Overview of the Jury System. from the Perspective of a Korean Attorney. From the perspective of a Korean attorney, the jury system
|
|
- Donald Turner
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lee 1 Hyung Won Lee Judge William G. Young Judging in the American Legal System 10 May 2013 Overview of the Jury System from the Perspective of a Korean Attorney I. Introduction From the perspective of a Korean attorney, the jury system is probably the most remarkable part of the American justice system. In recent years, Korean citizens have shown increasing interest in the American jury system. In 2008, the Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system, created based on the American jury system, was introduced to criminal trials in Korea. Encouraged by the successful introduction of this system, lawmakers have discussed the introduction of a Grand Jury system. Under these circumstances, systematic study of the American jury system is expected to be useful for improving the Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system and acquiring knowledge and insight to determine whether it would be beneficial to introduce the Grand Jury system. Section II of this paper provides an overview of the American jury system. Section III describes the Citizen Participation Trial system in Korea. Section IV addresses discussions in Korea regarding
2 Lee 2 whether to introduce a grand jury system. Finally, Section V provides thoughts about the jury system from the perspective of a Korean attorney. II. Overview of the Jury System in the United States A. American Jury System The right to trial by a jury of one s peers is a cornerstone of the individual freedoms guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution s Bill of Rights. 1 Both Article III of the U.S. Constitution and the Sixth Amendment require that criminal cases be tried by a jury. And the Fourteenth Amendment applies this mandate to the states. Seventh Amendment requires a civil jury in cases where the value in dispute is greater than twenty dollars. The Seventh Amendment right to a civil jury trial does not apply in state courts so the right to a jury trial in state court is governed by the state s constitution and statutes. 2 However, in practice, most states make jury trials widely available for many kinds of civil cases above the level of small claims court. B. Type of Jury There are two types of juries: petit jury and grand jury. The petit jury (or trial jury ) hears the evidence in a 1 f 2
3 Lee 3 trial as presented by both the plaintiff (petitioner) and the defendant (respondent). After hearing the evidence and often jury instructions from the judge, the group retires for deliberation, to consider a verdict. The majority required for a verdict varies. In some cases it must be unanimous, while in other jurisdictions it may be a majority or supermajority. A jury that is unable to come to a verdict is referred to as a hung jury. The size of the jury varies; in criminal cases involving serious felonies there are usually 12 jurors. Petit jury is the most common type of jury system. 3 A grand jury determines whether there is enough evidence for a criminal trial to go forward. Grand juries carry out this duty by examining evidence presented to them by a prosecutor and issuing indictments, or by investigating alleged crimes and issuing presentments. A grand jury is traditionally larger than and distinguishable from the petit jury used during a trial, with at least 12 jurors. 4 C. Advantages of the Jury System First, the jury system serves as a safeguard against governmental abuse. The jury may counteract both judicial bias as well as corruption. 5 Juries provide an inestimable safeguard against the corrupt or overzealous prosecutor and against the 3 Id Ala. L. Rev. 441, 475.
4 Lee 4 compliant, biased, or eccentric judge. 6 Second, the jury system serves as a sort of educational institution, communicating civic values to all called to jury service. 7 While observing and impartially weighing the interests of others, jurors are educated about the role that they, as citizens, are expected to play in society. 8 Third, the jury adds to the legitimacy of the adjudicatory process. 9 The fact that the jury represents a group of individuals selected from the community as opposed to the singular person of the judge increases the legitimacy of the jury s verdict. 10 The jury, it is thought, is more likely to represent community values than would a single judge. 11 Also, the practical experience and knowledge of jurors from the community are considered advantages to the adjudicatory process. 12 D. Disadvantages of the Jury System Jurors, however, are sometimes criticized as incompetent in their roles as fact finders and in their ability to understand the law that they must apply to the facts of the case. Particularly in more complex cases, there have been concerns about juror incompetence. 13 Second, jurors, unlike the judge, 6 Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145, 156 (1968) 7 48 Ala. L. Rev. 441, Id. at Id. at Id. 11 Id. 12 Id. at Id. at
5 Lee 5 have not seen a number of cases and therefore cannot treat like cases alike as well as the professional judge. The ability of the adjudicatory process to treat like cases alike is arguably one of the requirements for its being deemed just in the outcomes it reaches. 14 Third, jury trials have also been criticized for being unduly lengthy and expensive. 15 III. Citizen Participation Trial in Korea A. Introduction of Citizen Participation Trial in Korea Citizen Participation Trial was introduced to the criminal justice system in Korea to democratize the judiciary and build public trust. Five years have passed since the Citizen Participation Trial system took effect on January 1, The Korean system was created with reference to various jury systems in other countries, including the American jury system. The Citizen Participation Trial System was scheduled to make a final decision on full adoption by evaluating enforcement results five years after the enactment. 16 The Citizen Participation Trial system was highly controversial from its inception. After heated debates and consideration, the current system was established, but with many variances from the American jury system. B. Features of Korean Citizen Participation Trial System 14 Id. at Id. at Act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials Article 55.
6 Lee 6 1. Limited Range of Subject Case Subject cases were enumerated in the statute in order to limit the number of cases to approximately one hundred to two hundred annually in consideration of the burden on the courts. Other criminal cases were entirely up to regulations of the Supreme Court. However, the number of Citizen Participation Trials was fewer than expected for one year after the enforcement of the act, so the subject cases have been expanded since July 1, The Citizen Participation Trial can be initiated upon the defendant s request when the case meets the subject case requirements, and the request of the defendant can be withdrawn. 17 Furthermore, the courts can exclude cases from the Citizen Participation Trial when the courts believe the case is inappropriate for it. 18 Thus, under the current system, it cannot be said that defendants have the right to a jury trial because the range of the subject cases is very limited, and the courts have broad discretion to exclude cases from the Citizen Participation Trial. 2. Jury Selection Process The statute provides that jurors and prospective jurors in the Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials must be Korean citizens over age twenty. The number of jurors is determined as 17 Act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials Article 5, Section Act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials Article 9, Section 1.
7 Lee 7 follows: (1) Nine jurors for cases equivalent to statutory penalties, such as capital penalty or life imprisonment; (2) Seven jurors for other cases; and (3) Five jurors for cases in which a confession was made regarding major facts charged in trial preparation process. Courts, prosecutors, defendants, and lawyers can ask questions to determine whether jury candidates are likely to judge unfairly. 19 A motion to challenge includes both a challenge for cause and peremptory challenge. The challenge for cause is made by prosecutors, defendants, or lawyers on the grounds that a specific jury candidate is inappropriate for the case. 20 In addition, the peremptory challenge is made by prosecutors, defendants, or lawyers without providing any reason within the scope of a certain number of jurors. 21 This is the direct adoption of procedures of challenge used in the United States. 3. Features of Juror Deliberation and Verdict Jurors and prospective jurors are equally involved in hearings because a court shall be convened in their presence. 22 Legal experts, such as judges especially presiding judges prosecutors, and lawyers, are legally obligated to conduct a speedy and easy-to-understand hearing because jurors and 19 Act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials Article 80, Section Act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials Article 28, Section Act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials Article 30, Section Act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials Article 39, Section 1.
8 Lee 8 prospective jurors are unfamiliar with legal proceedings and legal terms. After the conclusion of the hearing, jurors are required to deliberate and reach a verdict. Deliberation involves discussions around guilt or innocence, and verdict means a final decision by jurors on the relevant case. The verdict of guilty or not guilty is eventually made by a simple majority of jurors. In this regard, criticism has emerged around the idea that the simple majority requirement of the current law is not suitable for the jury system. Critics say that the unanimity or stricter majority verdict (requiring more than seven votes of nine jurors) should be required instead. 23 In case of a conviction, jurors are required to discuss sentences with a judge and state their own views. Verdicts of guilty or not guilty, and opinions on sentences, do not bind courts. Thus, it can be said that the acceptance of only hortatory effects of verdict results by jurors is the most distinctive feature of the current Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system. C. Future Issues of Citizen Participation Trials System 1. Pros and Cons of Expanding Subject Cases As for the subject cases of the Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system, serious cases were enumerated and, at the same time, other cases were supposed to be specified based 23 Eun mo Lee, Problems of current Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials System, 2009, p.418.
9 Lee 9 on regulations of the Supreme Court in consideration of the pressure on courts during the initial stage of introduction. According to the revision of regulations of the Supreme Court, the subject cases have been expanded since July 1, As a result, most cases under the jurisdiction of the three-judge panel except for cases involving election, public safety, and property crime have been included. Opinions differ regarding the current regulations with respect to the subject cases as follows: one opinion holds that there is no need to expand the subject cases; the second is that it is necessary to expand the Citizen Participation Trials to the entire range of criminal cases; the third is that the subject cases should be partially extended. The first opinion is based on the needs of selection and concentration in order to maintain the Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system effectively. The second opinion indicates that it is necessary to extend the Citizen Participation Trials to the entire range of criminal cases in order to fulfill the purpose of introducing the Citizen Participation Trials system, such as democratizing the judiciary and ensuring public trust. Those who advocate for the second opinion imply that the request rate of defendants is not expected to increase rapidly, even if it is extended to all cases, and it is possible to adjust the number of Citizen Participation Trials by the exclusion decision of the courts. I
10 Lee 10 agree with the second opinion, in principle. However, because it takes so much time and money to conduct a Citizen Participation in Criminal Trial (12 million won, equivalent to 10,000 U.S. dollars, is spent per defendant in the Citizen Participation Trial) and that all countries in the world limit jury trials to serious crimes, it seems that the opinion to extend subject cases in full scale is unrealistic. Therefore, it seems desirable to extend the subject cases with a focus on property crimes, which are easy for jurors to judge, including cases of fraud, embezzlement, and breach of trust. 2. Simple Majority Verdict Unanimity is the most distinctive feature of the American jury system. If the jury cannot reach a unanimous decision, a hung jury is declared, and the procedure ends. This unanimity is not absolute, and a majority of ten to two or nine to three can be required for conviction in state cases. Unlike the unanimity requirement in the United States, a simple majority verdict has been introduced under current Korean law, and that verdict has been criticized because it considerably degrades the meaning of jury trials. It is understandable why the current Korean system does not adopt unanimity and the hung jury because the Citizen Participation Trial remains in the introductory stage and only has a hortatory effect. However, the simple majority requirement negates the purpose of the jury system because unanimity of the
11 Lee 11 jurors is an essential attribute of a trial jury in criminal cases. In certain aspects, both unanimity and the simple majority requirement are not appropriate for the current situation in Korea. Therefore, it seems necessary to introduce the two-thirds voting requirement. I believe that requiring affirmative votes of two-thirds or more of the jurors for conviction would be an appropriate compromise between the characteristics of the U.S. jury system and the uniqueness of the Korean Citizen Participation Trial. 3. Controversy over Jury Participation in Sentencing Procedure Under the current Act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials, jurors participate in both fact-finding and sentencing procedures. Examining the enforcement results of the Citizen Participation Trials up to now, they are operated with a focus on sentencing because more cases involve sentencing than guilt or innocence. In light of the fact that one of the major characteristics of the jury system is fact-finding by jurors and sentencing by judges, criticism has arisen because these activities are inconsistent with the original purpose of the system. 4. Controversy over a Hortatory Effect of Jury Verdicts If a final sentence differs from a jury verdict, the Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system will become a mere formality, and the meaning will be lost. In other countries
12 Lee 12 that have some kind of jury system, such as the United States, England, Germany, and Japan, judges are bound by jury verdicts in principle. The Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system was implemented only after investing enormous time, effort, and money. Nevertheless, if the binding force is denied, and the courts maintain the attitude that they have the right to make the final decision without regard to jury verdict, it is not possible to find the meaning of introducing jury trials. It, therefore, seems necessary to adopt a binding effect of jury verdicts on courts in the long term. D. Conclusion After the introduction of the Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system, many changes occurred in criminal trials. Not only have formal changes such as the promotion of speedy trials occurred, but also actual changes, such as more frequent verdicts of not guilty, justice department s respect for judgment of acquittal by juries, appeals court s respect for unanimous not guilty verdicts have been perceived. The Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system was created with reference to the American and British jury systems and, at the same time, it includes Korea-specific features while it continues in its introductory phase. However, the establishment of this unique system results not from reflecting the particularity of Korean society, but from the courts reluctance
13 Lee 13 to introduce a jury system. Before introducing the Citizen Participation Trial in Korea, many judges expressed their opinions that the jury system was not appropriate for the Korean legal system and Korean society because jurors are not legal experts. Currently, five years have passed since the Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system took effect, and the concordance rate has exceeded ninety percent between jury verdict and the final judgment of the court. Based on this, the court s concerns of jurors being incompetent to participate in trials have proved unfounded. Now is the time to re-establish the direction of reshaping the current Citizen Participation Trial system. I believe it is desirable to revise the current system into a new system closer to the original jury system. I think it is necessary to expand subject cases and change the simple majority verdict into a two-thirds majority verdict. Also, although the pros and cons of accepting the binding force of the jury verdicts remain highly controversial, I think it is necessary to accept the binding force of jury verdicts in principle, removing skeptical eyes from the jury system. IV. Grand Jury A. Grand Jury in the United States The grand jury originated over eight hundred years ago when King Henry II created it as a tool in his political battle
14 Lee 14 against both the Church and the nobility by limiting the power of their court systems. 24 The grand jury was originally a body of twelve and later twenty-three men who served as accusers presenting indictments at the request of not only the prosecutor of the king, but also at the request of individual citizens. 25 The grand jury was brought from England to the American colonies. Grand juries provided a means for citizens to protest abuses by the king s agents. 26 The Fifth Amendment right to be indicted by a grand jury is one of the few provisions in the Bill of Rights that has not been incorporated into the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. This means that this right applies only to the federal government. Most states, however, use some form of grand jury for criminal indictment. B. Function of the Grand Jury The grand jury served the public in two ways. First, it limited the power of government to prosecute citizens by permitting the grand jury to vote for or against an indictment. Second, it had the power to make a presentment. A presentment was a public report of the grand jury s activity. Through a presentment, the grand jury could make criminal activity known B.U.L. Rev. 1, Id.
15 Lee 15 to the public, including criminal conduct committed by government officials, judges, or prosecutors. 27 C. Advantages of the Grand Jury The grand jury has value as an impartial and neutral screening panel. 28 It prevents false accusations against the innocent, so it has a reputation as a protector of liberty. 29 Also, the grand jury provides the criminal justice system with a critical input of real-life experience, allowing the enforcement and application of criminal laws to undergo a regular review by ordinary citizens. In doing so, the grand jury helps to legitimize the very process of enforcing and applying the laws. 30 D. Criticism over the Grand Jury Critics of the grand jury argue that it is almost entirely an ineffective institution, and that when it has any effect at all, it does more harm than good. 31 These critics think the grand jury is fundamentally incapable of being anything other than a rubber stamp that is willing to indict any case a prosecutor presents. 32 However, other commentators say that criticisms of the grand jury are based on a number of fundamental 27 Id B.U.L. Rev. 1, Id. at Id. at Id. at Id. at 3.
16 Lee 16 misconceptions about the institution s history, its effectiveness, and its diversity across jurisdictions. 33 These proponents argue that many critics of the Grand Jury focus exclusively on the anemic federal grand jury without examining the functions and influence of grand juries at the state level. 34 E. Possibility of Introducing Grand Jury system in Korea Recently, Korean citizens have developed a critical attitude toward prosecution, police, and courts in Korea and have called for the reform of judicial proceedings. The Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials system was introduced as one result of this public dissatisfaction. Also, it has been claimed that it is necessary to introduce the Grand Jury system for prosecution reform. Unlike the traditional system, if a new system is introduced from foreign countries, it will be necessary to objectively analyze the positive and negative aspects of the system by examining the problems related to the operation of the system. The Grand Jury system plays a role in ensuring the legitimacy of the judicial process through the public participation in that process and protecting citizens basic human rights from the abuse of government power. Because of these characteristics, the Grand Jury system has been supported by American citizens, regardless of its high cost and 33 Id. at Id.
17 Lee 17 inefficiency. In particular, the Grand Jury system plays a crucial role in the investigation and indictment of white-collar crime. I think it is appropriate for Korea to introduce the Grand Jury system to improve fairness and transparency in the process of investigation and prosecution. There has been criticism concerning the Grand Jury system s disadvantages, such as inefficiency and high cost. However, if we refer to various models to find the most effective system that is also harmonious with the Korean judicial process, it seems possible to overcome such criticism sufficiently. In the United States, various types of Grand Jury systems have been implemented in the federal courts and the state courts. The Grand Jury system of New York State may provide the best example of a Grand Jury with the strongest power and influence. So I think the Grand Jury system of New York State offers many ideas for Korea. If the Grand Jury system is introduced to Korea, it will be desirable to implement the system for important or high-visibility cases in the early phase before expanding the subject cases gradually. V. Thoughts about the Jury System from the Perspective of a Korean Attorney It has been five years since the Citizen Participation Trial system took effect. Considering the enforcement results
18 Lee 18 and the people's responses over the last five years, it is generally believed the Citizen Participation Trial system has been successful. Currently, the Citizen Participation Trial system is being reevaluated, and the discussions regarding whether to expand the subject cases of the Citizen Participation Trial and whether to introduce the grand jury system are ongoing. Until now, it is true that Korean judicial circles generally held negative views of the jury system. Many Korean legal experts doubted whether a fair trial could be conducted through the jury system, citing the O.J. Simpson case from the U.S. as an example. These experts argued that the possibility of an unfair trial is serious because juries lack legal expertise and are subject to outside lobby, threats, and prejudices. Also, given Samsung and Apple's lawsuits regarding patents, the Korean legal experts pointed out that a trial by jurors who are not experts is inappropriate for cases that are complex or that require technical knowledge. But as I study the jury system more and more, I believe the advantages of the jury system avoiding governmental abuse, providing an educational function for citizens, and securing the legitimacy of judicial proceedings outweigh the disadvantages. It is understandable why the jury system is regarded as the cornerstone of the American justice system and jurors are often described as the conscience of the community in the United States.
19 Lee 19 However, in launching and expanding the jury system in Korea, one problem still remains regarding whether the jury system is appropriate for Korea. The jury system was founded upon long historical experiences in other countries that have different systemic, social, and cultural traditions, so there arise arguments stating that the jury system is not fit for Korea, and that the introduction of jury system must stop at the minimum. However, such an argument does not seem to be persuasive when looking at the successful enforcement results of the Citizen Participation Trial system over the past five years. J.H Jearey argues that three conditions are necessary for a jury system to function effectively: First, the society must be for the most part racially, culturally, linguistically, and religiously homogeneous. Second, the members of the society must be sufficiently educated to understand their responsibilities as jurors and understand that they must set aside private prejudices when fulfilling these responsibilities. Third, the members of the society must generally agree with the laws which, as jurors, they are required to enforce. 35 Korea is, overall, one of the most socially homogeneous societies in the world because almost all Korean citizens have the same ethnic and historical background. Korea is also one of the most educationally advanced countries in the world considering the 35 Law & Contemp. Prob. 261,
20 Lee 20 literacy rate and the rate of advancement to universities. Finally, the Korean people are in basic agreement with the criminal laws of Korea. Because all three of Jearey s conditions are present in Korean society, it seems that the jury system can effectively function in Korean society, at least in criminal cases. Surely, instead of introducing the American jury system or other country s system uncritically, a form of jury that is most appropriate to the Korean situation must be introduced based on a through comparative study of other countries jury systems and an understanding of Korea s distinctive characteristics. In the current situation in Korea in which people s trust in the judicial branch has decreased and people s desire to participate in the realization of justice has increased, I think it is reasonable to consider more active acceptance of the jury system, such as expansion of the range of the Citizen Participation Trial System and introduction of the Grand Jury.
Criminal Justice in America CJ Chapter 10 James J. Drylie, Ph.D.
Criminal Justice in America CJ 2600 Chapter 10 James J. Drylie, Ph.D. Pretrial Activities & The Criminal Trial This chapter will examine the criminal trial process. Highlights of the chapter will include
More informationCHAPTER. Criminal Trial. Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
CHAPTER 10 Criminal Trial 1 The Criminal Trial START HERE 2009 Pearson Education, Inc 2 Review 3 The Nature and Purpose of the Criminal Trial: The trial process is highly formalized and governed by rules
More informationcase 3:04-cr AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6
case 3:04-cr-00071-AS document 162 filed 09/01/2005 page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Cause No. 3:04-CR-71(AS)
More informationHOW DO THE FIFTH, SIXTH, AND EIGHTH AMENDMENTS PROTECT RIGHTS WITHIN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM?
32 HOW DO THE FIFTH, SIXTH, AND EIGHTH AMENDMENTS PROTECT RIGHTS WITHIN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM? LESSON PURPOSE Four of the first eight amendments in the Bill of Rights address the rights of criminal defendants.
More informationBUSINESS LAW. Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes
BUSINESS LAW Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes Learning Objectives List and describe the essential elements of a crime. Describe criminal procedure, including arrest, indictment, arraignment, and
More informationAn End to the Twelve-Man Jury
University of Miami Law School Institutional Repository University of Miami Law Review 7-1-1970 An End to the Twelve-Man Jury Lawrence H. Goldberg Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr
More informationAPPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY 120 S. CT (2000)
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 10 Spring 4-1-2001 APPRENDI v. NEW JERSEY 120 S. CT. 2348 (2000) Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/crsj
More informationIn this article we are going to provide a brief look at the ten amendments that comprise the Bill of Rights.
The Bill of Rights Introduction The Bill of Rights is the first ten amendments to the Constitution. It establishes the basic civil liberties that the federal government cannot violate. When the Constitution
More informationFifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights
You do not need your computers today. Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendment Rights How have the Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments' rights of the accused been incorporated as a right of all American citizens?
More informationSixth Amendment. Fair Trial
Sixth Amendment Fair Trial Many parts to a fair trial 1. Speedy and Public 2. Impartial jury (local) 3. Informed of the charges 4. Access to the same tools that the state has to prove guilt Speedy Trial
More informationSTUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER SIX
Multiple Choice Questions STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER SIX 1. The Sixth Amendment guarantees a trial by jury for. a. all felony cases b. all misdemeanor cases c. all civil cases d. all of the above 2. In,
More informationFall, Criminal Litigation 9/4/17. Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal. How Do We Get A Case?
Fall, 2017 F Criminal Litigation 20 17 Criminal Litigation: Arraignment to Appeal! Something must go wrong.! A wrongful act must occur. How Do We Get A Case?! If the law states that the wrongful act is
More informationName: Class: Date: 5. The amendment to the U.S. Constitution that forbids cruel and unusual punishment and prohibits excessive bail is the
1. Roman laws a. often came to include commentaries written by judges. b. treated criminals with compassion. c. were ignored by the Emperor Justinian. d. were condemned by the Roman Catholic Church. 2.
More informationSupreme Court of Korea. Introduction to the Judicial System of Korea. Jan. 21, 2003
Introduction to the Judicial System Jan. 21, 2003 March, 2013 Introduction Judicial Branch Definition: The national authority that exercises judicial power separate from the administrative and the legislative
More informationSocial Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS
Social Studies 7 Civics CH 4.2: OTHER BILL OF RIGHTS PROTECTIONS RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED A. The First Amendment protects five basic freedoms for all Americans. RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED
More informationHOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA
HOW A CRIMINAL CASE PROCEEDS IN FLORIDA This legal guide explains the steps you will go through if you should be arrested or charged with a crime in Florida. This guide is only general information and
More informationTRAVERSE JUROR HANDBOOK
TRAVERSE JUROR HANDBOOK State of Maine Superior Court Constitution of the State of Maine, as Amended ARTICLE I - DECLARATION OF RIGHTS Rights of persons accused: Section 6. In all criminal prosecutions,
More informationSTRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL TRIAL: (FELONY)
TRIAL: (FELONY) STRUCTURE OF A CRIMINAL Crimes are divided into 2 general classifications: felonies and misdemeanors. A misdemeanor is a lesser offense, punishable by community service, probation, fine
More informationThe Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens: Selected Opinions on the Jury s Role in Criminal Sentencing
The Jurisprudence of Justice John Paul Stevens: Selected Opinions on the Jury s Role in Criminal Sentencing Anna C. Henning Legislative Attorney June 7, 2010 Congressional Research Service CRS Report for
More information1 HB By Representative England. 4 RFD: Judiciary. 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 12/15/2016. Page 0
1 HB32 2 180359-2 3 By Representative England 4 RFD: Judiciary 5 First Read: 07-FEB-17 6 PFD: 12/15/2016 Page 0 1 180359-2:g:11/23/2016:FC/tj LRS2016-3160R1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SYNOPSIS: Under existing law,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION
USDC IN/ND case 2:17-cr-00153-JVB-APR document 7 filed 11/17/17 page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) V ) ) Cause No. 2:17
More informationCourt Records Glossary
Court Records Glossary Documents Affidavit Answer Appeal Brief Case File Complaint Deposition Docket Indictment Interrogatories Injunction Judgment Opinion Pleadings Praecipe A written or printed statement
More informationJURY SELECTION (CRIMINAL)
JURY SELECTION (CRIMINAL) 1. Qualifications Qualifications for jurors in all cases, criminal and civil, are established by G.S. 9-3. A person who is not qualified under that statute is subject to a challenge
More informationForensics and Bill of Rights. Elkins
Forensics and Bill of Rights Elkins Our Rights and Their Effect on Forensic Evidence Understanding the rights of United States citizens under the law (Bill of Rights) is vital when collecting, analyzing,
More informationChapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART. Section 2.1 A Dual Court System
Chapter 2 SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Section 2.1 Chapter 2 A Dual The Court Court System System Section 2.1 Section 2.2 Trial Procedures Why It s Important Learning the structure of
More informationThe court process CONSUMER GUIDE. How the criminal justice system works. FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON
The court process How the criminal justice system works. CONSUMER GUIDE FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL JEREMIAH W. (JAY) NIXON Inside The process Arrest and complaint Preliminary hearing Grand jury Arraignment
More informationImpeachment in Louisiana State Courts:
Impeachment in Louisiana State Courts: La. Code of Evidence Recognizes Eight Ways By Bobby M. Harges 252 To impeach or attack the credibility of a witness in Louisiana state courts, a party may examine
More informationSteps in the Process
The Trial Juries Steps in the Process Initial Appearance Charges & Rights Probable Cause Bail or Jail Preliminary Hearing Grand Jury Plea Out Arraignment Pre-Trial Indictment Discovery Pretrial Motions
More informationReligious Beliefs, Motion for Voir Dire on Sentence Length, and Motion for Voir
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CRIMINAL COURT DEPARTMENT STATE OF KANSAS, Plaintiff, VS. FRAZIER GLENN CROSS, JR., Defendant. 14CR853 Div. 17 STATE S BRIEF RE: JURY SELECTION COMES NOW
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1998) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 96 1584 TERRY CAMPBELL, PETITIONER v. LOUISIANA ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, THIRD CIRCUIT [April 21, 1998]
More informationUNIT 4 AOS 2 PART 1- ADVERSARY SYSTEM OF TRIAL & JURY SYSTEM
Key Dot Point #1: The elements of an effective legal system: entitlement to a fair and unbiased hearing, effective access to the legal system and timely resolution of disputes. Entitlement to a fair and
More informationUnit 4 Assessment Amending the Constitution
Unit 4 Assessment Amending the Constitution 1. Which 1 st Amendment right does the freedom to gather and associate imply? a. speech b. assembly c. religion d. the press 2. The Fourth Amendment prevents
More informationv. TRA VIS COUNTY, TEXAS
NO. DlDC-O5-900725 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF v. TRA VIS COUNTY, TEXAS THOMAS DALE DELAY 331ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT THE BASIS OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT 1 On Wednesday, September 28,2005,
More informationRIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. It is better to allow 10 guilty men to go free than to punish a single innocent man.
RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED It is better to allow 10 guilty men to go free than to punish a single innocent man. HABEAS CORPUS A writ of habeas corpus is a court order directing officials holding a prisoner
More informationPretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial
C H A P T E R 1 0 Pretrial Activities and the Criminal Trial O U T L I N E Introduction Pretrial Activities The Criminal Trial Stages of a Criminal Trial Improving the Adjudication Process L E A R N I
More informationacquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
GlosaryofLegalTerms acquittal: Judgment that a criminal defendant has not been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. affidavit: A written statement of facts confirmed by the oath of the party making
More informationCRIMINAL DEFENSE COURT PROCESS
TEXAS CRIMINAL DEFENSE GUIDE E-BOOK CRIMINAL DEFENSE COURT PROCESS nealdavislaw.com NEAL DAVIS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CONTENTS COURT PROCESS... 3 HOW CRIMINAL CASES PROCEED... 3 PRE-TRIAL HEARINGS AND MOTIONS...
More informationDue Process of Law. 5th, 6th and & 7th amendments
Due Process of Law 5th, 6th and & 7th amendments Miranda v. Arizona (1966) Ernesto Miranda was arrested in his home and brought to the police station where he was questioned After 2 hours he signed a confession,
More informationDirections: Read each of the questions or statements below, then choose the correct answer from those provided.
Pre Test: How Courts Work Name: Directions: Read each of the questions or statements below, then choose the correct answer from those provided. 1. What type of case does the government bring against one
More informationWhat is a Grand Jury?
What is a Grand Jury? In Short: A body of persons, selected and convened upon order of a judge, to inquire into and return indictments for crimes. The grand jury has the power to request that the circuit
More informationBench or Court Trial: A trial that takes place in front of a judge with no jury present.
GLOSSARY Adversarial System: A justice system in which the defendant is presumed innocent and both sides may present competing views of the evidence (as opposed to an inquisitorial system where the state
More informationJudicial Branch. Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court?
Judicial Branch Why this is important What do I do if I m arrested? What are my rights? What happens in court? What could happen if I am found guilty? What do I do if I think my rights are being violated?
More informationChapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law:
Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law: Crime a wrong against society proclaimed in a statute and, if committed, punishable
More informationHow the Law Works A guide to the Oregon court system and civil cases
How the Law Works A guide to the Oregon court system and civil cases The Law and You Informaion Series 10, Volume 1 How the Law Works Simply stated, the law is divided into two major areas: Criminal and
More informationCriminal Justice. Process: The Trial. Right to Trial by Jury
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury..., and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with
More informationSuppose you disagreed with a new law.
Suppose you disagreed with a new law. You could write letters to newspapers voicing your opinion. You could demonstrate. You could contact your mayor or governor. You could even write a letter to the President.
More informationIntroduction to the Judicial System of Korea
Supreme Court of Korea Introduction to the Judicial System of Korea Jan. 21, 2003 April, 2008 Judicial Branch Definition: The national authority that exercises judicial power separate from the administrative
More informationHANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS SERVING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS
HANDBOOK FOR TRIAL JURORS SERVING IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS Prepared for the use of trial jurors serving in the United States district courts under the supervision of the Judicial Conference
More informationThe Legal Process: The Adversary System and Dispute Resolution
The Legal Process: The Adversary System and Dispute Resolution The adversary system of trial, sometimes called the sporting approach to the truth, recalls our commitment to democracy as the least corruptible
More informationSTIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No State of New Maine
STIPULATED JURY INSTRUCTIONS State v. Manny Rayfield Curr County Circuit Court Case No. 09-3031 State of New Maine Instruction Number Instruction Description 1. Preliminary Instructions 2. Functions of
More informationChapter 2 Law and Crime
Chapter 2 Law and Crime LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1. List the four key elements defining law. 2. Identify the three key characteristics of common law. 3. Explain the importance of the adversary system. 4. Name
More informationRESOURCESFOR NEW YORK STATE J
OPENI NG COURTHOUSE DOORS SCHOOLVISITSTOOLKIT RESOURCESFOR NEW YORK STATE J UDGESAND E DUCATORS TABLE OF CONTENTS The Value of School Visits... 2 Correlation to Learning Standards... 2 Goals and Objectives
More informationTest Bank for Criminal Evidence Principles and Cases 8th Edition by Thomas J. Gardner and Terry M. Anderson
Test Bank for Criminal Evidence Principles and Cases 8th Edition by Thomas J. Gardner and Terry M. Anderson Link download full: https://digitalcontentmarket.org/download/test-bank-forcriminal-evidence-principles-and-cases-8th-edition-by-gardner-and-anderson/
More informationThe jury panel is selected by lot from all the names of registered voters or from persons having a valid driver s license.
Handbook for Jurors Purpose of this Handbook The purpose of this handbook is to acquaint jurors with a few of the methods of procedure in district court, to tell them something about the nature of their
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY. STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant )
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CLAY COUNTY, MISSOURI AT LIBERTY STATE OF MISSOURI ) ) Plaintiff ) ) VS ) Case No. ) ) Defendant ) PETITION TO ENTER PLEA OF GUILTY The defendant represents to the Court: 1. My
More informationIntroduction How Jurors are Selected Qualifications Exemptions. Your Role As A Juror Sequence of a Trial Petit and Grand Juries
Hand Book for Jurors Introduction How Jurors are Selected Qualifications Exemptions Your Role As A Juror Sequence of a Trial Petit and Grand Juries Payment for Jury Duty Length of Service Dress Attire
More informationThe Judicial Branch. Chapter
The Judicial Branch Chapter 11 Learning Objectives 11.1 Identify the sources of Texas law. 11.2 Compare the functions of all participants in the justice system. 11.3 Describe the judicial procedure for
More informationA Guide to the Bill of Rights
A Guide to the Bill of Rights First Amendment Rights James Madison combined five basic freedoms into the First Amendment. These are the freedoms of religion, speech, the press, and assembly and the right
More informationNO IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
NO. 12-162 IN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT COREY MILLER Petitioner versus STATE OF LOUISIANA Respondent ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 02-37A ) JOHN LINDH, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT Paul J.
More informationLAW 01: Law Making and the Legal System. The Criminal Courts and Lay People
LAW 01: Law Making and the Legal System The Criminal Courts and Lay People Lay Magistrates Deal with approximately 98% of all criminal cases Known as Justices of the Peace 1195 - preserved the King s Peace
More informationWe the People: The Role of the Citizen in the United States
We the People: The Role of the Citizen in the United States In the United States, the government gets its power to govern from the people. We have a government of the people, by the people, and for the
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION
-GR-102-Guilty Plea IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF GREENE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA IN THE CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ) NO. Criminal Sessions, VS. ) Charge: ) ) Defendant. ) BEFORE THE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: U. S. (1998) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions,
More informationHas the Grand Jury Outlived its Usefulness?
PLENARY DAY 1 Has the Grand Jury Outlived its Usefulness? Michael O. Freeman Hennepin County Attorney s Office Minneapolis Minnesota CLE s Copyright Policy Minnesota Continuing Legal Education wants practitioners
More informationThe Bill of Rights *** The First Ten Amendments to the U.S. Constitution
The Bill of Rights *** The First Ten Amendments to the U.S. Constitution Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
More informationCHAPTER. OPENER- USE YOUR NOTES TO ANSWER THESE REVIEW Q s The Courts: Structure and Participants. Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
CHAPTER OPENER- USE YOUR NOTES TO ANSWER THESE REVIEW Q s The Courts: Structure and Participants 1 Appellate jurisdiction means the court may hear the case from the beginning until judgment. 1. Correct
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 42532 STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. MICHAEL BRIAN WILSON, Defendant-Appellant. 2015 Opinion No. 69 Filed: October 29, 2015 Stephen W.
More informationCAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NUMBER 00 THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE COUNTY CRIMINAL V. COURT AT LAW NUMBER 00 DEFENDANT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MEMBERS OF THE JURY: You have found the Defendant, name, guilty of the offense of driving
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE RESOLUTION
PRIOR PRINTER'S NO. 1 PRINTER'S NO. THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE RESOLUTION No. Session of 0 INTRODUCED BY GREENLEAF, ERICKSON, PIPPY, D. WHITE, LEACH, FERLO, WASHINGTON, WILLIAMS AND WOZNIAK,
More informationPeople can have weapons within limits, and be apart of the state protectors. Group 2
Amendment I - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
More informationSTUDY GUIDE Three Branches Test
STUDY GUIDE Three Branches Test NAME (Remember to review your notes and class materials as well as this guide.) 1 Circle, highlight, check, or underline the correct answers, or fill in the blanks. 1. The
More informationCriminal Litigation: Step-By-Step
Criminal Law & Procedure For Paralegals Criminal Litigation: Step-By-Step Path of Criminal Cases in Queens Commencement Arraignment Pre-Trial Trial Getting The Defendant Before The Court! There are four
More informationFrom National Human Rights Action Plan to read Chinese government s attitude toward the new criminal procedure reform
From the SelectedWorks of bo zong June 7, 2009 From National Human Rights Action Plan 2009-2010 to read Chinese government s attitude toward the new criminal procedure reform bo zong Available at: https://works.bepress.com/bo_zong/1/
More informationIn the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond, on Thursday, the 3rd day of March, 2005.
VIRGINIA: In the Supreme Court of Virginia held at the Supreme Court Building in the City of Richmond, on Thursday, the 3rd day of March, 2005. Christopher Scott Emmett, Petitioner, against Record No.
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Cite as: 529 U. S. (2000) 1 NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of
More informationSentencing and juries
Submission of the NEW SOUTH WALES COUNCIL FOR CIVIL LIBERTIES to the NSW Law Reform Commission Inquiry into Sentencing and juries Authors: John Benson 1 September 2006 Contents CONTENTS...1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...2
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES PROPOSED VOIR DIRE EXAMINATION QUESTIONS
Case 3:16-cr-00093-TJC-JRK Document 106 Filed 04/14/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID 351 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JACKSONVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CASE NO. 3:16-cr-93-J-32JRK
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. No. 11-00224-01/02-CR-W-DW JOSHUA SIMONSON, a/k/a Joshua Michael of Simonson,
More informationCOURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY CRIMINAL DIVISION. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) V. ) Case No. ) ) GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LEHIGH COUNTY CRIMINAL DIVISION COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) V. ) Case No. ) ) GUILTY PLEA COLLOQUY You or your attorney has indicated that you may want to plead guilty to
More informationNo IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. October Term JONATHAN BOYER, Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF LOUISIANA, Respondent
-.--- Defense Counsel No. 11-9953 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES October Term 2012 JONATHAN BOYER, Petitioner, -vs- STATE OF LOUISIANA, Respondent ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE LOUISIANA
More informationThe Bill of Rights. If YOU were there... First Amendment
2 SECTION What You Will Learn Main Ideas 1. The First Amendment guarantees basic freedoms to individuals. 2. Other amendments focus on protecting citizens from certain abuses. 3. The rights of the accused
More informationConference. Constitutional Aspects of Judicial Reform in Ukraine. March 24 and 25, 2011 Lviv, Ukraine CONCLUSIONS OF THE CONFERENCE
Council of Europe Conseil de l'europe European Union Union européenne This programme is co-funded by the European Union and the Council of Europe and implemented by the Council of Europe Lviv National
More informationPrinciples of the Constitution. Republicanism. Popular Sovereignty 9/5/2012
Principles of the Constitution Republicanism A republic is a nation governed by elected representatives. It is the opposite of a monarchy, with rule by king Popular Sovereignty A government in which the
More informationSupreme Court of Florida
IN THE Supreme Court of Florida LINROY BOTTOSON, v. Appellant, STATE OF FLORIDA, Case No. SC02-1455 Death Penalty Appeal Ninth Judicial Circuit Appellee. CORRECTED AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF FLORIDA ASSOCIATION
More informationPresent: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Keenan, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice
Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Hassell, and Keenan, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice OLAN CONWAY ALLEN OPINION BY v. Record No. 951681 SENIOR JUSTICE RICHARD H. POFF June 7, 1996 COMMONWEALTH
More informationSS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III
SS.7.C.3.3 and SS.7.C.3.8 Judicial Branch: Article III ****At the end of this lesson, I will be able to do the following: recognize the structure of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. compare
More informationChapter 1. Crime and Justice in the United States
Chapter 1 Crime and Justice in the United States Chapter Objectives After completing this chapter, you should be able to do the following: Describe how the type of crime routinely presented by the media
More informationSTUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER SEVEN
Multiple Choice Questions STUDENT STUDY GUIDE CHAPTER SEVEN 1. Which of the following contributes to a large amount of public attention for a criminal trial? a. Spectacular crime b. Notorious parties c.
More informationEASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Alexandria Division PLEA AGREEMENT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) CRIMINAL NO. ) IYMAN FARIS, ) a/k/a Mohammad Rauf, ) ) Defendant. ) PLEA AGREEMENT
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 100 1
SUBCHAPTER XV. CAPITAL PUNISHMENT. Article 100. Capital Punishment. 15A-2000. Sentence of death or life imprisonment for capital felonies; further proceedings to determine sentence. (a) Separate Proceedings
More information2016 VCE Legal Studies examination report
2016 VCE Legal Studies examination report General comments The 2016 Legal Studies examination was a challenge for some students. Students should respond to the question, use the stimulus material in their
More informationAn Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota
An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender s Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Federal Public Defender's Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Table of Contents
More informationMisdemeanor Appeal Bonds. By: Dana Graves. Hillsborough, NC
Misdemeanor Appeal Bonds By: Dana Graves Hillsborough, NC I. WHAT IS AN APPEAL BOND??? a. When a judge sets more stringent conditions of pretrial release following appeal from district to superior court
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED December 19, 2013 v No. 310647 Oakland Circuit Court STEVEN EDWIN WOODWARD, LC No. 2011-238688-FH Defendant-Appellant.
More informationCHAPTER 8 The Courtroom Work Group and the Criminal Trial. Teaching Outline. I. Introduction (p.226)
CHAPTER 8 The Courtroom Work Group and the Criminal Trial Teaching Outline I. Introduction (p.226) II. The Courtroom Work Group: Professional Courtroom Actors (p.226) Trial : In criminal proceedings, the
More informationPrimary Goal of the Legal System
The Judicial Branch Primary Goal of the Legal System The goal of the legal system is equal justice under the law This goal can be difficult to achieve. Why is the goal of equal justice under the law difficult
More informationOUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS
OUTLINE OF CRIMINAL COURT PROCESS What happens during a criminal case may be confusing to a victim or witness. The following summary will explain how a case generally progresses through Oklahoma s criminal
More informationCanadian soldiers are entitled to the rights and freedoms they fight to uphold.
Canadian soldiers are entitled to the rights and freedoms they fight to uphold. This report is a critical analysis Bill C-41, An Act to amend the National Defence Act and to make consequential amendments
More informationDistrict Court, S. D. Georgia. Nov. Term, 1867.
Case No. 18,312. [35 Ga. 336.] 1 UNITED STATES V. BLODGETT. District Court, S. D. Georgia. Nov. Term, 1867. GRAND JURY OATH PRESCRIBED BY ACT 1862 AIDING REBELLION WHO MAY CHALLENGE WHEN CHALLENGE TO BE
More information