|
|
- Silvia Cook
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUPREME COURT, STA TE OF COLORADO ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE BEFORE THE PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE 1300 Broadway, Suite 250 Denver, Colorado Complainant: THE PEOPLE OF THE ST A TE OF COLORADO Respondent: JASON LEE VAN DYKE,# FILED MAR O J 2019 PRESlDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO A COURT USE ONLY A Case Number: Jacob M. Vos, #41562 Assistant Regulation Counsel Attorney for Complainant 1300 Broadway, Suite 500 Denver, Colorado Telephone: (303) x7912 Fax No.: (303) j.vos@csc.state.co.us 1 9 PDJ O 2 1 Jason Lee Van Dyke,# Respondent 108 Durango Drive Crossroads, TX iasonleevandvke@orotonmail.com STIPULATION, AGREEMENT AND AFFIDAVIT CONTAINING THE RESPONDENT'S CONDITIONAL ADMISSION OF MISCONDUCT I On this Irr day of~, 2019, Jacob M. Vos, Assistant Regulation Counsel and attorney for the complainant, and Jason Lee Van Dyke, the Respondent in these proceedings, enter into the following Stipulation, Agreement, and Affidavit Containing Respondent's Conditional Admission of Misconduct ("Stipulation") and submit the same to the Presiding Disciplinary Judge for his consideration. RECOMMENDATION: a six-month suspension, fully stayed subject to Respondent's compliance with the terms of his probation in the State Bar of Texas Agreed Judgment in Texas Case No l. The Respondent has taken and subscribed to the oath of admission, was admitted to the bar of this Court on October 29, 2014, and is registered as an attorney upon the official
2 records of this Court, registration no Respondent is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court and the Presiding Disciplinary Judge in these pr<?ceedings. 2. Respondent enters into this Stipulation freely and voluntarily. No promises have been made concerning future consideration, punishment, or lenience in the above-referenced matter. It is Respondent's personal decision, and Respondent affirms there has been no coercion or other intimidating acts by any person or agency concerning this matter. 3. This matter has not become public under the operation of C.R.C.P l(c) as amended. However, Respondent specifically acknowledges that, if the Presiding Disciplinary Judge should decide to accept this Stipulation, and impose the agreed-to discipline contained herein, then this Stipulation and the discipline imposed will be matters of public record. 4. Respondent is familiar with the rules of the Colorado Supreme Court regarding the procedure for discipline of attorneys and with the rights provided by those rules. Respondent acknowledges the right to a full and complete evidentiary hearing on the above-referenced complaint. At any such hearing, Respondent would have the right to be represented by counsel, present evidence, call witnesses, and cross-examine the witnesses presented by Complainant. At any such formal hearing, Complainant would have the burden of proof and would be required to prove the charges contained in the complaint with clear and convincing evidence. Nonetheless, having full knowledge of the right to such a formal hearing, Respondent waives that right. 5. Respondent and Complainant specifically waive the right to a hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P (c)(l). 6. Respondent and Complainant stipulate to the following facts and conclusions: a. On December 28, 2018, Respondent and the Texas Commission for Lawyer Discipline tendered an agreement to the State Bar of Texas District 14 Grievance Committee, Evidentiary Panel See Ex. I. b. The parties stipulated that in a Texas civil suit, Respondent threatened to present criminal or disciplinary charges solely to gain an advantage in connection with a civil matter, and that Respondent continued to represent his client after it reasonably appeared that his representation became adversely limited by Respondent's own interests. Id. at p. 2. c. The parties also stipulated that Respondent's conduct violated Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct l.06(b)(2) and 4.04(b)(l). Id d. Texas Disciplinary Rule of Professional Conduct l.06(b)(2) is an analogue to Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct l.8(a)(2). It provides that a lawyer shall not represent a person if the representation of that person "reasonably appears to be or become adversely limited by the lawyer's or the law firm's responsibilities to another client or lo a third person or by the lawyer's or law firm 's own interests." 2
3 e. Texas Disciplinary Rule of Professional Conduct 4.04(b)(l) is an analogue to Colorado Rule of Professional Conduct 4.5(a). It provides that a "lawyer shall not present, participate in presenting, or threaten to present criminal or disciplinary charges solely to gain an advantage in a civil matter." f. The Evidentiary Panel accepted the parties' stipulation to a six-month suspension, fully stayed upon Respondent's successful completion of a six-month probation, with conditions. See id. p. 3 ("during all periods of suspension, Respondent shall be under the following tenns and conditions"). g. The probated suspension and probation became effective on November 15, Id. at p. 2. h. Through Respondent's conduct described above, Respondent has engaged in conduct constituting grounds for the imposition of discipline pursuant to C.R.C.P Respondent has also violated Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct 1.06(b)(2) and 4.04(b)(l ) 1 6. Pursuant to C.R.C.P , Respondent agrees to pay costs in the amount of $ (a copy of the statement of costs is attached hereto as Exhibit 2) incurred in conjunction with this matter within thirty-five (35) days after acceptance of the Stipulation by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, made payable to Colorado Supreme Court Attorney Regulation Offices. Respondent agrees that statutory interest shall accrue from thirty-five (35) days after the Presiding Disciplinary Judge accepts this Stipulation. Should Respondent fail to make payment of the aforementioned costs and interest within thirty-five (35) days, Respondent specifically agrees to be responsible for all additional costs and expenses, such as reasonable attorney fees and costs of collection incurred by Complainant in collecting the above stated amount. Complainant may amend the amount of the judgment for the additional costs and expenses by providing a motion and bill of costs to the Presiding Disciplinary Judge, which identifies this paragraph of the Stipulation and Respondent's default on the payment. 7. This Stipulation represents a settlement and compromise of the specific claims and defenses pled by the parties, and it shall have no meaning or effect in any other lawyer regulation case involving another respondent attorney. 8. This Stipulation is premised and conditioned upon acceptance of the same by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge. If for any reason the Stipulation is not accepted without changes or modification, then the admissions, confessions, and Stipulations made by Respondent will be of no effect. Either party will have the opportunity to accept or reject any modification. If either party rejects the modification, then the parties shall be entitled to a full evidentiary hearing; and no confession, Stipulation, or other statement made by Respondent in conjunction with this offer to accept discipline. of a six-month stayed suspension may be subsequently used. If the Stipulation is rejected, then the matter will be heard and considered pursuant to C.R.C.P Pursuant to Colo. RPC 8.5, this Court has jurisdiction over Respondent, who is admitted to practice in the State of Colorado, but because Respondent's conduct occurred in a Texas matter, the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct apply. 3
4 9. The Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel has notified or will notify shortly after the parties sign this agreement, the complaining witness in the matter of the proposed disposition. PRIOR DISCIPLINE 10. Respondent has no prior discipline in the State of Colorado, and has no other public discipline in the State of Texas. ANALYSIS OF DISCIPLINE 11. Pursuant to C.R.C.P l(a), the State Bar of Texas's final adjudication of misconduct constituting grounds for discipline shall conclusively establish Respondent's misconduct. See Ex. 1. And pursuant to C.R.C.P ( d), this Court shall issue a decision imposing the same discipline unless one of four conditions is met. Here, the People and Respondent stipulate that none of the provisions ofc.r.c.p l(d)(l)-(4) are satisfied, and therefore this Court should impose the same discipline as was imposed by the foreign jurisdiction - a six-month suspension, fully stayed upon Respondent's successful completion of probation under the terms set out in the Texas Agreed Judgment. 12. Pursuant to American Bar Association Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions 1991 and Supp ("ABA Standards"), 3.0, the Court should consider the following factors generally: a. The duty violated: the duty of fairness to the opposing party and counsel; the duty of loyalty. b. The lawyer's mental state: knowing. c. The actual or potential injury caused by the lawyer's misconduct: Respondent' s misconduct caused potential harm to his client and unnecessarily prolonged the legal proceedings. d. The existence of aggravating or mitigating factors: the following aggravating and mitigating factors apply: Standard 9.22 aggravating factors include: (d) multiple offenses; and (i) substantial experience in the practice of law. Standard 9.32 mitigating factors include: (a) absence of a prior disciplinary record; (e) full and free disclosure to disciplinary board or cooperative attitude toward proceedings; and (k) imposition of other penalties or sanctions. 4
5 13. Pursuant to ABA Standard 4.32, suspension is generally appropriate when a lawyer knows of a conflict of interest and does not fully disclose to a client the possible effect of that conflict, and causes injury or potential injury to a client. Likewise, pursuant to Standard 7.2, suspension is generally appropriate when a lawyer knowingly engages in conduct that is a violation of a duty owed as a professional and causes injury or potential injury to a client, the public, or the legal system. 14. Though it is an old case, People ex rel. Gallagher v. Hertz, 198 Colo. 522, 608 P.2d 335 (1979), may be the most analogous. It resulted in a six-month suspension for an attorney who threatened criminal prosecution to force the settlement of disputed property claims. See also People v. Sigley, 951 P.2d 48 I (Colo. 1998) (30-day suspension for failure to deposit advance fee into appropriate account and the initiation of criminal charges to gain advantage in a civil matter); People v. Farrant, 852 P.2d 452 (Colo. I 993) (60-day suspension for neglect and threat to reveal client confidences to trigger criminal proceedings if client did not pay fees). Analogous cases involving personal interest conflicts have led to similar results. See, e.g., People v. Watson, 787 P.2d 151 (Colo. 1990) (90-day suspension for failure to disclose personal interest conflict); c.f In re Fisher, 202 P.3d 1186 (Colo. 2009) (conflicted business transaction with client warranted stayed six-month suspension). 15. Considering all of the factors described above, as applied to this case, a reciprocal six-month stayed suspension under the terms of Respondent' s stayed Texas suspension is appropriate. Respondent meets the eligibility requirements for probation set forth in C.R.C.P (a). CONDITIONS 16. Respondent's six-month suspension is fully stayed subject to his successful completion of his Texas disciplinary probation, which is subject to the terms set out in pages three and four of Exhibit 1. The parties stipulate that Respondent is eligible for probation pursuant to C.R.C.P (a). 17. If, during the period of probation, the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel receives information that any condition may have been violated, the Regulation Counsel may file a motion with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge specifying the alleged violation and seeking an order that requires the attorney to show cause why the stay should not be lifted and the sanction activated for violation of the condition. See C.R.C.P (e). The filing of such a motion shall toll any period of suspension and probation until final action. Id. Any hearing shall be held pursuant to C.R.C.P (e). When, in a revocation hearing, the alleged violation of a condition is Respondent's failure to pay restitution or costs, the evidence of the failure to pay shall constitute prima facie evidence of a violation. Id 18. Within twenty-eight (28) days and no less than fourteen (14) days prior to the expiration of the period of probation, Respondent shall file an affidavit with the Regulation Counsel stating that Respondent has complied with all terms of probation and shall file with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge notice and a copy of such affidavit and application for an order showing successful completion of the period of probation. See C.R.C.P (f). Upon receipt of this notice and absent objection from the Regulation Counsel, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge 5
6 shall i ue an order showing that the period of probation wa ucces full y completed. Id. The order shall become effect i c upon the expi ration of the period of probation. Id RECOMMEN DATION FOR AN D CONSENT TO DI CIPLINE Based on the foregoing. the part ie hereto recommend that a fu lly-stayed ix-month suspension, with conditions as described above, be imposed upon Respondent. Re pondent con ents to the imposi tion of discipline of a ful ly-stayed six-month u pension. The parties req uest that the Presiding Disciplinary Judge order that the cffeeti e date of such di cipline be ovcmber 15, Jason Lee Yan Dyke. Respondent and Jacob M. Vo. attorney for the Complainant, acknowledge by igning this document that the_ ha e read and reviewed the above and request 1he Presiding Disciplinary.Judge to acccpl 1he ~ bo, c. Ja on Le Van D kc I 08 Durango Dri ve Crossroads. TX jason leevandykc'<l;protonmai I.com Respondent TATE OF TEXA cou TY or- (oll(rj )ss: ) ) ubscribcd and worn to before me thi ' osvn lte VM f.nk.. the Respondent. a 7 11 da of rr,,l),f,z by Witness my hand and official seal. My commission cxpin:s: CHRISTINE SCALLIN Notary 10 # My Commission Expires July 23, ~~)(J~ ±,ddi : N!~ry Public 6
7 M. Vos, #41562 Assistant Regulation Counsel 1300 Broadway, Suite 500 Denver, CO Telephone: (303) Attorney for the Complainant - 7
8 BEFORE THE DISTRICT 14 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE EVIDENTIARY PANEL 14-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Petitioner v. JASON LEE VAN DYKE, Respondent I CASE NO AGREED JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED SUSPENSION Parties and Appearance On this day, came to be heard the above-styled and numbered cause. Petitioner, Commission for Lawyer Discipline (Petitioner) and Respondent, JASON LEE VAN DYKE (Respondent), Texas Bar Number , announce that an agreement has been reached on all matters including the imposition of a Probated Suspension. Jurisdiction and Venue The Evidentiary Panel 14-2, having been duly appointed to hear this complaint by the chair of the Grievance Committee for State Bar of Texas District 14, finds that it has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action, and that venue is proper. Professional Misconduct The Evidentiary Panel, having considered the pleadings, admissions, stipulations and agreements of the parties, finds Respondent has committed Professional Misconduct as defined by Rule 1.06(W) of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. Findings of Fact Petitioner and Respondent agree to the following findings of fact. Accordingly, the Evidentiary Panel finds: CF6-15A Agreed Judgment of Fully Probated Suspension - Van Dyke.6276 Page 1 of 6 j EXHIBIT I j_ I
9 1. Respondent is an attorney licensed to practice law in Texas and is a member of the State Bar of Texas. 2. Respondent resides in and maintains his principal place of practice in Denton County, Texas. 3. On October 3, 2017, Respondent filed a lawsuit on behalf of his client, Jessica Vidrine (Vidrine), against Complainant, Ryan Daniel. 4. Respondent threatened to present criminal or disciplinary charges solely to gain an advantage in connection with the civil matter. 5. Respondent continued to represent Vidrine after it reasonably appeared that his representation became adversely limited by Respondent's own interests. 6. The Chief Disciplinary Counsel of the State Bar of Texas has incurred reasonable attorney's fees and direct expenses associated with this Disciplinary Proceeding in the amount of One Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars and No/100 Cents ($1,800.00). Conclusions of Law Petitioner and Respondent agree that. based on the foregoing findings of fact, the following Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct have been violated. Accordingly, the Evidentiary Panel concludes that the following Texas Disciplinary R~les of Professional Conduct have been violated : Rules 1.06(b)(2) and 4.04(b)(1 ). Sanction It is AGREED and ORDERED that the sanction of a Probated Suspension shall be imposed against Respondent in accordance with the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Proced ure. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that Respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six (6) months, with the suspension being fully probated pursuant to the terms stated below. The period of probated suspension shall begin on November 15, 2018, and shall end on May 14, CF6-15A Agreed Judgment of Fully Probated Suspension - Van Oyke.6276 Page 2 of 6
10 Terms of Probation It is further ORDERED that during all periods of suspension, Respondent shall be under the following terms and conditions: 1. Respondent shall not violate any term of this judgment. 2. Respondent shall not engage in professional misconduct as defined by Rule 1.06(W) of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. 3. Respondent shall not violate any state or federal criminal statutes. 4. Respondent shall keep State Bar of Texas membership department notified of current mailing, residence and business addresses and telephone numbers. 5. Respondent shall comply with Minimum Continuing Legal Education requirements. 6. Respondent shall comply with Interest on Lawyers Trust Account (IOLTA) requirements. 7. Respondent shall promptly respond to any request for information from the Chief Disciplinary Counsel in connection with any investigation of any allegations of professional misconduct. 8. Respondent shall pay all reasonable and necessary attorney's fees and direct expenses to the State Bar of Texas in the amount of One Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($1,800.00). The payment of attorney's fees and direct expenses shall be made in four (4) monthly installments, each in the amount of Four Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($450.00). Each payment is due on or before the fifteenth (15 1 h) day of each month, as follows: November 15, 2018; December 15, 2018; January 15, 2019; and February 15, The payments of attorney's fees and direct expenses shall be made by certified or cashier's check or money order and made payable to the State Bar of Texas, and delivered to the State Bar of Texas, Chief Disciplinary Counsel's Office, P.0. Box 12487, Austin. TX (1414 Colorado St., Austin, TX ). 9. Respondent shall seek mental health treatment. Prior to May 14, 2019, Respondent shall submit to a psychological evaluation and Respondent shall instruct the mental health professional to confirm to Petitioner, in writing, when Respondent has completed same. Further, Respondent shall instruct the mental health professional to provide Petitioner with written updates that confirm that Respondent is continuing therapy/counseling with said provider and that Respondent is continuing therapy/counseling with said provider and that confirm that Respondent is compliant with the provider's recommendations. c F&-1SA Agreed Judgment of Fully Probated Suspension - Van Dyke.6276 Page 3 of 6
11 Respondent shall sign any HIPAA release necessary for the limited purpose of the mental health professional confirming with Petitioner: a. That Respondent completed the psychological evaluation; and b. That Respondent is compliant with the mental health professional's recommendations. The substance of the evaluation and/or therapy shall not be released to Petitioner. 10. Respondent shall make contact with the Chief Disciplinary Counsel's Offices' Compliance Monitor at , ext and Special Programs Coordinator at , ext. 1323, not later than seven (7) days after receipt of a copy of this judgment to coordinate Respondent's compliance. Probation Revocation Upon information that Respondent has violated a term of this judgment, the Chief Disciplinary Counsel may, in addition to all other remedies available, file a motion to revoke probation pursuant to Rule 2.23 of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure with the Board of Disciplinary Appeals (BODA) and serve a copy of the motion on Respondent pursuant to Tex.R.Civ.P. 21a. BODA shall conduct an evidentiary hearing. At the hearing, BODA shall determine by a preponderance of the evidence whether Respondent has violated any term of this Judgment. If BODA finds grounds for revocation, BODA shall enter an order revoking probation and placing Respondent on active suspension from the date of such revocation order. Respondent shall not be given credit for any term of probation served prior to revocation. It is further ORDERED that any conduct on the part of Respondent which serves as the basis for a motion to revoke probation may also be brought as independent grounds for CF6 15A Agreed Judgment of Fully Probated Suspension - Van Dyke.6276 Page 4 of 6
12 discipline as allowed under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct and Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. Attorney's Fees and Expenses It is further ORDERED Respondent shalt pay all reasonable and necessary attorney's fees and direct expenses to the State Bar of Texas in the amount of One Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars and No Cents ($1,800.00). The payment of attorney's fees and direct expenses shall be made in (4) monthly installments, each in the amount of Four Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($450.00). Each payment is due on or before the fifteenth (15th) day of each month, as follows: November 15, 2018; December 15, 2018; January 15, 2019; and February 15, The payments of attorney's fees and direct expenses shall be made by certified or cashier's check or money order and made payable to the State Bar of Texas, and delivered to the State Bar of Texas, Chief Disciplinary Counsel's Office, P.O. Box 12487, Austin, TX (1414 Colorado St., Austin, TX ). It is further ORDERED that all amounts ordered herein are due to the misconduct of Respondent, are assessed as a part of the sanction in accordance with Rule 1.06(Z) of the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. Any amount not paid shall accrue interest at the maximum legal rate per annum until paid and the State Bar of Texas shall have all writs and other post-judgment remedies against Respondent in order to collect all unpaid amounts. Publication This suspension shall be made a matter of record and appropriately published in accordance with the Texas Rules of Disciplinary Procedure. CFS 15A Agreed Judgment of Fully Probated Suspension - Van Dyke.6276 Page 5 of 6
13 Other Relief All requested relief not expressly granted herein is. expressly DENIED. SIGNED this EVIDENTIARY PANEL 14-2 DISTRICT NO. 14 ST ATE BAR OF TEXAS &Aidf ~ Harold Frederick Hagen District 14, Panel 14-2 Presiding Member AGREED AS TO BOTH FORM AND SUBSTANCE: Kristin Virginia Brady State Bar No Counsel for Petitioner CF6-15A Agreed Judgment of Fully Probated Suspension - Van Oyke.6276 Page 6 of 6
14 Statement of Costs Jason L Van Dyke /14/2019 Administrative Fee $ AMOUNTDUE $ PENGAD ~ iii =i
BEFORE THE DISTRICT 6 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE EVIDENTIARY PANEL 6-1 STATE BAR OF TEXAS JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance
COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE, Petitioner BEFORE THE DISTRICT 6 GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE EVIDENTIARY PANEL 6-1 STATE BAR OF TEXAS v. XAVIER DURAN, Respondent CASE NO. 201603436 JUDGMENT OF FULLY PROBATED
More information* * * TONY L. SCHAFFER, * Respondent *
BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 09-2 STATE BAR OF TEXAS COMMISSION FOR LAWYER * DISCIPLINE, * Petitioner * v. * 201606357 * * TONY L. SCHAFFER, * Respondent * AGREED JUDGMENT OF
More informationOn this day came to be heard the above styled and numbered cause. Petitioner
BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 8-7 STATE BAR OF TEXAS COMMISSION FOR LAWYER * DISCIPLINE, * Petitioner * v. * * 201503043 * MARK EDWIN BRUNNER, * Respondent AGREED JUDGMENT OF
More informationBEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 8-6 STATE BAR OF TEXAS AGREED JUDGMENT OF PROBATED SUSPENSION. Parties and Appearance
BEFORE THE EVIDENTIARY PANEL FOR STATE BAR DISTRICT NO. 8-6 STATE BAR OF TEXAS COMMISSION FOR LAWYER * DISCIPLINE, * Petitioner * * 201503044 V. * 201503662 * JANA L. HUNSICKER, * Respondent * AGREED JUDGMENT
More informationPeople v. Kolhouse. 13PDJ001. August 13, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Nicole M. Kolhouse (Attorney
People v. Kolhouse. 13PDJ001. August 13, 2013. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Nicole M. Kolhouse (Attorney Registration Number 33291) from the practice of law for three
More informationPeople v. Leland Thomas Kintzele Jr. 15PDJ041. August 25, 2017.
People v. Leland Thomas Kintzele Jr. 15PDJ041. August 25, 2017. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Leland Thomas Kintzele Jr. (attorney registration number 06389),
More informationPeople v. Michael Scott Collins. 14PDJ042. December 2, 2014.
People v. Michael Scott Collins. 14PDJ042. December 2, 2014. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Michael Scott Collins (Attorney Registration Number 27234) for three
More informationREPORT, DECISION AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS
People v. Posselius, No.01PDJ062. 03.20.02. Attorney Regulation. The Hearing Board suspended Respondent Edward J. Posselius, attorney registration number 17010 from the practice of law in the State of
More informationPeople v. Ringler. 12PDJ087. June 21, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Victoria Lynne Ringler (Attorney
People v. Ringler. 12PDJ087. June 21, 2013. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Victoria Lynne Ringler (Attorney Registration Number 30727), effective July 26, 2013. Ringler
More informationPeople v. Romo-Vejar, 05PDJ057. March 31, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, a Hearing Board publicly censured Respondent
People v. Romo-Vejar, 05PDJ057. March 31, 2006. Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, a Hearing Board publicly censured Respondent Jesus Roberto Romo-Vejar (Attorney Registration No. 17350)
More informationPeople v. David William Beale. 16PDJ066. February 9, 2017.
People v. David William Beale. 16PDJ066. February 9, 2017. After a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred David William Beale (attorney registration number 19097) from the practice
More informationPeople v. Richard O. Schroeder. 17PDJ046. January 9, 2018.
People v. Richard O. Schroeder. 17PDJ046. January 9, 2018. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Richard O. Schroeder (attorney registration number 27616), effective
More informationOpinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board members, Daniel A. Vigil and Mickey W. Smith, both members of the bar.
People v. Espinoza, No. 99PDJ085, 1/18/01. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and Hearing Board suspended Pamela Michelle Espinoza from the practice of law for a period of six months
More informationPeople v. Lindsey Scott Topper. 16PDJ004. July 27, 2016.
People v. Lindsey Scott Topper. 16PDJ004. July 27, 2016. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Lindsey Scott Topper (attorney registration number 17133). Topper s disbarment
More informationPeople v. Evanson. 08PDJ082. August 4, Attorney Regulation. Following a default sanctions hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P (b), the Presiding
People v. Evanson. 08PDJ082. August 4, 2009. Attorney Regulation. Following a default sanctions hearing pursuant to C.R.C.P. 251.5(b), the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Dennis Blaine Evanson (Attorney
More informationPeople v. Allyn. 10PDJ068. February 7, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Glenn B. Allyn (Attorney Registration
People v. Allyn. 10PDJ068. February 7, 2011. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Glenn B. Allyn (Attorney Registration No. 25428), effective March 10, 2011. Allyn was disbarred
More informationPeople v. Jerold R. Gilbert. 17PDJ044. January 8, 2018.
People v. Jerold R. Gilbert. 17PDJ044. January 8, 2018. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Jerold R. Gilbert (attorney registration number 20301), effective February
More informationOPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS. Sanction Imposed: Two Year and Three Month Suspension
People v. Chastain, No. GC98A53 (consolidated with No. GC98A59). The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and Hearing Board imposed a two-year and threemonth suspension in this reciprocal discipline action arising
More informationPeople v. Alster. 07PDJ056. March 12, Attorney Regulation. Following a Sanctions Hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Respondent
People v. Alster. 07PDJ056. March 12, 2009. Attorney Regulation. Following a Sanctions Hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Respondent Christopher Alster (Attorney Registration No. 11884)
More informationOpinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board Members Helen R. Stone and Paul Willumstad, both members of the bar.
People v. Corbin, No. 02PDJ039, 11.20.03. Attorney Regulation. The Hearing Board disbarred Respondent Charles C. Corbin, attorney registration number 16382, following a sanctions hearing in this default
More information208.4 Inquiry Panel Review. applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary to practice law in
208.4 Inquiry Panel Review (6) Determination by Inquiry Panel. The inquiry panel shall make a finding whether the applicant has established that he or she possesses the character and fitness necessary
More informationPeople v. Bill Condon. 16PDJ050. December 23, 2016.
People v. Bill Condon. 16PDJ050. December 23, 2016. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Bill Condon (attorney registration number 11924) from the practice of law for
More informationFINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS
People v. Wright, GC98C90. 5/04/99. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and Hearing Board disbarred respondent for his conduct while under suspension. Six counts in the complaint alleged
More informationPeople v. William F. Levings. 16PDJ082. April 17, 2017.
People v. William F. Levings. 16PDJ082. April 17, 2017. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended William Frederick Levings (attorney registration number 24443) from the
More informationPeople v. Crews, 05PDJ049. March 6, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Respondent
People v. Crews, 05PDJ049. March 6, 2006. Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Respondent Richard A. Crews (Attorney Registration No. 32472) from
More informationPeople v. Tolentino. 11PDJ085, consolidated with 12PDJ028. August 16, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Gregory
People v. Tolentino. 11PDJ085, consolidated with 12PDJ028. August 16, 2012. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Gregory S. Tolentino (Attorney Registration Number 40913), effective
More informationORDER OF COURT. Upon consideration of the Report of Hearing Master Pursuant to C.R.C.P.
. Colorado Supreme Court RECEIVED 101 West Colfax Avenue, Suite 800 Denver, CO 80202 SEP 2 8 2012 Original Proceeding in Unauthorized Practice of Law, llupl1l2 Petitioner: The People of the State of Colorado,
More informationPresiding Disciplinary Judge are Approved. Respondent is ENJOINED. from the Unauthorized Practice of Law.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, ON V. Respondent: GOLDA TORRES-HARVEY OR1ER OF COURT Upon consideration of the Report Re: Unauthorized Practice of Law Pursuant to C.R.C.?. 235 & 236, filed in the
More informationDECISION RE: SANCTIONS PURSUANT TO C.R.C.P (b)
People v.woodford, No.02PDJ107 (consolidated with 03PDJ036). July 12, 2004. Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing at which Respondent did not appear, the Hearing Board disbarred Respondent,
More informationPeople v. Bigley. 10PDJ100. May 17, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Michael F.
People v. Bigley. 10PDJ100. May 17, 2011. Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Michael F. Bigley (Attorney Registration Number 39294) for ninety
More informationPeople v. Jerry R. Atencio. 16PDJ077. April 14, 2017.
People v. Jerry R. Atencio. 16PDJ077. April 14, 2017. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Jerry R. Atencio (attorney registration number 08888) from the practice of
More informationCAUSE NO. DC JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT CHRISTOPHER L. GRAHAM COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE
' CAUSE NO. DC-1 6-13821 COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE IN THE DISTRICT COURT WWWWWW v. DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS CHRISTOPHER L. GRAHAM 193R JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUDGMENT OF DISBARMENT Parties and Appearance
More informationSUPREME COURT, STATE OF COLORADO
People v. Hill, No. 03PDJ001, 06.11.03. Attorney Regulation. The Hearing Board suspended Respondent, Lawrence R. Hill, attorney registration number 17447, for a period of six months all stayed pending
More information[SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED]
(Filed - April 3, 2008 - Effective August 1, 2008) Rule XI. Disciplinary Proceedings. Section 1. Jurisdiction. [UNCHANGED] Section 2. Grounds for discipline. [SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) ARE UNCHANGED] (c)
More informationPeople v. Varen Craig Belair. 17PDJ060. February 12, 2018.
People v. Varen Craig Belair. 17PDJ060. February 12, 2018. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Varen Craig Belair (attorney registration number 32696), effective March
More informationIt is hereby stipulated and agreed by Respondent and the Committee that
STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY In the Matter of Melissa Ann Kaiser CPA Certificate No. 24212 STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER Board File 2012-461 The Minnesota Board of Accountancy ("Board") rs authorized
More informationPeople v. Kevin D. Heupel. 17PDJ005. July 11, 2017.
People v. Kevin D. Heupel. 17PDJ005. July 11, 2017. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Kevin D. Heupel (attorney registration number 30264), effective August 15,
More informationAPPENDIX A Affidavit in Support of Application to Resign While Proceeding or Investigation is Pending INSTRUCTIONS An application pursuant to section
APPENDIX A Affidavit in Support of Application to Resign While Proceeding or Investigation is Pending INSTRUCTIONS An application pursuant to section 1240.10 of these Rules to resign as an attorney and
More informationPeople v. Mascarenas. 11PDJ008. September 27, Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Steven J. Mascarenas (Attorney
People v. Mascarenas. 11PDJ008. September 27, 2011. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge disbarred Steven J. Mascarenas (Attorney Registration Number 15612). Mascarenas engaged in an elaborate
More informationUpon consideration of the Petition for Injunction, the Order and Rule to. Show Cause and the Stipulation, Agreement and Affidavit Containing
Colorado Supreme Court 2 East 14th Avenue Denver, CO 80203 DATE FILED: June 11, 2018 CASE NUMBER: 2018SA76 Original Proceeding in Discipline, 2017UPL39 and 2017UPL44 Petitioner: The People of the State
More informationPeople v. Espinoza, No. 00PDJ044 (consolidated with 00PDJ051) 1/30/01. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge ( PDJ ) and Hearing
People v. Espinoza, No. 00PDJ044 (consolidated with 00PDJ051) 1/30/01. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge ( PDJ ) and Hearing Board disbarred Pamela Michelle Espinoza from the practice
More informationOPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTIONS
People v. Pedersen, No. 99PDJ024, 9/21/99. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and the Hearing Board disbarred the respondent, Phillip M. Pedersen, for accepting a retainer, agreeing
More informationCHAPTER 20 RULE DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY: POLICY JURISDICTION
PROPOSED CHANGES TO COLORADO RULES OF PROCEDURE REGARDING ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE AND DISABILITY PROCEEDINGS, COLORADO ATTORNEYS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION, AND COLORADO RULE OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 1.15 The
More informationThe Anatomy of a Complaint
The Anatomy of a Complaint Stanton A. Hazlett, Disciplinary Administrator The Kansas Disciplinary Administrator s Office Return to Green 2016 Friday, April 22, 2016 9:30 am - 4:00 pm Stinson Leonard Street
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 118,378. In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 118,378 In the Matter of LANCE M. HALEY, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed March 2, 2018. One-year
More informationPeople v. Biddle, 07PDJ024. December 17, Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Grafton
People v. Biddle, 07PDJ024. December 17, 2007. Attorney Regulation. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Grafton Minot Biddle (Attorney Registration No. 09638) from
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY
STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY In the Matter of Ann Christine Viviano CPA Certificate No. 13097 STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER Board File 2013-001 The Minnesota Board of Accountancy ("Board") 1s
More informationPeople v. Kem W. Swarts. 17PDJ038. March 1, 2018.
People v. Kem W. Swarts. 17PDJ038. March 1, 2018. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Kem W. Swarts (attorney registration number 29242) for three years, effective
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY
STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY In the Matter of Nga ThienHo CPA Certificate No. 23457 STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER Board File 2013-005 The Minnesota Board of Accountancy ("Board") is authorized
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. (Before a Referee) Case No.: SC v. TFB File No.: ,037(07A)(OSC)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Case No.: SC11-1813 v. TFB File No.: 2012-90,037(07A)(OSC) FAYE ESTHER BENNETT, Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE ACCEPTING
More informationBEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF PROBATION
BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF REFUGIO RAFAEL PEREZ STATE BAR CARD NO. 24051893 CAUSE NO.---- PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF PROBATION TO
More informationFollowing a hearing, a hearing board disbarred James Michael Zarlengo (attorney registration number 12987). The disbarment took effect March 10, 2016.
People v. James Michael Zarlengo. 15PDJ054. February 4, 2016. Following a hearing, a hearing board disbarred James Michael Zarlengo (attorney registration number 12987). The disbarment took effect March
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 107,751. In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 107,751 In the Matter of DAVID K. LINK, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE probation. Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed July 6,
More information***FOR BACKGROUND CHECK ONLY***
TOM GREEN COUNTY BAIL BOND LICENSE APPLICATION FOR INDIVIDUALS ****Note: You Must Submit One Original and Fourteen Copies To The County Treasurer Office with your filing fee**** Date of Application New
More informationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility. Board Rules
District of Columbia Court of Appeals Board on Professional Responsibility Board Rules Adopted June 23, 1983 Effective July 1, 1983 This edition represents a complete revision of the Board Rules. All previous
More informationAMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION STANDARDS FOR IMPOSING LAWYER SANCTIONS Definitions Adopted by the Michigan Supreme Court in Grievance Administrator v Lopatin, 462 Mich 235, 238 n 1 (2000) Injury is harm to a
More informationInformation & Instructions: Motion to dissolve writ of garnishment. 1. A Motion to dissolve a Writ of Garnishment should set forth the following:
Information & Instructions: Motion to dissolve writ of garnishment 1. A Motion to dissolve a Writ of Garnishment should set forth the following: 2. The date the Writ of Garnishment was served on the garnishee,
More informationALABAMA PRIVATE INVESTIGATION BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 741-X-6 DISCIPLINARY ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS
ALABAMA PRIVATE INVESTIGATION BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 741-X-6 DISCIPLINARY ACTION TABLE OF CONTENTS 741-X-6-.01 741-X-6-.02 741-X-6-.03 741-X-6-.04 741-X-6-.05 741-X-6-.06 741-X-6-.07 741-X-6-.08
More informationOpinion by Presiding Disciplinary Judge Roger L. Keithley and Hearing Board members, Annita M. Menogan and Laird T. Milburn, both members of the bar.
People v. Ross, No. 99PDJ076, 11/14/00. Attorney Regulation. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge and Hearing Board disbarred Respondent, Kirby D. Ross, for conduct arising out of three separate matters. In
More informationBAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS 1 BAR OF GUAM ETHICS COMMITTEE RULES OF PROCEDURE - DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS Rule 1. Purpose of Rules. The purpose of these rules
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING October Term, A.D. 2016 In the Matter of Amendments to ) the Rules Governing the Commission on ) Judicial Conduct and Ethics ) ORDER AMENDING THE RULES GOVERNING
More informationRule 1.8 Service Methods. (a) Except as provided in Rule 4.2 and Rule 8.9, any pleading or document required under these rules to be served on an
Rule 1.8 Service Methods. (a) Except as provided in Rule 4.2 and Rule 8.9, any pleading or document required under these rules to be served on an accused, or applicant, or attorney shall be (1) sent to
More information~/
STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: Case No. L13-3-1044 BIOMAX CORP. and JORGE DIAZ Respondents -----------------------------------~/ ASSURANCE
More informationTHE NEW GRIEVANCE SYSTEM AND HOW TO AVOID IT. BETTY BLACKWELL Chair, Commission for Lawyer Discipline Standing Committee of The State Bar
THE NEW GRIEVANCE SYSTEM AND HOW TO AVOID IT BETTY BLACKWELL Chair, Commission for Lawyer Discipline Standing Committee of The State Bar Attorney at Law Board Certified Criminal Law 1306 Nueces St. Austin,
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY
OCT 1 2 20U STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY In the Matter of Teresa Marie Mitrani Certificate No. 18522 STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER Board File 2011-241 It is hereby stipulated and agreed by Teresa
More informationLAWYERING FOR A LAWYER WITH A DISABILITY BEFORE THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS
LAWYERING FOR A LAWYER WITH A DISABILITY BEFORE THE STATE BAR OF TEXAS By: José R. Guerrero, Jr., Esq. and Bob Bennett The Bennett Law Firm 515 Louisiana, Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77002 T: (713) 225-6000
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY
STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY In the Matter of Bernice Aurelia Garbina CPA Certificate No.19784 STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER Board File 2016-301 The Minnesota Board of Accountancy ("Board")
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE. Petitioner, Case No: License No.: OS 6133 FINAL ORDER ACCEPTING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF OSTEOPATHIC MEDICINE Final Order No. DOH-17-0552- S -MQA FILED DATE - MAR 1 5 2017 Department Ith DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH vs. Petitioner, Case No: 2015-29426 License No.: OS 6133
More information107 ADOPTED RESOLUTION
ADOPTED RESOLUTION 1 2 3 RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association reaffirms the black letter of the ABA Standards for Imposing Lawyer Sanctions as adopted February, 1986, and amended February 1992,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 117,607. In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,607 In the Matter of MATTHEW B. WORKS, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed November 17, 2017.
More informationENFORCEMENT RULES & DISCIPLINARY BOARD RULES RELATING TO REINSTATEMENT
ENFORCEMENT RULES & DISCIPLINARY BOARD RULES RELATING TO REINSTATEMENT PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF DISCIPLINARY ENFORCEMENT (Contains Amendments Through July 14, 2011) Rule 218. Reinstatement. (a) An attorney
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Form: Attorney Fee Agreement for Hourly Clients 1. The following form is a longer written fee contract. It may be used to employ the attorney. Use this fee agreement for transactions that require a more
More informationST ATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY. In the Matter of Lori Ann Huston-Vadnais, unlicensed; and Lori Ann Huston-Vadnais, CPA, unlicensed
ST ATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY In the Matter of Lori Ann Huston-Vadnais, unlicensed; and Lori Ann Huston-Vadnais, CPA, unlicensed SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND CEASE AND DESIST ORDER Board File Nos.
More informationTOM GREEN COUNTY BAIL BOND CORPORATE SURETY LICENSE APPLICATION
TOM GREEN COUNTY BAIL BOND CORPORATE SURETY LICENSE APPLICATION **Submit Original & 13 Copies with filing fee to Tom Green County Treasurer** Date of Application New Application Renewal Application If
More informationDISCIPLINARY PROCESS of the VIRGINIA STATE BAR
DISCIPLINARY PROCESS of the VIRGINIA STATE BAR Prepared by: Paul D. Georgiadis, Assistant Bar Counsel & Leslie T. Haley, Senior Ethics Counsel Edited and revised by Jane A. Fletcher, Deputy Intake Counsel
More informationHealth Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process
Health Practitioners Competence Assurance Act 2003 Complaints and Discipline Process The following notes have been prepared to explain the complaints process under the Health Practitioners Competence Assurance
More informationTHE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO
THE RETIREMENT BOARD OF THE FIREMEN S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUND OF CHICAGO Procedural Rules Established Pursuant to 40 ILCS 5/6-191 Governing Applications for and Administrative Hearings upon Applications
More informationIN THE EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT MUNICIPAL COURT OF DERBY, KANSAS
SAMPLE MOTION AND ORDER FOR EXPUNGEMENT OF CONVICTION OR DIVERSION AND RELATED ARREST RECORDS (AND ASSOCIATED STATUTE) This form is provided as a guide to assist defendants in preparing a motion to the
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire adopts
More informationEffective January 1, 2016
RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE COMMISSION ON CHARACTER AND FITNESS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF MONTANA Effective January 1, 2016 SECTION 1: PURPOSE The primary purposes of character and fitness screening before
More informationPeople v. Ken Jones. 17PDJ077. May 23, 2018.
People v. Ken Jones. 17PDJ077. May 23, 2018. Following a sanctions hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge suspended Ken Jones (Georgia attorney registration number 435125) for one year and one day,
More informationCODE OF ETHICS CODE OF ETHICS BYLAWS CODE OF ETHICS REGULATIONS STATEMENT OF ETHICS VIOLATION INITIAL SCREENING INQUIRY
CODE OF ETHICS I II III IV CODE OF ETHICS BYLAWS CODE OF ETHICS REGULATIONS STATEMENT OF ETHICS VIOLATION INITIAL SCREENING INQUIRY I ARTICLE II CODE OF ETHICS CODE OF ETHICS PREAMBLE Section 1. Dedication
More informationIt is hereby stipulated and agreed by Respondent and the Committee that without
STATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY In the Matter of Michael Eugene Graves CPA Certificate No. 26365 STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER Board File 2017-400 The Minnesota Board of Accountancy ('Board") is
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) REPORT OF REFEREE. The following attorneys appeared as counsel for the parties:
THE FLORIDA BAR, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) v. Complainant, Case No. SC07-663 TFB No. 2006-10,833 (6A) LAURIE L. PUCKETT, Respondent. / REPORT OF REFEREE I. Summary of Proceedings:
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE FINAL ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the BOARD OF MEDICINE (Board)
Final Order No. DOH-134518-9 -NIQA STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE 8). FILED DATE AUG 1 3 2013 Departinen Health I) Agency Clerk DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Petitioner, VS. DOH CASE NO.: 2010-06144 LICENSE
More informationCASE NO. CL JAMES DANIEL GRIFFITH VSB DOCKET NOS.:
12/27/2018 09:56 (FAX) P.002/003 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX IN THE MATTERS OF CASE NO. CL2018-15409 JAMES DANIEL GRIFFITH VSB DOCKET NOS.: 18-070-110110 18-070-110600
More informationRules of Procedure TABLE OF CONTENTS
OSB Rules of Procedure (Revised 1/1/2018) 1 Rules of Procedure (As approved by the Supreme Court by order dated February 9, 1984 and as amended by Supreme Court orders dated April 18, 1984, May 31, 1984,
More informationFEB ) ) CONSUMER PROTECTION SECTION ) ) )
VIRGINIA: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND r" r" % c COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. EXREL. MARK R. HERRING, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. Plaintiff, SHOCKOE BOTTOM AUTOMOTIVE & TIRES, INC. d/b/a SHOCKOE
More informationRULE 19 APPEALS TO THE CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE (Effective January 10, 2018; Rule Revision Memo 33D)
RULE 19 APPEALS TO THE CAREER SERVICE HEARING OFFICE (Effective January 10, 2018; Rule Revision Memo 33D) Purpose Statement: The purpose of this rule is to provide a fair, efficient, and speedy administrative
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE VS. DOH CASE NO.: LICENSE NO.: ME FINAL ORDER
STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF MEDICINE Final Order No. DOH-18-1395- 5.MQA ILED DATE - AUG 2 0 2018 Depart DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, puts Agency Clerk Petitioner, VS. DOH CASE NO.: 2016-27793 LICENSE NO.: ME0101995
More informationex parte application of the Committee, the Board may order the remedy specified in paragraph 7
ST ATE OF MINNESOTA BOARD OF ACCOUNTANCY In the Matter of Wendy Kay Rychley Certificate No. 09605 STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER Board File 2010-361 It is hereby stipulated and agreed by Wendy Kay Rychley
More informationJUSTICE COURT FORMS FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
JUSTICE COURT FORMS FOR CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS Appearance Bond, Secured............................................................ MRCrP 8 Appearance Bond, Unsecured..........................................................
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR INDIAN RIVER, MARTIN, OKEECHOBEE, AND ST. LUCIE COUNTIES, STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND AMENDED ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 2017-03 (Supersedes Administrative
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 114,097. In the Matter of TIMOTHY CLARK MEYER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,097 In the Matter of TIMOTHY CLARK MEYER, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING IN DISCIPLINE Original proceeding in discipline. Opinion filed December 18,
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY & AUDIOLOGY FINAL ORDER
Final Order No. DOH-17-1049-W STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY & AUDIOLOGY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Petitioner, VS. Case No.: 2015-30245 License No.: SA 1566 DORIS SIMONS WOLF, SLP Respondent.
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY
Final Order No. DOH-17-2175- By: FILED DATE 0 4 a0 Department of Healtf STATE OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BOARD OF DENTISTRY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, PETITIONER, VS. SCOTT P. WELCH, D.D.S., RESPONDENT. CASE NO.:
More informationCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court Local Rules 33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND COMPENSATION OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND
33.0 ASSIGNMENT AND OF COUNSEL TO DEFEND Due to changes to the Ohio Administrative Code regarding the qualifications of and the process for appointing assigned counsel to indigent clients (OAC:120-1-10),
More informationTermination of Guardianship Minor. Forms and Procedures. For Wyoming MOVANT
Packet 16 Termination of Guardianship Minor Forms and Procedures For Wyoming MOVANT Published by Wyoming Supreme Court 2301 Capitol Avenue Supreme Court Building Cheyenne, WY 82002 Termination of Guardianship
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA AT RICHMOND IN THE MATTER OF SUPREME COURT RULES, PART 6, IV, PARAGRAPH RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE PETITION
VIRGINIA: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA AT RICHMOND IN THE MATTER OF SUPREME COURT RULES, PART 6, IV, PARAGRAPH 13-24 RECIPROCAL DISCIPLINE PETITION TO THE HONORABLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND JUSTICES OF THE
More informationBEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF PROBATION
BEFORE THE BOARD OF DISCIPLINARY APPEALS APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS IN THE MATTER OF JOHN REX THOMPSON STATE BAR CARD NO. 19956150 CAUSE NO. PETITION FOR REVOCATION OF PROBATION TO THE BOARD
More information