In the ARBITRATION between. (Union/Applicant) and. (Respondent)
|
|
- Clement Stevens
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Arbitration Award Case Number: Commissioner: Date of Award: PSHS295-14/15 Dialwa Mathala 28 October-2014 In the ARBITRATION between NPSWU obo E Rafube (Union/Applicant) and Department of Heath Gauteng (Respondent) Union/Employee s representative: Mr. Kekana Union/Applicant s address: No 3 Lessing Close Rynfield Benoni 1500 Telephone: Telefax: Employer s representative: Ms Jennet Hobyana Respondent s address: PO Box 222 Springs 1560 Telephone: , Telefax: , thami.mvumbi@implats.co.za PSHS295-14/15 Page 1
2 DETAILS OF HEARING AND REPRESENTATION [1]This dispute was referred to the Public Health and Social Development Sectoral Bargaining Council (hereinafter referred to as the Council), as Collective Agreement- interpretation or application, section 24 (2), [24 (5)] of the Labour Relations Act of 1995(LRA) as amended, and was set down for Arbitration on the 26 th September 2014, after the parties failed to reach an agreement at conciliation. The hearing was held at Bank of Lisbon Building, 14 th Floor, Cnr Sauer and Market Street, in Johannesburg. The Applicant was represented by Mr. Kekana from NPSWU while the Respondent was represented by Ms Hobyana. ISSUE TO BE DECIDED [2] I am called to determine whether or not the Occupational Specific Dispensation (hereinafter referred to as the OSD) was implemented as per the wishes of the parties as envisaged in the Collective Agreement, Resolution 3 of 2009 and, and to pronounce an appropriate relief thereof. BACKGROUND TO THE ISSUE [3] This matter concerns the translation of the Applicant based on the OSD, the process which is informed by Resolution 3 of 2009 agreed upon between the Respondent and the Applicant. The Applicant s case is that the Respondent in implementing Resolution 3 of 2009 did not consider the correct implementation date, as the implementation was only effected from August 2013 and not August Feeling aggrieved, the Applicant referred the matter to Council for the interpretation of the Resolution in question. Parties agreed to make written submissions wherein they argued their cases, and same was received by Council. It is therefore against this background that I am not going to repeat or rewrite what the parties had already submitted but to deal only with what the case is, for respective parties. SURVEY OF EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT [4] The case for the Applicant is briefly that the Respondent did not comply with the implementation date as stated in Resolution 3 of 2009 which states that the implementation date would be the 1 st April Instead the Respondent only translated him from August 2013, a year later. The Applicant relies on the clear wording of the Resolution as far as the implementation date, the purpose of the Resolution and the qualification thereof of the candidates, all which are apparent upon reading the Resolution. According to the Applicant, the Respondent should have translated him retrospectively from August 2012, the month on which he attained 15 years working for the Respondent. The Applicant further alleges that his job title was not changed from that of Administrative Clerk to Administrative Officer, following his translation in He also argues that the letter of translation did not reflect the benefits attached to the new position and level. [5] On the other hand the Respondent, while not disputing what is stated as the date of implementation in Resolution 3 of 2009, and the fact that the Applicant completed 15 years, and thus qualified, the dispute lied in that the Applicant was not entitled to be translated the moment he attained 15 years of service. The Respondent submitted that the employer had a duty in terms of the said Resolution and the applicable Circular to wait for the financial year cycle before any other translation may be implemented. The Respondent further submitted that the DPSA is the custodian of all departments and has issued a Circular no:2 of 2009, to give effect on the implementation of Resolution 3 of 2009, which states as follows as per clause ; The date of grade progression is linked to the performance management cycle, which normally runs from 1 April to 31 March of the next year. The Respondent s interpretation of the above circular is submitted to imply that the grade progression of an employee, who meets the qualifying PSHS295-14/15 Page 2
3 prescribed period of service for grade progression during the course of a performance cycle, will only be effected on 1 April of the year following the particular performance cycle Therefore, grade progression will only be effected on with effect from 1 April of a year. On the unchanged rank as alleged by the Applicant, the Respondent submitted that the Resolution does not talk about changing of ranks but it seeks to address the question on salary progression and therefore on this basis the Applicant s rank will not change. [6] From the submission made, it appears as common cause that Resolution 3 of 2009 states the implementation date of the OSD as the 1 st April 2010; that the Applicant attained 15 years in August 2012 and was translated effective from August The Applicants contends that no one has the powers to deviate from a Resolution as it is a Collective Agreement, while the Respondent states that the employer has the power in terms of the Resolution and Circular 2 of 2009 to determine the implementation date. Whether or not the employer or the DPSA has powers or discretion to override a Resolution, it appears as a point of contention. It was through Circular 2 of 2009 that the implementation date of August 2013 came about. It is not clear from the submissions if the same was communicated to the affected parties at that stage but the Applicant disputes any knowledge of such communication. It appears from the parties submissions as well that there is no dispute on the wording of Resolution 3 of 2009 as far as the date of implementation, since such date is clearly and unambiguously articulated as the 1 st April The functions of the Minister of the Department Public Service Administration are of common cause, so far as stipulated in the Public Service Act. ANALYSIS OF EVIDENCE AND ARGUMENT [7]This is a collective agreement dispute and by definition in terms of the LRA, section 213, collective agreement is a written agreement concerning terms and conditions of employment or any other matter of mutual interest concluded by one or more registered trade unions, on the one hand and, on the other hand, one or more employers, one or registered employers organization, or one or more employers and one or more registered employers organization. [8] Section 23 of the LRA provides that the legal effect of a collective agreement is that it binds all the parties to the collective agreement. Section 3 (5) of the Public Service Act 103 of 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the PSA) provides that subject to the LRA and any collective agreement, the Minister may make determinations regarding any conditions of service of employees generally or categories of employees, including determinations regarding a salary scale for all employees or salary scales for particular categories of employees and allowances for particular categories of employees. section 3 (5) (a) of the PSA provides that subject to the provisions of the PSA, an executing authority shall have those powers and duties regarding the internal organization of the office or department concerned, including the organizational structure and the transfer of functions within that office or department. [9] Section 5 (4) provides that every act of the Minister, any executing authority or any other person, irrespective of whether such act consists of the making of any regulation or any determination or the taking of any decision, which relates to any matter of any collective agreement contemplated in item 15 (i) schedule 7 of the LRA, or of any collective agreement concluded by a bargaining council established in terms of the said Act for the public service as a whole or for a particular sector in the public service, shall be performed ONLY in accordance with any such collective agreement. Sub-section 5 provides that; notwithstanding the provisions of sub-section 4, any executing authority or other person may act in respect of a particular officer or employee in accordance with the provisions of the Act or any other law; provided that where any such act constitutes a deviation from a collective agreement referred to in subsection 4, it shall not derogate from or annul such collective agreement or the collective bargaining PSHS295-14/15 Page 3
4 relationship, or reduce the remuneration or other service benefits of the particular officer or employee, or deprive that officer or employee of his/her remuneration or other service benefit, except within section 34. [10] It appears from the above pieces of legislation that while the Minister has powers, he/she can only discharge such powers subject to the above provisions of the Act. The Respondent relied on the circular made by the DG to justify the change of the implementation date of the OSD regarding the Applicant. From the above provisions, it is clear that any such circular should not fall foul of, inter alia, the collective agreement. It must be emphasized that the implementation date of any agreement is fundamental and material and therefore cannot be ambiguous and left to the interpretation by any party outside the agreement. This is simply because such date gives rise to rights and obligation to the parties affected, unless so specified by the agreement. Only parties to the agreement can, by agreement make amendments to their agreement. If it was intended by the parties for the Minister to have a final word on the implementation date, such clause should have reflected in the agreement. A determination made through Circular 2 of 2009 by the DG deviated from the original Resolution atleast as far as the implementation date is concern, and therefore falling foul of the provisions set out in subsection 5 above. [11] Item of Resolution 3 of 2009 provides that the provision of the agreement shall take effect on the date 1 st April The same clause makes it clear that the implementation thereof will not be subject to the availability of posts. By implication, there was no condition envisaged by the parties to this agreement, hence this clause. The availability of a post will imply a funded post and therefore a subsequent argument by the Respondent that the Applicant could not be translated on the basis that such translation had to fall within a particular performance cycle is baseless and as a result dismissed. [12] A Circular by the DG is a discretion unilaterally implemented by the employer to the exclusion of other parties to the collective agreement. Nowhere does the Resolution provide that the implementation date will be determined by the Minister or the DPSA. It appears therefore that such was never the desire of the parties to the agreement hence the omission thereof. Item 6 of the Resolution provides that in the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Agreement and any other Agreement of the Council, the provisions of this Agreement shall take precedence. It further provides that no amendment to this Agreement shall be of force unless reduced to writing and agreed upon at the Council as a Resolution of the Council. From the above provisions it appears that the parties were wild awake to their intentions to the extent that in anticipating any unforeseeable unintended occurrence, made a provision that Resolution 3 of 2009 will take precedence. A Circular by the DG cannot supersede Resolution 3 of 2009 signed by the Respondent and NPSWU. Whether or not the Applicant s rank had to change, the Resolution is silent and therefore such averment is dismissed because it is baseless. AWARD [13]Having considered all relevant, reliable and admissible arguments submitted, it is my finding that the Applicant had proven on balance of probability that the Respondent incorrectly applied and/or interpreted Resolution 3 of 2009 by not translating him with effect from August [14] It is therefore my finding that the effective date of implementation of the OSD in relation to the Applicant is the 1 st April 2010 and that as he attained 15 years only in August 2012, he should have been translated in the same year, 2012 and not August [15] The Respondent is ordered to implement the OSD with effect from August PSHS295-14/15 Page 4
5 [16] The Respondent is further ordered to re-adjust the Applicant s salary accordingly and then pay the difference in salary, between the August 2012 and August 2013 to the Applicant. [17] The Respondent is ordered to comply with this award on or before 14 November Signature: Panelist/s: Dialwa Mathala PSHS295-14/15 Page 5
Panellist/s: E. Tlhotlhalemaje Case No.: PSCB77-09/10 Date of Ruling: 20 APRIL In the MATTER between: JR MOKOENA & OTHERS (Union / Applicants)
RULING Panellist/s: E. Tlhotlhalemaje Case No.: PSCB77-09/10 Date of Ruling: 20 APRIL 2010 In the MATTER between: JR MOKOENA & OTHERS (Union / Applicants) And THE SOUTH AFRICAN POLICE SERVICES (1 st Respondent)
More informationDepartment of Health-Free State. 1. The arbitration hearing convened on 11 August 2017 at Bophelo House in Bloemfontein.
ARBITRATION AWARD Case No: PSHS310-17/18 Commissioner: Suria van Wyk Date of award: 4 September 2017 In the matter between: PSA obo RA Watkins (Union/ Applicant) and Department of Health-Free State (Respondent)
More informationRULING. In the ARBITRATION between DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS RULING
1 CASE NO: PSCB68-11/12 PANELIST: JOYCE TOHLANG DATE: 27 March 2012 In the ARBITRATION between PSA OBO SELOTA Applicant AND DEPARTMENT OF WATER AFFAIRS Respondent DETAILS OF THE HEARING AND REPRESENTATION
More informationDEPARTMENT OF HEALTH- EASTERN CAPE
ARBITRATION AWARD CASE NO: PSHS277-17/18 PANELIST: W R PRETORIUS DATE OF AWARD: 11 DECEMBER 2017 In the matter between: PAWUSA obo MOLO, E N APPLICANT and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH- EASTERN CAPE RESPONDENT
More informationPanellist: M Naidoo Case No: PSCB690-15/16 Date of Award: 14 December In the ARBITRATION between:
ARBITRATION AWARD Panellist: M Naidoo Case No: PSCB690-15/16 Date of Award: 14 December 2017 In the ARBITRATION between: PSA obo LEPADIMA, P AND 5 OTHERS (Union / Applicant/s) And GOVERNMENT PENSION &
More informationIn the matter between: PSA obo GABANAKGOSI, M (Union / Applicant) And DEPARTMENT OF WATER & SANITATION, NORTH WEST PROVINCE (Respondent)
ARBITRATION AWARD Panellist/s: Annelie Bevan Case No.: PSCB 599-15/16 Date of Award: 1 June 2016 In the matter between: PSA obo GABANAKGOSI, M (Union / Applicant) And DEPARTMENT OF WATER & SANITATION,
More informationCase Number: PSCB240-14_15 Senior Commission / Panellist: Martinus van Aarde Date of Award: 15 October In the MATTER between.
ARBITRATION AWARD Case Number: PSCB240-14_15 Senior Commission / Panellist: Martinus van Aarde Date of Award: 15 October 2014 In the MATTER between PSA obo L Leiee & 2 Others (Applicant) and Department
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT Reportable Case no. D552/12 In the matter between: HEALTH AND OTHER SERVICES PERSONNEL TRADE UNION OF SOUTH AFRICA TM SOMERS First
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, PORT ELIZABETH JUDGMENT
1 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, PORT ELIZABETH JUDGMENT Not reportable Case no: P 341/11 In the matter between: BRIAN SCHROEDER GRAHAM SUTHERLAND First Applicant Second
More informationBARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE RESTAURANT, CATERING AND ALLIED TRADES
BARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE RESTAURANT, CATERING AND ALLIED TRADES 2 nd Floor Tel: (011) 832 1180/1/2/3/4 No. 1 Rissik Street FAX NO S P.O. Box 30822 Penmore Towers Admin & Statutory (011) 832 1192/1176
More informationLABOUR RELATIONS AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS TO LABOUR RELATIONS AMENDMENT BILL [B 16 2012] (As agreed to by the Portfolio Committee on Labour (National Assembly) [B 16A 2012] ISBN 978-1-77597-015-6
More informationHELD AT JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: J1794/2010 THE MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES JUDGMENT
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: J1794/2010 In the matter between: POPCRU Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Respondent JUDGMENT FRANCIS J 1. The applicant,
More informationJUDGMENT DELIVERED BY THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE PILLAY ON 18 AUGUST Instructed by
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SITTING IN DURBAN REPORTABLE CASE NO D218/03 DATE HEARD: 2003/08/08 2003/08/18 DATE DELIVERED: In the matter between: HOSPERSA MOULTRIE First Applicant Second Applicant
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT. PUBLIC SERVANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA obo P W MODITSWE
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Case no: JR 1702/12 In the matter between - PUBLIC SERVANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA obo P W MODITSWE Applicant
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Reportable Case no: JA 80/16 In the matter between: PARDON RUKWAYA AND 31 OTHERS Appellants and THE KITCHEN BAR RESTAURANT Respondent Heard: 03 May 2017
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. PUBLIC SERVANTS ASSOCIATION obo OLUFUNMILAYI ITUNU UBOGU
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: Cases CCT 6/17 and 14/17 Case CCT 6/17 PUBLIC SERVANTS ASSOCIATION obo OLUFUNMILAYI ITUNU UBOGU Applicant and HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Reportable/Not Reportable Case no: J 2591/17 In the matter between: FAIS OMBUD Applicant and MPHO RAMETSI First Respondent COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION
More informationANNEXURE K RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE RESTAURANT, CATERING AND ALLIED TRADES TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANNEXURE K RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE BARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE RESTAURANT, CATERING AND ALLIED TRADES TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE SERVING AND FILING DOCUMENTS 1. How to contact the
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT KHULULEKILE LAWRENCE MCHUBA PASSENGER RAIL AGENCY OF SOUTH AFRICA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: J 392/14 In the matter between KHULULEKILE LAWRENCE MCHUBA Applicant and PASSENGER RAIL AGENCY
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA,JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA,JOHANNESBURG Reportable/Not Reportable Case NO: J2074/17 In the matter between PUBLIC SERVANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA PORTIA CHUENE AND 55 OTHERS First Applicant
More informationArbitration Act, 2055 (1999)
Arbitration Act, 2055 (1999) Date of authentication and publication: 2 Chaitra 2056 (April 15, 1999) 1. The Act Amending Some Nepal Acts, 2064 2064.5.9 Act No. 1 of the year 2056 (1999) An act made to
More informationD R C. Rules. (As amended in July 2008)
D R C Rules (As amended in July 2008) 1 RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE DRC T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S PART ONE SERVING AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS 1. How to contact the DRC 2. Addresses
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG NUPSAW OBO NOLUTHANDO LENGS
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: JR 2494/16 In the matter between: NUPSAW OBO NOLUTHANDO LENGS Applicant and GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE SECTORAL
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT STATISTICS SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: J2110/2016 Case no: J2078/16 In the matter between STATISTICS SOUTH AFRICA Applicant and NEHAWU obo NETSHIVUNGULULU AND
More informationDEFENCE AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA DEFENCE AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 7); explanatory summary of Bill published in Gazette No. 33126 of 23 April ) (The English text
More informationIN THE PUBLIC SERVICE CO-ORDINATING BARGAINING COUNCIL HELD AT THE TEACHERS CENTRE, OVERPORT IN DURBAN. DEPARTMENT of EDUCATION - KZN
IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE CO-ORDINATING BARGAINING COUNCIL HELD AT THE TEACHERS CENTRE, OVERPORT IN DURBAN CASE NO: PSCB 396-15/16 PSA obo N JODAPERSAD APPLICANT and DEPARTMENT of EDUCATION - KZN RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE BARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE CIVIL ENGINEERING INDUSTRY ( BCCEI ) HELD AT GROOT MARICO; NORTH-WEST PROVINCE In the arbitration between
IN THE BARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE CIVIL ENGINEERING INDUSTRY ( BCCEI ) HELD AT GROOT MARICO; NORTH-WEST PROVINCE In the arbitration between SEALETSA, TATLHEGO JOEL APPLICANT AND G4 CIVILS (PTY) LTD RESPONDENT
More informationWIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER
For more information contact the: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and Mediation Center Address: 34, chemin des Colombettes P.O. Box 18 CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland WIPO ARBITRATION AND
More informationTRADE UNION AND LABOR RELATIONS ADJUSTMENT ACT. Act No. 5310, Mar. 13, 1997 CHAPTER I. General Provisions
TRADE UNION AND LABOR RELATIONS ADJUSTMENT ACT Act No. 5310, Mar. 13, 1997 Amended by Act No. Act No. Act No. Act No. Act No. Act No. Act No. Act No. 5511, 6456, 7845, 8158, 9041, 9930, 10339, 12630, Feb.
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: J 965/18 In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS UNION ( SAMWU ) Applicant and MXOLISI QINA MILTON MYOLWA SIVIWE
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SITTING IN DURBAN
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SITTING IN DURBAN CASE NO D318/03 DATE HEARD: 2004/02/09 DATE DELIVERED: 2004/02/16 In the matter between: NOEL WILLIAM OBEREM Applicant and COTTON KING MANUFACTURING
More informationARBITRATION AWARD. Panellist: Bella Goldman Case No.: PSHS419-11/12 and PHSS832-11/12 Date of Award: 17 May In the ARBITRATION between:
ARBITRATION AWARD Panellist: Bella Goldman Case No.: PSHS419-11/12 and PHSS832-11/12 Date of Award: 17 May 2012 In the ARBITRATION between: Errol Pierre Visser (Applicant) And Department of Health - Western
More informationAppeals and Revision. Chapter XVIII
Chapter XVIII Appeals and Revision Sections 107. Appeals to Appellate Authority 108. Powers of Revisional Authority 109. Constitution of Appellate Tribunal and Benches thereof 110. President and Members
More informationNATIONAL BARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE ROAD FREIGHT INDUSTRY RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCESSES AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE NBCRFI DISPUTE RESOLUTION
Ver. 10/06 NATIONAL BARGAINING COUNCIL FOR THE ROAD FREIGHT INDUSTRY RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCESSES AND PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE NBCRFI DISPUTE RESOLUTION In accordance with the Exemptions and Dispute
More informationTHE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE TAX REVENUE APPEALS ACT CHAPTER 408 REVISED EDITION 2006
THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA THE TAX REVENUE APPEALS ACT CHAPTER 408 REVISED EDITION 2006 This edition of the Tax Revenue Appeals Act, Cap. 408 incorporates all amendments up to 30th November, 2006
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG. THE PUBLIC SERVANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA obo A POTGIETER THE DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case No: JR2212/12 In the matter between: THE PUBLIC SERVANTS ASSOCIATION OF SOUTH AFRICA obo A POTGIETER Applicant and THE DEPARTMENT OF TRADE
More informationOF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Parliament of the Republic of South Africa/ Parlement van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika 78 Draft Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Amendment Bill, 2018: Invitation
More informationRules for CNNIC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (2012)
Rules for CNNIC Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (2012) Chapter I General Provisions and Definitions Article 1 In order to ensure the fairness, convenience and promptness of a domain name dispute
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between WISCONSIN INDIANHEAD TECHNICAL COLLEGE EDUCATION SUPPORT STAFF ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 4019,
More informationTrade Disputes Act Ch. 48:02
ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION VOLUME: X TRADE DISPUTES CHAPTER: 48:02 PART I Preliminary 1. Short title 2. Interpretation PART II Establishment of panel and procedure for settlement of trade disputes
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: J 1512/17 In the matter between: SANDI MAJAVU Applicant and LESEDI LOCAL MUNICIPALITY ISAAC RAMPEDI N.O SPEAKER OF LESEDI LOCAL
More informationORDINANCE ON COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION
STANDING COMMITTEE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM Independence - Freedom - Happiness No: 08-2003-PL-UBTVQH11 ORDINANCE ON COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION In order to contribute to the resolution
More informationJUDICIAL MATTERS AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JUDICIAL MATTERS AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 7); explanatory summary of the Bill published in Government Gazette No. 38248 of 2 November
More informationCONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA. Food and Allied Workers Union obo J Gaoshubelwe v Pieman s Pantry (Pty) Limited MEDIA SUMMARY
CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Food and Allied Workers Union obo J Gaoshubelwe v Pieman s Pantry (Pty) Limited 1 CCT 236/16 Date of hearing: 3 August 2017 Date of judgment: 20 March 2018 MEDIA SUMMARY
More informationSponsored by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans
Employee Benefit Plan Claims Arbitration RULES As Amended and Effective on January 1, 1988 Sponsored by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans Administered by the American Arbitration Association
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT MOKGAETJI BERNICE KEKANA
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: J 2536/12 In the matter between: MOKGAETJI BERNICE KEKANA Applicant and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
More informationCuyahoga County Rules of Council
Cuyahoga County Rules of Council Approved April 26, 2011 Amended May 8, 2012 Amended January 22, 2013 Amended July 9, 2013 Amended October 28, 2014 Amended January 27, 2015 Amended January 9, 2018 Table
More informationLABOUR ARBITRATION RULES
THE INSTITUTE of ARBITRATORS & MEDIATORS AUSTRALIA ACN 008 520 045 ARBITRATORS MEDIATORS CONCILIATORS LABOUR ARBITRATION RULES Preamble The preferred method of resolving a dispute between an employer and
More informationDecision of the. Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 29 July 2016, in the following composition: Geoff Thompson (England), Chairman Santiago Nebot (Spain), member John Bramhall
More informationEuropean Parliament Election Act 1
Issuer: Riigikogu Type: act In force from: 01.01.2018 In force until: 31.12.2018 Translation published: 04.12.2017 European Parliament Election Act 1 Amended by the following acts Passed 18.12.2002 RT
More informationMEMORANDUM OF INCORPORATION
MEMORANDUM OF INCORPORATION OF THE SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION NPC ( SAMA ) (Registration number 1927/000136/08) 1 SAMA Memorandum of Incorporation Preamble "We, the members of the South African
More informationTHE REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITIES ACT, 1994 REGULATIONS THE REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITIES (CONDUCT) REGULATIONS, 2008
Legal Notice No. REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO THE REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITIES ACT, 1994 REGULATIONS Made by the Minister under section 35 of the Regional Health Authorities Act THE REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITIES
More informationCHAPTER 4 THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT. Arrangement of Sections.
CHAPTER 4 THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT. Arrangement of Sections. Section 1. Application. 2. Interpretation. PART I PRELIMINARY. PART II ARBITRATION. 3. Form of arbitration agreement. 4. Waiver
More informationREPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, FREE STATE PROVINCE
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable/Not Reportable Case no: JR 1175/2013 In the matter between: DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, FREE STATE PROVINCE Applicant
More informationREPUBLIKA SLOVENIJA USTAVNO SODIŠČE
REPUBLIKA SLOVENIJA USTAVNO SODIŠČE Številka: Rm-1/97 Datum: 5.6.1997 D E C I S I O N At the meeting of 5 June 1997 concerning the procedure for the evaluation of constitutionality of an international
More informationOBO RICHARD CHARLES MATOLA MBOMBELA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA THE LABOUR COURT SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Case No: J2566/14 In the matter between: SOUTH AFRICAN MUNICIPAL WORKERS UNION OBO RICHARD CHARLES MATOLA Applicant
More informationCREDIT FACILITY AGREEMENT. Made and entered into by and between:-
CREDIT FACILITY AGREEMENT Made and entered into by and between:- MILPARK EDUCATION PROPRIETARY LIMITED Registration Number: 2004/026244/07 ( Milpark ) And The following Student ( Student ): Full Name:
More informationVancouver Elementary School Teachers Association BYLAWS. Approved by Annual General Meeting held 2009 May 19 BYLAW I: LOCAL ASSOCIATION
Vancouver Elementary School Teachers Association BYLAWS Approved by Annual General Meeting held 2009 May 19 BYLAW I: LOCAL ASSOCIATION The Vancouver Elementary School Teachers' Association (hereafter referred
More information1 From the General Secretary's desk...1
In this Issue: DECEMBER 2017 1 From the General Secretary's desk...1 2 Developments in Labour Law: Medical certificates from traditional health practitioners...1 Powers of bargaining council confirmed...3
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG ELIZABETH MATLAKALA BODIBE
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: JR 490/15 In the matter between: ELIZABETH MATLAKALA BODIBE Applicant and PUBLIC SERVICE CO-ORDINATING BARGAINING COUNCIL DANIEL
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG AMCU OBO L.S. RANTHO & 158 OTHERS SAMANCOR WESTERN CHROME MINES JUDGMENT: POINT IN LIMINE
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: JS 2015/14 & JS 406/14 In the matter between AMCU OBO L.S. RANTHO & 158 OTHERS TEBOGO MOSES MATHIBA First Applicant Second Applicant
More informationBASKETBALL ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL (BAT) Arbitration Rules. 1 January 2017 Version
BASKETBALL ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL (BAT) Arbitration Rules Version BASKETBALL ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL ARBITRATION RULES 0. Preamble 0.1 The Basketball Arbitral Tribunal (hereinafter the "BAT") has been created by
More informationAn Act to make certain further provisions respecting the law of arbitration
Arbitration (Protocol and Convention) Act 1937 APPENDIX THE ARBITRATION (PROTOCOL AND CONVENTION) ACT, 1937 (ACT VI o 1937) 4th March, 1937 An Act to make certain further provisions respecting the law
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT ETHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY JUDGMENT
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, DURBAN JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: D933/13 ETHEKWINI MUNICIPALITY Applicant and IMATU obo VIJAY NAIDOO Respondents Heard: 12 August 2014 Delivered: 13 August 2015
More informationWIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES
APPENDIX 3.17 WIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES (as from 1 October 2002) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Abbreviated Expressions Article 1 In these Rules: Arbitration Agreement means
More informationRules for the conduct of proceedings before the CCMA. Act. Published under. GN R1448 in GG of 10 October as amended by
Rules for the conduct of proceedings before the CCMA Act Published under GN R1448 in GG 25515 of 10 October 2003 as amended by GN R1512 in GG 25607 of 17 October 2003 GN R1748 of 2003 in GG 25797 of 5
More informationConvention on the settlement of investment disputes between States and nationals of other States
1 Convention on the settlement of investment disputes between States and nationals of other States Washington, 18 March 1965 PREAMBLE The Contracting States Considering the need for international cooperation
More informationCROATIAN PARLIAMENT DECISION PROMULGATING THE ACT ON REPRESENTATIVENESS OF EMPLOYER ORGANISATIONS AND TRADE UNION ORGANISATIONS ACT
CROATIAN PARLIAMENT 1875 Pursuant to the Article 89 of the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia, I hereby issue the DECISION PROMULGATING THE ACT ON REPRESENTATIVENESS OF EMPLOYER ORGANISATIONS AND
More informationPage 1 of 17 Attorney General International Commercial Arbitration Act (R.S.N.B. 2011, c. 176) Act current to March 7, 2012 2011, c.176 International Commercial Arbitration Act Deposited May 13, 2011 Definitions
More informationTHE CHILD LABOUR (PROHIBITION AND REGULATION) RULES, 1988
THE CHILD LABOUR (PROHIBITION AND REGULATION) RULES, 1988 G.S.R. 847(E), dated 10 th August, 1988 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of Sec. 18 of the said Act, the Central Government,
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: JR 2368/15 In the matter between: EKURHULENI METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY Applicant and SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT BARGAINING
More informationIN THE EDUCATION LABOUR RELATIONS COUNCIL HELD AT PRETORIA CASE NO: PSES /14 NAT
IN THE EDUCATION LABOUR RELATIONS COUNCIL HELD AT PRETORIA CASE NO: PSES 776-13/14 NAT In the matter between: SADTU Applicant and DEPARTMENT OF BASIC EDUCATION Respondent RULING ON POINTS IN LIMINE 1.
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE ACT,
PUBLIC SERVICE ACT, 1994 1 (Proclamation 103 published in GG 15791 of 3 June 1994) [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT: 3 JUNE 1994] as amended by Proclamation 105 of 1994 Proclamation 134 of 1994 Proclamation R171
More informationIN THE PUBLIC SERVICE CO-ORDINATING BARGAINING COUNCIL HELD IN POLOKWANE. NEHAWU obo MAHLAULE, RG DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: LIMPOPO ARBITRATION AWARD
IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE CO-ORDINATING BARGAINING COUNCIL HELD IN POLOKWANE Case No PSCB701-16/17 In the matter between NEHAWU obo MAHLAULE, RG Applicant and DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH: LIMPOPO Respondent ARBITRATION
More information1965 CONVENTION ON THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES BETWEEN STATES AND NATIONALS OF OTHER STATES
1965 CONVENTION ON THE SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES BETWEEN STATES AND NATIONALS OF OTHER STATES Adopted in Washington, D.C, the United States of America on 18 March 1965 PREAMBLE... 4 CHAPTER 1 INTERNATIONAL
More informationIN THE PUBLIC SERVICE CO-ORDINATING BARGAINING COUNCIL HELD IN DURBAN, KWAZULU-NATAL. Department of HUMAN SETTLEMENT - KwaZulu-Natal ARBITRATION AWARD
IN THE PUBLIC SERVICE CO-ORDINATING BARGAINING COUNCIL HELD IN DURBAN, KWAZULU-NATAL CASE NO: PSCB 123-16/17 PSA obo A.D. Abrahams APPLICANT and Department of HUMAN SETTLEMENT - KwaZulu-Natal RESPONDENT
More informationA by-law relating generally to the conduct of the affairs of. Canadian Hard of Hearing Association / Association des malentendants canadiens
A by-law relating generally to the conduct of the affairs of Canadian Hard of Hearing Association / Association des malentendants canadiens (the "Corporation") BE IT ENACTED as a by-law of the Corporation
More informationDEPARTMENT OF LABOUR. No. R March 2015 RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION
STAATSKOERANT, 17 MAART 2015 No. 38572 3 GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR No. R. 223 17 March 2015 RULES FOR THE CONDUCT OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION
More informationPLEASE NOTE. For more information concerning the history of this Act, please see the Table of Public Acts.
PLEASE NOTE This document, prepared by the Legislative Counsel Office, is an office consolidation of this Act, current to January 1, 2009. It is intended for information and reference purposes only. This
More informationROAD ACCIDENT FUND AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA ROAD ACCIDENT FUND AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 75); explanatory summary of Bill published in Government Gazette No. 40441 of 24 November
More informationBy-Law No. 1. Professional Engineers Ontario
Professional Engineers Ontario By-Law No. 1 A by-law relating to the administrative and domestic affairs of the Association of Professional Engineers of Ontario as approved by Council on June 25, 1984,
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not reportable Case no. JR 2422/08 In the matter between: GEORGE TOBA Applicant and MOLOPO LOCAL MUNICIPALITY First Respondent SOUTH AFRICAN LOCAL
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG Not Reportable Case no: JR 505/15 In the matter between: KAVITA RAMPERSAD Applicant and COMMISSIONER RICHARD BYRNE N.O. First Respondent COMMISSION FOR
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG
Of interest to other Judges THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, In the matter between: HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Case no: J1746/18 JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN BUS SERVICES SOC LTD Applicant and DEMOCRATIC MUNCIPAL
More information109th Session Judgment No. 2951
Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 109th Session Judgment No. 2951 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint
More informationCaribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat
Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat Back to model legislation on issues affecting women CARICOM MODEL LEGISLATION WITH REGARD TO EQUAL PAY Explanatory Memorandum: Long title. This sets out the objects
More information[1] In this matter the Court is called upon to decide two issues. They both
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF COURT AFRICA Held in Johannesburg Case no. J2456/98 In the matter between TIGER WHEELS BABELEGI (PTY) LTD t/a TSW INTERNATIONAL Applicant and NATIONAL UNION OF METAL WORKERS OF SOUTH
More informationBELIZE EQUAL PAY ACT CHAPTER 302:01 REVISED EDITION 2011 SHOWING THE SUBSTANTIVE LAWS AS AT 31 ST DECEMBER, 2011
BELIZE EQUAL PAY ACT CHAPTER 302:01 REVISED EDITION 2011 SHOWING THE SUBSTANTIVE LAWS AS AT 31 ST DECEMBER, 2011 This is a revised edition of the Substantive Laws, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT CAPE TOWN)
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (HELD AT CAPE TOWN) In the matter between: Case Number: C160/2006 Reportable MNIKELWA NXELE Applicant And THE CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CORPORATE SERVICES, DEPARTMENT
More informationDisciplinary Regulations
Disciplinary Regulations 1 Vision Professional financial planning for all. Our Mission The FPI s mission is to advance and promote the pre-eminence and status of financial planning professionals, while
More informationPARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995
PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995 (Certified on 30 th June-1995) Arbitration Act. No. 11 of 1995 1 (Certified on 30 th June-1995) L.D. O.10/93
More informationTHE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT
THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Case no: JS 1505/16 In the matter between: MOQHAKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Applicant and FUSI JOHN MOTLOUNG SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT,
More information.VERSICHERUNG. Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) for.versicherung Domain Names
.VERSICHERUNG Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP) for.versicherung Domain Names Overview Chapter I - Eligibility Requirements Dispute Resolution Policy (ERDRP)... 2 1. Purpose...
More informationDUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY Introductory Provisions. Article (1) Definitions
DUBAI INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE RULES 2007 AS OF 22 ND FEBRUARY 2011 Introductory Provisions Article (1) Definitions 1.1 The following words and phrases shall have the meaning assigned thereto unless
More informationGOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT, 1993 (ACT NO. 85 OF 1993)
GOVERNMENT NOTICE DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR NO. R. 929 25 June 2003 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY ACT, 1993 (ACT NO. 85 OF 1993) General Administrative Regulations, 2003 The Minister of Labour has, under section
More informationBE it enacted by Parliament in the Thirty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:-- CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY
THE CINE-WORKERS AND CINEMA THEATRE WORKERS (REGULATION OF EMPLOYMENT) ACT, 1981 ACT NO. 50 OF 1981 [24th December, 1981.] An Act to provide for the regulation of the conditions of employment of certain
More informationLABOUR LAWS AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA LABOUR LAWS AMENDMENT BILL (As introduced in the National Assembly (proposed section 75)) (The English text is the official text of the Bill) (Cheryllyn Dudley MP) [PMB 5 2015]
More informationSEATTLE CITY COUNCIL
SEATTLE CITY COUNCIL 600 Fourth Ave. 2nd Floor Seattle, WA 98104 Legislation Text File #: CB 118499, Version: 2 CITY OF SEATTLE ORDINANCE COUNCIL BILL AN ORDINANCE relating to taxicab, transportation network
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA 3659/98. In the matter between: NATIONAL UNION OF METALWORKERS OF SOUTH AFRICA. Applicant. and
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Case Number: J 3659/98 In the matter between: NATIONAL UNION OF METALWORKERS OF SOUTH AFRICA Applicant and NISSAN SOUTH AFRICA MANUFACTURING (PTY)
More informationLABOUR RELATIONS AMENDMENT BILL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA LABOUR RELATIONS AMENDMENT BILL (As amended by the Portfolio Committee on Labour (National Assembly)) (The English text is the offıcial text of the Bill) (MINISTER OF LABOUR) [B
More information