IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
|
|
- Robert Joseph
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 242/ Versus 1. Md. Anwar Ali, Son of Late Musabbir Ali, Resident of Village : Lankajan, PS & Mouza Hojai, District : Nagaon, Assam. 2. Mustt. Misma Khatoon, Wife of Md. Anwar Ali, Daughter of Munshi Abdul Jabbar, Resident of Dakhin Laskar Pathar, Police Station Lanka, District : Nagaon, Assam. 3. Shri Abdus Salam, Son of Md. Anwar Ali, Resident of Village Lankajan, Mouza & Police Station : Hojai, District : Nagaon, Assam. 4. Shri Abdul Kalam, Son of Md. Anwar Ali, Resident of Village Lankajan, Mouza & Police Station : Hojai, District : Nagaon, Assam..Petitioners 1. The State of Assam, represented by : The Secretary, The Home Department, Govt. of Assam, Dispur, Guwahati, Assam. 2. The Superintendent of Police (Border), District : Nagaon, Assam. 3. The Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Govt. of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi. Respondents. WP(C) 242/2011 Page 1 of 16
2 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B. K. SHARMA For the Petitioners : For the Respondents : Dr. B. Ahmed, Adv Ms. R. Chakraborty, Sr. GA. Mr. M. Bhagabati, CGC. Date of hearing : Date of Judgement : JUDGEMENT AND ORDER (CAV) This writ petition is directed against the judgement and order dated passed by the then Illegal Migrants (D) Tribunal, Hojai, Sankardev Nagar in case No. IMDT/H/683/91, declaring the 4 (four) petitioners to be illegal Bangladeshi migrants who entered into Assam after the cut off date, which is In the writ petition, there is no explanation about the inordinate delay in filling the writ petition after about 6(six) years of the said judgement and order. This must be because of all round protection extended to such illegal migrants by the State Administration. Although, the petitioners were declared to be illegal migrants by the said judgement and order dated , the State Administration did not take any action to deport them for the last six years. Not only that the proceeding before the Tribunal took long 20(twenty) years for the eventual declaration that the petitioners are illegal migrants. This is how the illegal WP(C) 242/2011 Page 2 of 16
3 migrants whose presence in the State in lakhs is an admitted position, are being detected, making a mockery of the entire system of detection and deportation of illegal migrants. 3. In the writ petition, although the petitioners have put to challenge the aforesaid judgement and order dated passed by the then IMDT, Hojai, Sankardev Nagar in case No. IMDT/H/683/91 but no ground has been urged in the writ petition as to why the same is liable to be interfered with. Only ground if the same can be said to be ground towards assailing the said order are in paragraphs 11 and 14 of the writ petition, which are reproduced below :- 11. That the petitioners Nos; 3 and 4 being the grandson and son of Indian Citizen and are not Bangladeshi National as alleged in the reference and declared by the IM(D)T, Hojai, Vide judgment dated The in vocation of the very IM(D)T Act against the petitioners is illegal for they being Indian Citizen and not illegal migrants as alleged in the reference and declared in the judgment. 14. That the Chairman and the Member of the Member, Illigal Migrants (Determination) Tribunal Hojai : Sankardev Nagar not satisfied with the reply posted the case for recording evidence. During hearing the petitioner duly proved that he is an Indian national and son of Indian citizen who have been in Assam. The learned Chairman and Member of the I.M(D) Tribunal, misinterpreted the entire evidence produced by the petitioners and in prejudging the case in a perverse manner hold that the petitioners are illegal migrants and had entered India WP(C) 242/2011 Page 3 of 16
4 after 25 th March 1971 from Bangladesh and the petitioners can not claim as Indian citizen and liable to be deported for being illegal migrants. Stand in the writ petition : 4. According to the petitioners, they are all citizens of India by birth. Be it stated here that the petitioners NO. 2, 3 & 4 are the wife and two sons of the petitioner No.1, who claims to be the son of late Musabbir Ali. It has been stated that the said father of the petitioner late Musabbir Ali was also an Indian citizen and was a permanent resident of village Lankajan under Police Station and Mouza Lanka in the then undivided district of Nagaon. According to the petitioners, the voter list of 1960 of Lumding constituency (Annexure-I) contained the name of the father of the petitioner at Sl. No. 195, a photocopy of which has been annexed to the writ petition. On perusal of the said voter list, it appears that under Sl. No. 195, name of one Masbir Son of Musan Mia appears and not that of Musabbir Ali. 5. In paragraph 3 of the writ petition, the petitioners have stated that the name of the father of the petitioner No. 1 Musabbir Ali continued to appear in the voter list of 1966, 1970, 1977 in respect of No. 93 Hojai Assembly constituency. It will be pertinent to mention here that the Annexure-I voter list of 1960 pertains to Lumding constituency but the other voter lists of 1966, 1970 and 1977, copies of which have been annexed to the writ petition as Annexure-2 (A, B, C) series are of Hojai Constituency. WP(C) 242/2011 Page 4 of 16
5 6. In 1966 voter list against Sl. No. 143, name of one Abdul Musbi Ali, Son of Fazal Ali appears, showing his age as 45 years. On the other hand in the voter list of 1960, the age of Masbir was recorded as 54 years. Thus, the person whom the petitioner No.1 claims to be his father, not only varied in name and also of his grand father, but with the efflux of time, his father instead of gaining in age became younger from 54 years to 45 years within 6 (six) years. 7. In 1970 voter list, against Sl. No. 109, name of Abdul Musba Ali aged 49 years son of Fazal Mia appears. In 1977 voter list, at Sl. No. 223, name of one Musabi Ali, aged 50 years, Son of Musal appears. Thus, the father of the petitioner No.1, who was 54 years of age in 1960 became 50 years of age after 17 years. In the normal circumstances, his age should have been increased by 17 years and adding this 17 years to 54 years in 1960, his father should have been 71 years of age. However, he became younger by 21 years of age. 8. The petitioners have also enclosed voter lists of 1975 and 1977 (photocopies) which have been annexed as Annexure 3A and 3B. In 1975 voter list, name of one Anwar aged 27 years son of Musbir appears and so also in 1977 voter list at Sl. No The petitioners have also enclosed photocopies of voter lists of 1966 and 1970 (Annexures 4A &B), so as to claim that the father of the petitioner No.2 Munshi Abdul Jabbar was an Indian citizen, by birth and his name appeared in the WP(C) 242/2011 Page 5 of 16
6 voter list. The petitioners have also enclosed Annexure- 5 document, so as to claim that said Mushi Abdul Jabbar had some land and that the said land came to the share of the petitioner No.2. Annexure-5 is the purported Jamabandi (photocopy) of Village- Laskar Pathar, Mouza- Lanka. 9. The petitioners have also enclosed photocopies of the voter lists of 1989 and 1997 (Annexures 6A and B ) so as to claim that the names of the petitioners No. 1 & 2 appeared in the said voter list. 10. Above are the documents on the basis of which the petitioners have asserted in the writ petition that they are Indian citizens, by birth. While doing so, there is however, no explanation as to why their purported father s name did not appear in any one of the voter lists after There is also no explanation as to why the names of the petitioners No.1 & 2 did not appear in any one of the voter list after Interestingly, their names were included in the voter list of 1997 at a time when the proceedings against them was initiated and pending before the then IMDT. Thus, in the State of Assam, any one can enter his name in the voter list, no matter he is an illegal Bangladeshi migrant. Stand before the Tribunal : 11. As against the aforesaid stand in the writ petition, the stand of the petitioners before the Tribunal as could be gathered from the written statement filed by them was that in the 1960 voter list, the name of the father WP(C) 242/2011 Page 6 of 16
7 of the petitioner No. 1 was included and that after his death, the petitioners shifted to Lankajan village. It was further stated that the names of the petitioners No. 1 & 2 were entered in the voter list. However, there was no indication as to in which one of the voter lists of which area, their names were included. As regards the petitioner No.2, it was stated that her father s name Munshi Abdul Jabbar was included in the voter list of Along with the written statement, the copy of the voter list of 1966 was enclosed showing the name of one Abdul Musbi Ali, aged 45 years S/o. Mazal Ali. The voter list of 1966 was also produced showing the name of one Munshi Abdul Jabbar. As in the writ petition, the voter list of 1977 containing the name of one Musabi Ali aged 50 years S/o. Musal was also produced. Likewise, the voter list of 1977 and 1989 were also produced. While in the voter list of 1977, name of one Anwar aged 27 years S/o. Musbir appears, but in the voter list of 1989, names of Anwar Ali and Misya Khatoon appeared. 12. Two other documents annexed to the written statement were the voter lists of 1966 depicting the name of one Munshi Abdul Jabbar and that of 1997 depicting the names of Anwar Ali and Misma Khatoon aged 46 and 42 years respectively. If the petitioner No.1 was aged 46 years in 1997, at the time of filling the writ petition on , he would have been 60 years of age but in the affidavit that has been filed in support of the writ petition, he has disclosed his age as 51 years. WP(C) 242/2011 Page 7 of 16
8 Proceeding before the Tribunal : 13. In the proceeding before the Tribunal, the State examined the Investigating Officer while the petitioners examined the petitioner No.1. The I.O. was entrusted with the investigation of the case on on the basis of the First Information Report (Ext.1). Accordingly, he visited the locality and interrogated the petitioners. He also filled in the prescribed form No.1 (Ext.2) wherein Ext.2(i) is his signature. During enquiry, the petitioners could not produce any document in support of their claim of Indian citizenship, that too by birth. The I.O. also examined some local witnesses and recorded their statements. On the basis of such enquiry, the said witness submitted his report in the prescribed form No. II (Ext.3) wherein Ext. 3(i) is his signature and Ext. 3(ii) is the signature of SP(B), Nagaon. The said witness in his deposition proved the enquiry and the report. The petitioners did not cross examine him and thus his evidence went unrefuted. 14. The petitioner No.1 in his deposition stated about the documents annexed to the written statement. He also stated that he has landed property but no document could be produced to prove the same. In his cross examination, the petitioner No.1 stated that his name did not enter in the 1966, 1970 and 1971 voter lists and that his name was entered in the electoral roll of WP(C) 242/2011 Page 8 of 16
9 Analysis of the evidence by the Tribunal : 15. The Tribunal on the basis of the aforesaid evidence has come to the conclusion that the petitioners are illegal migrants who had entered into Assam after The Tribunal in its impugned judgement and order dated has discussed in detail the evidence on record. It has noticed that although the petitioner No.1 in his deposition claimed that his father died in the same village but he could not disclose the year of death of his father. The Tribunal also noticed that the name of the alleged father of the petitioner did not appear in the voter list of 1970 and 1971, although the claim of the petitioner No.1 was that his name appeared in the voter lists of 1966 and Thus, the Tribunal has rightly recorded his finding that if the claim of the petitioner No.1 that his father did not go out of the State is to be believed than his name ought to have appeared in the voter lists of 1970 and The Tribunal has also noticed that the name of the petitioner No.1 appeared in the voter list of 1977 (Ext. C) when he was 27 years of age. His name again appeared along with his wife in the voter lists of 1989 and If that be so, the petitioner No.1 was aged about 20/21 years in the years and accordingly his name ought to have been there along his father in 1970 and 1971 voter lists. However, the same was not to be and his name was entered for the fist time in the electoral roll of WP(C) 242/2011 Page 9 of 16
10 17. As regards the purported inclusion of name of the father of the petitioner No.2 in the voter list of 1966, it has rightly been observed by the Tribunal that there is no evidence as to why after 1966, his name did not appear in any one of the voter list. Accordingly, the Tribunal upon a full length analysis of the entire evidence on record, rightly came to the conclusion that the reference made to the Tribunal was required to be answered in the affirmative and accordingly declared the petitioners to be illegal migrant from Bangladesh after the cut off date i.e Arguments in the writ petition : 18. Dr. B. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioners referring to the documents annexed to the writ petition submitted that the petitioners are Indian citizens, by birth. He submitted that the variations in the name, age and residential address of the petitioners, which are discernible from the own documents produced by the petitioners, are required to ignored, inasmuch as, variations are known to all. On being asked that the writ court cannot re-appreciate the evidence, he submitted that the same is required to be done for ends of justice. 19. As against the aforesaid submission made by Dr. Ahmed, both Ms. R. Chakraborty, learned State Counsel and Mr. M. Bhagabati, learned CGC, supporting the impugned judgement and order, submitted that the evidences against the petitioners being over-whelming, WP(C) 242/2011 Page 10 of 16
11 the impugned judgement and order is required to be sustained. Analysis, conclusions and findings : 20. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and the entire materials on record including the records of the Tribunal. 21. The petitioners have claimed that they are Indian citizens, by birth, however, they did not disclose as to where they were born. The only endeavour on their part is to place reliance on some photocopies of voter lists, so as to claim that the names included therein are their names. They have also claimed that the name of the father of the petitioner No.1 appeared in the aforementioned voter list. Although, it is not the task of the writ court to appreciate evidence but on the face of it, the documents annexed to the writ petition do not establish the Indian citizenship of the petitioners. 22. As noticed above, in the 1960 voter list, name of one Masbir aged 54 years son of Musan Mia appears, whom the petitioner No.1 claims to be his father. However, in the writ petition, he has described his father as Shri Musabbir Ali. In the 1966 voter list, name of one Abdul Musbi Ali aged 45 years son of Fazal Ali appears, whom also the petitioner No.1 claims to be his father. Thus, within a span of six years, the name of the father of the father of the petitioner No.1 got changed from Musbir to Musbi and his age got reduced from 54 to 45. Not only that, the name of the grand father of the petitioner No.1 also got changed WP(C) 242/2011 Page 11 of 16
12 from Musan Mia to Fazal Ali. As to how such variation could take place, there is no explanation in the writ petition. 23. In 1970 voter list, name of one Abdul Musba Ali aged 49 years son of Fazal Ali appears but in the voter list of 1977, name of one Musba Ali aged 50 years son of Musal appears. The petitioner No.1 claims that both persons are his father, who was 49 years of age in 1970 but became only 50 years of age after 7(seven) years i.e. in Not only that his grand father s name got changed from Fazal Ali to Musal during this period of 7(seven) years. 24. Appearance of name of the petitioners in 1977 voter list and thereafter, is of no consequence, inasmuch as, the cut off date is The petitioners have failed to produce any documents other than the aforementioned voter lists to prove their Indian citizenship, by birth. If the petitioners are Indian citizens, by birth, they could have easily disclosed the material particulars, which they miserably failed to do. Not only that they did not even state about their place of birth. 25. The petitioners have placed reliance on the Annexure-5 photocopy of the Jamabandi which was never produced before the Tribunal and thus this Court cannot take notice of the same. Mere containing the name of one Misma Khatoon can not go to show that the petitioner No.2 is an Indian citizen, by birth. If her WP(C) 242/2011 Page 12 of 16
13 name was included in the Jamabandi No. 68 and 69, it is not understood as to why her name did not appear in any one of the voter lists of that period of time. Her name came to be included only in the voter list of 1989 and The names Misya Khatooon and Misma Khatoon are said to be her name, although in the writ petition, she has disclosed her name as Mustt. Misma Khatoon. 26. For all the aforesaid reasons, I do not find any merit in the writ petition and accordingly it is dismissed. 27. The Deputy Commissioner, Nagaon shall ensure immediate deletion of the names of the petitioners from the voter lists and simultaneously the Superintendent of Police (B), Nagaon shall also ensure immediate detention of the petitioners in the detention camp for their eventual deportation to Bangladesh. Let the writ petition be listed again on for furnishing of reports by the Deputy Commissioner and the Superintendent of Police (B), Nagaon towards implementation of the aforesaid directions. Registry shall send down the LCR immediately. Observation 28. Before parting with the case records, I am constrained to observe that in the instant case, it took long 20 years to declare the petitioners to be illegal Bangladeshi migrants. The particular investigation was carried out in 1989 and thereafter the reference was made to the Tribunal in As many as 76 dates were WP(C) 242/2011 Page 13 of 16
14 involved in the proceeding starting from to Most of the times, the petitioners were absent in the proceeding. In the year 1993, the order for exparte hearing was recalled upon appearance of the petitioners by filling application. Thereafter, the petitioners merrily kept on praying for time to file written statement and in between also merrily remained absent. If this is the manner and method in which such an important matter is dealt with by the Tribunal, the very purpose of establishing the Tribunal gets frustrated. During the long 20 years which the Tribunal took to declare the petitioners illegal Bangladeshi migrants, they cast their votes to elect peoples representative to the Legislative Assembly and Parliament. Not only that, they also got their names included in the 1997 voter list i.e. at a time when the proceeding was pending in the Tribunal. 29. Although, the impugned judgement and order dated was passed six years back but the District/Police administration did nothing to arrest the petitioners for their detention and deportation to Bangladesh, as if they do not have any duty in such matter. The instant case is only one such instances of indifferent attitude of the District /State administration in the matter of detection and deportation of foreign nationals. There are lakhs of such foreigners present in the State. Only a few cases come under reference to the Tribunal but even in those cases, if this is the approach of the administration, the dangerous consequence can well be imagined, the whole approach WP(C) 242/2011 Page 14 of 16
15 seems to be the endeavour to protect the interest of the illegal migrants rather than the indigenous people of Assam, no matter, if in the process the indigenous people of Assam became minority in their own State. Apart from slogans to serve political purpose nobody seems to be bothered about the dangerous situation persistently being faced by the State of Assam, from constant and unabated influx of Bangladeshi nationals. Directions 30. Direction is hereby issued to all the Deputy Commissioners and Superintendent of Police(B) to take prompt action for detention and deportation of Bangladeshi nationals illegally staying in Assam. Once a person is declared to be illegal Bangladeshi national, he should be immediately arrested and kept in detention camp and thereafter should be deported. Immediate steps should also be taken for deletion of his/her name from the voter list. Further, once a reference is made to the Tribunal, the Superintendent of Police(B) will have to ensure that the person concerned cannot do the act of vanishing. If need be, he/she should be kept in the detention camp with the facility of defending the reference. These measures are directed in view of the fact that in most of the cases, the Bangladeshi nationals have done the act of vanishing, after their writ petitions filed against the orders of the Tribunal have been dismissed. In almost all the cases, the explanation furnished by the SP(B) is that such Bangladeshi nationals are not traceable and that efforts are being made to nab them. It is also the experience of this Court that WP(C) 242/2011 Page 15 of 16
16 the names of such Bangladeshi nationals are also not deleted from the voter lists, unless specific direction is issued by this Court. The said two authorities and their delegatees will keep in mind their constitutional duties and obligations and that their failure to discharge the same, may entail appropriate action. 31. Let copies of this judgement and order be sent to all the Deputy Commissioner(s) / Superintendent of Police(S) and the Foreigners Tribunals of all the Districts. Another copy may also be sent to the Union of India in the Home Ministry. JUDGE Sukhamay WP(C) 242/2011 Page 16 of 16
17 MC 775/2011 in WP(C) 242/2011 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA In terms of the order passed today in the main writ petition i.e. WP(C) 242/2011, the MC stands disposed of. JUDGE Sukhamay
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 3680 of Vs-
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 3680 of 2013 Ohed Ali, S/o. Late Abdul Jobbar @ Jobbar, Village Uralkata Pathar, P.O. Chahariagaon, P.S.-
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 2098 of 2013
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 2098 of 2013 1. Mustt. Khatoon Nessa, W/o. Md. Samsul Hoque, D/o. Lt. Uttam Ali. 2. Md. Samsul Hoque,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1576 of 2013
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1576 of 2013 1. Sri Krishna Deb Nath, S/o. Late Ramani Deb 2. Smti. Maloti Deb Nath,W/o. Sri Krishna Deb
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2013
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 5343 of 2013 Muncher Ali, S/o. Latee Hussain Ali @ Hussain @ Hussain Miya @ Hussain Ali Miya, Viollage-
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 4071/2013 Rahim Ali @ Rahimuddin @ Md. Abdul Rahim, S/o. Late Kuddush Ali @ Kaddus Ali @ Kurdush
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM, AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No.7347/2016 Jehirul Islam, Son of Md. Abdul Jalil @ Jalil Ali, Resident of village- Dimu, P.S.- Rangia,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 2842 of 2015 Md. Sahid Ali, S/o. Late Akbar Ali, R/o. Village- nmerapani Fareshtablak, P.S.- Merapani,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM, AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 357 of 2016 Lakhi Rani Das, Wife of Late Subhash Das, R/o village- Salpara, Molandubi, P.S.- Krishnai,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT APPEAL NO.322 OF 2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT APPEAL NO.322 OF 2015 1. Koddus Ali @ Kuddus Ali S/O Late Fazar Ali 2. Sofia Khatun @ Sibila Khatun W/O Koddus
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 238 of 2010
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 238 of 2010 Quadir Khan @ Md. Kader Khan, S/O Md. Faruk Khan, R/O Bessakopi Line No. 10, P.O. Rupai
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR,
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 3522/2000 1. Dhansiri Valley Project Oil and Natural Gas Commission
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WP(C) No of Versus-
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WP(C) No. 5648 of 2009 Sri Swapan Kumar Dey S/o late Jogesh Chandra Dey, R/o Nagadolong, P.O. & P.S. Namrup,
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI WP(C) No. 4088/2014 Sri Dibyajyoti Kaushik, Son of Sri Santanu Baruaha,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 2145/1999
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 2145/1999 Shri Wahed Ali, Son of Late Mafizuddin Ahmed, Resident of Dhirenpara, P.S. Fatasil Ambari,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2014
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 2306 of 2014 1. Md. Sirajul Hoque @ Sirajul Islam, S/o. Lt. Abdul Karim. 2. Musstt. Nurjahan Khatun
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P(C) 2085/2004
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P(C) 2085/2004 Sri Amarendra Kumar Singh Son of Sri M.M.P. Singh Technical Assistant,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015 Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora -Vs-...Petitioner M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
More informationTHE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE B.K. SHARMA
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P(C) 4494/2004 NLK-204 Anuj Sonowal Son of Late Jadunath Sonowal C/o Sri Ratul Das, Vill-Khajuabeel,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF. (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No. 1343/2012 Shri Sanjib Saikia, S/o. Late Muhiram Saikia R/o. House No. 12,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA 212/2005 1. Md. Hussain Ahmed 2. Md. Ilas Ahmed @ Bilal Ahmed 3. Md. Masuk Ahmed 4. Mustt. Chhayaban Nessa
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) NO. 3235 of 2004 Shri Samudra Baishya, S/o. Late Nabin Baishya, Hengrabari, Guwahati-6...Petitioner -Versus-
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3307/2005
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 3307/2005 Md. Intajur Rahman Laskar, S/o. Md. Siddique Ali Laskar, Vill- Banskandi Part-III, P.O.
More informationWrit Petition (C) No.1208 of 2011
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No.1208 of 2011 Md. Muktar Hussain, Son of Md. Rajab Ali, Resident
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) -Vs- WP(C) No. 1846/2010 Sri Ram Prakash Sarki, Constable (Since dismissed from
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Page 1 of 15 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) NO.4448/2007 1. Sri Abhiram Pegu, S/o Damodar Pegu, R/O- Nalipipar, P.O & P.S- Dhemaji, District-
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 2882/2005 M/s. Ladi Steel Industries Pvt. Limited, a private limited company duly incorporated under
More information1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 1. Writ Petition (C) No.3638 of 2015 1. Bahari Reserve Gaon Min Samabai Samity Limited, Village & PO- Bahari, PS-
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No. 149/2000 1. Musstt. Sufia Khatun, W/O Late Danish Ali. 2. Md. Mintu Sheikh alias
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Sri Rajesh Jaiswal, S/o Sri Radha Raman Jaiswal, Resident of Thana Back Road, Ward No. 11, New Amolapatty, Golaghat-785621.
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) WP(C) Nos. 835/2009 and 2465/2009
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) WP(C) Nos. 835/2009 and 2465/2009 (I) WP(C) No.835/2009 Smt. Lakhimi Hazarika, W/O Shri
More informationIntest.Cas.5 of 2004
Page No.1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Intest.Cas.5 of 2004 1. Isamuddin Mia 2. Md. Usman Mia Alias Osman Mia Both are sons of Late Uljan
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 4022/2016 Sri David Brahma Son of Sri Biraj Brahma Resident of Kahilipara Journalist Colony Dakhin
More information1. WRIT PETITION (C) NO.75 OF 2017
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 1. WRIT PETITION (C) NO.75 OF 2017 Md. Sirajul Islam, Son of Late Ayub Ali, Resident of Pub Singimari, PO: Singimari,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)
Review Petition No. 73/2013 (Arising out of Misc. Case No. 705/2013 In FAO 6/2013) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) NO.6459/2010 1. Md. Jeherul Islam, S/o Sultan Ali, Resident of Simelibari, Post Office- Bezera, District-
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh)
Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Writ Appeal No. 273/2014 Md. Imranul Hoque, S/o Shamsul Hoque, Village- Kacharipara, District Nagaon,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Petition No. 255 of 2010 Smt Roltong Singpho, Wife of Sri C C Singpho,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Petitioners : WP(C) No.3049 of 2006 1. M/s. Bogidhola Tea and Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016 Sri Bhabesh Das Son of Late Dhruba Das Vill Kulhati, No.2 Hidalghurisupa Police
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 1961 of 2010 Smt. Padma Rani Mudai Hazarika - Versus - - Petitioner Union of India
More informationCivil Revision Petition No. 118/2009 -VERSUS-
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Civil Revision Petition No. 118/2009 1. Md. Iman Ali, 2. Md. Abdul Basar, Both are sons of Late Ahmed Ali, 3. Msstt.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017 1. SMTI. TETERI DEVI, Wife of Late Mohendra Harizon. 2. SHRI RAMANANDA HARIZON, Son of Late Mohendra
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Crl. Leave Petition 28/2014 Smt. Rekha Bhargava, Wife of Sri Amrit Bhargava, D/o. Sri Satya Narayan Bhargava,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No of 2012
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 2284 of 2012 Monomohan Sarma, S/o Late Kama Dev Sarmah, Village- Belsor, P.O.- Belsor, District-
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No OF 2010
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 4667 OF 2010 SHRI SURAJEET DAS, SON OF SHRI CHITTA RANJAN DAS, RESIDENT OF PANJABARI (BOTAHGULI),
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No. 2131/2004 Shri Dwijendra Nath Deka S/o. Late Monmil Ch. Deka R/o. Madhgharia,
More informationJUDGEMENT AND ORDER (CAV)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RFA 08/2013 1. Manoj Lala, son of Late Mohanlal Lala, R/o. Central Road, Silchar, PO & PS- Silcahr, District-
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2855 of 2010 Ramesh Goswami Writ Petitioner
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) NO. 2017/2009 Sri Swapan Kr. Biswas S/o Late Anil Kr. Biswas, Vill- Basugaon P.O. Basugaon, Dist. Chirang,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: WP(C) 3845/2014 Dr. (Capt.) Suchitra Kakoty, W/o Sri Lekhoke Kakoty, R/o House No. 18, Bye Lane No.1,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION No. 4807/2012 Sri Bipul Chandra Barman S/O Late Ananta Barman Vill Mohkhali & P.O. Gopalthan PS-Belsor,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH )
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) KOHIMA BENCH Crl. Revision Petn. No. 2(K)/2010 1. Smti Zavekholu Epao, W/o. Vizekho
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI Writ Appeal No.136/2015 1. SRI CHITTARANJAN DASH CHIEF MANAGER (FINANCE
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No.8368 of 2003 1. Smti. Lilawati Neog Wife of Sri Roma Neog, 2.
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM : NAGALAND : MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No OF 2010
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM : NAGALAND : MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 4716 OF 2010 1. SRI SARIF UDDIN CHOUDHURY, SON OF SRI HABIB ALI CHOUDHURY, VILLAGE KALINAGAR,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 2973/2006 Sri Ajit Kumar Kakoti Lecturer, Son of Late Padmadhar Kakoti, Assam Textile
More informationWRIT PETITION (C) NO. 233O OF 2006
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND;MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 233O OF 2006 Sri Kajal Kumar Paul, Son of Late Rajkukar Paul, Resident of Santipara, Saratpalli,
More informationWrit Appeal No.43 of 2016
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND MIZORAM) Writ Appeal No.43 of 2016 Appellant: State of Assam, represented by its Commissioner and Special Secretary to
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 946 OF 2009
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 946 OF 2009 1. SRI PRAMOD KUMAR KEDIA, S/O. LATE BISWANATH KEDIA. 2. SRI SMTI. NIMAWATI KEDIA,
More informationW.P.(C) No. 61 of 2013
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) AIZAWL BENCH: AIZAWL W.P.(C) No. 61 of 2013 1. Dawrpui Vengthar Pig Producer Co-operative Society Ltd., B-2
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND,MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 157(AP) of 2012 M/S JORAM MPCS LTD. - Vs... Petitioner STATE OF ARUNACHAL
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION (C) NO.1723 OF 2009 Petitioner: Sri Sailendra Nath Kakati, Son of late Loknath Kakati, Resident
More informationCRP No. 369 / S/O Late Ganraram Upadhaya. S/O Late Ganraram Upadhaya
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Shri Vinit Tibrewala Son of Late Radheshyam tibrewala Main Road, Tezpur Town PO Tezpur Mouza-Mahabhairab Dist-Sonitput,
More information2. The Director General, Sashastra Seema Bal, Ministry of Home Affairs, East Block, R.K. Puram, New Delhi
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) W.P.(C) NO.2809 OF 2010 SHRI JIWAN CHANDRA PANT, S/o Shri L.P. Pant, Assistant
More informationWRIT PETITION NO. 911 OF 2016.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION NO. 911 OF 2016. IN THE MATTER OF: Legend Textiles Limited and others... Petitioners. -Versus- Bangladesh
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner.
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 30.07.2010 + WP (C) 11932/2009 M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner - versus THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER & ANR... Respondent
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07. Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Railways Act, 1989 W.P.(C) No.3245/2002 and CM No.11982/06, 761/07 Date of Decision: 6th August, 2008 M.K. SHARMA.. Petitioner Through : Mr. K.N. Kataria,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Crl. Revision 11/2004 Sri Pintu Das, Son of Late Arun Das Resident of Philobari
More informationWP(C) No of Mr. Shamsul Hoque Hazari, S/O Hazi Safiqur Rahman Hazari, Vill & PO-Krishnapur, PS-Silchar, Dist.-Cachar, Assam.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) WP(C) No. 4497 of 2011 Mr. Shamsul Hoque Hazari, S/O Hazi Safiqur Rahman Hazari, Vill & PO-Krishnapur, PS-Silchar,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2171 of 2017 Moizuddin Ahmed.. Petitioner
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No. 168/1999 On the death of Sibanath Sarma, the sole appellant his legal heirs
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, W.P.(C) 7068/2014
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgement delivered on: 12 th January, 2016 + W.P.(C) 7068/2014 RAJINDER PAL MALIK... Petitioner Represented by: Dr. Jose P. Verghese and Mr. Jawahar Singh,
More informationCont.Cas(C). No. 18of 2013
Cont.Cas(C). No. 18of 2013 HON BLE THE, Shri H.S.Thangkhiew, Sr. Advocate, assisted by Shri N.Mozika, Advocate, present for the petitioner. Smti. T.Yangi, Advocate, present for the respondents. Learned
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No.74 of 2001 On the death of the appellant, Mustt. Anowara Bewa, the following
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT APPEAL NO.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT APPEAL NO.278/2010 APPELLANT Md Aminul Haque Son of Late Samir Uddin Resident
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT RSA No. 94/ 2007 1. Musssamat Amirun Nessa, Wife of Late Safiquir Rahman 2. Hilal Uddin, Son
More information1. The State of Assam, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary to the Govt. of Assam, Education Department, Dispur, Guwahati-6.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 4717/2007. 1. Md. Alauddin Mondal, Son of Late Hazrat Ali Mondal, A resident of village-kaimari
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) M.F. A. NO. 90/2005
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) M.F. A. NO. 90/2005 United India Insurance Company Ltd.. Sri Shital Das -Vs- Petitioner Respondent For the petitioner:
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL WRIT JURISDICTION I.A NO OF 2012 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. OF 2012 IN THE MATTER OF: ASSAM SANMILITA MAHASANGHA & ORS PETITIONERS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA &
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RFA 27 of M/s Humanoid Laboratories,
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RFA 27 of 2004 1. M/s Humanoid Laboratories, Represented by its proprietor Shri Bipul Baruah, S/o Shri Bhaben
More informationHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5295 of 2010 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5296 OF 2010 AND SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5297 OF 2010 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER. Judgment delivered on: WP (C) 4642/2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX MATTER Judgment delivered on: 02.07.2008 WP (C) 4642/2008 M/S KESHAV SHARES and STOCKS LIMITED... Petitioner - versus - INCOME TAX OFFICER AND
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: Md. Anowar Hussain & others Jamal Uddin & others -Versus- Appellants... Respondents BEFORE :: HON BLE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) AND -VERSUS AND. Bhaban (3 rd Floor), 56, Agrabad C/A,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION ( SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION ) WRIT PETITION NO. 4891 OF 2014. IN THE MATTER OF: An application for extension of stay. AND IN THE MATTER OF: Clewiston
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Criminal Petition 21 (AP)2017 Shri Nabam Epo, S/o Lt. Nabam Echo, R/o Tayang Tarang (Emchi) village,
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 1. Misc. Case No.1926 of 2011 In C.Ex. App. No.1 of 2008. 2. Writ Appeal
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 21/2007
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: Babulal Choudhury and others Appellants -Versus- Ganesh Chandra Bharali and another... Respondents
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH )
Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) 1. M/S Standard Finance (P) Ltd., NBS Commercial Building, GS Road, Bhangagarh,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT OF FLAT. W.P.(C) No.5180/2011. Decided on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ALLOTMENT OF FLAT W.P.(C) No.5180/2011 Decided on: 16.01.2012 IN THE MATTER OF PITAMBER DUTT Through : Mr. V. Sridhar Reddy, Adv.... Petitioner versus
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C)No.5570/2016 1. Md. Nur Uddin Vs. The State of Assam and 4 Ors. Petitioner Respondents WP(C)No.5217/2016
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Petitioner : WP(C) NO.992 OF 2014 1. Sri Bijit Saikia, S/o Sri Tilak Saikia, R/o Deodia-Ati, P.O.-Bengena Ati
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 298 of 2013 ------- Md. Rizwan Akhtar son of Late Md. Suleman, resident of Ahmad Lane, Azad Basti, Gumla, P.O, P.S. and District: Gumla... Petitioner
More information$~26, 27 & 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 3539/2016. versus
$~26, 27 & 42 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 22.09.2016 + W.P.(C) 3539/2016 PHUNTSOK WANGYAL... Petitioner versus MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS & ORS... Respondents Advocates
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Petition No. 535 of 2011 1. M/S Brahmaputra Iron & Steel Company Pvt.
More informationThrough : Mr. A.K.Singla, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Pankaj Gupta and Ms.Promila K.Dhar Advocates. Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROVIDENT FUND MATTER Writ Petition (C) Nos.670, 671 & 672/2007 Reserved on : 01.02.2007 Date of decision : 09.02.2007 IN THE MATTER OF : PRUDENTIAL SPINNERS
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Writ Petition (C) No. 4612 of 2011 1) Abdul Gofur Mondal, Son of Late Nalu Mondal Village Boyzeralga part-iv, P.O-
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT: ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 2013 Abdul Baten Appellant -Versus- State of Assam & 15 Others Respondents -BEFORE-
More informationVill- Kunapara, P.O. Umarpur, Dist. Karimganj, Assam.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 1. Md. Nizam Uddin S/O Late Masaddar Ali Vill. & P.O. Umapur, Dist. Karimganj, Assam. 2 Md Helal Uddin, S/O Lt.
More informationPRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9844-9846 OF 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment pronounced on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Judgment reserved on:07.02.2012 Judgment pronounced on: 10.02.2012 W.P.(C) 734/2012 Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Another Petitioners Versus
More information