IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants. RENASANT BANK Appellee

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants. RENASANT BANK Appellee"

Transcription

1 E-Filed Document Aug :21: CA COA Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants v. RENASANT BANK Appellee REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANTS BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI Submitted by Counsel for the Appellants, Brown Lakeland Properties and Charles H. Brown: Pamela L. Hancock (MSB# 10676) Jeffrey B. McGuire (MSB# ) HANCOCK LAW FIRM, PLLC Post Office Box 1078 Ridgeland, Mississippi Telephone: (601) Facsimile: (601)

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...2 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES...3 ARGUMENT...4 I. Renasant Bank is not entitled to summary judgment against Charles H. Brown individually...4 II. III. There are genuine issues of material fact that require the denial of summary judgment...6 Renasant s argument regarding notice does not entitle it to summary judgment...9 CONCLUSION...10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Allied Steel v. Cooper, 607 So.2d 118 (Miss. 1992)...5, 8 Eller Media Co. v. Mississippi Transportation Commission, 882 So.2d 198 (Miss. 2004)...9 Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP v. Pitre, 35 So.3d 494 (Miss. 2010)...8 Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 153 So.3d 703 (Miss. 2014)...9 Hartman v. McInnis, 996 So.2d 704 (Miss. 2007)...7 Heigle v. Heigle, 771 So.2d 341 (Miss. 2000)...9 Karpinsky v. American National Ins. Co., 109 So.3d 84, 88 (Miss. 2013)...7 Lakeland Hillsdale Estates, Inc. v. Galloway, 473 So.2d 461 (Miss. 1985)...9 Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Franklin County Timber Co., 488 So.2d 782 (Miss. 1986)...8 Mississippi Valley Title Insurance Co. v. Horne Construction Co., Inc., 372 So.2d 1270 (Miss. 1979)...9 Myles v. Cox, 217 So.2d 31 (Miss. 1968)...6, 8 Newsom v. Newsom, 557 So.2d 511 (Miss. 1990)...5, 8 Rebelwood, Ltd. v. Hinds County, 544 So.2d 1356 (Miss. 1989)...8 Weyburn v. Watkins, 90 Miss. 728, 44 So. 145 (1907)...5 Publications Black s Law Dictionary 414 (6 th ed. 1991)

4 ARGUMENT I. Renasant Bank is not entitled to summary judgment against Charles H. Brown individually. Renasant argues that it is entitled to summary judgment against Charles H. Brown, individually, as a result of the guaranty he executed with Renasant. Renasant seemingly concedes that issues may and do exist with regard to the grant of summary judgment in their favor against Brown Lakeland Properties, and as such, have shifted their focus to the individual debtor. Importantly, the Appellants have never been heard to argue that a debt was never owed to Renasant, or that the debt is a fiction or invalid. The argument by Appellants has always been, and remains, that a genuine disagreement - and inherently, a genuine issue of material fact - exists between the parties as to what the amount owed pursuant to the original contract currently is. Summary judgment is wholly inappropriate, even in light of a personal unlimited guaranty, when the party against which the repayment is sought, can and has advanced argument and evidence supporting his theory that the amount for which the lender seeks repayment is incorrect at best, and a question to be determined by an unbiased jury, at minimum. That is to say, that even if a jury ultimately determines that the guaranty executed by Charles H. Brown in favor of Renasant Bank obligates him to repay Renasant Bank individually, that the amount of the same is a question for the same jury. Renasant summarily asserts that the defense of fairness of sales price is only available to Brown Lakeland Properties as the actual borrower, and not to Charles H. Brown individually, as the guarantor, ostensibly based on the language of the subject guaranty, which importantly does not waive fairness. Even still, this position ignores the obvious issue, however, that an individual guarantor is only liable to cover the indemnified borrower up to the actual amount owed to the -4-

5 lender. The argument, as presented by Renasant, would apply to an issue of non-payment, not one of proof, which Appellants do not necessarily contend. Essentially, a continuing guaranty, as described by Renasant, is a mechanism whereby it is extremely difficult, if not impossible, for an individual guarantor to escape repayment, but the amount to be repaid still must be shown and proven. The converse would be absurd. Banks could simply refuse to allow guarantors the ability to alleviate any of the burden when a loan got behind, and then call the note without any consideration as to whether the amount owed is what is actually owed. The practice is predatory. Again, the present matter creates issues for a jury that are simply not appropriate for summary judgment, and require the impartial consideration of a struck jury. Renasant has failed to prove as a matter of law that it is entitled to the amount it alleges, in that its conduct surrounding the subject foreclosure sales goes beyond a consideration of fairness of price, but to one of fairness of dealing, as was discussed in Appellants original brief. Appellants have submitted a purchase offer and affidavit that show that a bona fide purchaser was prepared to pay Ten Dollars ($10.00) per square foot (or $435, per acre) for the vacant Rankin County lot, and that those same purchasers were interested in purchasing a larger section of land from the same parcel. That purchaser was Veracity, LLC, to whom the whole tract was later sold by Renasant at a lower price, representing merely twenty-seven percent (27%) of what the value of the tract would have been had Appellants been allowed to sell to Veracity, LLC according to the terms of the original purchase agreement and subsequent request to purchase more land. [The Mississippi Supreme Court has] long followed the rule of thumb of about forty percent of fair market value first articulated in Weyburn v. Watkins, 90 Miss. 728, 44 So. 145 (1907). Allied Steel v. Cooper, 607 So.2d 118 (Miss. 1992) (citing Newsom v. Newsom, 557 So.2d 511 (Miss. 1990) and -5-

6 Myles v. Cox, 217 So.2d 31 (Miss. 1968)). By example, a price of thirty-six percent (36%) of fair market value at a foreclosure sale has been found to be inadequate. Id. Renasant contends in its brief that a purchase offer is not a reliable or acceptable means of valuation for land, ostensibly because the same is done at arms length, and one of the parties can back out at any moment. The problem with this assertion is that, in this instance, Appellants had no authority to compel the sale to go through, and were at the mercy of Renasant to accept. Renasant, as it were, of course, squashed the deal, and later sold the same parcel and more to the same buyers at a lower price. Had the original sale gone through, the amount owed under the note would have not only been mitigated, but perhaps extinguished. That being the case, Renasant would be correct in its assertion that a purchase offer is a speculative method of valuation, but the fact that their overt actions led to the cancellation of the purchase offer herein that provided the valuation that they seek to squash creates a fact question for a jury, and not a legal question. It is really rather simple. Renasant asserts that the purchase offer can not be offered to prove value. Even so, it can be offered to prove to a jury that Renasant did not properly mitigate, or that it actively interfered with a business relationship between Appellants and a third-party. For these reasons, the grant of summary judgment should be reversed. II. There are genuine issues of material fact that require the denial of summary judgment. Renasant contends that Appellants have failed to establish that any fact issues exist, for want of hard proof of the same. The Mississippi Supreme Court recently clarified the summary-judgment standard, explaining that [t]he movant bears the burden of persuading the trial judge that: (1) no genuine issue of material fact exists, and (2) on the basis of the facts established, he is entitled to -6-

7 judgment as a matter of law. Karpinsky v. American National Ins. Co., 109 So.3d 84, 88 (Miss. 2013). The Supreme Court further stated that [t]he movant bears the burden of production, if, at trial, he would bear the burden of proof on the issue raised. In other words, the movant only bears the burden of production where [he] would bear the burden of proof at trial. Id. at Appellants are not required to try their case at the summary judgment level. Id. It is perfectly reasonable for Appellants to assign error, and to preserve the ultimate evidence for the same for trial, not in a furtive or lazy manner, as Appellees would suggest, but just as a matter of efficiency to preserve resources while Appellants await the result of the instant appeal. Appellants are not to be punished for preserving resources to obtain alternative appraisals and the like for trial, should the same prove necessary. That is to say, Appellants have clearly pointed out myriad issues with not only the price paid by Renasant for the parcels, but in the methods used by Renasant to obtain the purchase prices that they deemed fair. As was stated in Appellants original brief and herein, a purchaser was willing and able to purchase the Rankin County property at an amount higher than what was ultimately paid to Renasant for the property, as evidenced by the purchase agreement, request to buy the whole parcel, and eventual purchase of the parcel from Renasant. The Appellee must establish that its bids at the foreclosure sale[s] represented the fair market value of the property. Hartman v. McInnis, 996 So.2d 704 (Miss. 2007). Fair market value is defined as [t]he amount at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, neither being under any compulsion to buy or sell and both having reasonable knowledge of the relevant facts. Black s Law Dictionary 414 (6 th ed. 1991). The determination of -7-

8 fair market value is a question for the trier of fact, and this Court will respect the trial court s findings of fact when they are supported by reasonable evidence in the record and are not manifestly wrong. Allied Steel v. Cooper, So.2d 118 (Miss. 1992) (citing Newsom v. Newsom, 557 So.2d 511 (Miss. 1990) and Myles v. Cox, 217 So.2d 31 (Miss. 1968)). To not allow Appellants the opportunity to present the argument regarding Veracity LLC s purchase offer to a jury is patently unfair. Additionally, as was also stated in Appellants original brief, the methods used to appraise the subject properties were deficient as a matter of law, most notably in the instance whereby the parcel containing the bowling alley was not compared to any bowling alleys for comparable values, and the actual appraisal report stated that the value for the parcel was based on the assumption that the property would not be used as a bowling alley in the future, even though the parcel and attached structure still operate as a bowling alley to this day. As to determining fair market value of real property, the Supreme Court has stated that Three standards are accepted in determining fair market value for real property: (1) the cost approach, (2) the income-capitalization approach, and (3) the market-data or comparative sales approach. Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP v. Pitre,35 So.3d 494 (Miss. 2010) (citing Rebelwood, Ltd. v. Hinds County, 544 So.2d 1356 (Miss 1989) and Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Franklin County Timber Co., 488 So.2d 782 (Miss. 1986). These approaches do not, considered singly, establish value. Each rather is one approach to value, with the appraiser s estimate of value being, in the end, an opinion which is the product of a reconciliation of the indications yielded by the three approaches. Id. Certainly, when appraising an owner s interest in commercial property, all three methods of valuation could be relevant and useful and, at a minimum, should be -8-

9 concerned. Eller Media Co. v. Mississippi Transportation Commission, 882 So.2d 198 (Miss. 2004). Once more, the issue of valuation again provides an issue to be presented to a jury, as there is simply no reasonable scenario whereby it can be said that no disagreement over the material fact of the value of these parcels exists. This is really a small representation of the whole, as there is disagreement between the parties as to essentially all matters regarding the foreclosures, ones that constitute more than the sour grapes -type scenario that Renasant would imply in its brief. Regardless, the Mississippi Supreme Court has held that Issues of fact sufficient to require denial of a motion for summary judgment obviously are present where one party swears to one version of the matter in issue and another says the opposite. Heigle v. Heigle, 771 So.2d 341 (Miss. 2000). That alone creates an issue, if not issues, for a jury, and if the issues before the jury are those of value, then summary judgment is inappropriate as to both Appellants, as Charles H. Brown, as guarantor, is only liable for the amount that can be proven against the borrower, Brown Lakeland Properties. For these reasons, the grant of summary judgment should be reversed. III. Renasant s argument regarding notice does not entitle it to summary judgment. Renasant asserts that Appellants waived their right to demand or notice of the foreclosure, and essentially admits in its brief that it provided no notice to Appellants prior to the foreclosure proceedings. The record does not contain evidence that demand has ever been made for the deficiency on the second mortgage, which is required under Mississippi law before a mortgagee can collect a post-foreclosure deficiency. Gutierrez v. Gutierrez, 153 So.3d 703 (Miss. 2014) (citing Lakeland Hillsdale Estates, Inc. v. Galloway, 473 So.2d 461 (Miss. 1985) and Mississippi Valley Title -9-

10 Insurance Co. v. Horne Construction Co., Inc., 372 So.2d 1270 (Miss. 1979)). To this point, Appellants would state that Renasant s arguments are purely legal in nature and for that reason, Appellee should have been precluded from obtaining a grant of summary judgment. The issue of whether or not notice was provided is essentially uncontested, and Appellants would concede that as such, this particular issue is a legal matter. Fact issues more than sufficient to survive summary judgment have been presented and advanced herein and in Appellants original brief. For these reasons, the grant of summary judgment should be reversed. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the Court should reverse and remand the judgment of the Circuit Court of Rankin County, Mississippi, and tax all costs of this appeal to the Appellees. Respectfully submitted, BY: /s/ Pamela L. Hancock Pamela L. Hancock (MSB# 10676) Attorney for Appellants Of Counsel: Pamela L. Hancock (MSB# 10676) Jeffrey B. McGuire (MSB# ) HANCOCK LAW FIRM, PLLC Post Office Box 1078 Ridgeland, Mississippi Telephone: (601) Facsimile: (601)

11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Pamela L. Hancock, do hereby certify that I have this day electronically filed the foregoing Brief of the Appellants with the Clerk of the Court using the MEC system, which issued electronic notification of such filing to: Scott R. Hendrix, Esq. R. Brannon Kahlstorf, Esq. MITCHELL, MCNUTT & SAMS, P.A. Post Office Box 7120 Tupelo, Mississippi Further, I hereby certify that I have also this day mailed a hard copy to the following persons not notified by the MEC system by United States mail, first class postage prepaid: Honorable Steve S. Ratcliff, III Circuit Court Judge, District 20 Post Office Box 1626 Canton, Mississippi SO CERTIFIED, this the 30 th day of August, BY: /s/ Pamela L. Hancock Pamela L. Hancock (MSB# 10676) Attorney for Appellants -11-

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. NO CA COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. NO CA COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P. E-Filed Document Jan 13 2016 21:53:42 2015-CA-00199-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PEARLIE WRIGHT APPELLANT v. NO. 2015-CA-00199-COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P. APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2009-CA-00442 LA V ADA THOMAS APPELLANT VERSUS FIRST FEDERAL BANK FOR SAVINGS APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00702

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00702 E-Filed Document Jun 6 2017 16:14:50 2016-CA-00702-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-00702 RICHARD COLL APPELLANT VERSUS WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P., COCA COLA BOTTLING COMPANY

More information

v. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

v. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document May 30 2017 17:35:20 2013-CT-01296-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI VALLEY SILICA COMPANY, INC. APPELLANT v. No. 2013-CA-01296-SCT DOROTHY L.

More information

FIFTH DISTRICT. PRESIDING JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the court:

FIFTH DISTRICT. PRESIDING JUSTICE STEWART delivered the opinion of the court: Rule 23 order filed NO. 5-06-0664 May 21, 2008; Motion to publish granted IN THE June 16, 2008. APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIFTH DISTRICT BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, L.L.C., Appeal from the Circuit Court

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO KA HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO KA HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI E-Filed Document Dec 12 2016 13:11:01 2015-CT-00050-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2015-KA-00050 HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES E-Filed Document Feb 24 2017 16:23:57 2015-CA-00749-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA-00749-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VIVIAN BYAS, DECEASED VICTOR BYAS

More information

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF BRIEF OF APPELLEE/CROSS APPELLANT H&E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF BRIEF OF APPELLEE/CROSS APPELLANT H&E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Aug 17 2016 15:50:02 2015-CA-01412-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-01412 20IS-CA-01412 BAR-TIL, BAR-TTL, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee

More information

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Sep 24 2015 10:10:03 2015-CA-00526 Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00526 S&M TRUCKING, LLC APPELLANT VERSUS ROGERS OIL COMPANY OF COLUMBIA,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BURNETTE AVAKIAN, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF NORAIR AVAKIAN, DECEASED NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BURNETTE AVAKIAN, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF NORAIR AVAKIAN, DECEASED NO. E-Filed Document Jul 19 2016 17:57:06 2015-CA-01520 Pages: 12 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BURNETTE AVAKIAN, AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF NORAIR AVAKIAN, DECEASED VS. WILMINGTON TRUST

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DBA MID-SOUTH FORESTRY; MID-SOUTH FORESTRY, INC.; AUG RICHARD CHISM, INDIVIDUALLY AND

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DBA MID-SOUTH FORESTRY; MID-SOUTH FORESTRY, INC.; AUG RICHARD CHISM, INDIVIDUALLY AND COpy IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GLEN D. JACKSON APPELLANT v. NO. 2oo8-CA-00376 CHARLES CARTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A REGISTERED FORESTER AND FILED DBA MID-SOUTH FORESTRY;

More information

v. CAUSE NO CA-01920

v. CAUSE NO CA-01920 E-Filed Document Jun 16 2014 16:40:22 2013-CA-01920-SCT Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PINNACLE TRUST COMPANY, L.L.C., EFP ADVISORS INC. AND DOUGLAS M. McDANIEL APPELLANTS

More information

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS E-Filed Document Jan 3 2017 15:44:13 2016-WC-00842-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI SHANNON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. and ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF MS, INC. APPELLANTS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00742

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00742 E-Filed Document Jun 14 2017 15:21:03 2016-CA-00742-SCT Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00742 CYNDY HOWARTH, Individually, wife, wrongful death beneficiary, and as Executrix

More information

APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING

APPELLEE'S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Mar 28 2018 16:45:38 2016-CA-00807-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2016 CA 00807 SCT 2016-CA-00807-SCT PATRICK RIDGEWAY, APPELLANT vs. VS. LOUISE RIDGEWAY

More information

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE.

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. E-Filed Document May 29 2015 11:28:47 2013-KA-02000-COA Pages: 11 NO. 2013-KA-02000-COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. ON APPEAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 29 2016 14:31:24 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CT-00615-SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI r;~~' ~\~/~I,,I - "-- MAURICE GRAY APPELLANT FILED VS. FEB 252008 NO.2007-CA-0160-COA OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

E-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17

E-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17 E-Filed Document Dec 1 2017 18:19:55 2016-CA-01082 Pages: 17 IN THE MISSISSIPPI, SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2016-CA-01082 TONY L. AND LINDA SMITH APPELLANTS VS. JOHN HENDON, UNION PLANTERS BANK, NA FIRST AMERICAN

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 10 2017 16:56:22 2016-KA-01527-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RODISE JENKINS APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01527-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE REPLY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT DIANE SMITH, R.N.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT DIANE SMITH, R.N. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2009-CA-01619 DIANE SMITH, R.N. v. WESLEY HEALTH SYSTEM, LLC APPELLANT APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT DIANE SMITH, R.N. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 28 2015 11:05:44 2014-KA-01230-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMMY DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01230 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

APPELLANTS' RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI OF DR. RANDALL HINES AND MISSISSIPPI REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, PLLC

APPELLANTS' RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI OF DR. RANDALL HINES AND MISSISSIPPI REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, PLLC E-Filed Document Feb 28 2017 23:37:10 2015-CT-00334-SCT Pages: 8 CASE NO. 2015-CA-00334-COA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LACY DODD AND CHARLES DODD, APPELLANTS v. DR. RANDALL HINES;

More information

REPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU

REPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU E-Filed Document Oct 2 2014 21:28:49 2013-CA-00524-COA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-CA-00524 CINDY WALLS APPELLANT V. FRANKLIN CORPORATION AND EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF WAUSAU

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CA COA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No CA COA E-Filed Document Jul 5 2016 19:15:35 2014-CA-01692-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2014-CA-01692-COA CRAIG W. CLEVELAND APPELLANT/CROSS- APPELLEE VS. DEUTSCHE BANK

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Aug 5 2014 01:08:18 2014-CA-00054-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DENNIS TERRY HUTCHINS APPELLANT V. CAUSE NO. 2014-CA-00054-COA

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA SCT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA SCT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2008-IA-01191-SCT SHANNON HOLMES AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLANTS VS. LEE MCMILLAN APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00598

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00598 E-Filed Document Jun 8 2016 13:37:33 2015-CA-00598-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-00598 THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, BY AND THROUGH DELBERT HOSEMANN, IN HIS

More information

Case: 25CO1:16-cr Document #: 36 Filed: 08/19/2016 Page 1 of 5 IN THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI VS. CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

Case: 25CO1:16-cr Document #: 36 Filed: 08/19/2016 Page 1 of 5 IN THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI VS. CRIMINAL ACTION NO. Case: 25CO1:16-cr-00624 Document #: 36 Filed: 08/19/2016 Page 1 of 5 IN THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PLAINTIFF VS. CRIMINAL ACTION NO.: 16-624 ROBERT SHULER SMITH

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 14:04:25 2013-CP-02023-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURTNEY ELKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02023-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WOODKREST CUSTOM HOMES INC., NATIONWIDE CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION, LLC and ROBERT KRESS, SR. individually APPELLANTS VS. CAUSE NO.: 2008-TS-00846 JAMES COOPER

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA BRIEF OF APPELLEES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA BRIEF OF APPELLEES /' ~ ~'. '\.. ' ' IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA FILE':';, MAY 262011 om.. af the Clerk 8up... COurt Courto'~I. MATT BROWN & HOLLI BROWN

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER2015 CA 0815 WHITNEY BANK VERSUS C. NORMAN NOLAN, ELIZABETH A. NOLAN, NEN CRUSHED CONCRETE, LLC, NEN LIME, LLC, AND

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Mar 29 2018 15:36:58 2017-KA-01112-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY MARTIN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-TS-01112 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D.

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D. E-Filed Document Jan 12 2017 15:26:19 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2016-CA-01085 MARLIN BUSINESS BANK APPELLANT V. STEVENS

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff E-Filed Document May 10 2016 11:30:53 2015-CA-01496 Pages: 9 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA-01496 JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff BRIEF OF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA SCT WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER TUCKER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA SCT WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER TUCKER E-Filed Document Nov 12 2015 22:59:01 2013-CA-02100-SCT Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2013-CA-02100-SCT WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER TUCKER APPELLANT VS. GAY ST. MARY WILLIAMS AND LARRY

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS FLAGSTAR BANK, F.S.B., Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED July 6, 2010 v No. 289856 Macomb Circuit Court VINCENT DILORENZO and ANGELA LC No. 2007-003381-CK TINERVIA, Defendants-Appellants.

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Feb 23 2017 00:43:33 2016-CA-00687-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JERRARD T. COOK APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-00687-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE REPLY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 14:15:34 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MILTON TROTTER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. SAMUEL M. BROTHERS and LORA BROTHERS

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. SAMUEL M. BROTHERS and LORA BROTHERS IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE MATTER OF: SAMUEL M. BROTHERS and LORA BROTHERS CHAPTER 13 CASE NO. 10-10518-NPO LOCKE D. BARKLEY, Chapter 13 Trustee

More information

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to the Foreclosure Mediation Program. (BDR 9-488)

Referred to Committee on Judiciary. SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to the Foreclosure Mediation Program. (BDR 9-488) REQUIRES TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY VOTE (, ) S.B. 0 SENATE BILL NO. 0 COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY MARCH, 0 Referred to Committee on Judiciary SUMMARY Revises provisions relating to the Foreclosure Mediation Program.

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040 SHEILA DANETTE WELLS APPELLANT VS. FRANK PRICE and PHIL PRICE d/b/a PRICE CONSTRUCTIOCOMPANY CANTON SHEET METAL AND ROOFING APPELLEES

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 68,458

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 68,458 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 68,458 LANDMARK FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT LAUDERDALE, v. Petitioner, GEPETTO'S TALE 0' THE WHALE : OF FORT LAUDERDALE, INC., ROBINEX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, ARTHUR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 8 2015 13:57:01 2014-CP-00165-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL WALDEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-00165-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

V. NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING STANDARD OF REVIEW ARGUMENT

V. NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING STANDARD OF REVIEW ARGUMENT E-Filed Document Oct 27 2015 16:20:26 2013-KA-01758-COA Pages: 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DILLARD HARVEY APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-KA-01758-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 66 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 66 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/2015 09:00 PM INDEX NO. 651992/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 66 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY -----------------------------------------------------------------------X

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIAN ROBISON, et al APPELLANTS VS. NO. 2009-CA-00383 ENTERPRISE RENT -A-CAR COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE

More information

E-Filed Document Jun :06: KA COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY

E-Filed Document Jun :06: KA COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY E-Filed Document Jun 21 2017 11:06:32 2016-KA-01267-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI HUNTER LANE SARRETT vs. VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT NO. 2016-TS-01267-COA APPELLEE APPELLANT'S

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document May 3 2017 12:58:02 2015-CA-01650-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA-01650 DERRICK DORTCH APPELLANT vs. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION FOR REHEARING

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI US BANK TRUST, N.A. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI US BANK TRUST, N.A. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Apr 7 2017 15:30:20 2016-CA-01770 Pages: 28 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FRANKLIN N. WILLIAMS APPELLANT VS. 2016-CA-01770 US BANK TRUST, N.A. APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 6 2016 12:52:15 2015-CP-01248-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL BRIAN BALLE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01248-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this Motion for Rehearing of the decision rendered by the

Rules of Appellate Procedure, and files this Motion for Rehearing of the decision rendered by the E-Filed Document Aug 8 2017 16:22:14 2016-CA-00215-COA Pages: 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-00215 CONNIE HAWKINS, Individually and on Behalf of the WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT E-Filed Document Dec 2 2016 16:11:11 2016-CA-00678 Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00678 CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT VS BEN ALLEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, LLC

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, LLC E-Filed Document Apr 11 2016 16:07:20 2015-CA-00256-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2015-CA-00256-COA CYNTHIA KULJIS APPELLANT VERSUS WINN-DIXIE MONTGOMERY, LLC APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC. PLAINTIFF/ APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DEFENDANT/APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC. PLAINTIFF/ APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY DEFENDANT/APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 29 2015 11:38:08 2014-SA-01364-COA Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI GLOBE METALLURGICAL, INC. PLAINTIFF/ APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-TS-01364 MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: SC Lower Tribunal Nos.: 5D CA W HOWARD BROWNING, Petitioner, vs. LYNN ANNE POIRIER,

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO.: SC Lower Tribunal Nos.: 5D CA W HOWARD BROWNING, Petitioner, vs. LYNN ANNE POIRIER, Filing # 18199903 Electronically Filed 09/12/2014 10:17:38 PM RECEIVED, 9/12/2014 22:18:53, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: SC13-2416 Lower Tribunal Nos.:

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 29 2015 16:09:56 2015-CP-00263-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00263-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. BARRY NUSSBAUM, Appellant V. ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Appellee

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas. No CV. BARRY NUSSBAUM, Appellant V. ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Appellee AFFIRM; Opinion Filed May 21, 2014. S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00081-CV BARRY NUSSBAUM, Appellant V. ONEWEST BANK, FSB, Appellee On Appeal from the 44th Judicial

More information

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida

In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida In the District Court of Appeal Fourth District of Florida CASE NO. (Circuit Court Case No. and Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE OF THE INDYMAC INDA MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2005-AR2,

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, A NATIONAL BANKING ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 112,201 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. CML-KS BLUE VALLEY, LLC, Appellee,

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 112,201 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. CML-KS BLUE VALLEY, LLC, Appellee, NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 112,201 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CML-KS BLUE VALLEY, LLC, Appellee, v. MJH VENTURE, LLC, et al., Appellants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Johnson

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Sep 21 2016 14:36:53 2015-CA-01865-SCT Pages: 20 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PEMBERTON PROPERTIES, LTD d/b/a PEMBERTON APARTMENTS, PARK VILLA, LLC d/b/a EAST VILLA APARTMENTS,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Jan 13 2014 16:30:11 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA HUDSON VS. LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01004

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 14 2015 11:36:28 2014-KA-01327-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAURICE TOWNSEND APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01327-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1182-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00231

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-00231 E-Filed Document Jan 21 2016 16:47:42 2014-CA-00231-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-00231 TAMARA GLENN, INDIVIDUALLY AD ADMINISTRATRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF MATTIE

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Sep 28 2015 15:42:23 2015-CA-00145 Pages: 16 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DEBRA TARVIN FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Mar 2 2018 13:44:46 2017-KA-00853-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHN WARE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00853 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00121

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00121 ~ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2008-CA-00121 REBUILD AMERICA, INC. APPELLANT VERSES ROBERT K. MILNER AND WIFE, PATRICIA K. MILNER AND W ACHOVIA BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FIRST

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT NAPOLEON L. CASSIBRY, III

REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT NAPOLEON L. CASSIBRY, III E-Filed Document May 11 2016 15:57:28 2013-CA-01468-COA Pages: 11 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS NO. 2013-CA-01468 NAPOLEON L. CASSIBRY, III, as Trustee of the N.L. Cassibry, Jr. Family Trust, Trustee

More information

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 AMOS FINANCIAL, LLC, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. PAUL E. KIEBLER, IV, JOSEPH T. SVETE, KENNETH M. LAPINE, LAWRENCE J.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 4 2017 16:36:59 2016-CP-01145-COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THOMAS HOLDER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CP-01145 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TD BANK, N.A., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D14-1505

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Feb 12 2018 10:06:26 2016-CA-00928-COA Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2016-TS-00928 CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. APPELLANT VS. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLEES

More information

E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006

E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 E-Filed Document May 12 2014 14:25:52 2013-CA-01006 Pages: 18 2013-CA-01006 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 C.H. MILES APPELLANT V. BRENDA C. MILES APPELLEE APPELLEE

More information

CASE NO. SUPREME COURT For The State of Mississipp TUPELO REDEVELOPMENT AG. THE GRAY CORPORATION, INC. Appellee. vs.

CASE NO. SUPREME COURT For The State of Mississipp TUPELO REDEVELOPMENT AG. THE GRAY CORPORATION, INC. Appellee. vs. CASE NO. GOP~' k SUPREME COURT For The State of Mississipp TUPELO REDEVELOPMENT AG vs. THE GRAY CORPORATION, INC. Appellee vs. RONALD J. RAGLAND, SR. Appellee/Cross-Appellant REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLEEICROSS-APPELLANT-RONALD

More information

IN THE. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA AND MISSISSIPPI STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD, ET AL

IN THE. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA AND MISSISSIPPI STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD, ET AL ~L-rP-r IN THE. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JONES COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ET AL VERSUS APPELLANTS NO.2011-CA-00712 AND MISSISSIPPI STATE OIL AND GAS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA February 4 2014 DA 13-0389 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2014 MT 32N ZACHARY DURNAM and STEPHANIE DURNAM for the Estate of ZACHARY DURNAM, v. Plaintiffs and Appellants, BANK OF AMERICA N.A.;

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT T. MOSHER, CASE NO.: SC00-1263 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D99-1067 Petitioner, v. STEPHEN J. ANDERSON, Respondent. / PETITIONER S INITIAL BRIEF ON THE MERITS John T. Mulhall

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Case: 15-60683 Document: 00513486795 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/29/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Summary Calendar EDWARDS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, L.P.; BEHER HOLDINGS TRUST,

More information

Filing # E-Filed 09/22/ :42:05 PM

Filing # E-Filed 09/22/ :42:05 PM Filing # 46814510 E-Filed 09/22/2016 04:42:05 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. 2014CA007769 AH MICHELLE SMITH, as Personal Representative

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED TD BANK, N.A., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D14-1505

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 17 2015 16:55:41 2014-IA-00674-SCT Pages: 21 CASE NO. 2014-IA-00674-SCT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CALHOUN HEALTH SERVICES, APPELLANT v. MARTHA GLASPIE, APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA-1783 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA-1783 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 17 2015 07:28:18 2014-KA-01783-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ANDREW GRAHAM APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-1783 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 22 2014 15:58:43 2013-CP-00239-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SHELBY RAY PARHAM APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D L.T. CASE NO

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D L.T. CASE NO SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC10-2453 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D 09-161 L.T. CASE NO. 05-15300 BARBARA J. TUCKER, Petitioner, vs. LPP MORTGAGE LTD., f/k/a LOAN PARTICIPANT PARTNERS,

More information

NO CA-0232 RUSSELL KELLY D/B/A AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONTRACTORS, LLC COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT THOMAS H.

NO CA-0232 RUSSELL KELLY D/B/A AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONTRACTORS, LLC COURT OF APPEAL VERSUS FOURTH CIRCUIT THOMAS H. RUSSELL KELLY D/B/A AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONTRACTORS, LLC THOMAS H. O'NEIL D/B/A 3RD STREET PROPERTIES, LLC NO. 2011-CA-0232 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA THOMAS H. O'NEIL, BIENVILLE

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D Lower Tribunal Case No.: CA-21

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D Lower Tribunal Case No.: CA-21 E-Copy Received Jul 3, 2014 1:03 AM IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D14-542 Lower Tribunal Case No.: 12-45100-CA-21 ELAD MORTGAGE GROUP, LLC, a Florida

More information

ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE. THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of

ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE. THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of ORDER ESTABLISHING MOTION PRACTICE PROCEDURE THIS COURT, having determined the need to facilitate an orderly progression of certain civil matters before this Court, finds as follows: A. Discovery motions

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES CRAIG PALCULICT REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES CRAIG PALCULICT REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES CRAIG PALCULICT VS. LUCIANA GASCON CURTIS PALCULICT APPELLANT CAUSE NO.: 2007-CA-019S4 APPELLEE REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY

More information

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com

thejasminebrand.com thejasminebrand.com Case 13-62570 Doc 31 Filed 01/13/15 Entered 01/13/15 07:44:13 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Lynchburg Division IN RE: MAXINE

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 22 2016 15:32:53 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MARLIN BUSINESS BANK vs. STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY AND JOHN D. STEVENS APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 20I6-CA-OI 2016-CA-011085

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAMELA A. BARCLAY 4D RESPONDENT S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION. On Review from the District Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PAMELA A. BARCLAY 4D RESPONDENT S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION. On Review from the District Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT C. MALT & CO., INC., Petitioner, v. Case No. SCO8-1527 PAMELA A. BARCLAY 4D07-3104 Respondent. / RESPONDENT S AMENDED BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On Review from the District

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903 E-Filed Document May 23 2016 10:57:29 2015-CA-00903-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903 MARKWETZEL APPELLANT VERSUS RICHARD SEARS APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE

More information

PETITION FOR REHEARING

PETITION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Mar 6 2018 19:55:11 2016-KA-00932-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-KA-00932-COA JACARRUS ANTYONE PICKETT APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv600-HSO-LRA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08cv600-HSO-LRA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION DANIEL B. O'KEEFE, CELESTE A. FOSTER O'KEEFE, and THE DANCEL GROUP, INC. VS. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, and MARSHALL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND. This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND R U L E S O R D E R This Court s Standing Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure having submitted its One Hundred Sixty-Fourth Report to the Court recommending

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2010 LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ETC., Appellant, v. Case No. 5D09-2129 DAISY E. ALICEA A/K/A DAISY ALICEA, ETC.,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE SPECIAL COURT OF EMINENT DOMAIN OF WAYNE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE SPECIAL COURT OF EMINENT DOMAIN OF WAYNE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document May 11 2017 09:19:18 2016-CA-00928-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.2016-CA-00928-COA CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. vs. VS. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLANT

More information