ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE VICTOR MENDHAM. Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 STATEMENT OF CLAIM
|
|
- Derek Dorsey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ... c J ~ ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No.: i::t-- g_;; l.pi3 - occ.:? VICTOR MENDHAM Plaintiff Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 Defendants TO THE DEFENDANTS STATEMENT OF CLAIM A LEG AL PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED AGAINST YOU by the plaintiff. The claim made against yoti is set out in the following pages. IF YOU WISH TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, you or an Ontario lawyer acting for you must prepare a sta tement of defence in Form l 8A prescribed by th e Rules of Civil Procedure, serve it on the plaintiff's lawyer or, where the plaintiff does not have a lawyer, serve it on the plaintiff, and file it, with proofof service, in this court office, WITHIN TWENTY DAYS after this statement of claim is served on you, if you are served in Ontario. If you are served in another province or terri tory of Canada or in the United States of America, the period for serving and filing your statement of defence is forty days. If you are served outside Canada and the United States of America, the period is sixty days. Instead of serving and filing a statement of defence, you may serve and file a notice of intent to defend in Form 18B prescribed by the Rules of Civil Procedure. This will entitle you to ten more days within which to serve and file your statement of defence. IF YOU FAIL TO DEFEND THIS PROCEEDING, JUDGMENT MAY BE GIVEN AGAINST YOU IN YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU. IF YOU WISH TO D EFEND THIS PROCEEDING BUT ARE UNABLE TO PAY LEGAL FEES, LEGAL AID MAY BE AVAILABLE TO YOU BY CONTACTING A LOCAL LEGAL AID OFFICE. TAKE NOTICE: THIS ACTION WILL AUTOMATICALLY BE DISMISSED if it has not been set down for trial or terminated by any means within five years after the action was comme ced u j ess otherwise ordered by the court. DMe -j'.)~~!""'' by -t--t 7t<- --\t~-± l -;;.;, '...-~----- Local Registrar 393 University Avenue, 10th Floor Toronto, Ontario MSG!E6 - l -
2 ,. TO: FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES N.V. 25 St James's Street London, United Kingdom SWIA IHA AND TO: FCA USLLC 1000 Chrysler Drive Aubmn Hills, Michigan United States of America AND TO:. FCA CANADA INC. 1 Riverside Drive West Windsor, Ontario N9A 5K3-2 -
3 ' I. RELIEF CLAIMED 1. The Plaintiff, on behalf of themselves and other Class Members, including the Family Class, claim against the Defendants for: a) an order pursuant to the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, So. 1992, c.6, ce1tifying this action as a class proceeding and appointing him as the representative plaintiff for the Class; b) a declaration that the defendants were negligent and are liable in damages; c) general damages in the sum of $500 million for negligent design, testing manufacturing, marketing and sale or such other sum as this Court finds appropriate; d) damages for breach of implied and express wananties and unfair practices provisions under consumer protection legislation, including but not limited to the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c.30; Sched. A; e) damages recoverable pursuant to section 36 of the Competition Act; f) prejudgment and postjudgment interest, compounded, or pursuant toss. 128 and 129 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, as amended; g) in the alternative to the general damages desc1ibed above, disgorgement all profits received from the sale of the Affected Vehicles, as defined herein; - 3 -
4 h) punitive or exemplary damages in the sum of $50 million or some other sum this Court finds just; i) costs of this action on a substantial indemnity basis or in an amount that provides full indemnity plus, the costs of distribution of an award under ss.24 or 25 of the Class Proceedings Act, including costs ofnotice associated with distribution and fees payable to a person administering the distribution pursuant to s.26 of the Class Proceedings Act; and, j) such further and other relief as to this Honourable Corut seems just. II. NATURE OF ACTION 2. This action arises out of automobiles, namely FCA Dodge RAM 1500 and FCA Jeep Grand Cherokee, which were tested, manufactured, marketed, distributed and sold, directly or indirectly, by the Defendants (the "Affected Vehicles"). 3. All vehicles, including Affected Vehicles, are required to comply with ce1tain emissions standards, which are designed to protect the environment and the health and safety of Canadians. 4. The Affected Vehicles are equipped with devices or software ("Emissions Control Devices") which make it appear, during emissions testing, fuat the Class Vehicles meet these standards; however, under normal driving conditions the Class Vehicles are in fact incapable of meeting the required emissions standards (the "Defect"). 5. On January 12th, 2017, the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States of America issued a Notice of Violation directed at FCA and FCA US ("EPA NOV")
5 6. As indicated in the EPA NOV, the Defendants had, prior to the issuance of the EPA NOV, been given a reasonable opportunity to justify the existence of Emissions Control Devices and did not do so. Ill. THE PARTIES Plaintiff 7. The Plaintiff, Victor Mendham, is a resident of Markham, Ontario. 8. On or about November 2013, the Plaintiff purchased a new 2014 diesel Jeep Grand Cherokee Summitt. 9. The Defect was unknown and could not, even through reasonable diligence on the pait of the Plaintiff, be known to the Plaintiff at the time of the purchase. 10. Had the Applicant known about the Defect and been aware that his vehicle would not, in all circumstances, meet the emissions standards imposed by law, he would not have purchased the vehicle or would not have paid as much for the vehicle. 11. In addition, due to the presence of the Defect, the Applicant's vehicle resale value has diminished. 12. The damages suffered by the Plaintiff are a direct and proximate result of the Defendants' conduct. 13. As a consequence of the foregoing, the Plaintiff is justified in claiming damages;
6 Defendants 14. The Defendant, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. ("FCA") is a corporation headquartered in London, United Kingdom. FCA directs and controls the business actions of FCA US LLC ("FCA US") and FCA Canada Inc. ("FCA Canada"). 15. The Defendant, FCA US, wholly owned by FCA, is a co1poration headquartered in Auburn Hills, Michigan. 16. The Defendant, FCA Canada, wholly owned by FCA US, is a corporation headquartered in Windsor, Ontario, and canies on business throughout Canada. 17. FCA, FCA US, and FCA Canada ("Defendants") shared the common pmpose of designing, testing, manufactming, marketing, sales, and distribution of the class vehicles in Canada. 18. The business and interests of the Defendants are inextricably interwoven, therefore, all the IV. THE PROPOSED CLASS 19. The Plaintiff brings this action on behalf of: All persons in Canada (including but not limited to individuals, corporations, and estates) who own or have owned, or lease or have leased, one or more of the following "Class Vehicles'', where equipped with 3L diesel engines: 2014, 2015, or 2016 model year FCA Dodge RAM , 2015, or 2016 model year FCA Jeep Grand Cherokee - 6 -
7 refened to herein as "the Affected Vehicles". V. CAUSES OF ACTION Negligence 20. At all material times, the Defendants owed a duty of care to the Plaintiff and to the Class and breached the standard of care expected in the circumstances. 21. The Defendants had a duty to design, manufactme, and market vehicles that are reasonably safe for their intended uses, reasonably efficient, and to provide true and accmate information to the public with respect its products. 22. The Defendants breached this duty through: (a) Failme to properly and adequately to design, develop, and test the Subject Vehicles to ensure that they were not producing illegal amounts of emissions; (b) Failme to discover, through reasonably expected adequate testing, that the Subject Vehicles were producing illegal amounts of emissions; (c) Failme to properly and adequately to install a safe software component or mechanical safeguard against producing illegal amounts of emissions; (d) Failure to properly and adequately design or manufacture components and component systems for Subject Vehicles that do not produce illegal amounts of emissions; - 7 -
8 . ( e) Failure to properly and adequately test Subject Vehicles the emissions system and other components of the emissions system; (f) Failure to properly and adequately to manufacture, fabricate, and assemble Subject Vehicles and the emissions systems, components, and parts thereof; (g) Failure to adequately monitor the safety and post-market performance of the Subject Vehicles and their component parts and to warn the Plaintiffs and Class Members of the dangers associated with producing illegal amounts of emissions; and, (h) Failure to promptly recall the Subject Vehicles from the Canadian market upon discove1y of their propensity to produce illegal amounts of emissions m1der conditions of ordinaiy usage. 23. As designers, manufacturers, and marketers of the Subject Vehicles in Canada, the Defendants were in a position of legal proximity to the Class Members. 24. It was reasonably foreseeable that a failure by the Defendants to design and manufacture reasonably efficient emissions system for the Subject Vehicles, and to monitor the performance of such systems in the Subject Vehicles following market introduction, would cause haim to the Plaintiff and Class Members. 25. Prior to and dming the design, manufacturing, marketing, and sale of the subject vehicles and thereafter, the Defendants knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, that other - 8 -
9 . feasible and safer design alternatives were available to them which would have significantly reduced emissions standard operating conditions to an acceptable level. 26. The Defendants negligently failed to utilize such other and feasible safer designs in their design of the emissions systems in the subject vehicles, and took active and illegal actions to bide the actual amount of emissions being produced. 27. As a result of the foregoing, the Plaintiff and the Class have suffered economic damages in an amount to be proven at tiial. Breach of Express and Implied Warranty 28. By marketing, advertising, and dishibuting diesel vehicles containing the defective emissions system, and without incorporating adequate electi onic or mechanical fail-safes, and while misrepresenting or failing report the actual emissions being produced by such vehicles to the public, the Defendants created and breached both express and implied wananties that the vehicles were safe for use, and compliant with environmental regulations, when in fact, they were not. 29. As a result of the foregoing, the Plaintiffs and the Class have suffered economic damages in an ammmt to be proven at hial. Violations of Competition Legislation 30. At all times relevant, the Defendants violated section 52 of the Competition Act, R.S., 1985, c. C-34, by the use of false and misleading representations or omissions of mate1i al fact in - 9 -
10 connection with the marketing, promotion, and sale of vehicles equipped with the defective emissions systems. 31. The Defendants comrmmicated the purp011ed benefits of vehicles equipped with a diesel engine, while failing to disclose that these vehicles were in fact less efficient and produced more emissions with the intent that consumers, like the Plaintiffs, would purchase a vehicle equipped with these defective emissions systems. 32. The Plaintiffs and the Class Members have suffered losses and damages and are entitled to recove1y pursuant to section 36 of the Competition Act. Violations of the Consumer Protection Act 33. At all mate1ial times, the Class Members are consumers for pmposes of the Consumer Protection Act, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sched. A ("Consumer Protection Act") and corresponding legislation in other provinces. 34. At all material times, the Defendants are suppliers for the purposes of the Consumer Protection Act, as they are engaged in the business of selling, leasing, or trading in the Affected Vehicles, either directly or indirectly through their agents. 35. Through their actions described above, the Defendants have breached implied warranties that the Affected Vehicles are of merchantable quality and I or are fit for their intended purpose
11 36. Through their actions described above, the Defendants have committed unfair practices by making false, misleading and I or deceptive representations as to the Affected Vehicles perfonnance characteristics, safety, quality, and benefit to the Class Members. 37. There is privity of contract between the Class Members and the Defendants by virtue of the consumer agreement for the Class Members to purchase, lease, and I or rent an Affected Vehicle. 38. In the alternative, contracts between the Defendants and any retailers involved in the sale, lease or rental of Affected Vehicles by the Class Members contained the implied wairnnties as to the Affected Vehicles' merchantable quality and fitness for intended purpose. 39. The Defendants and retailers intended to extend the benefit of these provisions to the prospective customers and Class Members. Allowing the Class Members to have a tight of action under these contracts would be an incremental change to the doctrine of p1ivity. 40. As a result of the breaches of consumer protection legislation, including the Consumer Protection Act, the Plaintiffs and other Class Members have suffered harm and are entitled to remedies at law including damages or rescission or both. Unjust Enrichment 41. The Defendants were unjustly enriched as a result of the revenues obtained from the sale of the Subject Vehicles and their component pmts:
12 (a) the Defendants were enriched through revenues and profit from the sale of the Subject Vehicles and their component paits; (b) the Plaintiffs and the Class have suffered con-esponding deprivation and losses; and, (c) there is no juristic reasons for the benefit by the Defendants and con-esponding detriment experienced by the Plaintiffs and the Class. 42. The circumstances, as described in this Statement of Claim are such that allowing the Defendants to retain the benefits provided by the Plaintiff and Class would be inequitable. 43. The Defendants have been tmjustly enriched at the expense of the Plaintiff and the Class and, as a matter of equity, the Defendants should be required to make them whole by disgorging the purchase p1ice of each vehicle which should be ordered disgorged on a Class wide aggregate basis. Waiver of Tort 44. The Plaintiffs reserve the right to elect at the ttial of the common issues to waive the tort and to have damages of the Class assessed in an amount equal to the gross revenues earned by the Defendants, or the disgorgement of all income received by the Defendants through the sale of the Subject Vehicles. 45. The Defendants wrongfully intt oduced and maintained the marketing and distribution of the Subject Vehicles in the Canadian market. But for the Defendants' negligent and intentional acts and statutory breaches, they would have sold no or alternatively fewer, Subject Vehicles and the Defendants would not have received any or part of the revenues they received
13 46. As a result of the Defendants' breaches of duty and intentional wrongdoing, they have generated substantial revenues that they should not in good conscience retain. VI. DAMAGES 47. As a result of the Defendants' acts and omissions particulaiized above, the Plaintiff and the Class have suffered, and will continue to suffer loss and damage: (a) loss of income; (b) expenses related to the Subject Vehicles; (c) loss of use of the Subject Vehicles and inconvenience; (d) depreciation in vehicle's resale value of the Subject Vehicles; and, ( e) such further and other damages to be proven at trial. 48. Such loss and damage was foreseeable by the Defendants. VII. PUNITIVE AND EXEMPLARY DAMAGES 49. The Defendants have acted in such a high-handed, wanton, ai1d reckless manner as to waffant a claim for punitive damages
14 50. The Defendants prioritized corporate profits over the quality of its vehicles and the safety of the Plaintiff and Class. 51. The Defendants knew that certain models of their vehicles were not meeting emissions standard, and deceived the public and regulators about the actual emissions being produced. 52. The Defendants went as far as deceiving regulators through developing software to hide the actual amount of emissions being produced. 53. To know of the defect, and hide it, is atrocious conduct. Under the Canadian system of governance we have a higher expectation of the judicial arm of governance to punish and this is a case where punitive or exemplary damages ought to be ordered. 54. Punitive or exemplary damages ought to be awarded to the Class to discourage such highhanded corporate wrongdoing in the future. 55. An award of punitive or exemplary damages should be made on a lump sum basis to be distributed among members of the Class in whatever manner the common issues tiial judge deems approp1iate. VIII. STATUTES 56. The Plaintiffs plead and rely upon the following statues and the regulations made theretmder:
15 (a) Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c.6; (b) Consumer Protection Act 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sched A; (c) Comis of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.43; (d) Family Law Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. F.3; and (e) Negligence Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. N.1. IX. REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL CONNECTION TO ONTARIO 57. This action has a real and substantial connection between the subject matter of this action and Ontario for the following reasons, inter alia: a. several or all of the Defendants canyon business in Ontaiio; b. the head office of FCA Canada Inc. is in Windsor, Ontaiio; c. the Defendants distribute and sell their products, including the Affected Vehicles, in Ontario and derive substantial revenue from such business; d. the damages of the Plaintiffs and other Class Members resident in Ontario were sustained in Ontario; and, e. the Defendants marketed and sold their products, including the Affected Vehicles, in Ontaiio
16 X SERVICE OUTSIDE ONTARIO 58. The originating process may be served outside Ontaiio without court order because the claim is in respect of a tort committed in Ontario, damages sustained in Ontario arising from a tort or breach of contract however committed, against a person canying on business in Ontaiio, and against a person outside Ontaiio who is a necessary and proper party to this proceeding being brought against another person served in Ontario. 59. The Plaintiff proposes that this action be hied at Toronto, Ontario. Date: January l3 1 h, 2017 MERCHANT LAW GROUP LLP Lawyers 120 Adelaide Sh eet West, Suite 1201 PO Box 53 Toronto, ON M5H ltl Venessa Vuia LSUC #69499L Tel: ( 416) Fax: (647) vvuia@merchantlaw.com
17 / Court File No... VICTOR MENDHAM Plaintiff FCA CANADA INC., FCA US LLC, FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES N.V. Defendants \ CV- t * - S<; -tgpts- ~ ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE PROCEEDING COMMENCED AT TORONTO STATEMENT OF CLAIM Merchant Law Group LLP 120 Adelaide Street West Suite 1201 Toronto, ON, M5H 1 Tl Venessa Vuia Tel: (416) Fax: (647) LSUC # : 69499L G:,~.l;o,q L Lawyers for the Plaintiff
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE NOTICE OF ACTION
C V-1 1-5 0 i ':1'13-occP ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No. BETWEEN: (Court Seal) JACK ROMBOUTS Plaintiffs and FCA CANADA INC., FIAT CHRYSLER AUTOMOBILES N.V. and FCA US LLC Defendants Proceeding
More informationEDMONTON HOLLY STANDINGREADY STATEMENT OF CLAIM
----------- I I I I JUDICIAL CENTRE EDMONTON PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS HOLLY STANDINGREADY GENERAL MOTORS OF CANADA LIMITED and GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY Brought under the Class Proceedings Act DOCUMENT STATEMENT
More informationdays. If you are served outside Canada and the United States of America, the period is sixty days.
Court File No. SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DARA FRESCO Plaintiff -and - CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE Defendant PROCEEDING UNDER THE CLASS PROCEEDINGS ACT, 1992 TO THE DEFENDANT STATEMENT OF CLAIM A
More informationJ)NTAR/0 YEGALROSEN. -and- BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. FRESH AS AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM
PURSUANT TO CONFORM~MENT A J)NTAR/0 UPERIEURE D~OR COURT OF JUSTICE FFI A LOCAL Court File No. CV-10-39668500CP YEGALROSEN Plaintiff -and- BMO NESBITT BURNS INC. Defendant Proceeding under the Class Proceedings
More informationcv 1S~'S~V I&~ Court File No.
cv 1S~'S~V I&~ Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: (Court seal) METROPOLITAN TORONTO CONDOMINIUM CORPORATION NO. 933 Plaintiff - and- ICC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD., and MASSIMO MUSSO
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE NOTICE OF ACTION
Court File No./N du dossier du greffe: CV-18-00605906-00CP Court File No. Electronically issued Délivré par voie électronique B E T W E E : N: 26-Sep-2018 Toronto ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE STACEY
More information1:15-cv JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
1:15-cv-01511-JMC Date Filed 04/06/15 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA AIKEN DIVISION Robert K. Besley, Jr., on behalf of himself ) and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
Court File No.: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: PHOENIX HOSPITALITY (BANANAS) INC., PHOENIX HOSPITALITY (COPA) INC., PHOENIX HOSPITALITY (DARD) INC. and BANANAS BEACH BAR INC. - and - Plaintiffs
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DAVID CARMICHAEL. -and-
(1fl ~ I CJ~!fl%'1( Court File No. ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DAVID CARMICHAEL -and- Plaintiff VIA RAIL CANADA INC., CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY, and CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY Defendants
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION. CASE NO: 1:15-cv RNS
JOAQUIN F. BADIAS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiff, LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, LUMBER LIQUIDATORS LEASING, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability
More information.,;:(.~. * VANCOUVER REGISTRY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA PHIL BEEDLE
OF ~UPREME COURT VAN~ll~PRCROELUMB IA GIST RY S- 17 5315.::~,~ JUN 05 2017.. ::::~ :. No.. '.,;:(.~. * VANCOUVER REGISTRY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: PHIL BEEDLE PLAINTIFF AND: GENERAL
More information2008 S.H. No. B E T W E E N: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA BARRETT THOMPSON - and - Plaintiff CADBURY ADAMS CANADA INC., MARS, INCORPORATED, MAR
2008 S.H. No. B E T W E E N: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA BARRETT THOMPSON - and - Plaintiff CADBURY ADAMS CANADA INC., MARS, INCORPORATED, MARS CANADA INC. formerly known as EFFEM INC., THE HERSHEY
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE G. NIRAS. - and - SKECHERS USA INC., SKECHERS USA INC. II, AND SKECHERS USA CANADA INC.
Court File No. 12-55546 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: G. NIRAS Plaintiff - and - SKECHERS USA INC., SKECHERS USA INC. II, AND SKECHERS USA CANADA INC. Proceeding under the Class Proceedings
More informationIN THE QUEEN'S BENCH JUDICIAL CENTRE OF REGINA. -and-
..,. ~ I CANADA ) PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN ) } ()7 Q.B.G. No. ------'-'------- IN THE QUEEN'S BENCH JUDICIAL CENTRE OF REGINA Between: NICOLE BRITTIN -and- PLAINTIFF THE MINSTER OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND
More informationCase 5:15-cv BLF Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 18
Case :-cv-00-blf Document Filed /0/ Page of BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 0) North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: ()
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION WALTER KURTZ, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA,
More informationAttorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER. EDGARDO RODRIGUEZ, an individual,
VACHON LAW FIRM Michael R. Vachon, Esq. (SBN ) 0 Via del Campo, Suite San Diego, California Tel.: () -0 Fax: () - Attorney for Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL
More informationprotection The Consumer Protection Act contains a general prohibition against unfair and unlawful terms and conditions in agreements with consumers.
the consumer protection act CONTRACT TERMS UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT Applicable sections of the Consumer Protection Act, 68 of 2008: S 48, 49, 50, 51, 52 Applicable sections of the Consumer Protection
More informationCourthouse News Service
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 6/15/2009 4:12 PM CV-2009-900370.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA MAGARIA HAMNER BOBO, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TUSCALOOSA COUNTY, ALABAMA JACK MEADOWS, on behalf
More informationCase 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 7:18-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARTIN ORBACH and PHILLIP SEGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :23 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2015 01:23 PM INDEX NO. 190245/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 18 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationCase 1:13-cv PAB-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT Document 1 Filed 12/02/13 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. KATHY WORNICKI, on behalf of herself and
More informationCase 2:15-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1
Case 2:15-cv-07352-JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 10/07/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID: 1 James E. Cecchi Lindsey H. Taylor CARELLA, BYRNE, CECCHI, OLSTEIN, BRODY & AGNELLO, P.C. 5 Becker Farm Road Roseland, New Jersey
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ONTARIO LIMITED. -and- GREG KELLY, JOAN KELLY, ONTARIO INC. and TRADESMAN HOME INSPECTIONS
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No.: CV-12-466870 B E T W E E N: 2180511 ONTARIO LIMITED Plaintiff -and- GREG KELLY, JOAN KELLY, 1159387 ONTARIO INC. and TRADESMAN HOME INSPECTIONS STATEMENT
More information2:14-cv RMG Date Filed 02/25/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
2:14-cv-01400-RMG Date Filed 02/25/14 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 19 Civil Action No. WILMA DANIELS, Plaintiff, v. PFIZER, INC., Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
More informationContract and Tort Law for Engineers
Contract and Tort Law for Engineers Christian S. Tacit Tel: 613-599-5345 Email: ctacit@tacitlaw.com Canadian Systems of Law There are two systems of law that operate in Canada Common Law and Civil Law
More informationIN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH JUDICIAL CENTRE OF SASKATOON JEFFREY ALLEN. -and-
CANADA PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN Q.B. No. Q_.!/7 of2011 IN THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH JUDICIAL CENTRE OF SASKATOON BETWEEN: JEFFREY ALLEN Plaintiff -and- UPONOR LTD. (fka UPONOR CANADA INC. and UPONOR CANADA
More informationCase 0:17-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12
Case 0:17-cv-60089-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/13/2017 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL PANARIELLO, individually and on behalf
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE CHRIS AVENIR. and RYERSON UNIVERSITY STATEMENT OF CLAIM
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No. BETWEEN: (Court Seal) CHRIS AVENIR Plaintiff and RYERSON UNIVERSITY Defendant Proceedings under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 TO THE DEFENDANT(S) STATEMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.
BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 01) 10 North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: () 00- Facsimile: () 0-00 E-Mail: ltfisher@bursor.com
More informationCase 3:13-cv GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:13-cv-00101-GPM-PMF Document 5 Filed 02/14/13 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS THOMAS R. GUARINO, on behalf of ) Himself and all other similarly
More information11 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
The Honorable Carol Murphy 2 7 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF THURSTON JASON BEECHLER, on behalf of himself and al others similarly situated. No. -2-0- CLASS
More informationI. INTRODUCTION CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
0 0 Plaintiff Latoya Lumpkin, by her attorneys, files this Class Action Complaint, for herself and all others similarly situated against Chrysler Group LLC ( Chrysler or Defendant ). Plaintiff alleges,
More informationProceeding Under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No.: CV-11-00420886-00CP B E T W E E N PEGGY JANE DAVIS Plaintiff and CLIVE METCALF, TIMOTHY VOISIN, ELAINE FRANCES VOISIN, executor and trustee under the last
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-15-11192-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION
More informationvs. and MOTION TO AUTHORIZE THE BRINGING OF A CLASS ACTION AND TO ASCRIBE THE STATUS OF REPRESENTATIVE (Art C.C.P.
CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL SUPERIOR COURT OF QUEBEC (CLASS ACTION) No.: 500-06- vs. Petitioner MERCK CANADA INC., a legal person duly constituted according to the law with offices situated
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. - and - Proceeding under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION
Court File No. 60680 CP ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N : 1688782 ONTARIO INC. Plaintiff - and - MAPLE LEAF FOODS INC. and MAPLE LEAF CONSUMER FOODS INC. Defendants Proceeding under the
More information01-Jun-17. Vancouver. Court File No. VLC-S-S
01-Jun-17 Vancouver Court File No. VLC-S-S-175217 2 (c) (d) if you were served with the notice of civil claim anywhere else, within 49 days after that service, or if the time for response to civil claim
More informationCase 2:18-cv DMG-SK Document 1-2 Filed 08/09/18 Page 2 of 17 Page ID #:11
Case :-cv-0-dmg-sk Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-0-dmg-sk Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 INTRODUCTION. Plaintiff bring this action on his own behalf and on behalf of all
More informationSTATEMENT OF DEFENCE
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No.: CV-17-578059-00CP B E T W E E N: ROBIN CIRILLO Plaintiff - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO Defendant Proceedings under
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA MICHAEL CAIOLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, v. Plaintiff. LUMBER LIQUIDATORS, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
More information2017 Hfx. No SUPREME COURT OF NOV A SCOTIA BETWEEN: DAWN RAE DOWNTON PLAINTIFF. ORGANIGRAM HOLDINGS INC. and ORGANIGRAM INC.
Form 4.02A 2017 Hfx. No 4 6 0 9 8 4 SUPREME COURT OF NOV A SCOTIA BETWEEN: DAWN RAE DOWNTON PLAINTIFF -ANO- ORGANIGRAM HOLDINGS INC. and ORGANIGRAM INC. DEFENDANTS Proceeding under the Class Proceedings
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
File no: Victoria Registry IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN: JANE RENAUD Plaintiff AND HSBC INVESTMENTS (CANADA) LIMITED Defendant Brought pursuant to the Class Proceedings Act (R.S.B.C.,
More informationCase 8:16-cv JDW-JSS Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 8:16-cv-02725-JDW-JSS Document 1 Filed 09/22/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MICHAEL CHMIELEWSKI, individually and as the representative
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
N: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE LAURA VELL -and- Court File No. e Y / J.J--. /'1+-o 9 9o -- oo(l ~ Plaintiff MATTEL CANADA INC., MATTEL, INC. AND FISHER-PRICE INC. Proceeding under the Class Proceedings
More informationSTATUTE SECTION STATUTORY BREACH LIABILITY DEFENCE RESPONSIBLE PARTY FEDERAL STATUTES Canada Pension Plan, R.S.C 1985, c. C-8.
FEDERAL STATUTES Canada Pension Plan, R.S.C 1985, c. C-8. s. 21 Failure to deduct or remit the prescribed amount from an employee s remuneration, as and when required, to the Receiver General. s. 21.1(1)
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
JOHN S. CARROLL 649-0 810 Richards Street, Suite 810 Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 Telephone No. (808 526-9111 Attorney for Plaintiffs IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT STATE OF HAWAII ERNEST Y. INADA
More informationTHE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Case No.
// :: PM CV00 1 THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 1 MICHAEL LYNCH, as personal representative of the Estate of Edward C. Lynch, v. Plaintiff, PACIFIC FOODS OF OREGON,
More informationCase 9:16-cv KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2016 Page 1 of 32
Case 9:16-cv-80095-KLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2016 Page 1 of 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA J. STEVEN ERICKSON, Individually and on behalf
More information15 days if delivery is made in Nova Scotia. 30 days if delivery is made elsewhere in Canada. 45 days if delivery is made anywhere else.
Deadline for defending the action To defend the action, you or your counsel must file a notice of defence with the court no more than the following number of days after the day this notice of action is
More informationDISPUTE RESOLUTION & LITIGATION
W: DISPUTE RESOLUTION & LITIGATION LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT The Library of Parliament originated in the legislative libraries of Upper and Lower Canada, which were amalgamated in 1841. It is the main information
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION KING S HAWAIIAN BAKERY SOUTHEAST, INC., a Georgia corporation; KING S HAWAIIAN HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a California corporation;
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/30/ :06 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 60 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/30/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------x LEROY BAKER, Index No.: 190058/2017 Plaintiff, -against- AF SUPPLY USA INC.,
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE REPLY
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No. 1056/10CP B E T W E E N: THE ONTARIO FLUE-CURED TOBACCO GROWERS' MARKETING BOARD, ANDY J. JACKO, BRIAN BASWICK, RON KICHLER and ARPAD DOBRENTEY Plaintiffs
More informationCase 3:16-cv SDD-EWD Document 1 05/10/16 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Case 3:16-cv-00319-SDD-EWD Document 1 05/10/16 Page 1 of 50 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CASSANDRA JACKSON, TONI E. JONES, KIMBERLY PAYNE, BLAINE JACKSON, and RUSSELL JONES,
More informationSTATEMENT OF CLAIM. (Court File No. ) FEDERAL COURT. BETWEEN: DAN PELLETIER Plaintiff. and. HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant.
STATEMENT OF CLAIM (Court File No. ) FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: DAN PELLETIER Plaintiff and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Defendant (Court seal) STATEMENT OF CLAIM TO THE DEFENDANT PROPOSED CLASS PROCEEDING A LEGAL
More information{~! l\;n~'.r:)f~ ;,:) KOBE STEEL, LTD., SHINKO METAL PRODUCTS CO., LTD.,
1 Comi File No. r ONTARIO ;!,. SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE,.,'. - f. ) _, [c BETWEEN: NANCY CURRAN ;!,:{'i/' 1''.~;J ' '; ~-i;;\ -and- Plaintiff {~! l\;n~'.r:)f~ ;,:) KOBE STEEL, LTD., SHINKO METAL PRODUCTS
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE NOTICE OF ACTION
Court File No. -3'-t~ -\\ ~( ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ROBERT LEFEVER and GAlL RUNNELS Plaintiffs -and- SMART TECHNOLOGIES INC., APAX PARTNERS L.P., APAX PARTNERS EUROPE MANAGERS LTD., SCHOOL S.A.R.L.,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TIMOTHY HENNIGAN, AARON MCHENRY, and CHRISTOPHER COCKS, individually and on behalf of themselves and all others
More informationCase 8:13-cv CJC-JPR Document 1 Filed 08/15/13 Page 1 of 29 Page ID #:1
Case :-cv-0-cjc-jpr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: Case :-cv-0-cjc-jpr Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: GENERAL ALLEGATIONS. This is an action for damages suffered by Plaintiff as a proximate
More informationCase 1:16-cv LLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Defendants.
Case 1:16-cv-08986-LLS Document 1 Filed 11/18/16 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NICHOLAS PARKER, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL R. ROBITAILLE. -vs.- -and-
1 CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL NO: 500-06-000325-056 (Class Action) SUPERIOR COURT R. ROBITAILLE Petitioner -vs.- YAHOO! INC., a corporation created by virtue of the laws of the United
More informationMobile Application End User License Agreement
Mobile Application End User License Agreement This Mobile Application End User License Agreement ( Agreement ) is a binding agreement between you ( End User or you ) and Pelotonia LLC ( Pelotonia ). This
More informationAPR/05/2012/THU 05:29PM DIGI FAX No P. 002
APR/05/2012/THU 05:29PM DIGI FAX No. 416-628-5051 P. 002 ONTARIO c_ v~ l ~- 45
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/2016 0433 PM INDEX NO. 190115/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF 06/07/2016 LYNCH DASKAL EMERY LLP 137 West 25th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10001 (212) 302-2400
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT INDEPENDENCE 1716-CV12857 Case Type Code: TI Sharon K. Martin, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated in ) Missouri, ) Plaintiffs,
More informationPlaintiff, Deborah Fellner, by and through her counsel, Eichen Levinson & Crutchlow, LLP, hereby makes this claim against the Defendant as follows:
FELLNER v. TRI-UNION SEAFOODS, L.L.C. Doc. 28 EICHEN LEVINSON & CRUTCHLOW, LLP 40 Ethel Road Edison, New Jersey 08817 (732) 777-0100 Attorneys for Plaintiff DEBORAH FELLNER, vs. Plaintiff, TRI-UNION SEAFOODS,
More informationStrict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY WARRANTY LAW
Strict Liability and Product Liability PRODUCT LIABILITY The legal liability of manufacturers, sellers, and lessors of goods to consumers, users and bystanders for physical harm or injuries or property
More informationNOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM
SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA SEAL 21-Aug-15 Vancouver * REGISTRY Be ween And In the Supreme Court of British Columbia HERB NOLAN and LOUISE NOLAN Court File No. VLC-S-S-156878 No. Vancouver Registry
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2016 02:40 PM INDEX NO. 159321/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationGENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SALE OF GOODS
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SALE OF GOODS 1. Applicability. (a) These terms and conditions of sale (these "Terms") are the only terms which govern the sale of the goods ("Goods") by Tecogen Inc.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-dmg-jem Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: DANIEL L. KELLER (SBN ) STEPHEN M. FISHBACK (SBN ) DAN C. BOLTON (SBN ) KELLER, FISHBACK & JACKSON LLP Canwood Street, Suite 0 Agoura Hills,
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
Court File No./N du dossier du greffe: CV-17-00005494-00CP Court File No.: Electronically issued Délivré par voie électronique B E T W E E : N: 21-Dec-2017 Brampton ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE IRENE
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. and
B E T W E E N: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No. TSI INTERNATIONAL CANADA INC. Plaintiff and THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF MILTON, GORDON KRANTZ, WILLIAM F. MANN aka BILL MANN, and BARBARA
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-02212 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SIOUX STEEL COMPANY A South Dakota Corporation
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 40 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:17-cv-08867 Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 40 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE: INVOKANA (CANAGLIFLOZIN) PRODUCTS LIABLITY LITIGATION ROBIN PEPPER, Plaintiff,
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:13-cv-00601 Document #: 1 Filed: 01/24/13 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 BARRY GROSS, ) on behalf of plaintiff and the class ) members described below, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationMobile Application End User License Agreement
Mobile Application End User License Agreement This Mobile Application End User License Agreement ("Agreement") is a binding agreement between you ("End User" or "you") and Steelcase Inc. ("Company"). This
More informationKDM Analytics Freeware License Agreement
KDM Analytics Freeware License Agreement April 04, 2007 License KDM ANALYTICS FREEWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING LICENSE AGREEMENT BEFORE UPGRADING, COPYING, INSTALLING, OR USING SOFTWARE
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1
Case: 1:17-cv-01860 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION MIKHAIL ABRAMOV, individually ) and on behalf
More informationCase 3:17-cv Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Case 3:17-cv-00464 Document 1 Filed 05/03/17 Page 1 of 16 Page ID #1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS GAYLE GREENWOOD and ) DOMINIQUE MORRISON, ) individually and on behalf of
More informationCase 1:13-cv PAB-KMT Document 98 Filed 01/20/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 19
Case 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT Document 98 Filed 01/20/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 19 ` IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-03258-PAB-KMT KATHY WORNICKI;
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.:
Case 1:18-cv-08406 Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IDA LOBELLO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.:
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No: CV-12-9780-00CL BETWEEN: MARCUS WIDE of Grant Thornton (British Virgin Islands) Limited, and HUGH DICKSON, of Grant Thornton Specialist
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :24 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/15/2016 11:24 AM INDEX NO. 190043/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X JOHN D. FIEDERLEIN AND
More informationFleet Phospho-Soda Class Action
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Fleet Phospho-Soda Class Action FLEET PHOSPHO-SODA is an over-the-counter pharmaceutical product which was often directed to be used as part of a bowel cleansing regimen,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: Ryan J. Clarkson (SBN 0) rclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Shireen M. Clarkson (SBN ) sclarkson@clarksonlawfirm.com Bahar Sodaify (SBN 0) bsodaify@clarksonlawfirm.com
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT MCKEAGE, ) JANET MCKEAGE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 6:12-CV-3157 ) BASS PRO SHOPS ) OUTDOOR WORLD,
More informationCase 3:16-cv SK Document 1 Filed 08/17/16 Page 1 of 23
Case :-cv-0-sk Document Filed 0// Page of James R. Patterson, CA Bar No. Allison H. Goddard, CA Bar No. Elizabeth A. Mitchell CA Bar No. PATTERSON LAW GROUP 0 West Broadway, th Floor San Diego, CA Telephone:
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:15-cv-11903 Document 1 Filed 05/22/15 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS WILLIAM COX, Individually, as Parent and Next Friend and as Personal Representative
More informationCase 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 09/09/16 Page 1 of 41 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TRENTON DIVISION
Case 3:16-cv-05478 Document 1 Filed 09/09/16 Page 1 of 41 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY TRENTON DIVISION CRYSTAL ERVIN and LEE ERVIN, Civil Action No. Plaintiffs, JANSSEN
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE EXCALIBUR SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES LP. - and - SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP
Court File No. CV-12-466694-00CP ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: EXCALIBUR SPECIAL OPPORTUNITIES LP Plaintiff - and - SCHWARTZ LEVITSKY FELDMAN LLP Defendant Proceeding Under the Class
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Plaintiffs -and- TOKAI RIKA CO., LTD., TRAM, INC., TRMI, INC., TRIN, INC., CALSONIC KANSEI CORPORATION, CALSONIC KANSEI NORTH AMERICA, INC., DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE PLC, DELPHI
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 47 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 1:18-cv-12623 Document 1 Filed 08/09/18 Page 1 of 47 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY --------------------------------------------------------------------------- IN RE:
More informationThe Consumer Protection and Business Practices Act
1 CONSUMER PROTECTION AND BUSINESS PRACTICES c. C-30.2 The Consumer Protection and Business Practices Act being Chapter C-30.2* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 2013 (effective September 1, 2014, except
More informationCORPORATE SERVICES AGREEMENT. by and among THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA. as Client. and SCOTIABANK COVERED BOND GUARANTOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP.
Execution Version CORPORATE SERVICES AGREEMENT by and among THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA as Client and SCOTIABANK COVERED BOND GUARANTOR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP as Guarantor and COMPUTERSHARE TRUST COMPANY OF CANADA
More informationTHE PUNJAB CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 2005 (Pb. Act II of 2005) C O N T E N T S
SECTIONS THE PUNJAB CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT 2005 (Pb. Act II of 2005) C O N T E N T S Part I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Act not in derogation of any other law. Part
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO. - and - VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT NOTICE OF APPEAL
Court File No. COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO B E T W E E N: GEORGE LEON, in his capacity as Trustee of the GEORGE LEON FAMILY TRUST Plaintiff (Appellant) - and - VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Defendant (Respondent)
More informationMitel Networks(tm) SX-200 Integrated Communications Platform (ICP) Software License Agreement
Mitel Networks(tm) SX-200 Integrated Communications Platform (ICP) Software License Agreement USE OF THE SOFTWARE ON THE ENCLOSED CD-ROM IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS Mitel Networks(tm)
More information