The Doctor Is Out, But Is Resale Price Maintenance In?
|
|
- Georgina Harvey
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 July 2007 / Issue 20 A legal upate from Dechert s Antitrust Group The Doctor Is Out, But Is Resale Price Maintenance In? Key Questions for Clients Consiering Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) after Leegin 1. Why o you want to aopt RPM? A strong business rationale to promote interbran competition will be critical to overcome any legal challenge to the program. 2. Is the impetus for RPM coming from your retailers? Group pressure for RPM emanating from your retailer network can be use as evience that the restraint is facilitating a retailer cartel, or supporting a less efficient, but ominant, retailer. 3. Do others in your inustry have resale price maintenance policies? If the manufacturers employing RPM o not account for a ominant share of the market, a court will be less likely to conclue that the practice coul facilitate a manufacturer cartel. 4. What is your market share? Low market share makes it less likely that a manufacturer s RPM agreements coul even potentially achieve the kins of anticompetitive effects escribe in Leegin. 5. How oes Leegin affect the law in the states where you want to sell? Not all state antitrust laws follow the feeral law. RPM may continue to be illegal per se in some states, an state attorneys general may continue their enforcement efforts in this area. Supreme Court Overturns 96-Year- Ol-Preceent On June 28, 2007, in a lanmark 5-4 ecision, the Supreme Court funamentally change the law governing antitrust claims base on allege resale price maintenance ( RPM ) agreements. The Court sai goobye to one of its longstaning antitrust preceents, Dr. Miles Meical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co, 1 when it rule that resale price maintenance woul no longer be per se illegal. Leegin Creative Leather Proucts v. PSKS, Inc., No , S.Ct., 2007 WL (June 28, 2007). Leegin (pronounce like legion ) involve an antitrust challenge to Leegin s policy of refusing to sell its specialty leather goos an accessories to retailers who iscounte below suggeste prices an its relate marketing program, which require participating retailers to plege to sell at the suggeste prices. The trial court preclue the efenant from introucing expert testimony regaring the pro-competitive effects of its policies because RPM agreements were per se unlawful uner Dr. Miles. After losing at trial, the efenant challenge the application of the per se rule to its conuct. Boun by Dr. Miles, the Fifth Circuit affirme. The Supreme Court grante certiorari to reconsier the question it ecie long ago in Dr. Miles, namely whether vertical minimum resale price maintenance agreements shoul continue to be treate as per se unlawful. In an opinion by Justice Kenney, the Court U.S. 373 (1911).
2 ecie to jettison the per se rule. The ecision reste on several key points: Dr. Miles represente a eparture from the accepte rule-of-reason stanar for evaluating restraints generally, an for evaluating vertical restraints specifically, uner the Sherman Act. The unerpinnings of Dr. Miles ha been eroe by subsequent ecisions recognizing the ifferences in economic effect between vertical an horizontal agreements, ifferences the Dr. Miles Court faile to consier because it relie on formalistic legal octrine rather than emonstrable economic effect. The abunant economic literature recognizing pro-competitive justifications for a manufacturer s use of resale price maintenance argue against a per se approach, which is reserve for situations in which the practice always or almost always restricts competition an ecreases output. A manufacturer in a competitive market will generally have no incentive to overcompensate its retailers with inflate margins, since to o so woul not increase the manufacturer s margin, but woul reuce the sale of its proucts. Applying a per se rule to vertical price fixing an the rule of reason to other vertical restraints create an anomalous situation which rove manufacturers to less efficient istribution methos an create legal istinctions that became a trap for the unwary. Rule-of-Reason Guieposts Possible pro-competitive justifications: Manufacturers consiering a resale price maintenance program after Leegin must still make sure it will withstan scrutiny uner the rule of reason. This will require a soun pro-competitive justification. The majority opinion offere several possibilities. These inclue: encouraging retailers to invest in proviing aitional services for consumers by offering the retailer a guarantee margin; giving consumers more options, allowing them to choose among low-price, lowservice brans; high-price, high-service brans; an brans that fall in between; facilitating market entry for new firms an brans; an minimizing the risk of free-riing situations in which iscounting retailers capture some of the eman generate by other retailers who invest in increase services, thereby reucing the incentive to o so. Potential anti-competitive effects: While shutting the oor on Dr. Miles, the Court also clarifie the specific types of interbran anti-competitive effects that might support a rule-of-reason violation. The Court note that an RPM agreement might be use to facilitate a horizontal manufacturer or retailer cartel, forestall innovation in istribution that ecreases costs, or exclue rival manufacturers. Relevant factors to consier in etermining whether or not such an anticompetitive use of RPM is plausible inclue, among others: the number of competing manufacturers that have aopte RPM agreements; whether the impetus for the RPM agreement was the manufacturer or its ealers; an whether the participating manufacturers an retailers possess market power in a properly efine relevant market. The Court observe that anti-competitive uses of RPM are unlikely in situations in which the participating retailers or manufacturers lack market power, or in which only a few manufacturers in a relevant antitrust market use RPM. Implications for Manufacturers Manufacturers with free rier issues: The manufacturers with the most immeiate interest in Leegin are likely to be those who currently employ programs to prevent free riing. These may either take the form of vertical territorial or customer restrictions or a program seeking to take avantage of the Colgate oc- July 2007 / Issue 20 2
3 trine permitting manufacturers to terminate iscounting ealers unilaterally. 2 These manufacturers may now want to consier whether some form of RPM is a more efficient way to solve their free-rier issues. E-tailers: Although the Court i not iscuss internet retailing, Leegin may give manufacturers the poisonippe arrow with which to shoot own wiesprea iscounting of their proucts (an resulting evisceration of their bran equity) over the internet. One of the commonly asserte justifications for resale price maintenance in such circumstances is to prevent free riing. Even Justice Breyer, writing for the issent, acknowlege the avoiance of free riing as one of the important consumer benefits of resale price maintenance. Uner a rule-of-reason analysis, this may prove a powerful argument to justify imposing RPM requirements on internet sellers. Intellectual property owners: Of potential interest will be the egree to which Leegin carries over into the intellectual property arena. In 1926, in Unite States v. General Electric Co., 3 the Supreme Court hel that a patent owner coul agree with its licensee on a minimum price which the licensee must charge for articles manufacture uner the license. Subsequent ecisions have unermine this preceent but never overrule it, 4 an most intellectual property owners have therefore been reluctant to incorporate pricing restrictions of any kin in their licenses. Leegin opens the oor to a reconsieration of many of the ecisions that have unermine GE as a reliable preceent. large majority of state antitrust laws require aherence to feeral antitrust preceents, some state laws o not. In states that o not look to feeral law, RPM may be (or coul become) per se illegal. Enforcement attitues may iffer as well. Cases against RPM have been a significant enforcement priority of state attorneys general over the last 25 years. So, whereas the feeral antitrust agencies argue as amicus in Leegin that Dr. Miles shoul be overrule, an amicus brief submitte by a large number of state attorneys general argue just the opposite that Dr. Miles shoul not be overrule an that RPM shoul continue to be governe by the per se rule. This suggests that state attorneys general might continue to police this area, either by exploiting the lines of attack suggeste by the Court or uner state laws that o not require aherence to feeral preceent. Their ability to o so coul be bolstere if state legislatures amen their antitrust laws to reinstate the per se rule for RPM within the state. Such a legislative response woul not be unpreceente. A majority of the states, for example, passe legislation in the 1980s to exempt their state antitrust laws from the Supreme Court s Illinois Brick 5 ecision enying feeral staning to inirect purchasers. Nor woul such legislation necessarily be pre-empte by feeral law. 6 5 Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977). 6 See, e.g., Exxon Corp. v. Marylan, 437 U.S. 117 (1978). Impact on State Antitrust Law an Enforcement A Caution The Leegin ecision eliminate the per se rule for RPM as a matter of feeral antitrust law only. While the 2 Unite States v. Colgate & Co., 250 U.S. 300 (1919) U.S. 476( 1926). 4 See, e.g., Unite States v. Line Material Co., 333 U.S. 287, (1948) (General Electric not applie to crosslicense patents); Unite States v. Univis Lens, 316 U.S. 241, (1942) (General Electric oes not apply after the first sale of a prouct by the licensor); Newbourgh Moire Co. v. Superior Moire Co., 237 F (3 Cir. 1956) (General Electric oes not apply to multiple licenses containing price-fixing provisions); Cummer- Graham Co. v. Straight Sie Basket Corp., 142 F (5th Cir. 1944) (General Electric oes not apply to restrictions on the price of an unpatente goo manufacture using a patente process). July 2007 / Issue 20 3
4 Practice group contacts If you have questions regaring the information in this legal upate, please contact the Dechert attorney with whom you regularly work, or any of the attorneys liste. Visit us at Jeffrey W. Brennan Paul H. Frieman Robin P. Sumner Philaelphia Stephen D. Brown Philaelphia George G. Goron Philaelphia Joseph A. Tate Philaelphia Peter R. Crockfor Lonon Robert C. Heim Philaelphia Chris Watson Lonon Paul T. Denis Kevin T. Kerns Philaelphia Rebecca P. Dick Ewar L. Kling Lonon H. Joseph Escher III San Francisco Christine C. Levin Philaelphia Michael D. Farber Pierre-Manuel Louis pierre.louis@echert.com Carolyn H. Feeney Philaelphia carolyn.feeney@echert.com Isabelle M. Rahman isabelle.rahman@echert.com James A. Fishkin james.fishkin@echert.com Stephen A. Stack, Jr. Philaelphia stephen.stack@echert.com July 2007 / Issue 20 4
5 U.S. UK/Europe Dwww.echert.com Austin Boston Charlotte Hartfor New York Newport Beach Philaelphia Princeton San Francisco Silicon Valley Lonon Luxembourg Munich Paris 2007 Dechert LLP. All rights reserve. Materials have been abrige from laws, court ecisions, an aministrative rulings an shoul not be consiere as legal opinions on specific facts or as a substitute for legal counsel. This publication, provie by Dechert LLP as a general informational service, may be consiere attorney avertising in some jurisictions. Prior results o not guarantee a similar outcome. July 2007 / Issue 20 5
The Equality Act 2010 What Employers Need to Know Now
October 2010 / Special Alert A legal upate from Dechert s Employment Law Group The Equality Act 2010 What Employers Nee to Know Now Introuction The Equality Act (the Act ) receive Royal Assent in early
More informationThe United States Supreme Court Upholds the Gartenberg Standard for Claims Alleging Excessive Advisory Fees
March 2010 / Issue 8 A legal upate from Dechert s Financial Services Group The Unite States Supreme Court Uphols the Gartenberg Stanar for Claims Alleging Excessive Avisory Fees Introuction On March 30,
More informationLESER Global Form Global Commodity Management General Conditions Purchasing
Global Commoity Management General Conitions Page 1/7 I. General / scope of application 1. These General Conitions of Purchase apply to all contracts entere into by LESER an a supplier or subcontractor
More informationLegal Methodology in Antitrust Law
Thema/Anlass Datum Seite 1 Legal Methodology in Antitrust Law 10,502,1.00 Comparative Legal Methods Prof. Dr. Peter Hettich, LL.M. Friday, November 16, 2007, 12:35 Agenda Substantive Law and Procedure
More informationAnglo-American Law. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. V. Psks, Inc., Dba Kay s Kloset, Kay s Shoes. Aykut ÖZDEMİR* * Attorney at law.
Anglo-American Law Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. V. Psks, Inc., Dba Kay s Kloset, Kay s Shoes Aykut ÖZDEMİR* * Attorney at law. Introduction Mainly, agreements restricting competition are grouped
More informationPublished in cooperation with the University of Pittsburgh s Tri-State Area School Study Council 2017
EDUCATION LAW REPORT Publishe in cooperation with the University of Pittsburgh s Tri-State Area School Stuy Council Volume XXVIII Number 1 2017 In This Issue Office of Open Recors Hols That School Vieos
More informationINTERNATIONAL SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS: CURRENT TRENDS & ISSUES. By David B. Eberhardt and John E. McCann, Jr.
INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION ARRANGEMENTS: CURRENT TRENDS & ISSUES By David B. Eberhardt and John E. McCann, Jr. In today s global economy, and with the advent of purchasing via the Internet,
More informationCAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE
VIRGINIA CAMPAIGN FINANCE AND BALLOT MEASURE GUIDE These resources are current as of 11/5/2014: We o our best to perioically upate these resources an welcome any comments or questions regaring new evelopments
More informationWikiLeaks Document Release
WikiLeaks Document Release February 2, 2009 Congressional Research Service Report RS22700 Resale Price Maintenance No Longer a Per Se Antitrust Offense: Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, Inc. Janice
More informationCan international human rights treaties (IHRTs)
Treaties, Tenure, an Torture: The Conflicting Domestic Effects of International Law Courtenay R. Conra Emily Hencken Ritter University of California, Merce University of California, Merce International
More informationPublished in cooperation with the University of Pittsburgh s Tri-State Area School Study Council 2017
EDUCATION LAW REPORT Publishe in cooperation with the University of Pittsburgh s Tri-State Area School Stuy Council Volume XXVIII Number 2 2017 In This Issue Feeral Court Allows Title IX Claim to Procee
More informationIn The Supreme Court of the United States
No. 06-480 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States LEEGIN CREATIVE LEATHER PRODUCTS, INC., v. Petitioner, PSKS, INC., doing business as
More informationState Regulation of Resale Price Maintenance on the Internet: The Constitutional Problems with the 2009 Amendment to the Maryland Antitrust Act
State Regulation of Resale Price Maintenance on the Internet: The Constitutional Problems with the 2009 Amendment to the Maryland Antitrust Act Katherine M. Brockmeyer * Table of Contents I. Introduction...
More informationCRIMINALIZATION OF MARITIME ACTIVITIES
CRIMINALIZATION OF MARITIME ACTIVITIES Charles M. Davis 2008 Vessel operators, incluing shoresie corporate officers an supervisors, an shipboar officers an crews, potentially are subject to criminal prosecution
More information.Jl 76 April Haskell, with whom was Joanne T. Belisle, Glastonbury, for appellant (intervening
DURNIAK v AUGUST WINTER AND SONS, INC Conn 1277 Cite as 610 A2 1277 (Conn 1992) of employee's eath Employer intervene been no formal eman mae upon the responent for support prior to this petition We agree
More informationEFFECTS OF APPRENTICESHIP AND SOCIAL CAPITAL ON NEW BUSINESS CREATION PROCESS OF IMMIGRANT ENTREPRENEURS
Review of Public Aministration an Management Vol., No. 3, July 3 ISSN: 3-44 Website: www.arabianjbmr.com/rpam_inex.php Publisher: Department of Public Aministration Nnami Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria
More informationConvention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women
Unite Nations CEDAW/C/2006/II/4 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Distr.: General 19 April 2006 Original: English Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination
More informationSec Findings on the public health, safety, and welfare rationales of sign regulations.
Forsyth County Sign Orinance Chapter 66 - SIGNS FOOTNOTE(S): --- (1) --- Cross reference Builings an builing regulations, ch. 18; planning, ch. 58; unifie evelopment coe, app. A. (Back) State Law reference
More information2007] THE SUPREME COURT LEADING CASES 425
2007] THE SUPREME COURT LEADING CASES 425 dent, this is the congressional design. 95 Reserving its most forceful language to criticize one factor on the EPA s laundry list of impermissible reasons not
More informationCOMPARATIVE VERSUS CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE: A COMPARISON OF THE LITIGATION EXPENDITURES
COMARATIVE VERSUS CONTRIBUTOR NEGLIGENCE: A COMARISON O THE LITIGATION EENDITURES Jef De Mot ost-octoral Researcher WO University of Ghent Center for Avance Stuies in Law an Economics Visiting scholar
More informationA CRS Report for Congress
' ~ apt. Order Code RS22700 July 30, 2007 A CRS Report for Congress Resale Price Maintenance No Longer a Per Se Antitrust Offense: Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, Inc. Summary Janice E. Rubin
More informationABA Antitrust Section Fall Forum Legislation: What is Congress Doing?
ABA Antitrust Section Fall Forum Legislation: What is Congress Doing? Moderator: Arthur N. Lerner November 16, 2007 Washington, D.C. Crowell & Moring, Washington, DC Speakers Ivy Johnson, Chief Antitrust
More informationThe Decoupling of Median Wages from Productivity in OECD Countries
The Decoupling of Meian Wages from Prouctivity in OECD Countries Cyrille Schwellnus, Anreas Kappeler an Pierre-Alain Pionnier OECD 1 ABSTRACT Over the past two ecaes, aggregate labour prouctivity growth
More informationLessons ofauo: Application of the Per Se Rule Precluded Evaluation of the Reasons for, and Impact of Competitor Meetings
61ST ANNUAL ANTITRUST LAW SPRING MEETING April 10, 2013 3:45-5:15 pm Lessons From the AU0 Trial Lessons ofauo: Application of the Per Se Rule Precluded Evaluation of the Reasons for, and Impact of Competitor
More informationGREENWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT US Government Pacing Guide st Semester THIRD NINE WEEKS
Instructional Perio Pacing Guie 2017 2018 1 st Semester THIRD NINE WEEKS Acaemic Framework/ 1 Aug. 06 5, b, c 6a, b, c INTRODUCTION to COURSE Chapter 1: Government an the State Define Government an its
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH ) BENEFITS FUND, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-12277-PBS ) ) McKESSON CORPORATION, ) Defendant.
More informationFTC AND DOJ ISSUE JOINT REPORT REGARDING ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
OF INTEREST FTC AND DOJ ISSUE JOINT REPORT REGARDING ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS Interesting and difficult questions lie at the intersection of intellectual property rights and
More informationThe Rule of Reason After Leegin: Reconsidering the Use of Economic Analysis in the Antitrust Arena
The Rule of Reason After Leegin: Reconsidering the Use of Economic Analysis in the Antitrust Arena The rule of reason is designed and used to eliminate anti-competitive transactions from the market. This
More informationWhat Should Be Next at the Supreme Court?
theantitrustsource www.antitrustsource.com December 2007 1 What Should Be Next at the Supreme Court? Jonathan M. Jacobson I In asking What s next at the Supreme Court, we can focus on what we think will
More informationResale Price Maintenance: Consignment Agreements, Copyrighted or Patented Products and the First Sale Doctrine
University of Pennsylvania Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship 12-15-2010 Resale Price Maintenance: Consignment Agreements, Copyrighted or Patented Products and the First
More informationResale Price Maintenance in the Post-Leegin World: A Comparative Look at Recent Developments in the United States and European Union
The CPI Antitrust Journal June 2010 (1) Resale Price Maintenance in the Post-Leegin World: A Comparative Look at Recent Developments in the United States and European Union Andrew I. Gavil Howard University
More informationCOMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REGULATION AND THE DRAFT GUIDELINES ON VERTICAL RESTRAINTS
COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT REGULATION AND THE DRAFT GUIDELINES ON VERTICAL RESTRAINTS Boulevard Brand Whitlock 165 1200 Brussels Belgium Tel: +32 (0)2 645 14 11 Fax: + 32 (0)2 645 14 45 http://www.jonesday.com
More informationLeegin v. PSKS: New Standard, New Challenges
Berkeley Technology Law Journal Volume 23 Issue 1 Article 29 January 2008 Leegin v. PSKS: New Standard, New Challenges Ashley Doty Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/btlj
More informationDiscussion Points. Presented by the Business and Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) to the OECD Competition Committee.
Discussion Points Presented by the Business and Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) to the OECD Competition Committee 5 December, 2017 Roundtable on Safe Harbours and Legal Presumptions in Competition Law
More informationFOUNDING DOCUMENTS TREASURE HUNT
LESSON 1 FOUNDING DOCUMENTS TREASURE HUNT OVERVIEW Stuents will trace the origins of some of the funamental principles an ieals foun in the Declaration of Inepenence an the Constitution of the Unite States.
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 15-565 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States APPLE INC., v. Petitioner, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals
More informationInternational Competition Network Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire. Refusal to Deal
International Competition Network Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire Agency Name: Swiss Competition Authority Date: November 2009 Refusal to Deal This questionnaire seeks information on ICN
More informationIn 2016, the Federal Trade Commission prevailed in litigation before the
in the news Antitrust December 2016 2016 Antitrust Case Law And FTC Action Highlight Agency s Approach to Hospital Mergers In this Issue: I. FTC v. Advocate Health Care Network, et al.... 2 II. FTC v.
More informationRawls, Phelps, Nash: eciency curve and economic justice
Rawls, Phelps, Nash: eciency curve an economic justice Louis e Mesnar June 14, 2011 University of Burguny an CNRS, Laboratoire 'Economie et e Gestion (UMR CNRS 5118); 2 B Gabriel, B.P. 26611, F-21066 DIJON
More informationA (800) (800)
No. 15-565 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States APPLE, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES, et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND
More informationCONSTRAINTS TO FREEDOM OF CONTRACT IN PATENT LICENSING AGREEMENTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE US, EU AND UKRAINIAN SOLUTIONS. by Nataliia Ievchuk
CONSTRAINTS TO FREEDOM OF CONTRACT IN PATENT LICENSING AGREEMENTS: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE US, EU AND UKRAINIAN SOLUTIONS by Nataliia Ievchuk LL.M. SHORT THESIS COURSE: International and Comparative
More informationPrice Fixing Agreements --- Patented Products
Louisiana Law Review Volume 9 Number 3 March 1949 Price Fixing Agreements --- Patented Products Virginia L. Martin Repository Citation Virginia L. Martin, Price Fixing Agreements --- Patented Products,
More informationW urban, national, or continental entities; of the bourgeoisie, the working
The Inirect Social Structure of Eurobean Village Communities' ROBERT T. ANDERSON Mills College AND GALLATIN ANDERSON bngley Porter Neuropsychirk Instile HEN one thinks of European classes, one tens to
More informationThe Refinement of U.S. Antitrust Law in a Global Environment. Stuart M. Chemtob Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati
The Refinement of U.S. Antitrust Law in a Global Environment presentation by Stuart M. Chemtob Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati at International Conference on Global Standard v. National Standards in
More informationStudy Questions (with Answers) Lecture 10. Migration
Stuy Questions (with Answers) Page 1 of 4 (5) Stuy Questions (with Answers) Lecture 10 Part 1: Multiple Choice Select the best answer of those given. 1. Which of the following reasons for people migrating
More informationClient Advisory. United States Antitrust Guidelines. Corporate Department. I. The U.S. Antitrust Laws. July 2013
Client Advisory Corporate Department United States Antitrust Guidelines The American economic system depends upon free enterprise and open competition. The U.S. antitrust laws were enacted to help preserve
More informationChinese Court s Roadmap on Vertical Monopoly Analysis: Some Comments on the Final Judgment on Rainbow vs. Johnson & Johnson Case
Chinese Court s Roadmap on Vertical Monopoly Analysis: Some Comments on the Final Judgment on Rainbow vs. Johnson & Johnson Case Zhan Hao 1 On August 1 2013, Shanghai People s High Court (the Court) handed
More informationNominations to Article III Lower Courts by President George W. Bush During the 110 th Congress
Orer Coe RL33953 Nominations to Article III Lower Courts by Presient George W. Bush During the 110 th Congress Upate May 30, 2008 Denis Steven Rutkus Specialist on the Feeral Juiciary Government an Finance
More informationWorldhomecenter.com, Inc. v Quoizel, Inc NY Slip Op 34017(U) October 7, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: /10 Judge: Charles E.
Worldhomecenter.com, Inc. v Quoizel, Inc. 2011 NY Slip Op 34017(U) October 7, 2011 Sup Ct, New York County Docket Number: 651444/10 Judge: Charles E. Ramos Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationPharmaceutical Product Improvements and Life Cycle Management Antitrust Pitfalls 1
Pharmaceutical Product Improvements and Life Cycle Management Antitrust Pitfalls 1 The terms product switching, product hopping and line extension are often used to describe the strategy of protecting
More informationPrivate Antitrust Enforcement in China
Private Antitrust Enforcement in China I. Introduction Authored by Wei Tan * & Hao Zhan ** 1. Recent years have witnessed a rapid increase in private antitrust litigations in China. By the end of May 2014,
More informationANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS ADJUNCT PROFESSOR PAUL BARTLETT, JR LA TROBE UNIVERSITY, Melbourne, Australia
To: Students, Antitrust Law And Economics Greetings and welcome to the class. Regarding the class syllabus, the cases which are in bold print are for student class recitation. In view of time constraints,
More informationCrime versus Globalization
Crime versus Globalization Catherine e Fontena * Januar 5, 007 Preliminar an Incomlete In a recent ress release, the Secretar of the Organization of merican States (OS, Jose Miguel Insulza, referre to
More informationPrinceton University. Honors Faculty Members Receiving Emeritus Status d
Princeton University Honors Faculty Members Receiving Emeritus Status June 2007 The biographical sketches were written by colleagues in the epartments of those honore. Contents Paul Benacerraf Page 5 Nancy
More informationAntitrust and Refusals To Deal after Nynex v. Discon
Antitrust and Refusals To Deal after Nynex v. Discon Donald M. Falk * Your client really can say "no" without running afoul of the antitrust limitations. NO ONE LIKES to lose business. On the other hand,
More informationReverse Payment Settlements In Pharma Industry: Revisited
Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Reverse Payment Settlements In Pharma Industry: Revisited
More informationStandard-Setting, Competition Law and the Ex Ante Debate
Standard-Setting, Competition Law and the Ex Ante Debate Presentation to ETSI SOS Interoperability III Meeting Sofia Antipolis, France 21 February 2006 Gil Ohana Cisco Systems Legal Department 1 What We
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 08-661 In the Supreme Court of the United States AMERICAN NEEDLE, INC., Petitioner, V. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, et al., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
More informationAntitrust and Intellectual Property: Recent Developments in the Pharmaceuticals Sector
September 2009 (Release 2) Antitrust and Intellectual Property: Recent Developments in the Pharmaceuticals Sector Aidan Synnott & William Michael Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP www.competitionpolicyinternational.com
More informationInternational Competition Network Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire
International Competition Network Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire Agency Name: Commission for Promotion of Competition (COPROCOM), Costa Rica Date: 28-10-2009 Refusal to Deal This questionnaire
More information3.2 Antitrust Sherman Act (Section 1, Per Se Violation) Tying Agreement Defense Of Justification
3.2 Antitrust Sherman Act (Section 1, Per Se Violation) Tying Agreement Defense Of Justification In this case the Plaintiff claims that the Defendant violated Title 15, United States Code, Section 1, commonly
More informationRisks of Grant-back Provisions in Licensing Agreements: A Warning to Patent-heavy Companies
Risks of Grant-back Provisions in Licensing Agreements: A Warning to Patent-heavy Companies By Susan Ning, Ting Gong & Yuanshan Li 1 I. SUMMARY In recent years, the interplay between intellectual property
More informationTRADE REGULATION: VERTICAL TERRITORIAL RESTRICTIONS UPHELD BY SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
TRADE REGULATION: VERTICAL TERRITORIAL RESTRICTIONS UPHELD BY SEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR YEARS manufacturers have submitted without litigation to the Government's position that vertical territorial
More informationDarren M. Franklin. 333 South Hope Street, 48th Floor Los Angeles, California (213)
No. 06-937!" $%& '()*&+&,-(*$ -. $%& /"0$&1 '$2$&3! QUANTA COMPUTER, INC., QUANTA COMPUTER USA, INC., Q-LITY COMPUTER, INC, Petitioners, v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC, Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the
More information2015 ANTITRUST LAW UPDATE Brad Weber Locke Lord LLP Co-Leader of Antitrust Practice Group January 29, 2016
2015 ANTITRUST LAW UPDATE Brad Weber Locke Lord LLP Co-Leader of Antitrust Practice Group January 29, 2016 Atlanta Austin Boston Chicago Dallas Hartford Hong Kong Houston Istanbul London Los Angeles Miami
More informationAntitrust and Intellectual Property
and Intellectual Property July 22, 2016 Rob Kidwell, Member Antitrust Prohibitions vs IP Protections The Challenge Harmonizing U.S. antitrust laws that sanction the illegal use of monopoly/market power
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 13-720 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STEPHEN KIMBLE, ET AL., PETITIONERS, V. MARVEL ENTERPRISES, INC., RESPONDENT. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth
More informationVOLUME 6 EJLS ISSUE 2. European Journal of Legal Studies
OUME 6 EJS ISSUE Euroean Journal of egal Stuies Title: Rent Seeking with Asymmetric Players: An Alication to itigation Eenitures Author(s: Svetoslav Salkin Source: Euroean Journal of egal Stuies, olume
More informationHow China Deals with the Diverging Approaches to Monopoly Agreements
WHITE PAPER March 2018 How China Deals with the Diverging Approaches to Monopoly Agreements Over the first decade of China s Antimonopoly Law, we have seen a divergence between the approaches adopted by
More informationThe Supreme Court Decision in Empagran
The Supreme Court Decision On June 14, 2004, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated opinion in Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd. v. Empagran S.A, 2004 WL 1300131 (2004). This closely watched
More informationIs Chinese Private Antitrust Litigation Ready to Take Off? By Jiangxiao Athena Hou 1 (Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason LLP)
Is Chinese Private Antitrust Litigation Ready to Take Off? By Jiangxiao Athena Hou 1 (Zelle Hofmann Voelbel & Mason LLP) June 2015 China s Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) provides for private right of action.
More informationALI-ABA Course of Study PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING. San Francisco June 10, 2015
ALI-ABA Course of Study PRODUCT DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING San Francisco June 10, 2015 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, ANTITRUST, AND DISTRIBUTION IN TECHNOLOGY By Kevin J. O Connor Wendy K. Arends Godfrey & Kahn,
More informationANTITRUST AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: A BRIEF INTRODUCTION
ANTITRUST AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: A BRIEF INTRODUCTION Boston University School of Law Law & Economics Working Paper No. 16-32 Forthcoming in, Cambridge Handbook of Antitrust, Intellectual Property
More informationInternational Competition Network Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire
International Competition Network Unilateral Conduct Working Group Questionnaire Agency Name: Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition Date: October 2009 Refusal to Deal This questionnaire
More informationGermany. Stefan Abel and Pascal Böhner. Bardehle Pagenberg
Stefan Abel and Pascal Böhner Overview 1 Are there any restrictions on the establishment of a business entity by a foreign licensor or a joint venture involving a foreign licensor and are there any restrictions
More informationSOME PREDICTIONS ABOUT FUTURE ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT
2009] 895 SOME PREDICTIONS ABOUT FUTURE ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT Robert Pitofsky * INTRODUCTION I have been given the challenge of discussing what antitrust enforcement is likely to be over the next four
More informationDemocracy and the Threat of Kingmaking 1
Democracy an the Threat of Kingmaking 1 Thorsten Janus University of Wyoming Abstract This paper suggests a way to achieve emocratic reforms at no cost espite resistance from incumbent power holers. The
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
NO. 13-720 In the Supreme Court of the United States STEPHEN KIMBLE, ET AL., Petitioners, v. MARVEL ENTERPRISES, INC., Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Court of Appeals for
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 15-565 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States APPLE INC., v. Petitioner, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 15-1055 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, D/B/A GLAXOSMITHKLINE; TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.; TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, USA, Petitioners, v. KING DRUG COMPANY
More informationUNITED STATES ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS
UNITED STATES ANTITRUST LAW AND ECONOMICS by ElNER ELHAUGE Petrie Professor of Law, Harvard University FOUNDATION PRESS ^ANNIVERSARY] THOMSON "WEST TABLE OF CASES xiii CHAPTER 1 Introduction 1 A. The Framework
More informationAntitrust IP Competition Perspectives
Antitrust IP Competition Perspectives Dr. Dina Kallay Counsel for IP and Int l Antitrust Federal Trade Commission The 6 th Annual Session of the UNECE Team of I.P. Specialists June 21, 2012 The views expressed
More informationGraduate Industrial Organization Some Notes on Antitrust.
Graduate Industrial Organization Some Notes on Antitrust. John Asker October 17, 2011 The purpose of these notes is not to give an introduction to the law of antitrust in any comprehensive way. Instead,
More informationClient Alert. Circuit Courts Weigh In on Treatment of Trademark License Agreements in Bankruptcy
Number 1438 December 12, 2012 Client Alert Latham & Watkins Finance Department Circuit Courts Weigh In on Treatment of Trademark License Agreements in Bankruptcy Recent bankruptcy appellate rulings have
More informationCongressional Digital Collection Supporting Research and Education. Area of Practice: Antitrust Law
LexisNexis Congressional Digital Collection Supporting Research and Education Area of Practice: Antitrust Law Use primary source congressional documents to: Understand legislative process Compile research
More informationPharmaceutical Patent Settlements A Presumption in Reverse
AUGUST 2009, RELEASE ONE Pharmaceutical Patent Settlements A Presumption in Reverse Kristina Nordlander & Patrick Harrison Sidley Austin LLP Pharmaceutical Patent Settlements A Presumption in Reverse Kristina
More informationVertical Agreements. The regulation of distribution practices in 34 jurisdictions worldwide. Contributing editor: Stephen Kinsella OBE
Vertical Agreements The regulation of distribution practices in 34 jurisdictions worldwide 2008 Contributing editor: Stephen Kinsella OBE Published by GLOBAL COMPETITION REVIEW in association with: Allende
More informationCase 3:16-cv JCH Document 91 Filed 06/06/17 Page 1 of 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:16-cv-01434-JCH Document 91 Filed 06/06/17 Page 1 of 40 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT CONNECTICUT FINE WINE & : SPIRITS, LLC, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION NO. : 3:16 cv 1434
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 06-937 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States QUANTA COMPUTER, INC., ET AL., Petitioners, v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC., Respondent. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the
More informationPatents, Antitrust, and the Rule of Reason. Introduction
Patents, Antitrust, and the Rule of Reason Introduction Herbert * Antitrust's per se rule is applied only to "naked" restraints of trade -- mainly price fixing, market division, and some boycotts, all
More informationSupreme Court Invites Solicitor General s View on Safe Harbor of the Hatch-Waxman Act
Supreme Court Invites Solicitor General s View on Safe Harbor of the Hatch-Waxman Act Prepared By: The Intellectual Property Group On June 25, 2012, the United States Supreme Court invited the Solicitor
More informationSTATEMENT OF CHARLES P. BAKER CHAIR ABA SECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW. on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION. before the SUBCOMMITTEE
STATEMENT OF CHARLES P. BAKER CHAIR ABA SECTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW on behalf of the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION before the SUBCOMMITTEE on COURTS, THE INTERNET, AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMMITTEE
More informationMarch 13, This comment is submitted in response to the United States Department of
THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION PUBLIC ROUNDTABLE SERIES ON COMPETITION AND DEREGULATION, FIRST ROUNDTABLE ON STATE ACTION, STATUTORY EXEMPTIONS AND IMPLIED IMMUNITIES, COMMENT
More informationPreliminary Please Do Not Cite or Quote 8/3/2014. Exhausting Patents WENTONG ZHENG * Abstract
Preliminary Please Do Not Cite or Quote 8/3/2014 Exhausting Patents WENTONG ZHENG * Abstract A bedrock principle of patent law patent exhaustion proclaims that an authorized sale of a patented article
More informationLEGAL SUPERHEROES: VOL 2. MAKING YOU A LEGAL SUPERHERO!
LEGAL SUPERHEROES: VOL 2. MAKING YOU A LEGAL SUPERHERO! Session 7: 3:30-4:30 Presented by Sidley Austin Title: Antitrust Audits as part of a Gold Standard Compliance Program Speakers: Peter Huston, Partner,
More information2 Noerr-Pennington Rulings Affirm Narrow Scope Of Immunity
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com 2 Noerr-Pennington Rulings Affirm Narrow
More informationNavigating the Post-Grant Landscape
Navigating the Post-Grant Landscape John Alemanni Matthew Holohan 2017 Kilpatrick Townsend Overview Substantial Changes Proposed Scope of Estoppel Remains Uncertain Appellate Issues and Cases Covered Business
More informationJUDGE NEIL GORSUCH'S POTENTIAL IMPACT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTITRUST LAW
March 30, 2017 JUDGE NEIL GORSUCH'S POTENTIAL IMPACT ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ANTITRUST LAW To Our Clients and Friends: As Judge Neil Gorsuch proceeds through the Senate confirmation process, we are continuing
More informationStandard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When Does the Shield Become a Sword?
MAY 2008, RELEASE ONE Standard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When Does the Shield Become a Sword? Jennifer M. Driscoll Mayer Brown LLP Standard-Setting Policies and the Rule of Reason: When
More informationPENDING LEGISLATION REGULATING PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENTS
PENDING LEGISLATION REGULATING PATENT INFRINGEMENT SETTLEMENTS By Edward W. Correia* A number of bills have been introduced in the United States Congress this year that are intended to eliminate perceived
More information