Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
|
|
- Edward Moody
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv VAB MARK J. VARACCHI and SENTINEL GROWTH FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendants, and RADAR ALTERNATIVE FUND LP and RADAR ALTERNATIVE MASTER FUND SPC, Relief Defendants. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION S ASSENTED TO MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission respectfully seeks the Court s entry of judgment, in consideration of the consent filed herewith from Mark J. Varacchi ( Varacchi and Sentinel Growth Fund Management, LLC ( Sentinel (together, Defendants, and Radar Alternative Fund LP and Radar Alternative Master Fund SPC (together, Relief Defendants. Defendants and Relief Defendants have assented to this motion. Filed contemporaneously with this motion are the Consent to Entry of Judgment executed by Defendants and Relief Defendants, and a proposed Judgment. In entering into the Consent and assenting to the instant motion, Defendants and Relief Defendants have agreed to entry of the proposed Judgment which, among other things, (i permanently enjoins Defendants from violating the provisions of the federal securities laws charged in the Complaint, and (ii provides
2 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 2 of 5 that the Court will determine on later motion whether to award disgorgement against Defendants or Relief Defendants or penalties against Defendants and, if so, in what amount(s. The proposed Judgment permanently restrains and enjoins Defendants from violation of Section 10(b of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 [15 U.S.C. 78j(b] and Rule 10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R b-5], Section 17(a of the Securities Act of 1933 [15 U.S.C. 77q(a], and Sections 206(1, 206(2, and 206(4 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 [15 U.S.C. 80b-6(1, (2 & (4] and Rule 206(4-8 thereunder [15 C.F.R (4-8]. The proposed Judgment also provides that, upon motion of the Commission and absent further agreement between the parties, the Court will determine whether it is appropriate to order Defendants or Relief Defendants to pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains with prejudgment interest, and, if so, the amount of disgorgement. Further, the proposed Judgment provides that, upon motion of the Commission and absent any further agreement of the parties, the Court will determine whether it is appropriate to order Defendants to pay a civil penalty, and, if so, the amount of the penalty. The proposed Judgment provides that, in connection with a Commission motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, and at any hearing held on such a motion: (a Defendants and Relief Defendants will be precluded from arguing that Defendants did not violate the federal securities laws as alleged in the Complaint; (b Defendants and Relief Defendants may not challenge the validity of the Consent or Judgment; (c solely for the purposes of such motion, the allegations of the Complaint shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence, without 2
3 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 3 of 5 regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule 56(c of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The proposed Judgment also provides that the Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter to, among other things, enforce the terms of the Judgment and to oversee any receivership. The Commission is separately moving for appointment of a receiver to stand in the shoes of Sentinel and the Radar Funds to, among other things, marshal, collect, and maintain assets with a view to distribution. WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully moves for the entry of the proposed Judgment against Defendants and Relief Defendants, filed herewith. 3
4 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 4 of 5 Respectfully submitted, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION By its attorneys, /s/ Michael C. Moran Martin F. Healey (Mass. Bar No Regional Trial Counsel Michael C. Moran (Mass. Bar No , CT phv08741 Enforcement Counsel Cynthia Storer Baran (Illinois Bar No Senior Enforcement Counsel Naomi Sevilla (Mass. Bar No Senior Advisor Robert Baker (Mass. Bar No Assistant Regional Director Boston Regional Office 33 Arch Street, 24th Floor Boston, MA ( (Moran direct ( (fax moranmi@sec.gov (Moran Local Counsel: John B. Hughes (Fed. Bar No. CT Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney s Office Connecticut Financial Center 157 Church Street, 23rd Floor New Haven, CT ( ( (fax DATED: April 18,
5 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11 Filed 04/18/17 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on April 18, 2017, I caused a copy of the foregoing to be served upon the following counsel for Defendants by Rodney Villazor SMITH VILLAZOR LLP 1700 Broadway, Suite 2801 New York, NY /s/ Michael C. Moran 5
6 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv VAB MARK J. VARACCHI and SENTINEL GROWTH FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC, and Defendants, RADAR ALTERNATIVE FUND LP and RADAR ALTERNATIVE MASTER FUND SPC, Relief Defendants. CONSENT TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF DEFENDANTS MARK J. VARACCHI AND SENTINEL GROWTH FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC AND RELIEF DEFENDANTS RADAR ALTERNATIVE FUND LP AND RADAR ALTERNATIVE MASTER FUND SPC 1. Defendants Mark J. Varacchi ("Varacchi" and Sentinel Growth Fund Management, LLC ("Sentinel" (together "Defendants" and Relief Defendants Radar Alternative Master Fund LP and Radar Alternative Master Fund SPC (together "Relief Defendants" having waived service of a summons and the Complaint in this action, enter a general appearance, and admit the Court's jurisdiction over Defendants and Relief Defendants and over the subject matter ofthis action. 2. Defendant Varacchi has pleaded guilty to criminal conduct relating to certain matters alleged in the Complaint in this action. Specifically, in United States v. Varacchi, Crim. No. l:17-cr nrb (S.D.N. Y, Varacchi pleaded guilty to a criminal information charging 1
7 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 2 of 9
8 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 3 of 9
9 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 4 of 9
10 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 5 of 9
11 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 6 of 9
12 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 7 of 9
13 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 8 of 9
14 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-1 Filed 04/18/17 Page 9 of 9
15 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-2 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv VAB MARK J. VARACCHI and SENTINEL GROWTH FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendants, and RADAR ALTERNATIVE FUND LP and RADAR ALTERNATIVE MASTER FUND SPC, Relief Defendants. JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS MARK J. VARACCHI AND SENTINEL GROWTH FUND MANAGEMENT, LLC AND RELIEF DEFENDANTS RADAR ALTERNATIVE FUND LP AND RADAR ALTERNATIVE MASTER FUND SPC The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint, and Defendants Mark J. Varacchi ( Varacchi and Sentinel Growth Fund Management, LLC ( Sentinel (together Defendants and Relief Defendants Radar Alternative Master Fund LP and Radar Alternative Master Fund SPC (together Relief Defendants having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court s jurisdiction over Defendants and Relief Defendants and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Judgment; waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Judgment:
16 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-2 Filed 04/18/17 Page 2 of 7 I. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78j(b] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a (b to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d(2, the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a. II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77q(a] in the offer or sale of any 2
17 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-2 Filed 04/18/17 Page 3 of 7 security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a (b to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or (c to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d(2, the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a. III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 206(1 and 206(2 of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the Advisers Act [15 U.S.C. 80b-6(1 & (2], by use of the mails or any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, directly or indirectly: (a (b to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud clients or potential clients; or to engage in any transaction, practice, or courses of business which operates as a fraud or deceit upon a client or prospective client. 3
18 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-2 Filed 04/18/17 Page 4 of 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d(2, the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b other persons in active concert or participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a. IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 206(4 of the Advisers Act [15 U.S.C. 80b-6(4] and Rule 206(4-8 thereunder [15 C.F.R (4-8], by use of the mails, and the means and instrumentalities of interstate commerce, directly or indirectly: (a to make any untrue statements of a material fact or to omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading, to any investor or prospective investor in a pooled investment vehicle; or (b to otherwise engage in any act, practice, or course of businesses that is fraudulent, deceptive or manipulative, with respect to investors or prospective investors in a pooled investment vehicle. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, as provided in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(d(2, the foregoing paragraph also binds the following who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise: (a Defendants officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and (b other persons in active concert or 4
19 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-2 Filed 04/18/17 Page 5 of 7 participation with Defendants or with anyone described in (a. V. Upon motion of the Commission, absent further agreement between the parties, the Court shall determine whether it is appropriate to order Defendants or Relief Defendants to pay disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, and, if so, the amount of such disgorgement. If disgorgement is ordered, Defendants and Relief Defendants shall pay prejudgment interest thereon, calculated from August 22, 2013, based on the rate of interest used by the Internal Revenue Service for the underpayment of federal income tax as set forth in 26 U.S.C. 6621(a(2. Upon motion of the Commission, absent further agreement between the parties, the Court shall determine whether it is appropriate to order Defendants to pay a civil penalty pursuant to Section 20(d of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77t(d], Section 21(d(3 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78u(d(3] and Section 209(e of the Advisers Act [15 U.S.C. 80b-9(e] and, if so, the amount of the civil penalty. In connection with the Commission s motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, and at any hearing held on such a motion: (a Defendants and Relief Defendants will be precluded from arguing that Defendants did not violate the federal securities laws as alleged in the Complaint; (b Defendants and Relief Defendants may not challenge the validity of the Consent or this Judgment; (c solely for the purposes of such motion, the allegations of the Complaint shall be accepted as and deemed true by the Court; and (d the Court may determine the issues raised in the motion on the basis of affidavits, declarations, excerpts of sworn deposition or investigative testimony, and documentary evidence, without regard to the standards for summary judgment contained in Rule 56(c of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In connection with 5
20 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-2 Filed 04/18/17 Page 6 of 7 the Commission s motion for disgorgement and/or civil penalties, the parties may take discovery, including discovery from appropriate non-parties. VI. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Consent is incorporated herein with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendants and Relief Defendants shall comply with all of the undertakings and agreements set forth therein. VII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that, solely for purposes of exceptions to discharge set forth in Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 523, the allegations in the Complaint are true and admitted by Defendant Varacchi, and further, any debt for disgorgement, prejudgment interest, civil penalty or other amounts due by Defendant Varacchi under this Judgment or any other judgment, order, consent order, decree or settlement agreement entered in connection with this proceeding, is a debt for the violation of the federal securities laws or any regulation or order issued under such laws, as set forth in Section 523(a(19 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 523(a(19. VIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter, including, but not limited to, jurisdiction for the following purposes: (i to enforce the terms of this Judgment; (ii to consider any motion for the appointment of a receiver, for approval of a plan of distribution to investors or creditors, or for the establishment of a Fair Fund, or for miscellaneous relief related to any such motions; and (iii to enforce any 6
21 Case 3:17-cv VAB Document 11-2 Filed 04/18/17 Page 7 of 7 Order concerning appointment of a receiver, a plan of distribution, or the establishment of a Fair Fund. Dated:, VICTOR A. BOLDEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7
Case 2:15-cv GMN-PAL Document 62 Filed 06/16/16 Page 1 of 6
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ascenergy LLC et al Doc. Case :-cv-0-gmn-pal Document Filed 0// Page of DAVID REECE (TX Bar No. 000) Email: ReeceD@sec.gov KEEFE BERNSTEIN (TX Bar No. 00) Email: BernsteinK@sec.gov
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, CAROLYNE SUSAN JOHNSON, Defendant. Civ. Action No. 1:18-cv-00364 FINAL JUDGMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-00-DDP-JEM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 0 JOHN M. MCCOY III, Cal Bar. No. Email: mccoyj@sec.gov FINOLA H. MANVELIAN, Cal. Bar No. 0 Email: manvelianf@sec.gov JESSICA R. PUATHASNANON, Cal.
More informationSecurities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ingles Markets, Inc. Doc. 6 Case 1:06-cv-00136-LHT-DLH Document 6 Filed 04/28/2006 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
More informationCase 1:15-cv JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891
Case 1:15-cv-00758-JMS-MJD Document 177 Filed 06/30/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 891 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More informationNORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Securities And Exchange Commission v. JSW Financial Inc. et al Doc. 5 1 2 3 4 5 7 JINA L. CHOI (N.Y. Bar No. 997) ROBERT L. TASHJIAN (Cal. Bar No. 1007) tashjianr a~see.~ov. STEVEN D. BUCHHOLZ (Cal. Bar
More informationCase: 1:12-cv CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.
Case: 1:12-cv-01954-CAB Doc #: 4 Filed: 07/31/12 1 of 8. PageID #: 84 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, MICHAEL A. BODANZA and
More informationCase 3:18-cv L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:18-cv-01735-L Document 6-5 Filed 07/03/18 Page 1 of 9 PageID 97 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, C.A. No.
More informationCase 1:14-cv CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 222 Filed 10/03/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:14-cv-01002 (CRC)
More informationCase 3:16-cv EMC Document 311 Filed 02/12/18 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0-emc Document Filed 0// Page of JINA L. CHOI (N.Y. Bar No. ) JOHN S. YUN (Cal. Bar No. 0) yunj@sec.gov MARC D. KATZ (Cal. Bar No. ) katzma@sec.gov JESSICA W. CHAN (Cal. Bar No. ) chanjes@sec.gov
More informationCase 1:03-cv LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174
Case 1:03-cv-01659-LJM-TAB Document 745 Filed 05/22/07 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 8174 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) )
More informationCase 2:09-cv JP Document Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:09-cv-01634-JP Document 192-2 Filed 11/29/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil
More informationCase 1:18-cv AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 118-cv-08865-AJN Document 6 Filed 09/29/18 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff, vs. ELON MUSK Defendant.
More informationCase 3:17-cv VAB Document 10 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:17-cv-00155-VAB Document 10 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:17-cv-00155-VAB MARK
More informationCase 3:11-cv JBA Document 200 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:11-cv-00078-JBA Document 200 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 11-cv-78 (JBA v. FRANCISCO
More informationCase 1:05-cv MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7
Case 1:05-cv-00480-MSK -CBS Document 843 Filed 01/21/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 7 Civil Action No. 05-cv-00480-MSK-CBS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 113-cv-01104-TWT Document 40 Filed 03/16/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff vs.
More informationCase 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11
Case 4:15-cv-00053-DLH-CSM Document 5 Filed 05/05/15 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More informationCase 4:17-cv ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 543
Case 417-cv-00336-ALM Document 26 Filed 06/02/17 Page 1 of 3 PageID # 543 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:18-cv ER Document 71 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:18-cv-08175-ER Document 71 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------- x SECURITIES
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-gpc-blm Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff, BLOCKVEST, LLC and REGINALD BUDDY
More informationCase 3:09-cv N Document 5 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL
Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 5 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 7 ORIGINAL V.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO RT FILED FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF T XAS DALLAS
More informationCase 1:14-cv CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:14-cv-01002-CRC Document 238 Filed 03/08/19 Page 1 of 11 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:14-cv-01002
More informationCase 1:11-cv RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11
Case 1:11-cv-09645-RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 11 Case 1:11-cv-09645-RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 2 of 11 Case 1:11-cv-09645-RJS Document 267 Filed 02/08/17 Page 3 of 11 Case 1:11-cv-09645-RJS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.: 09-cv-02676 CMA MJW IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, MANTRIA CORPORATION, TROY B. WRAGG, AMANDA E. KNORR,
More informationCase 3:09-cv N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----,
Case 3:09-cv-00298-N Document 8 Filed 02/17/2009 Page 1 of 10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT :NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED ---'-----, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT OURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF EXAS FEB I
More information: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 01 Civ (BSJ) Plaintiff, : : : v. : PARTIAL FINAL : JUDGMENT AND
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : 01 Civ. 11427 (BSJ) Plaintiff, : : : v. : PARTIAL FINAL : JUDGMENT AND INVEST BETTER 2001, : ORDER ON
More informationCase 3:18-cv M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084
Case 3:18-cv-00186-M Document 62 Filed 03/09/18 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1084 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:12-cv Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Defendant.
Case 1:12-cv-02045 Document 2-1 Filed 12/20/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, Plaintiff, Defendant. Civil Action
More informationCase 1:18-cv RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:18-cv-10077-RWZ Document 53-1 Filed 04/05/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, My Big Coin Pay, Inc.,
More informationCase: 1:17-cv Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481
Case: 1:17-cv-06416 Document #: 8-1 Filed: 09/06/17 Page 397 of 420 PageID #:481 Page 1 108127 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MONEX INTER- NATIONAL LTD., dba PACIFIC COAST COIN EXCHANGE
More informationCase 1:15-cv BAH Document 1 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:15-cv-00307-BAH Document 1 Filed 03/03/15 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA : UNITED STATES SECURITES AND : EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : Case No. : Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, BRUKER CORPORATION, FRANK H. LAUKIEN, and ANTHONY L. MATTACCHIONE, Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, LULULEMON ATHLETICA, INC., LAURENT POTDEVIN and STUART C. HASELDEN,
More informationCase 3:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/11/16 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants
Case :-cv-00 Document Filed // Page of POMERANTZ LLP Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 0) North Camden Drive Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: () - E-mail: jpafiti@pomlaw.com - additional counsel on signature page - UNITED
More informationCase 1:19-cv DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:19-cv-00070-DLC Document 1 Filed 01/03/19 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHARLES MASIH, INDIVIDUALLY and ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, v. Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, WYNN RESORTS LIMITED, STEPHEN A. WYNN, and CRAIG SCOTT BILLINGS, Defendants.
More informationDISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO Bannock Street Denver, CO GERALD ROME, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado,
DISTRICT COURT, DENVER COUNTY, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 GERALD ROME, Securities Commissioner for the State of Colorado, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH DAVID RYAN, MADYSON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT,
More informationCase 3:16-cv PK Document 2 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:16-cv-00438-PK Document 2 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 4 JINA CHOI (NY Bar No. 2699718) ERIN E. SCHNEIDER (Cal. Bar No. 216114) SHEILA E. O CALLAGHAN (Cal. Bar No. 131032) ocallaghans@sec.gov WADE M.
More informationCase 1:16-cv DPG Document Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2016 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:16-cv-21301-DPG Document 206-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/01/2016 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-CV-21301-GAYLF,S SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, DRAFT. Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, GRUPO TELEVISA, S.A.B., EMILIO FERNANDO AZCÁRRAGA JEAN and SALVI RAFAEL
More informationUSDCSDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC#:,---.- DATE FILED: 1 / j {2.~> is
---------- -------- Case 1:13-cv-04609-NRB Document 69 Filed 01/09/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff, MAGDALENA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Case No.: Plaintiff, Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PLAINTIFF, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.: vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF THE
More informationmuia'aiena ED) wnrn 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2:15cv-05921DSF-FFM Document 1 fled 08/05/15 Page 1 of 17 Page ID #:1 1 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (SBN 219683) 2 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. 355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450 3 Los Angeles, CA 90071 4 Telephone:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
Case -cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID # 0 0 Jennifer Pafiti (SBN 0) POMERANTZ LLP North Camden Drive Beverly Hills, CA 00 Telephone (0) -0 E-mail jpafiti@pomlaw.com POMERANTZ LLP Jeremy A. Lieberman
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CASE No.: COMPLAINT
Ira M. Press KIRBY McINERNEY LLP 825 Third Avenue, 16th Floor New York, NY 10022 Telephone: (212) 371-6600 Facsimile: (212) 751-2540 Email: ipress@kmllp.com Counsel for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.:
Case 1:18-cv-08406 Document 1 Filed 09/14/18 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IDA LOBELLO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.:
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALAN GRABISCH, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff,
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 SCOTT+SCOTT ATTORNEYS AT LAW LLP JOHN T. JASNOCH (CA 0) jjasnoch@scott-scott.com 00 W. Broadway, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone: () - Facsimile:
More informationCase No. upon information and belief, except as to those allegations concerning Plaintiff, which are
Case 1:15-cv-09011-GBD Document 1 Filed 11/17/15 Page 1 of 16 THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. Phillip Kim, Esq. (PK 9384) Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (LR 5733) 275 Madison Avenue, 34th Floor New York, New York 10016
More informationCase 1:18-cv ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:18-cv-08175-ER Document 72 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------- x SECURITIES
More informationCase 2:16-cv JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH
Case 2:16-cv-00832-JNP Document 8 Filed 07/26/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. PLAINTIFF, TRAFFIC MONSOON, LLC, a Utah
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION STATE OF FLORIDA, CASE NO.: 05-02976 DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY PLAINTIFF, In His Behalf and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, COGNIZANT TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, FRANCISCO D SOUZA,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. CONSENT OF DEFENDANT SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Case 1:08-cv-02167-RJL Document 1-2 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 31 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Commission, 100 F. Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20549,
More informationEBERHARD SCHONEBURG, ) SECURITIES LAWS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS ) CASE No.: SIMILARLY SITUATED, ) 7 ) 8 Plaintiff, ) CLASS ACTION vs. ) COMPLAINT 9 ) FOR VIOLATIONS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND : EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 11-2054 (RC) : v. : Re Documents No.: 32, 80 : GARFIELD
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, Defendants. CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, RIOT BLOCKCHAIN, INC., JOHN R. O ROURKE III, and JEFFREY G. McGONEGAL, v. Plaintiff, Defendants.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: WOODBRIDGE GROUP OF COMPANIES, LLC, et al., 1 Debtors and Debtors In Possession. WOODBRIDGE GROUP OF COMPANIES, LLC, et al., vs.
More informationAGREED MOTION FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
Case 1:09-cv-04387 Document 59 Filed 05/17/10 Page 1 of 6 ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE ASSOCIATION, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Plaintiff, vs. No. 09 CV
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Case No.:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE CYNTHIA PITTMAN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Case No.: v. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF
More information- 1 - Class Action Complaint for Violation of the Federal Securities Laws
1 1 1 1 Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (SBN ) THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A. South Grand Avenue, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 001 Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com Counsel for Plaintiff UNITED
More informationCase 2:16-cv RFB-GWF Document 4 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 12
Case :-cv-0-rfb-gwf Document Filed 0// Page of 0 BLOCK & LEVITON LLP Jeffrey C. Block, Esq. (pro hac vice application to be filed) Joel A. Fleming, Esq. (pro hac vice application to be filed) Federal Street,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
Case 1:14-cv-13180-RGS Document 1 Filed 07/31/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Battle Construction Co., Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationCase 2:13-cv DAK Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:13-cv-00586-DAK Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 10 Peggy Hunt (Utah State Bar No. 6060) Chris Martinez (Utah State Bar No. 11152) Nathan S. Seim (Utah State Bar No. 12654) DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
More informationRULE 10b-5 AS APPLICABLE TO NEGOTIATED M+A TRANSACTIONS
RULE 10b-5 AS APPLICABLE TO NEGOTIATED M+A TRANSACTIONS This informal memo collects some relevant sources on the application of Rule 10b-5 to M+A transactions. 1. Common law fraud differs from state to
More information(--L DEPT i CLEW FILED SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CASE NO.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CASE NO. FILED JAN 1 7 2012 U. S. DISTRICT COURr EASTERN DISTRICT OF MO SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. BURTON DOUGLAS MORRISS,
More informationSTIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CIVIL MONEY PENALTIES, AND OTHER RELIEF
Case 8:14-cv-03078-CEH-EAJ Document 7 Filed 01/15/15 Page 1 of 15 PageiD 70 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Office of the
More informationCase: 1:06-cr Document #: 82 Filed: 10/01/08 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:547
Case: 1:06-cr-00964 Document #: 82 Filed: 10/01/08 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:547 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) No. 06 CR 964 v. )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JEFFREY K. SKILLING, and KENNETH L. LAY, Plaintiff, Defendants. Crim. No. H-04-25 (Lake, J. DEFENDANT
More informationSec. 202(a)(1)(C). Disclosure of Negative Risk Determinations about Financial Company.
Criminal Provisions in the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform & Consumer Protection Act 1 S. 3217 introduced by Senator Dodd (D CT) H.R. 4173 introduced by Barney Frank (D MASS) (all references herein are to
More informationCase 1:19-cv Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No.
Case 1:19-cv-00448 Document 3 Filed 01/16/19 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and the People of the State of
More informationUS legal and regulatory developments Prohibition on energy market manipulation
US legal and regulatory developments Prohibition on energy market manipulation Ian Cuillerier Hunton & Williams, 200 Park Avenue, 52nd Floor, New York, NY 10166-0136, USA. Tel. +1 212 309 1230; Fax. +1
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-gw-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of 0 DAVID J. VAN HAVERMAAT, Cal Bar. No. Email: vanhavermaatd@sec.gov MORGAN B. WARD DORAN, Cal. Bar No. Email: warddoranm@sec.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff Securities
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Case 1:15-cv-00299 Document 2-1 Filed 04/14/15 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Navajo Nation, Civil Action No. 15-cv-00299
More informationCFTC Adopts Final Anti-Manipulation and Anti-Fraud Rules & Begins Final Rulemaking Phase Implementing Dodd-Frank
CFTC Adopts Final Anti-Manipulation and Anti-Fraud Rules & Begins Final Rulemaking Phase Implementing Dodd-Frank by Peggy A. Heeg, Michael Loesch, and Lui Chambers On July 7, 2011, the Commodity Futures
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1
Case: 1:12-cv-07914 Document #: 1 Filed: 10/02/12 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:1 REMIEN LAW, INC. 8 S. Michigan Ave. Suite 2600 Chicago, Illinois 60603 (312 332.0606 Attorneys for Plaintiff Re:Invention Inc. IN
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-02212 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SIOUX STEEL COMPANY A South Dakota Corporation
More informationCase 1:08-cv RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38
Case 1:08-cv-02167-RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 1 of 38 Case 1:08-cv-02167-RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 2 of 38 Case 1:08-cv-02167-RJL Document 3 Filed 12/15/2008 Page 3 of 38 Case 1:08-cv-02167-RJL
More informationCase 9:03-cv KAM Document 3045 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/12/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:03-cv-80612-KAM Document 3045 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/12/2016 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 03-80612 CIV-MARRA/HOPKINS SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
More informationCase 2:10-cv PA -PJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:10
Case 2:10-cv-06128-PA -PJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 26 Page ID #:10 I EDWARD J. MCINTYRE [SBN 804021 emcintyyre((^^swsslaw.com 2 RICHART&"E. MCCARTHY [SBN 1060501 rmccarthswsslaw.com y 3 SOLOM6
More informationCase Number: CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN DEFAULT FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS YOUR YELLOW PAGES. INC., CITY PAGES. INC..
Case 1::14-cv-22129-JEM Document 41 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/29/2014 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division Case Number: 14-22129-CIV-MARTINEZ-GOODMAN
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. ) ) ) Case No. ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT ) ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PLAINTIFF, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, TRIVAGO N.V., ROLF SCHRÖMGENS and AXEL HEFER, Defendants.
More informationCase 2:13-cv DBP Document 2 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:13-cv-00521-DBP Document 2 Filed 06/21/13 Page 1 of 10 Peggy Hunt (Utah State Bar No. 6060) Chris Martinez (Utah State Bar No. 11152) Jeffrey M. Armington (Utah State Bar No. 14050) DORSEY & WHITNEY
More informationCase 2:17-cv CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:17-cv-12188-CCC-JBC Document 1 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v.
More informationCase 2:13-cv DAK Document 2 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:13-cv-00506-DAK Document 2 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 10 Peggy Hunt (Utah State Bar No. 6060) Chris Martinez (Utah State Bar No. 11152) Jeffrey M. Armington (Utah State Bar No. 14050) DORSEY & WHITNEY
More informationCase 2:13-cv CW Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:13-cv-00580-CW Document 2 Filed 06/24/13 Page 1 of 11 Peggy Hunt (Utah State Bar No. 6060) Chris Martinez (Utah State Bar No. 11152) Jeffrey M. Armington (Utah State Bar No. 14050) DORSEY & WHITNEY
More informationCase 9:18-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.
Case 9:18-cv-80674-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/22/2018 Page 1 of 11 Google LLC, a limited liability company vs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Plaintiff, CASE NO.
More informationCase 1:10-cv RJL Document 3-1 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 110-cv-00473-RJL Document 3-1 Filed 03/22/10 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 100 F Street, NE Washington, DC
More information3. USAT is a provider of cashless, micro-transactions an
Case 2:09-cv-03899-JD Document 1 Filed 08/27/2009 Page 1 of 7 JD UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA USA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 100 Deerfield Lane AUG 272009 Suite 140 MICH!~~UI\jZ,
More informationCase 1:18-cv TNM Document 14 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 20
Case 1:18-cv-02243-TNM Document 14 Filed 03/04/19 Page 1 of 20 COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, 1155 21st Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20581 Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
Case 4:11-cv-02451 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION LORI COOPER, Plaintiff CIVIL ACTION NO. vs. Jury
More informationCase 1:15-cr KAM Document Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 15856
Case 1:15-cr-00637-KAM Document 539-1 Filed 03/02/18 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 15856 SLR:LDM:CSK F.#2014R00501 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. -Civ- Case No. Defendants, ) ) CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
Case 1:14-cv-23337-KMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/10/2014 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. -Civ- ) KEVIN LAM, Individually and on Behalf of All
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/JJK
Case 0:09-cv-03332-MJD-JJK Document 351 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/JJK
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 4:17-cv-01372 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 05/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ROBERT EDGAR, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly
More informationCase 4:11-cv Document 102 Filed in TXSD on 09/11/12 Page 1 of 8
Case 4:11-cv-02830 Document 102 Filed in TXSD on 09/11/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION V. Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Case 009-cv-01750-ADM -JSM Document 153 Filed 10/25/10 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION
More informationCase 9:03-cv KAM Document 2795 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/17/2014 Page 1 of 8
Case 9:03-cv-80612-KAM Document 2795 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/17/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 03-80612-CIV-MARRA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
More information~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I
Case 1:09-cv-00118-VM-FM Document 1457 Filed 11/20/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ~~_,_ ~~-~ni~i#j~rj I u:nu ATl\'J!~O'd.L)J 'l J 1 J~'.ll'JO:XXl : " \ (J
More informationCase 1:16-cv DPG Document 527 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2019 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:16-cv-21301-DPG Document 527 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/10/2019 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 16-cv-21301-GAYLES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
More information