Thursday the 19th December 2013 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL) DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR THURSDAY 19/12/2013 (FROM 10:30 A.M. To 16:30 P.M.

Transcription

1 1 of 6 Print Thursday the 19th December 2013 ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR(JUDICIAL) DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR THURSDAY 19/12/2013 (FROM 10:30 A.M. To 16:30 P.M.) (THIS CAUSE LIST IS PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) No Case No Party Detail Advocates Remarks FRESH MATTERS 1. MCC/1184/2013 LAL RAGHUVIR SINGH ( DIED) LAL ANAND SHUKLA,PARAG KOTECHA / HARI NARAYAN SINGH ( DIED) SMT. PURNIMA TEKAM & LRS VS. AAKUNDI RAMANNA MOORTHY [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. INSTEAD OF M.C.C./ APPLICATION U/O 22 RULE 9 OF C.P.C. FOR SETTING ASIDE OF ABATEMENT, APPLICATION U/O 22 RULE 3 OF C.P.C. HAS WRONGLY ANNEXED HEREWITH. 2. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DT. 03/07/2013 PASSED IN S.A. NO. 94/1996 IS NOT FILED WITH MEMO OF PETITION. 3. APPLICANT NO. 2, 3 AND 4 NAMELY LAL MAHINDRA SINGH,BHUPENDRA SINGH AND LAL KOUSHAL SINGH ARE NOT MADE A PARTY IN MEMO OF PETITION. 4. DETAILS OF PARTIES IS INCOMPLETE IN MAIN APPLICATION I.E. APPLICATION U/O 22 RULE 9 OF C.P.C. 5. DETAILS OF PARTIES IS INCOMPLETE IN MCC/APPLICATION U/O 22 RULE 3 OF C.P.C. 6. VAKALATNAMA IS NOT SIGNED BY ALL APPLICANTS.] (WITH FA 94/1996) 2. SA/533/2013 SMT.DHELABAI VS. VINOD DHIWAR AND RAVI MAHOBIA,A.K.PRASAD,RISHI MAHOBIA / [ FOR DEFAULT OF ; 1. AFFIDAVIT HAS NOT FILED IN SUPPORT OF APPLICATION U/S 5 OF LIMITATION ACT. 2. COPY OF JUDGMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT HAS NOT FILED. 3. ONE ADVOCATE HAS NOT PUT HIS SIGN. ON VAKALATNAMA.] 3. CONT/572/2013 VIMLA AGRAWAL VS. SHRI SUNIL AGREHI AND SAREENA KHAN,MALAY KUMAR BHADURI / [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER DATED 02/04/2012 ANNEXURE C/1 IS NOT FILED WITH MEMO OF PETITION.] 4. FAM/113/2013 SMT.HEMLATA SAHU VS. CHETAN DAS SAHU MANISH THAKUR,B.P.SHARMA,VIVEK CHOPDA,AJAY SINGH RAJPUT / [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. APPEAL FILED BARRED BY 23 DAYS CONDONATION OF DELAY APPLICATION IS NOT FILED WITH MEMO OF APPEAL. 2. COURT FEE OF RS. 25/- IS DEFICIT IN MEMO OF APPEAL. ] 5. MAC/1169/2013 SOHANLAL PATEL VS. SHRI SIDDHI GANESH RICE INDUSTRIES CHARMUDIYA AND P.P.SAHU,C.P.SAHU,S.P.SAHU / [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. VALUATION OF THE APPEAL HAS NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE.] 6. MAC/1170/2013 KISKE KOSI VS. SHRI FIROZ KHAN AND ALOK DEWANGAN / [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. REQUISITE C.F. HAS NOT AFFIXED ON C.C. IMPUGNED. ] 7. WP227/909/2013 HORILAL TAMRAKAR VS. SHOBHRAM TAMRAKAR & JYOTI RATHORE,MANOJ AGRAWAL,MALAY SHRIVASTAVA,APURVA THAKUR / [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. DEFENDENTS OF THE CS 156A/11 OS NOT MADE IN CAUSE TITLE IN MEMO OF PETITION. ] 8. WPS/4301/2013 HEERALAL GUPTA & ORS JEET PATEL,RAHUL MISHRA / [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. COPY OF PETITION WITH ALL ANNE NOT SERVED TO RESPONDENT NO. 3 AS PER RULE 47(i) CG HIGH COURT RULE 2007 ]

2 2 of 6 9. WPS/4305/2013 PARMARATH VS. CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER & MEENA SHASTRI,SK.RATRE / [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. DATE NOT MENTIONED IN THE SYNOPSIS MEMO OF PETITION AND CERTIFICATE. 2. DATE OF ANNE P/12 IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE INDEX & 8.8 OF PETITION. 3. YEAR OF HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION PASSED BY PETITIONER IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE PARA NO. 8.2 OF PETITION. 4. TYPED COPY OF PAGE NO. 9 IS WRONGLY FILED WITH PETITION. ] 10. WPS/4307/2013 MANOJ KUMAR VERMA & ORS BHARAT RAJPUT / [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. DATE OF EVENTS NOT IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER IN THE SYNOPSIS. 2. DATE OF ANNE P/3 IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE INDEX. ] 11. WPS/4311/2013 JUGNURAM AND AMIT VERMA,ASHISH SHRIVASTAVA,AFROJ KHAN,ANURAG VERMA,ANIMESH VERMA / [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. AGE OF PETITIONER NOT MENTIONED IN THE CAUSE TITLE OF PETITION. 2. ADDRESS OF PETITIONER NOT MENTIONED COMPLETELY IN THE CAUSE TITLE OF PETITION. (PS NOT MENTIONED) 3. ADVOCATE ANIMESH VERMA COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER NOT SIGNED VAKALATNAMA (PAGE NO. 61,63 & 65) ] 12. WPS/4312/2013 P.D. BAIRAGI & ORS VARUN SHARMA,JITENDRA PALI,AMAN KESHARWANI,BHAVANA PALI / [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. DATE OF EVETNS NOT MENTIONED IN CHRONOLOGICAL MANNER. 2. PAGE NO. 29 & 31 ARE NOT LEGIBLE/ READABLE COPY BUT TYPED COPY OF THE SAME FILED WITH THE PETITION. 3. PARA NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED AFTER PARA NO OF MEMO OF PETITION. ] 13. WPPIL/70/2013 CHHATTISGARH MOOL ANUSUCHIT JATI ADHIKARI/KARMACHARI SANGH AND RAKESH KUMAR DUBEY / [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. DETAILS OF RESPONDENT NOT MENTIONED COMPLTELY IN CAUSE TITLE OF SYNOPSIS. 2. DATE NOT MENTIONED IN MEMO OF PETITION CERTIFICATE & BOTH APPOINTMENTS. 3. CONTENTS OF PARA NO. 3 OF AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF PETITION WRONGLY & INCOMPLETLY MENTIONED. 4. PAGING NOT DONE PROPERLY AFTER PAGE NO. 65 IN THE DOCUMENTS & INDEX ALSO. 5. PAGE NO. 164 & 165 ARE NOT ARRENGED PROPERLY WITH THE PETITION 6. PAGE NO. 165 FILED AS TWICE WITH THE PETITION. 7. PAGE NO. 166 & 167 ARE NOT ARRENGED PROPERLY WITH THE PETITION. 8. THE INSTANT PETITION IS NOT IN PRESERIBED FORMATE (PARA NO. C-V NOT MENTIONED ) AS PER HIGH COURT RULES AUTHRISATION LETTER NOT FILED WITH SPARE PART OF PETITION. ] 14. WPC/1880/2013 SALIK RAM VERMA RAJ KUMAR GUPTA,KRISHNA GUPTA,KIRAN JAIN,R.K. JAIN / [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. ANNE WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 8.7 & 8.8 OF MEMO OF PETITION. 2. AS PER CONTENTS MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 3 OF AFFIDAVIT. INTERIM APPLICATION NOT FILED WITH THE PETITION. ] 15. WPC/1885/2013 BANSIDHAR PATEL AND ATUL PANDEY,DEEPALI PANDEY / [ ON DEFAULT OF : 1. PARA NUMBER WRONGLY MENTIONED AFTER PARA NO. 3 OF PETITION. 2. LAND ACQUISITION PROCEEDING NUMBER IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN THE PARA NO. 3 AND 10.1 OF PETITION. ] 16. CRA/1217/2013 SWARATH VS. SHOBHA KASHYAP AND RAJESH JAIN,KIRAN JAIN / MUNGELI [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. APP. FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY ARE NOT SIGNED BY SMT. KIRAN JAIN & SHRI R.K.JAIN, ADVOCATE. 2. PARTICULAR WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE, PRAYER COLUMN & AFFIDAVIT. ] 17. CRR/847/2013 TEMSAI VS. SMT. JHINGOLI BAI D.N.PRAJAPATI,MOHD. TARIQ HAIDER,HIRALAL SINGH / [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. CR. REVISION FILED IN WRONG SECTION. ] SURGUJA (AMBIKAPUR) 18. MCRC/5787/2013 LALCHAND VISHVAKARMA DEVERSHI THAKUR / RAIPUR [ FOR DEFAULT OF: 1. INFORMATION TO CO-ACCUSED NOT MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT AS PER FILING CLERK REPORT.]

3 3 of MCRC/5801/2013 DOMENDRA GOLU SAHU P.P.SAHU,S.P.SAHU,C.P.SAHU / [ FOR DEFAULT OF: 1. ADVOCATE SHRI S.P. SAHU NOT SINGED IN MEMO OF APPEARANCE.] DHAMTARI 20. CRMP/1112/2013 STATE OF CHHATTISGARH / VS. JAY KUMAR SAHU [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. ANNEX. NOT MARKED IN PAGE NO PRAYER COLUMN WRONGLY MENTIONED IN MEMO OF ACQ. APPEAL. ] 21. MCRCA/1385/2013 MOHAR SINGH PRADEEP MISHRA,PRANAV KUMAR TIWARI / [ FOR DEFAULT OF: 1. PETITION NOT IN FORMAT.] 22. ACQA/69/2013 SMT.UMA MALLICK SUNIL SAHU / [ FOR DEFAULT OF: 1. NATURE OF CASE WRONGLY MENTIONED IN ALL PETITION.] RAIPUR SURGUJA (AMBIKAPUR) 23. FA/14/1998 BHAGWAT PRASAD SAHU & VS. DILHARAN & DEFAULT MATTERS NK.,VN.,SL.PATEL,,PANKAJ AGRAWAL,OM PRAKASH SAHU,ITU RANI MUKHERJEE / YK.GUPTA [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF NON COMPLIANCE OF THE HON'BLE C.O. DTD. 13/09/2013 REGARDING COMPLETE P.F. OF RESPONDENTS. ] WR 24. SA/3/1998 MOHD. MURTZA VS. MOHD. ASGAR & PC.PALIWAL,SMT. S.PALIWAL,KU. KIRAN MEHTA,ANIL SINGH,B.P. GUPTA /, [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF LATE PAYMENT OF P.F. AS PER THE RULE INCOMPLIANCE OF THE HON'BLE C.O.DT. 25/11/2013 ] WR 25. SA/18/1999 GANGADHAR &,VISHNU KOSHTA / VS. BAHADUR(D) L.R'S DOKRI BAI & AK.DAS,,H.S.PATEL [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF NON COMPLIANCE OF THE HON'BLE C.O.DT. 28/10/2013 REGARDING COMPLETE P.F. OF RESP.NO. 1 (A) TO (D) NOT PAID ] WR 26. SA/11/2002 GANGA & VS. BACHU RAJWAR &,A.K. PRASAD / [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF NON COMPLIANCE OF THE HON'BLE C.O. DT. 07/11/13 REGARDING R/AD P.F. FOR RESPS. NOT PAID ] WR 27. SA/6/2005 ADUR RAM AND OTHERS VS. KANIYA RAM AND OTHERS HP.AGRAWAL,PRAKASH TIWARI,JAMEEL AKHTAR LOHANI /,,VISHNU KOSHTA [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF NON COMPLIANCE OF THE HON'BLE C.O.DT. 22/11/2013 REGARDING R/AD P.F. NOT PAID FOR LR'S OF RESP NO.1 ] 28. SA/7/2005 ROHIT KUMAR AND ANOTHER VS. HIRAMANI AND OTHERS SANJAY AGRAWAL,SHARMILA SINGHAI,RAGHAVENDRA PRADHAN /, [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF NOT SUBMITTING COPY OF SUBSTAINTIAL QUESTION OF LAW ALONGWITH P.F. FOR ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO THE RESP NO. 1 TO 3 ] WR 29. SA/260/2006 RAM KUMAR VS. TIJMAT BAI AND OTHERS JITENDRA MUDLIYAR,SHASHANK SHARMA,SACHIN SINGH RAJPUT,MADHU NISHA SINGH,ANANT BAJPAI /, [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT NON COMPLIANCE OF THE HON'BLE C.O.DT. 29/11/2013 REGARDING COMPLETE P.F. NOT PAID.] WR 30. WPS/6773/2007 DR. KRISHANAMURTI SHARMA &,PRAKASH TIWARI,SANDEEP DUBEY,AVINASH & K.MISHRA,B.L.SAHU /,,ASHOK SONI,PAWAN KESHARWANI [ DEFAULT AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED IN SUPPORT OF U/H APPLICATION. ]

4 4 of WPT/6751/2008 M/S RASKIRAT ENTERPRISES &,ABHISHEK SINHA,GHANSHYAM PATEL,NEELABH OTHERS DUBEY / VS. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANAND DADARIYA,STANDING COUNSEL FOR I.T. [ FOR DEFAULT EDITOR PAPER BOOK NOTE DT (1)PAGE NO. 24 OF THE PAPER BOOK IS NOT ATTACHED IN ALL SETS OF THE PAPER BOOK. (2) PAGE NO. 10 OF ANNEXURE P/8, FILED IN APPLICATION FOR AMENDMENT HAS NOT BEEN ATTACHED IN ALL SETS OF THE PAPER BOOK ] 32. MAC/966/2012 SMT.DEVMATI VS. SHEKH ALEEM AND,SAMIR SINGH / KEDAR SINGH ANAND,CHITRA SHRIVASTAVA [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF CORRECT ADDRESS NOT GIVEN BY THE COUNSEL ALONGWITH P.F. FOR ISSUANCE OF NOTICE TO RESP. NO. 1 ] WR 33. SA/413/2013 SANTRAM YADAV VS. GULSHERA BEGUM AND SAREENA BEE,MALAY KUMAR BHADURI,SANTOSH BAJPAI,DINESH PRASAD YADAV / [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF O.N. DT. 10/09/2013 AS DEFAULT NO. 1,3,& 4 AS: 1 APPEAL VALUED AT RS. INCOMPLETELY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 3. COPY OF JUDGMENT DT. 19/07/2011 PASSED BY THE 3RD CIVIL JUDGE CLASS I HAS NOT FILED. 4. APPEAL IS TIME BARRED BY 204 DAYS FOR WHICH AN APPL. U/S 5 OF LIMITATION ACT HAS NOT FILED. ] 34. SA/486/2013 CHHUNKU & ANR VS. DHARMIN BAI & ANR KRISHNA KUMAR DEWANGAN,DEEPAK KUMAR SINGH / JANJGIR-CHAMPA [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. REQUISITE C.F. IS DEFICIT OF RS. 370/- ON MEMO OF APPEAL AS PER C.C. IMPUGNED. 2. REQUISITE C.F. HAS NOT PAID ON C.C. IMPUGNED & ITS DECREE. 3. PARTICULARS OF C.F. REGARDING COURT BELOW HAS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE. 4. STATUS OF THE COURT BELOW HAS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PROPER CLAUSE.5. REQUISITE C.F. ON STAY APPL. HAS NOT PAID. ] 35. SA/491/2013 RAMPRASAD AND VS. BUTHALU DANSENA AND MANOJ KUMAR JAISWAL,VINOD KUMAR TEKAM / RAIGARH [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT OF NON COMPLIANCE OF THE HON'BLE C.O.DT. 21/11/2013 REGARDING COMPLETE P.F. WITH BOTH MODE NOT PAID ] 36. SA/498/2013 JOGIRAM VS. JANKI BAI & ORS,MALAY KUMAR BHADURI,B.S. BANAFER,SAREENA KHAN / JANJGIR-CHAMPA [ FOR DEFAULT OF : 1. NAME OF APPELLANT IS WRONGLY TYPED IN CAUSE TITLE OF APPEAL AND AFFIDAVIT. 2. PAGE NO. 18 IS HAND WRITTEN.] 37. CONT/421/2013 NASEEM KHAN K.M. ANSARI / VS. R.B. TRIPATHI [ FOR DEFAULT OF AS PER O.N. DT : 1. COPY OF ANNEXURE C/1 IS INCOMPLETE AS PER INDEX AND MEMO OF PETITION. ] 38. REVP/164/2013 SHRIRAM MANDIR GRAM KURRA AND SMT. PREETI YADAV,PANKAJ AGRAWAL,ITU RANI MUKHERJEE /, [ ON DEFAULT OF:- 1. COURT FEE OF RS. 15/- IS DEFICIT IN MEMO OF PETITION AS PER SCHEDULE I ARTICLE 4 OF THE COURT FEE ACT ] 39. REVP/165/2013 AJAY KUMAR BAIS AND VS. RAMADHAR YADAV AND SMT.PREETI YADAV,PANKAJ AGRAWAL,ITU RANI MUKHERJEE /, [ ON DEFAULT OF:- 1. COURT FEE OF RS. 15/- IS DEFICIT IN MEMO OF PETITION AS PER SCHEDULE I ARTICLE 4 OF THE COURT FEE'S ACT ] 40. WP227/837/2013 RAJESH KUMAR VS. MAHAVIR PRASAD & P.P. SAHU,SMT.CHANDRA PRABHA SAHU,SUKDEV PRASAD SAHU,ADITYA KUMAR / [ FOR DEFAULT FATHER'S NAME OF R-4 (AKHILCHAND) NOT MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE & AR(J) NOTE DTD. 10/11/2013. ] 41. WA/586/2013 STATE OF CHHATTISGARH AND VS. VIVEK SHUKLA AND U.N.S.DEO, /,B.D.GURU,PRAVEEN DAS [ ON DEFAULT AS PER OFFICE NOTE DT. 04/12/13 OF - (1) DAYS OF DELAY WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 02 & PRAYER COLUMN OF APPLICATION FOR CONDO. OF DELAY & AR(J) ORDER DT. 06/12/13. ]

5 5 of WA/587/2013 MAHETARIN BAI VS. SMT. SITA BAI & ORS ANAND KESHARWANI,VINEET KUMAR PANDEY,SUMIT JHANWAR,S.D.SINGH / [ ON DEFAULT AS PER OFFICE NOTE DT. 04/12/2013 OF - (1) COPY OF APPEAL WITH ALL ANEX. NOT SERVED TO REPRESENTATIVE COUNSEL FOR RESP & AR(J) ORDER DATED 06/12/2013. ] 43. WPC/1777/2013 SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. VS. MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT & FOREST RAJKUMAR GUPTA,SWATI R.GUPTA / ASSTT. S.G. [ ON DEFAULT OF - 1. DATE OF ANNEX. P/4 WRONGLY MENTIONED IN INDEX & PARA NO. 6 OF PETITION. 3. PAGE NOS. 20. & 40 ARE NOT LEGIBLE / CLEAR COPY BUT TYPED COPY OF THE SAME FILED WITH THE PETITION & OFFICE NOTE DATE & A.R.(J) ORDER DATE & ] 44. MCRC/5553/2013 SANTOSH KUMAR NIRUPAMA BAJPAI,VIMLESH BAJPAI,SHRAWAN KUMAR CHANDEL / KORBA [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. INFORMATION OF CO-ACCUSED WRONGLY MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT. (AS PER REPORT OF FILING CLERK) ] 45. MCRC/5646/2013 RAJU SINGH GOAND [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. INFORMATION OF CO-ACCUSED COMPLETELY NOT MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT AS PER REPORT OF FILING CLERK. 2. BAIL REJECTION ORDER COPY OF LEARNED COURT BELOW NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. 3. BA. NO. OF LEARNED LOWER COURT WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE & SYNOPSIS. 4. MCRC NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE & SYNOPSIS. ] [AFTER A WEEK] 46. MCRC/5647/2013 RAJU SINGH GOAND [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. COPY OF BAIL REJECTION ORDER OF COURT BELOW NOT FILED. 2. CO-ACCUSED INFORMATION WRONGLY MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT AS PER FILING CLERK REPORT. ] [ AFTER A WEEK ] 47. MCRC/5648/2013 MUKUT RAM CHAUDHARY [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. INFORMATION OF CO-ACCUSED WRONGLY MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT AS PER REPORT OF FILING CLERK. 2. BAIL REJECTION ORDER COPY OF LEARNED COURT BELOW NOT FILED WITH THE CASE. 3. MCRC NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN CAUSE TITLE & SYNOPSIS. 4. MCRC NO. WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO RELATIONSHIP WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 04. ] [AFTER A WEEK] 48. MCRC/5650/2013 MUKUT RAM CHAUDHARY [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. COURT BELOW BAIL REJECTION ORDER NOT FILED. 2. CO-ACCUSED INFORMATION WRONGLY MENTIONED IN AFFIDAVIT. 3. RELATION CONTRARY MENTIONED IN PARA NO. 4 OF PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT. ] [AFTER A WEEK] 49. CRMP/648/2013 PRADEEP SHARAF,JITENDRA KUMAR GUPTA,F.S.KHARE / &, JANJGIR-CHAMPA [ FOR ORDER ON DEFAULT- 1-APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NOT REQUIRED WITH THE CASE. O2- APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY NOT REQUIRED WITH THE CASE. ] 50. CRMP/683/2013 DEONATH GARUDIK VS. RAJ KUMAR & ORS,C.R.SAHU,R.K.GOMASTA,C.K.SAHU,A.D.KULDEEP / [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. U/S OF LEAVE TO APPEAL AND ACQUITTAL APPEAL WRONGLY MENTIONED. 2. AS PER ANNEX. A/1 RESPONDENT NO. 1 NAME WRONGLY MENTIONED IN ALL THE PETITION. 3. OTHER RELEVANT EXHIBITED DOCUMENTS NOT FILED. 4. TYPED COPY OF PAGE NO. 34, 35 NOT FILED. 5. STATEMENTS OF PWS. COMPLETELY NOT FILED. 6. APPLICATION FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY WITH AFFIDAVIT NOT FILED. ] DURG 51. MCRCA/1366/2013 SUNNY BHAWNANI SUNIL OTWANI,SUSHIL SAHU,VINOD PANDEY,SUSHOBHIT SINGH / RAIPUR [ FOR DEFAULT OF- 1. COURT NAME IS WRONGLY MENTIONED IN PARA NO AFFIDAVIT IS NOT IDENTIFIED BY SHRI VINOD PANDEY. ] [AFTER A WEEK]

6 6 of 6 BY ORDER OF HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- (RAJESH SHRIVASTAVA ) ADDITIONAL REGISTRAR (J)