IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL ANSWER BRIEF OF RESPONDENT STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES
|
|
- Chastity Sparks
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL COUNSEL-MIDDLE REGION and JOHN W. JENNINGS, Petitioners. v. Case No. SC LT Case No. 1D FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Respondent. / AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL ANSWER BRIEF OF RESPONDENT STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES Richard T. Donelan, Jr. Attorney for Respondent Fla.Bar No Chief Counsel State of Florida Department of Financial Services Division of Legal Services 200 East Gaines Street Tallahassee, FL (850) fax (850)
2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Citations and Other Authorities...ii Preliminary Statement iv Summary of the Argument...1 Argument..2 Introduction..2 SATISFACTION OF THE JURISDICTIONAL STANDARD FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S DECISION HAS NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATED. Argument I..3 THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S DECISION HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EXPRESSLY AFFECT A CLASS OF CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATE OFFICERS. Argument II.7 THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S DECISION HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EXPRESSLY AND DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH ANY DECISION OF ANOTHER DISTRICT COURT OR THIS COURT ON THE SAME QUESTION OF LAW. Conclusion..10 Certificate of Service and Compliance...10 i
3 TABLE OF CITATIONS AND OTHER AUTHORITIES Cases Aravena v. Miami-Dade County 928 So.2d 1163 (Fla.2006)... 8, 9 Askew v. Cross Key Waterways 372 So.2d 913 (Fla. 1979)... 7 Bush v. Schiavo 885 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2004)... 7 Capaletti Bros., Inc. v. Dept. of Transportation 362 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1978) Chiles v. Children A, B. C. D, E. and F 589 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1991)... 7 Crossley v. State 596 So.2d 447, 449 (Fla. 1992)... 9 Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. Standard Oil Co 142 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 1962)... 6 Dodi Publ. Co. v. Editorial Am. 385 So.2d 1369 (Fla. 1980)... 8 Fla. Dept. of Revenue v. Cummings 930 So.2d 604 (Fla. 2006)... 9 Fla. State Bd. of Health v. Lewis 149 So.2d 41, 42 (Fla. 1963)... 6 Jenkins v. State 385 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 1980)... 3, 8 Larson v. Harrison 142 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 1962)... 6 Lewis v. Bank of Pasco County 346 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1976)... 7 Spradley v. State 293 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1974).... 4, 9 The Florida Star v. B.J.F 530 So.2d 286, (Fla.1988)... 3,8 Statutes Section , Florida Statutes... 5 Section (1)(b)(1), Florida Statutes... 4 ii
4 Section (15), Florida Statutes... 3 Rules Fla. R.App.P (a)(2)(A)(i-iv) Constitutional Provisions Article II, 3, Fla. Const. (1968)...7 Article III, 1, Fla. Const. (1968).. 7 Article V, 3(b)(3) Fla, Const. (1968)....3, 8 iii
5 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The following signals and abbreviations will be employed in this Jurisdictional Answer Brief: Respondent State of Florida Department of Financial Services will be referred to as the Department. Petitioner John W. Jennings, Capital Collateral Counsel for the Middle Region will be referred to as Mr. Jennings or CCRC-M. Petitioner Capital Collateral Regional Counsel- Middle Region will also be referred to as Mr. Jennings or CCRC-M. References to the Jurisdictional Initial Brief filed by the Appellees will be indicated by Jurisdictional Brief or the Brief, followed by the page number to which reference is made. The decision of the First District Court of Appeal which is the subject of the petition for review, Florida Department of Financial Services v. Capital Collateral Regional Counsel-Middle Region, 969 So.2d 527 (Fla. 1 st DCA 2007), will be referred to as the First District s decision or the decision. A copy of the decision is included in the Appendix. References to the decision will be to the page number of the decision as appended, e.g. (A-2). Unless otherwise indicated, all references to Florida Statutes are to Florida Statutes (2007). iv
6 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT In order to obtain discretionary review of a decision of a district court of appeal, a petitioner must show that one of the four tests contained in Article V (b)(3) of the Florida Constitution applies. The Jurisdictional Brief fails to demonstrate any constitutional basis for discretionary review jurisdiction. The First District s decision reversed an erroneous DOAH order regarding what constitutes a rule under the APA. It did not affect a class of constitutional or state officers and therefore provide jurisdiction for review. The decision did not directly, and in some way exclusively, affect the duties, powers, validity, formation, termination, or regulation of a particular class of constitutional or state officers. The decision does not affect the authority or duties of the two CCRCs. It does not expands the liability of Section , Florida Statutes, or prohibit the retention of outside lobbyists by CCRCs. The decision does not remove Mr. Jennings or the other CCRC from the legislative to the executive branch; the decision explicitly declined to opine on whether a CCRC was a legislative agency. The decision does not affect the Commission on Capital Cases. Even if it did, the Commission is not a class of state officers; it is a single state 1
7 entity. Nor does the decision reduce the authority of the Legislature to pass legislation that creates legislative agencies. Plenary authority remains with the Legislature under Article III, Section 1 of the Florida Constitution. For conflict jurisdiction to vest, there must be some statement or citation that hypothetically could create conflict if there were another opinion reaching a contrary result. In the absence of an identified statement effectively establishing the point of law upon which the decision rests it is impossible to determine the existence of any express and direct conflict between the decision sought to be reviewed and any other appellate decision. The Brief offers a string cite of 10 cases as a body of decisional law with which the First District s decision is supposed to conflict, but it never explains where, why or how the supposed conflict occurs. ARGUMENT INTRODUCTION: THE JURISDICTIONAL STANDARD FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S DECISION HAS NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATED. This Court may only exercise jurisdiction to grant discretionary review of a decision of a district court of appeal which: (1) "expressly declares valid a state statute"; (2) "expressly construes a provision of the state or federal constitution"; 2
8 (3) "expressly affects a class of constitutional or state officers"; or (4) "expressly and directly conflicts with a decision of another district court of appeal or the supreme court on the same question of law." See Art. V, 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. (1968),; Fla. R. App. P (a)(2)(A)(iiv); The Florida Star v. B.J.F., 530 So.2d 286, (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State, 385 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). The Jurisdictional Brief fails to demonstrate any sound constitutional basis for discretionary jurisdiction to review the correct decision of the lower appellate tribunal. The Brief erroneously claims that review jurisdiction exists under the last two of the four tests identified above. I. THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S DECISION HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EXPRESSLY AFFECT A CLASS OF CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATE OFFICERS. The First District Court of Appeal s decision below is this succinct sentence: Because the ALJ erred in finding that the Department had a rule placing the CCRCs in the executive branch, the order finding an invalid, unpromulgated rule is REVERSED. (A-3). The decision rejected a plainly erroneous order entered by a DOAH ALJ and illuminated Florida administrative law jurisprudence concerning the question of what constitutes a rule within the meaning of Section (15), Florida Statutes. Nothing in the decision, however, requires any state or constitutional officer 3
9 to do or not do anything. Because the decision did not pronounce any mandate or prohibition directed expressly at the powers or authority of any state or constitutional officer, it does not affect a class of officers. In Spradley v. State, 293 So.2d 697, 701, (Fla. 1974), this Court discussed when a decision affecting a class of constitutional or state officers would vest the Court with certiorari jurisdiction: A decision which affects a class of constitutional or state officers must be one which does more than simply modify or construe or add to the case law which comprises much of the substantive and procedural law of this state. Such cases naturally affect all classes of constitutional or state officers, in that the members of these classes are bound by the law the same as every citizen. To vest this Court with certiorari jurisdiction, a decision must directly, and in some way exclusively, affect the duties, powers, validity, formation, termination, or regulation of a particular class of constitutional or state officers. (emphasis original). The decision below certainly construes the rule-making requirements of Chapter 120, Florida Statutes, which apply equally to State agencies as defined in Section (1)(b)(1), Florida Statutes. But it does not directly or exclusively affect the duties, powers, validity, formation, termination, or regulation of any particular class of constitutional or state officers. Reversing DOAH, the First District held that the Department was not obligated to promulgate an investigative report or a legal opinion as rules in the absence of enforcement action by the agency. The District Court of Appeal specifically noted that whether the CCRC was an executive or 4
10 legislative agency was not an issue on appeal and stated we express no opinion on the matter. See A- 2, fn.2. The decision contains no judicial statement relative to the authority, duties, or responsibilities of Mr. Jennings as the occupant of the office of CCRC for the middle district. The decision, at A-2, does confirm that Mr. Jennings would be entitled to a clear point of entry in the event the Department were to undertake an action against him personally based upon Section , Florida Statutes, but this principle has been recognized in Florida administrative law since See Capaletti Bros., Inc. v. Dept. of Transportation, 362 So.2d 346 (Fla. 1 st DCA 1978). The Brief, at page 7, however, claims that the decision in question expressly affects not only Mr. Jennings but the entire class of state officers appointed pursuant to section (1), Fla. Stat. (2007) [i.e., the two CCRCs] by expanding the liability of section to include those appointed under section (1). The Brief does not cite any statement found in the decision as support for this assertion. This claim is simply wrong; nothing in the decision expands the liability of Section , Florida Statutes, in any respect. The Brief, at page 7, makes a second, equally unfounded claim: that the decision reduces the authority of those [sic] class of officers to effectively represent CCRC-M and CCRC-S before the Legislature and 5
11 executive branch by prohibiting the retention of outside lobbyists. No statement in the decision is identified as support for the claim. The decision, however, announces no prohibition of the retention of outside lobbyists. The Brief, at page 7, makes a third, equally unfounded claim: that the decision results in a wholesale removal of Mr. Jennings, and other similarly situated class [sic] of officers, from the legislative branch to the executive branch. Again, no statement from the decision that supports the claim is identified. In fact, the First District expressly declined to reach the issue of branch placement for the regional counsel, see A- 2, fn.2. The Brief, also at page 7, wrongly claims that decision affects an entirely different class of state officers: the Commission on Capital Cases. Even if the decision sought to be reviewed could actually be said to affect the Commission on Capital Cases which the Department in no way concedes the Commission is not a class of officers; rather, as an advisory commission, it is a single state entity. A group of officers composing a single government entity such as a board or commission would not, as such board or commission, constitute a class. (emphasis original). Fla. State Bd. of Health v. Lewis, 149 So. 2d 41, 42 (Fla. 1963) (State Board of Health not class of officers); see also Larson v. Harrison, 142 So.2d 727 (Fla. 1962) (no class of State Treasurers); Crown Central Petroleum Corp. v. 6
12 Standard Oil Co. 142 So.2d 731 (Fla. 1962). (no class of Secretaries of State). There is no class of Commissions on Capital Cases. Finally, the Brief, again at page 7, finds still another class expressly affected by the decision: the Florida Legislature. According to the Brief, the decision reduces the authority of the Legislature to pass legislation that creates legislative agencies subject to their [sic] exclusive oversight. Contrary to this unfounded claim, nothing in the First District s opinion displaces or can displace the Legislature as the supreme legislative authority of the State of Florida. See Article III, 1, Fla. Const. (1968). Neither the Department nor the First District Court of Appeal has the power to usurp constitutional legislative authority. See Art. II, 3, Fla. Const. (1968); Bush v. Schiavo, 885 So.2d 321 (Fla. 2004); Chiles v. Children A, B. C. D, E. and F, 589 So.2d 260 (Fla. 1991); Askew v. Cross Key Waterways, 372 So.2d 913 (Fla. 1979); Lewis v. Bank of Pasco County, 346 So.2d 53 (Fla. 1976). The Department has never claimed to have an unconstitutional power to alter the fundamental nature of any statutorilycreated state entity by essentially removing it from the legislative branch and placing it in the executive branch if it so pleases. II. THE FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL S DECISION HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EXPRESSLY AND DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH ANY DECISION OF ANOTHER DISTRICT COURT OR THIS COURT ON THE SAME QUESTION OF LAW. 7
13 The Jurisdictional Brief fails to identify any specific decision of this Court or of any district court of appeal that expressly and directly conflicts with the First District s decision below. Instead, the Brief, at p. 8-9, offers only a concatenation of 10 case citations and asserts that the decisions show the existence of conflict jurisdiction. See Dodi Publ. Co. v. Editorial Am., 385 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1980). See generally Jenkins v. State, 385 So.2d 1356 (Fla. 1980). The Brief does not discuss why there is express or direct conflict between any of the proffered string of appellate decisions and the decision of the First District below. No attempt has been made to identify any particular point of law as the subject of any conflict on the same point of law for purposes of establishing conflict jurisdiction in this Court. See Aravena v. Miami-Dade County, 928 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 2006) The Brief thus fails utterly to demonstrate the existence of lawful conflict jurisdiction that would support discretionary review by this Court of the decision below under Article V, 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. For conflict jurisdiction to vest, there must be some statement or citation that hypothetically could create conflict if there were another opinion reaching a contrary result. The Florida Star v. B.J.F., 530 So.2d 8
14 286, 288 (Fla. 1988). The Brief does not identify any such statement or citation contained in the First District s opinion. When, as here, a petitioner complains about the result reached by the lower appellate court and not about the specific legal rationale expressed in the court s written decision, it is no different than if he were seeking review of a per curiam affirmance without written opinion. In Aravena v. Miami-Dade County, 928 So.2d 1163, 1166 (Fla. 2006), the Court stated this test of conflict jurisdiction: whether the holdings of two different district courts on the same point of law are irreconcilable. See also Crossley v. State, 596 So.2d 447, 449 (Fla. 1992). All three district court of appeal opinions cited in the Brief are distinguishable, and these decisions are not irreconcilable with the decision of the First District. None of these cases is factually similar to the case below. Because of this, none is irreconcilable with the decision under review. See Spradley, supra, at 701 (no conflict when different facts cause different results). Fla. Dept. of Revenue v. Cummings, 930 So.2d 604 (Fla. 2006), is the epitome of irreconcilable district court conflict: diametrically opposite DCA decisions on the same question of law. Id., at No such express and direct conflict has been demonstrated here. 9
15 CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the Petition for Review must be DISMISSED. Respectfully submitted, Richard T. Donelan, Jr. Fla. Bar No Chief Counsel Department of Financial Services 200 East Gaines Street Tallahassee, FL (850) fax (850) CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I herby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Amended Jurisdictional Answer Brief of Respondent was furnished by U.S. Mail this 7 th day of March, 2008 to Peter J. Cannon, Esq., Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, 3801 Corporex Drive, Suite 210, Tampa, FL Richard T. Donelan, Jr. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE Pursuant to Fla. R. App. P (a)(2), I certify that this computergenerated brief is prepared in Times New Roman 14-point font and complies with the font requirements of Rule 9.210, Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Richard T. Donelan, Jr. 10
16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CAPITAL COLLATERAL REGIONAL COUNSEL-MIDDLE REGION and JOHN W. JENNINGS, Petitioners. v. Case No. SC LT Case No. 1D FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, Respondent. / APPENDIX TO JURISDICTIONAL ANSWER BRIEF OF STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES Florida Department of Financial Services v. A-1 Capital Collateral Regional Counsel-Middle Region, 969 So.2d 528 (Fla. 1 st DCA 2007)
An appeal from an order of the Division of Administrative Hearings.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 16753499 Electronically Filed 08/05/2014 04:58:21 PM RECEIVED, 8/5/2014 17:03:44, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC14-1360 L.T. CASE NO.: 2D13-3872
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents. PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Richard Zaldivar, Esquire Jay M. Levy,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT PAMELA JO BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL
Electronically Filed 06/27/2013 12:18:58 PM ET RECEIVED, 6/27/2013 12:23:39, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JOHNNIE LEE REMBERT, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC13-1125
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC FIRST DCA CASE NO.: 1D L.T. CASE NO.: L
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROB BRAYSHAW, ET AL., Petitioners, v. CASE NO.: SC11-507 FIRST DCA CASE NO.: 1D09-5894 L.T. CASE NO.: 2009-1337L AGENCY FOR WORKFORCE INNOVATION, Respondent. / RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLIAM E. WILLIAMSON, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC08-2192 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KEVIN TRACY. v. Petitioner, Case No. SC07-2057 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE TALLAHASSEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DELMART E.J.M. VREELAND, II, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC11-2238 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT PAMELA JO BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JESSE JAMES HURRY, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC09-980 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA MEGGS PATE TALLAHASSEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLIAM MURPHY ALLEN JR., v. Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, CASE NO. SC06-1644 L.T. CASE NO. 1D04-4578 Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KENNETH JENKINS, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-2088 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. SC
Electronically Filed 08/26/2013 04:20:02 PM ET RECEIVED, 8/26/2013 16:23:40, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JAMES LEVOY WATERS, Petitioner, v. SHERIFF, ESCAMBIA COUNTY FLORIDA,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC DCA Case No. 3D v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANGELO KYRELIS, Petitioner, S.C. Case No. SC12-642 DCA Case No. 3D11-1730 v. L.T. Case No. 08-CA-45992 ONEWEST BANK, FSB (SUBSTITUTED PARTY FOR FORMER PLAINTIFF INDYMAC
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STERLING R. LANIER, JR. v. Petitioner, Case No. SC08-19 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / AMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL TRISHA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BEST DIVERSIFIED, INC. and PETER HUFF. Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC06-1823 BEST DIVERSIFIED, INC. and PETER HUFF Petitioners, vs. OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA and STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondents.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Lower Tribunal No. 2D ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION BASED ON ALLEGED CONFLICT OF DECISIONS
Electronically Filed 07/31/2013 04:44:07 PM ET RECEIVED, 7/31/2013 16:48:32, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT VON GOETZMAN Petitioner/Pro Se SC No. 13-9999 v.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC04-58 ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT DEREK LEWIS, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC04-58 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12- DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, - versus - STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL CASE NO. 4D10-3345 RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC 07-1021 CLEO LECROY, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARIANNE F. CASWELL, v. Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-014 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC10-2418 RANDY SCOTT RIESEL, Respondent. / JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT NANCY A. DANIELS PUBLIC DEFENDER DAVID P. GAULDIN
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, DCA NO.: 2D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TODD A. HATFIELD, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC10-2404 STATE OF FLORIDA, DCA NO.: 2D09-5938 Respondent. 05-18908CFANO ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA VERNON GOINS, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC06-356 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC12- ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA LARRY BRYANT NETTLES, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Case No. SC12- L.T. No. 1D11-5951 Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC L.T. No.: CA 13
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA BEATRICE HURST, as Personal Representative of the Estate of KENNETH HURST, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC07-722 L.T. No.:04-24071 CA 13 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC FIRST DISTRICT CASE NO. 1D L.T. CASE NO CA WENDY HABEGGER, Petitioner, vs.
Filing # 11759404 Electronically Filed 03/26/2014 10:24:29 AM RECEIVED, 3/26/2014 10:28:40, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC13-2506 FIRST DISTRICT CASE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1605 ALVIN LEWIS, Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondents. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Seeking Discretionary Review from the District Court of
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC, vs. Petitioner, Supreme Court Case No. SC03-2063 THIRD DCA CASE NO. 02-3002 LT Case No. 00-21824 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MYRA VAIVADA, Petitioner, CASE NO. SC04-867 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF RESPONDENT CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA RESPONDENTS ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL AND RSKCO S ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA VICKI LUCAS, vs. Petitioner, ENGLEWOOD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL and RSKCO, CASE NO.: SC07-1736 L.T. Case No.: 1D06-5161 Respondents. / RESPONDENTS ENGLEWOOD
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC LOWER COURT NO.: 4D JACK LIEBMAN. Petitioner. vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC03-1896 LOWER COURT NO.: 4D00-2883 JACK LIEBMAN Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC LTNOS: 5D FCllR 2011H0278 DOAlH2-0537
E]cctronically Filed 05/09/2013 0]:l?:37 PM ET RECEIVED.5/9/2013 l3:l8:32. Thomas D. Hall. Clerk. Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANGELA TAGLIAF ER R1 and BETSY STEPlIENS. Petitioner, CASE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11- THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY a Florida Corporation,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC11- THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D10-108 UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY a Florida Corporation, Petitioner, -v- KENDALL SOUTH MEDICAL CENTER INC., & DAILYN
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC: 4 th DCA CASE NO: 4D04-4825 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. SALVATORE BENNETT, Respondent. PETITIONER'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. vs. L.T. NO.: 3D ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE RIGGINS Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC06-205 vs. L.T. NO.: 3D04-2620 AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK, Respondent. / ON NOTICE TO INVOKE DISCRETIONARY JURISDICTION FROM
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D CITY OF MIAMI. Petitioner. vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL.
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC04- L.T. Case No. 3D01-3050 CITY OF MIAMI Petitioner vs. SIDNEY S. WELLMAN, ET AL. Respondents RESPONDENTS ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NOS. 5D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC12-1661 L.T. CASE NOS. 5D10-2410 FLORIDA INSURANCE GUARANTY ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. WHISTLER'S PARK, INC., a Florida Corporation Respondent. FLORIDA INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC L.T. NO. 1D STATE OF FLORIDA,
Filing # 11092791 Electronically Filed 03/07/2014 02:35:35 PM RECEIVED, 3/7/2014 14:38:38, John A Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NOEL PLANK, Petitioner, v CASE NO SC14-414
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KEITH N. SMITH, DC# 736238 JODY C. COLVIN, DC # 115879 WILLIAM WRIGHT, DC# 046175, Petitioners, vs. Case No. SC05-776 L.T. No. 2D04-2735 THE FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC06-56 BEVERLY PENZELL AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioners, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC06-56 BEVERLY PENZELL AND BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioners, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, Respondent. RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC BETTY JEAN MANN, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA Case No. SC02-2646 BETTY JEAN MANN, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA and ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS Respondents. PETITIONER
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Filing # 15572814 Electronically Filed 07/03/2014 05:32:02 PM RECEIVED, 7/3/2014 17:33:34, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court MOHAMMAD ANWAR FARID AL-SALEH, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. PATRICK PALUMBO Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA PATRICK PALUMBO Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. CASE NO. 5D08-1275 LOWER COURT NO. 05-CF-0006841-O APPELLANT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF ON REQUEST
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D VINCENT MARGIOTTI. Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-2290 DCA CASE NO. 3D02-2862 VINCENT MARGIOTTI Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DERRICK GURLEY, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. Case No. SC th DCA Case No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DERRICK GURLEY, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. Case No. SC05-1376 4 th DCA Case No. 4D04-2697 RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC Lower Tribunal No.: 1D ADAMS GRADING AND TRUCKING, INC. and JOHN M.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC07-1175 Lower Tribunal No.: 1D06-1760 ADAMS GRADING AND TRUCKING, INC. and JOHN M. BLOODSWORTH, Petitioners, vs. MICHAEL E. GRAY, Respondent. ON REVIEW FROM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SCO5-938 Lower Case No. 3D RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROCCO NAPOLITANO Petitioner, v. Case No. SCO5-938 Lower Case No. 3D04--318 STATE OF FLORIDA, Florida Department of Corrections Respondent. ================================================================
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Petition for review of District Court of Appeal Case No. 1D BEVERLY ROGERS, et al.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC05-1495 Petition for review of District Court of Appeal Case No. 1D03-3325 BEVERLY ROGERS, et al., Petitioners, v. GLENDA E. HOOD, as Secretary of State for the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC07-1672 PETER SPOREA, ET AL., Petitioners, vs. CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT S AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Appeal from the
More informationPETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT E. GONZALEZ, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. : : : Case No. : : : 2D06-1619 DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
Electronically Filed 05/17/2013 11:04:14 AM ET RECEIVED, 5/17/2013 11:08:35, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA MARK ERIC OSTERBACK, Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC13-812 STATE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (4 th DCA 4D ) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1298 (4 th DCA 4D05-1624) MALCOLM HOSWELL, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION LAURA FISHER ZIBURA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO. SC L.T. NO. 3D MAURICE WHIPPLE, Petitioner. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO. SC05-394 L.T. NO. 3D03-2877 MAURICE WHIPPLE, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION CHARLES J. CRIST,
More informationN0. SC [LOWER TRIBUNAL NOS. 3D ] In the Supreme Court of Florida TRUST CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION,
N0. SC11-353 [LOWER TRIBUNAL NOS. 3D09-2568] In the Supreme Court of Florida TRUST CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Petitioner/Appellant, v. AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Respondent/Appellee. On Appeal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIS, Petitioner. vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-1056 TIMOTHY SCOTT HARRIS, Petitioner vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL McCOLLUM Attorney General Tallahassee,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA MARK ONDREY, vs. Appellant/Petitioner, FLORENCE PATTERSON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOHN WILLIAM PATTERSON, deceased. Case No.: SC04-961
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, DCA CASE No. 5D v. CASE NO. SC ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SAUL CARMONA, Petitioner, DCA CASE No. 5D03-229 v. CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL JURISDICTIONAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PERRY TANKSLEY, Petitioner, vs. 214 MAIN STREET CORP. and 3B REALTY NORTH, INC., Sup. Ct. Case No: SC07-272 Second DCA Case No: 2D06-768 Respondents. *********************************/
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
Electronically Filed 05/20/2013 12:08:02 PM ET RECEIVED, 5/20/2013 12:08:39, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC13-782 L.T. Case Nos. 4DII-3838; 502008CA034262XXXXMB
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC L.T. No. DO LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC06-189 L.T. No. DO4-5585 LAKELAND REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC., Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION; WINTER HAVEN HOSPITAL,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CLARENCE DENNIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) CASE NO. SC09-941 ) L.T. CASE NO. 4D07-3945 STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) PETITIONER S AMENDED REPLY BRIEF ON THE MERITS
More informationSUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA FRANCIS D. PETSCH, CASE NO. SC04-917 Petitioner, v. ORKIN EXTERMINATING COMPANY, INC.; ROLLINS, INC; DAVID BERNSTEIN, individually, and RICK PROTHERO,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DANIEL L. MURRAY & JAMES L. BRINK, Petitioners, v. District Court Case No. 5D10-1376 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF PETITIONERS J. BRIAN PAGE Florida
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC LEONARDO DIAZ, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1031 LEONARDO DIAZ, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC10-980 (Third DCA Case No. 3D09-3360) (Eleventh Judicial Circuit No. 09-81373 CA 09) MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Petitioner, vs. ELBA CARBAJAL, FORFEITURE OF U.S. CURRENCY
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 12/21/2016 10:21 AM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal SOLO AERO CORP., a Florida corporation, vs. Petitioner, AMERICA-CV
More informationIN THli SUPRiiMli COURT OF FLORIDA. CASH NO.: SCl ON REVIEW FROMTIIF DISTR[CTCOURTOI APPliAI. FIRST DISTRICL STATE OF FLORIDA
E]cctronically Filed 03/] I/2013 05:0]:34 PM ET RECE]VED.3/11/2Sl3 17:03:32, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THli SUPRiiMli COURT OF FLORIDA CASH NO.: SCl3-262 PÁl.MlTI~l O Bl.LFF PROPERTll-S.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ORANGE, vs. Petitioner, CASE NO.: SC04-2045 Lower Tribunal No.: 5D03-4065 RALEIGH WILSON, SR. EVELYN WILSON and RALEIGH WILSON, JR., Respondents.
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC R.H., G.W., T.L., juveniles, Petitioners, vs.
Electronically Filed 03/14/2013 02:35:25 PM ET RECEIVED, 3/14/2013 14:38:34, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC13-326 R.H., G.W.,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO. 3D THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC05-1141 DCA CASE NO. 3D03-2169 THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, -vs- MAXIMILIANO ROMERO, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC- IAN MANUEL L.T. No. 2D ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC- IAN MANUEL L.T. No. 2D08-3494 Respondent. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
More informationCASE NO. SC L.T. CASE NO. 4D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE STANEK-COUSINS, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
CASE NO. SC05-1987 L.T. CASE NO. 4D05-1129 ========================================================== IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CATHERINE STANEK-COUSINS, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC L.T. NO. 1D DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE,
SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA J. ANTONIO ALDRETE, M.D., Petitioner, v. CASE NO. SC04-1812 L.T. NO. 1D02-4457 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, BOARD OF MEDICINE, Respondent. / RESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION ON REVIEW
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA. v. 1DCA Case No. 1D APPELLANT S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS
FAIR INSURANCE RATES IN MONROE, INC. Appellant, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA v. 1DCA Case No. 1D17-1081 OFFICE OF INSURANCE REGULATION, and CITIZENS PROPERTY INSURANCE
More informationRESPONDENT S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA TRUST CARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC., Petitioner/Appellant, CASE NO.: SC11-353 v. DCA NO.: 3D09-2568 STATE OF FLORIDA, AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, Respondent/Appellee.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA RESPONDENT S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF
Filing # 8803708 Electronically Filed 01/03/2014 05:25:42 PM RECEIVED, 1/3/2014 17:28:35, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. and ANHEUSER-BUSCH,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner,
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08- Fourth District Court of Appeal Case No. 4D06-5070 JAN DANZIGER, Petitioner, v. ALTERNATIVE LEGAL, INC., Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW OF A DECISION
More informationCharlie Crist, Attorney General; Jonathan A. Glogau, Chief, Complex Litigation; Erik M. Figlio, Deputy Solicitor General, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE, DIVISION OF ELECTIONS, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Petitioner, Case No. SC PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, v. Petitioner, Case No. SC05-516 HERBERT DICKEY, Respondent. PETITIONER'S REPLY BRIEF CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL ROBERT R. WHEELER TALLAHASSEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D
Electronically Filed 10/09/2013 11:26:52 AM ET RECEIVED, 10/9/2013 11:28:34, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC2013-1834 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 4D11-3004
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA Supreme Court Case No. SC02-2736 5th DCA Case Nos.: 5D01-1662, 5D01-1663, 5D01-1664, 5D01-1665 & 5D01-3426 GREAT AMERICAN RESTAURANTS, INC., et al, v. Petitioners/Appellants,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC04-442 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D02-101 JOHN RHAMES, DAN MATHIS, and ROBERT MARTO, vs. Petitioners, CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, a Municipality, Respondent. / On
More informationAMENDED JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT BOB WHITE, SHERIFF OF PASCO COUNTY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA BOB WHITE, SHERIFF OF PASCO COUNTY, Appellant, Case No.: SC11-445 vs. L.T. No.: 1D09-3106 (First DCA) FLORIDA STATE LODGE, FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, INC., Appellee. / ON
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC DCA CASE NO.4D LT. NO CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SC CASE NO. SC10-2361 DCA CASE NO.4D08-1375 LT. NO. 06-4008CFA02 SHARA N. COOPER, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO.: SC11-734 THIRD DCA CASE NO. s: 3D09-3102 & 3D10-848 CIRCUIT CASE NO.: 09-25070-CA-01 UNITED AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC (Lower Tribunal Case No. 3D07-818) MARTHA VALDEZ, Petitioner, vs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC08-670 (Lower Tribunal Case No. 3D07-818) MARTHA VALDEZ, Petitioner, vs. HOMEOWNERS ASSISTANCE GROUP, LLC., A Florida limited liability company, Respondent. RESPONSE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA KEITH R. HARRIS, DC# 635563 Petitioner, vs. Case No. SC08-1367 L.T. No. 1D06-5125 THE FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent. / RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURIDICTION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC07-901 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ERIC S. SMITH, Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC JUDY RODRIGO, Petitioner, vs. STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.
Filing # 21934398 Electronically Filed 12/23/2014 04:16:21 PM RECEIVED, 12/23/2014 16:18:43, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC14-1846 JUDY RODRIGO, Petitioner,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. Case No. SC LCN: 4D STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA WILLIE FRANK DAVIS, Petitioner, v. Case No. SC09-192 LCN: 4D08-4272 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION BILL MCCOLLUM ATTORNEY GENERAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA NO:SC STEVE LYNCH, Petitioner, 477 DCA CASE NO: 3D1-61 Vs. L.T. CASE NO: C
.t ON cro G IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Joy., P, SC NO:SC14-2065 STEVE LYNCH, Sy Petitioner, 477 DCA CASE NO: 3D1-61 Vs. L.T. CASE NO: 01-368-C HON. PAM BONDI-ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF FLORIDA, et
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ROY McDONALD, Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. Case No. SC
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ROY McDONALD, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. Case No. SC05-2141 ****************************************************************** ON APPEAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC L.T. NOs: 4D , 4D THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC07-2402 L.T. NOs: 4D07-2378, 4D07-2379 THE SCHOOL BOARD OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Petitioner, v. SURVIVORS CHARTER SCHOOLS, INC., Respondent. On Discretionary
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DEMARIOUS CALDWELL, Petitioner, vs. CASE NO. SC12 - DCA No. 4D10-3345 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF On Review from the District Court of
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DAVID M. POLEN, v. ROSA POLEN, Petitioner, Respondent. / CASE NO. SC06-1226 4 TH DCA CASE NO. 4D06-1002 AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Respectfully submitted, JOEL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. L.T. No. 1D
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT ANDERSON Petitioner, VS. Case No. SC07-306 L.T. No. 1D06-2486 FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On petition for discretionary
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANTHONY FRANCIS, Petitioner, vs. CASE NO. SC07-1020 (L.T. CASE NO. 4D05-4542 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. PETITIONER=S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Review from the District
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM A DECISION OF THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
LARSON & LARSON, P.A., HERBERT W. LARSON, and H. WILLIAM LARSON, JR., IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Defendants/Petitioners, -vs- Sup. Ct. Case No. SC08-428 TSE INDUSTRIES, INC., Respondent. / ON PETITION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: SC DCA Case No.: 4D L.T. Case No.: CDDR FA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: SC05-1815 DCA Case No.: 4D04-651 L.T. Case No.: CDDR 02-10768 FA CARLIE CARGILE-SCHRAGE, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DONALD BRUCE SCHRAGE, Respondent/Appellee. On
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA NICHOLAS J. MORANA and ANN L. MORANA, Petitioners, v. Case No.: SC-08-988 HERNANDO COUNTY, etc., and KAREN NICOLAI, in her Official Capacity as the Hernando
More information