SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Her Majesty the Queen. and. Christopher Raymond O Halloran. Before: The Honourable Justice Wayne D.
|
|
- Buddy Jackson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: R. v. O Halloran 2013 PESC 22 Date: Docket: S2-GC-130 Registry: Summerside Her Majesty the Queen and Christopher Raymond O Halloran Before: The Honourable Justice Wayne D. Cheverie Appearances: Jonathan B. Greenan, solicitor for the Crown Christopher Montigny, solicitor for the accused Place and dates of trial - Summerside, Prince Edward Island June 4, 5 & October 18, 2013 Place and date of oral decision - Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island October 29, 2013
2 Page: 2 Criminal law - accused charged with trafficking and possession for the purpose of trafficking in Oxycodone contrary to Controlled Drugs and Substances Act - no evidence presented by the defence - accused found guilty of trafficking and not guilty of possession for the purpose of trafficking. CONSIDERED: Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s-s. 24(2); Canada Evidence Act, RSC 1985, c. C-5, s-s. 9(1). Cheverie J. (orally) Introduction [1] Christopher Raymond O Halloran stands charged that on or about Thursday, the 7 th day of September, 2012 at or near Summerside, Prince County, Province of Prince Edward Island; he did: And: Count 1: Traffic in a controlled substance, to wit: Oxycodone, contrary to sections 5(1) and 5(3)(a) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, C. 19 and amendments thereto. Count 2: Unlawfully possess a substance included in Schedule 1, to wit: Oxycodone, for the purpose of trafficking, contrary to sections 5(2) and 5(3)(a) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, S.C. 1996, C. 19 and amendments thereto. For reasons offered on September 23, 2013, I concluded O Halloran s s. 8 and s. 9 Charter rights had been violated and I went on to exclude all evidence seized from him pursuant to s-s. 24(2) of the Charter. [2] On October 18, 2013, the trial continued. With the express consent of counsel, the evidence of Cpl. Cook, Cst. Mintie, and Cst. Corish taken on the voir dire up to the time of O Halloran s unlawful arrest was incorporated into the trial proper. The Crown then continued its case by recalling Cpl. Cook, and then calling Justin Owen, who was the target of police surveillance on September 7, 2012.
3 Page: 3 [3] In his summation, counsel for O Halloran properly reminded the court of the basic principles of our criminal justice system, in particular, the presumption of innocence and the burden of proof. It is true that Mr. O Halloran is presumed innocent unless and until the Crown has proven his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. He does not have to present evidence or prove anything. It is the Crown which bears the burden of proof from beginning to end. That burden of proof requires the Crown to prove each of the elements of each of the offences beyond a reasonable doubt. [4] As to the standard of proof required for conviction, I am mindful that a reasonable doubt is not a far fetched or frivolous doubt. It is not a doubt based on sympathy or prejudice. To the contrary, it is a doubt based on reason and common sense. It is a doubt that logically arises from the evidence, or the lack of evidence. [5] Probable guilt is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt. However, the Crown is not required to prove its case to absolute certainty. Our law does not require that because absolute certainty is a standard of proof that is impossibly high. Therefore, if at the end of the case, after considering all the evidence, I am sure Christopher Raymond O Halloran committed the offences charged, or any of them, I should find him guilty of those offences. [6] Turning now to Count #1 in the indictment - trafficking. In order to find O Halloran guilty of trafficking in Oxycodone, the Crown must prove the following essential elements beyond a reasonable doubt: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) That O Halloran trafficked in a substance; That the substance was Oxycodone; That O Halloran knew that the substance was Oxycodone; and That O Halloran intentionally trafficked in Oxycodone. [7] O Halloran has the right to remain silent. He exercised his right in this case and did not testify. The defence called no evidence. Therefore, if O Halloran is to be found guilty of trafficking, in Count #1, I must be satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that what remains of the Crown case after the Charter ruling establishes proof of each of the elements of the offence. [8] On September 7, 2012, Cst. Mintie was responsible for keeping Justin Owen in view and reporting his movements to the other members of the team. The evidence establishes that Owen was driving a red Grand Am motor vehicle on that date. Cst. Mintie testified he first observed this vehicle at 6:25 p.m. when it came off
4 Page: 4 Water Street in Summerside onto Read Drive, and went past the Esso at the intersection and into a vacant lot. He kept the vehicle under visual contact and approximately 15 minutes later, at 6:40 p.m., a white Ford Explorer pulled into the vacant lot and stopped next to the Owen vehicle, such that the driver s side of each vehicle was facing each other. [9] Cst. Mintie then described the movements of the Ford Explorer in the lot to the point where he clearly saw Justin Owen get out of the passenger side of the white Explorer and head to the driver side of his red Grand Am. Owen then left the vacant lot and headed back towards Summerside on Water Street, and on instructions from Cpl. Cook, Cst. Mintie and Cst. Corish stopped the white Ford Explorer in the parking lot of the Esso service station. Prior to placing the occupant of the Ford Explorer under arrest for possession for the purpose and trafficking in a controlled substance, Cst. Mintie testified he recognized him as Chris O Halloran, the accused in this case. I accept Cst. Mintie s evidence as an accurate depiction of the interaction between Justin Owen and Christopher O Halloran on September 7, [10] At the continuation of the trial on October 18, Crown counsel called Cpl. Cook back to the stand. He gave evidence concerning his arrest of Justin Owen. It was not necessary for him to repeat his experience as a police officer because he had testified on June 4, 2013 that he had been with the RCMP for over 17 years in four different provinces. He has experiences in four different drug units, including two street level drug units in British Columbia. He also worked as a drug investigator in Toronto, Ontario. By my calculations, Cpl. Cook has at least six or seven years experience in drug investigation and enforcement. [11] Cpl. Cook testified he followed Justin Owen from the Read Corner Esso intersection on September 7 th to his residence on St. Stephen Street in Summerside and arrested him at approximately 7 p.m. on that date for possession and possession for the purposes of trafficking. He seized Owen s cell phone at that time after Owen tried to stomp on it. His search of Owen incidental to arrest led him to seize 100 Oxycodone pills from Owen s left pocket together with ten other smaller pills. The search of Owen s vehicle turned up a straw with white residue on it, plus Oxycodone pills with a pill crusher, with two Endocet pills and six Oxycocet pills in them in the dash of the vehicle. Exhibit C-3 is the pill bottle seized from Owen which now has not quite 100 pills in it because some were sent off for analysis. Exhibit C-4 is the drug envelope and certificates of analysis on the substance in Exhibit C-3 which indicate the contents of the pill bottle were Oxycodone. It is conceded the certificates of analysis were properly served on the accused. [12] Exhibit C-5 is the cell phone seized from Owen on the date in question from which Cpl. Cook retrieved extensive text conversations, some of which appear in
5 Page: 5 Exhibit C-6 which is the photo sheet of the exhibits seized. Of particular note are the photos of the text messages that appear as numbers 15 and 16 in Exhibit C-6 where C-O sends a text to ME where he says he would meet that individual at Read s at 6:30. There is no doubt but that this exchange is between C-O (Christopher O Halloran) and Justin Owen. Another text exchange between these individuals has Owen asking O Halloran if he could stop by here for coffee asap. O Halloran responds in the affirmative. [13] I refer to this specific information at this point because Cpl. Cook was asked, in his experience, to comment on the reference to coffee in the text messages. He said that in Prince Edward Island, coffee refers to Percocets in the drug culture, and he says in other provinces it is used to refer to cocaine. [14] Cpl. Cook was not qualified as an expert in drug language. Nor was he examined extensively on his specified drug investigation and enforcement experience which would allow him to comment on the reference to coffee in the text messages. However, I find his testimony on this point reliable because, as will be seen, it was confirmed by Justin Owen who was not present in court to hear Cpl. Cook s testimony. [15] The Crown then proceeded to call Justin Owen. He is 29 years of age and is currently in jail for possession of Oxycodone for the purpose of trafficking. He confirmed he was arrested by Cpl. Cook and that he subsequently was sentenced to jail in March, He confirmed the 100 Oxycodone pills found in his pocket are those that appear as Exhibit C-3. He also confirmed Exhibit C-5 was his cell phone that was seized from him and that he used it to text O Halloran. He then identified O Halloran in court. [16] Owen testified he was arrested after leaving Read s Corner where he had gone to pay O Halloran for parts for his car. In particular, he said he paid O Halloran for tires. He said that was the only reason he was at Read s Corner on that evening. He did not receive anything from O Halloran at that time, but he did give him some money. He testified his meeting with O Halloran on that date was fairly brief. He confirmed the vehicle he was operating on that date was a red Grand Am, but denied he received the pills in Exhibit C-3 from O Halloran. He said he already had them in his possession before he met the accused on that date and that he got them someplace else. In short, he denies getting the pills from O Halloran, but he did give O Halloran money which he said was for tires. [17] Owen gave a statement to the police following his arrest on September 7, 2012 and after viewing that statement and hearing argument by counsel, I ruled Owen was adverse for the purpose of s-s. 9(1) of the Canada Evidence Act, RSC 1985,
6 Page: 6 c. C-5. He was then cross-examined by Crown counsel on his statement only. It is clear from the cross-examination by Crown counsel and questions by defence counsel that Owen was a drug addict at the time of his arrest. He confirmed he made no mention of tires in the statement he gave to the police. He confirmed the text messages that appear in Exhibit C-6 were between him and O Halloran, but he was going to see someone for coffee. He confirmed he has heard the word coffee used to refer to percs. At the time of his arrest he says he was using 15 to 20 percs a day at a cost of $8 a pill. He was snorting. This appears to be confirmed by the straw with the white residue and the pill crusher which were seized from his vehicle. He confirmed this was not his first arrest for drug violations. Defence counsel suggested to Owen that he was prepared to tell the police anything on the evening of September 7, 2012 in order to be released and Owen agreed with this statement. [18] My observation of Mr. Owen as he gave his statement to the police does not convey any semblance of pressure put upon him. Nor did he appear to be in any way agitated or anxious to move on. This wasn t his first arrest, so he knew the drill. [19] The inconsistencies between Mr. Owen s statement to the police and his sworn testimony in the court cast a shadow on his credibility. Defence counsel would suggest Owen told the police what they wanted to hear when he gave his statement so he could get out of there. There is evidence he actually consumed more drugs once he was released. Defence suggests Owen is telling the truth in court, but was not honest in his statement to the police. [20] Crown counsel suggests Owen s evidence in court is accurate except for his denial of purchasing drugs from O Halloran. The further suggestion is that when the evidence is looked at in its totality, the only reasonable conclusion is that a drug transaction had, in fact, taken place. [21] In my view, the evidence supports a finding that O Halloran and Owen were engaged in a transaction for Oxycodone pills on September 7, The evidence discloses, and the defence concedes, that the pills in Exhibit C-3 are Oxycodone, a Schedule I controlled substance under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. The evidence is clear Owen gave O Halloran money on that date. I believe him. However, in court he says the money was to pay O Halloran for tires he had purchased from him sometime earlier. That is a lie. [22] The suggestion that Owen drove to the vacant lot at the time suggested in his text messaging with O Halloran; that the vehicles met in the manner described by Cst. Mintie; that there was a brief exchange between O Halloran and Owen; that Owen was subsequently arrested shortly after the encounter in possession of Oxycodone pills in a bottle that he had not yet opened is inconsistent with an innocent
7 Page: 7 transaction for the payment of tires. The tire story is far fetched and suggested for the first time at trial. There is not one shred of evidence to support Owen s assertion. To the contrary, the only logical inference to draw from this set of facts is that Owen purchased drugs from O Halloran. [23] When Owen testified he was going to have coffee with O Halloran, I believe him. However, the coffee referred to is not the liquid variety for sale at Tim Horton s, but rather the Oxycodone which was sold to Owen by O Halloran for Owen s personal use and his subsequent resale to others. [24] On the whole of the evidence as it relates to Count #1, I am sure Christopher Raymond O Halloran intentionally sold Oxycodone pills, which he knew to be such, to Justin Owen on September 7, Therefore, I find O Halloran guilty of trafficking as charged. [25] Count #2 in the indictment alleges O Halloran was in possession of Oxycodone for the purpose of trafficking. The first essential element of that offence is that O Halloran must be shown beyond a reasonable doubt to be in possession of a substance that was determined to be Oxycodone. Although I have found that he did sell Oxycodone to Owen, and thus transferred that substance to Owen, there is no evidence before me to substantiate a charge of being in possession for the purposes of trafficking. Therefore I find him not guilty on Count #2. October 29, 2013 J.
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Her Majesty the Queen. Gordon Robert Hippenstall. Before: The Honourable Justice Benjamin B.
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: R. v. Hippenstall 2012 PESC 1 Date: 20120103 Docket: S2-GC-92 Registry: Summerside Her Majesty the Queen V. Gordon Robert Hippenstall Before: The Honourable
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN. - against - JOHNATHAN RUSSELL VENIOT
PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION Citation: R. v. Veniot 2007 PESCTD 37 Date: 20071210 Docket: S2-GC-26 Registry: Summerside HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN - against - JOHNATHAN
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION. Against. Gerard Joseph MacDonald
PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION Citation: R v. MacDonald 2007 PESCTD 29 Date: 20070820 Docket: S1 GC-556 Registry: Charlottetown Between Her Majesty the Queen Against
More informationIN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
Citation: R. v. MacDonald 2018 BCPC 135 Date: File No: Registry: 20180508 86948-2-C Abbotsford IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA REGINA v. BRIAN VINCENT MacDONALD RULING ON APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL
More informationSTIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No State of New Maine
STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No. 09-3031 State of New Maine Instruction Number Instruction Description 1. Preliminary Instructions 2. Functions of
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED April 10, 2012 v No. 301668 Wayne Circuit Court KARON CORTEZ CRENSHAW, LC No. 09-023757-FC Defendant-Appellant.
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA
Date: 20171206 Docket: CR 15-01-35066 (Winnipeg Centre) Indexed as: R. v. Ajak Cited as: 2017 MBQB 202 COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF MANITOBA BETWEEN: ) APPEARANCES: ) HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ) Libby Standil
More informationLaw 12 Substantive Assignments Reading Booklet
Law 12 Substantive Assignments Reading Booklet Reading # 1: Police and the Law Training and Qualifications Police officers have to go through both physical and academic training to become members of the
More informationPROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Burrell, 2018 NSPC 9. Adam Leslie Burrell LIBRARY HEADING
PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Burrell, 2018 NSPC 9 Date: 20180409 Docket: Dartmouth No. 8110547 Registry: Dartmouth Between: Her Majesty the Queen v. Adam Leslie Burrell LIBRARY HEADING
More informationTHE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9. and a hearing concerning IMRAJ SINGH GILL APPLICANT
THE LAW SOCIETY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA In the matter of the Legal Profession Act, SBC 1998, c. 9 and a hearing concerning IMRAJ SINGH GILL APPLICANT 2015 LSBC 16 Report issued: April 9, 2015 Oral reasons:
More information1. The location or site where a criminal offence has taken place is called a(n)?
Canadian Law 2204 Criminal Law and he Criminal Trial Process Unit 2 Test Multiple Choice Name: { / 85} 1. The location or site where a criminal offence has taken place is called a(n)? death trap investigative
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 113,969 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, DAVID GARCIA, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 113,969 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DAVID GARCIA, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Ford District Court; E. LEIGH
More informationWho s who in a Criminal Trial
Mock Criminal Trial Scenario Who s who in a Criminal Trial ACCUSED The accused is the person who is alleged to have committed the criminal offence, and who has been charged with committing it. Before being
More informationCitation: R. v. Long Date: PESCTD 87 Docket: S-1-GC-71 Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: R. v. Long Date: 20011030 2001 PESCTD 87 Docket: S-1-GC-71 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN -against- JAMES
More informationCitation: R. v. R.C. (P.) Date: PESCTD 22 Docket: GSC Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: R. v. R.C. (P.) Date: 2000308 2000 PESCTD 22 Docket: GSC-17475 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: AND: PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
More informationCitation: R. v. Smith, 2003 YKTC 52 Date: Docket: T.C Registry: Whitehorse Trial Heard: Carcross
Citation: R. v. Smith, 2003 YKTC 52 Date: 20030725 Docket: T.C. 02-00513 Registry: Whitehorse Trial Heard: Carcross IN THE TERRITORIAL COURT OF YUKON Before: His Honour Chief Judge Lilles Regina v. Tommy
More informationEmpire Mock Trial Educate. Connect. Empower. A Guide for Competitors from Canada
General Takes place in the fictional State of Midlands. Takes place in the fictional location of YourTown, Cases can be either Criminal (standard of proof is Ontario. All cases are criminal (standard of
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Bruhm, 2018 NSSC 295. v. Austin James Douglas Bruhm. Voir Dire Decision
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Bruhm, 2018 NSSC 295 Date: 20181121 Docket: CRBW473972 Registry: Bridgewater Between: Her Majesty the Queen v. Austin James Douglas Bruhm Restriction on Publication
More informationTHE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court. Appellate Case No Appeal From Laurens County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court The State, Respondent, v. Timothy Artez Pulley, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2015-002206 Appeal From Laurens County Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge
More informationCommonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals
RENDERED: JULY 14, 2017; 10:00 A.M. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED Commonwealth of Kentucky Court of Appeals NO. 2016-CA-000245-MR LORENZO BARNES APPELLANT APPEAL FROM FAYETTE CIRCUIT COURT v. HONORABLE THOMAS L.
More informationR. v. LORNA BOURGET 2007 NWTTC 13 File: T-01-CR IN THE TERRITORIAL COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.
R. v. LORNA BOURGET 2007 NWTTC 13 File: T-01-CR-2007000630 IN THE TERRITORIAL COURT OF THE NORTHWEST TERRITORIES IN THE MATTER OF: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN - and - LORNA BOURGET Applicant REASONS FOR DECISION
More informationIn the Provincial Court of Alberta
In the Provincial Court of Alberta Citation: R. v. Clements, 2007 ABPC 220 Between: Her Majesty the Queen - and - Date: 20070911 Docket: 050217389P101, 103 Registry: Okotoks Allan Herbert Clements Voir
More informationIN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R v. Robichaud, 2008 NSPC 51 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN. - versus - PHILLIP ROBICHAUD
Editors note: Erratum released September 25, 2008.Original judgment has been corrected, with text of Erratum appended. IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R v. Robichaud, 2008 NSPC 51 Date:
More informationAlberta Justice and Solicitor General. Information for Self-represented Litigants In. Provincial Court. Adult Criminal Court
Alberta Justice and Solicitor General Information for Self-represented Litigants In Provincial Court Adult Criminal Court 1 Introduction This booklet outlines some basic information you must be aware of
More informationIncluded with your personal version of the incident are a series of questions that you should consider as you develop your role.
FACT SHEETS Defence witness #1 - J. Fair Accused Instructions These fact sheets provide basic information regarding the incident and the resulting charge for the trial you will be presenting. The scenario
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,547 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. RAYMOND CHRISTOPHER LOPEZ, Appellant,
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,547 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS RAYMOND CHRISTOPHER LOPEZ, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION 2018. Affirmed. Appeal from
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA
PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT OF MANITOBA November 4, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE TO PRACTICE DIRECTIVES FOR CONTESTED APPLICATIONS IN THE PROVINCIAL COURT
More informationSTUDENT LEGAL SERVICES TRAFFIC OFFENCES A GUIDE TO THE LAW IN ALBERTA REGARDING OF EDMONTON COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER
COPYRIGHT AND DISCLAIMER A GUIDE TO THE LAW IN ALBERTA REGARDING TRAFFIC version: 2009 STUDENT LEGAL SERVICES OF EDMONTON GENERAL All information is provided for general knowledge purposes only and is
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Citation: R. v. Levesque 2009 PESC 12 Date: Docket: S1-GC-559 Registry: Charlottetown
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: R. v. Levesque 2009 PESC 12 Date: 20090501 Docket: S1-GC-559 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: Her Majesty the Queen AND: Christopher Roland Levesque BEFORE:
More informationAppellant. THE QUEEN Respondent. Harrison, Goddard and Andrews JJ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
DRAFT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA761/2013 [2014] NZCA 375 BETWEEN AND BENJAMIN VAINU Appellant THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing: 29 July 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Harrison, Goddard and Andrews
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND. Her Majesty the Queen. - and - Charles Joseph Adams. Before: The Honourable Justice Wayne D.
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: R. v. Adams 2011 PESC 19 Date: 20110922 Docket: S2-GC-86 Registry: Summerside Her Majesty the Queen - and - Charles Joseph Adams Before: The Honourable Justice
More informationBetween Her Majesty the Queen, and Brandon Oliver. [2011] O.J. No Ontario Court of Justice Brampton, Ontario. W.J. Blacklock J.
Page 1 Case Name: R. v. Oliver Between Her Majesty the Queen, and Brandon Oliver [2011] O.J. No. 4554 Ontario Court of Justice Brampton, Ontario W.J. Blacklock J. Oral judgment: June 20, 2011. (32 paras.)
More informationThe Criminal Court System. Law 521 Chapter Seven
The Criminal Court System Law 521 Chapter Seven The Feds make criminal law and procedure. Criminal Court Structure Provinces responsible for organizing, administering, and maintaining the criminal court
More informationDefending Yourself. Assault. Defending yourself. Defending yourself. Defending yourself. Defending yourself. September 2015
Defending Yourself Assault September 2015 Defending yourself Defending yourself Defending yourself Defending yourself July 2012 After you ve been charged: A step-by-step chart The flowchart under this
More informationDefending Yourself. Mischief. Defending yourself. Defending yourself. Defending yourself. Defending yourself
Defending Yourself Defending yourself Mischief Defending yourself Defending yourself Defending yourself September 2015 After you ve been charged: A step-by-step chart The flowchart under this flap shows
More informationMcNeil Disclosure Packages
TRANSIT POLICE MCNEIL DISCLOSURE PACKAGES Effective Date: Interim Policy February 18, 2010 Revised Date: January 31, 2014 Reviewed Date: Review Frequency: As Required Office of Primary Responsibility:
More informationCriminal Litigation: Step-By-Step
Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step 2 Getting Defendant Before The Court! There are four methods to getting the defendant before the court 1) Warrantless Arrest 2)
More informationSUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Parsons, 2017 NSSC 269 HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN DYLAN DOUGLAS MICHAEL PARSONS. Decision
SUPREME COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Parsons, 2017 NSSC 269 Date: 20171016 Docket: CRP444456 Registry: Pictou Between: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN v. DYLAN DOUGLAS MICHAEL PARSONS Decision Judge: Heard:
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN LESLIE CAMERON KING
PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION Citation: R. v. King 2008 PESCTD 18 Date: 20080325 Docket: S1-GC-572 Registry: Charlottetown BETWEEN: AND: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN LESLIE
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN STACEY REID BLACKMORE
Date: 19991207 Docket: AD-0832 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - APPEAL DIVISION BETWEEN: AND: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN STACEY REID BLACKMORE APPELLANT RESPONDENT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN. - against - FRANCES GEORGINA LAMOUREUX. BEFORE: The Honourable Justice Wayne D.
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: R. v. Lamoureux 2011 PESC 03 Date: 20110225 Docket: S1-GC-799 Registry: Charlottetown HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN - against - FRANCES GEORGINA LAMOUREUX BEFORE:
More information1. If several suspected offenders are involved in the same criminal. accusation or indictment, no defense attorney shall be allowed to represent
Form TJ-110, INSTRUCTION FOR CRIMINAL JURY TRIAL PROCEEDINGS (Sections 6, 7, and 16, Rule 3, of the JSR) Recommendation: 1. If several suspected offenders are involved in the same criminal accusation or
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,787 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, COY RAY CARTMELL, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,787 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. COY RAY CARTMELL, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION 2019. Affirmed. Appeal from Butler
More informationAmerican Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary
American Criminal Law and Procedure Vocabulary acquit: affidavit: alibi: amendment: appeal: arrest: arraignment: bail: To set free or discharge from accusation; to declare that the defendant is innocent
More informationIN BRIEF SECTION 24(2) OF THE CHARTER EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE. Learning Objectives. Materials. Extension. Teaching and Learning Strategies
OF THE CHARTER EXCLUSION OF EVIDENCE Learning Objectives To develop students knowledge of section 24(2) of the Charter, including the legal test used to determine whether or not evidence obtained through
More informationThis booklet may not be commercially reproduced, but copying for other purposes, with credit, is encouraged.
February 2018 2018 Legal Services Society, BC Fifth edition: February 2018 First edition: May 2009 ISSN 2369-9523 (Print) ISSN 2369-9531 (Online) Acknowledgements Editor: Jennifer Hepburn Designer: Dan
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 26, 2018
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs September 26, 2018 10/15/2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TYWAN MONTREASE SYKES Appeal from the Circuit Court for Blount County No.
More informationS18A1394. FAVORS v. THE STATE. a jury found him guilty of malice murder and other crimes in connection with
In the Supreme Court of Georgia Decided: March 4, 2019 S18A1394. FAVORS v. THE STATE. BETHEL, Justice. Dearies Favors appeals from the denial of his motion for new trial after a jury found him guilty of
More informationSUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN. -and- RAYMOND ALFRED CANTELO. Before: The Honourable Justice Gordon L.
SUPREME COURT OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND Citation: R. v. Cantelo, 2013 PESC 1 Date: 20130130 Docket: S1-GC-931 Registry: Charlottetown HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN -and- RAYMOND ALFRED CANTELO Before: The Honourable
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
2011 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 7-28-2011 USA v. Kevin Felder Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 09-1567 Follow this and additional
More informationCanadian Judicial Council Final Instructions. (Revised June 2012)
Canadian Judicial Council Final Instructions (Revised June 2012) Table of Contents Table of Contents...2 Glossary...4 III - FINAL INSTRUCTIONS...5 8. Duties of Jurors...5 8.1 Introduction... 5 8.2 Respective
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Whitsett, 2014-Ohio-4933.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101182 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. ERNEST M. WHITSETT
More informationOTTAWA POLICE SERVICE DISCIPLINE HEARING IN THE MATTER OF ONTARION REGULATION 268/10 MADE UNDER THE POLICE SERVICES ACT, RSO 1990,
OTTAWA POLICE SERVICE DISCIPLINE HEARING IN THE MATTER OF ONTARION REGULATION 268/10 MADE UNDER THE POLICE SERVICES ACT, RSO 1990, AND THE AMENDMENTS THERETO; THE OTTAWA POLICE SERVICE AND CONSTABLE JARRID
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,683 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, SHAMECA R. DAVIS, Appellant.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,683 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. SHAMECA R. DAVIS, Appellant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Affirmed. Appeal from Sedgwick District
More informationCriminal Procedure Act 2009
Examinable excerpts of Criminal Procedure Act 2009 as at 2 October 2017 CHAPTER 2 COMMENCING A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING PART 2.1 WAYS IN WHICH A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING IS COMMENCED 5 How a criminal proceeding
More informationPROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Longaphy, 2017 NSPC 67. v. Christopher Longaphy. Section 11(B) Charter - Decision - Unreasonable Delay
PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Longaphy, 2017 NSPC 67 Date: 2017-11-21 Docket: 2668787, 2668788, 2668789, 2668790 Registry: Dartmouth Between: Her Majesty the Queen v. Christopher Longaphy
More informationNOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: R. v. MacDonald, 2016 NSCA 27. Between: James Malcolm Russell MacDonald. v. Her Majesty the Queen
NOVA SCOTIA COURT OF APPEAL Citation: R. v. MacDonald, 2016 NSCA 27 Date: 20160420 Docket: CAC 435925 Registry: Halifax Between: James Malcolm Russell MacDonald v. Her Majesty the Queen Appellant Respondent
More informationYOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW
YOU VE been CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU NEED to KNOW 1 This booklet is intended to provide general information only. If you require specific legal advice, please consult the appropriate legislation or
More informationPRACTICE REVIEW OF TEACHERS REGULATION
Province of Alberta SCHOOL ACT PRACTICE REVIEW OF TEACHERS REGULATION Alberta Regulation 11/2010 Extract Published by Alberta Queen s Printer Alberta Queen s Printer 7 th Floor, Park Plaza 10611-98 Avenue
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED June 22, 2010 v No. 291273 St. Clair Circuit Court MICHAEL ARTHUR JOYE, LC No. 08-001637-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ROOSEVELT FLEMING
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 5, 2008 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JAMES ROOSEVELT FLEMING Appeal from the Circuit Court for Tipton County No. 5357 Joseph
More informationPOLICE SERVICES. Presented By: JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY OF LONDON AND DISTRICT
POLICE SERVICES Presented By: JOHN HOWARD SOCIETY OF LONDON AND DISTRICT POLICE RESPONSIBILITY The police has the following responsibilities: Protect people and assets Prevent crime Enforce the law Provide
More informationINSTRUCTIONS AFTER JURY IS SWORN
Revised 10/15/12 INSTRUCTIONS AFTER JURY IS SWORN Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, you have been selected as the jury in this case. As you know this is a criminal case, and to assist you in better understanding
More informationONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE
Sault Ste. Marie COURT FILE No.: 05-3302 Citation: R. v. Maki, 2007 ONCJ 115 ONTARIO COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Michael Kelly, for the Crown AND ROBERT DANIEL MAKI, Joseph Bisceglia,
More informationCoroners Act. Purpose: Where the Act Applies: How the Act Works
Coroners Act Purpose: The purpose of this act is to provide for the appointment of coroners and a Chief Coroner. The Act requires persons to notify a coroner or police of any death in certain circumstances
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as State v. Chavers, 2011-Ohio-3248.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) STATE OF OHIO Appellee C.A. No. 10CA0031 v. GREGORY A. CHAVERS Appellant
More informationCOURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF MANITOBA
On review from a decision of Provincial Court Judge, July 24, 2018 Date: 20190204 Docket: CR 18-15-00824 (Thompson Centre) Indexed as: R. v. Kelly-White Cited as: 2019 MBQB 22 COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF
More information2016 PA Super 91. OPINION BY OTT, J.: Filed: April 28, Anthony Stilo appeals from the July 23, 2014, judgment of sentence
2016 PA Super 91 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. ANTHONY STILO Appellant No. 2838 EDA 2014 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence July 23, 2014 In the Court of Common
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Owing Goring AND. The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2011-03769 BETWEEN Owing Goring AND Claimant The Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago Defendant Before the Honourable Mr.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA. CITATION: R. v. Punko, 2012 SCC 39 DATE: DOCKET: 34135, 34193
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: R. v. Punko, 2012 SCC 39 DATE: 20120720 DOCKET: 34135, 34193 BETWEEN: AND BETWEEN: John Virgil Punko Appellant and Her Majesty The Queen Respondent Randall Richard Potts
More informationDepartment of Environment, Labour and Justice
Cover Department of Environment, Labour and Justice Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction & Intake...1 2.0 Information, Emotional Support and Referral............................. 1 3.0 Assistance Under the
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION CLAIR PERRY SCOTT GREGORY
Citation: Perry v. Gregory Date: 20030912 2003 PESCTD 73 Docket: S1-SC-24646 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN: CLAIR PERRY AND: PLAINTIFF
More information2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. Govt. Works
Page 1 2010 CarswellOnt 6035 R. v. Williams Her Majesty the Queen v. Jermaine Williams Ontario Court of Justice W.P. Bassel J. Heard: August 5, 2010 Judgment: August 5, 2010 Docket: None given. Thomson
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 1, 2009
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs December 1, 2009 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ERIC HUBBARD Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County No. 07-06938 W. Mark
More informationSTATE OF OHIO DAVANA SINGH
[Cite as State v. Singh, 2011-Ohio-6447.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96049 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DAVANA SINGH DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationTOP FIVE R v LLOYD, 2016 SCC 13, [2016] 1 SCR 130. Facts. Procedural History. Ontario Justice Education Network
Each year at OJEN s Toronto Summer Law Institute, former Ontario Court of Appeal judge Stephen Goudge presents his selection of the top five cases from the previous year that are of significance in an
More informationor
Community Legal Information Association of PEI 902-892-0853 or 1-800-240-9798 www.cliapei.ca/youth clia@cliapei.ca This booklet is for information purposes only. It does not replace legal advice. 2 What
More informationPages , Looking Back
Pages 280 281, Looking Back 1. Choose the appropriate term from the vocabulary list above to complete the following statements: a) A(n) peremptory challenge is the exclusion of a prospective juror from
More informationCase 0:13-cr KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2014 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:13-cr-60245-KAM Document 76 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/19/2014 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 13-60245-CR-MARRA(s) v. Plaintiff,
More information2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. Govt. Works
Page 1 2010 CarswellOnt 8109 R. v. Allen Her Majesty the Queen against Andre Allen Ontario Court of Justice M. Then J.P. Heard: October 19, 2010 Judgment: October 19, 2010 Docket: None given. Thomson Reuters
More informationAn Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota
An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender s Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Federal Public Defender's Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Table of Contents
More informationGENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS. Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to
GENERAL CLOSING INSTRUCTIONS Members of the jury, it is now time for me to tell you the law that applies to this case. As I mentioned at the beginning of the trial, you must follow the law as I state it
More informationNOTE WELL: See provisions pertaining to convening an investigative grand jury noted in N.C. Gen. Stat. 15A-622(h).
Page 1 of 14 100.11 NOTE WELL: If the existing grand jurors on a case are serving as the investigative grand jury, then you should instruct them that they will be serving throughout the complete investigation.
More informationFollow this and additional works at:
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 3-24-2008 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationDecember 17, XXX Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx. Toronto, Ontario XxX XxX
December 17, 2007 XXX Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxx. Toronto, Ontario XxX XxX The Honourable Robert Douglas Nicholson Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada 284 Wellington Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
More informationDefending Yourself in Court on a Not Guilty Plea
Defending Yourself in Court on a Not Guilty Plea The ideal solution when you have been charged with a criminal offence is to allow a lawyer to handle your case. However, if the matter is reasonably simple
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 16a0271p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. KEVIN PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellee,
More information(Bill No. 29) An Act to Respond to the Legalization of Cannabis
HOUSE USE ONLY CHAIR: WITH / WITHOUT 3rd SESSION, 65th GENERAL ASSEMBLY Province of Prince Edward Island 67 ELIZABETH II, 2018 (Bill No. 29) An Act to Respond to the Legalization of Cannabis Hon. J. Heath
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI JOINTLY PROPOSED JURY INSTRUCTIONS
Case 6:18-cr-00043-RBD-DCI Document 51 Filed 08/13/18 Page 1 of 34 PageID 307 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ORLANDO DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 6:18-cr-43-Orl-37DCI
More informationADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF CABARRUS 12 DOJ Petitioner:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS COUNTY OF CABARRUS 12 DOJ 00654 ALVIN LOUIS DANIELS ) Petitioner, ) ) ) v. ) PROPOSAL FOR DECISION ) NORTH CAROLINA CRIMINAL JUSTICE ) EDUCATION
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 17, 2018 Session
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 17, 2018 Session 02/20/2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BENJAMIN TATE BROWN Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. F-76199
More informationRECENT THIRD CIRCUIT AND SUPREME COURT CASES
RECENT THIRD CIRCUIT AND SUPREME COURT CASES March 6, 2013 Christofer Bates, EDPA SUPREME COURT I. Aiding and Abetting / Accomplice Liability / 924(c) Rosemond v. United States, --- U.S. ---, 2014 WL 839184
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN)
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) High Court Ref No: 13858 Goodwood Case No: C1658/2012 In the matter between: STATE And RAYMOND TITUS ACCUSED Coram: BINNS-WARD & ROGERS
More informationMULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A
MULTI CHOICE QUESTIONS EVI301-A 2010 Second Semester Assignment 1 Question 1 If the current South African law does not provide a solution to an evidentiary problem, our courts will first of all search
More informationIf you wish to understand it further, please consult my more detailed and articulated analysis.
Greetings! and thank you for consulting my legal self-defence kit. Print a copy It is free of charge, but it comes with instructions and warnings and advice. Equipment required: a printer with paper, a
More informationNOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TAKENDRICK CAMPBELL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4698
More informationCitation: Trans Canada Credit v. Judson Date: PESCTD 57 Docket: SCC Registry: Charlottetown
Citation: Trans Canada Credit v. Judson Date: 20020906 2002 PESCTD 57 Docket: SCC-22372 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN: TRANS CANADA
More informationCriminal Procedure Amendment (Mandatory Pre-trial Defence Disclosure) Act 2013 No 10
New South Wales Criminal Procedure Amendment (Mandatory Pre-trial Defence Disclosure) Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 Schedule 1 Amendment of Criminal Procedure Act 1986 No 209 3 New South
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA v. DARRYL RINGLER Appellant No. 797 WDA 2012 Appeal from the Judgment
More informationPROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION. Her Majesty the Queen. against. Corey Blair Clarke
Citation: R v Clarke Date:20050216 2005 PCSCTD 10 Docket:S 1 GC 384 Registry: Charlottetown PROVINCE OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND IN THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION Her Majesty the Queen against Corey Blair
More information