the nature of the questions and issues involved; and 6. Explain what you expect the outcome of the case to be at the conclusion of your trial. Structure of Opening Statement The structure of the opening statement can vary based on the facts of each case. An opening statement is a story. The opening statement is when you introduce your theme and the characters involved in the case. You give a short summary of the evidence and briefly explain the applicable law at issue in the case. At the end of your opening statement you need to tell the judge what you want him/her to do (i.e. find the defendant guilty/not guilty of the crime charged; hold the defendant liable/do not hold the defendant liable for the injuries caused, etc.). An opening statement is not the time for argument. Argument is reserved for the Closing Argument which takes place at the end of the trial. One basic rule to keep in mind is if a witness is not going to take the stand and say it, then it is more than likely argument. An opening statement is simply a roadmap of your case, and an outline of what you expect to happen during the course of the trial. Page 3
5 Helpful phrasing for an opening statement includes: The evidence will indicate that The facts will show Witness (full name) will be called to tell The defendant will testify that You will hear that The most important thing to remember in your opening is that you know the facts better than the judge ever will. It is your job to take all of the facts and the law and present it in a simple story for the judge to understand. Don t get bogged down in the facts. You do not want to articulate every single fact of your case in excruciating detail during your opening statement. Keep things simple, but focused. Anticipate Weaknesses of Your Case If you know that there is evidence which is damaging to your case, you should volunteer this evidence as soon as possible -- opening statements are your first opportunity to present information to the judge. The advantage of introducing damaging evidence in an opening statement is that you have a chance to explain the weakness or unfavorable evidence, and hopefully present it in a more favorable light. Think damage control. Physical Presence in the Courtroom: There is no one court room style and where you stand during your opening statement will depend on the judge s preference and you. However, to be sure, ask permission to move into the well (the center of the courtroom) before doing so, or clear this matter up with the judge before your trial begins. Generally, when the trier of fact is a judge (no jury) opening statements are presented from counsel table or the podium. ` Page 4
6 DIRECT-EXAMINATION Direct examination is when an attorney asks a witness they called to the witness stand a series of questions. Direct examination is conducted from behind counsel table, or from the podium. When it is time for you to call your witness to the witness stand, ask the judge the following: Your honor, I would like to call (name of witness) to the stand. The witness will then be sworn in before testifying. After the witness swears to tell the truth, you may wish to ask some basic introductory questions to make the witness feel comfortable. Appropriate areas of inquiry include: The witness s name. Length of residence or present employment, if this information helps to establish the witness s credibility. Further questions about professional qualifications are necessary if you wish to qualify the witness as an expert. A direct examination is the judge s opportunity to relive reality from your side s perspective. The witnesses should tell/show what happened so that the event is re-created for the judge s benefit. This must be done while keeping in mind the elements of the crimes, claims, or defenses, and the ever-present requirements of simplicity and efficiency. The purpose of a direct examination is to ask questions that develop a subject in a logical sequence. It is important to listen to both the questions and the answers, so that the next question continues developing the subject in a logical sequence. Direct examination is your time to introduce your witnesses and have them tell the story through a series of questions and answers. On direct examination, counsel should ask open-ended questions. One way to insure that the questions are open-ended is to ask questions that begin with Who, Why, What, Where, and When. This allows the witness to explain the facts and information. Examples of Proper Open-Ended Questions on Direct-Examinations: 1. Why did you go to that address Officer Smith? 2. What were you planning on doing when you arrived on scene? 3. Who did you speak to at the house? 4. Why did you speak to that person? Conclude your direct examination with the following statement: Thank you, Mr./Ms. (name of witness). That will be all, your honor. However, note that the witness needs to remain on the stand for cross-examination. Page 5
7 CROSS-EXAMINATION Cross examination is where you get to question the other side s witness. Cross examination takes place immediately after direct examination, and is conducted from behind counsel table, or from the podium. There are two basic purposes of crossexaminations: 1. Eliciting Favorable Testimony. This involves getting their witness to agree with those facts that support your case in chief and are consistent with your theory of the case. 2. Conducting a Destructive Cross. This involves asking the kinds of questions that will discredit their witness or his/her testimony so that the judge will minimize or even disregard what they had to say. This can be done by asking questions that elicit internal inconsistencies, lack of certainty, lack of opportunity to observe, an inherent implausibility, inconsistency with the testimony of another more credible witness. Understanding these two basic, broad purposes, and their order of use, is essential to conducting effective cross-examinations. While you may utilize only one of the approaches with some witnesses, you should always consider eliciting favorable testimony from the witness before you attempt a destructive cross-examination. Cross-examination should be structured to begin with your second strongest position, and end with your strongest. Your cross-examination should start out crisp, and clean. You need to know the questions you are going to ask, ask them without notes, and develop a tone that shows you are in control of the examination. Always remember that the most effective crosses have one fact per question. The Ten Commandments of Cross Examination: 1. Be brief; ask short questions 2. Use simple language 3. Ask only leading questions 4. Know the answer before you ask the question 5. Listen to the answer 6. Don t quarrel with the witness 7. Don t repeat the direct examination 8. Never allow the witness to explain anything 9. Avoid the one question to many; don t gild the lily 10. Save the ultimate point for summation Page 6
8 As noted above, ask only leading questions on cross examination. If you dare ask open-ended questions on cross examination you are giving their witness an opportunity to further explain and sing the praises of their case, potentially to the demise of your own case. What are leading questions? Leading questions are questions that contain the answer within the question. It is a simple statement of fact, and you are asking the witness to either agree or disagree with that statement of fact. Examples of Proper Leading Questions on Cross-Examinations: 1. The car was red, wasn t it? 2. You didn t like her, did you? 3. You picked Mr. Johnson out of the lineup, correct? 4. Isn t it true that you never went to the house that night? 5. You wear glasses, don t you Mr. Bond? Cross-examination should conclude with the following statement: Thank you, Mr./Ms. (name of witness). That will be all, your honor. RE-DIRECT EXAMINATION Following cross-examination, the attorney who called the witness may conduct re-direct examination. Attorneys conduct re-direct examination to clarify new (unexpected) issues or facts brought out in the immediately preceding cross-examination only. Re-direct examination will only be allowed at the discretion of the judge, and if time permits. Page 7
9 EXHIBITS Exhibits can be anything, other than testimony, that can be perceived by the senses and be presented in the courtroom. Exhibits have a tremendous impact and should be used to help tell the story to the judge. For example, consider using charts, diagrams, photographs, and physical objects such as clothing (or other objects you have on hand) to assist you in creating a more visual case. While visual effects are helpful, keep in mind that they must at all times be relevant to the case, and actually have some bearing on the fact pattern. You cannot introduce irrelevant exhibits into evidence at trial. If you would like to use an exhibit, confirm that it is indeed relevant to the case with your attorneycoach. When using exhibits, you must show the opposing team before trial what exhibits you plan to use during the actual trial. Prior to moving an exhibit into evidence, you must have an exhibit marked as evidence. This typically entails the judge asking you to label the exhibit with a number or letter. The plaintiff/prosecution uses numbers (i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4), and the defense uses letters (A, B, C, D, etc.). To introduce an exhibit into evidence, you must go through the following procedure: 1. Referring court and counsel to what has previously been marked for identification as s Exhibit. 2. May I approach the witness? (Judge will say yes) 3. Mr. Witness, I am showing you what has been marked for identification as s Exhibit. Do you recognize it? (Witness should answer yes). 4. What is it? (Witness will say that what it is photo/diagram/chart/clothing, etc.) 5. How are you familiar with this Exhibit? (Witness will explain that that they took the photo, drew the diagram, saw the clothing, etc.) 6. Does this photo fairly and accurately show how the victim looked when you contacted her on date/time? (Witness answers yes). See a. and b. below for other options. a. Does this diagram fairly and accurately depict the intersection of First St. and Main Street on date/time? (Witness answers yes) b. Does this dress appear to be in substantially the same condition as it was on date/time? (Witness answers yes) 7. At this time the move to have what has been marked as s Exhibit for identification moved into evidence. (The judge will confirm that it is admitted into evidence) You do not have to memorize these seven steps! The judges know that you are students, and most are doing this for the very first time. Either use this page as a guide during your questioning of the witness, or re-write the questions in your list/script of questions. Page 8
10 Show the Judge the Exhibit You went to the effort of introducing something into evidence. Don t forget to show it to the judge. After all, they are the ones rendering the verdict in your case it is the judge you are trying to persuade to decide the case in your favor. After the Exhibit has been Admitted: Once an exhibit is admitted into evidence it should always be kept with the clerk, and retrieved from the clerk when it is needed for later testimony or argument. While there is no actual clerk in the courtroom, there will be a clerk s table. Always identify where that is, and place your exhibits on that table. Page 9
11 IMPEACHMENT While testifying, a witness may make a statement that is inconsistent with something he/she said in their witness statement. The attorney questioning the witness may want to point out the inconsistency. This is called impeaching a witness. Generally, you do not want to have to impeach your own witness because it will reflect poorly on his/her credibility. This is why it is a good idea to make sure your witnesses are well prepared to testify, and have their own copy of their witness statement to review before testifying. Typically, you end up impeaching witnesses on cross examination of your opponent s witness. Here are the steps you need to go through in order to successfully impeach a witness: 1. The witness testifies inconsistently with what they said in their witness statement. 2. Confirm the witness testimony It is your testimony that? 3. Ask the witness, a. You remember giving a statement to Officer (name) on (date), don t you? i. You understand that it is important to tell the police the truth because they are there to help you, right? You teach your children (or, you were taught as a child) to always tell the police the truth, don t you? ii. And you did tell Officer (name) the truth, didn t you? b. You remember providing a witness statement in this case don t you? i. When you gave that statement, you signed it under penalty of perjury, right? ii. And you told the truth in that witness statement, didn t you? 4. Ask the judge if you can approach the witness 5. Refer court and counsel to the page/line in the witness statement. 6. Mr. Witness, I m showing you a copy of your witness statement. Please read this silently to yourself (identify page/line for witness), while I read your prior statement aloud. 7. Read the portion of the statement that contains the prior inconsistent statement. 8. Confirm with the witness, I read that correctly, didn t I? 9. Remove the transcript from the witness 10. Do NOT re-ask the question. Move on with the rest of your questions. You do not have to memorize these ten steps! The judges know that you are students, and most are doing this for the very first time. If this issue comes up in your trial, use this page as a guide during your questioning of the witness. Page 10
12 REFRESHING THE MEMORY OF A WITNESS If your witness is not prepared, they may forget some of the facts of the case. Sometimes, your witness won t remember the answer to a question, or cannot recall one of the facts of the case. It is important to note that anything (ANYTHING) can be used to refresh a witness memory. Also, whatever it is that you are using to refresh the witness memory does not have to be marked as an exhibit. Obviously, the best way to avoid this situation is to make sure your witness is well versed in the facts of this case. But, if such an occasion arises during the course of the trial (i.e. your witness responds to your question with I don t know or, I don t remember ), the following steps should be used to refresh your witness memory: 1. Ask the witness, Would seeing a copy your witness statement refresh your memory? See a. and b. below for other methods of asking this question. a. Would seeing a copy of the diagram refresh your memory? b. Would seeing the knife again refresh your memory as to how long the blade was? 2. Ask to approach the witness & refer court and counsel to the witness statement (page/line) or other item (like the knife or photo, which is probably already an exhibit just reference it by Exhibit #) 3. Mr. Witness, I am showing you a copy of your witness statement in this case. (Or, I am showing you the knife/photo/etc. ). Please read it silently to yourself (or look it over), and look up when you are finished. 4. When witness looks up, ask Has you memory been refreshed? (Witness should answer yes). 5. May the record reflect that I have removed the statement/knife/photo from the witness? (Judge will say yes) 6. Re-ask your first question that triggered the I don t remember response in the first place. Having to refresh a witness memory is time consuming. Try to avoid this situation by working with your witnesses in advance to ensure that they are well prepared to testify. Page 11
13 OBJECTIONS Objections can be one of the most difficult trial techniques for an attorney to learn. Objections can be made during any phase of the trial. When to make objections, however, involves more than simply having proper situations in which to make them. It also involves an almost instantaneous decision on whether to make the objection at all. It is important to remember that sometimes it is a strategic move not to object to a question. For example, if the question does not really hurt you, you may want to hold off and save objections if you anticipate that there will be more damaging testimony that may become heated later on. Second, sometimes, though a question may be objectionable, it may actually help you, or it may open the door to something you would like to explore on cross examination. There are dozens of objections and it takes years to become educated on when and how to raise them all. For the purposes of this program, we will focus only on the most common objections. How to Make an Objection: 1. Say Objection in a loud and clear voice; 2. Wait for the judge to respond a. Sustained vs. Overruled b. Judge may ask your opponent to respond to your objection c. The judge may then ask you for clarification, or for further comments based upon your opponent s response. 3. If the Judge sustains your objection, ask that the question and/or answer be stricken from the record. How to Respond When You are Objected to: 1. Listen, think about, and understand the objection your opponent is making be prepared to come up with a verbal response. 2. Wait for the judge to respond a. Judge may sustained or overrule objection immediately b. Judge may invite you to comment on your opponent s objection if you have no idea how to respond, just say, submitted. c. Ask to be heard if you do not agree with the Judge s ruling 3. Move on a. If the judge overrules your opponent s objection, ask your question again b. If the judge sustains your opponent s objection, you must move on. You are not allowed to repeat the question, nor is the witness allowed to answer it. Page 12
14 The most important thing to remember is that somebody will always lose an objection. Do not feel defeated, and do not let this discourage you from making further objections. Also, do not give up on a particular line of questioning simply because you are being objected to. As you prepare your direct and cross examinations you should keep in mind testimony which you believe may elicit an objection. If you are aware of what may be objectionable, you can fashion your questions to avoid the objection. List of Common Objections: 1. Relevance: a. The evidence is not directly material to an issue in the case. b. Example: in a criminal case, something is not relevant if it does not tend to prove/disprove the defendant s guilt. 2. Lack of Personal Knowledge: a. The witness lacks the ability to answer the question because they do not have direct knowledge of the answer. b. Example: asking Witness A about a fact contained in Witness B s statement, and that same fact is nowhere to be found in Witness A s statement. 3. Narrative: a. The question will allow the witness to ramble on and on about extraneous facts/information b. Example: asking a witness, What did you do on January 1 st? This type of question is not focused enough, and the answer could encompass an entire day s worth of irrelevant events. 4. Hearsay: a. The question/answer elicits the statements of someone else (not the witness), spoken out of court, and offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. b. Example: In the trial of Defendant X running a red light, witness John Doe testifies that Jane Smith told him that she saw Defendant run the red light. Jane Smith s statement about seeing the defendant run the red light is hearsay. c. Caveat: there are many exceptions to the hearsay rule. The most important, and easiest to remember, is that the prosecution can always introduce evidence of the defendant s statements in a criminal trial over a hearsay objection. Your attorney-coach will help you with other potential exceptions to the hearsay rule. 5. Leading: a. The form of the question suggests the answer. b. For examples, refer back to the section dealing with cross examination. Page 13
15 6. Asked and Answered: a. The question has already been asked by the attorney, and answered by the witness. Asking the same question multiple times will elicit this objection. 7. Beyond Scope: a. Going beyond the subject matter covered on direct or cross examination. b. Example: On direct examination, the scope of questions dealt with what someone did on January 1 st. On cross examination, questions about something that occurred on January 5 th would be beyond the scope of direct examination. 8. Assumes Facts Not in Evidence: a. A fact not testified to previously is contained in the form of the question. b. Example: Upon questioning, Goldilocks testifies that she went into the three bears house, and took a nap in baby bear s bed. The attorney then asked, What was it that you didn t like about papa bear s bed when you tried it out? This last question assumes a fact not yet in evidence specifically, that Goldilocks tried out papa bear s bed first. 9. Vague: a. The question is not specific or focused enough b. Example: asking a witness what they did yesterday. 10. Speculation: a. The question requires the witness who lacks personal knowledge to guess about the answer. b. Example: asking Witness A what Witness B was thinking. 11. Compound: a. More than one question contained in the question posed by an attorney b. Example: Do you like peas and carrots? 12. Argumentative: a. Counsel summarizes facts, draws own conclusion, and demands that the witness agree. b. Counsel s question is really argument in the guise of a question. c. Excessive quibbling with the witness by the attorney. 13. Cumulative: a. Repeated presentation of the same evidence by exhibits or witnesses to the point where it is unfair and wastes time. b. Example: Calling six witnesses to testify to the same thing 14. Non-responsive: a. Witness won t answer, or the answer they do give does not answer the question posed. b. Example: Attorney asks witness what color the car was that ran the stop sign, and the witness testifies that a woman was driving the car. Page 14
16 CLOSING ARGUMENT The closing argument is argument, not a mere recitation of the facts of your case. This is where you, the attorney, using common sense and logic, draw reasonable inferences from the facts of the case. The inferences you draw should be designed to support your view of the law. Your closing argument takes your theme, theory, along with the supporting evidence and the law, and molds them into a persuasive argument that you hope convinces the judge to rule in your favor. Physical Presence in the Courtroom: Where you stand during your closing argument will depend on the judge s preference and you. However, to be sure, ask permission to move into the well (the center of the courtroom) before doing so, or clear this matter up with the judge before your trial begins. Generally, when the trier of fact is a judge (no jury) closing arguments are presented from counsel table or the podium. Structure of a closing argument Generally, a closing argument follow this outline: 1. Theme & theory 2. Facts 3. Law 4. Burden of proof A. Criminal case = beyond a reasonable doubt B. Civil case = by a preponderance of the evidence 5. Application of law to the facts of your case 6. Call for the verdict (guilty/not guilty or liable/not liable) Theme/Theory Use your theme and theory as roadmaps. This is the time to demonstrate your theory through a logical incorporation of the evidence, utilizing both contested and uncontested facts that were admitted during the trial. Factual Summation As you further develop your theory in closing argument, recount witness testimony that was favorable. Do not state verbatim what the witness said; instead when arguing your theory support it with witness testimony. Page 15
17 If there was a witness that was damaging to you, consider going into the credibility of that witness, or establish inconsistencies of that witness and point out how the facts are in fact in your favor. Burden of Proof & Application of Law to the Facts At the conclusion of your case, the judge has to make a decision (a.k.a. verdict). Be clear in what the burden of proof is for your case. If you are the plaintiff or prosecution, you must prove your case by preponderance of the evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt. If you are the defense, you must argue that the plaintiff/prosecution has not met their burden of proof. To argue that you have met your burden of proof, articulate which facts of your case prove each element of the charged offense. To argue that the burden of proof has not been met, point out the lack of evidence and deficiency of the plaintiff/prosecution case with respect to each element of the charged offense. Effective aids for this process are charts and diagrams. Calling for the Verdict What You Want the Judge to Do At the conclusion of your argument you must tell the judge what to do. This means you ask them to find your client s favor. For example, tell the judge you want him/her to find the defendant guilty/not guilty, or liable/not liable. This is the most common element missing from any trial don t forget it. Page 16
18 DIAGRAM OF TYPICAL COURTROOM Page 17
Argumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge
Argumentative Questions (Badgering) Assuming Facts Not in Evidence (Extrapolation) Irrelevant Evidence Hearsay Opinion Lack of Personal Knowledge Asked and Answered Outside the Scope of Cross Examination
More informationJUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Stock Opening Instructions Introduction and General Instructions... 1 Summary of the Case... 2 Role of Judge, Jury and Lawyers...
More informationA Guide to Your First Mock Trial
A Guide to Your First Mock Trial Opening Statement (Begin with some kind of hook or story to make the jury interested in your statement.) Good morning ladies and gentlemen of the jury. My name is and I
More informationMock Trial. Role Description and Duties: Bailiff/Clerk
Mock Trial Role Description and Duties: Bailiff/Clerk Note: The court clerk and bailiff aid the judge in conduction of the trial. These positions are very important to the team. When evaluating the team
More informationHINTS FOR PREPARING FOR THE MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION
2012 - HINTS FOR PREPARING FOR THE MOCK TRIAL COMPETITION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Trial Overview 1 A. Governing Rules 1 B. Trial Basics 1 II. Opening Statements 2 A. Structure And Outline To Organize Your
More informationINTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS
INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS What are exhibits? Exhibits are types of evidence that are tangible. There are basically four types of exhibits. First, there is real evidence (the gun involved
More informationV.-E. DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS
V.-E. DEPOSITION INSTRUCTIONS (Note: Some of the advice provided below is applicable primarily in personal injury cases. Practitioners will wish to tailor these instructions to suit particular cases.)
More informationTHE ANSWER BOOK FOR JURY SERVICE
THE ANSWER BOOK FOR JURY SERVICE Message from the Chief Justice You have been requested to serve on a jury. Service on a jury is one of the most important responsibilities that you will exercise as a citizen
More informationDIRECT, CROSS, REDIRECT& RECROSS
There are 4 types of questioning / examination in a trial: DIRECT, CROSS, REDIRECT& RECROSS They are conducted in the following order. DIRECT: CROSS: *questioning of your OWN witness for the first time
More informationImpeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice
Impeachment by omission Impeachment for inconsistent statement The Evidence Dance Opening Statement Tip Twice Closing Argument The Love Boat Story: A Vicious Tale Top Six Objections Evidence Review Housekeeping
More informationWho s who in a Criminal Trial
Mock Criminal Trial Scenario Who s who in a Criminal Trial ACCUSED The accused is the person who is alleged to have committed the criminal offence, and who has been charged with committing it. Before being
More informationSIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE
SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...3 TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Title 1, Chapter 38...3 TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I: General Provisions...4 Article IV: Relevancy
More informationSTATE OF CONNECTICUT. Courtroom Testimony & Demeanor. Clinical Coordinator Training
STATE OF CONNECTICUT Court Support Services Division Division of Criminal Justice Courtroom Testimony & Demeanor Clinical Coordinator Training Prepared by: Francis J. Carino, Supervisory Assistant State
More informationSTIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No State of New Maine
STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No. 09-3031 State of New Maine Instruction Number Instruction Description 1. Preliminary Instructions 2. Functions of
More informationExamination of witnesses
Examination of witnesses Rules and procedures in the courtroom for eliciting (getting information) from witnesses Most evidence in our legal system is verbal. A person conveying their views and beliefs,
More informationPREPARING FOR AND TAKING DEPOSITIONS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE
PREPARING FOR AND TAKING DEPOSITIONS IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE Jeffrey K. Anderson, Esq. Anderson, Moschetti & Taffany, PLLC 26 Century Hill Drive, Suite 206 Latham, New York 12110 anderson@amtinjurylaw.com
More informationINTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE & INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT HANDBOOK
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE & INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT HANDBOOK [Attributed to IASAS and ISB THAIMUN will adopt the ICJ & ICC handbook compiled by ISB for the IASAS conference in November 2017 and
More informationPRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100
PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS CACI No. 100 You have now been sworn as jurors in this case. I want to impress on you the seriousness and importance of serving on a jury. Trial by jury is a fundamental right in
More informationMock Trial Instruction Packet
Mock Trial Instruction Packet C:\Documents and Settings\AStrobl\My Documents\3 - Living Law (LL)\3 - Criminal Law\2 - Criminal Law II - Mock Trial\1 - Trial Packet\1 - Mock Trial Instruction Packet.doc
More informationOBJECTION YOUR HONOUR!
OBJECTION YOUR HONOUR! ROBERT S. HARRISON JENNIFER McALEER FASKEN MARTINEAU DuMOULIN LLP THE BASICS What is an Objection? By definition an objection is an interruption. It should only be made when it is
More informationGENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to
GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must follow the law as I state it
More informationWRITING FOR TRIALS 1
WRITING FOR TRIALS 1 2017 The Writing Center at GULC. All Rights Reserved. I. Introduction Whether you are taking a trial practice class, competing in a mock trial tournament, representing a clinic client,
More informationMIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE
MIDDLE SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Revised August 2015 Rules Unique to Middle School Mock Trial I. Invention of Facts and Extrapolation The object of these rules is to prevent a team
More informationObjections DEFINITIONS
Objections Objections are an attorney s way of formally notifying a judge that opposing counsel is not following the rules of evidence and requesting the judge to make a ruling on the issue. Objections
More informationCase 1:08-cv LPS Document 601 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 57 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 1:08-cv-00862-LPS Document 601 Filed 07/26/10 Page 1 of 57 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LEADER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant,
More informationA Guide to Giving Evidence in Court
Preparation A Guide to Giving Evidence in Court It doesn't matter whether you have a lot of experience or a little - you may find that the witness box is a lonely place if you are not prepared for it.
More information1. If several suspected offenders are involved in the same criminal. accusation or indictment, no defense attorney shall be allowed to represent
Form TJ-110, INSTRUCTION FOR CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS (Sections 6, 7, and 16, Rule 3, of the JSR) Recommendation: 1. If several suspected offenders are involved in the same criminal accusation or
More informationDefense: Your goal is to convince as many members of the jury as possible that Abigail Williams is innocent of murder. 4 Attorneys
English 10 Crucible Mock Trial The People vs. Abigail Williams Assignment: You will be conducting a mock trial in which the innocence or guilt of Abigail Williams will be determined. For our purposes,
More information[The following paragraph should be given when the court gives the final instructions after the closing arguments:
defendant is charged, it is your duty to find him/her guilty of that offense. On the other hand, if you find that the government has failed to prove any element of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt,
More informationProsecutor Trial Preparation: Preparing the Victim of Human Trafficking to Testify
This guide is a gift of the United States Government PRACTICE GUIDE Prosecutor Trial Preparation: Preparing the Victim of Human Trafficking to Testify AT A GLANCE Intended Audience: Prosecutors working
More informationCase 1:17-cr KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS
Case 1:17-cr-00350-KBF Document 819 Filed 06/11/18 Page ORDERED. 1 of 8 Post to docket. GUIDELINES REGARDING APPROPRIATE USE OF 302 FORMS IN CRIMINAL TRIALS 6/11/18 Hon. Katherine B. Forrest I. INTRODUCTION
More information3:05-cv MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16
3:05-cv-02858-MBS Date Filed 05/08/13 Entry Number 810 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION United States of America, ex rel. ) Michael
More informationINSTRUCTIONS AFTER JURY IS SWORN
Revised 10/15/12 INSTRUCTIONS AFTER JURY IS SWORN Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, you have been selected as the jury in this case. As you know this is a criminal case, and to assist you in better understanding
More informationCalifornia Mock Trial Program Judge/Attorney Handbook
California Mock Trial Program 2018-2019 Judge/Attorney Handbook Official Materials for the California Mock Trial Competition A Program of Constitutional Rights Foundation Co-Sponsored by: American Board
More informationThe Criminal Court System. Law 521 Chapter Seven
The Criminal Court System Law 521 Chapter Seven The Feds make criminal law and procedure. Criminal Court Structure Provinces responsible for organizing, administering, and maintaining the criminal court
More informationCalifornia Mock Trial Program Judge and Attorney Handbook
California Mock Trial Program 2017-2018 Judge and Attorney Handbook Official Materials for the California Mock Trial Competition A Program of Constitutional Rights Foundation Co-Sponsored by: American
More informationHANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS SERVING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS
HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS SERVING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS Prepared for the use of trial jurors serving in the United States district courts under the supervision of the Judicial Conference
More informationSome Friendly, Random Advice On Federal Court Advocacy The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge
I. General Advocacy Some Friendly, Random Advice On Federal Court Advocacy The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge Judges do not like surprises! Anticipate potential problems, issues or
More informationAN INMATES GUIDE TO. Habeas Corpus. Includes the 11 things you must know about the habeas system
AN INMATES GUIDE TO Habeas Corpus Includes the 11 things you must know about the habeas system by Walter M. Reaves, Jr. i DISCLAIMER This guide has been prepared as an aid to those who have an interest
More informationTRIAL COURT JUDGE AND ATTORNEY STUDY GUIDE
TRIAL COURT JUDGE AND ATTORNEY STUDY GUIDE SECTION 1: JUDGE S RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Thoroughly know all of the Simplified Rules of Evidence and Trial Procedure Rules and make sure they are strictly enforced
More informationMOCK TRIAL RULES. The Case 1) The case may contain any or all of the following stipulations: documents, narratives, exhibits, witness statements, etc.
MOCK TRIAL RULES The Case 1) The case may contain any or all of the following stipulations: documents, narratives, exhibits, witness statements, etc. 2) The stipulations (and fact statements, if any) may
More informationWhat were the final scores in your scenario for prosecution and defense? What side were you on? What primarily helped your win or lose?
Quiz name: Make Your Case Debrief Activity (1-27-2016) Date: 01/27/2016 Question with Most Correct Answers: #0 Total Questions: 8 Question with Fewest Correct Answers: #0 1. What were the final scores
More informationTrial Date and Time. In some cases, the Police Department and the defendant will reach a plea agreement in lieu of going to trial.
Trial Date and Time This dates and times of court trials are set by the Clerk of Court's office at the Portsmouth District Court. The Clerk sends an order of notice to the Police Department and issues
More informationBYLINE: Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Special to the new york law journal
LENGTH: 2052 words HEADLINE: Preserving and Protecting the Trial Record BYLINE: Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan,web-editor@nylj.com, Special to the new york law journal BODY: There can be no doubt that
More informationPART XV: Local Trials and Appeals; Internal Appeals Procedures; Reinstatement Procedure; and Member Discipline
PART XV: Local Trials and Appeals; Internal Appeals Procedures; Reinstatement Procedure; and Member Discipline 1. Local Trial Procedures ARTICLE XX CWA CONSTITUTION I. CHARGES, DUTIES AND RIGHTS A. Charges
More informationThe criminal justice system cannot function without the participation of witnesses like you.
Your Role as a Witness in a Criminal Case The criminal justice system cannot function without the participation of witnesses like you. The information you provide is evidence that helps police solve crimes
More informationCase Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators
Case Preparation and Presentation: A Guide for Arbitration Advocates and Arbitrators Jay E. Grenig Rocco M. Scanza Cornell University, ILR School Scheinman Institute on Conflict Resolution JURIS Questions
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI ST. JOSEPH DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. No. 09-00121-01-CR-SJ-DGK GILBERTO LARA-RUIZ, a/k/a HILL Defendant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI JOINTLY PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
Case 6:18-cr-00043-RBD-DCI Document 51 Filed 08/13/18 Page 1 of 34 PageID 307 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI
More informationWhat happens at a Crown Court trial - The prosecution case.
What happens at a Crown Court trial - The prosecution case. Please note that in the Crown Court you can be represented by either a barrister or a solicitor advocate. Representation is the single most important
More informationLearning Station #5 LEVEL ONE-13
Learning Station #5 I am an attorney, and I represent the rights of the citizens of the State of Texas in a criminal trial. It is my job to convince the jury that the defendant is guilty of breaking the
More informationCHARACTERS IN THE COURTROOM
CHARACTERS IN THE COURTROOM Learning Objectives: Students will 1. State the positions and responsibilities of all the officers of the court. 2. Utilize problem solving skills through the use of analysis
More informationEMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE
EMPIRION EVIDENCE ORDINANCE Recognized Objections I. Authority RULE OBJECTION PAGE 001/002 Outside the Scope of the Ordinance 3 II. Rules of Form RULE OBJECTION PAGE RULE OBJECTION PAGE 003 Leading 3 004
More informationCourse Court Systems and Practices. Unit VII Courtroom Professionalism and Personnel
Course Court Systems and Practices Unit VII Courtroom Professionalism and Personnel Essential Question What are the roles and responsibilities of members of the courtroom work group? TEKS 130.296(c) (2)(A)(B)
More informationMock Trial: People of the World v. the Mongols
Mock Trial: People of the World v. the Mongols THE CHARGES AGAINST GENGHIS KHAN AND THE MONGOLS: 1. Destruction of Eurasian cities 2. Mass slaughters of civilians 3. Ineffective administration of empire
More informationOverview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure. Basic Concepts. What is Proof (Evidence) David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx.
Overview of Pretrial & Trial Procedure David Hamilton City Attorney Reno & Honey Grove Tx Basic Concepts PresumptionofInnocence:BurdenonStateto erase presumption by proof Beyond a Reasonable Doubt. Absolute
More informationProving Your Case in Supreme Court
Proving Your Case in Supreme Court Part 1 About the Supreme Court of BC If you are preparing your case to be heard in the Supreme Court of British Columbia, there is a lot you will need to know about the
More informationSS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III
SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III ****At the end of this lesson, I will be able to do the following: recognize the structure of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. compare
More informationKeith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC
Keith Berkshire Berkshire Law Office, PLLC (a) Preserving a Claim of Error. A party may claim error in a ruling to admit or exclude evidence only if the error affects a substantial right of the party and:
More informationby Robert J. Permutt, Esq. Assistant General Counsel Lead, Nationwide Insurance Company Mirna M. Santiago, Esq.
by Robert J. Permutt, Esq. Assistant General Counsel Lead, Nationwide Insurance Company Mirna M. Santiago, Esq. Chair Torts, Insurance & Compensation Law Section, New York State Bar Association Of Counsel
More informationWHAT IS A DEPOSITION?
by Robert J. Permutt, Esq. Assistant General Counsel Lead, Nationwide Insurance Company Mirna M. Santiago, Esq. Chair Torts, Insurance & Compensation Law Section, New York State Bar Association Of Counsel
More informationHOW TO REPRESENT YOURSELF IN COURT OR HEARING
HOW TO REPRESENT YOURSELF IN COURT OR HEARING This booklet provides basic information on how to represent yourself at a court or administrative hearing. It is only meant as a general overview of the court
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS GOVERNMENT S PROPOSED GUILT-PHASE PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS
Case 1:13-cr-10200-GAO Document 1098 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Crim. No.13-10200-GAO ) DZHOKHAR A. TSARNAEV, )
More informationALI-ABA Training Materials. from ALI-ABA s. Immigration Court Hearing by the American Law Institute. All rights reserved.
ALI-ABA Training Materials from ALI-ABA s BEST PRACTICES IN REPRESENTING ASYLUM-SEEKERS A VIDEO RESOURCE FOR PRO BONO ATTORNEYS Immigration Court Hearing 2004 by the American Law Institute. All rights
More informationDefending Yourself in Court on a Not Guilty Plea
Defending Yourself in Court on a Not Guilty Plea The ideal solution when you have been charged with a criminal offence is to allow a lawyer to handle your case. However, if the matter is reasonably simple
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Dave brought his sports car into
More information2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version)
2016 FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE (Mock Trial Version) In American trials, complex rules are used to govern the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure that
More informationCHAPTER 16 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
CHAPTER 16 FORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS I. INTRODUCTION Formal administrative hearings are one of the options provided to a person who has significant (or substantial) interests that will be affected
More informationSecond, you must not be influenced by sympathy, passion or prejudice in favor of any party or against any of the parties.
CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, we now come to that part of the case where I must give you the instructions on the law. If you cannot hear me, please raise your hand. It is important that you
More informationA JUDGE S PERSPECTIVE ON EVIDENCE. (Basic Tools of Your New Trade) W. David Lee. Senior Resident Superior Court Judge.
A JUDGE S PERSPECTIVE ON EVIDENCE (Basic Tools of Your New Trade) W. David Lee Senior Resident Superior Court Judge District 20B School for New Superior Court Judges January, 2009 The Exercise of Judicial
More informationSIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE
SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE AND PROCEDURE In trials in the United States, elaborate rules are used to regulate the admission of proof (i.e., oral or physical evidence). These rules are designed to ensure
More informationVideo Course Evaluation Form. My Name is: Name of Course: My Street address: Address:
Garden State CLE 2000 Hamilton Avenue Hamilton, New Jersey 08619 (609) 584-1924 Phone (609) 584-1920 - Fax Video Course Evaluation Form My Name is: Name of Course: My Street address: City: State: Zip Code:
More informationYOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW
YOU VE been CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU NEED to KNOW 1 This booklet is intended to provide general information only. If you require specific legal advice, please consult the appropriate legislation or
More informationMock Trial Practice Law Test
Mock Trial Practice Law Test NOTE: The practice law test is provided as an example and will not be updated each year. Below are sample questions that are similar to those that students may see on the real
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION GOVERNMENT'S PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 12-00075-01-CR-W-DW MARCUS D. GAMMAGE, Defendant. GOVERNMENT'S
More information2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20
2:16-cv-02222-EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20 E-FILED Friday, 18 May, 2018 03:51:00 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD Members of the jury, you have seen and heard all the evidence and will hear the arguments
More informationEVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS. Laurie Vahey, Esq.
EVIDENCE, FOUNDATIONS AND OBJECTIONS Laurie Vahey, Esq. KINDS OF EVIDENCE Testimonial Including depositions Make sure you comply with CPLR requirements Experts Real Documentary Demonstrative Visual aid
More informationINTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT
ISRMUN 2015 INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT I. General Description The International Criminal Court (ICC) is a permanent, international tribunal to prosecute individuals for genocide, crimes against humanity,
More informationEmpire Mock Trial Educate. Connect. Empower. A Guide for Competitors from Canada
General Takes place in the fictional State of Midlands. Takes place in the fictional location of YourTown, Cases can be either Criminal (standard of proof is Ontario. All cases are criminal (standard of
More informationSection A: General Assembly, Economic and Social Council, Security Council, Ad Hoc GA Committee on Middle Eastern Security, and Human Rights Council
Section A: General Assembly, Economic and Social Council, Security Council, Ad Hoc GA Committee on Middle Eastern Security, and Human Rights Council Since LEBMUN seeks to simulate the real United Nations,
More informationA Survivor s Guide. to Sexual Assault Prosecution. Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service
A Survivor s Guide to Sexual Assault Prosecution Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service A Survivor s Guide to Sexual Assault Prosecution Nova Scotia Public Prosecution Service Table of Contents Contact
More information2012 Hogan & Lovells Cup Rules and Procedures
2012 Hogan & Lovells Cup Rules and Procedures 1. A Note to Participants The Hogan & Hartson Cup is governed by the following rules. The rules are designed to comport with the mission of the trial tournament.
More informationIntroduction How Jurors are Selected Qualifications Exemptions. Your Role As A Juror Sequence of a Trial Petit and Grand Juries
Hand Book for Jurors Introduction How Jurors are Selected Qualifications Exemptions Your Role As A Juror Sequence of a Trial Petit and Grand Juries Payment for Jury Duty Length of Service Dress Attire
More informationADVANCED DISCOVERY TECHNIQUES
III. ADVANCED DISCOVERY TECHNIQUES DEPOSITION STRATEGIES A. START EARLY The most important aspect of a successful trial lawyer s practice is thorough preparation. Even the most eloquent and ingenious lawyers
More informationMR. FLYNN: Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the Court: This case concerns itself with the conviction of a defendant of two crimes of rape and
MR. FLYNN: Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the Court: This case concerns itself with the conviction of a defendant of two crimes of rape and kidnapping, the sentences on each count of 20 to 30 years to
More informationMock Trial Analysis 2017 Gladiator Final Round
Mock Trial Analysis 2017 Gladiator Final Round Video links Opening Statements: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxjrki77bzy Government Case in Chief: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lqfbt5auakm Defense
More informationJUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS
JUROR INSTRUCTIONS ALONG W/ QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR POTENTIAL JURORS As a Juror, there are certain responsibilities you will be asked to fulfill. A Juror must be prompt. A trial cannot begin or continue
More informationCase of the Missing Puppy
Case of the Missing Puppy Goal To familiarize students with the civil justice legal process. Objectives 1. Students will demonstrate understanding and use of vocabulary associated with the legal process.
More informationCITATIONS: INTRO: How Do You Fight A Traffic Citation? A Self-Help Publication From the Sponsors of Traffic Court Pros.com.
WINNING A TRAFFIC COURT TRIAL IN CALIFORNIA A Self-Help Publication From the Sponsors of Traffic Court Pros.com. CONTENTS INTRO HOW DO YOU FIGHT A TRAFFIC CITATION? Generally, the only way to fight a traffic
More informationCrafting a Closing Argument
Crafting a Closing Argument by Linda L. Listrom Let s begin by talking about what closing argument is not. Closing argument is not the time in the trial to begin to tell the jury your story. Nor is closing
More informationFunction of the Jury Burden of Proof and Greater Weight of the Evidence Credibility of Witness Weight of the Evidence
101.05 Function of the Jury Members of the jury, all the evidence has been presented. It is now your duty to decide the facts from the evidence. You must then apply to those facts the law which I am about
More informationTRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005
TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005 Thomas K. Maher 312 W Franklin Street Chapel Hill, N.C. 27516 (O) 929-1043 (H) 933-5674 TKMaher@tkmaherlaw.com General Instructions 1. General Information. The class will meet
More informationFRCP 30(b)(6) Notice or subpoena directed to entity to require designation of witness to testify on its behalf.
I. Deposition Goals A. Each deposition and each deposition question should be aimed at accomplishing a desired result. 1. Determine knowledge of relevant facts and pin down lack of knowledge of relevant
More information4. CROSS EXAMINATION 159
4. CROSS EXAMINATION 159 160 Trial Advocacy, Cross-Examination: The Basics Ben B. Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan Cross-examination involves relatively straightforward skills. Through preparation of your case,
More informationPRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES
PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION LAW 101 March 1, 2012, 4:00p.m. Courtroom M1404 ASK A PROPER QUESTION - FACTUAL AND EXPERT WITNESSES Speakers: Honorable Krystal Q. Alves, Circuit Court Honorable
More informationINDIANA HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF COMPETITION Indiana High School Mock Trial Competition. Administration of Competition
INDIANA HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF COMPETITION 2016-2017 Article I Article II Article III Article IV Article V Article VI Indiana High School Mock Trial Competition Teams Case Trial Judges and Scoring
More informationHANDBOOK FOR VICTIMS/WITNESSES OF VIOLENT CRIMES
HANDBOOK FOR VICTIMS/WITNESSES OF VIOLENT CRIMES Thank you for your cooperation and hard work as a victim/witness. TABLE OF CONTENTS Illinois Crime Victims Bill of Rights Introduction General Information
More informationThird District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2008
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2008 Opinion filed July 16, 2008. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D06-2072 Lower Tribunal No. 04-33909
More informationWitness Examination Strategies in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Direct and Cross Examination of Lay Witnesses
Presenting a live 90 minute webinar with interactive Q&A Witness Examination Strategies in Employment Litigation Best Practices for Direct and Cross Examination of Lay Witnesses WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 23,
More informationEFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW
EFFECTIVE CROSS-EXAMINATION TIPS LAWRENCE J. WHITNEY, ATTORNEY AT LAW I. GENERAL REMARKS A. Accountability (Advocate) 1. Just you 2. No one else is there for client - never do or say anything that goes
More information