IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
|
|
- Kathlyn Roberts
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at RANDBURG CASE NUMBER : LCC9R/98 In the matter concerning M P DU TOIT Plaintiff and LEWAK LE KAY alias LEWAK LANGTREY Defendant JUDGMENT MOLOTO J : [1] The Plaintiff obtained judgment by default in the Magistrate s Court, Oudtshoorn on the 2nd June 1998 against Defendant for the latter s eviction in terms of section 10 of the Extension of Security of Tenure Act, 1997 (No 62 of 1997) hereinafter Athe Act@. The full order of the Court reads as follows : - ANa oorweging van die pleitstukke, word bevind : (a) Dat betekening aan die verweerder geskied het; (b) Die verweerder nie kennis van voorneme om te verdedig in die voorgeskrewe tydperk gegee het nie; (c) Dat aan die bepalings van artikel 8 en 9 op die Wet op die Uitbreiding van Sekerheid van Verblyfreg 1997, (Wet 62 van 1997) voldoen is. Die hof beveel :
2 2 (i) Ingevolge artikel 10 van gemelde Wet, dat die verweerder en alle ander okkupeerders van die woonhuis op die plaas Thylitishia, Volmoed, Oudsthoorn, ontruim en eiser in besit daarvan gestel word; (ii) Ingevolge artikel 12(1)(a) word 10 Julie 1998 as n regverdige en billike datum beskou waarop die woning ontruim moet wees en dus gelas dat die okkupeerder die woning voor of op 10 Julie 1998 moet ontruim. (iii) Indien die okkupeerder nie voor of op 10 Julie 1998 die woning ontruim het nie, word 17 Julie 1998 bepaal waarop die uitsettingsbevel uitgevoer kan word. (iv) Koste deur verweerder betaal te word.@ 1 [2] The eviction is sought in terms of Section 10(1)(d) of the Act. To succeed, Plaintiff has to show that Defendant, being a person who was an occupier on 4 February 1997, was an employee whose right of residence arose solely from that employment and has voluntarily resigned in circumstances that do not amount to a constructive dismissal in terms of the Labour Relations Act. [3] Plaintiff has satisfied the first requirement, namely that the Defendant was an employee whose 2 right of residence arose solely from that employment. As to the second requirement that Defendant has voluntarily resigned in circumstances that do not amount to a constructive dismissal in terms of the Labour Relations Act, the following appears from the record : (1) a disciplinary hearing was held on behalf of the Plaintiff on Monday 8 September 1997 at which the Defendant was to answer to certain charges. The Defendant was in default of appearance and a verdict of guilty was returned and the sentence 3 was dismissal of the Defendant See par 3 of the Particulars of Claim and annexures to the said Particulars of Claim. See par 13.3 and 13.4 of the service contract. See record of the disciplinary hearing - Annexure AA@to the Particulars of Claim.
3 3 4 (2) On the same day, that is 8 September 1997, a letter was addressed to the Defendant by the Plaintiff in which the latter stated that the former resigned of his own free will. I quote from the letter : A(2) As gevolg van u optrede ten opsigte van die dissiplinêre verhoor, en ook dat u vir meer as 5 dae afwesig was, aanvaar ek M P du Toit (werkgewer) dat jy self bedank het uit eie vrye wil.@ The above paragraph flies in the face of the express dismissal according to the record of the disciplinary hearing which reads, in part, as follows : - Awerknemer afwesig van verhoor - nie opgedaag nie uitspraak : skuldig vonnis : ontslag van werknemer@ (3) Paragraph 3 of the particulars of claim also confirms that Defendant s services were terminated after disciplinary steps had been taken against him. (4) Paragraph 3 of the particulars of claim goes on to state that in terms of the written service contract between the parties the Defendant had to vacate his residence 5 within one month after termination of his services. Plaintiff relied on this provision of the service contract to evict defendant, hence the concluding paragraph of his letter of 8 September 1997 where he says : A(4) Die gevolg is, dat u voor of op 8 Oktober 1997 die huis sal ontruim.@ [4] It remains to investigate the meaning of Avoluntarily resigned in circumstances that do not amount to a constructive dismissal in terms of the Labour Relations Act@, in order to determine whether the second requirement of Section 10(1)(d) of the Act has been satisfied. The concept of constructive dismissal is accepted by the Labour Appeal Court to be Aactions on the part of the 4 5 Annexure AB@ to the Particulars of Claim. Par 13.4 of the service contract - Annexure AC@ to the Particulars of Claim.
4 4 6 employer which drive the employee to leave (whether or not there is a form of resignation)@ It 7 is noteworthy that the Labour Relaitons Act itself does not use the words constructive dismissal. What is said to refer to constructive dismissal in the Labour Relations Act is section 186(1)(e) which reads Atermination of a contract by an employee where the employer has made continued employment intolerable@. Quite clearly, the defendant in casu, has not terminated employment, but was actually dismised by his employer. He can, therefore, not be said to have voluntarily resigned in circumstances that do not amount to a constructive dismissal [5] Moreover, what seems to have escaped Plaintiff s attention is the effect of clause 2.2 of the service contract which states that - AIndien enige bepalings van hierdie kontrak in stryd sou wees met enige huidige of toekomstige statutêre voorskrifte, sal die statutêre voorskrifte geldig wees ten opsigte van daardie betrokke bepaling of bepalings, maar sal dit nie die geldigheid van die ander bepalings van hierdie kontrak raak nie.@ This clause 2.2 of the contract obviously affects the provisions of clause 13.4 of the service contract, in that, whereas clause 13.4 stipulates that in the event an employee s services are terminated on whatever grounds (my emphasis), the employee undertakes to vacate the residence within one month after such termination of services; section 10(1)(d)(ii) of the Act stipulates otherwise. Section 10(1)(d)(ii) specifically states that the employee must have resigned in circumstances that do not amount to a constructive dismissal as against the Awhatever grounds@ stipulation of clause 13.4 of the contract. [6] Section 10(1)(d)(ii) of the Act is a statutory provision which, in terms of clause 2.2 of the contract, supersedes clause 13.4 of the contract. Clearly, Defendant was dismissed after a disciplinary hearing was held and did not resign of his own accord and his eviction is then sought on the grounds that he no longer works for the plaintiff. The provisions of sub-paragraph (ii) of 6 7 Amalgamated Beverage Industries Ltd v Jonker (1993) 14 1LJ 1232 (LAC) 1248H, citing Edwin Cameron Halton Cheadle & Clive Thompson The New Labour Relations Act (1989) 144. No 66 of 1995
5 5 section 10(1)(d) of the Act have not been complied with, therefore, the order of the Magistrate dated 2nd June 1998 cannot stand. [7] By notice dated 17 June 1998, the Court afforded the parties an opportunity to make written submissions in terms of the proviso to section 19(3) of the Act. The notice specifically directed the attention of the parties to the question - Awhether, to succeed, plaintiff should or should not satisfy the requirements of section 10(1)(d) of Act 62 of 1997 and if he should, whether plaintiff has satisfied such requirements.@ [8] The plaintiff has filed his written submissions dated 26 June 1998, but no submissions were received on behalf of the defendant. [9] The effect of paragraphs 2.1 to 2.5 of plaintiff s submissions is that defendant s right to residence arose out of his employment by plaintiff, and as stipulated in section 8(2) of the Act; that he was dismissed in accordance with the provisions of the Labour Relations Act for being absent from work without good cause; that defendant did not resign but was dismissed. I have already dealt with this situation above and need not repeat myself here. [10] However, the submission in paragraph 2.6 of plaintiff s submissions, that we are dealing with a situation where Adie verweerder (okkupeerder) so n verbreking van die werkgewer-werknemer verhouding tussen homself en eiser (die eienaar) gepleeg het, dat dit nie prakties moontlik is om dié verhouding te herstel nie@ is a major departure from Plaintiff s case as presented before the magistrate. This is a cause of action in terms of section 10(1)(c) and not 10(1)(d) of the Act. Plaintiff s case before the magistrate was that defendant s right of residence arose solely from an employment agreement and that the employment agreement having terminated, defendant should vacate the residence, failing which he (plaintiff) seeks an order of eviction against defendant. This is a cause of action in terms of section 10(1)(d) of the Act, and is different from the one of a fundamental breach of the relationship between the parties which is mentioned in section 10(1)(c).
6 6 [11] Plaintiff should not, on review, be allowed to change his cause of action from that which is brought to this court for review. In any case, the facts from the pleadings do not support the Afundamental breach of the cause of action. Therefore, I cannot agree with plaintiff s submission that - AUit bogenoemde blyk dit dus dat die Agbare Hof in hierdie saak te doen het met n geval soos bedoel in Artikel 10(1)(c), saamgelees met Artikel 8(2) en dat Artikel 10(1)(d) van Wet 62 van 1997 nie van toepassing is nie.@ [12] The magistrate s court dealt with a situation which is regulated by section 10(1)(d), read with section 8(2) of Act 62 of 1997 and in that situation I have already found that the order of the magistrate cannot stand. [13] Accordingly, the order of 2nd June 1998 in terms of which Defendant is ordered to vacate his residence on Plaintiff s property is hereby set aside in whole in terms of section 19(3)(b) of the Act. JUDGE J MOLOTO Handed down on: 1 July 1998 For the plaintiff : James King & Partners For the defendant : Hennie Jacobs & Badenhorst Inc
7 7
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 15R/04 In chambers: MOLOTO J MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 95/02 Decided on: 3 March 2004 In the review proceedings in the case between:
More informationGOVERNMENT G - AZETTE STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA. I No September 1998 No September 1998
GOVERNMENT G - AZETTE STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Registered at the Post Ojice as a Newspaper As n Nuusblad by die Poskantoor Geregistreer b CAPE TOWN, 28 SEPTEMBER 1998 VOL. 399 No.
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 21R/00 In chambers: DODSON J MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 6753/98 Decided on: 02 May 2000 In the review proceedings in the case between:
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 81R/01 In chambers: Gildenhuys AJ MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 8448/2001 Decided on: 06 September 2001 In the review proceedings in
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 48R/00 In chambers: DODSON J MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 3001/2000 Decided on: 27 July 2000 In the review proceedings in the case
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at RANDBURG CASE NUMBER : 23/98 In the matter between : NEW ADVENTURE INVESTMENTS 19 (PTY) LTD MERCIA GLUTZ First Applicant Second Applicant amd BETCHI JOSEPH
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID AFRIKA Regulation Gazette No. 10847 10177 Regulasiekoerant Vol. 637 13 July Julie 2018 No. 41771 N.B. The Government Printing
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Review number. : 508/2010 In the review matter between: THE STATE and LEETO MAKEKA CORAM: MUSI, J et MOCUMIE, J JUDGMENT BY: C.J. MUSI, J DELIVERED
More informationESTERHUYZE v KHAMADI 2001 (1) SA 1024 (LCC) Flynote : Sleutelwoorde. Headnote : Kopnota
ESTERHUYZE v KHAMADI 2001 (1) SA 1024 (LCC) 2001 (1) SA p1024 Citation 2001 (1) SA 1024 (LCC) Case No LCC 48R/00 Court Land Claims Court Judge Dodson J Heard July 27, 2000 Judgment July 27, 2000 Annotations
More informationUITSPRAAK IN DIE NOORD GAUTENG HOE HOF PRETORIA (REPUBL1EK VAN SUID-AFRIKA) ) seres SAAKNOMMER: 38798/2006. In die saak tussen: Applikant
IN DIE NOORD GAUTENG HOE HOF PRETORIA (REPUBL1EK VAN SUID-AFRIKA) In die saak tussen: VERONICA KRETSCHMER SAAKNOMMER: 38798/2006 Applikant en 3ROLL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (EDMS) 3PK (REGISTRASIENOMMER 199S/C15132/07)
More informationR E A S O N S F O R J U D G M E N T. applicant also being tried on a further charge of indecent assault. It was alleged
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (SOUTH EASTERN CAPE LOCAL DIVISION) In the matter between Case No.: CC15/02 Date available: LIONEL FOURIE First Applicant TONY McCARTHY Second Applicant NATHAN NIEKERK
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG. V. V. A. Applicant. V. T. L. Respondent DATE OF HEARING : 05 SEPTEMBER 2015
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST DIVISION,
More informationIs s 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953 finally tailored? Prof Francois du Toit. FISA Conference. September 2012
Is s 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953 finally tailored? Prof Francois du Toit FISA Conference September 2012 John H Langbein, Substantial compliance with the Wills Act 1975 Harvard Law Review 489 498: What
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) PETER MOHLABA. and WINSTON NKOPODI JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (BOPHUTHATSWANA PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between: Case No.: Civil Appeal 3/2003 PETER MOHLABA and WINSTON NKOPODI JUDGMENT HENDRICKS AJ: INTRODUCTION This is
More information2 No GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 16 SEPTEMBER 2010 Act No, 5 of 2010 SOCIAL ASSISTANCE AMENDMENT ACT GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: Words in bold type
Vol. 543 Cape Town, 16 September2010 No. 33562 Kaapstad, THE PRESIDENCY DIE PRESIDENSIE No. 830 16 September 2010 Nr. 830 16 September 2010 It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the
More informationProclamations Proklamasies
R. 37 Special Investigating Units and Tribunals Act (74/1996): Referral of matters to existing Special Investigating Unit 41271 STAATSKOERANT, 24 NOVEMBER 2017 No. 41271 11 Proclamations Proklamasies PROCLAMATION
More informationEXHAUST & RADIATOR SERVICES
In the matter between: IN THE NORTH WEST HIGH COURT (MAFIKENG) CASE NO.: CIV APP 1/13 EXHAUST & RADIATOR SERVICES APPELLANT and WYNAND LAZENBY RESPONDENT CIVIL APPEAL LANDMAN J AND GUTTA J JUDGMENT LANDMAN
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case Number: 60/98 UITKYK FARM ESTATES (EDMS) BPK Applicant and A H VISSER E VISSER First Respondent Second Respondent JUDGMENT MEER, J:
More informationHANCKE, J et MOCUMIE, J. [1] This matter came before me on automatic review in terms of. section 302 read with 304 of the Criminal Procedure Act 51
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the review between:- THE STATE versus M G K Review No. : 13/08 CORAM: HANCKE, J et MOCUMIE, J JUDGMENT BY: MOCUMIE, J DELIVERED
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. LESLIE MILDENHALL TROLLIP t/a PROPERTY SOLUTIONS. HANCKE, J et FISCHER, AJ
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the appeal between:- Appeal No. : A297/10 JOHANNES STEPHANUS LATEGAN MARLET LATEGAN First Appellant Second Appellant and LESLIE MILDENHALL
More informationNORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY
Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to Regional Magistrates Circulate to Magistrates: YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO YES / NO NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY Saakno: / Case number: K/S 44/06 Datum
More information2 No Act No.6, 2006 SECTIONAL TITLES AMENDMENT ACT, 2006 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 25 JULY 2006 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: Words in bold type in squar
Vol. 493 Cape Town, 25 July Kaapstad, Julie 2006 THE PRESIDENCY DIE PRESIDENSIE No. 747 25 July 2006 No. 747 25 Julie 2006 It is hereby notified that the President has Hierby word bekend gemaak dat die
More informationVAN ZYL, J et MOCUMIE, J. [1] The accused was charged with housebreaking with intent to. commit an offence unknown to the prosecutor.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the review between:- THE STATE versus OTHNIEL SELLO MAIEANE Review No. : 92/2008 CORAM: VAN ZYL, J et MOCUMIE, J JUDGMENT BY:
More information[PROVINCIAL NOTICE NO. 7 OF 017] SUPPLEMENTARY VALUATION ROLL (017/018) Notice is hereby given in accordance with Chapter of the Municipal Systems Act
Provincial Gazette Free State Province Provinsiale Koerant Provinsie Vrystaat Published by Authority Uitgegee op Gesag NO.11 FRIDAY, 09 FEBRUARY 018 NR.11 VRYDAG, 09 FEBRUARIE 018 PROVINCIAL NOTICES PROVINSIALE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN OPTIC POWERLINES (PTY) LTD. J P HATTINGH trading as HAT KONTRUKSIE Respondent
SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION,
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CARLLO ANDRIAS GAGIANO
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the review between: Review No. : 4860/07 CARLLO ANDRIAS GAGIANO Plaintiff and CARRLO ANDRIAS GAGIANO (SNR) RACHEL MAGDALENA GAGIANO THERESA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION. In the matter between: FAIROAKS INVESTMENT HOLDI GS (PTY) LTD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA TRANSVAAL PROVINCIAL DIVISION Date: 02/02/2007 Case no: 9858/2005 UNREPORTABLE In the matter between: FAIROAKS INVESTMENT HOLDI GS (PTY) LTD WILLOW FALLS ESTATE Case no:
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Vol. 82 Cape Town, Kaapstad, 10 December 2013 No. 3714 THE PRESIDENCY DIE PRESIDENSIE No. 993 10 December 2013 No. 993
More informationLEBOGANG GODFREY MOGOPODI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the case between: Case No.: 122/2008 LEBOGANG GODFREY MOGOPODI Applicant and THE MEMBE OF THE EXECUTIVE COUNCIL OF THE FREE
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In matters between: Review No: 354/2010 The State vs. Motlatsi Monyane; The State vs. Leeto J Monyane and The State vs. Moholo A. Ramateletse
More informationDoreen Lame Serumula. Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment ofthe LLM degree at the University of Stellenbosch
THE RELEVANCE OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN SECTIONAL TITLES LAW IN INTERPRETATION AND APPLICATION OF THE SECTIONAL TITLES LEGISLATION OF BOTSWANA: AN ANALYSIS OF PROVISIONS PERTAINING TO ESTABLISHMENT OF SCHEMES
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION) CA&R No: Review No: Date Delivered: In the matter between: JUDGMENT
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE DIVISION) CA&R No: Review No: 020558 Date Delivered: In the matter between: The State and Nataniel Mondo JUDGMENT PLASKET AJ: [1] On 16 October 2002, the
More informationMALITABA REBECCA PHOKONTSI LIKELELI ELIZABETH SEBOLAI
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the appeal between: MALITABA REBECCA PHOKONTSI LIKELELI ELIZABETH SEBOLAI Case No.: A199/2009 1 st Appellant 2 nd Appellant and KHATSE EVELYN
More informationVAN ZYL, J et MOCUMIE, J. [1] This matter came before me on automatic review in terms of. section 302 read with 304 of the Criminal Procedure Act, No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the case between: Case No.: 209/2008 THE STATE and JIM HENDRICKS CORAM: VAN ZYL, J et MOCUMIE, J JUDGEMENT: MOCUMIE, J DELIVERED
More information2 No Act No.7, 2005 SECTIONAL TITLES AMENDMENT ACT, 2005 GOVERNMENT GAZETIE, 13 JULY 2005 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: Words in bold type in squar
.. II " Vol. 481 Cape Town, 13 July Kaapstad, Julie 2005 No. 27783 THE PRESIDENCY DIE PRESIDENSIE No. 697 13 July 2005 No. 697 13 Julie 2005 It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the
More informationSTATE LIABILITY AMENDMENT ACT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA STATE LIABILITY AMENDMENT ACT REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA WYSIGINGSWET OP STAATSAANSPREEKLIKHEID No 14, 11 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: [ ] Words in bold type in square brackets indicate
More information1:9'.t.:~7,?f(~. AJ~1( ~ And. Case number: 30836/2016 Date: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) In the matter between:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA) Case number: 30836/2016 Date: DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1) REPORTABLE: 'fes"/no 1:9'.t.:~7,?f(~. (2) OF INTEREST TO OTH,ER~ES: :tes/no
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY
Reportable: Yes / No Circulate to Judges: Yes / No Circulate to Magistrates: Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY In the matter between: CASE NO: 1960/2010 HEARD:
More informationGovernment Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. Cape Town Kaapstad. 02 August 2017 No DIE PRESIDENSIE THE PRESIDENCY. No August 2017
Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Cape Town Vol. 626 Kaapstad 02 August 17 No. 417 THE PRESIDENCY No. 769 02 August 17 It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the following Act,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Case No.: A183/2013 DANNY MEKGOE Applicant and THE STATE Respondent CORAM: DAFFUE, J et NAIDOO, J JUDGMENT BY:
More informationFILING SHEET FOR HIGH COURT, BISHO JUDGMENT MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY & ANO. [1] Case Number: 317/05
FILING SHEET FOR HIGH COURT, BISHO JUDGMENT PARTIES: LUMKA TWALO vs MINISTER OF SAFETY & SECURITY & ANO [1] Case Number: 317/05 DATE HEARD: 26 November 2008 JUDGMENT DELIVERED: 7 January 2009 JUDGE: Y
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Reportable: YES/NO Of Interest to other Judges: YES/NO Circulate to Magistrates: YES/NO In the matter between: LEON BOSMAN N.O. IZAK
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 1 APRIL 2010 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed documents not received
Regulation Gazette 9252 Regulasiekoerant Vol. 538 Pretoria, 1 April 2010 33068 2 33068 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 1 APRIL 2010 IMPORTANT NOTICE The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for faxed
More informationHIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN
HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN In the matter between:- Case Number : 99/2014 THE STATE and RETHABILE NTSHONYANE THABANG NTSHONYANE CORAM: DAFFUE, J et MURRAY, AJ JUDGMENT
More informationJUDGMENT DELIVERED ON 26 AUGUST 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) Case No: 20900/08 In the matter between: ROSSO SPORT AUTO CC Applicant and VIGLIETTI MOTORS (PTY) LTD Respondent JUDGMENT DELIVERED
More informationIN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT. PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA)
NOT REPORTABLE IN THE NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT. PRETORIA (REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA) CASE NO: 39248/2011 DATE: 08/02/2013 IN THE MATTER BETWEEN LEONARD GREYLING CARL GREYLING First Plaintiff Second Plaintiff
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG THE STATE AND THABANG LERUMO THSEPISO MASANGO BAFANA MATANA NKOSINATHI MTSHWENI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST HIGH COURT, MAFIKENG HIGH COURT REF: 08/2017 In the matter between:- THE STATE AND THABANG LERUMO THSEPISO MASANGO BAFANA MATANA NKOSINATHI MTSHWENI CALVIN
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG JACOBUS FREDERICK ENSLIN. WYNAND COENRAAD JACOBUS BEZUIDENTHOUD N.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH WEST DIVISION, MAHIKENG CASE NO: 1741/2012 In the matter between:- JACOBUS FREDERICK ENSLIN 1 st Applicant WYNAND COENRAAD JACOBUS BEZUIDENTHOUD N.O 2 nd Applicant
More informationFERDINAND WILHELMUS NEL ETIENNE BRITZ MINISTER OF SAFETY AND SECURITY. SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT L. S. MOFOKENG 2 nd Defendant CAPTAIN W.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the matter between: FERDINAND WILHELMUS NEL ETIENNE BRITZ Case No.: 1686/2006 1 st Plaintiff 2 nd Plaintiff and MINISTER OF
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA RANDBURG CASE NUMBER: LCC 38R/02 In chambers: MOLOTO AJ MAGISTRATE S COURT CASE NUMBER: 18577/01 Decided on: 27 May 2002 In the review proceedings in the case between:
More informationCRIMINAL LAW (SEXUAL OFFENCES AND RELATED MATTERS) AMENDMENT ACT AMENDMENT ACT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA CRIMINAL LAW (SEXUAL OFFENCES AND RELATED MATTERS) AMENDMENT ACT AMENDMENT ACT REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA WYSIGINGSWET OP WYSIGINGSWET OP DIE STRAFREG (SEKSUELE MISDRYWE EN VERWANTE
More informationGovernment Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Vol. 426 Cape Town 21 April 09 No. 32148 THE PRESIDENCY No. 434 21 April 09 It is hereby notified that the President has assented to the following Act, which
More informationFREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA. RAMPAI, AJP et SNELLENBURG, AJ
THE STATE versus FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Review No. : 56/2012 CLIFFORD MZIMKHULU MOTAUNG CORAM: RAMPAI, AJP et SNELLENBURG, AJ JUDGMENT BY: RAMPAI, AJP DELIVERED ON:
More information1] On 11 August 2011 the accused appeared before the Magistrate,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE GRAHAMSTOWN) In the matter between: Review No.: 110154 CA&R No.: 296/2012 Date delivered: 17 September 2012 THE STATE and FREDLIN JOE-WAYNE DIDLOFT R E V
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT) JUDGMENT. The defendant applies to court for an order in terms of which the plaintiff is
I IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT) Case number: 56513/2008 Date: 31 March 2011 DELETE WHICHEVER IS NOT APPLICABLE (1} REPORTABLE: Y S?NO (2} OF INTEREST TO OTHERS jy^esi^xk/no
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA GOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Registered at the Post Office as a Newspaper As 'n Nuusblad by die Poskantoor Geregistreer Price 20c Prys Overseas
More informationCase No: 2142/2009. FIRST RAND BANK LIMITED t/a WESBANK DUAL DISCOUNT WHOLESALERS CC
IN THE KWAZULU-NATAL HIGH COURT, DURBAN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Case No: 2142/2009 In the matter between: FIRST RAND BANK LIMITED t/a WESBANK PLAINTIFF and DUAL DISCOUNT WHOLESALERS CC DEFENDANT JUDGMENT
More informationReproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer s Copyright Authority No dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT
STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA GOVER~ENT GAZETTE As 'n Nuusblad by die Poskantoor Geregistreer Registered at the Post Office as a Newspaper Prys loe Price Oorsee
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
, Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Vol. 72 Cape Town, Kaapstad, 1 February 2013 No. 36128 THE PRESIDENCY DIE PRESIDENSIE No. 72 1 February 2013 No. 72
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID AFRIKA Regulation Gazette No. 10177 Regulasiekoerant Vol. 618 9 December Desember 2016 No. 40487 N.B. The Government Printing
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Vol. 568 Pretoria, 23 October Oktober 2012 35807 N.B. The Government Printing Works will not be held responsible for
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA ".'. GOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Registered at the Post Office as a Newspaper As 'n Nuusblad by die Poskontoot Geregistreer Price 20c Prys
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE HIGH COURT, KIMBERLEY) Case No: 724/14 Heard On 20/02/2015 Delivered 24/04/2015 In the matter between ALBERT WILLIAMS JACOBSZ Plaintiff And KAREN SOUTHEY
More informationRAMPAI J RAMPAI J. [1] The matter came before me by way of an exception. The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No. : 1071/2003 In the matter between: HUBRECHT WILLEM STEENBERGEN FIRST PLAINTIFF ZACHARIAS JOHANNES CILLIERS SECOND PLAINTIFF
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDGMENT Case no: 576/11 Reportable In the matter between:- RADITSHEGO GODFREY MASHILO MINISTER OF POLICE FIRST APPELLANT SECOND APPELLANT and JACOBUS MICHAEL
More informationRepublic of South Africa IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) HERMAN ALBERT VAN DER MERWE
Republic of South Africa REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE HIGH COURT, CAPE TOWN) CASE No: 15638/2008 In the matter between: LOGISTA INC DANIEL COETZEE LOURENS ERASMUS OOSTHUIZEN
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) FRANCOIS JOHANNES WIUM JUDGMENT DELIVERED 28 MAY 2104
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) Case no: 4567/2009 In the matter between: FRANCOIS JOHANNES WIUM Plaintiff and FREDERICK ARIJS Defendant JUDGMENT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WITWATERSRAND LOCAL DIVISION) REPORTABLE CASE NO: 04/9610 In the matter between: DITEDU. DINEO ROSLYN Plaintiff and TAYOB, YOUSHA Defendant JUDGMENT GOLDSTEIN J: [1]
More information.. That ~s correct, but as I stated when dealing with Objection
.. That ~s correct, but as I stated when dealing with Objection 6 the possibility is not excluded that the accused themselves personally liaised with the ANC or did the acts alleged in the sub-paragraph.
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Held at DURBAN on 31 October 2001 CASE NUMBER: LCC 40/01 Before: Gildenhuys AJ Decided on: 7 November 2001 In the interlocutory application of E M MDUNGE AND OTHERS
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID AFRIKA Regulation Gazette No. 10548 10177 Regulasiekoerant Vol. 607 14 January Januarie 2016 No. 39595 N.B. The Government Printing
More informationOFFICIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDif\IARY
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OFFICIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDif\IARY OF SOUTH WEST AFRICA BUITENGEWONE. OFFISIELE KOERANT VAN SUIDWES-AFRIKA UITGAWE OP GESAG 30c Wednesday 9 October 1985 WINDHOEK Woensdag 9 Oktober
More informationThe accused in this case is a 20 year old first offender who was arraigned. in the Magistrate s Court at Odendaalsrus on 4 counts of housebreaking
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In the review between: THE STATE and MPHO BOCHELI Review No.: 619/2004 CORAM: MALHERBE JP DELIVERED ON: 1 JULY 2004 The accused
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between Case No: A313/2014
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) In the matter between Case No: A313/2014 LODEWIKUS BARTHOLOMEUS VORSTER NO as trustee of the ELMA VORSTER KINDERTRUST APPELLANT And PM
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID AFRIKA Regulation Gazette No. 10177 Regulasiekoerant Vol. 640 1 October Oktober 2018 No. 41948 N.B. The Government Printing
More informationEducational law in democracy -Who guards the guardians? Freedom of expression and whistle-blowers - A personal narrative
Educational law in democracy -Who guards the guardians? Freedom of expression and whistle-blowers - A personal narrative Justus Prinsloo BIuris LLB Senior Researcher, Faculty of Education, University of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN SUSANNA ISABELLA DU PLESSIS ALBERTUS JOHANNES ERASMUS JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION, BLOEMFONTEIN Appeal No.: A118/2015 In the appeal between:- SUSANNA ISABELLA DU PLESSIS Appellant And ALBERTUS JOHANNES ERASMUS Respondent CORAM: VAN
More informationProvincial Gazette Extraordinary Buitengewone Provinsiale Koerant
THE PROVINCE OF GAUTENG G A U T E N G PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT UNITY IN DIVERSITY DIE PROVINSIE GAUTENG Provincial Gazette Extraordinary Buitengewone Provinsiale Koerant Vol. 19 PRETORIA, 31 JULY JULIE 2013
More informationIN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LAND CLAIMS COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In Chambers: DODSON J CASE NUMBER: 90/98 In the matter of THE MAKULEKE COMMUNITY Claimant Concerning: PAFURI AREA OF THE KRUGER NATIONAL PARK AND ENVIRONS, SOUTPANSBERG
More informationREPORTABLE CASE NO: 397/96 THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. In the matter between: S A EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.
REPORTABLE CASE NO: 397/96 THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: S A EAGLE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD APPELLANT and LYNNE PRETORIUS RESPONDENT CORAM: SMALBERGER, MARAIS, SCHUTZ,
More informationOFFICIAL GAZETTE. Government Notice. Goewermentskennisgewing. 30c Wednesday 18 December 1985 WINDHOEK Woensdag 18 Desember 1985 No 5155
PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OFFICIAL GAZETTE EXTRAORDINARY OF SOUTH WEST AFRICA BUITENGEWONE OFFISIELE KOERANT VAN SUIDWES-AFRIKA UITGAWE OP GESAG 30c Wednesday 18 December 1985 WINDHOEK Woensdag 18 Desember
More informationThe law of general application requirement in expropriation law and the impact of the Expropriation Bill of 2015
346 The law of general application requirement in expropriation law and the impact of the Expropriation Bill of 2015 Bradley V Slade BComm LLM LLD Senior Lecturer, Department of Public Law, University
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA Vol. 571 Pretoria, 4 January Januarie 2013 36055 AIDS HELPLINE: 0800-0123-22 Prevention is the cure 202098 A 36055 1
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION: BLOEMFONTEIN
In the matter between: THE STATE And IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA FREE STATE DIVISION: BLOEMFONTEIN Review No: 191/2014 PHELLO MXHAKA CORAM: MOCUMIE J et MOENG, AJ JUDGMENT: MOENG, AJ DELIVERED ON:
More informationMUSI J. [1] On 27 June 2003 the parties hereto entered into a Deed of. Sale of a fixed property described as Gedeelte 1 van die
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) Case No. : 2589/2004 In the matter between: ABRAHAM WILLEM ADRIAAN COETZEE APPLICANT and ANNA CATHARINA VAN DER WALT RESPONDENT
More informationFORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT
FORM A FILING SHEET FOR EASTERN CAPE JUDGMENT ECJ no: PARTIES: ROAD ACCIDENT FUND v CORNEL FORBES REFERENCE NUMBERS Registrar: CA 197/05 Magistrate: Supreme Court of appeal/constitutional Court: EASTERN
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA 1 Reportable CASE NO: 499/2000 In the matter between: AUSSENKEHR FARMS (PTY) LTD Appellant and TRIO TRANSPORT CC Respondent Before: Heard: 7 MARCH 2002 Delivered:
More informationReproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer s Copyright Authority No dated 02 February 1998
2 No. 36743 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 12 August 13 Act No. of 13 Superior Courts Act, 13 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: [ ] Words in bold type in square brackets indicate omissions from existing enactments. Words
More informationGOVERNMENT GAZETTE STAATSKOERANT
eproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer s Copyright Authority No. 10505 dated 02 February 1998 EPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFI
More informationGovernment Gazette Staatskoerant
Government Gazette Staatskoerant REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIEK VAN SUID AFRIKA Regulation Gazette No. 10495 10177 Regulasiekoerant Vol. 603 10 September September 2015 No. 39184 N.B. The Government
More informationIn the matter between: Case No: 607/2010
REPORTABLE IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, GRAHAMSTOWN) In the matter between: Case No: 607/2010 ANTONIE LE ROUX Applicant And H. PIETERSE N.O 1 st Respondent THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
More informationReproduced by Data Dynamics in terms of Government Printers' Copyright Authority No dated 24 September 1993
2 No. 417 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, 2 AUGUST 17 GENERAL EXPLANATORY NOTE: [ ] Words in bold type in square brackets indicate omissions from existing enactments. Words underlined with a solid line indicate insertions
More informationReproduced by Sabinet Online in terms of Government Printer s Copyright Authority No dated 02 February 1998 STAATSKOERANT
STAATSKOERANT VAN DIE REPUBLIEK VAN SUID-AFRIKA REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA GOVERNMENT GAZETTE As 'n Nuusblad by die Poskantoor Geregistreer Registered at the Post Office as a Newspaper Prys 10e Price Oorsee
More informationGIDEON JAKOBUS DU PLESSIS APPLICANT WILLEM JACOBUS DU PLESSIS N.O SECOND RESPONDENT JUDGMENT
Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, PORT ELIZABETH) Case no: 2990/10 Date delivered: 29 October 2010 In the matter between: GIDEON JAKOBUS DU PLESSIS APPLICANT and WILLEM JACOBUS
More informationPROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PROTECTION FROM HARASSMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 75); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No. 32922 of 1 February
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT JOHANNESBURG
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 14842/2011 (1) REPORTABLE: Yes (2) OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: Yes. (3) REVISED...... DATE SIGNATURE In the matter between THABO
More informationJUDGMENT PHATUDI, J IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH AND SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) DATE: 23 SEPTEMBER 2010 CASE NO: 44572/2009.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTH AND SOUTH GAUTENG HIGH COURT, PRETORIA) DATE: 23 SEPTEMBER 2010 CASE NO: 44572/2009 MARLOW PROJECTS CC PLAINTIFF And CAREL SEBASTIAAN JANSER VAN RENSBURG 1 s
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN High Court Review Ref: 18509/2018 Riversdal Magistrates Court case no. SB295/16 Mossel Bay Magistrates Court Special Review (C.M. Maseti)
More informationMR THIBILE ELVIS SEHLABAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (ORANGE FREE STATE PROVINCIAL DIVISION) In matter between:- Case No. : 4820/2008 MR THIBILE ELVIS SEHLABAKA Applicant And ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Respondent HEARD ON: 23 SEPTEMBER
More informationELIZABETH ANTOINETTE ROHDE
FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between:- Application No: 4966/09 ELIZABETH ANTOINETTE ROHDE Applicant and HELLMUTH ROBERT ROHDE HELLMUTH ROBERT ROHDE N.O. ELIZABETH
More information