IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
|
|
- Conrad Hopkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW (ACORN), Plaintiff NO (JUDGE FISCHER) v. TOM CORBETT, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and STEPHEN A. ZAPALLA, JR., District Attorney for Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, Defendants ELECTRONICALLY FILED DEFENDANT THOMAS W. CORBETT S ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT Defendant Thomas W. Corbett, Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by his attorneys, hereby answers the complaint as follows: FIRST DEFENSE Introduction - This unnumbered paragraph consists of a general overview of the legal claims set forth in the complaint. As such, the allegations are CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. To the extent that these allegations are deemed factual, Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to either affirm or deny said allegations. Therefore, they are By way of further answer, district attorneys are
2 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 2 of 27 independently elected at the county level and have primary responsibility for prosecuting violations of Pennsylvania s election statutes within their jurisdictions. Although the Office of Attorney General cooperates with both local and federal criminal law enforcement efforts, it would not normally be consulted regarding decisions to bring criminal charges by a district attorney and except in rare cases would not have the authority to interfere with or otherwise override such decisions. The Office of Attorney General was not involved in the criminal investigation nor the decision to file criminal charges in Allegheny County which are the basis of the allegations in the complaint. 1. This paragraph contains CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. However, Answering Defendant does not dispute that this Court has jurisdiction over the claims presented. 2. This paragraph contains CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. However, Answering Defendant does not dispute that venue properly lies in the Western District of Pennsylvania. 3. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 2
3 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 3 of Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 5. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 6. It is ADMITTED that Thomas W. Corbett is the Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and has held that office since January of The remaining allegations in this paragraph of the complaint are CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. Therefore, the remaining allegations are 7. It is ADMITTED that Stephen A. Zappala, Jr. is the District Attorney for the County of Allegheny. The remaining allegations in this paragraph of the complaint are CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. Therefore, the remaining allegations are 8. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 3
4 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 4 of Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 10. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 11. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 12. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 13. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, the Office of Attorney General is not involved in managing or overseeing voter registration in Pennsylvania. The duty to oversee voter registration and other matters relating to elections in Pennsylvania does not lie with the Office of Attorney General, but has been delegated by the 4
5 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 5 of 27 Legislature to the Pennsylvania Department of State and the local boards of elections for each county. 14. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 15. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, the Office of Attorney General is not involved in managing or overseeing voter registration in Pennsylvania. The duty to oversee voter registration and other matters relating to elections in Pennsylvania does not lie with the Office of Attorney General, but has been delegated by the Legislature to the Pennsylvania Department of State and the local boards of elections for each county. 16. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 17. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 5
6 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 6 of Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 19. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 20. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 21. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 22. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 23. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 6
7 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 7 of It is ADMITTED that there have been numerous reports over the past few years of problems with the submission of duplicate voter registration forms, fictitious names on voter registration forms, and registration forms which were invalid for other reasons. While some of these reports involve ACORN, the scope of the problem is larger than one single organization and poses a substantial burden on the ability of states like Pennsylvania to smoothly and efficiently manage the electoral process. 25. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge concerning all of the charges which have been made against ACORN in order to affirm or deny the allegations in this paragraph of the complaint as stated. It is ADMITTED that some of the charges or allegations made against ACORN involved registration applications which were duplicates for people who had already registered, filled out on behalf of non-existent people, or were invalid for other reasons. 26. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, the Office of Attorney General is not involved in managing or overseeing voter registration in Pennsylvania. The duty to oversee voter registration and other matters relating to elections in Pennsylvania 7
8 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 8 of 27 does not lie with the Office of Attorney General, but has been delegated by the Legislature to the Pennsylvania Department of State and the local boards of elections for each county. 27. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 28. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 29. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 30. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 31. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 8
9 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 9 of Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 33. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, the Office of Attorney General is not involved in managing or overseeing voter registration in Pennsylvania. The duty to oversee voter registration and other matters relating to elections in Pennsylvania does not lie with the Office of Attorney General, but has been delegated by the Legislature to the Pennsylvania Department of State and the local boards of elections for each county. 34. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, the Office of Attorney General is not involved in managing or overseeing voter registration in Pennsylvania. The duty to oversee voter registration and other matters relating to elections in Pennsylvania does not lie with the Office of Attorney General, but has been delegated by the Legislature to the Pennsylvania Department of State and the local boards of elections for each county. 9
10 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 10 of Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, the Office of Attorney General is not involved in managing or overseeing voter registration in Pennsylvania. The duty to oversee voter registration and other matters relating to elections in Pennsylvania does not lie with the Office of Attorney General, but has been delegated by the Legislature to the Pennsylvania Department of State and the local boards of elections for each county. 36. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 37. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, the Office of Attorney General is not involved in managing or overseeing voter registration in Pennsylvania. The duty to oversee voter registration and other matters relating to elections in Pennsylvania does not lie with the Office of Attorney General, but has been delegated by the Legislature to the Pennsylvania Department of State and the local boards of elections for each county. 10
11 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 11 of Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, the Office of Attorney General is not involved in managing or overseeing voter registration in Pennsylvania. The duty to oversee voter registration and other matters relating to elections in Pennsylvania does not lie with the Office of Attorney General, but has been delegated by the Legislature to the Pennsylvania Department of State and the local boards of elections for each county. 9. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, district attorneys are independently elected at the county level and have primary responsibility for prosecuting violations of Pennsylvania s election statutes within their jurisdictions. Although the Office of Attorney General cooperates with both local and federal criminal law enforcement efforts, it would not normally be consulted regarding decisions to bring criminal charges by a district attorney and except in rare cases would not have the authority to interfere with or otherwise override such decisions. The Office of Attorney General was not involved in the criminal investigation nor the decision to 11
12 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 12 of 27 file criminal charges in Allegheny County which are the basis of the allegations in the complaint. 40. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, district attorneys are independently elected at the county level and have primary responsibility for prosecuting violations of Pennsylvania s election statutes within their jurisdictions. Although the Office of Attorney General cooperates with both local and federal criminal law enforcement efforts, it would not normally be consulted regarding decisions to bring criminal charges by a district attorney and except in rare cases would not have the authority to interfere with or otherwise override such decisions. The Office of Attorney General was not involved in the criminal investigation nor the decision to file criminal charges in Allegheny County which are the basis of the allegations in the complaint. 41. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, the Office of Attorney General is not involved in managing or overseeing voter registration in Pennsylvania. The duty to oversee voter registration and other matters relating to elections in Pennsylvania 12
13 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 13 of 27 does not lie with the Office of Attorney General, but has been delegated by the Legislature to the Pennsylvania Department of State and the local boards of elections for each county. 42. ADMITTED in part; DENIED in part. It is ADMITTED that on May 7, 2009, the Allegheny County District Attorney filed criminal charges against seven individuals for various criminal offenses relating to voter registration fraud. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge regarding the employee relationship of these individuals to ACORN to affirm the remaining allegations in this paragraph of the complaint; therefore, these remaining allegations are 43. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 44. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 45. ADMITTED in part; DENIED in part. It is ADMITTED that on May 7, 2009, at least five individuals were criminally charged by the Allegheny County District Attorney for violating 25 Pa. C.S (Solicitation of 13
14 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 14 of 27 Registration). Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge regarding the employee relationship of these individuals to ACORN to affirm that these individuals were former employees of ACORN. Accordingly, the allegation that these individuals were former employees of ACORN is specifically By way of further answer, district attorneys are independently elected at the county level and have primary responsibility for prosecuting violations of Pennsylvania s election statutes within their jurisdictions. Although the Office of Attorney General cooperates with both local and federal criminal law enforcement efforts, it would not normally be consulted regarding decisions to bring criminal charges by a district attorney and except in rare cases would not have the authority to interfere with or otherwise override such decisions. The Office of Attorney General was not involved in the criminal investigation nor the decision to file criminal charges in Allegheny County which are the basis of the allegations in the complaint. 46. ADMITTED. 47. This paragraph contains CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. 48. ADMITTED in part; DENIED in part. The affidavits of probable cause referred to in this paragraph are legal documents which speak for 14
15 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 15 of 27 themselves. To the extent that the plaintiff has accurately restated the averments contained in these affidavits, the allegations in this paragraph of the complaint are ADMITTED. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to affirm the allegations regarding newspaper reports in this paragraph of the complaint; therefore, the allegations regarding newspaper reports in the second sentence of this paragraph are 49. The allegation regarding whether 25 Pa. C.S includes the term quota is a CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to affirm the remaining allegations in this paragraph of the complaint; therefore, they are By way of further answer, district attorneys are independently elected at the county level and have primary responsibility for prosecuting violations of Pennsylvania s election statutes within their jurisdictions. Although the Office of Attorney General cooperates with both local and federal criminal law enforcement efforts, it would not normally be consulted regarding decisions to bring criminal charges by a district attorney and except in rare cases would not have the authority to interfere with or otherwise override such decisions. The Office of Attorney General was not involved in the criminal investigation nor the 15
16 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 16 of 27 decision to file criminal charges in Allegheny County which are the basis of the allegations in the complaint. 50. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 51. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 52. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 53. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 54. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 16
17 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 17 of Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 56. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 57. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 58. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 59. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, 25 Pa. C.S does not prohibit the use of paid canvassers by ACORN or other organizations to obtain new voter registration applications. It only prohibits paying individuals based directly on the number of signatures obtained. Furthermore, the statute does not prohibit ACORN or other employers from terminating the employment of individuals hired to obtain 17
18 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 18 of 27 new voter registration applications because their performance was unsatisfactory or otherwise did not meet expectations. Such employees are considered at-will employees under Pennsylvania law who generally can be terminated for any reason by their employers. As paid hourly employees, these workers would be entitled to be paid for time worked (regardless of whether they had met any performance goals or quotas) until they were in fact terminated as provided by applicable state and federal law. 60. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to By way of further answer, 25 Pa. C.S does not prohibit the use of paid canvassers by ACORN or other organizations to obtain new voter registration applications. It only prohibits paying individuals based directly on the number of signatures obtained. Furthermore, the statute does not prohibit ACORN or other employers from terminating the employment of individuals hired to obtain new voter registration applications because their performance was unsatisfactory or otherwise did not meet expectations. Such employees are considered at-will employees under Pennsylvania law who generally can be terminated for any reason by their employers. As paid hourly employees, these workers would be entitled to be paid for time worked (regardless of whether they had met any performance 18
19 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 19 of 27 goals or quotas) until they were in fact terminated as provided by applicable state and federal law. 61. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 62. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 63. Answering Defendant lacks sufficient information or knowledge to 64. This paragraph contains CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. To the extent that these allegations are deemed factual, they are By way of further answer, 25 Pa. C.S does not substantially burden the First Amendment rights of organizations like ACORN who wish to conduct voter registration drives. While it restricts the payment for each registration obtained, it does not prohibit the use of paid canvassers to obtain new voter registration applications. Also, although it furthers the important government 19
20 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 20 of 27 interest of preventing voter fraud, its primary purpose is to prevent the clogging of the voter registration rolls with invalid or duplicate applications. The current provision codified at 25 Pa. C.S was first enacted in 1995 as part of Pennsylvania s Voter Registration Act, 25 P.S (commonly referred to as the Motor Voter Law ). While the Voter Registration Act has substantially increased the number of registered voters, it makes it more difficult to purge old or invalid registrations from the voting rolls. Pennsylvania election officials must use valuable government resources to process voter registration applications. Removing invalid registrations is difficult and timeconsuming since the Commonwealth has a duty to insure that it does not accidently deny a validly registered individual the right to vote. The burden on government is not significantly lessened when ACORN and other organizations submit tagged applications which they admit are probably invalid. Additional government resources must also be expended in preparing voting lists for each precinct. Although theoretically any mistakes or invalid applications would be caught before Election Day, the existence of duplicate registrations, invalid registrations, or other inaccuracies in voter registration materials can cause confusion and delay at the polls. 20
21 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 21 of 27 Pennsylvania s General Assembly has reasonably determined that the payment of a fee for each voter registration application creates an economic incentive for canvassers to submit duplicate, inaccurate or invalid voter registration applications. In many cases, this may be the result of carelessness (and not intentional criminal conduct) as workers attempt to maximize their income. However, even if such conduct does not always constitute fraud, it clogs the voter registration rolls, results in a greater administrative burden for election officials, and interferes with the smooth and efficient operation of elections. 65. This paragraph contains CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. To the extent that these allegations are deemed factual, they are By way of further answer, there is nothing in the language of 25 Pa. C.S which would suggest that having productivity standards would be prohibited under Pennsylvania law. Answering Defendant notes that ACORN has not been charged with having violated 25 Pa. C.S Also, although the Office of Attorney General was not involved in the criminal investigation nor the decision to file criminal charges in Allegheny County which are the basis of the allegations in the complaint, the individuals who have been charged face numerous counts of voter registration fraud. Answering Defendant is unaware of any individual (or organization) being charged with violating 25 Pa. 21
22 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 22 of 27 C.S solely because productivity or performance standards were used by the employer since the section was enacted in This paragraph contains CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. To the extent that these allegations are deemed factual, they are The allegations in these paragraphs contain CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. To the extent that these allegations are deemed factual, they are By way of further answer, 25 Pa. C.S does not substantially burden the First Amendment rights of organizations like ACORN who wish to conduct voter registration drives. While it restricts the payment for each registration obtained, it does not prohibit the use of paid canvassers to obtain new voter registration applications. Also, although it furthers the important government interest of preventing voter fraud, its primary purpose is to prevent the clogging of the voter registration rolls with invalid or duplicate applications. The current provision codified at 25 Pa. C.S was first enacted in 1995 as part of Pennsylvania s Voter Registration Act, 25 P.S (commonly referred to as the Motor Voter Law ). While the Voter Registration Act has substantially increased the number of registered voters, it makes it more 22
23 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 23 of 27 difficult to purge old or invalid registrations from the voting rolls. Pennsylvania election officials must use valuable government resources to process voter registration applications. Removing invalid registrations is difficult and timeconsuming since the Commonwealth has a duty to insure that it does not accidently deny a validly registered individual the right to vote. The burden on government is not significantly lessened when ACORN and other organizations submit tagged applications which they admit are probably invalid. Additional government resources must also be expended in preparing voting lists for each precinct. Although theoretically any mistakes or invalid applications would be caught before Election Day, the existence of duplicate registrations, invalid registrations, or other inaccuracies in voter registration materials can cause confusion and delay at the polls. Pennsylvania s General Assembly has reasonably determined that the payment of a fee for each voter registration application creates an economic incentive for canvassers to submit duplicate, inaccurate or invalid voter registration applications. In many cases, this may be the result of carelessness (and not intentional criminal conduct) as workers attempt to maximize their income. However, even if such conduct does not always constitute fraud, it clogs the voter 23
24 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 24 of 27 registration rolls, results in a greater administrative burden for election officials, and interferes with the smooth and efficient operation of elections. 72. This paragraph contains CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. To the extent that these allegations are deemed factual, they are 73. This paragraph contains CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. To the extent that these allegations are deemed factual, they are By way of further answer, there is nothing in the language of 25 Pa. C.S which would suggest that having productivity standards would be prohibited under Pennsylvania law. Answering Defendant notes that ACORN has not been charged with having violated 25 Pa. C.S Also, although the Office of Attorney General was not involved in the criminal investigation nor the decision to file criminal charges in Allegheny County which are the basis of the allegations in the complaint, the individuals who have been charged face numerous counts of voter registration fraud. Answering Defendant is unaware of any individual (or organization) being charged with violating 25 Pa. C.S solely because productivity or performance standards were used by the employer since the section was enacted in
25 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 25 of This paragraph contains CONCLUSIONS OF LAW to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. To the extent that these allegations are deemed factual, they are By way of further answer, there is nothing in the language of 25 Pa. C.S which would suggest that having productivity standards would be prohibited under Pennsylvania law. Answering Defendant notes that ACORN has not been charged with having violated 25 Pa. C.S Also, although the Office of Attorney General was not involved in the criminal investigation nor the decision to file criminal charges in Allegheny County which are the basis of the allegations in the complaint, the individuals who have been charged face numerous counts of voter registration fraud. Answering Defendant is unaware of any individual (or organization) being charged with violating 25 Pa. C.S solely because productivity or performance standards were used by the employer since the section was enacted in Prayer for Relief - The remainder of the Complaint is a request for relief to which NO RESPONSE IS REQUIRED. SECOND DEFENSE Plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 25
26 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 26 of 27 THIRD DEFENSE 25 Pa. C.S is constitutional on its face and is a reasonable exercise of the Pennsylvania General Assembly s powers to regulate elections. FOURTH DEFENSE Plaintiff s as applied challenge to 25 Pa. C.S should be dismissed as to Answering Defendant Thomas W. Corbett because the Office of Attorney General was not involved in the criminal investigation nor the decision to file criminal charges in Allegheny County which are the basis of the allegations in the complaint. Respectfully submitted, THOMAS W. CORBETT, JR. Attorney General By: s/howard G. Hopkirk HOWARD G. HOPKIRK Senior Deputy Attorney General Attorney I.D. #74264 Office of Attorney General Litigation Section 15 th Floor, Strawberry Square Harrisburg, PA Direct: Fax: SUSAN J. FORNEY Chief Deputy Attorney General Chief, Civil Litigation Section Date: September 22,
27 Case 2:09-cv NBF Document 12 Filed 09/22/09 Page 27 of 27 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Howard G. Hopkirk, Senior Deputy Attorney General, hereby certify that on September 22, 2009, I caused to be served the foregoing DEFENDANT THOMAS W. CORBETT S ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT by electronic filing to the following: Witold J. Walczak, Esquire vwalczak@aclupgh.org Sara J. Rose, Esquire srose@aclupgh.org Brian Mellor, Esquire bmellor@projectvote.org Teresa James, Esquire tjames@projectvote.org Arthur Z. Schwartz, Esquire General.counsel@acornmail.net Claudia Davidson, Esquire cdavidson@choiceon .com (Counsel for Plaintiff) Stephen A. Zappala, Jr., District Attorney Allegheny County District Attorney s Office ALLEGHENY COUNTY COURTHOUSE 436 Grant Street, Suite 303 Pittsburgh, PA (VIA FIRST-CLASS MAIL) By: s/howard G. Hopkirk HOWARD G. HOPKIRK Senior Deputy Attorney General
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:09-cv-00951-NBF Document 81 Filed 05/13/11 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW (ACORN);
More informationCase 2:09-cv NBF Document 52 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:09-cv-00951-NBF Document 52 Filed 08/16/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW (ACORN,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ) ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM ) NOW, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 08-4084-CV-C-NKL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No
Case: 09-2227 Document: 00319762032 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/10/2009 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT No. 09-2227 CHUCK BALDWIN, DARRELL R. CASTLE, WESLEY THOMPSON, JAMES E. PANYARD,
More informationCase 1:07-cv LEK-DRH Document Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:07-cv-00943-LEK-DRH Document 204-2 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBERT L. SHULZ, et al., Plaintiffs v. NO. 07-CV-0943 (LEK/DRH)
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLEARFIELD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION INSTRUCTIONS DRIVER S LICENSE OR REGISTRATION SUSPENSION APPEAL
INSTRUCTIONS DRIVER S LICENSE OR REGISTRATION SUSPENSION APPEAL ***IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED THAT YOU CONSULT AN ATTORNEY*** DISCLAIMER THE STAFF IN ANY COURT OFFICE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE YOU LEGAL ADVICE
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Petitioners, Respondent.
Received Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WILLIAM PENN SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al. v. s, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., No. 587 MD 2014 Respondent.
More informationCase 1:17-cv TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01295-TSC Document 13 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-CV-01295 v. UNITED STATES
More informationIN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HARRIS, et al., Plaintiffs 1CV-11-2228 v. (JONES) CORBETT, et al. Defendants Electronically Filed PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR EMERGENCY
More informationCase: 3:17-cv GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32-1 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 217
Case: 3:17-cv-00094-GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32-1 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 14 - Page ID#: 217 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION - FRANKFORT JUDICIAL WATCH,
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT RUNNING FOR PUBLIC OFFICE
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT RUNNING FOR PUBLIC OFFICE Please note that the information contained in this document is subject to change without notice in the event of the passage of amendatory legislation.
More informationPETITION FOR CONTEMPT OF A CUSTODY ORDER
PETITION FOR CONTEMPT OF A CUSTODY ORDER 1. Forms FORMS, FILING AND SERVICE PROCEDURES Attached is a packet of all forms necessary to file a Petition for Contempt of an existing Custody Order in the Monroe
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY, 2600 Virginia Avenue NW, Suite 200 Washington, DC, 20037, GARY JOHNSON, 850 C. Camino Chamisa Santa Fe, NM 87501 BRUCE MAJORS,
More informationCase: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 54 Filed: 02/21/13 Page: 1 of 9 PAGEID #: 652
Case 112-cv-00797-SJD Doc # 54 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 9 PAGEID # 652 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Fair Elections Ohio, et al., Plaintiffs, Jon
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CITIZENS ALLIANCE FOR JUDGE PAUL R. MATIA SECURE ELECTIONS, et al. CASE NO. 1:04CV2147 Plaintiffs -vs- O R D E R MICHAEL VU, etc.,
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA : THOMAS DOYLE, et al., : : Civil Division Plaintiffs, : : Civil Action No. 96-13606 v. : : ALLEGHENY COUNTY SALARY : BOARD, et al., : : Defendants.
More informationGENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT RUNNING FOR PUBLIC OFFICE
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT RUNNING FOR PUBLIC OFFICE Please note that the information contained in this document is subject to change without notice in the event of the passage of amendatory legislation.
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 330 MD 2012
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA No. 330 MD 2012 VIVIETTE APPLEWHITE; WILOLA SHINHOLSTER LEE; GROVER FREELAND; GLORIA CUTTINO; NADINE MARSH; DOROTHY BARKSDALE; BEA BOOKLER; JOYCE BLOCK; HENRIETTA
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Received 11/20/2017 3:22:10 PM Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania David P. Gersch 601 Massachusetts Ave., NW Washington, DC 20001-3743 Mary M. McKenzie Attorney ID No. 47434 PUBLIC INTEREST LAW CENTER
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : :
Case 111-cv-02228-JEJ Document 41 Filed 03/14/12 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA REVEREND EARL L. HARRIS; NEVIN MINDLIN; AND ERIC JENKINS CIVIL
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION CAROLYN SMITH, GEORGE M. SMITH JR., and KIMBERLIE A. COLLINS, v. Plaintiffs, TOWNSHIP OF ALEPPO, OLIVER L. POPPENBERG, RICHARD
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
and Harry Van Sickle Commissioner of Elections PETITION FOR REVIEW AND WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND NOW COMES, Petitioner Lawrence M. Otter, individually and as a candidate for Bucks County Court of Common Pleas
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF VENANGO COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF VENANGO COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: VENANGO COUNTY ELECTION BOARD CIV No. 219-2011 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Filed on behalf of: Specially Appointed Members of The Board
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE OF PENNSYLVANIA REITZ, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : v. : 1:04-CV-02360 : Judge Kane THE HONORABLE EDWARD : G. RENDELL et al., : [Filed Electronically] Defendants.
More informationCase 1:18-cv ADC Document 1 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:18-cv-03988-ADC Document 1 Filed 12/27/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND Robert S. JOHNSTON, III and the LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF MARYLAND Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Julie Anne Perez, Notary Public, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1289 C.D. 2003 : Submitted: January 16, 2004 Bureau of Commissions, Elections and : Legislation, : Respondent
More information[PROPOSED] ORDER. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Petitioners, COMMONWEALTH OF
Received 8/10/2017 5:23:57 PM Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania Filed 8/10/2017 5:23:00 PM Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania 261 MD 2017 IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION STATE ex rel. SKAGGS, et al. v. Relators, JENNIFER L. BRUNNER SECRETARY OF STATE OF OHIO, et al., Respondents. Case
More informationCase: 1:12-cv SJD Doc #: 29 Filed: 10/31/12 Page: 1 of 3 PAGEID #: 518
Case 112-cv-00797-SJD Doc # 29 Filed 10/31/12 Page 1 of 3 PAGEID # 518 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION FAIR ELECTIONS OHIO, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, JON HUSTED,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Plaintiffs, Case No.: VERIFIED COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT M. OWSIANY and EDWARD F. WISNESKI v. Plaintiffs, Case No.: THE CITY OF GREENSBURG, Defendant. VERIFIED COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION Plaintiff
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION FLORIDA SECRETARY OF STATE S ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES
Case 4:18-cv-00520-MW-MJF Document 109 Filed 03/01/19 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION DEMOCRATIC EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF FLORIDA, and BILL NELSON
More informationCase 1:14-cv APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:14-cv-01311-APM Document 24 Filed 03/10/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER, v. Plaintiff, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA QUINN GLOVER, by and through his next friend, ELIZABETH GLOVER, Plaintiff, Case No. v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY; and ORLANDO HARPER,
More informationpennsylvania April 10, 2014 VIA
April 10, 2014 pennsylvania DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NORTHWEST REGIONAL COUNSEL VIA E-MAIL Glenda Davidson Docket Clerk Department of Environmental Protection 400 Market Street Rachel Carson
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DOE ONE and DOE TWO, v. Plaintiffs, KEYSTONE SCHOOL DISTRICT and JOHN R. SLAGLE, in his official capacity as school board president,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: General Election 2014 : Muriel Kauffman : : Appeal of: Helen Banushi, : Philadelphia Registered Elector : and Elizabeth Elkin, : No. 2043 C.D. 2014 Philadelphia
More informationDocket Number: 1076 ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, INC. Aaron Jay Beyer, Esquire VS.
Docket Number: 1076 ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, INC. Aaron Jay Beyer, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DICK THORNBURGH, Governor and ROBERT A. GLEASON, JR., Secretary of State and RICHARD E. ANDERSON,
More informationCourthouse News Service
Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 279 Filed 03/04/2009 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Diana Rader, Plaintiff, C. A. No. v. City of Pittsburgh, Detective
More informationDocket Number: 2847 DELAWARE VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY, INC. Stephen C. Baker, Esquire Stephen R. Harris, Esquire Nancy L. Margolis, Esquire CLOSED VS.
Docket Number: 2847 DELAWARE VALLEY RAILWAY COMPANY, INC. Stephen C. Baker, Esquire Stephen R. Harris, Esquire Nancy L. Margolis, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Andrew
More informationDownload Nomination Petitions - IMPORTANT NOTICE
Download Nomination Petitions - IMPORTANT NOTICE Nomination petitions must be printed as duplex (two-sided, front and back) on plain white 8 1/2" x 11" (letter-size) paper. This requirement cannot be satisfied
More informationTHE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., PROPOSED REMEDIAL PLAN. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Petitioners,
FILED 2/22/2018 Supreme Court Middle District IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA NO. 159 MM 2017 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al., Petitioners, v. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, et al.,
More informationConvene Special Called Meeting at 5:00 PM
SPECIAL CALLED AGENDA Camden County Board of Commissioners Government Services Building, (Courthouse Square) 200 East 4 th Street, 2 nd Floor, Room 252, Commissioners Meeting Chambers Woodbine, Georgia
More informationCase 2:17-cv NBF Document 24 Filed 10/10/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-00836-NBF Document 24 Filed 10/10/17 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CYNTHIA ZURCHIN, Ed.D. v. Plaintiff, AMBRIDGE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT,
More informationMOTION TO STRIKE, IN PART; FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND TO DISMISS, IN PART, FOR LACK OF RIPENESS
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80202 LESLIE TAYLOR, Plaintiff, v. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE, POLICY and FINANCING, and SUE BIRCH, in her official
More informationCase: 3:17-cv GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 210
Case: 3:17-cv-00094-GFVT-EBA Doc #: 32 Filed: 06/12/18 Page: 1 of 7 - Page ID#: 210 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION - FRANKFORT JUDICIAL WATCH,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:16-cv-00452-TCB Document 29 Filed 08/11/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION COMMON CAUSE, et al., * * Civil Action No. Plaintiffs,
More informationDocket Number: Robert J. Ray, Esquire John P. Sieminski, Esquire Benjamin Sorisio, Esquire Ira L. Podheiser, Esquire VS.
Docket Number: 3532 APOSTOLOU ASSOCIATES/ROSSER INTERNATIONAL, INC., a joint venture, * on its own behalf and for the benefit of BRINJAC ENGINEERING, INC. and WALTER P. MOORE, ENGINEERS AND CONSULTANTS
More informationDocket Number: 3984 DEREK DELACH. Joseph D. Talarico, Esquire VS.
DEREK DELACH Joseph D. Talarico, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION, INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA Scott A. Bradley, Senior Deputy Attorney General Jacqueline
More informationDocket Number: 1866 CLOSED. Jennifer A. Stiller, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE
Docket Number: 1866 ALLEGHENY GENERAL HOSPITAL, HAHNEMANN UNIVERSITY, MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITALS, MAIN CLINICAL CAMPUS, and ST. CHRISTOPHER S HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN Jennifer A. Stiller, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 1:13-cv-03233-JKB Document 96 Filed 09/07/16 Page 1 of 27 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND STEPHEN M. SHAPIRO, et al., Plaintiffs, v. DAVID J. MCMANUS, JR., et al.,
More informationCARLISLE HOME RULE CHARTER. ARTICLE I General Provisions
CARLISLE HOME RULE CHARTER We, the people of Carlisle, under the authority granted the citizens of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to adopt home rule charters and exercise the rights of local self-government,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Received 07/21/2015 Supreme Court Eastern District Filed 07/21/2015 Supreme Court Eastern District 78 EM 2015 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF : PENNSYLVANIA, : : Petitioner : : v.
More informationCoalville, Utah. March 30, 2016
Coalville, Utah March 30, 2016 A regular meeting of the County Council of Summit County, Utah (the Council ), acting as the governing board of the North Summit Recreation Special Service District (the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NO. 3 09-CR-385 vs. (JUDGE CONABOY) MICHAEL T. TOOLE UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF SENTENCING HEARING AND NOW comes the Defendant,, by and through his counsel, Frank W. Nocito,
More information1 SB By Senator McClendon. 4 RFD: Constitution, Ethics and Elections. 5 First Read: 11-FEB-16. Page 0
1 SB200 2 173240-2 3 By Senator McClendon 4 RFD: Constitution, Ethics and Elections 5 First Read: 11-FEB-16 Page 0 1 173240-2:n:02/10/2016:PMG/tj LRS2016-292R1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SYNOPSIS: Under existing law,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : : : : : : : PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Case 118-cv-00608-YK Document 19 Filed 04/02/18 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA OWNER OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-04789-LMM Document 31 Filed 10/25/18 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GEORGIA MUSLIM VOTER PROJECT, et al., Plaintiffs,
More informationDocket Number: 3829 LUKE B. MIHALY AND MATTHEW G. MIHALY. Jeffrey S. Treat, Esquire VS.
LUKE B. MIHALY AND MATTHEW G. MIHALY Jeffrey S. Treat, Esquire VS. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BY AND THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATIVE DEPARTMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, AND PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES REVISED PLAN FOR COMPLIANCE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ) ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM NOW ) et al., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 08-4084-CV-C-NKL )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO --------------------------------------- x : COMMON CAUSE OF COLORADO, et al., Plaintiffs, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 1 :08-cv-02321-JLK v. : BERNIE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) NEW YORK STATE BOARD OF ) ELECTIONS; PETER S. KOSINSKI ) and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NO. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT INTRODUCTION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY Plaintiff v. NO. THE CITY OF HAZLETON Defendant v. PEDRO LOZANO, CASA DOMINICA OF HAZLETON, INC.,
More informationCase 1:17-cv RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01701-RC Document 8 Filed 09/25/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, v. Plaintiff, Case 1:17-cv-01701-RC FEDERAL
More information(Published in the Tulsa World, 2016.) RESOLUTION NO.
(Published in the Tulsa World, 2016.) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE TULSA COUNTY ELECTION BOARD TO CONDUCT A NON-PARTISAN SPECIAL ELECTION ON APRIL 5, 2016, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMITTING TO
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONROE COUNTY FORTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONROE COUNTY FORTY-THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Re Amendments of Local Rules of Civil Procedure Administrative Order #11 9956 CV 2004 ORDER And Now, this
More informationA federal court authorized this important notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania If you paid a real estate agent directly to help you buy or sell real estate between February 13, 2005 and February 13, 2009, inclusive,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT
Case 1:18-cv-04789-LMM Document 1 Filed 10/16/18 Page 1 of 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION GEORGIA MUSLIM VOTER PROJECT and ASIAN-AMERICANS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 1599 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 Petitioner. : No. 44 DB 2010 V. : Attorney Registration No. 77883 JOHN H. LOWERY, Ill, Respondent
More informationPetitioners, * COURT OF APPEALS. v. * OF MARYLAND. MARIROSE JOAN CAPOZZI, et al., * September Term, Respondents. * Petition Docket No.
LINDA H. LAMONE, et al., * IN THE Petitioners, * COURT OF APPEALS v. * OF MARYLAND MARIROSE JOAN CAPOZZI, et al., * September Term, 2006 Respondents. * Petition Docket No. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * PETITION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:06-cv-01891-JTC Document 31 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS FOR REFORM
More informationBEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BEFORE THE DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL : No. 756, Disciplinary Docket : No. 3 Supreme Court Petitioner : : No. 98 DB 2002 Disciplinary Board v.
More information2009 General Voter Records Maintenance Program (National Change of Address and Supplemental Processes); Grounds for Registration Cancellations
DIRECTIVE 2009-05 May 11, 2009 To: Re: ALL COUNTY BOARDS OF ELECTIONS 2009 General Voter Records Maintenance Program (National Change of Address and Supplemental Processes); Grounds for Registration Cancellations
More informationCase 2:13-cv Document 1060 Filed in TXSD on 07/17/17 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:13-cv-00193 Document 1060 Filed in TXSD on 07/17/17 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION MARC VEASEY, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationCase 2:17-cv MMB Document 148 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:17-cv-04392-MMB Document 148 Filed 11/29/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Louis Agre, William Ewing, ) Floyd Montgomery, Joy Montgomery,
More informationTHE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY A Time to Come Together
THE CITY OF CALIFORNIA CITY A Time to Come Together PREFACE: The City of California City (The City) tried twice but failed to pass Parcel Tax measures by the required two-thirds majority vote. A Parcel
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:17-cv-00100-YK Document 29 Filed 04/04/17 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GREGORY J. HARTNETT, ELIZABETH M. GALASKA, ROBERT G. BROUGH, JR., and
More informationINVITATION TO BID. from COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 800 ALLEGHENY AVENUE PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15233
INVITATION TO BID from COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 800 ALLEGHENY AVENUE PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15233 BID PROPOSAL NO. 1000 DESCRIPTION: RENEWAL OF CISCO SMARTNET MAINTENANCE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : VERIFIED COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division LIBERTARIAN PARTY OF VIRGINIA and DARRYL BONNER, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES JUDD, KIMBERLY BOWERS, and DON PALMER,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) Civil Action No. Defendants. ) VERIFIED COMPLAINT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA INDUSTRIAL WORKERS OF THE WORLD; KENNETH MILLER; JOEL WALLER; KEVIN MAYLE; and MICHELLE GAFFEY, Plaintiffs, vs. Civil Action
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Case 1:13-cv-00660-TDS-JEP Document 116-21 Filed 05/19/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, EMMANUEL
More informationINSTRUCTION SHEET FOR CHANGING AN ADULT S NAME
INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR CHANGING AN ADULT S NAME The forms presented in this packet are designed to guide you in the preparation of your change of name. You must type in the required information as it applies
More informationOregon. Voter Participation. Support local pilot. Support in my state. N/A Yes N/A. Election Day registration No X
Oregon Voter Participation Assistance for language minority voters outside of Voting Rights Act mandates Automatic restoration of voting rights for ex-felons Automatic voter registration 1 in Continuation
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-01427-TCB-MLB-BBM Document 210 Filed 11/05/18 Page 1 of 35 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NAACP, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * * Case
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE March 2, All County Contact Persons For Elections
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF STATE March 2, 2015 SUBJECT: TO: FROM: Nomination Papers All County Contact Persons For Elections Jonathan Marks, Commissioner Bureau of Commissions, Elections
More informationCase 1:16-cv NGG-VMS Document 13 Filed 12/10/16 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 87
Case 1:16-cv-06122-NGG-VMS Document 13 Filed 12/10/16 Page 1 of 22 PageID #: 87 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMMON CAUSE NEW YORK, as an organization and on behalf
More informationINVITATION TO BID. from COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 800 ALLEGHENY AVENUE PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15233
INVITATION TO BID from COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 800 ALLEGHENY AVENUE PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA 15233 BID PROPOSAL NO. 1023 DESCRIPTION: RENEWAL OF CISCO SMARTNET MAINTENANCE
More information0 8 / 1 4 / : J O N E S C O C I R C U I T C L K P A G E 0 2 / 0 9
0 8 / 1 4 / 2 0 1 4 1 3 : 4 2 6 0 1-3 9 9-4 7 7 4 J O N E S C O C I R C U I T C L K P A G E 0 2 / 0 9 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF JONES COUNTY MISSISSIPPI C H R I S M c D A
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Abdur Raheem Muhammad, : Appellant : : v. : No. 2116 C.D. 2015 : Submitted: October 21, 2016 Arthur Carl Schwotzer; Gregg A. : Schwotzer and the Estate of : Gregg
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Received 11/11/2014 Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA JAKE CORMAN, in his official capacity as Senator from the 34 th Senatorial District of Pennsylvania and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION REPUBLICAN PARTY OF OHIO : OF OHIO, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : : Case No. 2:08-cv--00913 v. : : JENNIFER BRUNNER :
More informationIllinois Constitution
Illinois Constitution Article XI Section 3. Constitutional Initiative for Legislative Article Amendments to Article IV of this Constitution may be proposed by a petition signed by a number of electors
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA ELECTRONICALLY FILED 12/17/2012 2:06 PM CV-2012-901531.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ALABAMA FLORENCE CAUTHEN, CLERK INNOVATION SPORTS & ) ENTERTAINMENT,
More informationINTRODUCTION JURISDICTION VENUE
DISTRICT COURT, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO 1437 Bannock St. Denver, CO 80203 Plaintiff: SCOTT GESSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for the State of Colorado, v. Defendant: DEBRA
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION P.O. BOX 3265, HARRISBURG, PA August 30, 2013
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION P.O. BOX 3265, HARRISBURG, PA 17105-3265 August 30, 2013 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO OUR FILE SB Secretary Rosemary Chiavetta Pennsylvania
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA HANOVER COUNTY, VIRGINIA, ) a political subdivision of ) the Commonwealth of Virginia, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:13-cv-00625 )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA T JASON NOYE, : individually and on behalf : of all others similarly situated, : : Case No. 15- Plaintiff, : : v. : CLASS ACTION : YALE ASSOCIATES,
More informationCase: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1
Case: 5:17-cv-00011-DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LEXINGTON DIVISION CHRISMAN MILL FARMS, LLC Plaintiff, Case No. v.
More informationNotice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against
Notice of Motion and Motion to Consolidate Related Actions Against Sagent Technology, Inc. for Violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof
More informationCase 4:05-cv TSL-LRA Document 224 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 4:05-cv-00033-TSL-LRA Document 224 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) Plaintiff,
More informationHOW TO FILE AN ARD EXPUNGEMENT
HOW TO FILE AN ARD EXPUNGEMENT Disclaimer by the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania Neither the staff in the Center nor the staff in any Court office will be able to give you legal
More information