2017 STAC Fact Pattern Clarifications
|
|
- Maximillian Norman Goodman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 2017 STAC Fact Pattern Clarifications Editor s Note In addition to the questions answered below, the fact pattern has been reposted, revised to reflect the following changes: The stipulations have been revised to reflect accurate numbering. A compass regarding the directions on the map and the locations of the windows and doors has been added at STAC 48. The expert report of Quinn Noonan has been updated to reflect the correct date of October 16, The Joint Exhibit List has been updated to reflect the correct title of the Steelton Post- Gazette article that is provided as Exhibit B. Exhibit A has been updated with the correct time of the police report being taken at 23:45 Answers to Team Questions 1. Based on the language in the jury instructions, are we to assume the depositions taken were video depos? Answer: Yes. 2. Given that Exhibit 6 is labeled photographs and other demonstratives of scooters property but only includes one demonstrative, are we missing additional photos of the property? Answer: There are no additional photographs of the property. 3. Is the parking lot fenced? The lines on the diagram indicate some kind of limited access. Answer: The parking lot is not fenced. 4. If the Chase place was on the corner (and the corner is not indicated on the diagram), was the store and/or the parking lot in its range? That is, could customers receive monsters on their phones while they were in the store and/or the parking lot, or did they have to be on the sidewalk close to the corner? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding this question. 5. Were there other businesses on the street and were they open at the time of the assault? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding this question. 6. On page STAC 36, the expert report of Quinn Noonan is dated October 16, All the other reports are from Is the correct date listed or should it read October 16, 2016? Answer: The date should read October 16, The fact pattern has been updated to reflect this fact. 1
2 7. Regarding Exhibit D, Chase m End User Licensing Agreement ( EULA ). Is the EULA provided for the player of the game or for the individual applying to be a Chase m place? Answer: This agreement is for the player of the game. 8. I understand there are no pre-trial motions, does that include motions in límine? Answer: Motions in limine are not allowed. 9. Is the purpose of Exhibit E to be demonstrative of what the Chase m game looks like or does it depict some specific person in the case file? Answer: Yes, the purpose of Exhibit E is to demonstrate what the Chase m game looks like. It does not depict a specific person in the case file. 10. Could an individual download the Chase m app and play without agreeing to the Licensing Agreement by way of a click? Answer: The Chase m app cannot be accessed without agreeing to the End User Licensing Agreement (EULA). 11. Even though not marked as exhibits, can the experts CVs and reports be introduced as evidence? Answer: Yes, they may be introduced as evidence. 12. Where on Scooter's building is the door located? Do the windows and door to Scooter s face the parking lot, the street, or both? Answer: There is one door with a small window leading to the parking lot. There are windows facing the streets. Please see Exhibit F for the locations. 13. Is the sidewalk insured by Scooter at the X, KF, or both? Are the street lights and sidewalk in front of Scooter s Ice Cream Parlor under the jurisdiction and control of the Steelton municipality with the exception of snow removal from the sidewalk on Scooter s property? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding whether the sidewalk is insured by Scooter or who controls the sidewalk. 14. Is the poster s mention of the rare monsters in general meant to reflect the specific rare monsters mentioned in the Answer? Answer: The poster s mention of rare monsters is meant to reflect rare monsters in general, not any specific rare monster. 15. Is trespassing an affirmative defense? The Defense asserts trespassing in the Answer, but the jury instructions do not refer to trespassing as an affirmative defense. Answer: Yes, trespassing is an affirmative defense. 2
3 16. Affirmative Defense #2 alleges, Plaintiff's Complaint is barred by Plaintiff's own negligence. The jury instruction titled Comparative Negligence (STAC p. 57) does not make clear whether Steelton is a pure or modified comparative negligence jurisdiction. Will the committee clarify? Answer: Steelton is a modified comparative negligence jurisdiction. If the plaintiff is 50 percent or more at fault, there is no recovery. 17. On STAC 32, the first sentence under "Facts" reads, "... while he was in outside of Scooter's." Is "in outside" a typo that will be corrected Answer: Yes, the fact pattern has been revised and the line now reads while he was outside of Scooter s. 18. Is the Steelton Post-Gazette Newspaper article identified as Exhibit B (STAC 40) the same article referred to in Scooter's deposition (STAC 27:2)? The joint exhibit list refers to a Steelton Post-Gazette Newspaper article titled Chase m Turns into Beat m, is this the same article as Exhibit B, even though the article titles do not match? Answer: Yes, the fact pattern has been revised to reflect that the article identified as Exhibit B in the Joint Exhibit List is the article on STAC 40. The article is now titled Video Game Leads to Violence. 19. Why are there discrepancies in the Plaintiff and Defendant s addresses? Answer: The plaintiff s address is 480 Pennsylvania Avenue, District of Steelton. The defendant s address is 178 Kessel Drive, District of Steelton. 20. What is the age of majority in Steeleton? Answer: Eighteen. 21. How many people were standing on the sidewalk playing Chase'm in the moments leading up to the mugging of Mr. Daley? Answer: No further information will be given regarding how many people were standing on the sidewalk playing Chase m in the moments leading up to the mugging. 22. Does Chase'm give notifications to players about nearby monsters while the player is not using their phone? Answer: Yes. 23. How much of the parking lot do the cameras capture? Answer: The cameras capture the entire parking lot. 3
4 24. Stipulation 11 states that the expert reports were produced simultaneously by the parties, but it also says that the experts have reviewed all documents contained within this case file and may testify to the same. Does this mean an expert witness can comment on another expert witness s report? Answer: Please see page 11 of the Official Rules under Witnesses, which states Expert witnesses are assumed to have access to and have read all documents in the fact pattern. A lay witness can only attest to his or her deposition and related exhibits. Yes, experts have read and may comment on another s report. 25. Are the lights on the street referenced in STAC 19 line 3 affixed to the side of the building, or are they mounted on lampposts? Answer: The lights on the street refer to street lights on lampposts that are not affixed to the side of the building. 26. Would either, both, or neither of the cameras be visible to a person standing on the extreme easternmost portion of the sidewalk in Exhibit F, or would one or both cameras be obstructed by the building? Answer: No further information will be provided about the visibility of the cameras from specific angles. 27. When did Scooter s initially install the security cameras/lights in parking lot? Answer: According to the fact pattern, the cameras and lights were installed after a boy fell in the parking lot, approximately a year before Bobby Daley s incident. 28. Ex. A - how did Officer Nath prepare the report on 6/6/15 at 2245 when she received call at 2305? Answer: The fact pattern has been updated to reflect that the report was prepared at Is Guardsman Corporation (the company for which Quinn Noonan works), located in Steelton? Answer: Yes. 30. Does one have to be at a Chase Place to catch monsters? Answer: No. 31. According to Bryce Summerstein, the Plaintiff could have been seen from inside Scooter s when he was standing on the sidewalk where he was attacked if the plaintiff was standing as is depicted in one of the potential locations. Which depicted location is Bryce Summerstein referring to? Answer: Exhibit F shows where the Plaintiff was attacked. 4
5 32. Can it be inferred that Exhibit B is an opinion piece in the local newspaper? The case packet has no information or description of Exhibit B Answer: The Joint Exhibit List on STAC 12 describes it as a newspaper article with the date the article appeared and what paper it appeared in. No further information on the article will be provided. 33. Exhibit E - How can a team lay a proper foundation as to this exhibit if there are no facts? Answer: Exhibit E is a demonstrative of what the game looks like and is from the Chase m website. 34. Page 6, Line 18 of Tracey (Scooter) Simon's deposition: Is this line correctly typed or should it read "About a week before the incident with Bobby,...?" Answer: The line is correctly typed in the deposition. About a week after the incident with Bobby, meaning the Chase Place was moved inside after Bobby s incident. 35. Stipulation 6 states that Krista Fullatonova's deposition may be used at trial and the deposition testimony itself is not subject to a hearsay object. Does that mean there we are not able to object to any single portion of that deposition on hearsay grounds? Answer: Please refer to the Federal Rules of Evidence for how to handle hearsay objections. The stipulation is that the deposition may not be objected to on grounds of admissibility. 36. Can we get jury instructions for superseding and intervening acts of persons, entities or circumstances beyond the control of Defendant? That s affirmative defense #4 in the answer to the complaint. Answer: This is covered by the instruction on causation. 37. What did Quinn Noonan review to come to his/her conclusions? Answer: The experts have reviewed all documents contained within the case file. 38. Will the diagram of Scooter s Ice Cream Parlor (STAC 48) be admissible without a foundation as to who prepared the document? Answer: Yes. 39. What was the extent of the Plaintiff s physical injuries? For example, the Plaintiff mentions his broken arm (13; 20-21) then discusses being hit in the head (19; 14-15) but also has memory loss and was able to crawl/bang on door (24; 20-21). Answer: No further information will be provided regarding Plaintiff s injuries. 5
6 40. When was the advertisement on page 41 posted/published? Did Plaintiff see it? Answer: The advertisements were both posted before the incident. No further information will be provided regarding whether the Plaintiff saw them. 41. Is Plaintiff's expert s reference to news articles (32; 26) only referring to the Steelton Gazette article in the Record, or are there more articles that were published (page 40)? Answer: There were more articles published that are not in the record. 42. How frequently does Chase m remind its players about safe play and Chase m code of conduct, once through the End User Agreement when downloading the game or multiple times as a general warning when a player opens the app? Answer: No further information will be provided about Chase m reminders regarding safe play and its code of conduct. 43. When did Scooter submit his application to become a Chase Place? Answer: No information will be provided about when the application was submitted. 44. On page 39, Exhibit A, PO Report, it states that the PO responded to a 911 emergency dispatch at Scooter's Ice Cream. However, on pages 28-31, Kristy Fullatonova's deposition, she does not state whether or not she made the call. Only the Defendant in his deposition says so. Did Kristy call 911? Answer: No further information will be provided about a call. 45. Neither advertisement in Exhibit C is dated. The plaintiff s expert testifies that an advertisement appeared in newspaper circulation. Bobby states at STAC 17 that the advertisement dated June 1, 2015 was seen inside Scooter's. Which is the referenced advertisement and which advertisement appeared in circulation? Answer: Both the advertisement that appeared in the newspaper circulation and the advertisement that Bobby was shown during his deposition can be found on STAC Are both the complaint and answer verified by their respective parties? Answer: Yes. 47. Who took the photograph depicted in Exhibit E? Answer: No further information will be given regarding exactly who took the photograph depicted in Exhibit E. It is from the Chase m website. 48. Do we have definitions of willful and reckless as they pertain to the duty owed to a trespasser? Answer: No further definitions will be provided. 6
7 49. How much time did Scooter spend at his shop? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding how much time Scooter spent at his shop. 50. How many employees did Scooter's have? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding Scooter s employees. 51. STAC 37 - Expert report mentions a trespassing sign at Scooter's, even though this is not mentioned anywhere else in the fact pattern. Is this factual? Or is this an example of an expert using information he has no evidence to support? Did he visit the scene? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding this sign. 52. When playing Chase 'm, does it always show the real world when looking at the phone, or is it like Pokemon go and the real world only shows up when a monster spawns and you click on it to catch it Answer: Chase m is augmented reality. The real world will show as projected through the cell phone camera with a computer-generated Chase monster showing up. 53. Is there a typo in #5 of the complaint? Answer: Yes, the sentence should read: Chase m uses a mobile device s GPS capability to locate, capture, battle, and train virtual creatures called Chase Monsters. The record has been revised to reflect this change. 54. What was the exact language regarding safety on the box Scooter had to check to verify its location was safe? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding safety language that Scooter checked. 55. Does Daley still play Chase m? Answer: According to Bobby Daley s deposition, he indicated that he is no longer familiar with the game and there are new games that he plays now. 56. Are chase monsters tied to specific locations - i.e., chase places, or is it like Pokemon go and they can appear anywhere Answer: Chase Monsters can appear anywhere. 57. Is Scooter s Ice Cream Parlor s building immediately adjacent to the sidewalk, or is there a yard between the storefront and the sidewalk? Answer: Scooter s Ice Cream Parlor is immediately adjacent to the sidewalk. 7
8 58. For demonstrative purposes, may a team selectively pick pertinent jury instructions to fit on a single blow-up? Answer: Yes, as long as the instructions are exactly as they appear in the fact pattern. Please see page 12 of the Official Rules for rules regarding exhibits. 59. May "housekeeping matters" be discussed pre-trial, i.e., asking for permission to move freely about the well, constructively pre-swearing witnesses, bringing to the court's attention any stipulated-to exhibits, etc.? Answer: Yes, housekeeping matters may be discussed pre-trial. It is up to the discretion of the presiding judge in the competition how housekeeping matters are handled. 60. Is the police report in Exhibit A considered a matter of public record? Answer: The exhibits are stipulated to as being authentic and admissible subject to objection. 61. When talking about the duty listed under Failure to prevent intentional harm to business invitees is this the same standard of care as the duty defined under the Business visitor section of the jury instructions? Answer: Yes, it is the same standard of care. 62. Which directions are the cameras pointing? Are they pointing in the same direction or opposite? Answer: The camera closest to the sidewalk faces northwest and the camera furthest from the sidewalk faces southwest. 63. Are teams limited to the affirmative defenses listed in the Answer? Answer: Yes. Only affirmative defenses that have been pled in the Answer are allowed. 64. Plaintiff's Complaint alleges that when Defendant was designated a Chase's Place, it was guaranteed to have five Petunia Choppers appear monthly (Paragraph 15). The Defendant's Answer says that the averments of Paragraphs of Plaintiff's Complaint are denied as stated. Defendant recognized that the certain Chase Monsters were rare, however, it was never notified of specific quantities of those Chase Monsters that would be available. In fact, Defendant's advertisements indicated that patrons could catch Petunia Choppers, Dornburgers, and Giggle Tickers, among others. Plaintiff's deposition states that on the wall "there was this big flyer about the fact that all of these rare Chase Monsters could be caught there. And these rare Chase Monsters only spawn something like five times at each location." Simon's deposition contains no mention of a Petunia Chopper. The flyer that Daley refers to has two monsters on it that are unidentified. Is this an intentional discrepancy, or is one of the monsters on the Flyer meant to be a 8
9 Petunia Chopper? Where does the Plaintiff get their contention in their complaint about the guarantee of five Petunia Choppers? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding specific Chase Monsters or quantities. 65. According to Bobby, who asked him/her to stand on the sidewalk next to the parking lot? Answer: According to Bobby s deposition, he does not specify who told him to stand on the sidewalk. 66. The Joint Exhibit List refers to screen shots of Chase m game, but there is only one such screen shot in the case file. Will any additional screen shots be provided? Answer: No. 67. Scooter s deposition testimony refers to the re-arrest of a mugger a couple of months back from the date of the deposition. On what date was this mugger rearrested? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding the mugger s arrest. 68. Did Scooter install both cameras and lights after the slip and fall or were the lights already there? Answer: Both the lights and cameras were installed after the slip and fall. 69. In the jury instructions on STAC 53, is a business visitor considered an invitee? Answer: No. 70. Do the common-law principles of notice and intervening causes apply in Steelton? Answer: No further legal principles will be provided. The legal principles that apply in Steelton are laid out in the jury instructions. 71. What is the disclosed area of expertise for each expert witness? How much are the experts being paid? Answer: Both experts are receiving $250 per hour for their services. Plaintiff s expert spent 20 hours on the case prior to testimony and defendant s expert spent 24 hours. 72. May witnesses be sequestered if we request it from the presiding judge? Answer: No, witnesses may not be sequestered. 73. Is the X on the map where Bobby says he was attacked? Answer: According to the fact pattern, the X is where Bobby was standing on the sidewalk. 9
10 74. For the two separate sections involving business visitor invitees and then intentional harm to business invitees: is a "customer" a fourth option under standard of care or is it an additional duty for a business visitor invitee? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding the instructions. 75. How is it possible that the victim was "lying on the sidewalk outside of Scooter's and the parking lot for Scooter's."? (police report) Answer: The victim was lying on the sidewalk outside of Scooter s, which is outside the parking lot for Scooter s. 76. On page 23, Scooter says that there were video cameras "inside and out." Then on page 24 he says that the two cameras were on the west side of the shop, facing the parking lot. Are both of the latter cameras outside? Are there therefore none inside, or are there actually three total? Answer: There are two cameras located on the outside of the shop. 77. Where were the advertisements published that scooters used and how many were published (like in a local newspaper?) (published everyday for a few weeks or months?) Answer: No further information will be provided regarding the publication of the advertisements. 78. In the diagram of scooters and the parking lot there are blue lines. Do all of the blue lines represent walls? is there a tall wall in between the parking lot and sidewalk as depicted) Answer: There is no wall between the parking lot and sidewalk. 79. What approach does our jurisdiction (Steelton) follow to determine foreseeability (i.e., specific harm; prior incidents test; totality of the circumstances; or balancing test)? Answer: No further legal principles will be provided. The legal principles that apply in Steelton are laid out in the jury instructions. 80. How long have street lights near the scene not been operational? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding the length of time that the streetlights near the scene were nonoperational. 81. Can you clarify whether the X/KF markings on the diagram indicate the location where the witnesses believe the attack occurred or where the plaintiff was when they were last seen by the witness. Answer: According to the testimonies, the X marking is where Bobby stated he was standing and the KF marking is where Kristy Fullatonova believed Bobby was going. 10
11 82. What is the proper text of the first paragraph of the newspaper article on p. 40? There is clearly a typo there. Answer: The last line of the paragraph should read: But every time your children pick up their phones, are they putting away their safety? The fact pattern has been revised to reflect this change. 83. In the Expert Witness Report (Summerstein) - when he references a red light - (Stac 33 & 34) is he indicating that the light was on even though the cameras were not recording or that the red light would be on IF the cameras were recording? Answer: He indicated that the red light was on at the time of the incident. 84. Is the sidewalk public property or private property? Answer: No further information will be provided regarding whether the sidewalk is public or private property. 85. Are there two cameras in the parking lot, or one inside and one out? Answer: There are two cameras in the parking lot. 86. What is the correct procedure for entering Fullatonova's deposition testimony? Answer: If you would like to enter Kristy Fullatonova s deposition testimony, you may read from the deposition transcript. 87. Should there be an intervening cause jury instruction? Answer: No. Please see the causation instruction, which states 88. Is the ice cream shop diagram (Ex. F) accurate in its depiction that no lights were installed on the sidewalk outside the shop? Answer: Exhibit F only depicts lights installed on the premises, not lights on the sidewalk outside of the shop. 11
Clarification Questions and Answers
Clarification Questions and Answers For purposes of this competition, the answer to any clarification question shall be treated as a stipulation during the trial. The competitors are bound by the answers
More information2018 STAC Fact Pattern Clarifications
2018 STAC Fact Pattern Clarifications Editor s Note In addition to the questions answered below, the fact pattern has been reposted, revised to reflect the following changes: A jury verdict form has been
More informationHOT TOPIC ISSUE: SPOILATION. General Liability Track, Session 3 Fifth Annual General Liability & Workers Compensation Seminar
HOT TOPIC ISSUE: SPOILATION General Liability Track, Session 3 Fifth Annual General Liability & Workers Compensation Seminar Carlock, Copeland & Stair Speaker: Scott Huray, Partner WHAT IS IT? Spoliation
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CLERMONT COUNTY, OHIO : : CASE # PLAINTIFF VS. : CIVIL PRE-TRIAL ORDER (JURY TRIAL) DEFENDANT IT IS ORDERED BY THE COURT AS FOLLOWS: 1. JURY TRIAL: The case is scheduled for a Primary
More informationINTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS
INTRODUCTION OF EXHIBITS AT TRIAL THE BASICS What are exhibits? Exhibits are types of evidence that are tangible. There are basically four types of exhibits. First, there is real evidence (the gun involved
More informationRULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS
RULES OF EVIDENCE LEGAL STANDARDS Digital evidence or electronic evidence is any probative information stored or transmitted in digital form that a party to a court case may use at trial. The use of digital
More informationRENO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER
RENO POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL ORDER This directive is for internal use only and does not enlarge this department's, governmental entity's and/or any of this department's employees' civil or criminal liability
More informationWhat if the other parent is not making child support payments? The court will consider whether a parent is helping to support their child.
How Does the Court Decide Which Parent Should Have Custody? Will the Court ask what I want? The court will allow each parent to tell who the child should live with and why. Will the Court ask my child
More information2014 Law Student Trial Competition Questions and Answers October 17, 2014
2014 Law Student Trial Competition Questions and Answers October 17, 2014 Q. Brandi Boots is said to have graduated high school in 1995, but in 2011 was only 23 years old. Can we get clarification on this?
More informationMENOMONEE FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY MEETING ROOM POLICY Approved by the Library Board: January 17, 2018 Effective: January 18, 2018
MENOMONEE FALLS PUBLIC LIBRARY MEETING ROOM POLICY Approved by the Library Board: January 17, 2018 Effective: January 18, 2018 The Library s meeting rooms are intended primarily for programs operated and
More informationINSTRUCTIONS AFTER JURY IS SWORN
Revised 10/15/12 INSTRUCTIONS AFTER JURY IS SWORN Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, you have been selected as the jury in this case. As you know this is a criminal case, and to assist you in better understanding
More informationCircuit Court for Baltimore County Case No.: 03-K UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No September Term, 2018
Circuit Court for Baltimore County Case No.: 03-K-17-005202 UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND No. 201 September Term, 2018 KHEVYN ARCELLE SHARP v. STATE OF MARYLAND Fader C.J., Leahy,
More informationBarbara Harris, v. Toys R Us 880 A.2d 1270 Superior Court of Pennsylvania August 3, 2005
Barbara Harris, v. Toys R Us Readers were referred to this case on page 210 of the 9 th edition Barbara Harris, v. Toys R Us 880 A.2d 1270 Superior Court of Pennsylvania August 3, 2005 Lally-Green, J.:
More informationHigh School Mock Trial 2015 Emerson Jones v. Buckeye Juvenile Correctional Institute Errata Sheet 10/14/14
High School Mock Trial 2015 Emerson Jones v. Buckeye Juvenile Correctional Institute Errata Sheet 10/14/14 1) What is the burden of proof of this year s case? Emerson Jones v. Buckeye Juvenile Correctional
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON
No. 511 October 25, 2017 407 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON In the Matter of M. M. A., a Youth. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. M. M. A., Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court J140225;
More informationIC Chapter 5. Search and Seizure
IC 35-33-5 Chapter 5. Search and Seizure IC 35-33-5-0.1 Application of certain amendments to chapter Sec. 0.1. The amendments made to section 5 of this chapter by P.L.17-2001 apply to all actions of a
More informationHigh School Mock Trial 2015 Emerson Jones v. Buckeye Juvenile Correctional Institute Errata Sheet 10/14/14
High School Mock Trial 2015 Emerson Jones v. Buckeye Juvenile Correctional Institute Errata Sheet 10/14/14 1) What is the burden of proof of this year s case? Emerson Jones v. Buckeye Juvenile Correctional
More informationANSWER A TO QUESTION 3
Question 3 Roofer contracted with Hal to replace the roof on Hal s house. The usual practice among roofers was to place tarpaulins on the ground around the house to catch the nails and other materials
More informationCACJ Questions and Answers
CACJ Questions and Answers A NUMBER OF THE QUESTIONS POSED BY TEAMS HAS RESULTED IN THE REPLACEMENT OF SOME OF THE PAGES TO THE MATERIALS. Witness List and Trial Stipulations (pages 005 and 006) have been
More informationCOMPLAINT FOR VISITATION COMMON PLEAS COURT
COMPLAINT FOR VISITATION COMMON PLEAS COURT THESE ARE PACKETS OF LEGAL FORMS AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE IN THE STATE OF OHIO COURTS AND THEY ARE INTENDED TO BE A GENERAL GUIDE TO GET THE FORMS FILLED OUT,
More informationTHE LAW PROFESSOR TORT LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #3 MODEL ANSWER
THE LAW PROFESSOR TORT LAW ESSAY SERIES ESSAY QUESTION #3 MODEL ANSWER Carol stopped her car at the entrance to her office building to get some papers from her office. She left her car unlocked and left
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 STEVEN EDWARDS, v. Plaintiff, A. DESFOSSES, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff Steven Edwards is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Craft v. Target Corporation Doc. 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 12-cv-00634-WJM-MJW ZAFIE CRAFT, Plaintiff, v. TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 13, 2012 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE June 13, 2012 Session KNOX COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION v. SHELLEY BREEDING Appeal from the Chancery Court for Knox County No. 182753-1 W. Frank Brown, III,
More informationMaricopa County Attorney Officer Involved Shooting Response Protocol
Maricopa County Attorney Officer Involved Shooting Response Protocol January, 2016 MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICER INVOLVED SHOOTING RESPONSE PROTOCOL PREAMBLE Law enforcement officers perform the vital
More information2015 IL App (1st) U. No IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
2015 IL App (1st) 141934-U FIFTH DIVISION SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 NOTICE: This order was filed under Supreme Court Rule 23 and may not be cited as precedent by any party except in the limited circumstances
More informationPurpose of a Deposition
1 Purpose of a Deposition A deposition permits a party to explore the facts held by an individual or an entity bearing on the case at hand. Depositions occur well before trial and allow the party taking
More informationDecided: May 30, S17A0357. THE STATE v. OGUNSUYI. Olubumi Ogunsuyi was indicted for malice murder and related crimes in
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: May 30, 2017 S17A0357. THE STATE v. OGUNSUYI. HINES, Chief Justice. Olubumi Ogunsuyi was indicted for malice murder and related crimes in connection with the January
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MARSHA PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED April 12, 2005 v No. 250418 Wayne Circuit Court STC, INC., d/b/a MCDONALD S and STATE LC No. 02-229289-NO FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 216 Filed: 03/31/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1811
Case: 1:13-cv-01851 Document #: 216 Filed: 03/31/17 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1811 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BASSIL ABDELAL, Plaintiff, v. No. 13 C 1851 CITY
More informationMOTION FOR CHANGE OF PARENTING TIME (COMPANIONSHIP AND VISITATION) LAWRENCE COUNTY, OHIO
MOTION FOR CHANGE OF PARENTING TIME (COMPANIONSHIP AND VISITATION) LAWRENCE COUNTY, OHIO You should only use these forms if there is already a custody and parenting order issued by the Domestic Relations
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER March 29, 2012 This Standing Order supercedes all prior Standing Orders regarding pending
More information2:16-cv EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20
2:16-cv-02222-EIL # 106 Page 1 of 20 E-FILED Friday, 18 May, 2018 03:51:00 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD Members of the jury, you have seen and heard all the evidence and will hear the arguments
More informationPERSON COUNTY ROXBORO, NORTH CAROLINA APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITIES
CASE (ASSIGNED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT) LOCATION: ZONING: CURRENT USE: It is understood that the Person County will hire Trigon Engineering as a consultant to review, analyze and evaluate all application
More informationSIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE
SIMPLIFIED RULES OF EVIDENCE Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...3 TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Title 1, Chapter 38...3 TEXAS RULES OF EVIDENCE Article I: General Provisions...4 Article IV: Relevancy
More informationPreparing and Trying Negligence Cases
Ottawa Law School March 5, 2018 Preparing and Trying Negligence Cases Presented by: DAVID F. MACDONALD, Partner *David MacDonald Law Professional Corporation 1-888-223-0448 647-290-7291 cell dmacdonald@thomsonrogers.com
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 21, 2016 v No. 326645 Ingham Circuit Court KRISTOFFERSON TYRONE THOMAS, LC No. 14-000507-FC Defendant-Appellant.
More informationJUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS
JUDGE DENISE POSSE LINDBERG STOCK CIVIL JURY INSTRUCTIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS Stock Opening Instructions Introduction and General Instructions... 1 Summary of the Case... 2 Role of Judge, Jury and Lawyers...
More informationHo norable Victoria A. Valentine
Ho norable Victoria A. Valentine Courtroom 2F - Second Floor - Oakland County Courthouse Telephone: 248-858-5282 GENERAL: Counsel and parties shall treat all people, be they opposing parties, opposing
More informationThe Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, et al. v. Brunner, Jennifer, etc.
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO 3 THE NORTHEAST OHIO ) 4 COALITION FOR THE ) HOMELESS, ET AL., ) 5 ) Plaintiffs, ) 6 ) vs. ) Case No. C2-06-896 7 ) JENNIFER BRUNNER,
More informationPRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS. CACI No. 100
PRETRIAL INSTRUCTIONS CACI No. 100 You have now been sworn as jurors in this case. I want to impress on you the seriousness and importance of serving on a jury. Trial by jury is a fundamental right in
More informationMaster File No ORDER NO. 9 Plaintiffs' Master Set of Requests for Production to Defendants
Master File No. 2004-70000 In Re: TEXAS STATE SILICA PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates to All Cases IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 295 JUDICIAL DISTRICT (Judge Tracy Christopher
More informationCBA Municipal Court Pro Bono Panel Program Municipal Procedure Guide 1 February 2011
CBA Municipal Court Pro Bono Panel Program Municipal Procedure Guide 1 February 2011 I. Initial steps A. CARPLS Screening. Every new case is screened by CARPLS at the Municipal Court Advice Desk. Located
More informationTRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005
TRIAL ADVOCACY - FALL 2005 Thomas K. Maher 312 W Franklin Street Chapel Hill, N.C. 27516 (O) 929-1043 (H) 933-5674 TKMaher@tkmaherlaw.com General Instructions 1. General Information. The class will meet
More informationSlowinski v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J NY Slip Op 30030(U) January 7, 2013 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /07 Judge: Joan A.
Slowinski v Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J. 2013 NY Slip Op 30030(U) January 7, 2013 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 113106/07 Judge: Joan A. Madden Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts
More informationGreenwood-Leflore Public Library System. 405 West Washington Street Greenwood, MS Meeting Room Policy
405 West Washington Street Greenwood, MS 38930 662-453-3634 The Library Board of Trustees of the (GLPLS) will be the final determining authority as to the interpretation of any section herein. GLPLS welcomes
More informationSUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO
SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN LUIS OBISPO Department 9 STANDING CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO THE HON. CHARLES S. CRANDALL INSTRUCTIONS TO PLAINTIFF(S)/CROSS-COMPLAINANT(S):
More informationBRADFORD COUNTY CELL PHONE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE POLICY. AND NOW, April 18, 2017, the Court of Common Pleas of Bradford County has hereby
BRADFORD COUNTY CELL PHONE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE POLICY AND NOW, April 18, 2017, the Court of Common Pleas of Bradford County has hereby entered an Administrative Order implementing a Cell Phone and Electronic
More informationWritten materials by Jonathan D. Sasser
Power Point Presentation By Rachel Scott Decker Ward Black Law 208 West Wendover Avenue Greensboro, North Carolina 27401 (336) 273-3812 www.wardblacklaw.com Written materials by Jonathan D. Sasser Since
More informationUPDATE MEMORANDUM 2016 ISBA High School Mock Trial Invitational
UPDATE MEMORANDUM 2016 ISBA High School Mock Trial Invitational Dunn v. Davies First Update Memo 1/4/2016 ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY TEAMS 1. Question: It seems jury instructions explain analysis
More informationCanales v The R.C. Church of the Holy Spirit 2015 NY Slip Op 30174(U) January 21, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: 20311/12 Judge:
Canales v The R.C. Church of the Holy Spirit 2015 NY Slip Op 30174(U) January 21, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: 20311/12 Judge: Sharon A.M. Aarons Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KHALANI CARR, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED June 20, 2017 v No. 330115 Oakland Circuit Court ROGER A. REED, INC., doing business as REED LC No. 2013-134098-NI WAX,
More information25101 PROCEDURE VIDEO IDENTIFICATION
Version 4.3 Last updated 03/10/2017 Review date 03/10/2018 Equality Impact Assessment High Owning department Custody 1. About this Procedure 1.1. This Procedure provides instruction to Hampshire Constabulary
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JANUARY 6, 2017; 10:00 A.M. TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2015-CA-000926-MR SHERRY G. MCCOY APPELLANT APPEAL FROM MARTIN CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE JOHN DAVID
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Information & Instructions: Master Interrogatories 1. The interrogatories in this form are designed for selection to fit the case. 2. The questions are intended to show the range of questions that may
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 LISA A. AND KEVIN BARRON Appellants IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ALLIED PROPERTIES, INC. AND COLONNADE, LLC, AND MAXWELL TRUCKING
More informationImpeachment by omission. Impeachment for inconsistent statement. The Evidence Dance. Opening Statement Tip Twice
Impeachment by omission Impeachment for inconsistent statement The Evidence Dance Opening Statement Tip Twice Closing Argument The Love Boat Story: A Vicious Tale Top Six Objections Evidence Review Housekeeping
More informationKnowledge Objectives (2 of 2) Skills Objectives. Introduction. Legal Considerations During Investigation 12/20/2013. Legal Considerations
Legal Considerations Knowledge Objectives (1 of 2) Recognize and list the major legal issues and considerations that may arise in a fire or explosion investigation. Describe the legal authority for both
More informationSAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE
SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT PROCEDURE DATE: 04/04/2014 NUMBER: SUBJECT: 4.02 LEGAL EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION RELATED POLICY: 4.02 ORIGINATING DIVISION: OPERATIONAL SUPPORT NEW PROCEDURE: PROCEDURAL CHANGE:
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 04-916 BILLYE S. COHEN, ET VIR VERSUS BROOKSHIRE BROTHERS, INC., ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/22/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/22/2016 12:04 PM INDEX NO. 159878/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/22/2016 1 Page 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------X
More informationInterviewing Suspects. ABC Food Safety Online
Interviewing Suspects ABC Food Safety Online Aims This course aims to provide the reader with the necessary skills and confidence to undertake PACE interviews. Objectives On completion of this course the
More informationSTATE'S SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION IN LIMINE REGARDING COMPUTER ANIMATION
e IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, 18th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 2012-001083-CFA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. GEORGE ZIMMERMAN, Defendant. ----------------- / STATE'S SUPPLEMENTAL
More informationAppendix 3J Training Memo How a Prosecutor Reads a Domestic Violence Related Police Report
Appendix 3J Training Memo How a Prosecutor Reads a Domestic Violence Related Police Report Adapted from Domestic Violence: The Law Enforcement Response, a training curriculum from The Domestic Abuse Intervention
More informationEXHIBIT AND DISPLAY POLICY DISPLAY CASES
DATE: July 24, 2007 Revised: August 28, 2007 EXHIBIT AND DISPLAY POLICY DISPLAY CASES The Cumberland Public Library provides space for displays and exhibits of items from the library s own collections,
More information[Cite as Hess v. One Americana Ltd. Partnership, 2002-Ohio-1076.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Hess v. One Americana Ltd. Partnership, 2002-Ohio-1076.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Mary Hess, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : v. : No. 01AP-1200 One Americana Limited Partnership
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-180 BARBARA ARDOIN VERSUS LEWISBURG WATER SYSTEM ********** APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. LANDRY, NO. 05-C-5228-B
More informationBRIEF OF THE APPELLANT
E-Filed Document Jun 14 2017 16:56:06 2016-KA-01711-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL MCKEITHAN APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01711-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs February 1, 2005 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JASON COOK Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Weakley County No. CR18-2004 William
More informationRULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE PROCEDURE OF THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI AS ADOPTED
RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE PROCEDURE OF THE BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI AS ADOPTED TABLE OF CONTENTS Article I Officers 2 Article II Undue Influence 4 Article III Meetings
More informationE. Expert Testimony Issue. 1. Defendants may assert that before any photographs or video evidence from a camera
In the wake of the passage of the state law pertaining to so-called red light traffic cameras, [See Acts 2008, Public Chapter 962, effective July 1, 2008, codified at Tenn. Code Ann. 55-8- 198 (Supp. 2009)],
More informationAdding a Little Bit of Hollywood to Your Trial
Adding a Little Bit of Hollywood to Your Trial Todd M. Raskin Mazanec, Raskin & Ryder Co., L.P.A. 34305 Solon Road 100 Franklin s Row Cleveland, OH 44139 (440) 248-7906 traskin@mrrlaw.com Todd M. Raskin
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION CALENDAR 7 COURTROOM 2405 JUDGE DIANE J. LARSEN STANDING ORDER 2.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT CHANCERY DIVISION Chambers Telephone: 312-603-3343 Courtroom Clerk: Phil Amato Law Clerks: Azar Alexander & Andrew Sarros CALENDAR 7 COURTROOM
More informationCASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:
Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). / IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: DIV 71 UNIFORM ORDER REGARDING SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL, PRE-TRIAL
More informationCounty Sheriff s Office
** Boulder ) 201 / I County Sheriff s Office JOE PELLE Sheriff April 24, 2012 SENT VIA MAIL Ms. Sara J. Rich ACLU of Colorado P.O. Box 18986 Denver, Colorado 80218-0986 Dear Ms. Rich, Thank you for your
More informationOak Park High School ASB. Club Application Packet
Oak Park High School ASB Club Application Packet 2016-2017 INDEX Page 1 List of documents required and due dates. Pages 3-11: A. Club Constitution Template B. Request for Club Recognition Form (p.9) C.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 5, 2001 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 5, 2001 Session JAMES RAY v. THOMAS ALVIN RICHARDS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 99C-2370 Hamilton Gayden, Judge No. M2000-01808-COA-R3-CV
More informationRecording of Officers Increases Has Your Agency Set The Standards for Liability Protection? Let s face it; police officers do not like to be recorded, especially when performing their official duties in
More informationStudent Government Association Wolfson Campus. Elections Packet
Student Government Association Wolfson Campus Elections Packet 2016-2017 Application Deadline Monday, February 29 th, 2016, 4:00 p.m. Student Life Department January 2016 Dear Student: On behalf of the
More informationStandard Operating Procedures. For. The Honorable Michael E. McCarthy
Standard Operating Procedures For The Honorable Michael E. McCarthy Table of Contents Non-Jury Trial Procedures... 3 Standard Judicial Operating Procedures... 7 Non-Jury Trial Procedures - Appeals from
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION GENE C. BENCKINI, Plaintiff VS. Case No. 2013-C-2613 GIANT FOOD STORES, LLC, Defendant Appearances: Plaintiff, pro se George B.
More informationNo. 48,370-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * * * * * *
Judgment rendered October 2, 2013. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. No. 48,370-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * SANDRA
More informationThe SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE is the intentional, reckless, or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, fabricating, or destroying of evidence relevant
What is it? The SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE is the intentional, reckless, or negligent withholding, hiding, altering, fabricating, or destroying of evidence relevant to a legal proceeding. When Spoliation has
More informationLAWRENCE COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT LOCAL RULES RULE ONE
LAWRENCE COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT LOCAL RULES All Local Rules of Court will become effective upon approval by the Supreme Court Committee on technology and the Court. A. TERMS, HOURS, AND SESSIONS RULE ONE
More informationCase 1:15-cv JCH-LF Document 60 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:15-cv-00597-JCH-LF Document 60 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PATRICIA CABRERA, Plaintiff, v. No. 15 CV 597 JCH/LF WAL-MART STORES
More informationIllinois Official Reports
Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Bulduk v. Walgreen Co., 2015 IL App (1st) 150166 Appellate Court Caption SAIME SEBNEM BULDUK and ABDULLAH BULDUK, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. WALGREEN COMPANY, an
More informationIC Chapter 5. Search and Seizure
IC 35-33-5 Chapter 5. Search and Seizure IC 35-33-5-0.1 Application of certain amendments to chapter Sec. 0.1. The amendments made to section 5 of this chapter by P.L.17-2001 apply to all actions of a
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Carver Moore and La Tonya : Reese Moore, : : Appellants : : v. : No. 1598 C.D. 2009 : The School District of Philadelphia : Argued: May 17, 2010 and URS Corporation
More informationWEST MEMPHIS PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION CHECK LIST. I. Petition for Rezone and Special Permit Use should include one or more of the following:
WEST MEMPHIS PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION CHECK LIST I. Petition for Rezone and Special Permit Use should include one or more of the following: 1. Petition for Comprehensive Plan change and public notice
More informationDAY CAMP SUPERVISOR LIABLE FOR LOG ROLLING FATALITY IN CITY PARK
DAY CAMP SUPERVISOR LIABLE FOR LOG ROLLING FATALITY IN CITY PARK James C. Kozlowski, J.D., Ph.D. 1991 James C. Kozlowski An unscientific observation of the Glorioso decision described herein and innumerable
More informationWho s who in a Criminal Trial
Mock Criminal Trial Scenario Who s who in a Criminal Trial ACCUSED The accused is the person who is alleged to have committed the criminal offence, and who has been charged with committing it. Before being
More informationCHRISTMAS ON THE BRICKS 2017 Downtown Wills Point, Texas December 9, AM to 5PM
CHRISTMAS ON THE BRICKS 2017 Downtown Wills Point, Texas December 9, 2017 9AM to 5PM We are SUPER EXCITED that you have chosen to be a part of this signature Christmas CELEBRATION! QUALITY MERCHANDISE
More informationi Click the link in the bottom left hand
The Immigration Service has created this presentation to assist with the Tier 4 (General) visa application process using screen-shots from the UKBA website and online application form. It is only appropriate
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER (JURY TRIAL) for Plaintiff.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION, Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO:, Defendant(s). / Present: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER (JURY TRIAL) for Plaintiff
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/27/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF. DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2018
NYSCEF. DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/27/2018 SUPREME COURT STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------X FRANCISCA PAGUADA RODRIGUEZ, Index No.:
More informationWhen Shoplifting Prevention Escalates to a Shoplifter Detention
Retail Loss Prevention Publications When Shoplifting Prevention Escalates BILL CAFFERTY RETAIL LOSS PREVENTION CONSULTANT 5/31/12 You ve done your best to display merchandise in a way that maximizes associate
More informationUNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. CIVIL DIVISION 37 Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). / UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE
More informationMatter of DiMattia v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 33033(U) October 4, 2018 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: 85126/2018 Judge: Thomas
Matter of DiMattia v City of New York 2018 NY Slip Op 33033(U) October 4, 2018 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: 85126/2018 Judge: Thomas P. Aliotta Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationCase 1:11-cv DPW Document 7 Filed 07/15/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:11-cv-11235-DPW Document 7 Filed 07/15/11 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MAX STRAHAN, Plaintiff, v. JAMES ROWLEY, ET AL., Defendants. C.A. No. 11-11235-DPW WOODLOCK,
More informationRhode Island Police Chiefs Association LINE-UP AND SHOW-UP PROCEDURES (Eyewitness Identification) MODEL POLICY GENERAL ORDER
Rhode Island Police Chiefs Association LINE-UP AND SHOW-UP PROCEDURES (Eyewitness Identification) MODEL POLICY GENERAL ORDER NUMBER POLICY NAME CALEA STANDARD PAGES 340.10 LINE-UP AND SHOW-UP PROCEDURES
More information