FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/16/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/16/2017. Exhibit D
|
|
- Marsha Hensley
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Exhibit D
2 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY MAARTEN DE JONG, -against- WILCO FAESSEN, Plaintiff, Defendant x x Index No /2016 WILCO FAESSEN S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Article 31 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules, Defendant Wilco Faessen ( Faessen ) hereby responds to Plaintiff Martin de Jong s ( de Jong ) First Request for the Production of Documents (the Request ) in the above-captioned matter. GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. Faessen s specific objections to each request are in addition to the general objections set forth in this section. These general objections form a part of the response to each request and are set forth here to avoid the duplication and repetition of restating them for each response. The absence of a reference to a general objection should not be construed as a waiver of the general objection as to the specific request. 2. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it purports to impose on Faessen obligations beyond those imposed by the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules, the Rules of the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court, or the rules and orders of the Court.
3 3. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong, available from public, court, or agency records, or otherwise in the public domain and accessible to all parties. 4. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it seeks documents that are not within Faessen s possession, control or custody. 5. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 6. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and/or unduly burdensome. 7. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it is unreasonably cumulative and duplicative. 8. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it purports to require identification and disclosure of documents and information that were prepared in anticipation of litigation, constitute attorney work product, disclosure, mental impressions, conclusions, opinions or legal theories of any attorney for or other representative of Faessen, contain privileged attorney-client communications, or are otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable privileges, laws or rules. Faessen hereby claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Request and excludes privileged and protected information from its responses to the Request. 9. Inadvertent production of any document which is privileged shall not constitute waiver of any privilege or of any other ground for objection to discovery of such document, the 2
4 information contained therein, or the subject matter thereof, or of Faessen s right to object to the use of such document or the information contained therein. 10. Insofar as Faessen has responded to a request to which he has objected, Faessen reserves the right to maintain such objection and such objection is not waived in any respect by the provision of a response. 11. These responses to the Request shall not be construed in any way as an admission that any definition or assertion of fact provided therein is either factually correct or legally binding upon Faessen, or as a waiver of any of Faessen s objections, including but not limited to, objections regarding discoverability and admissibility of documents or other evidence. 12. Faessen reserves the right to supplement these responses pursuant to the Civil Practice Law and Rules, the Rules of the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court, and/or the rules and orders of the Court. SPECIFIC RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS REQUEST NO. 1 All documents or communications relating to any allegations or claims in the Complaint. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 1 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is unreasonably cumulative and duplicative of other requests. REQUEST NO. 2 All documents or communications relating to de Jong. 3
5 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 2 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request on the grounds that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is unreasonably cumulative and duplicative of other requests. Subject to these objections and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, relating to the agreement between de Jong and Faessen alleged in the Complaint and to de Jong s investments in GoAmericaGo and WhistlePig that Faessen has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 3 All documents or communications relating to GoAmericaGo, including but not limited to any operating agreements, amended operating agreements, financial statements, statements of shareholder equity, or any other document setting forth the rights, obligations, and duties of any members, managing members, investors, or any other party with any interest in GoAmericaGo. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. REQUEST NO. 4 All documents or communications relating to WhistlePig, including but not limited to any operating agreements, amended operating agreements, financial statements, statements of shareholder equity, or any other document setting forth the rights, obligations, and duties of any members, managing members, investors, or any other party with any interest in GoAmericaGo [sic]. 4
6 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. REQUEST NO. 5 All documents or communications relating to the business relationship between Faessen and Bhakta, including any documents or communications prior to January 1, 2008 relating to the business relationship between these parties. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 5 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that the term business relationship is vague and ambiguous. Faessen further objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. REQUEST NO. 6 All documents or communications relating the Agreement. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 6 REQUEST NO. 7 All documents or communications relating to any subsequent modifications, whether oral or written, to the Agreement. 5
7 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 7 REQUEST NO. 8 All documents or communications regarding any agreement between Faessen and de Jong regarding Faessen or de Jong s investments in WhistlePig or GoAmericaGo. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 8 REQUEST NO. 9 All communications between de Jong and Faessen regarding any investment, conversion, or any other action taken by de Jong or Faessen with regards to the entities GoAmericaGo, WhistlePig, or any other spirit-related venture created by Bhakta. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 9 REQUEST NO. 10 All documents or communications relating to Faessen s investments in GoAmericaGo. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 10 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, relating to the terms, amount and timing of his investments in GoAmericaGo that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. 6
8 REQUEST NO. 11 All documents or communications relating to de Jong s investments in GoAmericaGo. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 11 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 12 All documents or communications relating to Faessen s investments in WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 12 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, relating to the terms, amount and timing of his investments in WhistlePig that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 13 All documents or communications relating to de Jong s investments in WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 13 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. 7
9 REQUEST NO. 14 All communications between Faessen and Bhakta concerning Faessen s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 14 REQUEST NO. 15 All communications between Faessen and de Jong concerning Faessen s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 15 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 16 All communications between Faessen and any other party concerning Faessen s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 16 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request on the grounds that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it is unreasonably cumulative and duplicative of other requests. 8
10 REQUEST NO. 17 All communications between Faessen and Bhakta concerning de Jong s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 17 REQUEST NO. 18 All communications between Faessen and de Jong concerning de Jong s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 18 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 19 All communications between Faessen and any other party concerning de Jong s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 19 REQUEST NO. 20 All documents or communications relating to the Secret Negotiations. 9
11 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 20 REQUEST NO. 21 All documents or communications concerning any placement fee negotiated or received by Faessen in exchange for any services provided by Faessen to GoAmericaGo, WhistlePig or Bhakta. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 21 Faessen objects to the request on the grounds that the term placement fee is vague and ambiguous. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 22 All documents or communications concerning any services provided by Faessen to GoAmericaGo, WhistlePig or Bhakta. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 22 Faessen objects to the request on the grounds that the term services is vague and ambiguous. Faessen further objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. REQUEST NO. 23 All documents and communications concerning de Jong s 2013 sale of his equity stake in WhistlePig and/or GoAmericaGo. 10
12 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 23 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 24 All documents or communications regarding the Secret Agreement. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 24 REQUEST NO. 25 All documents or communications concerning to Faessen s current equity stake in WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 25 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce documents sufficient to show his current equity stake in WhistlePig. REQUEST NO. 26 Documents and Communications sufficient to show the current valuation of WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 26 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks documents that are not within Faessen s possession, control or custody. 11
13 REQUEST NO. 27 All documents or communications regarding any agreement between Faessen, Bhakta, WhistlePig and/or GoAmericaGo regarding Faessen s equity stake in WhistlePig or GoAmericaGo. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 27 REQUEST NO. 28 All documents or communications concerning any other litigation between Faessen, Bhakta and/or WhistlePig, including but not limited to documents and communications regarding the action currently pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery, Case No VCG. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 28 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request on the grounds that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent it calls for documents and information covered by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product doctrine or other applicable privileges and immunities. REQUEST NO. 29 All documents or communications that you referred to or relied upon in forming your answers to de Jong s Interrogatories. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 29 Faessen objects to this request to the extent it calls for documents and information covered by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product doctrine or other applicable 12
14 privileges and immunities. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 30 All documents or communications that you referred to or relied upon in drafting your motion to dismiss this action. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 30 Faessen objects to this request to the extent it calls for documents and information covered by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product doctrine or other applicable privileges and immunities. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 31 All documents or communications on which you intend to rely to prove any counterclaims or defenses you may assert in this action, or to establish damages or any other remedy. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 31 Faessen objects to this request to the extent it calls for documents and information covered by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product doctrine or other applicable privileges and immunities. Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 32 Any and all documents not otherwise covered by the foregoing requests that Defendant intends to rely upon in any dispositive motion or at trial. 13
15 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 32 Faessen objects to this request to the extent it calls for documents and information covered by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product doctrine or other applicable privileges and immunities. Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. New York, New York Dated January 30, 2017 Zachary S. Taylor TAYLOR & COHEN LLP 40 Worth Street 10th Floor New York, New York Telephone (646) Facsimile (646) Attorneys for Defendant Wilco Faessen 14
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :51 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2015 EXHIBIT B
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/23/2015 1151 AM INDEX NO. 651659/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF 02/23/2015 EXHIBIT B SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationDEFENDANT S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AND CONTINUING INTERROGATORIES
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA v. Plaintiff,, Case No.: Defendant., DEFENDANT S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AND CONTINUING INTERROGATORIES My name is, and I am the Defendant
More informationDe Jong v Faessen 2017 NY Slip Op 30558(U) March 21, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /16 Judge: Barry Ostrager Cases posted
De Jong v Faessen 2017 NY Slip Op 30558(U) March 21, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 655478/16 Judge: Barry Ostrager Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Chapter 11
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN In re ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC. Chapter 11 Case No. 12-43166-TJT Judge Thomas J. Tucker (Jointly Administered) ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/28/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS SUPPLYTEK INTERNATIONAL, LLC, D/B/A/ LASERTONE, AND LASERTONE, CORP.,.: Index No.: 508465/2017 Plaintiffs, : Assigned Justice: Hon. Lawrence Knipel
More informationDISCOVERY- LOCAL RULES JUSTICE COURTS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS
DISCOVERY- LOCAL RULES JUSTICE COURTS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS EFFECTIVE: JULY 1, 2015 TARRANT COUNTY JUSTICE COURTS - LOCAL RULES FOR DISCOVERY OBJECTIVES In accordance with law, the Justice Courts conduct
More informationFederal Rules of Civil Procedure
1 of 7 10/10/2005 11:14 AM Federal Rules of Civil Procedure collection home tell me more donate search V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY > Rule 26. Prev Next Notes Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery;
More informationPlaintiff, Defendant. GENERAL OBJECTIONS. 1. The following responses are without in any way waiving or intending to waive:
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Acme Home & Garden, LLC, v. John Doe, Plaintiff, DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Contract Court File No.: xx-cv-xx-xxx DEFENDANT S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF
More informationRule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]
Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ] (a) Required Disclosures; Methods to Discover Additional Matter. (1) Initial Disclosures. Except to the extent
More informationTEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY
TEXAS DISCOVERY Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW 2. 1999 REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY 3. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLANS 4. FORMS OF DISCOVERY A. Discovery Provided for by the Texas
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 WAYNE K. LEMIEUX (SBN 01 W. KEITH LEMIEUX (SBN 0 CHRISTINE CARSON (SBN. LEMIEUX & O'NEILL 1 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., Suite 0 Westlake Village, CA 1 Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0 - Attorneys
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2012 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2012
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2012 INDEX NO. 652200/2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., * Plaintiff * v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH LINDA H. LAMONE, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DEFENDANT
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1
Article 5. Depositions and Discovery. Rule 26. General provisions governing discovery. (a) Discovery methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/01/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/01/2016. Exhibit C
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/01/2016 04:41 PM INDEX NO. 653611/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/01/2016 Exhibit C JEFFREY G. STEINBERG KEVIN F. CAVALIERE STEINBERG & CAVALIERE, LLP SO MAIN
More informationLOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]
LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana] Local Rule 1.1 - Scope of the Rules These Rules shall govern all proceedings
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 0 H 1 HOUSE BILL 0 Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information. (Public) Sponsors: Representatives Glazier, T. Moore, Ross, and Jordan (Primary Sponsors).
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure having submitted its One Hundred Fifty-Second Report to the Court, recommending
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
Proceeding 91234467 Party Correspondence Address Submission Filer's Name Filer's email Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA843411
More informationCase 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 93 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 4:16-cv-00650-RGE-SBJ Document 93 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION DEBORAH INNIS, on behalf of the Telligen, Inc. Employee
More informationInformation or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories
Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories 1. The practitioner may desire to combine Request for Admissions, Interrogatories and Request
More informationPLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF DEL NORTE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.
35987149 Feb 16 2011 12:13PM DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Denver City and County Building 1437 Bannock St. Denver, Colorado 80202 Plaintiffs: ANTHONY LOBATO, et al. and Plaintiff-Intervenors:
More informationTHE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Section 1: 8-K (FORM 8-K) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 Date of
More informationCase 1:14-cv TSC-DAR Document 27 Filed 12/15/14 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:14-cv-00857-TSC-DAR Document 27 Filed 12/15/14 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY
EFiled: Jul 10 2007 8:37PM EDT Transaction ID 15525691 Case No. 2776-CC IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY HIGH RIVER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ) ICAHN PARTNERS MASTER
More informationCase 1:13-cv JKB Document Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT E
Case 1:13-cv-03233-JKB Document 177-7 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT E Case 1:13-cv-03233-JKB Document 177-7 Filed 05/31/17 Page 2 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
More informationCOMES NOW, Plaintiff, United Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "United" or
UNITED CORPORATION, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS /ST. JOHN v. Plaintiff, WAHEED HAMED, (a/k/a Willy or Willie Hamed), Case No.: 2013 -CV -101 ACTION FOR DAMAGES JURY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, PREMIUM BEEF FEEDERS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. 13-CV-1168-EFM-TJJ MEMORANDUM AND
More informationInternational Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2017 OTC EQUITY DERIVATIVES T+2 SETTLEMENT CYCLE PROTOCOL
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2017 OTC EQUITY DERIVATIVES T+2 SETTLEMENT CYCLE PROTOCOL published on July 28, 2017 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2015 06:04 PM INDEX NO. 650312/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015 ExhibitA SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEW YORK COUNTYOFNEW YORK BANK HAPOALIM B.M., vs.
More information1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure.
Information or instructions: Request for disclosure 1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure. 2. Either party may file a request upon the other in order to obtain basic
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, et al., v. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-1891-JTC
More informationStreamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures
RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)
Apple Computer, Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc. Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 David J. Miclean (#1/miclean@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 00 Arguello Street, Suite 00 Redwood City, California 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile:
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2016 EXHIBIT C
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2016 06:54 PM INDEX NO. 650369/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2016 EXHIBIT C SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK LEONID L. LEBEDEV,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez
Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow Doc. 34 Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MARK J. GAINOR, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, et al., v. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-1891-JTC
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
Aubin et al v. Columbia Casualty Company et al Doc. 140 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILLIAM J. AUBIN, ET AL. VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-290-BAJ-EWD COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1.
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/2015 05:15 PM INDEX NO. 652471/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015 Exhibit 1 Document1 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SNI/SI
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/18/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/18/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ALLEN DAVIDSON, -against- Plaintiff, 307-311 UNION AVE LLC and SUN SUN CONTRACTING INC., Index No. 505042/2016 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT 307-311
More informationInternational Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL published on 3 May 2016 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. The International
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JAMES TRACY, Plaintiff, Case No. 9:16-cv-80655-RLR-JMH v. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, a/k/a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY,
More informationP R E T R I A L O R D E R
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER COLORADO Address: City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 COURT USE ONLY Plaintiff(s):, v. Defendant(s):. Case Number: Courtroom: 424 P R
More informationIN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA PATRICK C. DESMOND, MARY C. DESMOND, Individually, and MARY C. DESMOND, as Administratrix of the Estate of PATRICK W. DESMOND v. Plaintiffs, NARCONON
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,
More informationFiling # E-Filed 09/14/ :37:55 PM
Filing # 32014556 E-Filed 09/14/2015 02:37:55 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA P & S ASSOCIATES, GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited Partnership,
More informationDiscovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law
Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law Michael Grow Arent Fox LLP, Washington D.C., United States Summary and Outline Parties to civil actions or inter partes proceedings before the United
More informationNational Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS
National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Important Notice...3 Introduction...3 Standard Clause...3 Submission Agreement...3 Administrative
More informationCase 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
Case :-cv-000-jcc Document Filed // Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 KIM BAROVIC, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN A. BALLMER, Defendant.
More informationCase KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 17-12913-KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Dex Liquidating Co. (f/k/a Dextera Surgical Inc.), 1 Debtor. ) ) ) ) ) ) )
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3. Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN MICHAEL SWEENEY, Index No.: /2017.
Index Number: 650053/2017 Page 1 out of 15 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3 MICHAEL SWEENEY, Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: 650053/2017 RJI Filing
More informationA Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive Q&A
presents Multi-Defendant Patent Litigation: Controlling Costs and Pooling Resources Strategies for Joint Defense Groups, Joint Defense Agreements, and Privilege Issues A Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar
More informationARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties
ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter
More informationConsolidated Arbitration Rules
Consolidated Arbitration Rules THE LEADING PROVIDER OF ADR SERVICES 1. Applicability of Rules The parties to a dispute shall be deemed to have made these Consolidated Arbitration Rules a part of their
More informationASSERTING, CONTESTING, AND PRESERVING PRIVILEGES UNDER THE NEW RULES OF DISCOVERY
UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW FOUNDATION CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION ADVANCED CIVIL DISCOVERY UNDER THE NEW RULES June 1-2, 2000 Dallas, Texas June 8-9, 2000 Houston, Texas ASSERTING, CONTESTING, AND PRESERVING
More informationDodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)
Dodge County (Sixth Judicial District) 1. Rules of Decorum 2. Civil Practice 3. Rules of Criminal Procedure 4. Rules of Family Court Procedure 5. Filing of Papers by Electronic Filing and Facsimile Transmission
More informationCase Doc 89 Filed 07/26/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:29:16 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11
Document Page 1 of 11 FILED & JUDGMENT ENTERED Steven T. Salata July 26 2017 Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Western District of North Carolina J. Craig Whitley United States Bankruptcy Judge UNITED STATES
More informationSTIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Filed D.C. Sl\p"~rj:)r 10 Apr: ]() P03:07 Clerk ot Court C'j'FI. STEVEN 1. ROSEN Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION v. Case No.: 09 CA 001256 B Judge Erik P. Christian
More informationP R E T R I A L O R D E R
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER COLORADO Address: City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 COURT USE ONLY Plaintiff(s):, v. Defendant(s):. Case Number: Courtroom: 424 P R
More informationAnnotated Form Fund Formation Opinion for Delaware Limited Liability Company. (Prepared by Louis G. Hering) [Date]
Annotated Form Fund Formation Opinion for Delaware Limited Liability Company (Prepared by Louis G. Hering) TO: Re: [Fund Name] LLC Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as special [Delaware] counsel to [Fund
More informationResponses of the Christian Civic League of Maine, Inc. to Defendants First Set of Interrogatories
Case 1:06-cv-00614-LFO Document 26-5 Filed 04/21/2006 Page 1 of 10 United States District Court District of Columbia The Christian Civic League of Maine, Inc. 70 Sewall Street Augusta, ME 04330, Plaintiff,
More informationAttorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters
Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Code of Civil Procedure 1985.8 Subpoena seeking electronically stored information (a)(1) A subpoena in a civil proceeding may require
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946
Case 4:17-cv-02946 Document 3 Filed in TXSD on 10/03/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION United States District Court Southern District of Texas
More informationCLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE
CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE I. Recitals. A. Introduction. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement ) details and finalizes the terms for settlement of class claims
More informationJOINT MARKETING AND SALES REFERRAL AGREEMENT
This Referral Agreement (the Agreement) is made effective as of 2012 (the Effective Date) by and between Aerospike, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with an address at 2525 E. Charleston Road, Suite 201,
More informationCase Doc Filed 11/22/17 Entered 11/22/17 17:35:58 Desc Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 6
2 Page 1 of 6 I. DEFINITIONS 1. And as well as or shall be construed either disjunctively or conjunctively as necessary to bring within the scope of these discovery requests any information that might
More informationbrl Doc 76 Filed 03/28/12 Entered 03/28/12 10:50:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. Plaintiff-Applicant, Adv. Pro. No.
Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff-Applicant, Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789 (BRL) BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES
More informationAAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes)
APPENDIX 4 AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes) Commercial Mediation Procedures M-1. Agreement of Parties Whenever, by
More informationANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE
ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE "Redacted" Case Document 98 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION v. v.,.,, Plaintiffs,
More informationAAA Healthcare. Payor Provider Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures. Available online at adr.org/healthcare
AAA Healthcare Payor Provider Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures Available online at adr.org/healthcare Rules Amended and Effective November 1, 2014 Rules Amended and Effective November 1, 2014.
More informationDISCOVERY & E-DISCOVERY
DISCOVERY & E-DISCOVERY The Supreme Court of Hawai i seeks public comment regarding proposals to amend Rules 26, 30, 33, 34, 37, and 45 of the Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure. The proposals clarifies
More informationCase 3:15-cv RJB Document 74 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0-rjb Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 0 ALAA ELKHARWILY, M.D., Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant. CASE NO. :-cv-0-rjb
More informationrdd Doc 381 Filed 09/01/17 Entered 09/01/17 17:18:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 27
Pg 1 of 27 Christopher Marcus, P.C. James H.M. Sprayregen, P.C. John T. Weber William A. Guerrieri (admitted pro hac vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Alexandra Schwarzman (admitted pro hac vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS
More informationAGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER. dated as of FEBRUARY 23, by and among MURRAY KENTUCKY ENERGY, INC., WESTERN KENTUCKY MERGER SUB, LLC,
EXECUTION VERSION AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER dated as of FEBRUARY 23, 2018 by and among MURRAY KENTUCKY ENERGY, INC., WESTERN KENTUCKY MERGER SUB, LLC, WESTERN KENTUCKY COAL RESOURCES, LLC and MURRAY
More informationARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES
1. INTRODUCTION ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES 1.1 These procedures shall be known as the ARIAS U.S. Rules for the Resolution of U.S. Insurance and Reinsurance
More informationAlliance Bank & Trust Company ( Alliance Bank ) ( First Motion to Compel ); Plaintiffs
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA MECKLENBURG COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 11 CVS 9668 WNC HOLDINGS, LLC, MASON VENABLE and HAROLD KEE, Plaintiffs, v. ALLIANCE BANK & TRUST COMPANY,
More informationADR CODE OF PROCEDURE
Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:10-cv-04372-DWF-JJG Document 89 Filed 02/08/12 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and
More information9/26/2012 PAPER MACHE,ORIGAMI & AND OTHER CREATIVE THINGS TO DO WITH PAPER: BASIC INITIAL CONSIDERATIONS
PAPER MACHE,ORIGAMI & AND OTHER CREATIVE THINGS TO DO WITH PAPER: The Art Of Paper Discovery In Texas PAUL N. GOLD BASIC INITIAL CONSIDERATIONS QUESTIONS YOU MUST ASK AND ANSWER AT THE OUTSET What Are
More informationIMPORTANT NOTICE...3 INTRODUCTION...4. Standard Arbitration Clause...5. Administrative Fees...5 HEALTHCARE PAYOR PROVIDER RULES -- REGULAR TRACK...
AAA Healthcare Payor Provider Arbitration Rules Effective Date: January 31, 2011 To access the AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures with the previous versions of Fee Schedules, visit
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Steven J. HATFILL, M.D., Plaintiff Civil No. 1:03-CV-01793 (RBW v. Attorney General John ASHCROFT, Timothy BERES, Daryl DARNELL, Van HARP,
More informationREVISED AS OF MARCH 2014
REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014 JUDICATE WEST COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES RULE 1. INTENT AND OVERVIEW 1 RULE 1.A. INTENT 1 RULE 1.B. COMMITMENT TO EFFICIENT RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES 1 RULE 2. JURISDICTION 1 RULE
More informationIN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
E-FILED 2014 JAN 02 736 PM POLK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY BELLE OF SIOUX CITY, L.P., v. Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant MISSOURI RIVER HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
Brighton Crossing Condominium Association et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Doc. 52 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION BRIGHTON CROSSING CONDOMINIUM
More informationEcclesiastical Court of the Missionary Diocese of CANA East Rules of Procedure
Ecclesiastical Court of the Missionary Diocese of CANA East Rules of Procedure Preface The rules of the ecclesiastical court are for the purpose of the smooth functioning of the court. The function of
More informationCommercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)
Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes) Rules Amended and Effective October 1, 2013 Fee Schedule Amended and Effective June 1,
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant : This action came before the court at a final pretrial conference held on at a.m./p.m.,
More informationThe 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
The 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Boston Bar Association Commercial and Business Litigation Section December 7, 2015 Paula M. Bagger, Cooke Clancy & Gruenthal LLP Gregory S. Bombard,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00579-BAJ-RLB THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE RESPONSE OF JAMES HILBURN
More informationSTREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers
More informationJeremy Fitzpatrick
Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Jeremy Fitzpatrick 402-231-8756 Jeremy.Fitzpatrick @KutakRock.com December 2015 Amendments December 2015 Amendments Discovery is out of control.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE Event Service of Complaint Scheduled Time Total Time After Complaint Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks Initial
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION. vs. CAUSE NO. IP T/L
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION GARY L. BRANHAM, Plaintiff vs. CAUSE NO. IP01-0152-T/L JOHN W. SNOW, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY/INTERNAL
More informationSAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. These responses and objections are made without prejudice to, and are not a waiver of, SDG&E and SoCalGas right to rely on other facts or documents in these proceedings. 2. By
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES
COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/20/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2007 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2016 EXHIBIT D
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/20/2016 05:44 PM INDEX NO. 603770/2007 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2016 EXHIBIT D SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK... X HELLENIC AMERICAN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division In re: TSI Holdings, LLC 1 et al., DEBTORS. CASE NO. 17-30132 CHAPTER 7 Jointly Administered TRUSTEE
More informationThese rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.
BUSINESS OF THE COURT L.R. No. 51 TITLE AND CITATION OF RULES These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.
More informationRULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS
RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS Rule 1:18. Pretrial Scheduling Order. A. In any civil case the parties, by counsel of record, may agree and submit for approval
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Information & Instructions: Master Interrogatories 1. The interrogatories in this form are designed for selection to fit the case. 2. The questions are intended to show the range of questions that may
More information