FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/13/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/13/2015
|
|
- Dortha Lewis
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/13/ PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 23 RECEIVED NYSCEF 07/13/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MDW FUNDING LLC and VERSANT FUNDING LLC, vs. Plaintiffs, DARDEN MEDIA GROUP, LLC, DARDEN MEDIAL HOLDINGS, LLC, CALVIN DARDEN, CALVIN DARDEN, JR., FOREFRONT CAPITAL MARKETS, LLC, MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER & SMITH INCORPORATED, BRENT ALLEN WATSON, Defendants. Index No /2015 Oral Argument Requested REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF MERRILL LYNCH S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT July 13, 2015 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 787 Seventh Avenue New York, NY Telephone (212) Facsimile (212) Attorneys for Defendant Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated
2 Table of Contents Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT...1 ARGUMENT...1 I. PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO ADEQUATELY PLEAD SCIENTER FOR A FRAUD CLAIM...1 II. PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO ADEQUATELY PLEAD A SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP FOR A NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION CLAIM...2 III. PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO PLEAD RELIANCE...3 IV. PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO PLEAD PROXIMATE CAUSE...4 V. PLAINTIFFS HAVE NOT ADEQUATELY PLED THAT WATSON S ACTIONS ARE IMPUTABLE TO MERRILL LYNCH OR THAT MERRILL LYNCH IS VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR WATSON S ACTIONS...5 A. Plaintiffs fail to adequately allege that Watson had actual or apparent authority to make the purported misrepresentations....5 B. Plaintiffs fail to allege a basis for vicarious liability....7 CONCLUSION...8
3 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases ACA Fin. Guaranty Corp. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 25 N.Y.3d 1043 (2015)...4 Amusement Industry Inc. v. Stern, 693 F. Supp. 2d 327 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)...5 Citibank, N.A. v. K-H Corp., 968 F.2d 1489 (2d Cir. 1992)...5 People ex rel. Cuomo v. Wells Fargo Ins. Servs. Inc., 2008 WL (1st Dep t Jan. 14, 2008)...2 EED Holdings v. Palmer Johnson Acquisition Corp., 387 F. Supp. 2d 265 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)...3 ER Holdings, LLC v. 122 W.P.R. Corp., 65 A.D.3d 1275 (2d Dep t 2009)...6 Essig v United States, 675 F. Supp. 84 (E.D.N.Y. 1987)...7 Friedman v. Anderson, 23 A.D.3d 163 (1st Dep t 2005)...5 Glidepath Holding B.V. v. Spherion Corp., 590 F. Supp. 435 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)...7 Greenberg, Trager & Herbst, LLP v. HSBC Bank USA, 17 N.Y.3d 565 (2011)...2 Imburgio v. Toby, 82 A.D.3d 653 (1st Dep t 2011)...6 JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Winnick, 350 F. Supp. 2d 393 (S.D.N.Y. 2004)...3 Judith M. v. Sisters of Charity Hospital, 93 N.Y.2d 932 (1999)...7 Kirschner v. KPMG LLP, 15 N.Y.3d 446 (2010)...6, 7 ii
4 Laub v. Faessel, 297 A.D.2d 28 (1st Dep t 2002)...5 Loreley Fin. (Jersey) No. 4 Ltd. v. UBS Ltd., 978 N.Y.S.2d 615 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013)...4 Riviello v. Waldron, 47 N.Y.2d 297 (1979)...7 Ryan v. Prescott, 2013 N.Y. Slip Op (U), (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Feb. 14, 2013)...5 Shea v. Hambros PLC, 244 A.D.2d 39 (1st Dep t 1998)...4 Yuco Mgt., Inc. v. Cheung, 2010 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4487 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Sept. 15, 2010)...8 Zutty v. Rye Select Broad Mkt. Prime Fund, 2011 WL (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Apr. 15, 2011)...2 Statutes CPLR 3211(a)(7)...1 CPLR 3016(b)...1 iii
5 Defendant Merrill Lynch respectfully submits this reply memorandum of law in further support of its motion to dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) and 3016(b). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Plaintiffs opposition only serves to underscore the ironic gravamen of their claims against Merrill Lynch they are suing Merrill Lynch because one of its employees was fooled by the very same individuals and misrepresentations that led to Plaintiffs almost being defrauded to the tune of $5.5 million. Of course, Plaintiffs scarcely even acknowledge two essential points that (i) they were strangers to Merrill Lynch, having had no relationship before reaching out to establish the control account that was supposed to (but never did) hold shares to serve as collateral for their loan to the Dardens; and (ii) because those shares never made their way into a Merrill Lynch account, the contemplated loan was not consummated and Plaintiffs received back all of their money. Plaintiffs chose to do business with individuals and companies whom they now label as fraudsters. That decision had nothing to do with Merrill Lynch, and their claims against Merrill Lynch cannot be sustained. As discussed in the moving memorandum and further explained below, the Complaint should be dismissed as to Merrill Lynch because Plaintiffs have failed to plead adequately (1) the element of scienter to support their fraud claim; (2) a special relationship sufficient to support a negligent misrepresentation claim; (3) reasonable reliance; (4) that Merrill Lynch s conduct proximately caused injury (if any) to Plaintiffs; and (5) that Watson s actions can be imputed to Merrill Lynch. Therefore, the claims against Merrill Lynch must be dismissed. ARGUMENT I. PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO ADEQUATELY PLEAD SCIENTER FOR A FRAUD CLAIM As explained in the moving memorandum, Plaintiffs must allege specific instance[s] of
6 [plaintiffs] justifiably relying upon a material misrepresentation known by the maker to be false rather than generalized allegations of what a defendant knew or should have known. People ex rel. Cuomo v. Wells Fargo Ins. Servs. Inc., 2008 WL , at *3 (1st Dep t Jan. 14, 2008); Zutty v. Rye Select Broad Mkt. Prime Fund, 2011 WL , at *14 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Apr. 15, 2011). In response, Plaintiffs rely exclusively on Merrill Lynch s filing with its regulator, FINRA, noting that Watson accept[ed] instructions from an unauthorized family member, and they argue that this somehow suffices to allege that Watson had knowlege of the alleged fraudulent scheme or the criminal history of Darden, Jr. Plaintiffs Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Merrill Lynch s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint ( Opp. Br. ) at 17; Cpl. 61. No reasonable inference of scienter can be made from these conclusory allegations and arguments. II. PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO ADEQUATELY PLEAD A SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP FOR A NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION CLAIM Merrill Lynch demonstrated in the opening memorandum that Plaintiffs have failed to plead that Merrill Lynch had a special relationship with Plaintiffs, such that Merrill Lynch possessed unique or specialized expertise 1 or was in a special position of confidence and trust with Plaintiffs. See Memorandum of Law in Support of Merrill Lynch s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint ( Mem. ) at 6-9; Greenberg, Trager & Herbst, LLP v. HSBC Bank USA, 17 N.Y.3d 565, 578 (2011). In response, Plaintiffs argue that Merrill Lynch and MDW were in privity of contract pursuant to the Control Agreement. Opp. Br. at 19. However, even if the inclusion of MDW as a creditor on the face of the Control Agreement were sufficient to make MDW a party to the agreement, privity of contract or near-privity in the commercial context involving 1 Plaintiffs also argue that Watson had the exclusive knowledge that he was aiding a convicted felon. Opp. Br. at 20. Again, Plaintiffs allege no facts supporting a conclusion that Watson had this information. 2
7 an arms length transaction is not on its own sufficient to create a special relationship without an additional duty to provide correct information. See EED Holdings v. Palmer Johnson Acquisition Corp., 387 F. Supp. 2d 265, 281 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) ( The next step in New York s negligent misrepresentation analysis is to determine whether this near-privity relationship imparted a duty on [defendant] to provide correct information. Under New York law, a statement made in the context of an arms-length commercial transaction, without more, cannot give rise to such a duty. ) (citing Kimmell v. Schaefer, 89 N.Y.2d 257 (1996)); JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Winnick, 350 F. Supp. 2d 393, (S.D.N.Y. 2004) ( A special relationship may be brought about by either privity of contract between the parties or a relationship so close as to approach that of privity. However, where the duty arises in commercial contexts in which a contract exists, the duty attendant to that special relationship must spring from circumstances extraneous to, and not constituting elements of the contract, although it may be connected with and dependent on that contract. ) (citation omitted). III. PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO PLEAD RELIANCE As explained in the moving memorandum, Plaintiffs have not pled reasonable reliance on Merrill Lynch; to the contrary, the Complaint makes clear that Plaintiffs relied upon their direct communications with the Dardens and their agents. See, e.g., Mem. at 9-10; Cpl 33 ( Forefront s Senior Managing Director, Chris Thomas ( Thomas ), aggressively solicited MDW to loan $5.5 million to the Darden Defendants. ); Cpl. 51 ( Later that same afternoon, Mr. Weinberg received a purported from Darden attaching a communication from Alma at BOA... confirming the transfer of the Shares. ). Rather than attempting to refute this point, Plaintiffs argue that they had no duty to prosecute an investigation or conduct due diligence regarding Watson s representations. But Merrill Lynch does not argue that Plaintiffs had a duty to conduct an investigation, but rather that Plaintiffs have not sufficiently alleged that they 3
8 reasonably relied upon any information passed on by Watson. Plaintiffs have alleged that they relied on Alma s direct statement to MDW that the shares were transferred, and they have alleged no facts indicating any connection between Watson and Alma, nor any basis to conclude that Watson knew more about Alma than Plaintiffs did. Cpl. 51. Thus, Plaintiffs allegations confirm that they did not act in reliance upon Merrill Lynch s (or Watson s) representations. See Shea v. Hambros PLC, 244 A.D.2d 39, (1st Dep t 1998) ( To show reliance, [Plaintiffs] must demonstrate that [they were] induced to act or refrain from acting to [their] detriment by virtue of the alleged misrepresentation or omission. ). Plaintiffs cite ACA Fin. Guaranty Corp. v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 25 N.Y.3d 1043, 1045 (2015), for the holding that the question of what constitutes reasonable realiance is not generally a question to be resolved as a matter of law on a motion to dismiss. ACA, however, provides further support for dismissal as the Court emphasized that the plaintiff had satisfied the justifiable reliance element only because it had alleged that it relied specifically on defendant s alleged affirmative misrepresentations and would not have moved forward without the representations. Id. at Here, no such allegation could be made because Plaintiffs have alleged that they moved forward following the received directly from Alma. IV. PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO PLEAD PROXIMATE CAUSE To sufficiently plead proximate cause, Plaintiffs must allege both transaction and loss causation; in other words, that but for Merrill Lynch s representations the transaction would not have come about and that the representations directly caused a loss. See Loreley Fin. (Jersey) No. 4 Ltd. v. UBS Ltd., 978 N.Y.S.2d 615, 620 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013). Plaintiffs all but ignore loss causation and address transaction causation unconvincingly. First, Plaintiffs concede that they received back all the funds paid into escrow so the link between Merrill Lynch and any damages Plaintiffs could have incurred is even more attenuated. Second, Plaintiffs argument 4
9 that it is sufficient for Watson s misrepresentations to be one of the inducing causes of the transaction misses the point. Opp. Br. at 23. Under New York law, separate from the transaction causation point, Plaintiffs must properly allege that Watson s misrepresentations actually caused the subject losses. See Friedman v. Anderson, 23 A.D.3d 163, 167 (1st Dep t 2005); Laub v. Faessel, 297 A.D.2d 28, 31 (1st Dep t 2002). Plaintiffs have made no attempt to do this, nor could they. The case Plaintiffs cite, Amusement Industry Inc. v. Stern, 693 F. Supp. 2d 327 (S.D.N.Y. 2010), makes this distinction. The court explained that Amusement alleges that Safrin and Egert induced it to hand over money that Safrin and Egert themselves (among others) used for their own benefit. Thus, unlike the situation in [Citibank, N.A. v. K-H Corp., 968 F.2d 1489 (2d Cir. 1992)], here the fraud and injury are connected; it appears in an appreciable sense that damage flowed from fraud as proximate and not remote cause. Amusement Industry, 692 F. Supp. 2d at 353 (emphasis added) (quotations and alterations omitted). Plaintiffs have failed to allege that their purported damages flowed as a proximate, not remote, cause from information passed on by Watson, rather than other conduct. V. PLAINTIFFS HAVE NOT ADEQUATELY PLED THAT WATSON S ACTIONS ARE IMPUTABLE TO MERRILL LYNCH OR THAT MERRILL LYNCH IS VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR WATSON S ACTIONS A. Plaintiffs fail to adequately allege that Watson had actual or apparent authority to make the purported misrepresentations. Merrill Lynch demonstrated in the moving memorandum that Plaintiffs have failed to plead that Watson had the authority actual or apparent to make the alleged misrepresentations to MDW. Actual authority only exists when an agent has the power to do an act or to conduct a transaction on account of the principal which, with respect to the principal, he is privileged to do because of the principal s manifestations to him. Ryan v. Prescott, 2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 5
10 50388(U), at *7 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Feb. 14, 2013) (quoting Minskoff v. Am. Exp. Travel Relates Servs. Co., Inc., 98 F.3d 703, 708 (2d Cir. 1996)). Similarly, to plead apparent authority, Plaintiffs must plead facts showing that Merrill Lynch imbued Watson with such authority. See ER Holdings, LLC v. 122 W.P.R. Corp., 65 A.D.3d 1275, 1277 (2d Dep t 2009) (quoting Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 231 (1984)); Imburgio v. Toby, 82 A.D.3d 653, 653 (1st Dep t 2011). Although Watson may have had authority to take actions with respect to Merrill Lynch customers, there is no basis pled for any such authority with respect to MDW. 2 Plaintiffs cite Kirschner v. KPMG LLP, 15 N.Y.3d 446 (2010), for the proposition that Watson was acting within the scope of his corporate authority by setting up the Control Account and that undeniably, Merrill Lynch authorized Watson to issue representations relating to the Control Account.... Opp. Br. at 8-9. First, there is no allegation that the establishment of a control account was improper or fraudulent in any respect. Indeed, if the Dardens had transferred into the control account the shares that had been promised, Plaintiffs presumably would have moved forward with their planned transaction. It was only because Darden, Jr. allegedly forged an instruction to release funds without the shares having been received in the control account that Plaintiffs were at risk of loss. Cpl. 53. Second, as Plaintiffs themselves acknowledge, the control agreement was signed by a different, more senior Merrill Lynch employee, not Watson, so at most the control agreement gave the signing employee rather than Watson actual authority regarding that account. 3 Opp. Br. at 4. In Kirschner the most senior 2 Plaintiffs also claim that Merrill Lynch unconvincingly argues that the adverse interest exception to the general rule of imputation applies to sever the principal-agent relationship between Merrill Lynch and Watson. Opp. Br. at Merrill Lynch has made no such argument; rather, Merrill Lynch argued that it is not liable for Watson s actions because his actions were not in furtherance of Merrill Lynch s business. Mem. at As discussed in Section V.B. below, Plaintiffs have not successfully refuted that argument. 3 For the same reason, Plaintiffs allegation that Merrill Lynch confirmed that Watson had the authority to issue representations to MDW about the Control Account through a Merrill Lynch Director signing off on the Control Account (Opp. Br. at 12) provides no support to the contention that Watson had apparent authority. 6
11 officers of two corporations intentionally made misrepresentations in the course of their duties, including representing the financial condition of the corporation to the public, regulators, and their investors. 15 N.Y.3d at , 462. In sharp contrast, to the extent Watson is alleged to have made representations about the Dardens to MDW, he was not carry[ing] out the everyday activities of Merrill Lynch or acting within the scope of [his] authority, as explained in Kirschner. 4 B. Plaintiffs fail to allege a basis for vicarious liability. Plaintiffs concede that Merrill Lynch may only be held liable for Watson s actions that are generally foreseeable and a natural incident of his employment and may not be held liable for Watson s actions that constitute an abandonment of his service. See Judith M. v. Sisters of Charity Hospital, 93 N.Y.2d 932, 933 (1999). Plaintiffs cite several inapposite cases to argue that employers have been held liable for the tortious acts of their employees that could have been reasonably anticipated. Opp. Br. at 14. However, in all of these cases the employer had knowledge of the activity that the employee was engaged in and the employee committed tortious conduct while carrying out that activity. 5 Here, Plaintiffs have pled no facts establishing 4 Similarly, Glidepath Holding B.V. v. Spherion Corp., 590 F. Supp. 435 (S.D.N.Y. 2007), is distinguishable as it involved a managing director of a corporation fraudulently inducing an investor to purchase a business. Id. at 443. Even though the court held that an employer does not have to approve or be aware of a representation made by the employee, it explained that the representations must be made within the scope of the agent s employment. Id. at 453. The court found that Plaintiffs had properly alleged that the managing director was instructed to find potential buyers by the defendant company and had alleged and provided documentation that his representations were made during the course of duties. Id. Here, Plaintiffs have not alleged that Merrill Lynch instructed Watson to communicate with MDW or Weinberg, and there are no other facts alleged to support a conclusion that any such communications would have been within the scope of his employment. As discussed above, the creation of the control account itself may have been within the scope of Merrill Lynch s employee, but it was signed by a different Merrill Lynch employee. 5 See, e.g., Essig v United States, 675 F. Supp. 84 (E.D.N.Y. 1987) ( The government granted Hamill permission to use the car for official business as well as to commute to and from his home and office.... There is no question that the government was aware that Hamill would be driving the vehicle.... ); Riviello v. Waldron, 47 N.Y.2d 297 (1979) (explaining that [t]here was also proof that, in the time he had been there, when not preparing or serving food or relieving the bartender, he would follow the practice of mingling with patrons, which made his conduct of injuring a patron with a knife reasonably foreseeable). 7
12
MDW Funding LLC v Darden Media Group, LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 30878(U) April 28, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015 Judge:
MDW Funding LLC v Darden Media Group, LLC 2017 NY Slip Op 30878(U) April 28, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651708/2015 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationUnreported Disposition 56 Misc.3d 1203(A), 63 N.Y.S.3d 307 (Table), 2017 WL (N.Y.Sup.), 2017 N.Y. Slip Op (U)
Unreported Disposition 56 Misc.3d 1203(A), 63 N.Y.S.3d 307 (Table), 2017 WL 2784999 (N.Y.Sup.), 2017 N.Y. Slip Op. 50846(U) This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official
More informationCase 1:09-md LAK-GWG Document 909 Filed 05/16/12 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:09-md-02017-LAK-GWG Document 909 Filed 05/16/12 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: LEHMAN BROTHERS SECURITIES AND ERISA LITIGATION This Document Applies
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/30/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/30/2015
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/30/2015 0542 PM INDEX NO. 452951/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF 10/30/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationFILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 01/21/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/21/2016
FILED WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 01/21/2016 1152 AM INDEX NO. 70104/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 59 RECEIVED NYSCEF 01/21/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WESTCHESTER COUNTY ------------------------------------X
More informationBattaglia v Tortato 2016 NY Slip Op 31791(U) September 29, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: Carol R.
Battaglia v Tortato 2016 NY Slip Op 31791(U) September 29, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 153643/2016 Judge: Carol R. Edmead Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationPlaintiff, : : : : John Sgaliordich is an individual investor who alleges that various investment
-VVP Sgaliordich v. Lloyd's Asset Management et al Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ X JOHN ANTHONY SGALIORDICH,
More informationRodriguez v Judge 2014 NY Slip Op 30546(U) January 27, 2014 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: /2011 Judge: Denis J. Butler Cases posted with
Rodriguez v Judge 2014 NY Slip Op 30546(U) January 27, 2014 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 700268/2011 Judge: Denis J. Butler Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationPhoenix Light SF Ltd. v Credit Suisse AG 2015 NY Slip Op 30658(U) April 16, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge:
Phoenix Light SF Ltd. v Credit Suisse AG 2015 NY Slip Op 30658(U) April 16, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653123/13 Judge: Charles E. Ramos Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/26/2014
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/26/2014 0525 PM INDEX NO. 652450/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF 08/26/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationCase: 4:15-cv RWS Doc. #: 30 Filed: 05/04/15 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: 183
Case: 4:15-cv-00464-RWS Doc. #: 30 Filed: 05/04/15 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: 183 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION GRYPHON INVESTMENTS III, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No.
More informationState of New York v Credit Suisse Sec NY Slip Op 32031(U) July 17, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Kelly
State of New York v Credit Suisse Sec. 2015 NY Slip Op 32031(U) July 17, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 100185/2013 Judge: Kelly A. O'Neill Levy Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/ :00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 66 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/2015 09:00 PM INDEX NO. 651992/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 66 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY -----------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/ :58 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/19/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/2016 04:58 PM INDEX NO. 651587/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 53 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/19/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PERSEUS TELECOM LTD., v.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2013 INDEX NO. 650841/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK GEM HOLDCO, LLC, -against- Plaintiff,
More informationCanon Fin. Servs., Inc. v Meyers Assoc., LP 2014 NY Slip Op 32519(U) September 26, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013
Canon Fin. Servs., Inc. v Meyers Assoc., LP 2014 NY Slip Op 32519(U) September 26, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650613/2013 Judge: Debra A. James Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationWells Fargo Bank N.A. v Webster Bus. Credit Corp NY Slip Op 33850(U) April 13, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Richard
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v Webster Bus. Credit Corp. 2010 NY Slip Op 33850(U) April 13, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 601680/2009 Judge: Richard B. Lowe III Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/27/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X ALVIN DWORMAN, individually, and derivatively on behalf of CAPITAL
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/12/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/12/2013 INDEX NO. 653787/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/12/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK HOME EQUITY MORTGAGE TRUST SERIES
More informationFor plaintiffs: Sameul Rudman, Esq. of Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP
[*1] Phoenix Light SF Ltd. v Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. 2014 NY Slip Op 50917(U) Decided on June 13, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Ramos, J. Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
More informationJin Hai Liu v Forever Beauty Day Spa Inc NY Slip Op 32701(U) October 11, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge:
Jin Hai Liu v Forever Beauty Day Spa Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 32701(U) October 11, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652167/2017 Judge: Gerald Lebovits Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationSmith v Ashland, Inc NY Slip Op 32448(U) September 26, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: Arlene P.
Smith v Ashland, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 32448(U) September 26, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 156780/2017 Judge: Arlene P. Bluth Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
Sunoptic Technologies, LLC v. Integra Luxtec, Inc et al Doc. 34 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION SUNOPTIC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company,
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: December 20, 2018 526578 CHARLES W. DOLLER, v Appellant, DAVID J. PRESCOTT et al., Respondents. MEMORANDUM
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re DIGITAL MUSIC ANTITRUST : LITIGATION : x MDL Docket No. 1780 (LAP) ECF Case DEFENDANT TIME WARNER S SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW
More informationIndo-Med Commodities, Inc. v Wisell 2014 NY Slip Op 33918(U) September 29, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: /14 Judge: F.
Indo-Med Commodities, Inc. v Wisell 2014 NY Slip Op 33918(U) September 29, 2014 Supreme Court, Nassau County Docket Number: 600546/14 Judge: F. Dana Winslow Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationTransit Funding Assoc. LLC v Capital One Equip. Fin. Corp NY Slip Op 32631(U) December 14, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Transit Funding Assoc. LLC v Capital One Equip. Fin. Corp. 2017 NY Slip Op 32631(U) December 14, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652346/2015 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with
More informationMEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF NORMA LOREN'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/15/2016 04:30 PM INDEX NO. 651052/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 30 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NORMA LOREN, -v- Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:14-cv JSR Document 58 Filed 12/01/14 Page 1 of 7. Lead plaintiffs Joseph Ebin and Yeruchum Jenkins bring this
Case 1:14-cv-01324-JSR Document 58 Filed 12/01/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x JOSEPH EBIN and YERUCHUM JENKINS, individually
More informationFederal Home Loan Bank of Boston v Moody's Corp NY Slip Op 30921(U) March 25, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston v Moody's Corp. 2019 NY Slip Op 30921(U) March 25, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 656707/2017 Judge: Joel M. Cohen Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationCase 1:09-cv MGC Document 24 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 12. -against- 09 Civ (MGC)
Case 1:09-cv-06649-MGC Document 24 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------X ACA GALLERIES, INC., Plaintiff, OPINION AND
More informationMacquarie Capital (USA) Inc. v Morrison & Foerster LLP 2016 NY Slip Op 31405(U) July 14, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Macquarie Capital (USA) Inc. v Morrison & Foerster LLP 2016 NY Slip Op 31405(U) July 14, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650988/2015 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationCase 0:14-cv WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:14-cv-60975-WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 WENDY GRAVE and JOSEPH GRAVE, vs. Plaintiffs, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/23/ :19 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/23/2014
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/23/2014 0919 PM INDEX NO. 651958/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF 10/23/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationCarlyle, LLC v Quik Park 1633 Garage LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 32476(U) December 15, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge:
Carlyle, LLC v Quik Park 1633 Garage LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 32476(U) December 15, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653347/15 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationDEFENDANT TIME WARNER'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' SECOND CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re DIGITAL MUSIC ANTITRUST LITIGATION x MDL Docket No. 1780 (LAP) DEFENDANT TIME WARNER'S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS'
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/04/ :29 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/04/2014
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/04/2014 0629 PM INDEX NO. 651958/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 17 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/04/2014 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------
More information241 Fifth Ave. Hotel LLC v Nader & Sons LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 31755(U) September 20, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2012
241 Fifth Ave. Hotel LLC v Nader & Sons LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 31755(U) September 20, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652082/2012 Judge: Jeffrey K. Oing Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationItria Ventures LLC v Spire Mgt. Group, Inc NY Slip Op 30194(U) January 30, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /16 Judge:
Itria Ventures LLC v Spire Mgt. Group, Inc. 2017 NY Slip Op 30194(U) January 30, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 152407/16 Judge: Barbara Jaffe Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationTaboola, Inc. v DML News & Entertainment, Inc NY Slip Op 33448(U) December 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017
Taboola, Inc. v DML News & Entertainment, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 33448(U) December 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 656393/2017 Judge: Margaret A. Chan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationOwnit Mtge. Loan Trust v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc NY Slip Op 32303(U) December 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Ownit Mtge. Loan Trust v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 32303(U) December 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651370/2014 Judge: Marcy S. Friedman Cases posted with
More informationCase 7:12-cv VB Document 26 Filed 04/18/13 Page 1 of 11 : : : : : :
Case 712-cv-07778-VB Document 26 Filed 04/18/13 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x PRESTIGE BRANDS INC.
More informationIn this diversity action for money damages, Plaintiff Lydian Private Bank, d/b/a
Lydian Private Bank v. Leff et al Doc. 67 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------x LYDIAN PRIVATE BANK d/b/a VIRTUALBANK, Plaintiff,
More informationTigrent Group, Inc. v Cynergy Holdings, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 31746(U) May 15, 2014 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Marguerite
Tigrent Group, Inc. v Cynergy Holdings, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 31746(U) May 15, 2014 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 703951/2013 Judge: Marguerite A. Grays Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/17/ :55 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 468 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/17/2015
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/17/2015 0855 PM INDEX NO. 652382/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 468 RECEIVED NYSCEF 07/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:18-CV-593 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Case 1:18-cv-00593-CCE-JLW Document 14 Filed 09/12/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHANDRA MILLIKIN MCLAUGHLIN, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:18-CV-593
More informationCase 1:12-cv CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-04873-CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR TO WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/29/ :57 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/29/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ANTIPODEAN DOMESTIC PARTNERS, L.P., Plaintiff, v. CLOVIS ONCOLOGY, INC.; PATRICK J. MAHAFFY; ERLE T. MAST; ANDREW ALLEN; ANNA SUSSMAN; J.P. MORGAN
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/27/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/27/2016
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 01/27/2016 09:45 PM INDEX NO. 509843/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 49 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/27/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/ :13 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/17/2015
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/17/2015 0213 PM INDEX NO. 653600/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF 12/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------X
More informationBloostein v Morrison Cohen LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 31238(U) June 7, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2012 Judge: Anil C.
Bloostein v Morrison Cohen LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 31238(U) June 7, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651242/2012 Judge: Anil C. Singh Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationMay 7, By E-File and Hand Delivery. Hon. Marcy S. Friedman New York State Supreme Court 60 Centre Street, Part 60 Room 663 New York, NY 10007
May 7, 2015 By E-File and Hand Delivery Peter W. Tomlinson Partner (212) 336-2977 Direct Fax: (212) 336-2343 pwtomlinson@pbwt.com Hon. Marcy S. Friedman New York State Supreme Court 60 Centre Street, Part
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/21/ :07 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/21/2016
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/21/2016 0507 PM INDEX NO. 651546/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 45 RECEIVED NYSCEF 09/21/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x In re: Chapter 11
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re: RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY LLC, Debtor. ---------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationCase 1:13-cv RJS Document 34 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 18 ) ) ECF CASE ) )
Case 1:13-cv-06882-RJS Document 34 Filed 05/13/14 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) JOHN ORTUZAR, Individually and On Behalf ) of All Others Similarly Situated,
More informationCase 1:12-cv JSR Document 34 Filed 11/26/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:12-cv-04222-JSR Document 34 Filed 11/26/13 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK HERBERT HANSON, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v.
More informationRothman v RNK Capital, LLC 2015 NY Slip Op 31640(U) August 26, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /15 Judge: Barbara Jaffe
Rothman v RNK Capital, LLC 2015 NY Slip Op 31640(U) August 26, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150120/15 Judge: Barbara Jaffe Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationCase 3:18-cv VLB Document 33 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
Case 3:18-cv-00705-VLB Document 33 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 12 CONNECTICUT FAIR HOUSING CENTER and CARMEN ARROYO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT v. Plaintiffs, Case No. 3:18cv00705-VLB
More informationMatter of Goyal v Vintage India NYC, LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 31926(U) August 7, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017 Judge: O.
Matter of Goyal v Vintage India NYC, LLC 2018 NY Slip Op 31926(U) August 7, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 657004/2017 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationCase 1:12-cv RJS Document 32 Filed 09/25/12 Page 1 of 16 : : : : : 12 CV 4558 (RJS)
Case 1:12-cv-04558-RJS Document 32 Filed 09/25/12 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x GOLDMAN, SACHS & CO., : : Plaintiff, : : 12 CV 4558 (RJS) -v- : : GOLDEN EMPIRE
More informationGreenberg v DeRosa 2019 NY Slip Op 30046(U) January 2, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2018 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Cases
Greenberg v DeRosa 2019 NY Slip Op 30046(U) January 2, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652424/2018 Judge: O. Peter Sherwood Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationCase 1:04-md LAK-HBP Document 1636 Filed 08/11/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:04-md-01653-LAK-HBP Document 1636 Filed 08/11/2008 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationCase 1:13-cv AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:13-cv-00584-AKH Document 58 Filed 12/31/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, AS CONSERVATOR FOR THE FEDERAL HOME
More informationJanuary 19, By Fax. The Honorable Paul A. Crotty Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007
Erik Haas Partner (212) 336-2117 Direct Fax (212) 336-2386 ehaas@pbwt.com By Fax The Honorable Paul A. Crotty Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 By Fax
More informationEric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York (Steven C. Wu of counsel), for respondent.
People v Credit Suisse Sec. (USA) LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 08339 Decided on December 13, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/02/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 34 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/02/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DEMOND MOORE and MICHAEL KIMMELMAN, P.C. v. Plaintiffs, CIOX HEALTH LLC and NYU HOSPITALS CENTER, Defendants. Index No. 655060/2016 ASSIGNED JUDGE
More informationCase 1:12-cv SLT-VVP Document 23 Filed 03/31/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 306. Plaintiffs, 12-CV-1428 (SLT)(VVP)
Case 1:12-cv-01428-SLT-VVP Document 23 Filed 03/31/14 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 306 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/ :36 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 72 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/10/2017
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/10/2017 0136 PM INDEX NO. 655186/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 72 RECEIVED NYSCEF 05/10/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationCase 2:06-cv JS-WDW Document 18 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 1 of 13. Plaintiffs,
Case 2:06-cv-01238-JS-WDW Document 18 Filed 03/26/2007 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------X JEFFREY SCHAUB and HOWARD SCHAUB, as
More informationCase: 1:16-cv CAB Doc #: 26 Filed: 11/14/17 1 of 7. PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:16-cv-02739-CAB Doc #: 26 Filed: 11/14/17 1 of 7. PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TOWNE AUTO SALES, LLC, CASE NO. 1:16-cv-02739 Plaintiff,
More informationKonig v Chanin 2011 NY Slip Op 33951(U) August 5, 2011 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich Cases posted with a
Konig v Chanin 2011 NY Slip Op 33951(U) August 5, 2011 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 100822/09 Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationDiakonikolas v New Horizons Worldwide Inc NY Slip Op 32008(U) July 21, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Joan
Diakonikolas v New Horizons Worldwide Inc. 2010 NY Slip Op 32008(U) July 21, 2010 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 112565/09 Judge: Joan A. Madden Republished from New York State Unified Court
More informationCase 1:11-cv WHP Document 100 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 13
Case 1:11-cv-05988-WHP Document 100 Filed 09/27/11 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In the matter of the application of THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON (as Trustee under
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No. 14-C-966 DECISION AND ORDER
Bourbonnais et al v. Ameriprise Financial Services Inc et al Doc. 45 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN WILLIAM BOURBONNAIS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 14-C-966 AMERIPRISE
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/31/2016 03:48 PM INDEX NO. 155839/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/31/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ROSOLINO AGRUSA, - against
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/02/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/02/2016
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 05/02/2016 04:32 PM INDEX NO. 514527/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 8 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/02/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS THE BOARD OF MANAGERS OF THE ONE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MEMORANDUM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION LORRIE THOMPSON ) ) v. ) NO. 3-13-0817 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS ) CORPORATION, et al. ) MEMORANDUM
More informationManda Intl. Corp. v Yager 2015 NY Slip Op 31920(U) October 14, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla
Manda Intl. Corp. v Yager 2015 NY Slip Op 31920(U) October 14, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653012/13 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY
More informationAndrew Walzer v. Muriel Siebert Co
2011 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 10-6-2011 Andrew Walzer v. Muriel Siebert Co Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-4526 Follow
More informationJemrock Enter. LLC v Konig 2013 NY Slip Op 32884(U) October 24, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Orin R.
Jemrock Enter. LLC v Konig 2013 NY Slip Op 32884(U) October 24, 2013 Sup Ct, Queens County Docket Number: 703280/2013 Judge: Orin R. Kitzes Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op
More informationJMS AN's, LLC v Fast Food Enters., LLC 2011 NY Slip Op 33900(U) September 28, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /09 Judge:
JMS AN's, LLC v Fast Food Enters., LLC 2011 NY Slip Op 33900(U) September 28, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 603608/09 Judge: Richard B. Lowe III Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationCase 2:08-cv JLL-CCC Document 46 Filed 10/23/2009 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 2:08-cv-04143-JLL-CCC Document 46 Filed 10/23/2009 Page 1 of 13 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY THOMASON AUTO GROUP, LLC, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.: 08-4143
More informationPlaintiff, DECISION and ORDER No. 1:14-cv-341(MAT)(JMM) Accadia Site Contracting, Inc. ( Accadia or Plaintiff ),
Accadia Site Contracting, Inc. v. Northwest Savings Bank Doc. 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ACCADIA SITE CONTRACTING, INC. -vs- Plaintiff, DECISION and ORDER No. 1:14-cv-341(MAT)(JMM)
More informationCase 1:14-cv DLI-CLP Document 75 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 741. Plaintiffs, Defendants.
Case 1:14-cv-06601-DLI-CLP Document 75 Filed 03/16/15 Page 1 of 13 PageID #: 741 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHARLOTTE FREEMAN, et al. v. Plaintiffs, HSBC HOLDINGS PLC, et
More informationMARY MURPHY-CLAGETT, AS : DECOTIIS IN OPPOSITION TO
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK IN RE: NEW YORK CITY : INDEX NO.: 190311/2015 ASBESTOS LITIGATION : : This Document Relates To: : : AFFIRMATION OF LEIGH A MARY MURPHY-CLAGETT,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:12-cv-10605-PJD-DRG Doc # 18 Filed 07/26/12 Pg 1 of 8 Pg ID 344 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION JOHN MARROCCO, v. Plaintiff, CHASE BANK, N.A. c/o CHASE HOME
More informationMejer v Met Life 2012 NY Slip Op 33288(U) January 13, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Emily Jane Goodman Cases posted with a
Mejer v Met Life 2012 NY Slip Op 33288(U) January 13, 2012 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 100754/11 Judge: Emily Jane Goodman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are
More informationWater Pro Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. v Mt. Pleasant Agency, Ltd NY Slip Op 32994(U) April 15, 2014 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number:
Water Pro Lawn Sprinklers, Inc. v Mt. Pleasant Agency, Ltd. 2014 NY Slip Op 32994(U) April 15, 2014 Supreme Court, Westchester County Docket Number: 55382/12 Judge: James W. Hubert Cases posted with a
More information-JMA CSX Transportation, Inc., v. Filco Carting Corp. Doc. 22. Plaintiff CS){ Transportation Inc. ("CSX') brings this action against Defendant Filco
-JMA CSX Transportation, Inc., v. Filco Carting Corp. Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------){ CSJC TRANSPORTATION,
More informationNew Thinking Fashion USA, Inc. v ZG Apparel Group, LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 30524(U) March 29, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
New Thinking Fashion USA, Inc. v ZG Apparel Group, LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 30524(U) March 29, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652186/15 Judge: Ellen M. Coin Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/ :10 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 27 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK RIMROCK HIGH INCOME PLUS (MASTER) FUND, LTD. AND RIMROCK LOW VOLATILITY (MASTER) FUND, LTD., Plaintiffs, against AVANTI COMMUNICATIONS GROUP PLC,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/26/2010 INDEX NO /2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 20 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/26/2010
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/26/2010 INDEX NO. 603751/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 20 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/26/2010 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION, Index
More informationVerdi v Dinowitz 2017 NY Slip Op 32073(U) September 28, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2016 Judge: Arlene P.
Verdi v Dinowitz 2017 NY Slip Op 32073(U) September 28, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158747/2016 Judge: Arlene P. Bluth Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/2012 INDEX NO /2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 135 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/19/2012
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/19/2012 INDEX NO. 100061/2011 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 135 RECEIVED NYSCEF 07/19/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationBeys v MMM Group, LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 30619(U) April 11, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Judge: George J.
Beys v MMM Group, LLC 2016 NY Slip Op 30619(U) April 11, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650625-2012 Judge: George J. Silver Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationNelson v Patterson 2010 NY Slip Op 31799(U) July 12, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Joan A. Madden Republished from New York
Nelson v Patterson 2010 NY Slip Op 31799(U) July 12, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 100948/09 Judge: Joan A. Madden Republished from New York State Unified Court System's E-Courts Service. Search
More informationHSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc NY Slip Op 32257(U) November 3, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 32257(U) November 3, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652727/14 Judge: Marcy Friedman Cases posted with a "30000"
More informationInternational Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers v Bank of New York Mellon 2014 NY Slip Op 30177(U) January 17, 2014 Supreme Court, New York
International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers v Bank of New York Mellon 2014 NY Slip Op 30177(U) January 17, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653441/2012 Judge: Marcy S. Friedman
More informationBarneli & Cie SA v Dutch Book Fund SPC, Ltd NY Slip Op 33379(U) February 10, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /08
Barneli & Cie SA v Dutch Book Fund SPC, Ltd. 2012 NY Slip Op 33379(U) February 10, 2012 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 600871/08 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationUnited States District Court District of Massachusetts
Afridi v. Residential Credit Solutions, Inc. Doc. 40 United States District Court District of Massachusetts NADEEM AFRIDI, Plaintiff, v. RESIDENTIAL CREDIT SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No.
More information