IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY, ABUJA HOLDEN AT ABUIA ON TUESDAY, 8TH DAY OF MARCH, 2011 BEFORE HON. JUSTICE SYLV ANUS RULING
|
|
- Lily Goodman
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY, ABUJA HOLDEN AT ABUIA ON TUESDAY, 8TH DAY OF MARCH, 2011 BEFORE HON. JUSTICE SYLV ANUS C. ORIll SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/217/2008 MOTION MOTION NO. M/4750/2009 NO. M/537/2009 BETWEEN: DIYA, FATIMILEHIN & CO. PLAINTIFF AND OTUNBA DE]I OSIBOGBUN DEFENDANT RULING Upon being served with the originating processes in this suit, the defendant filed a motion on notice on 17/6/2009 for leave to file his memorandum of appearance and statement of defence out of time. The Court granted the application on 17/6/2009. The memorandum of appearance attached to the motion on notice was deemed to be properly filed and served. The defendant was to file and serve his statement of defence within 7 days from the date of the Order. However, the defendant has not filed his statement of defence. 1
2 By a motion on notice No. M/4750/2009 dated 20/7/2009but filed on 21/7/2009, the defendant prayed for an order of the Court dismissing and/or striking out the suit for want of jurisdiction. The grounds of the application are: 1. The suit is a gross abuse of the process of this Honourable Court. 2. The plaintiff has no reasonable cause of action and also has no right of action. 3. The suit as presently constituted is not cognizable in law. 4. Reliefs sought by the plaintiff are not grantable in the circumstances of this suit. 5. The plaintiff lacks the requisite legal capacity to institute and or maintain this suit. 6. The institution of this suit and its maintenance are contrary to public policy. In support of the application is an affidavit of 13 paragraphs, and Exhibit A attached thereto. The defence counsel, Kolawole Olowookere Esq., filed a written address in support of the application on 29/9/2009. In reaction, the plaintiff filed a counter affidavit of 7 paragraphs on 18/11/2009 and Exhibit F1 attached thereto. The plaintiff's counsel, Miss Yewande Kujore, filed a written address along with the counter affidavit. On the same date, the plaintiff filed a notice of preliminary objection to the competence of the 2
3 defendant's application on the ground that it amounts to a demurrer. Miss Kujore filed a written address in support of the objection. In opposition, Mr. Olowookere filed a written address on 11/12/2009. At the hearing of both applications, Jerry Akhazemea Esq. adopted the processes filed on behalf of the plaintiff, while N. O. Henry Esq. adopted the processes filed on behalf of the defendant. From the submissions of both counsel on the two applications, the issues for determination are: 1. Whether the defendant's motion on notice dated 20/7/2009 but filed on 21/7/2009 is a demurrer. 2. If the answer to issue 1 is not in the affirmative, then: (a) Whether this suit is an abuse of the process of the court; and (b) Whether the plaintiff has the requisite legal capacity to institute this suit. On the first issue, the plaintiff's counsel referred to Order 22 of the Rules of this Court, which provides that demurrer has been abolished. He argued that any defendant wishing to challenge the competence of a suit by a preliminary objection on a point of law is required to file his statement of defence and 3
4 raise the point of law therein. He referred to Akinade VoNoAoSoUo(1999) 2 NWLR (pt. 592) 570, among others, for support. Miss Kujore concluded that the application of the defendant is a demurrer and the Court has no jurisdiction to entertain it. On the other hand, the standpoint of the defence counsel is that by abolishing demurrer, the Rules of Court did not abolish preliminary objections on points of law especially where the objection is anchored on jurisdiction. He argued that the defendant need not file a statement of defence before he can challenge the jurisdiction of the Court to entertain the action. The case of NoDoI.CoVoCoBoNo& Anoro (2002) 7 NWLR (pt. 766) 272 was relied upon. Mr. Olowookere concluded that the application is not a demurrer as it challenges the jurisdiction of the Court to hear the suit. Now, the essence of the procedure by way of demurrer is that the party raising it contends that even if all the allegations in the pleadings of the adverse party were true, it still does not in law disclose a cause of action for the party to answer or a defence to the party's claim. See Bamisile VoOsasuyi (2007) 9 NWLR (pt. 1042) 225. It is correct that by virtue of Order 22 rules 1 & 2 of the Rules of this Court, no demurrer shall be allowed. A party may raise any point of law by his pleadings, which point shall be disposed of by the trial Judge at or after the trial. On the application of a party, a Judge may set the point of law down for hearing and same disposed of at any time before trial where the parties consent or the Court so orders. 4
5 The defendant's motion on notice under attack is challenging the jurisdiction of the Court to entertain this suit on the ground, inter alia, that the plaintiff lacks the legal capacity to institute the action. Let me pause to emphasize that for an action to be properly constituted so as to vest jurisdiction in the court to adjudicate on it, there must be a competent plaintiff and a competent defendant. See Ataguba & Company v. Gura Nig. Ltd. (2005) 8 NWLR (pt. 927) 429. See also the case of Georgewill v. Ekine (1998) 8 NWLR (Rt. 562) 454, where it was held that a court will decline jurisdiction to hear a suit that is not properly constituted because the proper parties are not before it. Clearly, an objection to the legal capacity of a party to institute an action is a challenge of the court's jurisdiction to entertain the suit. The question then is whether a defendant can raise a preliminary objection to challenge the jurisdiction of the court, as in the present case, without first filing a statement of defence. In Akinade v. N.A.S.U. (supra), cited by the plaintiff's counsel, the Court of Appeal held that by virtue of Order 22 of the High Court of Oyo State (Civil Procedure) Rules, which is similar to Order 22 of the Rules of this Court, demurrer has been abolished in Oyo State. Thus, a defendant wishing to challenge the competence of a suit by a preliminary objection on a point of law is entitled to file his statement of defence and raise the point of law therein. It was further held that since the defendants did not file a statement of defence in the High Court, they cannot raise a preliminary objection on a point of law. 5
6 The above decision was delivered on 15/12/98. However, recent decisions of the Court of Appeal are to the effect that where the point of law raised by the defendant is an objection to the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the suit, that point could be raised even if the defendant has not filed a defence. For example, in Usman v. Baba (2005) 5 NWLR (pt. 917) 133, paras. D-H, delivered on 9/8/2004, his Lordship, Abubakar Abdulkadir lega, lca held: HOrder 23 rules 1 & 2 of the Kaduna State High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 1987 abolished demurrer, but it does not extend to nor cover the issue of jurisdiction. An application or preliminary objection, as in this case, seeking an order to strike out a suit for being incompetent on the ground of absence of jurisdiction is not a demurrer and therefore can be filed and taken before the defendant files his statement of defence or without the defendant filing a statement of defence. This is because the issue of jurisdiction can be raised at any time. It is crystal clear that jurisdiction and demurrer are different... Therefore where jurisdiction is the root of the matter and the pleading can be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction simpliciter, no useful purpose will be served by filing a defence not withstanding the rules of court." Also in Bamisile v. Osasuyi (supra) delivered on 7/2/2007, the Court of Appeal held that an issue of jurisdiction can be raised before pleadings are filed provided that adequate fa~ts and materials for its determination are 6
7 before the Court. See also the judgment in Oluwaniyi v. Adewumi (2008) 13 NWLR (pt. 1104) 387 delivered on 20/3/2007, which adopted the decision in Usman v. Baba (supra). There seems to be an inconsistency in the decisions of the Court of Appeal on the point under consideration. The law is that where there are inconsistent decisions of a court with respect to the same issue, the later in time is to be preferred. This is the rule of posterior construction. See the cases of Seriki v. Solaru (1965) NMLR 1 and Cardoso v. Daniel (1986) 2 NWLR (pt. 20) 1. Therefore, this Court will follow the recent decisions of the Court of Appeal. Let me add that in N.D.I.C. v. C.B.N. & Anor. (supra), the Supreme Court held that there is a distinction between objection to jurisdiction and demurrer and that the issue of jurisdiction is not a matter for demurrer proceedings. Finally, it must be borne in mind that the issue of jurisdiction, being a threshold and fundamental issue, can be raised at any stage of the proceeding in the court of first instance or on appeal. See The Minister of Works & Housing v. Alhaja Kuburat ShiUu & Ors. (2007) 16 NWLR (pt. 1060) 351. The raising of an issue of jurisdiction can neither be too early nor too late. See First Fuels Ltd. v. N.N.P.C. (2007) 2 NWLR (pt. 1018) 276. In the light of all I have said, I hold that the defendant's motion on notice is not a demurrer. The preliminary objection of the plaintiff is dismissed. 7
8 I now turn to the first issue raised in the defendant's motion on notice, namely whether this suit is an abuse of the process of the court. The defence counsel stated that this suit is an abuse of the process of the court because it was filed to annoy and irritate the defendant. According to him, the abuse of court process in the instant case lies in the fact that the issues submitted before this Court in Suit No. FCT/HC/CV/1138/2008 have been stylishly created to be the basis of the instant suit. On the other hand, the view of the plaintiff's counsel is that this suit is not an abuse of court process because it has a distinct subject matter from Suit No. FCT/HC/CV/1138/2008. Abuse of court process is a term generally applied to a proceeding which is wanting in bona fides; and is frivolous, vexatious or oppressive. It is an abuse of court process when a party uses the issue of judicial process to the irritation or annoyance of his opponent. This will arise, for example, in instituting a multiplicity of actions on the same subject matter against the same opponent on the same issues. See Ajuwa v. S.P.D.C. (Nig.) Ltd. (2008) 10 NWLR (pt. 1094) 64 and Jonpal Ltd. v. Afribank (Nig.) Ltd. (2002) 8 NWLR (pt. 822) 290. The key features of abuse of court process arising from the institution of multiplicity of actions are that the suits must be between the same parties and on the same subject matter. It is also important that the end result in the suits must be the same. See Ali v. Albishir (2008)3 NWLR (pt. 1073) 94. 8
9 The statement of claim in Suit No. FCT/HC/CV/1138/2008: Otunba Deji Osibogun v. The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission & Anor. is attached as Exhibit A to the affidavit in support of the application. In that suit, the plaintiff (who is the defendant herein), is challenging the sale of the property known as and called No. 36 Suez Crescent, Sanni Abacha Estate, Wuse Il, Abuja by the 1st defendant through the 2nd defendant. He seeks, inter alia, an order of specific performance directing the 1st defendant through the 2nd defendant to collect from him the sum of N280,000, being the sum offered and accepted for the sale of the property. In the instant case, the claims of the plaintiff are: damages of N50 million for libel arising from the defendant's solicitor's letter dated 4/6/2008 and the defendant's letter dated 6/6/2008 both addressed to the Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission; and an order of injunction to restrain the defendant from publishing further libellous words against him. Without much ado, it is clear to me that the subject matter in this suit is different from the subject matter in Suit No. FCT/HC/CV/1138/2008. As I said earlier, where two or more suits are pending between the same parties on different subjects, there is no abuse of the process of the court. The defence counsel asked whether the defendant in this suit is expected to rely on the defence of justification even though his action instituted to challenge the sale of the said house is yet to be determined. Let me briefly remark that in Suit No. FCT/HC/CV/1138/2008, one of the issues is whether the 2nd defendant (i.e. the plaintiff herein) sold the property in issue in a 'fraudulent 9
10 manner' as alleged by the plaintiff. In the present case however, the main issue is whether the letters respectively written by and on behalf of the defendant were defamatory of the plaintiff. It may well be that the pieces of evidence in one of the cases may also be used in the other, nevertheless, this does not make this suit an abuse of the process of the court. The defence counsel further argued that there will be contradictory decisions of this Court in the two suits on the same set of documents. With due respect, I am not persuaded by this argument. In so far as the issues in the two cases are different, there cannot be contradictory decisions of this Court in the two suits. The decision of the Court is that this suit is not an abuse of court process. It remains to resolve the question whether the plaintiff has the requisite legal capacity to institute this suit. Mr. Olowookere pointed out that the tort of defamation is a special kind of tort which can be suffered by a person in law who has a reputation to protect. It was submitted on behalf of the defendant that the plaintiff is not a person in law and has no personality or reputation that can be defamed. On the other hand, Miss Kujore referred to the case of z. P. Industries Ltd. v. Samotech Ltd. (2007) 16 NWLR (pt. 1060) 315 and Order 10 rule 10(1) of the Rules of this Court, and argued that the plaintiff, being a partnership, has the requisite legal capacity to maintain an action for libel which affects its reputation and affects its business. 10
11 Order 10 rule 10(1) of the Rules of this Court provides: HAny two or more persons likely to benefit or be liable, as partners, may sue or be sued in the name of the partnership action arose." when the cause of In Z. P. Industries Ltd. v. Samotech Ltd. 338, paragraph G, the Court of Appeal held that: HActions in court can only be brought by natural or legal persons. As regards the latter, the legal person under the name by which it sues or is sued and examples are corporation sole, corporation aggregate, incorporated by special Act of the Legislature or under the Companies Act, bodies incorporated by foreign law. Partnerships, trade unions and friendly societies..." At page 348, paragraph D, it was further held that /la corporate body, i.e. a legal person could bring an action for libel if the defamatory matter is published against its business, or the management of its business or that the affairs of the company are conducted in a dishonest manner. /I The certificate of registration of the plaintiff as a business name dated 3/5/83 is attached to the plaintiff's counter affidavit as Exhibit Fl. In the light of the provision of Order 10 rule 10(1) of the Rules of this Court and the decision in the above case, I hold that the plaintiff has the legal capacity to institute this action. If it is otherwise, one wonders why 11
12 the defendant sued the plaintiff in Suit No. FCT/HC/CV/1138/2008 as 2nd defendant. The plaintiff can sue and be sued in the name of the partnership. In the end, the motion on notice of the defendant lacks merit. It is dismissed. I award cost of N4,OOO.OO in favour of the plaintiff payable by the defendant. HON. JUSTICE S. C. ORIJI (JUDGE) Appearances: 1. Miss Yewande Kujore & Jerry Akhazemea Esq. for the plaintiff. 2. Kolawole Olowookere Esq. & N. O. Henry Esq. for the defendant. 12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT ABUJA BEFORE HON. JUSTICE SYLVANUS C. ORIJI RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY, ABUJA HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON TUESDAY, 21 ST DAY OF MAY, 2013 BEFORE HON. JUSTICE SYLVANUS C. ORIJI SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/866/2012 BETWEEN LIVING EYES INTERNATIONAL
More informationTHE EFFECT OF THE ABOLITION OF DEMURRER PROCEEDINGS IN NIGERIAN COURTS CLARIFYING THE MISAPPLICATION
THE EFFECT OF THE ABOLITION OF DEMURRER PROCEEDINGS IN NIGERIAN COURTS CLARIFYING THE MISAPPLICATION The operation of demurrer 1 proceedings, before it was abolished in England was the necessity to allow
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA. OJI PRESIDING JUDGE SUIT NO: FCT\HC\CV\6015\11 BETWEEN:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA. IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ABUJA ON THE 13 TH DAY OF MAY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON JUSTICE CHIZOBA N. OJI PRESIDING
More informationRULING ON NOTICE OF PRELIMINARY OBJECTION. The applicant by a preliminary objection dated 5/4/13 moved the court to:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF NIGERIA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT LUGBE ABUJA ON, 17 TH OCTOBER, 2013. BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP:- HON. JUSTICE A. O. OTALUKA. SUIT NO.:-
More informationBEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HONOURABLE JUSTICE FOLASADE OJO JUDGE: BETWEEN:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 3RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2013 SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/2563/12 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HONOURABLE JUSTICE FOLASADE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE WUSE ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE M.M.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY BETWEEN:- HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE WUSE ABUJA ON THE 18 TH DAY OF JULY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE M.M. KOLO COURT NO. HIGH COURT THIRTY
More informationThe defendant did not defend this suit. She neither entered appearance nor file any pleadings.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT COURT NO.36 ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON JUSTICE A.S ADEPOJU ON THE 19 TH DAY OF JULY, 2013 SUIT NO:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP, HON. JUSTICE U.P KEKEMEKE MOTION NO. FCT/HC/M/389/11 DATE: 23/10/13 BETWEEN: MRS. OLGA
More informationBETWEEN: 1. CHIEF EBENEZER OGBONNA 2 ELDER EPELLE AGIRIGA === 1 ST SET OF 3. CHIEF JOSAIAH NWOGU PLAINTIFFS 4. ELDER NWOBILOR NWELE
IN THE FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA IN THE UMUAHIA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT UMUAHIA ON WEDNESDAY THE 29 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE F. A. OLUBANJO JUDGE SUIT NO: FHC/UM/CS/64/2005
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT MAITAMA ABUJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT MAITAMA ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE SALISU GARBA COURT CLERKS: BWALA NATHAN & OTHERS COURT NUMBER:
More informationBETWEEN: AND AND RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 28 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013 SUIT NO. FCT/HC/M/8529/13 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HONOURABLE JUSTICE FOLASADE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT GWAGWALADA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP.HON. JUSTICE M.BALAMI COURT CLERK..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT GWAGWALADA SUIT NO: FCT /HC/GWD/CV/585/11 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP.HON. JUSTICE M.BALAMI COURT CLERK..PAUL OJILE BETWEEN ZIP SYSTEM LTD &2 ORS.PLAINTIFFS/RESPONDENTS
More informationIN THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NIGERIA
IN THE NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL COURT OF NIGERIA ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information2. That the suit as presently constituted is an abuse of the process of this court.
More information
(2018) LPELR-45327(CA)
MV CORAL GEM & ORS v. OISEOMAYE & ORS CITATION: TIJJANI ABUBAKAR In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos ON WEDNESDAY, 13TH JUNE, 2018 Suit No: CA/L/492/2014 BIOBELE ABRAHAM
More informationRULING. i.e. whether having regard to the circumstances of this case the applicant is entitled to the Court s discretion ion in granting
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE APO ABUJA ON THE 4 TH DAY OF JULY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: - HON. JUSTICE M.A NASIR COURT NO.:- HIGH COURT TWENTY TWO
More informationRULING. This is a motion on notice wherein the judgment debtor/applicant seeks the following reliefs:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2013 SUIT NO. FCT/HC/M/8912/13 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HONOURABLE JUSTICE FOLASADE
More informationI.S. G. VEMBEH for the Plaintiff Plaintiff is in Court. Defendant in Court. JUDGEMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT COURT NO.36 ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON JUSTICE A.S ADEPOJU ON THE 13 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013 SUIT NO:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 7 TH DAY OF MAY 2013 SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/2055/11 M/2997/12 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HONOURABLE JUSTICE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE WUSE ABUJA ON THE 20TH DAY OF MAY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: - HON
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE WUSE ABUJA ON THE 20 TH DAY OF MAY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: - HON. JUSTICE M.A NASIR COURT NO.:- HIGH COURT TWENTY TWO
More information(2018) LPELR-44008(CA)
BLUEBAY GLOBAL CONCEPTS LTD & ANOR v. CITY VIEW ESTATES LTD CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Abuja Judicial Division Holden at Abuja ON TUESDAY, 6TH FEBRUARY, 2018 Suit No: CA/A/301/2016 EMMANUEL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ZONE 2 ABUJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ZONE 2 ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON.JUSTICE D.Z. SENCHI COURT CLERKS: T. P. SALLAH & ORS. COURT NUMBER:
More informationAjiroghene Aruga Esq, for the Applicant A. N. Shuru Esq for the Party seeking to be Joined. RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 11 TH OF JUNE, 2013 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE A. B. MOHAMMED SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/599/12 BETWEEN:
More informationJUDGMENT. The plaintiff claims against the defendant as follows:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE WUSE ABUJA ON THE 14 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE M.M. KOLO COURT NO. HIGH COURT THIRTY
More informationAND 1. NATIONAL AGENCY FOR FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION AND CONTROL (NAFDAC) 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL NAFDAC RULING A.
FEDERAL HIGH COURT OF NIGERIA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON MONDAY THE 15 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP, HON. JUSTICE A. F. A. ADEMOLA JUDGE SUIT NO: FHC/ABJ/CS/760/13
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ZONE 2 ABUJA FCT/HC/CV/1072/2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ZONE 2 ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON.JUSTICE D.Z. SENCHI COURT CLERKS: TSENYEN P. SALLAH COURT NUMBER:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT MAITAMA ABUJA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT MAITAMA ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE SALISU GARBA COURT CLERKS: BWALA NATHAN & OTHERS COURT NUMBER:
More information(2018) LPELR-44058(CA)
UBA PLC v. ACCESS BANK & ANOR CITATION: HUSSEIN MUKHTAR In the Court of Appeal In the Sokoto Judicial Division Holden at Sokoto ON FRIDAY, 2ND FEBRUARY, 2018 Suit No: CA/S/21/2017 MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU
More information(2018) LPELR-44208(CA)
OKAFOR & ORS v. EZEATU CITATION: HUSSEIN MUKHTAR In the Court of Appeal In the Enugu Judicial Division Holden at Enugu ON TUESDAY, 13TH FEBRUARY, 2018 Suit No: CA/E/165/2015 MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU FREDERICK
More informationSUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/2900/12 BETWEEN: SAVANNAH BANK OF NIGERIA LIMITED - PLAINTIFF AND
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON THE 23 RD OF JANUARY, 2013. BEFORE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE A. B. MOHAMMED SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/2900/12
More information(2018) LPELR-45450(CA)
IBRAHIM & ANOR v. YARBAWA CITATION: HUSSEIN MUKHTAR In the Court of Appeal In the Sokoto Judicial Division Holden at Sokoto MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU FREDERICK OZIAKPONO OHO ON FRIDAY, 13TH JULY, 2018 Suit
More informationSAINT LUCIA. IN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIl) A.D Between: JUDCEMENT. Mr Kenneth Monplaisir, OC for the Plaintiff
... "i.,; ~ SAINT LUCIA IN THE HICH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIl) A.D. 1997 SUIT NO: 722 OF 1996 Between: CONCRETE AND AGGREGATES LTD PLAINTIFF AND DAMAR ENTERPRISES LTD AND DEFENDANT C. O. WILLIAMS CONSTRUCTION
More informationMOTION NO: FCT/HC/M/9227/13 BETWEEN: CHUKWU CHRISTIAN NWEKE JUDGMENT CREDITOR/ RESPONDENT AND MOSES NWOBODO...JUDGMENT DEBTOR/ APPLICANT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP, HON. JUSTICE A.A.I BANJOKO JUDGE MOTION NO: FCT/HC/M/9227/13 BETWEEN: CHUKWU CHRISTIAN
More information(2017) LPELR-43361(CA)
MUHAMMED GONI COLLEGE OF LEGAL & ISLAMIC STUDIES & ANOR v. ALI & ORS CITATION: ADAMU JAURO In the Court of Appeal In the Jos Judicial Division Holden at Jos ON TUESDAY, 11TH JULY, 2017 Suit No: CA/J/121M/2016(R)
More information(2017) LPELR-42383(CA)
FIRST BANK OF NIGERIA PLC. v. ALDAR & CO.LTD. & ANOR CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Ibadan Judicial Division Holden at Ibadan ON FRIDAY, 17TH MARCH, 2017 Suit No: CA/I/76/2010 Before Their Lordships:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT JABI - ABUJA THIS TUESDAY, THE 4 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT JABI - ABUJA THIS TUESDAY, THE 4 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2013 BEFORE: HON. JUSTICE UGOCHUKWU A. OGAKWU - JUDGE MOTION NO. FCT/HC/M/1882/2012 BETWEEN:
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO ABUJA ON THE 1 ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT APO ABUJA ON THE 1 ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON. JUSTICE CHIZOBA N. OJI PRESIDING JUDGE
More informationBEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON JUSTICE CHIZOBA N. OJI PRESIDING JUDGE IBRAHIM DOMA WOKILI PLAINTIFF
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY ABUJA. IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ABUJA ON THE 5 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON JUSTICE CHIZOBA N. OJI
More information(2016) LPELR-40165(CA)
MOUDKAS NIG ENT. LTD & ORS v. OBIOMA & ORS CITATION: UZO I. NDUKWE-ANYANWU JOSEPH SHAGBAOR IKYEGH SAMUEL CHUKWUDUMEBI OSEJI In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos ON FRIDAY,
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA ACCRA-AD 2016
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA ACCRA-AD 2016 BETWEEN Suit No: 1. ABU RAMADAN H/NO. 27 4 TH ABEKA KWAME STREET ABEKA-LAPAZ, ACCRA 2. EVANS NIMAKO H/NO. AP174 APLAKU-ISRAEL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between NIXON CALLENDER JILLIAN BEDEAU-CALLENDER AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO AND
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Claim No. 2013-01906 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between NIXON CALLENDER JILLIAN BEDEAU-CALLENDER Claimants AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO
More information(2018) LPELR-44275(CA)
ODIASE & ORS v. EDOGHOGHO CITATION: PHILOMENA MBUA EKPE In the Court of Appeal In the Benin Judicial Division Holden at Benin ON FRIDAY, 9TH MARCH, 2018 Suit No: CA/B/322/2016(R) SAMUEL CHUKWUDUMEBI OSEJI
More information(2018) LPELR-45834(CA)
BRAINS & ANOR v. NWAFOR CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Abuja Judicial Division Holden at Abuja ABUBAKAR DATTI YAHAYA ON THURSDAY, 12TH JULY, 2018 Suit No: CA/A/102/2009 TINUADE AKOMOLAFE-WILSON
More informationSUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/1599/10 MOTION NO: FCT/HC/M/3716/10 FCT/H/G/15/M/75/10 BETWEEN:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT ABUJA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP, HON. JUSTICE A.A.I. BANJOKO JUDGE SUIT NO. FCT/HC/CV/1599/10 MOTION NO: FCT/HC/M/3716/10
More information(2017) LPELR-43293(CA)
GONIMI & ORS v. MAKINTAMI CITATION: ADZIRA GANA MSHELIA UCHECHUKWU ONYEMENAM In the Court of Appeal In the Jos Judicial Division Holden at Jos ON THURSDAY, 8TH JUNE, 2017 Suit No: CA/J/173/2014(R) Before
More information(2017) LPELR-43312(CA)
SHETIMA v. GADAL & ORS CITATION: ADZIRA GANA MSHELIA UCHECHUKWU ONYEMENAM In the Court of Appeal In the Jos Judicial Division Holden at Jos ON FRIDAY, 2ND JUNE, 2017 Suit No: CA/J/73M/2017(R) Before Their
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION. CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005 Reserved on: 26-11-2010 Date of pronouncement : 18-01-2011 M/s Sanjay Cold Storage..Petitioner
More information(2018) LPELR-45308(CA)
EPE RESORTS & SPA LTD v. UBA PLC CITATION: TIJJANI ABUBAKAR In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos ON THURSDAY, 5TH JULY, 2018 Suit No: CA/L/799/2014 BIOBELE ABRAHAM GEORGEWILL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. CS(OS)No.1307/2006. Date of decision:16th January, 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CS(OS)No.1307/2006 Date of decision:16th January, 2009 SMT. TARAN JEET KAUR... Through: Plaintiff Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate
More information(2016) LPELR-40192(CA)
SCOA (NIG) PLC & ANOR v. REGISTERED TRUSTEES OF METHODIST CHURCH OF NIG & ANOR CITATION: AMINA ADAMU AUGIE YARGATA BYENCHIT NIMPAR JAMILU YAMMAMA TUKUR SCOA NIGERIA PLC SCOATRAC In the Court of Appeal
More information$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CS(COMM) 1468/2016 & I.A.No.1532/2017. versus. % Date of Decision: 02 nd November, 2017
$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1468/2016 & I.A.No.1532/2017 KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD & ANR.... Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Rajeshwari H. with Mr.Kumar Chitranshu, Advocates. versus MR
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. 261 of 2017 BETWEEN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D. 2017 (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. 261 of 2017 BETWEEN MARIA MOGUEL AND Claimant/Counter-Defendant CHRISTINA MOGUEL Defendant/Counter-Claimant Before: The Honourable Madame Justice
More informationCURRENT FEATURES OF THE SUMMARY JUDGEMENT PROCEDURE UNDER THE HIGH COURT OF LAGOS STATE (CIVIL PROCEDURE) RULES 2004 *
CURRENT FEATURES OF THE SUMMARY JUDGEMENT PROCEDURE UNDER THE HIGH COURT OF LAGOS STATE (CIVIL PROCEDURE) RULES 2004 * The declared objective of the 2004 Lagos High Court Civil Procedure Rules is the achievement
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between AFRICAN OPTION. And DAVID WALCOTT. And BANK OF BARODA TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED
THE REPUBIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2013-05221 Between AFRICAN OPTION First Claimant And DAVID WALCOTT Second Claimant And BANK OF BARODA TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO LIMITED
More information(2019) LPELR-46963(CA)
SCC (NIG) LTD & ANOR v. GEORGE & ANOR CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Abuja Judicial Division Holden at Abuja ABUBAKAR DATTI YAHAYA STEPHEN JONAH ADAH MOHAMMED BABA IDRIS 1. SCC NIGERIA LIMITED
More information(2017) LPELR-42702(CA)
SIJUADE v. ELUGBINDIN & 3 ORS. CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Akure Judicial Division Holden at Akure ON MONDAY, 15TH MAY, 2017 Suit No: CA/AK/48/2014 Before Their Lordships: UZO IFEYINWA NDUKWE-ANYANWU
More information(2017) 3 Journal of the Mooting Society University of Lagos AGIP (NIG.) LTD V. AGIP PETROLI INT L (2010) 5NWLR PT. 1187
AGIP (NIG.) LTD V. AGIP PETROLI INT L (2010) 5NWLR PT. 1187 MISTHURA OTUBU * 1.0 INTRODUCTION There are three categories of proceedings that may be brought by minority shareholders for the purpose of prosecuting,
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 236/2017 ARUN JAITLEY versus Through:... Plaintiff Mr Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Manik Dogra and Mr. Saurabh Seth, Advocates. ARVIND KEJRIWAL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL. and RYAN OLLIVIERRE
SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES CIVIL APPEAL NO.27 OF 2001 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: SYLVANUS LESLIE and RYAN OLLIVIERRE Appellant/Plaintiff Respondent/Defendant Before: The Hon. Sir Dennis Byron
More information(2017) LPELR-43016(CA)
USMAN & ORS v. FRN CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Yola Judicial Division Holden at Yola OYEBISI FOLAYEMI OMOLEYE JAMES SHEHU ABIRIYI SAIDU TANKO HUSAINI 1. ALHAJI INIWA USMAN 2. ALHAJI CHINDO
More informationBEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON. JUSTICE CHIZOBA N. OJI PRESIDING JUDGE MOTION NO: M\9217\11 BETWEEN:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITALTERRITORY ABUJA IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT WUSE ZONE 2 FCT ABUJA ON THE 28 TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013 BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP HON. JUSTICE CHIZOBA N. OJI
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION (APPELLATE DIVISION) HOLDEN AT APO, ABUJA DATED 21/03/13
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION (APPELLATE DIVISION) HOLDEN AT APO, ABUJA DATED 21/03/13 BEFORE THEIR LORDSHIPS: HON. JUSTICE U.P. KEKEMEKE (PRESIDING
More information(2018) LPELR-45114(CA)
ASHIMIYU v. BOLAJI & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos MOHAMMED LAWAL GARBA JOSEPH SHAGBAOR IKYEGH YARGATA BYENCHIT NIMPAR ON FRIDAY, 8TH JUNE, 2018 Suit
More information(2018) LPELR-45302(CA)
ALLIED ENERGY LTD & ANOR v. NIGERIAN AGIP EXPLORATION LTD CITATION: TIJJANI ABUBAKAR In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos ON TUESDAY, 24TH JULY, 2018 Suit No: CA/L/120/2018
More informationArbitration and Conciliation Act 1988 (Section 5): Pinning the Nigerian Courts to the Era of Demurrer
International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Vol. 3 No. 11; June 2013 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1988 (Section 5): Pinning the Nigerian Courts to the Era of Demurrer Abstract Khafayat Yetunde
More informationSubmissions to the Joint Committee. on the. Draft Defamation Bill. on behalf of. The Booksellers Association of the United. Kingdom & Ireland Limited
Submissions to the Joint Committee on the Draft Defamation Bill on behalf of The Booksellers Association of the United Kingdom & Ireland Limited ---------- Thrings LLP Kinnaird House 1 Pall Mall East London
More informationSALISU & ANOR V MOBOLAJI & ORS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON FRIDAY THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013
SALISU & ANOR V MOBOLAJI & ORS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON FRIDAY THE 20TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013 ELECTRONIC CITATION: LER[ ]SC.272/2008 OTHER CITATIONS: [ ] ANLR CORAM IBRAHIM TANKO
More information2yh August, Supplement No THE BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENFORCEMENT (CAP.
ISSN 0856-034X Supplement No. 34 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 2yh August, 2014 to the Gazette of the United Republic of Tanzania No. 35 Vol 95 dated 2cjh August, 2014 Printed by the Government Printer, Dar es
More informationINTRODUCTION. Nigeria;
RECENT TRENDS IN LIABILITIES OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CORPORATIONS: BEING A PAPER DELIVERED BY YUSUF ALI SAN 1 AT THE INTERNATIONAL BAR ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONFERENCE, TOKYO ON 23
More informationFederal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2000
Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2000 Commencement: 1st May 2000 In exercise of the powers conferred on me by section 254 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 and all powers
More informationTHE REGISTERED TRUSTEES OF IGBO COMMUNITY, OYO STATE v. CYRIL AKABUEZE AND TWO OTHERS HIGH COURT IBADAN OYO STATE
THE REGISTERED TRUSTEES OF IGBO COMMUNITY, OYO STATE v. CYRIL AKABUEZE AND TWO OTHERS HIGH COURT IBADAN OYO STATE 1/568/96 J.O. IGE, J. Friday, 30 th June 2000. FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS Freedom of Association
More information(2018) LPELR-45115(CA)
DIELI & ANOR v. COMMISSIONER FOR ENVIRONMENT, SOLID MINERALS AND COOPERATIVES, ABIA STATE & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Owerri Judicial Division Holden at Owerri ON FRIDAY, 2ND FEBRUARY,
More information8. Foreign judgments which can be registered not to be enforceable otherwise
Foreign Judgments (Reciprocal Enforcement) Act (Cap 76) CHAPTER 76 THE FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT CHAPTER 76 THE FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-04009 IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT MAITAMA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE A. S. UMAR RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT MAITAMA BEFORE HIS LORDSHIP: HON. JUSTICE A. S. UMAR MOTION NO: FCT/HC/M/178/13 BETWEEN: CORNELIUS NWAPI - JUDGEMENT CREDITOR VS MR. OLATOKUNBO
More information(2017) LPELR-43190(CA)
MOHAMMED & ANOR v. GWARZO & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Kaduna Judicial Division Holden at Kaduna IBRAHIM SHATA BDLIYA ON WEDNESDAY, 10TH MAY, 2017 Suit No: CA/K/114/M/2015(R) Before Their
More informationJUDGEMENT [DELIVERED BY HIS LORDSHIP HON. JUSTICE (DR.) M. N. ONIYANGI (MNIM)]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE FEDERAL CAPTIAL TERRITORY IN THE ABUJA JUDICIAL DIVISION HOLDEN AT MAITAMA ON FRIDAY, THE 6 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013 SUIT NO: FCT/HC/CV/5126/2011 BETWEEN: 1. ABUBAKAR
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: FAO (OS) 298/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Date of Judgment: 17.01.2013 FAO (OS) 298/2010 SHIROMANI GURUDWARA PRABHANDHAK COMMITTEE AND ANR... Appellants Through Mr. H.S.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (NORTHERN CAPE DIVISION, KIMBERLEY)
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy Reportable: Circulate to Judges: Circulate to
More informationIN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION. (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J.
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J.) APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2013 (ARISING FROM APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2012)
More informationWEST AFRICAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL & ORS V. MRS. NKOYO EDET IKANG & ORS CITATION: (2011) LPELR-5098(CA)
1 WEST AFRICAN EXAMINATIONS COUNCIL & ORS V. MRS. NKOYO EDET IKANG & ORS CITATION: (2011) LPELR-5098(CA) In The Court of Appeal (Calabar Judicial Division) On Thursday, the 17th day of March, 2011 Suit
More information(2018) LPELR-45173(CA)
HI-QUALITY BAKERY LTD & ANOR v. LONGE & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Calabar Judicial Division Holden at Calabar ON WEDNESDAY, 30TH MAY, 2018 Suit No: CA/C/122/2015 Before Their Lordships:
More informationRULE 20 PLEADINGS GENERALLY
RULE 20 PLEADINGS GENERALLY Contents Form (1) A pleading shall be as brief as the nature of the case will permit and must contain a statement in summary form of the material facts on which the party relies,
More informationCRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) The Federal Bank Ltd. Petitioner VERSUS Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. Respondents CRP No. 220/2014 The Federal
More informationMISS OLUCHI ANYANWOKO V. CHIEF MRS CHRISTY OKOYE
MISS OLUCHI ANYANWOKO V. CHIEF MRS CHRISTY OKOYE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA HOLDEN AT ABUJA ON FRIDAY THE 22TH DAYOF JANUARY, 2010 CORAM GEORGE ADESOLA OGUNTADE FRANCIS FEDODE TABAI JAMES OGENYI OGEBE
More information(2018) LPELR-45396(CA)
FRSC & ORS v. MOHAMMED CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Jos Judicial Division Holden at Jos ON THURSDAY, 3RD MAY, 2018 Suit No: CA/J/269M/2012(R) UCHECHUKWU ONYEMENAM Before Their Lordships: HABEEB
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. And
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2012-00877 Between BABY SOOKRAM (as Representative of the estate of Sonnyboy Sookram, pursuant to the order of Mr. Justice Mon
More informationALLIANCE FOR DEMOCRACY
ALLIANCE FOR DEMOCRACY V. 1. PETER AYODELE FAYOSE 2. JACOB ABIODUN ALUKO 3. INDEPENDENT NATIONAL ELECTORAL COMMISSION 4. RESIDENT ELECTORAL COMMISSIONER FOR EK1TI STATE 5. RETURNING OFFICER FOR EKITI STATE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) (1) LEON A. GEORGE (2) GERDA G GEORGE. And DANIEL HARRIGAN
EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT TERRITORY OF THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS CLAIM NO. BVIHCV 143 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) BETWEEN: (1) LEON A. GEORGE (2) GERDA G GEORGE Respondents/Claimants
More information(2018) LPELR-44252(CA)
IKURAV (NIG) LTD & ANOR v. MADUGU & ORS CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Makurdi Judicial Division Holden at Makurdi JUMMAI HANNATU SANKEY ONYEKACHI AJA OTISI JOSEPH EYO EKANEM 1. IKURAV (NIG) LTD
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2003 ACTION NO: 281 OF 2003 (CEDRIC D. FLOWERS ( ( (AND ( ( (KAY L. MENZIES (BELIZE PORT AUTHORITY PLAINTIFF DEFENDANTS Mr. Rodwell Williams, SC, for the claimant.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT ABUJA THIS THURSDAY, THE 25 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE FEDERAL CAPITAL TERRITORY HOLDEN AT ABUJA THIS THURSDAY, THE 25 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2013 BEFORE: HON. JUSTICE UGOCHUKWU A. OGAKWU - JUDGE MOTION NO. M/4719/2013 BETWEEN: 1. COSMOS
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D SECOND TIME LIMITED. KISS THIS LIMITED (dba Tackle Box Bar and Grill )
CLAIM NO. 222 OF 2015 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2015 BETWEEN: SECOND TIME LIMITED Claimant AND KISS THIS LIMITED (dba Tackle Box Bar and Grill ) Defendant In Court. BEFORE: Hon. Chief Justice
More information(2018) LPELR-45265(CA)
GARBA & ANOR v. SAMINU & ANOR CITATION: HUSSEIN MUKHTAR In the Court of Appeal In the Sokoto Judicial Division Holden at Sokoto ON WEDNESDAY, 11TH JULY, 2018 Suit No: CA/S/31S/2017 MUHAMMED LAWAL SHUAIBU
More information(2016) LPELR-40572(CA)
MAINSTREET BANK REGISTRARS LTD v. PROMISE CITATION: SIDI DAUDA BAGE In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos JOSEPH SHAGBAOR IKYEGH ON TUESDAY, 22ND MARCH, 2016 Suit No: CA/L/1157/2014
More informationPLAINTIFFS' SKELETAL SUBMISSIONS (CROSS-EXAMINATION)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (CIVIL DIVISION) CIVIL SUIT NO. S2-23 - 38-2006 BETWEEN 1. SARAWAK SHELL BHD (71978-W) 2. SHELL MALAYSIA TRADING SENDIRIAN BERHAD (6078-M) 3. SHELL REFINING
More information(2016) LPELR-40491(CA)
ACCESS BANK v. AGEGE LOCAL GOVT & ANOR CITATION: SIDI DAUDA BAGE YARGATA BYENCHIT NIMPAR In the Court of Appeal In the Lagos Judicial Division Holden at Lagos ON TUESDAY, 17TH MAY, 2016 Suit No: CA/L/649/2014
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN AND RAMDATH DAVE RAMPERSAD, LIQUIDATOR OF HINDU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No: CV 2012-04837 BETWEEN R. A. HOLDINGS LIMITED Claimant AND RAMDATH DAVE RAMPERSAD, LIQUIDATOR OF HINDU CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE
More informationDate of last Order. Date of Ruling
Date of last Order Date of Ruling TIMA HAJI through the services of K. MWITTAWAISSAKA ADVOCATE,has made an application by Chamber Summons under the Civil Procedure Code 1966 seeking from this court, the
More information(2018) LPELR-45103(CA)
BASHIR v. FRN CITATION: In the Court of Appeal In the Kaduna Judicial Division Holden at Kaduna ON FRIDAY, 22ND JUNE, 2018 Suit No: CA/K/453/2017 Before Their Lordships: UZO IFEYINWA NDUKWE-ANYANWU MOHAMMED
More information