NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT"

Transcription

1 NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE AND CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Emily Hunt v. VEP Healthcare, Inc. Case No. 16-cv A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation. This is not a lawsuit against you and you are not being sued. However, your legal rights are affected by whether you act or do not act. YOU ARE ENTITLED TO MONEY UNDER THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY; IT INFORMS YOU ABOUT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has granted preliminary approval of a proposed settlement ( Settlement ) of the above-captioned Collective and Class Action ( Lawsuit ). Because your rights may be affected by this Settlement, it is important that you read this Notice carefully. Most importantly, this Notice will advise you of how you can obtain your money under the Settlement or, if you desire, how you can decide to not take part in the Settlement and preserve your rights against VEP Healthcare, Inc. ( VEP ). The Settlement provides Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) to resolve this Lawsuit over whether VEP violated Federal law by failing to pay its physician s assistants who were eligible to receive productivity pay at a higher hourly rate for overtime hours. The Settlement also seeks to resolve, for those VEP physician s assistants who worked in California, claims that VEP violated California law regarding meal and rest periods, itemized wage statements, and timely pay upon separation from the company. The Court has not determined that VEP violated the law and VEP disputes the claims being made in the Lawsuit. After fighting the matter in state and federal court over the course of the past couple of years, the parties have agreed to resolve it under this proposed Settlement that the Northern District of California granted preliminary approval of. WHAT INFORMATION IS IN THIS NOTICE 1. Why Have I Received This Notice?... Page 1 2. What is this Case About?... Page 2 3. Am I a California Class Member and/or a FLSA Collective Member?... Page 2 4. How Does this Collective and Class Action Settlement Work?... Page 2 5. Who Are the Attorneys Representing the Parties?... Page 3 6. How do I Participate, Opt-out of, or Object to the FLSA Portion of the Settlement?... Page 3 7. How do I Participate, Opt-out of, or Object to the California Class Portion of the Settlement?...Page 4 8. How Do I Object to the Settlement?... Page 5 9. How Does This Settlement Affect Participating California Class Members Rights?... Page How Does This Settlement Affect Participating FLSA Collective Members Rights?... Page How Much Can I Expect to Receive from this Settlement?... Page When Can I Expect to Receive Money from the Settlement?... Page How Will the Attorneys for the Class and the Class Representative Be Paid?... Page What do I do if I Need More Information or Have Questions?...Page 8 1. Why Have I Received This Notice? Records indicate that you were employed as a Physician s Assistant by VEP sometime between April 6, 2011, and May 15, 2017 and you were eligible to receive productivity pay. This Notice is meant to provide you with basic information about the case and to advise you of your options to remain part of the Settlement, exclude yourself from it, or object to it. If you worked for VEP at any time between April 6, 2012, and May 15, 2017, you will be eligible to recover money from the portion of this Settlement that resolves the federal claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act ( FLSA ). If you worked during this time period, you are referred to in the Settlement as an FLSA Collective Member, and you are receiving this Notice to advise you of your rights and responsibilities as a FLSA Collective Member under the Settlement. -1-

2 If you only worked for VEP during this time period outside the state of California, you can only recover money under the Settlement as an FLSA Collective Member. If, at any time during that same time period between April 6, 2012, and May 15, 2017, you worked for VEP in California, you will also be eligible to recover money from the portion of this Settlement that resolves the California claims. If you worked during this time period in California, you are referred to in the Settlement as a California Class Member, and you are also receiving this Notice to advise you of your rights and responsibilities as a California Class Member under the Settlement. If you worked for VEP at any time, from April 6, 2011, but not after April 5, 2012, and only in the state of California, you are only eligible to recover from the portion of this Settlement that resolves the California Claims. If you only worked for VEP during this time period and only in California, you can only recover money as a California Class Member. 2. What is this Case About? If you are a FLSA Collective Member, this Settlement resolves claims that you should have been paid a higher hourly rate for overtime hours. The named plaintiff in this Lawsuit complained that, whenever you received a monthly productivity bonus from VEP, you should have been compensated at a higher rate for the overtime hours you worked in that month. VEP denies all of these claims and contends its payment of the monthly productivity bonus did not trigger an obligation to increase the overtime hourly rate under the FLSA, because it was more akin to a profit sharing plan, which would exempt it from having to pay a higher overtime rate. If you are a California Class Member, this Settlement resolves claims in this lawsuit that VEP did not provide timely or duty-free meal and rest periods, did not pay all wages owed, did not pay all overtime wages, did not properly itemize pay stubs, and did not pay all wages owed timely upon termination. The named plaintiff in the Lawsuit complained that the California physician s assistants were not relieved of duty during meal and rest periods because she claimed they could not leave the medical facility during meal or rest breaks and could not sleep during meal and rest breaks. She also complained that, because they couldn t leave the medical facility and were always subject to being called back at any moment while on unpaid meal periods, the physician s assistants in California should have been paid for that time. The named plaintiff also complained that, because physician s assistants were working through unpaid meal periods, VEP had to, but did not, itemize that time on their pay stubs. Finally, because these wages alleged to have been owed to the California physician s assistants were not paid at or after termination from VEP, California s law with respect to the payment of wages due at termination was violated. VEP denies that it violated any provisions of California law. It contends it had policies that provided timely meal and rest periods to its California Physician s Assistants and relieved them of all duty during such meal and rest periods. VEP finally contends its wage statements (i.e., pay stubs) had all the information California law requires and that it paid all wages owed at the time of termination. 3. Am I a California Class Member and/or a FLSA Collective Member? You are a Class Member if VEP Healthcare, Inc. employed you as a Physician s Assistant in the state of California and you were eligible to receive productivity pay at any time between April 6, 2011 and May 15, 2017 (the Class Period ). Based upon VEP Healthcare, Inc. s records, you are a member of the California Class. You are a FLSA Collective Member if VEP Healthcare, Inc. employed you as a Physician s Assistant anywhere in the United States and you were eligible to receive productivity pay at any time between April 6, 2012 and May 15, 2017 (the FLSA Collective Period ). Based upon VEP Healthcare, Inc. s records, you are a member of the FLSA Collective. 4. How Does this Collective and Class Action Settlement Work? Plaintiff and the Attorneys for the Class/Collective believe the Settlement is fair and reasonable. The Court has preliminarily reviewed the terms of the Settlement and determined the Settlement is fair and reasonable. On December 5, -2-

3 2017, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the Court conditionally certified the California Class and the FLSA Collective Class for settlement purposes only and directed that you receive this Notice. The Court will hold a Final Fairness Hearing concerning the proposed settlement on March 15, 2018 at 10:00 a.m., before United States District Court Judge Vince Chhabria, located at 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102, Courtroom 4. The date of the final approval hearing may change without further notice to the class. Class and Collective Members are advised to check or the Court s PACER site (instructions on accessing this site are provided in Section 14 of this Notice) to confirm that the date has not been changed. 5. Who Are the Attorneys Representing the Parties? Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class/FLSA Collective THE TURLEY & MARA LAW FIRM, APLC William Turley David Mara Jill Vecchi 7428 Trade Street San Diego, CA Telephone: (619) Facsimile: (619) Attorneys for VEP Healthcare, Inc. ALLEN, GLAESSNER, HAZELWOOD & WERTH, LLP Steven Werth Hannibal Odisho 180 Montgomery Street, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA Telephone: (415) Facsimile: (415) The Court has decided that The Turley & Mara Law Firm, APLC is qualified to represent you and all other California Class and FLSA Collective Members simultaneously in this Settlement. You do not need to hire your own attorney because Class/Collective Counsel is working on your behalf. But, if you want your own attorney, you may hire one at your own cost. 6. How do I Participate, Opt-out of, or Object to the FLSA Portion of the Settlement? Your rights regarding each option, and the steps you must take to select each option, are summarized below and explained in more detail in this Notice. PLEASE PAY CLOSE ATTENTION HERE!!! THE WAY THAT YOU CAN GET YOUR MONEY OR EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT IS DIFFERENT DEPENDING ON WHETHER YOU ARE A CALIFORNIA CLASS MEMBER AND/OR A FLSA COLLECTIVE MEMBER. Important Note: VEP Healthcare, Inc. will not retaliate against you in any way for either participating or not participating in this Settlement. If you are a member of the FLSA Collective, your options are as follows: HOW TO GET YOUR MONEY IF YOU ARE A FLSA COLLECTIVE MEMBER: If you are a FLSA Collective Member, as described above, and you want to participate in and get your money under this portion of the Settlement, you must submit to the settlement administrator a postmarked claim to opt in. The claim form is accompanying this Notice if you are a FLSA Collective Member. Submit the Claim Form if you wish to recover the money to which you are entitled under the Settlement as a FLSA Collective Member. Mail your Claim Form to the Settlement Administrator, CPT Group, Inc., at 50 Corporate Park, Irvine, CA To be a valid claim submission, the Claim form must be post-marked no later than February 20,

4 OPT OUT OF THE FLSA COLLECTIVE PORTION OF THE SETTLEMENT: OBJECT: If you do not want to participate as a FLSA Collective member, then you do not have to do anything. If the Court grants final approval of the settlement, you will not receive a Settlement Payment and you will not give up the right to sue VEP Healthcare, Inc. and the Released Parties for the Release of Claims by Participating FLSA Collective Class Members as defined in Section No. 10 below. You may file a legal objection to any aspect of the proposed settlement. You can object to the FLSA Collective settlement. If you want to object to the FLSA Collective settlement, then you must opt in by submitting a claim form. If you wish to object to the FLSA Collective Action Settlement, you may do so by following the instructions in Section No. 8, entitled How do I Object to the Settlement? 7. How do I Participate, Opt-out of, or Object to the California Class Portion of the Settlement? Your rights regarding each option, and the steps you must take to select each option, are summarized below and explained in more detail in this Notice. PLEASE PAY CLOSE ATTENTION HERE!!! THE WAY THAT YOU CAN GET YOUR MONEY OR EXCLUDE YOURSELF FROM THE SETTLEMENT IS DIFFERENT DEPENDING ON WHETHER YOU ARE A CALIFORNIA CLASS MEMBER AND/OR A FLSA COLLECTIVE MEMBER. Important Note: VEP Healthcare, Inc. will not retaliate against you in any way for either participating or not participating in this Settlement. If you are a member of the California Class, your options are as follows: HOW TO GET YOUR MONEY IF YOU ARE A CALIFORNIA CLASS MEMBER: OPT OUT OF CALIFORNIA CLASS PORTION OF THE SETTLEMENT: OBJECT: If you do nothing, you will receive money and will be bound by the release of class action claims stated in this Notice and Settlement Agreement. If you do not want to take part in the Class Action settlement, you must sign and mail a written request for exclusion to the Settlement Administrator, CPT Group, Inc. Requests for exclusion should be mailed to CPT Group, Inc. at 50 Corporate Park, Irvine, CA The written request for exclusion must (a) state your name, address, telephone number, and social security number; (b) state your intention to exclude yourself from or opt-out of the Settlement; (c) be addressed to the CPT Group, Inc.; (d) be signed by you or your lawful representative; and (e) be postmarked no later than February 20, The Court s entry of the Final Judgment, following Approval of the settlement, will bind all Class Members who do not request exclusion from the Class Action settlement. If the Court grants final approval of the settlement, you will not receive a Settlement Payment and you will not give up the right to sue VEP Healthcare, Inc. and the Released Parties for the Release of Claims by Participating California Class Members as defined in Section No. 9 below. You may file a legal objection to any aspect of the proposed settlement. You can object to the California Class settlement. If you wish to object to the California Class Action Settlement, you may do so by following the instructions in Section No. 8, entitled How do I -4-

5 Object to the Settlement? 8. How Do I Object to the Settlement? You can ask the Court to deny approval by filing an objection. You cannot ask the Court to order a larger settlement; the Court can only approve or deny the settlement. If the Court denies approval, no settlement payments will be sent out and the lawsuit will continue. If that is what you want to happen, you must object. If you are a Class or Collective Member who does not opt out of the Class Action settlement and/or who opted in/filed a claim under the FLSA Collective settlement, you may object to the proposed settlement in writing. You may also appear at the Final Fairness/Approval Hearing, either in person or through your own attorney. If you appear through your own attorney, you are responsible for paying that attorney. All written objections and supporting papers must (a) clearly identify the case name and number (Hunt v. VEP Healthcare, Inc., Case Number 16-cv-04790), (b) be submitted to the Court either by mailing them to the Class Action Clerk, United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102, or by filing them in person at any location for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, and (c) be filed or postmarked before February 20, In addition, the objection must state: (a) your full name, address, and telephone number; (b) the words Notice of Objection or Formal Objection; (c) describe, in clear and concise terms, the legal and factual arguments supporting the objection; (d) list identifying witness(es) you may call to testify at the Final Approval Hearing; and (e) provide true and correct copies of any exhibit(s) you intend to offer at the Final Approval Hearing. Objectors who want to appear at the Final Fairness/Approval Hearing must state the intention to do so at the time of submitting the written objection(s). Class and/or Collective Members who fail to file timely objections in the manner specified above shall be deemed to have waived any objections and shall be foreclosed from making any objection (whether an appeal or otherwise) to the Settlement, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. The Court may excuse this requirement upon a showing of good cause. The Court will only require substantial compliance with the requirements for submitting an objection. If the Court rejects the objection, the objector will receive a Class Action settlement payment and will be bound by the terms of the Class Action settlement and Participating California Class Members Released Claims as defined in Section 9 of this Notice and in the Settlement Agreement. With regards to the FLSA Collective settlement, if the Court rejects the objection, the objector will receive a FLSA Collective settlement payment and will be bound by the terms of the FLSA Collective settlement and Participating FLSA Collective Members Released Claims as defined in Section No. 10 of this Notice and in the Settlement Agreement. 9. How Does This Settlement Affect Participating California Class Members Rights? If the proposed Settlement is approved by the Court, a Final Judgment will be entered by the Court. All California Class Members who do not opt out of the Settlement will be bound by the Court s Final Judgment and will release VEP Healthcare, Inc. and the other Released Parties from the Release of Claims by Participating California Class Members. The full and detailed Release of Claims by Participating California Class Members is contained in the Settlement Agreement, which can be found at or on the Court s PACER website (instructions on accessing this site are provided in Section 14 of this Notice). The claims released under this Settlement are paraphrased as follows: California Class Members who do not validly and timely request to be excluded from the Settlement shall release the claims pled in the Lawsuit and all claims based on the facts stated in the Complaints filed in this Lawsuit or could have been alleged based on the facts stated in the Complaints filed in this Lawsuit. This includes claims for unpaid wages, including overtime wages, missed or unprovided meal or rest breaks, paystub violations, waiting time penalties, unlawful business practices, entitlement to declaratory or injunctive relief, restitutionary damages, attorneys fees and/or costs incurred to prosecute this Lawsuit, and any other remedies, penalties, and interest, including but not limited to, under -5-

6 California Labor Code sections 201, 202, 203, 205, 226, 226.7, 510, 512, 1174, 1194, , 1197, , 2699, and the applicable Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Order. 10. How Does This Settlement Affect Participating FLSA Collective Members Rights? If the proposed Settlement is approved by the Court, a Final Judgment will be entered by the Court. All FLSA Collective Members who submit Claim Forms will be bound by the Court s Final Judgment and will release VEP Healthcare, Inc. and the other Released Parties from the Release of Claims by Participating FLSA Collective Members. The full and detailed Release of Claims by Participating FLSA Collective Members is contained in the Settlement Agreement, which can be found at or on the Court s PACER website (instructions on accessing this site are provided in Section 14 of this Notice). The Release of Claims by Participating FLSA Collective Members is paraphrased as follows: Members of the FLSA Collective who submit valid and timely Claim Forms shall release all claims for wages under the FLSA, including but not limited to 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq., and any entitlement to relief based on the facts stated in the Complaints filed in this Lawsuit or could have been stated based on the facts stated in the Complaints filed in this Lawsuit. Released Parties means VEP Healthcare, Inc. and its subsidiaries, affiliates, parents, members, attorneys, successors, assigns, joint venturers, partners, predecessors in interest, all of their respective officers, directors, shareholders, contractors, employees, administrators, fiduciaries, trustees and agents, and each of their past, present, and future officers, directors, members, shareholders, employees, contractors, agents, principals, heirs, assigns, joint venturers, partners, representatives, accountants, auditors, consultants, insurers, and reinsurers. 11. How Much Can I Expect to Receive from this Settlement? The total maximum amount that VEP could be required to pay under this Settlement is Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000.00) ( Gross Settlement Amount ). From the Gross Settlement Amount, the following shall be subtracted: (1) the Class/Collective Representative Payment to Plaintiff Emily Hunt in an amount up to $10,000, for prosecution of the Action, risks undertaken for the payment of attorneys fees and costs, and a general release of all claims; (2) the Settlement Administration Costs to the Settlement Administrator, CPT Group, Inc., not to exceed $40,000; and (3) payment to Class/Collective Counsel in an amount not to exceed $500,000 (25% of the Gross Settlement Amount) for attorneys fees and an amount not to exceed $40,000 for actual litigation costs. All of these payments are subject to court approval. The Court will not approve any of these requests until the Final Approval/Fairness hearing. If the any of the amounts awarded are less than the amounts requested, the difference shall become part of the California Class Net Settlement Amount and FLSA Collective Net Settlement Amount, equally, and be available for distribution to Class/Collective Members. What remains of the Gross Settlement Amount after these Court approved deductions will be the Net Settlement Amount for making settlement payments to Participating California Class Members, which is defined below and in the Settlement Agreement, and for making FLSA Collective Settlement Payments to Participating FLSA Collective Members. CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT California Class Net Settlement Amount. The total amount of money available for payout to California Class Members, is fifty percent (50%) of the GSA after subtracting the Attorney Fee Award, Cost Award, Class Representative Enhancement, and Settlement Administration Costs. Individual California Class Settlement Share. Each Participating Class Member will receive a proportionate share of the California Class Net Settlement Amount that is equal to (i) the number of workweeks he or she worked based on the Class/Collective Data provided by Defendant, divided by (ii) the total number of workweeks worked by all Participating Class Members based on the same Class/Collective Data, which is then multiplied by the California Class Net Settlement Amount. Therefore, the results of the Class Member s settlement value ties directly to the amount of workweeks worked. Based on VEP Healthcare, Inc. s records, you are a member of the California Class. Although your exact share of the California Class Net Settlement Amount cannot be precisely calculated until after the time during which individuals may -6-

7 object or seek exclusion from the Settlement concludes, based upon the calculation above, your approximate share of the California Class Net Settlement Amount would be as follows: «CAEstAmount». Tax Consequences of California Class Settlement Shares. Thirty-Three and One-Third percent (33 1/3%) of each Individual California Class Member Settlement Share is intended to settle each California Class Member s claims for unpaid wages (the Wage Portion ). The Wage Portion will be reduced by applicable payroll tax withholdings and deductions; the employer s share of legally required payroll taxes for the Wage Portion will be paid by Defendant through the Settlement Administrator; the Settlement Administrator will issue an IRS Form W-2 with respect to the Wage Portion withheld from each California Class Member who does not submit a valid request for exclusion under this Agreement. All taxes shall come out of the Gross Settlement Amount. Sixty-Six and Two-Thirds percent (66 2/3%) of the Individual California Class Member Settlement Share is intended to settle each Class Member s claims for interest and penalties. This portion will not be reduced by payroll tax withholding and deductions. The Settlement Administrator will issue each Class Member who does not submit a request for exclusion an IRS Form 1099 with respect to this portion of his/her Individual Settlement Share. The settlement share for interest and penalties is allocated 33 1/3% penalties & 33 1/3% interest. FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT FLSA Collective Net Settlement Amount. The total amount of money available for payout to FLSA Collective Members, is fifty percent (50%) of the Gross Settlement Amount after subtracting the Attorney Fee Award, Cost Award, Class/Collective Representative Enhancement, and Settlement Administration Costs. Individual FLSA Collective Settlement Share. Each Participating FLSA Collective Member will receive a proportionate share of the FLSA Collective Net Settlement Amount that is equal to (i) the number of workweeks he or she worked based on the Class/Collective Data provided by Defendant, divided by (ii) the total number of workweeks worked by all Participating FLSA Collective Members based on the same Class/Collective Data, which is then multiplied by the FLSA Collective Net Settlement Amount. Therefore, the results of the Collective Member s settlement value ties directly to the amount of workweeks worked. Based on VEP Healthcare, Inc. s records, you are a member of the FLSA Collective Class. Although your exact share of the Stipulated FLSA Collective Net Settlement Fund cannot be precisely calculated until after the time during which individuals may object or seek exclusion from the Settlement concludes, based upon the calculation above, your approximate share of the Stipulated FLSA Collective Net Settlement Fund would be as follows: «FLSAEstAmount». Tax consequences of FLSA Collective Settlement Shares. One Hundred Percent (100%) of the Individual FLSA Collective Member Settlement Share is intended to settle each Collective Member s claims for unpaid wages. The settlement share will be reduced by applicable payroll tax withholdings and deductions; the employer s share of the legally required payroll taxes for the Settlement Share will be paid by Defendant through the Settlement Administrator; the Settlement Administrator will issue an IRS Form W-2 to the Participating FLSA Collective Member who submits a valid and timely Claim Form. All taxes shall come out of the Gross Settlement Amount. Uncashed checks. California Class/FLSA Collective Members must cash or deposit their Individual Settlement Share checks within one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days after the checks are mailed to them. If any checks are not redeemed or deposited within ninety (90) days after mailing, the Settlement Administrator will send a letter indicating that unless the check is redeemed or deposited in the next ninety (90) days, it will expire and become non-negotiable, and offer to replace the check if it was lost or misplaced. If any checks remain uncashed or not deposited by the expiration of the 90-day period after mailing the reminder notice, the Settlement Administrator will pay the funds represented by such unredeemed checks to the State of California Unclaimed Property Fund to be held in the name and of and for the benefit of such class members under California s escheatment laws. 12. When Can I Expect to Receive Money from the Settlement? Under the Settlement, should you choose to receive money under it, you will receive three payments. Once the Court grants final approval of the Settlement, and provided that there are no objections or appeals to the Court s Final Approval Order and Judgment, CPT Group, Inc. will disburse the Settlement monies under the following schedule: -7-

8 1. Seventeen (17) Calendar Days after the Effective Date - 45% of the Gross Settlement Amount, or $900,000, shall be disbursed. This disbursement shall include 45% of the total Net Settlement Amount, 45% of the Total Attorney Fee Award, 45% of the Cost Award, 45% of the Class Representative Enhancement, and 45% of the Settlement Administration Costs. 2. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven (157) Calendar Days after the First Payment - 45% of the Gross Settlement Amount, or $900,000, shall be disbursed. This disbursement shall include 45% of the total Net Settlement Amount, 45% of the Total Attorney Fee Award, 45% of the Cost Award, 45% of the Class Representative Enhancement, and 45% of the Settlement Administration Costs. 3. One Hundred and Fifty-Seven (157) Calendar Days after the Second Payment - 10% of the Gross Settlement Amount, or $200,000, shall be disbursed. This disbursement shall include 10% of the total Net Settlement Amount, 10% of the Total Attorney Fee Award, 10% of the Cost Award, 10% of the Class Representative Enhancement, and 10% of the Settlement Administration Costs. The Effective Date is the date the Court grants Final Approval of the Settlement or, and only if there are objections filed at or before the Final Approval Hearing Date, after the period of filing a Notice of Appeal has expired, or, if an appeal is filed, after the appeal is finally adjudicated and the settlement is finally approved. 13. How Will the Attorneys for the Class and the Class Representative Be Paid? The Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class/Collective will be paid from the Gross Settlement Amount, subject to Court approval, in an amount not to exceed 25% of the Gross Settlement Amount ($500,000) in fees and an amount not to exceed $40,000 in actual litigation costs. VEP Healthcare, Inc. has paid all of its own attorneys fees and costs. The Plaintiff will also be paid, subject to Court approval, an amount not to exceed $10,000, as an enhancement for the initiation of and prosecution of this case, the risks undertaken for the payment of costs in the event this case had been lost, and a general release of all claims. 14. What do I do if I Need More Information or Have Questions? This notice summarizes the proposed settlement. For the precise terms and conditions of the settlement, please see the settlement agreement available at by contacting class/collective counsel at (619) , by accessing the Court docket in this case through the Court s Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system at or by visiting the office of the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102, between 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Court holidays. You may also ask California Class/ FLSA Collective Class counsel for a copy of any of the case documents to be mailed to you free of charge. Please refer to the Hunt v. VEP Healthcare, Inc. Collective and Class Action Settlement when calling the settlement administrator or class/collective counsel. Alternatively, to view the case documents on PACER, access the website Once at this website, click on the Login tab in the upper right-hand corner of the webpage. Then click on the link which reads Log in to PACER now. Then, click on the link Need an Account? and create an account. Once you have created an account, log into PACER and click the link PACER Case Locator under the heading FIND A CASE on the left-hand side of the webpage. Then, click on the button Search the PACER Case Locator Now. On the next page, type the case number 16- cv into the box next to the words Case Number. Then, click the Search button. You will be directed to a screen with case names. Find the case name Hunt v. VEP Healthcare, Inc. filed on 8/19/2016 and click on the case number associated with this case (3:2016-cv-04790). Then, click on the link for Docket Report. On the next page, click Run Report. This will take you to the case information. If you scroll down on this page you will be able to access all of the documents filed in the case while it was pending in the Northern District of California for a small fee. PLEASE DO NOT TELEPHONE THE COURT OR THE COURT CLERK S OFFICE ABOUT THIS SETTLEMENT OR THE CLAIM PROCESS. -8-

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Richard Terry v. Hoovestol, Inc. Case No. 3:16-cv-05183-JST A court authorized this notice. This is

More information

JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JOINT STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Subject to final approval by the Court, this Settlement Agreement is between Plaintiff Emily Hunt ( Plaintiff or Hunt or Named Plaintiff ) and Defendant VEP Healthcare,

More information

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:17-cv EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 Case 3:17-cv-05653-EMC Document 49 Filed 08/26/18 Page 1 of 15 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com H. Scott Leviant (SBN 200834) scott@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANED LOPEZ AND CRISTIAN ALAS, on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

Your Estimated Settlement Share is: N/A

Your Estimated Settlement Share is: N/A To: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Antoine Turnage v. Joerns LLC, et al., Alameda County Superior Court, Case No. RG16808099 NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

More information

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. ("LA QUINTA") YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT L.L.C. (LA QUINTA) YOU MAY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THIS CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Sergio Peralta, et al. v. LQ Management L.L.C, et al. United States District Court for the Southern District of California Case No. 3:14-cv-01027-DMS-JLB ATTENTION: CURRENT AND FORMER EMPLOYEES OF LQ MANAGEMENT

More information

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT This notice is being sent pursuant to court order. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT Rainoldo Gooding, et al v. Vita-Mix

More information

FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT This notice is being sent pursuant to court order. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. FLSA NOTICE OF PENDING COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT Rainoldo Gooding, et al v. Vita-Mix Corp., et al United

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ANTONIA CANO V. ABLE FREIGHT SERVICES, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC639763 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

More information

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY!

IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY! SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO IMPORTANT PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY! YOU ARE ENTITLED TO PAYMENT UNDER THIS SETTLEMENT IF YOU WORKED FOR COIT SERVICES, INC. (dba

More information

- 1 - Questions? Call:

- 1 - Questions? Call: Patrick Sinay, et al. v. Essendant Co., et al. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC651043 ATTENTION: ALL CURRENT AND FORMER HOURLY-PAID OR NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEES

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Perez, et al. v. Centinela Feed, Inc. Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC575341 PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY To: A California

More information

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC

Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC CPT ID: NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING Jennifer Araiza, v. Farmers Insurance Exchange Superior Court of the State California, County of Riverside Case No. RIC1305688

More information

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant.

DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. DYLAN HOFFMAN, Individually, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. WELLS FARGO & COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Rodriguez v. El Toro Medical Investors Settlement Administrator PO Box. 404041 ETZ «Barcode» Postal Service: Please do not mark barcode Claim#: ETZ-«Claim8»-«CkDig» «First1» «Last1» «Addr1» «Addr2» «City»,

More information

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued.

A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. You are not being sued. NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION LAWSUIT Brown, et al. v. Health Resource Solutions, Inc., et al. Case No. 16-cv-10667, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

More information

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT

STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT EXHIBIT 1 STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT This Stipulation of Settlement ( Settlement Agreement ) is reached by and between Plaintiff Sonia Razon ( Plaintiff ), individually and on behalf of all members of the

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Daniel L. Warshaw (SBN 185365) Bobby Pouya (SBN 245527) PEARSON, SIMON & WARSHAW, LLP 15165 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 400 Sherman Oaks, California 91403 Tel: (818)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION. No. 3:15-cv EMC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE ENERGY RECOVERY, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION No. 3:15-cv-00265-EMC NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. United States District Court, Central District of California Case No. 2:14-cv-04378 (RGk) SHx THIS NOTICE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMY WOODS, JOSHUA FROST, JORDAN KNOWLES, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, and on behalf of the general

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: Salazar v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., Pending before the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles Case No. BC556145 If you worked for Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc. ( Sedgwick

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION OVERVIEW OF YOUR RIGHTS AND OPTIONS UNDER THE SETTLEMENT SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA JULIUS DENNIS V. PLANETECHS, LLC PABLO LINN V. PLANETECHS, LLC GREGORY TATUM V. PLANETECHS, LLC CASE NOS. 15CV000787, RG16799430 and 16CV00363

More information

IF YOU WORKED FOR ST. CHARLES HOME HEALTH BETWEEN MARCH 1, 2007 AND THE PRESENT,

IF YOU WORKED FOR ST. CHARLES HOME HEALTH BETWEEN MARCH 1, 2007 AND THE PRESENT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON Dusan-Speck et al. v. St. Charles Health System, Inc., No. 6:13-cv-00358-AA NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU WORKED FOR ST. CHARLES

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS JOHN STELL and CHARLES WILLIAMS, ) JR., on behalf of themselves individually ) and as class representatives on

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT CPT ID SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ALL PERSONS WHO WORKED FOR DEFENDANT ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL, INC. ( ANDREWS INTERNATIONAL

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.:

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS. Case No.: SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF STANISLAUS Oscar Torres and Anthony Quintana, individually and on behalf of all others individually situated, vs. Plaintiffs, Salinas Farm Labor

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE SUNRUN INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:17-cv-02537-VC CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT.

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY FROM A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JAVIER PEREZ, as an individual and

More information

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights. United States District Court for the Northern District of California If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO If You Are or Were a Non-Exempt Employee of Gale Pacific USA, Inc., or Worked for Gale Pacific USA, Inc. as a Temporary Worker,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JIM BROWN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. BRETT C. BREWER, et al., Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you Incurred One or More $35 Extended Overdrawn Balance Charges in Connection with your BANK OF AMERICA personal checking account,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Jeffrey Spencer, Esq. Spencer Law Firm 0 Calle Amanecer, Suite 0 San Clemente, California Telephone:.0. Facsimile:.0.1 jps@spencerlaw.net Jeffrey Wilens, Esq. Lakeshore Law Center Yorba Linda Blvd., Suite

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT MarketStar Wage and Hour Cases Case No. JCCP004820 If you were employed by either MarketStar Corporation or Pierce Promotions and Events Management LLC in the State of

More information

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET...

WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS. BASIC INFORMATION... Page 2. WHO IS IN THE CLASS SETTLEMENT... Page 2. THE SETTLEMENT BENEFITS WHAT YOU GET... NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING Frank Ortegon-Ramirez v. Cedar Fair, L.P., et al. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA (CASE NO. 1-13-CV-254098)

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RUBEN AMAYA; individually, an on behalf of other members of the

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement IF YOU WORKED FOR BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AS A DEDICATED SERVICE DIRECTOR, TREASURY SERVICES

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) VISWANATH V. SHANKAR, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. IMPERVA, INC., et al., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION Plaintiff, Defendants.

More information

PLEASE READ THIS CLASS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS ARE AFFECTED BY IT.

PLEASE READ THIS CLASS NOTICE CAREFULLY. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS ARE AFFECTED BY IT. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND HEARING DATE FOR COURT APPROVAL Mata et al. v. Manpower, Inc./California Peninsula, Case No. 5:14-cv-03787 As a current or former non-exempt associate of

More information

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST

FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES CENTRAL CIVIL WEST 1 1 1 1 Brian S. Kabateck, SBN 1 bsk@kbklawyers.com Cheryl A. Kenner, SBN 0 ck@kbklawyers.com KABATECK BROWN KELLNER LLP S. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 00 Phone: () -000 Fax: () -0 Raul Perez, SBN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If You Played NCAA Division I Men s or Women s Basketball or FBS Football

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL FROM ZACKS OR IF YOU RECEIVED A TELEPHONE CALL REGARDING THE ZACKS BEAT THE MARKET BOOK OR AN EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR REGARDING OPTIONS TRADING, YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO MONEY

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FITAPELLI & SCHAFFER, LLP Brian S. Schaffer 475 Park Avenue South, 12 th Floor New York, New York 10016 Telephone: (212) 300-0375 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

More information

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation Doc. 276 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058) 29229 Canwood

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARTHUR HATTENSTY, ET AL. V. BESSIRE AND CASENHISER, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC540657 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT

SUMMARY OF YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you have or had a residential purchase or refinance mortgage loan owned and/or serviced by Chase and Chase, directly or indirectly,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PATRICK BIGNARDI and AARON BARRETT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, FLEXTRONICS AMERICA LLC; and DOES

More information

º Bay Area Beverage failed to provide its employees with proper meal and rest periods;

º Bay Area Beverage failed to provide its employees with proper meal and rest periods; SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA TYRONE WINDHAM, TERRY COLLINS, and TIMOTHY DAVIS, et al. V. T.F. LOUDERBACK, INC. dba BAY AREA BEVERAGE COMPANY, ET AL. - CASE NO. MSC16-00861

More information

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT ( NOTICE ) Mark Thompson v. Professional Courier & Newspaper Distribution, Inc., et al. Case No. BC568018 600 South Commonwealth Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90005 If you are

More information

CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM. Pursuant to Section IV of the Notice, I hereby wish to change the mailing address on record for the remainder of this matter.

CHANGE OF ADDRESS FORM. Pursuant to Section IV of the Notice, I hereby wish to change the mailing address on record for the remainder of this matter. RE: JAVIER MATTER C/O RUST CONSULTING, INC. - 5273 P.O. BOX 2396 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9096 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *Barcode39* - UAA

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION BARRETT v. FOREST SETTLEMENT c/o RG/2 Claims Administration LLC P.O. Box 59479 Philadelphia, PA 19102-9479 (866) 742-4955 ,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS-ACTION SETTLEMENT If you purchased Polycom, Inc. securities between January 20, 2011 and July 23, 2013, you could receive a payment from a class-action settlement. A federal court

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT [CLASS ACTION]

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT [CLASS ACTION] 0 LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT W. SKRIPKO, JR., APLC Robert W. Skripko, Jr. (SEN ) N. Broadway, nd Floor Santa Ana, California 0 Tel: () -00; Fax: () -0 DENIS & RASI, PC PaulJ. Denis (SEN 0) Ethan E. Rasi (SEN:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION A Federal Court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CENTRAL DIVISION Audino,

More information

If you were a Jamestown distributor in North Carolina at any time since September 12, 2010, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

If you were a Jamestown distributor in North Carolina at any time since September 12, 2010, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA If you were a Jamestown distributor in North Carolina at any time since September 12, 2010, you could get a payment from a class

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT SPRING STREET COURTHOUSE HEATHER DAVIS, SBN AMIR NAYEBDADASH, SBN PROTECTION LAW GROUP, LLP Main Street, Suite A El Segundo, CA 0 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () -0 Attorneys for Plaintiffs RICHARD RAMMER and ROBERT KINSCH SUPERIOR

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Eric B. Kingsley, CA Bar No. 185123 2 eric@kingsleykingsley.com Kelsey M. Szamet, CA Bar No. 04 3 kelsey@kingsleykingsley.com KINGSLEY & KINGSLEY, APC 4 16133 Ventura Blvd., Suite 1200 Encino, CA 91436

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NICHOLAS CHALUPA, ) Individually and on Behalf of All Other ) No. 1:12-cv-10868-JCB Persons Similarly Situated, ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) ) UNITED PARCEL

More information

Case 3:15-cv JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 29

Case 3:15-cv JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 1 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 2 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD Document 67-1 Filed 12/20/17 Page 3 of 29 Case 3:15-cv-05689-JD

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES. Case No. BC Hon. Victoria Gerrard Chaney SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BRUCE M. TAYLOR, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., a Delaware Corporation,

More information

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB If you received more than one call to your telephone from DISH One Satellite,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Master File No. 3:15-cv-00347-EMC CLASS ACTION

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Paul T. Cullen, Esq. (#193575 THE CULLEN LAW FIRM, APC 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 Agoura Hills, CA 91301-1555 Tel: (818 360-2529; (626 744-9125

More information

If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you were sent facsimile advertisements from TOMY, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. A federal court authorized this

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN GAUQUIE, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiff, v. ALBANY MOLECULAR RESEARCH, INC., WILLIAM MARTH,

More information

Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018

Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018 Attention purchasers of Bertolli Brand Olive Oil Between May 23, 2010 and April 16, 2018 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you received a phone call on your cellular phone from, or on behalf of, Educational Financial Solutions, LLC d/b/a Campus Debt Solutions

More information

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23

Case 7:18-cv CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23 Case 7:18-cv-03583-CS Document 15 Filed 05/31/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------X CHRISTOPHER AYALA, BENJAMIN

More information

As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement.

As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA As a current or former mortgage loan officer for PNC, you are eligible to get a payment from a class action settlement. A federal court

More information

Superior Court of the State of Washington, Yakima County

Superior Court of the State of Washington, Yakima County Superior Court of the State of Washington, Yakima County IF YOU WERE A PIECE-RATE FARM WORKER FOR MMP ORCHARDS, LLC, IN WASHINGTON AT ANY TIME FROM FEBRUARY 21, 2014 THROUGH JULY 13, 2015, YOU ARE ELIGIBLE

More information

FIRST AMENDED RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

FIRST AMENDED RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT FIRST AMENDED RELEASE AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This First Amended Release and Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Plaintiff Antoine Turnage ( Plaintiff ), individually

More information

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION CONCERNING SEVERANCE CLAIMS The United States Bankruptcy Court for

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE FREMONT GENERAL CORPORATION LITIGATION Case No.: CV07-02693 JHN(FFMX) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re INTERMUNE, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-03-2954-SI CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

v. No. D-202-CV MAILED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

v. No. D-202-CV MAILED NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF BERNALILLO SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT VINCENT R. GARCIA, ROBERTO BORBON, MARK MORAN, and KENNETH A. ZIEGLER, on behalf of Themselves and all other similarly situated, Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MICHAEL R. PETERS, Plaintiff, v. CREDIT PROTECTION ASSOCIATION, LP, Defendant. Case No. 2:13-cv-00767 MAGISTRATE JUDGE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 3:16-cv-00492-L-WVG Document 73 Filed 12/19/17 PageID.715 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JEFF M. OSTROW (admitted pro hac vice) KOPELOWITZ OSTROW

More information

Plaintiff, Defendant.

Plaintiff, Defendant. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NOEL CINTRON, -against- Plaintiff, TRUMP ORGANIZATION LLC a/k/a TRUMP CORPORATION and TRUMP TOWER COMMERCIAL LLC, Index No. SUMMONS The basis for

More information

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS

Case 8:15-cv JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RECITALS Case 8:15-cv-01936-JLS-KES Document 43-4 Filed 07/25/17 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:440 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is made and entered into as of July 24, 2017, between (a) Plaintiff Jordan

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMY SILVIS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. 2:14-cv-05005 CLASS ACTION AMBIT NORTHEAST,

More information

EXHIBIT 1. Settlement Agreement. (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey)

EXHIBIT 1. Settlement Agreement. (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey) Case 4:14-cv-02505-YGR Document 80-2 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 26 EXHIBIT 1 Settlement Agreement (to Declaration of Christina A. Humphrey) EXHIBIT 1 Settlement Agreement (to Declaration of Christina A.

More information

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID»

*«Barcode_print»* «SeqID» American Casino Recording Class Action c/o Dahl Administration LLC P.O Box 3614 Minneapolis, MN 55403-0614 *«Barcode_print»* «SeqID» UNIQUE ID:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re TERAYON COMMUNICATION ) Master File No. C-00-1967-MHP SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CLASS ACTION ) This Document Relates To:

More information

COURT APPROVED SETTLEMENT NOTICE AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

COURT APPROVED SETTLEMENT NOTICE AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COURT APPROVED SETTLEMENT NOTICE AUTHORIZED BY THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK If Bottling Group, LLC, Grayhawk Leasing, LLC, or New Bern Transport Co (individually and collectively,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION GREGORY M. JORDAN, ELI GOLDHABER and JOSEPHINA GOLDHABER individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF CLASS AND COLLECTIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT YOU ARE NOT BEING SUED. A FEDERAL COURT AUTHORIZED THIS NOTICE. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER. CASE NAME AND DOCKET NUMBER: CHELSEA KOENIG V.

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garo Madenlian, et al. v. Flax USA, Inc. Civil Litigation No. SACV13-01748 JVS (JPRx) If you purchased flax milk sold in the United States by Flax USA, Inc.,

More information

Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action

Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action If You Performed at any Deja Vu-Affiliated Nightclub as an Exotic Dancer, a Proposed Class Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION In re PROVIDIAN FINANCIAL CORP. SECURITIES ) Master File No. C 01-3952 CRB LITIGATION ) ) ) This Document Relates to:

More information

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13

6:15-cv MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13 6:15-cv-02475-MGL Date Filed 10/13/15 Entry Number 26 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Roger DeBenedetto, individually and on ) behalf

More information

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Mike Arias (State Bar No. 115385) Mikael Stahle (State Bar No. 182599) Alfredo Torrijos, Esq. (State Bar No. 222458)

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a

More information

If You Bought an Airline Ticket between the U.S. and Asia, Australia, New Zealand, or the Pacific Islands,

If You Bought an Airline Ticket between the U.S. and Asia, Australia, New Zealand, or the Pacific Islands, U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If You Bought an Airline Ticket between the U.S. and Asia, Australia, New Zealand, or the Pacific Islands, You Could Receive Money from Class

More information

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc EXHIBIT A-1 Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc TO: All persons and entities who owned shares either of Thema International Fund plc or

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT CLASS ACTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT CLASS ACTION DocuSign Envelope ID: C0B-C--FD-0BFFEA 0 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF HUMBOLDT Erick Grumm, individually and on behalf of all others individually situated, Plaintiff vs.

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Case: 1:16-cv-10844 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/23/16 Page 1 of 13 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ARLENE KAMINSKI, individually and on behalf of all others

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is made by and between Martin Petersen, Susan Hurtado, Joseph Sarasua, and Charleen Swaney (collectively, Plaintiffs ), on behalf of themselves

More information