Follow this and additional works at:
|
|
- Christiana Scott
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs PONTIAC GRAND AM, VIN #1G2NE52T5XM842965, SEIZED FROM: IRENZO LEE TERRELL, SEIZURE DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 2007, CLAIMANT: MARSHA TERRELL, LIENHOLDER: N/A Follow this and additional works at: This Initial Order by the Administrative Judges of the Administrative Procedures Division, Tennessee Department of State, is a public document made available by the College of Law Library, and the Tennessee Department of State, Administrative Procedures Division. For more information about this public document, please contact administrative.procedures@tn.gov
2 BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY In the matter of: ) ) TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT ) OF SAFETY, v. ) ) 1999 PONTIAC GRAND AM ) VIN #1G2NE52T5XM ) SEIZED FROM: IRENZO LEE TERRELL ) SEIZURE DATE: NOVEMBER 8, 2007 ) CLAIMANT: MARSHA TERRELL ) LIENHOLDER: N/A ) ) Docket No J ) ) Department of Safety ) Case No. G8516 ) INITIAL ORDER This matter came on to be heard on March 24, 2008, in Chattanooga, Tennessee before Joyce Grimes Safley, Administrative Judge, assigned by the Secretary of State, and sitting for the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Safety. Ms. Lori Long, attorney for the Department of Safety, represented the State. Claimant, Marsha Terrell, was present at the hearing and represented herself. The subject of this hearing was the proposed forfeiture of a 1999 Pontiac Grand Am, VIN #1G2NE52T5XM842965, for its alleged use in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act, T.C.A , et seq., and T.C.A (a)(4).
3 After consideration of the evidence offered, the arguments of counsel and pro se claimant, and the entire record in this matter, it is ORDERED that the seized vehicle be immediately FORFEITED to the seizing agency. This decision is based upon the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Agent Dave Jones of the 10 th District Drug Task Force testified on behalf of the State. 2. On November 8, 2007, Agent Jones and other agents on duty, stopped at the Rocky Top gas station in Cleveland, Tennessee. 3. While Agent Jones was inside the store, the store clerk told him that a suspicious car had pulled in front of the gas pumps. 4. The man driving the vehicle (driver of the first car) left the engine running while his passenger jumped out and got into a Pontiac Grand Am, later found to be driven by Irenzo Terrell. The passenger in the first car rode off with Irenzo Terrell. 5. Based upon his years of experience and his training as a Drug Task Force agent, Agent Jones believed that the occupants of the two vehicles were involved in an illegal narcotic transaction. 6. Agent Jones returned outside the gas station market as the passenger in the first car was dropped off by the person driving the Pontiac Grand Am (Irenzo Terrell). 7. The driver of the first car drove off with his passenger, and was followed by some of the other Drug Task Force agents present at the gas
4 station. The driver of the Pontiac Grand Am (Irenzo Terrell) drove off, driving southbound on Keith Street in Cleveland, Tennessee. Agent Jones and another agent followed the blue Pontiac Grand Am (driven by Irenzo Terrell). 8. The Pontiac Grand Am began traveling at 51 mph in a posted 45 mph speed zone. When Agent Jones ran the vehicle s tags, the registration identified it as belonging on a gold Pontiac. 9. Agent Jones initiated a traffic stop. He explained to the vehicle s driver, Irenzo Terrell, what he had observed at the Rocky Top Market. Mr. Terrell denied that he had been at the market, and stated he had just been at a friend s house. 10. Agent Jones believed he had witnessed a drug transaction, and asked for permission to search Mr. Terrell s vehicle. 11. Mr. Terrell gave consent for Agent Jones to search the vehicle. 12. Agent Jones found approximately ½ ounce of marijuana stuff between the passenger seat and the center console of Mr. Terrell s vehicle. He also found digital scales which had fresh marijuana residue on them. Upon searching further, Agent Jones discovered a box of sandwich bags and numerous corner baggies on the rear seat. 13. The driver of the first vehicle, the green vehicle, was stopped by other agents. The passenger in the first vehicle, John Carter, gave a statement that he had purchased marijuana from Mr. Terrell. Adam Macon, the driver of the green vehicle, also gave a statement in which he admitted that he had met
5 with Mr. Terrell and purchased two twenty sacks of marijuana from Mr. Terrell, and had paid with two twenty dollar bills. 14. Mr. Terrell stated that the vehicle he was driving, the blue Pontiac Grand Am referenced above, belonged to him and he had been the sole owner since he was 16 years of age. Mr. Terrell told Agent Jones that the Grand Am was registered to his mother, but belonged to him. 15. Mr. Terrell s personal belongings were in the Grand Am. They included sales receipts, CD s with Mr. Terrell s name written on them with magic marker, and check stubs. 16. $211 in cash was seized by the agents 1, along with the vehicle. 17. Additionally, a cell phone was seized. 18. Claimant asserted a claim for the vehicle, and at the hearing testified that the seized cell phone was also hers. 19. Claimant s testimony that the cell phone was her telephone is not deemed credible. The cell phone contained pictures of bags of marijuana, Mr. Terrell, 100 dollar bills, a stack of currency, Mr. Terrell holding bags of marijuana, and a young woman dressed only in underwear who appeared to be touching her genitals. There were also pictures of Mr. Terrell with Claimant, a picture of Claimant s birthday cake, and other family members. 20. It strains credulity to believe that Claimant, a middle-aged woman, has a cell phone containing the pictures of marijuana, cash, and the lingerieclad young woman described above. 2 1 No claim was made for the currency seized.
6 21. At the time the above vehicle was seized, Mr. Terrell was not living at Claimant s residence but was living with his girlfriend at a different residence. Mr. Terrell kept the car with him, and bought gas for the vehicle. 22. Claimant conceded that she primarily drove a truck she owns. She testified that she paid for the vehicle and that she paid the vehicle s insurance. 23. Mr. Terrell was in possession of the vehicle at the time the traffic stop was made. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The State has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the seized vehicle was subject to forfeiture because it was being used or was intended to be used to violate the Tennessee Drug Control Act, T.C.A , et seq. See T.C.A and T.C.A (d)(2). Failure to carry the burden of proof operates as a bar to any forfeiture and the property shall be immediately returned to the Claimant. T.C.A (b)(1). 2. T.C.A states: Goods subject to forfeiture---seizure---disposition.--- (a) The following are subject to forfeiture: (1) All controlled substances that have been manufactured, distributed, dispensed, or acquired in violation of parts 3 and 4 of this chapter or title 39, chapter 17, part 4; *** (4) All conveyances, including aircraft, vehicles or vessels that are used, or are intended for use, to transport, or in any manner to 2 For argument s sake, even if the cell phone belonged to Claimant Marsha Terrell, she could not claim that she did not know or have reason to believe Mr. Terrell was selling marijuana when the cell phone contained such photographs.
7 facilitate the transportation, sale or receipt of property described in subdivision (a)(1) or (2). 3. It is noted that no conveyance is subject to forfeiture under T.C.A for simple possession of a controlled substance as set forth in T.C.A See T.C.A (4)(C) and T.C.A If the State presents a prima facie case for forfeiture, i.e., that the vehicle was used or intended to be used to facilitate a violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act or drug laws, the burden of going forward with the evidence shifts to the claimant to prove either that the vehicle is not subject to forfeiture or that claimant has a good faith interest in the vehicle and that he or she did not know or have reason to know that the property was being used to facilitate a violation of the drug laws. T.C.A (f)(1). 5. Rule (4), The Rules of Procedure for Asset Forfeiture Hearings, Department of Safety (Revised December 2007), sets forth the criteria for determining ownership of a vehicle: If the person in possession of the property is not the registered owner as determined from public records of titles, registrations, or other recorded documents, the officer may submit certain indicia of ownership to the judge which proves that the possessor is nonetheless the owner of the property. Such indicia of ownership shall include, but is not limited to the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) How the parties involved regarded ownership of the vehicle in question; The intentions of the parties relative to ownership of the property; Who was responsible for originally purchasing the property; Who pays any insurance, license or fees required to possess or operate the property; Who maintains and repairs the property; Who uses or operates the property;
8 (g) (h) Who has access to the property; Who acts as if they have a proprietary interest in the property. 6. Mr. Terrell stated that the vehicle he was driving, the blue Pontiac Grand Am referenced above, belonged to him and he had been the sole owner since he was 16 years of age. Mr. Terrell told Agent Jones that the Grand Am was registered in his mother s (claimant s) name, but belonged to him. 7. Mr. Terrell s personal belongings were in the Grand Am. They included sales receipts, CD s with Mr. Terrell s name written on them with magic marker, and check stubs. 8. Mr. Terrell did not reside with his mother, and had possession and control of the vehicle. 9. Mr. Terrell s cell phone was in the vehicle. Claimant s testimony regarding her ownership of the cell phone was not credible. 10. It is clear that Mr. Terrell regarded the vehicle as his vehicle. There is no evidence that any belongings of Claimant s were found in the automobile. All of these facts support Mr. Terrell s being the true owner of the vehicle. These facts also support that the intentions of Mr. Terrell, and his mother, Claimant Marsha Terrell, were for the vehicle to be considered Mr. Terrell s. Clearly, the vehicle was intended for his use and benefit, not his mother s. 11. With regard to the person who used or operated the vehicle, the evidence preponderates that Mr. Terrell used and operated the subject vehicle. He kept it at his new residence, not at Claimant Terrell s residence.
9 12. While Claimant testified that both she and her son had a set of keys to the subject vehicle, it is clear from the testimony provided that Mr. Terrell was the person with unlimited access to use the vehicle. Claimant did not have access to the vehicle while it was at Mr. Terrell s work or at his new home. 13. Mr. Terrell acted as if he had a proprietary interest in the vehicle when he told the drug agents that he was the sole owner of the car. 14. Agent Jones testimony regarding Mr. Terrell s statements of ownership is deemed credible. 15. While it is true that Claimant is the registered owner of the car, there was no testimony that Claimant put any restrictions on Mr. Terrell s use of the vehicle. 16. Pursuant to all the indicia of ownership, Mr. Terrell is the true owner of the above referenced vehicle. 17. T.C.A (a)(6)(A) authorizes the forfeiture of everything of value furnished, or intended to be furnished in exchange for controlled substance, all proceeds traceable to such an exchange, and all moneys, negotiable instruments, and securities used, or intended to be used, to facilitate any violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act. 18. T.C.A (a)(2) provides that all raw materials, products, and equipment of any kind which are used, or intended for use, in manufacturing, compounding, processing, delivering, importing or exporting
10 any controlled substance in violation of the Tennessee Drug Control Act are subject to forfeiture. 19. T.C.A permits an inference from the amount of controlled substance or substances possessed by an offender, along with other relevant facts surrounding the arrest, that the controlled substance or substances were possessed with the purpose of selling or otherwise dispensing Marijuana is a controlled substance (Schedule VI drug). T.C.A. 21. Possession of marijuana is a Class E felony if the amount involved is greater or equal to grams (one-half ounce) and less than or equal to 4535 grams (10 lbs). See T.C.A (g)(1). 22. T.C.A states as follows: Criminal offenses and penalties. --- (a) It is an offense for a defendant to knowingly: *** (4) Possess a controlled substance [such as marijuana] with intent to manufacture, deliver or sell such controlled substance. 23. T.C.A (g)(1) provides that subsection (a)(4) is violated [intent to manufacture, deliver, or sell) with respect to a Schedule VI controlled substance classified as marijuana when the amount is grams (one-half ounce) or more of any substance containing marijuana. Here, the amount of marijuana seized from Claimant s vehicle was one-half ounce
11 24. The State has met its burden of proof in this case. Given all the evidence and circumstances in this matter, it is more probable than not that Mr. Terrell was using the seized vehicle to conduct illegal drug sales and to transport illegal drugs (marijuana). 25. Additionally, the evidence preponderates that Mr. Terrell, not Claimant, is the true owner of the vehicle. Claimant Marsha Terrell s claim for the vehicle must fail. 26. The seized property is subject to forfeiture. Accordingly, for all the above reasons, it is ORDERED that Claimant s claim is DISMISSED, and the subject vehicle be immediately FORFEITED to the seizing agency. It is so ordered. This Order entered and effective this 25th day of April, Thomas G. Stovall, Director Administrative Procedures Division
12
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-24-2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-13-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-19-2008 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-21-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. $6, in US Currency, Seized from: Todd Walters, Date of Seizure: August 21, 2008, Claimant: Todd Walters
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-14-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-6-2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Trey & Michael Torres vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-13-2014 Trey & Michael Torres
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-10-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-15-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-16-2006 Department of Safety,
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-22-2008 Tennessee Department
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT vs. $ in U.S. CURRENCY, SEIZED FROM: MOISES SILVA, SEIZURE DATE: DECEMBER 9, 2009 CLAIMANT: MOISES SILVA
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-9-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-27-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
One 1994 Chevrole Pickup, VIN.: 1GCCS14W4R , SEIZED FROM: Trevor A. Coleman, DATE OF SEIZURE: March 12, 2012, CLAIMANT: Trevor A.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-26-2013 One 1994 Chevrole Pickup,
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-27-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-29-2012 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-8-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-21-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-29-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
William K. Bryant vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law September 2013 William K. Bryant
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 11-5-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
Vanessa Quilantan vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law January 2015 Vanessa Quilantan
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-8-2008 Tennessee Department
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-21-2012 State of Tennessee Department
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-2-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. KEVIN BEATY
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-4-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-18-2006 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-21-2006 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
Robert M. Russell vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-30-2014 Robert M. Russell vs.
Valorie D. Thacker vs. Department of Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-22-2013 Valorie D. Thacker vs.
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 11-4-2009, DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-12-2012 Tina (M1888) Bilbrey,
Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) November 28, 2017 Seizure of Controlled Substances and Related Property
Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) November 28, 2017 Seizure of Controlled Substances and Related Property Dear Reader: The following document was created from the CTAS electronic library
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-11-2012 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-18-2008 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-28-2010 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Gregory Brunson vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-27-2014 Gregory Brunson vs.
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-26-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 1-12-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-20-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 9-24-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY vs. One 1996 Honda Accord Vin Number 1HGCE1822TA , Date of Seizure: October 21, 2010, Claimant: Lesile Frazier
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 9-11-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-17-2009 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY
Gary F. Bickford vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law October 2013 Gary F. Bickford
Matthew McBee vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-17-2014 Matthew McBee vs. Safety
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-2-2008 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-5-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-11-2009 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-25-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
Follow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 7-31-2008 One 2004 Chevrolet Trailblazer,
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. For plaintiff-appellee: : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS : For defendant-appellant:
[Cite as State v. Ricks, 2004-Ohio-6913.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 84500 STATE OF OHIO : : Plaintiff-appellee : : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : and : OPINION KEITH RICKS :
BOARD OF EDUCATION vs. NATASHA KRUITHOF, Respondent.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-7-2011 BOARD OF EDUCATION vs.
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 2-13-2007 DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY,
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 1 HOUSE BILL 471. Short Title: Fail to Obtain DL/Increase Punishment. (Public)
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION H 1 HOUSE BILL 1 Short Title: Fail to Obtain DL/Increase Punishment. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Millis, Destin Hall, Cleveland, and Burr
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 29, 2011 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE March 29, 2011 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES DAVID MOATS Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for McMinn County No. 09048 Carroll L. Ross,
2007 Indiana House Bill No. 1103, Indiana One Hundred Fifteenth General Assembly - First Regular Session
2007 Indiana House Bill No. 1103, Indiana One Hundred Fifteenth General Assembly - First Regular Session INDIANA BILL TEXT (Amendments in BOLD) VERSION: Introduced January 08, 2007 A BILL FOR AN ACT to
Department of Legislative Services
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2008 Session SB 972 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Senate Bill 972 Judicial Proceedings (Senator Forehand) Identity Fraud - Seizure and Forfeiture This
CTAS e-li. Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) December 06, 2017 Statutory Powers
Published on e-li (https://eli.ctas.tennessee.edu) December 06, 2017 Statutory Powers Dear Reader: The following document was created from the CTAS electronic library known as e-li. This online library
Forfeiture of motor vehicle for impaired driving after impaired driving license revocation; forfeiture for felony speeding to elude arrest.
20-28.2. Forfeiture of motor vehicle for impaired driving after impaired driving license revocation; forfeiture for felony speeding to elude arrest. (a) Meaning of "Impaired Driving License Revocation".
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Petitioner, vs. KYLE CANTWELL, Grievant
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-16-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.20, VEHICLE SEIZURE AND IMPOUNDMENT, OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE
10/14/2013 ORDINANCE NO. 2013 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10.20, VEHICLE SEIZURE AND IMPOUNDMENT, OF THE VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the Village of Buffalo Grove is a Home Rule
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 21, 2010 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEVIN M. FRIERSON Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2007-C-2329
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-24-2010 Terry Lynn Pennix Follow
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 11-24-2009 Joyce Allen Follow
UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 913 A BILL ENTITLED
UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 913 L5 6lr0613 By: Prince George's County Delegation and Montgomery County Delegation Introduced and read first time: February 9, 2006 Assigned to: Judiciary 1 AN ACT concerning
Cornelius Sorina vs. Safety
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 5-23-2014 Cornelius Sorina vs.
No. 1D On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James M. Colaw, Judge. October 16, 2018
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA No. 1D17-2808 CHRISTOPHER ANTIAWN JONES, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County. James M. Colaw, Judge.
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) )
THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO Plaintiff vs EDWARD WALKER Defendant CASE NO. CR 429590 MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER FRIEDMAN, J.: 1. The Court has before it a proposed
Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL
Title 15: COURT PROCEDURE -- CRIMINAL Chapter 517: ASSET FORFEITURE Table of Contents Part 7. ASSET FORFEITURE... Section 5821. SUBJECT PROPERTY... 3 Section 5821-A. PROPERTY NOT SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 17, 2018 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 17, 2018 Session 02/20/2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BENJAMIN TATE BROWN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-76199
Court of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Whitsett, 2014-Ohio-4933.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101182 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ERNEST M. WHITSETT
Mark Singer vs. Commerce and Insurance
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law February 2015 Mark Singer vs.
v No Oakland Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED September 19, 2017 v No. 332310 Oakland Circuit Court MICHAEL DOUGLAS NORTH, LC
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN S SERVICES, Petitioner, vs. DARREN BIVINGS, Grievant.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 8-10-2011 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,683 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, SHAMECA R. DAVIS, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,683 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. SHAMECA R. DAVIS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Sedgwick District
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 17, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE February 17, 2005 Session CITY OF MORRISTOWN v. REBECCA A. LONG Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamblen County No. 2003-64 Ben K. Wexler, Chancellor
The Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Rice State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, AUSTIN JAMES VALENZUELA DOB: 08/21/1998 29 1st Ave NW #1 Defendant. District Court 3rd Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 0660041185
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. Case No. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2009 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D08-2047 ASHLER RISHAUD TAYLOR, Appellee. / Opinion filed August 28, 2009
ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
REL: 09/28/2012 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT. vs. ** CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO Appellee. **
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2003 APRIL MERRILL, ** Appellant, ** vs. ** CASE
ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO NO (8-2)
i~")i(...i..~~.) Submitted by: Assembly Members Abney, Murdy Prepared by: Department of Law For reading: May. 0 II 0 0 0 ANCHORAGE, ALASKA AO NO. -(-) AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ANCHORAGE MUNICIPAL CODE ntle,
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 7, 2017
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 7, 2017 03/16/2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. DAMARKO 1 D. CLAY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 16-108
COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellant : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs.
[Cite as State v. Ely, 2006-Ohio-459.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 86091 STATE OF OHIO, Plaintiff-Appellant JOURNAL ENTRY vs. AND KEITH ELY, OPINION Defendant-Appellee
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court. Appellate Case No Appeal From Laurens County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Artez Pulley, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2015-002206 Appeal From Laurens County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge
STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION
[Cite as State v. Evans, 2012-Ohio-5485.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 26483 Appellant v. KIMBERLY S. EVANS Appellee APPEAL
21 USC 881. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 21 - FOOD AND DRUGS CHAPTER 13 - DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION AND CONTROL SUBCHAPTER I - CONTROL AND ENFORCEMENT Part E - Administrative and Enforcement Provisions 881. Forfeitures (a) Subject property
TENNESSEE INSURANCE DIVISION, Petitioner, vs. Docket No.: J JAMES MICHAEL FOLEY, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 12-4-2008 TENNESSEE INSURANCE
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ROOSEVELT FLEMING
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ROOSEVELT FLEMING Appeal from the Circuit Court for Tipton County No. 5357 Joseph
Tennessee Insurance Division, Petitioner, vs. John Porter Franklin, Jr., Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law November 2012 Tennessee Insurance
MEMORANDUM (via ) Changes to DWI Seizure and Felony Speeding Elude Seizure Laws
Legal and Legislative Services Division Peter E. Powell Legal and Legislative Administrator PO Box 2448, Raleigh, NC 27602 T 919 890-1300 F 919 890-1914 MEMORANDUM (via E-Mail) TO: FROM: Senior Resident
STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE POLICY SUBJECT FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL
STOCKTON POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER ASSET SEIZURE AND FORFEITURE POLICY SUBJECT DATE: January 24, 2008 NO: FROM: CHIEF ERIC JONES TO: ALL PERSONNEL INDEX: Asset Seizure Forfeiture Narcotics Asset
JANUARY 11, 2017 STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF R.M. NO CA-0972 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
STATE OF LOUISIANA IN THE INTEREST OF R.M. * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2016-CA-0972 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM JUVENILE COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2016-028-03-DQ-E/F, SECTION
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 10-6-2006 Shane Quinn Follow this
No. 117,992 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, ERIC WAYNE KNIGHT, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT
No. 117,992 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. ERIC WAYNE KNIGHT, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. As a general rule, appellate review of a district court's
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 656
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW 2013-243 HOUSE BILL 656 AN ACT TO REVISE THE LAWS GOVERNING THE SEIZURE, FORFEITURE, AND SALE OF MOTOR VEHICLES USED BY DEFENDANTS IN FELONY
Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Administrative Law Commons
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 6-2-2008 James R. Edens Sr Follow
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,223 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. In the Matter of A.A-M. MEMORANDUM OPINION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,223 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS In the Matter of A.A-M. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Wyandotte District Court; DELIA M. YORK, judge.
COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT FOR DAVIDSON COUNTY AT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE
BILLY L. GORDON, ) ) Petitioner/Appellant, ) Appeal No. ) 01-A-01-9511-CH-00522 v. ) ) Davidson Chancery MICHAEL C. GREENE, Commissioner ) No. 94-3552-I of the Tennessee Department of ) Safety, ) ) Respondent/Appellee.
E-Filed Document Apr :44: CP Pages: 15
E-Filed Document Apr 5 2016 14:44:01 2015-CP-01097 Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CP-01097 DARRYL JEROME BOBO, II ONE HUNDRED THIRTY SEVEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TWENTY
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA OPINION AND ORDER. transfer of firearms and persons not to possess.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH : No. CR-437-2016 : vs. : CRIMINAL DIVISION : : TYREE GREEN, : Defendant : Motion to Suppress OPINION AND ORDER By Information