RAM SUNDAR EAM V RAM CHARIT BHAKAT*. H-

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "RAM SUNDAR EAM V RAM CHARIT BHAKAT*. H-"

Transcription

1 VOL. L I] CALCUTTA SERIES. 663 APPELLATE CIVIL. Before Walmsley and MuJterji JJ. RAM SUNDAR EAM V RAM CHARIT BHAKAT*. H- Insolvency Receiver Who should conduct proceedings fa r annulling a conveyance executed by the inwlvent Provincial insolvency Act (V of 1920), s. i. Wiien a receiver has been appointed to an insolvent s estate, it is only the Receiver vrho 'shouid conduct proceedings in regard to a conveyance executed by the insolvent shortly before he sought the refuge of the Court. Section 4 o f the Provincial Insolvency Act of 1920 does not authorize a creditor to prosecute an enquiry o f this kind. Joy Chandra Das v. Mahomed Am ir (1 ) referred to. A p p e a l by Ram Sundar Ram, a transferee of the insolvent. One Ganpafc Ram was declared an insolyent by the District Judge of Dinajpur on the 12th January, Previous to the adjudication and within two years thereof, Ganpat Ram had executed two conveyances on the 23rd June, 1918 (corresponding to 9th Asarh, 1325 B. S.) in respect of some of his immoveable properties in favour of one Earn Sundar Ram. On the 30th January, 1920, Syed Muhammad Musa Choudhuri, one of the creditors, applied before the Receiver, under section 36 of the old Provincial Insolvency Act of 1907, praying for annulment of the aforesaid conveyances, which he alleged were mere benami transactions * Appeal from Order, No. 201 o f 1922, against the order o f 3. Koxburgh, Additional District Judge o f Dinajpur, dated March 8, (1)(1917) W. N. 702.

2 664 INDIAN LA.W REPORTS. [VOL.. LI ill favour of the iiisolyciit's cousin., the aforesaid E am~su n d aii vsiincler Ram. Objecuoii was taiien on behalf of Ram the transferee to the effect that th e Receiver had d o Eam CHAniT jnrisdictioii to deal with the matter. Thereupon the 2akat. Keceiver reported the matter to the then District Judge, who, by his order, dated the Uth August, 1920, held that section 36 of the (old) Act applied and d.irected the parties to adduce evidence before him. 1 hereafter two other creditors, Ramcharit Bhakat and Radhaprasad Bhakat, who had. been all along supporting the creditor, Syed Muhammad Musa Choudhuri, made a separate application on the 29th January, 1921, under section 36 of the old Act, making allegations similar to those contained in the petition of the said Musa Choudhuri. The matter then came on for liearing before the Additional Distiicfc Judge of Dinajpur who, being of opinion that the Receiver was a necessary party to a proceeding under section 36 of the old Act, proceeded to deal witli the matter under section 18 of the old. Act and held, on the 8th March, 1922, on the evidence, that the conveyances were benami transactious in favour of the insolvent s cousin and had been resorted to for the purpose of d.efrauding his creditors. He accordingly directed the Receiver to take possession of the prox^erties covered. by the two conveyances as being properties in the possession of the insolvent. The transferee preferred the present appeal against the aforesaid order of the 8th March, 1922, making the abovenamed objecting creditors respondents. BahII Girija Prascmna SamjaU for the appellant. I shall contend in limine that a proceeding to set aside a sale, as being a henami transaction, could be entertained by the Insolvency Court only at the instance of the Receiver, and the present proceeding is

3 YOL. LL] 'CALCUTTA SERIES. 665 misconceived as having been initiated by a creditor The esect of a receiving order is to vest the estate in l asiscsdab the Receiver, who therefore fully represents it and as such can alone realise all debts due to it. See Pro- ilisi Ci u e i t vincial Insolvency Act, 1907, section 18 and section Bhakat. 56 of the amended Act of Farther, a transfer as contemplated in section 53 of the amended Act is not void ah initio, but is voidable and the Receiver must seek to avoid it if so advised. 'Mt\ Chakravarti. Look at section 4 of the amended A ct: it is a new section introduced in order to set at rest questions like the one now argued." Section 4 does not toiicb the present point. It enlarges the scope of an enquiry and deepens the le^al effect of an order made by the Insolvency Court. But it must be read subject to the other provisions of the Act. It does not, in any way, lay down as to w'ho is competeiit under the Act to initiate proceedings. The question was specifically raised in the case, Joy Chandra Das v. Mahomed Amir (1). The decision was agains^t the creditor, who wanted to set the proceedings on foot. See also Sayiyasi Charan Mandal V. Krishnadhan Baiierji (2). All the High Courts in India are in agreement, but as regards Bombay^and Lahore no decision can be traced directly on the point. See Hemraj Champa LaU v. Bamkishen Ram (3), Ohunnoo Lai v. Lachman Sonar (4) and Mariappa Pillai V. Raman Ghettiyar (o). The position is, not much different under the English Bankruptcy Law, See In re a Debtor (6). Babii Dwarkanath ChUkravarti (with him Babu Bimal Chandra Das Gupta), for the respondent. Under ( n (1917) 22 G. W. N (3 ) (1916) 2 Pat. L. J (2 ) (1922) I L. B 49 Calc. 560 ; (4) (1917) I. L, R. 39 AH L. li. 49 I. A (.5) (1918) I. L R. 42 Mad (6 ) [1901] 2 Q. B.354.

4 666 INDIAN LAW REPORTS. [YOL. LI the old law, there was divergence of judicial opinion as Eam"^dae ^0 whether, nnder section 18, the Insolvency Court Bam could determine a question of title as between the in- Ram c h a b it solvent and a third party, the case of Joy Chandra Bh a k a t. j)cls. (1), cited by my friend holding that it could not, the Madras and Allahabad High Courts holding all along that the Insolvency Courts could do so. But in the present Act which is the Act which applies in this case a new section, viz., section 4, has been introduced to lay that conflict at rest and it has been enacted that the Insolvency Court can decide a question of title. So there is no substance in the first objection of the appellant. In so far as section 36 is concerned, none of the cases cited by the appellant goes so far as to lay down that it is the Receiver and the Receiver alone who can initiate proceedings under section 36. Those cases only lay down that primarily the Receiver would be the proper person to do so. The section does not say who is to initiate the proceedings. It is the creditors who are vitally interested in the matter and ordinarily they would be in a better position to know about the real nature of the insolvent s dealings with his properties» There are several reported cases which shew that proceedings both under sections 18 and 36 were initiated by creditors and no objection was taken in any of the Courts on this ground. See Satya Kumar Mukherjee v. Manager, Benares Bank, Ltd, (2), Nilmoni Ohoudhury v. Diirga Gharan Ghoudhury (3) and Basiruddin Thanadar v. Mokima Bibi (4). There is one case where, in a matter under section 36 initiated by the creditors, objection was taken in appeal before this Court about the absence of the Receiver and it was argued that the absence of the (1 ) (1917) 22 C. W. N (3) (1918) 22 G. W. N (2) (1917) n C. W.N (4) (1918) \V. N. 709.

5 YOL. LL] CALCUTTA SERIES. 66" Receiver rendered the appeal liicoinpetent. This 1924 contention was overruled, the learned Judges holding lun Sp^das that the Receiver, though a proper party, was not indispensable: Lalji Sahai Sing \\ Ahcliil Gcmi (1). RamCsabit This case supports my contention that the absence of ^hakat.» the Receiver does not go to the root of the jurisdiction of the Court. [ WALMSLEy J. But in this case the objection taken was that the Receiver had not been joined in the appeal before this Court.* The principle is the same. Moreover, here the objection which is one relating to jurisdiction was not taken at the earliest opportunity. ^Mb. Sanyal. The point was urged in the very first petition filed by the transferee in the present proceedings. The objection was heard and overruled.' Cu7\ adv. villi. W a l m s l e y J. One Ganpat Ram was adjudicated insolvent by an order of the District Judge of Dinajpur on January li, The nazir of the Court was then appointed Receiver of the insolvent s estate. In April, a creditor, Syed Mnhammad Musa Chondhuri (No. 8), and in the following January, another creditor, Rani Charit, now respondent, asked the Judge to take proceedings in regard to a conveyance execnted by the insolvent in favour of the appellant, Ram Sundar Ram, shortly before the insolvent sought the refuge of the Oonrt. The Judge held an enquiry and annulled the conveyance. The transferee prefers this appeal and his principal contention is that the proceedings were incompetent because they were conducted by a creditor or creditors and not by the Receiver. It appears to me beyond ( I ) (1910) W. N. 253.

6 C6S INDIAN-LAW REPORTS. [VOL. LI doubt that it is blie Receiver and only the Receiver who should conducfc sach proceedings. The course that is to be taken is clearly described in the case liamc'liabit of Joy Ghandra Das v. Mahomed Am ir (1). It is argued that since that decision a new Act lias been VvAi.MSLEY passed and that the terms of section 4 are wide J. enough to justify the procedure followed in this case. I do not thinlv that this argument is correct because the words subject to the provisions of this Act appear in that section and as under the Act fciie property of the insolvent vests in the Receiver, the provisions of section i cannot be taken to authorize a creditor to prosecute an enquiry of this kind. It is true that in substance the result may be much the same, whether the creditor carries on the enquiry in person or uses the Receiver as a figure head, but that is not a sufficient reason for countenancing a procedure not warranted by law, particularly where, as in this case, the objection was taken, though perhaps, rather obscurely in the lower Court. I think that the appeal should be allowed and the order annulling the conveyance set aside, with costs : the hearing fee in this Court being assessed afc two gold mohurs. We expres.s no opinion on the merits and this order will not prevent the Receiver taking action if thought advisable, MukbRJI J. I agree. S. M. Appeal allowed, (1) (1917) 22 a W. N. 702.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012 DESIGN WORKS Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv.... Appellant Versus ICICI BANK LTD... Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. CCP 55/2000, 1141/99 and 82/1999 IN CS (OS) 635/1992. Judgment delivered on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. CCP 55/2000, 1141/99 and 82/1999 IN CS (OS) 635/1992. Judgment delivered on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 CCP 55/2000, 1141/99 and 82/1999 IN CS (OS) 635/1992 Judgment delivered on: 5.12.2007 ANAND KUMAR DEEPAK KUMAR... Petitioners

More information

FRAUDS ON CREDITORS ACT

FRAUDS ON CREDITORS ACT c t FRAUDS ON CREDITORS ACT PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to November 1, 2003. It is intended for information and

More information

Ashan Devi & Anr vs Phulwasi Devi & Ors on 19 November, 2003

Ashan Devi & Anr vs Phulwasi Devi & Ors on 19 November, 2003 Supreme Court of India Ashan Devi & Anr vs Phulwasi Devi & Ors on 19 November, 2003 Author: Dharmadhikari Bench: Shivaraj V. Patil, D.M. Dharmadhikari. CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 3130 of 2002 Special Leave

More information

INSOLVENCY STATUTORY MATERIALS FOR DISCUSSION IN LECTURE 12 ON 15 AUGUST 2017 CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 STATUTORY DEMANDS

INSOLVENCY STATUTORY MATERIALS FOR DISCUSSION IN LECTURE 12 ON 15 AUGUST 2017 CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 STATUTORY DEMANDS INSOLVENCY STATUTORY MATERIALS FOR DISCUSSION IN LECTURE 12 ON 15 AUGUST 2017 CORPORATIONS ACT 2001 STATUTORY DEMANDS Part 5.4 Winding up in insolvency Division 1 When company to be wound up in insolvency

More information

EDMONDSON V. HYDE. [2 Sawy. 205; 1 7 N. B. R. 1; 5 Am. Law T. Rep. U. S. Cts. 380.] Circuit Court, D. California. June 17, 1872.

EDMONDSON V. HYDE. [2 Sawy. 205; 1 7 N. B. R. 1; 5 Am. Law T. Rep. U. S. Cts. 380.] Circuit Court, D. California. June 17, 1872. YesWeScan: The FEDERAL CASES EDMONDSON V. HYDE. Case No. 4,285. [2 Sawy. 205; 1 7 N. B. R. 1; 5 Am. Law T. Rep. U. S. Cts. 380.] Circuit Court, D. California. June 17, 1872. REMEDIAL, STATUTES MORTGAGES

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.8693/2014. George. Versus. Advs. for UOI. HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) No.8693/2014. George. Versus. Advs. for UOI. HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27th November, 2015 W.P.(C) No.8693/2014 HENNA GEORGE... Petitioner Through: Ms. Purti Marwaha, C.S. Chauhan, Mr. Arvind Kumar & Ms. Henna George.

More information

Impact of enforcement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on the sections to the Companies Act, 2013

Impact of enforcement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on the sections to the Companies Act, 2013 Impact of enforcement of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 on the sections to the Companies Act, 2013 Section 245 to 255 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 enlists the amendments, resulting

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 ARB.P. 63/2012 Date of Decision : December 06, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 ARB.P. 63/2012 Date of Decision : December 06, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 ARB.P. 63/2012 Date of Decision : December 06, 2012 M/S RURAL COMMUNICATION & MARKETING PVT LTD... Petitioner Through:

More information

2. Definitions.- In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject (a) " creditor" includes a decree- holder;

2. Definitions.- In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject (a)  creditor includes a decree- holder; THE PRESIDENCY- TOWNS INSOLVENCY ACT, 1909 ACT NO. 3 OF 1909 1 [ 12th March, 1909.] An Act to amend the Law of Insolvency in the Presidency- Towns 2 WHEREAS it is expedient to amend the law relating to

More information

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 213 of 2017

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 213 of 2017 1 IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION (Arising out of Order dated 18 th September, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Chennai

More information

Court No Case :- WRIT - C No of 2017

Court No Case :- WRIT - C No of 2017 Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 32444 of 2017 Petitioner :- Deepak Singhania Respondent :- Union Of India And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kacker,Akash Chandra Maurya Counsel for Respondent

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 VERSUS V. RAMAKRISHNAN & ANR.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 VERSUS V. RAMAKRISHNAN & ANR. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3595 OF 2018 STATE BANK OF INDIA APPELLANT VERSUS V. RAMAKRISHNAN & ANR. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4553 OF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Nos OF 2015

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Nos OF 2015 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos.1269-1270 OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Nos. 21402-21403 OF 2015 PYARELAL... APPELLANT Versus SHUBHENDRA

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : THE ARCHITECTS ACT, 1972 Date of decision: 4th January, 2012 WP(C) NO.8653/2008 INSTITUTE OF TOWN PLANNERS, INDIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE 1 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE Present: The Hon ble The Chief Justice Jyotirmay Bhattacharya. AND The Hon ble Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay. MAT 901 of 2016

More information

AND. PONDEROSA PEACHLAND DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, TREEGROUP PONDEROSA DEVELOPMENT CORP. and B.C. LTD. Respondents

AND. PONDEROSA PEACHLAND DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, TREEGROUP PONDEROSA DEVELOPMENT CORP. and B.C. LTD. Respondents IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA No. S144265 Vancouver Registry IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENTS ACT, R.S.C. 1985, C. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE

More information

Maheshwary Ispat Limited vs Tata Capital Financial Services... on 17 April, 2015

Maheshwary Ispat Limited vs Tata Capital Financial Services... on 17 April, 2015 Calcutta High Court Maheshwary Ispat Limited vs Tata Capital Financial Services... on 17 April, 2015 Author: Banerjee Form No. J.(2) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Original

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO.7207 OF 2010 [Arising out of SLP [C] No.352 of 2008] J U D G M E N T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO.7207 OF 2010 [Arising out of SLP [C] No.352 of 2008] J U D G M E N T Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.7207 OF 2010 [Arising out of SLP [C] No.352 of 2008] James Joseph Appellant Vs. State of Kerala Respondent J U D G

More information

The State Of Punjab vs S. Rattan Singh on 16 December, 1963

The State Of Punjab vs S. Rattan Singh on 16 December, 1963 Supreme Court of India The State Of Punjab vs S. Rattan Singh on 16 December, 1963 Equivalent citations: 1964 AIR 1223, 1964 SCR (5)1098 Author: R Dayal Bench: Gajendragadkar, P.B., Subbarao, K., Wanchoo,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus: 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4043 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.10173 of 2011) Central Bank of India Appellant :Versus: C.L. Vimla & Ors.

More information

Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017

Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017 Crl. Rev. P. No. 5 of 2017 BEFORE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK 31.07.2017 Heard Mr. Pallab Kataki, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Nava Kumar Kalita, learned Additional Public

More information

THE PROHIBITION OF BENAMI TRANSACTIONS ACT, 1988

THE PROHIBITION OF BENAMI TRANSACTIONS ACT, 1988 1. Section 3 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 states that no person shall enter into any benami transaction. 2. What is a benami transaction? According to section 2(9), benami

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Delhi Land Revenue Act, Reserved on: January 27, Pronounced on: February 22, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Delhi Land Revenue Act, Reserved on: January 27, Pronounced on: February 22, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Delhi Land Revenue Act, 1954 Reserved on: January 27, 2012 Pronounced on: February 22, 2012 W.P.(C) No. 2047/2011 & CM No.4371/2011 JAI PAL AND ORS....

More information

FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT

FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT CAP. 7.28 Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act CAP. 7.28 Arrangement of Sections FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT Arrangement of

More information

VIRGIN ISLANDS INSOLVENCY (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS, 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS

VIRGIN ISLANDS INSOLVENCY (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS, 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS VIRGIN ISLANDS INSOLVENCY (TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS) REGULATIONS, 2004 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS Section 1. Citation and commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Creditors arrangements. 4. Receivers. 5. Liquidation

More information

32000R1346 OJ L 160, , p (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, 1. Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings

32000R1346 OJ L 160, , p (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, 1. Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings 32000R1346 OJ L 160, 30.6.2000, p. 1-18 (ES, DA, DE, EL, EN, FR, 1 Council regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Council regulation (EC)

More information

SUPERIOR COURT. (Commercial Division) PRESIDING : THE HONOURABLE MARTIN CASTONGUAY, J.S.C.

SUPERIOR COURT. (Commercial Division) PRESIDING : THE HONOURABLE MARTIN CASTONGUAY, J.S.C. SUPERIOR COURT (Commercial Division) CANADA PROVINCE OF QUÉBEC DISTRICT OF MONTRÉAL No. 500-11-049214-154 DATE: February 18, 2016 PRESIDING : THE HONOURABLE MARTIN CASTONGUAY, J.S.C. IN THE MATTER OF THE

More information

Bankruptcy, financial agreements and the rights of creditors

Bankruptcy, financial agreements and the rights of creditors BA NKRUP T C Y A ND I NS O L V ENC Y Bankruptcy, financial agreements and the rights of creditors J A CK Y CA MPB EL L, A PRI L 2 0 1 6 The Full Court of the Family Court of Australia in Grainger & Bloomfield

More information

IN RE PITTS, BANKRUPT. District Court, S. D. New York. June 24, 1881.

IN RE PITTS, BANKRUPT. District Court, S. D. New York. June 24, 1881. IN RE PITTS, BANKRUPT. District Court, S. D. New York. June 24, 1881. 1. BANKRUPTCY INDIRECT TRANSFERS REV. ST. 5110, SUED. 9. REV. ST. 5129 DISCHARGE. Upon his own petition. P. was adjudged a bankrupt.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3166 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.34719 of 2011) Swami Shivshankargiri Chella Swami & Anr. Appellant(s) :Versus.:

More information

Sri J. Prakash vs Smt. M.T. Kamalamma And Anr. on 12 October, 2007

Sri J. Prakash vs Smt. M.T. Kamalamma And Anr. on 12 October, 2007 Karnataka High Court Karnataka High Court Equivalent citations: AIR 2008 Kant 26, ILR 2007 KAR 4752, 2008 (2) KarLJ 202 Author: S A Nazeer Bench: S A Nazeer JUDGMENT S. Abdul Nazeer, J. 1. In this case,

More information

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 297 of 2017

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 297 of 2017 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI IN THE MATTER OF: Deltronix India Ltd. & Ors....Appellants Vs. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd....Respondent Present: For Appellants: - Mr. Nesar Abmad,

More information

Downloaded From

Downloaded From CHAPTER I Preliminary 1. Short title, extent, commencement and application. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II Establishment of tribunal and appellate tribunal 3. Establishment of Tribunal. 4. Composition of Tribunal.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Through : Mr.Harvinder Singh with Ms. Sonia Khurana, Advs.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Through : Mr.Harvinder Singh with Ms. Sonia Khurana, Advs. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Writ Petition (C) No.5260/2006 Reserved on : 23.10.2007 Date of decision : 07.11.2007 IN THE MATTER OF : RAM AVTAR...Petitioner Through

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRP NO.6 OF 2017 1. SMTI. TETERI DEVI, Wife of Late Mohendra Harizon. 2. SHRI RAMANANDA HARIZON, Son of Late Mohendra

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Date of Reserve: Date of Order: CRP No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Date of Reserve: Date of Order: CRP No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Reserve: 30.09.2008 Date of Order: 27.11. 2008 CRP No.34/2005 Shriram Housing Finance and Investment of India Ltd. Through:

More information

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY ACT CAP 67 AND

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY ACT CAP 67 AND THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY ACT CAP 67 AND THE MATTER OF A PETITION FOR A RECEIVING ORDER BY MARIA K MUTESI (DEBTOR)

More information

CHAPTER 7:04 FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT PART I

CHAPTER 7:04 FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT PART I Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) 3 CHAPTER 7:04 FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. PART I REGISTRATION OF FOREIGN

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, EAST LONDON CIRCUIT DIVISION)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, EAST LONDON CIRCUIT DIVISION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE, EAST LONDON CIRCUIT DIVISION) In the matter between: Case no. EL 282/14 ECD 582/14 SIYABONGA SOGAXA Applicant and MINISTER OF POLICE INFORMATION OFFICER,

More information

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH

More information

BELIZE RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT CHAPTER 171 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000

BELIZE RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT CHAPTER 171 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 BELIZE RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENTS ACT CHAPTER 171 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER ARB P. 180/2003. Judgment delivered on: versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER ARB P. 180/2003. Judgment delivered on: versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER ARB P. 180/2003 Judgment delivered on: 03.07.2006 ESS VEE TRADERS & OTHERS... Petitioners versus M/S AMBUJA CEMENT RAJASTHAN LIMITED...

More information

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 2068/2015. versus. Through: None CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 2068/2015. versus. Through: None CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR $~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS (OS) 2068/2015 THE INDIAN SINGERS RIGHTS ASSOCIATION... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr.Advocate with Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Dhruv Anand and

More information

CHAPTER II INCORPORATION AND CAPITAL OF REGIONAL RURAL BANKS

CHAPTER II INCORPORATION AND CAPITAL OF REGIONAL RURAL BANKS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY THE REGIONAL RURAL BANKS ACT, 1976 ACT NO. 21 OF 1976 [9th February, 1976.] An Act to provide for the incorporation, regulation and winding up of Regional Rural Banks with a view

More information

FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT

FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT Arrangement of Sections 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. Part 1: Registration of Foreign Judgments 3. Power to extend Part I of Act to countries giving

More information

- versus - MAHAMEDHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS

- versus - MAHAMEDHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION Judgment Reserved on: 24th February, 2011 Judgment Pronounced on: 28th February, 2011 CS(OS) No. 2305/2010 SUSHMA SURI & ANR... Plaintiffs

More information

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 112 of 2018

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 112 of 2018 1 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (Arising out of Order dated 3 rd January, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Kolkata Bench, Kolkata in Company

More information

Fraudulent Conveyance As an Act of Bankruptcy

Fraudulent Conveyance As an Act of Bankruptcy Notre Dame Law Review Volume 9 Issue 3 Article 1 3-1-1934 Fraudulent Conveyance As an Act of Bankruptcy Edwin W. Hadley Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Part of the

More information

THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL ACT, 1963

THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL ACT, 1963 THE ADMINISTRATORS-GENERAL ACT, 1963 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II 3. Appointment of Administrator-General.

More information

THE REGIONAL RURAL BANKS ACT, 1976 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE REGIONAL RURAL BANKS ACT, 1976 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. THE REGIONAL RURAL BANKS ACT, 1976 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY CHAPTER II INCORPORATION AND CAPITAL OF REGIONAL RURAL

More information

11. To give effect to this guarantee, the IRBI may act as though the guarantors were the principal debtor to the IRBI. 6. The appellant sanctioned the

11. To give effect to this guarantee, the IRBI may act as though the guarantors were the principal debtor to the IRBI. 6. The appellant sanctioned the Hon'ble Judges: Dalveer Bhandari and H.L. Dattu, JJ. Dalveer Bhandari, J. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal No. 4613 of 2000 Decided On: 18.08.2009 Industrial Investment Bank of India Ltd. Vs.

More information

Insolvency judge declares divorce consent order signed by bankrupt husband void

Insolvency judge declares divorce consent order signed by bankrupt husband void Insolvency judge declares divorce consent order signed by bankrupt husband void Ian Robert [Trustee in bankruptcy of Jonathan Elichaoff (deceased)] v. Sarah Woodall [2016] EWHC 2987 (Ch) Article by David

More information

Stay on Execution: When & How

Stay on Execution: When & How Stay on Execution: When & How by Rakesh Kumar Singh ************** Decade is a normal time period if one is to ask a plaintiff of a civil suit more particularly he who wants to get the possession of his

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR. C.A.NO. 190/2008 In Co.P. NO.167/1999

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR. C.A.NO. 190/2008 In Co.P. NO.167/1999 1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR BETWEEN: C.A.NO. 190/2008 In Co.P. NO.167/1999 Official Liquidator of

More information

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 120 of 2012 RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS (BANKRUPTCY) 2012

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 120 of 2012 RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS (BANKRUPTCY) 2012 STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 120 of 2012 RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS (BANKRUPTCY) 2012 (Prn. A12/0601) 2 [120] S.I. No. 120 of 2012 RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURTS (BANKRUPTCY) 2012 We, the Superior Courts

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 W.P.(C) 1458/2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 W.P.(C) 1458/2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 W.P.(C) 1458/2008 Date of Decision: 11th April, 2008 KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD.... Through: Petitioner

More information

RBK Doc#: 1231 Filed: 09/02/09 Entered: 09/02/09 15:11:43 Page 1 of 13

RBK Doc#: 1231 Filed: 09/02/09 Entered: 09/02/09 15:11:43 Page 1 of 13 08-61570-RBK Doc#: 1231 Filed: 09/02/09 Entered: 09/02/09 15:11:43 Page 1 of 13 Charles W. Hingle (Bar No. 1947 Shane P. Coleman (Bar No. 3417 Robert L. Sterup (Bar No. 3533 HOLLAND & HART LLP 401 North

More information

SUPERIOR COURT. (Commercial Division) IN THE MATTER OF THE PLAN OF ARRANGEMENT AND COMPROMISE OF:

SUPERIOR COURT. (Commercial Division) IN THE MATTER OF THE PLAN OF ARRANGEMENT AND COMPROMISE OF: SUPERIOR COURT (Commercial Division) CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL No. 500-11- Oi.(S-SS'{ -/32-.DATE: October 28,2013 PRESIDING: THE HONOURABLE JEAN-YVES LALONDE, J.S.C. IN THE MATTER

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) C.R.P. NO. 328/2016 Sri Mohini Gohain Baruah & another..petitioner -Vs- Smt. Putali Gohain Baruah & another.respondents

More information

Vidyawati Gupta & Ors vs Bhakti Hari Nayak & Ors on 3 February, 2006

Vidyawati Gupta & Ors vs Bhakti Hari Nayak & Ors on 3 February, 2006 Supreme Court of India Vidyawati Gupta & Ors vs Bhakti Hari Nayak & Ors on 3 February, 2006 Author: A Kabir Bench: B.P. Singh, Altamas Kabir CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 3005 of 2005 PETITIONER: Vidyawati

More information

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA In Re: Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company in Rehabilitation 1 PEN 2009 In Re: American Network Insurance Company in Rehabilitation 1 ANI 2009 MEMORANDUM

More information

Benami Transactions - Law in India By

Benami Transactions - Law in India By 1 st, 9th & 11 th Floors, Mohan Dev Building, 13, Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi 110001 (India) Phone: +91 11 42492532 (Direct) Phone: +91 11 42492525 Ext 532 Mobile :- 9810081079 email:- vpdalmia@vaishlaw.com

More information

FOUNDATIONS (WINDING UP) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 2009

FOUNDATIONS (WINDING UP) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 2009 FOUNDATIONS (WINDING UP) (JERSEY) REGULATIONS 2009 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2017 This is a revised edition of the law Foundations (Winding up) (Jersey) Regulations 2009 Arrangement

More information

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 181 of 2017

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 181 of 2017 1 IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION (Arising out of Order dated 27 th July, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 23 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 23 1 Chapter 23. Debtor and Creditor. Article 1. Assignments for Benefit of Creditors. 23-1. Debts mature on execution of assignment; no preferences. Upon the execution of any voluntary deed of trust or deed

More information

Ascertainment and application of foreign law in international insolvency proceedings. Charles University, Faculty of Law, Czech Republic

Ascertainment and application of foreign law in international insolvency proceedings. Charles University, Faculty of Law, Czech Republic Ascertainment and application of foreign law in international insolvency proceedings Charles University, Faculty of Law, Czech Republic What are the legal effects of the regulation in Art. 7 of the Insolvency

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2015 % Judgment Delivered on: December 01, CM(M) 1155/2015.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2015 % Judgment Delivered on: December 01, CM(M) 1155/2015. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2015 % Judgment Delivered on: December 01, 2015 + CM(M) 1155/2015 PURAN CHAND Through:... Petitioner Mr.Arun Kumar and Mr.Udit

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Sections 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Ordinance (II) 2002 W.P.(C) 191/2008

More information

INTRODUCTION Bankruptcy Act, 1988 Order 76 of the Rules of the Superior Court

INTRODUCTION Bankruptcy Act, 1988 Order 76 of the Rules of the Superior Court INTRODUCTION 1. In the current environment, clients are naturally concerned about borrowings and the extent to which they are personally exposed in relation to those borrowings and how much they could

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. WELTMANS CUSTOM OFFICE FURNITURE Appellant

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA. WELTMANS CUSTOM OFFICE FURNITURE Appellant IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: WELTMANS CUSTOM OFFICE FURNITURE Appellant (PTY) LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) and WHISTLERS CC Respondent CORAM : HEFER, NIENABER, SCHUTZ,

More information

FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA ENGEN PETROLEUM LIMITED

FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA ENGEN PETROLEUM LIMITED FREE STATE HIGH COURT, BLOEMFONTEIN REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Case No: 1771/2012 ENGEN PETROLEUM LIMITED Applicant and MR ROBERT HOWARD VAN LOGGERENBERG NO MRS PETRONELLA FRANCINA

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. Date of Reserve: January 14, Date of Order: January 21, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION. Date of Reserve: January 14, Date of Order: January 21, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION Date of Reserve: January 14, 2008 Date of Order: January 21, 2009 CS(OS) No.2582/2008 and IA No.425/2009 M/S DRISHTICON PROPERTIES

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 [ARISING OUT OF SLP(CIVIL) NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 [ARISING OUT OF SLP(CIVIL) NO. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10873 OF 2018 [ARISING OUT OF SLP(CIVIL) NO.5895 OF 2018] M/S HINDON FORGE PVT. LTD. & ANR. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE

More information

CHAPTER 26 THE DEEDS OF ARRANGEMENT ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

CHAPTER 26 THE DEEDS OF ARRANGEMENT ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Section CHAPTER 26 THE DEEDS OF ARRANGEMENT ACT [PRINCIPAL LEGISLATION] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Title PART I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Deeds of arrangement to which the

More information

IN THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

IN THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ITM SCHOOL OF LAW - MOOT COURT EXERCISE IN THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA IN THE MATTER OF SMT. VIDYA...APPELLANT Vs. NAND RAM ALIAS ASOOP RAM (DEAD) by LRs...RESPONDENT COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT SAKSHI

More information

DEALINGS BETWEEN PARTNERS BANKRUPTCY JOINT AND SEPARATE DEBTS FRAUDULENT TRANSPER.

DEALINGS BETWEEN PARTNERS BANKRUPTCY JOINT AND SEPARATE DEBTS FRAUDULENT TRANSPER. 951 Case No. 2,270. In re BYRNE. [1 N. B. R. 464 (Quarto, 122); 1 7 Am. Law Reg. (N. S.) 499; 1 Am. Law T. Rep. Bankr. 122; 15 Pittsb. Leg. J. 315.] District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania. April 1, 1868. DEALINGS

More information

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT Reportable Case no. D552/12 In the matter between: HEALTH AND OTHER SERVICES PERSONNEL TRADE UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA TM SOMERS First

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. CS(OS)No.1307/2006. Date of decision:16th January, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. CS(OS)No.1307/2006. Date of decision:16th January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CS(OS)No.1307/2006 Date of decision:16th January, 2009 SMT. TARAN JEET KAUR... Through: Plaintiff Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate

More information

Tata Motors Ltd vs Pharmaceutical Products Of India... on 16 May, 2008

Tata Motors Ltd vs Pharmaceutical Products Of India... on 16 May, 2008 Supreme Court of India Author: S Sinha Bench: S.B. Sinha, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, Markandey Katju REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IDNIA CIVIL APPELALTE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3640 OF 2008 (Arising

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION J U D G M E N T

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION J U D G M E N T 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO 8337 OF 2018 (Arising out of SLP (C) No 24000 of 2017) SUMAN DEVI... APPELLANT Versus MANISHA DEVI AND ORS... RESPONDENTS

More information

( Debtor ), the debtor in the above-captioned Chapter 7 case, by his attorneys, Pryor & Mandelup,

( Debtor ), the debtor in the above-captioned Chapter 7 case, by his attorneys, Pryor & Mandelup, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X In re: PRYOR & MANDELUP, L.L.P. 675 Old Country Road Westbury, New York 11590

More information

JUDGMENT. BPE Solicitors and another (Respondents) v Gabriel (Appellant)

JUDGMENT. BPE Solicitors and another (Respondents) v Gabriel (Appellant) Trinity Term [2015] UKSC 39 On appeal from: [2013] EWCA Civ 1513 JUDGMENT BPE Solicitors and another (Respondents) v Gabriel (Appellant) before Lord Mance Lord Sumption Lord Carnwath Lord Toulson Lord

More information

2013 EDITION. Bankruptcy Act. [Editor s NOTE: This Act has been amended by Bankruptcy (Amendment) Act No 109 of 1992]

2013 EDITION. Bankruptcy Act. [Editor s NOTE: This Act has been amended by Bankruptcy (Amendment) Act No 109 of 1992] Bankruptcy Act [Editor s NOTE: This Act has been amended Bankruptcy (Amendment) Act No 109 of 1992] Arrangement of Rules Part I: Proceedings from Act of Bankruptcy to discharge Acts of Bankruptcy 1. Acts

More information

Unannotated Statutes of Malaysia - Principal Acts/BANKRUPTCY ACT 1967 Act 360/BANKRUPTCY ACT 1967 ACT 360

Unannotated Statutes of Malaysia - Principal Acts/BANKRUPTCY ACT 1967 Act 360/BANKRUPTCY ACT 1967 ACT 360 Page 1 1967 ACT 360 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2007 First enacted............... 1967 (Act 55 of 1967) Revised.................. 1988 (Act 360 w.e.f. 31 December 1988) Date of coming

More information

Between the lines... Key Highlights. September, 2018

Between the lines... Key Highlights. September, 2018 Key Highlights New Delhi Mumbai Bengaluru Celebrating over 45 years of professional excellence I. Moratorium passed against the Corporate Debtor is not applicable to Personal Guarantor: Supreme Court decides

More information

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd. IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) The Federal Bank Ltd. Petitioner VERSUS Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. Respondents CRP No. 220/2014 The Federal

More information

ADVISORS BEWARE: BANKRUPTCY COURT HOLDS THAT FLORIDA HOMESTEAD CREDITOR EXEMPTION IS NOT ALLOWED FOR RESIDENCE TRANSFERRED TO REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST.

ADVISORS BEWARE: BANKRUPTCY COURT HOLDS THAT FLORIDA HOMESTEAD CREDITOR EXEMPTION IS NOT ALLOWED FOR RESIDENCE TRANSFERRED TO REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST. Page 1 of6 " «om ADVISORS BEWARE: BANKRUPTCY COURT HOLDS THAT FLORIDA HOMESTEAD CREDITOR EXEMPTION IS NOT ALLOWED FOR RESIDENCE TRANSFERRED TO REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST. See, In Re BOSONETTO, 271 B.R. 403

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION) CRP No. 380 of 2014 M/S Shriram Transport Finance

More information

KARNATAKA ACT NO. 30 OF 2005 THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, Arrangement Sections CHAPTER-1

KARNATAKA ACT NO. 30 OF 2005 THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, Arrangement Sections CHAPTER-1 KARNATAKA ACT NO. 30 OF 2005 THE KARNATAKA PROTECTION OF INTEREST OF DEPOSITORS IN FINANCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS ACT, 2004 STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS Sections: 1. Short title and commencement 2. Definitions

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 483 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 483 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 483 OF 2019 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 4608 of 2016) RIPUDAMAN SINGH Petitioner(s) VERSUS BALKRISHNA Respondent(s)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPETITION ACT, 2002 Date of decision: 2ndJuly, 2014 LPA No.390/2014

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPETITION ACT, 2002 Date of decision: 2ndJuly, 2014 LPA No.390/2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPETITION ACT, 2002 Date of decision: 2ndJuly, 2014 LPA No.390/2014 BELA RANI BHATTCHARYYA.. Appellant Through: Mr. Dipak Bhattacharya & Mr. Niloy Dasgupta,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND,RANCHI.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND,RANCHI. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND,RANCHI. W.P.(C) No. 6094 of 2012 Laxmi Narain Bhagat... Petitioner Versus Naresh Prasad & others..... Respondents For the Petitioners :- Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Respondents

More information

BELIZE BANKRUPTCY ACT CHAPTER 244 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST OCTOBER, 2003

BELIZE BANKRUPTCY ACT CHAPTER 244 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST OCTOBER, 2003 BELIZE BANKRUPTCY ACT CHAPTER 244 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST OCTOBER, 2003 This is a revised edition of the Subsidiary Laws, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under

More information

Shaukat Hussain Alias Ali Akram &... vs Smt. Bhuneshwari Devi (Dead)) By... on 25 August, 1972

Shaukat Hussain Alias Ali Akram &... vs Smt. Bhuneshwari Devi (Dead)) By... on 25 August, 1972 Supreme Court of India Shaukat Hussain Alias Ali Akram &... vs Smt. Bhuneshwari Devi (Dead)) By... on 25 August, 1972 Equivalent citations: 1973 AIR 528, 1973 SCR (1)1022 Author: D Palekar Bench: Palekar,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2809 OF 1991

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2809 OF 1991 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2809 OF 1991 M/s.Shah Diagnostic Institute Private Limited, a Company incorporated under the Companies

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 6641 OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No. 29268 OF 2016 INDIAN BANK & ANR... Appellants VERSUS K

More information

CATCHWORDS: BANKRUPTCY - application to Court to act in aid of a United Kingdom bankruptcy - power to act - relevant principles

CATCHWORDS: BANKRUPTCY - application to Court to act in aid of a United Kingdom bankruptcy - power to act - relevant principles FEDERAL COURT UNREPORTED JUDGMENTS DICK (as trustee of the property of McINTOSH) v McINTOSH (A bankrupt) Dick as Trustee in Bankruptcy v McIntosh [2001] FCA 1008 Q 7305 of 2001 FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

More information

Preferences Under the Bankruptcy Act

Preferences Under the Bankruptcy Act Fordham Law Review Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 2 1916 Preferences Under the Bankruptcy Act Jacob J. Lesser Recommended Citation Jacob J. Lesser, Preferences Under the Bankruptcy Act, 3 Fordham L. Rev. 11

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3932 OF 2009 ASHIM RANJAN DAS (D) BY LRS.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3932 OF 2009 ASHIM RANJAN DAS (D) BY LRS. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3932 OF 2009 REPORTABLE ASHIM RANJAN DAS (D) BY LRS..Appellant Versus SHIBU BODHAK & ORS.. Respondents J U D G M E N T SANJAY

More information