This is an application for revision in terms of the provisions of
|
|
|
- Andrew Marshall
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ESSALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, l.a., MROSO, l.a., And MSOFFE, l.a.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 183 OF ABBAS SHERALLY ] 2. MEHRUNISSA ABBAS SHERALLY ] APPLICANTS VERSUS ABDUL SULTAN HAJI MOHAMED FAZALBOY RESPONDENT (Application for Revision from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam) (Luanda, J.) dated the 16 th day of August, 2002 in Civil Case No. 17 of 1990 This is an application for revision in terms of the provisions of section 4 (3) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, 1979 as amended by Act NO.7 of The application arises from the decision of the High Court (Luanda, J.) of 16 th August, 2002 in Civil Case No. 17 of The historical background giving rise to this matter may briefly be stated. In High Court Civil Case No. 17 of 1990 the respondent in
2 this application Abdulsultan Haji Mohamed Fazalboy,was the plaintiff. He instituted proceedings against the National Housing Corporation seeking among other reliefs, a declaration that the plaintiff is the legal tenant - purchaser in the suit premises, payment of rent and interest. On judgment in favour of the plaintiff was delivered. Apparently, based on the judgment and decree in this case several orders were subsequently made in the process of execution. Among such orders was issued on 16/8/2002 against the Registrar of Buildings and another. In this application the applicants, Abbas Sherally and Mehrunissa Abbas Sherally, who it would appear were staying in the suit premises, subject of the proceedings in Civil Case No. 17 of 1990, allege that although they were not party to this Civil Case (No. 17 of 1990) eviction order of was issued against them. Not being party to the civil suit, the applicants could not appeal against the order. Hence this application for revision has been filed. At the commencement of hearing this application, the court suo motu raised the issue whether the application was competent. The
3 reason is that no copy of the ruling which is sought to be revised was attached to the application for revision. In his submission on this issue Mr. Kesaria, learned counsel for the applicant, was quick to concede that the application was not accompanied with a copy of the ruling which was sought to be revised. However, he said in this case after the application was filed by notice of motion on , a copy of the ruling was made available to the court attached to the affidavit in reply which was filed on In that situation, Mr. Kesaria urged that the objective to enable the court to see and examine the ruling sought to be revised was achieved. After all, Mr. Kesaria further submitted, there is no specific provision in the rules of the Court requiring the attachment of a copy of the decision subject of the revision, to be attached to the application. On the other hand Mr. Kesaria took the view that if the court finds that as a matter of practice it is necessary to attach to the notice of motion a copy of the ruling he prayed for the court's indulgence to grant leave for him to file an amended
4 notice of motion to include a copy of the ruling to comply with the practice of the court. On his part, Mr. Marando, learned counsel for the respondent, submitted that it is now settled that applications to this Court for revision should be accompanied by a copy of the decision which is sought to be revised. He referred to the Court's decision in Citibank Tanzania Limited v Tanzania Communications Company Ltd. and Others, Civil Application No. 112 of 2003, (unreported). In this case, Mr. Marando further submitted, as Mr. Kesaria conceded, the application for revision was lodged without the attachment of a copy of the decision subject of the revision sought. The application lodged in this Court was therefore incompetent, it should be struck out, he urged. Mr. Marando added that Mr. Kesaria's prayer for the Court's indulgence to grant leave for him to rectify the position and file an amended notice of motion is untenable. According to him the reason is that the application before the Court being incompetent there is no legal basis upon which the Court can be moved to accommodate Mr. Kesaria'sprayer.
5 It is common ground that in this application under the provisions of section 4 (3) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, 1979 as amended by Act No. 17 of 1993, there was no attachment of a copy of the High Court decision of to the application which was sought to be revised. It is also not disputed that the respondent's reply to the affidavit in support of the application affirmed by the applicants, Abbas Sherally and Mehrunissa Abbas Sherally filed on had the attachment of the order of by Luanda, J. The question for consideration is whether the copy of the decision attached by the respondent to the affidavit in reply satisfies the requirement for the attachment of the decision sought to be revised to the application as urged by Mr. Kesaria. We do not think so. As submitted by Mr. Marando, and Mr. Kesaria apparently is not disputing, at the time the application for revision was filed on no attachment of the copy of the decision subject of revision had been attached to the application. It would therefore
6 follow that the application was incompetent on account of lack of attachment of a copy of the decision sought to be revised. At any rate, Mr. Kesaria having failed to attach a copy of the ruling to the application cannot resort to rely on the copy of the decision furnished by the respondent in the affidavit in reply. The rationale behind the Court's exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under section 4 (3) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, 1979 as amended is not far to seek. The revisional jurisdiction is aimed at enabling the Court to examine the proceedings before the High Court in order to satisfy itself as to the correctness, legality or propriety of the decision thereon. If that is the objective of vesting the Court with revisional jurisdiction, it goes without saying that the Court can hardly invoke its revisional jurisdiction meaningfully unless it is seized with the decision which is sought to be revised. In this regard, we may even go further. In applications for stay of execution, the Court has consistently taken the view that such applications should be accompanied by a copy of the decision which
7 is sought to be stayed. See for instance, East African Development Bank v Blue line Enterprises Ltd. Civil Application No. 35 of 2003 (unreported). All the more reason in applications for revision for requiring the attachment of a copy of the decision, subject of revision in order for the Court to examine by reading the decision and satisfy itself as to its correctness, legality or propriety. Telecommunications Company Ltd. And Five Others, Civil Application No. 112 of 2003 (unreported) the Court had occasion to address among other things the effect of non-attachment of a copy of the decision which is sought to be revised. In that case, although the application for revision was not affected becausethe ruling of the High Court Commercial Division, was attached to the application, the Court inter alia observed: "In case the circumstances permit the Court to exercise its revisional jurisdiction do exist, how can such a task be undertaken without the Court seeing a copy of the ruling being
8 For the foregoing reasons, the application is struck out with DATED at DAR ES SALAAM this 18 th day of July, D.Z. LUBUVA JUSTICE OF APPEAL J.A. MROSO JUSTICE OF APPEAL J.H. MSOFFE JUSTICE OF APPEAL I certify that this is a true copy of the original. lka ) RI:GISTRAR
STAY OF EXECUTION-whether the application has been overtakenusually,
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAZA SHABIR BHAIJEE 3. HUZAIRA SHABIR BHAIJEE Vs. 1. SELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO, 2. REGISTRAR OF TITLES- CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 40 OF
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. MROSO, J.A., NSEKELA, J.A. And MSOFFE, J.A. CIVIL REFERENCE NO. 3 OF 2007
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CIVIL REFERENCE NO. 3 OF 2007- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM- MROSO, J.A., NSEKELA, J.A. And MSOFFE, J.A. HARUNA MPANGAOS AND OTHERS Vs. TANZANIA
SELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAYEZA SHABIR BHAIJEE... RESPONDENTS 3. HUZAIRA SHABIR BHAIJEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2007 In the Matter of an Intended Appeal SELEMANI RAJABU MIZINO... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. SHABIR EBRAHIM BHAIJEE 2. FAYEZA SHABIR
1 ST ADILI BANCORP LIMITED.APPELLANT VERSUS ISSA HUSSEIN SAMMA...RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. And MUNUO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 78 OF 2006 1 ST ADILI BANCORP LIMITED.APPELLANT VERSUS ISSA HUSSEIN SAMMA....RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CORAM: RAMADHANI, J. A. NSEKELA, J. A. AND KAJI, J. A. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
1 In the Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam Civil Application No. 173 of 2004 KAJI, J.A STELLA TEMU VS TANZANIA REVENUE AUTHORITY (Application for Revenue from the judgement of the Court of Appeal
RULING OF THE COURT. The third respondent herein, Elias K. Musiba, used to be an employee
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: RUTAKANGWA, J.A., MBAROUK, J.A., And MASSATI, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 97 OF 2010 TANZANIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LTD... APPLICANT VERSUS
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed
1 Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 20 OF 2007- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM- MSOFFE, J.A, KAJI, J. A; and RUTAKANGWA, J. A. 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
(CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. And MUNUO, J.A.)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. And MUNUO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 152 OF 2004 VICTOR FRANK ISHEBABI (a person of weak mind by his next friend) MAHAMOUD
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. (CORAM: MROSO, J. A, MSOFFE, J. A. AND KAJI, J. A.) CIVIL REFERECE NO.
1 Civil Reference No 14 of 2005 Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam. Mroso, J.A, Msoffe, J.A and Kaji, J.A Philip Chumbuka VS. Masudi Ally Kasele (Appeal from the Judgement Decision of the Appeal
This is an application for extension of time within which to lodge an. application for leave to appeal against the decision of the High Court sitting
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A., RUTAKANGWA, J.A., And LUANDA, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 182 A OF 2007 SELINA CHIBAGO... APPLICANT VERSUS FINIHAS CHIBAGO... RESPONDENT
ELIGI EDWARD MASSAWE AND THREE OTHERS (On behalf of 104 others)..applicants ATTORNEY GENERAL AND TWO OTHERS...RESPONDENTS
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., MSOFFE, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 75 OF 2006 ELIGI EDWARD MASSAWE AND THREE OTHERS (On behalf of 104 others)..applicants
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. AND RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2005
jj (CORAM: IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A. AND RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.3 OF 2005 (Application for Review from the Judgment/Decision of the Court
The appellants, through the services of the Women's Legal Aid. Centre (WLAC) lodged the present appeal to challenge the dismissal of
1 IN THE COURTOF APPEALOF TANZANIA AT OAR ESSALAAM (CORAM: RAMAOHANI, C.l., MUNUO, l.a., RUTAKANGWA, l.a., KIMARO, l.a., And BWANA, l.a.) CIVIL APPEAL NO.4 OF 2007 ELIZABETH STEPHEN 1ST APPELLANT SALOME
In this omnibus application there are two basic prayers. Extension of time to file an application for leave to appeal AND leave
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A., KILEO, J.A., And BWANA, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 98 OF 2010 RUTAGATINA C.L. APPLICANT VERSUS 1. THE ADVOCATES COMMITTEE 2. CLAVERY
(Application for stay of execution from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO 82 OF 2008 NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION. APPLICANT AND HAMISI LUSWAGA... 1 ST RESPONDENT PETER KASIDI..2 ND RESPONDENT CHRISTOPHER
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 28 OF 2014 URSINO PALMS ESTATE LIMITED... APPLICANT VERSUS 1. KYELA VALLEY FOODS LTD.................... lst RESPONDENT 2. THE
In this application made under Rule 11 (2) (b) of the Court of. Appeal Rules, 2009, the applicant, Indian Ocean Hotels Ltd. t/a
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: RUTAKANGWA, J.A., MBAROUK, J.A., And MASSATI, J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 82 A OF 2010 INDIAN OCEAN HOTELS LTD. t/a GOLDEN TULIP DAR ES SALAAM
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed TANZANIA SEWING MACHINES COMPANY LIMITED Vs. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.56 of 2007 Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam. Munuo, J.A MJAKE ENTERPRISES LIMITED.
Civil Appeal No 4 of 2003 in the court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam
1 Civil Appeal No 4 of 2003 in the court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam DAHABURALI E. SHAMJI TADEMA OVERSEAS LIMITED Vs. 1. The Treasury Registrar Ministry of Finance Tanzania. 2. The Attorney
Date of last Order. Date of Ruling
Date of last Order Date of Ruling TIMA HAJI through the services of K. MWITTAWAISSAKA ADVOCATE,has made an application by Chamber Summons under the Civil Procedure Code 1966 seeking from this court, the
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL REFERENCE NO.12 OF 2004 DAVID MWAKIKUNGA. APPELANT VERSUS
1 Civil reference No.12 of 2004 Court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam. Munuo, J.A, Kaji, J.A and Kimaro. David Mwakikunga Vs Mzumbe University (inccessor of the title of IDM Mzumbe) (Reference from
In the High Court of Tanzania at Mwanza the appellant and two. others were charged with murder c/s 196 of the Penal Code. It was
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA (CORAM: SAMATTA, C.J., MSOFFE, J.A., And KAJI, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 42 OF 2001 JUMA LYAMWIWE THE REPUBLIC VERSUS APPELLANT RESPONDENT 16/2/2005 & 28/4/2006
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIIVIL APPLICATION NO.111 OF 2006 STANBIC BANK TANZANIA LTD.. APPLICANT VERSUS
1 Civil Application No 111 of 2006 court of Appeal of Tanzania at Dar es Salaam Msoffe, J.A Stanbic Bank Tanzania Ltd Vs Plexus Cotton Ltd (Application for stay of execution from decision of High Court
(CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And LUANDA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2008
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MUNUO, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And LUANDA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2008 1. MIRE ARTAN ISMAIL....1 ST APPELLANT 2. ZAINABU MZEE...2 ND APPELLANT
appeal, it is desirable to state the following, albeit briefly.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MSOFFE, J.A.; BWANA, J.A. AND MANDIA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9 OF 2008 SHENGENA LTD...... APPELLANT VERSUS 1. NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION
RAMADHANI, C.J., LUBUVA, J.A. And NSEKELA, J.A.) KAPINGA & COMPANY ADVOCATES... APPELLANT VERSUS NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIMITED...
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., LUBUVA, J.A. And NSEKELA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 42 OF 2007 KAPINGA & COMPANY ADVOCATES... APPELLANT VERSUS NATIONAL BANK OF
(CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) 1. JOSEPH CHUWA 2. HASHIM MOTTO.. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And KAJI, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 75 OF 2006 1. JOSEPH CHUWA 2. HASHIM MOTTO.. APPELLANTS VERSUS THE REPUBLIC.RESPONDENT
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed. Valambhia, Civil Application No.18 of 1993 (Unreported). J.A, NSEKELA, - that it has inherent J.
1 Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed CRIMINAL ROBERT EDWARD The Court may only review APPLICATION MORINGE@KADOGOO its decisions as spelt out in NO.9 OF 2005 VS THE REPUBLIC- Chandrakand Joshubhai
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Of TANZANIA AT ZANZIBAR
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL Of TANZANIA AT ZANZIBAR 1. SALUM ABASS SALUM } 2. ABDALLA HDA SHAMTE... RESPONDENTS 3. ALl SElF AU :. (Appeal from the Judgment and Decree of the High Court of Zanzibar at Vuga)
This is an application for extension of time in which to.applyfor. leave to appeal out of time. The matter relates to High Court Civil
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA BERTHA ANQ~J~S_QN..................... RESPONDENT (Application for extension of time from the decision of the High Court of Tanzania at Moshi) (Mchome, J.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING
/".1", IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL CASE NO. 311 OF 1999 MWENGE GAS AND LUB OIL LTD PLAINTIFF VERSUS UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM DEFENDANT RULING A.Shangwa,J. On 17/8/1999, DR.
MROSO, J.A., NSEKELA, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) FRANCISCA MBAKILEKI... APPLICANT VERSUS TANZANIA HARBOURS CORPORATION RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: MROSO, J.A., NSEKELA, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CIVIL REFERENCE NO. 14 OF 2004 FRANCISCA MBAKILEKI. APPLICANT VERSUS TANZANIA HARBOURS CORPORATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM. (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A., MASSATI,J.A., And MUGASHA,J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: KIMARO,J.A., MASSATI,J.A., And MUGASHA,J.A.) CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 171 OF 2015 1. JOHN PAUL SHIBUDA ~ 2.TANZANIAINTERNATIONA AGRI INPUT CO-L
REGIONAL MANAGER, TANROADS KAGERA.. APPLICANT VERSUS RUAHA CONCRETE COMPANY LIMITED... RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 96 OF 2007 REGIONAL MANAGER, TANROADS KAGERA.. APPLICANT VERSUS RUAHA CONCRETE COMPANY LIMITED.... RESPONDENT (Application for
TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD...APPLICANT/J.DEBTOR INTEREBEST INVESTMENT CO. LIMITED.RESPONDENT/D. HOLDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL CASE NO. 68 OF 2000 TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD....APPLICANT/J.DEBTOR VERSUS INTEREBEST INVESTMENT CO. LIMITED.RESPONDENT/D.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (OAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL CAUSE NO.157 OF 2005 ELIZABETH AUGUSTINO SAID PETITIONER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (OAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC. CIVIL CAUSE NO.157 OF 2005 ELIZABETH AUGUSTINO SAID PETITIONER VERSUS 1. OYSTERBAY PROPERTIES LTD 1 st RESPONDENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA COMMERCIAL DIVISION AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC.COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO.70 OF 2013 VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA COMMERCIAL DIVISION AT OAR ES SALAAM MISC.COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO.70 OF 2013 1. ANDREW WISTON KALELA NDIMBO 1 st APPLICANT 2. CHRISTINA ANDREW NDIMBO 2 nd APPLICANT VERSUS 1.
AR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- RUTAKANGWA, J.A.
1 AR CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4 OF 2006- COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA- RUTAKANGWA, J.A. ROBERT LESKAR Vs. SHIBESH ABEBE (Application to set aside the Dismissal Order of 15/09/2006 and restore AR
JOHN NAIMAN MUSHI APPELLANT VERSUS KOMBO RURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED RESPONDENT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM KAJI,J.A., KILEO,J.A., And KIMARO,J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2006 JOHN NAIMAN MUSHI APPELLANT VERSUS KOMBO RURAL COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED RESPONDENT
1. YUSUFU SAME 2. HAWA DADA APPELLANTS VERSUS
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CORAM: MUNUO, J,A. KAJI. J.A. AND KIMARO, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2002 1. YUSUFU SAME 2. HAWA DADA APPELLANTS VERSUS HADIJA YUSUFU RESPONDENT (Appeal
AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2002 MATHEW MBATA...APPLICANT VERSUS DENIS CATHELESS...RESPONDENT RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 145 OF 2002 MATHEW MBATA...APPLICANT VERSUS DENIS CATHELESS...RESPONDENT Date of last order - 29/2/2008 Date of Ruling - 31/03/2008 RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAWI COMMERCIAL DIVISION Blantyre Registry Commercial Case No. 28 of 2016 (Before Honourable Justice Dr. Mtambo) BETWEEN HARA & ASSOCIATES... CLAIMANT AND ABDUL RASHID OSMAN, sc...
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION. (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J.
IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J.) APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2013 (ARISING FROM APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2012)
IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL AT DAR ES SALAAM TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2013 TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS JUDGMENT
IN THE FAIR COMPETITION TRIBUNAL AT DAR ES SALAAM TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2013 TANZANIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO. LTD...APPELLANT VERSUS MS. ELIZABETH KIUNSI 1 ST RESPONDENT ENERGY AND WATER UTILITIES REGULATORY
(CORAM: NSEKELA, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And BWANA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2008
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: NSEKELA, J.A., KILEO, J.A. And BWANA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 26 OF 2008 AGNESS SIMBAMBILI GABBA. APPELLANT VERSUS DAVID SAMSON GABBA RESPONDENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY) JUDGMENT the demolition Notice cis 12(2) and 64 of the township Rules Cap. 101. district and Dar es Salaam Region, erecting a Dwelling house
Ar_JlAB K~ ~bij.bb.m
/ IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA Ar_JlAB K~ ~bij.bb.m CIVIL CASE NO. 247 OF 1997 BASIL NICHOLAS ALEXANDER JENNINGS BRAMLY VERSUS 1. PHOKION FILIOS 2. A & F CONTRACTORS 3. EXPO TANZANIA LTD LTD. KAI!Rm~..x_A-,--.J._L
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2015 % Judgment Delivered on: December 01, CM(M) 1155/2015.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: November 27, 2015 % Judgment Delivered on: December 01, 2015 + CM(M) 1155/2015 PURAN CHAND Through:... Petitioner Mr.Arun Kumar and Mr.Udit
In this application, the applicant has moved the Court to review its. decision in Criminal Appeals Nos. 128 and 129 of 2007.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA ATTABORA (CORAM: LUANDA, l.a. MMILLA, l.a., And MWARIJA, l.a.) CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1 OF 2010 DAUDI SIO MAGUNGA APPLICANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC RESPONDENT (An application
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2003 JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2003 (From the Ruling of The Court of the Resident Magistrate at Kisutu in Civil Case No.78 of 1997 Mgetta, ISSA. H. NANGUPECHI. SRM)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. CS(OS)No.1307/2006. Date of decision:16th January, 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CS(OS)No.1307/2006 Date of decision:16th January, 2009 SMT. TARAN JEET KAUR... Through: Plaintiff Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VICTOR SUNGURA TOKE... APPLICANT VERSUS P.S.R.C & BOARD OF INTERNAL TRADE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VICTOR SUNGURA TOKE...... APPLICANT VERSUS P.S.R.C & BOARD OF INTERNAL TRADE RESPONDENT Date of last Order: Date of Ruling : 09/04/2008 The PSRC and the BOARD
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANIOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2017 MANSOR AND
(... \...' IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (MAIN REGISTRY) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANIOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 43 OF 2017 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION MANSOR BY NASSORO SLEYUM AND IN THE MATTER OF AN
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: SAMATTA, C.J, MUNUO,J, A, AND RUTAKANGWA, J, A.)
Citation Parties Legal Principles Discussed SULTAN S/O Non-compliance with the MOHAMED VS provisions of section 240 (3) of the THE REPUBLIC. Criminal Procedure Act, Cap 20 (Appeal from the R.E 2002 is
In the Resident Magistrate Court of Shinyanga sitting at Shinyanga, the appellant KAUNGUZA S/O MACHEMBA was charged with four counts.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT TABORA (CORAM: LUANDA, J.A., ORIYO, J.A., And KAIJAGE, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 157B OF 2013 KAUNGUZA S/O MACHEMBA... APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC... RESPONDENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OFT AN ZAN IA (COMMERCIAL DIVTSfON) AT DAR ES SALAAM
IN THE HIGH COURT OFT AN ZAN IA (COMMERCIAL DIVTSfON) AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC COMMERCIAL CAUSE NO 70 OF 2017 (ARISING FROM COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 127 OF 2016) BETWEEN MAN TRAC T ANZANTA LIMITED --------------------------------------------A
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5903 OF Smt. Sudama Devi & Ors..Appellant(s) VERSUS
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5903 OF 2012 Smt. Sudama Devi & Ors..Appellant(s) VERSUS Vijay Nath Gupta & Anr. Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T Abhay
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT DAR ES SALAAM REVISION NO 305 OF 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT DAR ES SALAAM REVISION NO 305 OF 2010 TANZANIA BUILDING WORKS LTD. APPLICANT VERSUS ALLY MGOMBA & 4 OTHERS RESPONDENTS (Original CMA/DSM/TEM/337/09) 17/09/2012
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GITHINJI, SICHALE & KANTAI, JJ. A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 97 OF 2016 (UR 76/2016)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL AT NAIROBI (CORAM: GITHINJI, SICHALE & KANTAI, JJ. A CIVIL APPLICATION NO. NAI 97 OF 2016 (UR 76/2016) BETWEEN SATROSE AYUMA... 1 ST APPLICANT JOSEPH SHIKANGA....2 ND APPLICANT JOSEPH
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ALLAN T. MATERU APPELLANT / APPLICANT VERSUS AKIBA COMMERCIAL BANK... RESPONDENT
..... --...,:. IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ALLAN T. MATERU APPELLANT / APPLICANT VERSUS AKIBA COMMERCIAL BANK... RESPONDENT The applicant, Allan Materu, sued his former employer, Akiba
GOVERNMENT NOTICE NO published on. THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT (CAP.141) RULES. (fv1ade under section 12) THE TANZANI COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 2009
GOVERNMENT NOTICE NO published on. THE APPELLATE JURISDICTION ACT (CAP.141) RULES (fv1ade under section 12) THE TANZANI COURT OF APPEAL RULES, 2009 ARRANGEMENT OF RULES CITATION PART 1 AND INTERPRET ATION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.170 OF 2004 (Originating fr~m Cr. Case No.l043/2000 From the Decision of Resident Magistrate Court of Kisutu AT DAR ES ES SALAAM IN THE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA C.A.No.453/98 (F) D.C.Kuliyapitiya 11546/RE Sahibi Marikkar Mohomed Ismail Marikkar No: 316, Aswadduma, Kuliyapitiya And No: 05,
IN THE MATTER OF ANA PPLIATION FOR PREROGATIVE ORDERS OFCERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS BY ADELINA CHUGULU AND 99 OTHERS
IN THE MATTER OF ANA PPLIATION FOR PREROGATIVE ORDERS OFCERTIORARI AND MANDAMUS BY ADELINA CHUGULU AND 99 OTHERS IN THE MATTER OF REVISION OF THE DECISION OF THE NATIONAL EXAMINATION COUNCIL OF TANZANIA
[GALWAY SOLICITORS BAR ASSOCIATION] Title: Defending Mortgage Proceedings. Presenter: Mahmud Samad BL e:
![[GALWAY SOLICITORS BAR ASSOCIATION] Title: Defending Mortgage Proceedings. Presenter: Mahmud Samad BL e:](/thumbs/73/68120075.jpg "[GALWAY SOLICITORS BAR ASSOCIATION] Title: Defending Mortgage Proceedings. Presenter: Mahmud Samad BL e:")
Title: Defending Mortgage Proceedings Date: 18 th October 2013 Presenter: Mahmud Samad BL e: mahmudsamadbl@gmail.com t: 087-2611694 What are Mortgage proceedings? Mortgage proceedings include any proceedings
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RUPIANA TUNGU 3 OTHERS APPELLANTS VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RUPIANA TUNGU 3 OTHERS APPELLANTS VERSUS Date of Last Order:08/05/2008 Date of Judgment: 27/05/2008 According to the memorandum of appeal filed in this court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION. CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005 Reserved on: 26-11-2010 Date of pronouncement : 18-01-2011 M/s Sanjay Cold Storage..Petitioner
AT DODOMA DOM CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF HARUNI PIASON 2. IBRAHIM MTANI... APPLICANTS VERSUS DORINA NDALIJE...
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DODOMA CRIMINAL APPLICATIO N NO. 1 OF 2007 MSOFFE, J.A 1] HARUNI PIASON 2)IBRAHIM TANI VS DORINA NDALIJE (Applicatio n for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against
RULING OF THE COURT. The appellant, John s/o Ayoub was charged in the District. Court of Tunduru in Ruvuma Region with two economic offences;
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT IRINGA (CORAM: MBAROUK, J.A., MMILLA,J.A., And MWARIJA,J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 196 OF 2014 JOHN IKLAND @ AYOUB APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC. RESPONDENT (Appeal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ES SALAAM 1. ATTORNEY GENERAL} 2. T.R.A RULING Mlay, J. This ruling is on a preliminary objection on points of law to an application for leave to apply for the orders
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, J.A., NSEKELA. J.A., And KAJI,J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 77 OF 2002 BETWEEN
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, J.A., NSEKELA. J.A., And KAJI,J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 77 OF 2002 BETWEEN TANGA CEMENT COMPANY LIMITED...APPELLANT AND CHRISTOPHERSON COMPANY
2yh August, Supplement No THE BASIC RIGHTS AND DUTIES ENFORCEMENT (CAP.
ISSN 0856-034X Supplement No. 34 SUBSIDIARY LEGISLATION 2yh August, 2014 to the Gazette of the United Republic of Tanzania No. 35 Vol 95 dated 2cjh August, 2014 Printed by the Government Printer, Dar es
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR POSSESSION Date of Judgment: 28.4.2011 RSA No.251/2008 & CM Nos.17860/2008 & 11828/2010 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD..Appellant Through: Mr.P.K.Seth,
Samuel G. Momanyi v Attorney General & another [2012] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
![Samuel G. Momanyi v Attorney General & another [2012] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)](/thumbs/84/91175965.jpg "Samuel G. Momanyi v Attorney General & another [2012] eklr REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)")
REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS) Petition 341 of 2011 SAMUEL G. MOMANYI..PETITIONER VERSUS THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL..... 1ST RESPONDENT SDV TRANSAMI KENYA LTD....2ND
.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004
.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE I.A. No. 11454/2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004 Judgment Reserved on: 09.08.2011 Judgment Pronounced on: 02.11.2011 MADAN LAL KHANNA
pc. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2002 (Original Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2001 IIala District Court before Mr. Mnengo H.M.)
AT DAR ES SALAAM pc. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1 OF 2002 (Original Civil Appeal No. 37 of 2001 IIala District Court before Mr. Mnengo H.M.) CHARLES MOSES.... APPELLANT I APPLICANT VERSUS Date of last order - 21/12/2007
Legal Business. Overview Of Court Procedure. Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities
Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities Overview Of Court Procedure 1 Rajah & Tann 4 Battery Road #26-01 Bank of China Building Singapore 049908
Through Mr. Atul Nigam, Mr. Amit Tiwari, Advs. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE OA 92/2013 & IA Nos. 132/2013, 18787/2012, 218/2013, 1581/2013 in CS(OS) 3081/2012 Reserved on: 29th October, 2013 Decided on:
LUBUVA, J.A., MUNUO, J.A. And NSEKELA, J.A.) RAHEL MBUYA... APPELLANT VERSUS 1. MINISTER FOR LABOUR AND YOUTH
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MUNUO, J.A. And NSEKELA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 121 OF 2005 RAHEL MBUYA..... APPELLANT VERSUS 1. MINISTER FOR LABOUR AND YOUTH
IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF TOOELE, TOOELE DEPARTMENT
Name Address City, State ZIP Telephone Plaintiff IN THE THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH COUNTY OF TOOELE, TOOELE DEPARTMENT, vs. Plaintiff,, Case No.: Judge: Defendant(s). COMES NOW Plaintiff
Act 7 of 1975 THE KEALA BUILDING TAX ACT, 1975 [6] An Act to provide for the levy of a tax on buildings
![Act 7 of 1975 THE KEALA BUILDING TAX ACT, 1975 [6] An Act to provide for the levy of a tax on buildings](/thumbs/90/103481204.jpg "Act 7 of 1975 THE KEALA BUILDING TAX ACT, 1975 [6] An Act to provide for the levy of a tax on buildings")
1 of 12 27/02/2013 11:25 PM Back >> Home Page >> Act Contents >> Location Map >> Principal Act >> Act 7 of 1975 THE KEALA BUILDING TAX ACT, 1975 [6] S I D E M E N U An Act to provide for the levy of a
(CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ARUSHA (CORAM: RAMADHANI, C.J., MROSO, J.A. And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 73 OF 2003 MR. ANJUM VICAR SALEEM ABDI.. APPELLANT VERSUS MRS. NASEEM AKHTAR SALEEM
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA S.C. Appeal No: 106/2007 S.C.H.C.C.A.L.A. No: 19/2007 Civil Appeal High Court No: WP/HC/CA/Co/30/2007 (LA) District Court No: 7749/CD
R U L I N G. The Plaintiff has instituted this suit against the Defendants jointly and severally with prayers as follows:-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION) AT DAR ES SALAAM LAND CASE NO. 4 OF 2011 BRITANIA BISCUITS LIMITED. PLAINTIFF VERSUS NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE LIMITED 1 ST DEFENDANT SILVANUS BENEDICT MLOLA..2
Communication 243/2001, Women's Legal Aid Center (on behalf of Sophia Moto) v Tanzania
Women's Legal Aid Center (on behalf of Moto) v Tanzania (2004) AHRLR 116 (ACHPR 2004) Communication 243/2001, Women's Legal Aid Center (on behalf of Sophia Moto) v Tanzania Decided at the 36th ordinary
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM VERSUS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM ERNEST MANENO SHIJA VERSUS MAZINGA CORPORATION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT Date of last Order: 19/09/2006 Date of Ruling: 06/11/2007 Mlay, J. Mzinga Corporation is
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2014 (arising out of SLP(C)No.3909 of 2012) JACKY.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4453 OF 2014 (arising out of SLP(C)No.3909 of 2012) JACKY. APPELLANT VERSUS TINY @ ANTONY & ORS..RESPONDENTS J UD
(CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A., And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.)
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT MWANZA (CORAM: LUBUVA, J.A., MROSO, J.A., And RUTAKANGWA, J.A.) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 5 OF 2004 RAMADHANI SALUM... APPELLANT VERSUS THE REPUBLIC..... RESPONDENT (Appeal
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH CIV Plaintiff
IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT CHRISTCHURCH CIV-22009-009-001314 BETWEEN AND I Q HOMES LTD Plaintiff GRAEME NEIL SMITH, RICHARD DOUGLAS FISHER AND BELINDA MAY FISHER (AS TRUSTEES OF THE FISHER FAMILY HOME TRUST)
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA In the matter between: CASE NUMBER: 4/95 ENSIGN-BICKFORD (SOUTH AFRICA) (PTY) LIMITED BULK MINING EXPLOSIVES (PTY) LIMITED DANTEX EXPLOSIVES (PTY) LIMITED 1st
BUFFALO CITY METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY
1 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (EASTERN CAPE
IS A HARD-HITTING CONTRACTUAL TERM CONSTITUTIONALLY UNFAIR AND HENCE UNENFORCEABLE?
IS A HARD-HITTING CONTRACTUAL TERM CONSTITUTIONALLY UNFAIR AND HENCE UNENFORCEABLE? Mohamed's Leisure Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Southern Sun Hotel Interests (Pty) Ltd (183/17) [2017] ZASCA 176 (1 December 2017)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. CS (OS) No of Versus CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR O R D E R
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS (OS) No. 2206 of 2012 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS ELECTRONICS N.V.... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Pravin Anand, Ms. Vaishali Mittal,
Date of CAV : Pronounced on 11/2/2014. appellants against the order dated passed by Learned
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Misc Appeal No. 224 of 2011 Abdul Hamid and others... Appellants State of Jharkhand and others Versus Respondents Coram : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM RULING. This is an application for extension of time to apply for
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM 1. GENERAL TYRE 2. SILVA GENERAL DISTRIBUTORS RESPONDENTS Date of last order - 14/2/2008 Date of Ruling - 28/3/2008 RULING Shangwa, J. This is an application
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ZANZIBAR
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT ZANZIBAR (AppHq~tij)_nfQrJeave to appeal to The Court of Appeal of Tanzania from the Ruling and Order of the High Court of.~~!1zibar at Vuga) dated the 9 th day of
The plaintiffs are the Trustees of the Juma Musjid Trust, bearing the reference
IN HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA KWAZULU-NATAL LOCAL DIVISION, DURBAN CASE NO: 7155/2011 AHMED ASRUFF ESSAY, N.O. ABOOBAKER JOOSAB NOOR MAHOMED, N.O. AHMED VALLY MAHOMED, N.O. HAROUN MAHOMED GANIE, N.O. MAHOMED
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY ACT CAP 67 AND
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE MATTER OF THE BANKRUPTCY ACT CAP 67 AND THE MATTER OF A PETITION FOR A RECEIVING ORDER BY MARIA K MUTESI (DEBTOR)
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + Date of Decision: % RSA 417/2015 & C.M. Nos /2015. versus.
$~26. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Date of Decision: 04.12.2015 % RSA 417/2015 & C.M. Nos.29313-14/2015 SHIV KUMAR... Appellant Through: Mr. Anil Sehgal, Mr. Om Prakash and Mr. Lalit Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ESSALAAM MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 38 OF VERSUS RULING
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT OAR ESSALAAM MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2003. MR. HAMIS A. E. MKORA APPLICANT VERSUS THE CHIEF SECRETARY PRESIDENTSOFFICE & OTHERS... RESPONDENT Date of last Order: