The Manual concerning proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
|
|
- Alexandra Lang
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Manual concerning proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Part E, Section 8 Interlocutory Revision
2 2 Table of contents 8.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES AVAILABILITY OF INTERLOCUTORY REVISION PROCEDURE WHERE INTERLOCUTORY REVISION IS AVAILABLE Verification whether the appeal is deemed to have been filed Verification whether the appeal is admissible Verification whether the appeal is well-founded Situations where the initial decision may be rectified Situations where the appeal is well-founded but interlocutory revision may nevertheless not take place Impact of a request for restitutio in integrum Decision to grant interlocutory revision Deadlines for taking the decision Contents of the decision Appeal against the decision Communication of the decision PROCEDURE WHERE INTERLOCUTORY REVISION IS NOT GRANTED...9
3 3 8.1 GENERAL PRINCIPLES CTMR 60 Interlocutory revision can be granted where an appeal has been lodged against a decision for which the Boards of Appeal are competent pursuant to Article 57 CTMR. CTMR 60 (1) If the division or instance of the Office whose decision is appealed considers the appeal to be admissible and well founded, it shall rectify its decision. This shall not apply where the appellant is opposed by other parties to the proceedings. If the decision is not rectified within one month after receipt of the statement of grounds of the appeal, the appeal shall be remitted to the Boards of Appeal without delay, and without comment as to its merits. The purpose of interlocutory revision is to avoid that the Boards of Appeal are seized with appeals against decisions with regard to which the need of rectification has been recognized by the Office. However, the purpose of interlocutory revision is not to remove mistakes in decisions of the Office without changing the outcome of a case, but to grant the appellant the relief sought by him. 8.2 AVAILABILITY OF INTERLOCUTORY REVISION CTMR 60 (1) Interlocutory revision is not available in inter partes-proceedings. This comprises opposition proceedings, including decisions by which the opposition is rejected as inadmissible, proceedings concerning applications for revocation or declaration of invalidity, and certain proceedings concerning inspection of files (see points and of this Manual). Likewise, interlocutory revision is not available where the time limit of one month following the receipt by the Office of the statement of grounds of appeal has expired. Interlocutory revision requires a pending appeal. Where the appeal has been withdrawn before the one month time limit available for interlocutory revision has expired and before a decision granting interlocutory revision has been taken, interlocutory revision is not available.
4 4 8.3 PROCEDURE WHERE INTERLOCUTORY REVISION IS AVAILABLE Where interlocutory revision is available, the documents making up the appeal shall be transmitted by the Registrar of the Board of Appeal to the head of the department or division of the Office which has taken the decision. This applies also to any subsequent communication relating to the appeal. A copy of the appeal and any such communication shall be communicated to the Legal Department. CTMR 60, 125 The division or department referred to above (hereinafter referred to as the competent division ) shall examine whether interlocutory revision may be granted. CTMR 60 (1) Interlocutory revision may only be granted where the appeal is admissible and well-founded. CTMR 59 IR 49 (3) Verification whether the appeal is deemed to have been filed As an appeal shall be deemed to have been filed only when the appeal fee has been paid, appeals for which the appeal fee has not been paid must be left out of consideration for the purposes of interlocutory revision. IR 49 (3) FR 2 point 18 The competent division must therefore verify whether the appeal fee has been fully paid within the applicable time limit of two months after notification of the contested decision. If that is not the case, interlocutory revision is excluded, and the appeal will have to be remitted without delay, and not necessarily only at the end of the one month time limit, to the Boards of Appeal. FR 8 (3), (4) Under Article 8 (3) FR a payment which is received by the Office after the expiry of the time limit for payment is nevertheless deemed to observe the time limit if the payer made the necessary steps before expiry of the time limit, provided that if these steps were completed only within the ten days before expiry of the time limit, a surcharge must be paid as well. Interlocutory revision
5 5 can only be granted if at the date the payment is received the competent division is immediately satisfied that the conditions of Article 8 (3) FR have been met, that is to say, if the records available at the Financial Service of the Office (such as copy of the order of the bank transfer) evidence the day on which the payment was initiated and if the surcharge, if applicable, has already been received by the Office. An invitation pursuant to Article 8 (4) FR may not be issued by the competent division. Where the appellant or, where the representative of the appellant has introduced the appeal, the representative has a current account, the current account will be debited (for details, see Communication of the President of the Office No 5/96, OJ OHIM 1996, 1460). Where the current account lacks sufficient funds, the procedure of inviting the holder of the current account to fill up the account within one month, pursuant to Article 8 of Decision No EX of the President of the Office as amended (OJ OHIM 1996, 48 and 1996, 1454), will generally not be completed before the expiration of the one month time limit available for granting interlocutory review. In such a case, the competent division must, instead of initiating a notification to fill up the current account, abstain from further steps and without delay remit the case to the Boards of Appeal Verification whether the appeal is admissible CTMR 57, 58, 59 IR 48, 49 (1), (2) The competent division must be satisfied that the appeal is admissible. The appeal must thus comply with the requirements laid down in Articles 57 to 59 CTMR and Rule 48 (1) (c), (2) IR, as well as with all the other requirements to which Rule 49 (2) IR refers. The competent division may in no case contact the appellant so as to have formal or substantive deficiencies of the appeal remedied. This applies as well to oral contacts. Where the requirements for admissibility of the appeal are not met, the case must be remitted without delay to the Boards of Appeal. IR 48 (2), 49 (1) Where the language used is not available for the lodging of the appeal, interlocutory revision shall not be granted. IR 48 (1) (a), 49 (2), 79 Where required indications such as the name and the address of the appellant are lacking or where the signature or the required authorization are missing, interlocutory revision shall not be granted. CTMR 59, 60 (2)
6 6 Where the appeal is not accompanied by a written statement of the grounds of appeal, the competent division must first wait for it to be filed without however contacting the appellant. When the written statement is filed subsequently but within the time limit, the date of filing the written statement is the starting point of the one month time limit for interlocutory revision. When the written statement is not filed within the time limit of four months after the notification of the contested decision as provided for in Article 59 3rd sentence CTMR, the appeal is inadmissible and must therefore be remitted without delay to the Boards of Appeal; this applies even where the competent division is convinced that its decision was incorrect without having to know any statements of the appellant. CTMR 60 (1) Verification whether the appeal is well-founded The competent division has to verify whether the appeal is well-founded Situations where the initial decision may be rectified The relevant date for assessing whether the appeal is well-founded is the date on which the competent division examines whether or not interlocutory revision shall be granted. The appeal is well-founded where the contested decision was incorrect. CTMR 88 (2), (3), 89 (1) IR 1 (1) (b), 9 (3), (4), 31 (6), 33 (3), 76 (1) The appeal is also well-founded where, although the contested decision, generally the refusal of an application pronounced in the course of the examination ex parte, was correct at the time it was taken, the appellant furnishes additional proof or information together with the appeal which remedies the deficiences of the application or request which have been the subject of an objection by the Office and enables the Office to rectify its decision. Interlocutory revision is available in these situations if the consequence of refusal is not the immediate result of a peremptory time period Situations where the appeal is well-founded but interlocutory revision may nevertheless not take place Interlocutory revision may only be granted if the objections raised by the Office are completely overcome. IR 9 For example, interlocutory revision may not take place where the CTM applicant removes the deficiencies pointed out by the Office only partially.
7 7 IR 9 (3), 13 Another example is where the examiner has objected to the list of goods and services and the CTM applicant files a new list of goods and services which fails to overcome the examiner s objections completely, but requires further examination. CTMR 7 (3), 38 (1) IR 11 (1), (3) A further example is where the Office has rejected a CTM application for absolute grounds but the CTM applicant invokes, in his appeal, that the mark has acquired distinctiveness in consequence of the use made of it and this would require further proof. Interlocutory revision is not available when granting it would lead merely to a re-opening of the issue without resolving it. Interlocutory revision need not necessarily result in a positive decision on the main issue (in case of a CTM application, registration or at least publication). Rather, interlocutory revision may grant relief to the appellant to the extent that he seeks a reversal of a decision. In determining whether a decision by means of interlocutory revision would grant the requested relief, the attacked decision and the reasons on which it is based provide the basis for the analysis Impact of a request for restitutio in integrum CTMR 59, 78 Where the notice of appeal, or the written statement of the grounds of appeal, were not filed in time but are accompanied by a request for restitutio in integrum seeking reinstatement into the time limit of two months for lodging an appeal or filing the statement, interlocutory revision may not be granted. Rather, the appeal shall be remitted to the Boards of Appeal without delay Decision to grant interlocutory revision If the competent division comes to the conclusion that interlocutory revision should be granted, it must take a decision to this effect within the time limit of one month after receipt of the statement of grounds of appeal. IR Deadlines for taking the decision The decision must be dispatched on the last day of that time limit at the latest. It does not matter whether the date of notification of the decision is after that
8 8 date. If, for example, the decision is notified by registered mail, the registered letter must be posted on the last day of the time limit at the latest Contents of the decision As far as the contents of the decision is concerned, it must at least provide for the annulment of the initial decision and can make provision for the further treatment of the case, e.g. that the CTM application be registered or the transfer the registration of which has been applied for be entered in the files of the CTM application. IR 51 Furthermore, the decision must state whether or not the appeal fee is reimbursed. The reimbursement of the appeal fee shall be ordered only if such reimbursement is equitable by reason of a substantial procedural violation. The basic consideration is whether or not at the date on which the contested decision was taken there was a fault on the side of the Office. If the contested decision was found incorrect in itself, reimbursement shall be granted. If the contested decision was correct at the date on which it was taken, reimbursement shall be denied except where it is established that a document or observation removing the deficiency raised by the Office was actually received by the Office prior to the decision but not included in the file in time. In case of payment of fees by means of a current account reimbursement shall be effected by crediting the fee to the holder of the current account or, where the appeal fee has not yet been debited, by making a statement in the decision that the appeal fee will not be debited. CTMR Appeal against the decision The decision to grant interlocutory revision as such is not subject to appeal. CTMR 57 (2) Where reimbursement of the appeal fee is denied, that decision is subject to separate appeal Communication of the decision When interlocutory revision has been granted, the competent division shall inform the Registrar of the Boards of Appeal of the result. The competent divison shall as well inform the Legal Departement.
9 9 8.4 PROCEDURE WHERE INTERLOCUTORY REVISION IS NOT GRANTED When the competent division comes to the conclusion that the conditions for granting interlocutory revision are not met, and at the latest when the one month time limit provided for in Article 60 (2) has expired, the competent division must remit the case to the Boards of Appeal without any comment or statement. Remittance without comments in particular means that no decision shall be taken to deny interlocutory revision. The competent division shall inform the Legal Department accordingly.
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 8
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 8 RESTITUTIO IN INTEGRUM Guidelines for Examination in the Office,
More informationNEW TRENDS IN TRADE MARK PRACTICE AT OHIM. AMENDMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY TRADE MARK REGULATION. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 422/
NEW TRENDS IN TRADE MARK PRACTICE AT OHIM. AMENDMENTS TO THE COMMUNITY TRADE MARK REGULATION. COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 422/2004 1. Julio Laporta Insa Examiner Trade Marks Department OHIM 1 The opinions
More informationGuidelines Concerning Proceedings before the. Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market. (Trade Marks and Designs) Part C: OPOSITION GUIDELINES
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) TRADE MARKS DEPARTMENT Guidelines Concerning Proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART D
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART D CANCELLATION SECTION 1 PROCEEDINGS Guidelines for Examination
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART A
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 1 MEANS OF COMMUNICATION, TIME LIMITS Guidelines
More informationECTA European Communities Trade Mark Association 27 th Annual Meeting in Killarney
ECTA European Communities Trade Mark Association 27 th Annual Meeting in Killarney Opposition and Cancellation Proceedings Similarities and Differences Vincent O Reilly, Director Department for Industrial
More informationThe Manual Concerning Proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Part E, Section 3:
The Manual Concerning Proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Part E, Section 3: Changes in an application or registration ( TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.1
More informationL 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union
L 172/4 EN Official Journal of the European Union 5.7.2005 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1041/2005 of 29 June 2005 amending Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the
More informationMadrid Easy. A rough and easy guide how international registrations designating the European Community will be processed by the OHIM
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) Trade Marks Department IP Matters Alicante, 14 September 2004 DS/ab -TMD/04 Madrid Easy Or: A rough and easy guide how international
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON EUROPEAN TRADE MARKS PART B EXAMINATION
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON EUROPEAN TRADE MARKS PART B EXAMINATION SECTION 1 PROCEEDINGS Guidelines for Examination in the
More informationA trademark licensee s position in Italian & CTM practice By Edith Van den Eede
A trademark licensee s position in Italian & CTM practice By Edith Van den Eede Trademark licensing has become an important way of conducting IP business transactions, often linking small and large companies
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union L 251/3
24.9.2009 Official Journal of the European Union L 251/3 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 874/2009 of 17 September 2009 establishing implementing rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94
More informationECTA European Communities Trade Mark Association
ECTA European Communities Trade Mark Association Summary Report on the Workshop on the Changes in the Implementing Regulations and CTM Renewals held in Alicante on October 4, 2005 ECTA attended the above
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART E REGISTER OPERATIONS SECTION 2
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF EUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART E REGISTER OPERATIONS SECTION 2 CONVERSION Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part
More informationGuidelines Concerning Proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Part B, Examination
Guidelines Concerning Proceedings before the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) Part B, Examination Amendments (Chapter 13) Final version, 25 November 2004 1 Table
More informationThis document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents
1995R2868 EN 23.03.2016 005.002 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2868/95 of 13 December
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ON REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS RENEWAL OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ON REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS RENEWAL OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS Guidelines for Examination in the Office Page 1 Table
More informationKey to the European Patent Convention Edition Part VI
Key to the European Patent Convention Edition 2011 Part VI Article 106 - Decisions subject to appeal PART VI - APPEALS PROCEDURE Article 106 i - Decisions subject to appeal (1) An appeal shall lie from
More informationIMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.
Page 1 of 9 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber) 17 September 2003 (1) (Community
More informationRules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court
18 th draft of 19 October 2015 Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court Preliminary set of provisions for the Status 1. First draft dated 29 May 2009 Discussed in expert meetings on 5 June
More information(Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EC ) No 2868/95. of 13 December 1995
15. 12. 95 [ EN Official Journal of the European Communities No L 303/1 I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) COMMISSION REGULATION ( EC ) No 2868/95 of 13 December 1995 implementing Council Regulation
More informationAPPLICATION FOR TOTAL CONVERSION
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (OHIM) Avenida de Europa, 4 Apartado de Correos 77 Tel. +34 965 139 100 E 03080 Alicante Fax +34 965 131 344 APPLICATION FOR TOTAL CONVERSION OHIM FORM EN
More informationHUNGARY Utility Model Act Act XXXVIII OF 1991 on the protection of utility models as consolidated on April 1, 2013
HUNGARY Utility Model Act Act XXXVIII OF 1991 on the protection of utility models as consolidated on April 1, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter I SUBJECT MATTER OF AND RIGHTS CONFERRED BY UTILITY MODEL PROTECTION
More informationGUIDELINES CONCERNING PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARK AND DESIGNS) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN
GUIDELINES CONCERNING PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARK AND DESIGNS) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN RENEWAL Draft, DIPP Status: October 2007 Renewal Guidelines
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART A
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 2 GENERAL PRINCIPLES TO BE RESPECTED IN
More informationVADEMECUM TO THE COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS BULLETIN
VADEMECUM TO THE COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS BULLETIN V. 3 (15.09.2005) VADEMECUM Introduction Part A Part B Part C Part D Part E Part F Part M - CTM applications - CTM registrations - Later entries in the CTM
More informationThe Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board. Disciplinary Procedure Rules
The Patent Regulation Board and The Trade Mark Regulation Board Disciplinary Procedure Rules The Patent Regulation Board of the Chartered Institute of Patent Attorneys and the Trade Mark Regulation Board
More informationGUIDELINES FOR THE PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY OF A REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN
GUIDELINES FOR THE PROCEEDINGS RELATING TO A DECLARATION OF INVALIDITY OF A REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGN 1) INTRODUCTION 2) GENERAL PRINCIPLES 3) FILING OF THE APPLICATION 4) ADMISSIBILITY 5) EXCHANGE OF
More informationNotes on the Conversion Form
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (OHIM) Trade Marks and Designs Notes on the Conversion Form General Remarks The conversion form is made available by the Office for Harmonization in the
More informationPATENT ACT (UNOFFICIAL CLEAR TEXT) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
PATENT ACT NN 173/03, 31.10.2003. (in force from January 1, 2004) *NN 87/05, 18.07.2005. (in force from July 18, 2005) **NN 76/07, 23.07.2007. (in force from July 31, 2007) ***NN 30/09, 09.03.2009. (in
More informationCOMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 5.3.2018 C(2018) 1231 final COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of 5.3.2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on
More informationImplementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents
Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents of 5 October 1973 as adopted by decision of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation of 7 December 2006
More informationAnnex IX Regulations governing administrative review, mediation, complaints and appeals
APRIL 2005 Amdt 17/July 2014 PART 4 ANNEX IX-1 Annex IX Regulations governing administrative review, mediation, complaints and appeals Approved by the Council on 23 January 2013 (1), the present Regulations
More informationFINAL PROPOSAL OF THE ACT ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT
FINAL PROPOSAL OF THE ACT ON AMENDMENTS TO THE PATENT ACT In the Patent Act ( Official Gazette Nos. 173/2003, 87/2005, 76/2007, 30/2009, 128/10 and 49/2011), after Article 1, Articles 1.a and 1.b are added
More informationPART I IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO PART I OF THE CONVENTION
EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the grant of European Patents as last amended on 15 October 2014 enter into force on 1 April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I IMPLEMENTING
More informationUnitary Patent Procedure before the EPO
Unitary Patent Procedure before the EPO Platform Formalities Officers EPO The Hague H.-C. Haugg Director Legal and Unitary Patent Division D.5.2.3 20 April 2017 Part I General Information What is the legal
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART E
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITY TRADE MARKS PART E REGISTER OPERATIONS SECTION 3 CTMs AS OBJECTS OF PROPERTY CHAPTER
More informationUNITED STATES OF AMERICA Trademark Regulations Title 37 - Code of Federal Regulations as amended on June 11, 2015, effective July 17, 2015.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Trademark Regulations Title 37 - Code of Federal Regulations as amended on June 11, 2015, effective July 17, 2015. TABLE OF CONTENTS RULES APPLICABLE TO TRADEMARK CASES 2.1 [Reserved]
More informationThe Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board)
The Intellectual Property Regulation Board (incorporating The Patent Regulation Board and the Trade Mark Regulation Board) Final Draft Disciplinary Procedure Rules The Patent Regulation Board of the Chartered
More informationPROCEDURE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE ACT
PART ONE General Principles PROCEDURE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE ACT Act No : 2577 Date of Enactment : 06.01.1982 Date of Promulgation in the Official Gazette : 20.01.1982 No: 17580 Collection of Acts :
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ON REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE ON REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EXAMINATION OF DESIGN INVALIDITY APPLICATIONS Guidelines for Examination
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 8 RESTITUTIO IN INTEGRUM
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 8 RESTITUTIO IN INTEGRUM Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part A, General Rules Page
More informationXVI.3. Maintenance of the patent in amended form
XVI.3. Maintenance of the patent in amended form XVI.3.1. Art.101(3)(a) and R.82 contain the legal provisions for the maintenance of a patent in amended form. The current EPO practice for implementing
More information1 Introduction The EUIPO as Office of Origin... 4
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION IN THE EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) ON COMMUNITYEUROPEAN UNION TRADE MARKS PART M INTERNATIONAL
More informationWORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION
Information Notice No. 27/2008 WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION 34, chemin des Colombettes, P.O. Box 18, CH-1211 Geneva 20 (Switzerland) (41) 22 338 91 11 Facsimile (International Trademark Registry):
More informationCouncil Regulation (EC) No 40/94
I (Acts whose publication is obligatory) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark TABLE OF CONTENTS pages TITLE I GENERAL PROVISIONS... 4 TITLE II THE LAW RELATING
More informationLAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN «ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS»
DRAFT LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN «ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS» This Law shall govern relations arising in connection with the legal protection and use in the Republic of Tajikistan of appellation
More informationPAPER: FC5 MARKS AWARDED: 56
PAPER: FC5 MARKS AWARDED: 56 Question 1 a) 'Unitary in character' means that the CTM has equivalent affect throughout each member state of the Community. It can only be dealt with (e.g. assigned, mortgaged)
More informationEU ADMINISTRATIVE LAW SECTORAL REPORT: TRADE MARKS 1. INTRODUCTORY NOTE ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVERSARY AND INQUISITORIAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS.
EU ADMINISTRATIVE LAW SECTORAL REPORT: TRADE MARKS 1. INTRODUCTORY NOTE ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ADVERSARY AND INQUISITORIAL ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS. EU law and practice is more inquisitorial and less
More informationAct on Model Case Proceedings in Disputes under Capital Markets Law (Capital Markets Model Case Act KapMuG)
Übersetzung durch Jane Yager für das Bundesministerium der Justiz und für Verbraucherschutz. Translation provided by Jane Yager for the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. Stand: Die Übersetzung
More informationINDUSTRIAL DESIGNS REGULATIONS 1999 as amended by PU (A) 182 on June 24, 2013 ENTRY INTO FORCE: July 1, 2013
INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS REGULATIONS 1999 as amended by PU (A) 182 on June 24, 2013 ENTRY INTO FORCE: July 1, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Preamble 1. Citation and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Prescribed fee
More informationDEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) RULES, (1) These rules may be called the Debts Recovery Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1993.
DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL (PROCEDURE) RULES, 1993 In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-sections(1) and (2) of section 36 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institution Ordinance, 1993
More information( Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, No. 19/02) LAW ON ADMINISTRATIVE DISPUTES OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
( Official Gazette of Bosnia and Herzegovina, No. 19/02) Pursuant to Article IV.4.a) of the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Parliamentary Assembly of Bosnia and Herzegovina, at the session
More informationBESCHWERDEKAMMERN DES EUROPÄISCHEN PATENTAMTS BOARDS OF APPEAL OF THE EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE CHAMBRES DE RECOURS DE L'OFFICE EUROPEEN DES BREVETS
Abstract A Euro-PCT applicant who has not carried out a certain procedural act within the time limit prescribed in the PCT can take advantage of the relevant provisions of the EPC concerning re-establishment
More informationHONG KONG Trade Marks Rules as amended by L.N. 62 of 2006 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 26, 2006 Chapter: 559A
HONG KONG Trade Marks Rules as amended by L.N. 62 of 2006 ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 26, 2006 Chapter: 559A TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY Section: 1 (Omitted as spent) Section: 2 Interpretation Section:
More informationExecutive Rules under the Uniform Benelux Designs Laws*
Executive Rules under the Uniform Benelux Designs Laws* TABLE OF CONTENTS** Articles Chapter I: Benelux Deposit... 1 to 9 Chapter II: Registration... 9 to 11 Chapter III: Renewal... 12 and 13 Chapter IV:
More informationACCESSION KIT: THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS
ACCESSION KIT: THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS Contents THE MADRID SYSTEM FOR THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS... 1 ADVANTAGES OF THE MADRID SYSTEM... 1 BENEFITS FOR
More informationI. Correspondence received by OHIM
OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET (TRADE MARKS AND DESIGNS) I. Correspondence received by OHIM The OHIMs internal document classification system for CTM-related documents has three levels:
More informationUtility Models Act. Passed RT I 1994, 25, 407 Entry into force
Issuer: Riigikogu Type: act In force from: 01.01.2015 In force until: In force Translation published: 23.12.2014 Amended by the following acts Passed 16.03.1994 RT I 1994, 25, 407 Entry into force 23.05.1994
More informationEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ON THE DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR RULES ON THE EUROPEAN PATENT LITIGATION CERTIFICATE AND OTHER APPROPRIATE QUALIFICATIONS
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ON THE DRAFT PROPOSAL FOR RULES ON THE EUROPEAN PATENT LITIGATION CERTIFICATE AND OTHER APPROPRIATE QUALIFICATIONS According to Article 48(2) of the Agreement on a Unified Patent
More informationOrdinance on the Protection of Plant Varieties
Ordinance on the Protection of Plant Varieties (of May 11, 1977)* TABLE OF CONTENTS** Chapter I: Section 1: Section 2: Section 3: Chapter II: Section 1: Section 2: Chapter III: Section 1: Section 2: Chapter
More informationKingdom of Saudi Arabia Law of Arbitration
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Law of Arbitration Royal Decree No. M/34 Dated 24/5/1433H 16/4/2012 of approving the Law of Arbitration With the Help of Almighty God, We, Abdullah ibn Abdulaziz Al Saud, King of
More informationTrade Marks Act, 1996 (Community Trade Mark) Regulations (S.I. No. 229 of 2000) The Irish Patent Office
Title Source Trade Marks Act, 1996 (Community Trade Mark) Regulations (S.I. No. 229 of 2000) The Irish Patent Office S.I. No. 229 of 2000. Trade Marks Act, 1996 (Community Trade Mark) Regulations, 2000
More informationThe Community Trade Mark and the National Trade Marks Are they in harmony? The Benelux point of view.
Round Table ECTA-BOIP-OHIM The Community Trade Mark and the National Trade Marks Are they in harmony? The Benelux point of view. Are the CTM and Benelux systems harmonized? Relative grounds of refusal
More informationIMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO THE LAW 84/1998 ON TRADEMARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS. CHAPTER I General Provisions
IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS TO THE LAW 84/1998 ON TRADEMARKS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS CHAPTER I General Provisions Article 1 - Definitions (1) Within the meaning of the present regulations the terms and
More informationANNEX C. Official Court Translation
ICC-01/05-01/08-757-AnxC-tENG 17-01-2013 1/22 NM T ANNEX C ICC-01/05-01/08-757-AnxC-tENG 17-01-2013 2/22 NM T CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC Unity Dignity Work PRESIDENCY OF THE REPUBLIC Chérubin Laurent Ndobe
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION OF REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) REGISTERED COMMUNITY DESIGNS EXAMINATION OF DESIGN INVALIDITY APPLICATIONS Guidelines for
More informationPart IV. Fees payable on entering the European regional phase. Fees - general remarks
IV.7.5. extend beyond the originally filed contents of the application in the original language, then the application in its original language can form the basis for such an amendment, which is consequently
More informationRegulations to the Norwegian Patents Act (The Patent Regulations)
Regulations to the Norwegian Patents Act (The Patent Regulations) This is an unofficial translation of the regulations to the Norwegian Patents Act. Should there be any differences between this translation
More informationThe Ministry of Justice March 5, 2013 Stockholm
1 The Ministry of Justice March 5, 2013 Stockholm TRADE MARKS ACT (Swedish Statute Book, SFS, 2010:1877) Unofficial translation CHAPTER 1. General Provisions Scope of Application Trade marks and other
More informationAct to Implement Certain Legal Instruments In the Field of International Family Law (International Family Law Procedure Act - IFLPA)
Übersetzung durch Brian Duffett Translation provided by Brian Duffett 2011 juris GmbH, Saarbrücken Act to Implement Certain Legal Instruments In the Field of International Family Law (International Family
More informationLUXEMBOURG Patent Law as amended by the law of May 24, 1998 ENTRY INTO FORCE: June 21, 1998
LUXEMBOURG Patent Law as amended by the law of May 24, 1998 ENTRY INTO FORCE: June 21, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE I GENERAL Art. 1. Definitions Art. 2. International Conventions TITLE II PATENTS FOR
More informationPROTOCOL relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks, adopted at Madrid on 27 June 1989
L 296/22 PROTOCOL relating to the Madrid Agreement concerning the international registration of marks, adopted at Madrid on 27 June 1989 Article 1 Membership in the Madrid Union The States party to this
More informationR 84a EPC does not apply to filing date itself as was no due date missed. So, effective date for and contacts subject matter is
Candidate s Answer DII 1. HVHF plugs + PP has: US2 - granted in US (related to US 1) EP1 - pending before EPO + + for all states LBP has: FR1 - France - still pending? EP2 - granted for DE, ES, FR, GB
More informationFinancial Services Tribunal Rules 2015 (as amended 2017 and 2018)
Rule c FINANCIAL SERVICES TRIBUNAL RULES 2015 Index Page* (* page numbers below relate to original legislation, not to this document) PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Title... 3 2 Commencement... 3 3 Interpretation...
More informationCZECH REPUBLIC Utility Model Act
CZECH REPUBLIC Utility Model Act No. 478 Coll. of September 24, 1992 as amended by Act No. 116 Coll. of April 6, 2000 (No. 4/2001 Coll. Complete wording) ENTRY INTO FORCE: May 10, 2000 (except for the
More informationDelegations will find in the Annex a Presidency compromise proposal concerning the abovementioned
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 20 February 2014 (OR. en) 6570/14 Interinstitutional File: 2013/0088 (COD) PI 20 CODEC 433 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations No. Cion
More informationMadrid Agreement and Protocol Concerning the International Registration of Marks
INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 18/2017 Madrid Agreement and Protocol Concerning the International Registration of Marks Amendments to the Common Regulations under the Madrid Agreement and Protocol in force as
More informationPreliminary set of provisions for the Rules of procedure of the Unified Patent Court
27 January 2012 Preliminary set of provisions for the Rules of procedure of the Unified Patent Court Status 1. First draft dated 29 May 2009 discussed in expert meetings on 5 June and 19 June 2009 2. Second
More informationCALL FOR TENDER No D/SE/10/02. Fundamental rights of persons with intellectual disabilities and persons with mental health problems ANNEX B
CALL FOR TENDER No D/SE/10/02 Fundamental rights of persons with intellectual disabilities and persons with mental health problems ANNEX B DRAFT SERVICES CONTRACT The European Union Agency for Fundamental
More informationGUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 8 RESTITUTIO IN INTEGRUM
GUIDELINES FOR EXAMINATION EUROPEAN UNION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OFFICE (EUIPO) PART A GENERAL RULES SECTION 8 RESTITUTIO IN INTEGRUM Guidelines for Examination in the Office, Part A, General Rules Page
More informationBANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENT'S. Administrative Tribunal RULES OF PROCEDURE. ( 31"March 2001 ) Article 1. Applicable provisions
1 BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENT'S Administrative Tribunal RULES OF PROCEDURE ( 31"March 2001 ) Section I : General provisions Article 1 Applicable provisions 1. These rules ( the Rules of Procedure
More information1. Inventions that are new, that involve an inventive step and that are susceptible of industrial application shall be patentable.
Patent Act 1995 (Netherlands) ENTRY INTO FORCE: April 1, 1995, except for provisions relating to extension of priority right and the criterion for a non-voluntary license: January 1, 1996. Chapter 1 General
More informationADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, CODE PROCEDURAT ADMINISTRATIVE, KOD
Project funded by the European Union ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES, CODE PROCEDURAT ADMINISTRATIVE, KOD DISCLAIMER Please note that the translation provided below is only provisional translation and therefore
More informationSTATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CONSOLIDATED VERSION)
STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (CONSOLIDATED VERSION) This text contains the consolidated version of Protocol (No 3) on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union,
More informationSOUTH AFRICA Designs Regulations Government Notice R843 of 2 July 1999 as amended by Government Notice R1182 of 1 December 2006
SOUTH AFRICA Designs Regulations Government Notice R843 of 2 July 1999 as amended by Government Notice R1182 of 1 December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Definitions 1A. Electronic services 2. Office hours
More informationAct to Implement Certain Legal Instruments in the Field of International Family Law (International Family Law Procedure Act IFLPA)
Übersetzung durch Brian Duffett. Translation provided by Brian Duffett. Stand: Die Übersetzung berücksichtigt die Änderung(en) des Gesetzes durch Artikel 6 des Gesetzes vom 8.7.2014 (BGBl. I S. 890) Version
More informationCHAPTER I. Definitions
13 FEBRUARY 2001 Royal Decree implementing the Act of 8 December 1992 on the protection of privacy in relation to the processing of personal data Unofficial translation September 2009 ALBERT II, King of
More informationHague Guide for Users
Hague Guide for Users Table of Contents Hague Guide for Users 1 Introduction 10 The Guide... 10 The Hague System: general overview... 11 Who may use the System?... 11 No prior national application or registration...
More informationPROTOCOL RELATING TO THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS
PROTOCOL RELATING TO THE MADRID AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF MARKS Adopted at Madrid on June 27, 1989, as amended on October 3, 2006, and on November 12, 2007 List of the Articles
More informationBy virtue of Article 88 item 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Montenegro, I pass this D E C R E E
"Official Gazette of RM", No. 60/2003 By virtue of Article 88 item 2 of the Constitution of the Republic of Montenegro, I pass this D E C R E E ON PROMULGATION OF THE LAW ON ADMINISTRATIVE DISPUTES This
More informationAre the CTM and the Benelux systems Harmonized?
Round Table in The Netherlands Are the CTM and the Benelux systems Harmonized? From a legal point of view: absolute grounds of refusal in examination and cancellation proceedings - The differences by Sophie
More informationIMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.
Page 1 of 10 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber) 23 September 2003 (1) (Community
More information1 OJ L 3, , p. 1
COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2245/2002 of 21 October 2002 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs (OJ EC No L 341 of 17.12.2002, p. 28) amended by Commission Regulation (EC)
More informationPROTOCOL (No 3) ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
C 83/210 Official Journal of the European Union 30.3.2010 PROTOCOL (No 3) ON THE STATUTE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION THE HIGH CONTRACTING PARTIES, DESIRING to lay down the Statute of
More informationTHE TRADE MARKS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2009
1 AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 18 DECEMBER, 2009 Bill No. 106-C of 2009 THE TRADE MARKS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2009 A BILL to amend the Trade Marks Act, 1999. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixtieth Year of
More informationUK trade mark application opposition procedure
UK trade mark application opposition procedure If opposition is based on s.5(1), (2) or (3) of Trade Marks Act and earlier right is more than five years old, a statement of use is required when filing
More informationTRADE MARKS AND SERVICE MARKS REGULATIONS 1993 BR 31/1993 TRADE MARKS ACT 1974 TRADE MARKS AND SERVICE MARKS REGULATIONS 1993
BR 31/1993 TRADE MARKS ACT 1974 TRADE MARKS AND SERVICE MARKS REGULATIONS 1993 ARRANGEMENT OF REGULATIONS 1 Citation and commencement 2 Interpretation 3 Forms 4 Classification of goods and services 5 Application
More informationWIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES
APPENDIX 3.17 WIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES (as from 1 October 2002) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Abbreviated Expressions Article 1 In these Rules: Arbitration Agreement means
More informationLAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN ON TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS
DRAFT LAW OF THE REPUBLIC OF TAJIKISTAN ON TRADEMARKS AND SERVICE MARKS This Law shall govern relations arising in connection with the legal protection and use of trademarks and service marks. CHAPTER
More information