No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOHN R. TURNER. Petitioner-Appellant UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
|
- Hubert Eugene Mills
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 No IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT JOHN R. TURNER Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Respondent-Appellee BRIEF OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS AS AMICUS CURIAE SUPPORTING APPELLANT S PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE Steven J. Mulroy Associate Dean & Professor of Law Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law University of Memphis 1 N. Front Street Memphis TN Phone: (901) Stephen Ross Johnson NACDL Amicus Committee Sixth Circuit Vice-Chair Ritchie, Dillard, Davies & Johnson, P.C. 606 W. Main Street, Suite 300 Knoxville, TN Phone: (865) Counsel for Amicus Curiae
2 Corporate Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 26.1, Amicus Curiae the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers makes the following disclosures: 1. Amicus is not a subsidiary or affiliate of a publicly-owned corporation. 2. There is no publicly-owned corporation with a financial interest in the outcome. i
3 Table of Contents Page Corporate Disclosure Statement... i Table of Contents... ii Table of Authorities... iii Interest of Amici Curiae... 1 Summary of the Argument... 2 Argument... 4 I. Prior Sixth Circuit Rulings... 4 II. Supreme Court Precedent... 5 III. The Better Rule... 8 IV. Sixth Amendment Text... 9 V. Practical Implications of the Government s Bright-Line Rule Conclusion Certificate of Compliance with Rule 32(a) Certificate of Service ii
4 Table of Authorities Page Cases: Kirby v. Illinois, 406 U.S. 682 (1972)... 5, 6, 8, 9 Maine v. Moulton, 474 U.S. 159 (1985)... 6 McNeil v. Wisconsin, 501 U.S. 171 (1991)... 6 Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012)... 5, 7 Moran v. Burbine, 475 U.S. 412 (1986)... 5, 6, 8, 9 Texas v. Cobb, 532 U.S. 162 (2001)... 6 Turner v. United States, No (6 th Cir. Feb. 15, 2017)... 2, 6, 9, 11 United States v. Ash, 413 U.S. 300 (1973)... 7, 8 United States v. Gouveia, 467 U.S. 180 (1984)... 5, 6, 8, 9 United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834 (2d Cir. 1988) United States v. Moody, 206 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2000)... 2, 3, 4, 5, 10 iii
5 United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967)... 8 Statutes: U.S. CONST. amend VI... 9 Other Authorities: Gary Fields & Jon R. Emshwiller, Federal Guilty Pleas Soar as Bargains Trump Trials WALL ST. J., Sept. 24, Steven J. Mulroy, The Bright Line s Dark Side Pre-Charge Attachment of the 6 th Amendment Right to Counsel, 92 WASH L. REV. (2017) , 10 United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Rule i iv
6 INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers ( NACDL ) is a nonprofit voluntary professional bar association that works on behalf of criminal defense attorneys to ensure justice and due process for those accused of crime or misconduct. It has a nationwide membership of approximately 10,000 direct members. NACDL s members include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors, and judges. NACDL files numerous amicus briefs each year in the U.S. Supreme Court, this Court, and other courts, seeking to provide amicus assistance in cases that present issues of broad importance to criminal defendants, criminal defense lawyers, and the criminal justice system as a whole. NACDL regularly files amicus briefs on the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, arguing that ensuring criminal defendants have access to legal assistance is a linchpin of a free society. NACDL filed 10 such briefs in NACDL has an interest in this case because it will affect the number of criminal defendants entitled to effective assistance of counsel in the increasingly common situation of pre-charge plea negotiations. 1 Available online at 1
7 Summary of the Argument In this case, the federal prosecutor engaged in pre-indictment plea negotiations with defense counsel; defense counsel allegedly failed to properly communicate the nature of the plea offer to his client which, if true, would fall below the minimum standard of care of effective assistance of counsel; and the client was prejudiced as a result, to the tune of 10 additional years on his sentence. Turner v. United States, No (6 th Cir. Feb. 15, 2017) (Opinion pp. 2-3). Yet the defendant was denied relief on his ineffective assistance of counsel claim, or even an evidentiary hearing on this claim, for the sole reason that the relevant ineffective assistance occurred prior to indictment on the federal charge. (Opinion pp. 3-4) This case thus presents a pure question of law: whether, absent an appearance before a magistrate, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel can ever attach prior to a formal charge. This question becomes ever more salient as pre-indictment plea negotiations become more common. Two panels of this Circuit have now complained of the injustice of a brightline rule denying Sixth Amendment right to counsel protection pre-indictment. The panel in United States v. Moody, 206 F.3d 609, (6 th Cir. 2000), felt bound by Supreme Court precedent; and the panel in the instant case felt bound by Moody. (Opinion pp. 9-10) 2
8 But Supreme Court precedent, properly understood in light of the text and purpose of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, does not compel the Moody approach. Indeed, it suggests the different approach that the right is triggered whenever a prosecutor gets involved in substantive discussions of the case with defendant, either directly or through counsel. For this reason, this Court should grant en banc review, so that the Court may reconsider the panel decision and join the other Circuits which have ruled that, under the proper circumstances, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel can attach prior to formal charge particularly where, as here, the prosecutor initiates pre-indictment plea negotiations. 3
9 ARGUMENT I. Prior Sixth Circuit Rulings In Moody, a pre-indictment plea negotiation case, the court read Supreme Court case law as establishing a bright-line rule against pre-charge attachment of the right to counsel; made clear that it disagreed with such a rule; and reluctantly concluded that it is beyond our reach to modify this rule, even in this case where the facts so clearly demonstrate that the rights protected by the Sixth Amendment are endangered. 206 F.3d at 615. The court noted that the prosecutor s involvement in pre-indictment plea negotiations raises the specter of the unwary defendant agreeing to surrender his right to a trial in exchange for an unfair sentence without the assurance of legal assistance to protect him. Id. Thus, the rule it was enforcing was a mere formality that exalt[s] form over substance and requires that we disregard the cold reality that faces a suspect in pre-indictment plea negotiations. 2 The panel opinion in the instant case deferred to Moody, noting that one Sixth Circuit panel could not overrule the decision of a prior panel. (Opinion pp. 9-10) The unanimous panel in this case went out of its way to emphasize the injustice of a rigid bright-line rule. Whether they occur before or after the filing of formal charges, the panel reasoned, plea negotiations are adversarial by nature, and 2 Id. at A concurring opinion echoed the majority s dissatisfaction with what it construed to be a rigidly inflexible, unrealistic Supreme Court rule. Id. at (Wiseman, J., concurring). 4
10 present defendants with the complex web of federal sentencing guidelines which can confuse even those who work with them often. Id. II. Supreme Court Precedent Moody presumed that Supreme Court precedent mandated the bright-line rule. But the Supreme Court opinions in question Kirby v. Illinois, 3 United States v. Gouveia, 4 and Moran v. Burbine 5 issued decades before the Court s relatively recent acknowledgment that ineffective assistance claims could apply to the failure to accept a plea bargain. 6 Those decisions did not consider pre-charge plea negotiations. Nor has the Court ever since had occasion to consider pre-charge plea negotiations. The oft-quoted language from these decisions supposedly supporting the bright-line rule is the famous statement that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches at or after the initiation of adversary judicial criminal proceedings whether by way of formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment. Kirby, 406 U.S. at 689; Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 188 (quoting Kirby, 406 U.S. at 689); Cf. Moran, 475 U.S. at 431 (citing Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 189) U.S. 682 (1972) U.S. 180 (1984) U.S. 412 (1986). 6 See Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134 (2012). 5
11 But the same Supreme Court opinions tell us that the Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies when: the government has committed itself to prosecute, and... the adverse positions of government and defendant have solidified. It is then that a defendant finds himself faced with the prosecutorial forces of organized society, and immersed in the intricacies of substantive and procedural criminal law. Kirby, 406 U.S. at 689 (emphasis added); Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 189 (citing Kirby, 406 U.S. at 689); Moran, 475 U.S. at 432 (citing Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 189); McNeil, 501 U.S. at (citing Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 189); Moulton, 474 U.S. at 170 (citing Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 189). Cf. Cobb, 532 U.S. at The criteria of (1) solidification of adverse positions, with the corresponding need to guide the defendant through (2) the intricacies of substantive and procedural criminal law, explains the Court s statement regarding formal charge... or arraignment. Kirby, 406 U.S. at 689; Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 189 (citing Kirby, 406 U.S. at 689); Moran, 475 U.S. at 432 (citing Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 189). Formal charge and appearance before a judge are certainly situations which meet those two criteria. But as 2 panels of this Circuit, and 4-6 other Circuits 7 have acknowledged, other situations can meet these criteria as well. 7 Four Circuits have unambiguously rejected a bright-line rule against precharge attachment of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Two others have so ruled in the specific context of successive prosecutions by different sovereigns. See Petition For Rehearing En Banc, Turner v. United States, No (6 th Cir. Mar. 2, 2017), at 7-11 (discussing cases in other circuits). 6
12 The above criteria should not be disregarded, but rather reconciled with the Court s language regarding formal charge... or arraignment. The way to reconcile the opinions language is to realize that the Court was providing examples of those events which satisfied the criteria, but that the list was not exhaustive. Now that the Court has acknowledged that plea negotiations are among the critical phases of the process protected by the Sixth Amendment, Frye, 566 U.S. at 141, we can acknowledge that pre-charge plea negotiations also meet these criteria, and should be added to the list. This conclusion becomes even clearer when we examine the Court s statement of the underlying purpose of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. In Gouveia, the Court said that the core purpose 8 of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel, in the specific context of determining when the right attaches, is assuring aid at trial and at critical pretrial proceedings when the accused is confronted with the intricacies of criminal law or with the expert advocacy of the public prosecutor, or both. Id. at 181 (emphasis added). Crucially, the Court has stated that the right to counsel exists to protect the accused during trial-type confrontations with the prosecutor. Id. at 190 (emphasis added). When the accused is confronted by the procedural system, or by his expert adversary, such confrontation might well settle U.S. at 189 (citing United States v. Ash, 413 U.S. 300, 309 (1973)). 7
13 the accused s fate and render the trial itself a mere formality. Id. (citing Ash, 413 U.S. at 310; United States v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218, 224 (1967)). This language certainly seems to apply to plea negotiations, whether pre- or post-indictment. III. The Better Rule The above Court discussion of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel s purpose suggests the better rule. In the older cases setting out the language regarding formal charge or a defendant s appearance before a judge, the Court dealt with interactions between the defendant and law enforcement. Kirby, 406 U.S. at ; Gouveia, 467 U.S. at ; Moran, 475 U.S. at The prosecutor was not directly involved. In those situations, there is arguable utility in using the formality of an indictment or information as a dividing line between investigation and prosecution. The analysis changes, however, when the prosecution gets directly involved, as with plea negotiations. There, the defendant clearly is engaged in confrontations with the prosecutor and needs assistance in dealing with that prosecutor s expert advocacy. Thus, in addition to a formal charge or a defendant s appearance before a judge, the right should apply whenever the prosecutor engages in substantive discussions of the case with the defendant (other than as a witness), either directly or through counsel. See Steven J. Mulroy, The Bright Line s Dark Zone: Pre- Charge Attachment of the 6th Amendment Right to Counsel, 92 WASH. L. REV. 8
14 (2017) (forthcoming) (available electronically at or on the Sixth Circuit Public Docket Sheet, Turner v. United States, No (6th Cir. Sept. 6, 2016), ECF No. 28) (cited below at Opinion p. 7, and advocating such a rule). This rule avoids the arbitrariness and injustice described above, and better furthers the underlying purposes of the right as articulated by the Supreme Court. Id. But it still retains the clarity and ease of application of a bright-line rule. Id. IV. Sixth Amendment Text This formulation adheres more closely to the text of the Sixth Amendment itself than the Government s arbitrary bright line. In pertinent part, the Amendment states that In all criminal prosecutions, the Accused shall have the right to... the assistance of counsel. U.S. CONST. amend. VI. It was the use of the words prosecution and accused that helped motivate the Court in Kirby and Gouveia to first write the language regarding formal charge... or arraignment. Kirby, 406 U.S. at 689 (emphasis added); Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 189 (citing Kirby, 406 U.S. at 689); Moran, 475 U.S. at 432 (citing Gouveia, 467 U.S. at 189). Prior to an indictment or information, if only law enforcement is pressing for an admission, lineup, or even plea bargain, it is harder to speak of a criminal prosecution under the Amendment s text, and hence also harder to speak of an accused. Once a prosecutor has decided to prosecute, and is far enough along to engage in plea 9
15 negotiations, it makes sense to consider this a criminal prosecution, and the defendant an accused. V. Practical Implications of the Government s Bright-Line Rule Underscoring this concern is the overwhelming importance of plea bargaining in our criminal justice system. The number of cases concluded by plea agreements have increased in recent years, rising from 84% in 1990 to 97% in Indeed, pre-indictment plea bargaining has become more common in recent years, particularly with the increasing use of joint federal-state task forces with subsequent state and federal prosecutions (as occurred in Mr. Turner s case). See Opinion p. 9 ("Defendants face an increasing number of federal-state prosecutions that blur the lines of demarcation on exactly when charges are filed for purposes of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel"); Mulroy, The Bright Line s Dark Side, supra, at notes and accompanying text. Under the Government s bright-line rule, the prosecutor could game the system by delaying formal charge until after initial plea inquiries have been made. See United States v. Hammad, 858 F.2d 834, 839 (2d Cir. 1988) (making this same point); Moody, 206 F.3d at 615 (noting that prosecutor s delay deprived defendant of ineffective assistance of counsel protections). Similarly, as the panel below emphasized, the prosecutor in the instant case 9 Gary Fields & Jon R. Emshwiller, Federal Guilty Pleas Soar as Bargains Trump Trials, WALL ST. J., Sept. 24, 2012, at A1. 10
16 specifically made the plea offer expire at the filing of the federal indictment, ensuring that defendant would have no ineffective assistance of counsel claim (if the Government s bright-line rule applies). Thus, Turner could never challenge his attorney s effectiveness because the negotiations had to take place prior to the filing of formal charges or the offer would be withdrawn. (Opinion p. 8). Conclusion For the reasons stated above, this Court should grant the petition for en banc review. It should then join the several other Circuits in ruling that, at least in some circumstances, like pre-indictment plea negotiations, the Sixth Amendment right to counsel can attach prior to formal charge or appearance before a magistrate. Specifically, this Court should adopt the prosecutor s involvement rule articulated above, and grant relief to Mr. Turner. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Steven J. Mulroy Associate Dean & Professor of Law Cecil C. Humphreys School of Law University of Memphis 1 N. Front St. Memphis, TN Phone:
17 Certificate of Compliance with Rule 32(a) Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 32(a)(7)(C), I hereby certify that this brief complies with the type-volume limitation. I have checked the number of words in the applicable portions of this brief using Microsoft Word, and the report indicates that the countable portions of this brief under Rule 32(a)(7) contain 2,317 words in Times New Roman, 14-pt font. /s/ Stephen Ross Johnson Stephen Ross Johnson Counsel for Amicus Curiae Certificate of Service I certify that on this 7th day of March 2017, I ed this Brief of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amici Curiae Supporting Appellant s Petition for Rehearing En Banc to Beverly Harris of the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. After she effects electronic filing, the Court s ECF system will automatically generate and send by a Notice of Docket Activity to all registered attorneys currently participating in this case, constituting service on those attorneys. /s/ Stephen Ross Johnson Counsel for Amicus Curiae 12
Turner-ing Over a New Leaf: Pre-Charge Plea Negotiations as a Critical Stage for the Purposes of the Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel
Boston College Law Review Volume 59 Issue 9 Electronic Supplement Article 11 3-21-2018 Turner-ing Over a New Leaf: Pre-Charge Plea Negotiations as a Critical Stage for the Purposes of the Sixth Amendment
More informationTHE BRIGHT LINE S DARK SIDE: PRE-CHARGE ATTACHMENT OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO COUNSEL
THE BRIGHT LINE S DARK SIDE: PRE-CHARGE ATTACHMENT OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO COUNSEL Steven J. Mulroy Abstract: In this Article, Professor Mulroy discusses a current circuit split over whether the
More information4 The Initial Hearing: Prehearing Interview; Arraignment; Pretrial Detention Arguments; Probable-Cause Hearing
4 The Initial Hearing: Prehearing Interview; Arraignment; Pretrial Detention Arguments; Probable-Cause Hearing Part A. Introduction 4.01 THE NATURE OF THE INITIAL HEARING; SCOPE OF THE CHAPTER; TERMINOLOGY
More informationCOUNSEL JUDGES. Bivins, J., wrote the opinion. WE CONCUR: A. JOSEPH ALARID, Judge, PAMELA B. MINZNER, Judge. AUTHOR: BIVINS OPINION
STATE V. SANDOVAL, 1984-NMCA-053, 101 N.M. 399, 683 P.2d 516 (Ct. App. 1984) STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. TIMOTHY SANDOVAL, Defendant-Appellant, STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellant,
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 07-1529 In the Supreme Court of the United States JESSE JAY MONTEJO, PETITIONER v. STATE OF LOUISIANA (CAPITAL CASE) ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES
More informationSigns of Life in the Supreme Court s Uncharted Territory:
34 THE FEDERAL LAWYER October/November 2015 Signs of Life in the Supreme Court s Uncharted Territory: Why the Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel Should Attach to Pre-Indictment Plea Bargaining BRANDON
More informationSEVENTH CIRCUIT BRIEF FILING CHECKLIST
NOTE: Items 1-2 are in Monospaced type and items 3-30 are in Proportional type. 1. The docketing fee, if applicable, must be paid. Cir. R.3(b). 2. Lead counsel must be admitted to practice before the Seventh
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
REL:6/26/2009 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationINDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge. Courtroom Deputy Clerk
July 23, 2013 INDIVIDUAL PRACTICES IN CIVIL CASES Nelson S. Román, United States District Judge Chambers Courtroom Deputy Clerk United States Courthouse Ms. Gina Sicora 300 Quarropas Street (914) 390-4178
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT SUSAN L. VAUGHAN, ANDERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER,
No. 16-60104 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT SUSAN L. VAUGHAN, v. Plaintiff- Appellant, ANDERSON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District
More informationSupreme Court, Kings County, People v. Nunez
Touro Law Review Volume 21 Number 1 New York State Constitutional Decisions: 2004 Compilation Article 14 December 2014 Supreme Court, Kings County, People v. Nunez Yale Pollack Follow this and additional
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT F. MCDONNELL,
Appeal: 15-4019 Doc: 59 Filed: 03/06/2015 Pg: 1 of 18 No. 15-4019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, Defendant-Appellant.
More informationSECOND CIRCUIT APPEALS
SECOND CIRCUIT APPEALS February 2015-1- DISCLAIMER These materials were prepared in an effort to assist CJA counsel in understanding the rules applicable to Second Circuit appeals and to answer some of
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC03-1363 PER CURIAM. NATHANIEL CHARLES JONES, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. [December 16, 2004] We initially accepted jurisdiction to review Jones v. State,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: LORINDA MEIER YOUNGCOURT Huron, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana JOBY D. JERRELLS Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ROBERT F. MCDONNELL,
No. 15-4019 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ROBERT F. MCDONNELL, Defendant-Appellant. On Appeal From the United States District
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-3452 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, Respondent-Appellant. Appeal From
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED January 17, 2006 v No. 253692 Wayne Circuit Court BRIAN JOHNSON, LC No. 99-002236-01 Defendant-Appellant.
More informationStages of a Case Glossary
Stages of a Case Glossary Stages of a Case are the specific events in the life of an indigent defense case. Each type of case has its own events known by special names. Following are details about the
More information306 HARVARD LAW REVIEW [Vol. 122:276
306 HARVARD LAW REVIEW [Vol. 122:276 tutes a national consensus, which might result in the chilling effect that Justice Alito and Louisiana suggested occurred in the case of capital rape provisions. If
More informationNACDL 1660 L St., NW, 12th Fl. Washington, DC February 16, 2015
NACDL 1660 L St., NW, 12th Fl. Washington, DC 20036 February 16, 2015 To the Members of the Advisory Committee: The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is pleased to submit our comments on
More informationTREVINO v. TEXAS. on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas
562 OCTOBER TERM, 1991 TREVINO v. TEXAS on petition for writ of certiorari to the court of criminal appeals of texas No. 91 6751. Decided April 6, 1992 Before jury selection began in petitioner Trevino
More informationCase No IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit DAVID JOHN SLATER, WILDLIFE PERSONALITIES, LTD.,
Case: 16-15469, 06/15/2018, ID: 10910417, DktEntry: 64, Page 1 of 10 Case No. 16-15469 IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit NARUTO, A CRESTED MACAQUE, BY AND THROUGH HIS NEXT FRIENDS,
More information[J ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT : : : : : : : : : : : : : OPINION MADAME JUSTICE NEWMAN DECIDED: FEBRUARY 18, 1999
[J-259-1998] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, v. Appellee JOSEPH WAYNE ANDERS, JR., Appellant No. 0012 M.D. Appeal Docket 1998 Appeal from the Judgment
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS DEMARCUS O. JOHNSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 15-CV-1070-MJR vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) REAGAN, Chief
More informationCase Nos , UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., ILLUMINA, INC.,
Case Nos. 2016-2388, 2017-1020 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., v. ILLUMINA, INC., ANDREI IANCU, Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Appellant, Appellee,
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-9-2007 USA v. Roberts Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-1371 Follow this and additional
More informationCase: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/19/2017. No United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Case: 15-1804 Document: 003112677643 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/19/2017 No. 15-1804 United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit A.D. and R.D., individually and on behalf of their son, S.D., a minor,
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Anthony Butler v. K. Harrington Doc. 9026142555 Case: 10-55202 06/24/2014 ID: 9142958 DktEntry: 84 Page: 1 of 11 FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANTHONY BUTLER, Petitioner-Appellant,
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC93037 STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, vs. ROBERT HARBAUGH, Respondent. [March 9, 2000] PER CURIAM. We have for review a district court s decision on the following question,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 537 U. S. (2002) 1 Per Curiam NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. SUSAN WATERS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees.
No. 15-1452 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT SUSAN WATERS, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees. v. PETE RICKETTS, in his official capacity as Governor of Nebraska, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 11-9307 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- ARMARCION D. HENDERSON,
More informationSTATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRYSTAL STROBEL NO. COA Filed: 18 May 2004
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. CRYSTAL STROBEL NO. COA03-566 Filed: 18 May 2004 1. Confessions and Incriminating Statements--motion to suppress--miranda warnings- -voluntariness The trial court did not err
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. CLEAN AIR COUNCIL, et al.,
USCA Case #17-1145 Document #1683079 Filed: 07/07/2017 Page 1 of 15 NOT YET SCHEDULED FOR ORAL ARGUMENT No. 17-1145 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT CLEAN AIR
More information1/7/ :53 PM GEARTY_COMMENT_WDF (PAGE PROOF) (DO NOT DELETE)
Immigration Law Second Drug Offense Not Aggravated Felony Merely Because of Possible Felony Recidivist Prosecution Alsol v. Mukasey, 548 F.3d 207 (2d Cir. 2008) Under the Immigration and Nationality Act
More informationCOLORADO COURT OF APPEALS
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS 2015COA34 Court of Appeals No. 14CA0049 Weld County District Court No. 09CR358 Honorable Thomas J. Quammen, Judge The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Osvaldo
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-26-2013 USA v. Jo Benoit Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 12-3745 Follow this and additional
More informationPostconviction Relief Actions Hon. Robert J. Blink 5 th Judicial District of Iowa
Postconviction Relief Actions Hon. Robert J. Blink 5 th Judicial District of Iowa Basics Protecting yourself preventing PCRs o Two step approach Protect your client Facts & law Consult experienced lawyers
More informationORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, No (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1363 Document #1600435 Filed: 02/23/2016 Page 1 of 6 ORAL ARGUMENT SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, 2016 No. 15-1363 (and consolidated cases) UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 12-1074 In the Supreme Court of the United States MARY BERGHUIS, WARDEN, PETITIONER v. KEVIN MOORE ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT REPLY
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 21, 2010 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 21, 2010 Session GERARDO GOMEZ v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Knox County No. 94604 Mary Beth Leibowitz, Judge
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 8, 2015 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 8, 2015 Session KENTAVIS JONES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-14-251 Donald H. Allen, Judge
More informationTHE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
THE JOINT RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF CRIMINAL APPEALS Effective 1 January 2019 Table of Contents I. General... 1 Rule 1. Courts of Criminal Appeals... 1 Rule 2. Scope of Rules; Title...
More information2018 CO 19. No. 15SC469, People v. Washam Crim. P. 7(e) Time-allegation Amendments
Opinions of the Colorado Supreme Court are available to the public and can be accessed through the Judicial Branch s homepage at http://www.courts.state.co.us. Opinions are also posted on the Colorado
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Appellants-Plaintiffs, V. CASE NO Appellee-Defendant, Appellee-Intervenor-Defendant.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF OHIO, et al., Appellants-Plaintiffs, V. CASE NO. 15-4270 JON HUSTED, in his Official Capacity as Ohio Secretary of State, and THE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT People v. Dillard 1 (decided February 21, 2006) Troy Dillard was convicted of manslaughter on May 17, 2001, and sentenced as a second felony
More informationCourt Records Glossary
Court Records Glossary Documents Affidavit Answer Appeal Brief Case File Complaint Deposition Docket Indictment Interrogatories Injunction Judgment Opinion Pleadings Praecipe A written or printed statement
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
No. 2016-1346 IN THE United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Appellant v. MERUS N.V., Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
More informationCase 5:12-cv KES Document 27 Filed 10/22/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION
Case 5:12-cv-05004-KES Document 27 Filed 10/22/13 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION DONROY GHOST BEAR, Petitioner, vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Case: 14-55900, 04/11/2017, ID: 10392099, DktEntry: 59, Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU, Appellee, v. No. 14-55900 GREAT PLAINS
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT. Petitioner-Appellant, No v. Western District of Oklahoma WALTER DINWIDDIE, Warden,
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 8, 2008 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court JESSIE JAMES DALTON, Petitioner-Appellant, No. 07-6126
More informationSixth Amendment--Right to Counsel of Prisoners Isolated in Administrative Detention
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 75 Issue 3 Fall Article 12 Fall 1984 Sixth Amendment--Right to Counsel of Prisoners Isolated in Administrative Detention Deborah L. Yalowitz Follow this and
More information8:17-cr LSC-SMB Doc # 46 Filed: 02/23/18 Page 1 of 10 - Page ID # 81 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
8:17-cr-00379-LSC-SMB Doc # 46 Filed: 02/23/18 Page 1 of 10 - Page ID # 81 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA Plaintiff, vs. CHRISTOPHER H. FREEMONT,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE DIVISION 3 ) STATE OF TENNESSEE ) ) V. ) NO ) ) ) JASON WHITE ) ) PETITION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE DIVISION 3 STATE OF TENNESSEE V. NO. 16-02794 17-01568 JASON WHITE PETITION Comes now Jason White pro-se, and files this Petition in exercising his 1 st Amendment
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT PADUCAH (Filed Electronically) CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 5:06CR-19-R UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, vs. STEVEN DALE GREEN, DEFENDANT. DEFENDANT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT VS. : APPEAL NUMBER
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Appellant, VS. : APPEAL NUMBER 05-4833 MARC RICKS : Appellee. Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Under
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 17-10589 Document: 00514661802 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2018 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT In re: ROBERT E. LUTTRELL, III, Appellant United States Court of Appeals
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 15-40238 Document: 00512980287 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT STATE OF TEXAS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellees, ) Case Number: 15-40238
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT. v. CASE NO. 3D12-13 LT CASE NO CA 10
KEVIN GABERLAVAGE, Appellant, IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT v. CASE NO. 3D12-13 LT CASE NO. 08 11527 CA 10 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, Appellee. / BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF NATIONAL
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-11-2008 Fuchs v. Mercer Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-4473 Follow this and additional
More informationNo (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #15-1381 Document #1675253 Filed: 05/15/2017 Page 1 of 14 ORAL ARGUMENT REMOVED FROM CALENDAR No. 15-1381 (and consolidated cases) IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
More informationF I L E D November 28, 2012
Case: 11-40572 Document: 00512066931 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS United States Court of Appeals FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Fifth Circuit F I L E D November 28, 2012
More informationFEDERAL COURTS COMMITTEE OF THE NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS ASSOCIATION COMMENTS ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE
Vincent T. Chang Co-Chair Hon. Joseph Kevin McKay Co-Chair Federal Courts Committee February 12, 2015 FEDERAL COURTS COMMITTEE OF THE NEW YORK COUNTY LAWYERS ASSOCIATION COMMENTS ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS
More informationReleased for Publication May 24, COUNSEL
VIGIL V. N.M. MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION, 2005-NMCA-057, 137 N.M. 438, 112 P.3d 299 MANUEL VIGIL, Petitioner-Appellee, v. NEW MEXICO MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION, Respondent-Appellant. Docket No. 24,208 COURT OF
More informationTHE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant v. LEATHA DRY JOHNSON, Appellee. No COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS. 821 S.W.2d 609
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant v. LEATHA DRY JOHNSON, Appellee No. 1026-90 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS 821 S.W.2d 609 December 11, 1991, Delivered PRIOR HISTORY: Petition for Discretionary Review
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 29, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs November 29, 2005 ROBERT MICHAEL WINTERS v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No.
More informationRemedying the Remedy: Johnson v. Uribe and Determining Prejudice for Sixth Amendment Claims
Boston College Journal of Law & Social Justice Volume 34 Issue 3 Electronic Supplement Article 7 March 2014 Remedying the Remedy: Johnson v. Uribe and Determining Prejudice for Sixth Amendment Claims Keith
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA * * * * * * * *
-r-gas 2011 S.D. 40 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA KYLE STEINER, v. DOUG WEBER, acting in his capacity as the warden of the South Dakota State Penitentiary, Appellant, Appellee. APPEAL
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0185P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0185p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump Doc. 55 No. 17-1351 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. DONALD J.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 16-3024-01-CR-S-MDH SAFYA ROE YASSIN, Defendant. GOVERNMENT S
More informationNo IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant,
No. 12-2484 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, v. FORD MOTOR CO., Plaintiff-Appellant, Defendant-Appellee. On Appeal from the United States
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1999) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,
More informationFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE October 16, 2009 The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit proposes to amend its Rules. These amendments are
More informationIN THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS. No. 15A PC-2889 STATE S BRIEF OF APPELLEE
IN THE INDIANA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15A04-1712-PC-2889 DANIEL BREWINGTON, Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee-Respondent. Appeal from the Dearborn Superior Court 2, No. 15D02-1702-PC-3,
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Harrison, 2011-Ohio-3258.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95666 STATE OF OHIO vs. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE LORENZO HARRISON
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
No. 4-422 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Chad David, Petitioner, v. United States of America, Respondent, ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES BRIEF FOR RESPONDENT
More informationPeople v. Lincoln Staple, 2016 IL App (4th) (December 20,2016)
People v. Lincoln Staple, 2016 IL App (4th) 160061 (December 20,2016) DOUBLE JEOPARDY On double-jeopardy grounds, the trial court dismissed a felony aggravated DUI charge after defendant pleaded guilty
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
Supreme Court of Florida No. SC04-2255 PER CURIAM. IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.172. [September 1, 2005] At the request of the Court, The Florida Bar s Criminal Procedure Rules
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE COUNTY. CASE No. 07-CR-0043
Terri Wood, OSB # Law Office of Terri Wood, P.C. 0 Van Buren Street Eugene, Oregon 0 1--1 Fax: 1-- Email: twood@callatg.com Attorney for Benjamin Jones IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR JOSEPHINE
More informationfor the boutbern Aisuttt Of deorata
Ware v. Flournoy Doc. 19 the Eniteb State itrid Court for the boutbern Aisuttt Of deorata 38runabick fltbiion KEITH WARE, * * Petitioner, * CIVIL ACTION NO.: 2:15-cv-84 * V. * * J.V. FLOURNOY, * * Respondent.
More informationIn the United States Court of Appeals
No. 16-3397 In the United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT BRENDAN DASSEY, PETITIONER-APPELLEE, v. MICHAEL A. DITTMANN, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. On Appeal From The United States District Court
More informationThe Courts CHAPTER. Criminal Justice: A Brief Introduction, 7E by Frank Schmalleger
CHAPTER 7 The Courts 1 America s Dual Court System The United States has courts on both the federal and state levels. This dual system reflects the state s need to retain judicial autonomy separate from
More informationIn the Supreme Court of the United States
No. 14-271 In the Supreme Court of the United States MARVIN PLUMLEY, WARDEN, Petitioner, v. TIMOTHY AUSTIN, Respondent. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
Nos. 06-340, 06-549 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS, et al., Petitioners, v. DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, et al., Respondents. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY,
More informationNo IN THE DAVID LEON RILEY, On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District
No. 13-132 IN THE DAVID LEON RILEY, v. Petitioner, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District REPLY BRIEF FOR PETITIONER Patrick
More informationNo IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT
USCA Case #16-1048 Document #1613512 Filed: 05/16/2016 Page 1 of 19 No. 16-1048 IN THE United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT IN RE STEPHEN M. SILBERSTEIN, Petitioner. BRIEF
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE STEVEN LAUX. Argued: March 31, 2015 Opinion Issued: May 22, 2015
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for rehearing under Rule 22 as well as formal revision before publication in the New Hampshire Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter, Supreme
More information4.5 No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents * * * * * *
Rule 4. Time and Notice Provisions 4.5 No Notice of Judgment or Order of Appellate Court; Effect on Time to File Certain Documents Additional Time to File Documents. A party may move for additional time
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY INTRODUCTION
[Cite as State v. Crangle, 2011-Ohio-5776.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 25735 Appellee v. THOMAS CHARLES CRANGLE Appellant
More informationCase 1:12-cr DPW Document 57 Filed 01/14/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:12-cr-10044-DPW Document 57 Filed 01/14/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Criminal No. 12-10044-DPW INOCENTE ORLANDO MONTANO,
More information2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14984, * DARBERTO GARCIA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 04-CV-0465
2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14984, * DARBERTO GARCIA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. 04-CV-0465 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT HALLIBURTON COMPANY, No. 13-60323 Petitioner, United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 11, 2015 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Fletcher v. Miller et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND KEVIN DWAYNE FLETCHER, Inmate Identification No. 341-134, Petitioner, v. RICHARD E. MILLER, Acting Warden of North Branch
More informationDecember 19, This advisory is divided into the following sections:
PRACTICE ADVISORY: THE IMPACT OF THE BIA DECISIONS IN MATTER OF CARACHURI AND MATTER OF THOMAS ON REMOVAL DEFENSE OF IMMIGRANTS WITH MORE THAN ONE DRUG POSSESSION CONVICTION * December 19, 2007 On December
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 16, 2008 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 16, 2008 Session DANNY A. STEWART v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County Nos. 2000-A-431, 2000-C-1395,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO : : JOURNAL ENTRY. For Plaintiff-Appellee: : and -vs- : : OPINION. For Defendant-Appellant:
[Cite as State v. Jester, 2004-Ohio-3611.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 83520 STATE OF OHIO : : JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee : : and -vs- : : OPINION WILLIE LEE
More informationCOUNSEL JUDGES. Wood, C.J., wrote the opinion. WE CONCUR: Leila Andrews J., Lewis R. Sutin, J. (Specially Concurring) AUTHOR: WOOD OPINION
1 STATE V. MESTAS, 1980-NMCA-001, 93 N.M. 765, 605 P.2d 1164 (Ct. App. 1980) STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JERRY LEWIS MESTAS, Defendant-Appellant No. 4092 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
More informationTERMINATING REPRESENTATION: ETHICAL AND LEGAL DUTIES OF CJA COUNSEL. March 2, 2011 CLE. Sponsored by Federal Defender Services of Wisconsin, Inc.
TERMINATING REPRESENTATION: ETHICAL AND LEGAL DUTIES OF CJA COUNSEL March 2, 2011 CLE Sponsored by Federal Defender Services of Wisconsin, Inc. Presented and Moderated by Robert T. Ruth I. MOTION TO WITHDRAW
More information