IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
|
|
- Deborah Carr
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA In the Matter of the Application for Admission to the Florida Bar of Case No.: SC EDWARD L. HOWLETTE, SR. / APPELLANT S INITIAL BRIEF BYRD & BARNHILL, P.L. JOHNNIE B. BYRD, JR., ESQ. FBN: North Collins Street Plant City, Florida Telephone: Fax: johnnie@byrd-law.com Attorney for Petitioner 1
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS.2 TABLE OF CITATIONS. 3 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS..5 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 7 ARGUMENT 8 CONCLUSION 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 16 CERTIFICATE OF FONT SIZE COMPLIANCE..16 2
3 TABLE OF CITATIONS Cite Page Florida constitution: Art. V 15, Fla. Const...8 Florida Supreme Court: Florida Bd. Bar Examiners re Higgins So. 2d 486 (Fla. 2000) Florida Bd. Of Bar Examiners re M.B.S. 955 So.2d 504,508 (Fla. 2007).9 Holland v. Gros, 89 So.2d 255 (Fla. 1956)..9 State v. Boyd, 846 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2003).8,9,10 Florida Rules: Fla. Bar Admiss Fla. Bar Admiss. R ,12,11 Fla. Bar Admiss. R
4 STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS 1 1. Nature of the Case. Howlette, an applicant for admission to the Florida Bar, is seeking an extension of his Bar Exam Grades for a time period to include: (1) the time required for the Florida Board of Bar Examiners to conduct the public hearing in May of 2010; (2) the time for the Board to make a recommendation to the Supreme Court based upon the public hearing, and (3) for the Supreme Court to render a decision on the Board s recommendation with respect to him. 2. Course of the Proceedings. Howlette, a Florida resident and previously disbarred and now reinstated member of the New York Bar, has been on a quest to gain admission to the Florida Bar since his initial application in See, Verified Petition and Exhibits and Appendix M (Chronology) 1 Throughout this Brief, the Appellant/Petitioner, Edward Lee Howlette, Sr., will be referred to as the Howlette. The Respondent/Appellee, The Florida Board of Bar Examiners, will be referred to as the Board. References to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar will be designated as Rule with the appropriate number, i.e. Rule 3-7 or as Rules. 4
5 The Court previously denied Howlette admission to the Bar because of his disbarment in New York; however, after his reinstatement in New York in 2007, the Court ordered that Howlette could re-apply for admission to the Florida Bar subject to the provisions of the Rules relating to the admission of disbarred lawyers. See, Appendix G Howlette subsequently reapplied for admission to the Florida Bar and also requested and was granted a two year extension of his grades by the Board from January, 2008 until January, See, Appendix H For reasons unknown to and beyond the control of Howlette, the Board s investigation extended well beyond the nine-month time period set out in Rule Howlette was finally noticed to appear for an investigative hearing before the Board in November, See, Appendix I Since the Board did not concluded its investigation within the nine-month time period set out in Rule , Howlette requested the Board to extend his grades a second time to encompass amount of time necessary for the completion of the process of his admission to the Bar. See, Appendix D On December 22, 2009, Howlette s request for a second extension was summarily denied by the Board. Despite the submissions by Howlette, the Board made no factual inquiry or finding regarding the substantive issue of whether there 5
6 was good cause for the extension of the bar grades, only denying the request without findings or comment. See, Appendix F Howlette moved the Board to reconsider its denial to extend his grades. See Appendix E The request for reconsideration was denied by the Board on the basis that the request was a third request for extension of his grades over which the Board had no jurisdiction. See, Appendix L Howlette thereafter filed this petition with the Court pursuant to the Rules and the Court s Constitutional authority over the Florida Bar. 3. Disposition in the Lower Tribunal. The Florida Board of Bar Examiners denied Howlette s request for extension of bar exam grades. 6
7 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT The Supreme Court has exclusive, original jurisdiction pursuant to Art. V 15 of the Florida Constitution over the process of the admission of Howlette to the Florida Bar. The standard of review should be de novo as the decision of the Board was obviously made without any consideration of the issue of good cause, or the Board was silent as to any factual findings it made. As such, Board s decision is analogous to a conclusion of law and the review is de novo. The Board s decision is clearly erroneous and inequitable based upon the particular facts of the case. The Rule regarding the extension of bar exam grades requires a showing of good cause which is based upon the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case. The peculiar facts of Howlette s case show that there was unreasonable delay by the Board in conducting its investigation of Howlette. All the while Howlette maintained his efforts to keep his knowledge of the law fresh. Adding the fact of his proven rehabilitation in both Florida and New York, it is clear that the Board s denial out-of-hand of the request for an extension was clearly erroneous. The Court should grant an extension until the Court has received and acted upon the Board s recommendation. 7
8 ARGUMENT ISSUE I. WHETHER HOWLETTE IS ENTITLED TO AN EXTENSION OF HIS BAR EXAM GRADES UNTIL THE COMPLETION OF THE ADMISSIONS PROCESS PURSUANT TO RULE ? 1. Jurisdiction. Howlette seeks an extension of his bar exam grades based upon good cause as provided in Rule This is a case of Supreme Court s original, exclusive jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 15 of the Constitution of the State of Florida, and the Court s review of Board actions in administering the Court s authority pursuant to Rule Standard of Review. Given that the issue in this case turns on the Board s denial of a good cause extension of Howlette s bar exam grades pursuant to Rule , the Board will probably argue that the standard of review would be the abuse of discretion standard. State v. Boyd, 846 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2003) However, the abuse of discretion standard is based upon the lower tribunal being in the best position to weigh the equities involved in decisions made on a case-bycase manner. Yet, in this particular case the Board did not weigh any evidence, take any testimony or make any factual or legal findings. For all intents and purposes the Board simply declined to consider the good cause argument of Howlette. 8
9 In Holland v. Gros, 89 So.2d 255 (Fla. 1956) the Supreme Court held that, A finding which rests on conclusions drawn from undisputed evidence, rather than on conflicts in the testimony, does not carry with it the same conclusiveness as a finding resting on probative disputed facts, but is rather in the nature of a legal conclusion. As with a legal conclusion by a lower tribunal, the standard of review should be de novo and the Court may find that the Board s denial was clearly erroneous under the particular facts and circumstances of this case. In addition, in matters of admission to the Bar the Court need not be precluded from reviewing the factual underpinnings of the Board's recommendation based on the Court s independent review of the record. Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners re M.B.S., 955 So.2d 504,508 (Fla ) So, Howlette submits that the standard is de novo and that the Court has the inherent authority and duty to make an independent review of the record and any weigh the equities of this case which will lead but to one conclusion that the summary denial of the extension was clearly erroneous. 3. Issue I. a. Introduction. Rule requires good cause for an extension of bar exam grades. This Court has held that, The determination of good cause is based on the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case. State v. Boyd, 846 So.2d 458 (Fla. 2003) 9
10 Good cause has been held by the Court to require a substantial reason for an extension. State v. Boyd, supra at 459 The facts of the instant case show that there are numerous, substantial reasons in favor of an extension of Howlette s grades. First, Howlette was at a complete disadvantage during the admission process because the Board took an unreasonable time to conclude what was supposed to be a supplemental investigation, and Howlette had no ability to expedite the investigation process. Second, Howlette would show that he has kept as abreast of the law as well as any reasonably prudent applicant could be expected, and that sitting again for the bar exam is would not be the best way for Howlette to enhance his continuing legal education. Finally, Howlette has proven his rehabilitation twice before once in New York and once in Florida. In all likelihood Howlette is on the verge of another favorable recommendation by the Board. b. Extension of Bar Grades. By way of a brief history of Howlette s quest to be admitted to the Bar, Howlette applied for admission to the Florida Bar in In February, 2003, Petitioner passed both parts of the Florida Bar Exam and had previously obtained a passing score on the MPRE. These items are previously filed with the Court in Case SC After a public hearing in November of 2004, the Board recommended that Petitioner be admitted as a member of the Florida Bar. See, 10
11 Appendix B However, on June 17, 2005, the Supreme Court denied Petitioner s admission emphasizing the fact that Howlette was a disbarred attorney in the state of New York and holding that the Court did not want Florida... to become a haven for disbarred attorneys. Fla. Board of Bar Examiners re: Higgins, 772 So.2d 486 (Fla. 2000). See, Appendix C Howlette thereafter applied and was reinstated as a member in good standing of the New York Bar in 2007, after which Howlette began the necessary steps to re-apply to the Florida Bar. The Board s uncertainty of how to handle Howlette s application precipitated another petition to this Court that was resolved by a ruling that Howlette could re-apply to the Bar subject to the provisions of the Rules relating to the admission of disbarred attorneys. See, Appendix G Howlette re-applied and the investigatory process ensued. c. Unreasonable Delay by the Board. Petitioner s application was filed in late 2007 and finalized by June of This would mean that the investigative process should have been concluded by March of See, Rule In spite of the nine-month time requirement of Rule , and in spite of the fact that the investigation of Howlette was only a supplemental investigation since his initial application in 2002, the admissions process is still ongoing at the time of the filing of this brief. 11
12 From all appearances the Board only began its investigation in earnest just before the nine month deadline by waiting until late February and March of 2009 to send Petitioner extensive requests for information. Howlette promptly provided information in a timely manner, even traveling to the State of New York to obtain copies of various court findings that were obtainable only by searching court files in New York. The delays in the investigation appear even more inequitable in light of letters sent by the Board to Petitioner in December of 2008 and January of 2009, just two months earlier, stating that there were no outstanding matters remaining at that time. See, Appendix K There is no dispute that Howlette fully and promptly complied with veritable stream of sequential information requests from the Board. However, by May of 2009, there was no end in sight stimulating Howlette s attorney to write the Board requesting that the investigation be expedited and expressing deep concern for the prospect that the process might extend beyond Howlette s grade eligibility. See, Appendix A By October of 2009, it was obvious that another extension of bar exam grades was necessary giving rise to the second request for an extension and the denial thereof by the Board. d. Continuing Legal Education. In order to document that Howlette has stayed abreast of the legal 12
13 environment, Howlette provided the Board with documentation that since earning passing scores on the Florida Bar Exam he had continued his continuing legal education notwithstanding his disbarment. For example, Howlette supplied the Board with documentation that, while employed with the Florida House of Representatives as a Legislative Assistant and Legal Analyst for the House Education Committee, he completed courses offered by the House Administration acceptable by the Florida Bar as continuing legal education courses and forwarded proof of same to the Board. Exhibits were attached to the request to the Board for an extension showing the Board s stamp indicating the proof of courses taken were received, and showed other approved courses taken that were not sent to the Board. See, Appendix E As set forth in the Petition, Howlette is proficient in family law matters having represented himself in cases involving his former wife and children both in New York and Florida courts. Specifically in the past four years as a pro se litigant Petitioner has researched Florida and New York cases, prepared summonses, petitions, verified answers, counterclaims, replied to counterclaims, prepared affirmations in opposition to motions, written legal briefs in a support proceeding that commenced in New York in 2005 and concluded with a favorable decision in Hernando County in April, 2009 (most if not all of the documents are in the Board s file). 13
14 Howlette is knowledgeable in the use of Westlaw, LexisNexis and other online legal material, as well as being familiar with Mathew Bender s New York Civil Practice, the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act, and the New York Family Court Act. Howlette has access to the facilities and materials of a law firm and stays informed on recent changes in the law and court procedure. Howlette presently prepares monthly Judicial Reports for the Court as a volunteer Guardian Ad Litem for the Circuit Court of the Fifth Judicial District, Hernando County. He has been doing same for the past two years. If the reason for denial was failure to maintain legal continuing education the Board s decision was clearly erroneous. e. Howlette Has Proven Rehabilitation. Howlette has previously demonstrated he can meet his burden of proof of rehabilitation by showing clear and convincing proof of rehabilitation and obtaining a recommendation for admission. Howlette s position has dramatically changed in that he is no longer disbarred in New York and has no reason to believe he will not be recommended after his appearance at the public hearing scheduled for May 15, See, Appendix J CONCLUSION Howlette has in no way delayed the process and has acted diligently at each stage of the process. Petitioner has no control over the investigative process and 14
15 the scheduling process and should not be penalized as a result of same. Petitioner has kept abreast of the legal environment and will be a knowledgeable asset to the legal profession, and Howlette has proven his rehabilitation not once, but twice. Petitioner is not seeking a second two (2) year extension of grades but only a reasonable extension of time to allow for the completion of the process that has commenced should be final in a few months after the May 14-15, 2010, public hearing. For the foregoing reasons, Howlette would respectfully request that the Court enter an order extending Petitioner s Florida Bar Exam scores and MPRE score for a reasonable period of time to include the inclusion of (1) the conduct of the Public Hearing that has been scheduled by the Board for May 14-15, 2010; (2) time to allow the Board to forward its recommendation to the Supreme Court, and (3) time for the Supreme Court to render a decision based on that recommendation all of which are out of the control of Petitioner. Dated: Respectfully submitted, JOHNNIE B. BYRD, JR., ESQUIRE FBN: North Collins Street Plant City, Florida Telephone: Fax: johnnie@byrd-law.com Attorney for Petitioner 15
16 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Initial Brief has been furnished to Thomas A. Probjecky, Esquire, at the Florida Board of Bar Examiners, 1891 Eider Court, Tallahassee, FL , by U.S. Mail this 24th day of March, JOHNNIE B. BYRD, JR., Esq. Counsel for Petitioner CERTIFICATE OF TYPE, SIZE, STYLE Undersigned counsel does hereby certify that Howlette s Initial Brief is submitted in 14 point proportionately spaced Time New Roman font as required by Rule 9.120(a)(2) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. JOHNNIE B. BYRD, JR., ESQ. Counsel for Petitioner 16
17 INDEX TO THE APPENDIX A. Letter to Board (Exhibit P to Howlette s Petition herein) B. Board of Bar Examiners Public Report and Recommendation C. Order of Florida Supreme Court Denying Admission D. Petitioner s Request for Second Extension of Grades E. Petitioner s Request for Reconsideration of Denial of Second Extension F. Board s Denial of Request for Second Extension of Grades G. Sup. Ct. Order re: Permission to Apply for Admission to Florida Bar H. First Extension of Grades by Florida Bd. of Bar Examiners I. Notice of Scheduling Investigative Hearing for J. Notice of Scheduling of Public Hearing for May 14-15, 2010 K. Letters from Board in December of 2008 and January of 2009 L. Notice of Board Denial of Reconsideration M. Chronology 17
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS ) RE: EDWARD L. HOWLETTE, SR. ) Case No. SC ) Response to Petition for Review
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS ) RE: EDWARD L. HOWLETTE, SR. ) Case No. SC10-367 ) Response to Petition for Review The Florida Board of Bar Examiners, by and through its
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS ) RE: MICHAEL HUERTA, SR. ) Case No. SC ) Lower Tribunal No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA FLORIDA BOARD OF BAR EXAMINERS ) RE: MICHAEL HUERTA, SR. ) Case No. SC11-2192 ) Lower Tribunal No.: 99158 Response to Petition for Review of Administrative Action The Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT PAMELA JO BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL
Electronically Filed 06/27/2013 12:18:58 PM ET RECEIVED, 6/27/2013 12:23:39, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOHNNIE LEE REMBERT, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC13-1125
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. CHARLES FRATELLO, Respondent. Case No. SC07-780 ****************************************************************** ON APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER COURT NO.: 4D JACK LIEBMAN. Petitioner. vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC03-1896 LOWER COURT NO.: 4D00-2883 JACK LIEBMAN Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JESSE JAMES HURRY, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC09-980 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE TALLAHASSEE
More information(e) Appearance of Attorney. An attorney may appear in a proceeding in any of the following ways:
RULE 2.505. ATTORNEYS (a) Scope and Purpose. All persons in good standing as members of The Florida Bar shall be permitted to practice in Florida. Attorneys of other states who are not members of The Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D04-4825 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. THE FLORIDA BAR, Case No. SC Complainant, TFB Nos ,725(13F) ,532(13F) v.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Case No. SC06-1687 Complainant, TFB Nos. 2004-11,725(13F) 2005-10,532(13F) v. 2005-10,754(13F) EDGAR CALVIN WATKINS, JR. Respondent / ANSWER BRIEF OF THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1605 ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Seeking Discretionary Review from the District Court of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC04-58 ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT DEREK LEWIS, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC04-58 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, DCA CASE No. 5D v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SAUL CARMONA, Petitioner, DCA CASE No. 5D03-229 v. CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AMENDMENTS TO CONFORM TO AMENDMENTS TO FLA. R. JUD. ADMIN
Electronically Filed 07/29/2013 02:32:50 PM ET RECEIVED, 7/29/2013 14:33:33, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. IN RE: ESTATE OF CASE NO. SC04- Lower Tribunal No. 2D ALVARADO KELLY,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: ESTATE OF CASE NO. SC04- Lower Tribunal No. 2D03-110 ALVARADO KELLY, Deceased. / SARAH D. CUEVAS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Alvarado Kelly, deceased
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO.4D LT. NO CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC10-2361 DCA CASE NO.4D08-1375 LT. NO. 06-4008CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CARLOS VALDES v. Petitioner, SC Case: SC04-199 First DCA Case: 1D02-4026 INTEGRATED ADMINISTRATORS and WAL-MART STORE #6020, Respondent. / On discretionary review from the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE, vs. Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC04-2045 Lower Tribunal No.: 5D03-4065 RALEIGH WILSON, SR. EVELYN WILSON and RALEIGH WILSON, JR., Respondents.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. SC
Electronically Filed 08/26/2013 04:20:02 PM ET RECEIVED, 8/26/2013 16:23:40, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, v. SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA S. CT. CASE NO. SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILFRID METELLUS, Petitioner, S. CT. CASE NO. SC02-1494 vs. DCA CASE NO. 5D01-1044 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Petitioner/Appellant, Supreme Court Case No. SC09-922 v. PETER MARCELLUS CAPUA, Respondent/Appellee. The Florida Bar File No. 2009-71,123(11H-OSC) / THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA RICHARD S. ROSS, ) ) Appellant/Petitioner, ) ) S. CT. CASE NO.: v. ) LOWER CASE NO.: 04D06-2712 ) DR. DIANE BLANK, ) ) Appellee/Respondent. ) ) PETITIONER S
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA VERNON GOINS, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC06-356 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Complainant, SC Case No. SC
THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA v. Complainant, SC Case No. SC07-1783 TFB File No. 2007-00,671(03) RONALD HARDY PEACOCK, Respondent. / ANSWER BRIEF Clifford L. Adams Counsel for Respondent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL CASE NO. 4D10-3345 RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-2290 DCA CASE NO. 3D02-2862 VINCENT MARGIOTTI Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KEVIN TRACY. v. Petitioner, Case No. SC07-2057 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE TALLAHASSEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 07-1021 CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 4D ; 4D ; 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA Petitioner, vs. Case No. SC01-1596 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 4D99-4339; 4D99-4340; 4D99-4341 GREGORY BYRON ORR, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BEST DIVERSIFIED, INC. and PETER HUFF. Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC06-1823 BEST DIVERSIFIED, INC. and PETER HUFF Petitioners, vs. OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondents.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA INITIAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, RONALD HARDY PEACOCK, SC Case No. SC07-1783 TFB File No. 2007-00,671(03) Respondent. / INITIAL BRIEF James A.G. Davey, Jr., Bar Counsel
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DANIEL L. MURRAY & JAMES L. BRINK, Petitioners, v. District Court Case No. 5D10-1376 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONERS J. BRIAN PAGE Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC DCA Case No.: 4D L.T. Case No.: CDDR FA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC05-1815 DCA Case No.: 4D04-651 L.T. Case No.: CDDR 02-10768 FA CARLIE CARGILE-SCHRAGE, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DONALD BRUCE SCHRAGE, Respondent/Appellee. On
More informationRules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators
Part I. STANDARDS Rules 15.000 15.200 Part II. DISCIPLINE Rule 15.210. Procedure [No Change] Any complaint alleging violations of the Florida Rules For Qualified And Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC MUHAMMAD RAHEEM TAQWA EL SUPREME KALIFA. Petitioner. GRADY JUDD, SHERIFF, et. al.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-2487 MUHAMMAD RAHEEM TAQWA EL SUPREME KALIFA Petitioner v. GRADY JUDD, SHERIFF, et. al., Respondents ==========================================================
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4 th DCA 4D ) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1298 (4 th DCA 4D05-1624) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION LAURA FISHER ZIBURA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: SC Lower Tribunal Nos.: 5D CA W HOWARD BROWNING, Petitioner, vs. LYNN ANNE POIRIER,
Filing # 18199903 Electronically Filed 09/12/2014 10:17:38 PM RECEIVED, 9/12/2014 22:18:53, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC13-2416 Lower Tribunal Nos.:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA APPEAL FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CORAL BAY SECTION C HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner. Case No.: 3D07-2315 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Respondent Lower Tribunal Case No.: 2007-5354-CA-01 APPEAL FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STERLING R. LANIER, JR. v. Petitioner, Case No. SC08-19 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
Electronically Filed 05/17/2013 11:04:14 AM ET RECEIVED, 5/17/2013 11:08:35, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARK ERIC OSTERBACK, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC13-812 STATE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA MARK ONDREY, vs. Appellant/Petitioner, FLORENCE PATTERSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOHN WILLIAM PATTERSON, deceased. Case No.: SC04-961
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT, CITY OF LARGO, ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION IN RESPONSE TO PETITIONER'S AMENDED BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARY KATHERINE DAY-PETRANO CASE NO. SC05-1181 L.T. 2D04-4867 Petitioner, v. PINELLAS COUNTY AND CIRCUIT COURTS OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA; STATE OF FLORIDA;
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC11- ALBERTO G. DAVID, JR., Petitioner, vs. LORETTA L. DAVID, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC11- ALBERTO G. DAVID, JR., Petitioner, vs. LORETTA L. DAVID, Respondent. On Review from the District Court of Appeal, Fifth District, State of Florida Case No.:
More informationSTATEMENT OF THE CASE. Appellee, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., f/k/a COUNTRYWIDE
STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellee, BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, L.P., f/k/a COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERICING, L.P. ( BAC ) initiated the lower court proceeding by suing Appellant, LEONADRO DIGIOVANNI ( DiGiovanni
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLIAM E. WILLIAMSON, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC08-2192 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KENNETH JENKINS, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-2088 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE (As to Font Type Only)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, v. Case No. SC10-718 [TFB Case No. 2010-31,202(05A)(OSC)] SUZANNE MARIE HIMES, Respondent. / AMENDED REPORT OF REFEREE (As
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.:
MARIA CEVALLOS, SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 4th District Case No: 4D08-3042 v. Petitioner, KERI ANN RIDEOUT and LINDA RIDEOUT, Respondents. / PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA KENNETH PURDY, Petitioner, CASE NO.: Not Yet Assigned vs. JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MYRA VAIVADA, Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-867 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC FRANK HERNANDEZ. Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC02-2752 FRANK HERNANDEZ Petitioner, -vs- THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA,
More informationAdministrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents
Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, 2003 Table of Contents PART I Administrative Rules for Procedures for Preliminary Sunrise Review Assessments Part
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CHRISTINE BAUER and THOMAS BAUER, Petitioners, ONE WEST BANK, FSB, Respondent.
Filing # 17071819 Electronically Filed 08/13/2014 05:11:43 PM RECEIVED, 8/13/2014 17:13:41, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC14-1575 CHRISTINE BAUER and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RONALD COTE Petitioner vs. Case No.SC00-1327 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent / DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Lower Tribunal No. 2D ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION BASED ON ALLEGED CONFLICT OF DECISIONS
Electronically Filed 07/31/2013 04:44:07 PM ET RECEIVED, 7/31/2013 16:48:32, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT VON GOETZMAN Petitioner/Pro Se SC No. 13-9999 v.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC MIRACLE CENTER ASSOCIATES, Petitioner, vs. SCANDINAVIAN HEALTH SPA, INC. et al. Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC05-884 MIRACLE CENTER ASSOCIATES, Petitioner, vs. SCANDINAVIAN HEALTH SPA, INC. et al Respondent. ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD
More informationCHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE
CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE 20-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to use the title paralegal,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Jerome S. Rydell and Dale E. Krueger, individually and derivatively, on behalf of the shareholders of Surf Tech International, Inc., and Sigma Financial Corporation, a Michigan
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1141 DCA CASE NO. 3D03-2169 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWER BRIEF
THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA v. Complainant, HERMAN THOMAS, Case No. SC11-925 TFB File No. 2009-00,804(2B) Respondent. / ANSWER BRIEF Allison Carden Sackett, Bar Counsel The Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC Lower Court Case Number 4D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER SC06-2110 Lower Court Case Number 4D05-4560 EDWARD SEGAL, Petitioner, vs. BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, Respondent. BROWARD COUNTY S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-1056 TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIS, Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL McCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SANDRA P. CASTILLO, Sc12.-16n Petitioner, DCA Case No.: 3D11-2132 VS. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY AS TRUSTEE FOR MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I 2 INC. TRUST 2006-HE7
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, DCA NO.: 2D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TODD A. HATFIELD, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC10-2404 STATE OF FLORIDA, DCA NO.: 2D09-5938 Respondent. 05-18908CFANO ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLIAM MURPHY ALLEN JR., v. Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, CASE NO. SC06-1644 L.T. CASE NO. 1D04-4578 Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA CASE NO. THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D02-100 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NO. 00-20940 CA 01 MICHAEL E. HUMER Petitioner/Appellant, Vs. MIAMI-DADE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC IN RE: THE ESTATE OF MARY T. OSCEOLA, Petitioners, vs. PETTIES OSCEOLA, SR.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC04-4059 IN RE: THE ESTATE OF MARY T. OSCEOLA, Petitioners, vs. PETTIES OSCEOLA, SR., Respondent APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA, THIRD DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BETTY JEAN MANN, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. SC02-2646 BETTY JEAN MANN, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA and ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Respondents. PETITIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARIANNE F. CASWELL, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-014 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationWYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS
WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Scope. 2. Applicability. 3. Pleadings. 3.1. Commencement of action [Effective until June 1 2018.] 3.1. Commencement of action
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,378 In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed March 2, 2018. One-year
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE No.: SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE No.: SC06-1091 BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, Cross-Appellant/Appellee, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, AND THE TAXPAYERS, PROPERTY OWNERS, AND CITIZENS OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC FIRST DCA CASE NO.: 1D L.T. CASE NO.: L
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROB BRAYSHAW, ET AL., Petitioners, v. CASE NO.: SC11-507 FIRST DCA CASE NO.: 1D09-5894 L.T. CASE NO.: 2009-1337L AGENCY FOR WORKFORCE INNOVATION, Respondent. / RESPONDENT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: 98,448 SAUL ZINER, Petitioner, NATIONSBANK, N.A., Respondent. RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 98,448 SAUL ZINER, Petitioner, v. NATIONSBANK, N.A., Respondent. RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, Petitioner, vs. STEPHEN S. DOBSON, III, P.A., Sup. Ct. case no. SC07- DCA case no. 1D05-4326 Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ST. JOHNS RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC14-1092 COY A. KOONTZ, JR., AS Lower Tribunal Case No. 5D06-1116 PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA, CASE NO. Plaintiff, vs., Defendant. / ORDER SCHEDULING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND NON-JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Plaintiff
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 3D v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANGELO KYRELIS, Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC12-642 DCA Case No. 3D11-1730 v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992 ONEWEST BANK, FSB (SUBSTITUTED PARTY FOR FORMER PLAINTIFF INDYMAC
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC Lower Tribunal No.: 2D PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
KATHLEEN M. REILLY and RAYMOND J. REILLY, her Husband Petitioners, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Vs. PATRICK M. BRINKER, Respondent. / Case No.: SC03-1614 Lower Tribunal No.: 2D02-2622 PETITIONER S INITIAL
More informationENFORCEMENT RULES & DISCIPLINARY BOARD RULES RELATING TO REINSTATEMENT
ENFORCEMENT RULES & DISCIPLINARY BOARD RULES RELATING TO REINSTATEMENT PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT (Contains Amendments Through July 14, 2011) Rule 218. Reinstatement. (a) An attorney
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
The Florida Board of Bar Examiners has filed a petition with the Florida Supreme Court proposing amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to The Florida Bar. According to the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) The Florida Bar File No ,336(15D) FFC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before A Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, vs. Complainant, Supreme Court Case No. SC06-2411 The Florida Bar File No. 2007-50,336(15D) FFC JOHN ANTHONY GARCIA, Respondent. / APPELLANT/PETITIONER,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC12- ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LARRY BRYANT NETTLES, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Case No. SC12- L.T. No. 1D11-5951 Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT
More informationFlorida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators. Part I. Mediator Qualifications
Florida Rules for Certified and Court-Appointed Mediators Part I. Mediator Qualifications Rule 10.100. General Qualifications Certification Requirements (a) General. For certification as a county court,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC Lower Tribunal No.: 1D ADAMS GRADING AND TRUCKING, INC. and JOHN M.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC07-1175 Lower Tribunal No.: 1D06-1760 ADAMS GRADING AND TRUCKING, INC. and JOHN M. BLOODSWORTH, Petitioners, vs. MICHAEL E. GRAY, Respondent. ON REVIEW FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Partial Appeal of Order of Florida Third District Court of Appeal
< /. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC11-1580 Case No.: 3D10-1320 Case No.: LT99-1046 MICHELE G. HARDIN, vs. Appellant/Petitioner, MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDA and MONROE COUNTY CODE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC BRIAN MEATON
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-1524 Petitioner, BRIAN MEATON vs. CITY OF ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA Respondent. \ JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF JAMES A. SHEEHAN, ESQUIRE JAMES A. SHEEHAN
More informationCORNELIUS SHIVER, JR S INITIAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CORNELIUS SHIVER, JR., Appellant, Supreme Court Case No.: SC11-129 IN RE: PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF CORNELIUS SHIVER, JR., The Florida Bar File No.: 2011-70,736(11J-MRE)
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA INTEGRA CORPORATION, Petitioner, DOR 90-1-FOF vs. CASE NO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA INTEGRA CORPORATION, Petitioner, DOR 90-1-FOF vs. CASE NO. 90-4138 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Respondent. STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA GEORGE GREEN, Petitioner/Appellant, vs. F.S.Ct. CASE NO. 4 TH DCA CASE NO. 4D05-2009 STATE OF FLORIDA, 4D05-2247 Respondent/Appellee. PETITIONER S BRIEF ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC MARK TETZLAFF Petitioner, vs. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM N Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC-04-591 MARK TETZLAFF Petitioner, vs. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMM N Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF
More informationWhipple' s Brief on Jurisdiction
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLLIAM L. WHIPPLE Petitioner/Appellant V. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent/Appellee ) ) ) Case No. SC13- ) ) OUTGOING LEGA.v ) PROVIDED TO TAYLOR C MAILING ON DATE (CONFINEMENT-ANNEX)
More informationRESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1365 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D02-4510 RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF GARY A. BARCUS Appellant/Petitioner vs. GROVE AT GRAND PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Respondent
More informationCOMMENT TO AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFIED AND COURT-APPOINTED MEDIATORS
Filing # 31237551 E-Filed 08/24/2015 03:41:27 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFIED AND COURT- APPOINTED MEDIATORS CASE NO. SC15-875 COMMENT TO AMENDMENTS
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO.: SC LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NOS.: 4D
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO.: SC08-774 LOWER TRIBUNAL CASE NOS.: 4D07-1055 MANZINI & ASSOCIATES, P.A., vs. Petitioner, BROWARD SHERIFF S OFFICE and SONYA D. WIMBERLY, Respondents. / On Discretionary Review
More informationPetitioner, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORI l3 FEB 8 p CASE NO. SC12-1315 gy (4'h DCA 4D10-4525) NYKA O' CONNOR, Petitioner, Vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION PAMELA JO
More informationThe Florida Bar v. Roth SC Reply Brief IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT S REPLY BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT, SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC00-921 v. ROBERT L. ROTH, RESPONDENT, THE FLORIDA BAR FILE NO. 1999-71,053(11E) PETITIONER. / RESPONDENT S REPLY BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC., A Florida Corporation, Petitioner/Defendant,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC07-1397 PRO-ART DENTAL LAB, INC., A Florida Corporation, Petitioner/Defendant, v. V-STRATEGIC GROUP, LLC, A Florida Corporation, Respondent/Plaintiff. An Appeal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Supreme Court Case No. SC th DCA Case No. 4D RESPONDENTS BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA ALEXANDER SCHULTZ vs.. Petitioner Supreme Court Case No. SC04-2318 4th DCA Case No. 4D03-3286 WALDEMAR K. SCHICKEDANZ et al., Respondents / RESPONDENTS BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LESTER SMULL, Petitioner, CASE NO.: 4 TH DCA CASE NO.:4D02-1818 v. THE TOWN OF JUPITER, a Florida municipal corporation Respondent. / PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Lower Tribunal Case Number: 1D Case Number: SC05-957
IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT Lower Tribunal Case Number: 1D03-4621 Case Number: SC05-957 ANN LYON, ETC., vs. Petitioner/ Appellant, KEITH SANFORD, ET AL. Respondent/ Appellee. AMENDED PETITIONER S BRIEF
More information