LAW OFFICES OF FRED L. HERMAN A PROFESSIONAL LAw
|
|
- Patrick Willis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Sep :23PM Sui te 3000 No P. 2/61 FRED L. HEBMAN DIRECT DIAL; (504) THOMAS J. BARJlJ:J{A DDU:cr DIAL: (504) LAW OFFICES OF FRED L. HERMAN A PROFESSIONAL LAw CORPORATION 1010 COMMON STREET, SUITE 3000 NEW ORLEANS, LA TELEPHONE: (504) l'elefax: (504) 5S MSOCM.'!E C0t!NSEL: MA)'RAx". Samv~ MSCHEIJEIlMANN@FREDHERMANLAoW.COM Dnmcr DIAL, (S04) NURSE PAlI.ALEGAL: PATRICIA M. SIIARPI, R.N. PSBARPE@:FREDm;~w.c;:tIM Dnw:T DIAL: (504) September 30, 2013 Chief Disciplinruy Counsel La. Attorney Disciplinary Board 4000 S. Sherwood Forest Blvd., Suite 607 Baton Rouge, LA VIA TELEFAX RE: Respondent: Kevin Paul Guillory Complainant: Samuel S. Dalton (Michael Anderson) Complaint No.: ii - Dear Mr. Plattsmier: This is in response to the inquiry made by the Office of the Disciplinary Counsel directed to Kevin P. Guillory Orleans Parish Assistant District Attorney. The Complaint involves the case of State a/louisiana v. Michael Anderson, Orleans Parish Criminal District Court. It begins with a cl$n that "Judge Linda Van Davis Orleans Parish Criminal District Court ordered a new trial for MI. Michael Anderson because the prosecution had concealed important exculpatoj.y evidence." The Complaint further alleges "the State did not disclose its plea agreement with Ronnie Morgan, and it allowed Mr Morgan to testify that he expected nothing in exchange for his cooperation." The Complaints against Kevin Guillory relate to two issues. The First is the taped interview of witness Torrie Williams. The Second involves witness Ronnie Morgan.
2 Sep :23PM Suite 3000 No.1417 P. 3/61 September 30,2013 page 2 of4 Iorrie Williams The allegations against Kevin Guillory relating to the Tonie Williams taped interview were the subject of an identical complaint filed with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel in 2011~ your file number Mr Guillory responded to that Complaint (Exhibit A hereto), after which your office closed its case (Exhibit B hereto). The facts have not changed. Ronnie Morgan The plea referred to was reached in 2003, six years before the 2009 Anderson trial and three years before five murders. It has always been and remains in the public record. The plea has nothing to do with the Anderson trial. Ronnie Morgan~ was one of three incarcerated witnesses who testified against Mr. Anderson in his 2009 trial. In 2002, Morgan plead guilty in federal court to a bank robbery charge and received a seventeen year sentence. Morgan had State Charges pending at the time. On December 16,2003 Morgan appeared in Criminal District Court with counsel. He plead guilty to all pending state charges and was sentenced to various tenus of incarceration to run concurrent and cotenninous with the federal sentence he was serving. This meant that when he fmished his federal sentence his state sentence is over. This plea was confected between then District Attorney Eddie Jordan's office, Morgan's counsel and the Court. :Mr. Guillory had no role in the plea. This plea was confected three years before the occurrence of the five murders that Michael Anderson accepted responsibility for, and six years before Ronnie Morgan testified in the Anderson trial. The details ofthis plea were and remain in the records of the Clerk of Criminal Court, on the Criminal District Court Docket Master Sheet since (Exhibit C hereto) The Docket Master containing the details of the plea was a public record available to Michael Anderson's counsel since ;\nderson's counsel may have failed to check the records but that does not mean the plea was hidden from him. This was no "secret agreement". In connection with his testimony in the Anderson trial, six years after his plea he was made no promises. Ronnie Morgan testified in the trial as follows: Q. Have you been promised anything in exchange for your testimony today? A. No~ I haven't (Trial testimony page 114~ Exhibit D hereto) Q. Have you been told that even if you participate today, you may in fact never receive any consideration for your testimony today?
3 Sep,30, :23PM Suite 3000 No,1417 p, 4/61 September 30, 2013 page 3 of4 A. Yes, I have been told that. (Trial testimony page 114, Exhibit D hereto) Michael Anderson's counsel cross-examined Morgan extensively. (Trial testimony pages , Exhibit D hereto). There were no promises made, Michael Anderson' s counsel even questioned him regarding Rule 35. After the trial, the District Attorney's Office sent a Request for Rule 35 Consideration letter to the US Attorney informing them that Ronnie Morgan testified, and his testimony helped obtain a conviction and so please help:mr. Morgan if you can. The US Attorney was UIlder no obligation to do anything, but did file a Petition with Judge Barbier asking him to reduce Ronnie Morgan's sentence. Judge Barbier did reduce his Federal sentence. Thereafter, as also reflected on the Docket Master (Exhibit C hereto), Ronnie Morgan appeared in State Court with Counsel asking for the court to enforce the plea entered in 2003 and reduce his State sentence to that of the reduced Federal sentence. The Court did not believe there was any procedural device available to do that. Since, Ronnie Morgan was unable to receive the plea he agreed to in 2003, that is~ a sentence in state court coterminous with his federal sentence, the court permitted him to withdraw his 2003 plea. At that time, the District Attorney's office nolle prossed the state charges conditioned on Ronnie Morgan completing his Federal sentence. This was not done by Mr. Guillory. The effect of the States actions were to honor the plea made in There was no "secret deal". The ROMie Morgan plea was reached in open court and placed in the public records, three years before the five murders and six years before the Anderson trial. The State did not illicit any false testimony. The State did not treat Ronnie Morgan with "extraordinary leniency", the plea to a State sentence coterminous with the Federal sentence was reached in The State could not and did not reduce the FederaJ sentence, a Federal Judge decided to do that. The Anderson trial had nothing to do with "allowing Mr. Morgan to avoid serving any state prison time for his most recent anned robbery" as claimed in the Complaint. The "most recent" robbery referred to was in 2003 and the recorded plea was made at that time. He was to serve his State sentence in Federal prison for as long as the Federal Govenunent incarcerated him. To suggest that this plea was reached in an effort to reward Ronnie Morgan for testimony he would provide six years later relating to a crime that hadn't even occurred yet, is preposterous..
4 Sep,30, :24PM Suite 3000 No,1417 p, 5/61 September 30~ 2013 page 4 of4 Further~ in suggesting that a plea to a iicotenninous~' sentence constitutes "extraordinary leniency", ignores that fact that Mr. Anderson accepted responsibility for'the five murders and accepted a sentence of80 years for each count "cotenninous" with his pending Federal Life sentence relating to other murders. CONCLUSION l\1r Guillory did not violate any Rule of Professional Responsibility, or engage in any misconduct. The plea has been in the public record since 2003 and was always available to Mr. Anderson's couns.el. The Complaintant may believe that a vast conspiracy existed wherein Mr. Guillory was aware of the 2003 plea, that he knew the United States Attorney's Office would seek Rule 35 Consideration, that a Federal Judge would reduce Morgan's sentence and that a Criminal District Court would allow Mr. Morgan to withdraw his plea and the New Orleans District Attomey's would nollle prosse the State charges against Morgan, however, Mr. Guillory was not aware of the 2003 plea, did not have any idea what the United States. Attorneys Office would do~ what a Federal Judge would do or what the District Attorney's Office would do in the future. He made no promises, just as the testimony reflects. Should you require any additional information please let us know. I thank you for your attention to this matter.
5 Sep,30, :24PM Suite 3000 No, 1417 p, 6/61 Kevil) Guillot')' SheffIeld Street New Orleans, LA May Mr. O. Fred Ours Deputy Disciplinary Counsel Offic~ of Disciplinary Counsel 4000 S, Sherwood Forest Blvd, Suite 607 Baton Rouge, LA '70816 Dear Mr. Ours, I write this letter in response to your letters to me and John Alford regarding the news coverage surrounding the matter of the Stare of Louisiana v. Michael A17de1"~'oil (Ol'leans Parish Criminal District Court Case Number "B") wherein the defendant was charged with five co~mts of first degree m.lirde~, While the media was correct about the facts tha.t (1) there was a videotaped interview of eyewitness Torrie Williams that was conducted ill 2007; and (2) that interview was turoed over to defense counsel following the trial and conviction of the defendant, very little else of the story constitutes an accurate factual representation of the events su1tounding this disclosure, ' At the outset, it should be noted that th~ primary source for the WWLTV News coverage was defense counsel who was advocating for his cliellt 'at the time, This advocacy (esulted in a somewhat slanted version of the facts. The videota.pe was not turned over to the defense based upon the State's obligations under Brady v.. Ma1-yland, but based solely upon the Office's policy of turning over all statements made by Torrie Williams based upon her status as the sole eyewitness to testify at trial. I Ex, A, In fact, once members of the District Artor:tley's Offioe had review~d the videotapes, they were determined specifically not to be materially relevant exculpatory information, This fact was supported by the defendant's plea under North Carolina v. Alford which, while not conceding fa.ctual culpability, is an admission that the evidence against him (including the videotapes) was so overwhelming that it was in his, best interests to plead guilty. In addition to the fact that the videotape was not materially exculpatory. it was also not deliberately withheld by me or Mr. Alford for the simple fact of the matter that neither of us were aware of its existence. The interview was conducted by mem bers of the Office bef~re the defendant was ied icted under the case number under which it was ultimately tried. In the meantime, the felony trials division of District Attorney's Office had relocated from 1340 Poydras Avenue to 2601 Tulane Avenue, while the screening, appeals, and magistrate divisions remained behind, By August of2009, when Mr. Alford and I tried the defendant's case, [lone of the individuals \vh9 had, conducted the interview or had been in charge of the case in the interim were still involved. The videotapes were not part of the file at that time and I Evidence at trial, including jailhouse conversations by the defendant. would seem to indicate the p(esence of other eyewitnesses, 'but the State was unable to locate them, "--,..,-'--':.
6 Sep,30, :24PM Suite 3000 No, 1417 p, 7/61 neither of us were 011 notice that they existed or that they were to be found at a diffej'ent location, The defendant was foul1d guil~y as charged on August 26,2009 and sentenced to death on August 29, In November of 2009, ADA David Pipes, who was uninvolved in the case a.nd who was unpacking boxes that had been moved fron, 1340 Poydl'as to the Office's permanent horne at 619 S. White Str~et, found nn envelope containing several micro-videotapes labeled "Tonie Williams." I was informed of the discovery but I had no knowledge of what the tapes conta.ined. We met with the District Attorney and the First Assistant arid were instructed to convert the ta.pes to '~ viewable medium (we had no means to play the small tape's at the time) al1d then turn them over to the defense. Ex. B. Mr. Alford turned the tapes over to the defense on January 5, A hearing 011 the defendant's motion for new trial was conducted on March 1 & 2,2010. The trial jlldge, Lynda Van Davis, made no findizlg tha.t Mr, Alford or I knew about the existence ofthe videotapes and specifically stated that she would take Mr. Alford at his word when he said that he was unaware of their existence. Ex. A, Far from the i11fol'1'l.'lation in the videotapes being Brcu(y ma.terial, I believe that they actually bolstered the State's ca.se in that they constituted yet another recorded instance of Tarde Williams positi'vely and unwaveringly identifying Michael Anderson as the ITIu,del'er of the five victims. Had 1 known of the tape's existence, I would have infonned Mr. Alford and we would have discussed how best to utilize them to om benefit. The inconsistencies in Ms. Willi8.\ns ' statements were relatively minor when compared to a recorded statenlent obtained by the defense in which she stated that she had Ilot witnessed the murders. I am not awat'e, nor do I believe, that any individual attomey at the Orleans Parish District Attorney's Office intentionally withheld the videotaped interview of TOI:rie Williams. Even had the tapes been exculpatory, such intentional withholding'would have been contrary to the pattern of disclosul'e that the State had established during the tria1. 2 Ex. C. Before trial, the State complied with its obligations under Brady and turned over the 11.1uch-r:n:ore detrimental statement of Odey Cook, an alleged eyewitness who ha.d informed the Office that he had seen the murders and that Michael Anderson was not the perpetrator. Id. The intentional withholding of exculpatory ll1atel'ial in a capital murder is a,eprehensible act of which I am eth ically jllcapab Ie.. 1 appreciate your taking the time to review this letter and 1 am more than willing to address any further quest{ons or concerns that you may have. Sincerely, Kevin Guillory Attorney-at-Law. 2 With regards to what the COl..lrt found to be Ronnie Morgan's alleged "secret plea deal," no such deal has ever existed. Ronnie Morgan's plea was a matter of public record and., in fact, is conceptually identical to the plea that Michael Anderson undertook in both federal court and in the instant case. That deal too is a matter of public record
7 2:24PM~I.:l,l,.c:Suite 3000,V'.u J.UJ.L......,....J...,.,... --~--No, 1417 p, 8/61 OFFICE OF rhe DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL 4000 S. ShelWood Forest Blvd. Suite 607 Baton Rouge, Louisiana (225) FAX (225) June 7, 2011 Kevin Pa.ul Guillory 619 S. White Street New Orleans, LA RE: RESPONDENT: COMPLAJNANT: FILENO.: Kevin Paul Guillory ODe Dear Mr. Guillory: I am closing this.file. O. Fred Ours Deputy Disciplinary Counsel GFOIki.',., '" I. ",' ":'
death penalty. In prosecuting the case, State v. Michael Anderson, Mr. Alford and Mr.
I. Description of Misconduct In August 2009, Orleans Parish Assistant District Attorneys Kevin Guillory and John Alford conducted a trial on behalf of the State of Louisiana. The defendant faced the death
More informationLAW OFFICES OF FRED L. HERMAN A PROFESSIONAL LAW
Sep.20. 2013 11:05AM Suite 3000 No. 1268 P. 2 FBED L. HERMAN FBERMAN@J.?RJ!:DlDLRMAN:LAW.COM DJ:RECf DIAL: (504) 581-7068 THOMAS J. BARBERA TBARBERA@FREDHERMANLAW.COM DIRECT DIAL: (504) 581-7882 LAW OFFICES
More informationFrancis DeBlanc, Bobby Freeman, Michael Morales, Kevin Guillory, and John
I. Overview of the Complaint Francis DeBlanc, Bobby Freeman, Michael Morales, Kevin Guillory, and John Alford were part of a team of Orleans Parish Assistant District Attorneys who prosecuted Michael Anderson
More informationINNOCENCE PROJECT SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE
INNOCENCE PROJECT SCREENING QUESTIONNAIRE NAME: Ricky Smith PRISONER NUMBER: #5679832 DATE OF BIRTH: July 15, 1967 SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER: CURRENT CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND ADDRESS: New Columbia Correctional
More informationLOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: DEIDRE KATRINA PETERSON DOCKET NO. 17-DB-066 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 08 INTRODUCTION
LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: DEIDRE KATRINA PETERSON DOCKET NO. 17-DB-066 REPORT OF HEARING COMMITTEE # 08 INTRODUCTION This attorney disciplinary matter arises out of formal charges consisting
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 ELECTRONIC CITATION: 2004 FED App. 0185P (6th Cir.) File Name: 04a0185p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
More informationEXPUNGEMENT AND SEALING OF JUVENILE RECORDS LA.CH.C. Art. 901 and 903 INFORMATION SHEET
EXPUNGEMENT AND SEALING OF JUVENILE RECORDS LA.CH.C. Art. 901 and 903 INFORMATION SHEET WHAT IS EXPUNGEMENT? Under Louisiana law today, it is possible to have most juvenile records expunged and sealed.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) Complainant, Case No. SC v. TFB File No ,500(1A)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant, Case No. SC07-226 v. TFB File No. 2005-00,500(1A) ROBERT ANTHONY DEES, Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE ACCEPTING CONSENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY APPELLANT, CASE NO
[Cite as State v. Godfrey, 181 Ohio App.3d 75, 2009-Ohio-547.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT MERCER COUNTY THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, CASE NO. 10-08-08 v. GODFREY, O P I N
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING
IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING October Term, A.D. 2016 In the Matter of Amendments to ) the Rules Governing the Commission on ) Judicial Conduct and Ethics ) ORDER AMENDING THE RULES GOVERNING
More informationNASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS
NASD OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, v. Complainant Disciplinary Proceeding No. E8A2004095901 Jason A. Craig (CRD No. 4016543), Respondent. Hearing Officer RSH Hearing Panel Decision
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 5 November On writ of certiorari to review order entered 29 May 2012
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: GEORGE RANDY TRELLES NUMBER: 12-DB-031 RULING OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD
ORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: GEORGE RANDY TRELLES NUMBER: 12-DB-031 RULING OF THE LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD 12-DB-031 10/29/2013 This is a disciplinary proceeding based
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
Filing # 45970766 E-Filed 09/01/2016 12:25:05 PM IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA THE FLORIDA BAR, Supreme Court Case No. SC16-1323 v. Complainant, The Florida Bar File No. 2014-70,056 (11G) JOSE MARIA
More informationGUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE
GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Before completing the questionnaire please note: You must not be currently represented by counsel and the crime and conviction must have occurred in Michigan.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS: CRIMINAL TERM: PART K-TRP. -against- Indictment No.: ,
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS: CRIMINAL TERM: PART K-TRP PRESENT: HON. SEYMOUR ROTKER Justice. -------------------------------------------------------------X THE PEOPLE OF THE
More informationCASE NO. CL JAMES DANIEL GRIFFITH VSB DOCKET NOS.:
12/27/2018 09:56 (FAX) P.002/003 VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF FAIRFAX IN THE MATTERS OF CASE NO. CL2018-15409 JAMES DANIEL GRIFFITH VSB DOCKET NOS.: 18-070-110110 18-070-110600
More informationExoneration Project Intake Application
The Exoneration Project (EP) works with a team of legal students, interns, and staff members in Chicago, Illinois to evaluate potential cases around the country. Due to the high number of requests that
More information* * * * * * * (COURT COMPOSED OF CHIEF JUDGE JAMES F. MCKAY, III, JUDGE TERRI F. LOVE, JUDGE JOY COSSICH LOBRANO)
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CURTIS WILLIAMS * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2013-KA-0271 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 494-001, SECTION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: PATRICIA CARESS MCMATH Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: GREGORY F. ZOELLER Attorney General of Indiana IAN MCLEAN Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis,
More informationCase 1:07-cv WDM -MJW Document Filed 04/18/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:07-cv-01814-WDM -MJW Document 304-1 Filed 04/18/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 Civil Action No. 07-cv-01814-WDM-MJW DEBBIE ULIBARRI, et al., v. Plaintiffs, CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, Defendant. IN THE UNITED
More informationDISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY In the Matter of: : : HOWARD R. SHMUCKLER, : : Respondent. : Bar Docket Nos. 81-07 & 244-07 : A Member of the Bar of the : District
More informationRules for Qualified & Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators
Part I. STANDARDS Rules 15.000 15.200 Part II. DISCIPLINE Rule 15.210. Procedure [No Change] Any complaint alleging violations of the Florida Rules For Qualified And Court-Appointed Parenting Coordinators,
More informationSTEVE HENLEY, RICKY BELL, Warden, PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES STEVE HENLEY, Petitioner, vs. RICKY BELL, Warden, Respondent. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. COMMONWEALTH OF : NO ,880 PENNSYLVANIA : : CRIMINAL vs. : : : Relief Act Petition
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF : NO. 03-10,880 PENNSYLVANIA : : CRIMINAL vs. : : MICHAEL W. McCLOSKEY, : Defemdant s Amended Post Conviction Defendant : Relief
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-1065 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS LILL PAUL CONLEY ********** APPEAL FROM THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF IBERIA, NO. 10-1437 HONORABLE
More informationEleventh Judicial District Local Rules
Eleventh Judicial District Local Rules Table of Contents Standardized Practice for District Court Criminal Sessions... 11.3 Order for Non-Appearing Defendants/ Respondents and Non-Complying Defendant/
More informationCase 1:17-cr RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10. United States v. Michael T. Flynn
Case 1:17-cr-00232-RC Document 3 Filed 12/01/17 Page 1 of 10 U.S. Department of Justice The Special Counsel's Office Washington, D.C. 20530 November 30, 2017 Robert K. Kelner Stephen P. Anthony Covington
More informationInnocence Protections Proposal
Innocence Protections Proposal presented to the Nevada State Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice June 14, 2016 by the Rocky Mountain Innocence Center Innocence Project Introduction Protecting
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : DUSTIN ALAN MOSER, : NO. 425 MDA 2006 Appellant
2007 PA Super 93 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF : PENNSYLVANIA : v. : : DUSTIN ALAN MOSER, : NO. 425 MDA 2006 Appellant Appeal from the JUDGMENT of SENTENCE Entered September 15,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
September 22, 2015: Criminal Trial Scheduling and Discovery IN THE MATTER OF : CRIMINAL TRIAL SCHEDULING : STANDING ORDER AND DISCOVERY : The Court having considered a revised protocol for scheduling in
More informationArticle IX DISCIPLINE By-Law and Manual of Procedure
NOTICE 10-01-13 The following By-Laws, Manual and forms became effective August 28, 2013, and are to be used in all Disciplinary cases until further notice. Article IX DISCIPLINE By-Law and Manual of Procedure
More informationMotion for Rehearing Denied September 5, 1968 COUNSEL
1 STATE V. MILLER, 1968-NMSC-103, 79 N.M. 392, 444 P.2d 577 (S. Ct. 1968) STATE of New Mexico, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. Joseph Alvin MILLER, Defendant-Appellant No. 8488 SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO 1968-NMSC-103,
More informationSENT VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL: ;
THE LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH D. BERNARD, P.C. JOSEPH D. BERNARD, ESQ. ERICA M. BRUNO, ESQ. ONE MONARCH PLACE, SUITE 1100 SPRINGFIELD, MA 01144 TELEPHONE: (413 731 9995 FAX (413 730 6647 EMAIL: joe@bernardatlaw.com
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 29, 2011 Remanded by the Supreme Court March 8, 2012
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs March 29, 2011 Remanded by the Supreme Court March 8, 2012 ROBERT B. LEDFORD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Criminal
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-1717 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL GERARD TILLMAN FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS GERARD TILLMAN * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2010-KA-1717 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 484-033, SECTION
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2009 KA 1159 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RICHARD T PENA. Judgment Rendered December
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2009 KA 1159 f 0Q STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RICHARD T PENA Judgment Rendered December 23 2009 On Appeal 22nd Judicial
More informationinvolving separate victims in six other cases. 1 The court denied the motions, and Barto
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH : No. CR-1173-2010 : vs. : CRIMINAL DIVISION : : GREGORY BARTO, : Appellant : 1925(a) Opinion OPINION IN SUPPORT OF ORDER IN COMPLIANCE
More informationAll mandatory traffic, non criminal citations, etc., shall be set on the first Wednesday of the month.
ASSIGNMENT Martin: One-third of Martin County Court Cases To set a hearing, please call the Judge s office at 772-288-5556. Small claims Pretrial Conferences and dockets will occur on Tuesday mornings
More informationHANS J. LILJEBERG JUDGE
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JACQUES DUNCAN NO. 16-KA-493 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA
More informationHello! I am Artin DerOhanian
DISCOVERY IN MUNICIPAL COURT Artin DerOhanian Senior Associate Attorney 1380 Pantheon Way, Suite 110 San Antonio, Texas 78232 (210) 257-6357 Artin.DerOhanian@rshlawfirm.com 1 Hello! I am Artin DerOhanian
More informationCriminal Litigation: Step-By-Step
Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step Path of Criminal Cases in Queens Commencement Arraignment Pre-Trial Trial Getting The Defendant Before The Court! There are four
More informationCourt Records Glossary
Court Records Glossary Documents Affidavit Answer Appeal Brief Case File Complaint Deposition Docket Indictment Interrogatories Injunction Judgment Opinion Pleadings Praecipe A written or printed statement
More informationMOTION TO SET ASIDE CONVICTION AND DISMISS PROSECUTION
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO. DIV JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF STATE OF LOUISIANA MOTION TO SET ASIDE CONVICTION AND DISMISS PROSECUTION NOW INTO HONORABLE COURT, comes Defendant, OR Defendant through
More informationJudgment rendered September. Anthony G Falterman FIRST CIRCUIT VERSUS JOSHUA WEATHERSPOON BEFORE NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2007 KA 0723 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JOSHUA WEATHERSPOON Judgment rendered September 14 2007 V On Appeal from the 23rd
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
Rel 03/23/2007 Murray Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama
More informationCase 4:11 cr JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ) ) ) No.
Case 4:11 cr 00211 JMM Document 260 Filed 09/17/12 Page U.S. 1 DISTRICT of 12 COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FILED SEP 1 7 2012 UNITED
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Plaintiff, SECTION R
Pinero v. Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. et al Doc. 104 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VICKI L. PINERO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationr)' j7 STEPHEN J. WINDHORST JUDGE FIFTH CIRCUIT VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS BRANDON L. BARNES NO. 15-KA-236 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA
More informationWEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE. House Bill 2657
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE 2017 REGULAR SESSION Introduced House Bill 2657 BY DELEGATE MILEY [By Request of the Executive] [Introduced February 22, 2017; Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.] 1 2
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO ENTRY
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LOCAL RULES: ENTRY The following local rules are adopted to govern the practice and procedures of this Court, subject
More informationMasters of the Courtroom SM. Ethics
Masters of the Courtroom SM Ethics The Hon. Jane Triche Milazzo, USDC - EDLA Kim E. Moore, Irwin Fritchie Urquhart & Moore LLC Wanda Anderson Davis, Leefe, Gibbs, Sullivan & Dupré, LLC Course Number: 0200131212
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 24802 GERALD ROSS PIZZUTO, JR., Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF IDAHO, Respondent. Moscow, April 2000 Term 2000 Opinion No. 93 Filed: September 6,
More informationORIGINAL LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JULIE ANN FUSILIER NUMBER: 14-DB-052 RECOMMENDATION TO THE LOUISIANA SUPREME COURT INTRODUCTION
ORIGINAL Louisiana Attorne\ Disci linary Boud FILED by: cf_ynb~ Docket# Filed-On 14-DB-052 1/5/2016 LOUISIANA ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN RE: JULIE ANN FUSILIER NUMBER: 14-DB-052 RECOMMENDATION TO THE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA (Before a Referee) THE FLORIDA BAR, v. Complainant, KELLY KATHRYN MCGRAW, Case No. SC07-964 TFB File No. 2004-00,758(1A) Respondent. / REPORT OF THE REFEREE ACCEPTING CONSENT
More informationFINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS
FINANCIAL INDUSTRY REGULATORY AUTHORITY OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, v. Complainant Disciplinary Proceeding No. 2007011413501 RESPONDENT FIRM, Hearing Officer RSH RESPONDENT 2,
More informationJUDICIAL PRACTICE PREFERENCES FOR CIRCUIT FAMILY SECTION 17
HONORABLE DONEENE D. LOAR Family Section 17 545 1 st Avenue North St. Petersburg, FL 33701 SUZY ISAKSEN Judicial Assistant 77-582-7436 section17@jud6.org JUDICIAL PRACTICE PREFERENCES FOR CIRCUIT FAMILY
More informationCriminal Litigation: Step-By-Step
Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step 2 Getting Defendant Before The Court! There are four methods to getting the defendant before the court 1) Warrantless Arrest 2)
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 25, 2005
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 25, 2005 GREGORY CHRISTOPHER FLEENOR v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County
More informationYukon Corrections: Adult Custody Policy Manual. B 4.1 Inmate Disciplinary Process Approved by: Revised: February 9, 2018
STATEMENT OF POLICY This policy sets out the philosophy, options and process for the discipline of inmates, including informal methods of correcting behaviour and formal hearings and disposition of institutional
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 18, 2004
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 18, 2004 VENESSA BASTON v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Morgan County No. 8773-B E. Eugene
More informationTHE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
THE JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Before: Edith H. Jones, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit; Jerry E. Smith, U. S. Circuit Judge; W. Eugene Davis, U. S. Circuit Judge; Jacques
More informationFrequently Asked Questions The Consumer Assistance Program
Frequently Asked Questions The Consumer Assistance Program What is the Consumer Assistance Program? The Mississippi Bar s Consumer Assistance Program (CAP) helps people with questions or problems with
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 15-1089 DINA M. BOHN VERSUS KENNETH MILLER ************ APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, DOCKET NO. 20150018 F HONORABLE
More informationPostconviction Relief Actions Hon. Robert J. Blink 5 th Judicial District of Iowa
Postconviction Relief Actions Hon. Robert J. Blink 5 th Judicial District of Iowa Basics Protecting yourself preventing PCRs o Two step approach Protect your client Facts & law Consult experienced lawyers
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE HARBOR JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
ATTORNEY(Bar No. 102135 LAW OFFICES OF ATTORNEY 123 Main St City, California 12345 Telephone: Facsimile: Attorney for Defendant DDD, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2003
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2003 RONALD MCKEEHAN, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D02-1823 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion filed March 14, 2003 Appeal
More informationA NEW STRATEGY FOR PREVENTING WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS
A NEW STRATEGY FOR PREVENTING WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS After seven and a half hours in police custody, including a several hour polygraph test over three sessions that police informed him he was failing, 16
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO ) ) Case No. CR 88-232189-A Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW THOMAS MICHAEL KEENAN ) (READ ON RECORD) )
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT (ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED)
E-Filed Document Jun 8 2016 17:18:32 2016-CA-00168-COA Pages: 27 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2016-CA-00168-COA KENNY WALTON APPLELLANT VERSUS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF
More informationNO. 01-B-1642 IN RE: CHARLES R. ROWE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
9/21/01 SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA NO. 01-B-1642 IN RE: CHARLES R. ROWE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM * This matter arises from a petition for consent discipline filed by respondent, Charles
More informationU.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:02-cr HES All Defendants
U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville) CRIMINAL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:02-cr-00046-HES All Defendants Case title: USA v. Oulai Magistrate judge case number: 3:01-mj-00340 Date Filed:
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 14-708 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- EARL TRUVIA; GREGORY
More informationNASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS. Complainant, : Disciplinary Proceeding : No. C v. : : Hearing Officer JN
NASD REGULATION, INC. OFFICE OF HEARING OFFICERS DEPARTMENT OF ENFORCEMENT, Complainant, Disciplinary Proceeding No. C07010084 v. Hearing Officer JN FORREST G. HARRIS (CRD No. 4219457), HEARING PANEL DECISION
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-20 JANET DUNN MALBROUGH VERSUS W. MARVIN DUNN APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. LANDRY, NO. 05-C-4940-A HONORABLE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Case 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK Document 188 Filed 06/08/17 Page 1 of 19 PageID 5418 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationHoward Dean Dutton v State of Maryland, No September Term, 2003
Headnote Howard Dean Dutton v State of Maryland, No. 1607 September Term, 2003 CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCING - AMBIGUOUS SENTENCE - ALLEGED AMBIGUITY IN SENTENCE RESOLVED BY REVIEW OF TRANSCRIPT OF IMPOSITION
More informationFOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISHES OF MOREHOUSE A D OUACHITA TITLE IV RULES FOR FAMILY A D DOMESTIC RELATIO S PROCEEDI GS EFFECTIVE JA.
FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISHES OF MOREHOUSE A D OUACHITA TITLE IV RULES FOR FAMILY A D DOMESTIC RELATIO S PROCEEDI GS EFFECTIVE JA. 1, 2010 CHAPTER 22 JURISDICTIO OF THE COURT Rule 22.0 Jurisdiction
More informationAttorneys are expected to read and follow the Florida Bar Family Section Bounds of Advocacy that can be found at
HONORABLE SHERWOOD S COLEMAN Judicial Practice Preferences for Circuit Family Section 23 315 Court Street, Room 484 Clearwater, FL 33756 section23@jud6.org IF YOU DO NOT HAVE A LAWYER: The Judicial Assistant
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE OAK RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL PEACE ) ALLIANCE, NUCLEAR WATCH OF NEW ) MEXICO, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE ) COUNCIL, RALPH HUTCHISON, ED SULLIVAN, )
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) CASE NO. CR C ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL ) vs. ) ) DAVID L. HUMPHRIES ) JOURNAL ENTRY ) Defendant.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO CASE NO. CR 12 566544 C Plaintiff, JUDGE JOHN P. O DONNELL vs. DAVID L. HUMPHRIES JOURNAL ENTRY Defendant. John P. O Donnell, J.: STATEMENT
More information5 CRWIINAL NO. H
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DrVISIOlV UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5 v. 5 CRWIINAL NO. H-07-218-002 WILLIE CARSON, I11 5 PLEA AGREEMENT The United States of America, by
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE TWENTY-SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT CITY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Cause No. 1822-CR00642 v. ) ) ERIC GREITENS, ) ) Defendant. ) DEFENDANT
More informationENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO JULY TERM, 2014
Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal. ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2013-330 JULY TERM, 2014 In re Stanley Mayo } APPEALED FROM: } }
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2010 KA 1069 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS MICHAEL A ANDRUS
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2010 KA 1069 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS MICHAEL A ANDRUS Judgment Rendered PTT 2 2 2010 On Appeal from the TwentySecond Judicial
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA. STATE OF ALABAMA, ) ) ) ) v. ) CASE NO. CC ) ) ) FELIX BARRY MOORE, ) ) Defendant.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA ELECTRONICALLY FILED 7/31/2014 3:20 PM 43-CC-2014-000226.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF LEE COUNTY, ALABAMA MARY B. ROBERSON, CLERK STATE OF ALABAMA, v. CASE NO. CC-2014-000226
More informationNo. 45,371-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered June 23, 2010. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 922, La. C.Cr.P. No. 45,371-KA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * STATE
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 03-1013 GAYNELL FINNIE, INDIV., ET AL. VERSUS JERRY LEBLANC, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU,
More information***************************
Case 2:14-cv-01088-KDE-KWR Document 1 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DANNY HANNA * * Plaintiff, * * CIVIL ACTION NO. v. * * SHELL EXPLORATION AND
More informationSUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA. Atlanta June 11, The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed:
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA Atlanta June 11, 2015 The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment. The following order was passed: It is ordered that new Uniform Magistrate Court Rule 7.5 (relating
More informationREASONS FOR DECISION OF PAUL MOREAU MEMBER HEARING SEPTEMBER 26 AND NOVEMBER 8, 2006
IN THE MATTER OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF A HEARING REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF PAUL MOREAU, A MEMBER OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF ALBERTA REASONS FOR DECISION OF PAUL MOREAU MEMBER HEARING
More informationUSA v. Daniel Castelli
2014 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-7-2014 USA v. Daniel Castelli Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket 12-2316 Follow this and additional
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 5, 2006 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON December 5, 2006 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICHARD ODOM Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 91-07049 Chris Craft, Judge
More informationII. 1. Ineffective Assistance of Counsel 2. Newly discovered evidence III.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF DARLINGTON 2012-CP-16-814 Timothy Michael Farris, Applicant, REPLY TO v. MOTION TO DISMISS and State of South Carolina, Respondent. CONDITIONAL
More informationInvestigations and Enforcement
Investigations and Enforcement Los Angeles Administrative Code Section 24.1.2 Last Revised January 26, 2007 Prepared by City Ethics Commission CEC Los Angeles 200 North Spring Street, 24 th Floor Los Angeles,
More informationVIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF SHELLY RENEE COLLETTE VSB DOCKET NO.: ORDER OF SUSPENSION
VIRGINIA: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF SHELLY RENEE COLLETTE VSB DOCKET NO.: 18-000-111181 ORDER OF SUSPENSION THIS MATTER came on to be heard on February 16, 2018,
More information1. The defendant understands her rights as follows:
Case 1:16-cr-00024-CG Document 2 Filed 02/17/16 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. NATALIE REED PERHACS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA DURWIN ABBOTT VERSUS CAPTAIN PERCY BABIN, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION NO. 12-631-JJB-SCR RULING ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE This matter is before the court on
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2003 WILLIAM R. HAMILTON, Appellant, v. CASE NO. 5D02-2292 STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. Opinion filed December 5, 2003. 3.850
More informationSession of SENATE BILL No By Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance 1-10
Session of 0 SENATE BILL No. By Committee on Financial Institutions and Insurance -0 0 0 0 AN ACT concerning crimes, punishment and criminal procedure; relating to expungement; requiring disclosure of
More information