UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TRUSTEE S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SOLAR INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES GMHB

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TRUSTEE S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SOLAR INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES GMHB"

Transcription

1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No (Jointly Administered) Judge Thomas J. Tucker TRUSTEE S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SOLAR INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES GMHB John Madden, solely in his capacity as the trustee of the Energy Conversion Devices Liquidation Trust (the Trustee ), by and through its attorneys, Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP, and pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 33, 34, and 36, as made applicable to this contested matter by Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedures 7033, 7034, and 7036, submits the following discovery requests to Solar Integrated Technologies GMBH ( SIT GMBH ). I. Definitions Supply Agreement means that Supply and Cooperation Agreement between United Solar Ovonic LLC and SIT, Inc., dated September 28, Supply Agreement means that Supply and Cooperation Agreement between United Solar Ovonic LLC and SIT, Inc., dated April 28, Any means each and every as well as any one. 4. Communication or communications means any oral or written expression, statement, or utterance of any nature whatsoever, by and to whomever made. A 1 The Debtors in these jointly-administered cases are Energy Conversion Devices, Inc. (Case No ) and United Solar Ovonic LLC (Case No ) tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 1 of 21

2 communication if in writing is a type of document, and thus any request for documents includes a request for communications. Further, communication and communications shall be construed coextensively with document and documents so that a request for either shall be a request for anything discoverable under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 5. Contradict means to detract from, make less likely, oppose, cast doubt upon, impugn, or controvert in any way. 6. Describe in detail means: (a) Describe fully by reference to underlying facts rather than by reference to ultimate facts or conclusions of fact or law; (b) (c) Where applicable, particularize as to (i) time; (ii) place; and (iii) manner; Where applicable, identify any persons that engaged in actions or conduct described, made statements or representations described, or played a role in the development of the facts described; and (d) Set forth all relevant facts necessary to the complete understanding of the act, allegation, process, event, or thing in question. 7. Document or documents means anything discoverable under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and includes, without limitation, all written or graphic communications and all written or graphic matter of every kind and description however produced or reproduced, whether draft or final, original or reproduction, internal or otherwise, including, but not limited to, delivery tickets, order forms, purchase orders, letters, correspondence, memoranda, internal or otherwise, minutes, notes (whether typed or handwritten), films, recordings of any type, transcripts, contracts, memoranda of telephone conversations, personal conversations or meetings, diaries, desk calendars, telegrams, circulars, pamphlets, manuals, statements, notices, tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 2 of 21

3 reports, telexes, interoffice or intraoffice communications, minutes of meetings, reports, studies, books or records of accounts, bank account records, checks, bank drafts, invoices, requisitions, microfilms, movies, slides, photographs, data stored in any computer media, CD, DVD, computer runs or printouts, s, voic s, text messages, SMS messages, instant messages, tabulations, charts, guides, outlines, summaries, abstracts, plans, drawings, specifications, blueprints, graphs, studies, drafts and/or non-identical copies of any one or more of the foregoing or material similar to any of the foregoing, however denominated and by whomever prepared and to whomever addressed. 8. French Litigation is the matter of SAS Lauden Energy v. SAS Urbasolar and SA FM Logistic, et al., Commercial Court of Paris Case Nos. 2009/044809, 2009/061035, , including, without limitation, any investigations undertaken prior to or in connection with such proceeding. 9. Includes and including shall be construed to mean without limitation. 10. Person or persons means any natural person, governmental body, governmental agency, corporation, general or limited partnership, joint venture, or any other form of business organization. 11. Proof of Claim means the proof of claim filed by SIT GMBH on or about June 20, 2012, and assigned proof of claim number 531 by Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC. 12. Purchase Agreement means that certain Purchase Agreement between Charles L. Wells, III, the Trustee for the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of SIT, Inc. and ECCOSS GmbH, dated January 15, tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 3 of 21

4 13. PV Products or PV Product means, collectively and individually, the photovoltaic laminates sold to SIT, Inc. by USO pursuant to the 2006 Supply Contract and 2008 Supply Contract that SIT, Inc. or SIT GMBH incorporated into the SolarRoof Membranes. 14. Objection means the Debtors Objection to Solar Integrated Technologies GMBH s claim (docket no. 531), as may be amended. 15. Refer, referring, and referred shall be construed in their broadest sense and mean and include setting forth, reflecting, discussing, containing, or mentioning. 16. Relate to, related to, and relating to shall be construed in their broadest sense and shall mean consist of, refer to, reflect on, arise out of, or be in any way or manner legally, factually, or logically connected with the matter discussed. 17. Response means the Response to Liquidation Trustee s Objection to Solar Integrated Technologies GMBH s Claim No. 531(docket no. 1942). 18. Settlement Agreement means the Settlement and Release Agreement dated November 6, 2012, among the Energy Conversion Devices Liquidation Trust and SIT GMBH and others. 19. SIT, Inc. means Solar Integrated Technologies, Inc. (and any predecessor thereof), any of its subsidiaries (and any predecessors thereof), directors, officers, employees, affiliates, representatives, advisors, agents, attorneys, associates, or any person acting on behalf of or in concert with it, including, without limitation, Charles L. Wells, III, as Trustee for the Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Estate of SIT, Inc. 20. SolarRoof Membranes or SolarRoof Membrane means, collectively and individually, the roofing membranes into which SIT GMBH incorporated the PV Products tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 4 of 21

5 21. USO means United Solar Ovonic LLC (and any predecessor thereof), any of its subsidiaries (and any predecessors thereof), directors, officers, employees, affiliates, representatives, advisors, agents, attorneys, associates, or any other person acting on its behalf. 22. You or your means SIT GMBH and any person acting on behalf of or in concert with it. 23. As used here, the singular includes the plural and the plural includes the singular; the conjunctive includes the disjunctive and the disjunctive includes the conjunctive; the masculine includes the feminine and the feminine includes the masculine; and the present tense includes the past tense and the past tense includes the present tense so as to bring within the scope of these requests all responses that might otherwise be construed to be outside of their scope. 24. The use of a verb in one tense shall be construed as use of the verb in all other tenses. 25. And and or as used in and/or shall be construed either disjunctively or conjunctively as necessary to bring within the scope of these requests all responses that might otherwise be construed to be outside of their scope. 26. Capitalized terms used but not defined here have the meanings given them in the Objection. II. Instructions A. Form of Production of Electronically Stored Information The Trustee requests, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 34(b)(1)(C), that SIT GMBH produce electronically stored information ( ESI ) as searchable PDFs. B. Instructions for Responding to Requests for Production of Documents tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 5 of 21

6 1. Documents attached to each other must not be separated. 2. Where a claim of privilege is asserted in responding or objecting to any of these requests, and any documents are not provided on the basis of such assertion: (a) The attorney asserting the privilege shall in the response or objection to the request identify the nature of the privilege or immunity that is being claimed and if the privilege is being asserted in connection with a claim or defense governed by state law, indicate the state s privilege rule being invoked; and (b) The following information shall be provided in the response or objection: (i) the type of document, e.g., , letter, or memorandum; (ii) general subject matter of the document; (iii) the date of the document; (iv) the author, addressee, and any other recipient of the document, specifically identifying any attorneys, and, where not apparent, the relationship of the author, addressee, and any other recipient to each other. 3. All of the requests shall be deemed continuing so as to require further and supplemental production if you obtain or become aware of additional documents between the time of initial production until this matter is resolved. 4. These requests are not intended to be duplicative. Responsive documents that have already been produced need not be produced again. 5. In answering the requests, if you claim that there is any ambiguity in either a particular request or in an applicable definition or instruction, such claim shall not be a basis for refusing to respond, but you shall set forth as part of your response the language deemed to be ambiguous and the interpretation chosen or used in responding to the particular request tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 6 of 21

7 6. Each definition, instruction, and request shall be construed independently and not by reference to any other definition, instruction, or request for the purpose of limitation, unless otherwise indicated. 7. Selection of documents from files and other sources and the numbering of such documents shall be performed in such a manner as to ensure that the source of each document may be determined, if necessary. File folders with tabs or labels or directories of files identifying documents called for by these requests must be produced intact with such documents. 8. If you contend that it would be unreasonably burdensome to obtain and provide all of the documents requested in any request for production of documents (or any subsection thereof), you should: (a) Produce all documents available to you without undertaking what you contend to be an unreasonable burden; (b) State with particularity the grounds that you contend support your allegation that the additional efforts to obtain the documents in question would be unreasonably burdensome; and (c) Describe with particularity the efforts you made to secure such documents, including, but not limited to, identifying persons consulted, describing files, records and documents reviewed, and identifying each person who participated in the gathering of such information, specifying with regard to each the amount of time spent and nature of work done. C. Instructions for Responding to Interrogatories 1. Each interrogatory is continuing. If you obtain other information that would add to or alter your responses, please produce that additional or different information immediately tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 7 of 21

8 2. If any portion of these interrogatories cannot be answered in full, please answer to the extent and in the manner possible, using an estimate if detailed records are not available, and specifying if an estimate, rather than exact figures or statements, has been used. 3. If a privilege is claimed as a ground for refusing to answer any interrogatory or refusing to reveal any information responsive to any interrogatory, describe the basis for claiming the privilege in sufficient detail to permit the party serving this discovery to understand the claim and, if necessary, to allow the Court to adjudicate the validity of the claim. At a minimum, the following information should be disclosed: (a) A brief description of the type and content of each such communication, whether oral or written; (b) (c) The date of the communication and, if written, the document s title; and The name, occupation and position of the communication s initiator(s) and all addressee(s) and recipient(s), as well as any person(s) who was made aware of its content. 4. If you contend that it would be unreasonably burdensome to obtain and provide all of the information requested in any interrogatory you should: (a) Set forth all such information as is available to you without undertaking what you contend to be an unreasonable burden; (b) State with particularity the grounds that you contend support your allegation that the additional efforts to obtain the information in question would be unreasonably burdensome; and (c) Describe with particularity the efforts you made to secure such information including, but not limited to, identifying persons consulted, describing files, tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 8 of 21

9 records and documents reviewed, and identifying each person who participated in the gathering of such information, specifying with regard to each the amount of time spent and nature of work done. 5. If the answer to an interrogatory (or any part thereof) is not known or available, include a statement to that effect and furnish any information known or available. 6. Whenever there is a request in these interrogatories to identify a person, or for the identity of a person, please state, as to such person, the following information: (a) If a natural person: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) His or her full name; His or her occupation, business, or profession; His or her present employer and title; His or her employer and title at the time of the actions at which each interrogatory is directed; (v) His or her last known business address, telephone number, and mobilephone number; and (vi) His or her last known home address, telephone number, and mobile-phone number. (b) If other than a natural person: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) Its full name; The type of business in which it is engaged; The last known address and telephone number of its principal office; and The type of entity (e.g., corporation, partnership, etc.). D. Instructions for Responding to Requests for Admission 1. If you object to a request, you must state the reasons for your objection tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 9 of 21

10 2. Each answer must specifically admit or deny the matter or set forth in detail the reasons why you cannot truthfully admit or deny the matter. 3. A denial must fairly meet the substance of the requested admission, and when good faith requires that you qualify your answer or deny only a part of the matter of which an admission is requested, you must specify so much of it as is true and qualify or deny the remainder. 4. You may not give lack of information or knowledge as a reason for failure to admit or deny unless you state that you have made reasonable inquiry and that the information known or readily obtainable by you is insufficient to enable you to admit or deny. 5. You may not object that a request asks for the application of law to fact. 6. If you consider that a matter of which an admission has been requested presents a genuine issue for trial you may not, on that ground alone, object to the request; you may, subject to the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(c), deny the matter or set forth reasons why you cannot admit or deny it tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 10 of 21

11 III. Requests for Documents 1. All documents and communications that relate or refer to or tend to support or contradict the facts, claims, denials, or objections to the Proof of Claim stated in the Objection. 2. All documents and communications that relate or refer to or tend to support or contradict the facts, claims, denials, or defenses to the Objection stated in your Response. 3. All documents and communications that relate or refer to or tend to support or contradict any information or statements in the Proof of Claim. 4. All documents and communications that you consulted or reviewed in connection with preparing your Response. 5. All documents and communications that you consulted or reviewed in connection with preparing your Proof of Claim. 6. Any documents relating to the sale and purchase of PV Products or Solar Membranes by SIT GmbH from SIT, Inc., including supply contracts and POs, that were sold to Urbasolar tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 11 of 21

12 7. All documents and communications between SIT, Inc. and SIT GMBH relating or referring to negotiations, discussions, representations, or statements regarding the alleged PV Product defects or warranty claims. Urbasolar SA. 8. All documents relating or referring to your sale of SolarRoof Membranes to 9. The 2006 Supply Agreement and 2008 Supply Agreement, and all drafts, amendments, and extensions thereof. 10. All discoverable documents and communications that you provided to or received from any potential witness (expert or lay) in this contested matter. 11. All documents and communications that you received from or provided to any party in connection with the French Litigation tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 12 of 21

13 12. The resume and/or curriculum vitae of each person who may provide expert testimony in this contested matter. 13. All documents and communications that SIT GMBH will use or is likely to use in the trial of this contested matter. 14. All documents and communications that SIT GMBH will use or is likely to use in the French Litigation. 15. All documents and communications that you referred to, consulted, or relied upon in connection with your responses to any discovery requests served upon you in this matter including, without limitation, document requests and interrogatories. 16. All documents and communications that evidence, refer, refute, or relate to statements made with respect to the subject matter of this contested matter by any person who may be called as a witness at any trial of this action tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 13 of 21

14 17. All documents and communications that support, refute, or otherwise relate to your answers to any requests for admission served upon you in this matter. 18. All documents referring or relating to the design or other defects in the PV Products upon which you base the warranty claims against USO. 19. All documents evidencing warranty claims by your customers against you related to the PV Products. 20. All documents evidencing warranty claims by your customers against you related to the SolarRoof Membranes. 21. All documents relating or referring to your investigation of the alleged failures or defects in the PV Products, including laboratory or other test results confirming the failures. 22. All documents and communications relating to any investigation relating to the alleged PV Product defects or warranty claims tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 14 of 21

15 23. All documents and communications relating to any investigation relating to the alleged SolarRoof Membrane defects or warranty claims. 24. All documents and communications between SIT GMBH and Urbasolar SA relating or referring to negotiations, discussions, representations or statements regarding the alleged PV Product defects or warranty claims tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 15 of 21

16 IV. Interrogatories 1. Identify, in conformance with the instructions above, all persons who have knowledge or who are believed to have knowledge relating to any of the allegations, claims, defenses, facts, or other matters asserted in this contested matter, including, but not limited to, in the Proof of Claim, Objection, or Response. 2. For each person identified in response to Interrogatory No. 1, describe in detail (a) the substance of the facts of which each person has knowledge or is believed to have knowledge, (b) when and how the knowledge was obtained, and (c) all documents and communications relating to or evidencing the person s knowledge. 3. Identify, in conformance with the instructions above, all persons who have knowledge or who are believed to have knowledge relating to any of the allegations, claims, defenses, facts, or other matters asserted related to USO s warranty obligations to SIT GMBH under the 2006 Supply Agreement or 2008 Supply Agreement. 4. For each person identified in response to Interrogatory No. 3, describe in detail (a) the substance of the facts of which each person has knowledge or is believed to have knowledge, (b) when and how the knowledge was obtained, and (c) all documents and communications relating to or evidencing the person s knowledge tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 16 of 21

17 5. Identify, in conformance with the instructions above, all persons who have knowledge or who are believed to have knowledge relating to any of the allegations, claims, defenses, facts, or other matters asserted related to the French Litigation. 6. For each person identified in response to Interrogatory No. 5, describe in detail (a) the substance of the facts of which each person has knowledge or is believed to have knowledge, (b) when and how the knowledge was obtained, and (c) all documents and communications relating to or evidencing the person s knowledge. 7. Describe in detail the manufacturing process for producing the SolarRoof Membranes, which are the subject of the French Litigation, including, but not limited to, incorporating the PV Products into the SolarRoof Membranes. 8. Identify, in conformance with the instructions above, each expert witness who will or who is likely to testify on your behalf, describe the subject matter about which each expert is expected to testify, and describe in detail the substance of the facts and opinions to which each such person is expected to testify tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 17 of 21

18 9. Describe in detail all facts and documents that relate to or tend to support or contradict your Response. 10. State the serial number and date of purchase for each PV Product purchased from SIT, Inc. for which you seek recovery of a warranty or other claim. 11. Describe in detail the basis for USO s alleged warranty obligations to SIT GMBH under the 2008 Supply Agreement. 12. Describe in detail any payments or compensation you have received from any source related to the failures of the SolarRoof Membranes. 13. As part of the discovery in this case, you have been, or will be, served with Requests for Admission, and may be served with additional Requests for Admission in the future. If you provide anything other than an unqualified admission to any part of a Request for Admission, describe in detail all facts and documents that relate to or tend to support or contradict each such response tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 18 of 21

19 V. Requests for Admission 1. Admit that the 2008 Supply Agreement replaced and superseded the 2006 Supply Agreement in all respects. 2. Admit that SIT GMBH is not party to any contract with USO for the purchase or sale of PV Products. 3. Admit that SIT GMBH did not purchase any PV Products from USO. 4. Admit that SIT GMBH purchased the PV Products from SIT, Inc. 5. Admit that SIT GMBH s only basis for the claims asserted in the Proof of Claim is the warranty provisions of the 2008 Supply Agreement. 6. Admit that the warranty provisions of the 2006 Supply Agreement were replaced and superseded in their entirety by the warranty provisions of the 2008 Supply Agreement tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 19 of 21

20 7. Admit that the USO warranty for PV Products under the 2008 Supply Agreement extends only to SIT, Inc. 8. Admit that pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, you released all claims you had against SIT, Inc., other than the claims specifically described in paragraph 5.b. of the Purchase Agreement. 9. Admit that the French Litigation will not result in any claims against SIT GMBH related to the PV Panels. Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP Counsel for John Madden, solely in his capacity as the Trustee of the Energy Conversion Devices Liquidation Trust By: /s/seth A. Drucker Aaron M. Silver (P65481) Seth A. Drucker (P65641) 2290 First National Building 660 Woodward Avenue Detroit, Michigan Telephone: (313) Dated: August 7, 2013 Facsimile: (313) tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 20 of 21

21 Certificate of Service I certify that on August 7, 2013, I electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all ECF participants, and also served the foregoing document via on Rodney M. Glusac at rodg@brgpc.com and by firstclass mail to Rodney M. Glusac, Bernardi, Ronayne & Glusac, P.C., 1058 Maple Street, Suite 100, Plymouth, MI Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP Counsel for John Madden, solely in his capacity as the Trustee of the Energy Conversion Devices Liquidation Trust By: /s/seth A. Drucker Aaron M. Silver (P65481) Seth A. Drucker (P65641) 2290 First National Building 660 Woodward Avenue Detroit, Michigan Telephone: (313) Dated: August 7, 2013 Facsimile: (313) asilver@honigman.com ACTIVE\ tjt Doc 2028 Filed 08/07/13 Entered 08/07/13 14:27:36 Page 21 of 21

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 12-43166 (Jointly Administered) Judge Thomas

More information

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/07/2017

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/07/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS ----------------------------------------------------------------------x EDDIE SOTO and INGRID SOTO Index No. 714043/2016 -against- GLOBAL LIBERTY

More information

January 24, Via Electronic Transmission

January 24, Via Electronic Transmission January 24, 2008 Via Electronic Transmission James T. Dove, M.D., F.A.C.C. President American College of Cardiology 2400 N Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20037 Dear Dr. Dove: The United States Senate Committee

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: : : Chapter 11 WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., : Case No. 08-1229 : (MFW) Jointly : Debtors. : : INTERROGATORIES OF EDWARD F.

More information

December 12, Via facsimile transmission: Mitchell A. Leon President DesignWrite Inc. 175 Wall Street Princeton, NJ 08540

December 12, Via facsimile transmission: Mitchell A. Leon President DesignWrite Inc. 175 Wall Street Princeton, NJ 08540 Via facsimile transmission: 609-924-6648 Mitchell A. Leon President DesignWrite Inc. 175 Wall Street Princeton, NJ 08540 Dear Mr. Leon: December 12, 2008 The United States Senate Committee on Finance (Committee)

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division In re: TSI Holdings, LLC 1 et al., DEBTORS. CASE NO. 17-30132 CHAPTER 7 Jointly Administered TRUSTEE

More information

Control N rnber: ' Item Number: 397. Addendurn StartPage: 0

Control N rnber: ' Item Number: 397. Addendurn StartPage: 0 Control N rnber: 45414 ' Item Number: 397 Addendurn StartPage: 0 :;EIVED SOAH DOCKET NO. 473-16-4051 2017 FEB 1 AN, 10: PUC DOCKET NO. 45414 La IC UÏL Y Vii-11;T;SIC;tt REVIEW OF THE RATES OF BEFORE THE

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF CASS, NORTH DAKOTA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF CASS, NORTH DAKOTA IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF CASS, NORTH DAKOTA Sierra Corporate Design, Inc., Plaintiff, v. File No. 09-05-C-01660 David Ritz, Defendant. DEFENDANT DAVID RITZ S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

More information

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories

Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories 1. The practitioner may desire to combine Request for Admissions, Interrogatories and Request

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION SHELTON CHARLES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. A-06CA158LY TEXAS LOTTERY COMMISSION AND GARY GRIEF IN HIS INDIVIDUAL

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------X X Index 0 655065/2017 SCOTT KRAUSE,. DEFENDANT'S FIRST Plaintiff,. NOTICE FOR

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: ) Chapter 11 ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC., ) Case No. 12-43166-TJT et al., 1 ) (Jointly Administered) Debtors, )

More information

DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS

DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/28/2016 02:19 PM INDEX NO. 32209/2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/28/2016 SUPREME COURT: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX X Index No: Federal National Mortgage

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord and Tenant Branch

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord and Tenant Branch SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord and Tenant Branch [PLAINTIFF S NAME], Plaintiff, NOTE: Generally, only 10 requests for production are allowed. v. LT No. [CASE NUMBER]

More information

CAUSE NO. 18-C STREETS TO SHEETS ANIMAL IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW RESCUE Plaintiff, v. NO. 1

CAUSE NO. 18-C STREETS TO SHEETS ANIMAL IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW RESCUE Plaintiff, v. NO. 1 CAUSE NO. 18-C-3491 STREETS TO SHEETS ANIMAL IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW RESCUE Plaintiff, v. NO. 1 MUTTS & MAYHEM ANIMAL ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS RESCUE and SELENA SCHMIDT Defendants. DEFENDANT MUTTS & MAYHEM

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) McCONNELL, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civ. No. 02-0582 ) (CKK, KLH, RJL) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION et al., ) Defendants. ) ) ) NATIONAL

More information

Case Doc Filed 11/22/17 Entered 11/22/17 17:35:58 Desc Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 6

Case Doc Filed 11/22/17 Entered 11/22/17 17:35:58 Desc Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 6 2 Page 1 of 6 I. DEFINITIONS 1. And as well as or shall be construed either disjunctively or conjunctively as necessary to bring within the scope of these discovery requests any information that might

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF vs. CASE NO. CV DEFENDANT DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF Pursuant to Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure, you are hereby served

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re Chapter 11 WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., 1 Case No. 08-12229 (MFW) (Jointly Administered) Debtors. CLAIMANT ANDREW ESCHENBACH S REQUEST

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH * * * * * * * * * * * * *

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH * * * * * * * * * * * * * IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., * Plaintiff * v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH LINDA H. LAMONE, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DEFENDANT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CODE REVISION COMMISSION on Behalf of and For the Benefit of the GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA, and the STATE OF

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 14-10193-KG Doc 209 Filed 03/21/14 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: TUSCANY INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS (U.S.A.) LTD., et al., Debtors. 1 Chapter 11

More information

Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum

Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum To: Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. c/o Sandoz, Inc. 2555

More information

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA

DISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA ELECTRONICALLY SERVED //0 :0 AM Case Number: A-1--C 1 DAVID T. SPURLOCK, JR., ESQ. State Bar No. 00 THE LAW OFFICES OF KARL H. SMITH Arroyo Crossing Parkway, Suite 00 Las Vegas, NV Phone: (0) 0-00 david.spurlock@farmersinsurance.com

More information

Case: JGR Doc#:231 Filed:02/23/17 Entered:02/23/17 16:06:19 Page1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Case: JGR Doc#:231 Filed:02/23/17 Entered:02/23/17 16:06:19 Page1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Case:16-21382-JGR Doc#:231 Filed:02/23/17 Entered:02/23/17 16:06:19 Page1 of 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO In re: ) ) WESTON EDUCATIONAL, INC. ) Case No. 16-21382-JGR )

More information

Defendants. X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. WE COMMAND YOU, That all business and excuses being laid aside, you appear at

Defendants. X THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. WE COMMAND YOU, That all business and excuses being laid aside, you appear at SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK X RYAN S. KLARBERG Index No. 160509/13 Plaintiff, -against- VICTORIA GROSSMAN, THE AMBER AVALON CORP. D/B/A HOTEL CHANTELLE, AND JOHN DOES 1-10,

More information

Plaintiff, Defendant. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Acme Home & Garden, LLC demands answers

Plaintiff, Defendant. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Acme Home & Garden, LLC demands answers STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Acme Home & Garden, LLC, v. John Doe, Plaintiff, Defendant. DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Contract Court File No.: xx-cv-xx-xxx PLAINTIFF ACME

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT APPEARANCE POWDERZ, INC.

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT APPEARANCE POWDERZ, INC. STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT APPEARANCE IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: POWDERZ MEDICAL APOTHECARY POWDERZ, INC TOXIN

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/11/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/11/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/11/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/11/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/11/2014 INDEX NO. 650582/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 61 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/11/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 61 ---------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

Sample. Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE

Sample. Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF [Insert County] [Insert Caption] vs. Plaintiff Defendant To: Defendant [Insert Name] Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] Hon. [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord And Tenant Branch

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord And Tenant Branch SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord And Tenant Branch ) [PLAINTIFF S NAME], ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NOTE: Generally, only 10 interrogatories are allowed. v. ) L&T No. [CASE NUMBER]

More information

December 12, Via Electronic Transmission

December 12, Via Electronic Transmission December 12, 2008 Via Electronic Transmission Bernard J. Poussot Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Wyeth 5 Giralda Farms Madison, New Jersey 07940 Dear Mr. Poussot: The United States Senate

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/29/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 580 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/29/ :38 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 580 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2016 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/29/2016 05:38 PM INDEX NO. 650646/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 580 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/01/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ;X Index No. 650646/14 GEORGE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAROLYN WHITE, Individually, and as Executrix of the ESTATE OF JERE F. WHITE, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. TENOLD TRANSPORTATION

More information

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM C/O:

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM C/O: ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM CASE NO.: L-05-3-1121 TO: C/O: MURPHY OIL USA, INC. CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 200 Peach Street 1200 S. Pine Island Road El

More information

In the Superior Court Allen County, Indiana Cause No.. 02D PL-499

In the Superior Court Allen County, Indiana Cause No.. 02D PL-499 In the Superior Court Allen County, Indiana Cause No.. 02D01-0210-PL-499 WILLIAM G. BERGHOFF ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) TOWER BANK & TRUST COMPANY, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) WILLIAM G. BERGHOFF S FIRST

More information

Case Doc 225 Filed 10/05/18 Entered 10/05/18 14:02:08 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9

Case Doc 225 Filed 10/05/18 Entered 10/05/18 14:02:08 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9 Document Page 1 of 9 Michael R. Johnson, Esq. (A7070) David H. Leigh, Esq. (A9433) RAY QUINNEY & NEBEKER P.C. 36 South State Street, 14th Floor Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone: (801) 532-1500 Facsimile:

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Chapter 11

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Chapter 11 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN In re ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC. Chapter 11 Case No. 12-43166-TJT Judge Thomas J. Tucker (Jointly Administered) ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtor.

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Debtor. JOHN WALSHE MURRAY (0 ROBERT A. FRANKLIN (0 THOMAS T. HWANG (1 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 0 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto, CA 01 Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0-1 Email: murray.john@dorsey.com Email: franklin.robert@dorsey.com

More information

FILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :37 PM

FILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :37 PM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X QUALITY CHOICE HEALTHCARE, INC. d/b/a QUALITY CHOICE CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 130 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 130 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2015 1 of 23 2 of 23 Exhibit A 3 of 23 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/2015 03:44 PM INDEX NO. 162228/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 130 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF

More information

Case KJC Doc 4929 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. x : : : : : : x.

Case KJC Doc 4929 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. x : : : : : : x. Case 13-11482-KJC Doc 4929 Filed 12/14/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In re: EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES,

More information

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A

Case 3:16-md VC Document Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 2448-1 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 2448-1 Filed 01/09/19 Page 2 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH DIVISION CASE NO CIV-KAM

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH DIVISION CASE NO CIV-KAM NORMAN HIRSCH, MATTHEW DWYER, and RALPH WILLARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH DIVISION CASE NO. 13-80456-CIV-KAM

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JAMES TRACY, Plaintiff, Case No. 9:16-cv-80655-RLR v. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, a/k/a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY,

More information

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED

DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS UNITED CORPORATION, ) vs. WAHEED HAMED, DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN ) Case No. ST -13 -CV -102 ) PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF Plaintiff, ) INTERROGATORIES TO

More information

Case Document 545 Filed in TXSB on 03/07/18 Page 1 of 16

Case Document 545 Filed in TXSB on 03/07/18 Page 1 of 16 Case 17-36709 Document 545 Filed in TXSB on 03/07/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION -------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/28/ :10 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 51 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/28/2017. Exhibit UU

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/28/ :10 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 51 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/28/2017. Exhibit UU Exhibit UU SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No. 12230/2015 COUNTY OF KINGS: IAS PART 73 DIANNASAPP^ETAL, Plaintiffs, -against- CLARK WILSON INC., ET AL., Defendants. PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF

More information

[CAPTION] INTERROGATORIES [NAME AND ADDRESS OF PLAINTIFF S ATTORNEY] Attorneys for Plaintiff TO:

[CAPTION] INTERROGATORIES [NAME AND ADDRESS OF PLAINTIFF S ATTORNEY] Attorneys for Plaintiff TO: TO: [CAPTION] INTERROGATORIES [NAME AND ADDRESS OF PLAINTIFF S ATTORNEY] Attorneys for Plaintiff PROPOUNDING PARTY: RESPONDING PARTY: SET NO.: Defendant, [DEFENDANT S NAME] Plaintiff, [PLAINTIFF S NAME]

More information

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN ) PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, INC. ) etc., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) CIVIL ACTION NO

ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN ) PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, INC. ) etc., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) CIVIL ACTION NO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN ) PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, INC. ) etc., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 93 0399 vs. ) JUDGE LAMBERTH HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE JIMENEZ MORENO and MARIA JOSE LOPEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs,

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ELIMIR PILAZA, Plaintiff, Index No. 506405/2017 -against- FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., FRESENIUS NATIONAL MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., SHIEL

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case No.: 2012 CA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case No.: 2012 CA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA BERNARD LONG and VERONICO L. RON FLORES Plaintiffs, v. Case No.: 2012 CA 001980 KENNETH DETZNER in his official capacity

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO. 155113/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013 EXHIBIT E SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/13/ :56 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/13/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/13/ :56 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/13/2018 Supreme Court of ter State of grin Pork County of Reto gnrh --------------------------------------------------------------X â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â : JACK ELO, ELO GROUP LLC and ELO REALTY CORP.,

More information

U.S. Department of Justice

U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Department of Justice CRANSTON, RI O292O This Civil Investigative Demand is issued pursuant to the False Claims Act,3l U.S.C. $$ 3729-3733, in the course of an investigation to determine whether there

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION : : : : : :

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION : : : : : : UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ------------------------------------------------------x In re Chapter 9 CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Case No. 13-53846 Debtor.

More information

Case KJC Doc 4894 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. x : : : : : : x.

Case KJC Doc 4894 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. x : : : : : : x. Case 13-11482-KJC Doc 4894 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In re: EXIDE TECHNOLOGIES,

More information

Case 3:16-cv Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 68 SUBPOENA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Case 3:16-cv Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 68 SUBPOENA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD FORM NLRB-32 Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 68 SUBPOENA To Custodian of Records, 1455 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103 As requested by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL

More information

ANTITRUST CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND

ANTITRUST CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND STATE OF FLORIDA Department of Legal Affairs OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Tallahassee, Florida ANTITRUST CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND TO: Diebold Election Systems, Inc. No. 06-040 c/o CT Corporation System

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AARON RICH Plaintiff, v. EDWARD BUTOWSKY, MATTHEW COUCH, AMERICA FIRST MEDIA, and THE WASHINGTON TIMES, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:18-cv-00681-RJL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,

More information

tjt Doc 2391 Filed 10/21/14 Entered 10/21/14 16:40:26 Page 1 of 5

tjt Doc 2391 Filed 10/21/14 Entered 10/21/14 16:40:26 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC., et al. 1, Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 12-43166 (Jointly Administered) Judge Thomas

More information

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIME DIVISION FIRST INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM

ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIME DIVISION FIRST INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIME DIVISION FIRST INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM CASE NO.: L06-3-1057 TO: C/O: Compliance Department Go Daddy Software, Inc. GoDaddy.com, Inc.

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 195 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 195 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------x TATIANA BRUNETTI, individually, and as a member suing derivatively on behalf

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ) DAVID SABEL, et al., ) ) Case No. 3:97CV-02022 RNC Plaintiffs. ) ) v. ) PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST ) FOR PRODUCTION OF ) DOCUMENTS DANBURY

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ASTORIA 48TH STREET CAPITAL, INC. INDEX NO. 504376/2015 Plaintiff, -against- DEFENDANT AND OP EQUITIES, LLC THIRD-PARTY Defendant OP EQUITIES, LLC

More information

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to CPLR 3101, 3120, et. seq., Defendant

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to CPLR 3101, 3120, et. seq., Defendant FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/09/2016 05:14 PM INDEX NO. 162228/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 156 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------

More information

CAUSE NO ZACK MAXWELL, IN THE DISTRICT COURT

CAUSE NO ZACK MAXWELL, IN THE DISTRICT COURT CAUSE NO. 352-301689-18 ZACK MAXWELL, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, v. 352nd JUDICIAL DISTRICT CITY OF ARLINGTON and JEFF WILLIAMS, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Mayor, Defendant. TARRANT

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/12/ :50 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2017. Exhibit A

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/12/ :50 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 143 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/12/2017. Exhibit A Exhibit A SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK, COMMERCIAL DIVISION REPRESENTACIONES E INVESTIGACIONES MÉDICAS, S.A. DE C.V., as successor to TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDINGS MÉXICO,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAROLYN WHITE, Individually, and as Executrix of the ESTATE OF JERE F. WHITE, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. TENOLD TRANSPORTATION

More information

Case 1:99-cv ECH Document 295 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

Case 1:99-cv ECH Document 295 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS Case 1:99-cv-00550-ECH Document 295 Filed 03/19/2008 Page 1 of 26 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS THE OSAGE NATION AND/OR TRIBE OF ) INDIANS OF OKLAHOMA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) No. 99-550 L (into

More information

SOLID ROCK CHURCH, INC. ofcourt File No. 71-C ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation,

SOLID ROCK CHURCH, INC. ofcourt File No. 71-C ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA, a Minnesota Non-Profit Corporation, CASE TYPE: OTHER CIVIL STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF SHERBURNE DISTRICT COURT TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT EDWARD G. PALMER, Plaintiff Vs. PLAINTIFFS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES SOLID ROCK CHURCH, INC. ofcourt

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re Chapter 9 CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Case No. 13-53846 Debtor. Hon. Thomas J. Tucker CERTIFICATION OF NO RESPONSE

More information

S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS,

S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS, DISTRICT COURT, CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80209 Clerk of Division 9: (720) 865-8612 Plaintiff: Lion Capital, L.L.C., a Colorado Limited Liability

More information

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands CLICK HERE to return to the home page 31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands (a) In General. (1)Issuance and service. Whenever the Attorney General, or a designee (for purposes of this section),

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re Chapter 9 CITY OF DETROIT, MICHIGAN, Debtor. Case No. 13-53846 Hon. Steven W. Rhodes NOTICE OF SUBPOENAS PURSUANT TO

More information

Case KG Doc 407 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case KG Doc 407 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 18-12378-KG Doc 407 Filed 01/11/19 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 WELDED CONSTRUCTION, L.P., et al., 1 Case No. 18-12378 (KG (Jointly

More information

Pursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff, by his attorneys,

Pursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff, by his attorneys, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RANDALL J. PALMER, vs. Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF S DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS and CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANNING

More information

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy Information & Instructions: Master Interrogatories 1. The interrogatories in this form are designed for selection to fit the case. 2. The questions are intended to show the range of questions that may

More information

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES

APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES CAUSE NO. ' IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, ' ' V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT ' ' Defendant. ' OF COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT S INTERROGATORIES TO PLANTIFF TO: PLAINTIFF,, by service

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 194 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 194 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------x TATIANA BRUNETTI, individually, and as a member suing derivatively on behalf

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In Re: OAKLAND PHYSICIANS MEDICAL Case No. 15-51011-wsd CENTER, L.L.C. d/b/a DOCTORS Chapter 11 HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN, a Michigan

More information

YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to produce to Eric Wm. Hendon, Esq., Assistant Attorney

YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to produce to Eric Wm. Hendon, Esq., Assistant Attorney CIVIL RIGHTS AND ECONOMIC CRIMES INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT DEPOSITION CASE NO: LO3-4-4259 INVESTIGATION OF THE SOUTHERN INN TO: Raj Patel d/b/a The Southern Inn 2238 Byron Butler Parkway

More information

Case 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 93 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 4:16-cv RGE-SBJ Document 93 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION Case 4:16-cv-00650-RGE-SBJ Document 93 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION DEBORAH INNIS, on behalf of the Telligen, Inc. Employee

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/04/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/04/ :54 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/04/2014 08:54 PM INDEX NO. 160007/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE JIMENEZ MORENO and MARIA JOSE LOPEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2014

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2014 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2014 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2014 INDEX NO. 160641/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47 HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47 LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Subchapter 1

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO CIV-SIMONTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO CIV-SIMONTON ,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO. 97-3924-CIV-SIMONTON JERRY GREENBERG, individually, and IDAZ GREENBERG, individually, vs. Plaintiffs, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC

More information

Plaintiff, DEFENDANT'S INTERROGATORIES, REQUEST. Defendant. City of Bloomington ( Bloomington ) and demands that Plaintiff Tony Webster ( Webster )

Plaintiff, DEFENDANT'S INTERROGATORIES, REQUEST. Defendant. City of Bloomington ( Bloomington ) and demands that Plaintiff Tony Webster ( Webster ) Electronically Served 3/18/2016 5:09:04 PM Hennepin County, MN STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Tony Webster, v. The City of Bloomington, Plaintiff, Defendant. DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

More information

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:13. DEPOSITIONS; DISCOVERY

RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:13. DEPOSITIONS; DISCOVERY RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY RULE 3:13. DEPOSITIONS; DISCOVERY 3:13-1. [Deleted] Note: Source-R.R. 3:5-3(a)(b). Paragraph designations and paragraph (b) adopted July 16, 1979 to

More information

Case 1:03-cv EGS Document Filed 03/10/2009 Page 1 of 12 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS FUND FOR ANIMALS

Case 1:03-cv EGS Document Filed 03/10/2009 Page 1 of 12 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS FUND FOR ANIMALS Case 1:03-cv-02006-EGS Document 461-2 Filed 03/10/2009 Page 1 of 12 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ThE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS et a. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Plaintiffs

More information

Case 1:16-cv CMA Document Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:16-cv CMA Document Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2017 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 1:16-cv-21199-CMA Document 179-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/17/2017 Page 1 of 16 ANDREA ROSSI, et al., v. Plaintiffs, THOMAS DARDEN; et al., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury

APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury Cases (Except Medical Malpractice Cases): Superior Court All questions must be answered

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. [insert individual case information] ) ) MDL NO.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. [insert individual case information] ) ) MDL NO. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK [insert individual case information] ) ) MDL NO. 1789 ) ) ) PLAINTIFF S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT PLEASE TAKE NOTICE

More information

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, 2003 Table of Contents PART I Administrative Rules for Procedures for Preliminary Sunrise Review Assessments Part

More information

Case Document 563 Filed in TXSB on 03/08/18 Page 1 of 298 ENTERED 03/08/2018

Case Document 563 Filed in TXSB on 03/08/18 Page 1 of 298 ENTERED 03/08/2018 Case 17-36709 Document 563 Filed in TXSB on 03/08/18 Page 1 of 298 ENTERED 03/08/2018 Case 17-36709 Document 563 Filed in TXSB on 03/08/18 Page 2 of 298 Case 17-36709 Document 563 Filed in TXSB on 03/08/18

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Docket No CV Sanjeev Lath

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Docket No CV Sanjeev Lath THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH, SS. NORTHERN DISTRICT SUPERIOR COURT Docket No. 216-2016-CV-00327 Sanjeev Lath v. Oak Brook Condominium Owners' Association, Board of Directors, Warren Mills, Vickie

More information

Case Document 1122 Filed in TXSB on 10/19/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Case Document 1122 Filed in TXSB on 10/19/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION Case 17-36709 Document 1122 Filed in TXSB on 10/19/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 COBALT INTERNATIONAL ENERGY INC., et al.,

More information