THE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CONTRACTUAL DECISION MAKING: IMPLICATIONS OF BRAGANZA FOR PROPERTY LAWYERS. Landmark Chambers
|
|
- Gordon Carson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 THE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CONTRACTUAL DECISION MAKING: IMPLICATIONS OF BRAGANZA FOR PROPERTY LAWYERS Tom Weekes QC Landmark Chambers November Over the past couple of decades, an important issue has bubbled away in the case law without attracting, amongst practitioners or academics, the attention that it deserves. 2. The question is how a Court should approach a challenge to the exercise, under a contract, of a discretionary power. In property law, discretionary powers are common. The type of discretionary power that we, perhaps, most often encounter is the power of a contracting party (or, perhaps, someone else) to grant a consent: leases and restrictive covenants frequently confer on someone a discretionary power to grant or withhold consent for such things as changes of use, building or alterations. But, as property lawyers, we encounter many other types of discretionary power. For example, under a Jervis v Harris clause a landlord, during the term of a lease, has a discretion to enter the demised premises and carry out works to remedy disrepair. 3. Sometimes, a discretionary power is subject to an express fetter or constraint. For example, section 19 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1927 provides that a landlord s ability to consent to assignments is subject to an implied proviso that consent is not to be unreasonably withheld. But suppose the discretionary power contains no express fetter? If there is no express fetter on the exercise of a discretionary 1
2 power, the question is: on what grounds, if any, can a Court review, or overturn, the exercise of the power? In other words, what constraints or fetters on the exercise of the power will the Court imply into the contract? 4. In March 2015, there was an important decision of the Supreme Court about that question. Namely, Braganza v BP Shipping Ltd [2015] UKSC 17, [2015] 1 WLR That decision has attracted little comment (certainly from property lawyers). But this is a case that merits our attention. Authorities before Braganza 5. Before turning to Braganza itself, it is helpful to look at how some previous authorities approached this type of issue. It turns out, that there was no consistent or coherent approach. And the concepts adopted by the Courts when they grappled with the issue were often somewhat vague and difficult to pin down. 6. This can be illustrated by three property cases which illustrate the contrasting approaches adopted by the Courts to discretionary powers. 7. First, in Viscount Tredegar v Harwood [1929] AC 72 a 99 year lease of a house provided: The lessee shall and will...insure...the [house] in the Law Fire Office or in some other responsible insurance office to be approved by the lessor.... The tenant insured the house, not at the Law Fire Office, but with the Atlas Company. The landlord refused to grant its approval for insuring with that company. The tenant argued that the landlord was not entitled unreasonably to withhold its consent to a responsible insurance office, and that, in the circumstances, the landlord s refusal to approve insurance with the Atlas Company was unreasonable. The House of Lords rejected that submission. Lord Shaw said (at page 79): In the present case no such restriction or condition upon the right of approval 2
3 or disapproval by the landlord is imposed. The case is the simple one of one sound office being named, with the alternative given of another responsible office approved by the lessor. If the lessee will not insure in the Law Fire Office nor in any other responsible office which the lessor has approved, the covenant is broken...i am of opinion..that this condition precedent cannot be removed or hold as satisfied, because in the opinion of a court of law the lessor s refusal was unreasonable. 8. Secondly, in Paragon Finance plc v Nash [2001] EWCA Civ 1466, [2002] 1 WLR 685, a mortgagee sought possession of a house relying on mortgage arrears. The mortgagor disputed the amount of the arrears. The mortgage provided that the rate of interest may...be increased or decreased by the company at any time.... The mortgagee had raised the interest rate. The mortgagor claimed that the increases had been unreasonable, and, therefore, ineffective. The Court of Appeal held that mortgagee s entitlement to vary the interest rate was subject to implied constraints. Dyson LJ said (at page 699 to 700, and page 702): In the absence of an implied term, there would be nothing to prevent the claimant corm raising the rate demanded of the [mortgagor] to exorbitant levels, or raising the rate to a level higher than that required of other similar borrowers for some improper purpose or capricious reason. An example of an improper purpose would be where the lender decided that the borrower was a nuisance (but had not been in breach of the terms of the agreement) and, wishing to get rid of him, raised the rate of interest to a level that it know he could not afford to pay. An example of a capricious reason would be where the lender decided to raise the rate of interest because its manager did not like the colour of the borrowers hair. 3
4 [There is therefore] an implied term that the discretion to vary interest rates should not be exercised dishonestly, for an improper purpose, capriciously or arbitrarily... [Also, there was an] implied term to include unreasonableness that is analogous to Wednesbury unreasonableness...[namely] a term that the lender will not exercise his discretion in a way that no reasonable lender, acting reasonably, would do. 9. Finally, in Lymington Maria Ltd v Macnamara [2007] EWCA Civ 151, [2007] 2 All ER (comm) 825 a 99 year licence to use a mooring at a marina provided that the licensee was permitted to grant a sublicence. The licence agreement provided that the licensee could authorise a third party to exercise all the rights hereby granted...for a period of not less than one month and not more than twelve months PROVIDED ALWAYS that such third party shall first be approved by the Company. One of the licensees had no immediate use of his mooring. So he applied to the company for permission to grant a sublicence. The company refused to grant consent. The trial judge (Patten J) held that there was an implied term that the company could not unreasonably withhold consent; and, as in the Paragon Finance case, he held that this reasonableness test was analogous to the public law test of Wednesbury unreasonableness. The Court of Appeal disagreed. Arden LJ said (at paragraphs 37 and 44):...the judge was in error in using public law principles in this context... [However] there has to be implied a term that the power to withhold approval should be exercised in good faith and that the approval will not be withheld arbitrarily...it is obvious that if that if the licence hold is to obtain the proper benefit of [the right to grant sub licences the company] should not be in a position to withhold its approval in bad faith or capriciously. 4
5 10. Accordingly, as these three cases illustrate, the authorities prior to Braganza exhibit a lack of consistency in the Courts approach to the exercise of discretionary powers. There was a lack of consistency about whether contractual discretionary power were subject to any implied constraints, and, if they were, the Courts could not agree on whether the constraints were essentially the same as those that enabled a Court, in a public law context, to review decisions of public bodies. Also, the Courts resorted to a series of concepts (e.g. good faith, dishonesty, arbitrariness, capriciousness), which were rather imprecise and uncertain. 11. In short, the guidance hitherto provided by the Courts on the approach to contractual discretionary powers has been piecemeal and somewhat rudimentary. BRAGANZA 12. Mr Braganza was the chief engineer on a BP oil tanker called the MV British Unity. Between 1am and 7am on the night of 11 May 2009, whilst the tanker was in the mid-north Atlantic, Mr Braganza disappeared overboard. Clause of Mr Braganza s contract of employment provided that...compensation for death...shall not be payable if, in the opinion of the company..., the death...resulted from...the officer s wilful act. So, to ascertain whether it was required to pay compensation to Mr Braganza s widow, BP had to work out whether Mr Braganza had committed suicide. BP set up an inquiry. The inquiry sat for four months. It concluded that Mr Braganza had committed suicide by throwing himself overboard, with the result that BP did not have to pay compensation to Mr Braganza s widow. 13. Mr Braganza s widow issued proceedings challenging that finding 14. The case reached the Supreme Court. Their Lordships considered the principles falling to be applied when one party to a contract is given a 5
6 power to exercise a discretion, or to form an opinion about relevant facts, that is capable of affecting the other party to the contract. Baroness Hale said (at paragraph 19): There is an obvious parallel between cases where a contract assigns a decision-making function to one of the parties and cases where a statute (or the royal prerogative) assigns a decisionmaking function to a public authority. It is right, therefore, that the standard of review generally adopted by the courts should be no more demanding than the standard of review adopted in the judicial review of administrative action. The question is whether it should be any less demanding. The decided cases reveal an understandable reluctance to adopt the fully developed rigour of the principles of judicial review of administrative action in a contractual context. But at the same time they have struggled to articulate precisely what the differences might be. 15. The Supreme Court reached the striking and important conclusion that there is little or no difference between the approach of the Court when reviewing the exercise of a contractual discretion to the approach of the Court when reviewing the exercise by a public authority of a statutory discretion. Baroness Hale said (at paragraph 28) that: There are signs...that the contractual implied term is drawing closer and closer to the principles applicable in judicial review. Lord Neuberger said (at paragraph 103) that when a contract allocates only to one party a power to make decisions which may have effect on both parties:...there is considerable force in the notion that [the approach to be taken to a contractual discretion] is, and at any rate should be, the same as the approach which domestic courts adopt to a decision of the executive.... 6
7 16. That meant that BP s inquiry was required to satisfy both limbs of the test propounded by Lord Greene MR in Wednesbury test. First, BP s finding that Mr Braganza had committed suicide was required, when viewed objectively, to be one that a reasonable fact-finder could have reached. Secondly, BP s reasoning, when viewed subjectively by reference to the mental processes of the inquiry, was required to have had regard to all relevant matters, and to have disregarded all irrelevant matters. In other words, the implied obligations included, not only the outcome of the inquiry, but also how the inquiry s decision was arrived at. 17. Applying that approach, the Supreme Court held that Mr Baganza s widow succeeded. Their Lords held (by a three/two majority) that the inquiry s conclusion was flawed because it had failed to have regard to a relevant matter. Namely, the inquiry had it had failed to apply a legal principle: the principle being that suicide was such an inherently unlikely thing to happen that a finding of suicide can properly be made only if there is cogent evidence supporting a finding of suicide. BP should also have had in mind that it was all the more unlikely that Mr Braganza would have committed suicide because he was a Roman Catholic, and so, for him, suicide was a mortal sin. CONCLUSION 18. I make the following points in conclusion. 19. Whilst Braganza is an important decision, we shouldn t get carried away. In Patural v DB Services (UK) Ltd [2015] EWHC 3659 (QB), Singh J said that Braganza was...an interesting example of the continuing development of the common law and in particular of the potential for cross-fertilisation between concepts of public law and private law...however, for my part, I would respectfully sound a note of caution. It is to be recalled that the fundamental basis of public law is that public authorities have only those powers which 7
8 are conferred upon them by law and must act in the public interest. Private actors such as employers and business entities more generally do not necessarily have the same duties. 20. In particular, there are some types of contractual power or discretion to which the principles set out in Braganza have no application. Often, a contracting party, when deciding whether to exercise a power or discretion, will be entitled to have regard solely to his own selfinterest. This will be the case, for example, when a contracting party deciding whether to terminate a contract (e.g. exercise under a break clause) or to exercise an option. In Monk v Largo Foods Ltd [2016] EWHC 1837 (Comm), David Foxton QC (sitting as a deputy judge) said (at paragraph 60): I would respectfully doubt the general applicability of the principles developed in the contractual discretion cases to terminate at law or under a contract. 21. Nevertheless, Braganza is likely to embolden the Court in reviewing the exercise of contractual discretions. The Courts will be more likely to find that contractual discretions are subject to implied fetters. And the approach of the Courts is likely now to be less piecemeal and woolly. Having recognised that the approach to contractual discretions is broadly similar to the approach to the review of the exercise of statutory discretions by public bodies, the Courts will now be able to draw upon the reasoning from a fully developed set of legal principles. The law will be more coherent and clear. 22. For a one line summary of the impact of Braganza, here is what Sir Kim Lewison said in The Interpretation of Contracts (2015, 6 th edition): As a result of this decision the exercise of a contractual discretion will be easier to challenge. 8
Appeal Ref: CH IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT CENTRAL LONDON HH JUDGE CRYAN.
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 132 (Ch) Appeal Ref: CH-2017-000072 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CHANCERY DIVISION ON APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT CENTRAL LONDON HH JUDGE CRYAN The Rolls Building
More informationBefore : LORD JUSTICE LEWISON LORD JUSTICE FLOYD and LORD JUSTICE PETER JACKSON Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 250 Case No: A3/2016/4009 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, CHANCERY DIVISION Mr Justice Henderson CH-2016-000066
More informationShortfalls on Sale. Toby Watkin
Shortfalls on Sale Toby Watkin 1. In this paper I wish to discuss some issues and considerations which arise when it is expected that there will be a shortfall upon a sale of the mortgaged property following
More informationLAW SHEET No.5 THE DISCRETION OF THE CORONER
LAW SHEET No.5 THE DISCRETION OF THE CORONER Introduction 1. The purpose of this Law Sheet is to set out for coroners the main headlines from the authorities on the exercise of the coroner s discretion.
More informationCuthbert v Gair (t/a The Bowes Manor Equestrian Centre) [2008] APP.L.R. 09/03
JUDGMENT : Master Haworth : Costs Court. 3 rd September 2008 1. This is an appeal pursuant to CPR Rule 47.20 from a decision of Costs Officer Martin in relation to a detailed assessment which took place
More informationB e f o r e: LORD JUSTICE STAUGHTON LORD JUSTICE ALDOUS SIR JOHN MAY B E T W E E N : GEORGE SAVVA AMALIA SAVVA Plaintiff/Appellant.
Neutral Citation Number: [2000] EWCA Civ 1295 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT (JUDGE COTRAN) CCRTF 95/0298/H Royal
More informationCommercial Leases: Consents to Assignation and Reasonableness of Refusal
1 Commercial Leases: Consents to Assignation and Reasonableness of Refusal Typical clauses restricting a tenant s ability to renew his interest in a lease in favour of a third party on terms oblige the
More informationCourt of Appeal to hear mortgage fraud case where claim is made for vicarious liability of broker for its dishonest agent s acts
Court of Appeal to hear mortgage fraud case where claim is made for vicarious liability of broker for its dishonest agent s acts Donald, Phyllis & Janine Frederick and Sharnay Redmond v. Positive Solutions
More informationON APPEAL FROM THE MILTON KEYNES COUNTY COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CIVIL DIVISION LORD JUSTICE TOMLINSON Appeal Number: B2/2015/0594 ON APPEAL FROM THE OXFORD COUNTY COURT HH JUDGE TOLSON QC ON APPEAL FROM THE MILTON KEYNES COUNTY COURT DISTRICT
More informationLicensing and Public Nuisance
Licensing and Public Nuisance DAVID HORROCKS Independent Chartered EHP Technical Partner: Statutory Nuisance Solutions david@statutorynuisancesolutions.co.uk www.statutorynuisancesolutions.co.uk (c) Statutory
More informationProportionality what has it done for us so far; what might it do to us next? Jonathan Swift QC
Proportionality what has it done for us so far; what might it do to us next? Jonathan Swift QC A. Introduction 1. This afternoon I will address two matters. First (and shortly) to try to identify some
More informationJUDGMENT. Hallman Holding Ltd (Appellant) v Webster and another (Respondents) (Anguilla)
Hilary Term [2016] UKPC 3 Privy Council Appeal No 0103 of 2014 JUDGMENT Hallman Holding Ltd (Appellant) v Webster and another (Respondents) (Anguilla) From the Court of Appeal of the Eastern Caribbean
More informationBefore : MR JUSTICE HENRY CARR Between : - and
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 3120 (Ch) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES CHANCERY DIVISION Case No: CH-2018-000108 Royal Courts of Justice 7 Rolls Building,
More informationJUDGMENT. Tiuta International Limited (in liquidation) (Respondent) v De Villiers Surveyors Limited (Appellant)
Michaelmas Term [2017] UKSC 77 On appeal from: [2016] EWCA Civ 661 JUDGMENT Tiuta International Limited (in liquidation) (Respondent) v De Villiers Surveyors Limited (Appellant) before Lady Hale, President
More informationCOMMERCIAL PROPERTY CASE UPDATE
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY CASE UPDATE Daisy Brown, Guildhall Chambers Martin Retail Group Limited v Crawley Borough Council [2013] EW Misc 32 (CC) Preliminary issue hearing determining whether a local council
More informationRECOVERING COSTS FALLING DUE UNDER LEASES
RECOVERING COSTS FALLING DUE UNDER LEASES by Edward Cole Falcon Chambers Edward Cole practises at Falcon Chambers. He read Classics at Jesus College Oxford before being called to the Bar by Gray's Inn
More informationSkanska Rashleigh Weatherfoil Ltd v Somerfield Stores Ltd [2006] ABC.L.R. 11/22
CA on appeal from QBD (Mr Justice Ramsey) before Neuberger LJ; Richards LJ; Leveson LJ. 22 nd November 2006 LORD JUSTICE NEUBERGER: 1. This is an appeal from the decision of Ramsey J on the preliminary
More informationHarry Fitzhugh v Anthony Fitzhugh
Page1 Harry Fitzhugh v Anthony Fitzhugh Case No: A3/2011/3117 Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1 June 2012 [2012] EWCA Civ 694 2012 WL 1933439 Before: Lord Justice Longmore Lord Justice Rimer and Lord
More informationCONSTRAINTS ON THE EXERCISE OF CONTRACTUAL POWERS
17 CONSTRAINTS ON THE EXERCISE OF CONTRACTUAL POWERS Hon Justice Stephen Kós * This article considers a topic largely ignored by the standard contract texts: contractual powers vested, usually without
More informationIvey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd t/a Crockfords [2017] UKSC 67: the demise of Ghosh and Twinsectra
Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd t/a Crockfords [2017] UKSC 67: the demise of Ghosh and Twinsectra 1. All paragraph numbers, unless otherwise stated, refer to Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd t/a Crockfords
More informationJUDGMENT. R (on the application of AA) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)
Trinity Term [2013] UKSC 49 On appeal from: [2012] EWCA Civ 1383 JUDGMENT R (on the application of AA) (FC) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) before Lord Neuberger,
More informationBefore: NEIL CAMERON QC Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge. Between:
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 2647 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No: CO/2272/2016 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 28/10/2016
More informationBefore : LADY JUSTICE ARDEN and LORD JUSTICE BRIGGS Between : - and -
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 1034 Case No: B5/2016/0387 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM Civil and Family Justice Centre His Honour Judge N Bidder QC 3CF00338 Royal Courts
More informationBefore : LADY JUSTICE ARDEN LORD JUSTICE LEWISON LADY JUSTICE ASPLIN Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 62 Case No: A3/2017/2781 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, COMMERCIAL COURT Mr Richard Salter QC sitting as a Deputy
More informationCase Note. Carty v London Borough Of Croydon. Andrew Knott. I Context
Case Note Carty v London Borough Of Croydon Andrew Knott Macrossans Lawyers, Brisbane, Australia I Context The law regulating schools, those who work in them, and those who deal with them, involves increasingly
More informationProportionality and Legitimate Expectation Jonathan Moffett. Introduction
Proportionality and Legitimate Expectation Jonathan Moffett Introduction 1. This paper seeks to summarise the key points that emerge from the recent case law on proportionality and legitimate expectation.
More informationBefore : THE HON. MR JUSTICE POPPLEWELL Between : DACORUM BOROUGH COUNCIL
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 2094 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION On Appeal from the County Court at Watford Case No: QB/2017/0031 Royal Courts of Justice, Rolls Building
More informationRectification Wills and Trusts
Rectification Wills and Trusts Amanda Hardy QC Tax Chambers 15 Old Square Lincoln s Inn Recent cases: Rectification of a will Marley v Rawlings and another [2014] UKSC A husband and wife each executed
More informationSTATE LIABILITY CLAIMS IN THE ENGLISH COURTS CELEBRATING 20 YEARS OF FRANCOVICH IN THE EU THOMAS DE LA MARE Barrister, Blackstone Chambers
STATE LIABILITY CLAIMS IN THE ENGLISH COURTS CELEBRATING 20 YEARS OF FRANCOVICH IN THE EU THOMAS DE LA MARE Barrister, Blackstone Chambers 1. Important to note the substantial contribution English Courts
More informationBefore : - and - THE HIGH COMMISSION OF BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWCA Civ 1521 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION The Honourable Mr Justice Bean QB20130421 Case No:
More informationLECTURE: RECEIVERSHIP AND OTHER MORTGAGEE REMEDY ISSUES
LECTURE: RECEIVERSHIP AND OTHER MORTGAGEE REMEDY ISSUES PART 1 A MORTGAGEE S REMEDIES 1. During this part of the talk, we will be looking at some issues that can arise whenever a mortgagee wants to exercise
More informationBefore: LORD CARLILE OF BERRIEW QC Sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court Between:
Neutral Citation Number: [2009] EWHC 443 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No: CO/8217/2008 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 10
More informationOVERRIDING OBJECTIVE, MK II: A YEAR ON
OVERRIDING OBJECTIVE, MK II: A YEAR ON THE 18TH IMPLEMENTATION LECTURE management and costs budgeting. Those commentators who perceive, for instance, the decision in Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2013]
More informationCommercial Briefing. Consideration, Anti- Oral Variation Clauses and Collateral Unilateral Contracts. Andrew Bowen QC (Scotland) FCIARB
Spring 2018 Number 5 Commercial Briefing Andrew Bowen QC (Scotland) FCIARB Consideration, Anti- Oral Variation Clauses and Collateral Unilateral Contracts MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd v Rock Advertising
More informationIN THE CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT. Before: DISTRICT JUDGE BROOKS. - and -
IN THE CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT No. B00BM862 Thomas Moore Building Royal Courts of Justice Thursday, 9 th July 2015 Before: DISTRICT JUDGE BROOKS B E T W E E N : ONE HOUSING GROUP LTD Claimant - and
More informationBefore : LORD JUSTICE LAWS LORD JUSTICE RICHARDS and LORD JUSTICE LAWRENCE COLLINS Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2008] EWCA Civ 1283 Case No: B2/2008/0489 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM CENTRAL LONDON CIVIL JUSTICE CENTRE HIS HONOUR JUDGE
More informationLegal Briefing. Lungowe & Others v Vedanta Resources Plc & Konkola Copper Mines [2017]
Legal Briefing Lungowe & Others v Vedanta Resources Plc & Konkola Copper Mines [2017] Friday 13th October: An auspicious day for Zambian claimants On Friday 13 October 2017 the Court of Appeal handed down
More informationSection 8 Possession Proceedings
Section 8 Possession Proceedings Miriam Seitler Landmark Chambers 5 th June 2018 1 Section 5, Housing Act 1988 (1) An assured tenancy cannot be brought to an end by the landlord except by (a) obtaining
More informationChairman s Ruling on Applications by certain persons to withhold their names from a list of core participants
Chairman s Ruling on Applications by certain persons to withhold their names from a list of core participants 1. Some time ago I stated that it was my intention to publish on the Inquiry s website the
More informationFreedom of Information and Closed Proceedings: The Unavoidable Irony
[2014] JR DOI: 10.5235/10854681.19.2.119 119 Freedom of Information and Closed Proceedings: The Unavoidable Irony Jamie Potter Bindmans LLP The idea of a court hearing evidence or argument in private is
More informationGood faith in the performance of a contract: building bridges between common and civil law systems
Good faith in the performance of a contract: building bridges between common and civil law systems Dr Séverine Saintier Good faith conference Montreal (10-11 May 2018) Introduction (1) Good faith: divisive
More informationBankrupting personal guarantors: recent developments. Insolvency Intelligence 2012, 25(2), Joseph Curl
Bankrupting personal guarantors: recent developments Insolvency Intelligence 2012, 25(2), 17-22 Joseph Curl Reliance by creditors on personal guarantees has increased in recent years. The downturn has
More informationBUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES CIRCUIT COMMERCIAL COURT [2018] EWHC 3021 (Comm) Royal Courts of Justice Friday, 12 October 2018
WARNING: reporting restrictions may apply to the contents transcribed in this document, particularly if the case concerned a sexual offence or involved a child. Reporting restrictions prohibit the publication
More informationLAW AND POLICY: Notes PLP, A legal rule dictates a result. A policy indicates a result; it may be departed from for good reason.
LAW AND POLICY: Notes PLP, 15.10.12 Raza Husain QC Matrix Chambers The difference between policy and law 1. A legal rule dictates a result. A policy indicates a result; it may be departed from for good
More informationRIGHTS OF LIGHT and SECTION 237 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT Neil Cameron QC
RIGHTS OF LIGHT and SECTION 237 TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 Neil Cameron QC 1. Whether or not the judgment in HKRUK II (CHC) Limited v. Heaney [2010] EWHC 2245 (Ch) ( Heaney ) represents any change
More informationNEC3: UNCERTAINTY OF TERMS - ARE YOU SURE?
NEC3: UNCERTAINTY OF TERMS - ARE YOU SURE? ALEX EDWARDS Senior Consultant, Leeds From time to time, contracts are drafted and entered into, where some of the terms are uncertain and, unfortunately, often
More informationTOLATA UPDATE Issuing a claim. Claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
TOLATA UPDATE 2013 Issuing a claim Claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 A claim is normally brought under CPR Part 8 (short claim form and detailed witness statement in
More informationFLOODING CLAIMS. By Andrew Williams. Last winter was the wettest since records began in It s a fair bet, then, that
By Andrew Williams Last winter was the wettest since records began in 1766. It s a fair bet, then, that there may be several flooding claims arising out of the events of that winter that have yet to be
More informationGOVERNMENT CHALLENGES TO THE RULES ON STANDING IN JUDICIAL REVIEW MEET STRONG AND EFFECTIVE OPPOSITION
GOVERNMENT CHALLENGES TO THE RULES ON STANDING IN JUDICIAL REVIEW MEET STRONG AND EFFECTIVE OPPOSITION R (on the application of O) v Secretary of State for International Development [2014] EWHC 2371 (QB)
More informationGUIDANCE No.25 CORONERS AND THE MEDIA
GUIDANCE No.25 CORONERS AND THE MEDIA INTRODUCTION 1. The purpose of this Guidance is to help coroners in all aspects of their work which concerns the media. 1 It is intended to assist coroners on the
More informationJUDGMENT. In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)
Hilary Term [2019] UKSC 9 On appeal from: [2015] NICA 66 JUDGMENT In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) before Lady Hale, President Lord Reed, Deputy President
More informationEnforceability of take-or-pay provisions in English law contracts resolved
Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1164554 Enforceability of take-or-pay provisions in English law contracts resolved Ben Holland is a partner in the
More informationBe Careful and Honest in What You Say: Fraud in Arbitration
Be Careful and Honest in What You Say: Fraud in Arbitration by Vincent Moran QC Vincent Moran QC acted for the successful Claimant in Celtic v Knowles, the first reported decision under the 1996 Arbitration
More informationIN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE <CIVIL) A.D KEN RATTAN AND. Mr Marcus Peter Foster for the Applicant. Mr Michael Gordon for the Respondents
SAINT LUCIA IN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE
More informationRECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES: EMPHASISING THE LAW OF CONTRACT. Tom Brennan 1. Barrister, 13 Wentworth Chambers
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES: EMPHASISING THE LAW OF CONTRACT Tom Brennan 1 Barrister, 13 Wentworth Chambers Australian law has shifted from regulating the employer/employee relationship
More informationMarks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services [2015] UKSC 72, [2016] AC 742
1 Marks & Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services [2015] UKSC 72, [2016] AC 742 Summary Marks & Spencer ( M&S ) rented four premises from BNP Paribas. Under the terms of the leases which had been
More informationCommentary. By Jeremy Walton and Anna Gilbert
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report The Remedy For Non-payment Of A Contractual Debt: Arbitration Or Winding Up? Conflicting Approaches Taken By The Courts Of The UK, Cayman Islands And The BVI
More informationIN THE SOUTHEND COUNTY COURT CASE NO 0BQ IRVING BENJAMIN GRAHAM. SAND MARTIN HEIGHTS RESIDENTS COMPANY LIMITED Respondent JUDGMENT
IN THE SOUTHEND COUNTY COURT CASE NO 0BQ 12347 HHJ MOLONEY QC BETWEEN IRVING BENJAMIN GRAHAM Appellant And SAND MARTIN HEIGHTS RESIDENTS COMPANY LIMITED Respondent JUDGMENT [handed down at Southend Crown
More informationCorporate and commercial disputes review
Financial institutions Energy Infrastructure, mining and commodities Transport Technology and innovation Life sciences and healthcare Corporate and commercial disputes review Issue 05 July 2017 In this
More informationLIMITATION running the defence
LIMITATION running the defence Oliver Moore, Guildhall Chambers 9 th June 2010 SECTION 11 (4) LIMITATION ACT 1980 the period applicable is three years from (a) date on which cause of action accrued; or
More informationAmendments to Statements of Case Learning the Hard Way: PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov and others [2016] EWHC 2816 (Comm)
Amendments to Statements of Case Learning the Hard Way: PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov and others [2016] EWHC 2816 (Comm) Simon P. Camilleri * Associate, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson (London) LLP,
More informationClause 14: Contract Price and Payment
Clause 14: Contract Price and Payment Written by George Rosenberg 1 This important clause sets out the method of payment, certificates and release from liability. The overall methodology has not changed
More informationMR ANDREW GRAEME WARING. and MR MARK MCDONNELL. Judgment. 1. On 14 June 2016, the claimant and defendant were cycling in opposite directions on Lodge
IN THE COUNTY COURT AT BRIGHTON CLAIM NO: D60YJ743 Brighton County and Family Court William Street Brighton BN2 0RF BEFORE HER HONOUR JUDGE VENN BETWEEN MR ANDREW GRAEME WARING Claimant and MR MARK MCDONNELL
More informationUnder construction: drafting and interpretation of land options
Under construction: drafting and interpretation of land options Charlie Newington-Bridges, St John s Chambers Published on 27 September 2016 Land Options Introduction 1. In H&S Developments v Chant [2016]
More informationFiat Justitia Rat Caelum? Andrew Hogan
Fiat Justitia Rat Caelum? Andrew Hogan The title of this newsletter reflects the Latin maxim Let justice be done though the heavens fall, a principle formulated originally by Terence, or Piso, and echoed
More informationENDEAVOURS CLAUSES: WHEN THEY WORK AND WHAT THEY MEAN
ENDEAVOURS CLAUSES: WHEN THEY WORK AND WHAT THEY MEAN Ross Fentem, Guildhall Chambers Endeavours clauses: why analyse them at all? 1. The title of this paper may be thought somewhat ambitious. Endeavours
More informationBefore : MR EDWARD PEPPERALL QC SITTING AS A DEPUTY HIGH COURT JUDGE Between : ABDULRAHMAN MOHAMMED Claimant
Neutral Citation: [2017] EWHC 3051 (QB) Case No: HQ16X01806 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION Before : MR EDWARD PEPPERALL QC SITTING AS A DEPUTY HIGH COURT JUDGE - - - - - - - - - -
More informationReasonableness and withholding consent to an assignment of contractual rights
Investing in Infrastructure International Best Legal Practice in Project and Construction Agreements January 2016 Damian McNair Partner, Legal M: +61 421 899 231 E: damian.mcnair@au.pwc.com Reasonableness
More informationBefore : MR. JUSTICE TEARE Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 3143 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION MERCANTILE COURT Case No: LM-2014-000084 Royal Courts of Justice Rolls Building, 7 Rolls Buildings Fetter
More informationGUIDANCE No 16A. DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY SAFEGUARDS (DoLS) 3 rd April 2017 onwards. Introduction
GUIDANCE No 16A DEPRIVATION OF LIBERTY SAFEGUARDS (DoLS) 3 rd April 2017 onwards. Introduction 1. In December 2014 guidance was issued in relation to DoLS. That guidance was updated in January 2016. In
More informationCompensation, Disturbance, Inconvenience. Under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996
Compensation, Disturbance, Inconvenience Under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 Compensation The compensation provisions in section 7(2) are new in as much as they now refer to any work in pursuance of the
More informationBefore: LORD JUSTICE PATTEN LORD JUSTICE DAVID RICHARDS and LADY JUSTICE ASPLIN Between:
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 2694 Case Nos: A3/2018/0353 and A3/2018/0389 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CHANCERY DIVISION) The Hon. Mr Justice
More informationBefore: LORD JUSTICE BRIGGS and LORD JUSTICE SALES Between:
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 1260 Case No: C1/2016/0625 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT (QUEEN S BENCH) THE HON. MR JUSTICE JAY CO33722015 Royal Courts
More informationCoventry v Lawrence: a general overview and the significance of planning decisions
Coventry v Lawrence: a general overview and the significance of planning decisions Jonathan Wills This Note is intended to accompany the seminar given at Landmark Chambers on 7 May 2014. Introduction 1.
More informationHousing Law Update. April Daniel Skinner Batchelors
Housing Law Update April 2014 Daniel Skinner Batchelors Solicitors dskinner@batchelors.co.uk 020 8768 7068 @DSkinnerLegal The Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013 What was the Problem? 98,000 social
More informationBefore: SIR TERENCE ETHERTON, MR LORD JUSTICE DAVIS and LORD JUSTICE UNDERHILL Between: - and -
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 52 Case No: C3/2016/0126 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE UPPER TRIBUNAL (LANDS CHAMBER) DEPUTY PRESIDENT MARTIN RODGER QC LRX/43/2015
More informationInsight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group
Insight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group Issue #78 19 April 2018 Alexander House 94 Talbot Road Manchester M16 0SP T. 03300 240 711 F. 03300 240 712 www.h-f.co.uk Page 1 Welcome to
More informationThe Scope of Hybrid Public Authorities within the HRA 1998
[2004] JR 43 The Scope of Hybrid Public Authorities within the HRA 1998 Vikram Sachdeva* Supervisor in Administrative and Public Law, Trinity Hall, Cambridge; and Barrister, 39 Essex Street 1. The width
More informationBefore : LORD JUSTICE PATTEN LORD JUSTICE BEATSON and SIR STANLEY BURNTON Between :
Case No: C1/2012/1387 Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWCA Civ 115 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION, ADMINISTRATIVE COURT HHJ Mackie QC [2012] EWHC 1830 (Admin)
More informationPort of Tilbury (London) Ltd v Stora Enso Transport & Distribution Ltd [2008] Int.Com.L.R. 05/07
JUDGMENT : The Hon Mr Justice Ramsey: TCC. 7 th May 2008 Introduction 1. On 19 November 2003 Port of Tilbury (London) Limited ("Tilbury") entered into an agreement ("the Agreement") to provide paper handling
More informationTHE HON. MR JUSTICE BLAIR. - and- (1) ESSAR GLOBAL FUND LIMITED (2) ESSAR SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS LIMITED (3) WHITE SPRINGS HOLDINGS LIMITED
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 2206 (QB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION COMMERCIAL COURT Claim No: CL-2016-000598 Royal Courts of Justice The Rolls Building 7 Rolls Buildings,
More informationU-TURN ON RIGHTS OF WAY
U-TURN ON RIGHTS OF WAY In an article published in Solicitors Journal on *** it was noted that it had been established since 1993 that vehicular rights of access over common land could not arise by prescription.
More informationENDEAVOURS OBLIGATIONS:
DISPUTE RESOLUTION This is the fifth in our series of contract disputes practical guides, designed to provide clients with practical guidance on some key issues that feature in disputes relating to commercial
More informationBefore : DAVID CASEMENT QC (Sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWHC 7 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No: CO/5130/2012 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 09/01/2015
More informationBefore : HIS HONOUR JUDGE ROBINSON Between :
IN THE COUNTY COURT AT SHEFFIELD On Appeal from District Judge Bellamy Case No: 2 YK 74402 Sheffield Appeal Hearing Centre Sheffield Combined Court Centre 50 West Bar Sheffield Date: 29 September 2014
More informationBefore : THE CHANCELLOR OF THE HIGH COURT LORD JUSTICE RIX and LORD JUSTICE PATTEN Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWCA Civ 1657 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SLADE DBE QB/2010/0010 Before : Case No: B2/2012/1386
More informationLIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY ACCOUNTANTS
LIMITATION OF LIABILITY BY ACCOUNTANTS Introduction 1. Traditionally, a central plank of an accountant s corporate work has been carrying out the audit. However, over the years the profession s role has
More informationContract law Case law update
Contract law Case law update January March 2017 3 In this issue Intentions to create legal relations over dinner: MacInnes v Gross [2017] EWHC 46 (QB) From timeshares to all-inclusive holidays - roll on
More informationNottingham Law School
Nottingham Law School Centre for Business and Insolvency Law Insolvency Bulletin Spring 2014 Volume 7 In this Bulletin 1. Cross-Border Erste Group Bank AG London Branch v JCS VMZ Red October (1) Red October
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN IRELAND CROCKAGARRAN WIND FARM LIMITED. -v- ARTHUR McCRORY AND MARY McCRORY
Neutral Citation No: [2012] NICh 30 Ref: DEE8619 Judgment: approved by the Court for handing down Delivered: 11/10/2012 (subject to editorial corrections) DEENY J IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN NORTHERN
More informationPRACTITIONER REMUNERATION ORDER
Legal Profession Act 2004 PRACTITIONER REMUNERATION ORDER (includes GST) We the Honourable MARILYN WARREN, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Victoria, PETER ARNOLD SHATTOCK and PHILIP LAURENCE WILLIAMS
More informationPRACTITIONER REMUNERATION ORDER
LAW INSTITUTE OF VICTORIA PRACTITIONER REMUNERATION ORDER Legal Profession Act 2004 Including Amendments commencing 1 st January 2015 - 2 - Legal Profession Act 2004 PRACTITIONER REMUNERATION ORDER (includes
More informationManjit S Gill QC Public Law
Manjit S Gill QC Public Law Direct email: mgq@no5.com Silk: 2000 Year of Call: 1982 Position: Head of International Human Rights Law Clerks Senior Practice Manager Abdul Hafeez Practice Director Tony McDaid
More informationGalliford Try Construction Ltd v Mott MacDonald Ltd [2008] APP.L.R. 03/14
JUDGMENT : Mr Justice Coulson : TCC. 14 th March 2008 Introduction 1. This is an application by the Defendant for an order that paragraphs 39 to 48 inclusive of the witness statement of Mr Joseph Martin,
More informationBest Interests Applications to the Court of Protection
Best Interests Applications to the Court of Protection Bristol Marriot Royal Hotel - Thursday, 21st March 2013 by Charlie Newington-Bridges Historical Background Law Commission Proposals 1. The Law Commission,
More informationProcedural Fairness on Appeal: Is O Cathail No Longer Good Law?
Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 45, No. 3, September 2016 Industrial Law Society; all rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. RECENT CASES NOTE Procedural Fairness on
More informationSection 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989
Section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 Katie Hooper St John s Chambers Friday, 17 th June 2011 Section 2: Contracts for the sale etc of land to be made by signed writing SS
More informationBefore : LORD JUSTICE GROSS LORD JUSTICE LEWISON and LORD JUSTICE FLAUX Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 1476 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE STAINES COUNTY COURT District Judge Trigg 3BO03394 Before : Case No: B5/2016/4135 Royal Courts of
More informationCompromising Civil Proceedings: The Pitfalls of Leaving the Liability for Costs to be Determined by the Court. Jonathan Owen
Compromising Civil Proceedings: The Pitfalls of Leaving the Liability for Costs to be Determined by the Court Summary 1. The Court of Appeal authority of Gossage v. Bishton [2012] EWCA Civ 717 makes clear
More informationBefore:
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 244 Case No: C1/2014/0953 & C1/2014/1262 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) IN A MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW LADY JUSTICE RAFFERTY & MR JUSTICE
More information