Jackson reforms to civil litigation
|
|
- Rosamond Curtis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 June 2013 Jackson reforms to civil litigation What do commercial parties really need to know? SPEED READ The bulk of the Jackson reforms to costs in English civil litigation were implemented on 1 April The reforms are still relatively recent and this note highlights those thought to be most relevant to commercial litigators: the introduction of damages-based agreements; wide-ranging changes to costs and case management of litigation generally and disclosure specifically; and changes to settlement offers made under Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Note: this article was originally published on 14 February It has been amended to take account of subsequent developments as at 25 June Jason Rix Senior Professional Support Lawyer Litigation London jason.rix@allenovery.com Sarah Garvey PSL Counsel Litigation London Contact Tel +44 (0) sarah.garvey@allenovery.com 1
2 BACKGROUND Lord Justice Jackson completed his year-long review of costs in civil litigation in January 2010, when he published his final report proposing, in his words, a coherent package of interlocking reforms, designed to control costs and promote access to justice. In March 2011, after consultation, the UK Government published its response to the recommendations for reform, agreeing to implement the vast majority of them. The legislation introducing these changes, the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, was passed in May Various Statutory Instruments have been made this year and most of the relevant provisions came into force on the implementation date, 1 April DAMAGES-BASED AGREEMENTS Damages-based agreements (DBAs), or what many call contingency fees, are a type of no win, no fee agreement between a client and lawyer, under which the lawyer is paid by reference to an agreed percentage of the client s damages if the case is won, but will receive nothing if the case is lost. These types of agreement have not previously been permitted in relation to English advocacy or litigation services (except in employment matters). In the right context they may provide an opportunity for parties to fund litigation by reference to damages that they anticipate winning. In commercial litigation, the amount the lawyer can recover is limited to 50% of the damages awarded. Compliant DBAs will be permitted for all advocacy and litigation services relating to any sort of civil proceedings for resolving disputes (including arbitration), whether commenced or contemplated. DBAs should not be confused with conditional fee agreements (CFAs) where the success fee is calculated by reference to the lawyer s fees and not the client s damages. Under the reforms, the recoverability of success fees and after the event (ATE) premiums from opponents will be prohibited. CFAs can be used for defendants and can be combined with standard-fee arrangements. There are, at least, two principle flaws with the new regulations which prescribe the requirements for DBAs which mean that lawyers would be foolhardy to use them until the new regulations are reformed by the Ministry of Justice. First, the regulations do not permit hybrid or blended fee arrangements (ie part DBA, part standard fee arrangement). Secondly, and more fundamentally, the way that regulations are drafted appears to mean that a client can terminate the arrangement at any time and the lawyer cannot insist on being paid (for example, a lawyer could be "sacked" just after having negotiated a settlement agreement, but before it was signed, and it appears the lawyer would be unable to pursue its client for its fees). COSTS MANAGEMENT Jackson LJ s report identified the following as the essential elements of costs management: (1) The parties prepare and exchange litigation budgets or (as the case proceeds) amended budgets. (2) The court states the extent to which those budgets are approved. (3) So far as is possible, the court manages the case so that it proceeds within the approved budgets. 2
3 Jackson reforms to civil litigation What do commercial parties really need to know? (4) At the end of the litigation, the recoverable costs of the winning party are assessed in accordance with the approved budgets. The new rules on costs management reflecting these essential elements were intended to apply to all multi-track (in essence, complex high value) cases commenced on or after 1 April 2013 in a county court or in the Chancery or Queen s Bench Division of the High Court (except the Admiralty and Commercial Courts) unless the court otherwise orders. However in an eleventh hour intervention, on 21 February 2013, the President of the Queen's Bench Division and the Chancellor of the High Court gave notice of an important amendment to the previously published legislation. The notice states that "on further reflection" in the Chancery Division and the Queen's Bench Division (specifically the Technology and Construction Court (TCC) and Mercantile Courts within the Queen's Bench Division) the rules on costs budgeting will not apply to "to cases where at the date of the first case management conference the sums in dispute in the proceedings exceed 2,000,000, excluding interest and costs, except where the court so orders." The Commercial Court has, from the outset, negotiated an exemption from the reforms on costs management since, in his final report, Jackson LJ readily accepted that no case had yet been made out for this. The logic perhaps being that if multinational parties are conducting litigation in various jurisdictions and are able to fund their own and the other side s costs if need be, why should the court of one jurisdiction hold otherwise? Now, it seems, all high court cases where the sums in dispute exceed GBP 2 million (except, curiously, pure Queen s Bench Division cases) are also outside of the costs management reforms. Subsequently, the Civil Procedure Rule Committee set up a sub-committee to advise on the the desirability of retaining both the Commericial Court s blanket exemption and the value-based exemption for the TCC, Chancery Division and the Mercantile Courts. Judges are expected to be much more proactive in the project management of cases and in seeking to ensure efficiency. The intention is that a judge will be allocated to a case and so will be familiar with the issues. Parties will have to do much more at the early stages of litigation, including setting budgets of costs verified by a statement of truth. This will be based on various assumptions and contingencies (the first page of the new form, Precedent H, is set out at the end of this note). If the court makes a costs management order, which it is encouraged to do, the court will control the parties budgets in respect of recoverable costs. There will be a shift from necessity to reasonableness when considering the proportionality of costs. The new rules will provide as follows: Costs incurred are proportionate if they bear a reasonable relationship to: (a) the sums in issue in the proceedings; (b) the value of any non-monetary relief in issue in the proceedings; (c) the complexity of the litigation; (d) any additional work generated by the conduct of the paying party; and (e) any wider factors involved in the proceedings, such as reputation or public importance. It is likely to be at least a year, possibly longer, before we have any solid guidance as to what this new test means. In the interim, the old rule of thumb that clients will typically recover two thirds of their costs can no longer stand. It is quite possible that clients will recover less than 50%. As Jackson LJ said in his report: The policy which underlies the proposed new rule is that cost benefit analysis has a part to play, even in the realm of civil justice. If parties wish to pursue claims or defences at disproportionate cost, they must do so, at least in part, at their own expense. In other words the fact that a party needs to do something will not be enough if they want to recover the costs of so doing; it will need to be proportionate to do so given the claims at issue. On 28 January 2013, the Court of Appeal gave a ruling on costs budgeting under a pilot scheme. The case, Henry v NGN, related to an application by a social worker involved in the Baby P case to recover nearly GBP 300,000 the amount by which the budget had overrun in costs from a successful libel claim against The Sun newspaper. The Court of Appeal (Moore-Bick LJ) held that that there was good reason to depart from the court-approved costs budget. Some commentators immediately described this as thwarting the purpose of Jackson LJ s reforms. However, it was difficult to make 3
4 that extrapolation from one case, particularly since the relevant practice direction under the pilot scheme recognised that there may be good reason to depart from a budget and the court was unwilling to set down general guidelines on what is meant by good reason. Moreover, the court also recognised that, going forward, with the introduction of the new rules from April 2013 which in the words of the court differ in some important respects from the practice direction with which this appeal is concerned it was likely to be more difficult to persuade the court to depart from a budget of costs than was the case with this specific practice direction. Nevertheless, on 18 April 2013, costs budgeting came before Lord Justice Moore-Bick again in Troy Foods v Manton (as part of an application for permission to appeal). In granting permission he held, "In [Henry v NGN] I expressed the view that an approved budget was not to be taken as a licence to conduct litigation in an unnecessarily expensive way. It follows that I do not accept that the costs judges should or will treat the court's approval of a budget at demonstrating, without further consideration, that the costs incurred by the receiving party are reasonable or proportionate simply because they fall within the scope of the approved budget". This would appear to run contrary to one of the aims of the Jackson reforms: dispensing with a detailed assessment where there is an agreed, or court approved, budget. It is particularly interesting since Moore-Bick LJ was so heavily involved in the Jackson reforms himself. The case was subsequently settled so we will have to wait for further guidance from the Court of Appeal. DISCLOSURE The standard test for disclosure of documents in English litigation requires parties to disclose documents that help or hinder their or the other side s case. Essentially, there are three main elements to the reforms relating to disclosure: (1) The electronic documents questionnaire will still apply to the disclosure of electronic documents as it currently does. It is not mandatory but as a firm we recommend its use. (The relevant practice direction within which the questionnaire is contained that deals with electronic documents is unaffected.) (2) At the first case management conference, parties may agree to or the court can dispense with or limit standard disclosure. In some circumstances (perhaps, for example, in patent litigation), there may be no disclosure at all; alternatively there may be disclosure by issue, and there may even be the very wide disclosure that is sometimes required in a fraud case. Parties will need to think about disclosure early and, if at all possible, agree the approach with each other. In order to do this they will need a good understanding of their documents (especially electronic documents) and what disclosure might involve as well as what documents the other side might have. (3) Parties will have to file and serve a report which estimates the broad range of costs that could be involved in giving standard disclosure in the case, including the costs of searching for and disclosing any electronically stored documents. The current exemption from costs management where the sums in dispute exceed GBP 2 million does not apply to the disclosure reforms so the majority of parties will have to address these. Likewise, the Commercial Court is subject to the Jackson reforms on disclosure. 4
5 Jackson reforms to civil litigation What do commercial parties really need to know? PART 36 Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules is a mechanism to encourage parties to settle by using costs as a sanction. If one party makes an offer to settle, in a prescribed form, and the other party does not accept the offer and then fails to beat the offer at trial, the party that declined the offer has to pay the other side s costs from the date of expiry of the offer and interest on those costs. The key reforms to Part 36 which the UK Government backed were: (1) To make it clear that, where a money offer is beaten at trial (by whatever amount), the Part 36 costs sanctions will apply (this is sometimes referred to as reversing the decision in Carver v BAA). This has been implemented, since October 2011, by virtue of CPR 36.14(1A). (2) To introduce an extra sanction (equivalent to 10% of the amount awarded) payable by defendants who do not accept a claimant s reasonable offer where that offer is not beaten at trial. Provisions implementing this sanction mean that in wholly- or part-monetary claims it will be calculated by reference to the damages awarded and in claims which are non-monetary only by reference to the costs. The percentage starts at 10% for amounts up to GBP 500,000 and on a sliding scale after that (with a cap of GBP 75,000 in the case of nonmonetary claims). The reforms to Part 36 apply to all civil proceedings including the Commercial Court. CONCLUSION It is still too early to assess the impact the Jackson reforms have had on commercial litigation. Much will continue to depend on the reaction of the judiciary and whether they seize the opportunity actively to manage their cases including the costs of those cases. In relation to cost budgeting, the attitude of the Court of Appeal seems slightly at odds with some intentions behind the Jackson reforms. We are also still in a state of flux with adjustments to the reforms themselves in relation to the courts in which cost budgeting applies and the DBA regulations currently expected, in October
6 PRECEDENT H COSTS BUDGET 6
7 Jackson reforms to civil litigation What do commercial parties really need to know? Allen & Overy LLP One Bishops Square, London E1 6AD, United Kingdom Tel Fax Allen & Overy maintains a database of business contact details in order to develop and improve its services to its clients. The information is not traded with any external bodies or organisations. If any of your details are incorrect or you no longer wish to receive publications from Allen & Overy please epublications@allenovery.com In this document, Allen & Overy means Allen & Overy LLP and/or its affiliated undertakings. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Allen & Overy LLP or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications or an individual with equivalent status in one of Allen & Overy LLP s affiliated undertakings. Allen & Overy LLP or an affiliated undertaking has an office in each of: Abu Dhabi, Amsterdam, Antwerp, Athens (representative office), Bangkok, Beijing, Belfast, Bratislava, Brussels, Bucharest (associated office), Budapest, Casablanca, Doha, Dubai, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hanoi, Ho Chi Minh City, Hong Kong, Istanbul, Jakarta (associated office), London, Luxembourg, Madrid, Mannheim, Milan, Moscow, Munich, New York, Paris, Perth, Prague, Riyadh (associated office), Rome, São Paulo, Shanghai, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Warsaw and Washington, D.C. Allen & Overy LLP This document is for general guidance only and does not constitute definitive advice. LT:
Sovereign Immunity. Key points for commercial parties July allenovery.com
Sovereign Immunity Key points for commercial parties July 2018 2 Sovereign Immunity Key points for commercial parties July 2018 Allen & Overy LLP 2018 3 Introduction Sovereign immunity is a complex topic.
More informationUPC Alert. March 2014 SPEED READ
March 2014 UPC Alert SPEED READ Recent events signal that the radical change to how patents are obtained and enforced in and in particular involving Europe the new European Unified Patent Court (UPC) is
More informationEnforcing International Arbitral Awards in the UAE and The DIFC Courts: A conduit jurisdiction
Enforcing International Arbitral Awards in the UAE and The DIFC Courts: A conduit jurisdiction Simon Roderick Yacine Francis April 2016 www.allenovery.com 2 Meeting you today Simon Roderick Partner Dubai
More informationNew draft European Regulation on the freezing of bank accounts
26 July 2011 New draft European Regulation on the freezing of bank accounts SPEED READ On 25 July, the European Commission published a new draft Regulation introducing European Account Preservation Orders
More informationLitigation Strategies in Europe MIP Global IP & Innovation Summit
Litigation Strategies in Europe MIP Global IP & Innovation Summit Paul Brown, Partner, London 4 September 2013 What will this talk cover? What factors does a litigant need to consider when litigating patents
More informationFact or Fiction? U.S. Government Surveillance in a Post-Snowden World
Fact or Fiction? U.S. Government Surveillance in a Post-Snowden World Bret Cohen Hogan Lovells US LLP September 18, 2014 The Snowden effect 2 U.S. cloud perception post-snowden July 2013 survey of non-u.s.
More informationChallenging Government decisions in the UK. An introduction to judicial review
Challenging Government decisions in the UK An introduction to judicial review Challenging Government decisions in the UK Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of challenging
More informationDamages United Kingdom perspective
Damages United Kingdom perspective Laura Whiting Young EPLAW Congress Brussels - 28 April 2014 Statutory basis Patents Act 1977, s 61(1) " civil proceedings may be brought in the court by the proprietor
More informationICC INTRODUCES FAST-TRACK ARBITRATION PROCEDURE AND BOLSTERS TRANSPARENCY
The latest Rules of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) entered into force on 1 March 2017 (the 2017 Rules). New provisions are aimed at reducing the cost and increasing the transparency
More informationLaw Introducing Rules for Localization of Personal Data of Russian Citizens
Law Introducing Rules for Localization of Personal Data of Russian Citizens Natalia Gulyaeva Partner, Head of IPMT practice for Russia/CIS Moscow Bret Cohen Associate, Privacy & Information Management
More informationLegal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Implications for Personal Injury Litigation
www.mcdermottqc.com Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill: The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill covers a wide
More informationOmnibus accounts in Poland new solutions available to foreign investors and custodians
Briefing note December 2011 Omnibus accounts in Poland new solutions available to foreign investors and custodians On 16 September 2011, the Act Amending the Act on Trading in Financial Instruments and
More informationBREXIT: THE WAY FORWARD FOR APPLICABLE LAW AND CIVIL JURISDICTION AND JUDGMENTS?
APPLICABLE LAW AND CIVIL JURISDICTION Both the and the have now published short papers setting out their positions on judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters. A comparison of the two perhaps
More informationPrivate action for contempt of court?
Private action for contempt of court? May 2018 Private action for contempt of court? May 2018 1 Private action for contempt of court? Introduction In March, the UK Supreme Court handed down a landmark
More informationMIP International Patent Forum 2013 Russia Focus
MIP International Patent Forum 2013 Russia Focus Natalia Gulyaeva, Partner Head of IP, Media & Technology, Hogan Lovells CIS 16 April 2013 Patents as a key to business expansion: produced in Russia Russian
More informationPresenting our Belgian Antitrust Litigation practice. Advising you on private enforcement.
Presenting our Belgian Antitrust Litigation practice Advising you on private enforcement 2 Presenting our Antitrust Litigation practice Private enforcement: a phenomenon on the rise Private enforcement
More informationJudicial Review. Where do we stand? Will proposals for further judicial review reform make any difference? Procedure & Practice
Judicial Review Procedure & Practice Where do we stand? Will proposals for further judicial review reform make any difference? Charles Brasted & Ben Gaston Report Judicial Review November 2013 1 Where
More informationAlternative Dispute Resolution in England and Wales
Alternative Dispute Resolution in England and Wales October 2017 Contents Introduction 1 Support for ADR 2 Main features of ADR 4 Mediation 5 Other types of ADR 6 Timing 8 Cases suitable for ADR 9 Conclusion
More informationWhat future for unilateral dispute resolution clauses?
What future for unilateral dispute resolution clauses? 1 Briefing note October 2012 What future for unilateral dispute resolution clauses? It is common practice to insert into contracts unilateral choice-of-court
More informationThe Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2013
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2013 No. 262 (L. 1) SENIOR COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES COUNTY COURTS, ENGLAND AND WALES The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2013 Made - - - - 31st January 2013 Laid before Parliament
More informationJapan amends its Commercial Arbitration Rules
1 Japan amends its Commercial Arbitration Rules Briefing note 14 May 2014 Japan amends its Commercial Arbitration Rules Japan is known, at least in academic circles, as a country of low "litigiousness".
More informationDisclosure of documents in civil proceedings in England and Wales
Disclosure of documents in civil proceedings in England and Wales October 2017 Contents Disclosure 1 Purpose of this note 1 Disclosable documents 1 Control 2 Preservation of documents 3 Duty to search
More informationChina's New Exit-Entry Law Targets Illegal Foreigners July 2012
China's New Exit-Entry Law Targets Illegal Foreigners July 2012 Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of the alert please contact a person mentioned below or the person
More informationRisk and Return. Foreign Direct Investment and the Rule of Law. Briefing Note
Risk and Return Foreign Direct Investment and the Rule of Law Briefing Note Risk and Return Foreign Direct Investment and the Rule of Law 3 Briefing Note Background and objectives The Economist Intelligence
More informationEEA and Swiss national. Children and their rights to British citizenship
EEA and Swiss national Children and their rights to British citizenship April 2019 Please note: The information set out here does not cover all the circumstances in which a child born to a European Economic
More informationPossible models for the UK/EU relationship
Possible models for the UK/EU relationship This paper summarizes some potential alternative models for the UK s future relationship with the European Union, together with the key differences between the
More informationBREXIT AND JURISDICTION CLAUSES: CHOICE OF ENGLISH LAW FOLLOWING THE EU REFERENDUM
: CHOICE OF ENGLISH LAW FOLLOWING THE EU REFERENDUM The choice of law to govern a contract will be unaffected by Brexit, if and when it occurs, but jurisdiction provisions may require consideration. But
More information2. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROCEDURAL REGULATION ARTICLE
RESPONSE TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION S CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO REGULATION 773/2004 AND THE NOTICES ON ACCESS TO THE FILE, LENIENCY, SETTLEMENTS AND COOPERATION WITH NATIONAL COURTS Freshfields
More informationSettlement Offers under Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Settlement Offers under Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules September 2017 Contents Introduction 1 When is a settlement offer a true Part 36 Offer? 2 Costs consequences of making a Part 36 Offer 4 Part
More informationAIPLA Overview of recent developments in Community trade mark law
AIPLA Overview of recent developments in Community trade mark law Marie-Aimée de Dampierre, Partner 2 May 2013 IPMT / Paris Overview Trade mark registration general principles Earlier rights Distinctiveness
More informationAbout Allen & Overy LLP
Allen & Overy LLP's Response to the European Commission Staff Working Document "Towards a coherent European approach to collective redress", SEC (2011) 173 final About Allen & Overy LLP Allen & Overy LLP
More informationChanges to the Russian Civil Code: What's new in the regulation of obligations
Changes to the Russian Civil Code: What's new in the regulation of obligations 1 Briefing note May 2015 Changes to the Russian Civil Code: What's new in the regulation of obligations As of 1 June 2015,
More informationBusiness Immigration. Brexit and the EU Settlement Scheme. December 2018
Business Immigration Brexit and the EU Settlement Scheme December 2018 Foreword Brexit will have a major impact on EU nationals and their family members in the UK. The Government has introduced a plan
More informationPatent Litigation in China & Amicus Curiae in the U.S. William (Skip) Fisher Partner, Shanghai. EPLAW Congress, 22 November 2013
Patent Litigation in China & Amicus Curiae in the U.S. William (Skip) Fisher Partner, Shanghai EPLAW Congress, 22 November 2013 What I will cover Considerations for patent litigation in China Anatomy of
More informationJurisdiction and Governing Law Rules in the European Union
2016 Jurisdiction and Governing Law Rules in the European Union Contents Introduction Recast Brussels Regulation (EU 1215/2012) Rome I Regulation (EC 593/2008) Rome II Regulation (EC 864/2007) Main exceptions
More informationIndemnities, Disclaimers and Constitution
Indemnities, Disclaimers and Constitution Deon Francis 21 May 2015 Disclaimer Notice 2 Overview Legal principles Contract; and Delict Public policy The Constitution Cases Questions 3 Legal Principles Contractual
More informationWhat You Need To Know About The Rise Of Civil Litigation By State Attorneys General
What You Need To Know About The Rise Of Civil Litigation By State Attorneys General This brown bag is brought to you by the Healthcare Liability and Litigation (HC Liability) Practice Group April 18, 2011
More informationEU-China Workshop on Trademark Law
EU-China Workshop on Trademark Law 13 May 2011 - Diqing (Yunnan Province) Marc L. Holtorf / 郝韬福 Topic III - Indication of Source, Appellation of Origin and Geographical Indications Overview German national
More informationPrivately Funded Civil Litigation CFAs and DBAs Frequently Asked Questions
Privately Funded Civil Litigation CFAs and DBAs Frequently Asked Questions Updated October 2017 The Bar Council frequently receives enquiries from barristers and clerks in relation to Conditional Fee Agreements
More informationIP & IT Bytes. November Patents: jurisdiction and declaratory relief
November 2016 IP & IT Bytes First published in the November 2016 issue of PLC Magazine and reproduced with the kind permission of the publishers. Subscription enquiries 020 7202 1200. Patents: jurisdiction
More informationFor the purpose of this opinion, we have assumed the following:
Baker & McKenzie Ltd. Attorneys at Law 25th Floor, Abdulrahim Place 990 Rama IV Road Bangkok 10500, Thailand Tel: +66 (0) 2636 2000 Fax: +66 (0) 2636 2111 bangkok.info@bakernet.com www.bakernet.com Asia
More informationHow the French contract law reform impacts your contracts: key points
How the French contract law reform impacts your contracts: key points 1 Client Briefing 13 October 2016 How the French contract law reform impacts your contracts: key points On 1 October 2016, the French
More informationEuropean Regulation on the freezing of bank accounts
European Regulation on the freezing of bank accounts November 2016 OVERVIEW From 18 January 2017 claimants will be able to apply for a European Account Preservation Order (EAPO), a new, and potentially
More informationDamages in Judicial Review: The Commercial Context
Damages in Judicial Review: The Commercial Context Further information If you would like further information on any aspect of Damages in Judicial Review please contact a person mentioned below or the person
More informationLEGAL GUIDE HANDY CLIENT GUIDE TO PRIVILEGE
LEGAL GUIDE HANDY CLIENT GUIDE TO PRIVILEGE LEGAL PROFESSIONAL PRIVILEGE: A DECISION TREE AT THE TIME A DOCUMENT/COMMUNICATION ( X ) WAS CREATED This decision tree has been prepared as a quick reference
More informationThe netting decision of the German Federal Court of Justice key issues
The netting decision of the German Federal Court of Justice key issues 1 Newsletter June 2016 The netting decision of the German Federal Court of Justice key issues The decision of the German Federal Court
More informationLatham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department
Number 1090 October 13, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Environment, Land & Resources Department Recent Legislative Changes Affecting Pending and Future Projects Under CEQA This legislation is intended
More informationSeminar for HKIS on: "Non-Payment and Termination of Contracts"
Seminar for HKIS on: "Non-Payment and Termination of Contracts" 13 May 2014 Joyce Leung, Associate Projects (Engineering & Construction) Practice Contractual Termination Conditional upon: 1. an event -
More informationSecurity of Payment Legislation and Set-Off Under Commonwealth Insolvency Laws
1 April 2015 Practice Group(s): Energy & Infrastructure Projects and Transactions Real Estate Restructuring and Insolvency Security of Payment Legislation and Set-Off Under Commonwealth Australia Energy,
More informationThe Senior Consumer. The Institute of Food, Medicine and Nutrition October David Donnan. A.T. Kearney October
The Senior Consumer The Institute of Food, Medicine and Nutrition October 2015 David Donnan A.T. Kearney October 2015 1 We are facing an Agequake THE SUPER-AGING OVERHANG (Countries with >65 segments over
More informationASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN THE BRAVE NEW WORLD EIGHTH LECTURE BY LORD JUSTICE JACKSON IN THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME
ASSESSMENT OF COSTS IN THE BRAVE NEW WORLD EIGHTH LECTURE BY LORD JUSTICE JACKSON IN THE IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME KPMG FORENSIC S LEEDS LAW LECTURE 2012 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The text of this lecture is
More informationGUIDE TO RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ICA ARBITRATION AWARDS IN THAILAND LEGAL GUIDE FIRST EDITION
GUIDE TO RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF ICA ARBITRATION AWARDS IN THAILAND LEGAL GUIDE FIRST EDITION August 2015 HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS GUIDE TO RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT 03 OF ICA ARBITRATION AWARDS
More informationBREXIT THE CONSTITUTIONAL ENDGAME AND THE NEED TO ACT NOW
BREXIT THE CONSTITUTIONAL ENDGAME AND THE NEED TO ACT NOW BREXIT: THE CONSTITUTIONAL ENDGAME AND THE NEED TO ACT NOW Service of notice under article 50 of the Treaty on European Union will fire the starting
More informationNEFF CORP FORM S-8. (Securities Registration: Employee Benefit Plan) Filed 11/21/14
NEFF CORP FORM S-8 (Securities Registration: Employee Benefit Plan) Filed 11/21/14 Address 3750 N.W. 87TH AVENUE SUITE 400 MIAMI, FL 33178 Telephone 3055133350 CIK 0001617667 Symbol NEFF SIC Code 7359
More informationCriminal liability of legal persons
Criminal liability of legal persons March 2016 The new Slovak legislation governing the criminal liability of legal persons will come into effect on 1 July 2016. Considering the extent of the new legislation,
More informationLEVEL 6 - UNIT 15 CIVIL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2016
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 6 - UNIT 15 CIVIL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2016 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points
More informationINSOLVENCY UPDATE A CONCISE GUIDE TO THE 2017 INSOLVENCY AND RESTRUCTURING AMENDMENTS TO THE SINGAPORE COMPANIES ACT
A CONCISE GUIDE TO THE 2017 INSOLVENCY AND RESTRUCTURING AMENDMENTS TO THE SINGAPORE COMPANIES ACT CONTENTS Introduction 3 1. Executive Summary 4 2. Increased Accessibility for Foreign Companies 4 3. Enhanced
More informationDISPUTE RESOLUTION AND GOVERNING LAW CLAUSES IN INDONESIA-RELATED CONTRACTS LEGAL GUIDE FIRST EDITION
DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND GOVERNING LAW CLAUSES IN INDONESIA-RELATED CONTRACTS LEGAL GUIDE FIRST EDITION 02 DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND GOVERNING LAW Contents page 1. Introduction...03 2. Definitions...04 3. Dispute
More informationTHIS PRACTICE DIRECTION SUPPLEMENTS CPR PARTS 43 TO 48
PRACTICE DIRECTION PART 43 PRACTICE DIRECTION ABOUT COSTS THIS PRACTICE DIRECTION SUPPLEMENTS CPR PARTS 43 TO 48. SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION. SECTION 2 SCOPE OF COSTS RULES AND DEFINITIONS. SECTION 3 MODEL
More informationLORD JUSTICE JACKSON S REVIEW OF CIVIL LITIGATION COSTS FINAL REPORT. Summary of Recommendations
LORD JUSTICE JACKSON S REVIEW OF CIVIL LITIGATION COSTS Recommendations: Executive Summary FINAL REPORT Summary of Recommendations Lord Justice Jackson s report contained an executive summary of his recommendations
More informationSarepta Therapeutics, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Registration No. 333-101826 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 POST-EFFECTIVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO FORM S-8 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 Sarepta
More informationRTA Post Jackson How to deal with them 3 months on what have we learned?
www.clerksroom.com Administration: Equity House Blackbrook Park Avenue Taunton Somerset TA1 2PX DX: 97188 Taunton Blackbrook T: 0845 083 3000 F: 0845 083 3001 mail@clerksroom.com www.clerksroom.com RTA
More informationPROCEDURE FOR DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF COSTS AND DEFAULT PROVISIONS
PRACTICE DIRECTION PART 47 DIRECTIONS RELATING TO PART 47 PROCEDURE FOR DETAILED ASSESSMENT OF COSTS AND DEFAULT PROVISIONS SECTION 28 TIME WHEN ASSESSMENT MAY BE CARRIED OUT: RULE 47.1 28.1 (1) For the
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department
Number 866 May 14, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department The Third Circuit Clarifies the Class Action Fairness Act s Local Controversy Exception to Federal Jurisdiction In addressing
More informationDelaware Bankruptcy Court Confirms Lock-Up Agreements Are a Valuable Tool Not a Violation of the Bankruptcy Code
Latham & Watkins Number 1467 February 13, 2013 Finance Department Delaware Bankruptcy Court Confirms Lock-Up Agreements Are a Valuable Tool Not a Violation of the Bankruptcy Code Josef S. Athanas, Caroline
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 1025 May 13, 2010 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Pending a decision on BNY s appeal, structured transaction and derivative lawyers should carefully consider the drafting of current
More informationINSIDE ARBITRATION PERSPECTIVES ON CROSS-BORDER DISPUTES
INSIDE ARBITRATION PERSPECTIVES ON CROSS-BORDER DISPUTES IN THIS ISSUE 04 Interview with Incoming Secretary General of the HKIAC Sarah Grimmer 06 Arbitrating disputes under the ISDA Master Agreement Nick
More informationStatutory adjudication
Statutory adjudication 2017 A brief overview of statutory adjudication What is statutory adjudication? Statutory adjudication is adjudication which takes place under Part II of the Housing Grants, Construction
More informationEnglish jurisdiction clauses should commercial parties change their approach?
Brexit legal consequences for commercial parties English jurisdiction clauses should commercial parties change their approach? February 2016 Issue in focus In our first Specialist paper on the legal consequences
More information2011 No. 586 (L. 2) SENIOR COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES COUNTY COURTS, ENGLAND AND WALES. The Civil Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2011
S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2011 No. 586 (L. 2) SENIOR COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES COUNTY COURTS, ENGLAND AND WALES The Civil Proceedings Fees (Amendment) Order 2011 Made - - - - 28th February
More informationIN THE COUNTY COURT AT NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE Case No: B54YJ494. Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE FREEDMAN. and JUDGMENT
IN THE COUNTY COURT AT NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE Case No: B54YJ494 Hearing date: 11 th August 2017 Before: HIS HONOUR JUDGE FREEDMAN B E T W E E N: DEBORAH BOWMAN Claimant and NORFRAN ALUMINIUM LIMITED (1) R
More information340B Update: HRSA Finalizes 340B Pricing & Penalties for Drug Manufacturers
18 January 2017 Practice Group: Health Care 340B Update: HRSA Finalizes 340B Pricing & Penalties for Drug Manufacturers By Richard P. Church, Michael H. Hinckle, Ryan J. Severson On January 5, 2017, the
More informationLatham & Watkins Health Care Practice
Number 878 June 8, 2009 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Health Care Practice This initiative represents a continuation and expansion of interagency efforts begun more than two years ago and illustrates an
More informationWho can create jobs in america? The American Worker Perspective on U.S. Job Creation
Who can create jobs in america? The American Worker Perspective on U.S. Job Creation Who can create jobs in america? The perspectives of a CFO master class The American Worker Perspective on U.S. Job Creation
More informationBrexit English law and the English Courts
Brexit Law your business, the EU and the way ahead Brexit English law and the English Courts Introduction June 2018 One of the key questions that commercial parties continue to raise in relation to Brexit,
More informationLatham & Watkins Finance Department
Number 1147 February 17, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department The Settlement does not affirm or overturn Judge Peck s controversial decision in the US Litigation barring enforcement of
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation Department Securities Litigation and Professional Liability Practice
Number 1312 April 4, 2012 Client Alert While the Second Circuit s formulation answers some questions about what transactions fall within the scope of Section 10(b), it also raises a host of new questions
More informationBackground. 21 August Practice Group: Public Policy and Law. By Raymond P. Pepe
21 August 2014 Practice Group: Public Policy and Law Permanent Injunction of Pennsylvania s Prohibition against Establishment of Political Committees to Receive Contributions of Corporate and Labor Union
More informationAlternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) In Chapter 36 of his Final Report Jackson LJ wrote:
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) In Chapter 36 of his Final Report Jackson LJ wrote: 4.2 I recommend that: (i) There should be a serious campaign (a) to ensure that all litigation lawyers and judges
More informationGENERAL RULES ABOUT COSTS
GENERAL RULES ABOUT COSTS PART 44 PART 44 Contents of this Part Rule 44.1 Rule 44.2 Rule 44.3 Rule 44.3A Rule 44.3B Rule 44.3C Rule 44.4 Rule 44.5 Rule 44.6 Rule 44.7 Rule 44.8 Rule 44.9 Rule 44.10 Rule
More informationPIBA S ANALYSIS OF ISSUES ARISING FROM THE JACKSON REFORMS
For the Civil Justice Council 27.2.2014 PIBA S ANALYSIS OF ISSUES ARISING FROM THE JACKSON REFORMS 1. The types of cases being taken on (and not being taken on) by law firms Some barristers are already
More informationFreedom of Information Act Request: Mobile Biometric Devices and Applications
51 LOUISIANA AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001.2113 TELEPHONE: +1.202.879.3939 FACSIMILE: +1.202.626.1700 Direct Number: (202) 879-3437 smlevine@jonesday.com VIA E-MAIL: ICE-FOIA@DHS.GOV U.S. Immigration
More informationGuide to the Patents County Court Small Claims Track
Guide to the Patents County Court Small Claims Track 1. General 1.1. Introduction This Guide applies to the small claims track within the Patents County Court (PCC). It is written for all users of the
More informationGeneral Pre-Action Protocol. Practice Direction on Protocols
General Pre-Action Protocol and Practice Direction on Protocols Response to Consultation [8 October 2008] 1 General Pre-Action Protocol and Practice Direction on Protocols Response to consultation carried
More informationSECURITIES INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION
SECURITIES INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION Michael Delikat mdelikat@orrick.com Jill Rosenberg jrosenberg@orrick.com Lisa Lupion llupion@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 51 W 52 nd Street New
More informationThe Current Regime. Unreasonable Behaviour
Lord Justice Jackson s Supplemental Report into Civil Litigation Costs After many months of work, Lord Justice Jackson s report on fixed costs is now available. This briefing considers his proposals and
More informationVIEW FROM DAVOS: THE END OF GLOBALISATION?
VIEW FROM DAVOS: THE END OF GLOBALISATION? VIEW FROM DAVOS: THE END OF GLOBALISATION? The issue now is how we manage globalisation. JOSEPH E. STIGLITZ Donald Trump s ascent to power, the UK s supposed
More informationCompetition Law Newsletter. Settlement with the Competition Authority
Competition Law Newsletter Settlement with the Competition Authority October 2013 The main purpose of a settlement with the competition authority is an efficient conclusion of the procedure with considerable
More informationUSDA Rulemaking Petition
USDA Rulemaking Petition Sound Horse Conference 2010 Joyce M. Wang Latham & Watkins LLP Latham & Watkins operates as a limited liability partnership worldwide with affiliated limited liability partnerships
More informationFull guidance and FAQs
Acting pro bono? Please seek pro bono costs Full guidance and FAQs Download quick guides at www.atjf.org.uk Questions? costs@atjf.org.uk Thank you! The Foundation distributes the funds to support agencies
More informationClient Alert. Background on Discovery Requests under Section 1782
Number 1383 August 13, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation Department Eleventh Circuit Holds That Parties to Private International Commercial Arbitral Tribunals May Seek Discovery Assistance
More informationLatham & Watkins Litigation and Finance Departments. Supreme Court Limits Reach of Non-Article III Courts Jurisdiction
Number 1210 July 5, 2011 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Litigation and Finance Departments Supreme Court Limits Reach of Non-Article III Courts Jurisdiction Under Article III, the judicial power of the
More informationVIEW FROM DAVOS: TECHNOLOGY WILL IT UNITE OR DIVIDE US?
VIEW FROM DAVOS: TECHNOLOGY WILL IT UNITE OR DIVIDE US? JANUARY 2018 VIEW FROM DAVOS: WILL TECHNOLOGY UNITE OR DIVIDE US? Technology was one of the dominant themes at the World Economic Forum in Davos.
More informationAutomotive: A Pillar of Mexico s Economy
Executive Agenda Automotive: A Pillar of Mexico s Economy Last June, Ernesto Hernandez was named President and Managing Director of General Motors de Mexico. In this exclusive interview, Mr. Hernandez
More informationCEE Public Procurement toolbox of remedies
CEE Public Procurement toolbox of remedies 2017 Toolbox of remedies in CEE public procurements In each CEE jurisdiction there are various remedies available in public procurement cases to ensure that related
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTION [ ] DISCLOSURE PILOT FOR THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS
Draft at 2.11.17 PRACTICE DIRECTION [ ] DISCLOSURE PILOT FOR THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS 1. General 1.1 This Practice Direction is made under Part 51 and provides a pilot scheme for disclosure in
More informationDelaware Chancery Court Confirms the Invalidity of Fee-Shifting Bylaws for Stock Corporations
4 January 2017 Practice Group(s): Corporate/M&A Delaware Chancery Court Confirms the Invalidity of Fee-Shifting Bylaws for By Lisa R. Stark and Taylor B. Bartholomew In Solak v. Sarowitz, C.A. No. 12299-CB
More informationBefore : MR EDWARD PEPPERALL QC SITTING AS A DEPUTY HIGH COURT JUDGE Between : ABDULRAHMAN MOHAMMED Claimant
Neutral Citation: [2017] EWHC 3051 (QB) Case No: HQ16X01806 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION Before : MR EDWARD PEPPERALL QC SITTING AS A DEPUTY HIGH COURT JUDGE - - - - - - - - - -
More informationConditional Fee Agreement (CFA) Additional Explanatory Notes Law Society Conditions (as amended)
Conditional Fee Agreement (CFA) Additional Explanatory Notes Law Society Conditions (as amended) The amended Law Society Conditions below form part of your Conditional Fee Agreement. You should read the
More informationClient Alert. Revisiting Venue: Patriot Coal and the Interest of Justice. Background
Number 1447 January 2, 2013 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Revisiting Venue: Patriot Coal and the Interest of Justice Steps taken by parties on the eve of filing for bankruptcy are likely
More information