IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) RSA No. 73 of 2004
|
|
- Harvey Skinner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) RSA No. 73 of ) On the death of Sri Tileswar Medhi, Appellant No.1- his legal heirsi) Smt Jamini Medhi, ii) Sri Dharmendra Medhi, iii) Smti Parul Medhi, iv) Smti Swapna Medhi. 2) Smti Ghana Kanti Medhi, Daughter of Late Tarapada Medhi, All are resident of Village Manaha Nasatra, Mouza- Manaha, District- Morigaon, Assam. -Versus-.. Appellants. 1. Smti. Bulu Medhi Phukan, Wife of Late Narendra Nath Medhi, 2. Sri Rinku Medhi, Son of Late Narendra Medhi 3. Sri Jewel Medhi, Son of Late Narendra Medhi, 4. Smti. Maina Medhi, Daughter of Late Narendra Medhi No. 1 to 4 all are residents of Village- Kamour, District- Nagaon, Assam. 5. Sri Lalit Chandra Medhi, Son of Late Deba Medhi. 6. Sri Putul Ch. Medhi, Son of Late Deba Medhi. RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 1 of 11
2 7. Smti. Babul Medhi, Wife of Sri Rajen Medhi. 8. Hatul Medhi, Son of Rajen Medhi, 9. Kanak Ch. Medhi, Son of Somnath Medhi. 10. B.M. Prathamik Bidyalaya, represented by Sri Dimbeswar Medhi, Son of Late Navia Medhi, Secretary of B.M. Prathamik Bidyalaya. 12. Mohan Deka, President of B.M. Prathamik Bidyalaya, Village Monaha Nasatra, Mouza Manah, District- Morigaon, Assam.. Respondents. 13. On the death of respondent No.13 his legal heirs, a) Smti Sabha Medhi (wife), b) Sri Pranal Medhi, (Son) c) Sri Nripen Medhi (Son) d) Sri Sarat Medhi (Son) e) Sri Mukut Medhi (Son) f) Sri Mantu Medhi (Son) g) Smti Bhanu Medhi (Daughter) h) Smti Ranju Medhi (Daughter) 14. On the death of respondent No.14 his legal heirs a) Smti Padumi Medhi (Wife) b) Sri Nareswar Medhi (Son) c) Sri Nabajyoti Medhi (Son) d) Smti. Mridula Medhi (Daughter) e) Smti Rekha Medhi (Daughter) f) Sri Tuttul Medhi (son) 15. On the death of respondent No.15, his legal heris a) Smti Kusum Medhi (Wife) b) Smti Darsana Medhi (Daughter) RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 2 of 11
3 16. Sri Anil Ch. Medhi, Son of Ram Das Medhi. 17. Sri Biddut Medhi, Son of Prafulla Medhi. 18. Sri Manash Medhi, Son of Prafulla Medhi. 19. Kulu Medhi, Son of Prafulla Medhi. 20. Smti Jogali Medhi, Daughter of Prafulla Medhi. 21. Smti Jonti Medhi, Daughter of Pudu Medhi. 22. Smti Sakuntala Medhi, Daughter of Pudu Medhi. 23. On the death of respondent No.23 her legal heirs- a) Maneka Medhi (wife of Deba Medhi) 24. Smti Dipti Medhi, Daughter of Debi Medhi. 25. Sri Keshab Ch. Medhi, Son of Rajen Medhi. 26. Smti Niru Medhi, Daughter of Rajen Medhi. Respondents No. 13 to 26 all are the residents of Village : Manaha Na-Sattra, Mouza- Manaha, District: Morigaon, Assam. Proforma- respondents. RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 3 of 11
4 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N. CHAUDHURY For the Petitioner : Mr. A. C. Sarma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Z. Mukit, Advocate. Date of hearing : Date of judgment : JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) This second appeal has been preferred by the plaintiffs challenging the concurrent findings of both the courts below in regard to the prayer of the plaintiffs for declaration of the right, title and interest and recovery of khas possession over a plot of land measuring 2 Bigha 8 Lechas covered by Dag No. 716 of periodic patta No.50 of Monaha Kissam &, Mouza in the District of Morigaon. The learned Trial Court by judgment and decree dated in Title Suit No. 8 of 2001 dismissed the suit holding that the plaintiffs failed to prove right, title and interest with respect to the suit land and also their possession over the same was not proved. As against the said judgment plaintiffs preferred Title Appeal No. 20 of 2003 before the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) No.1, Morigaon, and the said appeal was also dismissed on Against these said 2 (two) judgments, the present second appeal has been preferred. [2] The plaintiffs Tileshwar Medhi & Ghana Kanti Medhi are two sons of Late Tarapada Medhi, who on turn was one of the 7 sons of Bhutiram Medhi. The plaintiffs pleaded that land measuring 2 Bigha 8 Lechas covered by Dag No. 716 of Periodic Patta No. 50 under Monaha RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 4 of 11
5 Kissam & Mouza in the district of Morigaon fell in the share of Tarapada Medhi on amicable partition. The suit land is described in the Schedule-A to the plaint. According to the plaintiffs, their grandfather Late Bhutiram Medhi originally owned and possessed land measuring 4 Bigha 3 Katha 8 Lechas covered by Dag No. 351 of Periodic Patta No.33 as per settlement operation of and after his death his legal heirs got the land amicably partitioned consequent to which suit land measuring 2 Bigha 8 Lechas, more particularly described in Schedule-A to the plaint, fell in the share of the plaintiffs father Tarapada Medhi. Further case of the plaintiffs was that subsequently the defendants entering into collusion among themselves had shown a false partition which did really never happen and on the basis of the same the plaintiffs were dispossessed in the year The defendants fraudulently made transfer of the land in favour of defendants No. 6 & 7. The plaintiffs, therefore, prayed not only for declaration of their right, title and interest over the suit land with a decree for recovery of possession but also for further declaration that the partition claimed by the defendants so as to grab the Schedule-A land was illegal, inoperative and fraudulent. [3] On being summoned, the defendants appeared and submitted written statement. In their written statements, defendants admitted that the suit land originally belonged to one Bhutiram Medhi and have also admitted that there was amicable partition but they disputed the statement that the suit land fell in the share of the plaintiffs after partition. According to the defendants, the suit land originally fell in the share of Naren Medhi who obtained mutation in his favour and subsequently in the year 1990 he transferred the suit land to other defendants for establishing a school i.e. B.M. Prathamik Bidyalaya in the name of Bhutiram Medhi and also in favour of Kanak Ch. Medhi, the defendant No.6. According to the defendants, the records of rights bear testimony to the fact that the partition claimed by them is RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 5 of 11
6 correct and that suit land never fell in the share of the plaintiffs father Late Tarapada Medhi. [4] On the basis of the aforesaid rival contention, the learned trial court framed as many as 7 issues which were subsequently recast and reframed. Those issues are quoted below: i ) Whether there is any cause of action of the suit? ii) Whether the suit is maintainable in the present form? iii) Whether the plaintiffs has right, title and interest over the suit land through right of inheritance? iv) Whether the suit land fell into the share of the plaintiff s father Tarapad Medhi at the time of amicable partition? possession? v) Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to get the decree for khas vi) Whether the plaintiffs entitled to get the relief as prayed for? vii) To what relief/ reliefs the parties are entitled to? [5] In course of trial plaintiffs examined as many as 3 witnesses including the plaintiff No.1 and exhibited 9 documents, whereas the defendant examined 3 witnesses who are defendant No.2, defendant No. 6 & defendant No.9. The defendant exhibited 3 documents as Exhibits- Ka, Kha & Ga. [6] After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the materials available on record, the learned Trial Court passed judgment on By the said judgment the learned Trial Court took up issue No.4 as first issue which is in regard to the claim of the plaintiffs that suit land had fallen in the share of their father Late Tarapada Medhi. Consequent to amicable partition among the legal heirs of Bhutiram Medhi in deciding the issue No.4, the learned Trial Court considered the exhibits relied on by the parties and came to finding that name of Narendra Nath Medhi, defendant RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 6 of 11
7 No.1, exists in the records of rights since settlement operation which is evidenced by entry of his name in the records of rights as the original pattadar. Subsequently, the names of defendants No. 6 & 7 were mutated in place of original pattadar Naren Medhi in the year On this observation and in the absence of any written memorandum of the settlement for amicable partition among the legal heirs of Bhutiram Medhi, the learned Court was of the considered opinion that the plaintiffs failed to give any plausible explanation as to how, his predecessor could be owner in possession of the suit land when it is apparent that defendant No.1 is the recorded pattadar since As per entries made in the records of rights suit land fell in the share of Naren Medhi. On these considerations the learned Trial Court held that the plaintiffs did not have any right, title and interest over the suit land. Moreover according to the learned Trial Court, the plaintiffs could not prove possession over the Schedule-A land and as such the question of recovery of possession also did not arise. Be that as it may, along with the said issue the learned Trial Court while deciding the issue of maintainability of the suit, made an observation that the suit is barred under Section 154 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886, inasmuch as the entries in the records of rights have been challenged in the suit. [7] Against the aforesaid judgment of the learned Trial Court, plaintiffs approached the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) No.1 by preferring an appeal. The appeal was numbered as Title Appeal No. 20 of The learned First Appellate Court after hearing the learned counsel for the parties was of the view that the issue No.4 was the principal issue which was really the bone of contention between the parties and accordingly, without going for determining any point for determination as is required under the provision of Order XLI Rule 31 proceeded to decide the appeal issue wise. Issue No.4 was taken up first and all the materials particularly Exhibit.1, Exhibit- Ka and RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 7 of 11
8 other exhibits adduced by the parties were duly considered. The learned First Appellate Court was of the view that the plaintiffs could not prove the said issue in their favour. Consequently, it was held by the learned First Appellate Court that the land described in the Schedule-A of the plaint fell in the share of Naren Medhi i.e. defendant No.1 and not in favour of Tarapada Medhi, the predecessors in interest of the plaintiffs. The learned First Appellate Court did not feel necessity to discuss the other issues and dismissed the appeal by his judgment dated in view of findings in issue No.4. [8] Plaintiffs preferred second appeal against both the aforesaid judgments. This Court while admitting the second appeal on framed the following 2 (two) issues and the same are reproduced below: i) Whether the suit is barred under Section 154 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation? ii) Whether the judgment of the lower Appellate Court is bad for not framing the points for determination as provided under Order 41 Rule 31 of the Code of Civil Procedure? [9] I have heard Mr. A.C. Sarma, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Z. Mukit, learned counsel for the respondents. [10] According to the learned counsel for the appellants the plaintiffs filed the suit for declaration of right, title and interest and not for declaration that any endorsement made in the records of rights are erroneous or illegal and as such the findings of the learned Trial Court that the suit is barred by Section 154 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886, is erroneous. According to the learned counsel for the appellants, the Appellate Court failed to take into RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 8 of 11
9 consideration these aspects of the matter and as such fell into error of law. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that without deciding the question of maintainability of the suit, it was not open on the part of the learned First Appellate Court to enter into the merit of the case and accordingly, the appeal is liable to be allowed setting aside the aforesaid judgments of the learned Courts below. It is well settled principles of law that a suit for declaration of right, title and interest cannot be barred by Section 154 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886, as such the first substantial question of law framed by this Court is required to be decided in the negative holding that the suit of the plaintiffs was maintainable, the learned counsel for the appellants maintained. [11] Coming to the second substantial question of law the leaned counsel for the appellants, however, fairly submits that in view of the fact that the learned First Appellate Court proceeded to decide the appeal issue wise, there was substantial compliance of the provision of Order XLI Rule 31 and as such the learned counsel did not argue the same. [12] Per contra, Mr. Z. Mukit, learned counsel for the respondents would argue that even if the first substantial question of law is decided in favour of the appellants the end result does not change inasmuch as both the Courts have declared that the plaintiffs do not have right, title and interest with respect to the suit land. The dismissal of the suit at least on issues No.3 & 4 and affirmation thereof by the First Appellate Court cannot in any way be disturbed. According to Mr. Z. Mukit the two substantial questions of law framed by this Court at the time of admission of the second appeal are not material for the purpose of second appeal. The learned counsel for the respondents submits that the findings in regard to title having been given concurrently by both the Courts against the plaintiffs and RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 9 of 11
10 the said findings not having been challenged in any way before this Court, the second appeal is liable to be dismissed. [13] By Section 154 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation, 1886, some matters have been exempted from cognizance of Civil Court and it includes the matters in regard to preparation of records of rights. As many as 14 items have been mentioned under Section 154 giving an exhaustive list of the exempted items. The suit of the plaintiffs relates to declaration of right, title and interest which is neither included in Section 154 nor could it be so included. Section 9 CPC has vested Civil Courts to decide any suit of civil nature excepting the suit of which cognizance is barred specifically by a statute. So, except the items mentioned in various Clauses of Section 154 all other items shall be covered by Section 9 CPC. A civil court has been endowed with plenary power to entertain any suit of civil nature as long as the jurisdiction is not barred specifically by any statute. So, to confer jurisdiction of Civil Court, no other provision is necessary in view of provision under Section 9 CPC. Rather, ouster of jurisdiction of civil court can be done by a specific statutory provision only. Even if the jurisdiction of civil court is otherwise barred by any statute even thereafter when there is violation of the fundamental judicial Procedure and/ or provisions of the said Act and/ or the Principles of natural justice, a civil suit shall lie. The suit in hand is one for declaration of right, title and interest and the same, prima facie, does not come in any of the items mentioned under Section 154 of the Assam Land and Revenue Regulation. In that view of the matter the finding of the learned Trial Court that the suit is barred under Section 154 is erroneous. The first substantial question of law, therefore, is decided in the negative and in favour of the plaintiffs. [14] The second substantial question of law has not been pressed by the learned counsel for the appellants as has been stated above. The question then arises after having decided the first substantial RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 10 of 11
11 question of the law framed in the second appeal in favour of the appellants what would happen to the impugned judgments? This takes us to the findings of the learned Courts below which are referred to above. The learned Courts below have held that the plaintiffs have failed to prove their right, title and interest and possession over the Schedule-A to the plaint and this being the basic issue or the crux of the suit, the plaintiffs are not entitled to any relief. This is what has happened in the present case. Plaintiffs suit may be maintainable but the facts remain that the plaintiffs could not prove their right, title and interest. In that view of the matter although the substantial question No.1 of law is decided in favour of the appellants yet the findings of the learned courts below on merit. i.e. claim of plaintiffs as to right, title and interest over the Schedule-A are not interfered. Consequently, the said concurrent findings of fact and the decision that the plaintiffs are not entitled to relief are upheld. [15] Interim order, if there be any, shall stand automatically vacated. sumita JUDGE RSA No.73 of 2004 Page 11 of 11
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No. 168/1999 On the death of Sibanath Sarma, the sole appellant his legal heirs
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. RSA No. 106 of Smt. Mailata Talukdar, W/O Lt. Madhab Talukdar.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No. 106 of 2003 1. Smt. Mailata Talukdar, W/O Lt. Madhab Talukdar. 2. Sri Amarendra Talukdar, S/O Lt. Madhab
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 21/2007
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: Babulal Choudhury and others Appellants -Versus- Ganesh Chandra Bharali and another... Respondents
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No. 172/2000 Smt. Ranamaya Chetri, W/O late Chandra Bahadur Chetri, resident of
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH )
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) RSA No. 58 of 2005 1) Smti Chandra Sakhi Singha, Wife of Sri Horendra Singha, Village & P.O.- Borjalenga,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION) RSA No. 149 of 2006 APPELLANTS: 1. On the death of
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.55/2004
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.55/2004 1. Smti Jaya Handique, W/o. Late Dimbeswar Handique, 2. Sri Pradip Handique, 3. Sri Bipul Handique,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Page No.1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) ON THE DEATH OF HUSSAIN ALI HIS LEGAL HEIRS 1. CHAN MIA 2. BAKKAR ALI, 3. AKKAS ALI ALL ARE SONS OF
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA 212/2005 1. Md. Hussain Ahmed 2. Md. Ilas Ahmed @ Bilal Ahmed 3. Md. Masuk Ahmed 4. Mustt. Chhayaban Nessa
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No. 149/2000 1. Musstt. Sufia Khatun, W/O Late Danish Ali. 2. Md. Mintu Sheikh alias
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No.74 of 2001 On the death of the appellant, Mustt. Anowara Bewa, the following
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
RSA NO. 156/2005 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA 156/2005 Sri Pramendra Bijoy Roy, S/o Late Ramesh Chandra Roy, Silchar Road (Hailakandi
More informationCRP No. 369 / S/O Late Ganraram Upadhaya. S/O Late Ganraram Upadhaya
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Shri Vinit Tibrewala Son of Late Radheshyam tibrewala Main Road, Tezpur Town PO Tezpur Mouza-Mahabhairab Dist-Sonitput,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT RSA No. 94/ 2007 1. Musssamat Amirun Nessa, Wife of Late Safiquir Rahman 2. Hilal Uddin, Son
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM : NAGALAND : MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA NO. 177/2005 (1) Ashok Kr. Sinha. Son of Late Kalachand Sinha. (2) Sri Budhu Sinha. Son of Late Kalachand
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 946 OF 2009
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 946 OF 2009 1. SRI PRAMOD KUMAR KEDIA, S/O. LATE BISWANATH KEDIA. 2. SRI SMTI. NIMAWATI KEDIA,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 80/2006
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: 1. Md. Rahmat Ali, S/o Md. Hafizatddin 2. Smti. Nazma Rahman, W/o Md. Rahmat Ali, Both are residents
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RFA 9/2008 Sri Mrinal Kanti Dey, S/o- Shri Mohit Lal Dey, Resident of Circular Path, Rukmininagar, PO-Assam Sachivalaya,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Page No.1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA 6 OF 2003 Rupan Kishan S/O- Lt. Ganesh Kishan, Vill- Potabill, Mouza-Orang, P.O- Shillong Khuti,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017 1. SMTI. TETERI DEVI, Wife of Late Mohendra Harizon. 2. SHRI RAMANANDA HARIZON, Son of Late Mohendra
More informationCRP 210 of Versus BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Musstt. Saheda Begum Gopal Shah Versus Petitioners Respondents BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA For
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA No. 153 of 2000 1. Md. Anisur Rahman, S/O Lt. Mvi. Wazed Ali, Village-Batabari,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 132/2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: 1. Md. Alauddin, S/o Late Nazar Ali, 2. Mrs. Phulmati W/o Alauddin Both are resident of- Village:-
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP 94 of 2017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP 94 of 2017 ATOWAR RAHMAN KALACHAN SHEIKH & 2 ORS. -Versus-..Petitioner..Respondents BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: Md. Anowar Hussain & others Jamal Uddin & others -Versus- Appellants... Respondents BEFORE :: HON BLE
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION) CRP No. 329 of 2000 On the death of Rajmangal Dubey
More informationIntest.Cas.5 of 2004
Page No.1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Intest.Cas.5 of 2004 1. Isamuddin Mia 2. Md. Usman Mia Alias Osman Mia Both are sons of Late Uljan
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.29 OF Petitioners/Defendant Nos.2 to 9.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.29 OF 2017 1. Sri Nitesh Ghosh, Son of Late Narendra Nath Ghosh. 2. Sri Ashim Saha, Son of Sri Ajit Kr. Saha.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam,Nagaland,Meghalaya,Manipur, Tripura,Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) MIZORAM BENCH
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam,Nagaland,Meghalaya,Manipur, Tripura,Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) MIZORAM BENCH Civil Revision Petition No. 10 of 2011 Smti Zadingliani d/o Vanlalhluna
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 RSA No. 252/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 15th January,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 RSA No. 252/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 15th January, 2014 SURESH BALA & ORS Through: Mr. B.S.Mann, Advocate....Appellants VERSUS
More informationCRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) The Federal Bank Ltd. Petitioner VERSUS Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. Respondents CRP No. 220/2014 The Federal
More informationCIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 331/2008
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 331/2008 1. SMTI. PRATIMA RANI DEY, W/O. LATE BABUL DEY, 2. SRI BISWAJIT DEY [MINOR],
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No.8368 of 2003 1. Smti. Lilawati Neog Wife of Sri Roma Neog, 2.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No. 171/2014 On the death of Late Purna Chandra Deka, his legal heirs:- 1. Srimati Pramila Deka 2. Smti.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI. RSA No. 71 of 2005
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI APPELLANTS : RSA No. 71 of 2005 1. Smti Nanibala Dutta W/o Late Nandaram Dutta R/O/Toklai,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Case No: RSA 234/2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: 1. Shri Manik Chakraborty S/o late Bijoy Chakravorty R/o Rangapara Town, Ward No. 4, P.O. Rangapara,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1576 of 2013
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1576 of 2013 1. Sri Krishna Deb Nath, S/o. Late Ramani Deb 2. Smti. Maloti Deb Nath,W/o. Sri Krishna Deb
More informationCivil Revision Petition No. 118/2009 -VERSUS-
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Civil Revision Petition No. 118/2009 1. Md. Iman Ali, 2. Md. Abdul Basar, Both are sons of Late Ahmed Ali, 3. Msstt.
More informationJ U D G M E N T A N D O R D E R (ORAL)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) AIZAWL BENCH: AIZAWL Sh. Rev. Thangluaia S/o L.K. Siama(L) Bawngkawn, Aizawl. -Vs- C.R.P. (Art. 227) 12 of 2012
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT: ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal No. 357of 2013 Sri Rabindra Das Appellant -Versus- The State of Assam Respondent -BEFORE- HON
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Case No: 1. Smti. Sandhya Rani Choudhury, W/o late Birendra Kumar Choudhury, 2. Shri Bikash Chandra Choudhury,
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT AT GUWAHATI (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI WP(C) No. 4088/2014 Sri Dibyajyoti Kaushik, Son of Sri Santanu Baruaha,
More informationRFA. No. 38/ Versus- PRESENT HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N. CHAUDHURY. : Mr. GN SAhewalla, Sr.Adv.Ms. J Barua Adv. Adv. RFA No.18 of 2008 Page 1 of 13
Smti Tanuja Baruah Prof.of M/S Borsons Asia Borbheta Bongali Gaon PO Monkholi PS Bordubi Dist-Tinsukia, IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RFA.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Petition No. 535 of 2011 1. M/S Brahmaputra Iron & Steel Company Pvt.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 RFA No.595/2003 Reserved on: 4th January, 2012 Pronounced on: 13th January, 2012 SHRI VIRENDER SINGH Through: Mr. R.C. Chopra,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015. Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 1140/2015 & WP(C) 2945/2015 Sri Vidyut Bikash Bora -Vs-...Petitioner M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Mizoram & Arunachal. Pradesh)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA 290 of 2010 1. Nandlal Rajbhore, Son of late Raj Narayan Rajbhore, 2. Smti Madia Rajbhore, 3. Smti Sadiya
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 2842 of 2015 Md. Sahid Ali, S/o. Late Akbar Ali, R/o. Village- nmerapani Fareshtablak, P.S.- Merapani,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION) CRP No. 380 of 2014 M/S Shriram Transport Finance
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP 17 of 2017
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) 1. KANHAIYA LAL KANKANI CRP 17 of 2017 2. SMT. RAJ KUMARI KANKANI..Petitioners -Versus- 1. AMBIKA SUPPLY AND SERVICES
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Crl. Leave Petition 28/2014 Smt. Rekha Bhargava, Wife of Sri Amrit Bhargava, D/o. Sri Satya Narayan Bhargava,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No. 3/2007
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA No. 3/2007 Habibur Rahman, S/o Late Jaharuddin, Village-Banskandi Part-II, P.O. Banskandi, Cachar. - Versus...Appellant
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RFA 27 of M/s Humanoid Laboratories,
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RFA 27 of 2004 1. M/s Humanoid Laboratories, Represented by its proprietor Shri Bipul Baruah, S/o Shri Bhaben
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 RFA No.621/2003 DATE OF DECISION : 5th March, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 RFA No.621/2003 DATE OF DECISION : 5th March, 2012 ASHOK KUMAR & ORS.... Appellant Through: Mr. R.K. Anand, Advocate with
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM, AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) No. 357 of 2016 Lakhi Rani Das, Wife of Late Subhash Das, R/o village- Salpara, Molandubi, P.S.- Krishnai,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Nos OF 2015
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.1269-1270 OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Nos. 21402-21403 OF 2015 PYARELAL... APPELLANT Versus SHUBHENDRA
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF APRIL 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.F.A.NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF APRIL 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR R.F.A.NO.937/2012 BETWEEN: 1. SMT.MUNIYAMMA, W/O LATE DORASWAMY REDDY, AGED
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) No.2798/2011 % 19 th October, 2015 SH. SUSHIL YADAV AND ANR. Through: None.... Plaintiffs Versus M/S VALLEY VIEW DEVELOPERS PVT LTD AND ORS.... Defendants
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, MIZORAM, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA NO.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, MIZORAM, TRIPURA AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) RSA NO.205 OF 2005 1. Sri Sailendra Mohon Ghosh, S/o Late Surendra Mohan Ghosh,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh)
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) RSA 44/2004 1. Smti Ketaki Singha, W/o Late Birmangal Singh, D/o- Late Punchi Singha, Village Kalinagar, P.O.-
More informationAPPELLANT: Smt. Sawichhungi, D/o Lalngaiha (L), Chaltlang Ruamveng, Aizawl, Aizawl District.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) APPELLANT: Smt. Sawichhungi, D/o Lalngaiha (L), Chaltlang Ruamveng, Aizawl, Aizawl District. By Advocate :
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2855 of 2010 Ramesh Goswami Writ Petitioner
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)
Review Petition No. 73/2013 (Arising out of Misc. Case No. 705/2013 In FAO 6/2013) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 22 ND DAY OF AUGUST, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMAR BETWEEN W.P. NO.466 OF 2012 (GM-CPC) SRI ANANTHAIAH S/O CHIKKAIAH AGED ABOUT 55
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION. Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR PARTITION Judgment pronounced on: 10.04.2012 I.A. No.4998/2012 in CS(OS) No.136/2009 SUGANDHA SETHI...Plaintiff Through: Ms. N.Shoba with Mr.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 1961 of 2010 Smt. Padma Rani Mudai Hazarika - Versus - - Petitioner Union of India
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA No.137/2011. DATE OF DECISION : 4th March, 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RFA No.137/2011 DATE OF DECISION : 4th March, 2011 NARESH KUMAR SAINI Through: Appellant Mr. S.P.Jha, Adv. VERSUS DAYA RANI DIXIT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. RFA Nos. 601/2007 and 606/2007. DATE OF DECISION 10th February, 2012.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION RFA Nos. 601/2007 and 606/2007 DATE OF DECISION 10th February, 2012 1. RFA 601/2007 SHER SINGH Through: Mr. Avadh Kaushik, Advocate....
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WP(C) No of Versus-
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WP(C) No. 5648 of 2009 Sri Swapan Kumar Dey S/o late Jogesh Chandra Dey, R/o Nagadolong, P.O. & P.S. Namrup,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Petition No. 255 of 2010 Smt Roltong Singpho, Wife of Sri C C Singpho,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: 07.03.2012 I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.1674/2011 SURENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Through Mr. J.S. Mann, Adv....
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 SMT. SALONI MAHAJAN Through: Mr. Puneet Saini, Advocate....Petitioner
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. RFA No.200/2003. Reserved on 14th February, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE RFA No.200/2003 Reserved on 14th February, 2012 Pronounced on 2nd March, 2012 SHRI VED PRAKASH (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS...
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) NO.6459/2010 1. Md. Jeherul Islam, S/o Sultan Ali, Resident of Simelibari, Post Office- Bezera, District-
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) NO. 3235 of 2004 Shri Samudra Baishya, S/o. Late Nabin Baishya, Hengrabari, Guwahati-6...Petitioner -Versus-
More information-Versus- THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) CRP No. 406 of 2007
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) CRP No. 406 of 2007 On death of Joynath Gour, his legal heirs are- 1. Smt. Tara Rani Gour, W/O Late Joynath Gour.
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) M.F.A. No. 51 of 2014
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) M.F.A. No. 51 of 2014 1. M/S Jain and Associates registered Office at 9, Old Court, House Street, Kolkata- 700001.
More informationSri Raj Kumar Agarwal. -vs- 1. Smti. Anu Singhania, 2. State of Assam.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal 57/2009 Sri Raj Kumar Agarwal -vs- 1. Smti. Anu Singhania, 2. State of Assam. BEFORE HON BLE MR.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA RSA NO.5663 OF 2010(PAR)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 03 RD DAY OF APRIL 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA BETWEEN: RSA NO.5663 OF 2010(PAR) 1. NARAYAN S/O ISHWAR HEGDE AGE:
More informationCRP No. 429 of The Ahmed Tea Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., K.N.C.B. Path, Boiragimath, Dibrugarh, Assam, represented by its Director Mrs. Nazrana A. Islam.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) CRP No. 429 of 2008 The Ahmed Tea Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., K.N.C.B. Path, Boiragimath, Dibrugarh, Assam, represented by its
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 3680 of Vs-
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) 3680 of 2013 Ohed Ali, S/o. Late Abdul Jobbar @ Jobbar, Village Uralkata Pathar, P.O. Chahariagaon, P.S.-
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.224 OF 2010
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 25 th DAY OF MARCH, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.224 OF 2010 BETWEEN: SRI GANESH SHENOY, AGED ABOUT
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT APPEAL NO.322 OF 2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT APPEAL NO.322 OF 2015 1. Koddus Ali @ Kuddus Ali S/O Late Fazar Ali 2. Sofia Khatun @ Sibila Khatun W/O Koddus
More informationPrasenjit Mandal, J.:
CIVIL REVISION Present : The Hon ble Mr. Justice Prasenjit Mandal Judgment on 25.08.2010 C.O. No. 4446 of 2007 Shyam Kishor Sahu Versus Ajit Kumar Das. Points: Evidence- Evidence closed as per the order
More informationDate of CAV : Pronounced on 11/2/2014. appellants against the order dated passed by Learned
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Misc Appeal No. 224 of 2011 Abdul Hamid and others... Appellants State of Jharkhand and others Versus Respondents Coram : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE LPA 776 OF 2012, CMs No. 19869/2012 (stay), 19870/2012 (additional documents), 19871/2012 (delay) Judgment Delivered on 29.11.2012
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7843 OF 2009 CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF TRUSTEE, APPELLANT(s) SRI RAM MANDIR JAGTIAL KARIMNAGAR DISTRICT, A.P VERSUS S. RAJYALAXMI
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) C.R.P. NO. 328/2016 Sri Mohini Gohain Baruah & another..petitioner -Vs- Smt. Putali Gohain Baruah & another.respondents
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No of 2014
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 2306 of 2014 1. Md. Sirajul Hoque @ Sirajul Islam, S/o. Lt. Abdul Karim. 2. Musstt. Nurjahan Khatun
More informationSecond Appeal No of 2001 (Old (defective) No. 15 of 1995)
Reserved Judgment IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Second Appeal No. 1259 of 2001 (Old (defective) No. 15 of 1995) 1. Daulat Ram (since deceased) S/o Dhama Ram 1/1 Data Ram Balodi 1/2 Vimal
More informationCIVIL APPEAL Present: The Hon ble Mr. Justice Tarun Kumar Gupta Judgment on S.A. No.239 of 1996 Jagannath Ghosh and another Versus The
CIVIL APPEAL Present: The Hon ble Mr. Justice Tarun Kumar Gupta Judgment on 03.09.2010 S.A. No.239 of 1996 Jagannath Ghosh and another Versus The State of West Bengal and Ors. Points: Mutation - Whether
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) MAC APPEAL No. 95/2014 NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD...(APPELLANT) -VERSUS- JOGEN BORA @ JOGENDRA NATH BORA &
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO OF 2014 (GM-CPC)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015 B E F O R E THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO.38461 OF 2014 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) W.P. (C) No. 2131/2004 Shri Dwijendra Nath Deka S/o. Late Monmil Ch. Deka R/o. Madhgharia,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH )
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) KOHIMA BENCH Crl. Revision Petn. No. 2(K)/2010 1. Smti Zavekholu Epao, W/o. Vizekho
More information(THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Basistha Police Station in the district
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MEGHALAYA: MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL PETITION NO.510 OF 2012 Shri Kalyan Kr. Sarma, Son of Sri Mrigendra Sarma,
More informationJUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Test Case No. 01 OF 2003 Smt. Gita Mukherjee Appellant -Versus- Smt. Purnima Mukherjee and another..respondents BEFORE
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Sri Rajesh Jaiswal, S/o Sri Radha Raman Jaiswal, Resident of Thana Back Road, Ward No. 11, New Amolapatty, Golaghat-785621.
More informationThrough: Mr. Rahul Kumar Srivastava, Advocate. C.M(M) No. 211/2013. Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar Srivastava, Advocate.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) Nos. 208/2013 & 211/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 4th December, 2014 C.M(M) No. 208/2013 SUDARSHAN KUMAR JAIN Through: Mr. Rahul
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
Page 1 of 15 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP(C) NO.4448/2007 1. Sri Abhiram Pegu, S/o Damodar Pegu, R/O- Nalipipar, P.O & P.S- Dhemaji, District-
More information