Lompoc City Council Agenda Item
|
|
- Matthew Pearson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lompoc City Council Agenda Item City Council Meeting Date: July 15, 2014 TO: FROM: Patrick Wiemiller, City Administrator Joseph W. Pannone, City Attorney Lindsay M. Tabaian, Special Litigation Counsel SUBJECT: (1) Introduction of Ordinance No. 1606(14) Amending Portions of Chapter 9.44 of the Lompoc Municipal Code Regarding Loitering By Registered Sex Offenders to Align With California Penal Code Section 653b; and (2) Approval of Settlement Agreement Regarding Litigation Entitled Frank Lindsay v. City of Lompoc, Central District Case No. 2:14-cv-3032 and Associated Stay of City s Residency Restrictions Recommendation: Based on the analysis presented in this report, the Office of the City Attorney and staff recommend the City Council take the following actions: 1) Introduce, for first reading, Ordinance No. 1606(14) Amending Portions of Chapter 9.44 of the Lompoc Municipal Code Regarding Loitering By Registered Sex Offenders to Align With California Penal Code Section 653b (Attachment 1 includes redlined changes and Attachment 2 is the final version of the proposed Ordinance); 2) Approve the Settlement Agreement & Release of All Claims regarding the matter of Frank Lindsay v. City of Lompoc, Case No. 2:14-cv-3032, filed on April 21, 2014, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same on behalf of the City Council, following approval as to form by the City Attorney (Attachment 3); 3) Pursuant to Section 3 of the attached Settlement Agreement & Release of All Claims, authorize the Lompoc Police Department to temporarily stay enforcement of Lompoc Municipal Code sections and , regulating the residency of registered sex offenders, until such time as the California Supreme Court has issued a final and binding decision in the matter of In Re Taylor.
2 Page 2 of 6 Background: In the 1990s, federal and state legislatures enacted various laws intended to protect minors from registered sex offenders. At the federal level, this legislation includes Megan s Law, which was adopted in 1996 and created a nationwide sex offender registry. At the state level, the California legislature adopted a series of regulations on the day-to-day lives of registered sex offenders, codified at California Penal Code 290 et seq., including a voter-approved measure known as Jessica s Law, codified at California Penal Code ( Section ). Section regulates the residency of registered sex offenders. It specifically prohibits registered sex offenders from residing within 2,000 feet of a school or park (Section (b)), and expressly permits supplemental local regulation of sex offender residency (Section (c)). In addition, California Penal Code section 653b (Section 653b) regulates loitering by registered sex offenders and provides any 290 registrant who loiters about any school or public place at or near which children attend or normally congregate is guilty of a misdemeanor. (Id. at subds. (b)-(c).) After the adoption of those state laws, concerns arose among numerous California cities regarding how local agencies could enforce Megan s Law and Jessica s Law. Due to those concerns, over 75 California municipalities, including the City of Lompoc, enacted local ordinances further regulating the residency, loitering and other activities of registered sex offenders in their communities. Mirroring state law, the Lompoc Municipal Code currently imposes both residency and loitering restrictions upon the activities of registered sex offenders in the City. Those laws (state and local) have prompted a series of lawsuits up and down the State of California. As those legal challenges have made their way through the court system, California courts have begun to limit the independent regulatory authority of municipalities. Those Supreme Court and appellate decisions, described herein, now call into question the continuing efficacy and enforceability of certain portions of Lompoc s Municipal Code regulating registered sex offenders. In addition, on April 21, 2014, the City of Lompoc was served with a federal lawsuit filed by a registered sex offender named Frank Lindsay in the matter of Frank Lindsay v. City of Lompoc, Central District Case No. 2:14-cv-3032, which challenges the constitutionality of the Ordinance. Discussion: A. Summary of City s Ordinance In 2012, the City of Lompoc acted proactively to further the protections provided by state law by adopting Lompoc Municipal Code ( LMC ) Chapter 9.44, entitled
3 Page 3 of 6 Registered Sex Offender Residency Prohibitions (the Ordinance ). The Ordinance codifies the following restrictions upon registered sex offenders within the City of Lompoc: 1. Loitering Restrictions (LMC , ): Registered sex offenders may not loiter or temporarily reside "within 300 feet from... a child care center, public or private school... park, public library, commercial establishment that provides a child's playground either in or adjacent to the establishment, a location that holds classes or group activities for children, and/or any school bus stop." 2. Residency Restrictions (LMC , ): Registered sex offenders may not live "2,000 feet from... a child care center, public or private school... park, or public library." The Ordinance further includes "co-habitation" restrictions, which provide a registered sex offender may not live in a single- or multi-family dwelling, if another unrelated registered sex offender has already established residency at that location. 3. Hotel/Motel Restrictions (LMC ): Registered sex offenders are prohibited from: (i) renting or occupying the same hotel room as another sex offender, or (ii) renting or occupying another room in the same hotel or motel where a room is already occupied by a sex offender. 4. Enforcement Provisions (LMC ): The above-stated restrictions are enforced through a series of enforcement provisions, which require landlords and hotel operators to comply with these laws in renting out their units. The Ordinance further provides violators of this Chapter "shall be guilty of a misdemeanor," subject to certain "grandfathering" and legal exceptions. B. Recent Court Cases Regarding Residency and Loitering Restrictions Recently, the California Supreme Court has accepted a case which reviews and could potentially change the current status of the law regarding residency restrictions like those in the Ordinance and Section Specifically, our highest court accepted a petition for review in the matter of In re Taylor, Supreme Court Case No. S206143, regarding the constitutionality of residency restrictions at both the state and local level. Prior to that grant of review, the controlling case on the constitutionality of Section was a Supreme Court decision issued in the matter of In re E.J. (2010) 47 Cal.4th 1258 ( E.J. ), which affirmed Jessica s Law was constitutional and was not an ex post facto law. (Id. at 1264). Subsequently, in 2012, a registered sex offender residing in San Diego County initiated the matter of In re William Taylor (2012) 209 Cal.App.4th 210 ( Taylor ). The offender sought a court order enjoining the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ( CDCR ) from enforcing the residency restrictions set forth in Jessica s
4 Page 4 of 6 Law/Section , on the grounds the blanket restriction was unconstitutional. The trial court agreed with the sex offender, and granted the relief sought. The CDCR appealed, and the Court of Appeals, Fourth Appellate District, affirmed the trial court s order in favor of the registered sex offender. The California Supreme Court has granted the CDCR s petition for review of that appellate court decision. Given its prior decision in E.J., it is possible the Supreme Court will reverse the lower courts and issue a decision which will be favorable to the continued enforceability of the Ordinance. However, we cannot be certain of that outcome. It is likely the California Supreme Court will issue a decision later this year. In addition, the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, has issued, and the California Supreme Court has declined to review, two related opinions regarding the permissible scope of local enforcement of registered sex offenders in the matters of: Hugo Godinez v. People of the State of California, Court of Appeals Case No. G ( Godinez ) and People v. Nguyen, Court of Appeals Case No. G ( Nguyen ). These published decisions determined state law preempted municipalities from adopting ordinances prohibiting sex offenders from entering local parks. Notably, in reaching this conclusion, the Court of Appeals determined that in enacting the restrictions set forth at California Penal Code 290 et seq., the state of California created a standardized, statewide system to identify, assess, monitor and contain known sex offenders for the purpose of reducing the risk of recidivism posed by these offenders, thereby protecting victims and potential victims from future harm (emphasis in original by the court). C. Frank Lindsay Litigation Against City of Lompoc The same week as the Supreme Court s April 2014 decision not to review the Court of Appeals rulings in Godinez and Nguyen, the City was served with a federal lawsuit filed by a registered sex offender named Frank Lindsay in the matter of Frank Lindsay v. City of Lompoc, Central District Case No. 2:14-cv That lawsuit challenges the constitutionality of the Lompoc Ordinance and alleges it is in violation of the First, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, the Ex Post Facto Clause of the U.S. Constitution, and Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution (state law preemption). This lawsuit is one of five filed by Mr. Lindsay through an organization entitled the California Reform Sex Offender Laws ( RSOL ). The other cities sued include the City of Pomona, City of South Lake Tahoe, National City and the City of Carson. Mr. Lindsay s counsel in all the matters is the same.
5 Page 5 of 6 D. Summary of Recommended Amendments to Residency Restrictions in Development Code In light of those recent court decisions, and the litigation initiated against the City, the City Attorney s office recommends the Council take the following actions (reiterated briefly above, and restated here with further detail regarding the basis for and effect of these recommendations): First, introduce, for first reading, Ordinance No. 1606(14) Amending Portions of Chapter 9.44 of the Lompoc Municipal Code Regarding Loitering By Registered Sex Offenders to Align With California Penal Code Section 653b (Attachment 1). Effectively, the proposed amendment would align the City s loitering restrictions with California Penal Code Section 653b, which provides any 290 registrant who loiters about any school or public place at or near which children attend or normally congregate is guilty of a misdemeanor (id. at subds. (b)-(c)), as opposed to the Ordinance s current requirement for registered sex offenders to remain 300 feet from numerous child-centric locations in the city. Second, approve the attached Settlement Agreement & Release of All Claims regarding the matter of Frank Lindsay v. City of Lompoc, Case No. 2:14-cv-3032, filed on April 21, 2014, and authorize the Mayor to execute the same on behalf of the City Council. In response to the initiation of the Frank Lindsay lawsuit, our office has negotiated a proposed settlement agreement with counsel for Mr. Lindsay/RSOL. The settlement agreement will: (1) settle the pending lawsuit for the nominal sum of $2,500 in attorney s fees and (2) stay the residency provisions of the Ordinance until the In re Taylor decision is issued by the Supreme Court. Third, pursuant to the settlement agreement (see Attachment 3, Section 3), authorize the Lompoc Police Department to temporarily stay enforcement of Lompoc Municipal Code sections and , regulating the residency of registered sex offenders, until such time as the California Supreme Court has issued a final and binding decision in the matter of In Re Taylor. As the Council has previously been informed, the proposed stay of the City s residency restrictions only has been discussed with and approved by Chief Ralston. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, once the In re Taylor decision is issued by the California Supreme Court, both parties including Mr. Lindsay and the RSOL members have agreed to conform to the Court s decision without the City needing to take further enforcement action.
6 Page 6 of 6 Fiscal Impact: Approval of the Settlement Agreement will result in the City s payment of $2,500 in attorney s fees to Mr. Lindsay. City s costs related to defending this lawsuit are appropriated in the City s self-insurance program Liability Insurance, a non- General Fund resource. Funds are appropriated and available in account for the payment of the $2,500 in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. Conclusion: In light of those recent opinions by our state s high courts, and the filing of the Frank Lindsay case against the City of Lompoc, it is recommended the City: (1) amend its regulations on sex offender loitering to align with state law (i.e. Section 653b); (2) approve a settlement agreement settling the Frank Lindsay litigation for a nominal sum; and (3) pursuant to that settlement agreement, temporarily stay enforcement of Lompoc Municipal Code sections and , regulating the residency of registered sex offenders, until such time as the California Supreme Court has issued a final and binding decision in the matter of In Re Taylor. Respectfully submitted, Joseph W. Pannone, City Attorney Lindsay Tabaian, Special Litigation Counsel Attachments: 1) Ordinance No. 1606(14) ( redlined version) 2) Ordinance No. 1606(14) ( final version) 3) Settlement Agreement and Release of Claims
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: Honorable City Council Roxanne Diaz, City Attorney Date: October 18, 2016 SUBJECT: ORDINANCE NO. 16-1684 - REPEALING CHAPTER 9.30 OF TITLE 9 OF THE NORWALK MUNICIPAL
More informationWHEREAS, Many families with children reside in the City of West Covina; and
ORDINANCE NO. 2321 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF WEST COVINA, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 15-19 (SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS) OF ARTICLE I (GENERAL) OF CHAPTER 15 (MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
More informationCITY OF LOMPOC ORDINANCE NO. 1583(12)
CITY OF LOMPOC ORDINANCE NO. 1583(12) An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Lompoc Adding Chapter 9.44 to the Lompoc Municipal Code Relating to Registered Sex Offender Residency Prohibitions
More informationT H E A G C U P D A T E
a special report on legal developments THE STATUS OF SEX OFFENDER REGULATION IN CALIFORNIA Despite the passage of Jessica s Law in 2006, many communities throughout California continue to be plagued with
More informationORDINANCE NO. 902 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 902.1) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ESTABLISHING SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY AND LOITERING PROHIBITIONS
ORDINANCE NO. 902 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 902.1) AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ESTABLISHING SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY AND LOITERING PROHIBITIONS The Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside ordains
More informationORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Lancaster ( City ) is becoming an increasingly attractive place for families with young children; and
ORDINANCE NO. 981 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 9.44 TO THE LANCASTER MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF REGISTERED SEX OFFENDERS WHEREAS,
More informationCase 3:17-cv W-WVG Document 1 Filed 08/07/17 PageID.1 Page 1 of 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-w-wvg Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of Janice M. Bellucci, SBN (JMBellucci@aol.com LAW OFFICE OF JANICE M. BELLUCCI K Street, th Floor Sacramento, CA Tel: (0 - Fax: ( - Attorney for Plaintiffs
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ROCKLAND THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK YOEL OBERLANDER, Defendant.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ROCKLAND THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK -against- YOEL OBERLANDER, Defendant. 02-354 IND. # Following a Violation of Probation hearing in this matter,
More informationYour Legal Powers and Obligations
Disclaimer: This paper is provided for general information only and is not offered or intended as legal advice. Readers should seek the advice of an attorney when confronted with legal issues and attorneys
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 599-2006 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF DICKINSON CITY, TEXAS AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES E N T IT L E D O F F E N S E S -M IS C E L L A N E O U S, B Y T H E A D D IT IO N
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS No. 17-0081 CITY OF KRUM, TEXAS, PETITIONER, v. TAYLOR RICE, RESPONDENT ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS PER CURIAM This interlocutory
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 9/15/08 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TIMOTHY ALLEN MILLIGAN, G039546
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE
Filed 1/17/18 Johnston v. City of Hermosa Beach CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/12/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-08854 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/12/16 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSHUA VASQUEZ, and ) MIGUEL CARDONA,
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 1/10/14 P. v. Godinez CA4/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationSex Offender Restrictions
TMCCP Presents Legislative Update Seminar August 17-18, 2017, San Marcos, Texas HANDOUT FOR Sex Offender Restrictions with speaker Bradford E. Bullock Attorney, Partner, Russell Rodriguez Hyde Bullock,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION DONALD MULDER, SYLVESTER ) JACKSON, VENTAE PARROW, DIMARCO ) MCMATH, JASON LATIMORE, and ) GLENN DAVIS, ) No.
More informationSTAFF REPORT JIM COPSEY, CHIEF OF POLICE/ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL JIM COPSEY, CHIEF OF POLICE/ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 14-01 TO AMEND SECTION 3999 OF CHAPTER 16 ARTICLE'" OF
More informationCity Council Agenda Item
City Council Agenda Item City Council Meeting Date: June 19, 2018 TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and Council Members Joseph W. Pannone, City Attorney jpannone@awattorneys.com SUBJECT: Adoption of Resolution
More informationRecent Decision in Case Challenging Sex Offender Residency Regulations Yields Important Lessons
1 April 28, 2017 League-L Email Newsletter Recent Decision in Case Challenging Sex Offender Residency Regulations Yields Important Lessons By Claire Silverman, Legal Counsel, League of Wisconsin Municipalities
More informationThe Court, having taken the above-entitled matter under submission on 5/16/2011, now makes the following ruling:
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER MINUTE ORDER DATE: 08/15/2011 TIME: 04:32:00 PM JUDICIAL OFFICER PRESIDING: David Chaffee CLERK: Cora Bolisay REPORTER/ERM: BAILIFF/COURT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION JOHN DOES I-IV, ) on their own behalf and on behalf ) of a class of those similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No.
More informationOverview of Whitaker v. Perdue, Civil Action No. 4:06-cv-140-CC (N.D. Ga. 2006)
Overview of Whitaker v. Perdue, Civil Action No. 4:06-cv-140-CC (N.D. Ga. 2006) Thank you for contacting us about Georgia s sex offender residency and employment restrictions. Due to the large volume of
More informationCITY COUNCIL MEETING July 27, 2017
CITY COUNCIL MEETING July 27, 2017 SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance Related to Camping on Public Property. RECOMMENDATION: Motion to adopt an Ordinance adding a new chapter related to camping to the Lacey Municipal
More informationCity of Shamokin Ordinance SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY PROHIBITION
City of Shamokin Ordinance 06-07 SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY PROHIBITION WHEREAS, the Pennsylvania Legislature enacted legislation requiring the registration of sexual offenders, now referred to as Megan s
More informationTRAVIS COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT NO. 9. Fire Code
TRAVIS COUNTY EMERGENCY SERVICES DISTRICT NO. 9 Fire Code Section 1. Adoption of Code (a) The following are hereby adopted as the Fire Code of Travis County Emergency Service District No. 9 in the State
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND. C.A. No. 15-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND CLASS ACTION REQUESTED AND CHALLENGE TO CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE STATUTE JOHN FREITAS, THEODORE CHAPDELAINE, TROY PORTER, FREDERICK KENNEY, MICHAEL
More informationMEMORANDUM II. SHORT ANSWER
DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FRANCESCA GESSNER Deputy City Attorney DIRECT DIAL: (415) 554 4762 E-MAIL francesca.gessner@sfgov.org MEMORANDUM FROM: Francesca Gessner ~ Deputy
More informationCities in Orange County California that have passed ordinances restricting persons required to register under Penal Code 290
City of Aliso Viejo City of Anaheim City of Brea code Chapter 7.60 Child Safety Zones City of Buena Park 8.50.030 Prohibitions 2012 City of Costa Mesa City of Cypress CHAPTER XIII. SEX OFFENDERS PROHIBITED
More informationCHAPTER 9 SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY AND ACTIVITY RESTRICTIONS
CHAPTER 9 SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY AND ACTIVITY RESTRICTIONS 9.01 FINDINGS AND INTENT. This section is a non-punitive civil regulatory measure aimed at protecting the public health, safety and welfare of
More information1 California Criminal Law (4th), Introduction to Crimes
1 California Criminal Law (4th), Introduction to Crimes I. NATURE OF CRIMINAL LAW A. [ 1] In General. B. [ 2] Commentary. C. [ 3] Scope of Treatment. D. [ 4] Nature of Crime. E. [ 5] Necessity of Punishment.
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Trem v. State, 2009-Ohio-3875.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JOSEPH TREM Petitioner-Appellee -vs- STATE OF OHIO Respondent-Appellant JUDGES Hon. Sheila G. Farmer,
More informationChapter 32. Sexual Offender Residency Ordinance
Sexual Offender Residency Ordinance 32.01 Findings and Intent 32.02 Authority 32.03 Definitions 32.04 Original Domicile Restriction 32.05 Property Owners Prohibited from Renting Real Property to Certain
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LAKE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION
1 1 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. ) 00 Fell Street #1 San Francisco, CA Telephone: () - Email: joeelford@yahoo.com Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE
More informationResidency Restrictions:
Residency Restrictions: Sound public policy? League of Minnesota Cities Mark Bliven Minnesota Department of Corrections Aug 21, 2017 Offenders Among Us Predatory offenders have always lived in our communities
More informationFourteenth Court of Appeals
Affirmed as Modified and Opinion filed December 17, 2015. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00283-CV THE CITY OF ANAHUAC, Appellant V. C. WAYNE MORRIS, Appellee On Appeal from the 344th District
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
0 Brian T. Hildreth (SBN ) bhildreth@bmhlaw.com Charles H. Bell, Jr. (SBN 0) cbell@bmhlaw.com Paul T. Gough (SBN 0) pgough@bmhlaw.com BELL, McANDREWS & HILTACHK, LLP Capitol Mall, Suite 00 Sacramento,
More informationORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, Chapter 46, Article II of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Clute, as amended,
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 46, ARTICLE II, NOISE, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLUTE, TEXAS; ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 46, ARTICLE II REGULATING NOISE IN THE CITY OF CLUTE, TEXAS;
More informationREPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Discussion of Preferential Parking Permit Program
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL DATE: Meeting of December 16, 2014 TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Mayor and Members of the City Council J. Patrick Tang, City Attorney Discussion of Preferential Parking Permit Program
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Filed 3/2/15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA In re WILLIAM TAYLOR et al. ) ) on Habeas Corpus. ) S206143 ) ) Ct.App. 4/1 D059574 ) ) San Diego County ) Super. Ct. Nos. HC19743, HC19742, ) HC19731, HC19612
More informationSUMMARY OF COURT DECISIONS OF IMPORTANCE TO ASSEMBLY JUDICIARY ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY FEBRUARY 8, 2011
SUMMARY OF COURT DECISIONS OF IMPORTANCE TO ASSEMBLY JUDICIARY ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY FEBRUARY 8, 2011 Prepared by Nicolas C. Anthony Legal Division, Legislative Counsel Bureau In response to
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED JOHN DOE I, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D13-3876
More informationPLAINTIFF S COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. 1. This civil-rights lawsuit seeks to vindicate Plaintiff Natalie Nichols s constitutional
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA GENERAL CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. NATALIE NICHOLS, vs. Plaintiff, CITY OF MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA; DAN GELBER, in his
More informationCITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT
CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT Agenda Item 1 Date: April 25, 2017 To: From: Presentation By: Honorable Mayor & Members of the City Council Administration Pete Daley, Fire Chief and Rob Landon Police Chief
More informationIMPERIAL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM
Agenda Item No. C-2 DATE SUBMITTED 01/19/16 COUNCIL ACTION ( x) PUBLIC HEARING REQUIRED ( ) SUBMITTED BY City Manager RESOLUTION ( ) ORDINANCE 1 ST READING (x) DATE ACTION REQUIRED 01/20/16 ORDINANCE 2
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND
Case 1:17-cv-00602 Document 1 Filed 12/29/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND CHALLENGE TO CONSTITUTIONALITY OF STATE STATUTE RHODE ISLAND HOMELESS ADVOCACY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Filed 12/18/09 P. v. Carrigg CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationTown of Yarmouth Sex Offender Residency Restriction Ordinance Town of Yarmouth, Maine Enacted 11/18/16
Town of Yarmouth Sex Offender Residency Restriction Ordinance Town of Yarmouth, Maine Enacted 11/18/16 SEX OFFENDERS RESIDENCY RESTRICTION Table of Contents ARTICLE I... 1 TITLE... 1 ARTICLE II... 1 FINDINGS
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT AT KANSAS CITY
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT AT KANSAS CITY JOHN DOE I, Jackson County, Missouri, JOHN DOE II, Jackson County, Missouri, JOHN DOE III, Pettis County, Missouri,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.:
Case 9:18-cv-81345-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/05/2018 Page 1 of 4 JOHN DOE, vs. Plaintiff, RICHARD L. SWEARINGEN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Florida Department of Law
More informationINTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 1417
INTERIM ORDINANCE NO. 1417 AN URGENCY MEASURE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCATA ADOPTED AS AN INTERIM ORDINANCE IMPOSING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA DISPENSARIES,
More informationArticle XIII. Vacation Home Rentals. 28A-68 Purpose of article. The city council of the city of South Lake Tahoe finds and declares as follows:
Article XIII. Vacation Home Rentals 28A-68 Purpose of article. The city council of the city of South Lake Tahoe finds and declares as follows: A. Vacation home rentals provide a community benefit by expanding
More informationCase 3:11-cv JPB Document 3 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 3
Case 3:11-cv-00005-JPB Document 3 Filed 01/24/11 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT MARTINSBURG West Virginia Citizens Defense League,
More informationIN THE YEAR TWO THOUSAND AND TEN AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS IN THE CITY OF LYNN
IN THE YEAR TWO THOUSAND AND TEN AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO SEX OFFENDER RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS IN THE CITY OF LYNN SECTION 1:00 Findings. A. The City of Lynn recognizes that it
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2010-11 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOERNE, TEXAS, AMENDING CHAPTER 15 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES TO PROVIDE FOR A NEW ARTICLE VI: SEX OFFENDERS, MAKING IT UNLAWFUL FOR CERTAIN SEXUAL OFFENDERS
More informationPOLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT
Research Division, Nevada Legislative Counsel Bureau POLICY AND PROGRAM REPORT Justice System: Focus on Sex Offenders April 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Federal Sex Offender Laws... 1 Jacob Wetterling Act of
More information555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 Sacramento, California tel fax
meyers nave 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1200 Sacramento, California 95814 tel 916.556.1531 fax 916.556.1516 www.meyersnave.com Ruthann G. Ziegler rziegler@meyersnave.com Via Federal Express Overnight Mail
More informationCHEBOYGAN COUNTY Zoning Ordinance Amendment # AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CHEBOYGAN COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 200 CONCERNING MEDICAL MARIJUANA
CHEBOYGAN COUNTY Zoning Ordinance Amendment # AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND THE CHEBOYGAN COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 200 CONCERNING MEDICAL MARIJUANA THE COUNTY OF CHEBOYGAN, STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDAINS: Section
More informationCITY OF JEFFERSON PROPOSED ORDINANCE #16-12 AN ORDINANCE TO RESTRICT CONVICTED SEX OFFENDERS FROM RESIDING WHERE CHILDREN CONGREGATE
CITY OF JEFFERSON PROPOSED ORDINANCE #16-12 AN ORDINANCE TO RESTRICT CONVICTED SEX OFFENDERS FROM RESIDING WHERE CHILDREN CONGREGATE Section 1. WHEREAS, Wis. Stat. 62.11(5) authorizes the Common Council
More information8. NCFM was established in 1976 to examine how sex discrimination adversely affects males in
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 8. NCFM was established in 1976 to examine how sex discrimination adversely affects males in military conscription, child custody laws,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE DIVISION LASHUN GRAY, ) ) No. 2:17 CV 1057 Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF FRANKLIN, WISCONSIN, ) Judge ) Defendant. )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN DOES 1-4 and JANE DOE, ) ) ) No. 16 C Plaintiffs, ) Judge ) Magistrate Judge v. ) ) LISA MADIGAN, Attorney
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION NEW GENERATION CHRISTIAN ) CHURCH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) ROCKDALE COUNTY, GEORGIA, ) JURY DEMANDED
More information* * * * * BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO:
AMENDING CHAPTER 6, BUILDINGS OF THE CITY CODE TO CREATE A NEW ARTICLE III ENTITLED ABSENTEE PROPERTY OWNER REGISTRATION TO REQUIRE ABSENTEE PROPERTY OWNERS TO REGISTER THEIR CONTACT INFORMATION WITH THE
More informationCase 2:06-cv LKK-GGH Document 96 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 11
Case :0-cv-0-LKK-GGH Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 JOHN DOE, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NO. CIV. S-0- LKK/GGH Plaintiff, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION MEMORANDUM OPINION. On September 27, 2012, the Appellants, Commissioners of
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CARBON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION IN RE: PETITION OF COMMISSIONERS : OF CARBON COUNTY TO LAY OUT AND : No. 12-2115 OPEN COUNTY ROAD, : Edward J. Hughes, Esquire
More informationAgenda Item C.1 DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEM Meeting Date: February 17, 2015
Agenda Item C.1 DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEM Meeting Date: February 17, 2015 TO: FROM: Mayor and Councilmembers Tim W. Giles, City Attorney CONTACT: Genie Wilson, Finance Director SUBJECT: Adoption of Ordinance
More informationSample argument that Estrada retroactivity applies to SB 180
Parts in blue print are instructions to user, not to be included in filed document unless so noted. Sample argument that Estrada retroactivity applies to SB 180 Note: Substantial parts of this argument
More information2017 and entered on the docket on September 29, The relevant facts follow. have any sexual offender registration requirements.
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LYCOMING COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH : No. CP-41-CR-2173-2015 Appellant : vs. : CRIMINAL DIVISION : GREGORY PERSON, : Appellee : 1925(a) Opinion OPINION IN SUPPORT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:10-cv-00050-W Document 1 Filed 01/19/2010 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA CHOCTAW NATION OF ) OKLAHOMA and ) CHICKASAW NATION, ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationNOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING CHAPTER 14.32 (PARKING AND STOPPING) TO ADD SECTION 14.32.206 (PARKING OVERSIZED VEHICLES RESTRICTED); TO AMEND SECTION 14.32.205 (LIMITATION
More informationRe: Proposed Ordinance to Confiscate Large-Capacity Ammunition Magazines, Council File No
VIA E-MAIL and FACSIMILE May 9, 2013 Los Angeles City Council CITY OF LOS ANGELES PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE 200 N. Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Herb J. Wesson, Jr. Ed P. Reyes Tom Labonge
More informationAN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ADDING CHAPTER 6
ORDINANCE NO. 2016- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ADDING CHAPTER 6.106 TO THE GENERAL ORDINANCE CODE RELATED TO THE PROHIBITION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA CULTIVATION AND DELIVERY
More informationO P I N I O N. Rendered on the 30th day of May,
[Cite as State v. King, 2008-Ohio-2594.] STATE OF OHIO v. Plaintiff-Appellee STEFANI KING Defendant-Appellant IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MIAMI COUNTY Appellate Case No. 08-CA-02
More informationORDINANCE NO requirements for the registration of adult sexual violent offenders after conviction
ORDINANCE NO. 168 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BETHEL, DELAWARE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA ESTABLISHING RESIDENTIAL RESTRICTIONS FOR REGISTERED SEXUAL VIOLENT OFFENDERS WITHIN THE TOWNSHIP, PROVIDING FOR
More informationSouth Dakota Constitution
South Dakota Constitution Article III 1. Legislative power -- Initiative and referendum. The legislative power of the state shall be vested in a Legislature which shall consist of a senate and house of
More informationCITY OF OAKLAND OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF OAKLAND OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY PUBLIC LEGAL OPINION TO: FROM: PRESIDENT LARRY REID AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL BARBARA J. PARKER CITY ATTORNEY DATE: MARCH 7, 2018 RE: CITY ATTORNEY S AUTHORITY
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Appellant, : No. 09AP-192 v. : (C.P.C. No. 08 MS )
[Cite as Core v. Ohio, 191 Ohio App.3d 651, 2010-Ohio-6292.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Core, : Appellant, : No. 09AP-192 v. : (C.P.C. No. 08 MS-01-0153) The State of Ohio,
More informationNOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of Choteau, Montana, that:
ORDINANCE NO. 303 AN ORDINANCE TO IMPOSE A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE REGISTERING, LICENSING, OPENING, AND OPERATING, OF ANY ESTABLISHMENTS THAT ACQUIRE, POSSESS, CULTIVATE, MANUFACTURE, DELIVER, TRANSFER,
More informationLocal Regulation of Oil and Gas
Local Regulation of Oil and Gas 1 Panel Presenters Alex Ritchie Assistant Professor, Karelitz Chair in Oil and Gas Law, UNM School of Law Jesus L. Lopez Attorney at Law and San Miguel County Attorney Stephen
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:10-cv-00059-WDM-MEH Document 6 Filed 03/01/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-CV-00059-WDM-MEH GRAY PETERSON, Plaintiff,
More informationHOUSE BILL No December 14, 2005, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
HOUSE BILL No. HOUSE BILL No. December, 00, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary. A bill to amend PA, entitled "The code of criminal procedure," by amending sections and
More informationOSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO Effective: Upon Publication After Adoption Published: March 16, 2011 OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE
OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE NO. 517 Adopted: March 8, 2011 Effective: Upon Publication After Adoption Published: March 16, 2011 OSHTEMO CHARTER TOWNSHIP ORDINANCE An Ordinance to impose a Temporary
More informationTITLE I: GENERAL PROVISIONS
TITLE I: GENERAL PROVISIONS Chapter 10. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1 CHAPTER 10: GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 10.01 Title of code 10.02 Rules of interpretation 10.03 Provisions of code as continuations of existing
More informationUnit 2 Sources of Law ARE 306. I. Constitutions
Unit 2 Sources of Law ARE 306 I. Constitutions A constitution is usually a written document that sets forth the powers, and limitations thereof, of a government. It represents an agreement between a government
More informationINTRODUCTION Copyright GENERAL PROVISIONS
Page 1 of 9 INTRODUCTION State law changes in California impact many provisions in the ordinance codes of California counties and cities. This pamphlet is intended to assist municipal and county attorneys
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 11, 2008 Session. JOHN DOE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE December 11, 2008 Session JOHN DOE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 08C-359 Hon. Amanda McClendon, Judge
More informationAgenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009
Agenda Item A.2 CONSENT CALENDAR Meeting Date: June 16, 2009 TO: FROM: CONTACT: SUBJECT: Mayor and Councilmembers Vyto Adomaitis, Director, RDA, Neighborhood Services and Public Safety Department Lt. Phil
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Page, 2011-Ohio-83.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 94369 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. WILLIE PAGE, JR. DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationSHALIMAR CHARTER. Charter
SHALIMAR CHARTER Charter Table of Contents PART I - CHARTER Modified... 1 Section 1 - [Existing town government abolished]... 1 Section 2 - Title to property reserved to new municipality... 2 Section 3
More informationDigest: People v. Nguyen
Digest: People v. Nguyen Meagan S. Tom Opinion by Baxter, J. with George, C.J., Werdegard, J., Chin, J., Moreno, J. and Corrigan, J. concurring. Dissenting Opinion by Kennard, J. Issue Does the United
More informationCITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT
03/20/18 Page 1 Item #13 CITY OF DANA POINT AGENDA REPORT Reviewed By: DH CM _X_ CA _X_ DATE: MARCH 20, 2018 TO: FROM: CITY MANAGER/CITY COUNCIL CITY ATTORNEY SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING TO TAKE INPUT REGARDING
More informationORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. 1893 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAF AEL ADOPTED AS AN URGENCY MEASURE ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION WITHIN THE CITY OF SAN
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:17-cv-00843 Document 1 Filed 08/29/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION CITY OF AUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. NO. STATE OF TEXAS and GREG
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 68 Filed: 06/29/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:369
Case: 1:16-cv-04847 Document #: 68 Filed: 06/29/18 Page 1 of 23 PageID #:369 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN DOES 1-4 and JANE DOE, ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 3:04-cv JGC Document 12-2 Filed 12/29/2004 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case 3:04-cv-07724-JGC Document 12-2 Filed 12/29/2004 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO STATE EX. REL DAVID YOST, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. C2-04-1139
More information77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 2549
77th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2013 Regular Session Enrolled House Bill 2549 Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed (at the request of House Interim Committee on Judiciary)
More informationORDINANCE NO WHEREAS, the City of Grover Beach is a General Law city organized pursuant to Article XI of the California Constitution; and
ORDINANCE NO. 18-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GROVER BEACH AMENDING SUBSECTIONS (Y) (FF) (GG) (HH) (II) AND (JJ) OF SECTION 4000.20; SUBSECTION (A) OF SECTION 4000.40; SUBSECTION
More informationORDINANCE NO IT IS ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of San Carlos as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1417 ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN CARLOS ADDING CHAPTER 8.09 TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE: REGULATION OF COLLECTIVE CULTIVATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA AND REQUIRING LICENSING OF MEDICAL
More informationCITY OF TRACY Office of the City Attorney 325 East Tenth Street Tracy, CA fax
CITY OF TRACY Office of the City Attorney 325 East Tenth Street Tracy, CA 95376 209-831-4050 209-831-4153 fax attorney@ci.tracy.ca.us City Attorney's Department Spring Conference League of California Cities
More information