FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/16/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/16/2017. Exhibit D

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/16/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/16/2017. Exhibit D"

Transcription

1 Exhibit D

2 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY MAARTEN DE JONG, -against- WILCO FAESSEN, Plaintiff, Defendant x x Index No /2016 WILCO FAESSEN S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST REQUEST FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Pursuant to Article 31 of the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules, Defendant Wilco Faessen ( Faessen ) hereby responds to Plaintiff Martin de Jong s ( de Jong ) First Request for the Production of Documents (the Request ) in the above-captioned matter. GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. Faessen s specific objections to each request are in addition to the general objections set forth in this section. These general objections form a part of the response to each request and are set forth here to avoid the duplication and repetition of restating them for each response. The absence of a reference to a general objection should not be construed as a waiver of the general objection as to the specific request. 2. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it purports to impose on Faessen obligations beyond those imposed by the New York Civil Practice Law and Rules, the Rules of the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court, or the rules and orders of the Court.

3 3. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong, available from public, court, or agency records, or otherwise in the public domain and accessible to all parties. 4. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it seeks documents that are not within Faessen s possession, control or custody. 5. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. 6. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and/or unduly burdensome. 7. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it is unreasonably cumulative and duplicative. 8. Faessen objects to the Request to the extent that it purports to require identification and disclosure of documents and information that were prepared in anticipation of litigation, constitute attorney work product, disclosure, mental impressions, conclusions, opinions or legal theories of any attorney for or other representative of Faessen, contain privileged attorney-client communications, or are otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable privileges, laws or rules. Faessen hereby claims such privileges and protections to the extent implicated by each Request and excludes privileged and protected information from its responses to the Request. 9. Inadvertent production of any document which is privileged shall not constitute waiver of any privilege or of any other ground for objection to discovery of such document, the 2

4 information contained therein, or the subject matter thereof, or of Faessen s right to object to the use of such document or the information contained therein. 10. Insofar as Faessen has responded to a request to which he has objected, Faessen reserves the right to maintain such objection and such objection is not waived in any respect by the provision of a response. 11. These responses to the Request shall not be construed in any way as an admission that any definition or assertion of fact provided therein is either factually correct or legally binding upon Faessen, or as a waiver of any of Faessen s objections, including but not limited to, objections regarding discoverability and admissibility of documents or other evidence. 12. Faessen reserves the right to supplement these responses pursuant to the Civil Practice Law and Rules, the Rules of the Commercial Division of the Supreme Court, and/or the rules and orders of the Court. SPECIFIC RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS REQUEST NO. 1 All documents or communications relating to any allegations or claims in the Complaint. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 1 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is unreasonably cumulative and duplicative of other requests. REQUEST NO. 2 All documents or communications relating to de Jong. 3

5 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 2 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request on the grounds that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is unreasonably cumulative and duplicative of other requests. Subject to these objections and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, relating to the agreement between de Jong and Faessen alleged in the Complaint and to de Jong s investments in GoAmericaGo and WhistlePig that Faessen has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 3 All documents or communications relating to GoAmericaGo, including but not limited to any operating agreements, amended operating agreements, financial statements, statements of shareholder equity, or any other document setting forth the rights, obligations, and duties of any members, managing members, investors, or any other party with any interest in GoAmericaGo. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. REQUEST NO. 4 All documents or communications relating to WhistlePig, including but not limited to any operating agreements, amended operating agreements, financial statements, statements of shareholder equity, or any other document setting forth the rights, obligations, and duties of any members, managing members, investors, or any other party with any interest in GoAmericaGo [sic]. 4

6 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 4 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. REQUEST NO. 5 All documents or communications relating to the business relationship between Faessen and Bhakta, including any documents or communications prior to January 1, 2008 relating to the business relationship between these parties. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 5 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that the term business relationship is vague and ambiguous. Faessen further objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. REQUEST NO. 6 All documents or communications relating the Agreement. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 6 REQUEST NO. 7 All documents or communications relating to any subsequent modifications, whether oral or written, to the Agreement. 5

7 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 7 REQUEST NO. 8 All documents or communications regarding any agreement between Faessen and de Jong regarding Faessen or de Jong s investments in WhistlePig or GoAmericaGo. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 8 REQUEST NO. 9 All communications between de Jong and Faessen regarding any investment, conversion, or any other action taken by de Jong or Faessen with regards to the entities GoAmericaGo, WhistlePig, or any other spirit-related venture created by Bhakta. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 9 REQUEST NO. 10 All documents or communications relating to Faessen s investments in GoAmericaGo. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 10 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, relating to the terms, amount and timing of his investments in GoAmericaGo that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. 6

8 REQUEST NO. 11 All documents or communications relating to de Jong s investments in GoAmericaGo. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 11 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 12 All documents or communications relating to Faessen s investments in WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 12 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, relating to the terms, amount and timing of his investments in WhistlePig that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 13 All documents or communications relating to de Jong s investments in WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 13 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. 7

9 REQUEST NO. 14 All communications between Faessen and Bhakta concerning Faessen s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 14 REQUEST NO. 15 All communications between Faessen and de Jong concerning Faessen s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 15 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 16 All communications between Faessen and any other party concerning Faessen s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 16 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request on the grounds that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it is unreasonably cumulative and duplicative of other requests. 8

10 REQUEST NO. 17 All communications between Faessen and Bhakta concerning de Jong s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 17 REQUEST NO. 18 All communications between Faessen and de Jong concerning de Jong s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 18 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 19 All communications between Faessen and any other party concerning de Jong s equity stake in GoAmericaGo or WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 19 REQUEST NO. 20 All documents or communications relating to the Secret Negotiations. 9

11 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 20 REQUEST NO. 21 All documents or communications concerning any placement fee negotiated or received by Faessen in exchange for any services provided by Faessen to GoAmericaGo, WhistlePig or Bhakta. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 21 Faessen objects to the request on the grounds that the term placement fee is vague and ambiguous. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 22 All documents or communications concerning any services provided by Faessen to GoAmericaGo, WhistlePig or Bhakta. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 22 Faessen objects to the request on the grounds that the term services is vague and ambiguous. Faessen further objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. REQUEST NO. 23 All documents and communications concerning de Jong s 2013 sale of his equity stake in WhistlePig and/or GoAmericaGo. 10

12 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 23 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it seeks information already available to de Jong. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all nonprivileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 24 All documents or communications regarding the Secret Agreement. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 24 REQUEST NO. 25 All documents or communications concerning to Faessen s current equity stake in WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 25 Faessen objects to this request to the extent that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce documents sufficient to show his current equity stake in WhistlePig. REQUEST NO. 26 Documents and Communications sufficient to show the current valuation of WhistlePig. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 26 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks documents that are not within Faessen s possession, control or custody. 11

13 REQUEST NO. 27 All documents or communications regarding any agreement between Faessen, Bhakta, WhistlePig and/or GoAmericaGo regarding Faessen s equity stake in WhistlePig or GoAmericaGo. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 27 REQUEST NO. 28 All documents or communications concerning any other litigation between Faessen, Bhakta and/or WhistlePig, including but not limited to documents and communications regarding the action currently pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery, Case No VCG. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 28 Faessen objects to this request on the grounds that it seeks identification and disclosure of information that is neither relevant to the subject matter of this action nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Faessen further objects to this request on the grounds that it is lacking in specificity, overbroad and unduly burdensome. Faessen further objects to this request to the extent it calls for documents and information covered by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product doctrine or other applicable privileges and immunities. REQUEST NO. 29 All documents or communications that you referred to or relied upon in forming your answers to de Jong s Interrogatories. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 29 Faessen objects to this request to the extent it calls for documents and information covered by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product doctrine or other applicable 12

14 privileges and immunities. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 30 All documents or communications that you referred to or relied upon in drafting your motion to dismiss this action. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 30 Faessen objects to this request to the extent it calls for documents and information covered by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product doctrine or other applicable privileges and immunities. Subject to this objection and the General Objections, Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 31 All documents or communications on which you intend to rely to prove any counterclaims or defenses you may assert in this action, or to establish damages or any other remedy. RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 31 Faessen objects to this request to the extent it calls for documents and information covered by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product doctrine or other applicable privileges and immunities. Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. REQUEST NO. 32 Any and all documents not otherwise covered by the foregoing requests that Defendant intends to rely upon in any dispositive motion or at trial. 13

15 RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 32 Faessen objects to this request to the extent it calls for documents and information covered by the attorney-client privilege, the attorney work-product doctrine or other applicable privileges and immunities. Faessen will produce all non-privileged, responsive documents, if any, that he has located through a reasonable and diligent search. New York, New York Dated January 30, 2017 Zachary S. Taylor TAYLOR & COHEN LLP 40 Worth Street 10th Floor New York, New York Telephone (646) Facsimile (646) Attorneys for Defendant Wilco Faessen 14

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :51 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2015 EXHIBIT B

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/23/ :51 AM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/23/2015 EXHIBIT B FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/23/2015 1151 AM INDEX NO. 651659/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 93 RECEIVED NYSCEF 02/23/2015 EXHIBIT B SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

DEFENDANT S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AND CONTINUING INTERROGATORIES

DEFENDANT S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AND CONTINUING INTERROGATORIES IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA v. Plaintiff,, Case No.: Defendant., DEFENDANT S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S FIRST AND CONTINUING INTERROGATORIES My name is, and I am the Defendant

More information

De Jong v Faessen 2017 NY Slip Op 30558(U) March 21, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /16 Judge: Barry Ostrager Cases posted

De Jong v Faessen 2017 NY Slip Op 30558(U) March 21, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /16 Judge: Barry Ostrager Cases posted De Jong v Faessen 2017 NY Slip Op 30558(U) March 21, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 655478/16 Judge: Barry Ostrager Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Chapter 11

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Chapter 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN In re ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC. Chapter 11 Case No. 12-43166-TJT Judge Thomas J. Tucker (Jointly Administered) ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/28/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/28/ :30 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/28/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS SUPPLYTEK INTERNATIONAL, LLC, D/B/A/ LASERTONE, AND LASERTONE, CORP.,.: Index No.: 508465/2017 Plaintiffs, : Assigned Justice: Hon. Lawrence Knipel

More information

DISCOVERY- LOCAL RULES JUSTICE COURTS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS

DISCOVERY- LOCAL RULES JUSTICE COURTS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS DISCOVERY- LOCAL RULES JUSTICE COURTS OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS EFFECTIVE: JULY 1, 2015 TARRANT COUNTY JUSTICE COURTS - LOCAL RULES FOR DISCOVERY OBJECTIVES In accordance with law, the Justice Courts conduct

More information

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1 of 7 10/10/2005 11:14 AM Federal Rules of Civil Procedure collection home tell me more donate search V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY > Rule 26. Prev Next Notes Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery;

More information

Plaintiff, Defendant. GENERAL OBJECTIONS. 1. The following responses are without in any way waiving or intending to waive:

Plaintiff, Defendant. GENERAL OBJECTIONS. 1. The following responses are without in any way waiving or intending to waive: STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Acme Home & Garden, LLC, v. John Doe, Plaintiff, DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Contract Court File No.: xx-cv-xx-xxx DEFENDANT S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF

More information

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ] Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ] (a) Required Disclosures; Methods to Discover Additional Matter. (1) Initial Disclosures. Except to the extent

More information

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY TEXAS DISCOVERY Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW 2. 1999 REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY 3. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLANS 4. FORMS OF DISCOVERY A. Discovery Provided for by the Texas

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 WAYNE K. LEMIEUX (SBN 01 W. KEITH LEMIEUX (SBN 0 CHRISTINE CARSON (SBN. LEMIEUX & O'NEILL 1 E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., Suite 0 Westlake Village, CA 1 Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0 - Attorneys

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2012 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2012

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2012 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2012 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/27/2012 INDEX NO. 652200/2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/27/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH * * * * * * * * * * * * *

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH * * * * * * * * * * * * * IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., * Plaintiff * v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH LINDA H. LAMONE, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DEFENDANT

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1 Article 5. Depositions and Discovery. Rule 26. General provisions governing discovery. (a) Discovery methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/01/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/01/2016. Exhibit C

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/01/ :41 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/01/2016. Exhibit C FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/01/2016 04:41 PM INDEX NO. 653611/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 31 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/01/2016 Exhibit C JEFFREY G. STEINBERG KEVIN F. CAVALIERE STEINBERG & CAVALIERE, LLP SO MAIN

More information

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana] LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana] Local Rule 1.1 - Scope of the Rules These Rules shall govern all proceedings

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information. GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 0 H 1 HOUSE BILL 0 Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information. (Public) Sponsors: Representatives Glazier, T. Moore, Ross, and Jordan (Primary Sponsors).

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure having submitted its One Hundred Fifty-Second Report to the Court, recommending

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Proceeding 91234467 Party Correspondence Address Submission Filer's Name Filer's email Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov ESTTA Tracking number: ESTTA843411

More information

Case 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 93 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 93 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION Case 4:16-cv-00650-RGE-SBJ Document 93 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION DEBORAH INNIS, on behalf of the Telligen, Inc. Employee

More information

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories 1. The practitioner may desire to combine Request for Admissions, Interrogatories and Request

More information

PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF DEL NORTE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.

PLAINTIFFS SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SCHOOL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF DEL NORTE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 35987149 Feb 16 2011 12:13PM DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Denver City and County Building 1437 Bannock St. Denver, Colorado 80202 Plaintiffs: ANTHONY LOBATO, et al. and Plaintiff-Intervenors:

More information

THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Section 1: 8-K (FORM 8-K) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 Date of

More information

Case 1:14-cv TSC-DAR Document 27 Filed 12/15/14 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:14-cv TSC-DAR Document 27 Filed 12/15/14 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:14-cv-00857-TSC-DAR Document 27 Filed 12/15/14 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY

IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY EFiled: Jul 10 2007 8:37PM EDT Transaction ID 15525691 Case No. 2776-CC IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE IN AND FOR NEW CASTLE COUNTY HIGH RIVER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ) ICAHN PARTNERS MASTER

More information

Case 1:13-cv JKB Document Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT E

Case 1:13-cv JKB Document Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT E Case 1:13-cv-03233-JKB Document 177-7 Filed 05/31/17 Page 1 of 13 EXHIBIT E Case 1:13-cv-03233-JKB Document 177-7 Filed 05/31/17 Page 2 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

More information

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, United Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "United" or

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, United Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as United or UNITED CORPORATION, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS /ST. JOHN v. Plaintiff, WAHEED HAMED, (a/k/a Willy or Willie Hamed), Case No.: 2013 -CV -101 ACTION FOR DAMAGES JURY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS CARGILL MEAT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff, PREMIUM BEEF FEEDERS, LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. 13-CV-1168-EFM-TJJ MEMORANDUM AND

More information

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2017 OTC EQUITY DERIVATIVES T+2 SETTLEMENT CYCLE PROTOCOL

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2017 OTC EQUITY DERIVATIVES T+2 SETTLEMENT CYCLE PROTOCOL International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2017 OTC EQUITY DERIVATIVES T+2 SETTLEMENT CYCLE PROTOCOL published on July 28, 2017 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2015 06:04 PM INDEX NO. 650312/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015 ExhibitA SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEW YORK COUNTYOFNEW YORK BANK HAPOALIM B.M., vs.

More information

1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure.

1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure. Information or instructions: Request for disclosure 1. TRCP 194 created a new discovery tool entitled Requests for Disclosure. 2. Either party may file a request upon the other in order to obtain basic

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, et al., v. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-1891-JTC

More information

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (OAKLAND DIVISION) Apple Computer, Inc. v. Podfitness, Inc. Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 David J. Miclean (#1/miclean@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 00 Arguello Street, Suite 00 Redwood City, California 0 Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile:

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2016 EXHIBIT C

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2016 EXHIBIT C FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/12/2016 06:54 PM INDEX NO. 650369/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 137 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/12/2016 EXHIBIT C SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK LEONID L. LEBEDEV,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: Civ-Martinez Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow Doc. 34 Case 1:06-cv-21748-JEM Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MARK J. GAINOR, Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW, et al., v. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-1891-JTC

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Aubin et al v. Columbia Casualty Company et al Doc. 140 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILLIAM J. AUBIN, ET AL. VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-290-BAJ-EWD COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/2015 05:15 PM INDEX NO. 652471/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015 Exhibit 1 Document1 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SNI/SI

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/18/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/18/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 08/18/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/18/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ALLEN DAVIDSON, -against- Plaintiff, 307-311 UNION AVE LLC and SUN SUN CONTRACTING INC., Index No. 505042/2016 PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT 307-311

More information

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL published on 3 May 2016 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. The International

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JAMES TRACY, Plaintiff, Case No. 9:16-cv-80655-RLR-JMH v. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, a/k/a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY,

More information

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

P R E T R I A L O R D E R DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER COLORADO Address: City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 COURT USE ONLY Plaintiff(s):, v. Defendant(s):. Case Number: Courtroom: 424 P R

More information

IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA PATRICK C. DESMOND, MARY C. DESMOND, Individually, and MARY C. DESMOND, as Administratrix of the Estate of PATRICK W. DESMOND v. Plaintiffs, NARCONON

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,

More information

Filing # E-Filed 09/14/ :37:55 PM

Filing # E-Filed 09/14/ :37:55 PM Filing # 32014556 E-Filed 09/14/2015 02:37:55 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA P & S ASSOCIATES, GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, a Florida limited Partnership,

More information

Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law

Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law Discovery Requests in Trademark Cases Under U.S. Law Michael Grow Arent Fox LLP, Washington D.C., United States Summary and Outline Parties to civil actions or inter partes proceedings before the United

More information

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS

National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules TABLE OF CONTENTS National Patent Board Non-Binding Arbitration Rules Rules Amended and Effective June 1, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Important Notice...3 Introduction...3 Standard Clause...3 Submission Agreement...3 Administrative

More information

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:14-cv JCC Document 98 Filed 11/24/15 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-000-jcc Document Filed // Page of THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 KIM BAROVIC, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN A. BALLMER, Defendant.

More information

Case KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 17-12913-KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Dex Liquidating Co. (f/k/a Dextera Surgical Inc.), 1 Debtor. ) ) ) ) ) ) )

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3. Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN MICHAEL SWEENEY, Index No.: /2017.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3. Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN MICHAEL SWEENEY, Index No.: /2017. Index Number: 650053/2017 Page 1 out of 15 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3 MICHAEL SWEENEY, Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: 650053/2017 RJI Filing

More information

A Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive Q&A

A Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar with Interactive Q&A presents Multi-Defendant Patent Litigation: Controlling Costs and Pooling Resources Strategies for Joint Defense Groups, Joint Defense Agreements, and Privilege Issues A Live 90-Minute Teleconference/Webinar

More information

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties

ARBITRATION RULES. Arbitration Rules Archive. 1. Agreement of Parties ARBITRATION RULES 1. Agreement of Parties The parties shall be deemed to have made these rules a part of their arbitration agreement whenever they have provided for arbitration by ADR Services, Inc. (hereinafter

More information

Consolidated Arbitration Rules

Consolidated Arbitration Rules Consolidated Arbitration Rules THE LEADING PROVIDER OF ADR SERVICES 1. Applicability of Rules The parties to a dispute shall be deemed to have made these Consolidated Arbitration Rules a part of their

More information

ASSERTING, CONTESTING, AND PRESERVING PRIVILEGES UNDER THE NEW RULES OF DISCOVERY

ASSERTING, CONTESTING, AND PRESERVING PRIVILEGES UNDER THE NEW RULES OF DISCOVERY UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON LAW FOUNDATION CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION ADVANCED CIVIL DISCOVERY UNDER THE NEW RULES June 1-2, 2000 Dallas, Texas June 8-9, 2000 Houston, Texas ASSERTING, CONTESTING, AND PRESERVING

More information

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)

Dodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District) Dodge County (Sixth Judicial District) 1. Rules of Decorum 2. Civil Practice 3. Rules of Criminal Procedure 4. Rules of Family Court Procedure 5. Filing of Papers by Electronic Filing and Facsimile Transmission

More information

Case Doc 89 Filed 07/26/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:29:16 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11

Case Doc 89 Filed 07/26/17 Entered 07/26/17 16:29:16 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 11 Document Page 1 of 11 FILED & JUDGMENT ENTERED Steven T. Salata July 26 2017 Clerk, U.S. Bankruptcy Court Western District of North Carolina J. Craig Whitley United States Bankruptcy Judge UNITED STATES

More information

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Filed D.C. Sl\p"~rj:)r 10 Apr: ]() P03:07 Clerk ot Court C'j'FI. STEVEN 1. ROSEN Plaintiff SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION v. Case No.: 09 CA 001256 B Judge Erik P. Christian

More information

P R E T R I A L O R D E R

P R E T R I A L O R D E R DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER COLORADO Address: City and County Building 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 COURT USE ONLY Plaintiff(s):, v. Defendant(s):. Case Number: Courtroom: 424 P R

More information

Annotated Form Fund Formation Opinion for Delaware Limited Liability Company. (Prepared by Louis G. Hering) [Date]

Annotated Form Fund Formation Opinion for Delaware Limited Liability Company. (Prepared by Louis G. Hering) [Date] Annotated Form Fund Formation Opinion for Delaware Limited Liability Company (Prepared by Louis G. Hering) TO: Re: [Fund Name] LLC Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as special [Delaware] counsel to [Fund

More information

Responses of the Christian Civic League of Maine, Inc. to Defendants First Set of Interrogatories

Responses of the Christian Civic League of Maine, Inc. to Defendants First Set of Interrogatories Case 1:06-cv-00614-LFO Document 26-5 Filed 04/21/2006 Page 1 of 10 United States District Court District of Columbia The Christian Civic League of Maine, Inc. 70 Sewall Street Augusta, ME 04330, Plaintiff,

More information

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Code of Civil Procedure 1985.8 Subpoena seeking electronically stored information (a)(1) A subpoena in a civil proceeding may require

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946 Case 4:17-cv-02946 Document 3 Filed in TXSD on 10/03/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION United States District Court Southern District of Texas

More information

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE I. Recitals. A. Introduction. This class action settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement ) details and finalizes the terms for settlement of class claims

More information

JOINT MARKETING AND SALES REFERRAL AGREEMENT

JOINT MARKETING AND SALES REFERRAL AGREEMENT This Referral Agreement (the Agreement) is made effective as of 2012 (the Effective Date) by and between Aerospike, Inc., a Delaware corporation, with an address at 2525 E. Charleston Road, Suite 201,

More information

Case Doc Filed 11/22/17 Entered 11/22/17 17:35:58 Desc Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 6

Case Doc Filed 11/22/17 Entered 11/22/17 17:35:58 Desc Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 6 2 Page 1 of 6 I. DEFINITIONS 1. And as well as or shall be construed either disjunctively or conjunctively as necessary to bring within the scope of these discovery requests any information that might

More information

brl Doc 76 Filed 03/28/12 Entered 03/28/12 10:50:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. Plaintiff-Applicant, Adv. Pro. No.

brl Doc 76 Filed 03/28/12 Entered 03/28/12 10:50:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 10. Plaintiff-Applicant, Adv. Pro. No. Pg 1 of 10 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff-Applicant, Adv. Pro. No. 08-01789 (BRL) BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES

More information

AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes)

AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes) APPENDIX 4 AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex, Commercial Disputes) Commercial Mediation Procedures M-1. Agreement of Parties Whenever, by

More information

ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE

ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE ANSWER TO COUNTERCLAIM BUSINESS DISPUTE "Redacted" Case Document 98 Filed 09/15/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION v. v.,.,, Plaintiffs,

More information

AAA Healthcare. Payor Provider Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures. Available online at adr.org/healthcare

AAA Healthcare. Payor Provider Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures. Available online at adr.org/healthcare AAA Healthcare Payor Provider Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures Available online at adr.org/healthcare Rules Amended and Effective November 1, 2014 Rules Amended and Effective November 1, 2014.

More information

DISCOVERY & E-DISCOVERY

DISCOVERY & E-DISCOVERY DISCOVERY & E-DISCOVERY The Supreme Court of Hawai i seeks public comment regarding proposals to amend Rules 26, 30, 33, 34, 37, and 45 of the Hawai i Rules of Civil Procedure. The proposals clarifies

More information

Case 3:15-cv RJB Document 74 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:15-cv RJB Document 74 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 7 Case :-cv-0-rjb Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 0 ALAA ELKHARWILY, M.D., Plaintiff, v. FRANCISCAN HEALTH SYSTEM, Defendant. CASE NO. :-cv-0-rjb

More information

rdd Doc 381 Filed 09/01/17 Entered 09/01/17 17:18:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 27

rdd Doc 381 Filed 09/01/17 Entered 09/01/17 17:18:41 Main Document Pg 1 of 27 Pg 1 of 27 Christopher Marcus, P.C. James H.M. Sprayregen, P.C. John T. Weber William A. Guerrieri (admitted pro hac vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP Alexandra Schwarzman (admitted pro hac vice) KIRKLAND & ELLIS

More information

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER. dated as of FEBRUARY 23, by and among MURRAY KENTUCKY ENERGY, INC., WESTERN KENTUCKY MERGER SUB, LLC,

AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER. dated as of FEBRUARY 23, by and among MURRAY KENTUCKY ENERGY, INC., WESTERN KENTUCKY MERGER SUB, LLC, EXECUTION VERSION AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER dated as of FEBRUARY 23, 2018 by and among MURRAY KENTUCKY ENERGY, INC., WESTERN KENTUCKY MERGER SUB, LLC, WESTERN KENTUCKY COAL RESOURCES, LLC and MURRAY

More information

ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES

ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES 1. INTRODUCTION ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES 1.1 These procedures shall be known as the ARIAS U.S. Rules for the Resolution of U.S. Insurance and Reinsurance

More information

Alliance Bank & Trust Company ( Alliance Bank ) ( First Motion to Compel ); Plaintiffs

Alliance Bank & Trust Company ( Alliance Bank ) ( First Motion to Compel ); Plaintiffs STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA MECKLENBURG COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION 11 CVS 9668 WNC HOLDINGS, LLC, MASON VENABLE and HAROLD KEE, Plaintiffs, v. ALLIANCE BANK & TRUST COMPANY,

More information

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:10-cv-04372-DWF-JJG Document 89 Filed 02/08/12 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THE CITY OF FARMINGTON HILLS EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and

More information

9/26/2012 PAPER MACHE,ORIGAMI & AND OTHER CREATIVE THINGS TO DO WITH PAPER: BASIC INITIAL CONSIDERATIONS

9/26/2012 PAPER MACHE,ORIGAMI & AND OTHER CREATIVE THINGS TO DO WITH PAPER: BASIC INITIAL CONSIDERATIONS PAPER MACHE,ORIGAMI & AND OTHER CREATIVE THINGS TO DO WITH PAPER: The Art Of Paper Discovery In Texas PAUL N. GOLD BASIC INITIAL CONSIDERATIONS QUESTIONS YOU MUST ASK AND ANSWER AT THE OUTSET What Are

More information

IMPORTANT NOTICE...3 INTRODUCTION...4. Standard Arbitration Clause...5. Administrative Fees...5 HEALTHCARE PAYOR PROVIDER RULES -- REGULAR TRACK...

IMPORTANT NOTICE...3 INTRODUCTION...4. Standard Arbitration Clause...5. Administrative Fees...5 HEALTHCARE PAYOR PROVIDER RULES -- REGULAR TRACK... AAA Healthcare Payor Provider Arbitration Rules Effective Date: January 31, 2011 To access the AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures with the previous versions of Fee Schedules, visit

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Steven J. HATFILL, M.D., Plaintiff Civil No. 1:03-CV-01793 (RBW v. Attorney General John ASHCROFT, Timothy BERES, Daryl DARNELL, Van HARP,

More information

REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014

REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014 REVISED AS OF MARCH 2014 JUDICATE WEST COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION RULES RULE 1. INTENT AND OVERVIEW 1 RULE 1.A. INTENT 1 RULE 1.B. COMMITMENT TO EFFICIENT RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES 1 RULE 2. JURISDICTION 1 RULE

More information

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :

IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : E-FILED 2014 JAN 02 736 PM POLK - CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT IN THE IOWA DISTRICT COURT FOR POLK COUNTY BELLE OF SIOUX CITY, L.P., v. Plaintiff Counterclaim Defendant MISSOURI RIVER HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION Brighton Crossing Condominium Association et al v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company Doc. 52 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION BRIGHTON CROSSING CONDOMINIUM

More information

Ecclesiastical Court of the Missionary Diocese of CANA East Rules of Procedure

Ecclesiastical Court of the Missionary Diocese of CANA East Rules of Procedure Ecclesiastical Court of the Missionary Diocese of CANA East Rules of Procedure Preface The rules of the ecclesiastical court are for the purpose of the smooth functioning of the court. The function of

More information

Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes)

Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes) Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures (Including Procedures for Large, Complex Commercial Disputes) Rules Amended and Effective October 1, 2013 Fee Schedule Amended and Effective June 1,

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant : This action came before the court at a final pretrial conference held on at a.m./p.m.,

More information

The 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

The 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure The 2015 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Boston Bar Association Commercial and Business Litigation Section December 7, 2015 Paula M. Bagger, Cooke Clancy & Gruenthal LLP Gregory S. Bombard,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ERNEST TAYLOR VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO.: 13-00579-BAJ-RLB THE CITY OF BATON ROUGE, ET AL MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE RESPONSE OF JAMES HILBURN

More information

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers

More information

Jeremy Fitzpatrick

Jeremy Fitzpatrick Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Jeremy Fitzpatrick 402-231-8756 Jeremy.Fitzpatrick @KutakRock.com December 2015 Amendments December 2015 Amendments Discovery is out of control.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE Event Service of Complaint Scheduled Time Total Time After Complaint Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks Initial

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION. vs. CAUSE NO. IP T/L

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION. vs. CAUSE NO. IP T/L IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION GARY L. BRANHAM, Plaintiff vs. CAUSE NO. IP01-0152-T/L JOHN W. SNOW, SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY/INTERNAL

More information

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1. These responses and objections are made without prejudice to, and are not a waiver of, SDG&E and SoCalGas right to rely on other facts or documents in these proceedings. 2. By

More information

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/20/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2007 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2016 EXHIBIT D

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/20/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2007 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2016 EXHIBIT D FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/20/2016 05:44 PM INDEX NO. 603770/2007 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/20/2016 EXHIBIT D SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK... X HELLENIC AMERICAN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division In re: TSI Holdings, LLC 1 et al., DEBTORS. CASE NO. 17-30132 CHAPTER 7 Jointly Administered TRUSTEE

More information

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No. BUSINESS OF THE COURT L.R. No. 51 TITLE AND CITATION OF RULES These rules shall be known as the Local Rules for Columbia and Montour Counties, the 26 th Judicial District, and shall be cited as L.R. No.

More information

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS Rule 1:18. Pretrial Scheduling Order. A. In any civil case the parties, by counsel of record, may agree and submit for approval

More information

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy Information & Instructions: Master Interrogatories 1. The interrogatories in this form are designed for selection to fit the case. 2. The questions are intended to show the range of questions that may

More information